North Tarrant Express (NTE) 3B
|
|
- Raymond Stevens
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Fugro Consultants, Inc Virgo ane Tel: Dallas, Texas Fax: North Express (NTE) 3B Fugro Technical Memo No. 1 To: Jiri Filipovic, PE AECM Anthony Karlinski, PE - AECM scar Aguirre, P.E. Aguirre & Fields From: Saad M. Hineidi, P.E., Chula B. Ellepola, P.E., & Andrew D. Johnson, P.E. Date: December 22, 2009 Fugro Project No.: AECM Contact No.: ( ) Re: Preliminary eotechnical Recommendations for Bridge Design This design memorandum presents geotechnical information for the design of the bridges proposed for the NTE Segment 3B project. ur recommendations are based on the following: Plan and profile drawings provided by AECM Technical Services, Inc.; The bridge concept plan developed by Aguirre & Fields, P and Subsurface information obtained through the advancement of 15 borings by Fugro Consultants, Inc. (Fugro). This information is preliminary and is aimed at providing the design team with adequate information to size the drilled shafts and develop a bill of quantity (BQ). Additional borings and analyses are required to develop final geotechnical design recommendations in the detailed design phase. Drilled Shaft Foundations We recommend supporting the proposed bridges on auger-excavated, straight-shaft, steel reinforced, cast-in-place concrete drilled shafts. Depending on the locations of the bridges, the drilled shafts will bear in hard to very hard gray limestone. The borings indicate the drilled shafts may penetrate through limestone, which contains several intermixed shale seams. The limestone rock can adequately support the pier loads thru both end bearing and skin -Page 1-
2 NTE Segment 3B Fugro Technical Memo # 1 Fugro Project No December 22, 2009 friction. Resistance to uplift forces generated by the swelling soils have to be resisted by the skin friction generated by the interaction of the concrete pier and the limestone rock until the superstructure loads can be applied to the newly installed pier. In fact, most piers designed and constructed in the DFW area uses a combination of end bearing and skin friction to support the superstructure loads. Therefore, the drilled shafts will derive their load-carrying capability from a combination of skin friction through the various rock layers and end bearing within the recommended bearing stratum. The preliminary geotechnical design parameters for drilled shafts supporting the proposed bridges along with the approximate elevations of the top of the bearing strata are presented in Table 2. The drilled shafts should be designed using these parameters. The preliminary design parameters are summarized in Table 1. As a quality control measure of the drilled shaft capacity, we are presenting drilled shaft capacity charts as Plate 2 of this report. This chart can be used to visually verify the computed shaft capacity. Due to the subsurface materials underlying the project alignment as well as the undulating topographical relief along the alignment, we have developed a preliminary design for the proposed bridges. The geotechnical recommendations for the design of the piers use the methodology recommended by TxDT in their 2006 eotechnical Manual (Figures 5.3 and 5.4). The preliminary design is summarized in the following table: Table 1. Preliminary Bridge Design Parameters Parameters Design 1 Drilled Shaft Type Straight Shaft Recommended Bearing Stratum Hard to very hard limestone Approximate Elevation of the Top of the Bearing Statum See Table 2 Net Allowable End Bearing Pressure, ksf 64.0 Net Allowable Skin Friction, ksf 6.5 Net Allowable Resistance to Uplift Pressures, ksf 4.5 -Page 2-
3 NTE Segment 3B Fugro Technical Memo # 1 Fugro Project No December 22, 2009 Table 1. Preliminary Bridge Design Parameters Parameters Design 1 Minimum Penetration into the Bearing Stratum, ft. Minimum Shaft ength 2.0 The greatest of 3 times the shaft diameter or 10 ft Note: 1 The preliminary design parameters are based on 15 widely-spaced borings drilled by Fugro. Plate 2 of this report presents a chart showing the relationship between the required shaft penetrations into the bearing material versus the shaft capacity. The shaft design information and a table showing the TxDT recommendations for the shaft diameter versus their maximum service load are presented on this plate. The boring locations are shown on Plate 1 of this report. Table 2 presents the boring locations and corresponding station numbers, the depths to the bearing strata, the design criteria, and the applicable area. Table 2. Boring ocations, Bearing Strata Elevations, and Preliminary Design Parameters Bridge # Boring # Approximate ocation / Station Numbers Recommended Bearing Stratum Approximate Elevation of Bearing Stratum Minimum Penetration into the Bearing Stratum Allowable Skin Friction (ksf) Allowable Resistance To Uplift (ksf) Allowable End Bearing (ksf) 301 3B-1 & 3B-2 IH-35W & North Parkway Hard to Very Hard imestone , 303, & 304 3B-5, 3B-6, & 3B-7 IH-35W & Hwy 287 Hard to Very Hard imestone B , 308, 309, & , 312, 313, 314, 315, 3B-10 & 3B-11 3B-10, 3B-11, & 3B-12 3B-12, 3B-13, & 3B-14 IH-35W & Hwy 287 SB n-ramp STA to STA IH-35W & Basswood Blvd IH-35W STA to STA IH-35W & Big Fossil Creek Hard to Very Hard imestone Hard to Very Hard imestone Hard to Very Hard imestone Hard to Very Hard imestone to Page 3-
4 NTE Segment 3B Fugro Technical Memo # 1 Fugro Project No December 22, 2009 Table 2. Boring ocations, Bearing Strata Elevations, and Preliminary Design Parameters Bridge # Boring # Approximate ocation / Station Numbers Recommended Bearing Stratum Approximate Elevation of Bearing Stratum Minimum Penetration into the Bearing Stratum Allowable Skin Friction (ksf) Allowable Resistance To Uplift (ksf) Allowable End Bearing (ksf) 316, & , 319, & 320 3B-13 & 3B-14 IH-35W & Western Center Blvd Hard to Very Hard imestone Notes: 1 The preliminary design parameters are based on the widely-spaced borings drilled by Fugro. The depth to the bearing strata will vary between these borings. 2 The ground surface elevations of the boreholes were provided to us by SAM, Inc. 3 Due to the elevation of the bearing stratum changing significantly thru this area, an was sent to A&F under separate cover providing the bearing stratum elevation for each bent in this area. The shafts will be subjected to vertical uplift force caused by expansion within the expansive fat clay soils. Therefore, each shaft must contain reinforcing steel throughout its full length. The vertical uplift force can be approximated to be 1,500 pounds per square foot of perimeter surface area of the shaft over an average depth of 12 feet (zone of seasonal moisture change). Although, the uplift forces will be offset to some extent by the dead weight of the structure, the primary resistance against uplift will be the skin frictional resistance derived by the interaction of the concrete shaft against the surrounding bearing stratum below the minimum penetration depth. ur estimation of the resistance against the uplift forces is presented in Tables 1 and 2. Foundation shafts designed and constructed in accordance with the information provided in this report will have a factor of safety of 2 against shear type failure and should experience minimal settlement (less than ¾ inch). A reduction of the allowable bearing pressure and uplift resistance will be required if the shafts are placed less than three shaft diameters apart. We should be contacted to review closer shaft spacing on a case-by-case basis. As a general guide, the design skin friction will vary linearly from the full value at a spacing of 3 shaft diameters to 50 percent of the design value at a spacing of one (1) shaft diameter. -Page 4-
5 NTE Segment 3B Fugro Technical Memo # 1 Fugro Project No December 22, 2009 The borings advanced by Fugro indicate that perched groundwater was present in some of the borings at the time they were drilled. The depths to groundwater at the time of our subsurface exploration and recommendations about the need to use temporary casing to construct the drilled piers are presented in Table 3. Boring # 3B-1 3B-2 3B-3 3B-4 3B-5 3B-6 3B-7 3B-8 3B-9 Table 3. Depths to the Top of Perched roundwater During Drilling Depth to the Top of Seepage During Drilling, ft Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Depth to the Top of roundwater Upon the Completion of Drilling, ft. Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Depth to the Top of roundwater 24 Hours after Drilling Completion, ft. Need Temporary Casing to Install Drilled Piers? 11.7 No 13.4 No 2.7 Yes, during wet weather 11.4 No 3.6 Yes 1.3 Yes 6.7 Yes 6.7 Yes 16.4 Yes -Page 5-
