REPORT OX MAGNETOMETER AMD VLF-EM SURVEYS DIXIE - SOUTH BAY PROJECT GERRY LAKE AREA NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO

Transcription

1 52KMNEeaSI GERRY LAKE 010 REPORT OX MAGNETOMETER AMD VLF-EM SURVEYS DIXIE - SOUTH BAY PROJECT GERRY LAKE AREA NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO PROPERTY 24, GRID l PROPERTY 2], GRID l PROPERTY 23, GRID 2 l c l IV l A.P. Pryslak August, 1985 APP/Iop

2 PROPERTY 24, GRID l a) INTRODUCTION: VLF-EM and magnetometer surveys were initiated to provide aid in interpretation of stratigraphy and structural trends in an area extensively covered by overburden. The? surveys were carried out in March, b) LOCATION AND ACCESS: The property consists of twenty - two contigious claims situated in the southwest part of the Uchi Greenstone belt, midway between Ear Falls and the South Bay mine site. The claims straddle the Troutlake River and fall within the Gerry Lake claim sheet, G The South Bay road passes within one mile of the property to the east and a logging access road lies within one-half mile of the northwest corner of the claim block. c) H ISTORY OF EXPLORATION; Previous work in the area has been carried out by Caravelle Mines,Erzgellschaft M.H.B. and Selco. Work consisted of magnetometer and HLEM surveys and di amond dri11 i ng. d) RESULTS OF THE MAGNETOMETER SURVEY; The magnetic low feature that extends from 4N at the west part of the grid to 16N at 7200E essentially separates the mafic volcanics to the north from the felsic to intermediate volcanics occurring to the south. The magnetic low may actually represent a granite i ntrusi on. The magnetic anomaly on lines 60 and 64E and 4N is produced by an ultramafic intrusive. The short mag. anomaly just north of the base line at 20E and the long trend anomaly extending from 96E to 112E are both produced by pyrrhotite mineralization

3 - 2 - intersected by previous drilling. Other positive magnetic features are likely due to magnetite within felsic volcanics. e) RESULTS OF THE VLF-KM SURVEY: A simple bedrock conductor was identified. This conductor is associated with the high mag anomaly situated in the east part of the grid and was tested by Caravel 3 Mines in Drill logs indicate pyrrho tite' mineralization with minor sphalerite. A single line anomaly of low amplitude occurs at 2350N on 112E. It is associated with a low positive magnetic response and is likely due to minor pyrrhotite within the volcanics. Resistive-conductive trends strike at an azimuth of SO 0. These generally are reflected as bedrock topography and some of these features are shown on plan SB f) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; The results of the magnetometer and VLF-EM surveys were conducted to aid in interpretation of bedrock lithologies and structural trends. The extension of known zones of basemetal mineralization will by tested by a time-domain E.M. system.

4 - 3 - PROPERTY 21, GRID l a) INTRODUCTION: Parts of this grid were previously surveyed by Crone DEEPEM. The grid was expanded to the south and west and surveyed by VLF-KM and magnetometer in January, This data will aid in interpretation of the bedrock lithologies, trends and structures. b) LOCATION AND ACCESS: The property is situated in the Gerry Lake area (G-1782) and the road to the South Bay mine site passes through the southeast part of the grid. c) HISTORY OF EXPLORATION; All previous work in the area has been carried out b y S elco. The property was restaked in 1983 and portions were surveyed with the Crone DEEPEN! system. d) RESULTS OF THE MAGNETOMETER SURVEY: Two prominent mag netic anomalies occur on the surveyed area. The north anomaly is situated with a pyrrhotite-bearing conductor in felsic volcanics. The felsics also contain 5 to 10/i disseminated magnet i to. The high positive magnetic anomaly on the south part of the grid is associated with magnetite-bearing felsic volcanics. A pyrrhotite-bearing zone of mineralization is known to occur on the north flank of the anomaly. e) RESULTS OF THE VI.F-EH SURVEY; A very weak response to a known zone of sulphide mineralization identified in drill core is seen on lines 81E and 84E and 8. All other responses appear to be due to conductive overburden than structural features.

