VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES. Design-support for MSH sections
|
|
- Dennis Brown
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES Design-support for MSH sections according to Eurocode 3, DIN EN : 2005 and DIN EN : 2005
2 Design-Support for MSH sections according to Eurocode 3, DIN EN : 2005 and DIN EN : 2005 in cooperation with Prof. Dr.-Ing. R. Kindmann, Dr.-Ing. M. Kraus and Dipl.-Ing. J. Vette, University of Bochum, Dipl.-Ing. O. Josat, Dipl.-Ing. J. Krampen and Dipl.-Ing. C. Remde, Vallourec & Mannesmann Tubes VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES is world market leader in the manufacture of seamless hot rolled steel tubes for all applications. The company operates 11 state-of-the-art pipe mills worldwide, eight located in Europe (four plants at three locations in Germany and four plants in France), two at a facility in Brazil and one in the USA. With an annual output of up to three million tonnes the world s largest and most comprehensive range of seamless steel tubes is supplied. Hot rolled circular, square and rectangular Mannesmann Structural Hollow Sections of VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES have been used successfully for several decades. Modern steel architecture, with its elegant and transparent forms, would be practically impossible to create without them. 2 VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES
3 Descriptions and basic informations 4 Classification of hollow cross sections 5 Calculation methods/determination of internal forces 5 Resistance of cross sections 5 Buckling resistance of members 6 Design-support for members in compression 8 Lattice girders 9 Joints of lattice girders 10 Design-support for K gap joints with square MSH-chords (SHS) 12 Design-support for K joints with circular MSH sections (CHS) 13 Design-support for K gap joints with rectangular MSH-chords (RHS) 14 Design-support for K overlap joints with square MSH-chords (SHS) 16 Calculation examples 18 Circular MSH sections 22 Square MSH sections 24 Rectangular MSH sections 26
4 1 Descriptions and basic informations Table 1 Descriptions and available dimensions circular (CHS) square (SHS) rectangular (RHS) Cross section Outer measurement 21.3 mm 40 x 40 mm 50 x 30 mm d, b or h to to to 711 mm 400 x 400 mm 500 x 300 mm Wall thickness t 2.3 mm to 100 mm maximum 20 mm Available lengths up to 16 m; standard up to 12 m This brochure for the design only covers hot-rolled MSH sections (according to DIN EN 10210). Due to production differences they provide more favourable characteristics than cold formed profiles: higher load-carrying capacity for columns and members in compression larger cross section areas as a result of smaller corner radiuses substantially better suitability for welding in comparison to cold formed hollow profiles according to DIN EN there are no restrictions for the ability of welding (DIN EN :2005) Table 2 Materials: Yield strength fy, tensile strength fu, impact energy KV and carbon equivalent CEV Structural steels Steel designation fy in N/mm 2 fu in N/mm 2 KV* in J at DIN EN / test temp. EN old n. EN 1993 for t 40 mm CEV* in % for t 16 mm 16 < t 40 mm S 355 J0H St 52-3U C: S 355 J2H St 52-3N C: S 355 K2H C: Normalised S 355 NH StE 355 N C: fine grain S 355 NLH TStE 355 N C: structual S 460 NH StE 460 N C: steels S 460 NLH TStE 460 N C: S 690 approval in each individual case * according to DIN EN According to DIN EN the yield and tensile strengths f y and f u are either to be taken out of the product standard (DIN EN ) or simplified from DIN EN The values in table 2 correspond to the simplified specifications according to DIN EN for t 40 mm. The DIN EN demands a reduction of the yield strength for wall thicknesses > 16 mm already as well as different tensile strengths. The yield strength according to EC 3 specifies a nominal value for calculations, not the actual minimum value of the material. Detailed information and brochures are available at: 4 VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES
