Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach"

Transcription

1 Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 22 : Design of an unbraced sway frame with rigid joints Summary: NOTE This example is a draft version Pre-requisites: Notes for Tutors: This material comprises one 60 minute lecture. Objectives: To explain the main principles of EC by practical worked example. References: Eurocode : Design of steel structures Part 1.1 General rules and rules for buildings Contents: 15/02/07 2

2 WORKED EXAMPLE Design of a Sway Frame The frame consists of three storeys and three bays. The frames are at 10 m spacing. The beam span is 6,5 m and the total height is 15 m, each storey being,5 m high. It is assumed that the column foot is pinned at the foundation. Roof beams Floor beams,5 m Internal columns Internal columns,5 m External columns External columns,5 m 6,5 m 6,5 m 6,5 m Figure 1 Typical Cross Section of Frame The structure is assumed to be braced out of its plane and to be unbraced in its plane. In the longitudinal direction of the building, i.e. in the direction perpendicular to the frame plane, a bracing does exist so that the tops of 15/02/07

3 the columns are held in place. The lateral support for the floor beams is provided by the floor slabs. All the beam-to-column joints are assumed to be perfectly rigid. The connections must be capable of transmitting the forces and moments calculated in design. With these assumptions, the frame is classified as continuous, and the internal forces and moments are determined using a global elastic analysis which assumes the members to be effectively held in position. The steel grade selected for beams, columns and joints is Fe60 (f y = 25 N/mm 2 ). Characteristic Loads Floor: Variable actions, Q k = 1,8 kn/m 2, Permanent actions, G k =,0 kn/m 2 Roof: Variable actions, Q k = 6 kn/m 2, Permanent actions, G k = 2,0 kn/m 2 The wind loads are applied as point loads of 15 kn at roof level and 21 kn at the first and second storey levels. The basic loading cases, shown in Figure 2, have been considered in appropriate combinations. 20 kn/m 0 kn/m 15 kn 21 kn () kn/m 21 kn Permanent Loading (G) Wind Loading (W) 6 kn/m 6 kn/m 6 kn/m 6 kn/m 18 kn/m 18 kn/m 18 kn/m 18 kn/m 18 kn/m 18 kn/m 18 kn/m 18 kn/m loading case 1 (N1) loading case 2 (N2) loading case (N) Imposed Loading Cases Figure 2 Loading Cases 15/02/07 4

4 Frame Imperfections Frame imperfections are considered by means of equivalent horizontal loads. The initial sway imperfection is given as: φ = k c k s φ (1) where k = k s c 5+ 1 n c but k c 1, 1 = 2 + but k s 1, and n s 1 φ 0 =. 200 In this case, the number of full height columns per floor, n c, is 4 and the number of storeys in the frame, n s, is. Therefore k c = 5+ 1 = 866, and 4 1 k s = 2 + = 7. Substituting into the above equation: 1 φ = 866 x 7 x 200 = 1 15 The equivalent horizontal load, H, at each storey of the frame is derived from the initial sway, φ, and the total design vertical load, N, in any storey for a given load case. Therefore H = φn. The relevant values are listed in 1 for all the basic loading cases. Basic loading case (see Figure 2) Storey N (kn) φn (kn) G Roof 90 1,24 2nd Floor 585 1,86 1st Floor 585 1,86 N1 Roof nd Floor 51 1,11 1st Floor 51 1,11 N2 Roof nd Floor st Floor N Roof nd Floor st Floor Equivalent Horizontal Forces The equivalent horizontal forces must also be multiplied be the appropriate partial safety factors for actions. 15/02/07 5

5 Load Combinations It was decided to use the simplified combinations for the ultimate limit state and the serviceability limit state. The basic load cases are combined at the ULS as summarised in 2. Load Case 1 1,5G + 1,5W Load Case 2 1,5G + 1,5N1 Load Case 1,5G + 1,5N2 Load Case 4 1,5G + 1,5N Load Case 5 1,5G + 1,5W + 1,5N1 Load Case 6 1,5G + 1,5W + 1,5N2 Load Case 7 1,5G + 1,5W + 1,5N 2 Load Combination Cases at the Ultimate Limit State The basic load cases are combined at the SLS as summarised in. Load Case 1 1,0G + 1,0W Load Case 2 1,0G + 1,0N1 Load Case 1,0G + 1,0N2 Load Case 4 1,0G + 1,0N Load Case 5 1,0G + 9W + 9N1 Load Case 6 1,0G + 9W + 9N2 Load Case 7 1,0G + 9W + 9N Load Combination Cases at the Serviceability Limit State Partial Safety Factors for Strength The following partial safety factors for strength have been adopted during the design: Resistance of Class 1,2 or cross-section, γ M0 = 1,1 Resistance of member to buckling, γ M1 = 1,1 Resistance of bolted connections, γ Mb = 1,25 Trial Sections In order for a global elastic analysis of the structure to be carried out, initial section sizes must be assumed and allocated to the structural members. The analysis must then be carried out and the members checked for the relevant failure modes. The sections will then need to be modified and the structure re-analysed. This can be a long winded iterative process. The engineer may have his own method of selecting initial section sizes. As a guideline, for this example, columns were selected by assuming an average stress of approximately 100 N/mm 2 under axial forces. Axial forces can be estimated by approximating the floor area supported by that column. Generally, the bending moments withing the beams are critical. Simple bending moment diagrams can be constructed, assuming fixed end moments, and the maximum bending moment can then be estimated. An initial section size can then be determined. The trial member sizes for this example are: Inner columns: HEB 260 Outer columns: HEB (5) and 2..4(5) 2...2(1) 5.1.1(2) 5.1.1(2) 6.1.1(2) 15/02/07 6

6 Floor beams: IPE 450 Roof beams: IPE 60 Roof beams IPE 60 Floor beams IPE 450,5 m Internal columns HEB 260 Internal columns HEB 260,5 m External columns HEB 220 External columns HEB 220,5 m 6,5 m 6,5 m 6,5 m Figure Trial Member Sizes Determination of Design Moments and Forces This worked example uses the amplified sway moments method of analysis. An alternative method is to calculate the sway-mode buckling lengths of members, and then carry out a first order linear elastic analysis. However, it may be possible to directly use a second order elastic analysis. A global linear elastic analysis is carried out on the sway frame in order to determine the moments, axial forces and shear forces in each member. Props are then applied to the structure in order to prevent any horizontal movement (i.e. as if the structure was now braced), and the analysis carried out again. The moments induced in the members from the propped case are then subtracted from the moments determined from the sway case. The resultant moments are those induced by pure sway. The pure sway moments are then amplified to take account of second order effects ignored by the linear elastic analysis. The amplified pure sway moments are then added to the moments obtained from analysis of the propped structure. These are the design moments which each member must be able to resist. The members must also be checked for the axial and shear forces determined from the initial analysis of the sway frame, and in certain cases the interaction of the design moments with the axial forces and/or shear forces must also be checked. This needs to be carried out for every load case so that the critical conditions for each individual member can be identified (1) (1) (1) 15/02/07 7

7 Original Sway Case Moments Minus Propped Case Moments Equals "Pure Sway" Moments (To Be Amplified) 15/02/07 8

8 Figure 4 Determination of Pure Sway Moments Calculation of Amplification Factors The sway moments should be increased by multiplying them by the ratio: 1 1 VSd / Vcr where V Sd is the design value of the total vertical load, and V cr is its elastic critical value for failure in a sway mode. Instead of determining V Sd / V cr directly, the following approximation may be used: VSd V = V δ h H cr where δ is the horizontal displacement at the top of the storey, relative to the bottom of the storey, h is the storey height, V is the total vertical reaction at the bottom of the storey, and H is the total horizontal reaction at the bottom of the storey. This approximation may not be used if V Sd / V cr is greater than 25. If V Sd / V cr is greater than 25, then the frame may be more susceptible to buckling. It is therefore necessary to carry out analysis using a direct second order analysis. It may also be necessary to stiffen the frame - for example increasing the column sizes. Alternatively, if the value of V Sd / V cr is less than 1 then the structure is classified as non-sway. The amplification factor will be different for each storey of the structure. The maximum factor should be used to multiply the moments at all levels of the structure. This is essentially a conservative method as it corresponds to the critical elastic load of the whole structure. The amplification factor for load case 5 of this example was determined as follows: () (6) (4) (4) () 15/02/07 9

9 δ 2 δ = δ2 - δ = 15,6 mm 1 h = 500 mm V = 296 kn H = 81 kn h H V δ1 Figure 5 Determination of Amplification Factor Therefore V Sd V 15,6 x 296 = V δ cr h = = 18 H 500 x The amplification factor = = = 1, 22 1 VSd / Vcr 1 18 All the pure sway moments for load case 5 were amplified by a factor of 1,22. The global linear elastic analysis and amplification of sway moments was carried out for all seven load cases. s 4a and 4b shows the maximum forces in each member. N 19 P 20 Q 21 R K 1 L 14 J M F 6 G 7 E H 9 = Element G = Node A B C D Figure 6 Labelling of Members within the Structure 15/02/07 40

