S2B09NE HAGEY. Geology. of the. Cal-Chris Group. Lincoln Resources Inc. J.C.Davies \ 1985 (\ Jf RECEIVED. SEP l MINING LANDS SECTION

Transcription

1 S2B09NE HAGEY 010 Geology of the Cal-Chris Group Lincoln Resources Inc. J.C.Davies \ 1985 (\ Jf RECEIVED SEP l MINING LANDS SECTION

2 Introduction The area covered by the eastern four claims of the Cal-Chris Group were ^originally part of the Frank West property. Between 1974 and 1950, trenching and diamond drilling were carried out, but records of this work are not available. J.F.West permitted the mineral rights to revert to the Crown and the area was restaked by D.Calvert in Additional claims were added to the west and the claim group, held by D.Calvert and D.E.Christiansen, optioned in 1983 to GLE Resources Ltd. A grid was cut and a magnetic survey was conducted. Lincoln Resources Inc. subsequently obtained the property from GLE Resources Ltd. was Property The Cal-Chris Group consists of eleven claims: TB S, , , and 91, and Location and Access All of the claims lie between Highway 11 and Middle Shebandowan Lake, at a point about 85km west of Thunder Bay. Access is readily obtained from the Highway or Lake, or from cottage-access private roads. Topography Relief in the area is estimated to be less than 30m. A thin cover of glacial drift occurs on most of the hills but the orientation of the hills is parallel to structural trends in bedrock. The shore of Middle Shebandowan Lake consists almost entirely of glacial debris, but many of the boulders are angular and locally derived. An alder swamp/muskeg extends approximately east through the northern part of claims ,675735, and with drainage both to the south Un claim ) and east (in claim ). A forest fire in May.984, was largely confined by the swamp on the north and cottage-access roads on the south. Grid and Base Map A grid was established over the entire claim group, with the exception of cottage lots. The baseline was cut at a bearing of 107 degrees ar.d cross-lines were cut at 60m intervals. The 1984 fire devasted an area

3 -2- extending east from 780E to the eastern edge of the Group, and beyond; within the burn the grid i s a lmost impossible to follow. The base nap was derived from air photographs at a scale of 1:3960 and was photo-reduced to 1:5000. As several photographs were required to obtain complete coverage, minor distortion has occurred, but the basentap is consistent with measured distances. The position of cottages has not been shown. General Geology Altered, mafic to intermediate metavolcanic rocks predominate in the area. These are mainly massive to pillowd, very f ine grained flows which, where best exposed in the burn, have weathered surfaces that are mottled buff, grey and green. Pink weathered surfaces are due to abundant fine disseminated hematite and green coloration is due to epidote. In unburned areas exposures are mostly grey weathering; brown or buff weathered surfaces typically indicate the presence of iron carbonate. Primary features are poorly preserved. Partial pillow rims are evident in some outcrops, and both pillow breccia and finer fragnentais occur locally. Recognizable bedding is virtually absent. In the western part of the Group felsic flows appear to form a distinct layer of the order of 100m wide. These are best exposed to the west of the Group where the altered rocks are yellowish green and contain minor quartz veinlets. Felsic flows outcrop on the shore near the east boundary of claim Their eastward continuity has not been established, but it is possible that the sheared felsic volcanics on Lynx Island are stratigraphically equivalent. Felsic flows and fragmentals are also present in claims 6154S7 and 88, but do not appear to be as siliceous as those in the western paart of the Group. Some interlaying of these rocks with more mafic volcanics is apparent. A series of felsic porphyry lenses lie to the south of, and approximatelyparallel to, the baseline. These are mainly quartz bearing, but quartz veinlets are less numerous than in the larger body of quartz porphyry in the Frank West property to the north. It is possible that there is continuity between some of the lenses as overburden is abundant. Quartz diorite of the Shebandowan stock underlies the southern part of claim and small islands in claim The contact is interpreted to be regular and to extend under the lake from the southwest corner of claim to the southeast corner of claim , but is poorly defined raagnetlically.

