Serviceability Limit States

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Serviceability Limit States"

Transcription

1 Serviceability Limit States 1

2 Outline Crack control and limitations Crack width calculations Crack width calculation example Crack width calculation problem Restraint cracking Deflection calculations Deflection calculation example 3

3 Crack control and limitations 4

4 (Flexural) Crack Width Limits (Table 7.1N) EC 2: Table 7.1(N) Concise: 10.2 Exposure class RC or unbonded PSC members Quasi-permanent load Prestressed members with bonded tendons Frequent load X0,XC XC2,XC3,XC4 0.3 XD1,XD2,XS1,XS2, XS3 Decompression 5

5 (Flexural) Crack Width Control EC 2: Cl Concise: 10.2 Crack control may be achieved: Limiting the maximum bar diameter using Table 7.2 Limiting the maximum bar spacing using Table 7.3 (this table is not applicable for restraint loading) Calculating cracks to ensure they are within limits 6

6 (Flexural) Crack Width Control EC 2: Cl Concise: 10.2 Crack control may be achieved: Limiting the maximum bar diameter using Table 7.2 Limiting the maximum bar spacing using Table 7.3 (this table is not applicable for restraint loading) Calculating cracks to ensure they are within limits 7

7 Crack width calculations 8

8 Basis Section Neutral axis Figure 7.2 Slab soffit (h - x) Crack width vs spacing Crack width w Actual crack width Crack width predicted by Expressions (7.8) & (7.14) Crack width predicted by Expressions (7.8) & (7.11) 5(c + /2) 9

9 Crack width calculation EC2 Exp (7.8) The crack width may be calculated from: w k = s r,max (ε sm - ε cm ) where s r,max ε sm ε cm = maximum crack spacing = mean strain in reinforcement = mean strain in concrete between cracks 10

10 Maximum crack spacing s r,max c k 1 k 2 Φ = 3.4c k 1 k 2 Φ /ρ p,eff = (nominal) cover to the longitudinal reinforcement = factor to take account on bond properties = 0.8 for high bond bars = 1.6 for plain bars = factor to take account of strain distribution = 0.5 for flexure = 1.0 for pure tension = bar diameter When spacing > 5(c + Φ/2); s r,max = 1.3(h x) 11

11 Crack (ε sm - ε cm ) Difference in concrete and reinforcement strain Strain diagram w k = s.(ε sm - ε cm ) (s r,max includes fos of 1.7) ε cs ε cult S (s r,max includes fos of 1.7) 12

12 (ε sm - ε cm ) Difference in concrete and reinforcement strain For flexure,(ε sm - ε cm ) may be calculated from: fct, eff s kt ( 1 e p, eff ) p, eff sm cm 0. 6 E E s where: σ s = stress in the tension steel calculated using the cracked concrete section k t = factor that accounts for the duration of loading = 0.6 for short-term load = 0.4 for long-term load α e = E s /E c = modular ratio s s 13

13 where cont. ρ p,eff, is the effective reinforcement ratio. ρ p,eff where A s A c,eff h c,ef = A s /A c,eff = area of tension reinforcement = effective area of concrete in tension around d the reinforcement Effective = Min{2.5(h - d); (h - x)/3; h/2} h tension area h c,eff Effective tension area for this face d Beam h c,eff Effective tension area Member h c,eff Slab h = lesser of 2.5(h-d), (h-x)/3 or h/2 c,eff Figure 6.12: Typical examples of effective concrete tension 14

14 (Flexural) Crack width calculation example 15

15 d = 930 h = 1000 (Flexural) Crack width calculation Calculate the design flexural crack for the beam shown. M QP = 650 knm Concrete class C25/30 A s = 3770 mm 2 (,t0) = 2.63 d = 400 x F s F c (d x/3) 3 No H40 bars 16

16 Crack width example Step 1 Calculate effective modulus From Table 3.1, E cm = 31 kn/mm 2 E c,eff = E cm /(1 + (,t0) ) = 31 / ( ) = 8.54 kn/mm 2 Step 2 Calculate the stress in the tension steel : find x Taking moments about neutral axis: b x 2 /2 = α e A s (d x) 400 x 2 /2 = 200/8.54 x 3770 (930 x) This has the solution, x = 457 mm 17

17 Crack width example Step 3 Calculate stress in the tension steel Taking moments about the level of force in the concrete: σ s = M QP /(d x/3)a s = 650 x 10 6 /(( /3) x 3770) = 222 MPa 18

18 Crack width example Step 4 Calculate difference in concrete and reinforcement strains fct, eff s kt ( 1 e p, eff ) p, eff sm cm 0. 6 E E s s s k t = 0.4 (long-term loading) f ct,eff = f ctm = 2.6 MPa (Table 3.1) α e = E s /E cm = 200 / 31 = 6.45 h c,ef = Min{2.5(h - d); (h - x)/3; h/2} = Min{2.5( ); ( )/3; 1000/2} = Min{175; 181; 500} = 175 mm 19

19 Crack width example A c,eff = 175 x 400 = mm 2 ρ p,eff = A s /A c,eff = 3700 / = sm cm ( )

20 Crack width example Step 5 Calculate the maximum crack spacing s r,max c k 1 k 2 Φ = 3.4c k 1 k 2 Φ /ρ p,eff = /2 = 50 mm = 0.8 (ribbed bars) = 0.5 (flexure) = 40 mm s r,max = 3.4 x x 0.8 x 0.5 x 40 / = 296 mm < 5(c + Φ/2) = 350 mm Step 6 Calculate crack width w k = x 296 = 0.30 mm 21

21 (Flexural) Crack Width Control EC 2: Cl Concise: 10.2 Crack control may be achieved: Limiting the maximum bar diameter using Table 7.2 Limiting the maximum bar spacing using Table 7.3 (this table is not applicable for restraint loading) Calculating cracks to ensure they are within limits Say 435/ 1.4 = 310 MPa Say 110 mm cf (400 2 x 40-40) /3 = 93 mm....ok 22

