Verification Examples

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Verification Examples"

Transcription

1 Verification Examples 018

2 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples Linear static... 4 Supported bar with concentrated loads Thermally loaded bar structure Continously supported beam with point loads External prestressed beam Periodically supported infinite membrane wall with constant distributed load Clamped beam examination with plane stress elements Clamped thin square plate Simply supported XLAM plate Plate with fixed support and constant distributed load.... Annular plate All edges simply supported plate with partial distributed load Clamped plate with linear distributed load Hemisphere displacement Nonlinear static D beam structure Plate with fixed end and bending moment Plastic material Clamped beam with plastic material under cyclic loading Clamped beam with symmetric nonlinear material model Clamped beam with asymmetric nonlinear material model... 4 Clamped beam with only compression material model Dynamic Deep simply supported beam Clamped thin rhombic plate Cantilevered thin square plate Cantilevered tapered membrane Flat grillages Stability Simply supported beam Simply supported beam Design N-M interaction curve of cross-section (EN :004) RC beam deflection according to EC, EN : RC one-way slab deflection according to EC, EN : RC two-way slab deflection according to EC, EN : Nonlinear analysis of RC columns according to EC, EN : Axially loaded RC column check according to EC, EN : Axially loaded RC column check according to EC, EN : Required steel reinforcement of RC plate according to EC, EN : Interaction check of simply supported beam under biaxial bending (EN ) Interaction check of simply supported beam under normal force, bending and shear force Buckling resistance of simply supported beam (EN ) Buckling resistance of simply supported beam (EN ) Buckling of a hollow cross-section beam (EN ) Lateral torsional buckling of a beam (EN ) Interaction check of beam in section class 4 (EN , EN ) Fire design of steel elements Unprotected column under axial compression (EN ) Fire design of steel elements Unrestrained beam (EN ) Fire design of steel elements Unrestrained beam-column (EN ) Fire design of steel elements Beam-column with restrained lateral displacements (EN ) Earth-quake design using response-spectrum method Design of an XLAM shell (EC5)

3 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 3 Appendix A Clamped beam with symmetrical nonlinear material model Theoretical background... 1 Clamped beam with asymmetrical nonlinear material model Theoretical background Clamped beam with only compression nonlinear material model Theoretical background... 15

4 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 4 Linear static

5 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 5 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: beam1.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Supported bar with concentrated loads. Linear analysis. Side view Section Area = 100,0 cm (10 10) Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Mesh Axial direction forces P1 = -00 kn, P = 100 kn, P3 = -40 kn Fix ends, at R1 and R5. E = 0000 kn / cm = 0,3 Beam element Target Results R1, R5 support forces Theory AxisVM % R 1 [kn] -,00 -,00 0,00 R 5 [kn] 118,00 118,00 0,00

6 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 6 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: beam.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Thermally loaded bar structure. Linear analysis. z x Sections: Steel: AS = x 10-4 m (D=cm) Copper: AC = x 10-4 m (D=cm) Side view Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Target Results P = -1 kn (Point load) Temperature rise of 10 C in the structure after assembly. The upper end of bars are fixed. Nodal DOF: Frame X-Z plane Steel: ES = 0700 kn / cm, = 0,3, S = 1, x 10-5 C -1 Copper: EC = kn / cm, = 0,3, C = 1,7 x 10-5 C -1 Beam element Smax in the three bars. Theory AxisVM % Steel S max [MPa] 3,84 3,848 0,10 Cooper S max [MPa] 7,185 7,199 0,19

7 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 7 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: beam3.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Continously supported beam with point loads. Linear analysis. Side view (Section width = 1,00 m, height1 = 0,30 m, height = 0,60 m) Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Target Results P1= -300 kn, P= -150 kn, P3= -800 kn, P4= -450 kn Elastic supported. From A to D is Kz = 5000 kn/m/m. From D to F is Kz = kn/m/m. Nodal DOF: Frame X-Z plane E = 3000 kn/cm = 0,3 Rib element: Three node beam element. Shear deformation is taken into account. ez, My, Vz, Rz Diagram ez Diagram My Results

8 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 8 Diagram Vz Diagram Rz Reference AxisVM e [%] e A [m] e B [m] e C [m] e D [m] e E [m] e F [m] Reference AxisVM e [%] M A [KNm] M B [KNm] M C [KNm] M D [KNm] M E [KNm] M F [KNm]

9 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 9 Results Reference AxisVM e [%] V A [KN] V B [KN] V C [KN] V D [KN] V E [KN] V F [KN] Reference AxisVM e [%] R A [KN/m ] R B [KN/m ] R C [KN/m ] R D [KN/m ] R E [KN/m ] R F [KN/m ]

10 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 10 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: beam4.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry External prestressed beam. Linear analysis. Side view Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties p = -50 kn /m distributed load Length change = -6,5E-3 at beam 5-6 ey = ez = = 0 at node 1 ex = ey = ez = 0 at node 4 E =,1E11 N / m Beam 1-5, 5-6, 6-4 A = 4,5E-3 m Iz= 0,E-5 m 4 Truss -5, 3-6 A = 3,48E-3 m Iz= 0,E-5 m 4 Beam 1-4 A = 1,516E- m Iz=,174E-4 m 4 Mesh Beam 1-4: division into N segment: N = 1 Element types Rib element: Three node beam element, 1-5, 5-6, 6-4, 1-4 (shear deformation is taken into account) Truss element -5, 3-6 Target NX at beam 1-4 My,max at beam -3 ez at node

11 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 11 Results Diagram ez ROBOT V6 AxisVM % N x [kn] 584,56 584,81 0,04 M y [knm] 49,6 49,60 0,68 e z [mm] -0,541-0,5469 0,89

12 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 1 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: plane1.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Periodically supported infinite membrane wall with constant distributed load. Linear analysis. Loads p = 00 kn / m Side view (thickness = 0,0 cm) Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Mesh vertical support at every 4,0 m support length is 0,4 m (Rz = 1E+3) Symmetry edges Nodal DOF: (C C f C C C) E = 880 kn / cm = 0,16 Parabolic quadrilateral membrane (plane stress) Target Sxx at 1-10 nodes (1-5 at middle, 6-10 at support)

13 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 13 Results Node Analytical [kn/cm ] AxisVM [kn/cm ] % 1 0,1313 0,1310-0,3 0,0399 0,0395-1,00 3-0,0093-0,0095,15 4-0,041-0,0413 0,4 5-0,1073-0,1070-0,8 6-0,9317-0,9166-1,6 7 0,0401 0,046 6,3 8 0,0465 0,0469 0,86 9 0,0538 0,0537-0, ,149 0,145-0,3 Reference: Dr. Bölcskey Elemér Dr. Orosz Árpád: Vasbeton szerkezetek Faltartók, Lemezek, Tárolók

14 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 14 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: plane.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Clamped beam examination with plane stress elements. Linear analysis. Side view Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Mesh p = -5 kn/m Both ends built-in. Line support component stiffness: 1E+10. Symmetry edge Nodal DOF: (C C f C C C) E = 880 kn / cm = 0 Parabolic quadrilateral membrane (plane stress) Side view

15 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 15 Target Results xy, max at section C Diagram xy Diagram xy at section C

16 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 16 V 65,65 kn ( from beam theory) S ' y 0, m 3 b 0,5 m I y 0, m 4 xy V S b I ' y y 65,650, ,5 0,50, kn/ m AxisVM result xy = 786,8 kn / m Difference = -0,09 % AxisVM result V nxy 65, 33 kn Difference = -0,45 %

17 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 17 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: plate1.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Clamped thin square plate. Linear analysis. Top view (thickness = 5,0 cm) Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Mesh P = -10 kn (at the middle of the plate) ex = ey = ez = fix = fiy = fiz = 0 along all edges Nodal DOF: Plate in X-Y plane E = 0000 kn / cm = 0,3 Plate element (Parabolic quadrilateral, heterosis type) Target Displacement of middle of the plate

18 Displacements AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 18 Results Displacements Mode Mesh Book 1 Timoshenko AxisVM Diff 1 [%] Diff [%] 1 x 0,40 0,40 4,48 10,53 4x4 0,416 0,369-11,30 -,89 3 8x8 0,394 0,38 0,381-3,30 0,6 4 1x1 0,387 0,383-1,03 0, x16 0,385 0,383-0,5 0,79 References: 1.) The Finite Element Method (Fourth Edition) Volume. /O.C. Zienkiewicz and R.L. Taylor/ McGraw-Hill Book Company 1991 London.) Result of analytical solution of Timoshenko Convergency 15,00 10,00 5,00 0, Diff1 [%] Diff [%] -5,00-10,00-15,00 Mesh density

19 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 19 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: XLAM_Example_1.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Simply supported XLAM plate. Linear analysis. Top view (x-y plane) Loads P = -100 kn concentrated force acting at point (x = 9.0 m, y =.5 m) PZ = kn/m uniform load Boundary ex = ey = ez = fiy = fiz = 0, fix = free along top and bottom edges Conditions ex = ey = ez = fix = fiz = 0, fiy = free along left and right edges Nodal DOF at the remaining nodes: Plate in X-Y plane Material Material quality equals to C4 timber. Properties Section MM 7s/40 XLAM section with x oriented top layer grain direction and Service Class, Properties producing an overall thickness of 40 mm. Element Plate element (Parabolic quadrilateral, heterosis type) types Mesh Target Average element length is 0. m. Displacement and stresses at node 397 (x = 8.0 m, y = m), material stiffness matrix, shear correction factors. Displacements and stresses with Axis VM, ANSYS and from Navier solution 1

20 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 0 x y Description AxisVM ANSYS Diff [%] Navier solution Diff [%] 8.0 m m e z [mm] σ x maximum 8.0 m m [N/mm ] 8.0 m m σ y maximum [N/mm ] 8.0 m m τ xz maximum [N/mm ] 8.0 m m τ yz maximum [N/mm ] Material stiffness matrix and shear correction factors from ANSYS Material stiffness matrix and shear correction factos from Axis VM 3 Membrane terms

21 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 1 Bending terms Shear terms 4 Shear correction factors 1 : with 50 harmonic terms included : units in [N] and [mm] 3 : units in [kn] and [m] 4 : corrected shear stiffnesses

22 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: plate.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Plate with fixed support and constant distributed load. Linear analysis. Top view (thickness = 15,0 cm) Loads P = -5 kn / m Boundary ex = ey = ez = fix = fiy = fiz = 0 along all edges Conditions Nodal DOF: Plate in X-Y plane Material E = 990 kn/cm Properties = 0,16 Element Parabolic triangle plate element types Mesh Target Results Maximal ez (found at Node1) and maximal mx (found at Node) Component Nastran AxisVM % ez,max [mm] mx,max [knm/m]

23 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 3 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: plate3.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Annular plate. Linear analysis. Top view (thickness =,0 cm) Loads Boundary Conditions Edge load: Q = 100 kn / m Distributed load: q = 100 kn / m Nodal DOF: Plate in X-Y plane Material Properties Element types E = 880 kn / cm = 0,3 Plate element (parabolic quadrilateral, heterosis type)

24 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 4 Mesh Target Smax, emax Results Theory AxisVM Model S max S max % [kn/cm] [kn/cm] a.),8,78-1,4 b.) 6,88 6,76-1,74 c.) 14, 14,10-0,84 d.) 1,33 1,33 0,00 e.),35,5-4,6 f.) 9,88 9,88 0,00 g.) 4,79 4,76-0,63 h.) 7,86 7,86 0,00 Theory AxisVM Model e max e max % [mm] [mm] a.) b.) c.) d.) e.) f.) g.) h.) Reference: S. Timoshenko and S. Woinowsky-Krieger: Theory of Plates And Shells