5 2 Classification of hollow cross sections By the classification of the cross sections the resistance and rotation capacity due to local buckling is supposed to be determined. Table 3 Classification on the bases of c/t- and d/t-ratios of cross section parts subjected to compression Cross section Class Pure Pure compression bending 1 c/t 33 ε c/t 72 ε 2 c/t 38 ε c/t 83 ε Cross sections which do not comply to the conditions of the classes 1, 2 or 3 are classified as class 4. ε = 235/fy fy in N/mm 2 3 c/t 42 ε c/t 124 ε 1 d/t 50 ε 2 2 d/t 70 ε 2 3 d/t 90 ε 2 fy ε ε The tables of the sections 14 to 16 include details on the classification using the steel grade S 355. The first digit describes the classification for pure compression, the second for pure bending. 3 Calculation methods/determination of internal forces Internal forces can be determined using an elastic or a plastic structural analysis. A plastic analysis can only be performed, if the structure provides sufficient rotation capacity at the locations where plastic hinges occur. For the structural analysis the design values of the loading have to be taken into consideration, which means that partial safety factors γ F and combination factors ψ have to be regarded for the actions. As a result the design values of the internal forces N Ed, V Ed und M Ed. 4 Resistance of cross sections Tension: N Ed N pl/ γ 1.0 M0 Class: N Ed Compression: 1, 2 or 3 N pl/ γ 1.0 M0 N Ed A eff f y/ γ M0 M Ed Bending moment: 1 or 2 M pl/ γ 1.0 M0 M Ed W el f y/ γ M all 4 3 Partial safety factors: According to DIN EN γ M0 = γ M1 = 1.00 is recommended. The definition will be stated in the national annex, which is not yet available. Npl, Vpl and Mpl for fy = 35.5 kn/cm 2 : see tables in sections 14 to 16. For a different yield strength the values can be converted using the ratio of the strengths. Shear: V Ed V pl/ γ 1.0 M0 no shear buckling! Design-support for MSH sections 5
6 Bending moment and shear force: The influence of the shear force on the bending moment resistance has to be taken into consideration if the shear force V Ed exceeds 0.5 V pl /γ M0. In that case a reduced yield strength has to be regarded for the parts of the cross section subjected to shear: 2 V red f y = (1 ρ) f y where ρ = 2 Ed 1 Bending moment and axial force: For classes 1 and 2 cross sections the following criterion should be satisfied: M Ed M N,Rd where M N,Rd is the design plastic moment resistance reduced by the axial force N Ed. For rectangular hollow sections the following approximation may be used: where: n = N Ed N pl/ γ M0 V pl/ γ M0 M M N,Rd = pl 1 n where: M N,Rd M pl γ M a w γ M0 2bt a w = 1 but a w 0.5 A For circular hollow cross sections EC 3 does not provide any specifications. Analogously the following condition is obtained according to Kindmann/Frickel Elastische und plastische Querschnittstragfähigkeit (Ernst & Sohn publishing, Berlin): N Ed 2 + arc sin M Ed 1.0 N pl/ γ M0 π M pl/ γ M0 5 Buckling resistance of members Buckling resistance of members in compression Uniform members with class 1, 2 and 3 sections shall be verified against buckling as follows: N Ed 1.0 χ N pl/ γ M1 1 χ = aber χ 1.0 Φ + Φ 2 λ 2 Φ = 0.5 [1+α (λ 0.2) + λ 2] λ = N pl L = cr f y ; Ncr = N cr i π E π 2 EI L 2 cr α = 0.21 for buckling curve a (S 235 to S 420) α = 0.13 for buckling curve a 0 (S 460) L cr : buckling length _ λ χ for curve a a _ λ χ for curve a a VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES
7 Buckling resistance of members in bending Procedure for the verification of sufficient carrying capacity: Application of equivalent geometric imperfections Determination of internal bending moments using a second order theory analysis taking the equivalent geometric imperfections into account (approximations see below) Verification of sufficient cross section carrying capacity according to section 4 for bending and axial force Equivalent geometric imperfections: a) Initial sway imperfections φ = 1/200 α h α m Reduction factor for height h [m] applicable to columns: 2 2 α h = but α h 1.0 h 3 Reduction factor for the number of columns in a row: α m = m m is the number of columns in a row including only those columns which carry a vertical load N Ed not less than 50% of the average value of the column in the vertical plane considered. Equivalent loading b) Initial bow imperfections According to DIN EN the initial bow imperfections are recommended as stated in the following table. The definition will be stated in the national annex, which is not available yet. e 