22 d = 192 h = 250 Workshop problem Calculate the design flexural crack for the slab shown. M QP = 85 knm Concrete class C35/45 A s = 2010 mm 2 /m Assume the depth to neutral axis, x = 63.5 mm x F c (d x/3) H mm CTRS F s HINT: You can start the calculation from step 3 23

23 Workshop problem Step 3 Calculate stress in the tension steel Taking moments about the level of force in the concrete: σ s = M QP /(d x/3)a s = 85 x 10 6 /(( /3) x 2010) = MPa 24

24 Workshop problem Step 4 Calculate difference in concrete and reinforcement strains fct, eff s kt ( 1 e p, eff ) p, eff sm cm 0. 6 E E k t = 0.4 (long-term loading) f ct,eff = f ctm = 3.2 MPa (Table 3.1) α e = E s /E cm = 200 / 34 = 5.88 h c,ef = Min{2.5(h - d); (h - x)/3; h/2} = Min{2.5( ); ( )/3; 250/2} = Min{145; 62.2; 125} = 62.2mm A c,eff = 62.2 x 1000 = mm 2 s s s 25

25 Workshop problem A c,eff = 62.2 x 1000 = mm 2 ρ p,eff = A s /A c,eff = 2010 / = sm cm ( )

26 Workshop problem Step 5 Calculate the maximum crack spacing s r,max c k 1 k 2 Φ = 3.4c k 1 k 2 Φ /ρ p,eff = 50 mm = 0.8 (ribbed bars) = 0.5 (flexure) = 16 mm s r,max = 3.4 x x 0.8 x 0.5 x 16 / = mm < 5(c + Φ/2) = 290 mm Step 6 Calculate crack width w k = x 254 = 0.25 mm 27

27 Restraint cracking 28

28 Restraint cracking Movement occurs not only due to loading but also due to: Early thermal effects Shrinkage drying autogenous, seasonal/long term temperature drop That becomes a problem when there is Restraint: Edge: End: adjacent slab pours, wall on base, adjacent wall pours infill bays, large area ground slabs (friction, foundations), piled slabs Internal (not covered.. members > say 750 mm th.) 29

29 Restraint cracking End restraint: restrained strain & stresses Original poured length Free contraction: R = 0 Partial restraint R = 0.0 to 1.0 Restrained strain: Stresses induced Fully restrained: R =1.0 Restrained strain: Large stresses induced 30

30 Restraint cracking 1) Cracking will occur if r ctu CIRIA C660: Cl 3.2 r = R ax free = K 1 { c T 1 + ca R 1 + c T 2 R 2 + cd R 3 } where: K 1 = allowance for creep = 1.0 to BS EN or = 0.65 to CIRIA C660 c = coefficient of thermal expansion (typical design value 12 m) T 1 = Peak to ambient temperature o C (See CIRIA C660). (e.g. 500 mm thick wall formed using 18 mm ply, using C30/37 concrete with 40%ggbs = 29 o C) ca = Autogenous shrinkage strain (typical design values using C30/37 concrete 15 3days, 50 m long term) R 1, R 2, R 3 = appropriate restraint factor for the short-term, medium term and long term see figure L1 of BS EN (includes for creep) or calculated for base wall restraint in accordance with CIRIA C660 (excludes for creep) 31

31 Restraint cracking (cont d) 1) Cracking will occur if r ctu CIRIA C660: Cl 3.2 r = R ax free = K 1 { c T 1 + ca R 1 + c T 2 R 2 + cd R 3 } where: cd = drying shrinkage strain, a function of time, thickness, RH, cement Class (BS EN or CIRIA C660) (e.g. 500 mm thick wall, using C30/37 concrete with 40% ggbs Class N = 340 m) T 2 = long-term drop in temperature after concreting. Recommended values: of 20 o C for concrete cast in the summer and 10 o C for concrete cast in winter. (See CIRIA C660), ctu = tensile strain capacity of the concrete. A function of concrete strength and type of aggregate used. (Typical design values of 76 3 days and 108 m for 28 days may be used for initial calculations. See CIRIA C

32 Restraint factors Table 1 Values of restraint factor R for a particular pour configuration BS EN Annex L Pour configuration Thin wall cast on to massive concrete base usually 0.5 Massive pour cast onto blinding Massive pour cast onto existing concrete Suspended slabs Infill bays, i.e. rigid restraint R 0,6 to 0,8 at base 0,1 to 0,2 at top 0,1 to 0,2 0,3 to 0,4 at base 0,1 to 0,2 at top 0,2 to 0,4 0,8 to 1,0 Beware: effects of creep included 33

33 Restraint cracking Short term load strength Long term load strength Stress due to early thermal & shrinkage & Stress due to early seasonal thermal & drying shrinkage Stress due to early thermal allowing for creep CS TR 67 34

34 Restraint cracking 1) Cracking will occur if r ctu r = R ax free = K 1 { c T 1 + ca R 1 + c T 2 R 2 + cd R 3 } CIRIA C660: Cl 3.2 Short term ( 3 days) Medium term ( 28 days) long term ( > days) 35

35 Restraint cracking 1) Cracking will occur if r ctu CIRIA C660: Cl 3.2 2) Minimum reinforcement, (with respect to restraint to movement): A s,min = k c ka ct (f ct,eff / f yk ) Where: k c = coeff. for stress distribution = 1.0 for full tension k Crack = coeff. width for thickness 1.0 for h < w300 k = smm and r,max 0.75 for h > 800 mm cr (interpolation allowed) A ct where = area of concrete in the tension zone just prior to onset of cracking. Most Maximum often crack based spacing on full thickness s r,max = 3.4c of the section. (k 1 / ( p,eff ) f ct,eff f ctm = mean tensile strength when cracking may be first expected to Crack inducing strain cr occur (Typical design values for a C30/37 concrete, days and days See BS EN = 500 MPa 3) Controlled cracking: f yk BS EN Exp (7.1) BS EN Exp (7.8) 36

