Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design


 Clara Quinn
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Elmer E. Marx, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Michael Keever, California Department of Transportation 2015 TRB Pushover Webinar 1
2 Learning Objective Given the plans for a conventional bridge pier, calculate the lateral forcedisplacement (pushover) response of the system necessary for the seismic design of bridges in accordance with the AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design (SGS). Focus is pushover analysis not modeling, seismic displacement demand or capacity design 2
3 Overview Flexural mechanics refresher Generation of MomentCurvature ( M  φ ) Material models and failure strains Hand checking M  φ Analytical plastic hinge length, L p ForceDisplacement pushover example Hand checking forcedisplacement Design Example Two circular column bent 3
4 Why Pushover? SGS is primarily a displacementbased approach More rational approach than forcebased method of AASHTO LRFD Seismic Design Category D (SDC D) requires pushover analysis 4
5 Why Pushover? Need to verify that the seismic displacement demand, L D, exceed the displacement capacity, L C Results can be used to help create the seismic model and subsequent displacement demands Provides for a better understanding of bridge response and behavior 5
6 Flexural Mechanics Relationship between force, shear, moment, curvature, slope and deflection Integration Moment area Energy methods Stiffness methods 6
7 Force Displacement Relationship P = load V = P dx M = V dx 7
8 Force Displacement Relationship M = V dx ϕ = M EI 8
9 Force Displacement Relationship ϕ = M E I θ = ϕ dx = θ dx 9
10 Example  Cantilever P V = P θ L o = ϕ 2 L L = ϕo 3 2 L L M o = P L ϕ o = M o E I = P E L I 10
11 Compatibility BernoulliEuler assumption sections that are plane (linear) before bending remain plane after bending Perfect bond between the steel reinforcing bars and surrounding concrete Material (constitutive σε) models are representative of actual material response (confinement, strain hardening, buckling, spalling, cracking, creep, strainrate, shear, etc.) 11
12 Moment Curvature ( M  φ ) 12
13 Moment Curvature ( M  φ ) For small angles, curvature (φ ) may be calculated as: φ = ε c / c = ε t / (D c) φ = strain / distance from neutral axis 13
14 Moment Curvature ( M  φ ) From equilibrium: P = F SC + F CC + F CU F ST Summing moments about the neutral axis M = CG SC *F SC +CG CC *F CC +CG CU *F CU +CG ST *F ST +P*(D/2 c) 14
15 Generation of MomentCurvature Relationship 15
16 Moment Curvature ( M  φ ) Predicted Response Idealized Bilinear Response used in SGS SGS
17 Idealized M φ Response Used for design purposes First yield Moment and Curvature, M y and φ y Effective stiffness, E ce * I eff = M y / φ y Idealized yield Moment and Curvature, M p and φ yi Expected nominal moment, M ne at ε c = Balance the area above and below the curve 17
18 SGS Material Models Concrete: Mander et al model for unconfined and confined condition Reinforcing steel: elastic  perfectly plastic with strain hardening Other: prestressing steel (see SGS) Any function / model that accurately captures the material σε relationship is acceptable 18
19 SGS Material Models  Concrete Stressstrain relationship for concrete where: f c = r ' fccxr 1+ x r f ' cc r = E ε c x = ε ' ' ' 7.94 fl 2 fl = f ce ' ' fce fce ce cc E ce E sec Mander, Priestley, Park
20 SGS Material Models  Concrete (continue) ε cc ' f cc = ' fce E = ce ' 1900 fce E sec = ' f cc ε cc Mander, Priestley, Park
21 SGS Material Models  Concrete Confinement of circular columns ρ s = 4 A sp ' D s f = K f ' l e l f l f l = 2A sp ' f D s yh = ρ f s 2 yh Mander, Priestley, Park
22 SGS Material Models  Concrete Confinement of rectangular columns f ' l K e ( + ρ ) ρ x y f yh 0.8( ρ x + ρ y ) 2 2 f yh ρ x = A sh sx c ρ y = A sy sb c Mander, Priestley, Park
23 SGS Material Models  Concrete ε c = strain in concrete (IN/IN) f c = stress in concrete corresponding to strain ε c (KSI) f ce = expected nominal compressive strength (KSI) f yh = nominal yield stress of transverse reinforcing (KSI) ε R su = reduced ultimate tensile strain of transverse bars (IN/IN A sx = total area of transverse bars in the x axis (IN 2 ) A sy = total area of transverse bars in the y axis (IN 2 ) A sp = area of hoop /spiral bar for circular column (IN 2 ) H c = confined core dimension in the y axis (IN) B c = confined core dimension in the x axis (IN) D = diameter of spiral or hoop for circular column (IN) s = pitch of spiral or spacing of hoops or ties (IN) Mander, Priestley, Park
24 SGS Material Models  Concrete Chen
25 Effective confinement factor for circular columns Effective confinement factor for rectangular columns SGS Material Models  Concrete ~ ' 1 2 ' 1 6 ) ( ' cc c c N i c d i e d s b s d b w K ρ = = ~ ' 2 ' 1 cc n e D s K ρ = Chen
26 SGS Material Models  Concrete s = clear distance between transverse bars = s d bh (IN) d bh = diameter of transverse reinforcing bar (IN) D = centerline diameter of hoop or spiral (IN) ρ cc = A st / A cc A st = total area of longitudinal reinforcement (IN 2 ) A cc = area of confined concrete core (IN 2 ) n = 1 for continuous spiral n = 2 for individual hoops w i = clear distance between adjacent tied longitudinal bars(in) b d = confined core dimension in the longer direction(in) d c = confined core dimension in the shorter direction (IN) N = number of spaces between longitudinal bars Chen
27 SGS Material Models  Concrete Stressstrain curves for concrete Spalling strain, ε sp, not to exceed Confined concrete crushing strain, ε cu, critical component ε cu Recommend ε cu < 0.02 for design purposes SGS
28 SGS Failure Strain  Concrete Confined concrete crushing strain limit, ε cu important ε cu = 1.4ρs f yhε su < ' f cc where: ρ s = transverse reinforcement ratio (ρ x +ρ y for rect.) f yh = nominal yield stress of transverse steel ε su = rupture strain of transverse steel ~ 0.09 to 0.12 f cc = confined concrete compressive stress Mander, Priestley, Park
29 SGS Material Models  Steel Kowalsky 2013 and SGS 29