0,d / L Buckling Elastic Plastic curve analysis analysis a 0 1/350 1/300 a 1/300 1/250 Equivalent loading Approximations for the bending moment according to second order theory: For the approximation the first order theory bending moment is multiplied by an enlargement factor α: Bending moment according to first order theory and correction factors δ for selected cases Hog. moment: M I = - q L 2 /2 δ = Hog. moment: M I = P L δ = Hog. moment: M I = - N Ed φ L δ = M II α M I 1+δ N Ed /N cr,d α= 1 N Ed /N cr,d Sag. moment: M I = q L 2 /8 δ = Sag. moment: M I = P L/4 δ = Sag. moment: M I = N Ed e 0,d δ = 0 N cr,d = N cr /γ Μ1 Condition: α 3 L = beam length Hog. moment: M I = - q L 2 /8 δ = Sag. moment at: 5/8 L: M I = 9 q L 2 /128 δ = Hog. moment: M I = - 3 PL/16 δ = Sag. moment: M I = 5 PL/32 δ = Online verification against buckling at (STACOM) Hog. moment: M I - N Ed e 0,d δ = Sag. moment at: 5/8 L: M I 0.6 N Ed e 0,d δ = Design-support for MSH sections 7
8 6 Design-support for members in compression Example 1, P.18 Example 5, P VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES
9 7 Lattice girders Lattice structures are often designed as single span girders with parallel chords, as for example roof girders of long span constructions. Established structures in practice are: - Warren truss - small amount of work due few joints - long diagonals in compression - few points of load application at the upper chord - Warren truss with vertical posts - Pratt truss - many points of load application at the upper chord - many joints - extensive joints at lower chord and large amount of work - short diagonals in compression - many points of load application at upper chord - many joints and therefore large amount of work Design-support for MSH sections 9
10 Compared to plate girders lattice girders with parallel chords using hollow members provide economic advantages for span lengths greater than about 20 m. The split-up of the internal bending moment into tension and compression forces leads to light roof constructions saving material. Additionally hollow profiles provide an ideal cross section shape for centrical compression loading. Support for the construction: - Lattice girders with parallel chords usually have heights from 1/10 to 1/20 of the system lengths. As a guide value for pre-design a girder height of 1/15 of the span length is appropriate. - The angles between the chords and the brace members should be in-between 45 and 60. In any case an angle greater than 30 has to be chosen. - Joints of lattice structures should be designed in a way that the centrelines of the members intersect in a single point. In the case they show eccentricities chapter of DIN EN :2005 has to be regarded (see section 8). - Loadings, as for instance from purlins, should be introduced at the joints of the structure. - Moments at the joints, caused by the actual rotational stiffness of the connections, may be neglected in the design of the members and joints, provided that the range of validity for the joints are observed and the ratio of the system length to the heights of the members is not less than 6. The cross section carrying capacity has to be verified for each member and for those in compression the stability as well. For connections the design joint resistance according to DIN EN :2005 has to be verified. 8 Joints of lattice girders Each member of a lattice structure is usually loaded by axial forces for which they have to be designed. At joints, several members come together and the directions of force-actions have to be redistributed in order to fulfil the equilibrium. Joints are highly stressed details of the structure for which the design joint resistance has to be determined and verified. Usually hollow profiles are welded at the connections; welds have to be verified separately however. The ends of brace members may not be flattened or pressed together. The following types of joints are often used: K gap joint K overlap joint K joint with vertical post (N joint) KT joint 10 VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES
11 The following supports for design may be applied for mainly stationary loading. Moments resulting from eccentricities of the centrelines have to be regarded in the design of tension chord members and brace members as well as the design of the connections if the following limits are not fulfilled: CHS: 0.55 d 0 e 0.25 d 0 resp. RHS/SHS: 0.55 h 0 e 0.25 h 0 In the design of compression chord members eccentricities usually have to be taken into account, even if they are within the limits specified above. According to DIN EN a partial safety factor of γ M5 = 1.00 is recommended for the design of the joints. The definition will be stated in the national annex, which is not available yet. Definition and Notation Table 4 Range of validity for K and N gap joints according to DIN EN :2005 Rectangular MSH sections (RHS): b i /b 0 Max b 0 /t 0 2. b i /t i 35 und h i /t i b 0 /t 0 35 und h 0 /t h 0 /b h i /b i b g Max 0 (1 (h 1 + b 1 + h 2 + b 2 )/(4 b 0 )) t i + t 2 7. If g 1.5 b 0 1 (h 1 + b 1 + h 2 + b 2 ) the joint has to 4 b 0 be treated as two separate Y and T joints 8. Class 2 sections in terms of pure bending at least (see section 2) 9. Θi 30 Table 5 Range of validity for K and N overlap joints according to DIN EN :2005 Circular MSH sections (CHS): d i /d d 0 /t d i /t i Θi Class 2 sections in terms of pure bending at least (see section 2) 6. g t 1 +t 2 Square MSH sections (SHS): Points 1-9 see RHS b 0 /t 0 35 b 1 + b b 1 Rectangular and square MSH sections (RHP/QHP): 1. b i /b Chord: 0.5 h 0 /b and class 2 section in terms of pure bending at least 3. Braces (in compression): class 1 sections (pure bending) 4. Braces (in tension): b i /t i 35 and h i /t i % λ 0V 100% and b i /b j Θi 30 Circular MSH sections (CHS): Points 1-5 see table 4 6. λ 0V 25% Design-support for MSH sections 11
12 9 Design-support for K gap joints with square MSH-chords (SHS) Preconditions: Joint has to be within the range of validity given in table 4! Same yield strength fy for all members Design resistance of the joint N 1,Rd = n Rd k n N pl,0 sin θ 1 γ M5 N 2,Rd = N 1,Rd sin θ 1 sin θ 2 n Rd see diagram below Note: For circular braces the design resistances N i,rd have to be multiplied by the factor π/4. For that case b i =d i is valid. k n is obtained for compression chords by: N o,d γ M5 2 b 0 k n = N pl,0 b 1 + b 2 for tension chords by: k n = 1.0 sin Θ is given by: θ sin θ Example: - Chord member SHS 150x150x6.3 mm (tension) - Brace members SHS 80x80x5 mm - Gradient of the brace members 45 (e = 0 cm) Check of the validity given in table 4: 1. b i /b 0 = 8/15 = b i /t i =h i /t i = 80/5 = g = 15 = 3.7 cm Max 15 = 3.5 cm sin cm 8 7. g = 15 sin 45 = 3.7 cm (1 8/15) = 10.5 cm 8. Members are at least class 2 sections 9. Θ 1 = Θ 2 = b 0 /t 0 = 150/6.3 = b 1 + b b = = Determination of the design resistance: b 1 8 b 0 15 With b = = and = = 23.8: n Rd t The limit brace force for a tension chord is: N 1,Rd = = kn 12 VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES
13 10 Design-support for K joints with circular MSH sections (CHS) Preconditions: Joint has to be within the range of validity given in tables 4 and 5! Same yield strength f y for all members Conditions for design: n Rd k p N pl,0 sin θ N 1,Rd Min i γ M5 d i k Θi N pl,0 (d 0 t 0 ) γ M5 N i,d n Rd see diagram below (Interim values may be interpolated) Notes: g<0: overlap joint (table 5) g>0: gap joint (table 4) where i = 1 Comp. 2 Tension k p is obtained for compression chords by: minn o,d γ M5 minn o,d γ M5 k p = (1+ ) 1.0 N pl,0 N pl,0 for tension chords by: k p = 1.0 k Θi is obtained by: k Θi = 1+sin Θ i 12 sin 2 Θ i Θ i k Θi Example: - Chord member: x 6.3 mm (tension) - Brace members: 60.3 x 5mm - Gradient of the brace members: 45 (e = 0 cm) Check of validity given in table 4: d i /d 0 = 60.3/101.6 = d 0 /t 0 = 101.6/6.3 = d i /t i = 60.3/5 = Θ 1 = Θ 2 = Members are at least class 2 sections g = = 1.6 cm t 1 + t 2 = 1.0 cm sin 45 Design-support for MSH sections Determination of the design resistance: d 1 d 0 g with = 0.594, = 16.1 and = 2.54 and by d 0 t 0 t 0 interpolation: n Rd 0.32 (g/t 0 4), n Rd 0.26 (g/t 0 8) n Rd ( ) (8 2.54)/(4+8) = The limit brace force for a tension chord is: = N Rd = = 272 kn Min = ( )