25 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 5 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: plate4.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry All edges simply supported plate with partial distributed load. Linear analysis. Top view (thickness =,0 cm) Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Mesh Distributed load: q = -10 kn / m (middle of the plate at,0 x,0 m area) a.) ex = ey = ez = 0 along all edges (soft support) b.) ex = ey = ez = 0 along all edges = 0 perpendicular the edges (hard support) Nodal DOF: Plate in X-Y plane E = 880 kn / cm = 0,3 Plate element (Heterosis type)

26 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 6 Target Results mx, max, my, max a.) Moment Theory AxisVM % m x, max [knm/m] 7,4 7,34 1,38 m y, max [knm/m] 5,3 5,39 1,3 b.) Moment Theory AxisVM % m x, max [knm/m] 7,4 7,8 0,55 m y, max [knm/m] 5,3 5,35 0,56 Reference: S. Timoshenko and S. Woinowsky-Krieger: Theory of Plates And Shells

27 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 7 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: plate5.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Clamped plate with linear distributed load. Linear analysis. Top view (thickness =,0 cm) Loads Distributed load: q = -10 kn / m Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Mesh ex = ey = ez = fix = fiy= fiz = 0 along all edges Nodal DOF: Plate in X-Y plane E = 880 kn / cm = 0,3 Plate element (Heterosis type)

28 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 8 Target mx, my Results Reference: Results Theory AxisVM % m x,1 [knm/m] 11,50 11,48-0,17 m y,1 [knm/m] 11,50 11,48-0,17 m x, [knm/m] 33,40 33,3-0,51 m x,3 [knm/m] 17,90 17,83-0,39 m y,4 [knm/m] 5,70 5,53-0,66 S. Timoshenko and S. Woinowsky-Krieger: Theory of Plates And Shells

29 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 9 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: hemisphere.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Hemisphere displacement. Linear analysis. Hemisphere (Axonometric view) t = 0,04 m Loads Point load P =,0 kn

30 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 30 Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Target ex = ey = ez = fix = fiy = fiz= 0 at C Symmetry in X-Z plane on A-C edge Symmetry in Y-Z plane on B-C edge E = 685 kn / cm = 0,3 Shell element 1.) guadrilateral parabolic.) triangle parabolic ex at point A Results e x [m] e [%] Theory 0,185 AxisVM quadrilateral 0,185 0,00 AxisVM triangle 0,18-1,6

31 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 31 Nonlinear static Software Release Number: X4r1

32 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 3 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: nonlin1.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry 3D beam structure. Geometrical nonlinear analysis. 1,73 m F y =-300,00 kn F z =-600,00 kn Node1 F y =-300,00 kn F z =-600,00 kn 3,000 m 1,73 m Beam1 D Y X 1,73 m 3,000 m 1,73 m A F z =-600,00 kn C B 4,000 m Z Z Y X X Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Cross- Section Properties Element types Target Py = -300 kn Pz = -600 kn ex = ey = ez = 0 at A, B, C and D S 75 E = 1000 kn / cm = 0,3 HEA 300 Ax = cm ; Ix = 85.3 cm 4 ; Iy = cm 4 ; Iz = cm 4 Beam ex, ey, ez, at Node1 Nx, Vy, Vz, Tx, My, Mz of Beam1 at Node1 Results Comparison with the results obtained using Nastran V4

33 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 33 Component Nastran AxisVM % ex [mm] 17,898 17,881-0,09 ey [mm] -75,70-75,663-0,05 ez [mm] -4,63-4,597-0,06 Nx [kn] -83,15-83,5 0,04 Vy [kn] -8,09-8,10 0,04 Vx [kn] -106,57-106,48-0,08 Tx [knm] -4,57-4,57 0,00 My [knm] -519,00-518,74-0,05 Mz [knm] 148,94 148,91-0,0

34 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 34 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: nonlin.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Plate with fixed end and bending moment. Geometrical nonlinear analysis. Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Cross Section Properties Element types Mz = 600 knm (x1300 Nm) acting on Edge ex = ey = ez = fix = fiy = fiz = 0 along Edge1 (Use Constrained nodes instead of line support; Nodal DOF on Edge 1: Fixed node) E = 0000 N / mm = 0 Plate thickness: 150 mm Rib on Edge: circular D = 500 mm (for distributing load to the mid-side-node) Parabolic quadrilateral shell (heterosis type) Rib on Edge for distributing load to the mid-side-node

35 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 35 Target Results Z at Edge I I E z plate plate plate plate M.610 Theoretical results based on the differential equation of the flexible beam: M E plate plate 3 ab N m 1 m M z I platee Nm.610 z plate plate rad Comparison the AxisVM result with the theoretical one: Component Theory AxisVM % fiz [rad] 5,5467 5,550 0,06

36 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 36 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: Plastic_1.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Plastic material Nonlinear static analysis Cross-section: D = 30mm Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Target Axial force at A: N Solution control: Displacement at A ex = ey = ez = 0 at B, C and D S 35 E = 1000 kn / cm = 0,3 Linear elastic perfectly plastic material model Truss element Check the load vertical displacement (A) curve Results Analytical results: [u;f(u)] AxisVM: [Axisi,1; Axisi,0]

37 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 37 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: Plastic_.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Clamped beam with plastic material under cyclic loading Nonlinear static analysis Fz A L = 100 cm B Nx Cross-section: Z = 30mm Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Target Results Nx = 63,333 kn; Fz =,666 kn Solution control: Displacement at B ez = -70 mm Increment function: 1, ,5 0-0, ,5 ex = ey = ez = fix = fiy = fiz = 0 at A Steel E = kn/cm ; ET = 1000 kn/cm ; y = 10 kn/cm = 0,3 Linear elastic plastic material model Hardening rule: Isotropic hardening Beam element Check the load displacements and beam strains curves AxisVM: Beam element Rib element (shear deformation is taken into account)

38 Fz [kn] Fz [kn] Fx [kn] AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 38 ANSYS 14.0 Beam element (unrestrained warping) Axis beam ANSYS beam Axis Rib -400 ex [mm] Axis beam ANSYS beam Axis Rib -0 ez [mm] Axis beam ANSYS beam Axis Rib -0 ey [mm]

39 Fz [kn] AxisVM X4 Verification Examples ,004-0,003-0,00-0, ,001 0,00 0,003 0,004 0,005-5 Axis beam ANSYS beam Axis Rib exx []

40 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 40 Software Release Number: X4r3 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: matnl_01_xx (xx element type) Thema Analysis Type Geometry Clamped beam with symmetric nonlinear material model Nonlinear static analysis Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Fz = 00 kn Solution control: Force Increment function: Equal increments ex = ey = ez = fix = fiy = fiz = 0 at A Steel Strain energy based (NLE) Steel Von Mises (VM) Material model function: σ = 400 ε Discrete function assignment per ε = [] = 0,3 Element types / File name Target Beam/Rib element Plate element (heterosis type) matnl_01_beam-rib_nle.axs, matnl_01_beam-rib_vm.axs matnl_01_plate_nle.axs, matnl_01_plate_vm.axs Membrane element matnl_01_membrane_nle.axs, matnl_01_membrane_vm.axs Check vertical displacements (B) and stresses (A)

41 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 41 Results Analytical background: Appendix A; Yield criterion Strain energy based Von Mises Type of element eb [mm] [%] eb [mm] [%] Analytical 156,4 156,4 Beam 157,98 1,01 158,6 1,41 Rib 158,48 1,33 159,14 1,75 Plate TRIA 158,98 1,65 158,68 1,46 Plate QUAD 159,04 1,69 158,81 1,54 Membrane TRIA 158,34 1,4 159,14 1,75 Membrane QUAD 158,79 1,53 159,6,05 Yield criterion Strain energy based Von Mises Type of element A [kn/cm ] [%] A [kn/cm ] [%] Analytical Beam 49,9-0,0 48,88 -,4 Rib 49,9-0,0 48,88 -,4 Plate TRIA 49,84-0,3 49,6-0,80 Plate QUAD 50,5 1,00 50,7 1,40 Membrane TRIA 49,75-0,50 47,44-5,1 Membrane QUAD 49,66-0,68 47,04-5,9

42 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 4 Software Release Number: X4r3 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: matnl_0_xx (xx element type) Thema Analysis Type Geometry Clamped beam with asymmetric nonlinear material model Nonlinear static analysis Loads Fz = 100 N; Solution control: Force Increment function: Equal increments Boundary ex = ey = ez = fix = fiy = fiz = 0 at A Conditions Material Properties Concrete Bresler-Pister (BP) Other Strain energy based (NLE) E = 8600 N/mm ; ET = 0 N/mm ; yt = 1,6 N/mm ;yc = 16 N/mm ; CyB = 1, (Bresler-Pister); = 0; Element types / File name Target Beam/Rib element matnl_0_beam-rib_nle.axs, matnl_0_beam-rib_bp.axs Shell element matnl_0_shell_nle.axs, matnl_0_shell_bp.axs (heterosis type) Check vertical displacements (B) and stresses (C), length of plastic zone (x)

43 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 43 Results Analytical background: Appendix A; Yield criterion Strain energy based Bresler Pister Type of element eb [mm] [%] eb [mm] [%] Analytical,833,833 Beam,798-1,4,796-1,31 Rib,841 0,8,837 0,14 Shell,899,33,79-1,45 Yield criterion Strain energy based Bresler Pister Type of element C,min [kn/cm ] [%] C,min [kn/cm ] Analytical 4,98 4,98 [%] Beam 5,03 1,00 5,0 0,8 Rib 4,90-1,61 4,90-1,61 Shell 5,01 0,60 4,90-1,61 Axis shell NLE model top and bottom Sxx [N/mm ]

44 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 44 Effective plastic strain of Beam and shell (top) with Bresler-Pister material Analytical result for x = 1,111 m (plastic zone)

45 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 45 Software Release Number: X4r3 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: matnl_03_xx (xx element type) Thema Analysis Type Geometry Clamped beam with only compression material model Nonlinear static analysis Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Fz =00 N; N = 5000 N Solution control: Force Increment function: Equal increments ex = ey = ez = fix = fiy = fiz = 0 at A Concrete Bresler-Pister (BP) Other Strain energy based (NLE) E = 8600 N/mm ; ET = 0 N/mm ; yt = 0,016 N/mm ;yc = 16 N/mm ; CyB = 1, (Bresler-Pister); = 0; Element types / File name Target Beam/Rib element matnl_03_beam-rib_nle.axs, matnl_03_beam-rib_bp.axs Shell element matnl_03_shell_nle.axs, matnl_03_shell_bp.axs (heterosis type) Check vertical displacements (B) and stresses (C), length of plastic zone (x)

46 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 46 Results Analytical background: Appendix A; Yield criterion Strain energy based Bresler Pister Type of element eb [mm] [%] eb [mm] [%] Analytical 0,475 0,475 Beam 0,467-1,76 0,466-1,97 Rib 0,475-0,07 0,473-0,50 Shell 0,483 1,61 0,471-0,9 Yield criterion Strain energy based Bresler Pister Type of element C,min [N/mm ] [%] C,min [N/mm ] Analytical 1,097 1,097 [%] Beam 1,088-0,8 1,086-1,0 Rib 1,067 -,73 1,066 -,8 Shell 1,085-1,09 1,076-1,97 Axis shell NLE model top and bottom Sxx [N/mm ]

47 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 47 Effective plastic strain of Beam and shell (top) with Bresler-Pister material Analytical result for x = 1,113 m (plastic zone)

48 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 48 BLANK

49 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 49 Dynamic Software Release Number: X4r1