30 SGS Material Models  Steel Stressstrain relationship for reinforcing steel Elastic ε s ε ye f = s E s ε s Plastic ε ye ε s ε sh f s = f ye Strain hardening ε sh ε s ε R su f s = f ue 1 ( f ue f ye ε ) ε su su ε s ε sh 2 Priestley, Calvi, Kowalsky
31 SGS Failure Strains  Steel Reinforcing steel failure strain, ε R su Property Notation Bar Size ASTM A706 ASTM A615 Grade 60 Specified minimum yield stress (ksi) f y #3  # Expected yield stress (ksi) f ye #3  # Expected tensile strength (ksi) f ue #3  # Expected yield strain ε ye #3  # Onset of strain hardening #3  # # ε sh #10  # # # Reduced ultimate tensile strain #4  # R ε su #11  # Ultimate tensile strain ε su #4  # #11  # SGS
32 SGS Material Models  Steel ASTM A 706 Grade 60 v. ASTM A 615 Grade 60 ASTM 2011,
33 Quasistatic v. Cyclic Discussion Quasistatic constitutive models for cyclic response Kowalsky et al
34 Moment Curvature Example Find the Mφ for the column shown below 940 KIP 2 IN clr. #5 4IN 20 #11 L =H o = 20 FT D = 48 IN ASTM A 706 Grade 60 f c = 4 KSI 34
35 Moment Curvature Example Diameter, D = 48 IN Gross Area, A g = π*d 2 /4 = 1810 IN^2 20 #11 A st = 20*1.56 = 31.2 IN^2 ρ l = A st / A g = = 1.724% #5 hoop (d sp = IN and A sp = 0.31 IN^2) Hoop spacing = 4 IN pitch (s = 4 IN) Clear cover, cov = 2 IN over transverse bars Core diameter, D = D 2*cov d sp = IN ρ s = 4*A sp / (D * s) = = 0.715% ASTM A 706 Grade 60 so f ye = 68 KSI, f ue = 95 KSI f c = 4 KSI so f ce = 5.2 KSI P = 940 K Axial Load Ratio, ALR = P / (f ce *A g ) =
36 Moment Curvature Example Confined concrete crushing strain limit, ε cu ε cu 1.4ρs f yhε su = = ' f cc where: ρ s = 4*A sp /(D *s) = f l = K e *ρ s *f yh /2 ~ 0.95* *60/2 = KSI f yh = 60 KSI (use nominal for horizontal steel) ε su = ε R su = 0.09 for #5 hoops f ' cc = f ' ce ' fl 2 f ' f ' ce f 6.49 Spreadsheet demo then check with commercial ce ' l = 36
37 M φ Spreadsheet Example 37
38 Moment Curvature Example Spreadsheet summary results for ALR =
39 Idealized Moment Curvature Elasticperfectly plastic relationship is defined as: M i = idealized moment values = E ce I eff *φ < M p M p = idealized plastic moment (solving for this) φ = actual calculated curvature from Mφ results E ce I eff = effective stiffness at first yield = M y / φ y (Mφ) = actual  idealized = ( M)*( φ) Σ (Mφ) = sum of difference = 0 by changing M p Spreadsheet demo then check with commercial 39
40 Idealized Moment Curvature 40
41 Moment Curvature Example Idealized M  φ relationship using more data points 41
42 Moment Curvature Example 42
43 Moment Curvature Example P = 940 K φ yi = /IN 2% φ u = /IN 0.2% M p = KIN 2% E ce I eff = E6 KIN 2 0.3% Spreadsheet Comparison φ yi = /IN φ u = /IN M p = KIN E ce I eff = 456.3E6 KIN 2 43
44 Approximate Methods the use of curvature ( φ ) in design is uncommon don t have a good feel for curvature values simple method to check the computer results can help with iterative processes use these approximations with due skepticism 44
45 Approximate Methods  φ yi For a rough check of conventional circular reinforced concrete column sections: where: φ yi ~ 2.25*ε ye /12B o ~ 1/2300B o φ yi ~ 2.25*ε ye /D ~ 1/190D φ yi = idealized yield curvature (1/IN) B o = column diameter (FT) D = column diameter (IN) ε ye = expected yield strain ~ (IN/IN) Priestley, Calvi, Kowalsky
46 Approximate Methods  φ yi For a rough check of conventional rectangular reinforced concrete column sections: φ yi ~ 2.1*ε ye /12B o ~ 1/2500B o where: φ yi = idealized yield curvature (1/IN) B o = column width in loaded direction (FT) ε ye = expected yield strain ~ (IN/IN) Priestley, Calvi, Kowalsky
47 Approximate Methods  φ u And for a very rough check of conventional circular or rectangular reinforced concrete column sections with good confinement: where: φ u = min (ε cu /c c, ε sur /dc) ~ ε R su /12B o φ u = ultimate curvature (1/IN) ε cu = ultimate confined concrete strain (1/IN) ε R su = reduced ultimate tensile strain (IN/IN) c c = neutral axis to edge of confined core (IN) dc = neutral axis to extreme tension bar (IN) B o = column diameter / width (FT) 47
48 Effective Stiffness  E ce *I eff E ce *I eff = M y / φ y where: E ce = Expected modulus of elasticity for concrete M y = moment at first yield (expected materials at first yield) φ y = curvature at first yield (expected materials at first yield) So, And typically, I eff = M y /( φ y *E ce ) 0.7 < I eff / I g <
49 Approximate Methods I eff / I g where: I eff /I g ~ *ρ l + 0.5*(P/f ce *A g ) ρ l = longitudinal reinforcement ratio in % = A st / A g * 100 < 3% practical limit P = axial load keep below 0.2*A g *f ce SGS
50 Approximate Methods  M p where: M p ~ D 3 * [ *ρ l + P/(f ce *A g )] M p = idealized plastic moment for circular section (KIN) D = column diameter (IN) > 30 IN ρ l = longitudinal reinforcement ratio in % = A st / A g * 100 < 4% but 3% is practical limit P = axial load on column (K) < 0.2 * f ce * A g f ce = expected concrete strength (KSI) A g = gross area of column (IN^2) Assumes ASTM A 706 Grade 60 reinforcing steel and f ce =
51 Approximate Methods  M p where: M p ~ b*d 2 * [ *ρ l + 1.5*P/(f ce *A g )] M p = idealized plastic moment for rectangular section (KIN) d b = column depth in direction of loading (IN) > 30 IN = column width (IN) > 30 IN ρ l = A st / A g * 100 = longitudinal reinforcement ratio in % P = axial load on column (K) < 0.2 * f ce * A g f ce = expected concrete strength (KSI) A g = b * d = gross area of column (IN^2) Assumes ASTM A 706 Grade 60 reinforcing steel and f ce =
52 Moment Curvature Check Diameter, D = 48 IN I g = D 4 π/64 = IN 4 ρ l = A st / A g = = 1.724% Axial Load Ratio, ALR = P / (f ce *A g ) = 0.1 [P ~ 940 K] ε ye = f ye /E s = 68/29000 = ε R su = 0.06 (#11) φ yi ~2.25* /48 = /IN v /IN φ u ~ 0.06/48 = /IN v /IN I eff ~ (0.2+.1* *0.1)* = 0.42* I eff ~ IN 4 v IN 4 4% M p ~ 48 3 ( * ) M p ~ KIN v KIN 6% 52
53 Moment Curvature Check Approximate Method Predicted Response Idealized Response XTRACT Response 53
54 Force  Displacement Calculate deflections using Mφ result Elastic deformation component, yi Plastic deformation component, p Foundation deformation component important but not specifically addressed in this workshop Conservative to neglect shear deformations 54
55 Force  Displacement Caltrans SDC Version
