Wavy Lake Silica Property. Silica Assays - EDEN TOWNSHIP -

Transcription

1 Wavy Lake Silica Property Silica Assays - EDEN TOWNSHIP - Prepared by: Robert G. Komarechka P.Geo. Dec. 8,

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...3 LOCATION and ACCESS...3 page PROPERTY TENURE...3 PREVIOUS WORK BY OTHERS...6 PREVIOUS WORK BY THE CLAIMHOLDER...6 GEOLOGY...6 Regional Geology...6 Sampled Area Geology...7 DESCRIPTION OF FIELD ACTIVITIES...8 OBSERVATIONS...8 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS...8 REFERENCES...9 CERTIFICATE...10 List of Figures Fig. # 1 - Index Map...4 Fig. # 2 - Local Map...5 List of Tables Table 1 List of Claims...3 Appendices...11 Appendix 1 Assay Certificates

3 Wavy Lake Silica Property Silica Assays - EDEN TOWNSHIP - INTRODUCTION This work in this report was conducted to confirm the silica grade of the blasted material located on claim in Eden Twp. of the Sudbury Mining District, Ontario. This material was blasted in 1993 for bulk sampling to test its use as a smelter flux while the property was optioned by Leo Alarie & Sons Ltd. See current land status Map #3. LOCATION and ACCESS The study area is located in the central east portion of Eden township in the District of Sudbury. It is located at a latitude of 46 19' and longitude of 81 05'. Access to the area can be obtained by driving 27 kilometers south of Sudbury on Long Lake Road, Tilton lake Road and Wavy Trail. One kilometer down the Wavy Trail after the turnoff from the Tilton Lake Road a trail 2.3 km. long leads eastward to the area. For this study an overgrown bulk sample access road (now an overgrown quad trail) located north of the Wavy Lake North Shore Road was used. Index map figure 1 and local index map figure 2 give the general location of this site. PROPERTY TENURE SUDBURY Mining Division KOMARECHKA, ROBERT GERALD Township/ Claim Recording Claim Due Percent Work Status Area Number Date Date Option Required EDEN Jun Dec-14 A 100 % $ 256 EDEN Jun Jun-18 A 100 % $ 88 EDEN Jun Jun-18 A 100 % $ 400 EDEN Jun Jun-18 A 100 % $ 400 EDEN Sep Sep-23 A 100 % $ 400 3

4 Area of This Report Figure 1: Location of Work By: R. Komarechka Dec. 9, 2011

5 Nast. EDEN Twp. Sample Location at UTM NAD83 Co-ordinates mE mN Twp. Quad trail Figure 2 : Claim map Red dot shows location of sample collection on claim Prepared by : R. Komarechka Dec. 9, 2011

6 PREVIOUS WORK DONE BY OTHERS Work has been done on the nearby past producing Long Lake Gold Mine but aside from that in the immediate area of this work the following has been done; 1966: geologic thesis mapping (see Spaven, HR in references section) 1975: mapping by the OGS in (see Card, KD in references section) Previous past claim staking in the area was also noted. REVIOUS WORK DONE BY CLAIMHOLDER ON THESE CLAIMS 1991: Geologic mapping (see Komarechka in references section) 1992: Geologic mapping (see Komarechka in references section) 1992: Percussion Drill Evaluation (see Komarechka in references section) 1993: Trail construction, stripping, analysis of drill cutting, bulk sampling (see Komarechka in references section) 2000: Beep Mat Study 2010: Recutting of claim lines Regional Geology GEOLOGY The area of study represents a portion of the western contact of the Eden Lake Granite with the Proterozoic Huronian rocks of the Lorrain formation. Generally the Lorrain formation in the area, adjacent to the earlier Gowganda formation to the west, grades from a pink arkosic quartzite into a tan massive aluminous quartzite, then into a massive to banded green alumina rich orthoquartzite, then into orthoquartzite with red bands of hematitic quartzite, then into areas of orthoquartzite and cherty orthoquartzite, containing occasional reddish hematitic swirls. The highest values of silica appear to occur in the last two rock types. From the results of previous mapping and assay results it is apparent that the occurrence of the last two members of the upper Lorrain appear along a parallel trend that matches the Gowganda Lorrain contact as indicated in OGS map Unfortunately this contact is not continuous due to intrusions of Nippising Diabase and later Eden Lake Intrusives. In addition, alteration due to local thermal effects from these intrusions, their metasomatic alterations and small scale structural movements and folding add complexity to the geological picture. Field observations suggest that the Eden Lake Granite frequently intruded along pre-existing ( Nippising) diabase intrusions within the Huronian metasediments. This resulted in partial assimilation and occasional brecciation of the surrounding diabase and quartzites. A result of this assimilation is the production of a hybrid rock noted as grey 6