50 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 50 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: dynam1.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Deep simply supported beam. Vibration analysis. Beam (Axonometric view) Cross section (square,0 m x,0 m) Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Target Self-weight (Other option: Apply Masses only option on Vibration analysis window) ex = ey = ez = fix = 0 at A ey = ez = 0 at B E = 0000 kn / cm = 0,3 = 8000 kg / m 3 Rib elemen: Three node beam element (shear deformation is taken into account) First 7 mode shapes Results

51 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 51 Mode 1: f = 43,16 Hz Mode : f = 43,16 Hz Mode 3: f = 14,01 Hz Mode 4: f = 15,50 Hz Mode 5: f = 15,50 Hz Mode 6: f = 93,55 Hz Mode 7: f = 93,55 Hz

52 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 5 Results Comparison with NAFEMS example Mode NAFEMS (Hz) AxisVM (Hz) % 1 4,65 43,16-1,0 4,65 43,16-1,0 3 15,00 14,01 0, ,31 15,50 -, ,31 15,50 -, ,55 93,55-3, ,55 93,55-3,16

53 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 53 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: dynam.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Clamped thin rhombic plate. Vibration analysis. Top view of plane (thickness = 5,0 cm) Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Mesh Self-weight ex = ey = fiz = 0 at all nodes (i.e.: ex, ey, fiz constrained at all nodes; Nodal DOF: Plate in X-Y plane) ez = fix = fiy = 0 along the 4 edges (Line support) E = 0000 kn / cm = 0,3 = 8000 kg / m 3 Parabolic quadrilateral shell element (heterosis type)

54 er 0,506 0,470 0,433 0,397 0,361 0,35 0,89 0,53 0,17 0,181 0,144 0,108 0,07 0,036 0 er 0,486 0,451 0,416 0,38 0,347 0,31 0,78 0,43 0,08 0,174 0,139 0,104 0,069 0,035 0 er 0,498 0,46 0,47 0,391 0,356 0,30 0,84 0,49 0,13 0,178 0,14 0,107 0,071 0,036 0 er 0,463 0,49 0,396 0,363 0,330 0,97 0,64 0,31 0,198 0,165 0,13 0,099 0,066 0,033 0 er er 0,449 0,417 0,385 0,353 0,31 0,89 0,57 0,5 0,19 0,160 0,18 0,096 0,064 0,03 0 0,50 0,483 0,446 0,409 0,37 0,335 0,97 0,60 0,3 0,186 0,149 0,11 0,074 0,037 0 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 54 Target First 6 mode shapes Results Mode 1: f = 8,0 Hz Mode : f = 13,0 Hz Mode 3: f = 18,41 Hz Mode 4: f = 19,33 Hz Mode 5: f = 4,6 Hz Mode 6: f = 8,4 Hz Results Comparison with NAFEMS example Mode NAFEMS (Hz) AxisVM (Hz) % 1 7,94 8,0 1,01 1,84 13,0 1, ,94 18,41,6 4 19,13 19,33 1,05 5 4,01 4,6,54 6 7,9 8,4 1,15

55 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 55 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: dynam3.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Cantilevered thin square plate. Vibration analysis. Top view (thickness = 5,0 cm) Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Mesh Self-weight ex = ey = ez = fix = fiy = fiz = 0 along y-axis E = 0000 kn / cm = 0,3 = 8000 kg / m 3 Parabolic quadrilateral shell element (heterosis type).

56 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 56 Target First 5 mode shapes Results Mode 1: f = 0,4 Hz Mode 3: f =,53 Hz Mode 5: f = 3,68 Hz

57 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 57 Mode : f = 1,0 Hz Mode 4: f = 3, Hz Comparison with NAFEMS example Mode NAFEMS (Hz) AxisVM (Hz) % 1 0,41 0,40-0,4 1,09 1,00-0,87 3,580,530-1,94 4 3,310 3,0 -,7 5 3,750 3,680-1,87

58 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 58 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: dynam4.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Cantilevered tapered membrane. Vibration analysis. Side view (thickness = 10,0 cm) Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Mesh Self-weight Edge 1: Nodal DOF: Fixed node Other nodes: DOF: (f f C C C C) (f: free; C: constrained) E = 0000 kn / cm = 0,3 = 8000 kg / m 3 Parabolic quadrilateral membrane (plane stress)

59 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 59 Target First 4 mode shapes Results 5,000 1,000 10,000 X Mode 1: f = 44,50 Hz Mode : f = 18,60 Hz

60 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 60 Mode 3: f = 16,48 Hz Mode 4: f = 41,46 Hz Results Comparison with NAFEMS example Software Release Number: R3 Software Release Number: X4r1 Mode NAFEMS (Hz) AxisVM (Hz) % 1 44,6 44,33-0,65 130,03 18,36-1,8 3 16,70 16,48-0, ,05 41,46-1,87

61 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 61 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: dynam5.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Flat grillages. Vibration analysis. Top view Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Cross Section Element types Mesh Self-weight ex = ey = ez = 0 at the ends (simple supported beams) Nodal DOF: Grillage in X-Y plane E = 0000 kn / cm G = 7690 kn / cm = 0,3 = 7860 kg / m 3 A = 0,004 m Ix =,5E-5 m 4 Iy = Iz = 1,5E-5 m 4 Rib element: Three node beam element (shear deformation is taken into account)

62 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 6 Target First 3 mode shapes Results Mode 1: f = 16,90 Hz Mode : f = 0,64 Hz Mode 3: f = 51,76 Hz

63 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 63 Reference: Mode Reference AxisVM (Hz) % 1 16,85 16,90 0,30 0,1 0,64, ,30 51,76 -,89 C.T.F. ROSS: Finite Element Methods In Engineering Science

64 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 64 BLANK

65 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 65 Stability Software Release Number: X4r1

66 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 66 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: buckling1.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Simply supported beam. Buckling analysis. Front view Cross section(iz =168,3 cm 4, It =1,18 cm 4, Iw =16667 cm 6 ) Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Mesh Bending moment at both ends of beam MA = 1,0 knm, MB = -1,0 knm (Moments are applied as surface edge loads) ex = ey = ez = 0 at A ex = ey = ez = 0 at B kz = kw = 1 E = 0600 kn / cm = 0,3 Parabolic quadrilateral shell element (heterosis type)

67 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 67 Target Mcr =? (for lateral torsional buckling) Results Analytical solution M cr E I Z W L IZ I L G It E I Z , ,18 M cr 1451 kncm 14, , ,3 knm AxisVM result Mcr = 15,3 knm Difference +0,6%

68 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 68 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: buckling.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Simply supported beam. Buckling analysis. Front view (L = 1,0 m) S G 1 10,0 S G 1 10, z 1,0 30,0 y z y Loads P = -1,0 kn at point B. Section A1 Cross-sections Section A Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Target Results ex = ey = ez = 0 at A ey = ez = 0 at B E = 0000 kn / cm = 0,3 Beam element Pcr =? (for inplane buckling) Theory AxisVM e [%] P cr [kn] 3,340 3,337-0,09

69 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 69 Design Software Release Number: X4r1

70 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 70 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: RC column1.axs Thema N-M interaction curve of cross-section (EN :004). Analysis Type Geometry Linear static analysis+design Section: 300x400 mm Covering: 40 mm Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Target Results Arbitrary. Arbitrary. Concrete: fcd=14, N/mm ec1=0,00 ecu=0,0035 (parabola-constans - diagram) Steel: fsd=348 N/mm esu=0,015 Compare the program results with with hand calculation at keypoints of M-N interaction curve. N N [kn] M [knm] N AxisVM M(N) AxisVM e % ,5 +61,4 +0, ,7-0, ,5 +0, ,5-61,4 +0, , +0, ,7-0,6 Reference: Dr. Kollár L. P., Vasbetonszerkezetek I. Műegyetemi kiadó

71 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 71 Software Release Number: X4r Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: RCbeam.axs Thema RC beam deflection according to EC, EN :010. Analysis Type Geometry Materially nonlinear analysis. q = 17 kn/m L = 5.60 m Side view 0 35 cm covering = 3 cm = cm Section Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Target q = 17 kn /m distributed load Simply supported beam. Concrete: C5/30, =.1 Steel: B500B ε=0.4 shrinkage strain Simple 1DOF beam elements (Euler-Bernoulli beam) ez, max

72 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 7 Results without shrinkage Diagram ez Hand calculation: e eii ( 1 ) ei mm where, M cr 1 M ei is the deflection which was calculated based on uncracked section eii is the deflection which was calculated based on cracked section Calculation with AxisVM: e = 19.9 mm (difference < 1%) Results with shrinkage Hand calculation: e eii ( 1 ) ei 3. 54mm where, M cr 1 M ei is the deflection which was calculated based on uncracked section eii is the deflection which was calculated based on cracked section Calculation with AxisVM: e =.1 mm (difference ~ -6%)

73 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 73 Software Release Number: X4r Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: RC_Slab_1.axs Thema RC one-way slab deflection according to EC, EN :010. Analysis Type Geometry Materially nonlinear analysis. q = 17 kn/m L = 5.60 m Side view Section: 5 cm 1 cm As = 16/00 = m Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Target q = 17 kn /m distributed load Simply supported one-way slab. Concrete: C5/30, =.1, ν = 0.0 Steel: B500B ε=0.4 shrinkage strain triangle shell elements ez, max

74 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 74 Results - without shrinkage NL behaviour in ε-n + κ-m Diagram ez NL behaviour in κ-m only Hand calculation: e eii ( 1 ) ei mm where, M cr 1 M ei is the deflection which was calculated based on uncracked section eii is the deflection which was calculated based on cracked section Calculation with AxisVM: e = mm (NL ε-n + κ-m) (difference < -1%) e = mm (NL κ-m) (difference ~ +3%) Results - with shrinkage Hand calculation: e eii ( 1 ) ei mm where, M cr 1 M ei is the deflection which was calculated based on uncracked section eii is the deflection which was calculated based on cracked section Calculation with AxisVM: e = 45.0 mm (NL ε-n + κ-m) (difference ~ -5%) e = 49.4 mm (NL κ-m) (difference ~ +4%)

75 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 75 Software Release Number: X4r Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: RC_Slab_.axs Thema RC two-way slab deflection according to EC, EN :010. Analysis Type Geometry Materially nonlinear analysis. x y h=50mm; q=17kn/m 5.6m axb=φ10/100; d=0mm ayb=φ10/100; d=10mm 8m Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Target = 0.5 q = 17 kn /m distributed load Simply supported two-way slab. Concrete: C5/30, =.1, ν = 0.0 (due to the comparison with hand calculation based on Marcus method) Steel: B500B ε=0.4 shrinkage strain triangle shell elements ez, max

76 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 76 Results - without shrinkage Hand calculation: e eii ( 1 ) ei mm where, NL behaviour in ε-n + κ-m Diagram ez M cr 1 M ei is the deflection which was calculated based on uncracked section eii is the deflection which was calculated based on cracked section Calculation with AxisVM: e = 9 mm (difference ~ -14%) (note: hand calculation gives conservative result because the effect of Mxy is not considered) Results - with shrinkage Hand calculation: e eii ( 1 ) ei mm where, M cr 1 M ei is the deflection which was calculated based on uncracked section eii is the deflection which was calculated based on cracked section Calculation with AxisVM: e = ~35 mm (difference ~ -13%) (note: hand calculation gives conservative result because the effect of Mxy is not considered)

77 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 77 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: RCcolumn.axs. RCLcolumn.axs Thema Nonlinear analysis of RC columns according to EC, EN :010. Analysis Type Geometry Materially and geometrically nonlinear analysis. Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Target Concentrated force on the top Cantilever Concrete: C5/30, =,0 Steel: B500B Simple 1DOF beam elements (Euler-Bernoulli beam) ez, max