56 Analytical Plastic Hinge Length  L p Approximation used to simplify analysis Converts (integrates) curvature to rotation Includes a moment gradient part (integration), tension shift (diagonal cracking) and a strain penetration part (yielding into cap, footing or shaft) Calibrated to the failure condition only and modification may be needed for full straindisplacement response 56
57 Analytical Plastic Hinge Length  L p L p = k * L + L sp > 2 * L sp where: L p = 0.08 * L * f ye * d bl > 0.3 * f ye * d bl k = 0.2*(f ue /f ye 1) 0.08 L = length of column from point of maximum moment to the point of moment contraflexure (IN) L sp = strain penetration component = 0.15*f ye *d bl (IN) f ye = expected yield stress of longitudinal bars (KSI) f ue = expected tensile strength (KSI) d bl = diameter of longitudinal column bars (IN) SGS
58 Predicted Force Displacement y ~ 1/3*φ y *(L+L sp ) 2 (M, φ) ~ y *(M/M y )+ (φ  φ y )*L p *(LL p /2) where: φ y L L p L sp φ M y M F = curvature at first yield = column height = analytical plastic hinge length = strain penetration = curvature at point of interest = moment at first yield = moment associated with φ = force associated with = M / L Priestley, Calvi, Kowalsky
59 Idealized Force Displacement yi ~ 1/3*φ yi *(L+L sp ) 2 L C = yi + p ~ yi + (φ u  φ yi )*L p *(LL p /2) where: φ yi yi p L L p L sp φ u L C F p = idealized yield curvature = idealized yield displacement = plastic displacement capacity = column height = analytical plastic hinge length = strain penetration = ultimate curvature = ultimate displacement = plastic force = M p / L Priestley, Calvi, Kowalsky
60 Idealized Force  Displacement So the deformation values for the example problem are: yi = 1/3* *( ) 2 = 2.44 IN L C = ( )*33.58*( /2) = 9.62 IN where: φ yi L L sp L p φ u M p F p = /IN = 20 FT = 240 IN = 0.15*68*1.41 = IN = 0.08* = IN > 28.8 IN = /IN = M yi = M u = KIN = M p / L = / 240 = 215 KIP µ D = L C / yi = 9.62 / 2.44 =
61 Force  Displacement The idealized response for the single column example Approximate M p, φ yi and φ u Idealized Spreadsheet M p, φ yi and φ u Predicted Response from Spreadsheet calculated Mφ 61
62 Approximate Methods As with Mφ, we prefer a simplified method to check the computer results simple method to check the computer results could use the closedform AASHTO equations to start but they are developed for specific target ductility / strain limits use these approximations with due skepticism 62
63 Approximate Methods  yi For a rough check of conventional circular reinforced concrete column sections: yi ~ 1/3*φ yi *(12*L+0.15*f ye *d b ) 2 ~ L 2 / 42B o where: yi = idealized yield displacement (IN) L = contraflexure to plastic hinge distance (FT) d b = diameter of longitudinal column bar (IN) φ yi = idealized yield curvature ~ 2.25*ε ye /B o (1/IN) B o = column diameter (FT) f ye = expected yield stress (KSI) 63
64 Approximate Methods  yi For a rough check of conventional rectangular reinforced concrete column sections: yi ~ 1/3*φ yi *(12*L+0.15*f ye *d b ) 2 ~ L 2 / 45B o where: yi = idealized yield displacement (IN) L = contraflexure to plastic hinge distance (FT) d b = diameter of longitudinal column bar (IN) φ yi = idealized yield curvature ~ 2.1*ε ye /12B o (1/IN) B o = column width in direction of loading (FT) f ye = expected yield stress (KSI) 64
65 Approximate Methods  c L And for a very rough check of conventional reinforced concrete columns with L/B o > 4 : L C ~ yi + (φ u  φ yi )*L p *(12*LL p /2) ~ L 2 / 10B o where: L C = local displacement capacity (IN) L = contraflexure to plastic hinge distance (FT) L p = analytical plastic hinge length (IN) φ u = ultimate curvature ~ ε R su /12B o (1/IN) φ yi = idealized yield curvature (1/IN) B o = column diameter / width (FT) 65
66 ForceDisplacement Check Diameter, D = 48 IN => B o = 4 FT Height, L = H o = 20 FT M p ~ 54713KIN/12 = 4560 KFT (see previous check) yi ~ L 2 / 42B o = 20 2 /(42*4) = 2.4 IN v. 2.4 IN L C ~ L 2 / 10B o = 20 2 /(10*4) = 10 IN v. 9.6 IN F p = M p / L = 4560/20 = 228 KIP v. 215 KIP 66
67 Force  Displacement Idealized response for the single column example Approximate M p, yi and L C Spreadsheet calculated M p, φ yi and φ u 67
68 What about Double Curvature? Effective column height, L, is taken from the maximum moment location to the contraflexure point Then add the displacement results for each part L 1 L 2 SGS
69 What about P Effects? From equilibrium and summing moments about the base of the column: M p = F p * H o + P * Caltrans SDC Version
70 What about P Effects? The moment left to resist lateral forces becomes, M p = M p P * F P = M P / H o But when using an idealized elastic perfectlyplastic forcedisplacement relationship check (SGS method) P dl * r 0.25 * M p 70
71 What about P Effects? Adjusted response for the single column example Unadjusted for P Adjusted for P 71
72 What about P Effects? Rearranging the P limit the maximum permissible deflection for the single column example r 0.25 * M p / P dl r 0.25 * KIN / 940 K = 13.7 IN In this case, the P limit is greater than the calculated L C value With more confinement, the P limit may govern 72
73 Local Ductility v. Global Ductility Use local member displacements D L < C L µ D = L D / yi where: L D = Local member deformation demand L C = Local member deformation capacity µ D = local member displacement ductility demand yi = idealized yield deformation 73
74 Local Ductility v. Global Ductility Must remove the deformation components associated with noncolumn deformation demands Caltrans SDC Version
75 Design Example 2 IN clr. #5 4IN d = 4 FT 940 KIP 940 KIP H o = 24 FT Rigid cap and footings 20 #11 D = 48 IN Z = 32 FT 75
76 Design Example Assume that the point of contraflexure is at column midheight L 1 =L = H o / 2 L 2 = L = H o / 2 Caltrans SDC Version
77 Design Example Predict Response Use approximate methods to predict expected response Diameter, D = 48 IN => B o = 4 FT Height, H o = 24 FT so for the transverse direction, L = 12 FT P = P DL ± P EQ P EQ = (M pl + M pr ) * (1 + d / H o ) / Z why? Use P = P DL = 940 K for first iteration M p ~ 54720KIN/12 = 4560 KFT (see previous calculations) yi ~ 2 * L 2 /42B o = 2 * 12 2 /(42*4) = 1.71 IN L C ~ 2 * L 2 /10B o = 2 * 12 2 /(10*4) = 7.2 IN F p = (2*M pl + 2*M pr ) / H o ~ 4 * M p /24 = 760 KIP why? 77