7 granite on the map. This rock is frequently encountered along the contact of the Huronian metasediments and the Eden Lake Granites and is gradationally with the latter. The intrusion of the Eden Lake Granite and the tectonic effects of the nearby Grenville Front resulted in numerous local faults and minor local displacements. Generally the more siliceous quartzites reacted to this by brittle fracturing while the more argillaceous metasediments responded by plastic deformation as evidenced by their highly variable dip and strike. Geology of the Sampled Area The sampled area is located in an east west band of primarily white cherty orthoquartzite believed to represent the upper Lorrain Formation. This area has been labeled as Zone 3 in previous assessment reports. The northern contact of this zone appears to change gradationally to an interbedded unit of narrow orthoquartzite, feldspar rich quartzite and arkosic bands. This area generally weathers recessively compared to the orthoquartzite and is bounded to the north by a combination of primarily diabase, followed by grey granite and gneissic metapelite. These last three rock type form a prominent ridge paralleling zone #3 to the north. Eden lake granite is also found in some areas but generally not in the immediate sampled area. The northern contact of the orthoquartzites as shown on the Geology map is poorly defined as most of this area is covered by overburden. In addition, the contact, in some areas, appears to be nonlinear due to some local folding and displacement. Despite the above, the contact was drawn to show the maximum southern extension of orthoquartzite having +90% silica content. Locally some variations from this contact line may be expected. The southern contact of this zone appears to change abruptly along the base of a high east-west ridge of primarily grey granite. This somewhat undulating contact appears to be pushed northward along lobe shaped areas of granite intrusions. To the east of this contact the enclosing rocks change from a grey granite to a gneissic metapelite. These rocks show a highly variable strike and dip orientation along the contact. This may represent an area of plastic deformation. A small area of Eden Lake pink granite occurs along the contact in the southwest corner of the map area, but generally this rock is more common in the center of granitic bodies. The southern contact seems to be well defined along the base of the above mentioned ridge but due to the lack of outcrop between the contact and the high quality silica orthoquartzite bedrock exposed to the north (between lines 3+71W and 1+20W) and due to the possibility of the westward extension of a large waste band, drill proven reserves were calculated for only part of this area. 7

8 Several variations in quality are found along the strike length of Zone #3. The purest area of this zone is generally white, cherty with occasional reddish hematitic swirls. The silica content of this area from a percussion chip analysis averages 94.53%. In the southwestern part of this zone there is a slight reduction of the silica (estimated 91-92% silica) content due to the presence of a series of parallel thin 1/16" - 1/2" micaceous seams, some minor granitic bands and some boudinaged granite and diabase trains. Sample Collection DESCRIPTION OF FIELD ACTIVITIES A field visit to collect samples for assaying was undertaken by the claimholder Bob Komarechka and his assistant Markus Svilans on Nov.12, A total of 7 samples were collected randomly from the broken blasted rock at the face of workings of the location of a previous bulk sample in the area of UTM NAD83 co-ordinates of and located within claim near the centre of its northern boundary. These samples were labeled, described under the stereomicroscope and sent to AGAT laboratories for whole rock analysis. This was done using a Lithium Borate Fusion Summation of Oxides,ICP-OES finish AGAT analytical method # Appendix 1 shows the assay certificate of these readings. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS The average SiO2 results (98.97%) of the whole rock samples as sent to AGAT are significantly higher than previous assaying of the area has shown. There may be several reasons for this. The previous assays were taken from percussion drill chip samples. These samples produced results from the whole quartzite sequence drilled. This included numerous thin (less then 1 cm) bands of highly micaceous material (muscovite). Once blasted, this rock broke along these micaceous bands causing the loosely held alumina rich muscovite to fall from the loose rock enhancing the grade of the rock chunks sampled. Another reason may be some bias with the lab. Future samples should have standards added to confirm this. The verification of an enhancement of the silica content from the blasting is very significant as large amounts of silica to the west, previously assayed as substandard grade for flux, may still be useable. This could contribute to a significant expansion of the tonnage of flux grade material on this property. 8

9 REFERENCES 1. Card, K. D., Palonen, P. A., and Siemiatkowska, K. M., 1975: Geology of the Louise-Eden Area, District of Sudbury; Ontario Div. Mines, GR124, 66p. Accompanied by Map 2299, Scale, 1 inch to 1/2 mile. 2. Komarechka, Robert G., 1991: Lorrain Orthoquartzite Study - Silica Potential - Eden Township, OPAP Reg. #OP Komarechka, Robert G., 1992: Lorrain Orthoquartzite Study - Silica Potential - Claims #S , S and S Eden Township, Jan Komarechka, Robert G., 1992: Percussion Drill Program Evaluation of Silica in Zone #1, Claim S Eden Township, Feb Spaven, H. R., 1966: Granite Tectonics in part of Eden Township, Sudbury District, Ontario; unpublished Msc. thesis, Mcmaster University, Hamilton, Ontario. 9