36 Restraint cracking Watchpoints: Ensures rebar does not yield Typically 0.58% for C30/37 in a 300 mm wall 0.8 factor on f ct,eff for sustained loading? or 0.67 to TR 59 Early age only? B Hughes Revised CIRIA C660? 37

37 Restraint cracking As before where: c = nominal cover, c nom in mm k 1 1) = Cracking 0.8 for high will bond occur bars (CIRIA if C660 r suggests a value 1.14 to account ctu for poor bond conditions) CIRIA C660: Cl 3.2 k 2 = 1.0 for tension (e.g. from restraint), 0.5 for bending, ( 2) Minimum reinforcement, )/ 2 1 for combinations BS EN Exp (7.1) = bar (with diameter, respect mm to restraint to movement): p,eff = A s /A c,eff, where A c,eff is calculated for each face = min0.5h or 2.5(c + 0.5) x b A s,min = k c ka ct (f ct,eff /w f yk ) 3) Controlled cracking: Crack width w k = s r,max cr where Maximum crack spacing s r,max = 3.4c (k 1 / p,eff ) Crack inducing strain cr ( sm - cm ) BS EN Exp (7.8) BS EN Exp (7.11) 38

38 Crack (ε sm - ε cm ) Difference in concrete and reinforcement strain Strain diagram w k = s.(ε sm - ε cm ) (s r,max includes fos of 1.7) ε cs ε cult S (s r,max includes fos of 1.7) 39

39 Crack inducing strain, cr a) Edge restraint:- early thermal effects cr = k c T 1 + ca R 0.5 ctu b) Edge restraint:- long term restraint effects cr = k { c T 1 + ca R 1 + c T 2 R 2 + cd R 3 } 0.5 ctu c) End restraint Can be critical! CIRIA C660: Cl 3.2 CIRIA C660: Cl 3.2 cr = 0.5 e k c kf ct,eff 1 + (1/ e ) /E s BS EN Exp (M.1) where: k c = coeff. for stress distribution = 1.0 for full tension k = coeff. for thickness 1.0 for h < 300 mm and 0.75 for h > 800 mm f ct,eff = f ctm for long-term effects, 28 day value considered to be reasonable e.g. 2.9 Mpa for C30/37. NB Possible 0.8 factor for sustained load in CIRIA C660 e = modular ratio, E s /E c. Typical values are 3 days, 28 days and 12 longterm. When cracking occurs, no creep has taken place so a modular ratio of 7 should be used. = ratio of total area of reinforcement to the gross section in tension. Note that this different from p,eff.

40 Deflection calculations 41

41 Deflection limits Deflections are limited for the following reasons: 1. Excessive deflections are unsightly and alarming. EC2 restricts total deflections to span/ To avoid damage to cladding, partitions and finishes due to increments in deflection following their construction. EC2 limits deflections after construction of finishes to span/ Both construction tolerances and deflections need to be considered in the design of fixings for cladding systems and partitions. In practice it can be difficult to separate construction tolerances from deflections. 42

42 Deflection limits The EC2 deflection limits are guidelines. It is the designers responsibility to agree suitable deflection limits with his client taking into account the nature of the structure and finishes. 43

43 Introduction Four factors need to be considered in the calculation of deflections 1. criteria defining the limiting deflections 2. appropriate design loads 3. appropriate design material properties 4. means of predicting behaviour Deflections cannot be predicted exactly before construction since neither the loading or material properties are accurately known at the design stage. 44

44 Load Deflection calculation Calculated assuming no cracking Actual behaviour Calculated assuming concrete has no tensile strength Deflection 45

45 Basic behaviour = ( II ) + (1 - )( I ) where: = deformation parameter considered (e.g. strain, curvature) I is the calculated uncracked parameter II is the calculated cracked parameter = distribution coefficient allowing for tension stiffening at a section. e.g. total curvature = S(cracked curvature + uncracked curvature) for each effect considered 46

46 Basic behaviour S Crack Crack Crack s2 Idealised steel stress Steel stress s1 0 S (1 - )S S Concrete stress Where = distribution coefficient allowing for 47 tension stiffening at a section.

47 Basic behaviour where: = distribution coefficient = 1 - ( sr / s ) 2 where: = coefficient taking account of the influence of the duration of the loading or of repeated loading on the average strain = 1.0 for first loading = 0.5 for long-term loading But always use 0.5 s = stress in tension steel based on cracked section sr = stress in tension steel based on cracked section at first cracking NB sr / s M cr /M for flexure 48

48 Basic behaviour = 1 - (first crack result/cracked analysis result) 2 Load no cracking M Ed M cr Actual cracked = 1.0 for fully cracked sections (in theory) = 0.0 for un-cracked sections Deflection 49

49 Concrete material properties for deflection calculation It is only possible to estimate concrete material properties at the design stage. Actual material properties may differ significantly from those assumed in design. Therefore, it is prudent to assume a range of material properties in deflection calculations. EC2 relates all the concrete properties required for deflection prediction to the concrete grade and cement type. In practice, properties are influenced by the aggregate type, curing etc. Mean values should be used for the tensile strength and elastic modulus of concrete to obtain a best estimate of the actual deflection. 50

50 Concrete tensile strength Deflections in slabs depend significantly on the effective concrete flexural strength which governs the cracking moment. The flexural strength of concrete is calculated from the peak failure load of unreinforced concrete beams with engineers bending theory. EC2 defines the flexural strength of concrete as follows: f fl =(1.6-h/1000)f ctm >f ctm where fctm = 0.3fck 2/3 is the mean tensile strength of concrete which can be estimated indirectly in the splitting test. fck is the characteristic cylinder compressive strength of concrete. The flexural strength is greater than the tensile strength since the tensile stress distribution is not linear at failure as assumed in its derivation. 51

51 Flexural strength of concrete The flexural strength is greater due the assumptions implicit in its derivation as illustrated below. f ct Strain f fl >f ct Stress at peak load Stress assumed in calculation f fl 52