78 Design Example  FBD F p M pl *(1 + d/h o ) M pr *(1 + d/h o ) d /2 L = H o / 2 M pl M pr Moment contraflexure M pl M pr Moment Diagram slope of line is the shear shear in cap beam is axial force in column 78
79 Design Example Predict Response Perform a second iteration to verify initial assumptions P EQ = (M pl +M pr )*(1+d/H o )/ Z ~ 2*54720*1.167 /12/32 ~ 332 K P = P DL ± P EQ = 940 /+ 332 = 608K and 1272K [compression] M pl ~ ( * ) * 48 3 = KIN M pr ~ ( * ) * 48 3 = KIN P EQ = (M pl + M pr )*(1 + d / H o ) / Z P EQ = ( )(1.167)/32/12 = 332 K F p = (2 * M pl + 2 * M pr ) / H o = 760 KIP 79
80 Design Example  Process Now use the refined analysis to determine the forcedisplacement response of the pier First calculation idealized Mφ Then calculate L sp and L p Then calculate the forcedisplacement for each column Then add the results of each column to find the total pier response 80
81 Design Example Refined Analysis 81
82 Design Example Refined Analysis Verify that the axial forces are reasonably close to the initial estimate P EQ = (M pl + M pr ) * (1 + d / H o ) / Z P EQ = ( )*1.167 /(12*32) ~ 314 K v. 332k P = P DL  P EQ = = 626K v. 608K close 3% P = P DL + P EQ = = 1254K v. 1272K close 2% Use the initial values since they are close 82
83 Design Example Hinge Formation Order of hinge formation and hinge failure 83
84 Design Example Displacement For the left / trailing side column: yil = 1/3* *( ) 2 = 0.92 IN L CL = ( )*28.8*( /2) = 4.92 IN where: φ yi L L sp L p φ u M p F pl = /IN (from Mφ analysis) = H o / 2 = 24 FT / 2 * 12 = 144 IN = 0.15*68*1.41 = IN = 0.08* = 25.9 IN < 2*L sp = 28.8 IN = /IN (from Mφ analysis) = KIN (from Mφ analysis) = M p / L = / 144 = 335 KIP 84
85 Design Example Displacement For the right / right side column: yir = 1/3* *( ) 2 = 0.94 IN L CR = ( )*28.8*( /2) = 4.21 IN where: φ yi L L sp L p φ u M p F pr = /IN (from Mφ analysis) = H o / 2 = 24 FT / 2 * 12 = 144 IN = 0.15*68*1.41 = IN = 0.08* = 25.9 IN < 2*L sp = 28.8 IN = /IN (from Mφ analysis) = KIN (from Mφ analysis) = M p / L = / 144 = 383 KIP 85
86 Design Example Left Column Right Column Axial compression, P Effective stiffness, (EI) eff 4.36E9 4.91E9 Plastic moment, M p Idealized yield curvature, φ yi Ultimate curvature, φ u Plastic curvature, φ p Analytical Plastic Hinge Length, L p yi (per half of column height) p (per half of column height) u (per half of column height) Plastic shear, F p
87 Design Example Combined Response Total effective lateral force F p = F pl + F pr = 335K + 383K = 718 K Idealized yield displacement yi ~ (2* yil + 2* yir ) / 2 = = 1.86 IN Ultimate displacement (first hinge failure on right) L c = 2 * L cr = 2 * 4.21 IN = 8.42 IN 87
88 Design Example Idealized Response Combined Right / Leading Column Left / Trailing Column 88
89 Design Example Refined Response Idealized force displacement for the two column pier Approximate M p, yi and L C Spreadsheet Idealized M p, φ yi and φ u 89
90 Design Example Verification The maximum deflection based on P limits r 0.25 * KIN / 940 K = 12.8 IN (per half) And the displacement ductility capacity µ D < L c / yi = 8.42 / 1.86 =
91 Capacity Design Designer dictates the bridge response (e.g., column hinge response mechanism Type I) Preclude all failure modes that would prevent the formation of the predicted forcedeflection response including: Shear failure inside and outside the plastic hinge region (not the same as analytical plastic hinge length, L p ) Columncap and columnfooting joint failure Cap beam, footing or shaft moment, shear, and axial overload / hinging Footing overturning, sliding, uplift and rocking failure Any other failure that occurs prior to reaching L C 91
92 Thank you  Questions 92
Appendix G Analytical Studies of Columns
Appendix G Analytical Studies of Columns G.1 Introduction Analytical parametric studies were performed to evaluate a number of issues related to the use of ASTM A103 steel as longitudinal and transverse
More information999 TOWN & COUNTRY ROAD ORANGE, CALIFORNIA TITLE PUSHOVER ANALYSIS EXAMPLE BY R. MATTHEWS DATE 5/21/01
DESCRIPTION Nonlinear static (pushover) analysis will be performed on a railroad bridge bent using several methods to determine its ultimate lateral deflection capability. 1. SAP2000 Nonlinear with axialmoment
More informationFlexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections
4 5000 4000 (increased d ) (increased f (increased A s or f y ) c or b) Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections Moment (kipin.) 3000 2000 1000 0 0 (basic) (A s 0.5A s ) 0.0005 0.001 0.0015
More informationEUROCODE EN SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES
Brussels, 1820 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 1 EUROCODE EN19982 SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES Basil Kolias Basic Requirements Brussels, 1820 February 2008 Dissemination of information
More informationLecture04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion
Lecture04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Design of
More informationSEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF LARGE RC CIRCULAR HOLLOW COLUMNS
SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF LARGE RC CIRCULAR HOLLOW COLUMNS Giulio RANZO 1 And M J N PRIESTLEY SUMMARY experimental study conducted on three large size specimens are reported. The test units, designed with
More informationε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram
CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case
More informationDesign of a MultiStoried RC Building
Design of a MultiStoried RC Building 16 14 14 3 C 1 B 1 C 2 B 2 C 3 B 3 C 4 13 B 15 (S 1 ) B 16 (S 2 ) B 17 (S 3 ) B 18 7 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 7 B 20 B 22 14 B 19 (S 4 ) C 10 C 11 B 23
More informationCHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE
CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE 6.1 GENERAL It shall be in accordance with JSCE Standard Specification (Design), 6.1. The collapse mechanism in statically indeterminate structures shall not be considered.
More informationCHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS
4.1. INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS A column is a vertical structural member transmitting axial compression loads with or without moments. The cross sectional dimensions of a column
More informationPerformance Modeling Strategies for Modern Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns
Performance Modeling Strategies for Modern Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns Michael P. Berry Marc O. Eberhard University of Washington Project funded by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center
More informationNonLinear Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Structures for Seismic Applications
2/18/21 NonLinear Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Structures for Seismic Applications Luis A. Montejo Assistant Professor Department of Engineering Science and Materials University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez
More informationMechanics of Materials Primer
Mechanics of Materials rimer Notation: A = area (net = with holes, bearing = in contact, etc...) b = total width of material at a horizontal section d = diameter of a hole D = symbol for diameter E = modulus
More information9.5 Compression Members
9.5 Compression Members This section covers the following topics. Introduction Analysis Development of Interaction Diagram Effect of Prestressing Force 9.5.1 Introduction Prestressing is meaningful when
More informationCivil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7
Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7 Dr. Colin Caprani, Chartered Engineer 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 1.1 Background... 3 1.2 Failure Modes... 5 1.3 Design Aspects...
More informationAutomated NonLinear Pushover Analyses of Reinforced Concrete Structures
Automated NonLinear Pushover Analyses of Reinforced Concrete Structures by Kyle Prusinski B. Science, Bradley University 2010 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University
More informationChapter 8. Shear and Diagonal Tension
Chapter 8. and Diagonal Tension 8.1. READING ASSIGNMENT Text Chapter 4; Sections 4.14.5 Code Chapter 11; Sections 11.1.1, 11.3, 11.5.1, 11.5.3, 11.5.4, 11.5.5.1, and 11.5.6 8.2. INTRODUCTION OF SHEAR
More informationME Final Exam. PROBLEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) M (x) y. z (neutral axis) beam crosssec+on. 20 kip ft. 0.2 ft. 10 ft. 0.1 ft.
ME 323  Final Exam Name December 15, 2015 Instructor (circle) PROEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) Krousgrill 11:30AM12:20PM Ghosh 2:303:20PM Gonzalez 12:301:20PM Zhao 4:305:20PM M (x) y 20 kip ft 0.2
More informationEFFECT OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT ON FAILURE MODE OF RC BRIDGE PIERS SUBJECTED TO STRONG EARTHQUAKE MOTIONS
EFFECT OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT ON FAILURE MODE OF RC BRIDGE PIERS SUBJECTED TO STRONG EARTHQUAKE MOTIONS Atsuhiko MACHIDA And Khairy H ABDELKAREEM SUMMARY Nonlinear D FEM was utilized to carry out inelastic
More informationPOSTPEAK BEHAVIOR OF FRPJACKETED REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS
POSTPEAK BEHAVIOR OF FRPJACKETED REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS  Technical Paper  Tidarut JIRAWATTANASOMKUL *1, Dawei ZHANG *2 and Tamon UEDA *3 ABSTRACT The objective of this study is to propose a new
More informationFLEXURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN METHODS FOR SRC BEAM SECTIONS WITH COMPLETE COMPOSITE ACTION
Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, Vol. 31, No., pp. 159 (8) 15 FLEXURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN METHODS FOR SRC BEAM SECTIONS WITH COMPLETE COMPOSITE ACTION ChengCheng Chen* and ChaoLin Cheng
More information1 Static Plastic Behaviour of Beams
1 Static Plastic Behaviour of Beams 1.1 Introduction Many ductile materials which are used in engineering practice have a considerable reserve capacity beyond the initial yield condition. The uniaxial
More informationCE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design  Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members
CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design  Design & Detailing Openings in RC Flexural Members Assoc Pr Tan Kiang Hwee Department Civil Engineering National In this lecture DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
More informationInfluence of cracked inertia and momentcurvature curve idealization on pushover analysis
Influence of cracked inertia and momentcurvature curve idealization on pushover analysis Vivier Aurélie, Sekkat Dayae, Montens Serge Systra, 3 avenue du Coq, 75009 Paris SUMMARY: The pushover analysis
More informationLecture08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures
Lecture08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Contents Analysis Approaches Point of Inflection Method Equivalent
More informationForceDisplacement Characterization of WellConfined Bridge Piers
ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL Title no. 101S54 TECHNICAL PAPER ForceDisplacement Characterization of WellConfined Bridge Piers by Eric M. Hines, José I. Restrepo, and Frieder Seible This paper outlines an
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)
Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of oneway ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are
More informationDETERMINATION OF DUCTILITY CAPACITY AND OTHER SECTION PROPERTIES OF TSHAPED RC WALLS IN DIRECT DISPLACEMENTBASED DESIGN
DETERMINATION OF DUCTILITY CAPACITY AND OTHER SECTION PROPERTIES OF TSHAPED RC WALLS IN DIRECT DISPLACEMENTBASED DESIGN E. Smyrou 1, T.J. Sullivan 2, M.J.N. Priestley 3 and G.M. Calvi 4 1 PhD Candidate,
More informationSERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONEWAY SLABS
CHAPTER REINFORCED CONCRETE Reinforced Concrete Design A Fundamental Approach  Fifth Edition Fifth Edition SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONEWAY SLABS A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil
More informationLecture03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads
Lecture03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com Prof.
