RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS
|
|
- Lesley Carson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) , Fax.: App'd by RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS In accordance with EN997:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the recommended values Retaining wall details Stem type; Propped cantilever Stem height; h stem = 5500 mm Prop height; h prop = 4000 mm Stem thickness; t stem = 500 mm Angle to rear face of stem; α = 90 deg Stem density; γ stem = 25 kn/m 3 Toe length; l toe = 2500 mm Heel length; l heel = 2500 mm Base thickness; t base = 500 mm Key position; p key = 550 mm Key depth; d key = 000 mm Key thickness; t key = 350 mm Base density; γ base = 25 kn/m 3 Height of retained soil; h ret = 5000 mm Angle of soil surface; β = 0 deg Depth of cover; d cover = 500 mm Depth of excavation; d exc = 200 mm Height of water; h water = 2500 mm Water density; γ w = 9.8 kn/m 3
2 Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) , Fax.: App'd by Surcharge Prop 88 kn/m 2 88 kn/m Retained soil properties Soil type; Soft clay Moist density; γ mr = 7 kn/m 3 Saturated density; γ sr = 7 kn/m 3 Characteristic effective shear resistance angle; φ' r.k = 2 deg Characteristic wall friction angle; δ r.k = 8 deg
3 Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) , Fax.: Base soil properties Soil type; Stiff clay Moist density; γ mb = 20 kn/m 3 Characteristic cohesion; c' b.k = 25 kn/m 2 Characteristic adhesion; a b.k = 20 kn/m 2 Characteristic effective shear resistance angle; Characteristic wall friction angle; Characteristic base friction angle; Loading details φ' b.k = 8 deg δ b.k = 2 deg δ bb.k = 4 deg Permanent surcharge load; Surcharge G = 2 kn/m 2 Variable surcharge load; Surcharge Q = 5 kn/m 2 Calculate retaining wall geometry Base length; Base height; Saturated soil height; Moist soil height; Length of surcharge load; l base = l toe + t stem + l heel = 5500 mm h base = t base + d key = 500 mm h sat = h water + d cover = 3000 mm h moist = h ret h water = 2500 mm l sur = l heel = 2500 mm Distance to vertical component; x sur_v = l base l heel / 2 = 4250 mm Effective height of wall; h eff = h base + d cover + h ret = 7000 mm Distance to horizontal component; x sur_h = h eff / 2 d key = 2500 mm Area of wall stem; A stem = h stem t stem = 2.75 m 2 Distance to vertical component; x stem = l toe + t stem / 2 = 2750 mm Area of wall base; A base = l base t base + d key t key = 3. m 2 App'd by Distance to vertical component; x base = (l base 2 t base / 2 + d key t key (p key + t key / 2)) / A base = 304 mm Area of saturated soil; A sat = h sat l heel = 7.5 m 2 Distance to vertical component; x sat_v = l base (h sat l heel 2 / 2) / A sat = 4250 mm Distance to horizontal component; x sat_h = (h sat + h base) / 3 d key = 500 mm Area of water; A water = h sat l heel = 7.5 m 2 Distance to vertical component; x water_v = l base (h sat l heel 2 / 2) / A sat = 4250 mm Distance to horizontal component; x water_h = (h sat + h base) / 3 d key = 500 mm Area of moist soil; A moist = h moist l heel = 6.25 m 2 Distance to vertical component; x moist_v = l base (h moist l heel 2 / 2) / A moist = 4250 mm Distance to horizontal component; x moist_h = (h moist (t base + h sat + h moist / 3) / 2 + (h sat + h base) ((h sat + h base)/2 d key)) / (h sat + h base + h moist / 2) = 920 mm Area of base soil; A pass = d cover l toe =.25 m 2 Distance to vertical component; x pass_v = l base (d cover l toe (l base l toe / 2)) / A pass = 250 mm Distance to horizontal component; x pass_h = (d cover + h base) / 3 d key = 333 mm Area of excavated base soil; A exc = h pass l toe = 0.75 m 2 Distance to vertical component; x exc_v = l base (h pass l toe (l base l toe / 2)) / A exc = 250 mm Distance to horizontal component; x exc_h = (h pass + h base) / 3 d key = 400 mm
4 Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) , Fax.: Partial factors on actions Table A.3 Combination Permanent unfavourable action; γ G =.35 Permanent favourable action; γ Gf =.00 Variable unfavourable action; γ Q =.50 Variable favourable action; γ Qf = 0.00 Partial factors for soil parameters Table A.4 Combination Angle of shearing resistance; γ φ' =.00 Effective cohesion; γ c' =.00 Weight density; γ γ =.00 App'd by Retained soil properties Design effective shear resistance angle; Design wall friction angle; φ' r.d = atan(tan(φ' r.k) / γ φ') = 2 deg δ r.d = atan(tan(δ r.k) / γ φ') = 8 deg Base soil properties Design effective shear resistance angle; φ' b.d = atan(tan(φ' b.k) / γ φ') = 8 deg Design wall friction angle; δ b.d = atan(tan(δ b.k) / γ φ') = 2 deg Design base friction angle; δ bb.d = atan(tan(δ bb.k) / γ φ') = 4 deg Design effective cohesion; c' b.d = c' b.k / γ c' = 25 kn/m 2 Design adhesion; a b.d = a b.k / γ c' = 20 kn/m 2 Using Coulomb theory Active pressure coefficient; K A = sin(α + φ' r.d) 2 / (sin(α) 2 sin(α δ r.d) [ + [sin(φ' r.d + δ r.d) sin(φ' r.d β) / (sin(α δ r.d) sin(α + β))]] 2 ) = 0.60 Passive pressure coefficient; K P = sin(90 φ' b.d) 2 / (sin(90 + δ b.d) [ [sin(φ' b.d + δ b.d) sin(φ' b.d) / (sin(90 + δ b.d))]] 2 ) = Bearing pressure check Vertical forces on wall Wall stem; F stem = γ G A stem γ stem = 92.8 kn/m Wall base; F base = γ G A base γ base = 04.6 kn/m Surcharge load; F sur_v = (γ G Surcharge G + γ Q Surcharge Q) l heel = 96.8 kn/m Saturated retained soil; F sat_v = γ G A sat (γ sr γ w) = 72.8 kn/m Water; F water_v = γ G A water γ w = 99.3 kn/m Moist retained soil; F moist_v = γ G A moist γ mr = 43.4 kn/m Base soil; F pass_v = γ G A pass γ mb = 33.8 kn/m Total; F total_v = F stem + F base + F sat_v + F moist_v + F pass_v + F water_v + F sur_v = kn/m Horizontal forces on wall Surcharge load; F sur_h = K A cos(δ r.d) (γ G Surcharge G + γ Q Surcharge Q) h eff = 6.2 kn/m Saturated retained soil; F sat_h = γ G K A cos(δ r.d) (γ sr γ w) (h sat + h base) 2 / 2 = 58.5 kn/m Water; F water_h = γ G γ w (h water + d cover + h base) 2 / 2 = 34. kn/m
