RECEIVED. JUL 2 l MINING LANDS SECTION. June 30, 1980 HELICOPTERBORNE MAGNETIC SURVEY OF WHITNEY - SHAW PROPERTY PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION

Transcription

1 42A06NE WHITNEY 010 RECEIVED JUL 2 l MINING LANDS SECTION HELICOPTERBORNE MAGNETIC SURVEY OF WHITNEY - SHAW PROPERTY PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION by R.S. Middlen Rosario Resources Canada Ltd King St. E. TORONTO, Ontario June 30, 1980

2 INTRODUCTION A helicopterborne magnetic survey was flown over Rosario claims in Whitney and Shaw Twps. in Ocber - December 1979 by Aerodat Ltd. This survey corresponded with a regional survey flown for Amax Minerals Exploration and that survey has been reported on separately by T. Watts. The survey covered the southern part of Whitney Tw as well as most of Shaw Tw which are located 6 miles southeast of Timmins. The location of the claims is given on the attached location ma Previous Airborne Surveys Southern Whitney Tw has been surveyed in the early 1970's by Canadian Aero using the Otter, EM and magnetic package and the results of this survey are filed for assessment under the name of Oro Mines Ltd. The same area has been flown by Dighem Ltd. for Cominco using the Dighem II - magnemeter package. This data has been filed under Rosario's name. No airborne surveys are on file for the Shaw claim area. Property The claims covered are all held by Rosario Resources Canada Ltd.'s license or by registered option. These claims are: Whitney Twp Shaw Tw Brown McDade Option ^

3 - 2 - SURVEY PROCEDURE AND INSTRUMENTATION The survey was flown by Jet Ranger helicopter using a Barringer AM 104 pron precession tal field magnemeter. The current the wed sensorhead was cycled every l second thus giving a data point every feet. The sensor was wed 50 feet below the helicopter. Lines were flown at 1/8 mile spacing northeastward in Shaw and northwestward in Whitney, The data was conured at Data Plotting in Toron at a scale of 1:15,000 with conurs at 20 gamma intervals. Flight path recovery was accomplished using a 35 mm camera on board the helicopter and plotting locations on pho mosaics. The tal line mileage flown over each claim groups is as follows: V miles miles miles miles miles miles miles INTERPRETATION The Shaw claims covered by the survey contain two major magnetic features, a narrow northeast trend that corresponds a ENE type diabase dike and a broad, high intensity northwest trend that corresponds an oxide iron formation. The low gradient magnetic pattern northeast of the iron forma tion trend corresponds an area of felsic rocks (quartzeye rhyolite) mainly extrusive tuffs etc. with possible high level intrusive components. On the Whitney - Shaw wnship line near the lot 3-4 line a small area of magnetic relief corresponds thoeliite basalt rocks. Another anomaly with no known outcrop for correlation occurs on the southeast corner of the claims and is interpreted be caused by ultramafic rocks which are rela tively unaltered. In Whitney Tw the areas of broad low gradient corresponds felsic tuffs while the high intensity trends correspond iron formation or ultramafic rocks.

4 - 3 - North south diabase dikes are rare but one can be seen in the Whitney Cody Tw line magnetic pattern. The main structure in Whitney is a northeast trending anticlinal feature that causes repeating rock trends. CONCLUSIONS The helicopterborne magnetic survey has delineated the main stratigraphic units such as iron formations and ultramafics. Detailed ground surveys are required outline small narrow features. Respectfully submitted, R. Middlen Exploration Manager RM/lyd

5 File. Ontario Type of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)_. 42A06NE WHITNEY 900 TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT.,., FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT JU TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC. ECEIVED -21J980 """ING LANDS SECTION MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically Survey Company - - Author of Report. - - Address of Author J&1L- Covering Dates of Survey. Total Miles of Line Cut 1} *Si, cl^t O 'f -i 'a fr "7*1 {linccutting office) (prefix) (number) SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED Geophysical DAYS ENTER 40 days {includes line cutting) for first survey. ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid. Magnemeter. -Other, u l AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply airborne surveys) MagnemeterijGit (enter days per claim) j ////l/'^ Itutrior'oT Report or Agent Res. Geol..Qualifications. Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder TOTAL CLAIMS.