10 Membe r Node Tension (kn) Compressio n (kn) Shear (kn) Bending Moment (knm) 0 Maximum forces 1 A - 517,6 C2-1,1 C4 E , C2 1,1 C4 44,7 C4 2 B ,4 C2 5,9 C7 0 Axial ld + BM F ,1 C2-5,9-142,1 C7 internal col C7 C , C2 8 C6 0 G ,0 C ,0 C6 C6 4 D - 529,0 C5 27,6 C7 0 Axial ld + BM H ,7 C5-27,6-105,5 C7 external col C7 8 E - 17,9 C2-4,9 79,8 C2 C2 J - -14,6 C2 4,9 C2 7,4 C2 9 F - 722,8 C2 25,8 C5 58,6 C7 K ,5 C2-25,8-69,2 C6 C5 10 G - 722,8 C2 11,5 C1 1,2 C4 L ,5 C2-11,5-45,9 C7 C1 11 H - 20 C2 51, C5-91,7 C5 M - -16,7 C2-51, -9,7 C5 C5 15 J - 11,0 C4-4,0 7,5 C C2 N ,7 C4 4,0 C2 77, C2 16 K - 25,9 C2 15,2 C6-41,9 C6 P ,6 C2-15,2-6,7 C6 C6 17 L - 25,9 C2-9,8 C 4,6 C Q ,6 C2 9,8 C 24,5 C4 18 M - 11,5 C4 44,8 C5-76,0 C5 R C4-44,8 C5-82,4 C5 4a Maximum Axial Forces, Shear Force and Bending Moment in Each Column Shaded boxes indicate the critical case that each section type will be designed to. For example, internal columns are the same section for every storey, therefore the worst case will obviously be one of the base columns. 15/02/07 41

11 Membe r Node Tension (kn) Compressio n (kn) Shear (kn) Bending Moment (knm) 5 E -28,9 C2 8,5 C1 201,8 C4 F 28,9 C2-8,5 C1 255,2 C5 6 F -2,4 1,4 C ,2 C2 C2 C G 2,4 C2-1,4 C1 21,6 17 C5 C5 7 G -1,5-244,2 C2 C2 H 1,5 C2-21, C7 12 J -6 G 28,1 C5 207,1-146,8 C2 C K 6 G -28,1 C5 242,7 288,6 C5 C2 1 K -1, C4 15,6 C5 222,0-242,6 C2 C4 L 1, C4-15,6 C5 22,6 261, C5 C2 14 L -1,9 G 6,5 C5 241,0-271,5 C2 C2 M 1,9 G -6,5 C5 208,5 169,7 C5 C 19 N - 55,8 C5 109,7 C4 P - -55,8 C5 14 C2 20 P - 42,4 C5 119, -11,7 C2 C Q - -42,4 C5 119,7 15,8 C5 C2 21 Q - 44,8 C5 129,9 C2 R - -44,8 C5 111 C4 4b Maximum Axial Force, Shear Force and Bending Moment in Each Beam Maximum forces -118,5 C4 Internal BM 41,6 C5 on floor beam -271,7 C2 External BM 194,4 C5 on floor beam -77, C2 Internal BM 152 C5 on roof beam -146,7 C2 External BM 82,4 C5 on roof beam 15/02/07 42

12 Shaded boxes indicate the critical case that each section type will be designed to. Generally, the beams will be designed to the maximum bending moment, and the columns will be designed for maximum axial load. However, it may also be necessary to check the interaction of the bending moments and axial forces for certain load cases. Floor Beam - Fully Restrained The maximum moment any floor beam has to resist is 41,6 knm at node F, under load case 5. The beam is in tension for this load case, therefore the interaction of the bending moment and axial force will not need to be checked. The maximum compression force any floor beam has to resist is 28,1 kn (member 12) under load case 5. The beam also has to resist a bending moment of 288,6 knm but as the axial force is low it is unlikely that the interaction will be critical. The maximum shear force any floor beam has to resist is 255,2 kn at node F, under load case 5. The maximum tensile force any floor beam has to resist is 1,5 kn (member 7) under load case 2. This will not be the critical condition for the floor beam design. IPE 450 Section properties: Depth, h = 450 mm, Width, b = 190 mm Web thickness, t w = 9,4 mm Flange thickness, t f = 14,6 mm Plastic modulus, W pl = 1702 cm This notation conforms with Figure 1.1 in Eurocode : Part 1.1. Classification of Cross-section Figure 7 shows a typical cross-section for an IPE /02/07 4

13 t t w f Figure 7 A Typical Cross- Section c d Flange Buckling Class 1 limiting value of c/t f for an outstand of a rolled section is 10ε. ε = 25 / f y and f y = 25 N/mm 2, therefore ε =1. Calculate the ratio c, where c is half t f the width of the flange = 95 mm, and t f is the flange thickness = 14,6 mm (if the flange is tapered, t f should be taken as the average thickness). c 95 = = 6, 5 t f 14, 6 Web Buckling Class 1 limiting value of d/t w for a web of a rolled section under bending is 72ε. ε = 25 / f y and f y = 25 N/mm 2, therefore ε =1. Calculate the ratio d, where d is the depth between root radii = 78,8 mm t w and t w is the web thickness = 9,4 mm. d 78, 8 = = 4 t w 9, 4 c < 10ε and d < 72ε t t f w Section is Class 1. The beam shown in Figure 8 is fixed at both ends and is fully restrained along its length. For the critical load cases given above, check the beam, assuming it is grade Fe6 and that it is carrying plaster, or a similar brittle finish. Load varies depending on appropriate load case 5..1 (Sheet ) 5..1 (Sheet 1) 5..1 (Sheets 1 and ) 6,5 m Figure 8 Loading on Fully Restrained Floor Beam Check Moment Capacity Design moment, M Sd = 41,6 knm (load case 5 - member 5) The design bending moment, M Sd, must be less than or equal to the design moment resistance of the cross section, M c.rd : M Sd M c.rd M c.rd = M pl.y.rd = W f pl y γ M (1) 15/02/07 44

14 where W pl is the plastic section modulus = 1702 cm, f y is the yield strength = 25 N/mm 2, and γ M0 is the partial material safety factor = 1,1. Therefore, M pl.y.rd = W f pl y 1702x10 x 25 = = 64 knm γ 1,1 M0 M Sd = 41,6 knm M pl.y.rd = 64 knm Therefore the section is satisfactory. Check Interaction of Maximum Axial Force and Bending Moment Interaction case: Design moment, M Sd = 41,6 knm and design axial force, N Sd = 28,1 kn (load case 5 - member 12) Lateral support to the floor beams is provided by the floor slabs, therefore there is no need to check for failure due to flexural or lateral torsional buckling. A class 1 member subject to moment about the major axis only should satisfy the following: 2 MSd NSd + 1 Mpl.Rd Npl.Rd Applied bending moment, M Sd, = 41,6 knm, design bending moment resistance of the section, M pl.rd = 64 knm, applied axial load, N Sd, = 28,1 kn, and (2) (2) design compression resistance of the cross-section, N pl.rd = Af y γ M0 where A is the cross-sectional area of the section = 9880 mm 2, f y is the yield strength = 25 N/mm 2, and γ M0 is the partial material safety factor = 1, x 25 Therefore, N pl.rd = = 2111 kn 11, Substituting into the above equation: (2) 6 41, 6x10 28, 1x x x10 = Therefore the section is satisfactory under combined axial load and bending moment Lateral Torsional Buckling Although lateral restraint is provided by the floor slabs, it is necessary to check for lateral torsional buckling over the length of the beam which is in hogging (approximately 1,7 m). This is because the floor beams are restrained only by the upper flange, while the lower flange which is under compression, has no lateral restraint. As this is over such a short length of the beam, it is unlikely that this will be a critical condition. For completeness, however, the check is included in this worked example. A class 1 section should satisfy the following: 5.5.4(2) 15/02/07 45

15 N k M Sd LT y.sd + 1, 0 χ Af / γ χ W f / γ z y M1 LT pl.y y M1 Applied axial force, N Sd = 28,1 kn Determination of χ z Slenderness, λ z = l/i z where l is taken as the length of beam in hogging, and i is the radius of gyration about the appropriate axis. Slenderness, λ z = 1700 / 41,2 = 41, λ Non-dimensional slenderness, λ z z = β where λ 1 = 9,9ε = 9,9 x 1 = 9,9, and β A = 1 for class 1 members 41, Non-dimensional slenderness, λ z = = 44 9, 9 From 5.5.2, using buckling curve b, reduction factor, χ z = 91 Cross-sectional area, A = 9880 mm 2, Yield strength of the steel, f y = 25 N/ mm 2, and Partial material safety factor for buckling resistance, γ M1 = 1,1. i a Lt Lt λ A (2) (1) (1) (2) 6 9 IzIw x10 x 791x10 = 25 mm W = 16, 76 = 46, F.2.2() 2 2 ply ( 1702x10 ) 9 Iw x10 = 5 mm 4 = 5 I 791 F.2.2(1) = ,9x10 t 15/02/07 46

16 k LT To Calculate k LT LTNSd = 1 µ but k LT 1,0. χ Af z y where µ = 15λ β 15 but µ 9 LT z M.LT LT λ z = 44 β M.LT = 1,8 (ψ = 0) µ LT = (15 x 44 x 1,8) - 15 = -0 = ( 0) x 28,1x10 k LT 1 = 1, 0 91 x 9880 x 25 Applied moment, M y.sd = 41,6 knm To Calculate Reduction Factor, χ LT The value of χ LT can be determined from for the appropriate value of the non-dimensional slenderness, λ LT. λ λ LT LT λ β 5 = w 1 where λ 1 = 9,9 ε = 9,9 x 1 = 9,9, β w = 1 for class 1 sections, and L / ilt λ LT = 2 25 ( L / alt) 5 C , 66 where L is the length = 1700 mm, i LT = 46, mm (from section properties), ψ = k = 1, therefore C 1 = 1,879, and a LT = 1087 mm (from section properties). Substituting into the above equation: 1700 / 46, λ LT = = 26, ( ) / , , 66 λ λ LT LT = = = λ β 5 26, w ,,, 0, 28 1 Where the non-dimensional slenderness λ LT 4, no allowance for lateral torsional buckling is necessary. Therefore, this section is satisfactory for lateral torsional buckling. Shear on Web Design shear force, V Sd = 255,2 kn (load case 5 - member 5) The shear resistance of the web must be checked. The design shear force, V Sd, must be less than or equal to the design plastic shear resistance, V pl.rd : V Sd V pl.rd where V pl.rd is given by A f / y v γ M (2) 5.5.4(7) and Figure (4) 5.5.2(5) 5.5.2(1) Equation F (5) 5.5.2(7) /02/07 47