5 Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) , Fax.: App'd by Moist retained soil; F moist_h = γ G K A cos(δ r.d) γ mr ((h eff h sat h base) 2 / 2 + (h eff h sat Total; Moments on wall Wall stem; Wall base; Surcharge load; Saturated retained soil; Water; Moist retained soil; Base soil; h base) (h sat + h base)) = 96.3 kn/m F total_h = F sat_h + F moist_h + F water_h + F sur_h = 550. kn/m M stem = F stem x stem = knm/m M base = F base x base = 38. knm/m M sur = F sur_v x sur_v F sur_h x sur_h = 8.2 knm/m M sat = F sat_v x sat_v F sat_h x sat_h = knm/m M water = F water_v x water_v F water_h x water_h = 355. knm/m M moist = F moist_v x moist_v F moist_h x moist_h = knm/m M pass = F pass_v x pass_v = 42.2 knm/m Total; M total = M stem + M base + M sat + M moist + M pass + M water + M sur = 49.6 Check bearing pressure knm/m Maximum friction force; Maximum base soil resistance; F friction_max = F total_v tan(δ bb.d) = 60.4 kn/m F pass_h_max = γ Gf K P cos(δ b.d) γ mb (d cover + h base) 2 / 2 = 99.6 kn/m Base soil resistance; F pass_h = min(max((m total + F total_h (h prop + t base) + F friction_max (h prop + t base) F total_v l base / 2) / (x pass_h h prop t base), 0 kn/m), F pass_h_max) = 0 kn/m Propping force; F prop_stem = min((f total_v l base / 2 M total) / (h prop + t base), F total_h) = 6.8 kn/m Friction force; F friction = F total_h F pass_h F prop_stem = kn/m Moment from propping force; M prop = F prop_stem (h prop + t base) = 278. knm/m Distance to reaction; x = (M total + M prop) / F total_v = 2750 mm Eccentricity of reaction; e = x l base / 2 = 0 mm Loaded length of base; l load = l base = 5500 mm Bearing pressure at toe; q toe = F total_v / l base = 7 kn/m 2 Bearing pressure at heel; q heel = F total_v / l base = 7 kn/m 2 Effective overburden pressure; q = max((t base + d cover) γ mb (t base + d cover + h water) γ w, 0 kn/m 2 ) = 0 kn/m 2 Design effective overburden pressure; q' = q / γ γ = 0 kn/m 2 Bearing resistance factors; N q = Exp(π tan(φ' b.d)) (tan(45 deg + φ' b.d / 2)) 2 = N c = (N q ) cot(φ' b.d) = 3.04 N γ = 2 (N q ) tan(φ' b.d) = Foundation shape factors; s q = s γ = s c = Load inclination factors; H = F total_h F prop_stem F friction = 0 kn/m V = F total_v = kn/m m = 2 i q = [ H / (V + l load c' b.d cot(φ' b.d))] m =
6 Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) , Fax.: Net ultimate bearing capacity; App'd by i γ = [ H / (V + l load c' b.d cot(φ' b.d))] (m + ) = i c = i q ( i q) / (N c tan(φ' b.d)) = n f = c' b.d N c s c i c + q' N q s q i q (γ mb γ w) l load N γ s γ i γ = 405. kn/m 2 Factor of safety; FoS bp = n f / max(q toe, q heel) = Partial factors on actions Table A.3 Combination 2 Permanent unfavourable action; γ G =.00 Permanent favourable action; γ Gf =.00 Variable unfavourable action; γ Q =.30 Variable favourable action; γ Qf = 0.00 Partial factors for soil parameters Table A.4 Combination 2 Angle of shearing resistance; γ φ' =.25 Effective cohesion; γ c' =.25 Weight density; γ γ =.00 PASS Allowable bearing pressure exceeds maximum applied bearing pressure Retained soil properties Design effective shear resistance angle; Design wall friction angle; φ' r.d = atan(tan(φ' r.k) / γ φ') = 9.7 deg δ r.d = atan(tan(δ r.k) / γ φ') = 6.4 deg Base soil properties Design effective shear resistance angle; φ' b.d = atan(tan(φ' b.k) / γ φ') = 4.6 deg Design wall friction angle; δ b.d = atan(tan(δ b.k) / γ φ') = 9.7 deg Design base friction angle; δ bb.d = atan(tan(δ bb.k) / γ φ') =.3 deg Design effective cohesion; c' b.d = c' b.k / γ c' = 20 kn/m 2 Design adhesion; a b.d = a b.k / γ c' = 6 kn/m 2 Using Coulomb theory Active pressure coefficient; K A = sin(α + φ' r.d) 2 / (sin(α) 2 sin(α δ r.d) [ + [sin(φ' r.d + δ r.d) sin(φ' r.d β) / (sin(α δ r.d) sin(α + β))]] 2 ) = 0.66 Passive pressure coefficient; K P = sin(90 φ' b.d) 2 / (sin(90 + δ b.d) [ [sin(φ' b.d + δ b.d) sin(φ' b.d) / (sin(90 + δ b.d))]] 2 ) = Bearing pressure check Vertical forces on wall Wall stem; Wall base; Surcharge load; Saturated retained soil; Water; Moist retained soil; Base soil; F stem = γ G A stem γ stem = 68.8 kn/m F base = γ G A base γ base = 77.5 kn/m F sur_v = (γ G Surcharge G + γ Q Surcharge Q) l heel = 78.8 kn/m F sat_v = γ G A sat (γ sr γ w) = 53.9 kn/m F water_v = γ G A water γ w = 73.6 kn/m F moist_v = γ G A moist γ mr = 06.3 kn/m F pass_v = γ G A pass γ mb = 25 kn/m
7 Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) , Fax.: App'd by Total; F total_v = F stem + F base + F sat_v + F moist_v + F pass_v + F water_v + F sur_v = Horizontal forces on wall kn/m Surcharge load; F sur_h = K A cos(δ r.d) (γ G Surcharge G + γ Q Surcharge Q) h eff = Saturated retained soil; Water; 44.9 kn/m F sat_h = γ G K A cos(δ r.d) (γ sr γ w) (h sat + h base) 2 / 2 = 47.8 kn/m F water_h = γ G γ w (h water + d cover + h base) 2 / 2 = 99.3 kn/m Moist retained soil; F moist_h = γ G K A cos(δ r.d) γ mr ((h eff h sat h base) 2 / 2 + (h eff h sat Total; Moments on wall Wall stem; Wall base; Surcharge load; Saturated retained soil; Water; Moist retained soil; Base soil; h base) (h sat + h base)) = 60.6 kn/m F total_h = F sat_h + F moist_h + F water_h + F sur_h = kn/m M stem = F stem x stem = 89. knm/m M base = F base x base = knm/m M sur = F sur_v x sur_v F sur_h x sur_h = 27.6 knm/m M sat = F sat_v x sat_v F sat_h x sat_h = knm/m M water = F water_v x water_v F water_h x water_h = 263 knm/m M moist = F moist_v x moist_v F moist_h x moist_h = 43.2 knm/m M pass = F pass_v x pass_v = 3.3 knm/m Total; M total = M stem + M base + M sat + M moist + M pass + M water + M sur = Check bearing pressure Maximum friction