6 GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA C jr( ) l,.\ IJJSl KA L\ S it more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey Number of Stations Station interval Profile scale Conur interval Number of Readings Line spacing W Z Accuracy Scale constant. Diurnal correction method. Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value CJ I1 ROM AGN Tl EC Coil ronfimir.-irinn Coil sep:irhtion Arnirary Method: O Fixed transmitter LD Shoot back C! In line Frenuenrv (specify V.L.F. station) Parameters measured CH Parallel line Scale constant Corrections made. Base station value and location Elevation accuracy. ^^\ s^ " ^ ^ 2..^ ^ ^ Method l i Time Domain Parameters On time ^ ^ - Off time Delay time. Integration time. Power. Electrode array Electrode spacing. Type of electrode l l Frequency Domain Frequency ^^ -- Range

7 SELF POTENTIAL Range. Survey Method Corrections made. RADIOMETRIC. Values measured Energy windows (levels) - ^^^^^ ^^^...^ ^^^^^^ ^^^^ ^^^^ ^^ Height of instrument Background Count. Size of detecr. Overburden ^^ ^^^-.^^^^^.^..^^.^^^^.^ - ^^^^^^^.. ^ ^ (type, depth include outcrop map) OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey ^ ^^ ^^^^^^^.- ^-^. Accuracy Parameters measured. Additional information (for understanding results). AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s)^ ^ (s) (specify for each type of survey) : L^ Accuracy. III" (specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used. Sensor altitude /.J O r T Navigation and flight path recovery method -? 5 Aircraft altitude '^ c^ l ' * Line Spacing Miles flown over tal area Over claims only /Q' ^

8 m p'. r. Pi:i) No IKi vs Credit d a Y s d a v s d a y s ti ays ci a Y s davs Claim No. Li;; Y 5 Credit ] mi. x 40 = 660 T 33 claims = days

9 GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD Numbers of claims from which samples taken. Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample. (Nature of Material) Average Sample Weight Method of Collection^ ^ Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development- Sample Depth^. Terrain Drainage Development ^ ^^^^^ Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness. ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: per cent m. b. d n Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle) Others ^^^^ ^^ ^. Field Analysis (. Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used Field Laborary Analysis No. ^.,..-^.. Extraction Method- Analytical Method. Reagents Used.tests).tests) SAMPLE PREPARATION (Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing) Mesh size of fraction used for analysis^ Commercial Laborary (- Name of Laborary^ Extraction Analytical Reagents Used.tests) GeneraL General

10 Ministry of Natural Resources FUc. Ontario GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC. Type of Survey(s). filo b Township or Claim Holder(s). /4-c 7-7 L( Survey Company Author of Report ^ Address of Author. /C 1 Covering Dates of Survey. Total Miles of Line Cut_!"? (linecutting office) fiir*" MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically (prefix) (number) SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED ~,.. Geophysical DAYS per claim ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey. ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid. Radiometric. S o S AIRBQRNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply airborne turveyi) Magnemeter-AJL Electromagnetic Radiometric ^ ^ (enter days per claim) DATE:. ) Y)'' SIGNATURE:. Author ofreport or Agent Res. Geo l..qualifications. Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder TOTAL CLAIMS.

11 GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA (ijju HJNjj,M RVKVS li more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey Number of Stations Number of Readings. Station interval ^-^- ^^. - - ^..^^^^^^^^^ Line spacing Profile scale ^^^^^^.^^ -^^^^^^^^ - ^^.. - ^^ ^^ -^^ Conur interval., ^ O ^-- ^- ^-- r. Accuracy Scale constant Z O tf Diurnal correction method. Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value -^ '-J z o Coil configuration ^^^ ^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^....- ^.^ Coil separation ^^^^^^.^ ^^..- ^^^^.^^^^ ^^...^.^..^..^.. ^ Accuracy Method: ilh Fixed transmitter d Shoot back CD In line CH Parallel line Frequency ^ - ^-^^^^ ^^^^-^..-.. ^^.^-..-^ ^ ^^.. ^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ (specify V.L.F. station) Parameters measured Scale constant Corrections made. Base station value and location Elevation accuracy J} 00 UJ Z Method Ci Time Domain CI Frequency Domain Parameters - On time Frequency.. Power. Electrode array. Electrode spacing Type of electrode - Off time Range : - Delay time - Integration time