10 CERTIFICATE I, Robert G. Komarechka, of the City of Sudbury, in the Province of Ontario hereby certify as follows: 1. That I am a consulting geologist currently residing in Sudbury. 2. That I am a graduate, BSc. Geology major, of Laurentian University of Sudbury, Ontario, a registered professional geologist in the Province of Alberta affiliated with the Canadian Council of Professional Engineers, and that I have been practicing my profession for 27 years. 3. That I have an interest in the properties at this time. 4. That this report is based on field observations and assays undertaken during the fall of Robert G. Komarechka P. Geol. Dated at Sudbury, Ontario, this 9th day of December,

11 Appendices

12 5623 McADAM ROAD MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1N9 TEL (905) FAX (905) CLIENT NAME: BEDROCK RESEARCH CORP. 545 GRANITE ST SUDBURY, ON P3C2P4 ATTENTION TO: BOB KOMARECHKA PROJECT NO: EDEN 11 AGAT WORK ORDER: 11U SOLID ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY: Kevin Motomura, ICP Supervisor DATE REPORTED: Nov 29, 2011 PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): 4 Should you require any information regarding this analysis please contact your client services representative at (905) *NOTES All samples are stored at no charge for 90 days. Please contact the lab if you require additional sample storage time. Laboratories (V1) Page 1 of 4 Results relate only to the items tested

13 CLIENT NAME: BEDROCK RESEARCH CORP. Analyte: Unit: Sample Login Weight Al2O3 BaO CaO Cr2O3 Fe2O3 K2O MgO MnO Na2O P2O5 SiO2 kg % % % % % % % % % % % Sample Description RDL: E < <0.005 < <0.005 E < <0.005 <0.005 < <0.005 E < <0.005 <0.005 < <0.005 E < <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 < <0.005 E < <0.005 <0.005 < <0.005 E < <0.005 <0.005 < <0.005 E < < < <0.005 Analyte: Unit: LOI Total % % Sample Description RDL: E E E E E E E Certificate of Analysis AGAT WORK ORDER: 11U PROJECT NO: EDEN 11 ATTENTION TO: BOB KOMARECHKA Lithium Borate Fusion - Summation of Oxides, ICP-OES finish (201076) DATE SAMPLED: Nov 18, 2011 DATE RECEIVED: Nov 21, 2011 DATE REPORTED: Nov 29, 2011 SAMPLE TYPE: Rock 5623 McADAM ROAD MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1N9 TEL (905) FAX (905) TiO2 % SrO % Comments: RDL - Reported Detection Limit CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1) Results relate only to the items tested Certified By: Page 2 of 4

14 CLIENT NAME: BEDROCK RESEARCH CORP. PROJECT NO: EDEN 11 Quality Assurance Solid Analysis AGAT WORK ORDER: 11U ATTENTION TO: BOB KOMARECHKA 5623 McADAM ROAD MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1N9 TEL (905) FAX (905) RPT Date: Nov 29, 2011 REPLICATE REFERENCE MATERIAL PARAMETER Batch Sample Id Original Rep #1 RPD Method Blank Result Value Expect Value Recovery Acceptable Limits Lower Upper Lithium Borate Fusion - Summation of Oxides, ICP-OES finish (201076) Al2O % < % 80% 120% BaO < < % < % 80% 120% CaO % < % 80% 120% Cr2O % < % 120% Fe2O % % 80% 120% K2O % < % 80% 120% MgO % < % 80% 120% MnO % < % 80% 120% Na2O < < % < % 80% 120% P2O < < % < % 80% 120% SiO % < % 80% 120% TiO % < % 80% 120% SrO < < % < % 80% 120% Certified By: QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V1) Page 3 of 4 Results relate only to the items tested

15 5623 McADAM ROAD MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CANADA L4Z 1N9 TEL (905) FAX (905) CLIENT NAME: BEDROCK RESEARCH CORP. PROJECT NO: EDEN 11 PARAMETER Method Summary AGAT S.O.P AGAT WORK ORDER: 11U ATTENTION TO: BOB KOMARECHKA LITERATURE REFERENCE Solid Analysis Sample Login Weight MIN BALANCE Al2O3 MIN ICP/OES BaO MIN ICP/OES CaO MIN ICP/OES Cr2O3 MIN ICP/OES Fe2O3 MIN ICP/OES K2O MIN ICP/OES MgO MIN ICP/OES MnO MIN ICP/OES Na2O MIN ICP/OES P2O5 MIN ICP/OES SiO2 MIN ICP/OES TiO2 MIN ICP/OES SrO MIN ICP/OES LOI MIN GRAVIMETRIC Total CALCULATION ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUE METHOD SUMMARY (V1) Page 4 of 4 Results relate only to the items tested