force; Maximum base soil resistance; knm/m F friction_max = F total_v tan(δ bb.d) = 96.5 kn/m F pass_h_max = γ Gf K P cos(δ b.d) γ mb (d cover + h base) 2 / 2 = 8.9 kn/m Base soil resistance; F pass_h = min(max((m total + F total_h (h prop + t base) + F friction_max (h prop + t base) F total_v l base / 2) / (x pass_h h prop t base), 0 kn/m), F pass_h_max) = 0 kn/m Propping force; F prop_stem = min((f total_v l base / 2 M total) / (h prop + t base), F total_h) = 64.6 Friction force; Moment from propping force; Distance to reaction; Eccentricity of reaction; kn/m F friction = F total_h F pass_h F prop_stem = 388. kn/m M prop = F prop_stem (h prop + t base) = knm/m x = (M total + M prop) / F total_v = 2750 mm e = x l base / 2 = 0 mm Loaded length of base; l load = l base = 5500 mm Bearing pressure at toe; q toe = F total_v / l base = 88 kn/m 2 Bearing pressure at heel; q heel = F total_v / l base = 88 kn/m 2 Effective overburden pressure; q = max((t base + d cover) γ mb (t base + d cover + h water) γ w, 0 kn/m 2 ) = 0 kn/m 2 Design effective overburden pressure; q' = q / γ γ = 0 kn/m 2 Bearing resistance factors; N q = Exp(π tan(φ' b.d)) (tan(45 deg + φ' b.d / 2)) 2 = N c = (N q ) cot(φ' b.d) = 0.7 N γ = 2 (N q ) tan(φ' b.d) =.447
8 Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) , Fax.: Foundation shape factors; s q = Load inclination factors; Net ultimate bearing capacity; s γ = s c = H = F total_h F prop_stem F friction = 0 kn/m V = F total_v = kn/m m = 2 i q = [ H / (V + l load c' b.d cot(φ' b.d))] m = App'd by i γ = [ H / (V + l load c' b.d cot(φ' b.d))] (m + ) = i c = i q ( i q) / (N c tan(φ' b.d)) = n f = c' b.d N c s c i c + q' N q s q i q (γ mb γ w) l load N γ s γ i γ = kn/m 2 Factor of safety; FoS bp = n f / max(q toe, q heel) = PASS Allowable bearing pressure exceeds maximum applied bearing pressure RETAINING WALL DESIGN In accordance with EN992:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated January 2008 and the recommended values Concrete details Table 3. Strength and deformation characteristics for concrete Concrete strength class; C40/50 Characteristic compressive cylinder strength; f ck = 40 N/mm 2 Characteristic compressive cube strength; f ck,cube = 50 N/mm 2 Mean value of compressive cylinder strength; f cm = f ck + 8 N/mm 2 = 48 N/mm 2 Mean value of axial tensile strength; f ctm = 0.3 N/mm 2 (f ck / N/mm 2 ) 2/3 = 3.5 N/mm 2 5% fractile of axial tensile strength; f ctk,0.05 = 0.7 f ctm = 2.5 N/mm 2 Secant modulus of elasticity of concrete; E cm = 22 kn/mm 2 (f cm / 0 N/mm 2 ) 0.3 = N/mm 2 Partial factor for concrete Table 2.N; γ C =.50 Compressive strength coefficient cl.3..6(); α cc =.00 Design compressive concrete strength exp.3.5; f cd = α cc f ck / γ C = 26.7 N/mm 2 Maximum aggregate size; Reinforcement details h agg = 20 mm Characteristic yield strength of reinforcement; f yk = 500 N/mm 2 Modulus of elasticity of reinforcement; E s = N/mm 2 Partial factor for reinforcing steel Table 2.N; γ S =.5 Design yield strength of reinforcement; f yd = f yk / γ S = 435 N/mm 2 Cover to reinforcement Front face of stem; Rear face of stem; Top face of base; Bottom face of base; Check stem design for maximum moment Depth of section; c sf = 40 mm c sr = 50 mm c bt = 50 mm c bb = 75 mm h = 500 mm
9 Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) , Fax.: Rectangular section in flexure 6. Design bending moment; Depth to tension reinforcement; Lever arm; Depth of neutral axis; M = 04.8 knm/m d = h c sr φ sr / 2 = 442 mm K = M / (d 2 f ck) = 0.03 K' = 0.96 App'd by K' > K No compression reinforcement is required z = min( ( 3.53 K) 0.5, 0.95) d = 420 mm x = 2.5 (d z) = 55 mm Area of tension reinforcement required; A sr.req = M / (f yd z) = 574 mm 2 /m Tension reinforcement provided; c/c Area of tension reinforcement provided; A sr.prov = π φ sr 2 / (4 s sr) = 005 mm 2 /m Minimum area of reinforcement exp.9.n; A sr.min = max(0.26 f ctm / f yk, 0.003) d = 806 mm 2 /m Maximum area of reinforcement cl.9.2..(3); A sr.max = 0.04 h = mm 2 /m Crack control 7.3 Limiting crack width; max(a sr.req, A sr.min) / A sr.prov = PASS Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required w max = 0.3 mm Variable load factor EN990 Table A.; ψ 2 = 0.6 Serviceability bending moment; M sls = 7.7 knm/m Tensile stress in reinforcement; σ s = M sls / (A sr.prov z) = 69.8 N/mm 2 Load duration; Long term Load duration factor; k t = 0.4 Effective area of concrete in tension; A c.eff = min(2.5 (h d), (h x) / 3, h / 2) = mm 2 /m Mean value of concrete tensile strength; f ct.eff = f ctm = 3.5 N/mm 2 Reinforcement ratio; ρ p.eff = A sr.prov / A c.eff = Modular ratio; α e = E s / E cm = Bond property coefficient; k = 0.8 Strain distribution coefficient; k 2 = 0.5 Maximum crack spacing exp.7.; Maximum crack width exp.7.8; Rectangular section in shear 6.2 Design shear force; k 3 = 3.4 k 4 = s r.max = k 3 c sr + k k 2 k 4 φ sr / ρ p.eff = 562 mm w k = s r.max max(σ s k t (f ct.eff / ρ p.eff) ( + α e ρ p.eff), 0.6 σ s) / E s w k = mm w k / w max = PASS Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width V = 95.7 kn/m C Rd,c = 0.8 / γ C = 0.20 k = min( + (200 mm / d), 2) =.673 Longitudinal reinforcement ratio; ρ l = min(a sr.prov / d, 0.02) = v min = N /2 /mm k 3/2 f ck 0.5 = N/mm 2