52 Concrete tensile strength In reinforced concrete structures the effective flexural strength of concrete is reduced by tensile stresses induced by restraint of shrinkage by reinforcement and restraining elements such as stiff columns and shear walls. It is conservative to use the tensile strength f ctm in deflection calculations. The How to Leaflet suggests that the design value concrete tensile strength for a low restraint layout is taken as the mean of the tensile and flexural strengths. 53

53 Long-term deflections Three additional factors must be considered in the long term calculation of deflections. 1.Loading 2.Creep 3.Shrinkage 54

54 Design loads: Permanent loads In concrete structures, deflections increase with time under sustained load. The greater part of the deflection normally occurs under sustained loads. Therefore, long-term deflections are calculated under a best estimate of the sustained load during the lifetime of the structure. The design load for calculating long-term deflections is the permanent load: Permanent load = G k + 2 Q k where G k = dead load Q k = imposed load Recommended values for 2 are: 0.3 for residential and offices, 0.6 for parking 0.8 for storage 55

55 Design loads: Frequent load Cracking is irreversible. Therefore, it is prudent to calculate longterm deflections using a modified flexural strength which corresponds to the worst cracking during the lifetime of the structure. The How to Leaflet suggests that the frequent load combination is used to calculate the deflection affecting cladding. The frequent load is given by: Frequent load = G k + 1 Q k Recommended values for 1 are: 0.5 for residential and offices, 0.7 for parking 0.9 for storage 56

56 Time dependent deformation Creep is the continuous deformation of a member under sustained load. Shrinkage consists of autogenous (due to hydration) and drying shrinkage. 57

57 Creep EC2 uses the effective modulus method to model creep in which creep is modelled as a delayed elastic strain. The creep strain at time t is given by: cc (t) = (t0) * where (t0) = the strain at the time of first loading t 0 and = /Ec(t0) where Ec(t0) is the elastic modulus of the concrete at time t 0. * = the true creep coefficient. = EC2 [E c (t 0 )/E c28 ] 58

58 E c EC2 defines the creep coefficient in terms of the 28 day tangent modulus of concrete, E c E c = 1.05 E cm where E cm = secant modulus = 22[f cm /10] 0.3 See table 3.1 MPA 59

59 EC2 Annex B or... Figure

60 Creep So total strain: (t) = (t0) (1+ *) = [/Ec(t0)] (1+ *) = /E ceff where E ceff = effective elastic modulus = E c (t0)/(1+ *) For practical purposes E ceff = E c28 /(1+ EC2 ) In practice, there are usually several loads placed at different times. In that case long term modulus, E LT for n serviceability loads, W i :- E LT = SW/{ (W 1 /E ceff,1 ) + (W 2 /E ceff,2 ) + (W 3 /E ceff,3 ) (W n /E ceff,n )} 61

61 Shrinkage induced curvature Shrinkage induces curvatures in asymmetrically reinforced sections that can increase deflections by as much as 25%. The reinforcement restrains the shortening of the member due to shrinkage which induces tension in the concrete. Consequently, the cracking moment is reduced. Tensile stress 62

62 Shrinkage induces a curvature that is given by: 1/rcs = cs e S/I where c = free shrinkange strain e = E s /E ceff S = Ase = the first moment of area of the reinforcement about the centroid of the transformed section I = second moment of area of the section EC2 extends the distribution coefficient approach to cover cracked sections by applying to S cr /I cr and (1- ) to S uncr /I uncr. 63

63 Accuracy of deflection calculations Many factors influence the accuracy of deflection calculations including: 1. actual loading relative to design loading 2. early age striking and loading from constructing slabs above 3. differences between actual and assumed material properties 4. Composite action between floor slabs and floor screeds and partitions 5. Temperature effects 64

64 Use of finite element analysis to calculate deflections Two approaches are commonly used: 1.Cracked section analysis in which the plate stiffness is reduced to account for cracking 2.Elastic analysis with reduced stiffness to allow for cracking creep and shrinkage. In this case, the effective E value can be taken as: E* ceff =0.5E c /(1+) where the factor of 0.5 accounts for the effects of cracking and shrinkage 65

65 Deflection The deflection may be calculated: Either by calculating the curvatures (due to load, shrinkage, creep) at a number of sections and then double integrating numerically Or by the simplified formula: δ = kl 2 (1/r) k depends on the shape of the bending moment diagram. Both methods are described in detail in How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2: Deflection 66

66 Rigorous method 67

67 Rigorous method 68

68 Rigorous method 69

69 Rigorous method This is the approach used in the Rigourous RC Spreadsheets 70

70 Rigorous method TCC41R 71

71 Simpler method (outline) Essentially add curvature due to SLS moments: ( 1 ) r r r sls. moments To curvature due to shrinkage: cracked, slsmoments ( 1 ) So total curvature: r r r uncracked, sls, moments r shrinkage r cracked, shrinkage r uncracked, shrinkage slsmoments Calculate deflection: shrinkage δ = kl 2 (1/r) k from chart depends on shape of BMD 72

72 Simpler method (in detail) 73

73 Simpler method 74

74 Simpler method 75

75 Simpler method 76

76 Simpler method 77

77 Deflection calculation example 78

78 d = 600 h = 700 Worked example Estimate the long-term deflection for the beam shown. Span = 9.5 m M QP = 200 knm Concrete class C25/30 A s = 2450 mm 2 x c = 329 mm I cr = 7976 x 10 6 mm 4 x u = 350 mm (ignoring reinforcement) I u = 8575 x 10 6 mm 4 (ignoring reinforcement) (,t0) = 2.8 ε cs = 470 x 10-6 d = No H25 bars 79

79 Deflection calculation example Step 1 Calculate cracking moment M cr 0.9f ctmi h x f ctm = 2.6 MPa (Table 3.1) u u M cr knm 6 If uncracked section properties are used, M cr = 57.3 knm Section is cracked, therefore: ζ = 1 0.5(57.3/200) 2 =

