Geotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project
|
|
- Moris Bond
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Geotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: DATE: June 28, 218 PROJECT NUMBER: Mobile Area Water and Sewer System (MAWSS) CH2M HILL Engineers, Inc. (CH2M) Revised July 23, 218 The existing site contains a 12-million-gallon (MG) Severe Weather Attenuation Tank (SWAT) and ancillary structures. The major components of the addition are as follows: Two 12-MG SWATs 24-foot diameter pre-stressed concrete tank manufactured by CROM or Precon on 18-inch-thick foundation and 4 6 thick membrane concrete floor slab Generator facility 3-foot-by-1-foot rigid heavily reinforced 18-inch-thick mat foundation Electrical building 37-foot-by-14-foot reinforced slab-on-grade with thickened edges on 7-inchthick foundation Lift station valve vault 32-foot-by-14-foot rigid heavily reinforced 18-inch-thick mat foundation Pump station 48-foot by-27-foot rigid heavily reinforced 3-inch-thick mat foundation Diversion box 25-foot-by-24-foot rigid heavily reinforced 2-inch-thick mat foundation Soil and groundwater conditions used in the foundation settlement evaluation were obtained from two geotechnical data reports provided by Southern Earth Sciences, dated May 11, 216 and May 18, 218. Existing ground surface elevations, structure floor and foundation bottom elevations, and estimated foundation bearing loads were provided by the structural designer. Jacobs used the computer program Settle 3D to evaluate foundation settlement, and allowable bearing capacity was evaluated based on Terzaghi and Vesic Methods. The results are presented in Table 1. Table 1. Soil Settlement at Estimated Bearing Load Structure Estimated Bearing Load Modeled Bearing Capacity* Total Settlement Immediate Settlement Long-term Settlement SWAT Tank #2 2,75 psf 3 psf 5. in. 2.5 in. 2.5 in. a SWAT Tank #3 2,75 psf 3 psf 1. in. 1. in. N/A Generator Facility 45 psf 5 psf.25 in..25 in. N/A Electrical Building 75 psf 1 psf.25 in..25 in. N/A Lift Station Valve Vault 5 psf 5 psf.5 in..25 in..25 in. BI PNS 1
2 GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROPOSED ADDITIONS TO THE THREE MILE CREEK SEVERE WEATHER ATTENUATION TANK PROJECT Table 1. Soil Settlement at Estimated Bearing Load Structure Estimated Bearing Load Modeled Bearing Capacity* Total Settlement Immediate Settlement Long-term Settlement Pump Station 2,35 psf 3 psf 1. in..25 in..75 in. Diversion Box 1,75 psf 2 psf..75 in..5 in..25 in. a SWAT Tank #2 is underlain by compressible clay soil on the approximate south half of the footprint. The immediate sand settlement will occur during construction. A long-term clay settlement of 2.5 in. is expected, resulting in a differential settlement of 2.5 in. The tank settlements were based on foundation loading conditions with tanks continuously filled with water. *Modeled bearing capacity has a FS of at least 3 on bearing capacity failure. in. = inches N/A = not applicable psf = pounds per square foot For the Generator Facility, Electrical Building, Lift Station Valve Vault and Diversion Box slabs-on-grade (i.e., mat foundation) design a modulus of subgrade reaction for a 1-foot-square plate K 1 of 15 tcf (tons/ft 3 ) is recommended. For the Pump Station slab-on-grade design a modulus of subgrade reaction for a 1-foot-square plate K 1 of 25 tcf is recommended due to the presence of compressible silt below the foundation. The modulus of subgrade reaction should be adjusted as follows to account for the difference in size between the plate and the actual foundation: Where: KK SS = KK BB 2LL 1.5 K s = Adjusted modulus of subgrade reaction (tcf) for a square footing K 1 = Modulus of subgrade reaction for a 1-foot-square plate in tcf B = Width of mat/raft foundation (feet) L = Length of mat/raft foundation (feet) Shallow compressible clay soils were encountered between and 5 feet depth in the cone sounding performed for the Generator Facility and Electrical Building. Jacobs recommends over-excavating all soil to a 5-foot depth and to 5 feet beyond these structure s perimeter. Also, compressible clay soils are expected at the Lift Station Valve Vault foundation bearing level. Jacobs recommends over-excavating all soil to a 2-foot depth below bottom of foundation and to foundation perimeter. These over-excavations should be filled with Structural Backfill as defined in the specifications. A factor of safety (FS) against uplift was evaluated for four structures that will have foundations below the 1-year flood elevation of +12 feet North American Vertical datum of 1988 (NAVD88). The results are summarized in Table 2. Table 2. Factor of Safety Against Uplift Evaluation Structure Case 1: Fully Constructed, Backfilled Sides, and Filled with Water Case 2: Fully Constructed, Backfilled Sides, and No Water Inside Case 3: During Construction Phase, Open Excavation, No Water, and No Backfill SWAT FS = 8.7 FS =.87 FS =.81 Lift Station Valve Vault FS = 2.28 N/A FS = 1.9 Pump Station FS = 1.77 FS = 1.29 FS = BI PNS
3 GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROPOSED ADDITIONS TO THE THREE MILE CREEK SEVERE WEATHER ATTENUATION TANK PROJECT Table 2. Factor of Safety Against Uplift Evaluation Structure Case 1: Fully Constructed, Backfilled Sides, and Filled with Water Case 2: Fully Constructed, Backfilled Sides, and No Water Inside Case 3: During Construction Phase, Open Excavation, No Water, and No Backfill Diversion Box FS = 1.83 FS = 1.24 FS = 1.24 The normal operation of the SWATs is to be empty; therefore, Case 2 would be the controlling condition. The structural engineer will specify hydrostatic pressure relief means. Lateral earth pressures imposed by soil backfill for permanent walls of SWATs, Lift Station Valve Vault, Pump Station, and Diversion Box can be evaluated using soil with an equivalent fluid unit weight. These unit weights have been established for above (drained) and below (undrained) groundwater level conditions. Jacobs recommends that the backfill behind walls be Structural Fill placed and compacted in accordance with the specifications. An assumed soil unit weight of 115 pcf and phi of 35 degrees was used in the calculations. The results are presented in Table 3. Table 3. Soil Equivalent Fluid Unit Weights Earth Pressure Coefficient Above Groundwater Level (Drained) (pcf) Below Groundwater Level (Undrained) (pcf) At-rest (Ko =.43) Active (Ka =.24) Passive (Kp = 3.7) psf = pounds per cubic foot Surcharge loads from temporary construction equipment or permanent structures should be added to the lateral earth pressure as an equivalent height of 2 feet of additional soil at 12 pcf unit weight. For earthquake risk evaluation, this project would be classified as Site Class D. The estimated peak ground acceleration (PGA) is.49 g. BI PNS 1-3
4 Mobile Office 546 Rangeline Road Mobile, AL Tel: (251) Fax: (251) Geotechnical, Environmental & Construction Materials Testing MOBILE AREA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM c\o CH2M 25 W. Cedar Street, Suite 56 Pensacola, FL 3252 May 11, 216 ATTENTION: Mr. David Stejskai, P.E. REFERENCE: Geotechnical Data Report Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Basin (SWAB) Project Mobile, AL SESI Project No: M Dear Mr. Stejskai: Southern Earth Sciences, Inc (SESI) has completed the authorized scope of drilling and laboratory testing services for the referenced project. This report presents a summary of our findings. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions. Sincerely, SOUTHERN EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Matt Reeves Matt Coaker, P.E. Project Engineer Registered, Alabama 3835 MR/MC/ja Attachments MOBILE MONTGOMERY SUMMERDALE DESTIN PANAMA CITY TALLAHASSEE BATON ROUGE MANDEVILLE NEW ORLEANS
5 MOBILE AREA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM c\o CH2M Geotechnical Data Report Three Mile Creek SWAB Project SESI Project Number: M May 11, Geological Setting Field Investigation Laboratory Testing Subsurface Conditions Groundwater TABLE General Comments APPENDIX 1 Test Location Plan APPENDIX 2 SPT Boring Logs APPENDIX 3 Laboratory Test Data APPENDIX 4 Grain Size Distribution Graphs APPENDIX 5 Standard Proctor Density Graphs ii
6 MOBILE AREA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM c\o CH2M Geotechnical Data Report Three Mile Creek SWAB Project SESI Project Number: M May 11, GEOLOGICAL SETTING The project is located inside the Coastal Plain Province and is overlain by Tertiary deposits which are part of the Pliocene Series. These deposits are part of the Citronelle Formation and are generally up to about 2 feet thick. These soils are described as gravelly sands and sandy clays. In many areas, lenses of sandy clay and clayey sand, which range in thickness from 5 to 15 feet, are interbedded with gravelly sand. Sediments along the base of the Citronelle Formation have high clay content, indicating that they were deposited in an estuarine environment; whereas overlying sediments were deposited by sediment laden streams (Isphording and Lamb, 1971).The underlain soils in this region are considered part of the Miocene Series. The Miocene Series consist of thin-bedded to massive fine to coarse quartz sand, gravelly sand, thin-bedded to massive clay and sandy clay; clays are plastic in part. The gravel in this formation is composed of quartz and chert granules and pebbles. Locally, the upper part of the unit is Pliocene in age (Geological Survey of Alabama Special Map 22, 1988). 2. FIELD INVESTIGATION As requested, seven (7) soil borings with Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed across the site. Test locations were performed at the locations as outlined in the preliminary boring plan. The exception was B-7, where it had to be offset to an accessible location due to difficult terrain and underground utilities. A Test Location Plan showing the approximate locations is attached in Appendix 1. Soil sampling and penetration testing were performed in general accordance with ASTM D 1586 using flight auger and mud rotary drilling techniques. SPT borings were advanced to depths of approximately 51.5 feet below existing ground surface. At regular intervals during the process the drill rods were removed and soil samples were obtained with a standard 2 inch split tube sampler. Representative portions of soil samples obtained during the investigation were transported to our laboratory where they were examined by an engineer and classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Soil descriptions, boring depths and penetration resistances are shown on the appropriate Soil Boring Log sheets attached in Appendix