4 -3- Structural Geology The general distribution of mafic and felsic volcanics is indicative of east-trending volcanic stratigraphy. East of the Group there is evidence that the volcanics face to the north and it is interpreted that the entire volcanic section exposed in the Cal-Chris Group is north facing. Foliation varies from weak to well developed and consistently strikes between 100O and 115O with steep north dips. Lineaments trending east-northeast occur in the area and are believed to mark the position of a sinistral fault system. One of these, in the north part of claims and , coincides with magnetically interpreted faults. A strong east-striking, north-dipping shear zone, with a possible width of up to 100m, occurs in the west-central part of claim This may be a sehhhhjdary feature related to the interpreted east-northeast faults. Economic Geology During the present survey, the only workings located are a series of shallow trenches between the baseline and the alder swamp in claims and 53. At 1400E and 025N, rock was blasted from outcrop which forms a low cliff at the north side of a hill. The rock consists of highly carbonatized mafic volcanics in which there is quartz veining and both pyrite and chalcopyrite. There was no obvious structural control but it nay indicate the presence of mineralization in lower ground to the north. At 1740E and 040N a shallow trench exposes altered mafic volcanics in which there is minor shearing and some disseminated pyrite. The trench is at the northedge of a hill and, similarly, may indicate a stronger zone of liberalization to the north. Nearby, at 1775E and 090N, a very large lens of white quartz has been exposed by trenching; the quartz is associated with carbonate in places, but is essentially devoid of sulphides. At 1815E and 080N, sheared carbonatized volcanics are cut by a small quartz-carbonate vein which contains minor pyrite. A wider section of similiar rock was exposed in a deeper trench at 1900E and 100N; at the writer's suggestion this trench was extended to the north and south and a second parallel trench was sunk 25m to the west. In both these trenches the sheared volcanics strike about 095O and dip 50O to 70O north. The sheared volcanics are reported to contain Au per ton (Schnieders

5 -4- and Dutka, 1985) but visible gold is present in quartz-carbonate veins which constitute a small percentage of the total exposure. A copper occurrence was noted by Morin (1974) in the area of claim The pit in felsic volcanics was not located during present work. Pyrite is present in many of the rocks of the area and there is some concentration along narrow shear zones. Morin (1974) noted the presence of carbonatized volcanics in the area of claim and considered these rocks to have potential for gold mineralization. Recommedations The zone of strongly sheared volcanics with auiferous quartz-carbonate veins is the principal exploration target in the claim group. In preparation for further work on this the baseline should be re-surveyed and picketed between 1320E and 2040E (beyond which the original baseline can be recognized). North of the baselline the cross-lines should be picketed through the burn. It is recommended that soil and humus samples be collected between the baseline and the alder swamp at 15m intervals along each cross-line east of 1380E. It is further recommended that this be followed by removal of shallow overburden from the low ridge between 1840E and 1920E and between 085N and 110N and that the stripped area be washed with high-pressure hoses to permit detailed geological mapping of the shear zone. Sheared quartz porphyry and volcanics are present between 1680E and 1860E and from 100S to 150S. Pyrite is common in the shears and carbonate is locally abundant. It is recommended that the area between the quartz porphyry and the cottage-access road be prospected and that 'all Mineralization be sampled. Prospecting and sampling of other shear zones adjacent to porphyry lenses should be carried out. This would include the vicinity of 400E and 25S, 540E and 140S, E and S, E and 100S, and 2040E and 130S. Claims and are mainly underlain by mafic volcanics. The area contains few outcrops and much windfall, and assessment of the mineral potential is difficult. Morin (1974) recommended the area for exploration, and it is here recommended that every second line be flagged and that geochemical sampling be carried out in order to locate possible anomalous zones

6 -5- Respectfully submitted, August 20, John C. Davies PhD. P.Eng.

7 m moiled -pmk Val axmii. 26 N mud ^low, SKebdnc/euJaw ovn 6r6op

8 CERTIFICATE I, John C. Davies, of the city of Saskatoon, in the province of Saskatchewan, do hereby certify that: 1. I an a geologist residing at 411 Garrison Crescent, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. 2. I a* a graduate of The University of Manitoba with a PhD in geology and have been practicing my profession continuously for thirty years. 3. I an a member of the Association of Professional Engineers of the Province of Saskatchewan, a nember of the Society of Economic Geologists and a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada. 4. My report, dated August 20, 1985, on the Cal-Chris Group is based on personal observations in the field during the period June 29-July 24, 1985, and an examination of pertinent literature. 5. I consent to the use of this report, or a summary thereof, by Lincoln Resources, Incorporated. 6. I hold no interest in the shares of Lincoln Resources Inc., nor do I expect to receive any such interest. Dated at Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, this 20th day of August 1985.