80 Deflection calculation example Step 2 Calculate flexural curvature 1 M QP r u E c, eff I u E c,eff = E cm /(1 + (,t0) ) = 31 / ( ) = 8.15 kn/mm r u M /mm 6 1 QP r c E c, eff I c /mm 1 r n 1 r c 1 (1 ) r u (1 0.95) /mm 81

81 Deflection calculation example Step 3 Calculate shrinkage curvature 1 cs S e r I where: S c = A s (d x) = 2450 ( ) = 664 x 10 3 mm (200/8.15) /mm 6 r s S u = A s (d x) = 2450 ( ) = x 10 3 mm (200/8.15) /mm 6 r su 1 r n 1 r c 1 (1 ) r u (1 0.95) /mm 82

82 Deflection calculation example Step 4 Calculate deflection Total curvature = 3.07 x x 10-6 = 4.02 x 10-6 /mm For a simply supported slab, k = δ = kl 2 (1/r) = x (4.02 x 10-6 ) = 37.8 mm 83

83 Serviceability Limit States 84

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN CHAPTER 11 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN Article 49. Cracking Limit State 49.1 General considerations In the case of verifications relating to Cracking Limit State, the effects of actions comprise

More information

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602 Design of wall panel according to EN 160 Example 3: Wall panel with wind load 1.1 Issue Design of a wall panel at an industrial building Materials with a compressive strength 3,5, density class 500, welded

More information

Chapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter

Chapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter Chapter 1 Materials 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter A Area of concrete cross-section C s Constant depending on the type of curing C t Creep coefficient (C t = ε sp /ε i ) C u Ultimate creep coefficient

More information

Note: For further information, including the development of creep with time, Annex B may be used.

Note: For further information, including the development of creep with time, Annex B may be used. ..4 Creep and shrinkage ()P Creep and shrinkage of the concrete depend on the ambient humidity, the dimensions of the element and the composition of the concrete. Creep is also influenced by the maturity

More information

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN 1992-1-1 and EN 1992-2 Validation Examples Brno, 21.10.2010 IDEA RS s.r.o. South Moravian Innovation Centre, U Vodarny 2a, 616 00 BRNO tel.: +420-511

More information

Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design]

Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design] Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design] A typical floor system of a lecture hall is to be designed as a ribbed slab. The joists which are spaced at 400mm are supported by girders. The overall depth of the slab

More information

Practical Design to Eurocode 2

Practical Design to Eurocode 2 Practical Design to Eurocode 2 The webinar will start at 12.30 (Any questions beforehand? use Questions on the GoTo Control Panel) Course Outline Lecture Date Speaker Title 1 21 Sep Jenny Burridge Introduction,

More information

SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS

SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS CHAPTER REINFORCED CONCRETE Reinforced Concrete Design A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition Fifth Edition SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil

More information

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data The design formulae and data provided in this Annex are for education, training and assessment purposes only. They are based on the Hong Kong Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013 (HKCP-2013).

More information

Eurocode Training EN : Reinforced Concrete

Eurocode Training EN : Reinforced Concrete Eurocode Training EN 1992-1-1: Reinforced Concrete Eurocode Training EN 1992-1-1 All information in this document is subject to modification without prior notice. No part of this manual may be reproduced,

More information

Bending and Shear in Beams

Bending and Shear in Beams Bending and Shear in Beams Lecture 3 5 th October 017 Contents Lecture 3 What reinforcement is needed to resist M Ed? Bending/ Flexure Section analysis, singly and doubly reinforced Tension reinforcement,

More information

DESIGN OF STAIRCASE. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

DESIGN OF STAIRCASE. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia DESIGN OF STAIRCASE Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email: iznisyahrizal@utm.my Introduction T N T G N G R h Flight Span, L Landing T = Thread

More information

Pre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension

Pre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension Pre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension but strong in compression Steel tendon is first stressed

More information

RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 App'd by RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS In accordance with

More information

Simplified procedures for calculation of instantaneous and long-term deflections of reinforced concrete beams

Simplified procedures for calculation of instantaneous and long-term deflections of reinforced concrete beams Simplified procedures for calculation of instantaneous and long-term deflections of reinforced concrete beams José Milton de Araújo 1 Department of Materials and Construction, University of Rio Grande

More information

Final Report. Predicting of the stiffness of cracked reinforced concrete structure. Author: Yongzhen Li

Final Report. Predicting of the stiffness of cracked reinforced concrete structure. Author: Yongzhen Li Predicting of the stiffness of cracked reinforced concrete structure Final Report Predicting of the Stiffness of Cracked Reinforced Concrete Structures Author: 1531344 Delft University of Technology Faculty

More information

RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 Retaining wall Analysis & Design (EN997:2004 App'd by RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS In accordance with

More information

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges EU-Russia Regulatory Dialogue Construction Sector Subgroup 1 Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges Application to a composite twin-girder bridge according to Eurocode 4 Laurence Davaine

More information

Serviceability Deflection calculation

Serviceability Deflection calculation Chp-6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation Deflection example Structural Design Profession is concerned with: Limit States Philosophy: Strength Limit State (safety-fracture, fatigue, overturning

More information

Dr. Hazim Dwairi. Example: Continuous beam deflection

Dr. Hazim Dwairi. Example: Continuous beam deflection Example: Continuous beam deflection Analyze the short-term and ultimate long-term deflections of end-span of multi-span beam shown below. Ignore comp steel Beam spacing = 3000 mm b eff = 9000/4 = 2250

More information

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction CHAPTER 2 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Introduction The primary purpose of structural analysis is to establish the distribution of internal forces and moments over the whole part of a structure and to identify

More information

EUROCODE EN SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES

EUROCODE EN SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 1 EUROCODE EN1998-2 SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES Basil Kolias Basic Requirements Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information

