RECEIVED .'UN 2 2 TO MINING LANDS SECTION NORTHWEST GEOPHYSICS LIMITED GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS P.I.R.P. HOLDINGS MINE CENTER AREA ONTARIO

Transcription

1 52C15SE BAD VERMILION LAKE 010 NORTHWEST GEOPHYSICS LIMITED GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS P.I.R.P. HOLDINGS MINE CENTER AREA ONTARIO RECEIVED.'UN 2 2 TO MINING LANDS SECTION

2 INTRODUCTION Electromagnetic and a magnetic surveys were performed on the GOLDEN STAR MINE claims of PIRP HOLDINGS during the period April 14 to 17, The property consists of 3 unpatented mining claims of approximately 40 acres each numbered , , The purpose of the surveys were to detect bedrock zones of electrical conductivity and magnetic susceptibility, which may lead to the discovery of gold bearing deposits in the area. LOCATION AND ACCESSIBILITY The property is located approximately l mile south of Mine Centre and is accessible via Bad Vermillion lake which passes through the northwest corner of claim No SURVEY METHODS Electromagnetic: The instrument used was an APEX PARAMETRICS MAXMIN 11 unit, serial No It was operated in the horizontal loop mode with 400' separation between the transmitting and receiving coils. Readings were taken at 100' intervals along the lines, except that in anomalous areas the readings were taken every 50'. The instrument is capable of operating on five different frequencies of which 1777 hz was used. In this type of survey, both the in-phase and out-of-phase components of the secondary field are measured and are recorded as percen tages of the primary field. The readings for both components are plotted along the survey lines shown on the accompanying map, and profiles are drawn. A conductor will produce a curve in both profiles which goes from positive through zero to negative and back to positive again. The ratio between the amplitudes of the negative parts of the curves for the two components is a measure of the conductivity. A good conductor, such as a pyritic sulphide body, will cause a greater amplitude in the in-phase profile than in.the out-of-phase profile. The opposite is true for a poor conductor. MAGNETIC: The instrument used in this survey was GEOMETRICS 816 total field proton magnetometer, serial No Readings were taken at 100" intervals along the lines, except that in anomalovs areas ( 100 gammas) *

3 the readings were taken every 50'. This type of magnetometer measures the value of the earths total magnetic Field at any given point, these readings are plotted along the survey lines shown on the accompanying map and contours are drawn. Diurnal variations were corrected for by estas blishing a base station at L-48 * 00 W on B.L. 6 * DOS, reading the baseline and then taking repeat readings at the intersection of the baseline and the picket lines. SUMMARY OF RESULTS ELECTROMAGNETIC There were four electromagnetic conductors located by the EM survey, all are very weak or poor conductors as characterized by high out-of phase amplitudes and low in-phase amplitudes. have parallel strike directions. All appear to be very narrow and None of the conductive zones have any significant magnetic coincidence and all are overburden or swamp covered. Zone A is the strongest of the four anomalies and is continuous across three lines. Zones B s C are very weak and are on strike with each other, although they are not continuous with each other they may be related to the same geological feature. Zone D is quite weak and continuous across two lines. CONCLUSIONS ; The four electromagnetic conductors appear to be legitimate bedrock anomalies however they are very weak and narrow. The grid area is mainly overlain by swamp so the only way to further explore these zones would be by diamond drilling. This report was written by A.J. Lambert a geological technician employed by NORTHWEST GEOPHYSICS LIMITED who personally supervised the survey on the SHOAL LAKE ROAD claims. A.J. Lambert NORTHWEST GEOPHYSICS LIMITED MAY 11, 1983.

4 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Report of Work (Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures) 52C1SSE0e BAD VERMILION LAKE 900 Township or Area! uciv* W7\'f Claim Holder(s) Prospector's Licence No. Address Sre 30^ /c? 6 *r 5V, NA/, "70*0*-?? Survey Company A/0*1*7'*' W? * 7 Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report) Date of Survey (from Si to */,^"^ S"3\ / J - -, y l Mo. l Yr. l Day Mo. j Yr. Totat ^ c*j' Cut Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Special Provisions Geophysical Days per Claim For first survey: Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting) - Electromagnetic - Magnetometer *S0 3.0 For each additional survey: using the same grid: Enter 20 days (for each) - Radiometric - Other Geological Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence) Man Days Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here Geochemical Geophysical - Electromagnetic - Magnetometer - Radiometric Days per Claim - Other Geological Airborne Credits Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys. Geochemical Electromagnetic Magnetometer Days per Claim Radiometric Expenditures (excludes power stripping) Type of Work Performed Performed on Claim(s) /C Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits Total Expenditures S Total Days Credits Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right. b W 053 Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work. Date Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature) Certification Verifying Report of l hereby certify that l have a persorfal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true. Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying Date Cert/led Certified by re) 1362 (81/9)

