Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Beam BS8110 v Member Design - RC Beam XX
|
|
- Morgan Quinn
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Effects From Structural Analysis Design axial force, F (tension -ve and compression +ve) (ensure < 0.1f cu b w h 0 kn OK Design shear force, V d 4223 kn Design bending moment, M knm Design torsion moment, T 555 knm Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 75 or 105N/mm 2 ; HSC) 50 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of longitudinal steel, f y 460 N/mm 2 Yield strength of shear and torsion link steel, f yv 460 N/mm 2 Section Dimensions Span (effective width, deflection, long'l shear and deep beam calcs) m Available beam spacing m (effective width calcs; usual spacing for interior beams; half for edge beams) Beam section type and support condition (section type for bending, defl'n calcs; support condition for LTB restraint, eff width, defl'n, long'l shear calcs) Ratio β b (1.0 for no moment redistribution, 0.70, 1.30) 1.00 OK Section Type and Support Condition Option Selection Downstand Beam Upstand Beam Support Effect Slab Type Defl'n Support Effect Slab Type Defl'n S/S Sag Precast Rect-s/s Yes S/S Sag Precast Rect-s/s Yes S/S Sag Insitu T/L-s/s Yes S/S Sag Insitu Rect-s/s Yes Cont. Sag Precast Rect-cont. Yes Cont. Sag Precast Rect-cont. Yes Cont. Sag Insitu T/L-cont. Yes Cont. Sag Insitu Rect-cont. Yes Cont. Hog Precast Rect-cont. Cont. Hog Precast Rect-cont. Cont. Hog Insitu Rect-cont. Cont. Hog Insitu T/L-cont. Cant. Hog Precast Rect-cant. Yes Cant. Hog Precast Rect-cant. Yes Cant. Hog Insitu Rect-cant. Yes Cant. Hog Insitu T/L-cant. Yes Overall depth, h (includes insitu slab thks; excludes precast slab thks; span/ 2800 mm OK Depth of flange, h f (bending flanged beam, longitudinal shear calcs) 300 mm Width (rectangular) or web width (flanged), b w 1500 mm Cover to all reinforcement, cover (usually 35 (C35) or 30 (C40) internal; 40 Add cover to tension steel (due to transverse steel layer(s)), cover add,t Add cover to compression steel (due to transverse steel layer(s)), cover add,c Effective depth to tension steel, d = h - cover - MAX(φ link, φ link,t, cover add,t ) - [ Effective depth to compression steel, d' = cover + MAX(φ link, φ link,t, cover add,c ) 35 mm 0 mm 0 mm 2415 mm 198 mm Longitudinal Reinforcement Details Tension steel reinforcement diameter, φ t 25 mm Tension steel reinforcement number, n t 72 Tension steel area provided, A s,prov = n t.π.φ 2 t / mm 2 Compression steel reinforcement diameter, φ c (where applicable) 25 mm Compression steel reinforcement number, n c 72 Compression steel area provided, A s,prov ' = n c.π.φ 2 c / mm 2 Number of layers of tension steel, n layers,tens 6 layer(s) Spacer for tension steel, s r,tens ( MAX (φ t, 25mm)) 100 mm OK Number of layers of compression steel, n layers,comp Spacer for compression steel, s r,comp = MAX (φ c, 25mm) 6 layer(s) 25 mm
2 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 2 Member Design - RC Beam Shear Reinforcement Details XX Shear link diameter, φ link 25 mm Number of shear links in a cross section, i.e. number of legs, n leg 5 Area provided by all shear links in a cross-section, A sv,prov = π.φ 2 link /4.n leg 2454 mm 2 Pitch of shear links, S 200 mm Torsion Reinforcement Details Torsion link diameter, φ link,t 25 mm Number of torsion links in a cross section, i.e. number of legs, n leg,t = 2 2 Area provided by all torsion links in a cross-section, A sv,prov,t = π.φ 2 link,t /4.n leg,t 982 mm 2 Pitch of torsion links, S t 200 mm Note that further longitudinal steel A s,t must be provided to resist torsion; 1717 mm 2 Utilisation Summary Item UT Remark Rectangular beam tension steel 34% OK ) Rectangular beam compression steel Rectangular beam % min tension reinforcement 18% OK Rectangular beam % min compression reinforcement Rectangular beam % max tension and compression rei 21% OK Flanged beam tension steel Flanged beam compression steel Flanged beam % min tension reinforcement Flanged beam % min compression reinforcement Flanged beam % max tension and compression reinfor Rectangular beam shear ultimate stress 23% OK Rectangular beam shear design capacity 22% OK Rectangular beam torsion ultimate stress 4% OK Rectangular beam torsion design capacity 0% OK Rectangular beam shear and torsion ultimate stress an 28% OK Rectangular or flanged beam deflection requirements 3% OK Total utilisation rectangular beam 34% OK Total utilisation rectangular beam (excluding def 34% OK Total utilisation flanged beam Detailing requirements OK % Tension reinforcement (rectangular) 0.84 % % Compression reinforcement (rectangular) % % Tension reinforcement (flanged) % % Compression reinforcement (flanged) % Estimated steel reinforcement quantity ( kg/m 3 ) 285 kg/m [(A s,prov +A s,prov ') / (b w or b).(h or h f ) + (A sv,prov.(h+anc.)/s+a sv,prov,t.(h+b w +anc.)/s t ) / Estimated steel reinforcement quantity ( kg/m 3 ) 399 kg/m 3 IStructE [(A s,prov +A s,prov ') / (b w or b).(h or h f ) + (A sv,prov.(h+anc.)/s+a sv,prov,t.(h+b w +anc.)/s t ) [Note that steel quantity in kg/m 3 can be obtained from x % rebar]; Material cost: concrete, c 315 units/m 3 steel, s 4600 units/tonne Reinforced concrete material cost = [c+(est. rebar quant).s].(b w o 9028 units/m Ductility of failure mechanism Section Under Reinforced Rectangular beam crack width 49% OK Max LTB stability (compression flange) restraints spacing, L LTB 90.0 m Note s/s / cont L LTB = MIN (60(b w or b), 250(b w or b) 2 /d) and cant L LTB = MIN (25b w, 100b w 2 / OK
3 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 3 Material Stresses Member Design - RC Beam XX Axial stress, F/b w h 0.00 N/mm 2 Shear stress, V d /b w d 1.17 N/mm 2 Bending stress, 6M/(b w or b).d N/mm 2 Torsion stress, 2T/((h 2 min )(h max -h min /3)) 0.21 N/mm 2 Material Stress-Strain Curves Detailing Instructions Not to Scale h f = h = 2800 mm Comp Steel = d = 2415 mm d' = 198 mm Shear Links = 5 legs of T25@200mm pitch Torsion Links = 2 legs of T25@200mm pitch Cover = 35 mm Concrete = 50 MPa Rebars = 460 MPa Links = 460 MPa b w = 1500 mm Tension Steel = 72 T25@123mm centres Diagram Produced for Sagging Design; Flip if Hogging Design; / b w.h + A sv,prov,h.(h n layers,tens.s r,tens n layers,comp.s r,comp 2.cover)/S h / b w.h]; No curtailment; No laps; / b w.h + A sv,prov,h.(h n layers,tens.s r,tens n layers,comp.s r,comp 2.cover)/S h / b w.h]; No curtailment; No laps; /d);
4 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 4 Additional Longitudinal Shear Rectangular or Flanged Beam Utilisation Summary Longitudinal shear between web and flange Longitudinal shear within web Length under consideration, x (span/2 s/s, span/4 cont, span cant) 938 mm Applicability of longitudinal shear design Not Applicable Longitudinal Shear Between Web and Flange (EC2) Longitudinal shear stress limit to prevent crushing Longitudinal shear stress limit for no transverse reinforcement Required design transverse reinforcement per unit length Longitudinal Shear Between Web and Flange (BS5400-4) Longitudinal shear force limit per unit length Required nominal transverse reinforcement per unit length Longitudinal Shear Between Web and Flange Mandatory Cr Longitudinal Shear Within Web (EC2) Longitudinal shear stress limit Longitudinal Shear Within Web () Longitudinal shear stress limit for no nominal / design vertical rein Required nominal vertical reinforcement per unit length Required design vertical reinforcement per unit length Longitudinal Shear Within Web (BS5400-4) Longitudinal shear force limit per unit length Required nominal vertical reinforcement per unit length Longitudinal Shear Within Web Mandatory Criteria Additional Deep Beam Rectangular Beam Utilisation Summary Deep beam design Span to depth ratio, span / h 1.34 Applicability of deep beam design Applicable Concrete type Horizontal shear link diameter, φ link,h mm Number of horizontal shear links in a horizontal section, i.e. number of legs, 4 Pitch of horizontal shear links, S h 225 mm Clear distance from edge of load to face of support, a 1 or x e 1750 mm Detailing requirements OK OK Reynolds Tension steel (deep beam) 46% OK Tension steel zone depth, T zone (sag s/s, sag cont, hog cant) 513 mm Tension steel zone depth, T zone (hog cont) Minimum breadth for deep beam, b w 507 mm OK Shear ultimate force (deep beam) 38% OK Shear design capacity (deep beam) 29% OK CIRIA Guide 2 Bending ultimate moment (deep beam) 17% OK Tension steel (deep beam) 49% OK Tension steel zone depth, T zone (sag s/s, sag cont, hog cant) 560 mm Tension steel zone depth, T zone (hog cont) upper band 17% 560 mm Tension steel zone depth, T zone (hog cont) lower band 83% 1680 mm Shear ultimate force (deep beam) 40% OK Shear design capacity (deep beam) 27% OK