More information

1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6

1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6 Page 3 Page 4 Substructure Design. ARRANGEMENT a. Frame A-P3 L = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m b. Frame P3-P6 L = 25 m H 3 = 8.39 m L 2 = 3 m H 4 = 8.5 m L

More information

- Rectangular Beam Design -

- Rectangular Beam Design - Semester 1 2016/2017 - Rectangular Beam Design - Department of Structures and Material Engineering Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Introduction The purposes

More information

CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS

CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS 4.1. INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS A column is a vertical structural member transmitting axial compression loads with or without moments. The cross sectional dimensions of a column

More information

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case

More information

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams CHAPTER 4 Design of R C Beams Learning Objectives Identify the data, formulae and procedures for design of R C beams Design simply-supported and continuous R C beams by integrating the following processes

More information

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of one-way ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are

More information

Composite bridge design (EN1994-2) Bridge modelling and structural analysis

Composite bridge design (EN1994-2) Bridge modelling and structural analysis EUROCODES Bridges: Background and applications Dissemination of information for training Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 1 Composite bridge design (EN1994-2) Bridge modelling and structural analysis Laurence

More information

Practical Design to Eurocode 2. The webinar will start at 12.30

Practical Design to Eurocode 2. The webinar will start at 12.30 Practical Design to Eurocode 2 The webinar will start at 12.30 Course Outline Lecture Date Speaker Title 1 21 Sep Jenny Burridge Introduction, Background and Codes 2 28 Sep Charles Goodchild EC2 Background,

More information

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Contents Introduction Beam types Lateral stability of beams Factors affecting lateral stability Behaviour of simple and built - up beams in bending (Without vertical stiffeners)

More information

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections 4 5000 4000 (increased d ) (increased f (increased A s or f y ) c or b) Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections Moment (kip-in.) 3000 2000 1000 0 0 (basic) (A s 0.5A s ) 0.0005 0.001 0.0015

More information

Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement

Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Section 1: Deflections

More information

9.5 Compression Members

9.5 Compression Members 9.5 Compression Members This section covers the following topics. Introduction Analysis Development of Interaction Diagram Effect of Prestressing Force 9.5.1 Introduction Prestressing is meaningful when

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite

More information

Software Verification

Software Verification EXAMPLE 16 racked Slab Analysis RAKED ANALYSIS METHOD The moment curvature diagram shown in Figure 16-1 depicts a plot of the uncracked and cracked conditions, Ψ 1 State 1, and, Ψ State, for a reinforced

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 0 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic Loads

More information

O Dr Andrew Bond (Geocentrix)

O Dr Andrew Bond (Geocentrix) DECODING EUROCODES 2 + 7: DESIGN SG OF FOUNDATIONS O Dr Andrew Bond (Geocentrix) Outline of talk April 2010: the death of British Standards? UK implementation of Eurocodes Verification of strength: limit

More information

Yuko Ogawa, Ryoichi Sato and Kenji Kawai Institute of Engineering, Hiroshima University, Japan

Yuko Ogawa, Ryoichi Sato and Kenji Kawai Institute of Engineering, Hiroshima University, Japan Early Age Deformation, its Resultant Stress and Creep Properties of Concrete with and without Internal Curing Subjected to High Temperature History at an Early Age Yuko Ogawa, Ryoichi Sato and Kenji Kawai

More information

CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-

CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members- CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing Openings in RC Flexural Members- Assoc Pr Tan Kiang Hwee Department Civil Engineering National In this lecture DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

More information

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Elmer E. Marx, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Michael Keever, California Department

More information

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are

More information

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column Effects From Structural Analysis Axial force, N (tension-ve and comp +ve) (ensure >= 0) 8000kN OK Major

More information

REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES DESIGN AND DRAWING (ACE009)

REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES DESIGN AND DRAWING (ACE009) LECTURE NOTES ON REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES DESIGN AND DRAWING (ACE009) III B. Tech I semester (Regulation- R16) Mr. Gude Ramakrishna Associate Professor DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING INSTITUTE OF

More information

Parametric analysis and torsion design charts for axially restrained RC beams

Parametric analysis and torsion design charts for axially restrained RC beams Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 55, No. 1 (2015) 1-27 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.55.1.001 1 Parametric analysis and torsion design charts for axially restrained RC beams Luís F.A.

More information

CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE

CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE 6.1 GENERAL It shall be in accordance with JSCE Standard Specification (Design), 6.1. The collapse mechanism in statically indeterminate structures shall not be considered.

More information

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement. Example on Design of Slab Bridge Design Data and Specifications Chapter 5 SUPERSTRUCTURES Superstructure consists of 10m slab, 36m box girder and 10m T-girder all simply supported. Only the design of Slab

More information

Software Verification

Software Verification PROGRAM NAME: SAFE 014 EXAMPLE 16 racked Slab Analysis RAKED ANALYSIS METHOD The moment curvature diagram shown in Figure 16-1 depicts a plot of the uncracked and cracked conditions, 1 State 1, and, State,

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode 3 Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 20 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic

More information

Standardisation of UHPC in Germany

Standardisation of UHPC in Germany Standardisation of UHPC in Germany Part II: Development of Design Rules, University of Siegen Prof. Dr.-Ing. Ekkehard Fehling, University of Kassel 1 Overvie Introduction: Work of the Task Group Design

More information

Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes

Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes October 2014 Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of Abstract tubular columns and arches Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal Contact:

More information

MODELLING NON-LINEAR BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL FIBRE REINFORCED CONCRETE

MODELLING NON-LINEAR BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL FIBRE REINFORCED CONCRETE 6th RILEM Symposium on Fibre-Reinforced Concretes (FRC) - BEFIB - September, Varenna, Italy MODELLING NON-LINEAR BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL FIBRE REINFORCED CONCRETE W. A. Elsaigh, J. M. Robberts and E.P. Kearsley

More information

CRACK FORMATION AND CRACK PROPAGATION INTO THE COMPRESSION ZONE ON REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM STRUCTURES