17 For rolled I and H sections loaded parallel to the web, shear area, A v = 1,04 h t w, f y is the yield strength = 25 N/mm 2, and γ M0 is the partial material safety factor = 1,1. 1,04htwfy Vpl.Rd = = 1, 04 x 450 x 9,4 x 25 = 54 kn xγ M0 x 1,1 This is greater than the shear on the section (255,2 kn). The section is satisfactory under shear. A further check is sometimes required, especially when there are significant point loads, cantilevers or continuity, to ensure that the shear will not have a significant effect on the moment resistance. This check is carried out for the moment and shear at the same point. The moment resistance of the web is reduced if the shear is more than 50% of the shear resistance of the section. With a uniform load, the maximum moment and shear are not coincident and this check is not required for beams without web openings. Check Tension Resistance of Member Maximum applied tensile force, N Sd = 1,5 kn (load case 2 - member 7) For members in axial tension, the design value of the tensile force, N Sd must be less than the design tension resistance of the cross-section, N t.rd. N t.rd = N pl.rd = A f y γ M0 where A is the cross-sectional area of the section = 9880 mm 2, f y is the yield strength = 25 N/mm 2, and γ M0 is the partial material safety factor = 1, x 25 Therefore N pl.rd = = 2110 kn 11, The design tension resistance of the cross-section, N t.rd = 2110 kn, is greater than the applied tensile force, N Sd = 1,5 kn, therefore the section is OK. Deflection Check For a plaster or similar brittle finish, the deflection limit is L/250 for δ max. Deflection checks are based on the serviceability loading. The maximum deflection for any floor beam is 6,2 mm which occurs under serviceability load case 4 at member 5. L 6500 Deflection limit for δ max = = = 26 mm The actual deflection is less than the allowable deflection: 6,2 mm < 26 mm, therefore the section is OK. The calculated deflections are less than the limits, so no pre-camber is required (4) (2) 5.4.7() 5.4.(1) (2) 4.1 Figure (2) 15/02/07 48

18 Summary The trial section IPE 450 is satisfactory. Roof Beam The maximum moment any roof beam has to resist is 152 knm at node P (member 19), under load case 5. The maximum compression force any roof beam has to resist is 55,8 kn (member 19) also under load case 5. The interaction of the axial force and bending moment will therefore be critical. The maximum shear force any roof beam has to resist is 14 kn at node P, under load case 2. The roof beams experience no tensile force. IPE 60 Section properties: Depth, h = 60 mm, Width, b = 170 mm Web thickness, t w = 8,0 mm Flange thickness, t f = 12,7 mm Plastic modulus, W pl = 1019 cm This notation conforms with Figure 1.1 in Eurocode : Part1.1. Classification of Cross-Section Flange buckling Class 1 limiting value of c/t f for an outstand of a rolled section is 10ε. ε = 25 / f y and f y = 25 N/mm 2, therefore ε =1. Calculate the ratio c, where c is half the width of the flange = 85 mm, t f and t f is the flange thickness = 12,7 mm (if the flange is tapered, t f should be taken as the average thickness). c 85 = = 6, 7 t f 12, 7 Web buckling Class 1 limiting value of d/t w for a web of a rolled section under bending is 72ε. ε = 25 / f y and f y = 25 N/mm 2, therefore ε =1. Calculate the ratio d, where d is the depth between root radii = 298,6 mm t w and t w is the web thickness = 8,0 mm. d 298, 6 = = 7, t w 8, 0 c < 10ε and d < 72ε t t f w Section is Class 1. For the critical load cases given above, check the beam, assuming it is grade Fe6 and that it is for a general roof. Check Interaction of Maximum Axial Force and Bending Moment Interaction case: Design moment, M Sd = 152 knm and design axial (Sheet ) 5..1 (Sheet 1) 5..1 (Sheets 1 and ) 15/02/07 49

19 force, N Sd = 55,8 kn (load case 5 - member 19). There is no lateral support provided for the roof beams, therefore they must be checked for failure due to flexural and lateral torsional buckling. Flexural Buckling A class 1 member subject to moment about the major axis only should satisfy the following: N k M sd y y.sd + 1,0 χ Af / γ W f / γ min y M1 pl.y y M1 Applied axial force, N Sd, = 55,8 kn To Calculate Reduction Factor, χ min The reduction factor χ min is the lesser of χ y and χ z, where χ y and χ z are the reduction factors from clause for the y-y and z-z axes respectively. Determination of χ y The reduction factor χ y depends on the slenderness about the y-y axis. Assuming that the connections at the beam ends are rigid, then the slenderness about the y-y axis is: λ y = l/i y where l is taken as the system length, and i is the radius of gyration about the appropriate axis. Slenderness, λ y = 6500 / 150 = 4, λ 1 = 9,9ε = 9,9 x 1,0 = 9,9 λ Non-dimensional slenderness, λ y y λ β 5 = A where β A = 1 for class 1 members 4, Non-dimensional slenderness, λ y = = 46 9, 9 From 5.5.2, using buckling curve a, the reduction factor, χ y = 95 Determination of χ z Slenderness, λ z = l/i z where l is taken as the system length, and i is the radius of gyration about the appropriate axis. Slenderness, λ z = 6500 / 7,9 = 171,5 λ Non-dimensional slenderness, λ z z λ β 5 = A where β A = 1 for class 1 members 171, 5 Non-dimensional slenderness, λ z = = 1, 8 9, 9 From 5.5.2, using buckling curve b, reduction factor, χ z = 2521 Reduction factor, χ min = χ z = 2521 A is the cross-sectional area = 7270 mm 2, f y is the yield strength = 25 N/mm 2, and γ M1 is the partial material safety factor for buckling resistance = 1, (1) (2) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (2) 15/02/07 50

20 To Calculate k y yn sd k y = 1 µ but k y 1,5 χ y Af y where Wpl.y W µ y = λ y (2β MY 4) + W el.y el.y but µ y 90 β My is an equivalent uniform moment factor for flexural buckling β My = β M,ψ + M Q MQ M ( β β ) M, ψ where β M,ψ = 1,8-7ψ, and ψ = 47 Therefore β M,ψ = 1,8 - (7 x 47) = 1,47, M Q = 187 knm, M = 21 knm, and β M,Q = 1,. Therefore β My = 1,47 + (187/21) x (1, - 1,47) = 1, µ y = 46( 2 x 1, - 4) + = (-49) x 55,8x10 k y = 1 = 1, 02 0, 95 x 7270 x 25 M y.sd is the design applied moment = 152 knm, and W pl.y is the plastic section modulus = 1019 x 10 mm. N k M sd y y.sd + 1,0 χ Af / γ W f / γ min y M1 pl.y y M1 6 55,8x10 1, 02 x 152x10 + = x 7270 x 25 / 1,1 1019x10 x 25 / 1,1 Therefore this section is satisfactory for flexural buckling Lateral Torsional Buckling A class 1 section should satisfy the following: N k M Sd LT y.sd + 1, 0 χ Af / γ χ W f / γ z y M1 LT pl.y y M1 Applied axial force, N Sd = 55,8 kn, Reduction factor, χ z = 2521, Cross-sectional area, A = 7270 mm 2, Yield strength of the steel, f y = 25 N/ mm 2, and Partial material safety factor for buckling resistance, γ M1 = 1,1. i a Lt Lt I I = W z w 2 ply x10 x 14x10 = ( 1019x10 ) 9 Iw x10 = mm 4 = I 14 = 917, 5 7,x10 t = 42, 1 mm 5.5.4(1) 5.5.4(7) and Figure (2) (2) F.2.2() F.2.2(1) 15/02/07 51

21 k LT To Calculate k LT LTNSd = 1 µ but k LT 1,0. χ Af z y where µ = 15λ β 15 but µ 9 LT z M.LT LT λ z = 1,8 β M.LT = β M,ψ + (M Q / M)(β M,Q - β M,ψ ), where β M,ψ = 1,8-7ψ, and ψ = 47, therefore β M,ψ = 1,8 - (7 x 47) = 1,47, M Q = 187 knm, M = 21 knm, and β M,Q = 1,. Therefore β M.LT = 1,47 + (187/21) (1, - 1,47) = 1,. µ LT = (15 x 1,8 x 1,) - 15 = x 55,8x10 k LT = 1 = x 7270 x 25 Applied moment, M y.sd = 151 knm To Calculate Reduction Factor, χ LT The value of χ LT can be determined from for the appropriate value of the non-dimensional slenderness, λ LT. λ λ LT LT λ β 5 = w 1 where λ 1 = 9,9 ε = 9,9 x 1 = 9,9, β w = 1 for class 1 sections, and L / ilt λ LT = 2 25 ( L / alt) 5 C , 66 where L is the length = 6500 mm, i LT = 42,1 mm (from section properties), ψ = 47, k = 1, therefore C 1 = 1,107, and a LT = 917,5 mm (from section properties). Substituting into the above equation: 6500 / 42, 1 λ LT = = 111, ( ) 5 /, 1107, , 66 λ λ LT LT = = = λ β 5 111, w ,,, 1, 2 Therefore, from 5.5.2, using buckling curve a (for rolled sections), the reduction factor, χ LT = 5 The plastic section modulus, W pl.y = 1019 x 10 mm (2) 5.5.4(7) and Figure (4) 5.5.2(5) 5.5.2(1) Equation F.15 F.1.2(6) 5.5.2(5) 5.5.(4), /02/07 52

