Topics. Module 3 Lecture 10 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS: ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY NPTEL ADVANCED FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-I
|
|
- Albert Owens
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Topics Module 3 Lecture 10 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS: ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY 1.1 THE GENERAL BEARING CAPACITY EQUATION Bearing Capacity Factors General Comments 1.2 EFFECT OF SOIL COMPRESSIBILITY 1.3 ECCENTRICALLY LOADED FOUNDATIONS Foundation with Two-Way Eccentricity
2 THE GENERAL BEARING CAPACITY EQUATION The ultimate bearing capacity equations presented in equations (3, 7 and 8) are for continuous, square, and circular foundations only. The do not address the case of rectangular foundations (0 < BB/LL < 1. Also, the equations do not take into account the shearing resistnace along the failure surface in soil above the bottom of the foundation (the portion of the failure surface marked as GI and HJ in figure 3.5). In addition, the load on the foundation may be inclined. To account for all these shortcomings, Meyerhof (1963) suggested the following form of the general bearing capacity equation: qq uu = ccnn cc FF cccc FF cccc FF eeee + qqnn qq FF qqqq FF qqqq FF qqqq γγbbbb γγff γγγγ FF γγγγ FF γγγγ [3.25] Where cc = cohesion qq = effective stress at the level of the bottom of the foundation γγ = unit weight of soil BB = width of foundation ( diameter for a circular foundation) FF cccc, FF qqqq, FF γγγγ = shape factors FF cccc, FF qqqq, FF γγγγ = depth factors FF cccc, FF qqqq, FF γγγγ = load inclination factors NN cc, NN qq, NN γγ = bearing capacity factors The equations for determining the various factors given in equation (25) are described briefly in the following sections. Note that the original equation for ultimate bearing capacity is derived only for the plane-strain case (that is, for continuous foundations). The shape, depth, and load inclination factors are empirical factors based on experimental data. Bearing Capacity Factors Based on laboratory and field studies of bearing capacity, the basic nature of the failure surface in soil suggested by Terzaghi now appears to be correct (Vesic, 1973). However, the angle αα as shown in figure 3.5 is closer to 45 + /2 than to. If this change is accepted, the values of NN cc, NN qq, and NN γγ for a given soil friction angle will also change from those given in table 1. With = 45 + /2, the relations for NN cc and NN qq can be derived as
3 NN qq = tttttt eeππ tan [3.26] NN cc = NN qq 1 cot [3.27] The equation for NN cc given by equation (27) was originally derived by Prandtl (1921), and the relation for NN qq [equation (26)] was presented by Reissner (1924). Caquot and Kerisel (1953) and Vesic (1973) gave the relation for NN γγ as NN γγ = 2 NN qq + 1 tan [3.28] Table 4 shows the variation of the preceding bearing capacity factors with soil friction angles. In many texts and reference books, the relationship for NN γγ may be different from that in equation (28). The reason is that there is still some controversy about the variation of NN γγ with the soil friction angle, φφ. In this text, equation (28) is used. Other relationships for NN γγ generally cited are those given by Meyerhof (1963), Hansen (1970), and Lundgren and Mortensen (1953). They NN γγ values for various soil friction angles are given in appendix B (table B-1, B-2, B-3). Table 4 Bearing Capacity Factors φφ NN cc NN qq NN γγ NN qq tan φφ φφ NN cc NN qq NN γγ NN qq tan φφ /NN cc /NN cc
4 a After Vesic (1973) Shape, Depth, and Inclination Factors The relationships for the shape factors, depth factors, and inclination factors recommended for use are shown in table 5. Other relationships generally found in many texts and references are shown in table B-4 (appendix B). General Comments When the water table is present at or near the foundations, the factors qq and γγ given in the general bearing capacity equations, equation (25), will need modifications. The procedure for modifying them is the same. For undrianed loading conditions (φφ = 0 concept) in clayey soils, the general loadbearing capacity equation [equation (25)] takes the form (vertical load) qq uu = ccnn cc FF cccc FF cccc + qq [3.29] Table 5 Shape, Depth, and Inclination Factors Recommended for Use Factor Relationship Source Shape a FF cccc = 1 + BBBB qq De Beer LL NN cc (1970 FF qqqq = + BB Hansen tan φφ LL (1970) FF γγγγ = BB LL Where LL = length of the foundation (LL > BB) Depth b Condition (a): DD ff /BB 1 FF cccc = DD ff BB FF qqqq = tan φφ(1 sin φφ) 2 DD ff BB FF γγγγ = 1 Condition (b): DD ff /BB > 1 Hansen (1970
5 Inclinatio n FF cccc = tan φφ(1 sin φφ) tan 1 DD ff BB FF γγγγ = 1 FF cccc = FF qqqq = 1 ββ 90 Where ββ = inclination of the load on the foundation with respect to the vert a These shape factors are empirical relations based on extensive laboratory tests. b The factors tttttt 1 (DD ff /BB) is in radians. 2 Meyerho f (1963); Hanna and Meyerho f (1981) Hence the ultimate baring capacity (vertical load) is qq net (uu) = qq uu qq = ccnn cc FF cccc FF cccc [3.30] Skempton (1951) proposed an equation for the net ultimate baring capacity for clayey soils (φφ = condition), which is similar to equation (30) : qq net (uu) = 5cc DD ff BB [3.31] BB LL Example 2 A square foundation (BB BB) has to be constructed as shown in figure 3.9. Assume that γγ = 105 lb/ft 3, γγ sat = 118 lb/ft 3, DD ff = 4 ft, and DD 1 = 2 ft. The gross allowable load, QQ all, with FFFF = 3 is 150,000 lb. The field standard penetration resistance, NN FF values are as follows: Depth (ft) NN FF (blow/ft) Determine the size of the footing. Use equation (25). Solution Using equation (7 from chapter 2) and the Liao and Whitman relationship (table 4 from chaper 2), the correct standard penetration number can be determined.