7 MOBILE AREA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM c\o CH2M Geotechnical Data Report Three Mile Creek SWAB Project SESI Project Number: M May 11, LABORATORY TESTING Soil samples were transported to SESI s laboratory where they were visually classified by an engineer. Daft boring logs were sent for your review and your geotechnical engineer to select samples for testing. Lab testing consisted of Moisture Content Determinations (ASTM D 2216), Grain Size Analysis (ASTM D 422), Soil Plasticity Tests - Atterberg Limits Tests (ASTM D 4318) and Standard Proctor Density (ASTM D 698). Laboratory test results are presented on the appropriate Soil Boring Log, as well as on the Laboratory Test Data sheet in Appendix SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Beneath a varying thickness of topsoil (1 to 18 inches), soils within the upper 1 feet consist of soft silts and clays and loose clayey sands, underlain by sands with varying density and silt content extending to the termination of the investigated depths. All reference to depths has been made with respect from existing ground surface. 5. GROUNDWATER To accurately determine static groundwater, three (3) piezometers were installed across the site at test locations B-1, 5 and 6 for obtaining delayed measurement over next several weeks. Table 1 below presents the date measured and depth for each respective piezometer location. TABLE 1 PEIZOMETER READINGS Piezometer Location Date Depth Below Existing Ground Surface (ft.) 4/12/ B-1 B-5 B-6 4/16/ /25/ /12/ /16/ /25/ /12/ /16/ /25/
8 MOBILE AREA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM c\o CH2M Geotechnical Data Report Three Mile Creek SWAB Project SESI Project Number: M May 11, 216 Fluctuation in the level of the groundwater table will occur due to variances in rainfall, drainage, types of soil present and other factors not evident at the time measurements were made. Detailed descriptions of soils encountered at each test location are shown on the appropriate Soil Boring Log attached in Appendix 2. All reference to depth has been made with respect to the existing ground surface. Groundwater levels should be verified prior to construction. 6. GENERAL COMMENTS While the soil test borings are representative of subsurface conditions at their respective locations and for their respective vertical reaches, local variations in the subsurface materials are anticipated and may be encountered. The delineation between soil types shown on the logs is approximate and the description represents our interpretation of subsurface conditions at the designated boring location and on the particular date drilled. This report is exclusively for the use and benefit of the addressee(s) identified on the first page of this report and is not for the use or benefit of, nor may it be relied upon by any other person or entity. The contents of this report may not be quoted in whole or in part or distributed to any person or entity other than the addressee(s) hereof without, in each case, advanced written consent
9 MOBILE AREA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM c\o CH2M Geotechnical Data Report Three Mile Creek SWAB Project SESI Project Number: M May 11, 216 APPENDIX 1 Test Location Plan
10
11 MOBILE AREA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM c\o CH2M Geotechnical Data Report Three Mile Creek SWAB Project SESI Project Number: M May 11, 216 APPENDIX 2 SPT Boring Logs
12 BORING NO.: B-1 PROJECT: THREE MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION: MOBILE, AL BORING LOCATION: SEE TEST LOCATION PLAN DATE DRILLED: 4/7/16 WATER LEVEL: 26.8 ft GEOL / ENGR: M. REEVES Elevation / Depth Soil Symbols Sampler Symbols and Field Test Data USCS SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT NO.: M METHOD: AUGER/WASH BORING ELEVATION: EXISTING GROUND DATE COMPLETED: 4/7/16 WATER LEVEL DATE: 4/25/16 DRILLER: D. GARDNER Description SPT N NM % Page 1 of 1 LL % 2 % 1 2/6 2/6 1/6 2/6 1/6 2/6 2/6 2/6 1/6 2/6 ML SC TOPSOIL Soft to Medium Red and Brown SILT Loose Orange Clayey SAND SP-SM Medium Orange and White SAND with some Silt GEOLOG L:\PROJECTS\JOB FOLDERS\216\ MILE CREEK SWAB\GINT\BORLOGS M GPJ SO_EARTH.GDT 5/13/ Remarks: N3.712 W SET PIEZOMETER 1/6 11/6 1/ /6 1 1 SP Medium to Dense White SAND
13 BORING NO.: B-2 PROJECT: THREE MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION: MOBILE, AL BORING LOCATION: SEE TEST LOCATION PLAN DATE DRILLED: 4/7/16 WATER LEVEL: 26.5 ft GEOL / ENGR: M. REEVES Elevation / Depth Soil Symbols Sampler Symbols and Field Test Data USCS SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT NO.: M METHOD: AUGER/WASH BORING ELEVATION: EXISTING GROUND DATE COMPLETED: 4/7/16 WATER LEVEL DATE: 4/12/16 DRILLER: D. GARDNER Description SPT N NM % Page 1 of 1 LL % 2 % 1 2/6 1/6 1/6 2/6 3/6 SM SC CL SM 6" TOPSOIL Loose Gray and Orange Silty SAND Very Loose Orange and Tan Clayey SAND Stiff Orange CLAY Loose Orange Silty SAND SP Medium to Loose Tan and White SAND SM Medium White Silty SAND GEOLOG L:\PROJECTS\JOB FOLDERS\216\ MILE CREEK SWAB\GINT\BORLOGS M GPJ SO_EARTH.GDT 5/13/ Remarks: N W /6 12/6 1 3/6 1/6 SP Loose to Medium White and Orange SAND
14 BORING NO.: B-3 PROJECT: THREE MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION: MOBILE, AL BORING LOCATION: SEE TEST LOCATION PLAN DATE DRILLED: 4/8/16 WATER LEVEL: 26.7 ft GEOL / ENGR: M. REEVES Elevation / Depth Soil Symbols Sampler Symbols and Field Test Data USCS SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT NO.: M METHOD: AUGER/WASH BORING ELEVATION: EXISTING GROUND DATE COMPLETED: 4/8/16 WATER LEVEL DATE: 4/12/16 DRILLER: D. GARDNER Description SPT N NM % Page 1 of 1 LL % 2 % 1 3/6 1/6 2/6 3/6 3/6 WOH/6 1/6 1/6 CL SC TOPSOIL Medium to Soft Orange and Tan CLAY Medium Tan and Orange Clayey SAND SM Medium White Silty SAND 11/ /6 19 SP Medium to Loose White, Yellow and Tan SAND GEOLOG L:\PROJECTS\JOB FOLDERS\216\ MILE CREEK SWAB\GINT\BORLOGS M GPJ SO_EARTH.GDT 5/13/ Remarks: N W /6 1/6 1/6 12/6 3/6 2/6 3/6 2/6 3/6 SM CL Loose Gray Silty SAND Medium Gray CLAY
15 BORING NO.: B-4 PROJECT: THREE MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION: MOBILE, AL BORING LOCATION: SEE TEST LOCATION PLAN DATE DRILLED: 4/7/16 WATER LEVEL: CAVED IN 4 FT GEOL / ENGR: M. REEVES Elevation / Depth Soil Symbols Sampler Symbols and Field Test Data USCS SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT NO.: M METHOD: AUGER/WASH BORING ELEVATION: EXISTING GROUND DATE COMPLETED: 4/7/16 WATER LEVEL DATE: 4/12/16 DRILLER: D. GARDNER Description SPT N NM % Page 1 of 1 LL % 2 % 1 2/6 2/6 2/6 2/6 1/6 3/6 SM SC-SM SM 6" TOPSOIL Very Loose Brown Silty SAND Very Loose to Medium Tan and Orange Clayey Silty SAND Loose to Medium White, Tan and Orange Silty SAND /6 21 GEOLOG L:\PROJECTS\JOB FOLDERS\216\ MILE CREEK SWAB\GINT\BORLOGS M GPJ SO_EARTH.GDT 5/13/ Remarks: N3.746 W /6 11/6 12/6 12/6 1/6 12/6 1 1 SP Medium to Dense White SAND
16 BORING NO.: B-5 PROJECT: THREE MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION: MOBILE, AL BORING LOCATION: SEE TEST LOCATION PLAN DATE DRILLED: 4/8/16 WATER LEVEL: 26.5 ft GEOL / ENGR: M. REEVES Elevation / Depth Soil Symbols Sampler Symbols and Field Test Data USCS SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT NO.: M METHOD: AUGER/WASH BORING ELEVATION: EXISTING GROUND DATE COMPLETED: 4/8/16 WATER LEVEL DATE: 4/25/16 DRILLER: D. GARDNER Description SPT N NM % Page 1 of 1 LL % 2 % 1 3/6 SC-SM SC SP-SM TOPSOIL Loose Tan and Orange Clayey Silty SAND Loose Tan and Orange Clayey SAND Loose to Medium Tan and White SAND with some Silt GEOLOG L:\PROJECTS\JOB FOLDERS\216\ MILE CREEK SWAB\GINT\BORLOGS M GPJ SO_EARTH.GDT 5/13/ Remarks: N3.789 W SET PEIZOMETER 1/6 1/6 2/6 1/6 2/6 2/6 2/6 3/6 3/6 SP SM Medium to Very Loose White and Orange SAND Very Loose to Loose Orange and Gray Silty SAND
17 BORING NO.: B-6 PROJECT: THREE MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION: MOBILE, AL BORING LOCATION: SEE TEST LOCATION PLAN DATE DRILLED: 4/11/16 WATER LEVEL: 26.8 ft GEOL / ENGR: M. REEVES Elevation / Depth Soil Symbols Sampler Symbols and Field Test Data USCS SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT NO.: M METHOD: AUGER/WASH BORING ELEVATION: EXISTING GROUND DATE COMPLETED: 4/11/16 WATER LEVEL DATE: 4/25/16 DRILLER: D. GARDNER Description SPT N NM % Page 1 of 1 LL % 2 % 1 2/6 3/6 1 11/6 1 11/6 1 2/6 SC CL SC TOPSOIL Medium Clayey SAND Stiff to Very Stiff Brown and Orange CLAY Medium White Clayey SAND SM Medium White Silty SAND 12/6 12/ GEOLOG L:\PROJECTS\JOB FOLDERS\216\ MILE CREEK SWAB\GINT\BORLOGS M GPJ SO_EARTH.GDT 5/13/ Remarks: N W SET PIEZOMETER 11/6 12/6 1 12/6 1 22/6 1 11/6 13/ SP-SM SP Medium White SAND with some Silt Medium to Very Dense White and Gray SAND