6 NTE Segment 3B Fugro Technical Memo # 1 Fugro Project No December 22, 2009 Boring # 3B-10 3B-11 3B-12 3B-13 3B-14 3B-15 Table 3. Depths to the Top of Perched roundwater During Drilling Depth to the Top of Seepage During Drilling, ft Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Depth to the Top of roundwater Upon the Completion of Drilling, ft. Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Water introduced as a drilling fluid to facilitate rock coring Depth to the Top of roundwater 24 Hours after Drilling Completion, ft. Need Temporary Casing to Install Drilled Piers? 15.3 No 12.4 No 1.1 No 6.7 Yes 2.3 No 0.7 No Based on the groundwater levels, temporary casing may be required to install the drilled shafts. Slurry using a mix of clays and sands may have to be used to facilitate the shaft excavation operations until the temporary casing can be seated in the bearing stratum. Additional design recommendations concerning all preliminary aspects of the design and construction of the foundation shafts will be provided in our final geotechnical report for the technical proposal effort level (BQ/FA workscope level) to be produced later. In preparation of this memorandum, we have strived to perform our services in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of our profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions. No other representation, express or implied is included or intended in this report, any addendum report, opinion, document, or other instrument of service. -Page 6-
7 NTE Segment 3B Fugro Technical Memo # 1 Fugro Project No December 22, 2009 ATTACHMENTS The following plates are attached to this memorandum: 1. Plate 1 Plan of Site and Boring ocations 2. Plate 2 Drilled Shaft Capacity Versus Penetration Charts. 3. Wincore Boring ogs -Page 7-
8 Farm-To-Market Road 1709 Bailey Boswell Basswood Cantrell Sansom Industrial Meacham ong REV DATE BY DESCRIPTIN Alta Vista Big Bear Creek Shiver Haltom 820 Haltom City W hit e s Branch Beach Western Center Basswood ong olden Triangle Riveside Riverside Sylvania Sylvania Fort Worth 35W North 81 ld Denton 35W TARRANT CUNTY Mark IV Deen Harmon Big Fossil Cr eek 820 Terminal Haslet Hwy 156 FM 156 Blue Mound Saginaw Watauga Mceroy Blue Mound ittle Fossil Cr eek Fort Worth Meacham Airport egend Seg 3B Alignment Scale: 1 inch = 3,000 feet Feet 0 1,500 3,000 6,000 Coordinate System: State Plane Texas North Central FIPS 4202 Ft Datum: D North American 1983 SITE VICINITY MAP North Expressway Segment 3B Source: Street map: TNRIS Stratmap, 2006 Drawn By: SE, Texas Date:, 2009 Project No.: PATE A
9 Basswood Blvd Caroline Ct REV DATE BY DESCRIPTIN liver Dr Burts Dr Burgee Ct Rose Ct Addison Dr ld Denton Rd Shiver Rd reen Juliet n N Juliet n Brittany Pl Cascade Ct enevieve Dr 35W North Fwy Fort Worth TARRANT CUNTY A 3B-1 A North Fwy North Fwy 3B-2 35W #Ò V 3B-4 D #Ò V 3B-3 3B-5 #Ò V 3B-6 81 #Ò V 3B-7 D 3B-8 D 3B-9 North Fwy A 3B-11 A 3B-10 Tuscan View Dr Indigo Ridge Dr Sienna Ridge n Scarlet View Trl Candler Dr Almondale Dr 81 B ig Fossil Creek egend A Bridge Boring ocations #Ò V Interchange Boring ocations D Pavement Boring ocations Scale: 1 inch = 1,000 feet Feet ,000 2,000 Coordinate System: State Plane Texas North Central FIPS 4202 Ft Datum: D North American 1983 SITE AND BRIN PAN North Expressway Segment 3B Source: rthophotography: i-cubed via ArcIS nline, 2007 Drawn By: SE, Texas Date: December 9, 2009 Project No.: PATE A-2
10 Approximate Boring ocations by thers Bridge Boring ocations Interchange Boring ocations D Pavement Boring ocations Seg 3B Alignment Ò ÒÒ Ò "B "B "B"B Ò"B"B Ò TH #666-2 "B Ò "B Ò TH #666-3 TH #658-4 Ron do Dr ray Rock Dr Mark IV Augusta Dr 820 ek 820 W r ig ht F wy i t t l e Fos l C re si Superior Pkwy Jim White Rock Dr Flint Rock Dr Dee rfoot Trl NE y P kw y Cantrell Sansom IV w Pk IV Ma rk Dancy Dr S a rk y Dr Sea rc Dancy Dr N M Dr McAdoo n Navasota Cir Sweetwood Dr z Calico Rock Dr Alpena Dr Evenin g Shade Dr Chadwick Dr k ar TH #666-1 "B Ò"BÒ "B"B ÒÒ D Silver Hill Dr Bull Shoals Dr Blanchard Dr TH #665-1 TH #657-1 Table Rock Dr Ash Flat Dr NE oop 820 NE oop 820 Fossil Creek Blvd Fossil Creek Blvd Sands hell Cir S n Aug us ta A A Western Ce nte r ou M e nk Dr TH #658-1 Big Flat Dr SITE AND BRIN PAN egend North Expressway Segment 3B B" Ò A V # Ò TH #659-1 ld Denton Western Center D A Almondal e Dr TH #658-2 ob i D r Sienna Ridge n TH # B-15 3B-13 TH #667-2 TH # o op 8 NE A y 3B-10 Candler Dr Fw y Nor th Sandshel l Dr Dr Fw o ss i l C r e e k DESCRIPTIN n ba 35W gf 3B-14 3B-12 th Nor Bi ir W BY AJ Ur 35W Paladin Pl il Pa rk D Fos s Welshman Dr l vd ll B e h ds San ll C s he d n Sa San ta Fe n Che sin gto n Dr Friendswa y Dr Fort Worth 3B-11 Dr ld Dento n Rd Wa y TARRANT CUNTY N R ive rsid e r Clu bga te D Kentish Dr Tha xton Trl Riverside Har tne tt Basswood Blvd en ev iev e Dr r Brittany Pl Danieldal e Dr rl e R i rs Dr y Pk w ek Permian n et b it o l Tri ers id N ive de Cr e Riv Fos sil B lu ff D r Whitefern Dr Rivesid e Sutter Ct Riv es id e ongleaf n ne Sto n o od n Em ery w Juliet n Ba ss wood f Big lea Riveside Dr N Ritt er n REV DATE 1 12/8/2009 Scale: 1 inch = 1,000 feet ,000 Feet 2,000 Coordinate System: State Plane Texas North Central FIPS 4202 Ft Datum: D North American 1983 Source:, Texas rthophotography: i-cubed via ArcIS nline, 2007 Drawn By : SE Project No.: Dat e: December 17, 2009 PATE A-3
11
12 DRIIN 1 of 2 Hole 3B-1 Structure North Express Station ffset T Date 11/2/09 rnd ft FI, clay, brown and tan, sandy, w/gravel. (Fill) ateral Deviator % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 83 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 56 PP = 4.5+ tsf (6) 8 (6) CAY, soft, dark brown to tan, sandy, w/gravel and calcareous particles. (Alluvium) (CH) % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 85 PP = 4.5 tsf (6) 9 (6) PP = 4.5 tsf (6) 7 (6) % Passing No. 4 Sieve: (6) 9 (6) % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 58 PP = 4.5 tsf 25 6 (6) 8 (6) (6) 36 (6) CAY, very stiff to hard, olive brown to yellowish brown, sandy, w/scattered shells and intermixed limestone fragments. (CH) PP = 2.5 tsf PP = 2.5 tsf (6) 22 (6) % Passing No. 4 Sieve: (6) 32 (6) % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 95 Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 45 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 45 ft, the boring was advanced to the 70.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 11.7 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
13 DRIIN 2 of 2 Hole 3B-1 Structure North Express Station ffset T Date 11/2/09 rnd ft CAY, very stiff to hard, olive brown to yellowish brown, sandy, w/scattered shells and intermixed limestone fragments. (CH) ateral Deviator (4) 50 (1.5) IMESTNE, hard to very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities. PP = 4.5 tsf REC = 97%, RQD = 88% (0) 50 (0.25) REC = 97%, RQD = 85% (0.5) 50 (0.25) REC = 90%, RQD = 58% (0.25) 50 (0.25) REC = 98%, RQD = 78% (0.75) 50 (0.5) REC = 92%, RQD = 75% (0.75) 50 (0.5) Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 45 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 45 ft, the boring was advanced to the 70.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 11.7 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
14 DRIIN 1 of 2 Hole 3B-2 Structure North Express Station ffset RT Date 11/3/09 rnd ft (6) 9 (6) FI, clay, brown and tan, sandy, w/gravel. (Fill) CAY, stiff, dark brown to tan, sandy, w/gravel and calcareous particles. (Alluvium) (CH) ateral Deviator PP = 4.5+ tsf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 100 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 87 PP = 4.5+ tsf PP = 4.5+ tsf PP = 3.0 tsf (6) 10 (6) % Passing No. 4 Sieve: (6) 10 (6) % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 86 PP = 4.0 tsf (6) 14 (6) % Passing No. 4 Sieve: (6) 15 (6) % Passing No. 200 Sieve: (6) 9 (6) CAY, soft to stiff, olive brown to yellowish brown, sandy, w/scattered shells and intermixed limestone fragments. (CH) PP = 4.5 tsf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: (6) 21 (6) % Passing No. 200 Sieve: (1) 50 (1) PP = 4.5+ tsf Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 40 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 40 ft, the boring was advanced to the 60.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 13.4 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