12 SELF POTENTIAL Range. Survey Method, -^^^ ^^^^-^- ^^^ ^^.... ^...^^^^ - Corrections made. RADIOMETRIC. Values measured Energy windows (levels)-^^^^ ^^^^ - ^^^^^ -^^ ^^.. Height of instrument ^^^^^-^^^ - ^^^^^^^... Background Count. Size of detecr^^ - ^^^^^^^^^^^^..^^^^^^^^.... Overburden - ^^^^^^^^ ^^.^^^^^.^^..^..^^^^^^^^- ^^.^ (type, depth include outcrop map) OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey^ ^ ^ ^^^ ^^^^^^^^ ^.^-.^......^^ Accuracy^^^^^ ^^^^^^ - ^^..^.. Parameters measured. Additional information (for understanding results). AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) fi l ft G? /S Z (s) ^ ^ na (specify for each type of survey) Accuracy ~ ^~" (specify for eacjj type of survey) Aircraft used O ^ Sensor altitude Navigation and flight path recovery method Aircraft altitude Z.^D Line Spacing Miles flown over tal area Over claims only

13 GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD Numbers of claims from vvhich samples taken. Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample. (Nature of Material) Average Sample Weight^-^ ^^ Method of Collection ^-^ ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: per cent m. b. Cu, Pb, D nd Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle) Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development- Sample Depth Terrain ^. Drainage Development^^ ^ Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness. Others_ Field Analysis (. Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used Field Laborary Analysis No. - -^ Extraction Method. Analytical Method - Reagents Used.tests) -tests) S A M P l. K P R K PA R AT l O N (Include:) drying, screening, crushing, ashing) Mesh size of fraction used for analysis^^-^ Commercial Laborary (- Name of Laborary Extraction Method Analytical Method- Reagents Used, ^ -tests) GeneraL General.

14 Ministry of Natural Resources File. Ontario Type of Survey (s) Township or Area ^ ^ Claim Holder(s) /w? ^ GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC. A& RECEIVED UNDS SECTION MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically Survey Company - 1 f*-*f ^r Author of Report Address of Author r/. ~ b Covering Dates of Survey. Total Miles of Line Cut_ (linecutting office) J4 7*9 (prefix) (number) SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey. ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid. Geophysical Electromagnetic. Magnemeter. Radiometric- Other Geological. Geochemical. DAYS per claim l AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply airborne surveys) Magnemeter^i&Jz Electromagnetic Radiometric ^ ^ (enter days per claim) natf- 3o S"? fo SIGNATURE:. Aifthor of Report or Agent Res. Geo I...Qualifications. Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder y TOTAL CLAIMS.

15 GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA 'U RVh\ S It more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey Number of Stations -^^ ^^^ Number of Readings Station interval.line spacing Profile scale ^^^ ^^ ^^....^^ ^^^^. Conur interval^. Accuracy Scale constant. Diurnal correction method. Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value u * t UJ z b Coil configuration Coil separation ^ ^^^^^^ ^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ - ^^^^^^...-^^^^ ^^.. ^ ^. Accuracy - -^^^^^^^^ -^- ^^^^ -^- -^^^^^. -^^^^^^^^^^^^^-.. Method: d Fixed transmitter d Shoot back d In line d Parallel line Frequency ^^^^^^^-^ - ^^^ (specify V.L.F. station) Parameters measured^^^ ^^^ ^ ^-^^^^^^^ - ~s- Scale constant Corrections made. Base station value and location Elevation accuracy- Method D Time Domain d Frequency Domain Parameters - On time Frequency ^^ - - Off time Range Delay time Integration time Power. Electrode array Electrode spacing. Type of electrode