18 BORING NO.: B-7 PROJECT: THREE MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION: MOBILE, AL BORING LOCATION: SEE TEST LOCATION PLAN DATE DRILLED: 4/11/16 WATER LEVEL: CAVED IN 12.2 FT GEOL / ENGR: M. REEVES Elevation / Depth Soil Symbols Sampler Symbols and Field Test Data USCS SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT NO.: M METHOD: AUGER/WASH BORING ELEVATION: EXISTING GROUND DATE COMPLETED: 4/11/16 WATER LEVEL DATE: 4/12/16 DRILLER: D. GARDNER Description SPT N NM % Page 1 of 1 LL % 2 % 1 11/6 12/6 12/6 1/6 1/6 SM CL SM 1" TOPSOIL Medium Orange Silty SAND Very Stiff Orange CLAY Medium Orange,Tan and White Silty SAND / / GEOLOG L:\PROJECTS\JOB FOLDERS\216\ MILE CREEK SWAB\GINT\BORLOGS M GPJ SO_EARTH.GDT 5/13/ Remarks: N3.798 W /6 12/6 1 12/6 1 23/6 12/ /6 SP SM CL Medium to Very Dense White SAND Medium Orange and Gray Silty SAND Stiff Gray CLAY
19 MOBILE AREA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM c\o CH2M Geotechnical Data Report Three Mile Creek SWAB Project SESI Project Number: M May 11, 216 APPENDIX 3 Laboratory Test Data
20 Materials Testing Report Tabulated Data Sheet Client: MAWSS C/O CH2M Date: 4/29/16 Project: THREE MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT SESI Project No. M Boring No. Sample No. Sample Depth (ft) USCS Symbol Moisture Content (%) Atterberg Limits B-1 S ML B-1 S SC B-1 S SP-SM B-2 S CL B-2 S SP B-3 S CL B-3 S SP B-4 S SC-SM B-5 S SC B-5 S SP-SM B-6 S CL B-6 S SM B-7 S CL B-7 S SM LL PI Passing No. 2 (%) Page 1 of 1
21 MOBILE AREA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM c\o CH2M Geotechnical Data Report Three Mile Creek SWAB Project SESI Project Number: M May 11, 216 APPENDIX 4 Grain Size Distribution Graphs
22 Particle Size Distribution Report 1 6 in. 3 in. 2 in. 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #1 #2 #3 #6 #1 #14 # PERCENT FINER GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines % +3" Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay.1 TEST RESULTS Opening Percent Spec.* Pass? Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail) #2 #6 #14 # sandy silt Material Description Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= 16 LL= 19 PI= 3 Classification USCS (D 2487)= ML AASHTO (M 145)= A-4() Coefficients D 9 =.1757 D 85 =.1535 D 6 =.885 D 5 = D 3 = D 15 = D 1 = C u = C c = Remarks * (no specification provided) Sample Number: B-1 S-2 Depth: SOUTHERN EARTH SCIENCES Mobile, Alabama Client: Project: Project No: Date Received: Tested By: Checked By: MAWSS C/O CH2M 3 MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT M Title: Date Tested: Date Sampled: Figure
23 Particle Size Distribution Report 1 6 in. 3 in. 2 in. 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #1 #2 #3 #6 #1 #14 # PERCENT FINER GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines % +3" Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay.1 TEST RESULTS Opening Percent Spec.* Pass? Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail) #1 #2 #6 #14 # Material Description clayey sand Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= 21 LL= 29 PI= 8 Classification USCS (D 2487)= SC AASHTO (M 145)= A-4(1) Coefficients D 9 =.1647 D 85 =.1448 D 6 =.933 D 5 =.812 D 3 = D 15 = D 1 = C u = C c = Remarks * (no specification provided) Sample Number: B-1 S-5 Depth: SOUTHERN EARTH SCIENCES Mobile, Alabama Client: Project: Project No: Date Received: Tested By: Checked By: MAWSS C/O CH2M 3 MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT M Title: Date Tested: Date Sampled: Figure
24 Particle Size Distribution Report 1 6 in. 3 in. 2 in. 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #1 #2 #3 #6 #1 #14 # PERCENT FINER GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines % +3" Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay.1 TEST RESULTS Opening Percent Spec.* Pass? Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail) #1 #2 #6 #14 # Material Description poorly graded sand with silt Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= NP LL= NV PI= Classification USCS (D 2487)= SP-SM AASHTO (M 145)= A-3 Coefficients D 9 =.31 D 85 =.2694 D 6 =.1965 D 5 =.1779 D 3 =.1455 D 15 =.1211 D 1 =.1112 C u = 1.77 C c =.97 Remarks * (no specification provided) Sample Number: B-1 S-7 Depth: SOUTHERN EARTH SCIENCES Mobile, Alabama Client: Project: Project No: Date Received: Tested By: Checked By: MAWSS C/O CH2M 3 MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT M Title: Date Tested: Date Sampled: Figure
25 Particle Size Distribution Report 1 6 in. 3 in. 2 in. 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #1 #2 #3 #6 #1 #14 # PERCENT FINER GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines % +3" Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay.1 TEST RESULTS Opening Percent Spec.* Pass? Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail) #1 #2 #6 #14 # Material Description poorly graded sand Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= NP LL= NV PI= Classification USCS (D 2487)= SP AASHTO (M 145)= A-3 Coefficients D 9 =.2722 D 85 =.248 D 6 =.1876 D 5 =.1724 D 3 =.1453 D 15 =.1251 D 1 =.1174 C u = 1.6 C c =.96 Remarks * (no specification provided) Sample Number: B-2 S-7 Depth: SOUTHERN EARTH SCIENCES Mobile, Alabama Client: Project: Project No: Date Received: Tested By: Checked By: MAWSS C/O CH2M 3 MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT M Title: Date Tested: Date Sampled: Figure
26 Particle Size Distribution Report 1 6 in. 3 in. 2 in. 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #1 #2 #3 #6 #1 #14 # PERCENT FINER GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines % +3" Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay.1 TEST RESULTS Opening Percent Spec.* Pass? Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail) #2 #6 #14 # sandy lean clay Material Description Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= 2 LL= 37 PI= 17 Classification USCS (D 2487)= CL AASHTO (M 145)= A-6(7) Coefficients D 9 =.1695 D 85 =.147 D 6 =.795 D 5 = D 3 = D 15 = D 1 = C u = C c = Remarks * (no specification provided) Sample Number: B-3 S-4 Depth: SOUTHERN EARTH SCIENCES Mobile, Alabama Client: Project: Project No: Date Received: Tested By: Checked By: MAWSS C/O CH2M 3 MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT M Title: Date Tested: Date Sampled: Figure
27 Particle Size Distribution Report 1 6 in. 3 in. 2 in. 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #1 #2 #3 #6 #1 #14 # PERCENT FINER GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines % +3" Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay.1 TEST RESULTS Opening Percent Spec.* Pass? Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail) #1 #2 #6 #14 # Material Description poorly graded sand Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= NP LL= NV PI= Classification USCS (D 2487)= SP AASHTO (M 145)= A-3 Coefficients D 9 =.2728 D 85 =.2496 D 6 =.1895 D 5 =.173 D 3 =.1438 D 15 =.1218 D 1 =.1132 C u = 1.67 C c =.96 Remarks * (no specification provided) Sample Number: B-3 S-8 Depth: SOUTHERN EARTH SCIENCES Mobile, Alabama Client: Project: Project No: Date Received: Tested By: Checked By: MAWSS C/O CH2M 3 MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT M Title: Date Tested: Date Sampled: Figure
28 Particle Size Distribution Report 1 6 in. 3 in. 2 in. 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #1 #2 #3 #6 #1 #14 # PERCENT FINER GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines % +3" Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay.1 TEST RESULTS Opening Percent Spec.* Pass? Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail) #1 #2 #6 #14 # Material Description silty, clayey sand Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= 15 LL= 2 PI= 5 Classification USCS (D 2487)= SC-SM AASHTO (M 145)= A-4() Coefficients D 9 =.1952 D 85 =.1763 D 6 =.1122 D 5 =.898 D 3 = D 15 = D 1 = C u = C c = Remarks * (no specification provided) Sample Number: B-4 S-2 Depth: SOUTHERN EARTH SCIENCES Mobile, Alabama Client: Project: Project No: Date Received: Tested By: Checked By: MAWSS C/O CH2M 3 MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT M Title: Date Tested: Date Sampled: Figure
29 Particle Size Distribution Report 1 6 in. 3 in. 2 in. 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #1 #2 #3 #6 #1 #14 # PERCENT FINER GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines % +3" Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay.1 TEST RESULTS Opening Percent Spec.* Pass? Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail) #2 #6 #14 # Material Description clayey sand Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= 2 LL= 38 PI= 18 Classification USCS (D 2487)= SC AASHTO (M 145)= A-6(5) Coefficients D 9 =.1887 D 85 =.1693 D 6 =.14 D 5 =.826 D 3 = D 15 = D 1 = C u = C c = Remarks * (no specification provided) Sample Number: B-5 S-3 Depth: SOUTHERN EARTH SCIENCES Mobile, Alabama Client: Project: Project No: Date Received: Tested By: Checked By: MAWSS C/O CH2M 3 MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT M Title: Date Tested: Date Sampled: Figure
30 Particle Size Distribution Report 1 6 in. 3 in. 2 in. 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #1 #2 #3 #6 #1 #14 # PERCENT FINER GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines % +3" Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay.1 TEST RESULTS Opening Percent Spec.* Pass? Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail) #2 #6 #14 # Material Description poorly graded sand with silt Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= NP LL= NV PI= NP Classification USCS (D 2487)= SP-SM AASHTO (M 145)= A-3 Coefficients D 9 =.2434 D 85 =.2277 D 6 =.1776 D 5 =.1627 D 3 =.1354 D 15 =.1138 D 1 =.19 C u = 1.76 C c = 1.2 Remarks * (no specification provided) Sample Number: B-5 S-6 Depth: SOUTHERN EARTH SCIENCES Mobile, Alabama Client: Project: Project No: Date Received: Tested By: Checked By: MAWSS C/O CH2M 3 MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT M Title: Date Tested: Date Sampled: Figure