22 N k M Sd LT y.sd + 1, 0 χ Af / γ χ W f / γ z y M1 LT pl.y y M (2) 6 55, 8x10 97 x 152x10 + = 1, x 7270 x 25 / 1,1 5 x 1019x10 x 25 / 1,1 Therefore, this section is not satisfactory for lateral torsional buckling. It is highly unusual to have, in practice, unrestrained roof beams. It is, therefore, asssumed that beams/purlins are present at quarter points along the beam, reducing the unrestrained length to 1,625 m. The maximum change in moment occurs between the rd restraint and node P 5.5.2(7) on member 19. When the check is carried out again, λ LT 4, therefore no allowance for lateral torsional buckling is necessary. Shear on Web Design shear force, V Sd = 14 kn (load case 2 - member 19) The shear resistance of the web must be checked. The design shear force, V Sd, must be less than or equal to the design plastic shear resistance, V pl.rd : V Sd V pl.rd where V pl.rd is given by A f / y v γ M0 For rolled I and H sections loaded parallel to the web, 5.4.6(4) shear area, A v = 1,04 h t w, f y is the yield strength = 25 N/mm 2, and.1 γ M0 is the partial material safety factor = 1, (2) 1,04htwfy Vpl.Rd = = 1, 04 x 60 x 8,0 x 25 = 69 kn xγ M0 x 1,1 This is greater than the shear on the section (14 kn), therefore this section is satisfactory under shear. A further check is sometimes required, especially when there are 5.4.7() significant point loads, cantilevers or continuity, to ensure that the shear will not have a significant effect on the moment resistance. This check is carried out for the moment and shear at the same point. The moment resistance of the web is reduced if the shear is more than 50% of the shear resistance of the section. With a uniform load, the maximum moment and shear are not coincident and this check is not required for beams without web openings. Deflection Check For a roof generally the deflection limit is L/200 for δ max. Deflection checks 4.1 are based on the serviceability loading. Figure 4.1 The maximum deflection for any roof beam is 6,5 mm which occurs under serviceability load case 4 at member 19. L Deflection limit for δ max = = = 2, 5 mm The actual deflection is less than the allowable deflection: 6,5 mm < 2,5 mm therefore the section is OK. The calculated deflections are less than the limits, so no pre-camber is 4..2(2) 15/02/07 5

23 required. Summary The trial section IPE 60 is satisfactory. Columns External Column The maximum compression force any external column has to resist is 529 kn (member 4) under load case 5. The maximum moment any external column has to resist is 106 knm at node H, under load case 7. The column is also subject to an axial load of 458,4 kn under this load case. However, the critical interaction case is likely to be under load case 5, with a maximum axial force of 529 kn and a bending moment of 10 knm. It is this case that is likely to be critical. The maximum shear force any external column has to resist is 51, kn at member 11 under load case 5. Section Properties All external columns are HE 220 B grade Fe60 h = 220 mm b = 220 mm t w = 9,5 mm t f = 16 mm d/t w = 16,0 c/t f = 6,9 A = 9100 mm 2 I y = 891 x 10 6 mm 4 I w = 295 x 10 9 mm 6 I z = 28,4 x 10 6 mm 4 I t = 76,6 x 10 4 mm 4 W pl.y = 827 x 10 mm W el.y = 76 x 10 mm i y = 94, mm i z = 55,9 mm i Lt = I I z w 2 ply W x10 x 754x10 = 51, 4 2 ( 128x10 ) = 69, 7 mm 9 Iw x10 alt = mm 4 = It 754 = 779, 8 124x10 All the above properties can be obtained from section property tables. Classification of Cross Section This section is designed to withstand moments in addition to axial force. (Note that the section is always in compression.) Flange (subject to compression) Class 1 limiting value of c/t f for an outstand of a rolled section is 10ε. ε = 25 / f y where f y = 25 N/mm 2, ε = 1. 10ε = 10 x 1 = 10 From section properties, c/t f = 6,9 Web (subject to compression) Class 1 limiting value of d/t w for a web subject to compression only is ε. ε = x 1 = From section properties, d/t w = 16 c/t f 10ε and d/t w ε Therefore the section is Class 1. F.2.2() F.2.2(1) 15/02/ (Sheet ) 5..1 (Sheet 1)

24 Resistance of Cross-Section It is highly unlikely that the resistance of the cross-section will be the critical case - it is generally the buckling resistance that governs the suitability of a cross-section. For the sake of completeness, the check is included in this worked example. For members in axial compression, the design value of the compressive 5.4.4(1) force, N Sd, at each cross-section shall satisfy N Sd N c.rd For a class 1 cross-section, the design compression resistance of the 5.4.4(2) cross-section, N c.rd, may be determined as: Afy Nc.Rd = γ M0 where A is cross-sectional area = 9100 mm 2, f y is the yield strength = 25 N/mm 2, and γ M0 is the partial material safety factor = 1, x 25 N c.rd = = 1944 kn 11, x10 N Sd = 529 kn, therefore N sd < N c.rd. The section can resist the applied axial load (2) 15/02/07 55

25 Buckling Resistance of Member A class 1 member subject to combined bending and axial compression should be checked for the following modes of failure: Flexural buckling (Clause 5.5.4(1)), and Lateral Torsional Buckling (Clause 5.5.4(2)). Flexural Buckling A class 1 member subject to moment about the major axis only should satisfy the following: N k M Sd y y.sd + 1, 0 χ A f / γ W f / γ min y M1 pl.y y M1 Applied axial force, N Sd, = 529 kn To Calculate Reduction Factor, χ min The reduction factor χ min is the lesser of χ y and χ z, where χ y and χ z are the reduction factors from clause for the y-y and z-z axes respectively. Determination of χ y The reduction factor χ y depends on the slenderness about the y-y axis. The connections at the column base are effectively pinned, then the slenderness about the y-y axis is: λ y = l/i y where l is equal to the system length and i is the radius of gyration about the appropriate axis. (Use the system length as using the amplified sway moment method. If using the effective length method, this is where the effective lengths would be greater than 1) Slenderness, λ y = 500 / 94, = 7,1 λ 1 = 9,9ε = 9,9 x 1,0 = 9,9 λ Non-dimensional slenderness, λ y y λ β 5 = A where β A = 1 for class 1 members 7, 1 Non-dimensional slenderness, λ y = = 4 9, 9 From 5.5.2, using buckling curve b, the reduction factor, χ y = 9261 Determination of χ z Slenderness, λ z = l/i z where l is equal to the system length and i is the radius of gyration about the appropriate axis. (Use the system length as using the amplified sway moment method. If using the effective length method, this is where the effective lengths would be greater than 1) Slenderness, λ z = 500 / 55,9 = 62,6 λ Non-dimensional slenderness, λ z z λ β 5 = A where β A = 1 for class 1 members (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) 15/02/07 56

26 62, 6 Non-dimensional slenderness, λ z = = 67 9, 9 From 5.5.2, using buckling curve c, reduction factor, χ z = 7 Reduction factor, χ min = χ z = 7 A is the cross-sectional area = 9100 mm 2, f y is the yield strength = 25 N/mm 2, and γ M1 is the partial material safety factor for buckling resistance = 1, (2) 15/02/07 57

27 To Calculate k y yn sd k y = 1 µ but k y 1,5 χ y Af y where Wpl.y Wel.y µ y = λ y( 2β My 4) + but µ y 90 W el.y β My is an equivalent uniform moment factor for flexural buckling (ψ = 0) = 1,8-0 = 1,8. 76 µ y = 4( 2 x 1,8-4) + 827x10 x10 = 04 76x10 ( ) = 04 x 529x10 k y 1 = 1, x9100 x 25 M y.sd is the design applied moment = 10 knm, and W pl.y is the plastic section modulus = 827 x 10 mm. N k M Sd y y.sd + 1, 0 χ A f / γ W f / γ min y M1 pl.y y M x10 1, 01 x 10x10 + = 96 7 x 9100 x 25 / 1,1 827x10 x 25 / 1,1 Therefore the section is satisfactory for flexural buckling Lateral Torsional Buckling A class 1 section should satisfy the following: N k M Sd LT y.sd + 1, 0 χ Af / γ χ W f / γ z y M1 LT pl.y y M1 Applied axial force, N Sd = 529 kn, Reduction factor, χ z = 7, Cross-sectional area, A = 9100 mm 2, Yield strength of the steel, f y = 25 N/ mm 2, and Partial material safety factor for buckling resistance, γ M1 = 1,1. To Calculate k LT LTNSd k LT = 1 µ but k LT 1,0. χ Af z y where µ = 15λ β 15 but µ 9 LT z M.LT LT λ z = 67 β M.LT = 1,8 (ψ = 0) µ LT = (15 x 67 x 1,8) - 15 = 0 0 x 529x10 k LT = 1 = 99 7 x 9100 x 25 Applied moment, M y.sd = 102,8 knm To Calculate Reduction Factor, χ LT The value of χ LT can be determined from for the appropriate value of the non-dimensional slenderness, λ LT (1) 5.5.4(7) and Figure (2) (2) 5.5.4(2) 5.5.4(7) and Figure (4) 15/02/07 58