5 - 4 - f) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; The magnetometer survey results identify stratigraphic trends. The VLF-EM responses are due to surficial conductivity and are of little use in interpretation of bedrock trends.... /5

6 - 5 - PjiQPERTY 23, GRID 2 a) INTRODUCTION: The area encompassed by this grid j s extensively covered by a thin mantle of overburden with only the rare exposure of bedrock. The magnetometer and VLF-EM surveys wore initiated to aid in interpretation of bedrock stratigraphy and structure. b) LOCATION AND ACCESS; The claims are located in the Gerry Lake claim sheet (G-1782). The baseline along the northwest part of the property follows the South Bay road. c; ) HISTORY OF EXPLORATION; All previous work in the area has been carried out by Selco. Noranda are currently working on claims adjoining to the north. d ) RESULTS OF THE MAGNETOMETER SURVEY; A prominent east- trending positive magnetic anomaly occurs across the entire grid. This feature is associated with magnetite-bearing rhyolites, which appear to thicken towards the east. parallel trends occur to the north; (1) on lines 44E and 48E at 9S and US, respectively and (2) on lines 60, 64 and 68E and at 378, 18SO and 20S. The first anomaly has a coincident conductor which has been tested by drilling. Two This conductor is due to pyrrhotite. The second magnetic anomaly has no known conductor but is likely due to a pyrrhotite-bearing sulphide f.ono. e) RESULTS OF THE VLF-EM SURVEY: The conductor in the east part of the grid has previously been tested by diamond drill ing and is due to massive sulphides. The weaker conductor on lines 132E and 116E and 55S has not been previously identi fied.... /6

7 - 6 - f ) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The magnetometer survey indicates that magnetite-bearing felsic volcanics persist through the claims. A time-domain E.M. survey is recommended for this grid.

8 S2KMNE GERRY LAKE 900 Mining Lands Section Control Sheet Pile No TYPE OF SURVEY GEOPHYSICAL GEOLOGICAL GEOCHEMICAL EXPENDITURE MINING LANDS COMMENTS: l/ Signature of Assessor Date

9 x-1 x1 t* -t/, x1 X JF x -/- 1L W X1 Kt x1

10 li fit L o - VO 41 'H ' " v/ x

11 Ontario Minisiryof Natural Re/sources HQf.OUI V Claim Holder's) Report of Work (Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures) DIXIE-SOUTH BAY - P21-Grid 2 Geophysics The Mining Act Instructions: Please type or print. ~ If number of mining claims traversed Note: exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Only days credits calculated in the "Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns. Do not use shaded areas below. iwnsn.p or Area G1782 j Prospectors 'Cicence~NoT BP Resources Canada Limited ^ j^ T190 Aiiiiress University Ave., Suite 1700, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7 Survey Company ~" - - jdate of Su BP Resources Canada Limited Day l Mo. Yr. j Day l Mo. l Yr. Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report) A. Gubins - 55 University Ave., Suite 1700, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7 Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Special Provisions Geophysical Days per Qlaim For first survey: Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting) - Electromagnetic - Magnetometer Total Miles of line Cut 11.0 Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence) Mining Claim Expend. IV ining Claim Prefix Number Days Cr. Prefix" Number Expend. Days Cr. For each additional survey: using the same grid: Enter 20 days (for eachl - Radiometric - Other Geological -- Man Days Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here Geochemical Geophysical - Electromagnet ic - Magnetometer Days per Clai m l: t If. f"' ". C,r r - rs v 1. t..j J..HU, - Radiometric - Other r *i ' - L '"! "" ' i ' ; :i r'- i-; :i:'lioi',! Geological Geochemical Airborne Credits Days per Claim Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys. Electromagnetic Magnetometer Radiometric Expenditures (excludes power stripping) Type of Work Performed ^ ~\s Performed on Claim(s) Calc ulation of Expenditure Days Credits Total Expenditures Total Days Credits ' M Hi? ^?ao K- O te?" -t^i96- * S nstructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right. V^Zl? rrr5^ Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work. l Certification Verifying Report of Work l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true. ^^/\^/, 7^L- "7 f 4- C? ^. Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying A- Gubins - 55 University Ave., Suite 1700 Toronto, Ontari J 2 Date Certified Cerjjjied by (Signature^