78 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 78 Results

79 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 79 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: RCcolumn.axs Thema Axially loaded RC column check according to EC, EN :010. Analysis Type Geometry Materially and geometrically linear analysis. Loads Material Properties Concentrated force NEd = 70 kn Bending moments: at the top MyEd = 48 knm at the bottom MyEd = 66 knm Concrete: C30/37, =,0 Steel: B500B Element Simple 1DOF beam elements (Euler-Bernoulli beam) types Target Calculate eccentricities according to EN 199-1

80 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 80 Results [cm] Hand calculation AxisVM e0 ei e etot e0 ei e etot e % x-z Bottom plane Middle ** 0** * ** 0** * 0 Top x-y plane Bottom * * 0 Middle * * 0 Top * * 0 * due to minimal eccentricity requirement ** due to the buckling

81 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 81 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: Rccolumn3.axs Thema Axially loaded RC column check according to EC, EN :010. Analysis Type Geometry Materially and geometrically linear analysis. Loads Material Properties Concentrated force NEd = 70 kn Bending moments: at the top MzEd = 40 knm at the bottom MzEd = 40 knm Concrete: C30/37, =,0 Steel: B500B Element Simple 1DOF beam elements (Euler-Bernoulli beam) types Target Calculate eccentricities according to MSZ EN 199-1

82 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 8 Results [cm] Hand calculation AxisVM e0 ei e etot e0 ei e etot e % x-z Bottom ** * ** * 0 plane Middle * * 0 Top ** * ** * 0 x-y plane Bottom Middle ~0 ** ** ** ** Top ** 0** * ** 0** * 0 * due to minimal eccentricity requirement ** due to the buckling

83 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 83 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: beam.axs Thema Required steel reinforcement of RC plate according to EC, EN :004. Analysis Type Geometry Linear analysis. Side view Cross-section Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Mesh Pz = -50 kn point load Clamped cantilever plate. Fix line support on clamped edge. Nodal DOF: Plate in X-Y plane Concrete: C5/30 Steel: B500A Parabolic quadrilateral plate element (heterosis type) Top view

84 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 84 Target AXT steel reinforcement along x direction at the top of the support Results Diagram AXT Calculation according to EC: f cd 5 1, ,15 16,6 N / mm f yd 435 N / mm c E 0,850, , cu S c0 cu ES f yd d = = 47 mm 0,54 xc M sd M Rd b xc fcd d 00 knm x c 439 h 55 xc 55 0, 0 0,54 47 c Steel reinforcement is yielding c d A S b xc f f yd cd , mm Calculation with AxisVM: AXT = 093 mm / m Different = -0,3 %

85 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 85 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: 3_10 Plastic biaxial bending interaction.axs Thema Interaction check of simply supported beam under biaxial bending (EN ). Analysis Type Geometry Steel Design h = 70 mm b = 135 mm tf = 10 mm tw = 7 mm l = 6000 mm A = 45,95 cm Wy,pl = 484,1 cm 3 Wz,pl = 97 cm 3 IPE70 cross section Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties qy = 1,5 kn/m qz = 0,4 kn/m ex = ey = ez = 0 at A ey = ez = 0 at B S 35 E = 1000 kn/cm = 0,3

86 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 86 Element types Target Results Beam element Interaction check taking into account plastic resistances Analytical solution in the following book: Dunai, L., Horváth, L., Kovács, N., Verőci, B., Vigh, L. G.: Acélszerkezetek méretezése az Eurocode 3 alapján, Gyakorlati útmutató (Design of steel structures according to Eurocode 3, ) Magyar Mérnöki Kamara Tartószerkezeti tagozata, Budapest, 009. Exercise 3.10., page 8. Analitical solution AxisVM e[%] My,Ed [knm] 91,8 91,8 - Mz,Ed [knm] 6,75 6,75 - Mpl,y,Rd [knm] 113,74 114,57 +0,07 Mpl,z,Rd [knm],78,78 +0,00 α - β capacity ratio [-] 0,948 0,

87 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 87 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: 3_1 _MNV_Interaction.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Interaction check of simply supported beam under normal force, bending and shear force. (EN , EN ) Steel Design h = 00 mm b = 00 mm tf = 15 mm tw = 9 mm l = 1400 mm A = 78,1 cm Av = 4,83 cm Iy = 5696 cm 3 Wy,pl = 643 cm 3 IPE70 cross section Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Target Fz = 300 kn at thirds of beam N = 500 kn at B ex = ey = ez = fix = 0 at A ey = ez = fix =0 at B S 35 E = 1000 kn/cm = 0,3 Beam element Interaction check of axial force, shear force and bending moment.

88 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 88 Results Analytical solution in the following book: Dunai, L., Horváth, L., Kovács, N., Verőci, B., Vigh, L. G.: Acélszerkezetek méretezése az Eurocode 3 alapján, Gyakorlati útmutató (Design of steel structures according to Eurocode 3, ) Magyar Mérnöki Kamara Tartószerkezeti tagozata, Budapest, 009. Exercise 3.1., page Analytical solution AxisVM results e[%] NEd [kn] Vz,Ed [kn] My,Ed [knm] Pure compression Npl,Rd [kn] ,6-0,0- capacity ratio [-] 0,33 0,33 - Pure shear Vpl,z,Rd [kn] 394, 394,5 +0,08 capacity ratio [-] 0,761 0,761 - Pure bending Mpl,y,Rd [knm] 176,8 178,4 +0,9 capacity ratio [-] 0,79 0,79 - Interaction check 0,73 0,71-0,73 MV,Rd [knm] 163,96 165,57 +0,98 n 0,33 0,33 - a 0,3 0,3 - MNV,Rd [knm] 14, 143,67 +1,03 capacity ratio [-] 0,985 0,974-1,1

89 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 89 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: 3_15 Központosan nyomott rúd - I szelvény.axs Thema Buckling resistance of simply supported beam (EN ). Analysis Type Geometry Steel Design h = 300 mm b = 50 mm tf = 14 mm tw = 8 mm l = 4500 mm A = 94 cm Iy = 19065,8cm 4 Iz = 3647,1 cm 4 iy = 14,1 cm iz = 6, cm I cross section, symmetric about y and z axis Loads Normal force at point A NA= -1,0 kn Boundary ey = 0 at A Conditions ex = ey = ez = fix = fiz= 0 at B kz = kw = 1 Material S 35 Properties E = 1000 kn / cm = 0,3 Element Beam element types Target Buckling resistance Nb,Rd =? Results Analytical solution in the following book:

90 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 90 Dunai, L., Horváth, L., Kovács, N., Verőci, B., Vigh, L. G.: Acélszerkezetek méretezése az Eurocode 3 alapján, Gyakorlati útmutató (Design of steel structures according to Eurocode 3, ) Magyar Mérnöki Kamara Tartószerkezeti tagozata, Budapest, 009. Exercise 3.15., P Analytical solution AxisVM e[%] y [-] 0,673 0,673 - z [-] 0,771 0,769-0,6 Χy [-] 0,8004 0,7989-0,19 Χz [-] 0,6810 0, ,07 Nb,Rd [kn] 1504,3 1505,3 +0,07

91 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 91 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: 3_1 Központosan nyomott rúd - T szelvény.axs Thema Buckling resistance of simply supported beam (EN ). Analysis Type Geometry Steel Design h = 180 mm b = 50 mm tf = 16 mm tw = 16 mm l = 3000 mm A = 68,8 cm Iy = 394,5cm 4 Iz = 089,48 cm 4 Ics= 58,71 cm 4 Iw = 1108,0 cm 6 iy = 5,90 cm iz = 5,51 cm Welded T section, symmetric to z but not y Loads Normal force at point A NA= -1,0 kn Boundary ez = ey = 0 at A Conditions ex = ey = ez = fix = 0 at B kz = kw = 1 Material S 35 Properties E = 1000 kn/cm = 0,3 Element Beam element types Target Buckling resistance Nb,Rd =? Results Analytical solution in the following book:

92 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 9 Dunai, L., Horváth, L., Kovács, N., Verőci, B., Vigh, L. G.: Acélszerkezetek méretezése az Eurocode 3 alapján, Gyakorlati útmutató (Design of steel structures according to Eurocode 3, ) Magyar Mérnöki Kamara Tartószerkezeti tagozata, Budapest, 009. Exercise 3.1., P Analitical solution AxisVM e[%] zs [cm] 49,0 49,0 - zw [cm] 4,10 4,04-1,46 iw [cm] * 9,05 9,03-0, y [-] 0,54 0,54 - Χy [-] 0,804 0,8195-0,11 Nb,Rd,1 [kn] 136,4 135,0-0,11 TF [-] * 0,667 0,667 - ΧTF [-] 0,743 0, ,19 Nb,Rd, [kn] 101,6 103,9 +0,19 * hidden partial results, Axis does not show them among the steel design results

93 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 93 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: Külpontosan nyomott rúd - RHS szelvény.axs Topic Buckling of a hollow cross-section beam (EN ). Analysis Type Geometry Steel Design h = 150 mm b = 100 mm tf = 10 mm tw = 10 mm L = 4,000 m A = 43,41 cm Iy = 109,8 cm 4 Iz = 635,7 cm 4 iy = 5,8 mm iz = 38,3 mm Wel,y = 161,3 cm 3 Wel,z = 17,1 cm 3 Wpl,y = 05,6 cm 3 Wpl,z = 154,6 cm 3 RHS 150x100x10,0 cross section (hot rolled) Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Steel Design Parameters Target Bending moment at both ends of beam and axial force NEd,C = 00 kn MEd,A = MEd,B = 0 knm ex = ey = ez = 0, warping free at A ey = ez = 0, warping free at B S 75 E = 1000 kn / cm = 0,3 Beam element Buckling length: Ly = L Lz = L Lw = L Check for interaction of compression and bending.

94 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 94 Results Analytical solution: Section class: 1. Compression flexural buckling E I y ,8 N cr,y 1567, kn K y L 400 E I z ,7 N cr,z 83,5 kn K z L 400 N pl,rd A f y 43,41 7,5 1193,8 kn y N pl N cry 1193,8 1567,16 0,878 z N pl N crz 1193,8 1,040 83,48 imperfection factor based on buckling curve a (hot rolled RHS section): y z 0,1 1 ( - 0.) 1 : - y 0,7516 z 0,575 N b,rd y A f y 1 0,575 43,41cm 7,5 kn/cm 1,0 69,7 kn N Ed,x 00 kn Bending lateral torsional buckling M pl,rd,y W 3 pl,y f y 05,6 cm 7,5 kn/cm 1 1,0 C 1 1,000 k k w 1 z 56,54 knm M Ed 10 knm M cr M cr M cr C 1 E I z (kl) kn ,7cm cm 1,0 (400 cm) 977,41kNm k z k w I w (kl) G I t I z E I z cm 4 635,7 cm kn 4 (400 cm) , cm cm kn ,7 cm cm

95 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 95 LT W y f y M cr 3 05,6 cm 7,5 kn/cm 0, ,41kNm LT 0, torsional buckling may occur LT LT : 0,76 1 ( - 0.) LT LT LT 1 0, LT 0,5443 M M knm knm b Rd LT 0, ,54 54,, pl, Rd, y 76 Interaction of bending and buckling N Rk A f y 43,41cm 7,5 kn/cm M y,rk M pl,rd,y 56,54kNm 1193,8 kn Equivalent uniform moment factors according to EN Annex B, Table B.3.: 1,0 C my 0,6 0,4 1,0 0,4 For members susceptible to torsional deformations the interaction factors may be calculated according to EN Annex B, Table B..: k yy C my 1 ( LT k yy 1,0 1-0,) (0,87-0,) y k yy min (1,149;1,178) 1,149 N Ed N Rk C my 1 0,8 / M1 y 00 1,0 1 0,8 0, ,78 /1,0 N Ed N Rk / M1 00 0, ,78 /1,0 k zy k zy 0,1 1 z C 0,5 mlt z N Ed,x N Rk / M1 0,11, ,0 0,5 0, ,78 /1,0 k zy max (0,9490; 0,9577) 0,9577 0,1 1 C 0,5 mlt z 0,1 1 1,0 0,5 N Ed,x N Rk / M1 00 0, ,78 /1,0