28 λ LT λ = λ LT 1 β 5 w where λ 1 = 9,9 ε = 9,9 x 1 = 9,9, β w = 1 for class 1 sections, and L / ilt λ LT = 2 25 ( L / alt) 5 C , 66 where L is the length = 500 mm, i LT = 69,7 mm (from section properties), ψ = k = 1, therefore C 1 = 1,879, and a LT = 779,8 mm (from section properties). Substituting into the above equation: 500 / 69, 7 λ LT = = ( ) 5 /, 1879, , 66 λ λ LT LT = = = λ β w ,,, 0, 4 Therefore, from 5.5.2, using buckling curve a (for rolled sections), the reduction factor, χ LT = 94 The plastic section modulus, W pl.y = 827 x 10 mm. N k M Sd LT y.sd + 1, 0 χ Af / γ χ W f / γ z y M1 LT pl.y y M x10 99 x 102,8x10 + = 98 7 x 9100 x 25 / 1,1 94 x 827x10 x 25 / 1,1 Therefore, this section is satisfactory for lateral torsional buckling. This section is satisfactory for both flexural buckling and lateral torsional buckling. Shear on Web Generally, a shear check on a column web would only be carried out if the structure is to be subjected to considerable seismic loading. For completeness, the check will be included in this worked example. Design shear force, V Sd = 51, kn (load case 5 - member 11) The shear resistance of the web must be checked. The design shear force, V Sd, must be less than or equal to the design plastic shear resistance, V pl.rd : V Sd V pl.rd where V pl.rd is given by A f / y v γ M0 For rolled I and H sections loaded parallel to the web, shear area, A v = 1,04 h t w, 5.5.2(5) 5.5.2(1) Equation F (5) 5.5.(4), (2) (4) 15/02/07 59

29 f y is the yield strength = 25 N/mm 2, and γ M0 is the partial material safety factor = 1,1. 1,04htwfy Vpl.Rd = = 1, 04 x 220 x 9,5 x 25 = 268, 1 kn xγ M0 x 1,1 This is greater than the shear on the section (51, kn). The section is satisfactory under shear. The column is satisfactory under all loading conditions. Internal Column The maximum compression force any internal column has to resist is 1196 kn (member 2) under load case 2. The maximum moment any internal column has to resist is 142 knm at node F, under load case 7. The column is also subject to an axial load of 961 kn under this load case. However, the critical interaction case is likely to be under load case 5, with an axial force of 1149,7 kn and a bending moment of 12,9 knm. It is this case that is likely to be critical. The maximum shear force any internal column has to resist is 5,9 kn at member 2 under load case 7. Section Properties All internal columns are HE 260 B grade Fe60 h = 260 mm b = 260 mm t w = 10 mm t f = 17,5 mm d/t w = 17,7 c/t f = 7,4 A = 1180 mm 2 I y = 149,2 x 10 6 mm 4 I w = 754 x 10 9 mm 6 I z = 51,4 x 10 6 mm 4 I t = 124 x 10 4 mm 4 W pl.y = 128 x 10 mm W el.y = 1148 x 10 mm i y = 112 mm i z = 65,8 mm i Lt = I I z w 2 ply W x10 x 754x10 = 51, 4 2 ( 128x10 ) = 69, 7 mm 9 Iw x10 alt = mm 4 = It 754 = 779, 8 124x10 All the above properties can be obtained from section property tables (2) F.2.2() F.2.2(1) 15/02/07 60

30 Classification of Cross Section 5. Flange (subject to compression) Class 1 limiting value of c/t f for an outstand of a rolled section is 10ε ε = 25 / f y where f y = 25 N/mm 2 (Sheet ), therefore ε = 1. From section properties, c/t f = 7,4 Web (subject to compression) Class 1 limiting value of d/t w for a web subject to compression only is ε. From section properties, d/t w = 17,7 c/t f 10ε and d/t w ε Therefore the section is Class (Sheet 1).5.1 (Sheets 1 and ) Resistance of Cross-Section It is highly unlikely that the resistance of the cross-section will be the critical case - it is generally the buckling resistance that governs the suitability of a cross-section. For the sake of completeness, the check is included in this worked example. For members in axial compression, the design value of the compressive 5.4.4(1) force, N Sd, at each cross-section shall satisfy N Sd N c.rd For a class 1 cross-section, the design compression resistance of the 5.4.4(2) cross-section, N c.rd, may be determined as: Afy Nc.Rd = γ M0 where A is cross-sectional area = mm 2, f y is the yield strength = 25 N/mm 2, and γ M0 is the partial material safety factor = 1, x 25 N c.rd = = 2521 kn 11, x10 N Sd = 1196 kn, therefore N sd < N c.rd. The section can resist the applied axial load (2) 15/02/07 61

31 Buckling Resistance of Member A class 1 member subject to combined bending and axial compression should be checked for the following modes of failure: Flexural buckling (Clause 5.5.4(1)), and Lateral Torsional Buckling (Clause 5.5.4(2)). Flexural Buckling A class 1 member subject to moment about the major axis only should satisfy the following: N k M Sd y y.sd + 1, 0 χ A f / γ W f / γ min y M1 pl.y y M1 Applied axial force, N Sd, = 1149,7 kn To Calculate Reduction Factor, χ min The reduction factor χ min is the lesser of χ y and χ z, where χ y and χ z are the reduction factors from clause for the y-y and z-z axes respectively. Determination of χ y The reduction factor χ y depends on the slenderness about the y-y axis. The connections at the column base are effectively pinned, then the slenderness about the y-y axis is: λ y = l/i y where l is equal to the system length and i is the radius of gyration about the appropriate axis. (Use the system length as using the amplified sway moment method. If using the effective length method, this is where the effective lengths would be greater than 1) Slenderness, λ y = 500 / 112 = 1, λ 1 = 9,9ε = 9,9 x 1,0 = 9,9 λ Non-dimensional slenderness, λ y y λ β 5 = A where β A = 1 for class 1 members 1, Non-dimensional slenderness, λ y = = 9, 9 From 5.5.2, using buckling curve b, the reduction factor, χ y = 97 Determination of χ z Slenderness, λ z = l/i z where l is equal to the system length and i is the radius of gyration about the appropriate axis. (Use the system length as using the amplified sway moment method. If using the effective length method, this is where the effective lengths would be greater than 1) Slenderness, λ z = 500 / 65,8 = 5,2 λ Non-dimensional slenderness, λ z z λ β 5 = A where β A = 1 for class 1 members (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) 15/02/07 62

32 5, 2 Non-dimensional slenderness, λ z = = 57 9, 9 From 5.5.2, using buckling curve c, reduction factor, χ z = 80 Reduction factor, χ min = χ z = 80 A is the cross-sectional area = mm 2, f y is the yield strength = 25 N/mm 2, and γ M1 is the partial material safety factor for buckling resistance = 1,1. To Calculate k y µ ynsd k y = 1 but k y 1,5 χ A f y y where Wpl.y Wel.y µ y = λ y( 2β My 4) + but µ y 90 W el.y β My is an equivalent uniform moment factor for flexural buckling (ψ = 0) = 1,8-0 = 1, µ y = ( 2 x 1,8-4) + 128x10 x10 = x10 ( ) = 01 x 1154x10 k y 1 = 1, 0 97 x x 25 M y.sd is the design applied moment = 12,9 knm, and W pl.y is the plastic section modulus = 128 x 10 mm. N k M Sd y y.sd + 1, 0 χ A f / γ W f / γ min y M1 pl.y y M , 7x10 1, 0 x 12,9x10 + = 1, x x 25 / 1,1 128x10 x 25 / 1,1 Therefore the section fails. The internal column section needs to be increased and the analysis and checks carried out on the modified structure (2) 5.5.4(1) 5.5.4(7) and Figure /02/07 6

33 1. Joint characterisation 1.1. General An important step when designing a frame consists of the characterisation of the rotational response of the joints, i.e. the evaluation of the mechanical properties in terms of stiffness, strength and ductility. Three main approaches may be followed : experimental numerical analytical. The only practical option for the designer is the analytical approach. Analytical procedures have been developed which enable a prediction of the joint response based on the knowledge of the mechanical and geometrical properties of the joint components. In this section a general analytical procedure, termed component method, is introduced. It applies to any type of steel or composite joints, whatever the geometrical configuration, the type of loading (axial force and/or bending moment,...) and the type of member sections. The method is used in the Lecture on Practical procedures for the characterisation of the response of moment resisting joints where the mechanical properties of joints subjected to bending moment and shear force are computed Introduction to the component method The component method considers any joint as a set of individual basic components. For the particular joint shown in Figure 2.b. (joint with an extended end-plate connection subject to bending), the relevant components are the following : J.1.5 Compression in zone : column web in compression; beam flange and web in compression; Tension zone : column web in tension; column flange in bending; bolts in tension; end-plate in bending; beam web in tension; Shear zone : column web panel in shear. Each of these basic components possesses its own strength and stiffness either in tension or in compression or in shear. The column web is subject to coincident compression, tension and shear. This coexistence of several components within the same joint element can obviously lead to stress interactions that are likely to decrease the 15/02/07 64