31 Particle Size Distribution Report 1 6 in. 3 in. 2 in. 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #1 #2 #3 #6 #1 #14 # PERCENT FINER GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines % +3" Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay.1 TEST RESULTS Opening Percent Spec.* Pass? Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail) #2 #6 #14 # Material Description silty sand Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= NP LL= NV PI= NP Classification USCS (D 2487)= SM AASHTO (M 145)= A-4() Coefficients D 9 =.1641 D 85 =.1442 D 6 =.912 D 5 =.785 D 3 = D 15 = D 1 = C u = C c = Remarks * (no specification provided) Sample Number: B-6 S-5 Depth: SOUTHERN EARTH SCIENCES Mobile, Alabama Client: Project: Project No: Date Received: Tested By: Checked By: MAWSS C/O CH2M 3 MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT M Title: Date Tested: Date Sampled: Figure
32 Particle Size Distribution Report 1 6 in. 3 in. 2 in. 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #1 #2 #3 #6 #1 #14 # PERCENT FINER GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines % +3" Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay.1 TEST RESULTS Opening Percent Spec.* Pass? Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail) #1 #2 #6 #14 # sandy lean clay Material Description Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= 18 LL= 39 PI= 21 Classification USCS (D 2487)= CL AASHTO (M 145)= A-6(8) Coefficients D 9 =.1759 D 85 =.1546 D 6 =.883 D 5 = D 3 = D 15 = D 1 = C u = C c = Remarks * (no specification provided) Sample Number: B-7 S-2 Depth: SOUTHERN EARTH SCIENCES Mobile, Alabama Client: Project: Project No: Date Received: Tested By: Checked By: MAWSS C/O CH2M 3 MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT M Title: Date Tested: Date Sampled: Figure
33 Particle Size Distribution Report 1 6 in. 3 in. 2 in. 1½ in. 1 in. ¾ in. ½ in. 3/8 in. #1 #2 #3 #6 #1 #14 # PERCENT FINER GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines % +3" Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay.1 TEST RESULTS Opening Percent Spec.* Pass? Size Finer (Percent) (X=Fail) #6 #14 # Material Description silty sand Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= 26 LL= 33 PI= 7 Classification USCS (D 2487)= SM AASHTO (M 145)= A-2-4() Coefficients D 9 =.1918 D 85 =.1745 D 6 =.1194 D 5 =.14 D 3 =.787 D 15 = D 1 = C u = C c = Remarks * (no specification provided) Sample Number: B-7 S-5 Depth: SOUTHERN EARTH SCIENCES Mobile, Alabama Client: Project: Project No: Date Received: Tested By: Checked By: MAWSS C/O CH2M 3 MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT M Title: Date Tested: Date Sampled: Figure
34 MOBILE AREA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM c\o CH2M Geotechnical Data Report Three Mile Creek SWAB Project SESI Project Number: M May 11, 216 APPENDIX 5 Standard Proctor Density Graphs
35 COMPACTION TEST REPORT Project No.: M Date: Project: THREE MILE CREEK - SWAB Client: CH2M Location: B-3 Sample Number: 2217 Depth: 5' - 1' Remarks: Description: RED SANDY CLAY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Classifications - USCS: CL AASHTO: Nat. Moist. = 2.1 % Sp.G. = Liquid Limit = 36 Plasticity Index = 17 % < No.2 = 54.2 % Maximum dry density = pcf Optimum moisture = 14.7 % TEST RESULTS 14 Test specification: ASTM D 698-a Method A Standard 13 Dry density, pcf % SATURATION CURVES FOR SPEC. GRAV. EQUAL TO: Water content, % Figure SOUTHERN EARTH SCIENCES
36 COMPACTION TEST REPORT Project No.: M Date: Project: THREE MILE CREEK - SWAB Client: CH2M Location: B-6 Sample Number: 2218 Depth: 5'-1' Remarks: Description: BROWN AND RED SANDY CLAY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Classifications - USCS: CL AASHTO: Nat. Moist. = 2.2 % Sp.G. = Liquid Limit = 35 Plasticity Index = 18 % < No.2 = 56.5 % Maximum dry density = pcf Optimum moisture = 12.5 % TEST RESULTS 14 Test specification: ASTM D 698-a Method A Standard 13 Dry density, pcf % SATURATION CURVES FOR SPEC. GRAV. EQUAL TO: Water content, % Figure SOUTHERN EARTH SCIENCES
37 COMPACTION TEST REPORT Project No.: M Date: Project: THREE MILE CREEK - SWAB Client: CH2M Location: B-5 Sample Number: 222 Depth: 5'-1' Remarks: Description: RED CLAY MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Classifications - USCS: SC AASHTO: Nat. Moist. = 17.8 % Sp.G. = Liquid Limit = 36 Plasticity Index = 17 % < No.2 = 49.8 % Maximum dry density = pcf Optimum moisture = 12.6 % TEST RESULTS 14 Test specification: ASTM D 698-a Method A Standard 13 Dry density, pcf % SATURATION CURVES FOR SPEC. GRAV. EQUAL TO: Water content, % Figure SOUTHERN EARTH SCIENCES
38 Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Basin (SWAB) Project Mobile, AL Subsurface Investigation and Geotechnical Data Report Prepared for: MOBILE AREA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM C\O CH2M Mobile, Alabama SESI Project No: M18-38 May 18, 218
39
40 MOBILE AREA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM C\O CH2M Subsurface Investigation and Geotechnical Data Report Three Mile Creek SWAB Project SESI Project Number: M18-38 May 18, Geologic setting Field Investigation CPT Soundings Soil Borings Subsurface Conditions Laboratory Testing Groundwater TABLE General Comments APPENDIX 1 Test Location Plan APPENDIX 2 CPT Sounding Logs SPT Boring Logs APPENDIX 3 Laboratory Test Data i
41 MOBILE AREA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM C\O CH2M Subsurface Investigation and Geotechnical Data Report Three Mile Creek SWAB Project SESI Project Number: M18-38 May 18, GEOLOGIC SETTING This project is located inside the alluvial, coastal and low terrace deposits of the Holocene. These deposits contain varicolored fine to coarse quartz sand containing clay lenses and gravel in places. Coastal deposits include fine to medium quartz sand with shell fragments. 2. FIELD INVESTIGATION Fourteen (14) Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) soundings and ten (1) soil borings with Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed across the site. A Test Location Plan indicating the approximate test locations is included in Appendix CPT Soundings Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) soundings were performed in accordance with ASTM Specification D using a 2-ton Hogentogler Electronic CPT rig. CPT soundings within the proposed structure area were advanced from about 45 to 18 feet below existing grade. Soil classifications were interpreted from methods recommended by Robertson and Campanella. Correlations between Cone Resistance values and Standard Penetration Testing "N" values were performed according to the methods developed by Robertson, Campanella and Wightman. The soil types and stratigraphy shown on the CPT Log sheets are based upon material parameters measured and evaluated as the cone is advanced. CPT Log sheets graphically showing the cone tip resistance, friction, equivalent N-value and interpreted soil behavior type at each sounding location are attached in Appendix Soil Borings Soil sampling and penetration testing were performed in general accordance with ASTM D 1586 using flight auger and mud rotary drilling techniques. SPT borings were advanced to depths of approximately 45 to 8 feet below existing ground surface. At regular intervals during the process the drill rods were removed and soil samples were obtained with a standard 2 inch split tube sampler. Representative portions of soil samples obtained during the investigation were transported to our laboratory where they were examined by an engineer and classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Soil descriptions, boring depths and penetration resistances are shown on the appropriate Soil Boring Log sheets attached in Appendix SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The subsurface descriptions outlined below are generalized to highlight the major subsurface stratigraphy encountered across the site. The CPT Sounding log sheets and Soil Boring logs are attached in Appendix 2-1 -
42 MOBILE AREA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM C\O CH2M Subsurface Investigation and Geotechnical Data Report Three Mile Creek SWAB Project SESI Project Number: M18-38 May 18, 218 present specific information at individual test locations. This information is representative of conditions encountered at the test locations. Variations may occur and should be expected between test locations. The stratification represents the approximate boundary between subsurface materials as the actual transition may be gradual. Beneath a varying thickness of topsoil (up to 9 inches), soils within the upper 1 feet consist of medium to very stiff clays and loose to medium clayey and silty sands, underlain by sands with varying density and silt and clay content. Within approximately the Eastern 1/3 of the project area, medium to stiff consistency clays were encountered between depths ranging from about 3 to 65 feet. Sands and gravelly sands were encountered from approximately 6 feet to 165 feet and are underlain by silty sands and silts to termination of the investigated depths. All reference to depths has been made with respect from existing ground surface. Detailed descriptions of soils encountered at each test location are shown on the appropriate CPT sounding or SPT boring log included in Appendix LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory testing included physical examination and general classification testing of samples obtained during boring operations. Testing included Moisture Content Determination (ASTM D 2216), No. 2 Sieve Washes (ASTM D114) and Atterberg Limits Tests (ASTM D4318). Laboratory test results are presented on the soil boring logs and on the Laboratory Test Data Summary Sheet in Appendix GROUNDWATER Two (2) piezometers were installed at test locations C5-R4 and C6-R1 for obtaining delayed water level measurement. Table 1 below presents the date measured and depth for each respective piezometer location
