Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Transnational Approach


 Caroline McDaniel
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Transnational Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 0 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic Loads 1. Design Loads F d = γ F F k 1. Partial Safety Factors for Strength. Floor Beam  Fully Restrained.1 Classification of Crosssection.1.1Flange buckling.1. Web buckling. Shear on Web. Deflection Check.4 Additional Checks if Section is on Seating Cleats.5 Crushing Resistance.6 Crippling Resistance.7 Buckling Resistance.8 Summary. Roof Beam Restrained at Load Points.1 Initial Section Selection. Classification of Cross Section..1 Flange buckling.. Web buckling. Design Buckling Resistance Moment.4 Shear on Web.5 Deflection Check.6 Crushing, Crippling and Buckling.7 Summary 4. Internal Column 4.1 Loadings 4. Section properties SSEDTA 001
2 4. Classification of CrossSection 4..1 Flange (subject to compression) 4.. Web (subject to compression) 4.4 Resistance of CrossSection 4.5 Buckling Resistance of Member 4.6 Determination of Reduction Factor χy 4.7 Determination of Reduction Factor χz 5. External Column 5.1 Loadings 5. Section properties 5. Classifcation of CrossSection 5..1 Flange (subject to compression) 5.. Web (subject to compression) 5.4 Resistance of CrossSection 5.5 Buckling Resistance of Member 5.6 Determination of Reduction factor χy 5.7 Determination of Reduction factor χz 6. Design of CrossBracing 6.1 Section Properties 6. Classification of CrossSection 6. Design of Compression Member 6..1 Resistance of Crosssection 6.. Design Buckling Resistance 6.. Determination of Reduction Factor χ? 6.4 Design of Tension Member 6.4.1Resistance of CrossSection 7. Concluding Summary 15/0/07
3 1. Simple Braced Frame The frame consists of two storeys and two bays. The frames are at 5 m spacing. The beam span is 7, m. The height from column foot to the beam at floor level is 4,5 m and the height from floor to roof is 4, m. It is assumed that the column foot is pinned at the foundation. Roof Beam External Column Internal Column 4, m Floor Beam 4,5 m 7, m 7, m Figure 1 Typical Cross Section of Frame It is assumed that resistance to lateral wind loads is provided by a system of localised crossbracing, and that the main steel frame is designed to support gravity loads only. The connections are designed to transmit vertical shear, and it is also () assumed that the connections offer little, if any, resistance to free rotation of the beam ends With these assumptions, the frame is classified as simple, and the internal forces and moments are determined using a global analysis which assumes the members to be effectively pinconnected. 1.1 Characteristic Loads Floor: Variable load, Q k =,5 kn/m Permanent load, G k = 8,11 kn/m Roof: Variable load, Q k = 0,75 kn/m Permanent load, G k = 7,17 kn/m 1. Design Loads F d = γ F F k...4(1) Floor: G d = γ G G k. At ultimate limit state γ G = 1,5 (unfavourable) G d = 1,5 x 8,11 = 10,95 kn/m Q d = γ Q Q k. At ultimate limit state γ Q = 1,5 (unfavourable) Q d = 1,5 x,5 = 5,5 kn/m...4()....4(). 15/0/07
4 Roof: G d = γ G G k. At ultimate limit state γ G = 1,5 (unfavourable) G d = 1,5 x 7,17 = 9,68 kn/m Q d = γ Q Q k. At ultimate limit state γ Q = 1,5 (unfavourable) Q d = 1,5 x 0,75 = 1,15 kn/m The steel grade selected for beams, columns and joints is Fe60. (f y = 5 N/mm ) 1. Partial Safety Factors for Strength The following partial safety factors for strength have been adopted during the design: Resistance of Class 1, or crosssection, γ M0 = 1,1 Resistance of member to buckling, γ M1 = 1,1 Resistance of bolted connections, γ Mb = 1,5 The following load case, corresponding to permanent and variable actions (no horizontal loads) is found to be critical.. Floor Beam  Fully Restrained The beam shown in Figure is simply supported at both ends and is fully restrained along its length. For the loading shown, design the beam in grade Fe60, assuming that it is carrying plaster, or a similar brittle finish. F d = γ G G k + γ Q Q k Design load, F d = (5 x 1,5 x 8,11) + (5 x 1,5 x,5) = 81 kn/m 81 kn/m...4()....4()..1...(1) 5.1.1() 5.1.1() 6.1.1().1 7, m Figure Loading on Fully Restrained Floor Beam Fd L Design moment, MSd = 8 Where M Sd is the design moment in beam span, F d is the design load = 81 kn/m, and L is the beam span = 7,m. 81x7, MSd = = 55 knm 8 Fd L 81x7, Design shear force, VSd = = = 9 kn To determine the section size it is assumed that the flange thickness is less than 40 mm so that the design strength is 5 N/mm, and that the section is class 1 or..1 15/0/07 4
5 The design bending moment, M Sd, must be less than or equal to the design moment resistance of the cross section, M c.rd : M Sd M c.rd M c.rd = M pl.y.rd = W f pl y γ M0 Where W pl is the plastic section modulus (to be determined), f y is the yield strength = 5 N/mm, and γ M0 is the partial material safety factor = 1,1. Therefore, rearranging: Msdγ M0 55x10 x1,1 Wpl.required = = = 457 cm fy 5 Try IPE 550 Section properties: Depth, h = 550 mm, Width, b = 10 mm Web thickness, t w = 11,1 mm Flange thickness, t f = 17, mm Plastic modulus, W pl = 787 cm This notation conforms with Figure 1.1 in Eurocode : Part Classification of Crosssection As a simply supported beam is not required to have any plastic rotation capacity (only one hinge required), it is sufficient to ensure that the section is at least class to develop the plastic moment resistance. Figure shows a typical crosssection for an IPE. IPE sections have been used in this example to reflect the European nature of the training pack (1) () and 5..1 t t w f c d Figure A Typical CrossSection.1.1 Flange buckling Class 1 limiting value of c/t f for an outstand of a rolled section is 10ε. ε = 5 / f y and f y = 5 N/mm, therefore ε =1. Calculate the ratio c, where c is half t f the width of the flange = 105 mm, and t f is the flange thickness = 17, mm (if the flange is tapered, t f should be taken as the average thickness). c 105 = = 6,10 t 17, f 5..1 (Sheet ) 15/0/07 5
6 .1. Web buckling Class 1 limiting value of d/t w for a web subject to bending is 7ε. ε = 5 / f y and f y = 5 N/mm, therefore ε =1. Calculate the ratio d, where d is the depth between root radii = 467,6 t w mm and t w is the web thickness = 11,1 mm. d 467,6 = = 4,1 t w 11,1 c < 10ε and d < 7ε t t f w Section is Class 1 and is capable of developing plastic moment.. Shear on Web The shear resistance of the web must be checked. The design shear force, V Sd, must be less than or equal to the design plastic shear resistance, V pl.rd : 5..1 (Sheet 1) 5..1 (Sheets 1 and ) V Sd V pl.rd Where V pl.rd is given by A f / y v γ M0 For rolled I and H sections loaded parallel to the web, Shear area, A v = 1,04 h t w, f y is the yield strength = 5 N/mm, and γ M0 is the partial material safety factor = 1, (4) () 1,04ht f Vpl.Rd = xγ w y M0 1,04 x 550 x 11,1 x 5 = = 78 kn x 1,1x10 This is greater than the shear on the section (9 kn). The shear on the beam web is OK. If the beam has partial depth endplates, a local shear check is required on the web of the beam where it is welded to the endplate. V A f / y pl.rd = v γ M0 where A v = t w d, and d is the depth of endplate = (for example) 00 mm. 11,1 x 00 x 5 Vpl.Rd = = 411 kn x 1,1 x 10 This is greater than the shear on the section (9 kn). The local shear on the beam web is OK. 15/0/07 6