6 Depth (ft) NN FF σσ (ton/ft 2 ) [ ( )] 2000 = (5)( ) 2000 = (5)( ) 2000 = (5)( ) 2000 = (5)( ) 2000 = NN cor = NN FF 1 σσ vv Figure 3.9 The average NN cor can be taken to be about 11. From equation 11 (from chapter 2), φφ 35. Given qq all = Q all B 2 = 150,000 B 2 lb/ft 2 [a] From equation (25) (note: cc = 0), qq all = qq uu FFFF = 1 3 qqnn qqff qqqq FF qqqq γγ BBBB γγff γγγγ FF γγγγ For φφ = 35, from table 4, NN qq = 33.3, NN γγ = From table 5,
7 FF qqqq = 1 + BB tan φφ = 1 + tan 35 = 1.7 LL FF γγγγ = BB = = 0.6 LL FF qqqq = tan φφ(1 sin φφ) 2 = tan 35(1 sin 35) 2 4 BB = BB FF γγγγ = 1 qq = (2)(105) + 2( ) = lb/ft 2 So qq all = 1 (321.2)(33.3)(1.7) B 1 ( )(B)(48.03)(0.6)(10 2 = [b] B BB Combining equations (a) and (b) 150, = BB BB 2 B By trial and error, BB 4.2 ft Example 3 Refer to example1. Use the definition of factor of safety given by equation (20) and FFFF = 5 to determine the net allowable load for the foundation. Solution From example 1, qq uu = 10,736 lb/ft 2 qq = (3)(115) = 345 lb/ft 2 qq all (net ) = 10, Hence 2078 lb/ft 2 qq all (net ) = (2078)(5)(5) = 51,950 lb Example 4
8 Refer to example 1. Use equation (7) and FFFF shear for the foundation. = 1.5 determine the net allowable load Solution For cc = 320 lb/ft 2 and φφ = 20, cc dd = cc = lb/ft2 FFFF shear 1.5 tan φφ φφ dd = tttttt 1 = tttttt 1 FFFF shear From equation (7), tan = qq all (net ) = 1.3cc dd NN cc + qq(nn 1) + 0.4γγBBBB γγ For φφ = 13.64, the values of the bearing capacity factors from table 1 are NN γγ 1.2, NN qq 3.8, NN cc 12 Hence qq all (net ) = 1.3(213)(12) + (345)(3.8 1) + (0.4)(115)(5)(1.2) = 4565 lb/ft 2 And qq all (net ) = (4565)(5)(5) = 114,125 lb 57 ton Note: There appears to be a large discrepancy between the results of examples 3 (or 1) and 4. The use of trial and error shows that, when FFFF shear is about 1.2, the results are approximated equal. EFFECT OF SOIL COMPRESSIBILITY In section 3 equation 3, 7, and 8, which were for the case of general shear failure, were modified to equations 9, 10, and 11 to take into account the change of failure mode in soil (that is, local shear failure). The change in failure mode is due to soil compressibility. In order to account for soil compressibility, Vesic (1973) proposed the following modification to equation (25), qq uu = ccnn cc FF cccc FF cccc FF cccc + qqnn qq FF qqqq FF qqqq FF qqqq γγbbbb γγff γγγγ FF γγγγ FF γγγγ [3.32] Where
9 FF cccc, FF qqqq, and FF γγγγ = soil compressibility factors The soil compressibility factors were derived by Vesic (1973) from the analogy of the expansion of cavities. According to that theory, in order to calculate FF cccc, FF qqqq, and FF γγγγ the following steps should be taken: 1. Calculate the rigidity index, II rr, of the soil at a depth approximately BB/2 below the bottom of the foundation, or II rr = GG cc+qq tan φφ [3.33] Where GG = shear modulus of the soil qq = effective overburden pressure at a depth of DD ff + BB/2 2. The critical rigidity index, II rr(cccc ), can be expressed as II rr(cccc ) = 1 exp BB cot 45 φφ [3.34] 2 LL 2 The variation of II rr(cccc ) for BB/LL = 0 and BB/LL = 1 are given in table If II rr II rr(cccc ), then FF cccc = FF qqqq = FF γγγγ = 1 However, if II rr < II rr(cccc ) FF γγγγ = FF qqqq = exp BB tan φφ + LL (3.07 sin φφ) (log 2II rr ) [3.35] 1+sin φφ Table 6 Variation of II rr(cccc ) with φφ aaaaaa BB/LL 11 II rr(cccc ) φφ (deg) BB LL = 0 BB LL =
10 After Vesic (1973) Figure 3.10 shows the variation of FF γγγγ = FF qqqq [equation (35)] with φφ and II rr. For φφ = 0, FF cccc = BB LL log II rr [3.36] For φφ > 0, FF cccc = FF qqqq 1 FF qqqq NN qq tan φφ [3.37] Figure 3.10 Variation of FF γγγγ = FF qqqq with II rr and φφ Example 5 For a shallow foundation, the following are given: BB = 0.6 m, LL = 1.2 m, DD ff = o. 6 m. Soil: φφ = 25 cc = 48 kn/m 2
11 γγ = 18 kn/m 3 Modulus of elasticity, EE = 620 kn/m 2 Poisson s ratio, μμ = 0.3 Calculate the ultimate bearing capacity. Solution From equation (33) II rr = GG cc+qq tan φφ However, GG = So II rr = EE 2(1+μμ ) EE 2(1+μμ )[cc+qq tan φφ] qq = γγ DD ff + BB 2 II rr = 0.6 = = 162 kn/m (1+0.3)[ tan 25] = 4.29 From equation (34) II rr(cccc ) = 1 2 exp BB LL cot 45 φφ exp cot = Since II rr(cccc ) > II rr, use equations 35 and 37. FF γγγγ = FF qqqq = exp BB tan φφ + LL (3.07 sin φφ) log (2II rr ) 1+sin φφ = exp sin 25) log (2 4.29) tan 25 + (3.07 = sin 25 FF cccc = FF qqqq 1 FF qqqq NN qq tan φφ For φφ = 25, NN qq = (table 4),
12 FF cccc = tan 25 = Now, from equation (32), qq uu = ccnn cc FF cccc FF cccc FF cccc + qqnn qq FF qqqq FF qqqq FF qqqq γγbbbb γγff γγγγ FF γγγγ FF γγγγ From table 4, for φφ = 25, NN cc = 20.72, NN qq = 10.66, NN γγ = From table 5, FF cccc = 1 + NN qq BB = NN cc LL FF qqqq = 1 + BB LL = tan φφ = 1 + tan 25 = FF γγγγ = BB LL = = 0.8 FF cccc = DD ff BB = = FF qqqq = tan φφ(1 sin φφ) 2 DD ff = tan 25(1 sin BB 25)2 0.6 = FF γγγγ = 1 Thus qq uu = (48)(20.72)(1.257)(1.4)(0.216) + (0.6 18)(10.66)(1.233)(1.311)(0.347) + 1 (18)(0.6)(10.88)(0.8)(1)(0.347) = 459 kn/m2 2 ECCENTRICALLY LOADED FOUNDATIONS In several instances, as with the base of a retaining wall, foundations are subjected to moments in addition to the vertical load, as shown in figure 3.11a. In such cases the distribution of pressure by the foundation on the soil is not uniform. The distribution of nominal pressure is qq max = QQ BBBB + 6MM BB 2 LL [3.38] And qq max = QQ BBBB 6MM BB 2 LL [3.39] Where QQ = total vertical load
13 MM = moment on the foundation Figure 3.11b shows force system equivalent to that shown in figure 3.11a. The distance e is he eccentricity, or ee = MM QQ [3.40] Substituting equation (40) in equations (38) and (39) gives qq max = QQ 6ee 1 + BBBB BB [3.41a] And qq max = QQ 6ee 1 BBBB BB [3.41b] Figure 3.11 Eccentrically loaded foundations Note that, in these equations, when the eccentricity, e, becomes BB/6, qq max is zero. for ee > BB/6, qq min will be negative, which means that tension will develop. Because soil cannot take any tension, there will be a separation between the foundation and the soil underlying it. The nature of the pressure distribution on the soil will be as shown in figure 3.11a. the value of qq max then is qq max = 4QQ 3LL(BB 2ee) [3.42] The exact distribution of pressure is difficult to estimate.