16 SELF POTENTIAL Range. Survey Method^ ^^ ^-^ ^.^^^^....-.^-^^^^^^^ Corrections made. RADIOMETRIC. Values measured Energy windows (levels) ^^^ ^^^^ ^^..-.^^ ^^. Height of instrument Background Count. Size of detecr^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ ^- ^^ ^ ^- Overburden ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^-^ - ^^.^.^.^^- ^.^ (type, depth include outcrop map) OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey ^.^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^ ^^^...^.^.^-.^ ^^^^^^^ ^^ ^. ^ Accuracy^^^^-^^^^^^^^^^- ^- ^.^^^.^^. -^^^^^^^^ Parameters measured. Additional information (for understanding results). AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) fij /J Cs Affc 7 (s) /O ' tf-^ty'l v*-yw /nm l Q (specify for each type of survey) Accuracy. Aircraft used. J *~ 7 Sensor altitude ± (specify for each type of survey) Navigation and flight path recovery method -^ 5 /w -f-,' f i* Aircraft altitude - O Line Spacing Miles flown over tal area Over claims only

17 GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD Numbers of claims from vvhich samples taken. Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample. (Nature of Material) Average Sample Weight^ Method of Collection^^^ ^^^ ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: per cent m. b. Cu, Pb, n D Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle) Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development- Sample Depth Terrain ^ -..^-^. Drainage Development^ - - Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness. SAMP1.K PREPARATION (Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing) Mesh size of fraction used for analysis. Others_ Field Analysis (. Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used Field Laborary Analysis No. Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used.^^ Commercial Laborary (. Name of Laborary Extraction MpthnH Analytical Method Reagents Used ^.^.-..tests).tests).tests) GeneraL General

18 Ministry of Natural Resources File. Ontario GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC. Type of Survey(s) Township or Area Claim Holder(s) Survey Company Author of Report Address of Author S^-. Covering Dates of Survey. Total Miles of Line Cut (linecutting office) MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically P: (prefix) (number) SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED Geophysical DAYS ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey. ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid. -Other- Geological. E y AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply airborne lurveyi) Magnemeter-i^iZ.Electromagnetic.. Radiometric (enter days per claim) DATE:. SIGNATURE: Z c Res. Geol..Qualifications. Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder TOTAL CLAIMS-

19 GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA CiROLND SI RVl-.'t S^ [l more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey Number of Stations - Number of Readings. Station interval Line spacing Profile scale Conur interval. rf Accuracy Scale constant. Diurnal correction method, Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ^_ Coil configuration *c Coil separation ^ O Accuracy Method: d Fixed transmitter CH Shoot back CH In line O Parallel line Frequency^^ ^ -^^ ^.^^-^^^^^.^^^ ^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^ ^.^ -. {specify V.L.F. station) Parameters measured. ^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^.^....^...-- Scale constant Corrections made. Base station value and location Elevation accuracy- JO ci Method Ci Time Domain D Frequency Domain Parameters - On time Frequency - O ff time Range Delay time ^^^^ ^^ ^ -^^^^ ^ ^ Integration time. Power. Electrode array Electrode spacing. Type of electrode

20 SELF POTENTIAL. ^^^^^ ^^^. Range. Survey Method -^ ^ ^^^^^^^^ ^ ^^^^^ ^ ^^^.^ -.. ^^^^ Corrections made. RADIOMETRIC. Values measured. Energy windows (levels)^^^ - ^ ^ ^^ ^^^-. ^^^^......^.. Height of instrument Background Count. Size of detecr ^^ ^^- ^^^^-^-^ - ^^^^^^^^.. ^^-.^^ - Overburden-^^^-^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^ ^.^^ ^^ (type, depth - include outcrop map) OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey^ ^ ^-^ ^^ - - ^^ ^ ^^^ ^-^.^^ ^^^^^^ Accuracy..^ -.^^..^.^ ^^. ^ Parameters measured. Additional information (for understanding results). AIRBORNE SURVEYS Typp ttf snrvpy(*) s) //s //c^e B^^rr^^^ (specify for each type omurvey) Accuracy -^^^ -^^^ ~ ' (specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used f- 2. Sensor altitude Navigation and flight path recovery method. -f-1 7u ^/^/^ x/, ^ T- s f AM /o 4 Aircraft altitude Z~V Line Spacing Miles flown over tal area Over claims only /- 3^- m*^te-e

21 GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD Numbers of claims from which samples taken. Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample. (Nature of Material) Average Sample Weight ^ ^^ Method of Collection ^-^ ^^^ ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: per cent m. b. Cu, Pb, D D Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle) Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development- Sample Depth^ - Terrain ^^^-^ ^ Drainage Development ^ Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness. Others Field Analysis (. Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used Field Laborary Analysis No. Extraction Method- Analytical Method - Reagents Used.tests).tests) SAMPLE PREPARATION (Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing) Mesh size of fraction used for analysis Commercial Laborary {. Name of Laborary Extraction MpthnH Analytical Method Reagents Used.^^.^^ -tests) GeneraL General.