5 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 5 Bending Rectangular Beam (Singly or Doubly Reinforced) M u = K'f cu bd 2 Note b here is b w ; knm Ratio, K' β b > β b > 1.10 K' = K' = mm BC2 [ β b =1.0] Note the expression for K' ensures that the section remains ductile i.e. ensuring that failure occurs with the gradual yielding of the tension steel and not by a sudden catastrophic compression failure of the concrete; VALID Note b here is b w ; To scheme beam, choose d such that K = M/(b w d 2 f cu ) < K' (0.156 for β b =1.0 and NSC) for no compression steel, i.e. d > 1011 and h > 1396 mm z <=0.95d 2294 mm Depth of neutral axis, x x limit mm OK Neutral axis, x Neutral axis limit, x limit x = 0.90 β b > β b > mm BC mm BC2 [ β b =1.0] Tension steel mm 2 Back-analysis of x in (0.67f cu /1.5).(s.b w )=(f y /1.05).(A s,prov ) 514 mm OK 0.90x mm BC2 s = Note for an under reinforced section, require x x limit for yielding of tension steel;
6 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 6 To scheme beam, with compression steel, choose d such that K = M/(b w d 2 f cu ) < 10/f cu for non-excessive comp steel, i.e. d > 893 and h > 1278 mm Depth of neutral axis, x x limit Neutral axis, x Neutral axis limit, x limit x = 0.90 β b > β b > 1.10 BC2 BC2 [ β b =1.0] K' Compression steel 2 Tension steel z 2 Back-analysis of x in (0.67f cu /1.5).(s.b w )+(f y /1.05).(A s,prov ')=(f y /1 BC2 s = Note for an under reinforced section, require ε st = ε cc (d-x)/x ε y for yielding of tension steel and ε sc = ε cc (x-d')/x ε y for yielding of compression steel, where ε cc = for f cu 60N/mm and ε cc = (f cu 60)/50000 for f cu > 60N/mm 2 and ε y =(f y /1.05)/E s ; Tension steel area provided mm 2 Tension steel area provided utilisation 34% OK Compression steel area provided 2 Compression steel area provided utilisation % Min tension reinforcement 0.84 % TR49 % Min tension reinforcement (>= b w h G250; >= MAX (0.0013, (f cu /40) 2/3 ).b w h G4 cl % Min tension reinforcement utilisation 18% OK % Min compression reinforcement (>= 0.002b w h) % % Min compression reinforcement utilisation % Max tension reinforcement (<= 0.04b w h) 0.84 % % Max tension reinforcement utilisation 21% OK % Max compression reinforcement (<= 0.04b w h) % % Max compression reinforcement utilisation % Max tension or compression reinforcement utilisation 21% OK
7 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 7 Member Design - RC Beam Bending Flanged Beam (Singly or Doubly Reinforced) XX For cantilevers, width shown is applicable for downstand beams as rect- sections. For upstand beams, T- or L- sections will apply with insitu Span m Depth of flange, h f Effective width, b = MIN(b w + function (span, section, structure), beam spac (bending flanged beam, deflection calcs flanged beam) K = M/bd 2 f cu z = d. [0.5 + (0.25-K/0.9) 0.5 ] <= 0.95d Depth of compression stress block, s = 2.(d-z) (applicable for all f cu ) Compression Stress Block in Flange (s <= h f ) M u = K'f cu bd 2 Ratio, K' 0.90 β b > β b > 1.10 K' = K' = knm BC2 [ β b =1.0] Note the expression for K' ensures that the section remains ductile i.e. ensuring that failure occurs with the gradual yielding of the tension steel and not by a sudden catastrophic compression failure of the concrete; m 2 To scheme beam, choose d such that K = M/(bd 2 f cu ) < K' (0.156 for β b =1.0 and NSC) for no compression steel, i.e. d > and h > z <=0.95d Depth of neutral axis, x x limit Neutral axis, x Neutral axis limit, x limit x = 0.90 β b > β b > 1.10 BC2 BC2 [ β b =1.0] Tension steel 2 Back-analysis of x in (0.67f cu /1.5).(s.b)=(f y /1.05).(A s,prov ) BC2 s = Note for an under reinforced section, require x x limit for yielding of tension steel;
8 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 8 Member Design - RC Beam XX To scheme beam, with compression steel, choose d such that K = M/(b d 2 f cu ) < 10/f cu for non-excessive comp steel, i.e. d > and h > Depth of neutral axis, x x limit Neutral axis Neutral limit, x limit axis, x x = 0.90 β b > β b > 1.10 BC2 BC2 [ β b =1.0] K' Compression steel 2 Tension steel z mm 2 Back-analysis of x in (0.67f cu /1.5).(s.b)+(f y /1.05).(A s,prov ')=(f y /1.0 BC2 s = Note for an under reinforced section, require ε st = ε cc (d-x)/x ε y for yielding of tension steel and ε sc = ε cc (x-d')/x ε y for yielding of compression steel, where ε cc = for f cu 60N/mm and ε cc = (f cu 60)/50000 for f cu > 60N/mm 2 and ε y =(f y /1.05)/E s ;
9 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 9 Member Design - RC Beam XX Compression Stress Block in Web (s > h f AND h f <={0.45,0.36,0.30} Note simplified method as equations within this section only valid for β b 0.90 and 1.10 as x = 0.5d; BC2 cl cl cl knm Ratio, K' 0.90 β b 1.10 K' = BC2 [ β b =1.0] If K f < K' no compression steel k 1 k 2 2 BC2 cl cl cl m 2 Back-analysis of x in (0.67f cu /1.5).[b.h f +(s-h f ).b w ]=(f y /1.05).(A s,p BC2 s = x limit =0.5d Note for an under reinforced section, require x x limit for yielding of tension steel; If K f > K' compression steel required Compression steel, A s ' = [M-(K'f cu b w d 2 +M uf )]/[0.95f y (d-d')] 2 Tension steel, A s = [{0.20,0.18,0.16}f cu b w d+0.45f cu h f (b-b w )]/(0.9 2 Note the coefficient 0.20, 0.18 or 0.16 is used for f cu 60, 75 or 105N/mm 2 respectively; x=0.5d Back-analysis of x in (0.67f cu /1.5).[b.h f +(s-h f ).b w ]+(f y /1.05).(A s,p BC2 s = Note for an under reinforced section, require ε st = ε cc (d-x)/x ε y for yielding of tension steel and ε sc = ε cc (x-d')/x ε y for yielding of compression steel, where ε cc = for f cu 60N/mm and ε cc = (f cu 60)/50000 for f cu > 60N/mm 2 and ε y =(f y /1.05)/E s ;
10 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 10 Member Design - RC Beam Made by Date XX Chd Compression Stress Block in Web (s > h f AND h f > {0.45,0.36,0.30}d Note complex method as equations within this section valid for β b 0.70 and 1.30; BC2 cl cl cl Tension steel area provided 2 Tension steel area provided utilisation Compression steel area provided 2 Compression steel area provided utilisation % Min tension reinforcement % TR49 % Min tension reinforcement (>= b w h G250; >= MAX (0.0018, (f cu /40) 2/3 ).b w h G4 cl % Min tension reinforcement utilisation % Min compression reinforcement (>= 0.004bh f flange; >= 0.002b w h web) % % Min compression reinforcement utilisation % Max tension reinforcement (<= 0.04b w h) % % Max tension reinforcement utilisation % Max compression reinforcement (<= 0.04bh f flange; <= 0.04b w h web) % % Max compression reinforcement utilisation % Max tension or compression reinforcement utilisation m 2