34 resistance of the individual basic components. The application of the component method requires the following steps : a) identification of the active components in the joint being considered; b) evaluation of the stiffness and/or resistance characteristics for each individual basic component (specific characteristics - initial stiffness, design resistance,... - or the whole deformability curve) ; c) assembly of all the constituent components and evaluation of the stiffness and/or resistance characteristics of the whole joint (specific characteristics - initial stiffness, design resistance,... - or the whole deformability curve). In Figure 1, the principles of the component method are illustrated in the specific case of a beam-to-column joint with a welded connection. COMPONENT METHOD Three steps F M=Fz F First step: Identification of the components Column web Column web Column web in shear in compression in tension Second step: Response of the components F Ek 1 Ek 2 F F F F Rd1 F Rd2 Rd Ek Stiffness coefficient k i of each component Resistance F Rdi of each component Third step: Assembly of the components M M Rd S j,ini φ Stiffness of the joint S j,ini = Ez²/Σk i Resistance of the joint M Rd = min(f Rdi).z Figure 1 Application of the component method to a welded joint The assembly procedure consists in deriving the mechanical properties of the whole joint from those of all the individual constituent 15/02/07 65

35 components. This requires a preliminary distribution of the forces acting on the joint into internal forces acting on the components in a way that satisfies equilibrium. In Eurocode Annex J, the analytical assembly procedures are described for the evaluation of the initial stiffness and the design moment resistance of the joint. These two properties enable the designer to determine the design joint moment-rotation characteristic whatever the type of analysis (Figures 4 to Figure 6). In Annex A of the present lecture, information is provided on how the stiffness and strength assembly is carried out. The application of the component method requires a sufficient knowledge of the behaviour of the basic components. Those covered by Eurocode are listed in 1. The combination of these components allows one to cover a wide range of joint configurations, which should be sufficient to satisfy the needs of practitioners as far as beam-to-column joints and beam splices in bending are concerned. Examples of such joints are given in Figure 2. Some fields of application can also be contemplated : Joints subject to bending moment (and shear) and axial force; Column bases subject to coincident bending moment, shear force and axial force where the components such as : - concrete foundation in compression; - end-plates with specific geometries; - anchorages in tension; - contact between soil and foundation, will be activated. These situations are however not yet covered, or only partially covered, by Eurocode. 15/02/07 66

36 N 1 Column web panel in shear Component V Sd 2 Column web in compression V Sd F c.sd Beam flange and web in compression F c.sd 4 Column flange in bending F t.sd J.1 5 Column web in tension F t.sd 6 End-plate in bending F t.sd 7 Beam web in tension F t.sd 8 Flange cleat in bending F t.sd 15/02/07 67

37 9 Bolts in tension F t.sd 10 Bolts in shear F v.sd 11 Bolts in bearing (on beam flange, column flange, end-plate or cleat) F b.sd 12 Plate in tension or compression F t.sd F c.sd 1 List of components covered by Eurocode 15/02/07 68

38 (a) Welded joint (b) Bolted joint with extended end-plate (c) Two joints with flush end-plates (Double-sided configuration) (d) Joint with flush end-plate (e) End-plate type beam splice (f) Cover-joint type beam splice Figure J.4 (g) Bolted joint with angle flange cleats (h) Two beam-to-beam joints (Double-sided configuration) Figure 2 Examples of joints covered by Eurocode 2. Joint idealisation 15/02/07 69

39 The non-linear behaviour of the isolated flexural spring which characterises the actual joint response does not lend itself towards everyday design practice. However the moment-rotation characteristic curve may be idealised without significant loss of accuracy. One of the most simple idealisations possible is the elastic-perfectly plastic relationship (Figure.a). This modelling has the advantage of being quite similar to that used traditionally for the modelling of member crosssections subject to bending (Figure.b). The moment M j,rd that corresponds to the yield plateau is termed the design moment resistance in Eurocode. It may be considered as the pseudo-plastic moment resistance of the joint. Strain-hardening effects and possible membrane effects are henceforth neglected, which explains the difference in Figure between the actual M-φ characteristic and the yield plateau of the idealisation. M j M b, M c M j,rd M pl,rd S j,ini /η EI/L (a) Joint φ (b) Member φ Actual M-φ characteristic Idealised M-φ characteristic Figure Bi-linearisation of moment-rotation curves The value of the constant stiffness S j.ini /η is discussed below. In fact there are different possible ways to idealise a joint M- φ characteristic. The choice of one of them is dependent upon the type of frame analysis which is contemplated: - Elastic idealisation for an elastic analysis (Figure 4) : The principal joint characteristic is the constant rotational stiffness. 15/02/07 70

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode 3 Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 20 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 0 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic Loads

More information

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Contents Introduction Beam types Lateral stability of beams Factors affecting lateral stability Behaviour of simple and built - up beams in bending (Without vertical stiffeners)

More information

3. Stability of built-up members in compression

3. Stability of built-up members in compression 3. Stability of built-up members in compression 3.1 Definitions Build-up members, made out by coupling two or more simple profiles for obtaining stronger and stiffer section are very common in steel structures,

More information

University of Sheffield. Department of Civil Structural Engineering. Member checks - Rafter 44.6

University of Sheffield. Department of Civil Structural Engineering. Member checks - Rafter 44.6 Member checks - Rafter 34 6.4Haunch (UB 457 x 191 x 89) The depth of a haunch is usually made approximately twice depth of the basic rafter sections, as it is the normal practice to use a UB cutting of

More information

Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps

Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps a brief guide on element design to EC3 Tim McCarthy Email tim.mccarthy@umist.ac.uk Slides available on the web http://www2.umist.ac.uk/construction/staff/

More information

Made by SMH Date Aug Checked by NRB Date Dec Revised by MEB Date April 2006

Made by SMH Date Aug Checked by NRB Date Dec Revised by MEB Date April 2006 Job No. OSM 4 Sheet 1 of 8 Rev B Telephone: (0144) 45 Fax: (0144) 944 Made b SMH Date Aug 001 Checked b NRB Date Dec 001 Revised b MEB Date April 00 DESIGN EXAMPLE 9 - BEAM WITH UNRESTRAINED COMPRESSION

More information

Advanced Analysis of Steel Structures

Advanced Analysis of Steel Structures Advanced Analysis of Steel Structures Master Thesis Written by: Maria Gulbrandsen & Rasmus Petersen Appendix Report Group B-204d M.Sc.Structural and Civil Engineering Aalborg University 4 th Semester Spring

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of a Trans-National Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of a Trans-National Approach Course: Eurocode 4 Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of a Trans-National Approach Lecture 9 : Composite joints Annex B References: COST C1: Composite steel-concrete joints in frames for buildings:

More information

Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures

Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures Civil Engineering for Bachelors 133FSTD Teacher: Zdeněk Sokol Office number: B619 1 Syllabus of lectures 1. Introduction, history of steel structures,

More information

THE EC3 CLASSIFICATION OF JOINTS AND ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS

THE EC3 CLASSIFICATION OF JOINTS AND ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS EUROSTEEL 2002, Coimbra, 19-20 September 2002, p.987-996 THE EC3 CLASSIFICATION OF JOINTS AND ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS Fernando C. T. Gomes 1 ABSTRACT The Eurocode 3 proposes a classification of beam-to-column

More information

STEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN :2005)

STEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN :2005) GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for App'd by STEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN1993-1-1:2005) In accordance with EN1993-1-1:2005 incorporating Corrigenda February 2006 and April details type;

More information

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite

More information

Basis of Design, a case study building

Basis of Design, a case study building Basis of Design, a case study building Luís Simões da Silva Department of Civil Engineering University of Coimbra Contents Definitions and basis of design Global analysis Structural modeling Structural

More information

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder 16 PLATE GIRDERS II 1.0 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the current practice for the design of plate girders adopting meaningful simplifications of the equations derived in the chapter on Plate Girders

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite

More information

Plastic Design of Portal frame to Eurocode 3

Plastic Design of Portal frame to Eurocode 3 Department of Civil and Structural Engineering Plastic Design of Portal frame to Eurocode 3 Worked Example University of Sheffield Contents 1 GEOMETRY... 3 2 DESIGN BRIEF... 4 3 DETERMINING LOADING ON

More information

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar 5.4 Beams As stated previousl, the effect of local buckling should invariabl be taken into account in thin walled members, using methods described alread. Laterall stable beams are beams, which do not

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of a Trans-National Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of a Trans-National Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of a Trans-National Approach Course: Eurocode 4 Lecture 9 : Composite joints Annex A Summary: Traditionally structural joints are considered as rigid or pinned

More information

Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes

Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes October 2014 Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of Abstract tubular columns and arches Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal Contact:

More information

7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces

7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces 7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces 7.3.1 General In the previous chapters of Draft IS: 800 LSM version, we have stipulated the codal provisions for determining the stress distribution in

More information

SECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS

SECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS SECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1 INTRODUCTION TO COLUMN BUCKLING Introduction Elastic buckling of an ideal column Strength curve for an ideal column Strength of practical column Concepts of effective

More information

Mechanics of Materials Primer

Mechanics of Materials Primer Mechanics of Materials rimer Notation: A = area (net = with holes, bearing = in contact, etc...) b = total width of material at a horizontal section d = diameter of a hole D = symbol for diameter E = modulus

More information

9-3. Structural response

9-3. Structural response 9-3. Structural response in fire František Wald Czech Technical University in Prague Objectives of the lecture The mechanical load in the fire design Response of the structure exposed to fire Levels of

More information

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1. C3 Flexural Members C3.1 Bending The nominal flexural strength [moment resistance], Mn, shall be the smallest of the values calculated for the limit states of yielding, lateral-torsional buckling and distortional

More information

Design of Compression Members

Design of Compression Members Design of Compression Members 2.1 Classification of cross sections Classifying cross-sections may mainly depend on four critical factors: 1- Width to thickness (c/t) ratio. 2- Support condition. 3- Yield

More information

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS This module of CIE 428 covers the following subjects Column theory Column design per AISC Effective length Torsional and flexural-torsional buckling Built-up members READING:

More information

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are

More information

Made by PTY/AAT Date Jan 2006

Made by PTY/AAT Date Jan 2006 Job No. VALCOSS Sheet of 9 Rev A P.O. Box 000, FI-0044 VTT Tel. +358 0 7 Fax +358 0 7 700 Design Example 3 Stainless steel lattice girder made Made by PTY/AAT Date Jan 006 RFCS Checked by MAP Date Feb

More information

Application nr. 3 (Ultimate Limit State) Resistance of member cross-section

Application nr. 3 (Ultimate Limit State) Resistance of member cross-section Application nr. 3 (Ultimate Limit State) Resistance of member cross-section 1)Resistance of member crosssection in tension Examples of members in tension: - Diagonal of a truss-girder - Bottom chord of

More information

STEEL JOINTS - COMPONENT METHOD APPLICATION

STEEL JOINTS - COMPONENT METHOD APPLICATION Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Vol. 5 (54) - 2012 Series 1: Special Issue No. 1 STEEL JOINTS - COPONENT ETHOD APPLICATION D. RADU 1 Abstract: As long as the rotation joint stiffness

More information

BRACING MEMBERS SUMMARY. OBJECTIVES. REFERENCES.