15 DRIIN 2 of 2 Hole 3B-2 Structure North Express Station ffset RT Date 11/3/09 rnd ft IMESTNE, very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities. ateral Deviator REC = 89%, RQD = 88% (0.25) 50 (0.25) REC = 91%, RQD = 58% (0.75) 50 (0) REC = 87%, RQD = 75% (0.25) 50 (0.5) REC = 100%, RQD = 72% (0.25) 50 (0) Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 40 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 40 ft, the boring was advanced to the 60.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 13.4 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
16 DRIIN 1 of 1 Hole 3B-3 Structure North Express Station ffset T Date 11/2/09 rnd ft (6) 5 (6) 12 (6) 50 (3.25) FI, gravel, brown and tan, clayey, w/sand. (Fill) CAY, soft to hard, dark brown to tan, sandy, w/gravel and calcareous particles. (Alluvium) (CH) IMESTNE, hard, tan, slightly weathered, w/discontinuities. IMESTNE, very hard, dark gray, 50 (0.125) 50 (0.125) w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities. ateral Deviator % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 53 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 23 PP = 3.0 tsf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 99 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 95 PP = 1.5 tsf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 100 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: REC = 94%, RQD = 58% REC = 95%, RQD = 73% (0.5) 50 (0.125) Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 11 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 11 ft, the boring was advanced to the 20.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 2.7 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
17 DRIIN 1 of 2 Hole 3B-4 Structure North Express Station ffset RT Date 10/31/09 rnd ft 5 7 (6) 9 (6) FI, clay, brown and tan, sandy, w/gravel. (Fill) ateral Deviator PP = 1.5 tsf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 100 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 94 PP = 3.5 tsf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 94 SPT = 15 bpf (6) 18 (6) (4.5) 50 (2.25) CAY, hard, dark brown, w/gravel and calcareous particles. (Alluvium) (CH) SPT = 38 bpf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 100 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: (2) 50 (0.25) IMESTNE, hard to very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities. SPT = 50/1'' REC = 90%, RQD = 83% (0.5) 50 (0.125) 13.0 REC = 96%, RQD = 90% (0.5) 50 (0.25) REC = 97%, RQD = 63% (0.5) 50 (0) REC = 98%, RQD = 83% (0.5) 50 (0.25) Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 20 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 20 ft, the boring was advanced to the 40.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 11.4 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
18 DRIIN 2 of 2 Hole 3B-4 Structure North Express Station ffset RT Date 10/31/09 rnd ft ateral Deviator IMESTNE, hard to very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 20 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 20 ft, the boring was advanced to the 40.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 11.4 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
19 DRIIN 1 of 2 Hole 3B-5 Structure North Express Station ffset T Date 11/2/09 rnd ft 5 2 (6) 3 (6) FI, clay, brown and tan, gravelly, w/sand. (Fill) ateral Deviator % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 78 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 52 PP = 1.25 tsf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 98 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 91 PP = 1.0 tsf (5.5) 50 (0.5) SAND, dense, brown, clayey, w/gravel. (Alluvium) (SC) IMESTNE, soft, tan, slightly weathered, w/discontinuities % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 69 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 31 REC = 97%, RQD = 72% IMESTNE, hard to very hard, 50 (0.75) 50 (0.25) dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities. REC = 97%, RQD = 60% (0.75) 50 (0.25) REC = 98%, RQD = 72% (0.125) 50 (0) REC = 98%, RQD = 62% (0.25) 50 (0.125) REC = 99%, RQD = 96% (0.25) 50 (0) REC = 97%, RQD = 93% 40 Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 10.5 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 10.5 ft, the boring was advanced to the 40.6 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the borehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 3.6 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
20 DRIIN 2 of 2 Hole 3B-5 Structure North Express Station ffset T Date 11/2/09 rnd ft ateral Deviator 50 (0.25) 50 (0.25) IMESTNE, hard to very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 10.5 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 10.5 ft, the boring was advanced to the 40.6 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the borehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 3.6 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
21 DRIIN 1 of 2 Hole 3B-6 Structure North Express Station ffset RT Date 10/31/09 rnd ft (6) 7 (6) FI, clay, brown and tan, sandy, w/gravel. (Fill) CAY, soft, dark brown, sandy, w/gravel and calcareous particles. (Alluvium) (CH) ateral Deviator PP = 2.5 tsf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 98 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 98 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 81 PP = 2.5 tsf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: (3.5) 50 (1.5) IMESTNE, soft, tan, slightly weathered, w/intermixed clay seams and discontinuities. % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 53 REC = 70%, RQD = 22% (0.5) 50 (0.5) IMESTNE, hard to very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities. REC = 78%, RQD = 50% (0.5) 50 (0.5) REC = 80%, RQD = 50% (0.75) 50 (0.25) 14.0 REC = 70%, RQD = 37% (0.75) 50 (0.25) REC = 62%, RQD = 52% (0.75) 50 (0.25) REC = 80%, RQD = 50% (0) 50 (0.25) Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 10 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 10 ft, the boring was advanced to the 40.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 1.3 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
22 DRIIN 2 of 2 Hole 3B-6 Structure North Express Station ffset RT Date 10/31/09 rnd ft ateral Deviator IMESTNE, hard to very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 10 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 10 ft, the boring was advanced to the 40.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 1.3 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
23 DRIIN 1 of 2 Hole 3B-7 Structure North Express Station ffset T Date 11/1/09 rnd ft 5 6 (6) 6 (6) FI, clay, brown and tan, sandy, w/gravel. (Fill) ateral Deviator PP = 2.75 tsf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 85 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 92 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 85 PP = 2.0 tsf (2) 50 (0.5) SAND, dense, tan, clayey, w/limestone fragments. (Completely Weathered imestone) (SC) IMESTNE, hard to very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 84 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 31 REC = 80%, RQD = 57% (1) 50 (0.5) REC = 98%, RQD = 92% (0.5) 50 (0.125) REC = 98%, RQD = 75% (0.5) 50 (0.125) REC = 98%, RQD = 79% (0.25) 50 (0) REC = 95%, RQD = 72% (0.125) 50 (0) REC = 99%, RQD = 67% (1) 50 (0.5) Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 10 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 10 ft, the boring was advanced to the 40.2 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 6.7 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
24 DRIIN 2 of 2 Hole 3B-7 Structure North Express Station ffset T Date 11/1/09 rnd ft ateral Deviator IMESTNE, hard to very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 10 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 10 ft, the boring was advanced to the 40.2 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 6.7 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
25 DRIIN 1 of 2 Hole 3B-8 Structure North Express Station ffset RT Date 11/1/09 rnd ft FI, clay, brown and tan, sandy, w/gravel. (Fill) ateral Deviator % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 94 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: (6) 6 (6) 50 (1) 50 (0.25) 50 (0.5) 50 (0.25) CAY, soft, dark brown, sandy, w/gravel and calcareous particles. (Alluvium) (CH) SAND, dense, tan, clayey, w/limestone fragments. (Completely Weathered imestone) (SC) IMESTNE, hard, tan, slightly weathered, w/intermixed clay seams and discontinuities. IMESTNE, very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 96 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 81 PP = 4.5 tsf SPT = 50/2'' % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 79 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 38 REC = 65%, RQD = 22% REC = 83%, RQD = 37% (0.5) 50 (0.5) REC = 80%, RQD = 50% (0.25) 50 (0.25) REC = 93%, RQD = 82% (0.5) 50 (0.25) REC = 100%, RQD = 95% (0.25) 50 (0.25) REC = 93%, RQD = 90% (0.25) 50 (0.25) Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 10 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 10 ft, the boring was advanced to the 40.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 6.7 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