10 Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) , Fax.: Design shear resistance exp.6.2a & 6.2b; Rectangular section in flexure 6. Design bending moment; Depth to tension reinforcement; Lever arm; Depth of neutral axis; App'd by V Rd.c = max(c Rd.c k (00 N 2 /mm 4 ρ l f ck) /3, v min) d V Rd.c = 2.7 kn/m V / V Rd.c = PASS Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force M = 72.6 knm/m d = h c sf φ sx φ sf / 2 = 442 mm K = M / (d 2 f ck) = K' = 0.96 K' > K No compression reinforcement is required z = min( ( 3.53 K) 0.5, 0.95) d = 420 mm x = 2.5 (d z) = 55 mm Area of tension reinforcement required; A sf.req = M / (f yd z) = 398 mm 2 /m Tension reinforcement provided; c/c Area of tension reinforcement provided; A sf.prov = π φ sf 2 / (4 s sf) = 894 mm 2 /m Minimum area of reinforcement exp.9.n; A sf.min = max(0.26 f ctm / f yk, 0.003) d = 806 mm 2 /m Maximum area of reinforcement cl.9.2..(3); A sf.max = 0.04 h = mm 2 /m Crack control 7.3 Limiting crack width; max(a sf.req, A sf.min) / A sf.prov = PASS Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required w max = 0.3 mm Variable load factor EN990 Table A.; ψ 2 = 0.6 Serviceability bending moment; M sls = 49.5 knm/m Tensile stress in reinforcement; σ s = M sls / (A sf.prov z) = 3.8 N/mm 2 Load duration; Long term Load duration factor; k t = 0.4 Effective area of concrete in tension; A c.eff = min(2.5 (h d), (h x) / 3, h / 2) = mm 2 /m Mean value of concrete tensile strength; f ct.eff = f ctm = 3.5 N/mm 2 Reinforcement ratio; ρ p.eff = A sf.prov / A c.eff = Modular ratio; α e = E s / E cm = Bond property coefficient; k = 0.8 Strain distribution coefficient; k 2 = 0.5 Maximum crack spacing exp.7.; Maximum crack width exp.7.8; k 3 = 3.4 k 4 = s r.max = k 3 c sf + k k 2 k 4 φ sf / ρ p.eff = 577 mm w k = s r.max max(σ s k t (f ct.eff / ρ p.eff) ( + α e ρ p.eff), 0.6 σ s) / E s w k = 0.27 mm w k / w max = PASS Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width Rectangular section in shear 6.2 Design shear force; V = 95.7 kn/m
11 Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) , Fax.: C Rd,c = 0.8 / γ C = 0.20 k = min( + (200 mm / d), 2) =.673 Longitudinal reinforcement ratio; ρ l = min(a sf.prov / d, 0.02) = Design shear resistance exp.6.2a & 6.2b; App'd by v min = N /2 /mm k 3/2 f ck 0.5 = N/mm 2 V Rd.c = max(c Rd.c k (00 N 2 /mm 4 ρ l f ck) /3, v min) d V Rd.c = 2.7 kn/m V / V Rd.c = Horizontal reinforcement parallel to face of stem 9.6 PASS Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force Minimum area of reinforcement cl.9.6.3(); A sx.req = max(0.25 A sr.prov, 0.00 t stem) = 500 mm 2 /m Maximum spacing of reinforcement cl.9.6.3(2); Transverse reinforcement provided; s sx_max = 400 mm c/c Area of transverse reinforcement provided; A sx.prov = π φ sx 2 / (4 s sx) = 393 mm 2 /m FAIL Area of reinforcement provided is less than area of reinforcement required Check base design Depth of section; h = 500 mm Rectangular section in flexure 6. Design bending moment at toe; Depth to tension reinforcement; Lever arm; Depth of neutral axis; M = knm/m d = h c bb φ bb / 2 = 45 mm K = M / (d 2 f ck) = K' = 0.96 K' > K No compression reinforcement is required z = min( ( 3.53 K) 0.5, 0.95) d = 394 mm x = 2.5 (d z) = 52 mm Area of tension reinforcement required; A bb.req = M / (f yd z) = 579 mm 2 /m Tension reinforcement provided; c/c Area of tension reinforcement provided; A bb.prov = π φ bb 2 / (4 s bb) = 253 mm 2 /m Minimum area of reinforcement exp.9.n; A bb.min = max(0.26 f ctm / f yk, 0.003) d = 757 mm 2 /m Maximum area of reinforcement cl.9.2..(3); A bb.max = 0.04 h = mm 2 /m Crack control 7.3 Limiting crack width; max(a bb.req, A bb.min) / A bb.prov = PASS Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required w max = 0.3 mm Variable load factor EN990 Table A.; ψ 2 = 0.6 Serviceability bending moment; M sls = 89.6 knm/m Tensile stress in reinforcement; σ s = M sls / (A bb.prov z) = 9.4 N/mm 2 Load duration; Long term Load duration factor; k t = 0.4 Effective area of concrete in tension; A c.eff = min(2.5 (h d), (h x) / 3, h / 2) = mm 2 /m Mean value of concrete tensile strength; f ct.eff = f ctm = 3.5 N/mm 2 Reinforcement ratio; ρ p.eff = A bb.prov / A c.eff = 0.07
12 Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) , Fax.: Modular ratio; α e = E s / E cm = Bond property coefficient; k = 0.8 Strain distribution coefficient; k 2 = 0.5 Maximum crack spacing exp.7.; Maximum crack width exp.7.8; Rectangular section in shear 6.2 Design shear force; k 3 = 3.4 k 4 = App'd by s r.max = k 3 c bb + k k 2 k 4 φ bb / ρ p.eff = 457 mm w k = s r.max max(σ s k t (f ct.eff / ρ p.eff) ( + α e ρ p.eff), 0.6 σ s) / E s w k = 0.25 mm w k / w max = PASS Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width V = 26.6 kn/m C Rd,c = 0.8 / γ C = 0.20 k = min( + (200 mm / d), 2) =.694 Longitudinal reinforcement ratio; ρ l = min(a bb.prov / d, 0.02) = Design shear resistance exp.6.2a & 6.2b; Rectangular section in flexure 6. Design bending moment at heel; Depth to tension reinforcement; Lever arm; Depth of neutral axis; v min = N /2 /mm k 3/2 f ck 0.5 = N/mm 2 V Rd.c = max(c Rd.c k (00 N 2 /mm 4 ρ l f ck) /3, v min) d V Rd.c = 244. kn/m V / V Rd.c = PASS Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force M = 70.6 knm/m d = h c bt φ bt / 2 = 440 mm K = M / (d 2 f ck) = K' = 0.96 K' > K No compression reinforcement is required z = min( ( 3.53 K) 0.5, 0.95) d = 48 mm x = 2.5 (d z) = 55 mm Area of tension reinforcement required; A bt.req = M / (f yd z) = 939 mm 2 /m Tension reinforcement provided; c/c Area of tension reinforcement provided; A bt.prov = π φ bt 2 / (4 s bt) = 795 mm 2 /m Minimum area of reinforcement exp.9.n; A bt.min = max(0.26 f ctm / f yk, 0.003) d = 803 mm 2 /m Maximum area of reinforcement cl.9.2..(3); A bt.max = 0.04 h = mm 2 /m Crack control 7.3 Limiting crack width; max(a bt.req, A bt.min) / A bt.prov = PASS Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required w max = 0.3 mm Variable load factor EN990 Table A.; ψ 2 = 0.6 Serviceability bending moment; M sls = 56.3 knm/m Tensile stress in reinforcement; σ s = M sls / (A bt.prov z) = N/mm 2 Load duration; Long term