43 MOBILE AREA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM C\O CH2M Subsurface Investigation and Geotechnical Data Report Three Mile Creek SWAB Project SESI Project Number: M18-38 May 18, 218 TABLE 1 PEIZOMETER READINGS Piezometer Location Date Depth Below Existing Ground Surface (ft.) 2/21/ C5-R4 5/11/ /18/ /2/ C6-R1 5/11/ /18/ B-1 5/18/ B-5 5/18/18 Not Found B-6 5/18/ Fluctuation in the level of the groundwater table will occur due to variances in rainfall, drainage, types of soil present and other factors not evident at the time measurements were made. Detailed descriptions of soils encountered at each test location are shown on the appropriate Soil Boring Log attached in Appendix 2. All reference to depth has been made with respect to the existing ground surface. Groundwater levels should be verified prior to construction
44 MOBILE AREA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM C\O CH2M Subsurface Investigation and Geotechnical Data Report Three Mile Creek SWAB Project SESI Project Number: M18-38 May 18, GENERAL COMMENTS While the CPT soundings and SPT borings are representative of subsurface conditions at their respective locations and for their respective vertical reaches, local variations characteristic of the subsurface materials of the region are anticipated and may be encountered. The delineation between soil types shown on the logs is approximate and the description represents our interpretation of subsurface conditions at the designated boring location and on the particular date drilled. This report is exclusively for the use and benefit of the addressee(s) identified on the first page of this report and is not for the use or benefit of, nor may it be relied upon by any other person or entity. The contents of this report may not be quoted in whole or in part or distributed to any person or entity other than the addressee(s) hereof without, in each case, advanced written consent
45 MOBILE AREA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM C\O CH2M Subsurface Investigation and Geotechnical Data Report Three Mile Creek SWAB Project SESI Project Number: M18-38 May 18, 218 APPENDIX 1 Test Location Plan
46
47 MOBILE AREA WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM C\O CH2M Subsurface Investigation and Geotechnical Data Report Three Mile Creek SWAB Project SESI Project Number: M18-38 May 18, 218 APPENDIX 2 CPT Sounding Logs SPT Boring Logs
48 BORING NO.: C1R2 PROJECT: THREE MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION: MOBILE, AL BORING LOCATION: SEE TEST LOCATION PLAN DATE DRILLED: 3/22/18 WATER LEVEL: 28.5 ft GEOL / ENGR: R. DAVIS Elevation / Depth Soil Symbols Sampler Symbols and Field Test Data USCS SOIL BORING LOG METHOD: BORING ELEVATION: DATE COMPLETED: WATER LEVEL DATE: DRILLER: Description PROJECT NO.: M18-38 FLIGHT/MUD EXISTING GROUND 3/22/18 3/22/18 C. KIRSCHNER SPT N NM % Page 1 of 1 LL % 2 % 1 2/6 3/6 3/6 2/6 3/6 1/6 3/6 1/6 1/6 1/6 SM SC SM SP Loose Tan and Brown Silty SAND Medium Orange and Red Clayey SAND with Silt Loose Light Orange and Tan Silty SAND Medium Tan and White SAND with Wood GEOLOG F:\PROJECTS\JOB FOLDERS\218\18-38 THREE MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT\GINT\M18-38.GPJ SO_EARTH.GDT 5/3/ /6 11/6 11/ /6 2/ /6 2/6 23/6 Remarks: N W FLIGHT AUGER TO 3' SP Medium to Very Dense Tan and White SAND
49 Southern Earth Sciences, Inc. Operator: Brandon Green Sounding: C1-R3 Cone Used: DDG121 GPS Data: N3.7 W CPT Date/Time: 2/21/218 9:56:1 AM Location: THREE MILE CREEK SWAB Job Number: M18-38 groundwater: Collapsed at 27.7-ft. Tip Resistance Local Friction Pore Pressure Friction Ratio Soil Behavior Type* SPT N* Qt TSF 3 Fs TSF 3 Pw PSI -1 7 Fs/Qt (%) 8 Zone: UBC % Hammer Depth (ft) Maximum Depth = 6.2 feet Depth Increment =.164 feet 1 sensitive fine grained 2 organic material 3 clay 4 silty clay to clay 5 clayey silt to silty clay 6 sandy silt to clayey silt 7 silty sand to sandy silt 8 sand to silty sand 9 sand 1 gravelly sand to sand 11 very stiff fine grained (*) 12 sand to clayey sand (*) *Soil behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC-1983
50 BORING NO.: C1R4 PROJECT: THREE MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION: MOBILE, AL BORING LOCATION: SEE TEST LOCATION PLAN DATE DRILLED: 3/3/18 WATER LEVEL: 19.4 ft GEOL / ENGR: R. DAVIS Elevation / Depth Soil Symbols Sampler Symbols and Field Test Data USCS SOIL BORING LOG METHOD: BORING ELEVATION: DATE COMPLETED: WATER LEVEL DATE: DRILLER: Description PROJECT NO.: M18-38 FLIGHT/MUD DRILLING EXISTING GROUND 3/3/18 3/3/18 C. KIRSCHNER SPT N NM % Page 1 of 1 LL % 2 % 1 2 WOH/6 11/6 1 12/6 12/6 1/6 1/6 1/6 CL SM CL SC SP SP-SM SP 4" TOPSOIL Very Stiff Red and Orange CLAY Medium Brown and Red Silty SAND Very Stiff Red and Orange Sandy CLAY Medium Tan and Orange Clayey SAND Medium Tan and Orange SAND with Clay Lense Medium Brown and Tan SAND with Silt Medium to Loose Tan SAND GEOLOG F:\PROJECTS\JOB FOLDERS\218\18-38 THREE MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT\GINT\M18-38.GPJ SO_EARTH.GDT 5/3/ /6 12/6 11/6 1/ /6 12/6 1/6 1/6 1 Remarks: N W SP Medium Tan SAND
51 Southern Earth Sciences, Inc. Operator: Brandon Green Sounding: C2-R1 Cone Used: DDG121 GPS Data: N3.76 W CPT Date/Time: 2/2/218 1:4:28 PM Location: THREE MILE CREEK SWAB Job Number: M18-38 Groundwater: Collapsed at 27.7-ft. Tip Resistance Local Friction Pore Pressure Friction Ratio Soil Behavior Type* SPT N* Qt TSF 3 Fs TSF 3 Pw PSI -1 9 Fs/Qt (%) 9 Zone: UBC % Hammer Depth (ft) Maximum Depth = feet Depth Increment =.164 feet 1 sensitive fine grained 2 organic material 3 clay 4 silty clay to clay 5 clayey silt to silty clay 6 sandy silt to clayey silt 7 silty sand to sandy silt 8 sand to silty sand 9 sand 1 gravelly sand to sand 11 very stiff fine grained (*) 12 sand to clayey sand (*) *Soil behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC-1983
52 Southern Earth Sciences Operator: Brandon Green Sounding: C2R2 Cone Used: DDG121 GPS Data: N3.743 W CPT Date/Time: 4/25/218 9:3:56 AM Location: THREE MILE CREEK SWAB Job Number: M18-38 Groundwater: Collapsed and dry at 27.5-ft. Tip Resistance Local Friction Pore Pressure Friction Ratio Soil Behavior Type* SPT N* Qt TSF 6 Fs TSF 2 Pw PSI -2 1 Fs/Qt (%) 7 Zone: UBC % Hammer Depth (ft) Maximum Depth = feet Depth Increment =.164 feet 1 sensitive fine grained 2 organic material 3 clay 4 silty clay to clay 5 clayey silt to silty clay 6 sandy silt to clayey silt 7 silty sand to sandy silt 8 sand to silty sand 9 sand 1 gravelly sand to sand 11 very stiff fine grained (*) 12 sand to clayey sand (*) *Soil behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC-1983
53 BORING NO.: C2R3 PROJECT: THREE MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION: MOBILE, AL BORING LOCATION: SEE TEST LOCATION PLAN DATE DRILLED: 3/2/18 WATER LEVEL: 28.5 ft GEOL / ENGR: R. DAVIS Elevation / Depth Soil Symbols Sampler Symbols and Field Test Data USCS SOIL BORING LOG METHOD: BORING ELEVATION: DATE COMPLETED: WATER LEVEL DATE: DRILLER: Description PROJECT NO.: M18-38 FLIGHT/MUD EXISTING GROUND 3/2/18 3/2/18 C. KIRSCHNER SPT N NM % Page 1 of 1 LL % 2 % 1 WOH/6 2/6 3/6 3/6 3/6 12/6 3/6 3/6 1/6 1 1/6 12/6 3/6 SM CL CL SC-SM SP-SM 9" TOPSOIL Loose Tan Silty SAND Medium Brown and Orange Sandy CLAY Medium to Very Stiff Brown, Orange and Red CLAY Medium Red and Orange Clayey Silty SAND Medium Red and Tan SAND with Silt GEOLOG F:\PROJECTS\JOB FOLDERS\218\18-38 THREE MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT\GINT\M18-38.GPJ SO_EARTH.GDT 5/3/ /6 12/6 1/6 1/6 12/6 1/6 1/6 11/6 13/6 13/6 13/6 Remarks: N W FLIGHT AUGER TO 3' SP-SM SP Medium Tan and White SAND with Silt Medium Tan SAND
54 Southern Earth Sciences, Inc. Operator: Brandon Green Sounding: C2-R4 Cone Used: DDG121 GPS Data: N3.71 W CPT Date/Time: 2/21/218 1:4:21 AM Location: THREE MILE CREEK SWAB Job Number: M18-38 Groundwater: Collapsed at surface Tip Resistance Local Friction Pore Pressure Friction Ratio Soil Behavior Type* SPT N* Qt TSF 25 Fs TSF 3-5 Pw PSI 4 Fs/Qt (%) 8 Zone: UBC % Hammer Depth (ft) Maximum Depth = 6.2 feet Depth Increment =.164 feet 1 sensitive fine grained 2 organic material 3 clay 4 silty clay to clay 5 clayey silt to silty clay 6 sandy silt to clayey silt 7 silty sand to sandy silt 8 sand to silty sand 9 sand 1 gravelly sand to sand 11 very stiff fine grained (*) 12 sand to clayey sand (*) *Soil behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC-1983
55 BORING NO.: C3R1 PROJECT: THREE MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION: MOBILE, AL BORING LOCATION: SEE TEST LOCATION PLAN DATE DRILLED: 2/2/18 WATER LEVEL: 28 ft GEOL / ENGR: R. DAVIS Elevation / Depth Soil Symbols Sampler Symbols and Field Test Data USCS SOIL BORING LOG METHOD: BORING ELEVATION: DATE COMPLETED: WATER LEVEL DATE: DRILLER: Description PROJECT NO.: M18-38 FLIGHT/MUD DRILLING EXISTING GROUND 2/2/18 2/2/18 D. GARDNER SPT N NM % Page 1 of 1 LL % 2 % 1 1/6 1/6 1/6 1 1/6 12/6 12/6 SC CL SM SP 2.5 " TOPSOIL Loose Red and Brown Clayey SAND Stiff to Very Stiff Orange, Red and Tan Sandy CLAY Medium Orange and White Silty SAND Medium White and Orange SAND /6 19 GEOLOG F:\PROJECTS\JOB FOLDERS\218\18-38 THREE MILE CREEK SWAB PROJECT\GINT\M18-38.GPJ SO_EARTH.GDT 5/3/ /6 11/6 1 11/6 1/6 1/6 13/ /6 13/6 1 11/6 1 Remarks: N W FLIGHT AUGER TO 3' SP SP Medium to Dense Orange, White and Tan SAND Medium Tan SAND
56 Southern Earth Sciences, Inc. Operator: Brandon Green Sounding: C3-R2 Cone Used: DDG121 GPS Data: N3.75 W CPT Date/Time: 2/21/218 11:31:5 AM Location: THREE MILE CREEK SWAB Job Number: M18-38 Groundwater: Collapsed at 27.8-ft. Tip Resistance Local Friction Pore Pressure Friction Ratio Soil Behavior Type* SPT N* Qt TSF 25 Fs TSF 3-2 Pw PSI 2 Fs/Qt (%) 9 Zone: UBC % Hammer Depth (ft) Maximum Depth = feet Depth Increment =.164 feet 1 sensitive fine grained 2 organic material 3 clay 4 silty clay to clay 5 clayey silt to silty clay 6 sandy silt to clayey silt 7 silty sand to sandy silt 8 sand to silty sand 9 sand 1 gravelly sand to sand 11 very stiff fine grained (*) 12 sand to clayey sand (*) *Soil behavior type and SPT based on data from UBC-1983
B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.
