REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
|
|
- Georgina Wade
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY HULBERT 69 KV SWITCHING STATION S. 440 Road Hulbert, Cherokee County, Oklahoma ENERCON PROJECT NO. GRDA006 MARCH 7, 2012 PREPARED FOR: C/O ENERCON SERVICES, INC STATE ROAD 434 SUITE 252 LONGWOOD, FLORIDA SUBMITTED BY: ENERCON SERVICES, INC. 500 TOWNPARK LANE SUITE 275 KENNESAW, GEORGIA 30144
2 March 7, 2012 Grand River Dam Authority c/o Enercon Services, Inc State Road 434 Suite 252 Longwood, Florida ENERCON Project No. GRDA006 Attention: Subject: Mr. Kenneth R. Lord, P.E. Report of Subsurface Exploration Hulbert 69 KV Switching Station South 440 Road Hulbert, Cherokee County, Oklahoma Dear Mr. Load: As authorized, Enercon Services, Inc. (ENERCON) has completed a subsurface exploration for the above listed project. The purpose of this exploration was to obtain subsurface data to assist in the design of the proposed substation. The scope of our exploration was established in correspondence and discussions with ENERCON project designers. This report describes the findings from this subsurface exploration and our recommendations. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of Enercon Services, Inc. and their client Grand River Dam Authority (GRDA). Our services were performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices in the State of Oklahoma. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. EXPLORATION METHODOLOGY Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by five soil test borings at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1 Boring Location Plan. ENERCON personnel established the boring locations by estimating right angles and taping distances from existing site features identified from the provided site plan. Some adjustments were made to some of the requested boring locations due to overhead power lines. The revised locations of these borings are shown on the Boring Location Plan. The borings were not located by survey techniques. ENERCON has not been provided with ground surface elevations at the boreholes. The soil test borings were advanced to auger refusal at depths ranging from about 5 to 8 feet below the existing ground surface. Standard penetration testing was performed at the surface and at 5-foot intervals. After auger refusal was encountered, each boring was then advanced utilizing NQ size (approximately 1.9 inches in diameter) rock coring techniques to assess the continuity and character of the refusal materials. Drilling and sampling operations were performed in general accordance with ASTM and geotechnical industry standards. Brief descriptions of the field procedures are included in Appendix A. Soil and rock samples obtained during the exploration were returned to our laboratory and reviewed by a geotechnical engineer. The general descriptions of the soils are summarized on Boring Records in Appendix B. Classification of soils were not based on laboratory testing. Therefore so they should be
3 Hulbert 69KV Switching Station Report of Subsurface Exploration Hulbert, Cherokee County, Oklahoma Page 2 considered approximate. The stratification lines shown on the boring records represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. However, the transitions may be more gradual. Several soil samples and two rock core samples were selected for laboratory resistivity testing. The results of these tests are appended and discussed in a latter section of the report. SITE CONDITIONS The site is a 2.6-acre parcel of land, which is located west of South Road 440 about 0.2 miles south of the intersection of S. Road 440 and W. 775 Road in Cherokee County, Oklahoma. It is located approximately 4 miles south-southeast of the town of Hulbert, Oklahoma. The site is currently a fenced pasture covered with grass and weeds. In the southeast corner of the site is a small pond. We were unable to determine if this was a manmade feature or remnant of a sinkhole. An overhead power line crosses the site in a generally east-west direction through the central portion of the site. Site topography is nearly flat with a gentle slope down to the south. At the time of our exploration, the ground surface was moist to wet. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The conditions encountered at each boring location are detailed on the appended Boring Records. Each boring initially encountered a 2 to 3 inch thick layer of topsoil and surface vegetation root material. Below the surficial covering, a zone of cultivated soil was penetrated to a depth of about 3 feet. Cultivated soils are soils that have been loosened and disturbed by past plowing and tilling during agricultural use. These soils were typically described as very soft to firm dark brown clay with topsoil and roots. Several samples of the near surface soils were wet. Standard Penetration Resistance values in the cultivated zone varied from the weight of hammer (i.e. the dead weight of the sampling device and hammer forced the sample through the sampling interval without striking a blow) to 5 blows per foot (bpf). At boring B-3 and B-4, a thin zone of undisturbed residual soils was penetrated below the cultivated soils to a depth of about 4 ½ to 5 feet. Residual soils have been formed in place by weathering of the parent material. These residual soils were described as brown clay and exhibited standard penetration resistance value of 14 bpf. At boring B-1, B-2, and B-5 the cultivated soils extended to the top of weathered limestone. At boring B- 3 and B-4 the weathered limestone was found below the thin layer of residuum. The weathered limestone extended to auger refusal, which was encountered at depths varying from 5 to 8 feet below the existing ground surface. Each boring was advanced using NQ size rock coring techniques. The NQ rock core bit retrieves a sample that is approximately 1.9 inches in diameter. The recovered rock was typically a limestone with some chert lenses. Rock recovery (REC) varied from 55 to 100 percent of the core run length. The Rock Quality Designation () of the runs varied from 31 to 93 percent. Several clay filled voids were detected during coring. No open voids were detected to the depths cored. Groundwater was not encountered in the borings at completion of soil test drilling and prior to rock coring. Rock coring was performed, which that introduced water into the borehole. At completion of the coring, the boreholes were abandoned in place by grouting the boreholes. Therefore, the boreholes could not be checked for stabilized groundwater. Considering the shallow depth of refusal, it is unlikely
4 Hulbert 69KV Switching Station Report of Subsurface Exploration Hulbert, Cherokee County, Oklahoma Page 3 groundwater exists in the soil matrix. The site appears to be susceptible to having temporary perched groundwater on the shallow weathered rock surface. LABORATORY SOIL RESISTIVITY TESTING Portions of soil samples were selected for laboratory soil resistivity testing to be used for grounding design. These samples were submitted to GeoTesting Express for soil resistivity testing using the Wenner Four Electrode Method described in ASTM G-57. The results of these tests are as follows: Boring Number Sample Type Depth (ft) Sample Description Electrical Resistivity, ohm-cm 10,064 B-1 Grab Sample from Moist, brown silty clay with Ground Surface organics B-1 Rock Core 4 Hard light gray limestone *>3.2E+08 B-2 Grab Sample from Moist, brown silty clay with 9,946 Ground Surface organics B-3 Split Spoon Moist, brown silty clay with 15,416 trace organics B-3 Grab Sample from 3 Dry, light gray rock cuttings 1,492 Auger Cuttings B-4 Split Spoon Moist, brown silty clay 5,968 B-4 Split Spoon Moist, brown silty clay 1,343 B-5 Split Spoon Moist, brown silty clay with 4,774 organics