12 Your File: Our File: Mining Recorder Ministry of Northern Development and Mines P.O. Box 5003 Red Lake, Ontario POV 2MO Dear Sir: RE: Notice of Intent dated November 8, 1985 Geophysical (Electromagnetic 4 Magnetometer) Surveys on Mining Claims , et al, 1n the Gerry Lake Area The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date. Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records. Yours sincerely, S.E. Yundt Director Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416) SH/mc cc: Encl. BP Resources Canada Limited 55 University Avenue Suite 1700 Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7 Attention: A. Gublns Mr. 6. H. Ferguson Mining A Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario Resident Geologist Red Lake, Ontario

13 Ontario Ministry of Northern Affairs and Mines Technical Assessment Work Credits AMENDED Date File Mining Recorder's Report of Work No Recorded Holder Township or Area Geophysical Electromagnetic - Magnetometer BP RESOURCES CANADA -LIMITED Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim LAKE AREA 20 days days Mining Claims Assessed Radiometric days Induced polarization...._ days,-.. days Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column Geological days Geochemical days Man days [ Airborne L 'i Special provision [)( Ground LXi [ ] Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims. Q ] Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant. Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims 10 DAYS ELECTROMAGNETIC 20 DAYS MAGNETOMETER DAYS ELECTROMAGNETIC 10 DAYS MAGNETOMETER No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims not sufficiently covered by the survey insufficient technical data filed The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical -80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) (85/9)

14 Your File: Our File: Mining Recorder Ministry of Northern Development and Mines P.O. Box 5003 Red Lake, Ontario POV 2MO Dear Sir: RE: Notice of Intent dated October 18, 1985 Geophysical (Electromagnetic 4 Magnetometer) Surveys on Mining Claims , et al, 1n the Gerry Lake area The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date. Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records. Yours sincerely, S.E. Yundt Director Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416) SH/rac cc: Encl. BP Resources Canada Limited 55 University Avenue Suite 1700 Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7 Attention: A. Gubins Mr. G.H. Ferguson Mining ft Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario Resident Geologist Red Lake, Ontario

15 Ontario Ministry of Northern Affairs and Mines Technical Assessment Work Credits File JMining Recorder's Report of Work No Recorded Holder Township or Area BP RESOURCES CANADA GERRY LAKE AREA Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim Geophysical Electromagnetic. Magnetometer days 40 days Mining Claims Assessed Radiometric _ days Induced polari7ation.._days Other days Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column Geological _days Geochemical ^days Man days [ l Airborne [J Special provision [Xj Ground [X] [J Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims. [ ] Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant. Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims 15 DAYS ELECTROMAGNETIC 30 DAYS MAGNETOMETER DAYS ELECTROMAGNETIC 20 DAYS MAGNETOMETER No credits have been allowed for the foil owing mining claims " "j not sufficiently covered by the survey insufficient technical data filed The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) (85/9)

16 ario Ministry of Natural Resources AMENDED -^ l /) Vv \ ^^ ' f Mining Recorder Ministry of Northern Affairs and Mines P.O. Box 5003 Red Lake, Ontario POV 2MO Dear Sir: Your File: Our File: Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets. For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/"" * 000 Yours sincerely, t-' Director Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 SH/mc Encls. cc: BP Resources Canada Limited 55 University Avenue Suite 1700 Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7 Attention: A. Gubins Mr. G.H. Ferguson Mining A Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario 845

17 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources AMENDED Notice of Intent for Technical Reports /90-85 An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged. If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application. If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded. If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued. 846 (82/5)