7 Other simple joints may be used instead, e.g. web cleat joints or fin plate joints. A further check is sometimes required, especially when there are significant point loads, cantilevers or continuity, to ensure that the shear will not have a significant effect on the moment resistance. This check is carried out for the moment and shear at the same point. The moment resistance of the web is reduced if the shear is more than 50% of the shear resistance of the section. With a uniform load, the maximum moment and shear are not coincident and this check is not required for beams without web openings.. Deflection Check Eurocode requires that the deflections of the beam be checked under the following serviceability loading conditions: Variable actions, and Permanent and variable actions. Figure 4 shows the vertical deflections to be considered () 4. δ δ 1 δ δ 0 max L Figure 4 Vertical Deflections δ 0 is the precamber (if present), δ 1 is the deflection due to permanent actions, δ is the deflection caused by variable loading, and δ max is the sagging in the final state relative to the straight line joining the supports. For a plaster or similar brittle finish, the deflection limits are L/50 for δ max and L/50 for δ. Deflection checks are based on the serviceability loading. For a uniform load δ = 5 84 x F L k EIy where F k is the total load = Q k or (G k + Q k ) as appropriate, L is the span = 7, m, E is the modulus of elasticity ( N/mm ), and I y is the second moment of area about the major axis = 6710 x 10 4 mm Figure /0/07 7
8 For permanent actions, F k = 5 x 8,11 x 7, = 9 kn. Therefore, deflection due to permanent actions, 5 x 9x10 x 700 δ 1 = = 10,1 mm 4 84 x x 6710x10 For variable actions, F k = 5 x,5 x 7, = 16 kn. Therefore, deflection due to variable actions, 5 x 16x10 x 700 δ = = 4, mm 4 84 x x 6710x10 The maximum deflection, δ max = δ 1 + δ = 10,1+ 4, = 14,4 mm L 700 Deflection limit for δ = = = 0,6 mm The actual deflection is less than the allowable deflection: 4, mm < 0,6 mm L 700 Deflection limit for δ max = = = 8,8 mm The actual deflection is less than the allowable deflection: 14,4 mm < 8,8 mm OK. The calculated deflections are less than the limits, so no precamber is required. It should be noted that if the structure is open to the public, there is a limit of 8 mm for the total deflection of δ 1 + δ (neglecting any precamber) under the frequent combination, to control vibration. This is based on a single degree of freedom, lumped mass approach. For the frequent combination the variable action is multiplied by ψ, which has a value of 0,6 for offices..4 Additional Checks if Section is on Seating Cleats There are cases where the beams may be supported on seating cleats, or on other materials such as concrete pads. A similar situation arises when a beam supports a concentrated load applied through the flanges. In these cases the following checks are required: Crushing of the web Crippling of the web Buckling of the web Generally, these checks need only be carried out for short beams or beams with concentrated loads. For the sake of completeness, these checks are included in this worked example. The following detailed checks are for an 85 mm stiff bearing. (The actual length of stiff bearing will depend on the detail of the connection  see Figure 5.7.) 4..() Lecture, section 6...4() /0/07 8
9 .5 Crushing Resistance 5.7. The crushing resistance is given by (ss + s y)twfyw Ry.Rd = γ M1 where s s is the length of stiff bearing = 85 mm, t w is the web thickness = 11,1 mm, f yw is the yield strength of the web = 5 N/mm, γ M1 is the partial material safety factor for buckling resistance = 1,1, and s y is the length over which the effect takes place, based on the section geometry and the longitudinal stresses in the flange. s y = t f (b f /t w ) (f yf /f yw ) [1  (σ f.ed /f yf ) ] At the support, the stress in the beam flange, σ f.ed, is zero, f yf = f yw but the value of s y is halved at the end of the member () 5.7.(1) 5.7.() x 17, x (10 / 11,1) sy = = 75 mm ( ) x 11,1 x 5 Crushing resistance, R y.rd = = 79,4 kn 1,1x10 This is greater than the reaction (9 kn). The crushing resistance is OK.6 Crippling Resistance The crippling resistance is given by 5.7.4(1) R a.rd = w t (Ef ) [(t / t ) + (t / t )(s / d)] yw f γ w M1 w f s where t w is the thickness of the web = 11,1 mm, E is the modulus of elasticity = N/mm, f yw is the yield strength of the web = 5 N/mm, t f is the flange thickness = 17, mm, s s is the length of stiff bearing = 85 mm, but s s is limited to a maximum of 0,d (467,6 mm x 0, = 9,5 mm), d is the depth between root radii = 467,6 mm, and γ M1 is the partial material safety factor buckling resistance = 1, (1) 5.1.1() x 11,1 (10000 x 5) [(17, / 11,1) + (11,1 / 17,)(85 / 467,6)] Ra,Rd = 1,1x10 = 66 kn This is greater than the reaction (9 kn). The crippling resistance is OK. 15/0/07 9
10 .7 Buckling Resistance The buckling resistance is determined by taking a length of web as a strut. The length of web is taken from Eurocode, which in this case, gives a length: ss beff = (h + s s ) + a + but [h + s s ] where h is the height of the section = 550 mm, s s is the length of stiff bearing = 85 mm, and a is the distance to the end of the beam = 0 mm. 85 beff = ( ) + = mm Provided that the construction is such that the top flange is held by a slab and the bottom by seating cleats, against rotation and displacement, the effective height of the web for buckling should be taken as 0,7 x distance between fillets. l = 467,6 mm x 0,7 = 7 mm t w 11,1 Radius of gyration for web, i = = =, 1 1 l 7 Slenderness of the web, = = = 10 i, Nondimensional slenderness of the web, β = 1 Where 1 = 9,9 ε = 9,9 x 1 = 9,9, and β A = 1 10 Non  dimensional slenderness of the web, = = 1, 09 9, 9 Using buckling curve c, the value of the reduction factor, χ may be determined from Reduction factor, χ = 0,49 AAfy Buckling resistance of a compression member, N b.rd = χβ γ M1 A is the crosssectional area = b eff t w, f y is the yield strength = 5 N/mm, and γ M1 is the partial material safety factor for buckling resistance = 1,1. 0,49 x 1 x x 11,1 x 5 N b.rd = = 7,4 kn 1,1x10 This is greater than the reaction (9 kn). The buckling resistance is OK..8 Summary The trial section IPE 550 is satisfactory if the section is on a stiff bearing 85 mm long. If it is supported by web cleats or welded end plates, the web checks, except for shear, are not required and the section is again satisfactory. The beam is satisfactory. A Figure (4) () () 5.7.5() and (1) () 15/0/07 10
11 . Roof Beam  Restrained at Load Points The roof beam shown in Figure 5 is laterally restrained at the ends and at the points of application of load. The load is applied through purlins at 1,8 m spacings. Internal point load = 1,8 [(5 x 1,5 x 7,17) + (5 x 1,5 x 0,75)] = 97, kn External point load = 0,9 [(5 x 1,5 x 7,17) + (5 x 1,5 x 0,75)] = 48,6 kn It is assumed that the external point loads will be applied at the end of the beams, and will contribute to the maximum shear force applied to the end of the beam, and the moment induced in the column due to the eccentricity of connection. For the loading shown, design the beam in grade Fe60 steel. 48,6 kn 97, kn 97, kn 97, kn 48,6 kn A B C D E 1,8 m 1,8 m 1,8 m 1,8 m 7, m Figure 5 Beam Restrained at Load Points Reactions V Sd (at supports) = [( x 48,6) + ( x 97,)] / = 194,4 kn Design Moment Figure 6 shows the distribution of bending moments. 1,8 m 1,8 m 1,8 m 1,8 m 0 0 6,4 knm 6,4 knm 49,9 knm Figure 6 Bending Moment Diagram Moment at midspan (maximum) M Sd = [(194,448,6) x,6]  (97, x 1,8) = 49,9 knm 15/0/07 11