14 The factor of safety for such types of loading against baring capacity failure can be evaluated by using the procedure suggested by Meyerhof (1953), which is generally referred to as the effective area method. The following is Meyerholf a step-by-step procedure for determination of the ultimate load that the soil can support and the factor of safety against bearing capacity failure. 1. Determine the effective dimensions of the foundation as BB = effective width = BB 2ee LL = effective length = LL Note that, if the eccentricity were in the direction of the length of the foundation, the value of LL would be equal to LL 2ee. The value of BB would equal BB. The smaller of the two dimensions (that is, LL and BB ) is the effective width of the foundation. 2. Use equation (25) for the ultimate bearing capacity as qq uu = ccnn cc FF cccc FF cccc FF cccc + qqnn qq FF qqqq FF qqqq FF qqqq γγbb NN γγff γγγγ FF γγγγ FF γγγγ [3.43] To evaluate FF cccc, FF qqqq, and FF γγγγ, use table 5 with effective length and effective width dimensions instead of LL and BB, respectively. To determine FF cccc, FF qqqq, and FF γγγγ use table 5 (do not replace BB with BB ). 3. The total ultimate load that the foundation can sustain is AA QQ ult = qq uu (BB )(LL ) [3.44] Where AA = effective area 4. The factor of safety against bearing capacity failure is FFFF = QQ ult QQ [3.45] 5. Check the factor of safety against qq max, or, FFFF = qq uu /qq max. Note that eccentricity tends to decrease the load-bearing capacity of a foundation. In such cases, placing foundation columns off center, as shown in figure 3.12, probably is advantageous. Doing so, in procedures a centrally loaded foundation with uniformly distributed pressure.
15 Figure 3.12 Foundation of columns with off-center loading Foundation with Two-Way Eccentricity Consider a situation in which a foundation is subjected to a vertical ultimate load QQ ult and a moment M as shown in figure 3.13a and b. For this case, the components of the moment, M, about the x and y axes can be determined as MM xx and MM yy respectively (figure 3.13). This condition is equivalent to a load QQ ult placed eccentrically on the foundation with xx = ee BB and yy = ee LL (figure 3.13d). Note that ee BB = MM yy QQ ult [3.46] And ee LL = MM xx QQ ult [3.47] If QQ ult is needed, it can be obtained as follows [equation (44)]: QQ ult = qq uu AA Where, from equation (43) qq uu = ccnn cc FF cccc FF cccc FF cccc + qqnn qq FF qqqq FF qqqq FF qqqq + 1 γγbb NN 2 γγff γγγγ FF γγγγ FF γγγγ [3.48] And AA = effective area = BB LL
16 Figure 3.13 Where Figure 3.14 Effective area for the case of ee LL /LL 1 6 and e B/B 1 6 BB 1 = BB 1.5 3ee BB BB LL 1 = LL 1.5 3ee LL LL [3.49a] [3.49b] The effective length, L, is the larger of the two dimensions, that is, BB 1 or LL 1. So, the effective width is BB = AA LL [3.50]
17 Case II ee LL /LL < 0.5 and 0 < e B /B < a.. The effective area for this condition is shown in figure AA = 1 2 (LL 1 + LL 2 )BB [3.51] Figure 3.15 Effective area for the case of ee LL /LL < 0.5 and 0 < ee BB /BB < 1 (after Highter 6 and Anders, 1985) The magnitudes of LL 1 andll 2 can be determined from figure 3.15b. The effective width is BB = AA LL 1 or LL 2 (which is larger ) [3.52] The effective length is LL = LL 1 orll 2 (which is larger) [3.53] Case III
18 ee LL /LL < 1 6 and 0 < e B/B < 0.5. The effective area for this condition is shown in figure 3.16a: AA = 1 2 (BB 1 + BB 2 )LL [3.54] Figure 3.16 Effective area for the case of ee LL /LL < 1 6 and 0 < ee BB/BB < 0.5 (after Highter and Anders, 1985) The effective width is BB = AA LL [3.55] The effective length is equal to LL = LL [3.56] The magnitude of BB 1 and BB 2 can be determined from figure 3.16b.