N B-1 SYMBOLS: Exploratory Boring Location Project Mngr: BORE LOCATION PLAN Project No. GK EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G1063.02 GK Scale: Checked By: 1045 Central Parkway North, Suite 103 San Antonio, Texas 78232
More informationProject: ITHACA-TOMPKINS REGIONAL AIRPORT EXPANSION Project Location: ITHACA, NY Project Number: 218-34 Key to Soil Symbols and Terms TERMS DESCRIBING CONSISTENCY OR CONDITION COARSE-GRAINED SOILS (major
More informationArdaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants
SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION 42-INCH FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT CHIQUITA BOULEVARD S AND SW 34 TH STREET CAPE CORAL, LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials
More informationCivil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx
2365 Haggerty Road South * Canton, Michigan 48188 P: 734-397-3100 * F: 734-397-3131 * www.manniksmithgroup.com August 29, 2012 Mr. Richard Kent Washtenaw County Parks and Recreation Commission 2330 Platt
More informationPhoto 1 - Southerly view across 2700 parking lot toward existing building. Multi-residential building borders western side of property in upper right of view. Photo 2 - Southerly view across 2750 parking
More informationNAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (APF) TAXIWAY D REALIGNMENT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS NORTH QUADRANT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO March, The following Addendum is hereby made a part of the Plans
More informationDATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS
DATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS SUBMITTED TO PORT OF GALVESTON 123 ROSENBERG AVENUE, 8TH FLOOR GALVESTON, TEXAS 77553 BY HVJ ASSOCIATES, INC. HOUSTON,
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Bridge B Bridge Crossing: South 257 th West Avenue Creek County, Oklahoma June 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04155197 Prepared for: Garver, LLC Tulsa,
More informationGeotechnical Data Report
Geotechnical Data Report Downtown Greenville Future Conveyance Study December 1, 2015 Terracon Project No. 86155032 Prepared for: Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. December 1, 2015 561 Mauldin Road
More informationAppendix G GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION
Appendix G GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION JOB NUMBER: 3268.001 DATE: 10-14-13 BY: CC SITE 0 2000 1"=2000' VICINITY MAP CARGILL PARCEL HICKORY STREET AND ENTERPRISE DRIVE NEWARK, CALIFORNIA FOR
More informationDecember 5, Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 Los Angeles, CA Mr. James Frost P: Dear Mr.
December 5, 2014 Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 90046 Attn: Re: Mr. James Frost P: 323.883.1800 Geotechnical Update Letter Sunset & Effie Mixed Use Development 4301 to 4311 Sunset
More informationSOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART COARSE-GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% RETAINED ON NO.200 SIEVE FINE-GRAINED SOILS 50% OR MORE PASSES THE NO.200 SIEVE PRIMARY DIVISIONS GRAVELS MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED
More informationM E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI
M E M O R A N D U M TO: FROM: Mr. Mark Schilling Gulf Interstate Engineering Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI DATE: November 11, 2014 RE: Summary of Findings Geotechnical
More informationCITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH 2 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT 3
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT City of Cape Coral Procurement Division Cultural Park Boulevard, nd Floor Cape Coral, FL ISSUED FOR BID VOLUME of GEOTECHNICAL
More informationArdaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants
SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE HENDRY COUNTY, FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants OFFICES Orlando, 88 S. Orange Avenue, Orlando,
More informationField Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E:
March 31, 201 11 Northstar Avenue 83301 Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E: taa@jub.com Re: Geotechnical Data Report Preliminary Phase 1 Field Exploration Revision No. 1 Proposed Rapid Infiltration Basin
More informationENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
July 16, 211 Vista Design, Inc. 11634 Worcester Highway Showell, Maryland 21862 Attention: Reference: Dear Mr. Polk: Mr. Richard F. Polk, P.E. Geotechnical Engineering Report Charles County RFP No. 11-9
More informationNorthern Colorado Geotech
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PROPOSED CECIL FARMS DEVELOPMENT WELD COUNTY ROAD 7, BETWEEN ROADS 7 AND 7 SEVERANCE, COLORADO NORTHERN COLORADO GEOTECH PROJECT NO. 0-6 APRIL 0, 06 Prepared
More informationADDENDUM NO. 1. PROJECT NAME: Surf Road NRCS Drainage Improvements PRI PROJECT NO: Wakulla Co ITB #
ADDENDUM NO. 1 DATE: January 23, 214 TO: Prospective Bidders via individual e-mails FROM: Alan Wise, P.E. PROJECT NAME: Surf Road NRCS Drainage Improvements PRI PROJECT NO: 23.18 --- Wakulla Co ITB #214-3
More informationREPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY HULBERT 69 KV SWITCHING STATION S. 440 Road Hulbert, Cherokee County, Oklahoma ENERCON PROJECT NO. GRDA006 MARCH 7, 2012 PREPARED FOR: C/O ENERCON
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Study, Conifer Senior High School Football Field Improvements, Conifer, Colorado
2390 South Lipan Street Denver, CO 80223 phone: (303) 742-9700 fax: (303) 742-9666 email: kadenver@kumarusa.com www.kumarusa.com Office Locations: Denver (HQ), Colorado Springs, Fort Collins, and Frisco,
More informationArdaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants
SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LELY AREA STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (LASIP) COUNTY BARN ROAD AND WING SOUTH CHANNELS NAPLES, COLLIER CO., FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc.
More informationATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY
ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY Kevin M. Martin, P.E. KMM Geotechnical Consultants, LLC 7 Marshall Road Hampstead, NH 0384 603-489-6 (p)/ 603-489-8 (f)/78-78-4084(m) kevinmartinpe@aol.com
More informationB-1 SURFACE ELEVATION
5A 5B LOGGED BY El. S. Bhangoo DRILLING CONTRACTOR Pitcher Drilling DRILLING METHOD Rotary Wash BEGIN DATE 12-14-12 SAMPLER TYPE(S) AND SIZE(S) (ID) SPT, MC BOREHOLE BACKFILL AND COMPLETION COMPLETION
More informationPreliminary Geotechnical Investigation Cadiz / Trigg County I-24 Business Park. Cadiz, Kentucky
Environmental & Geoscience, LLC 834 Madisonville Road Hopkinsville, KY 440 70.44.000 FAX 70.44.8300 www.wedrill.com A member of Trinity Energy & Infrastructure Group, LLC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Polecat Creek Bridge (Bridge A) June 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04155197 Prepared for: Garver, LLC Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. TABLE
More informationAPPENDIX E SOILS TEST REPORTS
Otsego County, NY Site Work Specifications APPENDIX E SOILS TEST REPORTS Blue Wing Services, Inc. July 1, 2010 Blue Wing Services May 20, 2010 Page 2 the site, was not made available to Empire at this
More informationDepth (ft) USCS Soil Description TOPSOIL & FOREST DUFF
Test Pit No. TP-6 Location: Latitude 47.543003, Longitude -121.980441 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 1,132 feet Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description 0 1.5 1.5 5.0 SM 5.0 8.0 SM Loose to medium dense,
More informationIN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION
IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION Nancy Case O Bourke, PE 1, Gregory L. Hartman, PE 2 and Paul Fuglevand, PE 3 ABSTRACT In-situ specific gravity
More informationReport of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration. CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. February, 2011
11242843_GeoTech_Preliminary - Feburary 2011_1/40 Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio February, 2011 11242843_GeoTech_Preliminary -
More informationADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON
F I N A L A D D E N D U M 1 R E P O R T ADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION URS JOB NO. 3376186 Prepared for Tetra Tech Inc. 142
More informationPRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION Additional MeadWestvaco Ridgeville Property 331 acres Dorchester County, South Carolina S&ME Project No. 1131-09-259A Prepared For: BP Barber & Associates Post Office
More informationGeotechnical Data Report
Geotechnical Data Report ReWa Solar Farm at Durbin Creek Fountain Inn, South Carolina September 1, 2017 Terracon Project No. 86165043 Prepared for: Renewable Water Resources Greenville, South Carolina
More informationGEOTECHNICAL REPORT. Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska.