12 .1 Initial Section Selection Assume that a rolled I beam will be used and that the flanges will be less than 40 mm thick. For grade Fe60 steel, f y = 5 N/mm. Because the beam is unrestrained between load points, the design resistance, M c.rd, of the section will be reduced by lateral torsional buckling. The final section, allowing for the buckling resistance moment being less than the full resistance moment of the section, would have to be determined from experience. Try IPE O 450 Section properties: Depth, h = 456 mm, Width, b = 19 mm Web thickness, t w = 11 mm Flange thickness, t f = 17,6 mm Plastic modulus, W pl = 046 cm This notation conforms with Figure 1.1 in Eurocode : Part1.1.. Classification of CrossSection As a simply supported beam is not required to have any plastic rotation capacity (only one hinge required), it is sufficient to ensure that the section is at least class to develop the plastic moment resistance...1 Flange buckling Class 1 limiting value of c/t f for an outstand of a rolled section is 10ε. ε = 5 / f y and f y = 5 N/mm, therefore ε =1. Calculate the ratio c, where c is half the width of the flange = 96 mm, t f and t f is the flange thickness = 17,6 mm (if the flange is tapered, t f should be taken as the average thickness). c 96 = = 5,5 t 17,6 f.. Web buckling Class 1 limiting value of d/t w for a web subject to bending is 7ε. ε = 5 / f y and f y = 5 N/mm, therefore ε =1. Calculate the ratio d, where d is the depth between root radii = 78,8 t w mm and t w is the web thickness = 11,0 mm. d 78,8 = = 4,4 t w 11,0 c < 10ε and d < 7ε t t f Section is Class 1. w and (Sheet ) 5..1 (Sheet 1) 5..1 (Sheets 1 and ) 15/0/07 1
13 . Design Buckling Resistance Moment The design buckling resistance moment of a laterally unrestrained beam is given by: M = b.rd χ β W f LT W pl.y y γ M1 in which χ LT is the reduction factor for lateral torsional buckling, from 5.5., for the appropriate value of LT, using curve a for rolled sections (4) In this case full lateral restraint is provided at the supports and at the load points B, C and D. In general, all segments need to be checked, but in this case they are all of equal length. The segments B  C and C  D are subject to the most severe condition, but with symmetrical loading only one segment needs to be checked. Segment B  C The value of LT can be determined using Annex F. For segment B  C it is assumed that the purlins at B and C provide the following conditions: restraint against lateral movement, restraint against rotation about the longitudinal axis (i.e. torsional/twisting restraint), and freedom to rotate in plan. i.e. k = k w = 1,0 For this example, the general formula for LT has been used, as the section is doubly symmetric and endmoment loading is present. The following formula for LT may be used: LT = C 0, L / i LT ( L / a ) LT 5, 66 0, 5 where L is the length between B and C = 1800 mm, I z is the second moment of area about the z  z axis = 085 x 10 4 mm 4, I w is the warping constant = 998 x 10 9 mm 6, W pl.y is the plastic modulus about the y  y axis = 046 x 10 mm, and I t is the torsion constant = 89, x 10 4 mm 4. i a LT LT = I I W z w pl.y x10 x 998x10 = 47, mm = (046x10 ) 9 Iw 998x10 = 957 mm 4 = I = 109x10 t Annex F F.1.() Equation F.15 F..() F..(1) 15/0/07 1
14 Note: These properties will probably be tabulated in handbooks. See also appendix A at the end of this example. C 1 is the correction factor for the effects of any change of moment along the length, L. ψ = 6,4/49,9 = 0,75, k = 1, therefore C 1 = 1,141 Substituting into the above equation: 1800 / 47, LT = = 4, 6 0, 5 ( ) 0, 5 / 1141, 1 + 5, 66 Nondimensional slenderness, LT = Where 1 = 9,9 ε = 9,9 x 1 = 9,9, β w = 1 for class 1 sections. 4, 6 Therefore, LT = ( = 9 9 1,, 0 ) 0, 7 For rolled I sections, buckling curve a should be used. From 5.5., the reduction factor, χ LT = 0,96. (This represents a 4% strength reduction due to moment) W pl.y is the plastic modulus about the y  y axis = 046 x 10 mm, f y is the yield strength of the steel = 5 N/mm, and γ M1 is the partial material safety factor for buckling resistance = 1,1. LT 1 β w The design buckling resistance moment for segment B  C is: M = b.rd χ β W f 0, 96 x 1 x 046x10 x 5 = = 419, 6 knm 6 γ 1,1 x 10 LT W pl.y y M1 F (4) 5.5.(5) () 5.5. M b.rd = 419,6 knm > M Sd = 49,9 knm, therefore the section is satisfactory. 15/0/07 14
15 .4 Shear on Web The maximum shear occurs at the supports, V Sd = 194,4 kn. The design shear resistance for a rolled I section is: V pl.rd 1,04htw = γ ( fy / ) M0 where h is the height of the section = 456 mm, t w is the web thickness = 11 mm, f y is the yield strength of the steel = 5 N/mm, and γ M0 is the partial material safety factor for the resistance of the crosssection = 1, (1) 5.4.6(4) () V 1,04 x 456 x 11 x 5 = = 64 kn x 1,1 x 10 pl.rd V Sd = 194,4 kn < V pl.rd = 64 kn, therefore the section is satisfactory. Inspection shows that V Sd < (V pl.rd / ), so there is no reduction in moment resistance due to the shear in the web..5 Deflection Check Eurocode requires that the deflections of the beam be checked under the following serviceability loading conditions: 5.4.7() 4. Variable actions, and Permanent and variable actions. For a general roof, the deflection limits are L/00 for δ max and L/50 for δ. Deflection checks are based on the serviceability loading. Consider the deflection from the permanent loading. For a point load, distance a from the end of the beam: 4.1 Figure 4.1 Central deflection, δ = F ka L a EIy (1) where F k is the value of one point load = (7,17 x 5 x 1,8) = 64,5 kn, E is the modulus of elasticity = N/mm, I y is the second moment of area about the major axis = 4090 x 10 4 mm 4, L is the span of the beam = 7, m, and a is the distance from the support to the adjacent load = 1,8 m. Central deflection, δ = 64,5x10 x x 4090x10 = 4, mm 15/0/07 15
16 For a central point load: Central deflection, δ = F L k 48EI y where F k is the value of one point load = (7,17 x 5 x 1,8) = 64,5 kn, L is the span of the beam = 7, m, E is the modulus of elasticity = N/mm, and I y is the second moment of area about the major axis = 4090 x 10 4 mm 4...5(1) 64,5x10 x 700 Central deflection, δ = = 5, 8 mm 4 48 x x 4090x10 Total deflection due to permanent loading, δ 1 = 5,8 + ( x 4,0) = 1,8 mm Consider the deflection from the variable loading. For a point load, distance a from the end of the beam: F ka L a Central deflection, δ = EIy 16 1 where F k is the value of one point load = (0,75 x 5 x 1,8) = 6,75 kn, E is the modulus of elasticity = N/mm, I y is the second moment of area about the major axis = 4090 x 10 4 mm 4, L is the span of the beam = 7, m, and a is the distance from the support to the adjacent load = 1,8 m. 6,75x10 x Central deflection, δ = x 4090x10 = 0, 4 mm (1) For a central point load: Central deflection, δ = F L k 48EI y where F k is the value of one point load = (0,75 x 5 x 1,8) = 6,75 kn, L is the span of the beam = 7, m, E is the modulus of elasticity = N/mm, and I y is the second moment of area about the major axis = 4090 x 10 4 mm 4...5(1) 6,75x10 x 700 Central deflection, δ = = 0, 6 mm 4 48 x x 4090x10 15/0/07 16
17 Total deflection due to variable loading, δ = 0,6 + ( x 0,4) = 1,4 mm Therefore, the total central deflection, δ max = δ 1 + δ = 1,8 + 1,4 = 15, mm. The limit for δ is L/50 = 700/50 = 8,8 mm. The limit for δ max = L/00 = 700/00 = 6 mm. 1,8 mm < 8,8 mm and 15,5 mm < 6 mm, therefore the deflections are within limits and no precamber of the beam is required..6 Crushing, Crippling and Buckling If the beam is supported on seating cleats, the checks for web crushing, crippling and buckling must be made. To satisfy the assumptions made in the design, both flanges must be held in place laterally, relative to each other. If seating cleats are used then the top flange must be held laterally. There is no requirement to prevent the flanges from rotating in plan, as k has been taken as 1,0..7 Summary All Eurocode recommendations are satisfied, therefore this beam is satisfactory. The beam is satisfactory. 4.1 and Figure Internal Column The internal column shown in Figure 7 is subject to loads from the roof and one floor. Design the column for the given loading, in grade Fe60 steel, as a member in simple framing. 15/0/07 17