18 Ministry of Natural Resources Type of Survey(t) Geophysics Claim HolderTi) Address Repoi"? of Work (Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures) DIXIE-SOUTH BAY - P21 Grid BP Resources Canada Limited The Mining Act 55 University Ave., Suite 1700, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7 Survey Company BP Resources Canada Limited Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report) tructions: Please type or print. If number of mining claims traversed exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Note: Only days credits calculated in the "Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns. - Do not use shaded areas belc Township or Area Date of Survey (from 8* to) Jan. '85 Day l Mo. Yr. Day j Mo. j Yr. G1782.y Prospector's Licence No, T190 A. Gubins - 55 University Ave., Suite 1700, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7 Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Special Provisions For first survey: Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting) For each additional survey: using the same grid: Enter 20 days (for each) Geophysical - Electromagnetic - Magnetometer - Radiometric - Other Geological Geochemical Days per Claim Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence Total Mi lw of line Cut ( Man Days Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here Geophysical - Electromagnetic - Magnetometer - Radiometric - Other Days per Claim Airborne Credits Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys. Geological Geochemical Electromagnetic Magnetometer Days per Claim Radiometric Expenditures (excludes power stripping) Type of Work Performed Performed on Claim(s) Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits Total Expenditures -f Total Days Credits Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right. XV Total number of mining :; * tlbirro covered by this J ; j \ if} report of work. Os) Date \ 1 1 i o Certification Verifying Report of Work nt (Signature) 1 hereby certify that 1 have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true. Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying A. Gubins - 55 University Ave., Suite 1700, A&te 727^ (81/9) Toronto, Ontario Date Certified - f "^ y O \ \\ * "T t o o ^ ^ M5J 2H7 CeuTTred by (Signature) C^^JL-W^ rj~ ^""' ' ~

19 Ministry of Natural Resources Mining Recorder Ministry of Northern Affairs and Mines P.O. Box 5003 Red Lake, Ontario POV 2MO Dear Sir: Your File: Our File: Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets. For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/ Yours sincerely,. Yundt Director Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 SH/mc Ends. cc: BP Resources Canada Limited 55 University Avenue Suite 1700 Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7 Attention: A. Gubins G.H. Ferguson Mining 8 Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

20 Ontario Ministryol Natural Resources Notice of Intent for Technical Reports /90-85 An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged. If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application. If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded. If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

21 Ontario Ministry of Northern Affairs and Mines Technical Assessment Work Credits Date File Mining Recorder's Report of Work ^' Recorded Holder Township or Area BP RESOURCES CANADA LIMITED GERRY LAKE AREA Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim Geophysical Electromagnetic. Magnetometer clays Mining Claims Assessed Radiometric... - _.. days Induced polari?ation _.. _..... M. -. days Other days Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column Geological ^....^... ^.....^ days Geochemical _...^_^.^^...,...,. days Man days [ ] Airborne Q J Special provision [x] Ground (Xj [71 Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims. [71 Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant. Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims 10 DAYS ELECTROMAGNETIC 20 DAYS MAGNETOMETER DAYS ELECTROMAGNETIC 10 DAYS MAGNETOMETER No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims not sufficiently covered by the survey insufficient technical data filed The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) (85/9)

22 Ministry of Natural Resources Mining Recorder Ministry of Northern Affairs and Mines P.O. Box 5003 Red Lake, Ontario POV 2MO Dear Sir: Your File: Our File: 85-85B Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets. For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/ Yours sincerely, Yundt Director Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 SH/mc Ends. cc: BP Resources Canada Limited 55 University Avenue Suite 1700 Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7 Attention: A. Gubins Mr. G.H. Ferguson Mining 4 Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario 845

23 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Notice of Intent for Technical Reports /85-85B An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged. If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application. If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded. if your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued. 646 ^