B-5 Grab Sample from 5 Dry, light gray rock cuttings 1,831 Auger Cuttings and moist, brown clay B-5** Rock Core 7.5 Hard gray limestone with chert 1.16E+08 *test could not be completed because sample resistance exceeded the capacity of the resistance meter **results may have been influenced by jointing and fractures in specimen GENERAL DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of our subsurface exploration, it appears that the site can be developed to support the proposed substation from a geotechnical standpoint. However, the presence of an upper layer of loose often wet cultivated soil, clayey residual soils, and the shallow depth to weathered rock and sound rock will impact design and construction. The presence of shallow weathered rock and sound rock will impact mass excavation, utility excavation, and foundation excavation. The premium cost of rock removal will impact the construction budget. The site has been used for agriculture and the upper soils appear to have been loosened by past land cultivation. In their current state, they are not suitable for support of foundations, slabs or pavements. Compaction of the upper cultivated soil zone is recommended to prepare the site for construction. The thickness of the cultivated zone will require that it be undercut and replaced in
5 Hulbert 69KV Switching Station Report of Subsurface Exploration Hulbert, Cherokee County, Oklahoma Page 4 compacted lifts. Considering the moisture content of the material and depending on the prevailing weather at the time of construction, it may be more cost effective to waste the cultivated soil and replace it with suitable borrow. Laboratory testing to determine the expansive characteristics of the clayey residual soils was not performed. This testing was not in the work scope and the thickness of the material is fairly insignificant. Penetration of these materials to the higher quality weathered rock encountered at shallow depths is recommended for shallow foundations. The site area is underlain by limestone rock, which is susceptible to solution activity and formation of voids in the subsurface materials. The voids form from soil migration into the solution opening in the underlying rock. Where these voids collapse, sinkholes form and loss of support can occur to structures supported above them. At the subject site the borings did not detect voids in the soil layer and the depth to rock is fairly uniform. Since structures will be support at or within a few feet of rock, the risk of an undetected soil void resulting in sinkhole formation and loss of foundation support appears to be low. SITE AND SUBGRADE PREPARATION Prior to proceeding with construction operations, the existing surficial grasses and miscellaneous vegetation should be cleared. Heavily organic topsoil should be stripped and wasted off site or used in landscaping areas. The few feet of soil below the topsoil is dark brown and will have a similar appearance to the heavily organic topsoil. This upper soil does not appear to be heavily organic and need not be stripped due to organic content. As mentioned in the GENERAL section of this report, the upper layer of soil has been loosened by past cultivation and will require compaction. We recommend it be removed and replaced at a compaction of at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density of the Standard Proctor (ASTM D-698). At the time of this exploration, the soils were wet to moist and would require drying to permit compaction. Depending on the moisture condition of the soils at the time of construction and the prevailing weather, it may be more cost effective to waste the upper three feet of cultivated soil and replace it with a suitable moisture soil then to dry the existing materials on site. Following the removal of the cultivated soil, the exposed subgrade should be proofrolled with a 20 to 30 ton tandem axle dump truck or similar piece of rubber tired equipment. Proof-rolling consists of applying repeated passes to the subgrade with this equipment. The purpose of the proof-rolling is to identify soft, weak, or excessively wet soils that may be present at the time of evaluation. Unsuitable or unstable materials identified during the subgrade evaluation or proof-rolling operations should be undercut and replaced with compacted fill or stabilized in-place. We do not know if any site development will occur in the area of the small on site pond. The scope of the field exploration did not include evaluation of conditions in this area. If development or filling of the pond is planned, additional evaluation of this area may be warranted.
6 Hulbert 69KV Switching Station Report of Subsurface Exploration Hulbert, Cherokee County, Oklahoma Page 5 EARTHWORK After subgrade evaluation and subgrade preparation measures have been implemented, the site may be brought to the design subgrade levels with structural fill. Structural fill or backfill should be clean soil, free of excessive organic matter. Material containing rocks or stones greater than 3 inches in diameter should not be used. Structural fill should be placed in maximum 6 to 8 inch loose lifts, and compacted to at least 95 percent of the soil s maximum dry density as determined by the Standard Proctor Compaction Test (ASTM D-698). Backfill in trenches or other confined spaces, where light portable compaction equipment is required, should be placed in maximum lift thicknesses of 4 inches and compacted to at least the same level of compaction. All fill material should be placed in horizontal lifts and adequately keyed into the existing subgrade. Crushed stone backfill discussed in this report should meet the requirements Subsection , Aggregate for Aggregate Base (Type A, Type B, or Type C) of the Oklahoma Department of Transportation 2009 Standard Specifications for Highway Construction. Crushed stone backfill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density of Modified Proctor (ASTM D-1557). During fill placement, field density tests should be performed by a qualified soils technician working under the direction of a geotechnical engineer to check that the degree of compaction being achieved is in accordance with project specifications. FOUNDATIONS We understand that the substation structures will be supported on both shallow spread footings and drilled piers. Due the condition of the upper cultivated soils and thin layer of clayey residual soils encountered in the borings, shallow foundations should penetrate these materials and bear on the underlying weathered rock. Alternately the foundations may be over-excavated down to the weathered rock and backfilled with compacted-crushed stone or additional concrete. An allowable bearing capacity of 6,000 psf can be used for foundations bearing on the weathered rock or on compacted crushed stone underlain directly by weathered rock. A minimum foundation width of 3 feet is recommended for this bearing capacity. An embedment depth of 2 feet is recommended as a precaution against frost heave. It is recommended that a geotechnical engineer evaluate all foundation excavations to assess that conditions are similar to those encountered in the borings and that the bearing soils are capable of supporting the design bearing pressures. If the foundation subgrades are to be over-excavated and backfilled, the engineer should evaluate the base of the undercut. Drilled piers should be extended at least 2 feet into the weathered rock or sound rock. Support can be obtained through end bearing, side frictional resistance or both. For end bearing in weathered rock an allowable capacity of 6000 psf can be assumed. For end bearing in competent rock, an allowable end bearing capacity of up to 40,000 psf can be used. For bearing pressures greater than 6,000 psf, evaluation of drilled percussion holes that extend 2 pier diameters below the base of the drilled pier should be performed by a geotechnical engineer. The geotechnical engineer should use a scratch rod to confirm the underlying materials are satisfactory for support of the anticipated foundation stresses. For side frictional resistance we recommend the length of pier in soil be ignored. The portion of the pier in weathered rock can be designed assuming a side friction of 1,000 psf for compressive loads and 700 psf for tension loads. The portion of the pier below auger refusal in sound rock can be designed assuming a side