18 4.1 Loadings (54 x 7,) At roof level, the applied axial load = x = 89 kn (81 x 7,) At first floor level, the applied axial load = x = 58 kn Maximum load, from the first floor to the base, = kn = 97 kn Roof Internal Column Floor 4, m 4,5 m Figure 7 Internal Column Consider the column from ground floor to first floor. The size of the column must be determined from experience and then checked for compliance with the Eurocode rules. 4. Section Properties Try an HE 40 A Grade Fe60 (terminology in accordance with EC) h = 0 mm b = 40 mm t w = 7,5 mm t f = 1 mm d/t w = 1,9 c/t f = 10 A = 7680 mm I y = 77,6 x 10 6 mm 4 I w = 8 x 10 9 mm 6 I z = 7,7 x 10 6 mm 4 I t = 41,6 x 10 4 mm 4 W pl.y = 745 x 10 mm W el.y = 675 x 10 mm i y = 101 mm i z = 60 mm i Lt = I I W z w pl.y 6 9 7,7x10 x 8x10 = 6,6 mm = (745x10 ) 9 Iw 8x10 alt = 888 mm 4 = It = 41,6x10 All the above properties can be obtained from section property tables. F..() F..(1) 15/0/07 18
19 4. Classification of Cross Section This section is designed to withstand axial force only. No moment is applied as the connecting beams are equally loaded Flange (subject to compression) Class 1 limiting value of c/t f for an outstand of a rolled section is 10ε. ε = 5 / f y where f y = 5 N/mm, therefore ε = 1. From section properties, c/t f = Web (subject to compression) Class 1 limiting value of d/t w for a web subject to compression only is ε. From section properties, d/t w = 1,9 c/t f 10ε and d/t w ε Class 1 section (Sheet ) 5..1 (Sheet 1).5.1 (Sheets 1 and ) Class 1 section 4.4 Resistance of CrossSection It is highly unlikely that the resistance of the crosssection will be the critical case  it is generally the buckling resistance that governs the suitability of a crosssection. For the sake of completeness, the check is included in this worked example. The resistance of the crosssection will only be critical if a short, stocky column is used. For members in axial compression, the design value of the compressive 5.4.4(1) force, N Sd, at each crosssection shall satisfy N Sd N c.rd For a class 1 crosssection, the design compression resistance of the 5.4.4() crosssection, N c.rd, may be determined as: Afy Nc.Rd = γ M0 where A is crosssectional area = 7680 mm, f y is the yield strength = 5 N/mm, and γ M0 is the partial material safety factor = 1,1. N 7680 x 5 = = 1641 kn 1,1x10 c.rd N Sd = 97 kn, therefore N sd N c.rd. The section can resist the applied axial load () 15/0/07 19
20 4.5 Buckling Resistance of Member A class 1 member should be checked for failure due to flexural and lateral torsional buckling. Here, since M y = M z = 0, only failure due to flexural buckling needs to be checked. The design buckling resistance of a compression member shall be taken as: N b.rd = χβ γ A Af M1 y where χ is the reduction factor for the relevant buckling mode, β A = 1 for class 1 crosssection, A is the crosssectional area = 7680 mm, f y is the yield strength of the steel = 5 N/mm, and γ M1 is the partial material safety factor for buckling resistance = 1,1. The magnitude of the reduction factor, χ depends on the reduced slenderness of the columns. χ is the lesser of χ y and χ z, where χ y and χ z are the reduction factors from clause for the yy and zz axes respectively. Values of χ for the appropriate value of nondimensional slenderness, may be obtained from Nondimensional slenderness, = β Where the slenderness, = l i l is the column buckling length, and i is the radius of gyration about the relevant axis. The braced frame is designed as a simple pinned structure. Therefore, the buckling length ratio l/l is equal to 1  the buckling length is equal to the system length. E 1 = π 9,9ε f = y 4.6 Determination of Reduction Factor, χ y Slenderness, y = l/i y = 4500/101 = 44,6 1 = 9,9ε = 9,9 x 1 = 9,9 Nondimensional slenderness, y = y β 44,6 A = 9,9 x 1 = 0,47 From 5.5., using buckling curve b, the reduction factor, χ y = 0, A (1) (1) () (1) () () (1) () /0/07 0
21 4.7 Determination of Reduction Factor, χ z Slenderness, z = l/i z = 4500/60 = 75 1 = 9,9ε = 9,9 x 1 = 9,9 Nondimensional slenderness, = z β 75 y A = 9,9 x 1 = 0,8 From 5.5., using buckling curve c,the reduction factor, χ z = 0,66 Therefore χ = χ z = 0,66. Design buckling resistance of member: χβ AAfy 0,66 x 1 x 7680 x 5 Nb.Rd = = = 1086 kn γ M1 1,1x10 The design buckling resistance of the member is greater than the applied load (97 kn), therefore the column is satisfactory. The column is OK () (1) 5. External Column The external column shown in Figure 8 is subject to loads from the roof and one floor. Design the column for the loading given below, in grade Fe60 steel, as a member in simple framing. 5.1 Loadings (54 x 7,) At roof level, the applied axial load = = 194 kn (81 x 7,) At first floor level, the applied axial load = = 9 kn Maximum load, from first floor to base, = kn = 486 kn The beams in the frame are designed to span from column centre to column centre, therefore all axial load is applied at the midpoint of the column. No moment due to eccentricity of applied load is therefore applied to the column. See Annex H 15/0/07 1
22 Roof 4, m First Floor 4,5 m Figure 8 External Column Consider the column from ground floor to first floor. The size of the column must be determined from experience and then checked for compliance with the Eurocode rules. 5. Section Properties Try an HE 00 A Grade Fe60 h = 190 mm b = 00 mm t w = 6,5 mm t f = 10 mm d/t w = 0,6 c/t f = 10 A = 580 mm I y = 6,9 x 10 6 mm 4 I w = 108 x 10 9 mm 6 I z = 1,6 x 10 6 mm 4 I t = 1,0 x 10 4 mm 4 W pl.y = 49 x 10 mm W el.y = 89 x 10 mm i y = 8,8 mm i z = 49,8 mm i Lt I I = W z w pl.y 6 9 1,6x10 x 108x10 = 5,9 mm = (49x10 ) 9 Iw 108x10 alt = 717 mm 4 = It = 1,0x10 All the above properties can be obtained from section property tables. F..() F..(1) 15/0/07
23 5. Classification of Cross Section This section is designed to withstand axial force only Flange (subject to compression) Class 1 limiting value of c/t f for an outstand of a rolled section is 10ε. ε = 5 / f y where f y = 5 N/mm, ε = 1. 10ε = 10 x 1 = 10 From section properties, c/t f = Web (subject to compression) Class 1 limiting value of d/t w for a web subject to compression only is ε. ε = 5 / f y where f y = 5 N/mm, ε = 1. ε = x 1 = From section properties, d/t w = 0,6 c/t f 10ε and d/t w ε Class 1 section (Sheet ) 5..1 (Sheet 1) 5..1 (Sheets 1 and ) 5.4 Resistance of CrossSection It is highly unlikely that the resistance of the crosssection will be the critical case  it is generally the buckling resistance that governs the suitability of a crosssection. For the sake of completeness, the check is included in this worked example. The resistance of the crosssection will only be critical if a short stocky column is used. For members in axial compression, the design value of the compressive 5.4.4(1) force, N Sd, at each crosssection shall satisfy N Sd N c.rd For a class 1 crosssection, the design compression resistance of the 5.4.4() crosssection, N c.rd, may be determined as: Afy Nc.Rd = γ M0 where A is crosssectional area = 580 mm, f y is the yield strength = 5 N/mm, and γ M0 is the partial material safety factor = 1, x 5 N c.rd = = 1149 kn 1,1x10 N Sd = 486 kn, therefore N sd N c.rd. The section can resist the applied axial load () 15/0/07