22 Ministry of Natural Resources File. Ontario GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC. Type of Survey(s) Township or Area ^ ^^ /l Claim Holder(s) fi.6 ^frfl/fl /i 7 ~ ~ Survey Company /f *ty.o trtgc/ Author of Report A MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically (prefix) (number) Address of Author 7 Lx Covering Dates of Survey. Total Miles of Line Cut O *- f X *? 7 9* (linecutting office) SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey. ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid. Geophysical Electromagnetic. Magnemeter Radiometric Other^^ Geological. GeochemicaL DAYS per claim AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply airborne surveys) Magnemeter ^j9l Electromagnetic.. Radiometric (enter days per claim) DATE:. 10 SIGNATURE:. ''AutMor of Report or Agent ^ X! Res. Geol...Qualifications. Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder u TOTAL CLAIMS.

23 GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA.-M ^ Vk\ S II more than one survey, specify data for each type o f survey Number of Stations. Station interval Profile scale ^^-^^ Conur interval ^^..Number of Readings J-,ine spacing ^ ^ Accuracy Scale constant. Diurnal correction method. Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station locution and value 2; Coil configuration Coil separation - Accuracy ^^ Method: Frequency- Parameters measured. Q Fixed transmitter d Shoot back D In line Parallel line (specify V.L.F. station) Scale constant Corrections made. Base station value and location Elevation accuracy. c/3 c/5 Method r~! Time Domain Parameters On time - ^ - Off time -^ - Delav time. Integration time. Power. Electrode array Electrode spacing. Type of electrode { l Frequency Domain Frequency ^^- -- Range

24 SEEP POTENTIAL Range. Survey Method ^ ^^^^-^^^^ ^^ ^ ^ ^^-.....^^ ^^.. Corrections made. RADIOMETRIC. Values measured Energy windows (levels) Height of instrument Background Count. Size of detecr ^^ ^^^^^^^- ---.^^^ ^ -^^^ - -.^^ ^^ Overburden ^^^^^^^-^ ^...^.^^^^^^. ^^^^^^^.^ ^^^^^^- - (type, depth include outcrop map) OTHERS (SEISMIC, URIEL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey-^^ ^^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Accuracy^ Parameters measured. Additional information (for understanding results). AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) fljfj tsaje~ T t Instrumcnt(s) O f^tti 'r~ ^ /fa* f fi (specify for each type of survey) Accuracy l^ ^ cj a u^^^at (specifyfor each type of survey) Aircraft used ^ J ^ii J p~ Sensor altitude. Navigation and flight path recovery method. 5-3 V-*. ta-a. /~" f f Aircraft altitude - O Line Spacing r* Miles flown over tal area Over claims only

25 GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD Numbers of claims from which samples taken. Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample. (Nature of Material) Average Sample Weight Method of Collection Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development- Sample Depth Terrain Drainage Development^^ ^^ ^^ Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness. Values expressed in: ANALYTICAL METHODS per cent m. b. n a Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle) Others Field Analysis (. Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used Field Laborary Analysis No.. Extraction Method- Analytical Method- Reagents Used..tests).tests) SAMPLE PREPARATION (Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing) Mesh size of fraction used for analysis ^. Commercial Laborary (. Name of Laborary- Extraction Method Analytical Method Reagents Used ^- -tests) GcneraL General.