9 i i Ontarn M.riislrye? Natural sources Type of Survey(s) ClairrTHoiderTs) Report of Work (Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures) GEOLOGICAL Address Richmond St.W., Toronto, Survey Company LINCOLN RE50URCES INC. Name and Address of Author {of Geo-Technical report} Mir Ont. 52B89NE HAGEY Township or Area Date of Survey (from a to) HAGEY G-661 tsy QS j S, 5 j 2^, flp i BS [Prospector's Licence No. JOHN C. DAVIES, 411 GARRISON CR., SASKATOON, SASKATCHEWAN Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence) Special Provisions For first survey: Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting) Geophysical - Electromagnetic - Magnetometer Day, per Claim Mining Claim Prefix Number TB O438 E xpend. Days Cr. &A"} )i fvhes o* line Cut Mmmg C'airn Prefix i Number approx Expend. Dftys Cr. For each additional survey: using the same grid: Enter 20 days (for each) - Radiometric - Other -,::.., l Geological j -JQ,.^vj Man Da * s Complete reverse side and enter t^al(s) here Geochemical -.., Geophys.cal - FJoctr omagnet ic Days per C laim ' "! ^WfSJ^t1 tv t9v^ -SG1DOt- 2/tA^ X i": ^ JT^^^S Vu^ ; F Olhc' i Gpoloqicn' Groc nt' r^iic. A'f borne Credits ; Dnvs Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborm- Surveys. Eicctfom.'ipr.et M.ignetorretui Expenditures (exrludes power stripping) Type Of Work Performed Pcftorrvier! on Claimls) : :: f P* X*V C; f 'D " "" ' - i r, ^ ''. M/ft h'a.ui " tt i'j( VED IQPq i*.'\'0 isnrn--- " Calculation ol txpenaitim: Days fri;.-::s Total t xpenditu re"; Total Days Credits may be apportioned.-u the t Li^rn holden tn columns at rirjht. Total n.t.fnlsor o^ mining rt-po' 1 O^ WO' k. M ; Certification Verifying Report of Work 1 hereby certify that 1 haw a persona! and intirmtr- know'cdqe of the farts set forth in thp Repot t of Wo'k annrxcd hrroto, ha v t ne pciformcti t h*.' woik O' witnosb(-{j sjme clurinp and/oi yftfrr its cfjmp'r-t on,"inci the nnncxocj report is true. ne fl'*cf Postri! Address ot Person Cc'tilying DAVID E. (JHRHiTI ANSON, R. R. 14. Dog Lake Rd.. Thunder Bay,, Ont. P7B 5E5

10 Ontario i Ministry o* Natural Resources Type of Survev(s) Claim Holder(t) Report of Work (Geophysical, Geological, VLEI LECHNICAL REPORTS Geochemical and Expenditure* )endituresb SUBMI ' TIED WITH REPORT n 382 GEOLOGICAL DANIEL CALVERT pt or print. ' If number of mining claims traversed exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Note: Only days credits calculated in the "Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns. Do not use shaded areas below. Township or Area HAGEY G-661 Prospector'* Licence No. E Address c/o D.E. Christiansen R.R. 14, Dog Lake Rd., Thunder Bay, Ont. Survey Company LINCOLN RESOURCES INC Date of Survey (from Si to) Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report) John C. Davies, 411 Garrison Court, Saskatoon; Saskatchewan. Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Special Provisions Geophysical Days per Claim For first survey: - Electromagnetic Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting) - Magnetometer Total Mi let of line Cut 2 app. Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence) Mining Claim Expend. Mining Claim Prefix Number Day t Cr. Prefix Number TB Expend. Days Cr. For each additional survey: using the same grid: Enter 20 days (for each) - Radiometric - Other Geological Geochemical 20 Man Days Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here Airborne Credits l" i r M 1 i,v:\- Geophysical - Electromagnetic, r f' \ V t t* ' V..5 Magnetometer - RadiomeirjgjO - Other.Geological :, ; - '" Geochemical Days per Claim "i i -i y Days per Claim Not*: Special provisions to Airborne Surveys. Electromagnetic Magnetometer Radiometric Expenditures (excludes power stripping) Type of Work Performed Performed on Claimd) Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits Total Expenditures S -f- 15 E Total Days Credits Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim (elected in columns at right. Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work. Date 01.1O.65 R. ri^tffldafu^ Agent ( Signature) 'r Sv s~s \*LjCzZ66x*i*'*-rt-~ Certification Verifying Report of Work l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true. Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying Q-!..E..,..PJlCi stjl anson, R. R. 14, Dog Lake Rd.. Thunder Bay. Ont. Date Certified CertU 136? (81/9)

11 REGISTERED November 20, 1985 Report Of Work 1468 Daniel Calvert c/o D.E. Christiansen R.R.I14 Dog Lake Road Thunder Bay* Ontario P7B 5E5 Dear Sir: RE: Mining Claims TB , et al, 1n Hagey Township I have not received the reports and naps ( 1n duplicate) for the Geological Survey on the above-mentioned claims. As the assessment "Report of Work" was recorded by the Mining Recorder on October l, 198S the 60 day period allowed by Section 77 of the Mining Act for the submission of the technical reports and maps to this office will expire on November 30* If the material Is not submitted to this office by November 30, 1985 I will have no alternative but to Instruct the Mining Recorder to delete the work credits from the claim record sheets. For further Information, please contact Mr. Arthur Barr at (416) Yours sincerely, S.E. Yundt Director Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario N7A 1U3 Phone:(416) AB/mc cc: Mining Recorder Thunder Bay, Ontario Encl.