7
8 FIGURE
9 B B CL Existing Overhead Power Lines 21 B-3 B B Hulbert 69 KV Switching Station S 440 Road and W 775 Road Hulbert, Oklahoma LEGEND: Approximate Boring Location Scale: 1 = 54± Source: Soil Boring Location Plan, GRDA (dated 09/09/2011) Figure 1 Boring Location Plan ENERCON Job No.: GRDA006
10 APPENDIX A TEST PROCEDURES
11 TEST PROCEDURES The general field procedures employed by Enercon Services, Inc. (ENERCON), are summarized in the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard D420 "Investigating and Sampling Soil and Rock". This recommended practice lists recognized methods for determining soil and rock distribution and groundwater conditions. These methods include geophysical and in-situ methods as well as borings. Standard Drilling Techniques To obtain subsurface samples, borings are drilled using one of several alternate techniques depending upon the subsurface conditions. Some of these techniques and typical drilling methods used are presented in the following paragraphs: In Soils: a) Continuous hollow stem augers. b) Rotary borings using roller cone bits or drag bits, and water or drilling mud to flush the hole. In Rock: a) Core drilling with diamond-faced, double or triple tube core barrels. b) Core boring with roller cone bits. Hollow Stem Augering: A hollow stem augers consists of a hollow steel tube with a continuous exterior spiral flange termed a flight. The auger is turned into the ground, returning the cuttings along the flights. The hollow center permits a variety of sampling and testing tools to be used without removing the auger. Rotary Borings: Rotary boring uses a high speed revolving cutter and circulating liquid or air to remove the cuttings. Typically, water or drilling mud is used to remove the cuttings. Several types of bits are used to penetrate through the soil mass, including tri-cone roller bits for hard soil/soft rock. Core Drilling: Soil drilling methods are not normally capable of penetrating through hard cemented soil, weathered rock, coarse gravel or boulders, thin rock seams, or the upper surface of sound, continuous rock. Materials that cannot be penetrated by auger or rotary soil-drilling methods at a reasonable rate are designated as refusal materials. Core drilling procedures are required to penetrate and sample refusal materials. Prior to coring, casing may be set in the drilled hole through the overburden soils to keep the hole from caving and to prevent excessive water loss. The refusal materials are then cored according to ASTM D2113 using a diamond-studded bit fastened to the end of a hollow, double or triple tube core barrel. This device is rotated at high speeds and the cuttings are brought to the surface by circulating water. Core samples of the material penetrated are protected and retained in the swivel-mounted inner tube. Upon completion of each drill run, the core barrel is brought to the surface, the core recovery is measured, and the core is placed in boxes for storage and transportation to our laboratory. Sampling and Testing in Boreholes Several techniques are used to obtain samples and data in soils in the field, however the most common methods in this area are: a) Standard Penetrating Testing b) Undisturbed Sampling c) Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Testing d) Water Level Readings
12 The procedures utilized for this project are presented below. Standard Penetration Testing: At regular intervals, the drilling tools are removed and soil samples obtained with a standard 2 inch diameter split tube sampler connected to an A or N-size rod. The sampler is first seated 6 inches to penetrate any loose cuttings, then driven an additional 12 inches with blows of a 140 pound safety hammer falling 30 inches. Generally, the number of hammer blows required to drive the sampler the final 12 inches is designated the "penetration resistance" or "N" value, in blows per foot (bpf). The split barrel sampler is designed to retain the soil penetrated, so that it may be returned to the surface for observation. Representative portions of the soil samples obtained from each split barrel sample are placed in jars, sealed and transported to our laboratory. The standard penetration test, when properly evaluated, provides an indication of the soil strength and compressibility. The tests are conducted according to ASTM Standard D1586. The depths and N-values of standard penetration tests are shown on the Boring Records. Split barrel samples are suitable for visual observation and classification tests but are not sufficiently intact for quantitative laboratory testing. Water Level Readings: Water table readings are normally taken in the borings and are recorded on the Boring Records. In sandy soils, these readings indicate the approximate location of the hydrostatic water table at the time of our field exploration. In clayey soils, the rate of water seepage into the borings is low and it is generally not possible to establish the location of the hydrostatic water table through short term water level readings. Also, fluctuation in the water table should be expected with variations in precipitation, surface runoff, evaporation, and other factors. For long-term monitoring of water levels, it is necessary to install piezometers. The water levels reported on the Boring Records are determined by field crews immediately after the drilling tools are removed, and several hours after the borings are completed, if possible. The time lag is intended to permit stabilization of the groundwater table which may have been disrupted by the drilling operation. Occasionally the borings will cave-in, preventing water level readings from being obtained or trapping drilling water above the cave-in zone. The cave-in depth is measured and recorded on the Boring Records. Boring Records The subsurface conditions encountered during drilling are reported on a field boring records prepared by the Driller or an ENERCON representative. The records contains information concerning the boring method, samples attempted and recovered, indications of the presence of coarse gravel, cobbles, etc., and observations of groundwater. It also contains the field representative's interpretation of the soil conditions between samples. Therefore, these boring records contain both factual and interpretive information. After the drilling is completed, a geotechnical engineer or geologist classifies the soil samples and prepares the final Boring Records, which are the basis for our evaluations and recommendations. Soil Classification Soil classifications provide a general guide to the engineering properties of various soil types and enable the engineer to apply his past experience to current problems. In our investigations, samples obtained during drilling operations are examined in our laboratory and visually classified by an engineer. The soils are classified according to consistency (based on number of blows from standard penetration tests), color and texture. These classification descriptions are included on our Boring Records. The Key to Symbols and Classifications in Appendix B presents criteria that are typically used in the classification and description of soil and rock samples for preparation of Boring Records.