More informationMechanical Properties of Materials
Mechanical Properties of Materials Strains Material Model Stresses Learning objectives Understand the qualitative and quantitative description of mechanical properties of materials. Learn the logic of
More informationAppendix K Design Examples
Appendix K Design Examples Example 1 * TwoSpan IGirder Bridge Continuous for Live Loads AASHTO Type IV I girder Zero Skew (a) Bridge Deck The bridge deck reinforcement using A615 rebars is shown below.
More informationLecture 15 Strain and stress in beams
Spring, 2019 ME 323 Mechanics of Materials Lecture 15 Strain and stress in beams Reading assignment: 6.1 6.2 News: Instructor: Prof. Marcial Gonzalez Last modified: 1/6/19 9:42:38 PM Beam theory (@ ME
More informationServiceability Deflection calculation
Chp6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation Deflection example Structural Design Profession is concerned with: Limit States Philosophy: Strength Limit State (safetyfracture, fatigue, overturning
More informationChapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter
Chapter 1 Materials 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter A Area of concrete crosssection C s Constant depending on the type of curing C t Creep coefficient (C t = ε sp /ε i ) C u Ultimate creep coefficient
More informationDEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8  PART 3 PROVISIONS
DEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8  PART 3 PROVISIONS Konstantinos CHRISTIDIS 1, Emmanouil VOUGIOUKAS 2 and Konstantinos TREZOS 3 ABSTRACT
More informationBending and Shear in Beams
Bending and Shear in Beams Lecture 3 5 th October 017 Contents Lecture 3 What reinforcement is needed to resist M Ed? Bending/ Flexure Section analysis, singly and doubly reinforced Tension reinforcement,
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear
Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk 1 Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular
More informationBehavior and Modeling of Existing Reinforced Concrete Columns
Behavior and Modeling of Existing Reinforced Concrete Columns Kenneth J. Elwood University of British Columbia with contributions from Jose Pincheira, Univ of Wisconsin John Wallace, UCLA Questions? What
More informationInteraction Diagram Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements
Interaction Diagram Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements Interaction Diagram  Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements Investigate the capacity for the irregular
More informationMoment redistribution of continuous composite Igirders with high strength steel
Moment redistribution of continuous composite Igirders with high strength steel * Hyun Sung Joo, 1) Jiho Moon, 2) IkHyun sung, 3) HakEun Lee 4) 1), 2), 4) School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural
More informationAppendix J. Example of Proposed Changes
Appendix J Example of Proposed Changes J.1 Introduction The proposed changes are illustrated with reference to a 200ft, single span, Washington DOT WF bridge girder with debonded strands and no skew.
More informationMECE 3321 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS CHAPTER 3
MECE 3321 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS CHAPTER 3 Samantha Ramirez TENSION AND COMPRESSION TESTS Tension and compression tests are used primarily to determine the relationship between σ avg and ε avg in any material.
More informationLecture05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement
Lecture05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Section 1: Deflections
More informationEARTHQUAKE SIMULATION TESTS OF BRIDGE COLUMN MODELS DAMAGED DURING 1995 KOBE EARTHQUAKE
EARTHQUAKE SIMULATION TESTS OF BRIDGE COLUMN MODELS DAMAGED DURING 1995 KOBE EARTHQUAKE J. Sakai 1, S. Unjoh 2 and H. Ukon 3 1 Senior Researcher, Center for Advanced Engineering Structural Assessment and
More informationChapter 5 Elastic Strain, Deflection, and Stability 1. Elastic StressStrain Relationship
Chapter 5 Elastic Strain, Deflection, and Stability Elastic StressStrain Relationship A stress in the xdirection causes a strain in the xdirection by σ x also causes a strain in the ydirection & zdirection
More informationMECHANICS OF MATERIALS Sample Problem 4.2
Sample Problem 4. SOLUTON: Based on the cross section geometry, calculate the location of the section centroid and moment of inertia. ya ( + Y Ad ) A A castiron machine part is acted upon by a knm couple.
More informationMechanics of Materials II. Chapter III. A review of the fundamental formulation of stress, strain, and deflection
Mechanics of Materials II Chapter III A review of the fundamental formulation of stress, strain, and deflection Outline Introduction Assumtions and limitations Axial loading Torsion of circular shafts
More informationComparison of Structural Models for Seismic Analysis of MultiStorey Frame Buildings
Comparison of Structural Models for Seismic Analysis of MultiStorey Frame Buildings Dj. Ladjinovic, A. Raseta, A. Radujkovic & R. Folic University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Novi Sad,
More informationSeismic Fragility Analysis of Highway Bridges. Sponsored by MidAmerica Earthquake Center Technical Report MAEC RR4 Project
Seismic Fragility Analysis of Highway Bridges Sponsored by MidAmerica Earthquake Center Technical Report MAEC RR4 Project Prepared by Howard Hwang, Jing Bo Liu, and YiHuei Chiu Center for Earthquake
More informationSabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are
More informationEFFECTS OF CONFINED CONCRETE MODELS ON SIMULATING RC COLUMNS UNDER LOWCYCLIC LOADING
13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 16, 2004 Paper No. 1498 EFFECTS OF CONFINED CONCRETE MODELS ON SIMULATING RC COLUMNS UNDER LOWCYCLIC LOADING Zongming HUANG
More informationThis Technical Note describes how the program checks column capacity or designs reinforced concrete columns when the ACI code is selected.
COMPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA DECEMBER 2001 CONCRETE FRAME DESIGN ACI31899 Technical Note This Technical Note describes how the program checks column capacity or designs reinforced
More information[5] Stress and Strain
[5] Stress and Strain Page 1 of 34 [5] Stress and Strain [5.1] Internal Stress of Solids [5.2] Design of Simple Connections (will not be covered in class) [5.3] Deformation and Strain [5.4] Hooke s Law
More informationForce Based Design Fundamentals. Ian Buckle Director Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research University of Nevada, Reno
Force Based Design Fundamentals Ian Buckle Director Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research University of Nevada, Reno Learning Outcomes Explain difference between elastic forces, actual forces
More informationAkkari, M., Duan L. "Nonlinear Analysis of Bridge Structures." Bridge Engineering Handbook. Ed. WaiFah Chen and Lian Duan Boca Raton: CRC Press,
Akkari, M., Duan. "Nonlinear Analysis of Bridge Structures." Bridge Engineering Handbook. Ed. WaiFah Chen and ian Duan Boca Raton: CRC Press, 000 36 Nonlinear Analysis of Bridge Structures Mohammed Akkari
More informationSeismic Assessment of a RC Building according to FEMA 356 and Eurocode 8
1 Seismic Assessment of a RC Building according to FEMA 356 and Eurocode 8 Ioannis P. GIANNOPOULOS 1 Key words: Pushover analysis, FEMA 356, Eurocode 8, seismic assessment, plastic rotation, limit states
More informationVTU EDUSAT PROGRAMME Lecture Notes on Design of Columns
VTU EDUSAT PROGRAMME 17 2012 Lecture Notes on Design of Columns DESIGN OF RCC STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS  10CV52 (PART B, UNIT 6) Dr. M. C. Nataraja Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Sri Jayachamarajendra
More informationVTU EDUSAT PROGRAMME Lecture Notes on Design of Columns
VTU EDUSAT PROGRAMME 17 2012 Lecture Notes on Design of Columns DESIGN OF RCC STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS  10CV52 (PART B, UNIT 6) Dr. M. C. Nataraja Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Sri Jayachamarajendra
More informationShear Failure Model for FlexureShear Critical Reinforced Concrete Columns
Shear Failure Model for FlexureShear Critical Reinforced Concrete Columns W.M. Ghannoum 1 and J.P. Moehle 2 1 Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, University
More informationCHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.
CHAPTER 5 Question Brief Explanation No. 5.1 From Fig. IBC 1613.5(3) and (4) enlarged region 1 (ASCE 7 Fig. 3 and 4) S S = 1.5g, and S 1 = 0.6g. The g term is already factored in the equations, thus
More informationTRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. TRB Webinar Program Direct Displacement Based Seismic Design of Bridges. Thursday, June 22, :003:30 PM ET
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD TRB Webinar Program Direct Displacement Based Seismic Design of Bridges Thursday, June 22, 2017 2:003:30 PM ET The Transportation Research Board has met the standards and
More informationInternational Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 9, Issue 3, March2018 ISSN
347 Pushover Analysis for Reinforced Concrete Portal Frames Gehad Abo ElFotoh, Amin Saleh Aly and Mohamed Mohamed Hussein Attabi Abstract This research provides a new methodology and a computer program
More informationENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC
ENERGY DIAGRAM ENERGY DIAGRAM w/ HYSTERETIC IMPLIED NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR STEEL STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIPS INELASTIC WORK DONE HYSTERETIC BEHAVIOR MOMENT ROTATION RELATIONSHIP IDEALIZED MOMENT ROTATION DUCTILITY
More information3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties
CHAPER 3: Reinforced Concrete Slabs and Beams 3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties Description his application calculates gross section moment of inertia neglecting reinforcement, moment of inertia
More informationChapter 4 Deflection and Stiffness
Chapter 4 Deflection and Stiffness Asst. Prof. Dr. Supakit Rooppakhun Chapter Outline Deflection and Stiffness 41 Spring Rates 42 Tension, Compression, and Torsion 43 Deflection Due to Bending 44 Beam
More informationPurpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will be on Exam 3.
ES230 STRENGTH OF MTERILS Exam 3 Study Guide Exam 3: Wednesday, March 8 th inclass Updated 3/3/17 Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will be on
More informationChapter 5 Structural Elements: The truss & beam elements
Institute of Structural Engineering Page 1 Chapter 5 Structural Elements: The truss & beam elements Institute of Structural Engineering Page 2 Chapter Goals Learn how to formulate the Finite Element Equations
More informationENG2000 Chapter 7 Beams. ENG2000: R.I. Hornsey Beam: 1
ENG2000 Chapter 7 Beams ENG2000: R.I. Hornsey Beam: 1 Overview In this chapter, we consider the stresses and moments present in loaded beams shear stress and bending moment diagrams We will also look at
More informationFailure interaction curves for combined loading involving torsion, bending, and axial loading
Failure interaction curves for combined loading involving torsion, bending, and axial loading W M Onsongo Many modern concrete structures such as elevated guideways are subjected to combined bending, torsion,
More informationChapter 5 CENTRIC TENSION OR COMPRESSION ( AXIAL LOADING )
Chapter 5 CENTRIC TENSION OR COMPRESSION ( AXIAL LOADING ) 5.1 DEFINITION A construction member is subjected to centric (axial) tension or compression if in any cross section the single distinct stress
More informationDesign of a BalancedCantilever Bridge
Design of a BalancedCantilever Bridge CL (Bridge is symmetric about CL) 0.8 L 0.2 L 0.6 L 0.2 L 0.8 L L = 80 ft Bridge Span = 2.6 L = 2.6 80 = 208 Bridge Width = 30 No. of girders = 6, Width of each girder
More informationSoilStructure Interaction in Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Frame RC Structures: Nonhomogeneous Soil Condition
ABSTRACT: SoilStructure Interaction in Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Frame RC Structures: Nonhomogeneous Soil Condition G. Dok ve O. Kırtel Res. Assist., Department of Civil Engineering, Sakarya University,
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear
Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular Beams Diagonal Tension
More informationGeneration of Biaxial Interaction Surfaces
COPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA AUGUST 2002 CONCRETE FRAE DESIGN BS 811097 Technical Note This Technical Note describes how the program checks column capacity or designs reinforced
More information3. BEAMS: STRAIN, STRESS, DEFLECTIONS