13 Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) , Fax.: Load duration factor; k t = 0.4 App'd by Effective area of concrete in tension; A c.eff = min(2.5 (h d), (h x) / 3, h / 2) = mm 2 /m Mean value of concrete tensile strength; f ct.eff = f ctm = 3.5 N/mm 2 Reinforcement ratio; ρ p.eff = A bt.prov / A c.eff = 0.02 Modular ratio; α e = E s / E cm = Bond property coefficient; k = 0.8 Strain distribution coefficient; k 2 = 0.5 Maximum crack spacing exp.7.; Maximum crack width exp.7.8; Rectangular section in shear 6.2 Design shear force; k 3 = 3.4 k 4 = s r.max = k 3 c bt + k k 2 k 4 φ bt / ρ p.eff = 45 mm w k = s r.max max(σ s k t (f ct.eff / ρ p.eff) ( + α e ρ p.eff), 0.6 σ s) / E s w k = mm w k / w max = PASS Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width V = 73.8 kn/m C Rd,c = 0.8 / γ C = 0.20 k = min( + (200 mm / d), 2) =.674 Longitudinal reinforcement ratio; ρ l = min(a bt.prov / d, 0.02) = Design shear resistance exp.6.2a & 6.2b; v min = N /2 /mm k 3/2 f ck 0.5 = N/mm 2 V Rd.c = max(c Rd.c k (00 N 2 /mm 4 ρ l f ck) /3, v min) d V Rd.c = kn/m V / V Rd.c = Secondary transverse reinforcement to base 9.3 Minimum area of reinforcement cl.9.3..(2); A bx.req = 0.2 A bb.prov = 503 mm 2 /m Maximum spacing of reinforcement cl.9.3..(3); s bx_max = 450 mm Transverse reinforcement provided; PASS Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force c/c Area of transverse reinforcement provided; A bx.prov = π φ bx 2 / (4 s bx) = 565 mm 2 /m Check key design Depth of section; Rectangular section in flexure 6. Design bending moment at key; Depth to tension reinforcement; Lever arm; Depth of neutral axis; PASS Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required h = 350 mm M = 7.7 knm/m d = h c bb φ k / 2 = 269 mm K = M / (d 2 f ck) = K' = 0.96 K' > K No compression reinforcement is required z = min( ( 3.53 K) 0.5, 0.95) d = 256 mm x = 2.5 (d z) = 34 mm Area of tension reinforcement required; A k.req = M / (f yd z) = 60 mm 2 /m
14 Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) , Fax.: Tension reinforcement provided; c/c Area of tension reinforcement provided; A k.prov = π φ k 2 / (4 s k) = 565 mm 2 /m App'd by Minimum area of reinforcement exp.9.n; A k.min = max(0.26 f ctm / f yk, 0.003) d = 49 mm 2 /m Maximum area of reinforcement cl.9.2..(3); A k.max = 0.04 h = 4000 mm 2 /m Crack control 7.3 Limiting crack width; max(a k.req, A k.min) / A k.prov = PASS Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required w max = 0.3 mm Variable load factor EN990 Table A.; ψ 2 = 0.6 Serviceability bending moment; M sls = 0 knm/m Tensile stress in reinforcement; σ s = M sls / (A k.prov z) = 0 N/mm 2 Load duration; Long term Load duration factor; k t = 0.4 Effective area of concrete in tension; A c.eff = min(2.5 (h d), (h x) / 3, h / 2) = mm 2 /m Mean value of concrete tensile strength; f ct.eff = f ctm = 3.5 N/mm 2 Reinforcement ratio; ρ p.eff = A k.prov / A c.eff = Modular ratio; α e = E s / E cm = Bond property coefficient; k = 0.8 Strain distribution coefficient; k 2 = 0.5 Maximum crack spacing exp.7.; k 3 = 3.4 k 4 = s r.max = k 3 c bb + k k 2 k 4 φ k / ρ p.eff = 635 mm Maximum crack width exp.7.8; w k = s r.max max(σ s k t (f ct.eff / ρ p.eff) ( + α e ρ p.eff), 0.6 σ s) / E s w k = 0 mm w k / w max = 0 PASS Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width Rectangular section in shear 6.2 Design shear force; V = 40 kn/m C Rd,c = 0.8 / γ C = 0.20 k = min( + (200 mm / d), 2) =.862 Longitudinal reinforcement ratio; ρ l = min(a k.prov / d, 0.02) = v min = N /2 /mm k 3/2 f 0.5 ck = N/mm 2 Design shear resistance exp.6.2a & 6.2b; V Rd.c = max(c Rd.c k (00 N 2 /mm 4 ρ l f ck) /3, v min) d V Rd.c = 5.3 kn/m V / V Rd.c = PASS Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force
15 Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) , Fax.: App'd by
RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS
GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 Retaining wall Analysis & Design (EN997:2004 App'd by RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS In accordance with
More informationDESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL
DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL When the height of the retaining wall exceeds about 6 m, the thickness of the stem and heel slab works out to be sufficiently large and the design becomes
More informationServiceability Limit States
Serviceability Limit States www.eurocode2.info 1 Outline Crack control and limitations Crack width calculations Crack width calculation example Crack width calculation problem Restraint cracking Deflection
More informationDESIGN OF STAIRCASE. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
DESIGN OF STAIRCASE Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email: iznisyahrizal@utm.my Introduction T N T G N G R h Flight Span, L Landing T = Thread
More informationDesign of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602
Design of wall panel according to EN 160 Example 3: Wall panel with wind load 1.1 Issue Design of a wall panel at an industrial building Materials with a compressive strength 3,5, density class 500, welded
More informationDesign of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN
Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN 1992-1-1 and EN 1992-2 Validation Examples Brno, 21.10.2010 IDEA RS s.r.o. South Moravian Innovation Centre, U Vodarny 2a, 616 00 BRNO tel.: +420-511
More informationGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RETAINING STRUCTURES
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE 07 3.0 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RETAINING STRUCTURES LEARNING OUTCOMES Learning outcomes: At the end of this lecture/week the students would be able to: Understand
More informationProject: Cantilever Steel SheetPile Retaining Wall Analysis & Design, Free Earth Support In accordance Eurocode 7.