24 l Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Report of Work (Geophysical, Geological, ^ r f fi**' ~ Geochemical and Expenditures^?*" 05 """ DIXIE-SOUTH BAY - P21 Type of Survey(s) Geophysics Claim Holder(s) BP Resources Canada Limited Address The Minin8 55 University Ave.. Suite 1700, Toronto, Ontarin M.IT?H7 Survey Company ' Date cj Survey Mwm 81 to) Jan. ob BP Resources Canada Ltd. Day MO. Yr. Day i MO. i Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report) A. Gubins - 55 University Ave., Suite 1700, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7 Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Special Provisions For first survey: Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting) For each additional survey: using the same grid: Enter 20 days (for each) Geophysical - Electromagnetic - Magnetometer - Radiometric - Other Geological Geochemical Days per Claim Instructions: Please type or print. If number of mining claims traversed exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Note: Only days credits calculated in the "Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns. - Do not use shaded areas below. Township or Area ^/faf MK& G1782 Pros sector's Licence No. T190 Total Miles of line Cut Yr Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence) Man Days Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here Geophysical - Electromagnetic - Magnetometer - Radiometric Days per Claim - Other Geological Airborne Credits Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys. Geochemical Electromagnetic Magnetometer Days per Claim Radiometric Expenditures (excludes power stripping) Type of Work Performed Performed on Claim(s) Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits Total Expenditures fi Total Days Credits nstructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right. For Office Use Only Total Days O. Recorded '/X, ^prim* covered by this ' v..^ -^eport of work. Branch Director Certification VerifyingHeport of Work l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, havjm performed the or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true. /^^^2-^L * f s9j f * Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying A. Gubins - 55 University Ave., Suite 1700, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7 Date Certified by (Signature) 1362 (81/9) T7

25 REGISTERED September 4, 1985 Report of Work*85 BP Resources Canada Limited 55 University Avenue Suite 1700 Toronto t Ontario M5J 2H7 Attention: Dear Sir: RE: A. Gublns Mining Claims , et al, In the Area of Gerry Lake I have not received the reports and maps (1n duplicate) for Geophysical (Electromagnetic A Magnetometer) Surveys on the above-mentioned claims. As the assessment "Report of Work" was recorded by the Mining Recorder on July 15, 1985 the 60 day period allowed by Section 77 of the Mining Act for the submission of the technical reports and maps to this office will expire on September 13, If the material 1s not submitted to this office by September 13, 1985, I will have no alternative but to Instruct the Mining Recorder to delete the work credits from the claim record sheets. For further Information, please contact Mr. Arthur Barr at (416) Yours sincerely, S.E. Yundt D1rector Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416) A. Barr:me cc: Mining Recorder Red Lake, Ontario

26 REGISTERED September 4, 1985 Report of Morki90 BP Resources Canada Limited 55 University Avenue Suite 1700 Toronto* Ontario M5J 2H7 Attention: Dear Sir: RE: A. Gublns Mining Claims , et al, 1n the Area of Gerry Lake I have not received the reports and maps (1n duplicate) for Geophysical (Electromagnetic ft Magnetometer) Surveys on the above-mentioned claims. As the assessment "Report of Work" was recorded by the Mining Recorder on July the 60 day period allowed by Section 77 of the Mining Act for the submission of the technical reports and maps to this office will expire on September 13, If the material 1s not submitted to this office by September 13, 1985, I will have no alternative but to Instruct the Mining Recorder to delete the work credits from the claim record sheets. For further Information, please contact Mr. Arthur Barr at (416) Yours sincerely, S.E. Yundt DI rector Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416) A. Barr:me cc: Mining Recorder Md Lake, Ontario

27 Ministry of Natural Resources /DIXIE-SOUTH BAY P21 j-.'grid I - Ontario GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC. Type of Survey(s] Township or Area Claim Holder(s) Survey Company Author of Report Address of Autho r Covering Dates of Surv Total Miles of Lin e Cut Geophysical G S 1801 BP Resources Canada Limited 55 University Ave., Suite 1700 BP Resources Canada Limited T. Pryslak 534 Berry St., Win., Manitoba R3H OR9 Py Jan (linecutting to office) 10.5 mis. MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically (prefix) rM , SPECIAL PROVISIONS DAYS CREDITS REQUESTED r.^,,,^, P" ** 20 ENTER 40 days (inc ludes A n MagnptmnptPr.,,. 7 U line cutting) for first survey. Radiometric ENTER 20 days for ( additional survey usir IR same grid. AIRBORNE CREDITS Magnptnmeter fipn]ngiral. (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys) RWtrnmacrnPtif- (enter days per claim) Rarlinmptrir yvathar of ReporUor Agent VTJT OOQCO Res. Geol. Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Qualifications Claim Holder TOTAL CLAIMS (5/79)