24 5.5 Buckling Resistance of Member A class 1 member should be checked for failure due to flexural and lateral torsional buckling. Here, since M y = M z = 0, only failure due to flexural buckling needs to be checked. The design buckling resistance of a compression member shall be taken as: AAfy Nb.Rd = χβ γ M1 where χ is the reduction factor for the relevant buckling mode, β A = 1 for class 1 crosssection, A is the crosssectional area = 580 mm, f y is the yield strength of the steel = 5 N/mm, and γ M1 is the partial material safety factor for buckling resistance = 1,1. The magnitude of the reduction factor, χ depends on the reduced slenderness of the columns. χ is the lesser of χ y and χ z, where χ y and χ z are the reduction factors from clause for the yy and zz axes respectively. Values of χ for the appropriate value of nondimensional slenderness, may be obtained from Nondimensional slenderness, = β Where the slenderness, = l i l is the column buckling length, and i is the radius of gyration about the relevant axis. The braced frame is designed as a simple pinned structure. Therefore, the buckling length ratio l/l is equal to 1  the buckling length is equal to the system length. E 1 = π 9,9ε f = y 5.6 Determination of Reduction Factor, χ y Slenderness, y = l/i y = 4500/8,8 = 54, 1 = 9,9ε = 9,9 x 1 = 9,9 Nondimensional slenderness, y = y β 54, A = 9,9 x 1 = 8 From 5.5., using buckling curve b, the reduction factor, χ y = 0, A (1) (1) () (1) () () Annex E Figure E (1) () /0/07 4
25 5.7 Determination of Reduction Factor, χ z Slenderness, z = l/i z = 4500/49,8 = 90,4 1 = 9,9ε = 9,9 x 1 = 9,9 Nondimensional slenderness, = z β 90,4 y A = 9,9 x 1 = 0,96 From 5.5., using buckling curve c,the reduction factor, χ z = 5 Therefore χ = χ z = 5. Design buckling resistance of member: χβ AAfy 5 x 1 x 580 x 5 N b.rd = = = 6, kn γ M1 1,1x10 The design buckling resistance of the member is greater than the applied load (486 kn), therefore the column is satisfactory. The column is OK. 6. Design of CrossBracing All horizontal loading will be resisted by bracing. For the purpose of illustration assume this will be present on every other frame (i.e. at 10 m spacing). It is more likely that bracing will be located at each end of the building or perhaps in a stair/lift well. The forces may therefore be greater than here but the principles would remain the same. For the loading shown, design the bracing members in grade Fe60 steel () (1)...4(). Characteristic wind load, Q k = 1,6 kn/m. Design wind load, Q d = γ Q Q k At ultimate limit state, γ Q = 1,5 (unfavourable), Q d = 1,5 x 1,6 =,4 kn/m. Therefore, the total load (per m height of frame) = 10 x,4 = 4 kn/m. 15/0/07 5
26 4 kn/m 4, m 4,5 m 7, m Figure 9 Wind Load on Frame It is assumed that the uniformly distributed load acts as two point loads on the frame. Top load = (4 x,1) = 50,4 kn. Middle load = (4 x,1) + (4 x,5) = 104,4 kn. Assume that all horizontal load is resisted by the bracing only. Therefore, the load in the top brace = 50,4 / cos 0,º = 58,4 kn, and the load in the bottom brace = (104,4 +50,4)/ cos º = 18,5 kn. 15/0/07 6
27 50,4 kn 58,4 kn 4, m 104,4 kn 18,5 kn 4,5 m 7, m Figure 10 Equivalent Point Wind Loads and Loads Within Bracing Design the bottom brace, as this carries the greater load. Try a CHS 175 x 5,0 6.1 Section Properties Depth of section, d = 175 mm, Thickness, t = 5 mm Area of section, A = 670 mm, Ratio for local buckling, d/t = 5, Radius of gyration, i = 60,1 mm. 6. Classification of CrossSection As the bracing is axially loaded, check the section classification is at least class 1, or. Figure 11 shows a typical CHS crosssection (1)a t d Figure 11 Typical CHS CrossSection 15/0/07 7
28 Class 1 limiting value of d/t for a tubular section is 50ε. ε = 5 / f y where f y = 5 N/mm, ε = 1. 50ε = 50 x 1 = 50 From section properties, d/t =5, therefore the section is Class Design of Compression Member The bracing members need to be checked as axially loaded Resistance of CrossSection It is highly unlikely that the resistance of the crosssection will be the critical case  it is generally the buckling resistance that governs the suitability of a crosssection. For the sake of completeness, the check is included in this worked example. The resistance of the crosssection will only be critical if a short, stocky column is used. The applied axial load, N Sd, must be less than the design compressive resistance of the crosssection, N c.rd (Sheet 4) 5.4.4(1) Applied axial load, N Sd = 18,5 kn. Design compressive resistance of crosssection, N c.rd = N Where A is the crosssectional area = 670 mm, f y is the yield strength of the steel = 5 N/ mm, and γ M0 is the partial material safety factor = 1,1. N 670 x 5 = = 570, 4 kn 11, x 10 pl.rd pl.rd Af = γ y M () The design compressive resistance of the crosssection, N c.rd = 570,4 kn, is greater than the applied axial load, N Sd = 18,5 kn. Therefore the section is satisfactory. 6.. Design Buckling Resistance A class 1 member subject to axial compression should be checked for failure due to buckling. The design buckling resistance of a compression member shall be taken as: AAfy Nb.Rd = χβ γ M1 where χ is the reduction factor for the relevant buckling mode, β A = 1 for class 1 crosssection, A is the crosssectional area = 670 mm, f y is the yield strength of the steel = 5 N/mm, and γ M1 is the partial material safety factor for buckling resistance = 1,1. Values of χ for the appropriate value of nondimensional slenderness, may be obtained from (1) (1) () 15/0/07 8
29 Nondimensional slenderness, = β Where the slenderness, = l i l is the member buckling length, and i is the radius of gyration. The bracing is designed as a simple pinned member. Therefore, the buckling length ratio l/l is equal to 1  the buckling length is equal to the system length. Length of member = (,, ) E 1 = π 9,9ε f = y 1 A = 8500 mm 6.. Determination Of Reduction Factor, χ Slenderness, = l/i = 8500/60,1 = = 9,9ε = 9,9 x 1 = 9,9 Nondimensional slenderness, = β = 141 A = 9,9 x 1 1,50 From 5.5., using buckling curve b, the reduction factor, χ = 0,4. Design buckling resistance of member: χβ AAfy 0,4 x 1 x 670 x 5 N b.rd = = = 195, kn γ M1 1,1x10 The design buckling resistance of the member is greater than the applied load (18,5 kn), therefore the bracing is satisfactory (1) () () Annex E Figure E (1) () (1) 15/0/07 9
30 6.4 Design of Tension Member When the wind load is applied in the opposite direction, the bracing will be loaded in tension. The section therefore needs to be checked, for the same magnitude of loading, to ensure it is also satisfactory in tension. 50,4 kn 4, m 58,4 kn 104,4 kn 4,5 m 18,5 kn 7, m Figure 1 Equivalent Point Wind Loads and Loads Within Bracing Resistance of CrossSection The applied axial load, N Sd, must be less than the design tension resistance of the crosssection, N t.rd. Applied axial load, N Sd = 18,5 kn. Afy Design tension resistance of the crosssection, N t.rd = N pl.rd = γ M0 where A is the crosssectional area = 670 mm, f y is the yield strength of the steel = 5 N/ mm, and γ M0 is the partial material safety factor = 1, x 5 N pl.rd = = 570, 4 kn 11, x 10 The design tension resistance of the crosssection, N t.rd = 570,4 kn, is greater than the applied axial load, N Sd = 18,5 kn. Therefore the section is satisfactory. 5.4.(1) () The bracing fulfils all the Eurocode requirements for members in tension and in compression, and is therefore satisfactory. The frame is satisfactory for all EC checks 15/0/07 0