App'd by Construction Stages Name Term Objects present in this stage Stage 1 Long Wall 1 (Generated) (Generated) On retained side: Ground 1 (Generated), Borehole 1 (Generated), On excavated side: Excavation
More informationTower Cranes & Foundations The Interface & CIRIA C654 Stuart Marchand C.Eng. FICE FIStructE Director Wentworth House Partnership
Tower Cranes & Foundations The Interface & CIRIA C654 Stuart Marchand C.Eng. FICE FIStructE Director Wentworth House Partnership EXAMPLES OF TOWER CRANE FOUNDATION TYPES Rail mounted Pad Base Piled Base
More informationBending and Shear in Beams
Bending and Shear in Beams Lecture 3 5 th October 017 Contents Lecture 3 What reinforcement is needed to resist M Ed? Bending/ Flexure Section analysis, singly and doubly reinforced Tension reinforcement,
More informationDesign of RC Retaining Walls
Lecture - 09 Design of RC Retaining Walls By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Retaining Walls Terms Related to Retaining Walls Types of Retaining
More informationRETAINING WALL LOADS: Horizontal Equivalent Fluid Pressure = pcf. (Load Case = Soil)
QuickWall 8.0 - RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ================================================================================ Job ID : Job Description : Designed By : ================================================================================
More information- Rectangular Beam Design -
Semester 1 2016/2017 - Rectangular Beam Design - Department of Structures and Material Engineering Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Introduction The purposes
More information10/14/2011. Types of Shear Failure. CASE 1: a v /d 6. a v. CASE 2: 2 a v /d 6. CASE 3: a v /d 2
V V Types o Shear Failure a v CASE 1: a v /d 6 d V a v CASE 2: 2 a v /d 6 d V a v CASE 3: a v /d 2 d V 1 Shear Resistance Concrete compression d V cz = Shear orce in the compression zone (20 40%) V a =
More informationClayey sand (SC)
Pile Bearing Capacity Analysis / Verification Input data Project Task : PROJECT: "NEW STEAM BOILER U-5190 Part : A-1 Descript. : The objective of this Analysis is the Pile allowable bearing Capacity Analysis
More informationO Dr Andrew Bond (Geocentrix)
DECODING EUROCODES 2 + 7: DESIGN SG OF FOUNDATIONS O Dr Andrew Bond (Geocentrix) Outline of talk April 2010: the death of British Standards? UK implementation of Eurocodes Verification of strength: limit
More informationR.C. FOUNDATION ANALYSIS, DETAILS & DETAILING
1 R.C. FOUNDATION ANALYSIS, DETAILS & DETAILING By 0 Dec 016 PAD FOOTING ANALYSIS & DESIGN (BS8110) FOR PROPOSED PIGS BUILDING FOR PAD FOOTING ANALYSIS AND DESIGN (BS8110-1:1997) 100 450 450 Pad footing
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet
E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC N/A) 35 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of longitudinal steel, f y 460 N/mm 2 Yield
More informationSTEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN :2005)
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for App'd by STEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN1993-1-1:2005) In accordance with EN1993-1-1:2005 incorporating Corrigenda February 2006 and April details type;
More informationPractical Design to Eurocode 2. The webinar will start at 12.30
Practical Design to Eurocode 2 The webinar will start at 12.30 Course Outline Lecture Date Speaker Title 1 21 Sep Jenny Burridge Introduction, Background and Codes 2 28 Sep Charles Goodchild EC2 Background,
More informationAnnex - R C Design Formulae and Data
The design formulae and data provided in this Annex are for education, training and assessment purposes only. They are based on the Hong Kong Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013 (HKCP-2013).
More informationDesign of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge
Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge CL (Bridge is symmetric about CL) 0.8 L 0.2 L 0.6 L 0.2 L 0.8 L L = 80 ft Bridge Span = 2.6 L = 2.6 80 = 208 Bridge Width = 30 No. of girders = 6, Width of each girder
More informationDelhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:
Serial : IG1_CE_G_Concrete Structures_100818 Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: E-mail: info@madeeasy.in Ph: 011-451461 CLASS TEST 018-19 CIVIL ENGINEERING
More informationCRACK FORMATION AND CRACK PROPAGATION INTO THE COMPRESSION ZONE ON REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM STRUCTURES
S. Kakay et al. Int. J. Comp. Meth. and Exp. Meas. Vol. 5 No. (017) 116 14 CRACK FORMATION AND CRACK PROPAGATION INTO THE COMPRESSION ZONE ON REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM STRUCTURES SAMDAR KAKAY DANIEL BÅRDSEN
More information9.5 Compression Members
9.5 Compression Members This section covers the following topics. Introduction Analysis Development of Interaction Diagram Effect of Prestressing Force 9.5.1 Introduction Prestressing is meaningful when
More informationChapter (7) Lateral Earth Pressure
Chapter (7) Lateral Earth Pressure Introduction Vertical or near vertical slopes of soil are supported by retaining walls, cantilever sheet-pile walls, sheet-pile bulkheads, braced cuts, and other similar
More informationVerification Manual. of GEO5 Gravity Wall program. Written by: Ing. Veronika Vaněčková, Ph.D. Verze: 1.0-en Fine Ltd.
of program Written by: Ing. Veronika Vaněčková, Ph.D. Edited by: Ing. Jiří Laurin Verze: 1.0-en 1989-2009 Fine Ltd. www.finesotware.eu INTRODUCTION This Gravity Wall program Verification Manual contains
More informationEntrance exam Master Course
- 1 - Guidelines for completion of test: On each page, fill in your name and your application code Each question has four answers while only one answer is correct. o Marked correct answer means 4 points
More informationSERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN
CHAPTER 11 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN Article 49. Cracking Limit State 49.1 General considerations In the case of verifications relating to Cracking Limit State, the effects of actions comprise
More informationDepartment of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601. Lecture no. 6: SHEAR AND TORSION
Budapest University of Technology and Economics Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601 Lecture no. 6: SHEAR AND TORSION Reinforced
More informationEurocode Training EN : Reinforced Concrete
Eurocode Training EN 1992-1-1: Reinforced Concrete Eurocode Training EN 1992-1-1 All information in this document is subject to modification without prior notice. No part of this manual may be reproduced,
More informationRAMWALL DESIGN METHODOLOGY
RAMWALL DESIGN METHODOLOGY Submitted by:. June 005 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Page. REFERENCED DOCUMENTS & ABBREVIATIONS 1 3 DESIGN METHODOLOGY / THEORY 3.1 General 3. Internal Analysis 4 3.3 External
More informationChapter (3) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations
Chapter (3) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations Introduction To perform satisfactorily, shallow foundations must have two main characteristics: 1. They have to be safe against overall shear
More informationD1. A normally consolidated clay has the following void ratio e versus effective stress σ relationship obtained in an oedometer test.
(d) COMPRESSIBILITY AND CONSOLIDATION D1. A normally consolidated clay has the following void ratio e versus effective stress σ relationship obtained in an oedometer test. (a) Plot the e - σ curve. (b)
More informationCE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-
CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing Openings in RC Flexural Members- Assoc Pr Tan Kiang Hwee Department Civil Engineering National In this lecture DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
More informationEUROCODE EN SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES
Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 1 EUROCODE EN1998-2 SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES Basil Kolias Basic Requirements Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information
More informationCHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE
CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE 6.1 GENERAL It shall be in accordance with JSCE Standard Specification (Design), 6.1. The collapse mechanism in statically indeterminate structures shall not be considered.
More informationReinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls. Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai
Geosynthetics and Reinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls continued Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai e-mail: gopalkr@iitm.ac.inac in Outline of the Lecture
More informationCivil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7
Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7 Dr. Colin Caprani, Chartered Engineer 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 1.1 Background... 3 1.2 Failure Modes... 5 1.3 Design Aspects...