11 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 11 Shear Rectangular Beam Note that this design check is performed for both rectangular and flanged sections, adopting rectangular section equations in the case of flanged sections; Note that d is the effective depth to the tension reinforcement irrespective of whether the section is sagging at midspans or hogging at supports. It follows then, for midspans, tension steel is the bottom steel whilst for supports, tension steel is the top steel; Ultimate shear stress, v ult = V d /b w d (< 0.8f cu 0.5 & {5.0,7.0}N/mm 2 ) 1.17 N/mm 2 BC2 Note the ultimate shear stress limit of 5.0 or 7.0N/mm 2 is used for f cu 60 or 105N/mm 2 respeccl Ultimate shear stress utilisation 23% OK Design shear stress, v d = V d /b w d 1.17 N/mm 2 (Conservatively, shear capacity enhancement by either calculating v d at d from support and comparing against unenhanced v c as clause or calculating v d at support and comparing against enhanced v c within 2d of the support as clause ignored;) Area of tension steel reinforcement provided, A s,prov mm 2 ρ w = 100A s,prov /b w d 0.98 % v c = (0.79/1.25)(ρ w f cu /25) 1/3 (400/d) 1/4 ; ρ w <3; f cu <80; (400/d) 1/4 >(0.67 or N/mm 2 BC2 cl Minimum shear strength, v r = MAX (0.4, 0.4 (MIN (80, f cu )/40) 2/3 ) 0.46 N/mm 2 BC2 cl Check v d < 0.5v c for no links (minor elements) INVALID Concrete shear capacity v c.(b w d) 2861 kn Check 0.0 < v d < v r + v c for nominal links Provide nominal links A sv /S > v r.b w /(0.95f yv ) i.e. A sv /S > Concrete and nominal links shear capacity (v r + v c ).(b w d) VALID 1.59 mm 2 /mm 4542 kn Check v d > v r + v c for design links Provide shear links A sv /S > b w (v d -v c )/(0.95f yv ) i.e. A sv /S > Concrete and design links shear capacity (A sv,prov /S+A sv,prov,t /S t ).( mm 2 /mm kn Area provided by all shear and torsion links in a cross-section, A sv,prov + A sv,pr 3436 mm 2 Tried A sv,prov /S + A sv,prov,t /S t value mm 2 /mm Design shear resistance utilisation 22% OK Note while minimum links should be provided in all beams of structural importance, it may be satisfactory to omit them in members of minor structural importance such as lintels or where the maximum design shear stress is less than half v c ;
12 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 12 Torsion Rectangular Beam Note that this design check is performed for both rectangular and flanged sections, adopting rectangular section equations in the case of flanged sections; Larger dimension of rectangular section, h max = MAX (h, b w ) 2800 mm Smaller dimension of rectangular section, h min = MIN (h, b w ) 1500 mm Design torsion stress, v t = 2T/((h 2 min )(h max -h min /3)) (< 0.8f 0.5 cu & {5.0,7.0}N 0.21 N/mm 2 Note the ultimate torsion stress limit of 5.0 or 7.0N/mm 2 is used for f cu 60 or 105N/mm 2 respectively; Design ultimate torsion stress utilisation 4% OK Check v t < v t.min for no torsion links VALID BC2 Concrete torsion resistance, v t.min = MIN (0.6, f cu ) 0.47 N/mm 2 cl.2.3 Check v t > v t.min for design torsion links Horizontal dimension of closed link, x 1 = b w - 2 x cover - φ link,t 1405 mm Vertical dimension of closed link, y 1 = h - 2 x cover - φ link,t 2705 mm Provide closed torsion links A sv,t /S t > T / (0.8x 1 y 1 (0.95f yv )) i.e. A sv 0.42 mm 2 /mm Provide longitudinal bars around inside perimeter of links, A s,t > (A 1717 mm 2 Area provided by all torsion links in a cross-section, A sv,prov,t 982 mm 2 Tried A sv,prov,t /S t value 4.91 mm 2 /mm Design torsion resistance utilisation 0% OK Combined Shear and Torsion Rectangular Beam Note that this design check is performed for both rectangular and flanged sections, adopting rectangular section equations in the case of flanged sections; Ultimate shear and torsion stresses v ult + v t (< 0.8f cu 0.5 & {5.0,7.0}N/mm 2 ) 1.38 N/mm 2 BC2 Note the ultimate shear and torsion stress limit of 5.0 or 7.0N/mm 2 is used for f cu 60 or 105N/mcl Ultimate shear and torsion stresses utilisation 28% N/mm 2 OK Check design shear and torsion links Provide critical torsion link leg A sv /S/(n leg +n leg,t ) + A sv,t /S t /n leg,t > 0.23 mm 2 /mm Area provided by critical torsion link leg, A sv,prov,t /n leg,t 491 mm 2 Tried A sv,prov,t /n leg,t /S t value 2.45 mm 2 /mm Design shear and torsion resistance utilisation 0% OK
13 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 13 Detailing Requirements Rectangular or Flanged Beam All detailing requirements met? OK Min tension steel reinforcement diameter, φ t (>=12mm) 25 mm OK Min tension steel reinforcement pitch (b w 2.cover 2.MAX(φ link,φ link,t ) φ t )/(n t /n l 123 mm OK Max tension steel reinforcement pitch (b w 2.cover 2.MAX(φ link,φ link,t ) φ t )/(n t /n 123 mm OK Note that max pitch assumes no moment redistribution in beam, if less than 20% moment redistribution then pitch to be less than 175mm for G250 and less than 150mm for G460; Min compression steel reinforcement diameter, φ c (>=12mm) 25 mm OK Min compression steel reinforcement pitch (b w or b 2.cover 2.MAX(φ link,φ link,t ) Max compression steel reinforcement pitch (b w or b 2.cover 2.MAX(φ link,φ link,t Min shear link diameter, φ link (>=6mm, >=φ c /4) 25 mm OK Min torsion link diameter, φ link,t (>=6mm, >=φ c /4) 25 mm OK Shear link pitch, S (<=0.75d, <=12φ c, <=300mm, >=MAX(100mm, mm OK Torsion link pitch, S t (<=0.75d, <=12φ c, <=300mm, >=MAX(100mm, mm OK A sv,prov / (b w.s) + A sv,prov,t / (b w.s t ) (>0.10% G460; >0.17% G250) 1.15 % OK A sv,prov / (b w.s) + A sv,prov,t / (b w.s t ) (<4.00%) 1.15 % OK Note require an overall enclosing link; Note require additional restraining links for each alternate longitudinal bar; Note lacer bars of 16mm are required at the sides of beams more than 750mm deep at 250mm pitch;
14 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 14 Deflection Criteria Rectangular or Flanged Beam
15 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 15 Span m Span / effective depth ratio 1.6 Basic span / effective depth ratio criteria 26.0 Multiplier C 1,rect or flanged 1.00 cl Multiplier C 1,span more or less than 10m 1.00 cl Modification factor for tension C 2 M/(b w or b).d N/mm 2 cl N/mm 2 Modification 1.92 T.3.10 Modification factor for compression C 3 100A s,prov '/(b w or b).d cl Modification 1.00 T.3.11 Modified span / effective depth ratio criteria 50.0 Deflection utilisation 3% OK
16 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 16 Member Design - RC Beam Crack Width Estimation Rectangular Beam Note that this design check is performed for both rectangular and flanged sections, adopting rectangular section equations in the case of flanged sections; XX Maximum crack width criteria, w allow 0.30 mm Load factor, LF = 1.4 conservatively 1.4 SLS bending moment, M sls = M / LF 8545 knm SLS axial force (tension +ve and compression -ve), F sls = -F / LF 0 kn Uncracked elastic modulus, E uncracked = f cu 30 GPa Cracked elastic modulus, E cracked = E uncracked / 2 15 GPa Steel elastic modulus, E s 200 GPa Modulus ratio, α e = E s / E cracked 13.3 Reinforcement ratio, ρ w = A s,prov /b w d 0.01 Factor, α e.ρ w 0.13 Depth of neutral axis, x = α e.ρ w.[(1+2/(α e ρ w )) 1/2-1].d 957 mm Lever arm, z = d-x/ mm Steel tensile service stress (flexural), f s1 = M sls /z / A s,prov 115 N/mm 2 Steel tensile (tensile +ve and compressive -ve) service stress (axial), f s2 0 N/mm 2 Note if F sls > 0, f s2 = F sls /(A s,prov +A s,prov '), else f s2 = α e.(a s,prov +A s,prov ')/[ α e.(a s,prov +A s,prov ')+(b w.h-a s,prov -A s,prov ')].F sls /(A s,prov +A s,prov '); Steel tensile service stress utilisation, (f s1 +f s2 ) / (0.8f y ) < % OK Concrete compressive service stress (flexural and axial), f c 6 N/mm 2 Note if F sls > 0, f c = 2(M sls /z)/(b w x), else f c = 2(M sls /z)/(b w x) + (b w.h-a s,prov -A s,prov ')/[ α e.(a s,prov +A s,prov ')+(b w.h-a s,prov -A s,prov ')].ABS(F sls )/(b w.h-a s,prov +A s,prov '); Concrete compressive service stress utilisation, f c / (0.45f cu ) < % OK Strain at tension face, ε 1 = (h-x)/(d-x).(f s1 +f s2 )/E s 0.73 x10-3 Strain stiffening, ε 2 = b w (h-x) 2 /[3E s A s,prov (d-x)] 0.16 x10-3 Mean strain, ε m = ε 1 - ε x10-3 Distance to face of extreme rebar, c f = cover + MAX(φ link,φ link,t ) Distance to centroid of extreme rebar, c = c f + φ t /2 Distance, s = (b w 2.cover 2.MAX(φ link,φ link,t ) φ t )/(n t /n layers,tens 1) Distance, a c1 = [c²+c²] 1/2 - φ t /2 Distance, a c2 = [c²+(s/2)²] 1/2 - φ t /2 Distance, a cr = MAX(a c1, a c2 ) Note a c1 is not applicable for continuous width sections, i.e. slabs or walls; 60 mm 73 mm 123 mm 90 mm 83 mm 90 mm ac1 a c 2 s c Maximum crack width, w max = 3a cr ε m /[1+2.(a cr -c f )/(h-x)] 0.15 mm Maximum crack width utilisation, w max / w allow < % OK Note for a particular section and force / moment, crack widths can be reduced by increasing steel area, reducing spacing between rebars and reducing concrete cover (limited to durability requirements). The employment of smaller diameter bars at closer centres is thus preferable to larger diameter bars at further centres. There should be a provision for longitudinal steels at the side faces of beams of moderate depths; Crack width utilisation 49% OK