28 GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA GROUND SURVEYS -- If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey Number of Station. 386 (M) 9 72 '(MAR) Number of Readings 586 fenf) 972 Station interval 25' (MAGI 50' f Bf) Line spacing 500' 8 400' -^- Profile scale 11 Contour interval Every 100 Gammas. O Instrument Geometrics G * l gamma Accuracy Scale constant 0 Diurnal correction method Ra^e Station Base Station check-in interval (hours)..^- Base Station location and value fifl^qfl Instrument WUJIAL.S, UV.LLU ELECTROMAGNETIC Coil configuration Coil separation ' N' A + \\ Method: S Fixed transmitter di Shoot back O In line CD Parallel line ^ NLK Seattle khz (specify V.L.F. station) Parameter, m^ur^ vertical In-phasc, vertical quadrature Instrument Scale constant. Corrections made. O! Base station value and location. Elevation accuracy. 2; ot-h < N ft < J 0 U4 Q rt o r^ a z, 1 4 5x H ^ l-h u rt OS Method D Time Domain D Frequency Domain Parameters - On time Frequency Off time Range Helay time Integration time Power... - Electrode array - - Electrode sparing.... Tvpe of electrode -

29 SELF POTENTIAL Instrument Range. Survey Method. Corrections made. RADIOMETRIC Instrument. Values measured. Energy windows (levels).^^-^ ^^^^^^^ Height of instrument Background Count. Size of detector^^^ ^^^^- ^ ^ ^^ ^.^ ^^. Overburden (type, depth include outcrop map) OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey.^. ^^^^^- ^- - Instrument Accuracy Parameters measured. Additional information (for understanding results). AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) Instrument(s) (specify for each type of survey) Accuracy ^ ^^ (specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used ^- - ^.. ^^^^ Sensor altitude- Navigation and flight path recovery method. Aircraft altitude Line Sparing Miles flown over total area Over claims only.

30 GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD Numbers of claims from which samples taken. Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample. (Nature of Material) Average Sample Weight, ^ ^ Method of Collection ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: per cent d p. p. m. CH p. p. b. EH Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle) Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth. Terrain Drainage Development -^ Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness. SAMPLE PREPARATION (Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing) Mesh size of fraction used for analysis.^ Others Field Analysis (. Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used Field Laboratory Analysis No..-^^ ^^ Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory Extraction Method Analytical Method Reagents Used.^ ^.tests).tests).tests) General. General.

31 Ministry of Natural Resources Vi]f Dixie-South Bay P21 - Grid 2 Ontario GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC. Type of Sut vey(s) Township o r Area Claim Hold"W Survey Con ipany Author of F Report Address of Author. Covering Diites of Surv ey Total Miles of Line Cut SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey. ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid. AIRBORNE CREDITS Magnetometer.., Geophysical G1792 BP Resources Canada Limited 55 University Ave., Suite 1700 BP Resources Canada Limited T. Pryslak 534 Berry St., Win., Manitoba R3H OR9 Jan (linecutting to office) 11 mis. DAYS ~ i. i per claim Geophysical F.WtrmTnagnptir & V MagnrtnmptPr ^0 Rad'"mptp'~ flpnlngiral,, (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys) R.Wrrnmaanptir (enter ( ays per claim) natr- Sept. 10, 1985 sinrvix Rarlinmctrir l l \ l j\ r^~s'~ ^f^ C - ^,,.. * Author-ef-ftepoN or Agent MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically J&U ,.. (prefix) y VTJT 77t;ftt;i; JNjVb 1 7 JO JO (number) Res. Geol. Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Qualifications Claim Holder TOTAL CLAIMS 837 (5/79)