BRACING MEMBERS SUMMARY. OBJECTIVES. REFERENCES. BRACING MEMBERS SUMMARY. Introduce the bracing member design concepts. Identify column bracing members requirements in terms of strength and stiffness. The assumptions and limitations of lateral bracing

More information

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602 Design of wall panel according to EN 160 Example 3: Wall panel with wind load 1.1 Issue Design of a wall panel at an industrial building Materials with a compressive strength 3,5, density class 500, welded

More information

five Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture

five Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture five mechanics www.carttalk.com of materials Mechanics of Materials 1 Mechanics of Materials MECHANICS MATERIALS

More information

COMPARISON BETWEEN BS 5950: PART 1: 2000 & EUROCODE 3 FOR THE DESIGN OF MULTI-STOREY BRACED STEEL FRAME CHAN CHEE HAN

COMPARISON BETWEEN BS 5950: PART 1: 2000 & EUROCODE 3 FOR THE DESIGN OF MULTI-STOREY BRACED STEEL FRAME CHAN CHEE HAN i COMPARISON BETWEEN BS 5950: PART 1: 2000 & EUROCODE 3 FOR THE DESIGN OF MULTI-STOREY BRACED STEEL FRAME CHAN CHEE HAN A project report submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award

More information

BASE PLATE CONNECTIONS

BASE PLATE CONNECTIONS SKILLS Project BASE PLATE CONNECTIONS LEARNING OUTCOMES Design process for pinned and fixed column base joints Base-plate resistance Anchor bolt resistance Concrete resistance Weld resistance Application

More information

Joint resistance M j,rd Elastic limit 2/3 M j,rd

Joint resistance M j,rd Elastic limit 2/3 M j,rd 6 OENT CONNECTIONS 6.1 Introduction The moment connections are transferring, except of shear and normal forces, bending moment (full or partial compare to connected element) to supports. Stiffness of connection

More information

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING LECTURE VIII Dr. Jason E. Charalambides Failure in Flexure!

More information

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State Hooke s law. 3. Define modular ratio,

More information

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN CHAPTER 11 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN Article 49. Cracking Limit State 49.1 General considerations In the case of verifications relating to Cracking Limit State, the effects of actions comprise

More information

to introduce the principles of stability and elastic buckling in relation to overall buckling, local buckling

to introduce the principles of stability and elastic buckling in relation to overall buckling, local buckling to introduce the principles of stability and elastic buckling in relation to overall buckling, local buckling In the case of elements subjected to compressive forces, secondary bending effects caused by,

More information

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State

More information

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar 6. BEAMS 6.1 Introduction One of the frequently used structural members is a beam whose main function is to transfer load principally by means of flexural or bending action. In a structural framework,

More information

INFLUENCE OF FLANGE STIFFNESS ON DUCTILITY BEHAVIOUR OF PLATE GIRDER

INFLUENCE OF FLANGE STIFFNESS ON DUCTILITY BEHAVIOUR OF PLATE GIRDER International Journal of Civil Structural 6 Environmental And Infrastructure Engineering Research Vol.1, Issue.1 (2011) 1-15 TJPRC Pvt. Ltd.,. INFLUENCE OF FLANGE STIFFNESS ON DUCTILITY BEHAVIOUR OF PLATE

More information

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges 01/02/2016 Marco Donà Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges 1 Plastic hinge approach A plastic hinge represents a concentrated post-yield behaviour in one or more degrees of freedom. Hinges only

More information

Job No. Sheet 1 of 7 Rev A. Made by ER/EM Date Feb Checked by HB Date March 2006

Job No. Sheet 1 of 7 Rev A. Made by ER/EM Date Feb Checked by HB Date March 2006 Job No. Sheet of 7 Rev A Design Example Design of a lipped channel in a Made by ER/EM Date Feb 006 Checked by HB Date March 006 DESIGN EXAMPLE DESIGN OF A LIPPED CHANNEL IN AN EXPOSED FLOOR Design a simply

More information

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 8: Description of member resistance calculator

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 8: Description of member resistance calculator STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE Multi-Store Steel Buildings Part 8: Description of member resistance calculator Multi-Store Steel Buildings Part : Description of member resistance calculator 8 - ii FOREWORD

More information

Tekla Structural Designer 2016i

Tekla Structural Designer 2016i Tekla Structural Designer 2016i Reference Guides (Australian Codes) September 2016 2016 Trimble Solutions Corporation part of Trimble Navigation Ltd. Table of Contents Analysis Verification Examples...

More information

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7 Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7 Dr. Colin Caprani, Chartered Engineer 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 1.1 Background... 3 1.2 Failure Modes... 5 1.3 Design Aspects...

More information

C6 Advanced design of steel structures

C6 Advanced design of steel structures C6 Advanced design of steel structures prepared b Josef achacek List of lessons 1) Lateral-torsional instabilit of beams. ) Buckling of plates. 3) Thin-walled steel members. 4) Torsion of members. 5) Fatigue

More information

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV UNIT I STRESS, STRAIN DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS PART A (2 MARKS)

More information

CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS

CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS 4.1. INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS A column is a vertical structural member transmitting axial compression loads with or without moments. The cross sectional dimensions of a column

More information

ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members

ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures III. Compression Members C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department University of Maryland Compression Members Following subjects are covered:

More information

PES Institute of Technology

PES Institute of Technology PES Institute of Technology Bangalore south campus, Bangalore-5460100 Department of Mechanical Engineering Faculty name : Madhu M Date: 29/06/2012 SEM : 3 rd A SEC Subject : MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Subject

More information

Steel Frame Design Manual

Steel Frame Design Manual Steel Frame Design Manual Eurocode 3-1:2005 with 8:2004 Eurocode 3-1:2005 with Eurocode 8:2004 Steel Frame Design Manual for ETABS 2016 ISO ETA122815M13 Rev 0 Proudly developed in the United States of

More information

Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A )

Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A ) Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A23.3-94) Slender Concrete Column Design in Sway Frame Buildings Evaluate slenderness effect for columns in a

More information

NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF THE ROTATIONAL CAPACITY OF STEEL BEAMS AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES

NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF THE ROTATIONAL CAPACITY OF STEEL BEAMS AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES 8 th GRACM International Congress on Computational Mechanics Volos, 12 July 15 July 2015 NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF THE ROTATIONAL CAPACITY OF STEEL BEAMS AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES Savvas Akritidis, Daphne

More information

Influence of column web stiffening on the seismic behaviour of beam-tocolumn

Influence of column web stiffening on the seismic behaviour of beam-tocolumn Influence of column web stiffening on the seismic behaviour of beam-tocolumn joints A.L. Ciutina & D. Dubina The Politehnica University of Timisoara, Romania ABSTRACT: The present paper summarises the

More information

two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS

two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) Analysis 1 Structural Requirements strength serviceability

More information

APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES

APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES 163 APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES A1.1 DESIGN AS PER NORTH AMERICAN SPECIFICATION OF COLD FORMED STEEL (AISI S100: 2007) 1. Based on Initiation of Yielding: Effective yield moment, M n

More information

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi Chapter 04 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Compression Members By Dr. Jawad Talib Al-Nasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering

More information

Practical Design to Eurocode 2

Practical Design to Eurocode 2 Practical Design to Eurocode 2 The webinar will start at 12.30 (Any questions beforehand? use Questions on the GoTo Control Panel) Course Outline Lecture Date Speaker Title 1 21 Sep Jenny Burridge Introduction,

More information

ENG1001 Engineering Design 1

ENG1001 Engineering Design 1 ENG1001 Engineering Design 1 Structure & Loads Determine forces that act on structures causing it to deform, bend, and stretch Forces push/pull on objects Structures are loaded by: > Dead loads permanent

More information

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown. D : SOLID MECHANICS Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown. Q.2 Consider the forces of magnitude F acting on the sides of the regular hexagon having

More information

twenty steel construction: columns & tension members ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS FALL 2013 lecture

twenty steel construction: columns & tension members ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS FALL 2013 lecture ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS Cor-Ten Steel Sculpture By Richard Serra Museum of Modern Art Fort Worth, TX (AISC - Steel Structures of the Everyday) FALL 2013 lecture

More information

1C8 Advanced design of steel structures. prepared by Josef Machacek

1C8 Advanced design of steel structures. prepared by Josef Machacek 1C8 Advanced design of steel structures prepared b Josef achacek List of lessons 1) Lateral-torsional instabilit of beams. ) Buckling of plates. 3) Thin-walled steel members. 4) Torsion of members. 5)