More informationNAGY GYÖRGY Tamás Assoc. Prof, PhD
NAGY GYÖRGY Tamás Assoc. Prof, PhD E mail: tamas.nagy gyorgy@upt.ro Tel: +40 256 403 935 Web: http://www.ct.upt.ro/users/tamasnagygyorgy/index.htm Office: A219 SIMPLE SUPORTED BEAM b = 15 cm h = 30 cm
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Beam BS8110 v Member Design - RC Beam XX
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Effects From Structural Analysis Design axial force, F (tension -ve and compression +ve) (ensure < 0.1f cu b w h 0
More informationChapter (4) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations (Special Cases)
Chapter (4) Ultimate earing Capacity of Shallow Foundations (Special Cases) Ultimate.C. of Shallow Foundations (Special Cases) Introduction The ultimate bearing capacity theories discussed in Chapter 3
More informationε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram
CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case
More informationQUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS
QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State Hooke s law. 3. Define modular ratio,
More informationINTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA
EGC373 (F) / Page 1 of 5 INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA UK DEGREE TRANSFER PROGRAMME INTI ADELAIDE TRANSFER PROGRAMME EGC 373: FOUNDATION ENGINEERING FINAL EXAMINATION : AUGUST 00 SESSION This paper consists of
More informationStandardisation of UHPC in Germany
Standardisation of UHPC in Germany Part II: Development of Design Rules, University of Siegen Prof. Dr.-Ing. Ekkehard Fehling, University of Kassel 1 Overvie Introduction: Work of the Task Group Design
More informationDESIGN OF DOWELS FOR SHEAR TRANSFER AT THE INTERFACE BETWEEN CONCRETE CAST AT DIFFERENT TIMES: A CASE STUDY
DESIGN OF DOWELS FOR SHEAR TRANSFER AT THE INTERFACE BETWEEN CONCRETE CAST AT DIFFERENT TIMES: A CASE STUDY Samayamanthree Mudiyanselage Premasiri Karunarathna 118614J Degree of Master of Engineering in
More informationDetailing. Lecture 9 16 th November Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2
Detailing Lecture 9 16 th November 2017 Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2 EC2 Section 8 - Detailing of Reinforcement - General Rules Bar spacing, Minimum bend diameter Anchorage of reinforcement
More informationNORMAL STRESS. The simplest form of stress is normal stress/direct stress, which is the stress perpendicular to the surface on which it acts.
NORMAL STRESS The simplest form of stress is normal stress/direct stress, which is the stress perpendicular to the surface on which it acts. σ = force/area = P/A where σ = the normal stress P = the centric
More informationModule 14. Tension Members. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Module 14 Tension Members Lesson 37 Numerical Problems Instructional Objectives: At the end of this lesson, the student should be able to: select the category of the problem if it is a liquid retaining
More informationPre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension
Pre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension but strong in compression Steel tendon is first stressed
More informationQUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A
DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State
More informationChapter (11) Pile Foundations
Chapter (11) Introduction Piles are structural members that are made of steel, concrete, or timber. They are used to build pile foundations (classified as deep foundations) which cost more than shallow
More informationDEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8 - PART 3 PROVISIONS
DEFORMATION CAPACITY OF OLDER RC SHEAR WALLS: EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON WITH EUROCODE 8 - PART 3 PROVISIONS Konstantinos CHRISTIDIS 1, Emmanouil VOUGIOUKAS 2 and Konstantinos TREZOS 3 ABSTRACT
More informationLecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion
Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Design of
More informationPERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK
PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM - 613 403 - THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Sub : Strength of Materials Year / Sem: II / III Sub Code : MEB 310
More informationSabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are
More informationPractical Design to Eurocode 2
Practical Design to Eurocode 2 The webinar will start at 12.30 (Any questions beforehand? use Questions on the GoTo Control Panel) Course Outline Lecture Date Speaker Title 1 21 Sep Jenny Burridge Introduction,
More informationAssociate Professor. Tel:
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING IIT DELHI Dr. Suresh Bhalla Associate Professor Tel: 2659-1040 Email: Sbhalla@civil.iitd.ac.in FOUNDATIONS Geotechnical Engineer Structural Engineer Location and depth criteria
More informationEN Eurocode 7. Section 3 Geotechnical Data Section 6 Spread Foundations. Trevor L.L. Orr Trinity College Dublin Ireland.
EN 1997 1: Sections 3 and 6 Your logo Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 1 EN 1997-1 Eurocode 7 Section 3 Geotechnical Data Section 6 Spread Foundations Trevor L.L. Orr
More informationFlexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections
4 5000 4000 (increased d ) (increased f (increased A s or f y ) c or b) Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections Moment (kip-in.) 3000 2000 1000 0 0 (basic) (A s 0.5A s ) 0.0005 0.001 0.0015
More informationFOUNDATION ENGINEERING UNIT V
FOUNDATION ENGINEERING UNIT V RETAINING WALLS Plastic equilibrium in soils active and passive states Rankine s theory cohesion less and cohesive soil - Coloumb s wedge theory condition for critical failure
More informationChapter 5 Shear Strength of Soil
Page 5 Chapter 5 Shear Strength of Soil. The internal resistance per unit area that the soil mass can offer to resist failure and sliding along any plane inside it is called (a) strength (b) shear strength
More informationUNIT III DEFLECTION OF BEAMS 1. What are the methods for finding out the slope and deflection at a section? The important methods used for finding out the slope and deflection at a section in a loaded
More informationModule 6. Shear, Bond, Anchorage, Development Length and Torsion. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Module 6 Shear, Bond, Anchorage, Development Length and Torsion Lesson 15 Bond, Anchorage, Development Length and Splicing Instruction Objectives: At the end of this lesson, the student should be able
More informationModule 14. Tension Members. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Module 14 Tension Members Lesson 36 Structural Requirements, Code Stipulations and Governing Equations Instructional Objectives: At the end of this lesson, the student should be able to: state the need
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV UNIT I STRESS, STRAIN DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS PART A (2 MARKS)
More informationSeismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design
Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Elmer E. Marx, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Michael Keever, California Department
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear
Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk 1 Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular
More informationPURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.
BENDING STRESS The effect of a bending moment applied to a cross-section of a beam is to induce a state of stress across that section. These stresses are known as bending stresses and they act normally
More informationModule 7 (Lecture 25) RETAINING WALLS
Module 7 (Lecture 25) RETAINING WALLS Topics Check for Bearing Capacity Failure Example Factor of Safety Against Overturning Factor of Safety Against Sliding Factor of Safety Against Bearing Capacity Failure
More informationUNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN. 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2
UNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2 Young s modulus E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2 Area1=900mm 2 Area2=400mm 2 Area3=625mm
More informationDepending on the application and the anchor type one of the following two concepts can be applied: Partial safety factor concept.