96 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 96 N M Ed y,ed k yy y N Rk / M1 y M y,rk / M ,149 0,646 0, ,78 0, ,54 N Ed k zy z N Rk / M1 M y,ed M y,rk / M ,9577 0,6674 0, ,78 0, ,54 Analytical solution AxisVM e [%] NRk = Npl,Rd [kn] 1193,8 1193,9 - y [-] 0,873 0,870-0,3 z [-] 1,04 1,01-0, Χy [-] 0,7516 0, Χz [-] 0,575 0,574 - Nb,Rd [kn] 69,7 69,7 - Mc,Rd = Mpl,Rd [knm] 56,54 56,54 - C1 1,000 1,000 - Mcr [knm] 977,41 977,40 - LT [-] 0,405 0,405 - ΧLT [-] 0,9684 0, Mb,Rd [knm] 54,76 54,75 - Cmy [-] 1,0 1,0 - kyy [-] 1,149 1,150 - kzy [-] 0,9577 0, Interaction capacity ratio 1 [-] 0,643 0,643 - Interaction capacity ratio [-] 0,667 0,667 -

97 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 97 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: 3_6 Külpontosan nyomott rúd - I szelvény.axs Thema Lateral torsional buckling of a beam (EN ). Analysis Type Geometry Steel Design h = 171 mm b = 180 mm tf = 6 mm tw = 9,5 mm L = 4,000 m A = 45,6 cm Iy = 510,7 cm 4 Iz = 94,6 cm 4 iy = 74 mm iz = 45 mm Wel,y = 93,7 cm 3 Wel,z = 10,7 cm 3 Wpl,y = 34,9 cm 3 Wpl,z = 156,5 cm 3 HEA180 Iw = 5893 cm 6 It = 15 cm 4 Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Axial force at B: Nx = -80 kn Point load in y direction at the thirds of the beam: Fy = 5 kn Distributed load in z direction: qz = 4,5 knm ex = ey = ez = 0, warping free at A ey = ez = 0, warping free at B S 35 E = 1000 kn / cm = 0,3 Beam element

98 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 98 Steel Design Parameters The elastic critical load factor is: αcr = 4,8 As αcr = 4,8 < 15 II. order analysis is required. For this, the beam element needs to be meshed. Divison of the beam element into 4. Buckling length: Ly = L Lz = L LT buckling length: Lw = L Target Results Buckling check for interaction of axial force and bi-axial bending. Internal forces from the second order analysis NEd,x = 80 kn MEd,y = 9,81 knm MEd,z = 8,88 knm VEd,y = 6,5 kn VEd,z = 9,61 kn

99 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 99 Analytical solution: Section class: 1. Normal force E I y N cr,y K y L E I N z cr,z K z L N pl,rd ,7 35,3 kn ,6 1197,7 kn 400 A f y 45,6 3,5 1063,6 kn y N pl N cry 1063,6 35,3 0,5719 z N pl N crz 1063,6 0, ,7 based on buckling curve b in y direction and c in z direction: y 0,8508 z 0,5741 N b,rd,1 N b,rd, y A f y 0, ,6cm 3,5kN/cm 904,9 kn N Ed,x 80 kn 1 1,0 A f z y 0, ,6cm 3,5kN/cm 610,6 kn N Ed,x 80 kn 1 1,0 Bending M pl,rd,y M pl,rd,z W pl,y 1 W pl,z f y 1 f y 3 34,9 cm 3,5 kn/cm 1, ,5 cm 3,5 kn/cm 1, 0 76,35 knm M Ed,y 9,81kNm 36,78 knm M Ed,z 8,88 knm Calculation of the critical moment: C 1 1,13 (due to the My moment diagram) E I k z I w (kl) G I M z t cr C 1 k I (kl) w z E I z kn/cm 94,6 cm M cr 1,13 (400 cm) M cr 174,1 knm cm (400 cm) 8077 kn/cm 15 cm ,6 cm 1000 kn/cm 94,6 cm

100 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 100 For rolled section, the following procedure may be used to determine the reduction factor (EN ,Paragraph ): LT 1 ( LT LT LT : W y f y M cr 3 34,9 cm 3,5 kn/cm 0,66 174,10 knm - 0.4) 0.75 LT 1 0, LT 0,7090 M M knm knm b Rd LT 0, ,35 67,, pl, Rd, y 81 Interaction of axial force and bi-axial bending N Rk M y,rk M z,rk N pl,rd 1063,6 kn M pl,rd,y 76,35 knm M pl,rd,z 36,78 knm Equivalent uniform moment factors according to EN Annex B, Table B.3.: 0, 0 C my Cmz in both directions C 0,95 0,05 0,95 (distributed load) mlt 0,90 0,10 0,90 (concentrated load) k yy C my 1 ( y k yy 0,95-0,) y N Ed,x N Rk 80 1 (0,5719-0,) 0,95 1 0,8 0, ,6 /1,0 k yy min (1,0593;1,1851) 1,0593 C my 1 0,8 / M1 y N Ed,x N Rk / M1 80 0, ,6 /1,0 0,1 k zy 1 z C 0,5 mlt z k zy N Ed,x N Rk 0,1 0, , ,95 0,5 0, ,6 /1,0 0,95 0,5 k zy max (0,9383; 0,9345) 0,9383 0,1 1 / C 0,5 M1 mlt z N Ed,x N Rk / M1 80 0, ,6 /1,0

101 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 101 0,858 zz 0,6 k k yz 1,4303 min (1,4303;1,478) k zz 1063,6 /1,0 0, ,4 1 0, ,6 /1,0 0, ,6) 0,944 - ( 1 0,90 k zz M1 / Rk N Ed,x N 1,4 1 mz C M1 / Rk N Ed,x N 0,6) - ( 1 mz C k zz z z z ,78 8,88 1, ,35 0,8881 9,81 0, ,6 0, M1 / z,rk M z,ed M k zz M1 / y,rk M LT y,ed M k zy M1 / Rk N z Ed,x N 0, ,78 8,88 0,858 76,35 0,8881 9,81 1, ,6 0, M1 / z,rk M z,ed M k yz M1 / y,rk M LT y,ed M k yy M1 / Rk N y Ed,x N,

102 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 10 Analytical solution AxisVM e [%] Npl,Rd [kn] 1063,6 1063,6 - Ncr,y [kn] 35,3 35,4 - Ncr,z [kn] 1197,7 1197,7 - λy, rel [-] 0,5719 0, λz, rel [-] 0,944 0,944 - Χy [-] 0,8508 0, Χz [-] 0,5741 0, Mpl,Rd,y [knm] 76,35 77,17 +1 Mpl,Rd,z [knm] 36,78 36,78 - C1 [-] 1,13 1,13 Mcr [knm] 174,1 173,3-0,5 λlt, rel [-] 0,66 0,667 +0,7 ΧLT [-] 0,8881 0, ,3 Mb,Rd [knm] 67,81 68,353 +0,8 Cmy = CmLt [-] 0,95 0,95 - Cmz [-] 0,90 0,95 +5,5** kyy 1,0593 1, kzz 1,4303 1, ,5*** kyz 0,858 0, ,5*** kzy 0,9383 0, Interaction capacity ratio 1 0,6687 0, ,7*** Interaction capacity ratio 0,9374 0,9564 +,0*** ** See EC3 Annex B, Table B.3: the difference is due to the fact, that AxisVM calculates the equivalent uniform moment factor (Cmy, Cmz, CmLT) for both uniform load and concentrated load, and then takes the higher value. The effect on the final result (efficiency) is +1~%. *** the difference is due to the different Cmz value

103 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 103 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: Double-symmetric I - Class 4.axs Thema Interaction check of beam in section class 4 (EN , EN ) Analysis Type Geometry Steel Design h = 114 mm tw = 8 mm b = 30 mm tf = 1 mm L = 8,000 m A = 164,8 cm Iy = 36159,4 cm 4 Wel,y = 5803,6 cm 3 Double-symmetric welded I shape Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Target Axial force at B: N Ed,C = 700 kn Distributed load in z direction: qz = 16,5 knm The internal forces in the mid-section: MEd,y = 1300 knm, NEd,x = kn ex = ey = ez = fix = 0 at A ey = ez = fix = 0 at B S 355 E = 1000 kn / cm ε=0,81 = 0,3 Beam element Check the strength capacity ratios for axial force, bending and interaction.

104 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 104 Results Analytical solution in the following book: Dunai, L., Horváth, L., Kovács, N., Verőci, B., Vigh, L. G.: Acélszerkezetek méretezése az Eurocode 3 alapján, Gyakorlati útmutató (Design of steel structures according to Eurocode 3, ) Magyar Mérnöki Kamara Tartószerkezeti tagozata, Budapest, 009. Exercise 3.4., P Exercise 3.6., P Exercise 3.13., P. 34. Analytical solution AxisVM e [%] Uniform compression Uniform bending k σ,flange [ ] 0,43 0,43 - λ p,flange [ ] 0,831 0,858 +3,1 ρ flange [ ] 0,931 0,910 -,3 b eff,f [cm] 140,0 14,0 +1,4 k σ,web [ ] λ p,web [ ],957,975 +0,6 ρ web [ ] 0,313 0,311-0,6 b eff,web [cm] 340,8 34,4 +0,5 A eff [cm ] 99,98 97,46 -,6 N eff [kn/cm ] [kn] ,6 capacity ratio: N 0, 0, - k σ,flange [ ] 0,43 0,43 - λ p,flange [ ] 0,831 0,858 +3,1 ρ flange [ ] 0,931 0,910 -,3 b eff,f [cm] 139,95 14,0 +1,4 Ψ [ ] -0,969-0,959 +1,0 k σ,web [ ] 3,09,84-1,1 λ p,web [ ] 1,31 1,45 +1,1 ρ web [ ] 0,739 0,731-1,1 b eff,web [cm] 408,6 410,4 +0,4 W eff,y,min [cm 3 ] ,1 M y,eff,rd [knm] 181,5 1766,5-3,1 capacity ratio: M 0,71 0,74 +4,1 capacity ratio: N M interaction 0,91 0,94 +3,3 Small differences occur because AxisVM does not take into account welding when calculating the effective section sizes.