19 Case IV ee LL /LL < 1 and e 6 B/B < 1. Figure 3.17a shows the effective area for this case. The ratio 6 BB 2 /BB and thus BB 2 can be determined by using the ee LL /LL curves that slope upward. Similarly, the ratio LL 2 /LL and thus LL 2 can be determined by using the ee LL /LL curves that slope downward. The effective area is then Figure 3.17 Effective area for the case of ee LL /LL < 1 and 0 < ee 6 BB/BB < 1 (after Highter and 6 Anders, 1985) AA = LL 2 BB (BB + BB 2)(LL LL 2 ) [3.57] The effective width is BB = AA LL [3.58] The effective length is LL = LL [3.59]
20 Example 6 A square foundation is shown in figure Assume that the one-way load eccentricityee = 0.15 m. Determine the ultimate load, QQ ult. Figure 3.18 Solution With cc = 0, equation (43) becomes qq uu = ccnn qq FF qqqq FF qqqq FF qqqq γγbb NN γγff γγγγ FF γγγγ FF γγγγ qq = (0.7)(18) = 12.6 kn/m 2 For φφ = 30, from table 4, NN qq = 18.4 and NN γγ = 22.4 BB = 1.5 2(0.15) = 1.2 m LL = 1.5 m From table 5 FF qqqq = 1 + BB tan φφ = tan LL = FF qqqq = tan φφ(1 sin φφ) 2 DD ff = 1 + (0.289)(0.7) = BB 1.5
21 FF γγγγ = BB = = 0.68 LL 1.5 FF γγγγ = 1 So qq uu = (12.6)(18.4)(1.462)(1.135) + 1 (18)(1.2)(22.4)(0.68)(1) = = kn/m 2 Hence QQ ult = BB LL qq = (1.2)(1.5)(549.2) 988kN uu Example 7 Refer to example 6. Other quantities remaining the same, assume that the load has a twoway eccentricity. Given: ee LL = 0.3 m, and ee BB = 0.15 m (figure 3.19). Determine the ultimate load, QQ ult. Solution ee LL LL = = 0.2 ee BB BB = = 0.1 Figure 3.19 This case is similar to that shown in figure 3.15a. From figure 3.15b, for ee LL /LL = 0.2 and e B /B = 0.1 LL 1 LL 0.85; LL 1 = (0.85)(1.5) = m
22 And LL 2 LL 0.21; LL 2 = (0.21)(1.5) = m From equation (51) AA = 1(LL LL 2 )BB = 1 ( )(1.5) = m2 2 From equation (53) LL = LL 1 = m From equation (52) BB = AA = = m LL Note, from equation (43) for cc = 0 qq uu = ccnn qq FF qqqq FF qqqq FF qqqq γγbb NN γγff γγγγ FF γγγγ FF γγγγ qq = (0.7)(18) = 12.6 kn/m 2 For φφ = 30, from table 4, NN qq = 18.4 and NN γγ = Thus FF qqqq = 1 + BB tan φφ = tan LL = FF qqqq = BB = = LL FF qqqq = tan φφ(1 sin φφ) 2 DD ff = 1 + (0.289)(0.7) = BB 1.5 FF γγγγ = 1 So qq ult = AA qq uu = AA (qqnn qq FF qqqq FF qqqq γγbb NN γγ FF γγγγ FF γγγγ = (1.193)[(12.6)(18.4)(1.424)(1.135) + (0.5)(18)(0.936)(22.4)(0.706)(1)] = kn
Module 7 (Lecture 25) RETAINING WALLS
Module 7 (Lecture 25) RETAINING WALLS Topics Check for Bearing Capacity Failure Example Factor of Safety Against Overturning Factor of Safety Against Sliding Factor of Safety Against Bearing Capacity Failure
More informationModule 4 (Lecture 16) SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS: ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT
Topics Module 4 (Lecture 16) SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS: ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY AND SETTLEMENT 1.1 STRIP FOUNDATION ON GRANULAR SOIL REINFORCED BY METALLIC STRIPS Mode of Failure Location of Failure Surface
More informationModule 7 (Lecture 27) RETAINING WALLS
Module 7 (Lecture 27) RETAINING WALLS Topics 1.1 RETAINING WALLS WITH METALLIC STRIP REINFORCEMENT Calculation of Active Horizontal and vertical Pressure Tie Force Factor of Safety Against Tie Failure
More informationModule 6 (Lecture 23) LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE
Module 6 (Lecture 23) LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE Topics 1.1 PASSIVE PRESSURE 1.2 RANKINE PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE 1.3 RANKINE PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE-INCLINED BACKFILL 1.4 COULOMB S PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE 1.5
More informationModule 6 (Lecture 22) LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE
Module 6 (Lecture ) LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE 1.1 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE DUE TO SURCHARGE 1. ACTIVE PRESSURE FOR WALL ROTATION ABOUT TOP- BRACED CUT 1.3 ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE FOR TRANSLATION OF RETAINING
More information(Lecture 18) MAT FOUNDATIONS
Module 5 (Lecture 18) MAT FOUNDATIONS Topics 1.1 FIELD SETTLEMENT OBSERVATIONS FOR MAT FOUNDATIONS 1.2 COMPENSATED FOUNDATIONS 1.3 Example FIELD SETTLEMENT OBSERVATIONS FOR MAT FOUNDATIONS Several field
More informationFoundations with D f equal to 3 to 4 times the width may be defined as shallow foundations. TWO MAIN CHARACTERISTICS ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY
oundation Analysis oundations with D f eual to 3 to 4 times the width may be defined as shallow foundations. TWO MAI CHARACTERISTICS o Safe against overall shear failure o Cannot undergo excessive displacement,
More informationFoundation Engineering Prof. Dr N.K. Samadhiya Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
Foundation Engineering Prof. Dr N.K. Samadhiya Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee Module 01 Lecture - 03 Shallow Foundation So, in the last lecture, we discussed the
More informationChapter (3) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations
Chapter (3) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations Introduction To perform satisfactorily, shallow foundations must have two main characteristics: 1. They have to be safe against overall shear
More informationObjectives. In this section you will learn the following. Development of Bearing Capacity Theory. Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Theory
Objectives In this section you will learn the following Development of Bearing Capacity Theory Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Theory Assumptions in Terzaghi s Bearing Capacity Theory. Meyerhof's Bearing Capacity
More informationChapter 4. Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations. Omitted parts: Sections 4.7, 4.8, 4.13 Examples 4.8, 4.9, 4.
Chapter 4 Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations Omitted parts: Sections 4.7, 4.8, 4.13 Examples 4.8, 4.9, 4.12 Pages 191-194 Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations To perform satisfactorily,
More informationThe Bearing Capacity of Soils. Dr Omar Al Hattamleh
The Bearing Capacity of Soils Dr Omar Al Hattamleh Example of Bearing Capacity Failure Omar Play the move of bearing Capacity failure The Philippine one Transcona Grain Silos Failure - Canada The Bearing
More informationChapter 7: Settlement of Shallow Foundations
Chapter 7: Settlement of Shallow Foundations Introduction The settlement of a shallow foundation can be divided into two major categories: (a) elastic, or immediate settlement and (b) consolidation settlement.