5 Ministry of Natural Resources FUe. Ontario GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC. Type of Survey(s) PROTON MAG KAXKIN II Township or Area BAD VKRMLLION LAKE Claim HnlHer(s) P. I. R. P. HOLDINGS MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED Uit numerically Survey Company -111 Author of Report A. J. LAMBERT ^ ^ Address of Author BOX 3263 THUNDER 3AY ONT. Covering Dates of Survey Apr, if/83 t o Apr. 18/83 (linecutting to office) 3-5 Total Miles of Line Cut. K " (number) SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey. ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid. Geophysical DAYS per claim -Electromagnetic 20 Radiometric -Other Geological. Geochemical. AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit* do not apply to airborne survey!) Magnetometer..Electromagnetic.. Radiometric (enter days per claim) l HATR. MAY 11/83 SIGNATURE: Author of Report or Agent Res. Geol...Qualifications. Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder TOTAL CLAIMS (6/70)

6 GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA GROUND SURVEYS If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey Number of Stations. 100 feet Station interval. Profile scale. I inch to 50 gammas Contour interval.. Number of R Line spacing 175 ^00 feet GEOMETRICS 816 Instrument. MAG I GAMMA Accuracy Scale constant. Diurnal correction T.nnPTNG Base Station check-in interval (h. ) less than one hour Base Station location and value, 600S 4800w 59o?0 gammas U Instrument APEX MAXMIN II Coil configuration Coil Accuracy. Method: 1777hz Parameters measured HORIZONTAL 400 feet D Fixed transmitter D Shoot back In line nparalldline In phase (ipecify V.L.F. lution) out of phase_^ Instrument. Scale constant. Corrections made. Base station value and location. Elevation accuracy. INDUCED POLARIZATION H Method D Time Domain Parameters On time.,. - nff time ^, Pelay time IX v, Tnfprati^n tim*1 U ^ Pnwer. ' Electrode array Electrode soacine Type of electrode. D Frequency Domain Frequency Range

7 SELF POTENTIAL Instrument -. Range, Survey Method Corrections made. RADIOMETRIC Instrument Values measured. Energy windows (levels) ^-- B. Height of instrument - Background Count. Size of detector ~ ~ Overburden ^..,^ (type, depth - include outcrop map) OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey Instrument Accuracy Parameters measured. Additional information (for understanding results). AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) Instrument(s) (specify for each type of survey) Accuracy (specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used Sensor altitude. Navigation and flight path recovery method. Aircraft altitude Line Spacing Miles flown over total area Over claims only.

8 GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD Numbers of claims from which samples taken. Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample. (Nature of Material). Average Sample Weight Method of Collection Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth Terrain Drainage Development Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness. ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: percent O p. p. m. Q p. p. b. Q Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle) Others -. : ;: ' Field Analysis (. Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used - Field Laboratory Analysis No.(-^ - -- Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used.tests).tests) SAMPLE PREPARATION (Indudet drying, icreening, cruihing, aihing) Mesh size of fraction used for analysis. Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratoryr Extraction Method Analytical Method Reagents Used ~.tests) General. General.

9 Mining Recorder Ministry of Natural Resources 808 Robertson Street Box 5160 Kenora, Ontario P9N 3X9 Dear Sir: RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic 4 Magnetometer) Survey on Mining Claims K et al In the Area of Bad Vemllllon Lake. The Geophysical (Electroreagnetlc ft Magnetometer) Survey assessment work credits as listed with my Notice of Intent dated November 23, 1983 have been approved as of the above date. Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records. Yours very truly* E.F. Anderson Director Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park M7A 1U3 Phone: 416/ D. K1nv1g:sc cc: P.I.R.P. Holdings Inc cc: Mr. G.H. Ferguson Mining a Lands Commissioner cc: Resident Geologist Kenoram Ontario

10 ario Ministry of Natural Resources Your Me: Our file: Mr. Wade Mathew Mining Recorder Ministry of Natural Resources 808 Robertson Street Box 5160 Kenora, Ontario P9N 3X9 Dear Sir: Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets. For further information, if required, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at 416/ Yours very truly, Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6450 Queen's Park M7A 1W3 Phone: 416/ D. Kinvig:mc Ends: cc: P.I.R.P. Holdings Inc Suite Adelaide Street West M2H 1S2 cc: Mr. G.H. Ferguson Mining S Lands Commissioner B 45