Anchor design Safety concept Depending on the application and the anchor type one of the following two concepts can be applied: For anchors for use in concrete having an European Technical Approval (ETA)
More informationMechanics of Structure
S.Y. Diploma : Sem. III [CE/CS/CR/CV] Mechanics of Structure Time: Hrs.] Prelim Question Paper Solution [Marks : 70 Q.1(a) Attempt any SIX of the following. [1] Q.1(a) Define moment of Inertia. State MI
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Effects From Structural Analysis Design axial force, F (tension -ve and compression +ve) (ensure < 0.1f cu b w h 0
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Effects From Structural Analysis Design axial force, F (tension -ve and compression +ve) (ensure < 0.1f cu b w h 0 kn OK Design shear force, V d 4223 kn
More informationErratum. Chapter 4 - Earth and water pressure 26. Chapter Area loads. q a. c+d ϕ'/2. Piling Handbook, 9th edition (2016)
Chapter 4 - Earth and water pressure 26 Chapter 4.9.15. Area loads z x q ϕ' a c+d 45 + ϕ'/2 Fig. 4.3. Force distribution area lords. Chapter 5 - Design of steel sheetpile structures 22 Chapter 5.8.3. Surcharge
More informationDESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF RETAINING WALLS
CHAPTER 8 DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF RETAINING WALLS 8. INTRODUCTION Retaining walls are structures used to provide stability for earth or other materials at their natural slopes. In general, they are used
More informationChapter 8. Shear and Diagonal Tension
Chapter 8. and Diagonal Tension 8.1. READING ASSIGNMENT Text Chapter 4; Sections 4.1-4.5 Code Chapter 11; Sections 11.1.1, 11.3, 11.5.1, 11.5.3, 11.5.4, 11.5.5.1, and 11.5.6 8.2. INTRODUCTION OF SHEAR
More informationCIVIL DEPARTMENT MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1. Brach: CE YEAR:
MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1 SEMESTER: V 1) Find the least moment of Inertia about the centroidal axes X-X and Y-Y of an unequal angle section 125 mm 75 mm 10 mm as shown in figure 2) Determine
More informationCHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY
CHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY. Volume 2 CHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY Detailed in this chapter: the theories behind the program the equations and methods that are use to perform the analyses. CONTENTS CHAPTER
More informationDesign of a Multi-Storied RC Building
Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building 16 14 14 3 C 1 B 1 C 2 B 2 C 3 B 3 C 4 13 B 15 (S 1 ) B 16 (S 2 ) B 17 (S 3 ) B 18 7 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 7 B 20 B 22 14 B 19 (S 4 ) C 10 C 11 B 23
More information3 Hours/100 Marks Seat No.
*17304* 17304 14115 3 Hours/100 Marks Seat No. Instructions : (1) All questions are compulsory. (2) Illustrate your answers with neat sketches wherever necessary. (3) Figures to the right indicate full
More informationD DAVID PUBLISHING. Port and Marine Structures Made of Sheet Piling with Staggered Toe. 1. Introduction. 2. Design Approach and Main Dependencies
Journal of Shipping and Ocean Engineering 4 (2017) 168-173 doi 10.17265/2159-5879/2017.04.004 D DAVID PUBLISHING Port and Marine Structures Made of Sheet Piling with Staggered Toe Doubrovsky Michael 1,
More informationChapter 5 CENTRIC TENSION OR COMPRESSION ( AXIAL LOADING )
Chapter 5 CENTRIC TENSION OR COMPRESSION ( AXIAL LOADING ) 5.1 DEFINITION A construction member is subjected to centric (axial) tension or compression if in any cross section the single distinct stress
More informationTopics. Module 3 Lecture 10 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS: ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY NPTEL ADVANCED FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-I
Topics Module 3 Lecture 10 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS: ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY 1.1 THE GENERAL BEARING CAPACITY EQUATION Bearing Capacity Factors General Comments 1.2 EFFECT OF SOIL COMPRESSIBILITY 1.3 ECCENTRICALLY
More informationSeismic design of bridges
NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS LABORATORY FOR EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING Seismic design of bridges Lecture 3 Ioannis N. Psycharis Capacity design Purpose To design structures of ductile behaviour
More informationUNIT II SHALLOW FOUNDATION
Introduction UNIT II SHALLOW FOUNDATION A foundation is a integral part of the structure which transfer the load of the superstructure to the soil. A foundation is that member which provides support for
More informationPOST-PEAK BEHAVIOR OF FRP-JACKETED REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS
POST-PEAK BEHAVIOR OF FRP-JACKETED REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS - Technical Paper - Tidarut JIRAWATTANASOMKUL *1, Dawei ZHANG *2 and Tamon UEDA *3 ABSTRACT The objective of this study is to propose a new
More informationN = Shear stress / Shear strain
UNIT - I 1. What is meant by factor of safety? [A/M-15] It is the ratio between ultimate stress to the working stress. Factor of safety = Ultimate stress Permissible stress 2. Define Resilience. [A/M-15]
More informationTechnical Note 16 Equivalent Static Method
Technical Note 16 Equivalent Static Method Contents Technical Note 21 -... 1 1 Introduction... 1 2 Operational Strain in the Pipeline... 2 3 Seismicity... 2 4 Vertical Uplift... 3 5 Vertical Bearing...
More informationSHEET PILE WALLS. Mehdi Mokhberi Islamic Azad University
SHEET PILE WALLS Mehdi Mokhberi Islamic Azad University Lateral Support In geotechnical engineering, it is often necessary to prevent lateral soil movements. Tie rod Anchor Sheet pile Cantilever retaining
More informationCHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS
(74) CHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS This chapter will be devoted to the analysis of prismatic members subjected to equal and opposite couples M and M' acting in the same longitudinal plane. Such members are
More informationCHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams
CHAPTER 4 Design of R C Beams Learning Objectives Identify the data, formulae and procedures for design of R C beams Design simply-supported and continuous R C beams by integrating the following processes
More informationBridge deck modelling and design process for bridges
EU-Russia Regulatory Dialogue Construction Sector Subgroup 1 Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges Application to a composite twin-girder bridge according to Eurocode 4 Laurence Davaine
More informationCO~RSEOUTL..INE. revisedjune 1981 by G. Frech. of..a.pqij~t(..~ttsa.fidteconol.q.gy. Sault ",Ste'...:M~ri,e.: SAUl. ir.ft\,nl~t';~l' G ". E b:.
-/ 1/ /.. SAUl. ir.ft\,nl~t';~l' G ". E b:.~~~~~, of..a.pqij~t(..~ttsa.fidteconol.q.gy. Sault ",Ste'...:M~ri,e.: ',' -.\'~. ~ ;:T.., CO~RSEOUTL..INE ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING II ARC 200-4 revisedjune 1981
More informationTheory of Shear Strength
MAJ 1013 ADVANCED SOIL MECHANICS Theory of Shear Strength Prepared by, Dr. Hetty 1 Strength of different materials Steel Concrete Soil Tensile strength Compressive strength Shear strength Complex behavior
More informationAssignment 1 - actions
Assignment 1 - actions b = 1,5 m a = 1 q kn/m 2 Determine action on the beam for verification of the ultimate limit state. Axial distance of the beams is 1 to 2 m, cross section dimensions 0,45 0,20 m
More informationTransactions on Information and Communications Technologies vol 20, 1998 WIT Press, ISSN
Design Of Retaining Walls : System Uncertainty & Fuzzy Safety Measures J. Oliphant *, P. W. Jowitt * and K. Ohno + * Department of Civil & Offshore Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh.
More information3.2 Reinforced Concrete Slabs Slabs are divided into suspended slabs. Suspended slabs may be divided into two groups:
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 017 3. Reinforced Concrete Slabs Slabs are divided into suspended slabs. Suspended slabs may be divided into two groups: (1) slabs supported on edges of
More information