105 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 105 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD Reference: Jean-Marc Franssen, Paulo Villa Real: Fire Design of Steel Structures (Example 5.3) File name: steel_fire.axs Thema Fire design of steel elements Unprotected column under axial compression (EN ) Analysis Steel Design Type Geometry Length: L = 3.5m Section: HE180B Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Axial force at A: N fi,ed = 495 kn R30 required fire resistance ex = ey = ez = fix = 0 at B ey = ez = fix = 0 at A S75 E = 1000 kn / cm = 0,3 Beam element Results Analytical solution AxisVM e [%] d [ C] cr [ C] k sh [-] A / V [1/m] z, fi [-] N b, fi,rd [kn]

106 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 106 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD Reference: Jean-Marc Franssen, Paulo Villa Real: Fire Design of Steel Structures (Example 5.6) File name: steel_fire.axs Thema Fire design of steel elements Unrestrained beam (EN ) Analysis Type Geometry Steel Design qfi,ed = 1.48 kn/m L = 5,0 m Section: IPE 300 Side view Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Target Distributed load: qfi,ed = 1.48 kn/m ex = ey = ez = fix = 0 at A ey = ez = fix = 0 at B S 35 E = 1000 kn / cm = 0,3 Beam element Evaluate the critical temperature. Results Analytical solution AxisVM e [%] cr [ C] LT, [1/m] LT, fi [-] M b, fi,rd [knm]

107 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 107 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD Reference: Jean-Marc Franssen, Paulo Villa Real: Fire Design of Steel Structures (Example 5.7) File name: steel_fire.axs Thema Fire design of steel elements Unrestrained beam-column (EN ) Analysis Type Geometry Steel Design Length: L= 6.0m Section IPE 450 Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Target Axial force at B: N fi,ed = kn Distributed load: qfi,ed = kn/m ex = ey = ez = fix = 0 at A ey = ez = fix = 0 at B S 35 E = 1000 kn / cm = 0,3 Beam element Evaluate the critical temperature.

108 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 108 Results Analytical solution AxisVM e [%] cr [ C] (no LTB) cr [ C] z, fi [-] (51 C) LT, fi [-] (51 C) LT [-] (51 C) k LT [-] (51 C)

109 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 109 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD Reference: Jean-Marc Franssen, Paulo Villa Real: Fire Design of Steel Structures (Example 5.8) File name: steel_fire.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Fire design of steel elements Beam-column with restrained lateral displacements (EN ) Steel Design (Jean-Marc Franssen, Paulo Villa Real: Fire Design of Steel Structures) Length: L= 3.0m Section HE 00B Loads Boundary Conditions Material Properties Element types Axial force: N fi,ed = 800 kn Bending moment: M y,fi,ed = +/-50 knm ex = ey = ez = fix = 0 at A ey = ez = fix = 0 at B S 35 E = 1000 kn / cm = 0,3 Beam element Results Analytical solution AxisVM e [%] cr [ C] (with buckling) k y [-] y, fi [-] V pl, fi,rd [kn] N pl, fi,rd [kn] ~0.0 M N, fi,rd [knm] cr [ C] (without buckling; M+N)

110 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 110 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: Earthquake-01-EC.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Earth-quake design using response-spectrum method. Linear frequency analysis with 5 modes. Linear static analysis. Top view Front view

111 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 111 Perspective view Section beams: 60x40 cm Ax=400 cm Ay=000 cm Az=000 cm Ix=75100 cm4 Iy=70000 cm Iz= cm4 Section columns: 60x40 cm Ax=400 cm Ay=000 cm Az=000 cm Ix=75100 cm4 Iy=70000 cm Iz=30000 cm4 Loads Nodal masses on eight nodes. Mx=My=Mz= kg Model self-weight is excluded. qd = 1 Spectrum for X and Y direction of seismic action: T[s] S d 1 0 1,150 0,000, ,6000, ,3000 0, ,0000 0, ,0000 0, ,156 S d [m/s ] 1,150 0,709 0,300,0000 T[s] Boundary Conditions Material Properties Nodes at the columns bottom ends are constrained in all directions. ex=ey=ez=fix=fiy=fiz=0 C5/30 E=3050 kn/cm =0, = 0

112 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 11 Element types Target Results Rib element: Three node straight prismatic beam element. Shear deformation is taken into account. Compare the model results with SAP000 v6.13 results. The results are combined for all modes and all direction of spectral acceleration. CQC combination are used for modes in each direction of acceleration. SRSS combination are used for combination of directions. Period times of first 5 modes Mode T[s] SAP000 T[s] AxisVM Difference [%] 1 0,7450 0, ,7099 0, ,01 3 0,3601 0, ,314 0, ,054 0,053 +0,05 Modal participating mass ratios in X and Y directions Mode X SAP000 X AxisVM Difference % Y SAP000 Y AxisVM Difference % 1 0,5719 0,573 +0,07 0,3153 0,3151-0,06 0,3650 0,3647-0,08 0,4761 0, , ,161 0, ,0460 0, , 0,0131 0, ,0170 0, ,056 0, Summ 1,0000 1, ,9868 0, Internal forces at the bottom end of Column A and Column B Column A SAP000 Column A AxisVM Difference % Column B SAP000 Column B AxisVM Difference % Nx [kn] 315,11 311,63 +1,11 557,6 551,68 +1,011 Vy [kn] 80,34 80,35-0,003 3,88 3,89-0,004 Vz [kn] 53,49 53,5-0,011 41,04 41,11-0,017 Tx [knm] 34,4 34,4 0 34,47 34,47 0 My [knm] 65,13 65,19-0, , ,88-0,013 Mz [knm] 61,31 61,33-0, ,41 553,43-0,004 Support forces of Support C Support C SAP000 Support C AxisVM Difference % Rx [kn] 80,34 80,35-0,004 Ry [kn] 53,49 53,5-0,011 Rz [kn] 315,11 311,63 +1,116 Rxx [knm] 65,13 65,19-0,01 Ryy [knm] 61,31 61,33-0,003 Rzz [knm] 34,4 34,4 0 Displacements of Node D Node D SAP000 Node D AxisVM Difference % ex [mm] 33,51 33,5-0,003 ey [mm] 19,944 19,945-0,005 ez [mm] 0,9 0,6 +1,37 X [rad] 0, , Y [rad] 0, , Z [rad] 0,0057 0,0057 0

113 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 113 Normal forces:

114 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 114 Bending moments:

115 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 115

116 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 116 Displacements:

117 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 117 Software Release Number: X4r1 Date: Tested by: InterCAD File name: XLAM_Example_.axs Thema Analysis Type Geometry Design of an XLAM shell (EC5). Linear analysis. Top view (x-y plane) Loads P = -100 kn concentrated force acting at point (x = 9.0 m, y =.5 m) Pz = kn/m uniform load PX = kn/m line load on the right edge Boundary Conditions Material Properties Section Properties Element types Mesh ez =0 along all edges ex = 0 along the left edge ey = 0 along the top edge The remaining DOFs are left free. Material quality equals to C4 timber. MM 7s/40 XLAM section with x oriented top layer grain direction and Service Class, producing an overall thickness of 40 mm. Shell element (Parabolic quadrilateral, heterosis type) Target Average element length is 0. m. Efficiency at node 540 (x = m, y = 3.15 m). Stresses calculated with Axis VM

118 AxisVM X4 Verification Examples 118 Normal stresses in x direction from bending and normal forces [N/mm ] Normal stresses in y direction from bending [N/mm ] Shear stresses in x and y direction [N/mm ] Rolling shear stresses in x and y direction [N/mm ] Design value of strength [N/mm ]

Verification Examples

Verification Examples Verification Examples 015 AxisVM 13 Verification Examples Linear static... 3 Supported bar with concentrated loads.... 4 Thermally loaded bar structure.... 5 Continously supported beam with constant distributed

More information

Verification Examples

Verification Examples Verification Examples 2008 AxisVM 9 Verification Examples 2 Linear static...3 Supported bar with concentrated loads....4 Thermally loaded bar structure...5 Continously supported beam with constant distributed

More information

Verification Examples

Verification Examples Verification Examples 01 AxisVM 11 Verification Examples Linear static...3 Supported bar with concentrated loads....4 Thermally loaded bar structure...5 Continously supported beam with constant distributed

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 0 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic Loads

More information

Advanced Analysis of Steel Structures

Advanced Analysis of Steel Structures Advanced Analysis of Steel Structures Master Thesis Written by: Maria Gulbrandsen & Rasmus Petersen Appendix Report Group B-204d M.Sc.Structural and Civil Engineering Aalborg University 4 th Semester Spring

More information

Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures

Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures Civil Engineering for Bachelors 133FSTD Teacher: Zdeněk Sokol Office number: B619 1 Syllabus of lectures 1. Introduction, history of steel structures,

More information

Verification Examples. FEM-Design. version

Verification Examples. FEM-Design. version FEM-Design 6.0 FEM-Design version. 06 FEM-Design 6.0 StruSoft AB Visit the StruSoft website for company and FEM-Design information at www.strusoft.com Copyright 06 by StruSoft, all rights reserved. Trademarks

More information

STEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN :2005)

STEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN :2005) GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for App'd by STEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN1993-1-1:2005) In accordance with EN1993-1-1:2005 incorporating Corrigenda February 2006 and April details type;

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode 3 Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 20 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic

More information

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN 1992-1-1 and EN 1992-2 Validation Examples Brno, 21.10.2010 IDEA RS s.r.o. South Moravian Innovation Centre, U Vodarny 2a, 616 00 BRNO tel.: +420-511

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 22 : Design of an unbraced sway frame with rigid joints Summary: NOTE This example

More information

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite

More information

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Contents Introduction Beam types Lateral stability of beams Factors affecting lateral stability Behaviour of simple and built - up beams in bending (Without vertical stiffeners)

More information

SECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS

SECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS SECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1 INTRODUCTION TO COLUMN BUCKLING Introduction Elastic buckling of an ideal column Strength curve for an ideal column Strength of practical column Concepts of effective

More information

3. Stability of built-up members in compression

3. Stability of built-up members in compression 3. Stability of built-up members in compression 3.1 Definitions Build-up members, made out by coupling two or more simple profiles for obtaining stronger and stiffer section are very common in steel structures,

More information

7 Vlasov torsion theory

7 Vlasov torsion theory 7 Vlasov torsion theory P.C.J. Hoogenboom, October 006 Restrained Warping The typical torsion stresses according to De Saint Venant only occur if warping can take place freely (Fig. 1). In engineering

More information

University of Sheffield The development of finite elements for 3D structural analysis in fire

University of Sheffield The development of finite elements for 3D structural analysis in fire The development of finite elements for 3D structural analysis in fire Chaoming Yu, I. W. Burgess, Z. Huang, R. J. Plank Department of Civil and Structural Engineering StiFF 05/09/2006 3D composite structures

More information

Software Verification

Software Verification EXAMPLE 16 racked Slab Analysis RAKED ANALYSIS METHOD The moment curvature diagram shown in Figure 16-1 depicts a plot of the uncracked and cracked conditions, Ψ 1 State 1, and, Ψ State, for a reinforced

More information

Design Examples using midas Gen to Eurocode 3. Integrated Design System for Building and General Structures

Design Examples using midas Gen to Eurocode 3. Integrated Design System for Building and General Structures Design Examples using midas Gen to Eurocode 3 Integrated Design System for Building and General Structures Introduction This design example book provides a comprehensive guide for steel design as per

More information

CHAPTER 14 BUCKLING ANALYSIS OF 1D AND 2D STRUCTURES

CHAPTER 14 BUCKLING ANALYSIS OF 1D AND 2D STRUCTURES CHAPTER 14 BUCKLING ANALYSIS OF 1D AND 2D STRUCTURES 14.1 GENERAL REMARKS In structures where dominant loading is usually static, the most common cause of the collapse is a buckling failure. Buckling may

More information

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 8: Description of member resistance calculator

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 8: Description of member resistance calculator STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE Multi-Store Steel Buildings Part 8: Description of member resistance calculator Multi-Store Steel Buildings Part : Description of member resistance calculator 8 - ii FOREWORD

More information

If you take CT5143 instead of CT4143 then write this at the first of your answer sheets and skip problem 4 and 6.