Matanuska-Susitna Borough GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska March 2, 20 Prepared By: John Thornley, PE Geotechnical Engineer 333 Arctic Blvd.,
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Richland Creek Trunk Sewer Greenville, South Carolina March 31, 2014 Terracon Project No. 86145008 Prepared for: Renewable Water Resources Greenville, South Carolina Prepared
More informationPierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section
Page 1 of 7 Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section PROJECT NAME: DATE: APPLICATION NO.: PCDE NO.: LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA (LHA) GEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Bridge D Bridge Crossing: South 209 th West Avenue Creek County, Oklahoma June 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04155197 Prepared for: Garver, LLC Tulsa,
More informationPRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT TOWN OF ASHLAND TOWN HALL 101 THOMPSON STREET ASHLAND, VIRGINIA JOB NUMBER: 39016 PREPARED FOR: PMA PLANNERS & ARCHITECTS 10325 WARWICK BOULEVARD NEWPORT NEWS,
More informationAPPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION
Figure B-5.7 Figure B-5.8 Preliminary Geotechnical and Environmental Report Appendix C Hydrogeologic Investigation APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION December 21, 2011 WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION PROJECT
More informationDRILLED DISPLACMENT PILE PERFORMANCE IN COASTAL PLAIN AND RESIDUAL SOILS
DRILLED DISPLACMENT PILE PERFORMANCE IN COASTAL PLAIN AND RESIDUAL SOILS Presented by: W. Morgan NeSmith, P.E. Berkel & Company Contractors Inc. 770.941.5100 mnesmith@berkelapg.com SC Engineering Conference
More information3.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
AECOM 500 W Jefferson St. Suite 1600 Louisville, KY 40202 www.aecom.com 502-569-2301 tel 502-569-2304 fax October 17, 2018 Big Rivers Electric Corporation Sebree Generating Station 9000 Highway 2096 Robards,
More informationAPPENDIX C. Borehole Data
APPENDIX C Borehole Data MAJOR DIVISIONS SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART SYMBOLS GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS ADDITIONAL MATERIAL
More informationTIERRA. Florida License No Florida License No
March 9, 208 TIERRA AECOM 7650 West Courtney Campbell Cswy Tampa, FL 33607 Attn: RE: Mr. Edgar Figueroa, P.E. Geotechnical Engineering Services Report Purchase Order No.: 9532 AECOM Project Number: 6055499
More informationGeneral. DATE December 10, 2013 PROJECT No TO Mary Jarvis Urbandale/Riverside South Development Corporation
DATE December 10, 201 PROJECT No. 10-1121-0260- TO Mary Jarvis Urbandale/Riverside South Development Corporation CC Justin Robitaille, Urbandale Jonathan Párraga, J.L. Richards & Associates Limited FROM
More informationPRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT. Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts. Prepared For:
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts Prepared For: Meridian Associates, Inc. 500 Cummings Center, Suite 5950 Beverly, Massachusetts
More informationLimited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Classroom Additions Albany County Campus Laramie, Wyoming
Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Classroom Additions Albany County Campus 2300 Missile Drive, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 Phone 307-635-0222 www.stratageotech.com Limited Geotechnical Engineering
More informationAPPENDIX F CORRELATION EQUATIONS. F 1 In-Situ Tests
APPENDIX F 1 APPENDIX F CORRELATION EQUATIONS F 1 In-Situ Tests 1. SPT (1) Sand (Hatanaka and Uchida, 1996), = effective vertical stress = effective friction angle = atmosphere pressure (Shmertmann, 1975)
More informationDate: April 2, 2014 Project No.: Prepared For: Mr. Adam Kates CLASSIC COMMUNITIES 1068 E. Meadow Circle Palo Alto, California 94303
City of Newark - 36120 Ruschin Drive Project Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix C: Geologic Information FirstCarbon Solutions H:\Client (PN-JN)\4554\45540001\ISMND\45540001 36120
More informationFIFTH STREET GRADE SEPARATION CARSON CITY, NEVADA
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FIFTH STREET GRADE SEPARATION CARSON CITY, NEVADA JULY 2005 MATERIALS DIVISION STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MATERIALS DIVISION GEOTECHNICAL SECTION GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
More informationSoil Mechanics Brief Review. Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E.
Soil Mechanics Brief Review Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E. 1 BASIC ROCK TYPES Igneous Rock (e.g. granite, basalt) Rock formed in place by cooling from magma Generally very stiff/strong and often abrasive
More informationENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods
ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods Geotechnical Involvement in Project Phases Planning Design Alternatives Preparation of Detailed Plans Final Design
More informationR-1 Conveyor Relocation Project Legend 0 500 1000 1500 ft. This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for general reference only. Data layers that appear on this map
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Single-Span Bridge North Western Road & Hall of Fame Avenue August 25, 2015 Terracon Project No. 03155156 Prepared for: Olsson Associates Prepared by: Terracon Consultants,
More informationPREPARED FOR MR. JOE WOOD CARTER & SLOOPE, INC PEAKE ROAD MACON, GEORGIA PREPARED BY
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION MACON WATER AUTHORITY (MWA) SANITARY SEWER RELOCATION MACON, GEORGIA GEC PROJECT NO. 14077.2 PREPARED FOR MR. JOE WOOD CARTER & SLOOPE, INC.
More informationPreliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report
Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Park 3 Barrow County, Georgia July, Terracon Project No. 4906 Prepared For: Winder Barrow Industrial Authority Prepared By: Terracon Consultants, Inc. Atlanta,
More informationNew WW Hastings Hospital Geotechnical Investigation RFP Addendum #1
88 E. Marshall Street, Suite 0 Tulsa, OK 76 98 8 9 Phone 98 8 798 FAX DATE: April 9, 0 ADDENDUM NO.: PROJECT: New WW Hastings Hospital BID PACKAGE NO: Geotechnical Investigation RFP SUBMITTED BY: CNCR
More informationREPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION. Marion County Industrial Park Lot 4. Marion County, South Carolina S&ME Project No.
REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION Marion County Industrial Park Lot 4 Marion County, South Carolina S&ME Project No. 1633-12-332 Prepared By: 133 Highway 1 Business Conway, South Carolina
More informationTechnical Memorandum. Soil Borings
Technical Memorandum To: Project File and Appendix F to Sediment Remedial Investigation Report From: Sara L. Leow, PE Subject: Geotechnical Investigation and Results Summary Date: February 213 Project:
More informationProject No: 68R3056 Client: City of Frederick Project: RFQ 14-H Future North Side Water Tank City/State: 7516 Hayward Road, Frederick, MD
Boring: SB-1 (1 of 1) Moist, brown to orange brown CLAY and SILT, trace sand with fine weathered rock fragments. POSSIBLE FILL. Dry, orange brown sandy SILT trace clay (SM-ML). RESIDUAL SOIL : Not Surveyed
More informationGeotechnical Data Report
Geotechnical Data Report Emergency Bridge Package 6 Richland County, South Carolina May 12, 2016 SCDOT Project ID.: P029942, P029943, P029944 Terracon Project No. 73100L (Rev. 1) Prepared for: South Carolina
More informationAPPENDIX A. Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols
APPENDIX A Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols Page 153 of 168 EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS The terms and symbols used on the borehole logs to summarize the results of field investigation
More informationChapter 12 Subsurface Exploration
Page 12 1 Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration 1. The process of identifying the layers of deposits that underlie a proposed structure and their physical characteristics is generally referred to as (a) subsurface
More informationAN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY
CTL Engineering, Inc. 2860 Fisher Road, P.O. Box 4448, Columbus, Ohio 43204338 Phone: 614/2768123 Fax: 614/2766377 Email: ctl@ctleng.com AN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY Consulting Engineers Testing Inspection
More informationMitigation of Liquefaction Potential Using Rammed Aggregate Piers
ASCE 2011 557 Mitigation of Liquefaction Potential Using Rammed Aggregate Piers R.W. Rudolph, M. ASCE, G.E. 1, B. Serna, M. ASCE, P.E. 2, and T. Farrell, M. ASCE, G.E. 3 1 Principal Consultant, ENGEO,
More informationGeotechnical Investigation
Geotechnical Investigation Veterans Parkway Bridge Approaches Investigation Savannah, Georgia July 20, 2015 Terracon Project No. ES155020 Prepared for: Chatham County Engineering Department Savannah, Georgia
More informationGEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT FOR STATIC TEST FACILITY FOR PROPELLANTS AT BDL, IBRAHIMPATNAM. Graphics Designers, M/s Architecture & Engineering 859, Banjara Avenue, Consultancy
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS The following section is a summary of the geotechnical report conducted for the proposed project. The Report of Geotechnical Investigation Proposed
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Aggregate Resource Evaluation Proposed Bernand Quarry San Diego County, California
October 3, 2 Mr. Mark San Agustin Project No. 28-- Home Land Investments Document No. -92 2239 Curlew Street San Diego, CA 92 SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Aggregate Resource
More informationDry Muliwai Sample Location Map
DMM2 DMM1 P:\AthruR\K838-Makua\GIS\Layouts\Dry Muliwai.mxd.mxd - 3/26/3 - JC DMM3 5 Dry Muliwai Sample Location Map Figure 2-4 P:\AthruR\K838-Makua\GIS\Layouts\orth Background Muliwai.mxd.mxd - 3/26/3
More informationSUBSURFACE EXPLORATION REPORT FOR THE MARITIME INFRACTURE REHABILITATION AT WHISKEY ISLAND BULK TERMINAL CLEVELAND, OHIO PGI PROJECT NO.