12 Ontario Ministry of Technical Assessment t Northern Affairs..,. -,. and Mines Work Cred.tS Date Mini File no Recorder's Report of 382 Recorded Holder Township or Area DANIEL CALVERT HAGEY TOWNSHIP Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim Geophysical Mining Claims Assessed Magnetometer riays Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column l Geological 31 days Geochemical Hays Man days Airborne l TB Special provision ^Tl Ground ~xl l Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims. l Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant. Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims j not sufficiently covered by the survey insufficient technical data filed The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) (85/9)

13 Mining Recorder Ministry of Northern Affairs and Mines 435 James Street South P.O. Box 5000 Thunder Bay* Ontario P7C 566 Dear Madam: RE: Geological Survey submitted on Mining Claim TB , et al, In Hagey Township Your File: 382 Our Files Please disregard our Notice of Intent dated October 18, 1985 covering the above-nant1oned survey. The survey has been reassessed at the request of the claim holder. Line cutting credits have been allowed. The assessment work credits, as shown on the attached statement have been approved as of the above date. Please Inform the recorded holder of these Mining claims and so Indicate on your records. Yours sincerely, S. E. Yundt Director Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1H3 Phone:(416) SH/mc cc: Daniel Calvert Toronto, Ontario David E. Christiansen Thunder Bay, Ontario Resident Geologist Thunder Bay, Ontario End. John C..Davies Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Mr. G.H. Ferguson Mining l Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

14 ario Ministry of Natural Resources Your File: 382 Our File: Mining Recorder Ministry of Northern Affairs and Mines P.O. Box 5000 Thunder Bay, Ontario P7C 5G6 Dear Madam: Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets. For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/ Yours sincerely,.e. Yundt Director Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 j) -SH/mc Ends. cc: 845 Daniel Calvert Suite Richmond Street West Toronto, Ontario M5H 1Z5 David E. Christiansen R.R.#14 Dog Lake Road Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 5E5 John C. Davies 411 Garrison Cr. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7H 2Z9 Mr. G.H. Ferguson Mining S Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

15 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Notice of Intent for Technical Reports /382 An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged. If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application. If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded. If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued. 846 (82/51

16 Ontario Ministry of Technical Assessment Northern Affairs,, and Mines Work Credlts ; File Date Mining Recorder's Report of Work *0-382 Recorded Holder Township or Area DANIEL CALVERT HAGEY TOWNSHIP Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim Geophysical Electromagnetic riays Mining Claims Assessed Magnetometer rtays Other Hay s Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column Geological 16 riays Georhemir.al days Man days Airborne l l TB Special provision fcl Ground fxi f)3 Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims. 1 l Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant. Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims Q not sufficiently covered by the survey Q insufficient technical data filed The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) (85/9)

17 Mining Lands Section Control Sheet File No TYPE OF SURVEY GEOPHYSICAL x GEOLOGICAL GEOCHEMICAL EXPENDITURE MINING LANDS COMMENTS: Signature of Assessor V Date

18 w x/

19 r CAL-CHRIS GROUP LINCOLN RESOURCES INC. o 300 METRES LATE MAFIC D IKES 6Q - tomprojorwre bb - G o b oro, diorite FELSIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS 5a - Quart L diorite 5 b " Quartz 5C - Quartz 5d ~ Quart*- 5c - Feldspar porpk^ru 5f - Felsite MAFIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS 4o ~ Gabbro (.or m.g. ~ Anorthotit* SEDIMENTS 3a - Chert FELSIC VOLCANIC ROCKS 2n-Massiv* flows 26 - Flow brtccm CO OD O x PUBLIC ROAD PRIVATE ROAD, TRAIL MAIN POWER LINE COTTAGE POWER LINE SWAMP. BOG MUSKEG CLAIM POSTS OUTCROP BROKEN OUTCROP GEOLOGICAL BOUNDARY FOLIATION BEDDING td - Altered vi PILLOW FACING MAFIC TO INTERMEDIATE VOLCANIC ROCKS la -MOM iv* flows (b 'Pillowed 14ows le - Pillow or?lo*i breccu Id - TuK breccia (e -Lailli t -ground p- Imm -fcld*^**- vemlci* vehicular, am t- o- o- GOLD S SOIL ANOMALY MOO, 30-99, 10- t9ppb DRILL HOLE GOLD INTERSECTION /3Ocm TRENCH LINEAMENT SHEARED 52B09NE HAGEY 200 J.C. DAVIES 1985