More informationTECHNICAL NOTE AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF POINT SPRING SUPPORTS BASED ON DEFINED SOIL PROFILES AND COLUMN-FOOTING PROPERTIES
COMPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., FEBRUARY 2016 TECHNICAL NOTE AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF POINT SPRING SUPPORTS BASED ON DEFINED SOIL PROFILES AND COLUMN-FOOTING PROPERTIES Introduction This technical note
More informationReinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls. Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai
Geosynthetics and Reinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls continued Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai e-mail: gopalkr@iitm.ac.inac in Outline of the Lecture
More informationChapter (4) Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations (Special Cases)
Chapter (4) Ultimate earing Capacity of Shallow Foundations (Special Cases) Ultimate.C. of Shallow Foundations (Special Cases) Introduction The ultimate bearing capacity theories discussed in Chapter 3
More information3-BEARING CAPACITY OF SOILS
3-BEARING CAPACITY OF SOILS INTRODUCTION The soil must be capable of carrying the loads from any engineered structure placed upon it without a shear failure and with the resulting settlements being tolerable
More informationModule 6 Lecture 37 Evaluation of Soil Settlement - 3 Topics
Module 6 Lecture 37 Evaluation of Soil Settlement - 3 Topics 1.2.4 Settlement Prediction in by Empirical Correlation 1.2.5 Calculation of Immediate Settlement in Granular Soil Using Simplified Strain Influence
More informationModule 4 Lecture 20 Pore water pressure and shear strength - 4 Topics
Module 4 Lecture 20 Pore water pressure and shear strength - 4 Topics 1.2.6 Curvature of the Failure Envelope Effect of angularity of soil particles Effect of rate of loading during the test 1.2.7 Shear
More informationINTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA
EGC373 (F) / Page 1 of 5 INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA UK DEGREE TRANSFER PROGRAMME INTI ADELAIDE TRANSFER PROGRAMME EGC 373: FOUNDATION ENGINEERING FINAL EXAMINATION : AUGUST 00 SESSION This paper consists of
More informationvulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from
This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net since 1997, your source for engineering information for the deep foundation and marine construction industries, and the historical site for Vulcan Iron Works
More informationCompute the lateral force per linear foot with sloping backfill and inclined wall. Use Equation No. 51, page 93. Press ENTER.
Sample Problems Problem 5.1 A gravity retaining wall is supporting a cohesionless soil. The active lateral force per linear foot of the retaining wall is most nearly (A) 5,000 lb/ft (B) 6,000 lb/ft (C)
More informationCHAPTER 12 SHALLOW FOUNDATION I: ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY 12.1 INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 12 SHALLOW FOUNDATION I: ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY 12.1 INTRODUCTION It is the customary practice to regard a foundation as shallow if the depth of the foundation is less than or equal to the width
More informationHKIE-GD Workshop on Foundation Engineering 7 May Shallow Foundations. Dr Limin Zhang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
HKIE-GD Workshop on Foundation Engineering 7 May 2011 Shallow Foundations Dr Limin Zhang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 1 Outline Summary of design requirements Load eccentricity Bearing
More informationUNIT II SHALLOW FOUNDATION
Introduction UNIT II SHALLOW FOUNDATION A foundation is a integral part of the structure which transfer the load of the superstructure to the soil. A foundation is that member which provides support for
More informationBEARING CAPACITY SHALLOW AND DEEP FOUNDATIONS
BEARING CAPACITY SHALLOW AND DEEP FOUNDATIONS CONTENTS: 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS 2.1 Design criteria 2.2 Spreading load 2.3 Types of foundations 2.4 Ground failure modes 2.5 Definitions
More informationDESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL
DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL When the height of the retaining wall exceeds about 6 m, the thickness of the stem and heel slab works out to be sufficiently large and the design becomes
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE TITLE PAGE DECLARATION DEDIDATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT ABSTRAK
TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE TITLE PAGE DECLARATION DEDIDATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT ABSTRAK TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLE LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF SYMBOLS LIST OF APENDICES i ii iii iv v
More informationModule 9 : Foundation on rocks
LECTURE 32 9.3 BEARING CAPCITY contd... 9.3.2 Safe bearing pressure There are different methods are available to determine the safe bearing pressure on rocks. However, the applicability of different methods
More informationChapter (11) Pile Foundations
Chapter (11) Introduction Piles are structural members that are made of steel, concrete, or timber. They are used to build pile foundations (classified as deep foundations) which cost more than shallow
More informationChapter (5) Allowable Bearing Capacity and Settlement
Chapter (5) Allowable Bearing Capacity and Settlement Introduction As we discussed previously in Chapter 3, foundations should be designed for both shear failure and allowable settlement. So the allowable
More informationSample Chapter HELICAL ANCHORS IN SAND 6.1 INTRODUCTION
6 ELICAL ANCORS IN SAN At the present time, limited studies on helical anchors are available, the results of which can be used to estimate their ultimate uplift capacity. In many instances, the ultimate
More informationThis document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine
This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine Don t forget to visit our companion site http://www.vulcanhammer.org Use subject to the terms and conditions of the respective
More informationUnit Workbook 1 Level 4 ENG U8 Mechanical Principles 2018 UniCourse Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Sample
Pearson BTEC Levels 4 Higher Nationals in Engineering (RQF) Unit 8: Mechanical Principles Unit Workbook 1 in a series of 4 for this unit Learning Outcome 1 Static Mechanical Systems Page 1 of 23 1.1 Shafts
More informationCHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY
CHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY. Volume 2 CHAPTER 8 CALCULATION THEORY Detailed in this chapter: the theories behind the program the equations and methods that are use to perform the analyses. CONTENTS CHAPTER
More informationBearing Capacity Of Shallow Foundation
Bearing Capacity Of Shallow Foundation Bearing Capacity Of Shallow Foundation * A foundation is required for distributing the loads of the superstructure on a large area. * The foundation should be designed
More informationLecture No. 5. For all weighted residual methods. For all (Bubnov) Galerkin methods. Summary of Conventional Galerkin Method
Lecture No. 5 LL(uu) pp(xx) = 0 in ΩΩ SS EE (uu) = gg EE on ΓΓ EE SS NN (uu) = gg NN on ΓΓ NN For all weighted residual methods NN uu aaaaaa = uu BB + αα ii φφ ii For all (Bubnov) Galerkin methods ii=1
More informationA Comparative Study on Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations in Sand from N and /
DOI 10.1007/s40030-017-0246-7 ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION A Comparative Study on Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations in Sand from N and / V. A. Sakleshpur 1 C. N. V. Satyanarayana Reddy 1 Received: 9 January
More informationReview for Exam Hyunse Yoon, Ph.D. Adjunct Assistant Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Iowa
Review for Exam2 11. 13. 2015 Hyunse Yoon, Ph.D. Adjunct Assistant Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Iowa Assistant Research Scientist IIHR-Hydroscience & Engineering, University
More informationAssociate Professor. Tel:
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING IIT DELHI Dr. Suresh Bhalla Associate Professor Tel: 2659-1040 Email: Sbhalla@civil.iitd.ac.in FOUNDATIONS Geotechnical Engineer Structural Engineer Location and depth criteria
More informationCivil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7
Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7 Dr. Colin Caprani, Chartered Engineer 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 1.1 Background... 3 1.2 Failure Modes... 5 1.3 Design Aspects...