11 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Notice of Intent for Technical Reports i An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have nol been fully rnel to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning thai you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will bc authori/ed to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged. If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application. H the reduced rale of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded. If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Lands Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

12 Ontario Ministry of Technical Assessi iient Natural,.., ^..^ Resources WO fk Credits ^^ Date File Mining Recorder's Report of WorkW Recorded Holder Township or Area P. I. R. P. HOLDINGS INC BAD VERMILLION LAKE AREA Type of survey and number ol Assessment days credit per claim Mining Claims Assessed Geophysical K Radinmptric days induced pnlaripation days Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assested" column npnlnginal days fienrhpmiral days Man days O Special provision Qg Airborne LJ Ground ix) fxl Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims. 1 1 Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant. Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims 30 DAYS ELECTROMAGNETIC AND 15 DAYS MAGNETOMETER K No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims 1 _ 1 not sufficiently covered by the survey 1 _ 1 Insufficient technical data filed The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 80; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 77 (19) 60: B28 (83/6)

13 September 23, P.I.R.P. Holdings Inc Suite Adelaide Street West H2H 1S2 Dear Sir: RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) Survey on mining claims K et al 1n the Area of Bad VermllHon Lake Returned herein are the plans (1n duplicate) for the abovedescribed survey. Please have the author of the report sign each copy of the maps and return them to this office quoting file For further Information, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at (416) Also returned herein 1s an extra set of maps submitted. Yours very truly, E.F. Anderson Director Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6450 Queen's Park M7A 1H3 Phone:(416) S. Hurst:mc Enctl. cc: Mining Recorder Kenora, Ontario

14 Ontario Ministry of Natural Res^k^s Geotechnical Report Approval File Mining Lands Comments -. J : Geophysics fi tf Comments pproved j J Wish to see again with corrections Jo: G eology - Expenditures Comments l j Approved j Wish to see again with corrections Date Signature Jo: G eochemistry Comments l j Approved [ l Wish to see again with corrections Date Signature \Jo: M ining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: ) (S33 (eti'tai

15 Mr. Wade Mathew Mining Recorder Ministry of Natural Resources 808 Robertson Street Box 5160 Kenora, Ontario P9N 3X9 Dear Sir: We have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims K et al In the Area of Bad Verm111Ion Lake. This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued. Yours very truly, E.F. Anderson Director Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room Queen's Park M7A 1W3 Phone: (416) A. Barr:me cc: cc: P.I.R.P. Holdings Inc Suite Adelaide Street West M5H 1S2 A.J. Lambert Box 3263 Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 508

16 te "^ ^a^^iifll' ^al^^s^fa^^l^jjj^^j-^^^-t-^.. j&fca-^zi Aj^ut&if&iihui f/ (X c/ L/ W

17 BAD VE RMILLION LAKE "' O O o o O o, NOTES: Instrument : GEOMETRICS 816 Mag. Datum : 59,000 oc Contour Interval" 50 oc Instrument : MAXMIN n Cable length : 400' Frequency : 1777 hz Profile scale : o.c. Claim post Swamp Cliff Claim line Outcrop Inphase Imaginary H- 10 NORTHWEST GEOPHYSICS LTD. o THUNDER BAY, ONT. GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY GOLDEN STAR GROUP OHO P.I.R.P HOLDINGS INC. MINE CENTRE, ONTARIO. 52C15SE007^ a.sb38 BAD VERMILION LAKE 200 DATE APRIL, 1983 SCALE l" = 200 DRAWN BY GEO-DRAFT CHECKED BY

18 BAD VE R MIL LION LAKE o O, o, o NOTES: Instrument : GEOMETRICS 8I6 Mag. Datum : 59,000 Contour Interval: Instrument: MAXMIN H Cable length : 400' Frequency : I777 hz Profile scale : o.c. Claim post Swamp Cliff Claim line Outcrop Inphase Imaginary A X.IS IO h!3 NORTHWEST GEOPHYSICS LTD. O o N/ -I5-10 THUNDER BAY, ONT. GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY GOLDEN STAR GROUP OHO P.I.P.P. HOLDINGS MINE CENTRE, ONTARIO INC 52C15SE B BAD VERMILION LAKE 210 DATE APRIL, 1983 SCALE = 200 DRAWN BY GEO-DRAFT CHECKED BY