13 APPENDIX B BORING RECORDS LABORATORY TEST REPORTS KEY TO SYMBOLS AND CLASSIFICATIONS
14 BORING RECORD BORING NO.: B-1 PROJECT NOTES Hulbert 69 KV Switching Station Borehole backfilled and grouted after delayed groundwater reading LOCATION S. 440 Road and W 775 Road, Hulbert, OK MANUFACTURERS DESIGNATION OF DRILL RIG SHEET NUMBER DRILLING AGENCY CME-550, Auto Hammer 1 OF 1 Mohawk Drilling, Inc. DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger DIRECTION OF HOLE Vertical DEPTH TO GROUND WATER AT TIME OF BORING Not Encountered ASTM D-1586 DEPTH TO GROUND WATER - DELAYED READING Not Obtained BOREHOLE DIAMETER 6 IN STARTED COMPLETED SAMPLING METHOD Split Spoon and NQ Rock DATE OF BOREHOLE ELEVATION OF TOP OF BOREHOLE Not Provided 2/7/2012 2/9/2012 DEPTH (FT) CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS 2 inches Top Soil Cultivated Soil - Very Soft dark brown silty CLAY with sand SAMPLE TYPE BOX OR SAMPLE NO. SS 1 ROCK RESULT REMARKS 0.25 tsf unconfined compression estimated with pocket penetrometer BLOWS PER 6" INCREMENT SPT N (BPF) Weathered Limestone sampled as very hard tan brown fine CLAY Auger Refusal at 4 feet SS 2 50 / 0 in Hard to moderately hard gray limestone with chert NQ REC Clay seam 7 to 8 feet Highly fractured 8 to 10 feet NQ REC REC 76 Highly fractured and weathered 14 to 15 feet NQ Highly fractured 18 to 20 feet 21.0 Coring terminated at 20 feet ENERCON Project #WALTON051
15 BORING RECORD BORING NO.: B-2 PROJECT NOTES Hulbert 69 KV Switching Station Borehole backfilled and grouted after completion of drilling LOCATION S. 440 Road and W 775 Road, Hulbert, OK MANUFACTURERS DESIGNATION OF DRILL RIG SHEET NUMBER DRILLING AGENCY CME-550, Auto Hammer 1 OF 1 Mohawk Drilling, Inc. DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger DIRECTION OF HOLE Vertical DEPTH TO GROUND WATER AT TIME OF BORING Not Encountered ASTM D-1586 DEPTH TO GROUND WATER - DELAYED READING Not Obtained BOREHOLE DIAMETER 6 IN STARTED COMPLETED SAMPLING METHOD Split Spoon and NQ Rock Core DATE OF BOREHOLE ELEVATION OF TOP OF BOREHOLE Not Provided 2/7/2012 2/9/2012 DEPTH (FT) CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS 3 inches of Top Soil Cultivated Soil - Firm brown silty CLAY, moist SAMPLE TYPE BOX OR SAMPLE NO. SS 1 ROCK RESULT REMARKS 1.0 tsf unconfined compression estimated with pocket penetrometer BLOWS PER 6" INCREMENT SPT N (BPF) Weathered Limestone - Sampled as very hard tan brown CLAY Auger Refusal at 5 feet Hard gray limestone with weathered joints Very hard fractured limestone with chert SS 2 50 / 0 in NQ REC Very slow coring rate (2 in./hr.) from 14 to 14.2 feet 15.0 Coring terminated at 14.2 feet ENERCON Project #WALTON051
16 BORING RECORD BORING NO.: B-3 PROJECT NOTES Hulbert 69 KV Switching Station Borehole backfilled after completion of drilling LOCATION S. 440 Road and W 775 Road, Hulbert, OK MANUFACTURERS DESIGNATION OF DRILL RIG SHEET NUMBER DRILLING AGENCY CME-550, Auto Hammer 1 OF 2 Mohawk Drilling, Inc. DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger DIRECTION OF HOLE Vertical DEPTH TO GROUND WATER AT TIME OF BORING Not Encountered ASTM D-1586 DEPTH TO GROUND WATER - DELAYED READING Not Obtained BOREHOLE DIAMETER 6 IN STARTED COMPLETED SAMPLING METHOD Split Spoon and NQ Rock Core DATE OF BOREHOLE ELEVATION OF TOP OF BOREHOLE Not Provided 2/7/2012 2/8/2012 DEPTH (FT) CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS 2 inches of Top Soil Cultivated Soil - Soft red brown sandy CLAY, wet SAMPLE TYPE SS BOX OR SAMPLE NO. 1 ROCK RESULT REMARKS 0.75 tsf unconfined compression estimated with pocket penetrometer BLOWS PER 6" INCREMENT SPT N (BPF) Residuum - Very stiff dark brown CLAY, moist Weathered Limestone - Sampled as very tan brown CLAY SS tsf unconfined compression estimated with pocket penetrometer / 1 in 8.0 Auger Refusal at 8 feet Moderately hard to hard light gray limestone with weathered joints REC NQ Very hard light gray limestone Coring terminated at 20 feet REC NQ REC NQ ENERCON Project #WALTON051
17 BORING RECORD BORING NO.: B-4 PROJECT NOTES Hulbert 69 KV Switching Station Borehole backfilled and grouted after delayed groundwater reading LOCATION S. 440 Road and W 775 Road, Hulbert, OK MANUFACTURERS DESIGNATION OF DRILL RIG SHEET NUMBER DRILLING AGENCY CME-550, Auto Hammer 1 OF 1 Mohawk Drilling, Inc. DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger DIRECTION OF HOLE Vertical DEPTH TO GROUND WATER AT TIME OF BORING Not Encountered ASTM D-1586 DEPTH TO GROUND WATER - DELAYED READING Not Obtained BOREHOLE DIAMETER 6 IN STARTED COMPLETED SAMPLING METHOD Split Spoon and NQ Rock Core DATE OF BOREHOLE ELEVATION OF TOP OF BOREHOLE Not Provided 2/7/2012 2/9/2012 DEPTH (FT) CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS 2 inches of Top Soil Cultivated Soil - Very soft brown CLAY, wet, with topsoil and roots SAMPLE TYPE BOX OR SAMPLE NO. SS 1 ROCK RESULTS REMARKS 0.50 tsf unconfined compression estimated from pocket penetrometer BLOWS PER 6" INCREMENT 1 WH WH SPT N (BPF) Residuum - Stiff dark brown CLAY, moist Weathered Limestone - Sampled as very hard tan brown CLAY SS tsf unconfined compression estimated from pocket penetrometer Auger refusal at 8 feet 9.0 Hard light gray medium to fine grained limestone NQ REC Coring terminated at 18 feet ENERCON Project #GRDA006
18 BORING RECORD BORING NO.: B-5 PROJECT Hulbert 69 KV Switching Station NOTES Borehole backfilled and grouted after completion of drilling S. 440 Road and W 775 Road, Hulbert, OK MANUFACTURERS DESIGNATION OF DRILL RIG SHEET NUMBER DRILLING AGENCY CME-550, Auto Hammer 1 OF 1 Mohawk Drilling, Inc. DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger DIRECTION OF HOLE Vertical DEPTH TO GROUND WATER AT TIME OF BORING Not Encountered ASTM D-1586 DEPTH TO GROUND WATER - DELAYED READING Not Obtained BOREHOLE DIAMETER 6 IN STARTED COMPLETED SAMPLING METHOD Split Spoon and NQ Rock Core DATE OF BOREHOLE ELEVATION OF TOP OF BOREHOLE Not Provided 2/7/2012 2/8/2012 DEPTH (FT) CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS 3 inches of Top Soil Cultivated Soil - Soft dark brown CLAY with roots SAMPLE TYPE BOX OR SAMPLE NO. SS 1 ROCK RESULT REMARKS 1.5 tsf unconfined compression estimated with pocket penetrometer BLOWS PER 6" INCREMENT SPT N (BPF) Weathered Limestone- Sampled as very hard tan brown CLAY 5.0 Auger Refusal at 5 feet Hard coarse grained gray limestone with weathered joints REC. NQ clay sem 8 to 9 feet clay seam 9.5 to 10 feet Very hard gray fine grained limestone with chert REC NQ REC NQ REC NQ highly fractured from 18 to 19 feet 21.0 Coring terminated at 20 feet ENERCON Project #GRDA006
19 Client: Enercon Project: Hulbert Switching Station Location: Hulbert Oklahoma GTX#: 1793 Test Date: thru Tested By: jm Checked By: MCM Laboratory Measurement of Soil Resistivity Using the Wenner Four-Electrode Method by ASTM G 57 Boring ID Sample ID Depth, ft. Sample Description Electrical Resistivity, ohm-cm Electrical Conductivity, (ohm-cm) -1 B Ground Moist, brown silt with organics 10, E-05 B Ground Moist, brown silt with organics 9, E-04 B " Moist, brown silt with organics 15, E-05 B-3 Rock Dust From Auger Recovery 3' Dry, ligth gray rock dust 1, E-04 B ' Moist, brown silt with organics 5, E-04 B ' Moist, brown silt with organics 1, E-04 B ' Moist, brown silt with organics 4, E-04 B-5 Rock Dust From Auger Recovery 5' Dry, light gray rock dust and Moist, brown clay 1, E-04 Notes: Electrical Conductivity is calculated as inverse of Electrical Resistivity (per ASTM G 57) Test conducted in standard laboratory atmosphere: F Samples B-1 Rock Dust at 4' and B-3 at 5' could not be run due to small amount of recovery
20 Client: Enercon Project: Hulbert 69 KV Switching Station Location: Hulbert, Oklahoma GTX#: 1793 Tested By: jm Test Date: 02/21/12 Checked By: MCM Laboratory Measurement of Rock Resistivity Using the Two-Electrode Method by ASTM G 187 Boring ID Sample ID Depth, ft Sample Description Electrical Resistivity, ohm-cm Electrical Conductivity, (ohm-cm) -1 B-1 * --- 4' Rock Core >328,614,237 >3.04E-09 B-5 ** ' Rock Core 1.16E E-09 Comments: Test Equipment: Nilsson Model 400 Resistance Meter Test conducted in standard laboratory atmosphere: F Test specimen soaked in distilled water for 90 minutes prior to testing. * Sample resistance exceeded the capacity of the resistance meter. ** Sample resistance may be influenced by cracks and shear planes present in material. See Photos.