If you take CT5143 instead of CT4143 then write this at the first of your answer sheets and skip problem 4 and 6. Delft University of Technology Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Structural Mechanics Section Write your name and study number at the top right-hand of your work. Exam CT4143 Shell Analysis

More information

TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES)

TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES) Page1 TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES) Restrained warping for the torsion of thin-wall open sections is not included in most commonly used frame analysis programs. Almost

More information

prepared checked approved Date: Date: Date: S. Fahrendholz/R.Geiger Dr.-Ing. Jürgen Bellmann Dr.-Ing.

prepared checked approved Date: Date: Date: S. Fahrendholz/R.Geiger Dr.-Ing. Jürgen Bellmann Dr.-Ing. Verification Manual Version 12.2 2009 prepared checked approved Date: 01.08.2003 Date: 19.01.2009 Date: 22.01.2009 S. Fahrendholz/R.Geiger Dr.Ing. Jürgen Bellmann Dr.Ing. Casimir Katz Document name: q:\dok\qs\verification.doc

More information

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges EU-Russia Regulatory Dialogue Construction Sector Subgroup 1 Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges Application to a composite twin-girder bridge according to Eurocode 4 Laurence Davaine

More information

FINAL EXAMINATION. (CE130-2 Mechanics of Materials)

FINAL EXAMINATION. (CE130-2 Mechanics of Materials) UNIVERSITY OF CLIFORNI, ERKELEY FLL SEMESTER 001 FINL EXMINTION (CE130- Mechanics of Materials) Problem 1: (15 points) pinned -bar structure is shown in Figure 1. There is an external force, W = 5000N,

More information

Workshop 8. Lateral Buckling

Workshop 8. Lateral Buckling Workshop 8 Lateral Buckling cross section A transversely loaded member that is bent about its major axis may buckle sideways if its compression flange is not laterally supported. The reason buckling occurs

More information

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each.

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. GTE 2016 Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. D : SOLID MECHNICS Q.1 single degree of freedom vibrating system has mass of 5 kg, stiffness of 500 N/m and damping coefficient of 100 N-s/m. To make the system

More information

Review of Strain Energy Methods and Introduction to Stiffness Matrix Methods of Structural Analysis

Review of Strain Energy Methods and Introduction to Stiffness Matrix Methods of Structural Analysis uke University epartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering CEE 42L. Matrix Structural Analysis Henri P. Gavin Fall, 22 Review of Strain Energy Methods and Introduction to Stiffness Matrix Methods

More information

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case

More information

Civil Engineering Design (1) Analysis and Design of Slabs 2006/7

Civil Engineering Design (1) Analysis and Design of Slabs 2006/7 Civil Engineering Design (1) Analysis and Design of Slabs 006/7 Dr. Colin Caprani, Chartered Engineer 1 Contents 1. Elastic Methods... 3 1.1 Introduction... 3 1. Grillage Analysis... 4 1.3 Finite Element

More information

Software Verification

Software Verification PROGRAM NAME: SAFE 014 EXAMPLE 16 racked Slab Analysis RAKED ANALYSIS METHOD The moment curvature diagram shown in Figure 16-1 depicts a plot of the uncracked and cracked conditions, 1 State 1, and, State,

More information

Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes

Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes October 2014 Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of Abstract tubular columns and arches Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal Contact:

More information

Design of Compression Members

Design of Compression Members Design of Compression Members 2.1 Classification of cross sections Classifying cross-sections may mainly depend on four critical factors: 1- Width to thickness (c/t) ratio. 2- Support condition. 3- Yield

More information

CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS

CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS 4.1. INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS A column is a vertical structural member transmitting axial compression loads with or without moments. The cross sectional dimensions of a column

More information

GATE SOLUTIONS E N G I N E E R I N G

GATE SOLUTIONS E N G I N E E R I N G GATE SOLUTIONS C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G From (1987-018) Office : F-16, (Lower Basement), Katwaria Sarai, New Delhi-110016 Phone : 011-65064 Mobile : 81309090, 9711853908 E-mail: info@iesmasterpublications.com,

More information

PREDICTION OF THE CYCLIC BEHAVIOR OF MOMENT RESISTANT BEAM-TO-COLUMN JOINTS OF COMPOSITE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS

PREDICTION OF THE CYCLIC BEHAVIOR OF MOMENT RESISTANT BEAM-TO-COLUMN JOINTS OF COMPOSITE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS SDSS Rio 21 STABILITY AND DUCTILITY OF STEEL STRUCTURES E. Batista, P. Vellasco, L. de Lima (Eds.) Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, September 8-1, 21 PREDICTION OF THE CYCLIC BEHAVIOR OF MOMENT RESISTANT BEAM-TO-COLUMN

More information

UNIT- I Thin plate theory, Structural Instability:

UNIT- I Thin plate theory, Structural Instability: UNIT- I Thin plate theory, Structural Instability: Analysis of thin rectangular plates subject to bending, twisting, distributed transverse load, combined bending and in-plane loading Thin plates having

More information

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF TAPERED COMPOSITE PLATE GIRDER WITH A NON-LINEAR VARYING WEB DEPTH

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF TAPERED COMPOSITE PLATE GIRDER WITH A NON-LINEAR VARYING WEB DEPTH Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol. 12, No. 11 (2017) 2839-2854 School of Engineering, Taylor s University FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF TAPERED COMPOSITE PLATE GIRDER WITH A NON-LINEAR VARYING

More information

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are

More information

T2. VIERENDEEL STRUCTURES

T2. VIERENDEEL STRUCTURES T2. VIERENDEEL STRUCTURES AND FRAMES 1/11 T2. VIERENDEEL STRUCTURES NOTE: The Picture Window House can be designed using a Vierendeel structure, but now we consider a simpler problem to discuss the calculation

More information

UNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN. 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2

UNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN. 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2 UNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2 Young s modulus E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2 Area1=900mm 2 Area2=400mm 2 Area3=625mm

More information

A Simplified Method for the Design of Steel Beam-to-column Connections

A Simplified Method for the Design of Steel Beam-to-column Connections P P Periodica Polytechnica Architecture A Simplified Method for the Design of Steel Beam-to-column Connections 48() pp. 79-86 017 https://doi.org/10.3311/ppar.11089 Creative Commons Attribution b Imola

More information

Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A )

Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A ) Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A23.3-94) Slender Concrete Column Design in Sway Frame Buildings Evaluate slenderness effect for columns in a

More information

Advanced stability analysis and design of a new Danube archbridge. DUNAI, László JOÓ, Attila László VIGH, László Gergely

Advanced stability analysis and design of a new Danube archbridge. DUNAI, László JOÓ, Attila László VIGH, László Gergely Advanced stability analysis and design of a new Danube archbridge DUNAI, László JOÓ, Attila László VIGH, László Gergely Subject of the lecture Buckling of steel tied arch Buckling of orthotropic steel

More information

An Increase in Elastic Buckling Strength of Plate Girder by the Influence of Transverse Stiffeners

An Increase in Elastic Buckling Strength of Plate Girder by the Influence of Transverse Stiffeners GRD Journals- Global Research and Development Journal for Engineering Volume 2 Issue 6 May 2017 ISSN: 2455-5703 An Increase in Elastic Buckling Strength of Plate Girder by the Influence of Transverse Stiffeners

More information

Level 7 Postgraduate Diploma in Engineering Computational mechanics using finite element method

Level 7 Postgraduate Diploma in Engineering Computational mechanics using finite element method 9210-203 Level 7 Postgraduate Diploma in Engineering Computational mechanics using finite element method You should have the following for this examination one answer book No additional data is attached

More information

Table of Contents. Preface...xvii. Part 1. Level

Table of Contents. Preface...xvii. Part 1. Level Preface...xvii Part 1. Level 1... 1 Chapter 1. The Basics of Linear Elastic Behavior... 3 1.1. Cohesion forces... 4 1.2. The notion of stress... 6 1.2.1. Definition... 6 1.2.2. Graphical representation...

More information

VORONOI APPLIED ELEMENT METHOD FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS: THEORY AND APPLICATION FOR LINEAR AND NON-LINEAR MATERIALS

VORONOI APPLIED ELEMENT METHOD FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS: THEORY AND APPLICATION FOR LINEAR AND NON-LINEAR MATERIALS The 4 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October -7, 008, Beijing, China VORONOI APPLIED ELEMENT METHOD FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS: THEORY AND APPLICATION FOR LINEAR AND NON-LINEAR MATERIALS K.

More information

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7 Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7 Dr. Colin Caprani, Chartered Engineer 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 1.1 Background... 3 1.2 Failure Modes... 5 1.3 Design Aspects...

More information

Structural Dynamics Lecture Eleven: Dynamic Response of MDOF Systems: (Chapter 11) By: H. Ahmadian

Structural Dynamics Lecture Eleven: Dynamic Response of MDOF Systems: (Chapter 11) By: H. Ahmadian Structural Dynamics Lecture Eleven: Dynamic Response of MDOF Systems: (Chapter 11) By: H. Ahmadian ahmadian@iust.ac.ir Dynamic Response of MDOF Systems: Mode-Superposition Method Mode-Superposition Method:

More information

Downloaded from Downloaded from / 1

Downloaded from   Downloaded from   / 1 PURWANCHAL UNIVERSITY III SEMESTER FINAL EXAMINATION-2002 LEVEL : B. E. (Civil) SUBJECT: BEG256CI, Strength of Material Full Marks: 80 TIME: 03:00 hrs Pass marks: 32 Candidates are required to give their

More information

Practical Design to Eurocode 2

Practical Design to Eurocode 2 Practical Design to Eurocode 2 The webinar will start at 12.30 (Any questions beforehand? use Questions on the GoTo Control Panel) Course Outline Lecture Date Speaker Title 1 21 Sep Jenny Burridge Introduction,

More information

AERSYS KNOWLEDGE UNIT

AERSYS KNOWLEDGE UNIT -7016 1. INTRODUCTION The scope of this document is to provide a clarification and a deeper understanding of the two different ways to move the mid plane of the element out of the nodal plane. Although

More information

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV UNIT I STRESS, STRAIN DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS PART A (2 MARKS)

More information

Esben Byskov. Elementary Continuum. Mechanics for Everyone. With Applications to Structural Mechanics. Springer

Esben Byskov. Elementary Continuum. Mechanics for Everyone. With Applications to Structural Mechanics. Springer Esben Byskov Elementary Continuum Mechanics for Everyone With Applications to Structural Mechanics Springer Contents Preface v Contents ix Introduction What Is Continuum Mechanics? "I Need Continuum Mechanics

More information

Composite bridge design (EN1994-2) Bridge modelling and structural analysis

Composite bridge design (EN1994-2) Bridge modelling and structural analysis EUROCODES Bridges: Background and applications Dissemination of information for training Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 1 Composite bridge design (EN1994-2) Bridge modelling and structural analysis Laurence

More information

INFLUENCE OF FLANGE STIFFNESS ON DUCTILITY BEHAVIOUR OF PLATE GIRDER

INFLUENCE OF FLANGE STIFFNESS ON DUCTILITY BEHAVIOUR OF PLATE GIRDER International Journal of Civil Structural 6 Environmental And Infrastructure Engineering Research Vol.1, Issue.1 (2011) 1-15 TJPRC Pvt. Ltd.,. INFLUENCE OF FLANGE STIFFNESS ON DUCTILITY BEHAVIOUR OF PLATE

More information

9-3. Structural response

9-3. Structural response 9-3. Structural response in fire František Wald Czech Technical University in Prague Objectives of the lecture The mechanical load in the fire design Response of the structure exposed to fire Levels of

More information

7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces

7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces 7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces 7.3.1 General In the previous chapters of Draft IS: 800 LSM version, we have stipulated the codal provisions for determining the stress distribution in

More information

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME 313.3 MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich A CLOSED BOOK EXAMINATION TIME: 3 HOURS For Marker s Use Only LAST NAME (printed): FIRST