26 Ministry of Natural Resources File. Ontario GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC. Type of Survey(s) Township or Area Claim Holder(s) Survey Company- Author of Report. l i Address of Author Covering Dates of Survey. Total Miles of Line Cut 7 M. s L s ~ (linecutting office) MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically (prefix) (number) s SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey. ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid. Geophysical Electromagnetic. Magnemeter^ Radiometric Other^^ ^ Geological. Geochemical- DAYS per claim AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply airborne lurveyi) Magnemeter ^A Electromagnetic Radiometric (enter days per claim) X DATE:.,. ft. SIGNATURE: Author of Heport or Agent Res. Geol...Qualifications. Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder TOTAL CLAIMS-

27 GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA GROl VI) SI RVKYS It more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey Number of Stations Number of Readings. Station interval Line spacing. - Profile scale ^.^... ^^^^^^^^^-^^^^^^^.^ Conur interval _ j. Accuracy Scale constant rjj Diurnal correction method. Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value a Z O<*T-t *Z Oaa CJ Coil configuration Coil Accuracy Method: CD Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back CD In line CD Parallel line Frequency (specify V.L.F. station) Parameters measured. ^ ^.^^-^^ ^^. -.. Scale constant Corrections made. Base station value and location. Elevation accuracy. 1/3 UJ Method D Time Domain CD Frequency Domain Parameters - On time Frequency - Off time Range - Delay time. Integration time. Power. Electrode array Electrode spacing. Type of electrode

28 SELF POTENTIAL Range. Survey Method ^ ^^^^^-^^^^^-^ ^-^....^ -. - ^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^ Corrections made. RADIOMETRIC. Values measured Energy windows (levels).....^^^^^^-^^^^^^^^^^^^ Height of instrument Background Count. Size of detecr - - ^^^ ^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^ ^ ^-^ Overburden ^^ ^ ^.^^^-.^^ ^^^^^^^^-^ ^-^ ^ ^^^^^^^^ (type, depth include outcrop map) OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey ^ ^ ^^^^^^^^^^.^^ -,-^ -^^^^^^^^^^ Accuracy ^^ ^^.^^^^^^^.^^^^....^ -. Parameters measured. Additional information {for understanding results). AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) ^ ^^ -^^^ ^ ^'f ft v7 X/^T,/ (s) fofwrmqay &21 L&. * ',.i. ~ f i f \ (specify for each type of survey) Accuracy X ^ c* i^. ** e* (specify for each type of survey) ^^ ' ^ Aircraft used. \J 2- T /C-^ Sensor altitude Navigation and flight path recovery method Aircraft altitude ^ ^O Line Spacing Miles flown over tal area Over claims only ' -

29 GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD Numbers of claims from which samples taken. Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample. (Nature of Material) Average Sample Weight. Method of Collection^^^ ^ ^ Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development- Sample Depth - - Terrain ^ ^^ ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: per cent m. b. D n Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle) Others ^^ ^, Field Analysis (. Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used.tests) Drainage Development Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness. Field Laborary Analysis No. ^^^ ^^^ Extraction Method- Analytical Method. Reagents Used..tests) SAMPLE PREPARATION (Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing) Mesh size of fraction used for analysis^ ^ Commercial Laborary (. Name of Laborary^ Extraction MethnH Analytical Method Reagents Used - ^..tests) GeneraL General.

30 Ministry of Natural Resources File. Ontario GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC. Type of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s) rc Survey Company^ /7 - Author of Report.. f^. Address of Author. Covering Dates of Survey Total Miles of Line Cut ft l G. J~ t C S/ - E (linecutting office) MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically (prefix) (number) SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey. ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid. Geophysical -Electromagnetic. Magnemeter^ Radiometric -Other. ^. Geological. Geochemical. DAYS per claim lw AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply airborne surveys) MagnemeterX2iJLL- Electromagnetic Radiometric (enter days per claim) HATR-. 7 v " Author of Report or Agent Res. Geol..Qualifications. Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder TOTAL CLAIMS-

31 GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA (j K^)l'^n SI J^VK VS li more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey Number of Stations. Station interval ^ Profile scale,^ Conur interval..number of Readings.Line spacing- -^ Accuracy Scale constant. Diurnal correction method. Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ^_ ECIROMAGNET1 Coil ronficmrntion Coil separation Arrnnirv Method: d Fixed transmitter Q Shoot back d In line Frennenrv Parameters measured. (specify V.L.F. station) D Parallel line Scale constant Corrections made. Base station value and location Elevation accuracy. O D ^ ^. ^ Method l l Time Domain Parameters On time ^ ^ - Off time Delay time. Integration time. Power. Electrode array Electrode spacing. Type of electrode l l Frequency Domain _ Frequency Range ^^ -^^