More informationAngular Momentum, Electromagnetic Waves
Angular Momentum, Electromagnetic Waves Lecture33: Electromagnetic Theory Professor D. K. Ghosh, Physics Department, I.I.T., Bombay As before, we keep in view the four Maxwell s equations for all our discussions.
More informationWorksheets for GCSE Mathematics. Algebraic Expressions. Mr Black 's Maths Resources for Teachers GCSE 1-9. Algebra
Worksheets for GCSE Mathematics Algebraic Expressions Mr Black 's Maths Resources for Teachers GCSE 1-9 Algebra Algebraic Expressions Worksheets Contents Differentiated Independent Learning Worksheets
More informationBy Dr. Mohammed Ramidh
Engineering Materials Design Lecture.6 the design of beams By Dr. Mohammed Ramidh 6.1 INTRODUCTION Finding the shear forces and bending moments is an essential step in the design of any beam. we usually
More informationFoundation Engineering
Foundation Engineering Draft Version April 01 S. van Baars PREFACE This book is just a help for the students fort the old course Grundbau. Luxembourg, April 01 Stefan Van Baars CONTENT I SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS...
More informationLaterally Loaded Piles. Rocscience 2018
Laterally Loaded Piles Rocscience 2018 Contents 1 Soil Response Modelled by p-y Curves... 3 2 Governing Differential Equation... 4 3 Finite Element Method... 5 4 Pile Bending Stiffness... 5 5 Soil Models...
More informationD1. A normally consolidated clay has the following void ratio e versus effective stress σ relationship obtained in an oedometer test.
(d) COMPRESSIBILITY AND CONSOLIDATION D1. A normally consolidated clay has the following void ratio e versus effective stress σ relationship obtained in an oedometer test. (a) Plot the e - σ curve. (b)
More informationIntroduction to Soil Mechanics
Introduction to Soil Mechanics Sela Sode and Colin Jones WILEY Blackwell Contents Preface Dedication and Acknowledgments List of Symbols Soil Structure 1.1 Volume relationships 1.1.1 Voids ratio (e) 1.1.2
More informationVerification Manual. of GEO5 Gravity Wall program. Written by: Ing. Veronika Vaněčková, Ph.D. Verze: 1.0-en Fine Ltd.
of program Written by: Ing. Veronika Vaněčková, Ph.D. Edited by: Ing. Jiří Laurin Verze: 1.0-en 1989-2009 Fine Ltd. www.finesotware.eu INTRODUCTION This Gravity Wall program Verification Manual contains
More informationName (Print) ME Mechanics of Materials Exam # 2 Date: March 29, 2017 Time: 8:00 10:00 PM - Location: WTHR 200
Name (Print) (Last) (First) Instructions: ME 323 - Mechanics of Materials Exam # 2 Date: Time: 8:00 10:00 PM - Location: WTHR 200 Circle your lecturer s name and your class meeting time. Koslowski Zhao
More informationProblem " Â F y = 0. ) R A + 2R B + R C = 200 kn ) 2R A + 2R B = 200 kn [using symmetry R A = R C ] ) R A + R B = 100 kn
Problem 0. Three cables are attached as shown. Determine the reactions in the supports. Assume R B as redundant. Also, L AD L CD cos 60 m m. uation of uilibrium: + " Â F y 0 ) R A cos 60 + R B + R C cos
More informationINTRODUCTION TO STATIC ANALYSIS PDPI 2013
INTRODUCTION TO STATIC ANALYSIS PDPI 2013 What is Pile Capacity? When we load a pile until IT Fails what is IT Strength Considerations Two Failure Modes 1. Pile structural failure controlled by allowable
More informationSTABILITY AND DEFORMATION RESPONSE OF PAD FOUNDATIONONS ON SAND USING STANDARD PENETRATION TEST METHOD
Vol. 1, No., May 2013, PP: 79-7, ISSN: 2327-269 (Online) Research article STABILITY AND DEFORMATION RESPONSE OF PAD FOUNDATIONONS ON SAND USING STANDARD PENETRATION TEST METHOD Akpila, S.B 1 and Ode, T
More informationwater proofing will relatively long time fully completed) be provided 10 storey building (15x25m) original GWT position 1 sat = 20 kn/m 3
P1 Question: An excavation will be made for a ten storey 15x25 m building. Temporary support of earth pressure and water pressure will be made by deep secant cantilever pile wall. The gross pressure due
More information2017 Soil Mechanics II and Exercises Final Exam. 2017/7/26 (Wed) 10:00-12:00 Kyotsu 4 Lecture room
2017 Soil Mechanics II and Exercises Final Exam 2017/7/26 (Wed) 10:00-12:00 Kyotsu 4 Lecture room Attention: The exam consists of five questions for which you are provided with five answer sheets. Write
More informationULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY OF FOOTING ON SANDY SOIL AGAINST COMBINED LOAD OF VERTICAL, HORIZONTAL AND MOMENT LOADS
Int. J. of GEOMATE, Feb., 06, Vol. 0, No. (Sl. No. 9), pp. 649-655 Geotech., Const. Mat. and En., ISSN: 86-98(P), 86-990(O), Japan ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY OF FOOTING ON SANDY SOIL AGAINST COMBINED LOAD
More informationRETAINING WALL ANALYSIS
GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 Retaining wall Analysis & Design (EN997:2004 App'd by RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS In accordance with
More informationRETAINING WALL ANALYSIS
Retaining Wall Analysis Example (EN997:2004) GEODOMISI Ltd. Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for Tel.: (+30) 20 523827, 20 57263 Fax.:+30 20 5746 App'd by RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS In accordance with
More informationSteel Cross Sections. Structural Steel Design
Steel Cross Sections Structural Steel Design PROPERTIES OF SECTIONS Perhaps the most important properties of a beam are the depth and shape of its cross section. There are many to choose from, and there
More informationChapter Two: Mechanical Properties of materials
Chapter Two: Mechanical Properties of materials Time : 16 Hours An important consideration in the choice of a material is the way it behave when subjected to force. The mechanical properties of a material