3. BEAMS: STRAIN, STRESS, DEFLECTIONS The beam, or flexural member, is frequently encountered in structures and machines, and its elementary stress analysis constitutes one of the more interesting facets
More informationNew model for Shear Failure of R/C BeamColumn Joints. Hitoshi Shiohara
New model for Shear Failure of R/ Beamolumn Joints Hitoshi Shiohara Dept. of Architectural Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 38656, Japan; PH +8(3)584659; FAX+8(3)584656; email:shiohara@arch.t.utokyo.ac.jp
More informationQUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS
QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1 STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State Hooke s law. 3. Define modular ratio,
More information4.MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS
4.MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS The diagram representing the relation between stress and strain in a given material is an important characteristic of the material. To obtain the stressstrain diagram
More informationCity, University of London Institutional Repository
City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Mergos, P.E. & Kappos, A.J. (2012). A gradual spread inelasticity model for R/C beamcolumns, accounting for flexure,
More informationProbabilistic damage control seismic design of bridges using structural reliability concept
Probabilistic damage control seismic design of bridges using structural reliability concept A. Saini Doctoral Student, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA A. Vosooghi Bridge Engineer III, Ph.D., P.E.,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING SUBJECT: CE 2252 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS UNIT: I ENERGY METHODS 1. Define: Strain Energy When an elastic body is under the action of external
More informationMarch 24, Chapter 4. Deflection and Stiffness. Dr. Mohammad Suliman Abuhaiba, PE
Chapter 4 Deflection and Stiffness 1 2 Chapter Outline Spring Rates Tension, Compression, and Torsion Deflection Due to Bending Beam Deflection Methods Beam Deflections by Superposition Strain Energy Castigliano
More informationSupplement: Statically Indeterminate Trusses and Frames
: Statically Indeterminate Trusses and Frames Approximate Analysis  In this supplement, we consider an approximate method of solving statically indeterminate trusses and frames subjected to lateral loads
More informationCE6306 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS TWO MARK QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS ACADEMIC YEAR
CE6306 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS TWO MARK QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS ACADEMIC YEAR 20142015 UNIT  1 STRESS, STRAIN AND DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS PART A 1. Define tensile stress and tensile strain. The stress induced
More informationTowards The. Design of Super Columns. Prof. AbdulQader Najmi
Towards The Design of Super Columns Prof. AbdulQader Najmi Description: Tubular Column Square or Round Filled with Concrete Provided with ULinks welded to its Walls as shown in Figure 1 Compression Specimen
More informationUNIT II SHALLOW FOUNDATION
Introduction UNIT II SHALLOW FOUNDATION A foundation is a integral part of the structure which transfer the load of the superstructure to the soil. A foundation is that member which provides support for
More informationCAPACITY DESIGN FOR TALL BUILDINGS WITH MIXED SYSTEM
13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 16, 24 Paper No. 2367 CAPACITY DESIGN FOR TALL BUILDINGS WITH MIXED SYSTEM M.UMA MAHESHWARI 1 and A.R.SANTHAKUMAR 2 SUMMARY
More information[8] Bending and Shear Loading of Beams
[8] Bending and Shear Loading of Beams Page 1 of 28 [8] Bending and Shear Loading of Beams [8.1] Bending of Beams (will not be covered in class) [8.2] Bending Strain and Stress [8.3] Shear in Straight
More informationSTRESS STRAIN AND DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS, STATES OF STRESS
1 UNIT I STRESS STRAIN AND DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS, STATES OF STRESS 1. Define: Stress When an external force acts on a body, it undergoes deformation. At the same time the body resists deformation. The
More informationPushover Seismic Analysis of Bridge Structures
Pushover Seismic Analysis of Bridge Structures Bernardo Frère Departamento de Engenharia Civil, Arquitectura e Georrecursos, Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal October
More informationRoadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.
Example on Design of Slab Bridge Design Data and Specifications Chapter 5 SUPERSTRUCTURES Superstructure consists of 10m slab, 36m box girder and 10m Tgirder all simply supported. Only the design of Slab
More information1 of 12. Law of Sines: Stress = E = G. Deformation due to Temperature: Δ
NAME: ES30 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS FINAL EXAM: FRIDAY, MAY 1 TH 4PM TO 7PM Closed book. Calculator and writing supplies allowed. Protractor and compass allowed. 180 Minute Time Limit GIVEN FORMULAE: Law
More informationMaterials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon.
Modes of Loading (1) tension (a) (2) compression (b) (3) bending (c) (4) torsion (d) and combinations of them (e) Figure 4.2 1 Standard Solution to Elastic Problems Three common modes of loading: (a) tie
More informationSTRENGTH OF MATERIALSI. Unit1. Simple stresses and strains
STRENGTH OF MATERIALSI Unit1 Simple stresses and strains 1. What is the Principle of surveying 2. Define Magnetic, True & Arbitrary Meridians. 3. Mention different types of chains 4. Differentiate between
More informationEMA 3702 Mechanics & Materials Science (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 2 Stress & Strain  Axial Loading
MA 3702 Mechanics & Materials Science (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 2 Stress & Strain  Axial Loading MA 3702 Mechanics & Materials Science Zhe Cheng (2018) 2 Stress & Strain  Axial Loading Statics
More informationCONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design  Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110
E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Job Title Member Design  Reinforced Concrete Column Effects From Structural Analysis Axial force, N (tensionve and comp +ve) (ensure >= 0) 8000kN OK Major
More information: APPLIED MECHANICS & STRENGTH OF MATERIALS COURSE CODE : 4021 COURSE CATEGORY : A PERIODS/ WEEK : 5 PERIODS/ SEMESTER : 75 CREDIT : 5 TIME SCHEDULE
COURSE TITLE : APPLIED MECHANICS & STRENGTH OF MATERIALS COURSE CODE : 4021 COURSE CATEGORY : A PERIODS/ WEEK : 5 PERIODS/ SEMESTER : 75 CREDIT : 5 TIME SCHEDULE MODULE TOPIC PERIODS 1 Simple stresses
More information