32 GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA GROUND SURVEYS -- If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey Number of Statinm 575 (FM) 11 Rn (MAG) Number of Readings 575 (EM) 1150 (MAG) Station interval 5DJ Line spacing Profile scale I" ; 2D?i Contour interval Every 1flfl Gammas Instrument Geometrics G.826 E Accuracy - Scale constant - 1 g3 15 C Diurnal correction method Base Station * Base Station check-in interval (hours) Base Station location and value 60,000 nt W 0 Q Di U J Instrument Geonics EM16 Coil configuration To)) Reparation Arrnrary Method: Frequency Parameters measured N/A N/A i 1 ^ (3 Fixed transmitter d Shoot back D In line NLK Seattle khz (specify V.L.F. station) vertical In-phase. vertical quadrature C] Parallel line ^ Instrument. Scale constant Corrections made. ^ Base station value and location. Elevation accuracy. Z O H < N (-H tf *t t l 2 Q ^ w u D Q Z Instrument Method D Time Domain d Frequency Domain Parameters - On time Frequency - Off time Range Delay time. Integration time. Power. Electrode array. Electrode spacing. Type of electrode

33 SELF POTENTIAL Instrument.- ^- ^- - ^ - ^ ^ ^.... Range. Survey Method ^- ^ -.- ^......^ Corrections made. RADIOMETRIC Instrument. Values measured. Energy windows (levels)- - -^. ^ M..- - ^..^ Height of instrument. -.^.. -^,... Background Count. Size of detector-^ ^^ ^^. ^^^^..,-... ^... Overburden -^^^ - - ^^^ -.^ ^ ^ (type, depth include outcrop map) OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey^^ ^^ ^ ^ Instrument ^^ ^-^.. Accuracy Parameters measured. Additional information (for understanding results). AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) Instrument(s) (specify for each type of survey) Accuracy^ ^^ ^ ^ (specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used - ^-^ ^ Sensor altitude. Navigation and flight path recovery method. Aircraft altitude Line Spacing Miles flown over total area Over claims only.

34 GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD Numbers of claims from which samples taken. Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample. (Nature of Material) Average Sample Weight Method of Collection ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: per cent CD p.p. m. D p. p. b. a Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle) Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth ^ Terrain Drainage Development Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness. Others_ Field Analysis (^ Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used Field Laboratory Analysis No.. Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used.tests).tests) SAMPLE PREPARATION (Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing) Mesh size of fraction used for analysis. Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory Extraction Method Analytical Method Reagents Used -tests) General. General.

35 BP Canada Selco Division 55 University Avenue Suite 1700 Toronto Ontario M5J 2H7 Telephone: (416) Telex: September 10, 1985 Ministry of Natural Resources Mining Lands Section Room 6610, Whitney Block Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario Dear Sir, RE: DIXIE-SOUTH BAY PROJECT - PROPERTY 21 - GRIDS G.1782 S 1801 Further to our Report of Work (July 10, 1985) please find enclosed the following:- CONTENT (in duplicate) Geophysical Report Technical Data Sheet Drawings No. SB 4032 (1/2) SB 4032C (1/2) SB 4033 (2/2) SB 4033C (2/2) Yours very truly, Jeanne E. Rackley Claims Control Co-ordinator JER:rt End.

36 3200W 280QW 2400W 2000W 1600W 1200W 800W 400N N 200N N BflSE LINE BflSE LINE AZ S BflSE LINE 200S E BflSE LINE AZ.90" MAGNETOMETER INSTRUMENT TYPE: G EOMETRICS G826 Readings in Commas: [ Base: 60,000 n T Profile: Contour Interval: loont SOOnT looont OTHER SEE DRWG. Nfi SB.4032CU/2) SB.4033 (2/2) SB 40330(2/2) SB Every 100 nt INFORMATION TYPE V.L.F., CLAIMS MAG. V.L.F., LOC. PLAN, CLAIMS DEEPEM LOOP 400S - 600S - 800S S S S N- 2000S S O L 200 l FEET 400 J Selco Division-BP Resources Canada L imited DIXIE- SOUTH BAY PROJECT PROPERTY 21 GRID l TOTAL FIELD MAGNETIC SURVEY 5aK14NE005l GERRY LAKE RESURVEYED LINES O N (1976 SURVEY) DRAWN BY G.C. TRACED BY DATAPLOTTING DATE JAN DATE JUNE 1985 NTS 52K/I4 PLAN SB.4032 l/