17 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 17 Member Design - RC Beam EC2 Longitudinal Shear Between Web and Flange Rectangular or Flanged Beam (EC2) Note that this check is performed for both rectangular and flanged section designs, although theoretically only applicable in the latter case; XX Longitudinal shear stress, K S. v Ed N/mm 2 Longitudinal shear stress, N/mm 2 cl Change of normal force in flange half over x, F d = K B.(M 0)/z kn Note conservatively factor, K B = 0.5(b eff b w )/b eff employed even if neutral axis within web; Lever arm, z Note if neutral axis within web, for simplicity, z = d h f /2; Thickness of the flange at the junctions, h f Length under consideration, x m Note the maximum value that may be assumed for x is half the distance between the section where the moment is 0 and the section where the moment is maximum. However, since F d is also calculated over x based on a variation of moment of ~ M/2 0 say, it is deemed acceptable to use for x the full distance between the section where the moment is 0 and the section where the moment is maximum based on a variation of moment of M 0 and factored by K S. Shear stress distribution factor, K S For UDLs, K S may be taken as 2.00 for simply supported beams, 1.33 for continuous beams and 2.00 for cantilever beams; Effective width, b eff = MIN(b w + function (span, section, structure Note for rectangular sections, b eff equivalent to that of T-sections assumed; Width (rectangular) or web width (flanged), b w cl Longitudinal shear stress limit to prevent crushing, N/mm 2 cl Design compressive strength, f cd N/mm 2 Strength reduction factor for concrete cracked in shear, ν with α cc =1.0, γ C =1.5 cl cl Longitudinal shear stress limit to prevent crushing utilisation, (K S.v Ed )/(νf cd sin Longitudinal shear stress limit for no transverse reinforcement, 0.4f ctd N/mm 2 cl Design tensile strength, f ctd N/mm 2 with α ct =1.0, γ C =1.5 cl N/mm 2 T.3.1 N/mm 2 T.3.1 N/mm 2 T.3.1 Characteristic cylinder strength of concrete, f ck N/mm 2 T.3.1 Characteristic cube strength of concrete, f cu N/mm 2 T.3.1 Longitudinal shear stress limit for no transverse reinforcement utilisation, (K Required design transverse reinforcement per unit length, A sf /s f > 2 /m Note area of transverse steel to be provided should be the greater of 1.0A sf /s f and cl A sf /s f + area required for slab bending; Note K S factored onto v Ed herein; Design yield strength of reinforcement, f yd = f y / γ S, γ S =1.15 N/mm 2 cl Thickness of the flange at the junctions, h f Angle, θ f 45.0 degrees cl Provided transverse reinforcement per unit length, A e 3927 mm 2 /m Required design transverse reinforcement per unit length utilisation, (A sf /s f )/
18 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 18 Member Design - RC Beam BS Longitudinal Shear Between Web and Flange Rectangular or Flanged Beam (BS5400-4) Note that this check is performed for both rectangular and flanged section designs, although theoretically only applicable in the latter case; XX Longitudinal shear force per unit length, V 1 = K S. F d / x Change of normal force in flange half over x, F d = K B.(M 0)/z kn/m kn Note conservatively factor, K B = 0.5(b eff b w )/b eff employed even if neutral axis within web; Lever arm, z Note if neutral axis within web, for simplicity, z = d h f /2; Thickness of the flange at the junctions, h f Length under consideration, x m Note x is the beam length between the point of maximum design moment and the point of zero moment; Shear stress distribution factor, K S The longitudinal shear should be calculated per unit length. For UDLs, K S may be taken as 2.00 for simply supported beams, 1.33 for continuous beams and 2.00 for cantilever beams; Effective width, b eff = MIN(b w + function (span, section, structure Note for rectangular sections, b eff equivalent to that of T-sections assumed; Width (rectangular) or web width (flanged), b w cl Longitudinal shear force limit per unit length, V 1,limit kn/m (a) kn/m cl (b) kn/m cl Concrete bond constant, k 1 T.31 Ultimate longitudinal shear stress limit, ν 1 N/mm 2 T.31 Surface type T.31 Length of shear plane, L s = h f Provided transverse reinforcement per unit length, A e 3927 mm 2 /m Note reinforcement provided for coexistent bending effects and shear reinforcement crossing the shear plane, provided to resist vertical shear, may be included provided they are fully anchored; Characteristic strength of reinforcement, f y N/mm 2 cl Longitudinal shear force limit per unit length utilisation, V 1 /V 1,limit Required nominal transverse reinforcement per unit length, 0.15%L s 2 /m cl Required nominal transverse reinforcement per unit length utilisation, 0.15%
19 Longitudinal shear stress limit, v Rdi N/mm 2 cl CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 19 EC2 Longitudinal Shear Within Web Rectangular or Flanged Beam (EC2) Longitudinal shear stress, N/mm 2 cl Ratio, β = 1.0 cl Transverse shear force, V Ed = V d kn cl Lever arm, z m cl Note if neutral axis within web, for simplicity, z = d h f /2; Width of the interface, b i = b w cl Note c.f ctd = 0.00 if σ n is negative (tension); cl Roughness coefficient, c cl Roughness coefficient, µ cl Design tensile strength, f ctd N/mm 2 with α ct =1.0, γ C =1.5 cl N/mm 2 N/mm 2 N/mm 2 T.3.1 T.3.1 T.3.1 Characteristic cylinder strength of concrete, f ck N/mm 2 T.3.1 Characteristic cube strength of concrete, f cu N/mm 2 T.3.1 Normal stress across longitudinal shear interface, σ n = 0 N/mm 2 Reinforcement ratio, ρ = A s / A i cl Area of reinforcement, A s = A sv,prov /S + A sv,prov,t /S t 2 /m Note that the area of reinforcement crossing the shear interface may include ordinary shear reinforcement with adequate anchorage at both cl sides of the interface; Area of the joint, A i = 1000.b i 2 /m Design yield strength of reinforcement, f yd = f yv / γ S, γ S =1.15 N/mm 2 cl Angle of reinforcement, α = 90.0 degrees cl Design compressive strength, f cd N/mm 2 Strength reduction factor for concrete cracked in shear, ν with α cc =1.0, γ C =1.5 cl cl Longitudinal shear stress limit utilisation, v Edi /v Rdi
20 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 20 Member Design - RC Beam Longitudinal Shear Within Web Rectangular or Flanged Beam () XX Longitudinal shear stress, ν h = K S. F c / (b w. x) N/mm 2 cl Change of total compression force over x, F c = (M 0)/z kn cl Lever arm, z Note if neutral axis within web, for simplicity, z = d h f /2; Length under consideration, x m Note x is the beam length between the point of maximum design moment and the point of zero moment; Shear stress distribution factor, K S The average design shear stress should then be distributed in proportion to the vertical design shear force diagram to give the horizontal shear stress at any point along the length of the member. For UDLs, K S maybe taken as 2.00 for simply supported beams, 1.33 for continuous beams and 2.00 for cantilever beams; Width (rectangular) or web width (flanged), b w cl cl Longitudinal shear stress limit for no nominal / design vertical reinforcement N/mm 2 Surface type T.5.5 Longitudinal shear stress limit for no nominal / design vertical reinforcement Required nominal vertical reinforcement per unit length, 0.15%b w 2 /m cl Provided vertical reinforcement per unit length, A e 2 /m Note A e = A sv,prov / S + A sv,prov,t / S t ; Required nominal vertical reinforcement per unit length utilisation, 0.15%b w / Note UT set to 0% if longitudinal shear stress limit for no nominal vertical reinforcement UT <= 100%; Required design vertical reinforcement per unit length, A h 2 /m cl Required design vertical reinforcement per unit length utilisation, A h /A e Note UT set to 0% if longitudinal shear stress limit for no design vertical reinforcement UT <= 100%;