26 DRIIN 2 of 2 Hole 3B-8 Structure North Express Station ffset RT Date 11/1/09 rnd ft IMESTNE, very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities. ateral Deviator Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 10 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 10 ft, the boring was advanced to the 40.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 6.7 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
27 DRIIN 1 of 2 Hole 3B-9 Structure North Express Station ffset T Date 11/1/09 rnd ft 5 9 (6) 11 (6) FI, clay, brown and tan, sandy, w/gravel, calcareous particles, and intermixed limestone fragments. (Fill) ateral Deviator PP = 1.5 tsf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 94 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 86 PP = 3.0 tsf 10 7 (6) 7 (6) % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 91 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: (6) 50 (2.5) PP = 3.5 tsf (6) 17 (6) CAY, stiff to hard, dark brown, sandy, w/intermixed gravel seams and calcareous particles. (Alluvium) (CH) % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 94 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: (5) 50 (3.5) PP = 4.5+ tsf (6) 50 (3.25) SAND, dense, tan, clayey, w/scattered gravel and calaceous particles. (Fluviatile Terrace Deposits) (SC) SPT = 24 bpf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 88 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: (0.25) 50 (0.125) IMESTNE, very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities. SPT = 50/1.5'' REC = 80%, RQD = 53% (0.5) 50 (0.25) Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 35 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 35 ft, the boring was advanced to the 55.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 16.4 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
28 DRIIN 2 of 2 Hole 3B-9 Structure North Express Station ffset T Date 11/1/09 rnd ft IMESTNE, very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities. ateral Deviator REC = 98%, RQD = 72% (0.25) 50 (0.125) REC = 98%, RQD = 97% (0.25) 50 (0) REC = 98%, RQD = 80% (0.25) 50 (0.125) Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 35 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 35 ft, the boring was advanced to the 55.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 16.4 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
29 DRIIN 1 of 2 Hole 3B-10 Structure North Express Station ffset RT Date 10/31/09 rnd ft 5 9 (6) 10 (6) FI, clay, brown and tan, sandy, w/gravel, calcareous particles, and intermixed limestone fragments. (Fill) ateral Deviator PP = 2.75 tsf PP = 1.75 tsf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 84 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 75 PP = 4.5+ tsf (6) 20 (6) PP = 4.25 tsf (6) 13 (6) % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 77 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: (5.5) 50 (6) PP = 3.5 tsf (6) 9 (6) CAY, soft, brown to yellowish brown, gravelly, w/intermixed gravel seams, sand, and calcareous particles. (Fluviatile Terrace Deposits) (CH) % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 99 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 90 SPT = 50/1.5'' (6) 50 (1.5) IMESTNE, soft to very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities REC = 98%, RQD = 93% (0.5) 50 (0.25) REC = 95%, RQD = 83% (0.25) 50 (0.125) Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 30 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 30 ft, the boring was advanced to the 50.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 15.3 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
30 DRIIN 2 of 2 Hole 3B-10 Structure North Express Station ffset RT Date 10/31/09 rnd ft ateral Deviator IMESTNE, soft to very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities. REC = 95%, RQD = 82% (0.5) 50 (0.25) REC = 100%, RQD = 92% (0.25) 50 (0.125) Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 30 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 30 ft, the boring was advanced to the 50.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 15.3 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
31 DRIIN 1 of 2 Hole 3B-11 Structure North Express Station ffset T Date 11/1/09 rnd ft 5 9 (6) 11 (6) FI, clay, brown and tan, sandy, w/gravel, calcareous particles, and intermixed limestone fragments. (Fill) ateral Deviator PP = 1.5 tsf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 88 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 96 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: (6) 7 (6) PP = 4.5+ tsf (6) 50 (2.5) PP = 3.5 tsf (6) 17 (6) CAY, stiff to hard, brown to yellowish brown, gravelly, w/intermixed gravel seams, sand, and calcareous particles. (Fluviatile Terrace Deposits) (CH) % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 100 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: (5) 50 (3.5) PP = 4.5+ tsf SPT = 24 bpf (6) 50 (3.25) (0.25) 50 (0.125) IMESTNE, very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities. SPT = 50/1.5'' REC = 80%, RQD = 53% (0.5) 50 (0.25) Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 35 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 35 ft, the boring was advanced to the 55.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 12.4 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
32 DRIIN 2 of 2 Hole 3B-11 Structure North Express Station ffset T Date 11/1/09 rnd ft IMESTNE, very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities. ateral Deviator REC = 98%, RQD = 72% (0.25) 50 (0.125) REC = 98%, RQD = 97% (0.25) 50 (0) REC = 98%, RQD = 80% (0.25) 50 (0.125) Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 35 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 35 ft, the boring was advanced to the 55.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 12.4 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
33 DRIIN 1 of 1 Hole 3B-12 Structure North Express Station ffset T Date 11/11/09 rnd ft (6) 10 (6) 50 (0.5) 50 (0) FI, clay, brown and tan, sandy, w/gravel, calcareous particles, and intermixed limestone fragments. (Fill) CAY, soft, brown to yellowish brown, gravelly, w/intermixed gravel seams, sand, and calcareous particles. (Fluviatile Terrace Deposits) (CH) IMESTNE, soft to very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities. ateral Deviator % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 85 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 63 PP = 2.5 tsf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 91 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 84 PP = 3.0 tsf SPT = 50/3.5'' REC = 58%, RQD = 20% (5) 50 (1.5) Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 10 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 10 ft, the boring was advanced to the 15.5 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 1.1 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
34 DRIIN 1 of 2 Hole 3B-13 Structure North Express Station ffset RT Date 11/9/09 rnd ft (6) 7 (6) FI, clay, brown and tan, sandy, w/gravel, calcareous particles, and intermixed limestone fragments. (Fill) CAY, soft, brown to yellowish brown, gravelly, w/intermixed gravel seams, sand, and calcareous particles. (Fluviatile Terrace Deposits) (C) ateral Deviator PP = 3.0 tsf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 100 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 91 PP = 4.0 tsf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 80 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: (6) 9 (6) (4.25) 50 (1) RAVE, dense, yellowish brown, clayey, w/intermixed clay seams. (Fluviatile Terrace Deposits) % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 55 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: (3.25) 50 (1.75) IMESTNE, soft to very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities. SPT = 50/1'' REC = 88%, RQD = 40% (0.25) 50 (0.125) REC = 98%, RQD = 63% (2) 50 (1) REC = 95%, RQD = 83% (0.5) 50 (0.25) REC = 97%, RQD = 73% (0.25) 50 (0.125) Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 20 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 20 ft, the boring was advanced to the 40.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 6.7 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