More information

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 1 General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 2 AISC ASD and LRFD AISC ASD = American Institute of Steel Construction = Allowable Stress Design AISC Ninth

More information

SIMPLE MODEL FOR PRYING FORCES IN T-HANGER CONNECTIONS WITH SNUG TIGHTENED BOLTS

SIMPLE MODEL FOR PRYING FORCES IN T-HANGER CONNECTIONS WITH SNUG TIGHTENED BOLTS SIMPLE MODEL FOR PRYING FORCES IN T-HANGER CONNECTIONS WITH SNUG TIGHTENED BOLTS By Fathy Abdelmoniem Abdelfattah Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra, Zagazig University, Banha Branch Mohamed Salah A. Soliman

More information

Compression Members Columns II

Compression Members Columns II Compression Members Columns II 1. Introduction. Main aspects related to the derivation of typical columns buckling lengths for. Analysis of imperfections, leading to the derivation of the Ayrton-Perry

More information

Steel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes

Steel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes Steel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes INTRODUCTION When the need for a new structure arises, an individual or agency has to arrange the funds required for its construction. The individual or

More information

Design of Steel Structures Prof. Damodar Maity Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati

Design of Steel Structures Prof. Damodar Maity Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati Design of Steel Structures Prof. Damodar Maity Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati Module 7 Gantry Girders and Plate Girders Lecture - 3 Introduction to Plate girders

More information

CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-

CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members- CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing Openings in RC Flexural Members- Assoc Pr Tan Kiang Hwee Department Civil Engineering National In this lecture DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

More information

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building 16 14 14 3 C 1 B 1 C 2 B 2 C 3 B 3 C 4 13 B 15 (S 1 ) B 16 (S 2 ) B 17 (S 3 ) B 18 7 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 7 B 20 B 22 14 B 19 (S 4 ) C 10 C 11 B 23

More information

Compression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)

Compression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.) ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures III. Compression Members C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department University of Maryland Compression Members Following subjects are covered:

More information

Experimental investigation on monotonic performance of steel curved knee braces for weld-free beam-to-column connections

Experimental investigation on monotonic performance of steel curved knee braces for weld-free beam-to-column connections Experimental investigation on monotonic performance of steel curved knee braces for weld-free beam-to-column connections *Zeyu Zhou 1) Bo Ye 2) and Yiyi Chen 3) 1), 2), 3) State Key Laboratory of Disaster

More information

Where and are the factored end moments of the column and >.

Where and are the factored end moments of the column and >. 11 LIMITATION OF THE SLENDERNESS RATIO----( ) 1-Nonsway (braced) frames: The ACI Code, Section 6.2.5 recommends the following limitations between short and long columns in braced (nonsway) frames: 1. The

More information

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN 1992-1-1 and EN 1992-2 Validation Examples Brno, 21.10.2010 IDEA RS s.r.o. South Moravian Innovation Centre, U Vodarny 2a, 616 00 BRNO tel.: +420-511

More information

2012 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

2012 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS R10 SET - 1 II B.Tech II Semester, Regular Examinations, April 2012 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS (Com. to ME, AME, MM) Time: 3 hours Max. Marks: 75 Answer any FIVE Questions All Questions carry Equal Marks ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

More information

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar 7. BEAM COLUMNS 7.1 Introduction The Indian steel code is now in the process of revision as specification-based design gives way to performance-based design. An expert committee mainly comprising eminent

More information

Level 7 Postgraduate Diploma in Engineering Computational mechanics using finite element method

Level 7 Postgraduate Diploma in Engineering Computational mechanics using finite element method 9210-203 Level 7 Postgraduate Diploma in Engineering Computational mechanics using finite element method You should have the following for this examination one answer book No additional data is attached

More information

A METHOD OF LOAD INCREMENTS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF SECOND-ORDER LIMIT LOAD AND COLLAPSE SAFETY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMED STRUCTURES

A METHOD OF LOAD INCREMENTS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF SECOND-ORDER LIMIT LOAD AND COLLAPSE SAFETY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMED STRUCTURES A METHOD OF LOAD INCREMENTS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF SECOND-ORDER LIMIT LOAD AND COLLAPSE SAFETY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMED STRUCTURES Konuralp Girgin (Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Science and Technology,

More information

Equivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams

Equivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams University of Alberta Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Master of Engineering Report in Structural Engineering Equivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams

More information

PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK

PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM - 613 403 - THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Sub : Strength of Materials Year / Sem: II / III Sub Code : MEB 310

More information

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of one-way ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are

More information

Seismic design of bridges

Seismic design of bridges NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS LABORATORY FOR EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING Seismic design of bridges Lecture 3 Ioannis N. Psycharis Capacity design Purpose To design structures of ductile behaviour

More information

Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I)

Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I) Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I) By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Introduction Earthquake

More information

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case

More information

Advanced stability analysis and design of a new Danube archbridge. DUNAI, László JOÓ, Attila László VIGH, László Gergely

Advanced stability analysis and design of a new Danube archbridge. DUNAI, László JOÓ, Attila László VIGH, László Gergely Advanced stability analysis and design of a new Danube archbridge DUNAI, László JOÓ, Attila László VIGH, László Gergely Subject of the lecture Buckling of steel tied arch Buckling of orthotropic steel

More information

Structural Mechanics Column Behaviour

Structural Mechanics Column Behaviour Structural Mechanics Column Behaviour 008/9 Dr. Colin Caprani, 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 1.1 Background... 3 1. Stability of Equilibrium... 4. Buckling Solutions... 6.1 Introduction... 6. Pinned-Pinned

More information

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture twenty one concrete construction: Copyright Kirk Martini shear & deflection Concrete Shear 1 Shear in Concrete

More information

LOAD BEARING CAPACITY OF SPLICED COLUMNS WITH SINGLE ROW BOLTED BUTT-PLATES

LOAD BEARING CAPACITY OF SPLICED COLUMNS WITH SINGLE ROW BOLTED BUTT-PLATES LOAD BEARING CAPACITY OF SPLICED COLUMNS WITH SINGLE ROW BOLTED BUTT-PLATES J.C.D. Hoenderkamp, H. H. Snijder Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands j.c.d.hoenderkamp@tue.nl h.h.snijder@tue.nl

More information

GATE SOLUTIONS E N G I N E E R I N G

GATE SOLUTIONS E N G I N E E R I N G GATE SOLUTIONS C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G From (1987-018) Office : F-16, (Lower Basement), Katwaria Sarai, New Delhi-110016 Phone : 011-65064 Mobile : 81309090, 9711853908 E-mail: info@iesmasterpublications.com,

More information

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Local buckling is an extremely important facet of cold formed steel

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Local buckling is an extremely important facet of cold formed steel 5.3 Local buckling Local buckling is an extremely important facet of cold formed steel sections on account of the fact that the very thin elements used will invariably buckle before yielding. Thinner the

More information

Metal Structures Lecture XIII Steel trusses

Metal Structures Lecture XIII Steel trusses Metal Structures Lecture XIII Steel trusses Contents Definition #t / 3 Geometry and cross-sections #t / 7 Types of truss structures #t / 15 Calculations #t / 29 Example #t / 57 Results of calculations

More information

ME Final Exam. PROBLEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) M (x) y. z (neutral axis) beam cross-sec+on. 20 kip ft. 0.2 ft. 10 ft. 0.1 ft.

ME Final Exam. PROBLEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) M (x) y. z (neutral axis) beam cross-sec+on. 20 kip ft. 0.2 ft. 10 ft. 0.1 ft. ME 323 - Final Exam Name December 15, 2015 Instructor (circle) PROEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) Krousgrill 11:30AM-12:20PM Ghosh 2:30-3:20PM Gonzalez 12:30-1:20PM Zhao 4:30-5:20PM M (x) y 20 kip ft 0.2

More information

Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation on Steel Plate Girders With Deep Section

Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation on Steel Plate Girders With Deep Section 6 th International Conference on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering 11 th International Workshop on Advanced Smart Materials and Smart Structures Technology August 1-2, 2015, University of

More information

Chapter 6: Cross-Sectional Properties of Structural Members

Chapter 6: Cross-Sectional Properties of Structural Members Chapter 6: Cross-Sectional Properties of Structural Members Introduction Beam design requires the knowledge of the following. Material strengths (allowable stresses) Critical shear and moment values Cross

More information

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING SUBJECT: CE 2252 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS UNIT: I ENERGY METHODS 1. Define: Strain Energy When an elastic body is under the action of external

More information

Theory of structure I 2006/2013. Chapter one DETERMINACY & INDETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES

Theory of structure I 2006/2013. Chapter one DETERMINACY & INDETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES Chapter one DETERMINACY & INDETERMINACY OF STRUCTURES Introduction A structure refers to a system of connected parts used to support a load. Important examples related to civil engineering include buildings,

More information

= = = 1,000 1,000 1,250. g M0 g M1 g M2 = = = 1,100 1,100 1,250 [ ] 1 0,000 8,000 HE 140 B 0,0. [m] Permanent Permanent Variable Variable Variable

= = = 1,000 1,000 1,250. g M0 g M1 g M2 = = = 1,100 1,100 1,250 [ ] 1 0,000 8,000 HE 140 B 0,0. [m] Permanent Permanent Variable Variable Variable Project Job name Part Author Date Steel Products and Solutions Standard 29.01.2018 Standard EN 199311, EN 199314/Czech Rep.. Factors for steel structures Section capacity Section resistance when checking

More information