21 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 21 Longitudinal Shear Within Web Rectangular or Flanged Beam (BS5400-4) BS Longitudinal shear force per unit length, V 1 = K S. F c / x Change of total compression force over x, F c = (M 0)/z Lever arm, z Note if neutral axis within web, for simplicity, z = d h f /2; Length under consideration, x kn/m kn m Note x is the beam length between the point of maximum design moment and the point of zero moment; Shear stress distribution factor, K S The longitudinal shear should be calculated per unit length. For UDLs, K S may be taken as 2.00 for simply supported beams, 1.33 for continuous beams and 2.00 for cantilever beams; Width (rectangular) or web width (flanged), b w cl Longitudinal shear force limit per unit length, V 1,limit kn/m (a) kn/m cl (b) kn/m cl Concrete bond constant, k 1 T.31 Ultimate longitudinal shear stress limit, ν 1 N/mm 2 T.31 Surface type T.31 Length of shear plane, L s = b w Provided vertical reinforcement per unit length, A e 2 /m Note A e = A sv,prov / S + A sv,prov,t / S t ; Note reinforcement provided for coexistent bending effects and shear reinforcement crossing the shear plane, provided to resist vertical shear, may be included provided they are fully anchored; Characteristic strength of reinforcement, f yv N/mm 2 cl Longitudinal shear force limit per unit length utilisation, V 1 /V 1,limit Required nominal vertical reinforcement per unit length, 0.15%L s 2 /m cl Required nominal vertical reinforcement per unit length utilisation, 0.15%L s / Note UT set to 0% if longitudinal shear force limit per unit length for no nominal vertical reinforcement UT <= 100%;
22 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 22 Deep Beam Rectangular Beam Note that this design check is performed for both rectangular and flanged sections, adopting rectangular section equations in the case of flanged sections; Note this section assumes a top loaded beam with no web openings ; Note this section assumes that the deep beam is laterally and rotationally restrained at the top and bottom of the beam overall depth, h (ref. CIRIA Guide 2 cl.2.2.3); Span to depth ratio, span / h 1.34 Applicability of deep beam design Applicable Note deep beam design is applicable for {1.0 span / h 2.0 s/s; 1.0 span / h 2.5 cont; 0.5 span / h 1.0 cant} (Reynolds cl and CIRIA Guide 2 cl.1.3); OK Concrete type Horizontal shear link diameter, φ link,h 25 mm Number of horizontal shear links in a horizontal section, i.e. number of legs, 4 Area provided by all horizontal shear links in a horizontal section, A sv,prov,h = 1963 mm 2 Pitch of horizontal shear links, S h 225 mm 2.π.(φ link or φ link,t ) 2 /4 / (b w.(s or S t )) (>0.20% G460; >0.25% G250) 0.33 % OK 2.π.φ link,h 2 /4 / (b w.s h ) (>0.20% G460; >0.25% G250) 0.29 % OK Tension steel area provided (deep beam) mm 2 CIRIA % Min tension reinforcement (deep beam) 0.84 % Guide 2 % Min tension reinforcement (deep beam) (>= 0.52 f cu /0.95f y ) cl % Min tension reinforcement (deep beam) utilisation 100% OK All detailing requirements met? OK
23 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 23 Deep Beam Bending Reynolds Design bending moment, M knm Tension steel (deep beam), A s,db = 1.75M / [f y.h] mm 2 T.148 Note that the factor 1.75 is obtained from 1 / (lever arm factor 0.6 x material factor 0.95); cl Tension steel zone depth, T zone (sag s/s, sag cont, hog cant) 513 mm cl Tension steel zone depth, T zone (hog cont) Note A s,db to be distributed over depth of T zone from tension face; cl Note T zone = (5h span lim ) / 20 s/s sag and cont sag, (5h 2 x span lim ) / 20 cant hog; cl / SE Tension steel area provided (deep beam) mm 2 Tension steel area provided (deep beam) utilisation 46% OK Deep Beam Shear Reynolds Design shear force, V d 4223 kn Note the ultimate shear force limit is b w.h.f c '/10 γ m where f c ' is the cylinder comp strength and γ cl Ultimate shear force utilisation 38% OK Area of tension steel reinforcement provided, A s,prov mm 2 Clear distance from edge of load to face of support, a mm T.148 Note for UDLs, concentrate total UDL at {span/4 s/s and cont, span/2 cant} from the support(s); T.148 Ratio a 1 /h 0.63 OK Note ensure a 1 /h is not greatly outside range of 0.23 to 0.70; T.148 Angle between horizontal bar and critical diagonal crack, θ = tan -1 (h/a 1 ) 58.0 degrees T.148 Empirical coefficient, k 1 = {0.70 NWC, 0.50 LWC} 0.70 T.148 Empirical coefficient, k 2 = {100 plain round bars, 225 deformed bars} 225 N/mm 2 T.148 Cylinder splitting tensile strength, f t = 0.5(f cu ) N/mm 2 T.148 Minimum breadth for deep beam, b w MAX {0, 0.65V d /[k 1.(h-0.35a 1 ).f t ]} 507 mm OK Number of rows of horizontal shear links in a vertical cross-section, n 10 Note the no. of rows of horizontal shear links reduced to account for T zone, i.e. (h T zone )/S h ; Design horizontal links shear capacity, V r = k 2 ΣA sv,prov,h.a 2.sin 2 θ/h 1404 kn T.148 Note the summation of the depths at which the horizontal shear links intersect the diagonal crack, Σ a 2 is calculated as S h.n.(n+1)/2 where n is the number of rows of horizontal shear links; Check V d < 1.0V 1 for no horizontal links (minor elements) VALID T.148 Concrete shear capacity, V kn T.148 Note V 1 = MAX[0,k 1.(h-0.35a 1 ).f t.b w ]+k 2.A s,prov.d.sin 2 θ /h; T.148 Check V d > 0.0 for design horizontal links VALID T.148 Concrete and design horizontal links shear capacity V r + V kn T.148 Design shear resistance (deep beam) utilisation 29% OK
24 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 24 Member Design - RC Beam Deep Beam Bending Design bending moment, M Note the ultimate bending moment limit is 0.12f cu b w h 2 ; XX knm CIRIA Guide 2 cl Ultimate bending moment utilisation 17% OK Tension steel (deep beam), A s,db = M / [0.95f y.z] mm 2 cl Lever arm at which the tension steel (deep beam) acts, z 1590 mm cl Simply supported, z = 0.2 x span lim + 0.4h 1870 mm cl ELF Continuous, z = 0.2 x span lim + 0.3h 1590 mm cl Cantilever, z = 0.4 x span lim + 0.4h 2240 mm SELF Tension steel zone depth, T zone (sag s/s, sag cont, hog cant) 560 mm cl Tension steel zone depth, T zone (hog cont) upper band 17% 560 mm cl Tension steel zone depth, T zone (hog cont) lower band 83% 1680 mm cl Note A s,db to be distributed over depth of T zone from tension face; cl Note T zone = 0.2h s/s sag, cont sag and cant hog; cl Note T zone = 0.2h cont hog upper band 0.5(span lim /h-1)a s,db, 0.2h-0.8h cont hog lower band remainder; Tension steel area provided (deep beam) mm 2 Tension steel area provided (deep beam) utilisation 49% OK Deep Beam Shear Design shear force, V d 4223 kn Note the ultimate shear force limit is min{b w.h. ν u,2b w.h 2 ν c k s /x e } where ν u is the ultimate concrete shear strength from CP 110 T.6 and T.26 replaced by min{0.8f cu 0.5,{5.0,7.0}N/mm 2 } and ν c is the design concrete shear strength from CP 110 T.5 and T.25 replaced by v c ; CIRIA Guide 2 cl Factor, k s = 1.0 for h/b w < 4, else cl Ultimate shear force utilisation 40% OK Area of tension steel reinforcement provided, A s,prov mm 2 Clear distance from edge of load to face of support, x e 1750 mm cl Note for UDLs, concentrate total UDL at {span/4 s/s and cont, span/2 cant} from the support(s); cl Ratio x e /h 0.63 OK Note ensure x e /h is not greatly outside range of 0.23 to 0.70; cl Angle between horizontal bar and critical diagonal crack, θ = tan -1 (h/x e ) 58.0 degrees cl Empirical coefficient, λ 1 = {0.44 NWC, 0.32 LWC} 0.44 cl Empirical coefficient, λ 2 = {0.85 plain round bars, 1.95 deformed bars} 1.95 N/mm 2 cl Number of rows of horizontal shear links in a vertical cross-section, n 9 Note the no. of rows of horizontal shear links reduced to account for T zone, i.e. (h T zone )/S h ; Design horizontal links shear capacity, V r = 100λ 2 ΣA sv,prov,h.y r.sin 2 θ/h 996 kn cl Note the summation of the depths at which the horizontal shear links intersect the diagonal crack, Σ y r is calculated as S h.n.