More information

Stresses Analysis of Petroleum Pipe Finite Element under Internal Pressure

Stresses Analysis of Petroleum Pipe Finite Element under Internal Pressure ISSN : 48-96, Vol. 6, Issue 8, ( Part -4 August 06, pp.3-38 RESEARCH ARTICLE Stresses Analysis of Petroleum Pipe Finite Element under Internal Pressure Dr.Ragbe.M.Abdusslam Eng. Khaled.S.Bagar ABSTRACT

More information

Lecture 8. Stress Strain in Multi-dimension

Lecture 8. Stress Strain in Multi-dimension Lecture 8. Stress Strain in Multi-dimension Module. General Field Equations General Field Equations [] Equilibrium Equations in Elastic bodies xx x y z yx zx f x 0, etc [2] Kinematics xx u x x,etc. [3]

More information

Deterministic and stochastic investigation of welded, high strength steel T joint

Deterministic and stochastic investigation of welded, high strength steel T joint Szakály Ferenc Student, MSc in Computational Structural Engineering, BUTE (M.Sc.) Deterministic and stochastic investigation of welded, high strength steel T joint Scientific Student s Association Thesis

More information

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges 01/02/2016 Marco Donà Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges 1 Plastic hinge approach A plastic hinge represents a concentrated post-yield behaviour in one or more degrees of freedom. Hinges only

More information

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State

More information

The Finite Element Method for Solid and Structural Mechanics

The Finite Element Method for Solid and Structural Mechanics The Finite Element Method for Solid and Structural Mechanics Sixth edition O.C. Zienkiewicz, CBE, FRS UNESCO Professor of Numerical Methods in Engineering International Centre for Numerical Methods in

More information

MS Excel Toolkit: Design of steel-concrete composite columns in accordance with EN

MS Excel Toolkit: Design of steel-concrete composite columns in accordance with EN MS Excel Toolkit: Design of steel-concrete composite columns in accordance with EN 1994-1-1 Guilherme de Azevedo Guedes Lebre Dissertation in Civil Engineering, Master Degree Instituto Superior Técnico,

More information

Fire Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams with 2-D Plane Stress Concrete Model

Fire Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams with 2-D Plane Stress Concrete Model Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 5(2): 398-44, 213 ISSN: 24-7459; E-ISSN: 24-7467 Maxwell Scientific Organization, 213 Submitted: April 29, 212 Accepted: May 23, 212 Published:

More information

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602 Design of wall panel according to EN 160 Example 3: Wall panel with wind load 1.1 Issue Design of a wall panel at an industrial building Materials with a compressive strength 3,5, density class 500, welded

More information

FIXED BEAMS IN BENDING

FIXED BEAMS IN BENDING FIXED BEAMS IN BENDING INTRODUCTION Fixed or built-in beams are commonly used in building construction because they possess high rigidity in comparison to simply supported beams. When a simply supported

More information

Analytical Strip Method for Thin Isotropic Cylindrical Shells

Analytical Strip Method for Thin Isotropic Cylindrical Shells IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-issn: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 14, Issue 4 Ver. III (Jul. Aug. 2017), PP 24-38 www.iosrjournals.org Analytical Strip Method for

More information

VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES. Design-support for MSH sections

VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES. Design-support for MSH sections VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES Design-support for MSH sections according to Eurocode 3, DIN EN 1993-1-1: 2005 and DIN EN 1993-1-8: 2005 Design-Support for MSH sections according to Eurocode 3, DIN EN 1993-1-1:

More information

APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES

APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES 163 APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES A1.1 DESIGN AS PER NORTH AMERICAN SPECIFICATION OF COLD FORMED STEEL (AISI S100: 2007) 1. Based on Initiation of Yielding: Effective yield moment, M n

More information

Mechanics of Materials II. Chapter III. A review of the fundamental formulation of stress, strain, and deflection

Mechanics of Materials II. Chapter III. A review of the fundamental formulation of stress, strain, and deflection Mechanics of Materials II Chapter III A review of the fundamental formulation of stress, strain, and deflection Outline Introduction Assumtions and limitations Axial loading Torsion of circular shafts

More information

Sample Question Paper

Sample Question Paper Scheme I Sample Question Paper Program Name : Mechanical Engineering Program Group Program Code : AE/ME/PG/PT/FG Semester : Third Course Title : Strength of Materials Marks : 70 Time: 3 Hrs. Instructions:

More information

EQUIVALENT FRACTURE ENERGY CONCEPT FOR DYNAMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF PROTOTYPE RC GIRDERS

EQUIVALENT FRACTURE ENERGY CONCEPT FOR DYNAMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF PROTOTYPE RC GIRDERS EQUIVALENT FRACTURE ENERGY CONCEPT FOR DYNAMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF PROTOTYPE RC GIRDERS Abdul Qadir Bhatti 1, Norimitsu Kishi 2 and Khaliq U Rehman Shad 3 1 Assistant Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering,

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite

More information

Comb resonator design (2)

Comb resonator design (2) Lecture 6: Comb resonator design () -Intro Intro. to Mechanics of Materials School of Electrical l Engineering i and Computer Science, Seoul National University Nano/Micro Systems & Controls Laboratory

More information

Aircraft Stress Analysis and Structural Design Summary

Aircraft Stress Analysis and Structural Design Summary Aircraft Stress Analysis and Structural Design Summary 1. Trusses 1.1 Determinacy in Truss Structures 1.1.1 Introduction to determinacy A truss structure is a structure consisting of members, connected

More information

On Design Method of Lateral-torsional Buckling of Beams: State of the Art and a New Proposal for a General Type Design Method

On Design Method of Lateral-torsional Buckling of Beams: State of the Art and a New Proposal for a General Type Design Method Ŕ Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering 59(2), pp. 179 192, 2015 DOI: 10.3311/PPci.7837 Creative Commons Attribution RESEARCH ARTICLE On Design Method of Lateral-torsional Buckling of Beams: State of

More information

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State Hooke s law. 3. Define modular ratio,

More information

ANALYSIS OF THE INTERACTIVE BUCKLING IN STIFFENED PLATES USING A SEMI-ANALYTICAL METHOD

ANALYSIS OF THE INTERACTIVE BUCKLING IN STIFFENED PLATES USING A SEMI-ANALYTICAL METHOD EUROSTEEL 2014, September 10-12, 2014, Naples, Italy ANALYSIS OF THE INTERACTIVE BUCKLING IN STIFFENED PLATES USING A SEMI-ANALYTICAL METHOD Pedro Salvado Ferreira a, Francisco Virtuoso b a Polytechnic

More information

Symmetric Bending of Beams

Symmetric Bending of Beams Symmetric Bending of Beams beam is any long structural member on which loads act perpendicular to the longitudinal axis. Learning objectives Understand the theory, its limitations and its applications

More information

Optimum Height of Plate Stiffener under Pressure Effect

Optimum Height of Plate Stiffener under Pressure Effect The st Regional Conference of Eng. Sci. NUCEJ Spatial ISSUE vol., No.3, 8 pp 459-468 Optimum Height of Plate Stiffener under Pressure Effect Mazin Victor Yousif M.Sc Production Engineering University of

More information

NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF THE ROTATIONAL CAPACITY OF STEEL BEAMS AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES

NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF THE ROTATIONAL CAPACITY OF STEEL BEAMS AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES 8 th GRACM International Congress on Computational Mechanics Volos, 12 July 15 July 2015 NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF THE ROTATIONAL CAPACITY OF STEEL BEAMS AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES Savvas Akritidis, Daphne

More information

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1. C3 Flexural Members C3.1 Bending The nominal flexural strength [moment resistance], Mn, shall be the smallest of the values calculated for the limit states of yielding, lateral-torsional buckling and distortional

More information

1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6

1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6 Page 3 Page 4 Substructure Design. ARRANGEMENT a. Frame A-P3 L = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m b. Frame P3-P6 L = 25 m H 3 = 8.39 m L 2 = 3 m H 4 = 8.5 m L

More information

Institute of Structural Engineering Page 1. Method of Finite Elements I. Chapter 2. The Direct Stiffness Method. Method of Finite Elements I

Institute of Structural Engineering Page 1. Method of Finite Elements I. Chapter 2. The Direct Stiffness Method. Method of Finite Elements I Institute of Structural Engineering Page 1 Chapter 2 The Direct Stiffness Method Institute of Structural Engineering Page 2 Direct Stiffness Method (DSM) Computational method for structural analysis Matrix

More information

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 172 (2017 )

Available online at  ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 172 (2017 ) Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Engineering 172 (2017 ) 1093 1101 Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques, MBMST 2016 Iterative Methods of Beam-Structure Analysis

More information

SRI CHANDRASEKHARENDRA SARASWATHI VISWA MAHAVIDHYALAYA

SRI CHANDRASEKHARENDRA SARASWATHI VISWA MAHAVIDHYALAYA SRI CHANDRASEKHARENDRA SARASWATHI VISWA MAHAVIDHYALAYA (Declared as Deemed-to-be University under Section 3 of the UGC Act, 1956, Vide notification No.F.9.9/92-U-3 dated 26 th May 1993 of the Govt. of

More information

March 24, Chapter 4. Deflection and Stiffness. Dr. Mohammad Suliman Abuhaiba, PE

March 24, Chapter 4. Deflection and Stiffness. Dr. Mohammad Suliman Abuhaiba, PE Chapter 4 Deflection and Stiffness 1 2 Chapter Outline Spring Rates Tension, Compression, and Torsion Deflection Due to Bending Beam Deflection Methods Beam Deflections by Superposition Strain Energy Castigliano

More information

Due Tuesday, September 21 st, 12:00 midnight

Due Tuesday, September 21 st, 12:00 midnight Due Tuesday, September 21 st, 12:00 midnight The first problem discusses a plane truss with inclined supports. You will need to modify the MatLab software from homework 1. The next 4 problems consider

More information

EUROCODE EN SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES

EUROCODE EN SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 1 EUROCODE EN1998-2 SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES Basil Kolias Basic Requirements Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information

More information

Project data Project name Project number Author Description Date 26/04/2017 Design code AISC dome anchor. Material.

Project data Project name Project number Author Description Date 26/04/2017 Design code AISC dome anchor. Material. Project data Project name Project number Author Description Date 26/04/2017 Design code AISC 360-10 Material Steel A36, A529, Gr. 50 Concrete 4000 psi dome anchor Connection Name Description Analysis Design

More information

Finite Element Analysis Prof. Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Module - 01 Lecture - 13

Finite Element Analysis Prof. Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Module - 01 Lecture - 13 Finite Element Analysis Prof. Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras (Refer Slide Time: 00:25) Module - 01 Lecture - 13 In the last class, we have seen how

More information

9.5 Compression Members

9.5 Compression Members 9.5 Compression Members This section covers the following topics. Introduction Analysis Development of Interaction Diagram Effect of Prestressing Force 9.5.1 Introduction Prestressing is meaningful when

More information

Effect of Bracing Stiffness on Buckling Strength of Cold-formed Steel Columns

Effect of Bracing Stiffness on Buckling Strength of Cold-formed Steel Columns Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine nternational Specialty Conference on Cold- Formed Steel Structures (1996) - 13th nternational Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures

More information

Validation of the Advanced Calculation Model SAFIR Through DIN EN Procedure

Validation of the Advanced Calculation Model SAFIR Through DIN EN Procedure Validation of the Advanced Calculation Model SAFIR Through DIN EN 1991-1-2 Procedure Raul Zaharia Department of Steel Structures and Structural Mechanics The Politehnica University of Timisoara, Ioan Curea

More information

PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK

PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM - 613 403 - THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Sub : Strength of Materials Year / Sem: II / III Sub Code : MEB 310

More information