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION REPORT FOR THE MARITIME INFRACTURE REHABILITATION AT WHISKEY ISLAND BULK TERMINAL CLEVELAND, OHIO PGI PROJECT NO. G1G PREPARED FOR KS ASSOCIATES, INC. PREPARED BY PRO GEOTECH, INC.
More informationMinnesota Department of Transportation Geotechnical Section Cone Penetration Test Index Sheet 1.0 (CPT 1.0)
This Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Sounding follows ASTM D 5778 and was made by ordinary and conventional methods and with care deemed adequate for the Department's design purposes. Since this sounding was
More informationEvaluation of Geotechnical Hazards
Evaluation of Geotechnical Hazards by Geoffrey R. Martin Appendix B: Evaluation of Geotechnical Hazards Describes Evaluation Procedures Soil Liquefaction Soil Settlement Surface Fault Rupture Flooding
More informationSoil Behaviour Type from the CPT: an update
Soil Behaviour Type from the CPT: an update P.K. Robertson Gregg Drilling & Testing Inc., Signal Hill, California, USA ABSTRACT: One of the most common applications of CPT results is to evaluate soil type
More information(C) Global Journal of Engineering Science and Research Management
GEOTECHNCIAL ASSESSMENT OF PART OF PORT HARCOURT, NIGER DELTA FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Warmate Tamunonengiyeofori Geostrat International Services Limited, www.geostratinternational.com. *Correspondence
More informationREPORT OF PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION. VCU Basketball Practice Facility 1300/1328 West Marshall Street City of Richmond, Virginia.
REPORT OF PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION VCU Basketball Practice Facility 100/18 West Marshall Street City of Richmond, Virginia For Mr. Carl F. Purdin, AIA Assistant Director of Design Services VCU
More informationGeotechnical Subsurface Exploration, Engineering Evaluation and Dam Visual Observation Sun Valley Drive Extension Roswell, Fulton County, GA
Ranger Consulting, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental, Drilling, Construction 3147 Martha Berry Highway, Rome, Georgia 165; Phone: 76-29-1782; Fax: 76-29-171 April 2, 215 Mr. Tommy Crochet, PE McGee Partners,
More informationGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT BRIDGE OVER BIG CREEK APPROXIMATELY.8 MILES EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF COUNTY ROAD EW1546 AND COUNTY ROAD 193 LEFLORE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA PROJECT No. J2-8616(5),
More information6.2 Geotechnical Investigation and Construction Material Survey
6.2 Geotechnical Investigation and Construction Material Survey Geological surveys and investigations were conducted to obtain information on the subsurface geological condition required for the preliminary
More informationGeotechnical Investigation Juneau Seawalk - Taku Fisheries to Miner s Wharf Juneau, Alaska DM&A Job No
Duane Miller & Associates 5821 Arctic Boulevard, Suite A Anchorage, AK 99518-1654 (907) 644-3200 Fax 644-0507 Arctic & Geotechnical Engineering May 4, 2006 Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. 1971 First Avenue Seattle,
More informationMinnesota Department of Transportation Geotechnical Section Cone Penetration Test Index Sheet 1.0 (CPT 1.0)
This Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Sounding follows ASTM D 778 and was made by ordinary and conventional methods and with care deemed adequate for the Department's design purposes. Since this sounding was
More informationBoreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.
Implementation Boreholes 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3. Rotary Drilling Boring Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 4. Percussion Drilling The right choice of method depends on: Ground
More informationREPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION
REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION ENKA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL Sand Hill Road Candler, North Carolina Prepared For: BUNCOMBE COUNTY SCHOOLS Prepared By: AMEC ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
More information16 January 2018 Job Number: RICHARD NEWMAN C\- CLARK FORTUNE MCDONALD AND ASSOCIATES PO BOX 553 QUEENSTOWN
16 January 2018 Job Number: 50595 RICHARD NEWMAN C\- CLARK FORTUNE MCDONALD AND ASSOCIATES PO BOX 553 QUEENSTOWN CHANSEN@CFMA.CO.NZ STORMWATER DISPOSAL ASSESSMENT Dear Richard, RDAgritech were requested
More informationSolution:Example 1. Example 2. Solution: Example 2. clay. Textural Soil Classification System (USDA) CE353 Soil Mechanics Dr.
CE353 Soil Mechanics CE353 Lecture 5 Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory SOIL CLASSIFICATION Lecture 5 SOIL CLASSIFICATION Dr. Talat A Bader Dr. Talat Bader 2 Requirements of a soil Systems Why do we need
More informationSITE INVESTIGATION 1
SITE INVESTIGATION 1 Definition The process of determining the layers of natural soil deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical properties is generally referred to as site investigation.
More informationClass Principles of Foundation Engineering CEE430/530
Class Principles of Foundation Engineering CEE430/530 1-1 General Information Lecturer: Scott A. Barnhill, P.E. Lecture Time: Thursday, 7:10 pm to 9:50 pm Classroom: Kaufmann, Room 224 Office Hour: I have
More informationINVITATION TO BID CITY OF CAPE CORAL SW 6&7 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT VII CENTRAL AREA 6 AND CENTRAL AREA 8 ITB UT13-02/TM-G
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT INVITATION TO BID CITY OF CAPE CORAL SW 6&7 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT VII CENTRAL AREA 6 AND CENTRAL AREA 8 ITB UT13-02/TM-G City of Cape Coral Procurement Division 1015
More informationCE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.2. Engineering Classification of Soil (AASHTO and USCS) (Das, Ch. 4)
CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.2 Engineering Classification of Soil (AASHTO and USCS) (Das, Ch. 4) Outline of this Lecture 1. Particle distribution and Atterberg Limits 2. Soil classification
More informationGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT LOWER VALLEY LAGOON PHASE I AND II SAN JUAN COUNTY, NEW MEXICO. Submitted To:
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT LOWER VALLEY LAGOON PHASE I AND II SAN JUAN COUNTY, NEW MEXICO Submitted To: Wade Chacon, P.E. Louisiana Boulevard NE, Suite 00 Albuquerque, New Mexico 0 Submitted By: GEOMAT
More informationReport of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for Ponds
Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for Ponds Malabar Road (SR 514) PD&E Study From East of Babcock Street (SR 507) to US 1 Brevard County, Florida FPID:
More informationPRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. State College Redevelopment State College Borough, Centre County, Pennsylvania. CMT Laboratories File No.
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT State College Redevelopment State College Borough, Centre County, Pennsylvania CMT Laboratories File No. 1638700 Prepared for: National Development Council One Battery Park
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report SH-9 Bridge over Wewoka Creek Hughes County, Oklahoma Job Piece No. 27059(04) July 16, 2015 Terracon Project No. 04125055 Prepared for: Holloway, Updike, and Bellen, Inc.
More informationCPT Data Interpretation Theory Manual
CPT Data Interpretation Theory Manual 2016 Rocscience Inc. Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 3 2 Soil Parameter Interpretation... 5 3 Soil Profiling... 11 3.1 Non-Normalized SBT Charts... 11 3.2 Normalized
More information(THIS IS ONLY A SAMPLE REPORT OR APPENDIX OFFERED TO THE USERS OF THE COMPUTER PROGRAM
C A U T I O N!! (THIS IS ONLY A SAMPLE REPORT OR APPENDIX OFFERED TO THE USERS OF THE COMPUTER PROGRAM EQLique&Settle2. THE AUTHOR IS HEREBY RELEASED OF ANY LIABILITY FOR ANY INCORRECT USE OF THIS SAMPLE
More informationPERIODIC SAFETY FACTOR ASSESSMENT
PERIODIC SAFETY FACTOR ASSESSMENT CFR 257.73(e)(1) Pond 21, Pond 22, Pond 23, and Waste Water Sludge Pond Oklaunion Power Station Vernon, Texas October, 16 Prepared for: Public Service Company of Oklahoma
More informationGZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
GZA BORING NO.: GZ-1 SHEET: 1 of 1 PROJECT NO: 9.223. Drilling Co.: Geologic Type of Rig: Skid Boring Location: See Plan H. Datum: See Plan Rig Model: Mudline : Foreman: Ray Eastwood CME -.8 Final Boring
More informationREPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION. Marion County Industrial Park. Marion County, South Carolina S&ME Project No.
REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION Marion County Industrial Park Marion County, South Carolina S&ME Project No. 1633-12-186 Prepared By: 133 Highway 1 Business Conway, South Carolina 2926 August
More informationPreliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Gooseberry Point Pedestrian Improvements Whatcom County, Washington SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
File No. 12-100 Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering Consultants Mr. Kevin Brown, P.E. Gray & Osborne, Inc. 3710 168 th Street NE, Suite B210 Arlington, Washington 98223 Subject: Draft Report Preliminary
More informationGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT BELVILLE RIVERWALK BELVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA S&ME Project No Prepared For:
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT BELVILLE RIVERWALK BELVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA S&ME Project No. 1306-15-008 Prepared For: Town of Belville 497 Olde Waterford Way, Suite 205 Belville, NC 28451 Prepared By:
More informationAppendix 11-B Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
Appendix 11-B Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation 11.0 Soil, Geology, and Seismology PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATION ENGINEERING REPORT CPV VALLEY ENERGY CENTER Wawayanda,
More information