31 7. Concluding Summary 15/0/07 1
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Transnational Approach
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Transnational Approach Course: Eurocode 3 Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 20 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic
More informationStructural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Transnational Approach
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Transnational Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 22 : Design of an unbraced sway frame with rigid joints Summary: NOTE This example
More informationDesign of Beams (Unit  8)
Design of Beams (Unit  8) Contents Introduction Beam types Lateral stability of beams Factors affecting lateral stability Behaviour of simple and built  up beams in bending (Without vertical stiffeners)
More informationEurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps
Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps a brief guide on element design to EC3 Tim McCarthy Email tim.mccarthy@umist.ac.uk Slides available on the web http://www2.umist.ac.uk/construction/staff/
More informationSTEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. MultiStorey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams
STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE MultiStorey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams MultiStorey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite
More informationMade by SMH Date Aug Checked by NRB Date Dec Revised by MEB Date April 2006
Job No. OSM 4 Sheet 1 of 8 Rev B Telephone: (0144) 45 Fax: (0144) 944 Made b SMH Date Aug 001 Checked b NRB Date Dec 001 Revised b MEB Date April 00 DESIGN EXAMPLE 9  BEAM WITH UNRESTRAINED COMPRESSION
More informationUniversity of Sheffield. Department of Civil Structural Engineering. Member checks  Rafter 44.6
Member checks  Rafter 34 6.4Haunch (UB 457 x 191 x 89) The depth of a haunch is usually made approximately twice depth of the basic rafter sections, as it is the normal practice to use a UB cutting of
More informationCOMPARISON BETWEEN BS 5950: PART 1: 2000 & EUROCODE 3 FOR THE DESIGN OF MULTISTOREY BRACED STEEL FRAME CHAN CHEE HAN
i COMPARISON BETWEEN BS 5950: PART 1: 2000 & EUROCODE 3 FOR THE DESIGN OF MULTISTOREY BRACED STEEL FRAME CHAN CHEE HAN A project report submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design  Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design  Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite
More informationJob No. Sheet 1 of 7 Rev A. Made by ER/EM Date Feb Checked by HB Date March 2006
Job No. Sheet of 7 Rev A Design Example Design of a lipped channel in a Made by ER/EM Date Feb 006 Checked by HB Date March 006 DESIGN EXAMPLE DESIGN OF A LIPPED CHANNEL IN AN EXPOSED FLOOR Design a simply
More informationAdvanced Analysis of Steel Structures
Advanced Analysis of Steel Structures Master Thesis Written by: Maria Gulbrandsen & Rasmus Petersen Appendix Report Group B204d M.Sc.Structural and Civil Engineering Aalborg University 4 th Semester Spring
More information3. Stability of builtup members in compression
3. Stability of builtup members in compression 3.1 Definitions Buildup members, made out by coupling two or more simple profiles for obtaining stronger and stiffer section are very common in steel structures,
More informationMade by PTY/AAT Date Jan 2006
Job No. VALCOSS Sheet of 9 Rev A P.O. Box 000, FI0044 VTT Tel. +358 0 7 Fax +358 0 7 700 Design Example 3 Stainless steel lattice girder made Made by PTY/AAT Date Jan 006 RFCS Checked by MAP Date Feb
More informationFundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures
Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures Civil Engineering for Bachelors 133FSTD Teacher: Zdeněk Sokol Office number: B619 1 Syllabus of lectures 1. Introduction, history of steel structures,
More informationPLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder
16 PLATE GIRDERS II 1.0 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the current practice for the design of plate girders adopting meaningful simplifications of the equations derived in the chapter on Plate Girders
More informationKarbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi
Chapter 05 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Beams By Dr. Jawad Talib AlNasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering 71 Introduction
More informationSTEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. MultiStorey Steel Buildings Part 8: Description of member resistance calculator
STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE MultiStore Steel Buildings Part 8: Description of member resistance calculator MultiStore Steel Buildings Part : Description of member resistance calculator 8  ii FOREWORD
More informationBasis of Design, a case study building
Basis of Design, a case study building Luís Simões da Silva Department of Civil Engineering University of Coimbra Contents Definitions and basis of design Global analysis Structural modeling Structural
More informationC6 Advanced design of steel structures
C6 Advanced design of steel structures prepared b Josef achacek List of lessons 1) Lateraltorsional instabilit of beams. ) Buckling of plates. 3) Thinwalled steel members. 4) Torsion of members. 5) Fatigue
More informationBRACING MEMBERS SUMMARY. OBJECTIVES. REFERENCES.
BRACING MEMBERS SUMMARY. Introduce the bracing member design concepts. Identify column bracing members requirements in terms of strength and stiffness. The assumptions and limitations of lateral bracing
More informationPlastic Design of Portal frame to Eurocode 3
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering Plastic Design of Portal frame to Eurocode 3 Worked Example University of Sheffield Contents 1 GEOMETRY... 3 2 DESIGN BRIEF... 4 3 DETERMINING LOADING ON
More informationInfluence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes
October 2014 Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of Abstract tubular columns and arches Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal Contact:
More informationKarbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi
Chapter 04 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Compression Members By Dr. Jawad Talib AlNasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering
More informationDesign of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar
6. BEAMS 6.1 Introduction One of the frequently used structural members is a beam whose main function is to transfer load principally by means of flexural or bending action. In a structural framework,
More informationAccordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation CC3.1.
C3 Flexural Members C3.1 Bending The nominal flexural strength [moment resistance], Mn, shall be the smallest of the values calculated for the limit states of yielding, lateraltorsional buckling and distortional
More informationMODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS
MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS This module of CIE 428 covers the following subjects Column theory Column design per AISC Effective length Torsional and flexuraltorsional buckling Builtup members READING:
More informationFailure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas
Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING LECTURE VIII Dr. Jason E. Charalambides Failure in Flexure!