32 SELF POTENTIAL Range. Survey Method ^^ ^^^^ ^ ^. ^ ^ -.^. ^^ Corrections made. RADIOMETRIC. Values measured. Energy windows (levels)^. ^^ ^^^.-^ ^ ^...^ ^ ^ Height of instrument.^^ ^^-^ -..^^.^^^^ Background Count. Size of detecr ^^ ^^^ ^^-^..^^ ^^ ^ ^ Overburden.^^^^ ^.^^^ ^^^-^ ^ ^^^^ ^-. ^.. ^^^^...^-^^.^. ^^. ^ (type, depth include outcrop map) OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey^^^... ^ ^ ^ -^^ -.^^^^. Accuracy Parameters measured. Additional information (for understanding results). AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) ^ ^ Instrumcnt(s) (specify for each type of survey) Accuracy,/,f ^^^.^ ^^-^ ^ (specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used /-f t*l-4 f c Sensor altitude. / ^ ij T ~T Navigation and flight path recovery method. Aircraft altitude *^777] T i - ^ ^ Line Spacing Miles flown over tal area Over claims only.

33 ^ 00 Cu [U U ro ^J Cu Q] U cr- Cu 01 O B) tn n m ^ "J 'T! "v -e ~a T3 ^j -d ^ T) 13 U ^ "d *o "d T3 T) n ^0 -d '-d x) M l -t l M. ". t- - t 0 i ^ ' 0 t, ; t - ' -- ~ m Vi Cr i- 1 o L'i U' r o i : i-o t.- r-.i ---j -j -- j VC 00 -J U' 1,Ji L" L ' t.: t-o 'J 'o t J t j l. t o t-o : - t. t.' f J t - -j *-..J ^ 1 or- u ' i - '^- t o ^-* U' t j t o --J O^ O "-D n in t O t -0 t-o o^ cr- cr- o^ Oo *^J cr- t-o cr- J;- ro cr- 00 cr* t-o t O CT- 1 ' t-o cr- 0 t O r o L" "~D MS ^ O. L" 10 D. W n. w D, Cu t-o 0) ^en ro Q, 03 Q, C! O, W ro Cu DJ ro Cu O) t-o o, ^ en ro O- Cu D) ro D- BJ ro Cu 0) Cu B) ro Cu v; W ro Cu 0) ^ en ro Cu Q) K) D- ro Cu Q) Cu B)

34 GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD Numbers of claims from which samples taken. Total Number of Samples- Type of Sample. (Nature of Material) Average Sample Weight^^ ^ Method of Collection ^^-^ Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development- Sample Depth. Terrain^ Drainage Development ^^^^ Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness. ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: per cent m. b. Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-{circle) Others..^ ^^^^ ^.. Field Analysis (- Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used Field Laborary Analysis No. ^^^ ^^ - Extraction Method- D na.tests).tests) Analytical Method - Reagents Used SAMPLE PREPARATION (Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing) Mesh size of fraction used for analysis ^^ Commercial Laborary (. Name of Laborary Extraction Method Analytical Method Reagents Used ^^. -tests) GeneraL General.

35 THF TOWNSHIP OF HOYLE TWP M-287 WHITNEY 7802 j l j P) j ff 1- ncifin T D IQK R5I270 DISTRICT OF COCHRANE Z - lti PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION SCALE: 1-INCH 40 CHAINS in ro i Q: ^ LU O en \ ft! l ^fjjf P P 1990S R I 19904! mi hpnr P PATENTED LAND CROWN LAND SAIF LEASES LOCATED LAND LEGEND LICENSE OF OCCUPATION MINING RIGHTS ONLY SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY ROADS IMPROVED ROADS KING S HIGHWAYS RAILWAYS POWER LINES MARSH OR MUSKEG MINES CANCELLED S.R.O. PATENTED M.R.O. LEASED NOTES c. e B 400' Surface rights reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers. This t ownship lies within t he M unicipality of C ITY o f TIMMINS. No disposition of send and gravel on lands north of O.N.Ry., from May 8,1964 u ntil fum.ier n otite. Form D.O.M. f ile Any r e st Q kings within stippled area in L ots 5,6,7, 6 Con 4 a nd 5 subject r ights and privileges granted Pamour Porcupine Mines Ltd. for lailmgs d isposal R (D i (D ' / T R' ^5 DATE OF ISSUE J U A06NE WHITNEY 300 IOOI26 i 9774E P i P is l e e 52?264 ( P l P CD ' SHAW TWP M '05" 8l 0 0**8r" appro*. SURVEYS AND MAPPING WANS*.Z ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES SURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH Dare 10th. JULY!974(Rev.) M.3I9 Whitney Bloch Queen i Park,Toron