(n+1)/2 where n is the number of rows of horizontal shear links; Check V d < 1.0V for no horizontal links (minor elements) VALID cl Concrete shear capacity, V ( 1.3λ 1 f cu.b w.h) kn cl Note V = MAX[0, λ 1.(h-0.35x e ). f cu.b w ]+100 λ 2.A s,prov.d.sin 2 θ /h; cl Note require [100 λ 2.A s,prov.d.sin 2 θ /h] / V 0.20; 0.30 OK Check V d > 0.0 for design horizontal links VALID cl Concrete and design horizontal links shear capacity V r + V ( λ 1.ν kn cl Note ν max = 1.3 f cu ; T.5 Note require [V r λ 2.A s,prov.d.sin 2 θ /h] / [V r + V] 0.20; 0.34 OK Design shear resistance (deep beam) utilisation 27% OK
25 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 25 Detailing Instructions (Deep Beam)
26 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 26
27 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 27 Scheme Design
28 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 28
29 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 29
30 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 30
31 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 31
32 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 32
33 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 33
34 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 34
35 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 35 Note optional method of limiting allowable steel stress to full crack width calculation method;
36 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 36 Typical Initial Span / Effective Depth Ratios
37 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 37 Notes on Application to Upstand Beams Rect - s/s Rect - continuous Hog in continuous beam with precast slab Deflections irrelevant Rect - cantilever Hog in cantilever beam with precast slab Deflections relevant T - s/s T - continuous Hog in continuous interior beam with insitu slab Deflections irrelevant T - cantilever Hog in cantilever interior beam with insitu slab Deflections relevant L - s/s L - continuous Hog in continuous edge beam with insitu slab Deflections irrelevant L - cantilever Hog in cantilever edge beam with insitu slab Deflections relevant Rect - s/s Sag in s/s beam with precast or insitu slab Deflections relevant Rect - continuous Sag in continuous beam with precast or insitu slab Deflections relevant
Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Effects From Structural Analysis Design axial force, F (tension -ve and compression +ve) (ensure < 0.1f cu b w h 0 kn OK Design shear force, V d 4223 kn
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Effects From Structural Analysis Design axial force, F (tension -ve and compression +ve) (ensure < 0.1f cu b w h 0
More informationCONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110
E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column Effects From Structural Analysis Axial force, N (tension-ve and comp +ve) (ensure >= 0) 8000kN OK Major
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - RC Two Way Spanning Slab XX
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC N/A) 35 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Staircase BS8110
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC N/A) 25 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Staircase BS8110
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC N/A) 30 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet
E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC N/A) 35 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of longitudinal steel, f y 460 N/mm 2 Yield
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite
More informationCHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams
CHAPTER 4 Design of R C Beams Learning Objectives Identify the data, formulae and procedures for design of R C beams Design simply-supported and continuous R C beams by integrating the following processes
More informationBending and Shear in Beams
Bending and Shear in Beams Lecture 3 5 th October 017 Contents Lecture 3 What reinforcement is needed to resist M Ed? Bending/ Flexure Section analysis, singly and doubly reinforced Tension reinforcement,
More informationAnnex - R C Design Formulae and Data
The design formulae and data provided in this Annex are for education, training and assessment purposes only. They are based on the Hong Kong Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013 (HKCP-2013).
More information- Rectangular Beam Design -
Semester 1 2016/2017 - Rectangular Beam Design - Department of Structures and Material Engineering Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Introduction The purposes
More informationDesign of Beams (Unit - 8)
Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Contents Introduction Beam types Lateral stability of beams Factors affecting lateral stability Behaviour of simple and built - up beams in bending (Without vertical stiffeners)
More informationLecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion
Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Design of
More informationCE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-
CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing Openings in RC Flexural Members- Assoc Pr Tan Kiang Hwee Department Civil Engineering National In this lecture DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
More informationDESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL
DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL When the height of the retaining wall exceeds about 6 m, the thickness of the stem and heel slab works out to be sufficiently large and the design becomes
More informationDetailing. Lecture 9 16 th November Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2
Detailing Lecture 9 16 th November 2017 Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2 EC2 Section 8 - Detailing of Reinforcement - General Rules Bar spacing, Minimum bend diameter Anchorage of reinforcement
More informationDesign of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602
Design of wall panel according to EN 160 Example 3: Wall panel with wind load 1.1 Issue Design of a wall panel at an industrial building Materials with a compressive strength 3,5, density class 500, welded
More informationFlexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections
4 5000 4000 (increased d ) (increased f (increased A s or f y ) c or b) Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections Moment (kip-in.) 3000 2000 1000 0 0 (basic) (A s 0.5A s ) 0.0005 0.001 0.0015
More informationSub. Code:
Important Instructions to examiners: ) The answers should be examined by key words and not as word-to-word as given in the model answer scheme. ) The model answer and the answer written by candidate may
More informationSabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are
More informationChapter 8. Shear and Diagonal Tension
Chapter 8. and Diagonal Tension 8.1. READING ASSIGNMENT Text Chapter 4; Sections 4.1-4.5 Code Chapter 11; Sections 11.1.1, 11.3, 11.5.1, 11.5.3, 11.5.4, 11.5.5.1, and 11.5.6 8.2. INTRODUCTION OF SHEAR
More informationCivil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7
Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7 Dr. Colin Caprani, Chartered Engineer 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 1.1 Background... 3 1.2 Failure Modes... 5 1.3 Design Aspects...