More informationStructural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of a TransNational Approach
Course: Eurocode 4 Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of a TransNational Approach Lecture 9 : Composite joints Annex B References: COST C1: Composite steelconcrete joints in frames for buildings:
More information1C8 Advanced design of steel structures. prepared by Josef Machacek
1C8 Advanced design of steel structures prepared b Josef achacek List of lessons 1) Lateraltorsional instabilit of beams. ) Buckling of plates. 3) Thinwalled steel members. 4) Torsion of members. 5)
More informationApplication nr. 3 (Ultimate Limit State) Resistance of member crosssection
Application nr. 3 (Ultimate Limit State) Resistance of member crosssection 1)Resistance of member crosssection in tension Examples of members in tension:  Diagonal of a trussgirder  Bottom chord of
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)
Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of oneway ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are
More informationDesign of Compression Members
Design of Compression Members 2.1 Classification of cross sections Classifying crosssections may mainly depend on four critical factors: 1 Width to thickness (c/t) ratio. 2 Support condition. 3 Yield
More information93. Structural response
93. Structural response in fire František Wald Czech Technical University in Prague Objectives of the lecture The mechanical load in the fire design Response of the structure exposed to fire Levels of
More informationSteel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes
Steel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes INTRODUCTION When the need for a new structure arises, an individual or agency has to arrange the funds required for its construction. The individual or
More informationSTEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN :2005)
GEODOMISI Ltd.  Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for App'd by STEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN199311:2005) In accordance with EN199311:2005 incorporating Corrigenda February 2006 and April details type;
More informationTHE EC3 CLASSIFICATION OF JOINTS AND ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS
EUROSTEEL 2002, Coimbra, 1920 September 2002, p.987996 THE EC3 CLASSIFICATION OF JOINTS AND ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS Fernando C. T. Gomes 1 ABSTRACT The Eurocode 3 proposes a classification of beamtocolumn
More informationDesign of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar
5.4 Beams As stated previousl, the effect of local buckling should invariabl be taken into account in thin walled members, using methods described alread. Laterall stable beams are beams, which do not
More informationSECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS
SECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1 INTRODUCTION TO COLUMN BUCKLING Introduction Elastic buckling of an ideal column Strength curve for an ideal column Strength of practical column Concepts of effective
More informationEquivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams
University of Alberta Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Master of Engineering Report in Structural Engineering Equivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams
More informationto introduce the principles of stability and elastic buckling in relation to overall buckling, local buckling
to introduce the principles of stability and elastic buckling in relation to overall buckling, local buckling In the case of elements subjected to compressive forces, secondary bending effects caused by,
More informationSteel Frame Design Manual
Steel Frame Design Manual Eurocode 31:2005 with 8:2004 Eurocode 31:2005 with Eurocode 8:2004 Steel Frame Design Manual for ETABS 2016 ISO ETA122815M13 Rev 0 Proudly developed in the United States of
More informationSabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are
More informationFLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS
FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS Write Known Data Estimate selfweight of the member. a. The selfweight may be taken as 10 percent of the applied dead UDL or dead point load distributed over all the length.
More informationBASE PLATE CONNECTIONS
SKILLS Project BASE PLATE CONNECTIONS LEARNING OUTCOMES Design process for pinned and fixed column base joints Baseplate resistance Anchor bolt resistance Concrete resistance Weld resistance Application
More informationENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members
ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures III. Compression Members C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department University of Maryland Compression Members Following subjects are covered:
More informationDesign of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602
Design of wall panel according to EN 160 Example 3: Wall panel with wind load 1.1 Issue Design of a wall panel at an industrial building Materials with a compressive strength 3,5, density class 500, welded
More informationMechanics of Materials Primer
Mechanics of Materials rimer Notation: A = area (net = with holes, bearing = in contact, etc...) b = total width of material at a horizontal section d = diameter of a hole D = symbol for diameter E = modulus
More informationFinite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges
01/02/2016 Marco Donà Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges 1 Plastic hinge approach A plastic hinge represents a concentrated postyield behaviour in one or more degrees of freedom. Hinges only
More information: APPLIED MECHANICS & STRENGTH OF MATERIALS COURSE CODE : 4021 COURSE CATEGORY : A PERIODS/ WEEK : 5 PERIODS/ SEMESTER : 75 CREDIT : 5 TIME SCHEDULE
COURSE TITLE : APPLIED MECHANICS & STRENGTH OF MATERIALS COURSE CODE : 4021 COURSE CATEGORY : A PERIODS/ WEEK : 5 PERIODS/ SEMESTER : 75 CREDIT : 5 TIME SCHEDULE MODULE TOPIC PERIODS 1 Simple stresses
More informationAPOLLO SCAFFOLDING SERVICES LTD SPIGOT CONNECTION TO EUROCODES DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS
Alan White Design APOLLO SCAFFOLDING SERVICES LTD SPIGOT CONNECTION TO EUROCODES DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS Alan N White B.Sc., M.Eng., C.Eng., M.I.C.E., M.I.H.T. JUL 2013 Somerset House 11 Somerset Place
More informationAPPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES
163 APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES A1.1 DESIGN AS PER NORTH AMERICAN SPECIFICATION OF COLD FORMED STEEL (AISI S100: 2007) 1. Based on Initiation of Yielding: Effective yield moment, M n
More informationTekla Structural Designer 2016i
Tekla Structural Designer 2016i Reference Guides (Australian Codes) September 2016 2016 Trimble Solutions Corporation part of Trimble Navigation Ltd. Table of Contents Analysis Verification Examples...
More informationBridge deck modelling and design process for bridges
EURussia Regulatory Dialogue Construction Sector Subgroup 1 Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges Application to a composite twingirder bridge according to Eurocode 4 Laurence Davaine
More information9.5 Compression Members
9.5 Compression Members This section covers the following topics. Introduction Analysis Development of Interaction Diagram Effect of Prestressing Force 9.5.1 Introduction Prestressing is meaningful when
More informationDownloaded from Downloaded from / 1
PURWANCHAL UNIVERSITY III SEMESTER FINAL EXAMINATION2002 LEVEL : B. E. (Civil) SUBJECT: BEG256CI, Strength of Material Full Marks: 80 TIME: 03:00 hrs Pass marks: 32 Candidates are required to give their
More information7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces
7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces 7.3.1 General In the previous chapters of Draft IS: 800 LSM version, we have stipulated the codal provisions for determining the stress distribution in
More informationExample 4: Design of a Rigid Column Bracket (Bolted)
Worked Example 4: Design of a Rigid Column Bracket (Bolted) Example 4: Design of a Rigid Column Bracket (Bolted) Page : 1 Example 4: Design of a Rigid Column Bracket (Bolted) Determine the size of the
More informationCOURSE TITLE : APPLIED MECHANICS & STRENGTH OF MATERIALS COURSE CODE : 4017 COURSE CATEGORY : A PERIODS/WEEK : 6 PERIODS/ SEMESTER : 108 CREDITS : 5
COURSE TITLE : APPLIED MECHANICS & STRENGTH OF MATERIALS COURSE CODE : 4017 COURSE CATEGORY : A PERIODS/WEEK : 6 PERIODS/ SEMESTER : 108 CREDITS : 5 TIME SCHEDULE MODULE TOPICS PERIODS 1 Simple stresses
More informationDesign of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar
5.10 Examples 5.10.1 Analysis of effective section under compression To illustrate the evaluation of reduced section properties of a section under axial compression. Section: 00 x 80 x 5 x 4.0 mm Using
More informationVALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES. Designsupport for MSH sections
VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES Designsupport for MSH sections according to Eurocode 3, DIN EN 199311: 2005 and DIN EN 199318: 2005 DesignSupport for MSH sections according to Eurocode 3, DIN EN 199311:
More informationCHAPTER 5 Statically Determinate Plane Trusses TYPES OF ROOF TRUSS
CHAPTER 5 Statically Determinate Plane Trusses TYPES OF ROOF TRUSS 1 TYPES OF ROOF TRUSS ROOF TRUSS SETUP 2 ROOF TRUSS SETUP OBJECTIVES To determine the STABILITY and DETERMINACY of plane trusses To analyse
More informationUnit III Theory of columns. Dr.P.Venkateswara Rao, Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engg., SVCE, Sriperumbudir
Unit III Theory of columns 1 Unit III Theory of Columns References: Punmia B.C.,"Theory of Structures" (SMTS) Vol II, Laxmi Publishing Pvt Ltd, New Delhi 2004. Rattan.S.S., "Strength of Materials", Tata
More informationQUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS
QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1 STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State Hooke s law. 3. Define modular ratio,
More informationAnnex  R C Design Formulae and Data
The design formulae and data provided in this Annex are for education, training and assessment purposes only. They are based on the Hong Kong Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013 (HKCP2013).
More informationDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING SUBJECT: CE 2252 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS UNIT: I ENERGY METHODS 1. Define: Strain Energy When an elastic body is under the action of external
More informationCHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams
CHAPTER 4 Design of R C Beams Learning Objectives Identify the data, formulae and procedures for design of R C beams Design simplysupported and continuous R C beams by integrating the following processes
More informationCompression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)
ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures III. Compression Members C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department University of Maryland Compression Members Following subjects are covered:
More informationCHAPTER 5 Statically Determinate Plane Trusses
CHAPTER 5 Statically Determinate Plane Trusses TYPES OF ROOF TRUSS TYPES OF ROOF TRUSS ROOF TRUSS SETUP ROOF TRUSS SETUP OBJECTIVES To determine the STABILITY and DETERMINACY of plane trusses To analyse
More informationREINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 1. Design of Column (Examples and Tutorials)
For updated version, please click on http://ocw.ump.edu.my REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 1 Design of Column (Examples and Tutorials) by Dr. Sharifah Maszura Syed Mohsin Faculty of Civil Engineering and Earth
More informationENG1001 Engineering Design 1
ENG1001 Engineering Design 1 Structure & Loads Determine forces that act on structures causing it to deform, bend, and stretch Forces push/pull on objects Structures are loaded by: > Dead loads permanent
More informationDesign of a MultiStoried RC Building
Design of a MultiStoried RC Building 16 14 14 3 C 1 B 1 C 2 B 2 C 3 B 3 C 4 13 B 15 (S 1 ) B 16 (S 2 ) B 17 (S 3 ) B 18 7 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 7 B 20 B 22 14 B 19 (S 4 ) C 10 C 11 B 23
More informationBalcony balustrades using the SG12 laminated glass system: PAGE 1 (SG12FF010717) Structural Calculations for SG12 System balustrades using 21.5mm laminated toughened glass without the need for a handrail
More informationChapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams
Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams Introduction One of the earliest studies concerned with the strength and deflection of beams was conducted by Galileo Galilei. Galileo was the first to discuss
More informationε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram
CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case
More informationDIF SEK. PART 5a WORKED EXAMPLES. DIFSEK Part 5a: Worked examples 0 / 62
DIF SEK PART 5a WORKED EXAMPLES DIFSEK Part 5a: Worked examples 0 / 62 Resistance to fire  Chain of events Θ Loads 1: Ignition time Steel columns 2: Thermal action 3: Mechanical actions R 4: Thermal response
More informationMetal Structures Lecture XIII Steel trusses
Metal Structures Lecture XIII Steel trusses Contents Definition #t / 3 Geometry and crosssections #t / 7 Types of truss structures #t / 15 Calculations #t / 29 Example #t / 57 Results of calculations
More informationCIVL473 Fundamentals of Steel Design
CIVL473 Fundamentals of Steel Design CHAPTER 4 Design of Columns embers with Aial Loads and oments Prepared B Asst.Prof.Dr. urude Celikag 4.1 Braced ultistore Buildings  Combined tension and oments Interaction
More informationPES Institute of Technology
PES Institute of Technology Bangalore south campus, Bangalore5460100 Department of Mechanical Engineering Faculty name : Madhu M Date: 29/06/2012 SEM : 3 rd A SEC Subject : MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Subject
More informationQUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1 STRESS AND STRAIN PART A
DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1 STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State
More informationMECHANICS OF STRUCTURES SCI 1105 COURSE MATERIAL UNIT  I
MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES SCI 1105 COURSE MATERIAL UNIT  I Engineering Mechanics Branch of science which deals with the behavior of a body with the state of rest or motion, subjected to the action of forces.
More information7 STATICALLY DETERMINATE PLANE TRUSSES
7 STATICALLY DETERMINATE PLANE TRUSSES OBJECTIVES: This chapter starts with the definition of a truss and briefly explains various types of plane truss. The determinancy and stability of a truss also will
More informationSeismic design of bridges
NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS LABORATORY FOR EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING Seismic design of bridges Lecture 3 Ioannis N. Psycharis Capacity design Purpose To design structures of ductile behaviour
More informationGeneral Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD
General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 1 General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 2 AISC ASD and LRFD AISC ASD = American Institute of Steel Construction = Allowable Stress Design AISC Ninth
More informationCritical Load columns buckling critical load
Buckling of Columns Buckling of Columns Critical Load Some member may be subjected to compressive loadings, and if these members are long enough to cause the member to deflect laterally or sideway. To
More informationStructural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017
Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail PAGE 1 (ref: JULB2NB280317) Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail Our ref: JULB2NB280317 Date
More informationD : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.
D : SOLID MECHANICS Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown. Q.2 Consider the forces of magnitude F acting on the sides of the regular hexagon having
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Structural Description The two pinned (at the bases) portal frame is stable in its plane due to the moment connection
More informationPURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.
BENDING STRESS The effect of a bending moment applied to a crosssection of a beam is to induce a state of stress across that section. These stresses are known as bending stresses and they act normally
More informationDesign of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN
Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN 199211 and EN 19922 Validation Examples Brno, 21.10.2010 IDEA RS s.r.o. South Moravian Innovation Centre, U Vodarny 2a, 616 00 BRNO tel.: +420511
More informationDESIGN OF BEAMS AND SHAFTS
DESIGN OF EAMS AND SHAFTS! asis for eam Design! Stress Variations Throughout a Prismatic eam! Design of pristmatic beams! Steel beams! Wooden beams! Design of Shaft! ombined bending! Torsion 1 asis for
More informationSTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction
CHAPTER 2 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Introduction The primary purpose of structural analysis is to establish the distribution of internal forces and moments over the whole part of a structure and to identify
More informationUNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING. BEng (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2016/2017 MATHEMATICS & STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
TW21 UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING BEng (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2016/2017 MATHEMATICS & STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS MODULE NO: CIE4011 Date: Wednesday 11 th January 2017 Time:
More informationStructural Mechanics Column Behaviour
Structural Mechanics Column Behaviour 008/9 Dr. Colin Caprani, 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 1.1 Background... 3 1. Stability of Equilibrium... 4. Buckling Solutions... 6.1 Introduction... 6. PinnedPinned
More informationJob No. Sheet 1 of 6 Rev B. Made by IR Date Oct Checked by FH/NB Date Oct Revised by MEB Date April 2006
Job No. Sheet 1 of 6 Rev B, Route de Limours Tel : (0)1 0 85 5 00 Fax : (0)1 0 5 75 8 Revised by MEB Date April 006 DESIGN EXAMPLE 6 BOLTED JOINT A 0 0 angle loaded in tension is to be connected to a gusset
More informationCHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS
4.1. INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS A column is a vertical structural member transmitting axial compression loads with or without moments. The cross sectional dimensions of a column
More informationRigid and Braced Frames
RH 331 Note Set 12.1 F2014abn Rigid and raced Frames Notation: E = modulus of elasticit or Young s modulus F = force component in the direction F = force component in the direction FD = free bod diagram
More informationtwo structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS
APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) Analysis 1 Structural Requirements strength serviceability
More informationfive Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture
ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture five mechanics www.carttalk.com of materials Mechanics of Materials 1 Mechanics of Materials MECHANICS MATERIALS
More informationCompression Members Columns II
Compression Members Columns II 1. Introduction. Main aspects related to the derivation of typical columns buckling lengths for. Analysis of imperfections, leading to the derivation of the AyrtonPerry
More information