36 Whitney Tw M. 319 THE TOWNSHIP OF ft C L l * WITHDRAWN 5*396,7 ^ B6 \47867 l ,5009A)8'5009II, ^ SHAW DISTRICTOF COCHRANE PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION SCALE: I-INCHN4O CHAINS l V? LEGEND CJ N CM a. 5 cu Q FARM LOCATIO^ Ref. No ""\ j _ _i_ - ^ _ _ 554G , ! l i _ ^ l \ ' \OZ09 l 540V08 P~ A ' ]"p ~~~~~ CO CD CM O E i- D O PATENTED L AND CROWN L AND SALE LEASES LOCATED L AND LICENSE OF OCCUPATION MINING R IGHTS ONLY SURFACE R IGHTS ONLY ROADS IMPROVED ROADS KING'S H IGHWAYS RAILWAYS POWER LINES MARSH OR MUSKEG MINES CANCELLED PATENTED S.R.O. NOTES C.S. (D Loc. LO. M.R.O. S.R.O Surface Rights Reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers. c. e Unpatented Mining Claims in the Subdivided Portion of Shaw T are subject Section 118 of the Mining Act M. of N. R. FileNo.83.5 EL /p This Township l ies within the Municipality of CITY of T IMMINS. RESERVATIO NS: Reserved for recreational p urposes u nder Sec, 3 PL.A, File IM from staking under Section fining Act (R SO. 1970). Date Disposition (g)- W.97/77 ^ 6655! S R.O. ' DATE OF ISSUE * UL 2 4 i98f) ! : !s32B89 SURVEYS AND MAPPING 12 42AC6NEB WHITNEY 210 Eldorado Tw M. 276 PLAN NO. M.311 ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES J, v. K, SURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

37 TISDALE TWP M-3T, < CODY TWP M-270 pa o w t" N H- O n r-1 03 H- 3 CO f^ p- H- rr 3 s TJ S* o en pa i-t H* O n H1 t 3 CO tyi 3- P s^ H S TD en n P h-1 re t* h- H- 3 D P" II f~ O npj (13 H- 3 CO D H- CO rr (-( H- O rr O t-h O O n 3* ri 03 3 v O 3rr T) O ri o e o M- (H 2 H- P H- ^ OQ O H- ^ H* en H- o p w p" 01 s: I?l ^ H- O rt H^ p fd "-3 ^ 13 CO 4 H I m 00 z "D O -( ~* ET. o A s: : g- ^s ~- o 2 f z tt IT 5* Z c D O c Q -i (B t* -, U) M O) < O O 3 f m S" o s S D M X ^ ** S i g l ^ i OP o rn * ^ ^03) EL S S ^ g LE PAT SE E E ED MUSKEG OR H LINES R f"^ ^ m w 5 0 I 3) s 2 S ^ O y) CO OC o d 01 o S o z -o 2 r- > m B r- r- b b S o -. w m CO O >r* m 2 O I -c* o o x 2 C/) c/) X

38 Mac 5 H- /V Flown by Aerocbtt- Ctber Conur Interval - 20 InsbrumenL- Barnhner AM 104 -FVotbn Recession -_x SHAW, CARMAN 4- CODY TWPS., TOTAL HELD COMTOOK: PLAN MAP t; 15,000 ROSARIO RESOURCES CANADA LTD. S H AW S WHITNEY T WPS. 42A06NE WHITNEY June/1980

39 377 NATIONS LAKE * Flown by Aerod^ Ocber Corfor Interval 2O aa.mma.e. Instrujnerrt- Barrincjcr AM IO4- PrdW. AMAX MINCJCALC WHITNEY- CODY TWPS., OKTAKIO TOTAL PI^LD AEgoHAGMErrc r. 15,000 PLAM MAP ROSARIO RESOURCES CANADA LTD. WHITNEY TW June/1980 Map 42AC6NEB WHITNEY