More informationDesign of a Multi-Storied RC Building
Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building 16 14 14 3 C 1 B 1 C 2 B 2 C 3 B 3 C 4 13 B 15 (S 1 ) B 16 (S 2 ) B 17 (S 3 ) B 18 7 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 7 B 20 B 22 14 B 19 (S 4 ) C 10 C 11 B 23
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear
Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk 1 Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular
More informationDESIGN OF STAIRCASE. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
DESIGN OF STAIRCASE Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email: iznisyahrizal@utm.my Introduction T N T G N G R h Flight Span, L Landing T = Thread
More informationPURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.
BENDING STRESS The effect of a bending moment applied to a cross-section of a beam is to induce a state of stress across that section. These stresses are known as bending stresses and they act normally
More informationDepartment of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601. Lecture no. 6: SHEAR AND TORSION
Budapest University of Technology and Economics Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601 Lecture no. 6: SHEAR AND TORSION Reinforced
More informationCHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE
CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE 6.1 GENERAL It shall be in accordance with JSCE Standard Specification (Design), 6.1. The collapse mechanism in statically indeterminate structures shall not be considered.
More informationDelhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:
Serial : IG1_CE_G_Concrete Structures_100818 Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: E-mail: info@madeeasy.in Ph: 011-451461 CLASS TEST 018-19 CIVIL ENGINEERING
More informationQUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS
QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State Hooke s law. 3. Define modular ratio,
More informationQUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A
DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State
More informationSeismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design
Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Elmer E. Marx, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Michael Keever, California Department
More informationDesign of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar
5.10 Examples 5.10.1 Analysis of effective section under compression To illustrate the evaluation of reduced section properties of a section under axial compression. Section: 00 x 80 x 5 x 4.0 mm Using
More informationLecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads
Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com Prof.
More informationPractical Design to Eurocode 2
Practical Design to Eurocode 2 The webinar will start at 12.30 (Any questions beforehand? use Questions on the GoTo Control Panel) Course Outline Lecture Date Speaker Title 1 21 Sep Jenny Burridge Introduction,
More informationPractical Design to Eurocode 2. The webinar will start at 12.30
Practical Design to Eurocode 2 The webinar will start at 12.30 Course Outline Lecture Date Speaker Title 1 21 Sep Jenny Burridge Introduction, Background and Codes 2 28 Sep Charles Goodchild EC2 Background,
More informationCIVIL DEPARTMENT MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1. Brach: CE YEAR:
MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1 SEMESTER: V 1) Find the least moment of Inertia about the centroidal axes X-X and Y-Y of an unequal angle section 125 mm 75 mm 10 mm as shown in figure 2) Determine
More informationmportant nstructions to examiners: ) The answers should be examined by key words and not as word-to-word as given in the model answer scheme. ) The model answer and the answer written by candidate may
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear
Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular Beams Diagonal Tension
More informationDesign of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN
Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN 1992-1-1 and EN 1992-2 Validation Examples Brno, 21.10.2010 IDEA RS s.r.o. South Moravian Innovation Centre, U Vodarny 2a, 616 00 BRNO tel.: +420-511
More information9.5 Compression Members
9.5 Compression Members This section covers the following topics. Introduction Analysis Development of Interaction Diagram Effect of Prestressing Force 9.5.1 Introduction Prestressing is meaningful when
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV UNIT I STRESS, STRAIN DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS PART A (2 MARKS)
More informationPERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK
PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM - 613 403 - THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Sub : Strength of Materials Year / Sem: II / III Sub Code : MEB 310
More informationExample 2.2 [Ribbed slab design]
Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design] A typical floor system of a lecture hall is to be designed as a ribbed slab. The joists which are spaced at 400mm are supported by girders. The overall depth of the slab
More informationChapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter
Chapter 1 Materials 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter A Area of concrete cross-section C s Constant depending on the type of curing C t Creep coefficient (C t = ε sp /ε i ) C u Ultimate creep coefficient
More informationSERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS
CHAPTER REINFORCED CONCRETE Reinforced Concrete Design A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition Fifth Edition SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Structural Description The two pinned (at the bases) portal frame is stable in its plane due to the moment connection
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Structure, Member Design - Geotechnics Pad, Strip and Raft XX
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC ) 35 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of longitudinal
More informationServiceability Limit States
Serviceability Limit States www.eurocode2.info 1 Outline Crack control and limitations Crack width calculations Crack width calculation example Crack width calculation problem Restraint cracking Deflection
More informationSTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction
CHAPTER 2 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Introduction The primary purpose of structural analysis is to establish the distribution of internal forces and moments over the whole part of a structure and to identify
More informationMechanics of Structure
S.Y. Diploma : Sem. III [CE/CS/CR/CV] Mechanics of Structure Time: Hrs.] Prelim Question Paper Solution [Marks : 70 Q.1(a) Attempt any SIX of the following. [1] Q.1(a) Define moment of Inertia. State MI
More informationLecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures
Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Contents Analysis Approaches Point of Inflection Method Equivalent
More informationPLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder
16 PLATE GIRDERS II 1.0 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the current practice for the design of plate girders adopting meaningful simplifications of the equations derived in the chapter on Plate Girders
More informationREINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES DESIGN AND DRAWING (ACE009)
LECTURE NOTES ON REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES DESIGN AND DRAWING (ACE009) III B. Tech I semester (Regulation- R16) Mr. Gude Ramakrishna Associate Professor DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING INSTITUTE OF
More informationEurocode Training EN : Reinforced Concrete
Eurocode Training EN 1992-1-1: Reinforced Concrete Eurocode Training EN 1992-1-1 All information in this document is subject to modification without prior notice. No part of this manual may be reproduced,
More informationREINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 1. Design of Column (Examples and Tutorials)
For updated version, please click on http://ocw.ump.edu.my REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 1 Design of Column (Examples and Tutorials) by Dr. Sharifah Maszura Syed Mohsin Faculty of Civil Engineering and Earth
More informationFailure interaction curves for combined loading involving torsion, bending, and axial loading
Failure interaction curves for combined loading involving torsion, bending, and axial loading W M Onsongo Many modern concrete structures such as elevated guideways are subjected to combined bending, torsion,
More informationReinforced Concrete Structures
Reinforced Concrete Structures MIM 232E Dr. Haluk Sesigür I.T.U. Faculty of Architecture Structural and Earthquake Engineering WG Ultimate Strength Theory Design of Singly Reinforced Rectangular Beams
More informationSeismic Design, Assessment & Retrofitting of Concrete Buildings. fctm. h w, 24d bw, 175mm 8d bl, 4. w 4 (4) 2 cl
Seismic Design, Assessment & Retroitting o Concrete Buildings Table 5.1: EC8 rules or detailing and dimensioning o primary beams (secondary beams: as in DCL) DC H DCM DCL critical region length 1.5h w
More informationStandardisation of UHPC in Germany
Standardisation of UHPC in Germany Part II: Development of Design Rules, University of Siegen Prof. Dr.-Ing. Ekkehard Fehling, University of Kassel 1 Overvie Introduction: Work of the Task Group Design
More information10/14/2011. Types of Shear Failure. CASE 1: a v /d 6. a v. CASE 2: 2 a v /d 6. CASE 3: a v /d 2
V V Types o Shear Failure a v CASE 1: a v /d 6 d V a v CASE 2: 2 a v /d 6 d V a v CASE 3: a v /d 2 d V 1 Shear Resistance Concrete compression d V cz = Shear orce in the compression zone (20 40%) V a =
More informationUNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN. 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2
UNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2 Young s modulus E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2 Area1=900mm 2 Area2=400mm 2 Area3=625mm
More informationModule 6. Shear, Bond, Anchorage, Development Length and Torsion. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Module 6 Shear, Bond, Anchorage, Development Length and Torsion Lesson 15 Bond, Anchorage, Development Length and Splicing Instruction Objectives: At the end of this lesson, the student should be able
More informationAppendix K Design Examples
Appendix K Design Examples Example 1 * Two-Span I-Girder Bridge Continuous for Live Loads AASHTO Type IV I girder Zero Skew (a) Bridge Deck The bridge deck reinforcement using A615 rebars is shown below.