35 DRIIN 2 of 2 Hole 3B-13 Structure North Express Station ffset RT Date 11/9/09 rnd ft ateral Deviator IMESTNE, soft to very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 20 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 20 ft, the boring was advanced to the 40.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 6.7 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
36 DRIIN 1 of 2 Hole 3B-14 Structure North Express Station ffset T Date 11/11/09 rnd ft 5 7 (6) 9 (6) FI, clay, brown and tan, sandy, w/gravel, calcareous particles, and intermixed limestone fragments. (Fill) ateral Deviator % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 93 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 87 PP = 2.0 tsf PP = 4.5+ tsf (6) 10 (6) CAY, very soft to soft, brown to yellowish brown, gravelly, w/intermixed gravel seams, sand, and calcareous particles. (Fluviatile Terrace Deposits) (C) PP = 3.5 tsf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 91 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 85 PP = 2.0 tsf 15 4 (6) 4 (6) % Passing No. 4 Sieve: (2.5) 50 (0.5) IMESTNE, hard to very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 81 REC = 98%, RQD = 27% (0.5) 50 (0.25) REC = 97%, RQD = 43% (0) 50 (0.25) REC = 93%, RQD = 32% (0.5) 50 (0) REC = 97%, RQD = 85% (0) 50 (0.25) Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 20 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 20 ft, the boring was advanced to the 40.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 2.3 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
37 DRIIN 2 of 2 Hole 3B-14 Structure North Express Station ffset T Date 11/11/09 rnd ft 567. ateral Deviator IMESTNE, hard to very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 20 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 20 ft, the boring was advanced to the 40.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 2.3 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
38 DRIIN 1 of 1 Hole 3B-15 Structure North Express Station ffset RT Date 11/12/09 rnd ft (2) 50 (2) FI, clay, brown and tan, sandy, w/gravel. (Fill) CAY, stiff to hard, dark brown, sandy, w/gravel and calcareous particles. (Alluvium) (C) IMESTNE, very hard, dark gray, w/fossils, intermixed shale seams and layers, and discontinuities. ateral Deviator % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 87 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 61 PP = 1.0 tsf % Passing No. 4 Sieve: 89 % Passing No. 200 Sieve: 67 REC = 65%, RQD = 38% (0.25) 50 (0.25) REC = 98%, RQD = 57% (0.5) 50 (0) Remarks: Boring was advanced to the 5 ft depth using dry drilling procedures and groundwater was not encountered above that depth. Below 5 ft, the boring was advanced to the 15.1 ft depth using wet drilling procedures. 24 hours after completion of the bor ehole, the waterlevel (drilling fluid) was measured at the 0.7 ft depth. Northing: , Easting: Driller: Terra Testing ogger: Fugro Consultants, Inc. rganization: Fugro Consultants, Inc. C:\Documents and Settings\JohnsonA\My Documents\NTE\Segment 3B Wincore and PDF ogs\nte, Segment 3B.clg
APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION
Figure B-5.7 Figure B-5.8 Preliminary Geotechnical and Environmental Report Appendix C Hydrogeologic Investigation APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION December 21, 2011 WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION PROJECT
More informationB-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.
N B-1 SYMBOLS: Exploratory Boring Location Project Mngr: BORE LOCATION PLAN Project No. GK EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G1063.02 GK Scale: Checked By: 1045 Central Parkway North, Suite 103 San Antonio, Texas 78232
More informationProject: ITHACA-TOMPKINS REGIONAL AIRPORT EXPANSION Project Location: ITHACA, NY Project Number: 218-34 Key to Soil Symbols and Terms TERMS DESCRIBING CONSISTENCY OR CONDITION COARSE-GRAINED SOILS (major
More informationCivil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx
2365 Haggerty Road South * Canton, Michigan 48188 P: 734-397-3100 * F: 734-397-3131 * www.manniksmithgroup.com August 29, 2012 Mr. Richard Kent Washtenaw County Parks and Recreation Commission 2330 Platt
More informationGEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN EFFORT
GEOTECHNIEK MILIEU ONDERZOEK FUGRO CONSULTANTS, INC. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN EFFORT CSJ: NTE 4 HIGHWAY: IH 820 FROM RANDOL MILL ROAD TO WEST PIPELINE ROAD AND SH 121 FROM
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Bridge D Bridge Crossing: South 209 th West Avenue Creek County, Oklahoma June 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04155197 Prepared for: Garver, LLC Tulsa,
More informationB-1 SURFACE ELEVATION
5A 5B LOGGED BY El. S. Bhangoo DRILLING CONTRACTOR Pitcher Drilling DRILLING METHOD Rotary Wash BEGIN DATE 12-14-12 SAMPLER TYPE(S) AND SIZE(S) (ID) SPT, MC BOREHOLE BACKFILL AND COMPLETION COMPLETION
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Bridge B Bridge Crossing: South 257 th West Avenue Creek County, Oklahoma June 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04155197 Prepared for: Garver, LLC Tulsa,
More informationProject No: 68R3056 Client: City of Frederick Project: RFQ 14-H Future North Side Water Tank City/State: 7516 Hayward Road, Frederick, MD
Boring: SB-1 (1 of 1) Moist, brown to orange brown CLAY and SILT, trace sand with fine weathered rock fragments. POSSIBLE FILL. Dry, orange brown sandy SILT trace clay (SM-ML). RESIDUAL SOIL : Not Surveyed
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Polecat Creek Bridge (Bridge A) June 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04155197 Prepared for: Garver, LLC Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. TABLE
More informationPhoto 1 - Southerly view across 2700 parking lot toward existing building. Multi-residential building borders western side of property in upper right of view. Photo 2 - Southerly view across 2750 parking
More informationDATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS
DATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS SUBMITTED TO PORT OF GALVESTON 123 ROSENBERG AVENUE, 8TH FLOOR GALVESTON, TEXAS 77553 BY HVJ ASSOCIATES, INC. HOUSTON,
More informationArdaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants
SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION 42-INCH FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT CHIQUITA BOULEVARD S AND SW 34 TH STREET CAPE CORAL, LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials
More informationGeotechnical Data Report
Geotechnical Data Report Downtown Greenville Future Conveyance Study December 1, 2015 Terracon Project No. 86155032 Prepared for: Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. December 1, 2015 561 Mauldin Road
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Study, Conifer Senior High School Football Field Improvements, Conifer, Colorado
2390 South Lipan Street Denver, CO 80223 phone: (303) 742-9700 fax: (303) 742-9666 email: kadenver@kumarusa.com www.kumarusa.com Office Locations: Denver (HQ), Colorado Springs, Fort Collins, and Frisco,
More informationM E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI
M E M O R A N D U M TO: FROM: Mr. Mark Schilling Gulf Interstate Engineering Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI DATE: November 11, 2014 RE: Summary of Findings Geotechnical
More informationReport of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration. CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. February, 2011
11242843_GeoTech_Preliminary - Feburary 2011_1/40 Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio February, 2011 11242843_GeoTech_Preliminary -
More informationTP-1 N61E 0 DARK BROWN SANDY SILT (ML) stiff, wet with roots (Disturbed Surficial Soil) DEPTH (FEET) 5 REDDISH BROWN SANDSTONE intensely fractured, weak to friable, deeply weathered, tight (Franciscan
More informationArdaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants
SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE HENDRY COUNTY, FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants OFFICES Orlando, 88 S. Orange Avenue, Orlando,
More informationArdaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants
SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LELY AREA STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (LASIP) COUNTY BARN ROAD AND WING SOUTH CHANNELS NAPLES, COLLIER CO., FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc.
More informationATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY
ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY Kevin M. Martin, P.E. KMM Geotechnical Consultants, LLC 7 Marshall Road Hampstead, NH 0384 603-489-6 (p)/ 603-489-8 (f)/78-78-4084(m) kevinmartinpe@aol.com
More informationAPPENDIX E SOILS TEST REPORTS
Otsego County, NY Site Work Specifications APPENDIX E SOILS TEST REPORTS Blue Wing Services, Inc. July 1, 2010 Blue Wing Services May 20, 2010 Page 2 the site, was not made available to Empire at this
More informationAN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY
CTL Engineering, Inc. 2860 Fisher Road, P.O. Box 4448, Columbus, Ohio 43204338 Phone: 614/2768123 Fax: 614/2766377 Email: ctl@ctleng.com AN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY Consulting Engineers Testing Inspection
More informationSITE INVESTIGATION 1
SITE INVESTIGATION 1 Definition The process of determining the layers of natural soil deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical properties is generally referred to as site investigation.
More informationDrilled Shaft Foundations in Limestone. Dan Brown, P.E., Ph.D. Dan Brown and Associates
Drilled Shaft Foundations in Limestone Dan Brown, P.E., Ph.D. Dan Brown and Associates Foundation Engineering How we teach our students Fundamental understanding of soil and rock behavior (good!) Focus
More informationLimited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Classroom Additions Albany County Campus Laramie, Wyoming
Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Classroom Additions Albany County Campus 2300 Missile Drive, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 Phone 307-635-0222 www.stratageotech.com Limited Geotechnical Engineering
More informationINVITATION TO BID CITY OF CAPE CORAL SW 6&7 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT VII CENTRAL AREA 6 AND CENTRAL AREA 8 ITB UT13-02/TM-G
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT INVITATION TO BID CITY OF CAPE CORAL SW 6&7 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT VII CENTRAL AREA 6 AND CENTRAL AREA 8 ITB UT13-02/TM-G City of Cape Coral Procurement Division 1015
More informationREPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY HULBERT 69 KV SWITCHING STATION S. 440 Road Hulbert, Cherokee County, Oklahoma ENERCON PROJECT NO. GRDA006 MARCH 7, 2012 PREPARED FOR: C/O ENERCON
More informationJim Christal Rd B2 B1 B3
Jim Christal Rd B1 B2 B3 KEY O YMBOL AND ERM LIHOLOGIC YMBOL Asphalt ARIFICIAL Aggregate Base Concrete Fill CH: High Plasticity Clay CL: Low Plasticity Clay Consistency Very oft oft Medium tiff tiff Very
More informationAPPENDIX C. Borehole Data
APPENDIX C Borehole Data MAJOR DIVISIONS SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART SYMBOLS GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS ADDITIONAL MATERIAL
More informationJune 9, R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western Region PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON
PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED MARTIN RIVER BRIDGE MILE 306.7 MACKENZIE HIGHWAY Submitted by : R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western
More informationGeneral. DATE December 10, 2013 PROJECT No TO Mary Jarvis Urbandale/Riverside South Development Corporation
DATE December 10, 201 PROJECT No. 10-1121-0260- TO Mary Jarvis Urbandale/Riverside South Development Corporation CC Justin Robitaille, Urbandale Jonathan Párraga, J.L. Richards & Associates Limited FROM
More informationPreliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Gooseberry Point Pedestrian Improvements Whatcom County, Washington SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
File No. 12-100 Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering Consultants Mr. Kevin Brown, P.E. Gray & Osborne, Inc. 3710 168 th Street NE, Suite B210 Arlington, Washington 98223 Subject: Draft Report Preliminary
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Richland Creek Trunk Sewer Greenville, South Carolina March 31, 2014 Terracon Project No. 86145008 Prepared for: Renewable Water Resources Greenville, South Carolina Prepared
More informationChapter 12 Subsurface Exploration
Page 12 1 Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration 1. The process of identifying the layers of deposits that underlie a proposed structure and their physical characteristics is generally referred to as (a) subsurface
More informationCalibration of Resistance Factors for Drilled Shafts for the 2010 FHWA Design Method
Calibration of Resistance Factors for Drilled Shafts for the 21 FHWA Design Method Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh, Ph.D., P.E. Qiming Chen, Ph.D., P.E. Md Nafiul Haque, MS Feb 2, 213 213 Louisiana Transportation
More informationField Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E:
March 31, 201 11 Northstar Avenue 83301 Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E: taa@jub.com Re: Geotechnical Data Report Preliminary Phase 1 Field Exploration Revision No. 1 Proposed Rapid Infiltration Basin
More informationThe process of determining the layers of natural soil deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical properties is generally
The process of determining the layers of natural soil deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical properties is generally referred to as sub surface investigation 2 1 For proper
More informationS E C T I O N 1 2 P R O D U C T S E L E C T I O N G U I D E - H E L I C A L S C R E W P I L E F O U N D A T I O N S
1. P R O D U C T S E L E C T I O N G U I D E - H E L I C A L S C R E W P I L E F O U N D A T I O N S Helical foundation pile includes a lead and extension(s). The lead section is made of a central steel
More informationENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods
ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods Geotechnical Involvement in Project Phases Planning Design Alternatives Preparation of Detailed Plans Final Design
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report SH-9 Bridge over Wewoka Creek Hughes County, Oklahoma Job Piece No. 27059(04) July 16, 2015 Terracon Project No. 04125055 Prepared for: Holloway, Updike, and Bellen, Inc.
More informationCITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH 2 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT 3
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT City of Cape Coral Procurement Division Cultural Park Boulevard, nd Floor Cape Coral, FL ISSUED FOR BID VOLUME of GEOTECHNICAL
More informationPREDICTING SOIL SUCTION PROFILES USING PREVAILING WEATHER
PREDICTING SOIL SUCTION PROFILES USING PREVAILING WEATHER Ronald F. Reed, P.E. Member, ASCE rreed@reed-engineering.com Reed Engineering Group, Ltd. 2424 Stutz, Suite 4 Dallas, Texas 723 214-3-6 Abstract
More informationGEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT FOR STATIC TEST FACILITY FOR PROPELLANTS AT BDL, IBRAHIMPATNAM. Graphics Designers, M/s Architecture & Engineering 859, Banjara Avenue, Consultancy
More informationNAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (APF) TAXIWAY D REALIGNMENT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS NORTH QUADRANT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO March, The following Addendum is hereby made a part of the Plans
More informationGeotechnical Subsurface Exploration, Engineering Evaluation and Dam Visual Observation Sun Valley Drive Extension Roswell, Fulton County, GA
Ranger Consulting, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental, Drilling, Construction 3147 Martha Berry Highway, Rome, Georgia 165; Phone: 76-29-1782; Fax: 76-29-171 April 2, 215 Mr. Tommy Crochet, PE McGee Partners,
More informationPreliminary Geotechnical Investigation Cadiz / Trigg County I-24 Business Park. Cadiz, Kentucky
Environmental & Geoscience, LLC 834 Madisonville Road Hopkinsville, KY 440 70.44.000 FAX 70.44.8300 www.wedrill.com A member of Trinity Energy & Infrastructure Group, LLC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
More informationDepth (ft) USCS Soil Description TOPSOIL & FOREST DUFF
Test Pit No. TP-6 Location: Latitude 47.543003, Longitude -121.980441 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 1,132 feet Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description 0 1.5 1.5 5.0 SM 5.0 8.0 SM Loose to medium dense,
More informationNorthern Colorado Geotech
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PROPOSED CECIL FARMS DEVELOPMENT WELD COUNTY ROAD 7, BETWEEN ROADS 7 AND 7 SEVERANCE, COLORADO NORTHERN COLORADO GEOTECH PROJECT NO. 0-6 APRIL 0, 06 Prepared
More informationSOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT. PROPOSED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Coral Spring, Trelawny, Jamaica.
SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT PROPOSED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Coral Spring, Trelawny, Jamaica. Prepared for: FCS Consultants 7a Barbados Avenue Kingston 5, Jamaica Prepared by: NHL Engineering Limited
More informationGeotechnical Aspects of the Seismic Update to the ODOT Bridge Design Manual. Stuart Edwards, P.E Geotechnical Consultant Workshop
Geotechnical Aspects of the Seismic Update to the ODOT Bridge Design Manual Stuart Edwards, P.E. 2017 Geotechnical Consultant Workshop Changes Role of Geotechnical Engineer Background Methodology Worked
More informationPRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. State College Redevelopment State College Borough, Centre County, Pennsylvania. CMT Laboratories File No.
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT State College Redevelopment State College Borough, Centre County, Pennsylvania CMT Laboratories File No. 1638700 Prepared for: National Development Council One Battery Park
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Single-Span Bridge North Western Road & Hall of Fame Avenue August 25, 2015 Terracon Project No. 03155156 Prepared for: Olsson Associates Prepared by: Terracon Consultants,
More informationAppendix G GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION
Appendix G GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION JOB NUMBER: 3268.001 DATE: 10-14-13 BY: CC SITE 0 2000 1"=2000' VICINITY MAP CARGILL PARCEL HICKORY STREET AND ENTERPRISE DRIVE NEWARK, CALIFORNIA FOR
More informationADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON
F I N A L A D D E N D U M 1 R E P O R T ADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION URS JOB NO. 3376186 Prepared for Tetra Tech Inc. 142
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Subsurface Exploration The Proposed LAPLAWD Phase 2B 12 Main Water Line Durango, Colorado
July, La Plata Archuleta Water District c/o Harris Water Engeerg, P.E. East nd Avenue, Suite Durango, Colorado brett@durangowater.com PN: GE Subject: Geotechnical Engeerg Subsurface Exploration The Proposed
More informationDeep Foundations 2. Load Capacity of a Single Pile
Deep Foundations 2 Load Capacity of a Single Pile All calculations of pile capacity are approximate because it is almost impossible to account for the variability of soil types and the differences in the
More informationNEW DOWN-HOLE PENETROMETER (DHP-CIGMAT) FOR CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS
NEW DOWN-HOLE PENETROMETER (DHP-CIGMAT) FOR CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS 1 2 C. Vipulanandan 1, Ph.D., M. ASCE and Omer F. Usluogullari 2 Chairman, Professor, Director of Center for Innovative Grouting Materials
More informationPRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT. Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts. Prepared For:
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts Prepared For: Meridian Associates, Inc. 500 Cummings Center, Suite 5950 Beverly, Massachusetts
More informationH.1 SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHY AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES (DATA PACKAGE)
DRAFT ONONDAGA LAKE CAPPING AND DREDGE AREA AND DEPTH INITIAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL H.1 SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHY AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES (DATA PACKAGE) Parsons P:\Honeywell -SYR\444576 2008 Capping\09
More informationCalculations. Conceptual Cofferdam. Prepared for. LAN - Austin. August Briarpark Drive Suite 400 Houston, Texas 77042
Calculations Conceptual Cofferdam Prepared for - Austin August 0 9 Briarpark Drive Suite 00 Houston, Texas 770 Contents Cofferdam Design Report. Cofferdam Conceptual Design Summary.... Analysis Drawings...
More informationR-1 Conveyor Relocation Project Legend 0 500 1000 1500 ft. This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for general reference only. Data layers that appear on this map
More informationGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT BRIDGE OVER BIG CREEK APPROXIMATELY.8 MILES EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF COUNTY ROAD EW1546 AND COUNTY ROAD 193 LEFLORE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA PROJECT No. J2-8616(5),
More informationGeotechnical Data Report
Geotechnical Data Report Emergency Bridge Package 6 Richland County, South Carolina May 12, 2016 SCDOT Project ID.: P029942, P029943, P029944 Terracon Project No. 73100L (Rev. 1) Prepared for: South Carolina
More informationGeotechnical Data Report
Geotechnical Data Report ReWa Solar Farm at Durbin Creek Fountain Inn, South Carolina September 1, 2017 Terracon Project No. 86165043 Prepared for: Renewable Water Resources Greenville, South Carolina
More informationGeotechnical Investigation Juneau Seawalk - Taku Fisheries to Miner s Wharf Juneau, Alaska DM&A Job No
Duane Miller & Associates 5821 Arctic Boulevard, Suite A Anchorage, AK 99518-1654 (907) 644-3200 Fax 644-0507 Arctic & Geotechnical Engineering May 4, 2006 Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. 1971 First Avenue Seattle,
More informationDRILLED DISPLACMENT PILE PERFORMANCE IN COASTAL PLAIN AND RESIDUAL SOILS
DRILLED DISPLACMENT PILE PERFORMANCE IN COASTAL PLAIN AND RESIDUAL SOILS Presented by: W. Morgan NeSmith, P.E. Berkel & Company Contractors Inc. 770.941.5100 mnesmith@berkelapg.com SC Engineering Conference
More informationGeotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Geotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: DATE: June 28, 218 PROJECT NUMBER: 697482
More informationGEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FLAT CREEK WASTEWATER INTERCEPTOR GARLIC CREEK FORCE MAIN WACO, TEXAS BUDA, TEXAS
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FLAT CREEK WASTEWATER INTERCEPTOR GARLIC CREEK FORCE MAIN WACO, TEXAS BUDA, TEXAS G. E. WALKER & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. LOCKWOOD, ANDREWS & NEWNAM, INC.
More informationLesson 25. Static Pile Load Testing, O-cell, and Statnamic. Reference Manual Chapter 18
Lesson 25 Static Pile Load Testing, O-cell, and Statnamic Reference Manual Chapter 18 STATIC LOAD TESTING Most accurate method to determine static pile capacity Perform at design or construction stage
More informationIN SITU TESTING TECHNOLOGY FOR FOUNDATION & EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING. Wesley Spang, Ph.D., P.E. AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc.
IN SITU TESTING TECHNOLOGY FOR FOUNDATION & EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING Wesley Spang, Ph.D., P.E. AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc. Portland, Oregon In situ testing of soil, which essentially consists of evaluating
More information14 Geotechnical Hazards
Volume 2: Assessment of Environmental Effects 296 14 Geotechnical Hazards Overview This Chapter provides an assessment of the underlying geotechnical conditions to identify: any potential liquefaction
More informationPLATE 6 FEB G r o v e l a n d F l o o d w a l l - B o r e h o l e M a p. Legend. Groveland Floodwall Boreholes. Contour Lines.
611 6 Defau FALS conto Conto DPLV lt Eurs20 01_to 3po Defau FALS conto Conto DPLV lt Eurs20 01_to 4po 612 Conto DPLV conto Defau FALS 01_to urs20 Elt po 5 Conto DPLV conto Defau FALS 01_to urs15 Elt po
More informationR.M.HARW & ASSOCIATES LTD. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED BRIDGE SITE. HELAVA CREEKl MILE MACKENZIE HIGHWAY E-2510 OCTOBER 16, 1973
El R.M.HARW & ASSOCIATES LTD. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED BRIDGE SITE HELAVA CREEKl MILE 616.4 MACKENZIE HIGHWAY E-2510 OCTOBER 16, 1973 R,M,HARDV & ASSOCIATES LTD. CONSULTING ENGINEERING & TESTING
More informationBoreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.