More informationCE 221: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS I CHAPTER 1: STRESS. Dr. Krisada Chaiyasarn Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Thammasat university
CE 221: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS I CHAPTER 1: STRESS By Dr. Krisada Chaiyasarn Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Thammasat university Agenda Introduction to your lecturer Introduction
More informationLecture No. 1 Introduction to Method of Weighted Residuals. Solve the differential equation L (u) = p(x) in V where L is a differential operator
Lecture No. 1 Introduction to Method of Weighted Residuals Solve the differential equation L (u) = p(x) in V where L is a differential operator with boundary conditions S(u) = g(x) on Γ where S is a differential
More informationFoundation Engineering Prof. Dr. N. K. Samadhiya Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
Foundation Engineering Prof. Dr. N. K. Samadhiya Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee Module - 01 Lecture - 01 Shallow Foundation (Refer Slide Time: 00:19) Good morning.
More informationReview for Exam Hyunse Yoon, Ph.D. Adjunct Assistant Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Iowa
Review for Exam3 12. 9. 2015 Hyunse Yoon, Ph.D. Adjunct Assistant Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Iowa Assistant Research Scientist IIHR-Hydroscience & Engineering, University
More informationVariations. ECE 6540, Lecture 02 Multivariate Random Variables & Linear Algebra
Variations ECE 6540, Lecture 02 Multivariate Random Variables & Linear Algebra Last Time Probability Density Functions Normal Distribution Expectation / Expectation of a function Independence Uncorrelated
More informationChapter 5 Shear Strength of Soil
Page 5 Chapter 5 Shear Strength of Soil. The internal resistance per unit area that the soil mass can offer to resist failure and sliding along any plane inside it is called (a) strength (b) shear strength
More informationChapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations
Chapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations Introduction As we stated in Chapter 3, foundations are considered to be shallow if if [D (3 4)B]. Shallow foundations have several advantages: minimum
More informationSmith s Elements of Soil Mechanics
SEOA01 28/04/2006 01:55PM Page i Smith s Elements of Soil Mechanics Eighth Edition Ian Smith Napier University, Edinburgh SEOA01 28/04/2006 01:55PM Page ii Ian Smith 2006 G. N. Smith 1968, 1971, 1974,
More informationNew Approach for Evaluating the Bearing Capacity of Sandy Soil to Strip Shallow Foundation
International Journal of Advanced Materials Research Vol. 2,. 2, 2016, pp. 13-21 http://www.aiscience.org/journal/ijamr ISSN: 2381-6805 (Print); ISSN: 2381-6813 (Online) New Approach for Evaluating the
More informationFailure Modes and Bearing Capacity Estimation for Strip Foundations in C-ɸ Soils: A Numerical Study
Failure Modes and Bearing Capacity Estimation for Strip Foundations in C-ɸ Soils: A Numerical Study Paul Akagwu, Aaron Aboshio International Science Index, Civil and Environmental Engineering waset.org/publication/10005793
More informationfive Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture
ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture five mechanics www.carttalk.com of materials Mechanics of Materials 1 Mechanics of Materials MECHANICS MATERIALS
More informationON A CONTINUED FRACTION IDENTITY FROM RAMANUJAN S NOTEBOOK
Asian Journal of Current Engineering and Maths 3: (04) 39-399. Contents lists available at www.innovativejournal.in ASIAN JOURNAL OF CURRENT ENGINEERING AND MATHS Journal homepage: http://www.innovativejournal.in/index.php/ajcem
More informationChapter 5 CENTRIC TENSION OR COMPRESSION ( AXIAL LOADING )
Chapter 5 CENTRIC TENSION OR COMPRESSION ( AXIAL LOADING ) 5.1 DEFINITION A construction member is subjected to centric (axial) tension or compression if in any cross section the single distinct stress
More informationDouble punch test for tensile strength of concrete, Sept (70-18) PB224770/AS (NTIS)
Lehigh University Lehigh Preserve Fritz Laboratory Reports Civil and Environmental Engineering 1969 Double punch test for tensile strength of concrete, Sept. 1969 (70-18) PB224770/AS (NTIS) W. F. Chen
More information14- Hardening Soil Model with Small Strain Stiffness - PLAXIS
14- Hardening Soil Model with Small Strain Stiffness - PLAXIS This model is the Hardening Soil Model with Small Strain Stiffness as presented in PLAXIS. The model is developed using the user-defined material
More informationCh 4a Stress, Strain and Shearing
Ch. 4a - Stress, Strain, Shearing Page 1 Ch 4a Stress, Strain and Shearing Reading Assignment Ch. 4a Lecture Notes Sections 4.1-4.3 (Salgado) Other Materials Handout 4 Homework Assignment 3 Problems 4-13,
More informationPhysics 141 Second Mid-Term Examination Spring 2015 March 31, 2015
Physics 141 Second Mid-Term Examination Spring 2015 March 31, 2015 Your Number Solutions LAST Name (print) FIRST Name (print) Signature: UIN #: Your Section: Barkan 9 am Barkan 11 am Goeckner 3 pm PROBLEM
More informationWorksheets for GCSE Mathematics. Quadratics. mr-mathematics.com Maths Resources for Teachers. Algebra
Worksheets for GCSE Mathematics Quadratics mr-mathematics.com Maths Resources for Teachers Algebra Quadratics Worksheets Contents Differentiated Independent Learning Worksheets Solving x + bx + c by factorisation
More informationMathematics Ext 2. HSC 2014 Solutions. Suite 403, 410 Elizabeth St, Surry Hills NSW 2010 keystoneeducation.com.