CRACK FORMATION AND CRACK PROPAGATION INTO THE COMPRESSION ZONE ON REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM STRUCTURES S. Kakay et al. Int. J. Comp. Meth. and Exp. Meas. Vol. 5 No. (017) 116 14 CRACK FORMATION AND CRACK PROPAGATION INTO THE COMPRESSION ZONE ON REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM STRUCTURES SAMDAR KAKAY DANIEL BÅRDSEN

More information

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Design of

More information

Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017

Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017 Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail PAGE 1 (ref: JULB2NB280317) Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail Our ref: JULB2NB280317 Date

More information

Redistribution of force concentrations in reinforced concrete cantilever slab using 3D non-linear FE analyses

Redistribution of force concentrations in reinforced concrete cantilever slab using 3D non-linear FE analyses y x m y m y Linear elastic isotropic Linear elastic orthotropic Plastic Redistribution of force concentrations in reinforced concrete cantilever slab using 3D non-linear FE analyses x Master of Science

More information

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. ARCH 631 Note Set 11 S017abn Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. Building description The building is a three-story office building

More information

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk 1 Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular

More information

Appendix K Design Examples

Appendix K Design Examples Appendix K Design Examples Example 1 * Two-Span I-Girder Bridge Continuous for Live Loads AASHTO Type IV I girder Zero Skew (a) Bridge Deck The bridge deck reinforcement using A615 rebars is shown below.

More information

Einführung des EC2 in Belgien The introduction of EC2 in Belgium

Einführung des EC2 in Belgien The introduction of EC2 in Belgium Luc Taerwe 1 Einführung des EC2 in Belgien The introduction of EC2 in Belgium Luc Taerwe Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Luc Taerwe - graduated as civil engineer at Ghent University (1975) where he also obtained

More information

3.2 Reinforced Concrete Slabs Slabs are divided into suspended slabs. Suspended slabs may be divided into two groups:

3.2 Reinforced Concrete Slabs Slabs are divided into suspended slabs. Suspended slabs may be divided into two groups: Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 017 3. Reinforced Concrete Slabs Slabs are divided into suspended slabs. Suspended slabs may be divided into two groups: (1) slabs supported on edges of

More information

SIMPLIFIED METHOD FOR PREDICTING DEFORMATIONS OF RC FRAMES DURING FIRE EXPOSURE

SIMPLIFIED METHOD FOR PREDICTING DEFORMATIONS OF RC FRAMES DURING FIRE EXPOSURE SIMPLIFIED METHOD FOR PREDICTING DEFORMATIONS OF RC FRAMES DURING FIRE EXPOSURE M.A. Youssef a, S.F. El-Fitiany a a Western University, Faculty of Engineering, London, Ontario, Canada Abstract Structural

More information

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite

More information

Practical Design to Eurocode 2

Practical Design to Eurocode 2 Practical Design to Eurocode 2 The webinar will start at 12.30 (I m happy to field individual questions beforehand Use Questions on the shown Control Panel) Course Outline Lecture Date Speaker Title 1

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Beam BS8110 v Member Design - RC Beam XX

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Beam BS8110 v Member Design - RC Beam XX CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Effects From Structural Analysis Design axial force, F (tension -ve and compression +ve) (ensure < 0.1f cu b w h 0

More information

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular Beams Diagonal Tension

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - RC Two Way Spanning Slab XX

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - RC Two Way Spanning Slab XX CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC N/A) 35 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of

More information

POST-PEAK BEHAVIOR OF FRP-JACKETED REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS

POST-PEAK BEHAVIOR OF FRP-JACKETED REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS POST-PEAK BEHAVIOR OF FRP-JACKETED REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS - Technical Paper - Tidarut JIRAWATTANASOMKUL *1, Dawei ZHANG *2 and Tamon UEDA *3 ABSTRACT The objective of this study is to propose a new

More information

Entrance exam Master Course

Entrance exam Master Course - 1 - Guidelines for completion of test: On each page, fill in your name and your application code Each question has four answers while only one answer is correct. o Marked correct answer means 4 points

More information

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture twenty one concrete construction: Copyright Kirk Martini shear & deflection Concrete Shear 1 Shear in Concrete

More information

Detailing. Lecture 9 16 th November Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2

Detailing. Lecture 9 16 th November Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2 Detailing Lecture 9 16 th November 2017 Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2 EC2 Section 8 - Detailing of Reinforcement - General Rules Bar spacing, Minimum bend diameter Anchorage of reinforcement

More information

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web:     Ph: Serial : IG1_CE_G_Concrete Structures_100818 Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: E-mail: info@madeeasy.in Ph: 011-451461 CLASS TEST 018-19 CIVIL ENGINEERING

More information

DESIGN REINFORCED CEMENT CONCRETE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS

DESIGN REINFORCED CEMENT CONCRETE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS DESIGN OF REINFORCED CEMENT CONCRETE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS Contents CHAPTER 1.0 General: 1.1 Symbols 1. Materials 1..1 Cement 1.. Aggregate 1..3 Water 1..4 Admixtures 1..5 Reinforcement CHAPTER.0 Concrete:.1

More information

Strengthening of columns with FRP

Strengthening of columns with FRP with FRP Professor Dr. Björn Täljsten Luleå University of Technology Sto Scandinavia AB 9/12/2013 Agenda Case study Restrained transverse expansion (confinement) Circular and rectangular cross sections

More information

Hardened Concrete. Lecture No. 16

Hardened Concrete. Lecture No. 16 Hardened Concrete Lecture No. 16 Fatigue strength of concrete Modulus of elasticity, Creep Shrinkage of concrete Stress-Strain Plot of Concrete At stress below 30% of ultimate strength, the transition

More information

Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads

Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com Prof.