Implementation Boreholes 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3. Rotary Drilling Boring Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 4. Percussion Drilling The right choice of method depends on: Ground
More informationREPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION
REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION ENKA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL Sand Hill Road Candler, North Carolina Prepared For: BUNCOMBE COUNTY SCHOOLS Prepared By: AMEC ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
More informationGEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY
4.9 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY 4.9.1 Introduction Information about the geological conditions and seismic hazards in the study area was summarized in the FEIR, and was based on the Geotechnical Exploration
More informationChapter (11) Pile Foundations
Chapter (11) Introduction Piles are structural members that are made of steel, concrete, or timber. They are used to build pile foundations (classified as deep foundations) which cost more than shallow
More informationIN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION
IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION Nancy Case O Bourke, PE 1, Gregory L. Hartman, PE 2 and Paul Fuglevand, PE 3 ABSTRACT In-situ specific gravity
More information10 May Rod Walls - Director Facilities New Construction, Sustainability Hays CISD IH 35 Kyle, Texas 78640
10 May 2017 Rod Walls - Director Facilities New Construction, Sustainability Hays CISD 21003 IH 35 Kyle, Texas 78640 Re: Hays CISD Proposed ES15 Site, Buda Phase II Soil Sampling Dear Rod: Concern has
More informationREPORT NO 12/115/D NOVEMBER 2012 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC FACILITY, GROOTVLEI POWER STATION
Consulting Geotechnical Engineers & Engineering Geologists P.O.Box 3557 Cramerview 2060. Tel: (011) 465-1699. Fax: (011) 465-4586. Cell 082 556 7302 & 076 966 8445 REPORT NO 12/115/D NOVEMBER 2012 GEOTECHNICAL
More informationCHEROKEE NATION BUSINESSES, LLC
REPORT OF PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION PROPOSED CHEROKEE SPRINGS PLAZA TAHLEQUAH, OKLAHOMA BUILDING & EARTH PROJECT NO. OK10004 PREPARED FOR: CHEROKEE NATION BUSINESSES,
More informationRedwood City Harbor, California, Navigation Improvement Feasibility Study. Appendix D. Geotechnical Engineering. DRAFT April 2015
1 Redwood City Harbor, California, Navigation Improvement Feasibility Study Appendix D Geotechnical Engineering DRAFT April 2015 2 Contents 1 Purposes of Report... 3 2 Background... 3 3 References and
More informationA L A BA M A L A W R E V IE W
A L A BA M A L A W R E V IE W Volume 52 Fall 2000 Number 1 B E F O R E D I S A B I L I T Y C I V I L R I G HT S : C I V I L W A R P E N S I O N S A N D TH E P O L I T I C S O F D I S A B I L I T Y I N
More informationSHEET PILE WALLS. Mehdi Mokhberi Islamic Azad University
SHEET PILE WALLS Mehdi Mokhberi Islamic Azad University Lateral Support In geotechnical engineering, it is often necessary to prevent lateral soil movements. Tie rod Anchor Sheet pile Cantilever retaining
More informationSlope Stability Evaluation Ground Anchor Construction Area White Point Landslide San Pedro District Los Angeles, California.
Slope Stability Evaluation Ground Anchor Construction Area White Point Landslide San Pedro District Los Angeles, California Submitted To: Mr. Gene Edwards City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works
More informationGeotechnical Aspects of the Ohio River Bridges Project
Geotechnical Aspects of the Ohio River Bridges Project Mark A. Litkenhus, PE Sr. Geotechnical Engineer Stephen H. Bickel, PE Sr. Geotechnical Engineer STGEC Ohio River Bridges at Louisville Geotechnical
More informationAPPENDIX A. Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols
APPENDIX A Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols Page 153 of 168 EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS The terms and symbols used on the borehole logs to summarize the results of field investigation
More informationPRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT TOWN OF ASHLAND TOWN HALL 101 THOMPSON STREET ASHLAND, VIRGINIA JOB NUMBER: 39016 PREPARED FOR: PMA PLANNERS & ARCHITECTS 10325 WARWICK BOULEVARD NEWPORT NEWS,
More information10. GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION PROGRAM
Geotechnical site investigations should be conducted in multiple phases to obtain data for use during the planning and design of the tunnel system. Geotechnical investigations typically are performed in
More informationSOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART COARSE-GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% RETAINED ON NO.200 SIEVE FINE-GRAINED SOILS 50% OR MORE PASSES THE NO.200 SIEVE PRIMARY DIVISIONS GRAVELS MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED
More informationCONQUEST ENGINEERING LTD.
CONQUEST ENGINEERING LTD. Geotechnical and Materials Engineers Concrete Technology, Blasting Consultants Construction Quality Assurance / Quality Control 8 Bluewater Road, Bedford, NS BB J6 Phone (9)85-7
More informationReport of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for Ponds
Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for Ponds Malabar Road (SR 514) PD&E Study From East of Babcock Street (SR 507) to US 1 Brevard County, Florida FPID:
More informationDecember 5, Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 Los Angeles, CA Mr. James Frost P: Dear Mr.
December 5, 2014 Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 90046 Attn: Re: Mr. James Frost P: 323.883.1800 Geotechnical Update Letter Sunset & Effie Mixed Use Development 4301 to 4311 Sunset
More informationEFFECTIVENESS OF HYDROFRACTURE PREDICTION FOR HDD DESIGN
North American Society for Trenchless Technology (NASTT) No-Dig Show 2010 Chicago, Illinois May 2-7, 2010 Paper F-1-01 EFFECTIVENESS OF HYDROFRACTURE PREDICTION FOR HDD DESIGN Kimberlie Staheli, Ph.D.,
More informationBR-01 PAINT BRIDGE NO. 55 C GENERAL PLAN 720'-0" VC 605'-0" VC 1. FOR INDEX TO PLANS, QUANTITIES, AND GENERAL NOTES, SEE "INDEX TO PLANS" SHEET.
2'-" VC 6'-" VC BB EB 1 1 1 1 1 TV - " TV CONDUITS (COX E 8 - " ELECTRIC CONDUITS (SDG & E T - " TELEPHONE CONDUITS 1. FOR INDEX TO PLANS, QUANTITIES, AND GENERAL NOTES, SEE "INDEX TO PLANS" SHEET. 2.
More informationLEGEND ODOT CLASS A-3. A-3a. A-4a. A-6a. A-6b TOTAL VISUAL VISUAL VISUAL BORING LOCATION - PLAN VIEW
PROJECT THE PROJECT CONSISTS IN PART OF CONSTRUCTING A SINGLE-SPAN BRIDGE ON RELOCATED SHUMWAY HOOW ROAD OVER THE CSXT RAILROAD. THE STRUCTURE AS ANNED, IS A SINGLE-SPAN STRUCTURE WITH MSE WAS AT THE ABUTMENTS.
More informationENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
July 16, 211 Vista Design, Inc. 11634 Worcester Highway Showell, Maryland 21862 Attention: Reference: Dear Mr. Polk: Mr. Richard F. Polk, P.E. Geotechnical Engineering Report Charles County RFP No. 11-9
More informationADSC Research Project Update: Rock Sockets in the Southeastern U.S.
ADSC Research Project Update: Rock Sockets in the Southeastern U.S. W. Robert Thompson, III, P.E., D.GE, M.ASCE 1 ABSTRACT The bearing capacity of drilled shafts in rock has traditionally been assessed
More informationFINAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BURNS BRIDGE REPLACEMENT COLORADO RIVER ROAD BURNS, COLORADO. December 12, 2012
FINAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BURNS BRIDGE REPLACEMENT COLORADO RIVER ROAD BURNS, COLORADO December 12, 2012 Prepared For: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure 2000 South Colorado Boulevard, Suite 21000
More information