More informationVTU EDUSAT PROGRAMME Lecture Notes on Design of Columns
VTU EDUSAT PROGRAMME 17 2012 Lecture Notes on Design of Columns DESIGN OF RCC STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS - 10CV52 (PART B, UNIT 6) Dr. M. C. Nataraja Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Sri Jayachamarajendra
More informationUNIT 1 STRESS STRAIN AND DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS, STATES OF STRESS 1. Define stress. When an external force acts on a body, it undergoes deformation.
UNIT 1 STRESS STRAIN AND DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS, STATES OF STRESS 1. Define stress. When an external force acts on a body, it undergoes deformation. At the same time the body resists deformation. The magnitude
More informationGeneration of Biaxial Interaction Surfaces
COPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA AUGUST 2002 CONCRETE FRAE DESIGN BS 8110-97 Technical Note This Technical Note describes how the program checks column capacity or designs reinforced
More information1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6
Page 3 Page 4 Substructure Design. ARRANGEMENT a. Frame A-P3 L = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m b. Frame P3-P6 L = 25 m H 3 = 8.39 m L 2 = 3 m H 4 = 8.5 m L
More informationServiceability Deflection calculation
Chp-6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation Deflection example Structural Design Profession is concerned with: Limit States Philosophy: Strength Limit State (safety-fracture, fatigue, overturning
More informationLecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement
Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Section 1: Deflections
More informationConcrete and Masonry Structures 1 Office hours
Concrete and Masonry Structures 1 Petr Bílý, office B731 http://people.fsv.cvut.cz/www/bilypet1 Courses in English Concrete and Masonry Structures 1 Office hours Credit receiving requirements General knowledge
More informationStructural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 0 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic Loads
More informationtwenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture
ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture twenty one concrete construction: Copyright Kirk Martini shear & deflection Concrete Shear 1 Shear in Concrete
More informationSTEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams
STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite
More informationTekla Structural Designer 2016i
Tekla Structural Designer 2016i Reference Guides (British Standards) September 2016 2016 Trimble Solutions Corporation part of Trimble Navigation Ltd. Table of Contents Analysis Verification Examples...
More informationChapter 4. Test results and discussion. 4.1 Introduction to Experimental Results
Chapter 4 Test results and discussion This chapter presents a discussion of the results obtained from eighteen beam specimens tested at the Structural Technology Laboratory of the Technical University
More informationSERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN
CHAPTER 11 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN Article 49. Cracking Limit State 49.1 General considerations In the case of verifications relating to Cracking Limit State, the effects of actions comprise
More informationNAGY GYÖRGY Tamás Assoc. Prof, PhD
NAGY GYÖRGY Tamás Assoc. Prof, PhD E mail: tamas.nagy gyorgy@upt.ro Tel: +40 256 403 935 Web: http://www.ct.upt.ro/users/tamasnagygyorgy/index.htm Office: A219 SIMPLE SUPORTED BEAM b = 15 cm h = 30 cm
More informationDESIGN REINFORCED CEMENT CONCRETE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS
DESIGN OF REINFORCED CEMENT CONCRETE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS Contents CHAPTER 1.0 General: 1.1 Symbols 1. Materials 1..1 Cement 1.. Aggregate 1..3 Water 1..4 Admixtures 1..5 Reinforcement CHAPTER.0 Concrete:.1
More informationε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram
CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case
More informationCivil Engineering Design (1) Analysis and Design of Slabs 2006/7
Civil Engineering Design (1) Analysis and Design of Slabs 006/7 Dr. Colin Caprani, Chartered Engineer 1 Contents 1. Elastic Methods... 3 1.1 Introduction... 3 1. Grillage Analysis... 4 1.3 Finite Element
More informationUniversity of Sheffield. Department of Civil Structural Engineering. Member checks - Rafter 44.6
Member checks - Rafter 34 6.4Haunch (UB 457 x 191 x 89) The depth of a haunch is usually made approximately twice depth of the basic rafter sections, as it is the normal practice to use a UB cutting of
More informationRoadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.
Example on Design of Slab Bridge Design Data and Specifications Chapter 5 SUPERSTRUCTURES Superstructure consists of 10m slab, 36m box girder and 10m T-girder all simply supported. Only the design of Slab
More informationRETAINING WALL ANALYSIS
GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 Retaining wall Analysis & Design (EN997:2004 App'd by RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS In accordance with
More informationRETAINING WALL ANALYSIS
Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 App'd by RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS In accordance with
More information3.5 Analysis of Members under Flexure (Part IV)
3.5 Analysis o Members under Flexure (Part IV) This section covers the ollowing topics. Analysis o a Flanged Section 3.5.1 Analysis o a Flanged Section Introduction A beam can have langes or lexural eiciency.
More informationDEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8 - PART 3 PROVISIONS
DEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8 - PART 3 PROVISIONS Konstantinos CHRISTIDIS 1, Emmanouil VOUGIOUKAS 2 and Konstantinos TREZOS 3 ABSTRACT
More informationParametric analysis and torsion design charts for axially restrained RC beams
Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 55, No. 1 (2015) 1-27 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.55.1.001 1 Parametric analysis and torsion design charts for axially restrained RC beams Luís F.A.
More information2012 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS
R10 SET - 1 II B.Tech II Semester, Regular Examinations, April 2012 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS (Com. to ME, AME, MM) Time: 3 hours Max. Marks: 75 Answer any FIVE Questions All Questions carry Equal Marks ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
More informationCHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS
(74) CHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS This chapter will be devoted to the analysis of prismatic members subjected to equal and opposite couples M and M' acting in the same longitudinal plane. Such members are
More information7 TRANSVERSE SHEAR transverse shear stress longitudinal shear stresses
7 TRANSVERSE SHEAR Before we develop a relationship that describes the shear-stress distribution over the cross section of a beam, we will make some preliminary remarks regarding the way shear acts within
More informationDesign of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Local buckling is an extremely important facet of cold formed steel
5.3 Local buckling Local buckling is an extremely important facet of cold formed steel sections on account of the fact that the very thin elements used will invariably buckle before yielding. Thinner the
More informationLongitudinal strength standard
(1989) (Rev. 1 199) (Rev. Nov. 001) Longitudinal strength standard.1 Application This requirement applies only to steel ships of length 90 m and greater in unrestricted service. For ships having one or
More informationFLEXURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN METHODS FOR SRC BEAM SECTIONS WITH COMPLETE COMPOSITE ACTION
Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, Vol. 31, No., pp. 15-9 (8) 15 FLEXURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN METHODS FOR SRC BEAM SECTIONS WITH COMPLETE COMPOSITE ACTION Cheng-Cheng Chen* and Chao-Lin Cheng
More informationSTRENGTH OF MATERIALS-I. Unit-1. Simple stresses and strains
STRENGTH OF MATERIALS-I Unit-1 Simple stresses and strains 1. What is the Principle of surveying 2. Define Magnetic, True & Arbitrary Meridians. 3. Mention different types of chains 4. Differentiate between
More informationDESIGN OF DOWELS FOR SHEAR TRANSFER AT THE INTERFACE BETWEEN CONCRETE CAST AT DIFFERENT TIMES: A CASE STUDY
DESIGN OF DOWELS FOR SHEAR TRANSFER AT THE INTERFACE BETWEEN CONCRETE CAST AT DIFFERENT TIMES: A CASE STUDY Samayamanthree Mudiyanselage Premasiri Karunarathna 118614J Degree of Master of Engineering in
More informationMade by SMH Date Aug Checked by NRB Date Dec Revised by MEB Date April 2006
Job No. OSM 4 Sheet 1 of 8 Rev B Telephone: (0144) 45 Fax: (0144) 944 Made b SMH Date Aug 001 Checked b NRB Date Dec 001 Revised b MEB Date April 00 DESIGN EXAMPLE 9 - BEAM WITH UNRESTRAINED COMPRESSION
More informationSRI CHANDRASEKHARENDRA SARASWATHI VISWA MAHAVIDHYALAYA
SRI CHANDRASEKHARENDRA SARASWATHI VISWA MAHAVIDHYALAYA (Declared as Deemed-to-be University under Section 3 of the UGC Act, 1956, Vide notification No.F.9.9/92-U-3 dated 26 th May 1993 of the Govt. of
More informationUNIT III DEFLECTION OF BEAMS 1. What are the methods for finding out the slope and deflection at a section? The important methods used for finding out the slope and deflection at a section in a loaded
More information