21
B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.
N B-1 SYMBOLS: Exploratory Boring Location Project Mngr: BORE LOCATION PLAN Project No. GK EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G1063.02 GK Scale: Checked By: 1045 Central Parkway North, Suite 103 San Antonio, Texas 78232
More informationAPPENDIX E SOILS TEST REPORTS
Otsego County, NY Site Work Specifications APPENDIX E SOILS TEST REPORTS Blue Wing Services, Inc. July 1, 2010 Blue Wing Services May 20, 2010 Page 2 the site, was not made available to Empire at this
More informationBoreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.
Implementation Boreholes 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3. Rotary Drilling Boring Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 4. Percussion Drilling The right choice of method depends on: Ground
More informationGeotechnical Data Report
Geotechnical Data Report Downtown Greenville Future Conveyance Study December 1, 2015 Terracon Project No. 86155032 Prepared for: Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. December 1, 2015 561 Mauldin Road
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Polecat Creek Bridge (Bridge A) June 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04155197 Prepared for: Garver, LLC Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. TABLE
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Bridge B Bridge Crossing: South 257 th West Avenue Creek County, Oklahoma June 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04155197 Prepared for: Garver, LLC Tulsa,
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Bridge D Bridge Crossing: South 209 th West Avenue Creek County, Oklahoma June 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04155197 Prepared for: Garver, LLC Tulsa,
More informationATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY
ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY Kevin M. Martin, P.E. KMM Geotechnical Consultants, LLC 7 Marshall Road Hampstead, NH 0384 603-489-6 (p)/ 603-489-8 (f)/78-78-4084(m) kevinmartinpe@aol.com
More informationENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods
ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods Geotechnical Involvement in Project Phases Planning Design Alternatives Preparation of Detailed Plans Final Design
More informationCivil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx
2365 Haggerty Road South * Canton, Michigan 48188 P: 734-397-3100 * F: 734-397-3131 * www.manniksmithgroup.com August 29, 2012 Mr. Richard Kent Washtenaw County Parks and Recreation Commission 2330 Platt
More informationPreliminary Geotechnical Investigation Cadiz / Trigg County I-24 Business Park. Cadiz, Kentucky
Environmental & Geoscience, LLC 834 Madisonville Road Hopkinsville, KY 440 70.44.000 FAX 70.44.8300 www.wedrill.com A member of Trinity Energy & Infrastructure Group, LLC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
More informationSITE INVESTIGATION 1
SITE INVESTIGATION 1 Definition The process of determining the layers of natural soil deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical properties is generally referred to as site investigation.
More informationSOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART COARSE-GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% RETAINED ON NO.200 SIEVE FINE-GRAINED SOILS 50% OR MORE PASSES THE NO.200 SIEVE PRIMARY DIVISIONS GRAVELS MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED
More informationChapter 12 Subsurface Exploration
Page 12 1 Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration 1. The process of identifying the layers of deposits that underlie a proposed structure and their physical characteristics is generally referred to as (a) subsurface
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Study, Conifer Senior High School Football Field Improvements, Conifer, Colorado
2390 South Lipan Street Denver, CO 80223 phone: (303) 742-9700 fax: (303) 742-9666 email: kadenver@kumarusa.com www.kumarusa.com Office Locations: Denver (HQ), Colorado Springs, Fort Collins, and Frisco,
More informationGeotechnical Investigation Juneau Seawalk - Taku Fisheries to Miner s Wharf Juneau, Alaska DM&A Job No
Duane Miller & Associates 5821 Arctic Boulevard, Suite A Anchorage, AK 99518-1654 (907) 644-3200 Fax 644-0507 Arctic & Geotechnical Engineering May 4, 2006 Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. 1971 First Avenue Seattle,
More informationM E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI
M E M O R A N D U M TO: FROM: Mr. Mark Schilling Gulf Interstate Engineering Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI DATE: November 11, 2014 RE: Summary of Findings Geotechnical
More informationAPPENDIX C. Borehole Data
APPENDIX C Borehole Data MAJOR DIVISIONS SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART SYMBOLS GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS ADDITIONAL MATERIAL
More informationThe process of determining the layers of natural soil deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical properties is generally
The process of determining the layers of natural soil deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical properties is generally referred to as sub surface investigation 2 1 For proper
More informationREPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION
REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION ENKA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL Sand Hill Road Candler, North Carolina Prepared For: BUNCOMBE COUNTY SCHOOLS Prepared By: AMEC ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
More informationGotechnical Investigations and Sampling
Gotechnical Investigations and Sampling Amit Prashant Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar Short Course on Geotechnical Investigations for Structural Engineering 12 14 October, 2017 1 Purpose of
More informationPhoto 1 - Southerly view across 2700 parking lot toward existing building. Multi-residential building borders western side of property in upper right of view. Photo 2 - Southerly view across 2750 parking
More informationPRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT. Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts. Prepared For:
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts Prepared For: Meridian Associates, Inc. 500 Cummings Center, Suite 5950 Beverly, Massachusetts
More informationProject: ITHACA-TOMPKINS REGIONAL AIRPORT EXPANSION Project Location: ITHACA, NY Project Number: 218-34 Key to Soil Symbols and Terms TERMS DESCRIBING CONSISTENCY OR CONDITION COARSE-GRAINED SOILS (major
More informationLimited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Classroom Additions Albany County Campus Laramie, Wyoming
Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Classroom Additions Albany County Campus 2300 Missile Drive, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 Phone 307-635-0222 www.stratageotech.com Limited Geotechnical Engineering
More informationPREPARED FOR MR. JOE WOOD CARTER & SLOOPE, INC PEAKE ROAD MACON, GEORGIA PREPARED BY
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION MACON WATER AUTHORITY (MWA) SANITARY SEWER RELOCATION MACON, GEORGIA GEC PROJECT NO. 14077.2 PREPARED FOR MR. JOE WOOD CARTER & SLOOPE, INC.
More informationArdaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants
SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION 42-INCH FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT CHIQUITA BOULEVARD S AND SW 34 TH STREET CAPE CORAL, LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials
More informationPierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section
Page 1 of 7 Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section PROJECT NAME: DATE: APPLICATION NO.: PCDE NO.: LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA (LHA) GEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT
More informationREPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SITE INVESTIGATION KERSHAW COUNTY EXIT 87 OFFICE PARK. ELGIN, SOUTH CAROLINA S&ME Project No.
REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SITE INVESTIGATION KERSHAW COUNTY EXIT 87 OFFICE PARK ELGIN, SOUTH CAROLINA S&ME Project No. 1611-04-450 Prepared For: KERSHAW COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICE Post
More informationAPPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION
Figure B-5.7 Figure B-5.8 Preliminary Geotechnical and Environmental Report Appendix C Hydrogeologic Investigation APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION December 21, 2011 WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION PROJECT
More informationPRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT TOWN OF ASHLAND TOWN HALL 101 THOMPSON STREET ASHLAND, VIRGINIA JOB NUMBER: 39016 PREPARED FOR: PMA PLANNERS & ARCHITECTS 10325 WARWICK BOULEVARD NEWPORT NEWS,
More informationDepth (ft) USCS Soil Description TOPSOIL & FOREST DUFF
Test Pit No. TP-6 Location: Latitude 47.543003, Longitude -121.980441 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 1,132 feet Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description 0 1.5 1.5 5.0 SM 5.0 8.0 SM Loose to medium dense,
More informationCITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH 2 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT 3
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT City of Cape Coral Procurement Division Cultural Park Boulevard, nd Floor Cape Coral, FL ISSUED FOR BID VOLUME of GEOTECHNICAL
More informationGeneral. DATE December 10, 2013 PROJECT No TO Mary Jarvis Urbandale/Riverside South Development Corporation
DATE December 10, 201 PROJECT No. 10-1121-0260- TO Mary Jarvis Urbandale/Riverside South Development Corporation CC Justin Robitaille, Urbandale Jonathan Párraga, J.L. Richards & Associates Limited FROM
More informationGEOTECHNICAL REPORT. Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska.
Matanuska-Susitna Borough GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska March 2, 20 Prepared By: John Thornley, PE Geotechnical Engineer 333 Arctic Blvd.,
More informationNorthern Colorado Geotech
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PROPOSED CECIL FARMS DEVELOPMENT WELD COUNTY ROAD 7, BETWEEN ROADS 7 AND 7 SEVERANCE, COLORADO NORTHERN COLORADO GEOTECH PROJECT NO. 0-6 APRIL 0, 06 Prepared
More informationReference No S072 APRIL 2012
A REPORT TO SOLMAR DEVELOPMENT CORP. A PRELIMINARY SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT NORTHEAST OF SIDEROAD 5 AND 0 LINE TOWN OF ERIN Reference No. 202-S072 APRIL 202 DISTRIBUTION
More informationPreliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Gooseberry Point Pedestrian Improvements Whatcom County, Washington SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
File No. 12-100 Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering Consultants Mr. Kevin Brown, P.E. Gray & Osborne, Inc. 3710 168 th Street NE, Suite B210 Arlington, Washington 98223 Subject: Draft Report Preliminary
More informationB-1 SURFACE ELEVATION
5A 5B LOGGED BY El. S. Bhangoo DRILLING CONTRACTOR Pitcher Drilling DRILLING METHOD Rotary Wash BEGIN DATE 12-14-12 SAMPLER TYPE(S) AND SIZE(S) (ID) SPT, MC BOREHOLE BACKFILL AND COMPLETION COMPLETION
More informationField Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E:
March 31, 201 11 Northstar Avenue 83301 Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E: taa@jub.com Re: Geotechnical Data Report Preliminary Phase 1 Field Exploration Revision No. 1 Proposed Rapid Infiltration Basin
More informationJune 9, R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western Region PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON
PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED MARTIN RIVER BRIDGE MILE 306.7 MACKENZIE HIGHWAY Submitted by : R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western
More informationPRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. State College Redevelopment State College Borough, Centre County, Pennsylvania. CMT Laboratories File No.
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT State College Redevelopment State College Borough, Centre County, Pennsylvania CMT Laboratories File No. 1638700 Prepared for: National Development Council One Battery Park
More informationProject No: 68R3056 Client: City of Frederick Project: RFQ 14-H Future North Side Water Tank City/State: 7516 Hayward Road, Frederick, MD
Boring: SB-1 (1 of 1) Moist, brown to orange brown CLAY and SILT, trace sand with fine weathered rock fragments. POSSIBLE FILL. Dry, orange brown sandy SILT trace clay (SM-ML). RESIDUAL SOIL : Not Surveyed
More informationCHEROKEE NATION BUSINESSES, LLC
REPORT OF PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION PROPOSED CHEROKEE SPRINGS PLAZA TAHLEQUAH, OKLAHOMA BUILDING & EARTH PROJECT NO. OK10004 PREPARED FOR: CHEROKEE NATION BUSINESSES,
More informationArdaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants
SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE HENDRY COUNTY, FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants OFFICES Orlando, 88 S. Orange Avenue, Orlando,
More informationDATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS
DATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS SUBMITTED TO PORT OF GALVESTON 123 ROSENBERG AVENUE, 8TH FLOOR GALVESTON, TEXAS 77553 BY HVJ ASSOCIATES, INC. HOUSTON,
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Richland Creek Trunk Sewer Greenville, South Carolina March 31, 2014 Terracon Project No. 86145008 Prepared for: Renewable Water Resources Greenville, South Carolina Prepared
More informationGeotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Geotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: DATE: June 28, 218 PROJECT NUMBER: 697482
More informationGeotechnical Data Report
Geotechnical Data Report ReWa Solar Farm at Durbin Creek Fountain Inn, South Carolina September 1, 2017 Terracon Project No. 86165043 Prepared for: Renewable Water Resources Greenville, South Carolina
More informationR-1 Conveyor Relocation Project Legend 0 500 1000 1500 ft. This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for general reference only. Data layers that appear on this map
More informationSafe bearing capacity evaluation of the bridge site along Syafrubesi-Rasuwagadhi road, Central Nepal
Bulletin of the Department of Geology Bulletin of the Department of Geology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal, Vol. 12, 2009, pp. 95 100 Safe bearing capacity evaluation of the bridge site along
More informationTable of Contents. Description
Table of Contents Description Page A. Introduction... 1 A.1. Project Description... 1 A.2. Site Conditions and History... 2 A.3. Purpose... 3 A.4. Background Information and Reference Documents... 4 A.5.
More informationGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT BRIDGE OVER BIG CREEK APPROXIMATELY.8 MILES EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF COUNTY ROAD EW1546 AND COUNTY ROAD 193 LEFLORE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA PROJECT No. J2-8616(5),
More informationPreliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report
Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Park 3 Barrow County, Georgia July, Terracon Project No. 4906 Prepared For: Winder Barrow Industrial Authority Prepared By: Terracon Consultants, Inc. Atlanta,
More informationFebruary 22, 2016 AG File No
Ainley Graham & Associates Limited 1-50 Grant Timmins Drive, Kingston, Ontario, K7M 8N2 Tel: (343) 266-0002 Fax: (343) 266-0028 E-mail Kingston@ainleygroup.com February 22, 2016 AG File No. 15062-1 Ministry
More informationENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
July 16, 211 Vista Design, Inc. 11634 Worcester Highway Showell, Maryland 21862 Attention: Reference: Dear Mr. Polk: Mr. Richard F. Polk, P.E. Geotechnical Engineering Report Charles County RFP No. 11-9
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Single-Span Bridge North Western Road & Hall of Fame Avenue August 25, 2015 Terracon Project No. 03155156 Prepared for: Olsson Associates Prepared by: Terracon Consultants,
More informationAppendix A. Producer Statement Advisory Note
Appendix A Producer Statement Advisory Note Ref. No. 17095 26 May 2017 PRODUCER STATEMENT CONSTRUCTION REVIEW (PS4) IMPORTANT ADVISORY NOTE The Building Consent Authority (BCA) frequently requires Producer
More informationpatersongroup Design for Earthquakes Consulting Engineers May 19, 2016 File: PG3733-LET.01
patersongroup May 19, 2016 File: PG3733-LET.01 Hydro Ottawa Limited c/o Cresa Toronto 170 University Avenue, Suite 1 Toronto, Ontario M5H 3B3 Attention: Ms. Barbara Wright Consulting Engineers 154 Colonnade
More informationKDOT Geotechnical Manual Edition. Table of Contents
KDOT Geotechnical Manual 2007 Edition The KDOT Geotechnical Manual is available two volumes. Both volumes are very large electronic (pdf) files which may take several minutes to download. The table of
More informationIN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION
IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION Nancy Case O Bourke, PE 1, Gregory L. Hartman, PE 2 and Paul Fuglevand, PE 3 ABSTRACT In-situ specific gravity
More informationHydro One (Sept 2014) Hydro One (Sept 2014) Hydro One (Sept 2014)
TABLE 1 WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS MOE WWR No Well ID Location Installation Date Status Easting Coordinates Northing Source Elevation Screened Interval Screened Material Borehole Well Stick-up Ground Top
More informationSUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND SUBGRADE EVALUATION. Proposed North Main Street Reconstruction (Contract 14-02) From New York Avenue and Murdoch Avenue
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND SUBGRADE EVALUATION Proposed North Main Street Reconstruction (Contract 14-02) From New York Avenue and Murdoch Avenue Prepared for City of Oshkosh Department of Public Works
More informationGZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
GZA BORING NO.: GZ-1 SHEET: 1 of 1 PROJECT NO: 9.223. Drilling Co.: Geologic Type of Rig: Skid Boring Location: See Plan H. Datum: See Plan Rig Model: Mudline : Foreman: Ray Eastwood CME -.8 Final Boring
More informationAppendix 11-B Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
Appendix 11-B Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation 11.0 Soil, Geology, and Seismology PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATION ENGINEERING REPORT CPV VALLEY ENERGY CENTER Wawayanda,
More informationPLATE 6 FEB G r o v e l a n d F l o o d w a l l - B o r e h o l e M a p. Legend. Groveland Floodwall Boreholes. Contour Lines.
611 6 Defau FALS conto Conto DPLV lt Eurs20 01_to 3po Defau FALS conto Conto DPLV lt Eurs20 01_to 4po 612 Conto DPLV conto Defau FALS 01_to urs20 Elt po 5 Conto DPLV conto Defau FALS 01_to urs15 Elt po
More informationADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON
F I N A L A D D E N D U M 1 R E P O R T ADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION URS JOB NO. 3376186 Prepared for Tetra Tech Inc. 142
More informationNew WW Hastings Hospital Geotechnical Investigation RFP Addendum #1
88 E. Marshall Street, Suite 0 Tulsa, OK 76 98 8 9 Phone 98 8 798 FAX DATE: April 9, 0 ADDENDUM NO.: PROJECT: New WW Hastings Hospital BID PACKAGE NO: Geotechnical Investigation RFP SUBMITTED BY: CNCR
More informationGEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT FOR STATIC TEST FACILITY FOR PROPELLANTS AT BDL, IBRAHIMPATNAM. Graphics Designers, M/s Architecture & Engineering 859, Banjara Avenue, Consultancy
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report SH-9 Bridge over Wewoka Creek Hughes County, Oklahoma Job Piece No. 27059(04) July 16, 2015 Terracon Project No. 04125055 Prepared for: Holloway, Updike, and Bellen, Inc.
More informationArdaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants
SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LELY AREA STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (LASIP) COUNTY BARN ROAD AND WING SOUTH CHANNELS NAPLES, COLLIER CO., FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc.
More informationNAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (APF) TAXIWAY D REALIGNMENT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS NORTH QUADRANT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO March, The following Addendum is hereby made a part of the Plans
More informationGeotechnical Subsurface Exploration, Engineering Evaluation and Dam Visual Observation Sun Valley Drive Extension Roswell, Fulton County, GA
Ranger Consulting, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental, Drilling, Construction 3147 Martha Berry Highway, Rome, Georgia 165; Phone: 76-29-1782; Fax: 76-29-171 April 2, 215 Mr. Tommy Crochet, PE McGee Partners,
More informationAPPENDIX A. Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols
APPENDIX A Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols Page 153 of 168 EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS The terms and symbols used on the borehole logs to summarize the results of field investigation
More informationManual on Subsurface Investigations National Highway Institute Publication No. FHWA NHI Federal Highway Administration Washington, DC
Manual on Subsurface Investigations National Highway Institute Publication No. FHWA NHI-01-031 Federal Highway Administration Washington, DC Geotechnical Site Characterization July 2001 by Paul W. Mayne,
More informationAPPENDIX F CORRELATION EQUATIONS. F 1 In-Situ Tests
APPENDIX F 1 APPENDIX F CORRELATION EQUATIONS F 1 In-Situ Tests 1. SPT (1) Sand (Hatanaka and Uchida, 1996), = effective vertical stress = effective friction angle = atmosphere pressure (Shmertmann, 1975)
More informationSCOPE OF INVESTIGATION Simple visual examination of soil at the surface or from shallow test pits. Detailed study of soil and groundwater to a
Lecture-5 Soil Exploration Dr. Attaullah Shah 1 Today s Lecture Purpose of Soil Exploration Different methods 1. Test trenches and Pits 2. Auger and Wash Boring 3. Rotary Drilling 4. Geophysical Methods
More information16 January 2018 Job Number: RICHARD NEWMAN C\- CLARK FORTUNE MCDONALD AND ASSOCIATES PO BOX 553 QUEENSTOWN
16 January 2018 Job Number: 50595 RICHARD NEWMAN C\- CLARK FORTUNE MCDONALD AND ASSOCIATES PO BOX 553 QUEENSTOWN CHANSEN@CFMA.CO.NZ STORMWATER DISPOSAL ASSESSMENT Dear Richard, RDAgritech were requested
More informationAPPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
The City of Winnipeg Bid Opportunity No. 529-2017 Template Version: C420170317 - RW APPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Quality Engineering Valued Relationships KGS Group 2017 Industrial Street Rehabilitation
More informationThe attitude he maintains in his relation to the engineer is very well stated in his own words:
Su bsurface Soil Exploration, 53: 139 Foundation Engineering Geotechnical companies that have a history of experience in a given region usually have extensive boring logs and maps telling where the borings
More informationReport of Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation
Report of Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Proposed Chatham County Jail Pittsboro, North Carolina F&R Project No. 66N-0097 Prepared For: CHATHAM COUNTY P.O. Box 1809 Pittsboro,
More informationNHBRA SOIL LABORATORY SECTION INTERIM REVISED TEST RATES FOR THE MATERIALS LABORATORY
NHBRA SOIL LABORATORY SECTION INTERIM REVISED TEST RATES FOR THE MATERIALS LABORATORY DATE OF REVISION: ) 10th October 2010 S/N TEST DESCRIPTION UNIT RATE REMARKS 1 Sieve Analysis (wet and dry methods
More information3.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
AECOM 500 W Jefferson St. Suite 1600 Louisville, KY 40202 www.aecom.com 502-569-2301 tel 502-569-2304 fax October 17, 2018 Big Rivers Electric Corporation Sebree Generating Station 9000 Highway 2096 Robards,
More informationSoil Mechanics Brief Review. Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E.
Soil Mechanics Brief Review Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E. 1 BASIC ROCK TYPES Igneous Rock (e.g. granite, basalt) Rock formed in place by cooling from magma Generally very stiff/strong and often abrasive
More informationTown of Amenia Dutchess County New York
Appendix 9.14.2 Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation 2/2007 Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report for Silo Ridge Golf Resort Community Town of Amenia Dutchess County New York February 16, 2007
More informationIntroduction to Soil Mechanics Geotechnical Engineering-II
Introduction to Soil Mechanics Geotechnical Engineering-II ground SIVA Dr. Attaullah Shah 1 Soil Formation Soil derives from Latin word Solum having same meanings as our modern world. From Geologist point
More informationSoils. Technical English - I 10 th week
Technical English - I 10 th week Soils Soil Mechanics is defined as the branch of engineering science which enables an engineer to know theoretically or experimentally the behavior of soil under the action
More informationpatersongroup 1.0 Geotechnical Desktop Review Consulting Engineers April 18, 2017 PG4080-LET.01
patersongroup April 18, 2017 PG080-LET.01 2015-2017 RR Ltd 311 Richmond Road, Suite 203 Ottawa, ON K1Z 6X3 Attention: Subject: Mr. Jonah Bonn Geotechnical Desktop Review Proposed Drive-Thru Lanes 2015-2017
More informationReport of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration. CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. February, 2011
11242843_GeoTech_Preliminary - Feburary 2011_1/40 Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio February, 2011 11242843_GeoTech_Preliminary -
More informationREPORT OF PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION, LABORATORY TESTING AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ANALYSES
REPORT OF PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION, LABORATORY TESTING AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ANALYSES Maryland Masonic Home Cockeysville, Baltimore County, Maryland ECS Project No. 7 Prepared For BALTIMORE
More informationTP-1 N61E 0 DARK BROWN SANDY SILT (ML) stiff, wet with roots (Disturbed Surficial Soil) DEPTH (FEET) 5 REDDISH BROWN SANDSTONE intensely fractured, weak to friable, deeply weathered, tight (Franciscan
More information10. GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION PROGRAM
Geotechnical site investigations should be conducted in multiple phases to obtain data for use during the planning and design of the tunnel system. Geotechnical investigations typically are performed in
More informationDecember 20, 2017 (Revised from December 15, 2017) Project No
December 20, 2017 (Revised from December 15, 2017) Project No. 92270.02 Ms. Laura Krusinski, P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Maine Department of Transportation State House Station 16 Augusta, Maine 04333-016
More informationUNIT I SITE INVESTIGATION AND SELECTION OF FOUNDATION Types of boring 1.Displacement borings It is combined method of sampling & boring operation. Closed bottom sampler, slit cup, or piston type is forced
More informationGeotechnical Investigation
Geotechnical Investigation Slope Stability Analysis for the Existing Slope Southwest of the Proposed Condo Developments 50 Ann Street, Bolton, Ontario Prepared For: Brookfield Homes (Ontario) Limited GeoPro
More informationAN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY
CTL Engineering, Inc. 2860 Fisher Road, P.O. Box 4448, Columbus, Ohio 43204338 Phone: 614/2768123 Fax: 614/2766377 Email: ctl@ctleng.com AN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY Consulting Engineers Testing Inspection
More informationAPPENDICES. Appendix A City Standard Details Appendix B Engineering Geology Report
APPENDICES Appendix A City Standard Details Appendix B Engineering Geology Report APPENDIX A CITY STANDARDS DETAILS APPENDIX B ENGINEERING GEOLOGY REPORT ENGINEERING GEOLOGY REPORT WATER
More informationGeotechnical Geotechnical Assessment
Site Investigation Site Investigation Pile Probing Pile Probing Geotechnical Logging Geotechnical and Sampling Logging and Sampling Streetworks and Utilities Streetworks Avoidance and Utilities Avoidance
More informationMitigation of Liquefaction Potential Using Rammed Aggregate Piers
ASCE 2011 557 Mitigation of Liquefaction Potential Using Rammed Aggregate Piers R.W. Rudolph, M. ASCE, G.E. 1, B. Serna, M. ASCE, P.E. 2, and T. Farrell, M. ASCE, G.E. 3 1 Principal Consultant, ENGEO,
More informationLEGEND ODOT CLASS. A-4b. A-6a. A-6b TOTAL VISUAL WEATHERED SANDSTONE VISUAL BORING LOCATION - PLAN VIEW
PROJECT THE PROJECT CONSISTS IN PART OF ACING TWO STRUCTURES, EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND STRUCTURES, RESPECTIVELY FOR THE PROPOSED SR OVER BLUE ROAD (CR 9). THE TWO STRUCTURES AS ANNED, ARE SINGLE-SPAN STRUCTURES
More information