37 4400E 4800E 5200E 5600E 6000E 6400E 6800E 7200E BflSE LINE AZ S - 400S - 600S - 800S S S S S S S S - 400S E 10400E 2600S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S - 52K14NE GERRY LAKE 210

38 400N - 200N , S* -^ BRSE LINE BflSE LINE AZ S S 400S S 600S - \ S 800S S 1000S ELECTROMAGNETIC TYPE' v.l.r INSTRUMENT Instrument'G EON l cs E.M 16 Degrees of Dip Angle Station* NLK SEATTLE Khz Profile Scale 1 l " 20 Filtered Dip Angles (Fraser) Contour Interval - OTHER INFORMATION BflSE LINE BflSE LINE AZ.90 0 SEE DRWG. N2 SB.4032 ( 1/2 SB 4033 (2/2 SB 40330(2/2) SB.3815 V.L.F., LII PLAN, CLAIMS DEEPEM LOOP 200S - 400S S - 3, /i \ ; S S S -.CW 2000S , 3., v \ 2200S S S - Selco Division-BP Resources Canada Limited DIXIE-SOUTH BAY PROJECT PROPERTY 21 V.L.F. SURVEY 52K14NE03S GERRY LAKE 220 RESURVEYED LINES ON (1976 SURVEY) TRACED BY DATAPLOTTING 52K/I4 SB,4032C 1/2

39 4400E 4800E 5200E 5600E 6000E 6400E 6800E 7200E BflSE LINE AZ.50" 200S S S S 2400S S S E 3000S S S - ; IL. 3600S S S S S S S S S S S S - GOODS S S S S S S S S - 52Kl4NE805t GERRY LAKE 230

40 6800E 7200E - BflSE LINE - 200S - 400S - 600S - 800S S S S S S S S S 10400E 10800E 11200E 11600E S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S MAGNETOMETER INSTRUMENT TYPE: G EOMETRICS ceie p 1230 Readings in Gammas: i. 903 Base: 60,000 nt Profile: Contour Interval: 100 nt Every loont nt looont OTHER SEE DRWG. NO SB. 4033C(272) SB (1/2) SB (1/2) INFORMATION TYPE V.LF, CLAIMS, LOC.PLAN MAG. V.L.F., CLAIMS S S S S \ S S S O l FEET S S Selco Division-BP Resources C anada L imited S S DIXIE- SOUTH BAY PROJECT PROPERTY 21 GRID 2 TOTAL FIELD MAGNETIC SURVEY S RESURVEYED LINES ON (1976 SURVEY) DRAWN Bf G.C. TRACED BY DATAPLOTTING DATE JAN DATE JUNE 1985 NTS 52K/I4 PLAN SB.4033

41 OOE 6800E 7200E PROPERTY 21 GRID 2 LOCATION PLAN CLAIM MAP G ONT. Scale l" : 1/2 mile S S S 1800S S S S S 10800E 11200E 11600E 2800S S S 3400S r S S S S S ELECTROMAGNETIC TYPE' V.L.F. INSTRUMENT Instrument- G EONICS EM-16 Station; Degrees of Dip Angle * NLK. SEATTLE 24.8 Kh; Profile Scote- i" 2070 Filtered Dip Angles (Fraser) Contour Interval- OTHER SEE DRWG. NO SB (2of2) SB (l of 2) SB.4O32C(lof 2) INFORMATION MAG. TYPE MAG. V.L.F. ( CLAIMS \ O L 200 4OO FEET Selco Division-BP Resources Canada Limited S S DIXIE-SOUTH BAY PROJECT PROPERTY 21 GRID 2 V.L.F. SURVEY l 42-2 L RESURVEYED LINES ON (1976 SURVEY) DRAWN BY G. C. TRACED BY DATAPLOTTING DATE JAN DATE JUNE NTS 52K/I4 PLAN SB.4033I 2/