Mathematics Ext HSC 4 Solutions Suite 43, 4 Elizabeth St, Surry Hills NSW info@keystoneeducation.com.au keystoneeducation.com.au Mathematics Extension : HSC 4 Solutions Contents Multiple Choice... 3 Question...
More informationDynamic Earth Pressure Problems and Retaining Walls. Behavior of Retaining Walls During Earthquakes. Soil Dynamics week # 12
Dynamic Earth Pressure Problems and Retaining Walls 1/15 Behavior of Retaining Walls During Earthquakes - Permanent displacement = cc ' 2 2 due to one cycle of ground motion 2/15 Hence, questions are :
More informationGeneral Strong Polarization
General Strong Polarization Madhu Sudan Harvard University Joint work with Jaroslaw Blasiok (Harvard), Venkatesan Gurswami (CMU), Preetum Nakkiran (Harvard) and Atri Rudra (Buffalo) December 4, 2017 IAS:
More informationPRINCIPLES OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
PRINCIPLES OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Fourth Edition BRAJA M. DAS California State University, Sacramento I(T)P Boston Albany Bonn Cincinnati London Madrid Melbourne Mexico City New York Paris San Francisco
More informationGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RETAINING STRUCTURES
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ECG 503 LECTURE NOTE 07 3.0 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RETAINING STRUCTURES LEARNING OUTCOMES Learning outcomes: At the end of this lecture/week the students would be able to: Understand
More informationGeneral Strong Polarization
General Strong Polarization Madhu Sudan Harvard University Joint work with Jaroslaw Blasiok (Harvard), Venkatesan Gurswami (CMU), Preetum Nakkiran (Harvard) and Atri Rudra (Buffalo) May 1, 018 G.Tech:
More informationCHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION This chapter is devoted to describe the assigned project which is the Korean Industrial School at Jenin district.it concentrates also at investigation and understanding of the
More informationSECTION 7: FAULT ANALYSIS. ESE 470 Energy Distribution Systems
SECTION 7: FAULT ANALYSIS ESE 470 Energy Distribution Systems 2 Introduction Power System Faults 3 Faults in three-phase power systems are short circuits Line-to-ground Line-to-line Result in the flow
More informationFIXED BEAMS IN BENDING
FIXED BEAMS IN BENDING INTRODUCTION Fixed or built-in beams are commonly used in building construction because they possess high rigidity in comparison to simply supported beams. When a simply supported
More informationON CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE ELASTIC PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS WITH CRACKS
Materials Physics and Mechanics 32 (2017) 213-221 Received: November 7, 2017 ON CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE ELASTIC PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS WITH CRACKS Ruslan L. Lapin 1, Vitaly A. Kuzkin 1,2 1 Peter the
More informationFluids in Rigid-Body Motion
Fluids in Rigid-Body Motion 9. 14. 2016 Hyunse Yoon, Ph.D. Associate Research Scientist IIHR-Hydroscience & Engineering Newton s 2 nd Law of Motion In general, for a body of mass mm, mmaa = FF where, aa
More informationADVANCED SOIL MECHANICS FINAL EXAM (TAKE HOME):DUE THURSDAY, DECEMBER 19, 6PM.
14.531 ADVANCED SOIL MECHANICS FINAL EXAM (TAKE HOME):DUE THURSDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2013 @ 6PM. Problem #1. Field load tests on strip footings yielded the test data provided below in Figure 1 and Table 1
More informationFailure mechanisms and corresponding shape factors of shallow foundations
-4 June 06, Near East University, Nicosia, North Cyrus Failure mechanisms and corresonding shae factors of shallow foundations Stefan Van Baars University of Luxembourg KEYWORDS: Footings; Shallow Foundations;
More informationVerification Manual GT
Verification Manual GT Written by: The SoilVision Systems Ltd. Team Last Updated: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 SoilVision Systems Ltd. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada Software License The software described
More informationINFLUENCE OF NONASSOCIATIVITY ON THE BEARING CAPACITY
INFLUENCE OF NONASSOCIATIVITY ON THE BEARING CAPACITY OF A STRIP FOOTING By Jian-Hua Yin, 1 Yu-Jie Wang, and A. P. S. Selvadurai 3 ABSTRACT: This paper examines the ultimate bearing capacity of a strip
More informationDeep Foundations 2. Load Capacity of a Single Pile
Deep Foundations 2 Load Capacity of a Single Pile All calculations of pile capacity are approximate because it is almost impossible to account for the variability of soil types and the differences in the
More informationInformation Booklet of Formulae and Constants
Pearson BTEC Level 3 Nationals Engineering Information Booklet of Formulae and Constants Unit 1: Engineering Principles Extended Certificate, Foundation Diploma, Diploma, Extended Diploma in Engineering
More informationFailure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas
Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING LECTURE VIII Dr. Jason E. Charalambides Failure in Flexure!
More informationSAULTCOLLEGE of AppliedArtsand Technology SaultSte. Marie COURSEOUTLINE
SAULTCOLLEGE of AppliedArtsand Technology SaultSte. Marie COURSEOUTLINE STRENGTH OF ~1ATERIALS MCH 103-3 revised June 1981 by W.J. Adolph ------- STRENGHT OF MATERIALS MCH 103-3 To'Cic Periods Tooic Description
More informationA study on the bearing capacity of steel pipe piles with tapered tips
Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication The 6th Japan-China Geotechnical Symposium A study on the bearing capacity of steel pipe piles with tapered tips Hironobu Matsumiya i), Yoshiro Ishihama
More informationFOUNDATION ENGINEERING UNIT V
FOUNDATION ENGINEERING UNIT V RETAINING WALLS Plastic equilibrium in soils active and passive states Rankine s theory cohesion less and cohesive soil - Coloumb s wedge theory condition for critical failure
More information8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses.
8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses. 8.2. Some soils show a peak shear strength. Why and what type(s)
More information