More information

Evaluation of Flexural Stiffness for RC Beams During Fire Events

Evaluation of Flexural Stiffness for RC Beams During Fire Events 3 rd International Structural Specialty Conference 3 ième conférence internationale spécialisée sur le génie des structures Edmonton, Alberta June 6-9, 202 / 6 au 9 juin 202 Evaluation of Flexural Stiffness

More information

Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A )

Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A ) Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A23.3-94) Slender Concrete Column Design in Sway Frame Buildings Evaluate slenderness effect for columns in a

More information

Fire Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams with 2-D Plane Stress Concrete Model

Fire Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams with 2-D Plane Stress Concrete Model Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 5(2): 398-44, 213 ISSN: 24-7459; E-ISSN: 24-7467 Maxwell Scientific Organization, 213 Submitted: April 29, 212 Accepted: May 23, 212 Published:

More information

twenty one concrete construction: materials & beams ELEMENTS OF ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2014

twenty one concrete construction: materials & beams ELEMENTS OF ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2014 ELEMENTS OF ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2014 lecture twenty one concrete construction: http:// nisee.berkeley.edu/godden materials & beams Concrete Beams

More information

Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures

Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Contents Analysis Approaches Point of Inflection Method Equivalent

More information

Rigid pavement design

Rigid pavement design Rigid pavement design Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering Prof. Tom V. Mathew Contents 1 Overview 1 1.1 Modulus of sub-grade reaction.......................... 2 1.2 Relative stiffness

More information

APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS

APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS D-1 An extensive literature search revealed many methods for the calculation of live load distribution factors. This appendix will discuss, in detail,

More information

Balcony balustrades using the SG12 laminated glass system: PAGE 1 (SG12FF010717) Structural Calculations for SG12 System balustrades using 21.5mm laminated toughened glass without the need for a handrail

More information

SPECIFIC VERIFICATION Chapter 5

SPECIFIC VERIFICATION Chapter 5 As = 736624/(0.5*413.69) = 3562 mm 2 (ADAPT 3569 mm 2, B29, C6) Data Block 27 - Compressive Stresses The initial compressive strength, f ci, is the strength entered in the Material/Concrete input screen.

More information

five Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture

five Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture five mechanics www.carttalk.com of materials Mechanics of Materials 1 Mechanics of Materials MECHANICS MATERIALS

More information

Fire resistance assessment of composite steel-concrete structures

Fire resistance assessment of composite steel-concrete structures Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 78 November 0 Fire resistance assessment of composite steelconcrete structures Basic design methods Worked examples CAJOT

More information

Civil Engineering Design (1) Analysis and Design of Slabs 2006/7

Civil Engineering Design (1) Analysis and Design of Slabs 2006/7 Civil Engineering Design (1) Analysis and Design of Slabs 006/7 Dr. Colin Caprani, Chartered Engineer 1 Contents 1. Elastic Methods... 3 1.1 Introduction... 3 1. Grillage Analysis... 4 1.3 Finite Element

More information

Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601. Lecture no. 6: SHEAR AND TORSION

Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601. Lecture no. 6: SHEAR AND TORSION Budapest University of Technology and Economics Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601 Lecture no. 6: SHEAR AND TORSION Reinforced

More information

Figure 2-1: Stresses under axisymmetric circular loading

Figure 2-1: Stresses under axisymmetric circular loading . Stresses in Pavements.1. Stresses in Fleible Pavements.1.1. Stresses in Homogeneous Mass Boussinesq formulated models for the stresses inside an elastic half-space due to a concentrated load applied

More information

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC. BENDING STRESS The effect of a bending moment applied to a cross-section of a beam is to induce a state of stress across that section. These stresses are known as bending stresses and they act normally

More information

Appendix G Analytical Studies of Columns

Appendix G Analytical Studies of Columns Appendix G Analytical Studies of Columns G.1 Introduction Analytical parametric studies were performed to evaluate a number of issues related to the use of ASTM A103 steel as longitudinal and transverse

More information

Therefore, for all members designed according to ACI 318 Code, f s =f y at failure, and the nominal strength is given by:

Therefore, for all members designed according to ACI 318 Code, f s =f y at failure, and the nominal strength is given by: 5.11. Under-reinforced Beams (Read Sect. 3.4b oour text) We want the reinforced concrete beams to fail in tension because is not a sudden failure. Therefore, following Figure 5.3, you have to make sure

More information

Made by SMH Date Aug Checked by NRB Date Dec Revised by MEB Date April 2006

Made by SMH Date Aug Checked by NRB Date Dec Revised by MEB Date April 2006 Job No. OSM 4 Sheet 1 of 8 Rev B Telephone: (0144) 45 Fax: (0144) 944 Made b SMH Date Aug 001 Checked b NRB Date Dec 001 Revised b MEB Date April 00 DESIGN EXAMPLE 9 - BEAM WITH UNRESTRAINED COMPRESSION

More information

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME 313.3 MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich A CLOSED BOOK EXAMINATION TIME: 3 HOURS For Marker s Use Only LAST NAME (printed): FIRST

More information

DEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8 - PART 3 PROVISIONS

DEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8 - PART 3 PROVISIONS DEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8 - PART 3 PROVISIONS Konstantinos CHRISTIDIS 1, Emmanouil VOUGIOUKAS 2 and Konstantinos TREZOS 3 ABSTRACT

More information

Reinforced Concrete Structures

Reinforced Concrete Structures Reinforced Concrete Structures MIM 232E Dr. Haluk Sesigür I.T.U. Faculty of Architecture Structural and Earthquake Engineering WG Ultimate Strength Theory Design of Singly Reinforced Rectangular Beams

More information

FRAME ANALYSIS. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

FRAME ANALYSIS. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia FRAME ANALYSIS Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email: iznisyahrizal@utm.my Introduction 3D Frame: Beam, Column & Slab 2D Frame Analysis Building

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Effects From Structural Analysis Design axial force, F (tension -ve and compression +ve) (ensure < 0.1f cu b w h 0 kn OK Design shear force, V d 4223 kn

More information

PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK

PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM - 613 403 - THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Sub : Strength of Materials Year / Sem: II / III Sub Code : MEB 310

More information