14 11 Design-support for K gap joints with rectangular MSH-chords (RHS) Preconditions: Joint has to be within the range of validity given in table 4! Brace members are equal profiles SHS/CHS Same yield strength f y for all members N o,d The compression force in the chord shall satisfy: γ N M5 0.5 pl,0 (For small b i /b 0 -ratios and small compression forces or tension forces in the chord the exact verification according to Eurocode can lead to favourable results) Note: For circular braces the design resistances N i,rd have to be multiplied by the factor π/4. For that case b i =d i is valid. Conditions for design: 1. Condition (Verification of the chord force) V Ed = N 1,d sin Θ 1 V pl,0 γ M5 h 0 k α = 0.2 b n 0,Rd = v 2 Ed k α n N 0,Rd = 0,Rd N pl,0 >N 0,d γ M5 2. Condition (Verification of the brace force) n 1,Rd N pl,i γ M5 > N i,d N i,rd = Min n 1,Rd and n 2,Rd see diagrams below Diagram for n 1,Rd : n 2,Rd N pl,0 sin Θ i γ M5 14 VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES
15 Diagrams for n 2,Rd : Design-support for MSH sections 15
16 12 Design-support for K overlap joints with square MSH-chords (SHS) Preconditions: Joint has to be within the range of validity given in table 5! Brace members are equal profiles SHS/CHS Same yield strength f y for all members Note: For circular braces the design resistancese N i,rd have to be multiplied by the factor π/4. For that case b i =d i is valid. Design resistance of the joint: N 1,Rd = n Rd N pl,1 γ M5 The overlapping brace member 2 does not have to be verified. Determination n Rd taking into account: λ 0V = q/p 100% 25% (see table 5) With the overlap ratio λ 0V the following cases can be distinguished: Case 1: λ 0V = 25% Case 2: 25% < λ 0V < 50% linear interpolation of n Rd using case 1 and case 3 Case 3: 50% λ 0V < 80% Case 4: 80% λ 0V 100% Diagrams for n Rd in case 1 (λ 0V = 25%): 16 VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES
17 Diagrams for n Rd in case 3 (50% < λ 0V < 80%): Diagrams for n Rd in case 4 (80% λ 0V 100%): Design-support for MSH sections 17
18 13 Calculation examples Example 1: Column with hinged supports (L = 6 m): By considering L cr = L = 6 m the following can directly be taken from the design-support of section 6: CHS x 16 N Ed 6250 kn > 6000 kn In comparison to that the verification against buckling according to sect. 5 is carried out: I = cm 4, N pl = 6966 kn (see section 14), buckling length: L cr = 600 cm (see section 5) π N cr = 2 EI π = = kn; N pl 6966 λ = = = 0.57 L 2 cr N cr χ 0.9 (buckling curve a, see section 5) N Ed 6000 Verification against buckling: = = 0.96 < 1.0 χ N pl /γ M /1.0 Example 2: Column with fixed support (L = 4 m) and lateral loading: The column shown in the figure has to be verified for stability. Due to the lateral loading the verification will be achieved by a second order theory analysis (l y = 9055 cm 4 ). The buckling length of the column is L cr = 2L = 8 m. π 2 EI π N cr = L 2 = cr γ M = kn 1.0 The bending moment at support due to the uniformly distributed load is (see sect. 5): 4 M 2 q l = 15 = 120 knm 2 With δ = 0.40 from the table of section 5 the enlargement factor α is determined as follows: 1+δ N Ed /N cr.d / α = = = N Ed /N cr,d / The second order theory moment is gained with the multiplication of the moment at support by the enlargement factor α (see section 5). M ll q = Ml q α = ( 120) 1.48 = knm 1 The initial sway imperfection is regarded with φ = (for the application of equiv. geo. imperfections see section 5) H 0 = φ N ED = = 6.5 kn; Mϕ l = H l = = 26 knm With δ = 0,18 (see section 5): / α = = ; M ll ϕ = ( 26) 1.65 = 42.9 knm / The internal forces according to the second order theory analysis may only be superposed, if the axial compression force of the loading conditions is identical (limited superposition). In this example the axial compression force is regarded with N d = 1300 kn in combination with the uniformly distributed load q d as well as the sway imperfection φ. MEd ll = Mll q + Mll ϕ = = knm The bending moment resistance is determined according to section 4 with regard of the axial compression force (since V/V pl is smaller than 0.5, a reduction of the yield strength is not necessary): N Ed b t n = = = 0.386; a w = 1 = 1 = N pl /γ M0 3370/1.0 A M pl 1 n ,386 M N,Rd = = = knm MEd ll = knm Condition satisfied! γ M a w VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES
19 Example 3: K gap joint with RHS-chord and SHS-brace members Check of validity: (see section 8) decisive 1. b i /b 0 = = 0.35 Max = b i /ti = h i /t i = 7/0.5 = b 0 /t 0 = 20/1 = und h 0 /t 0 = 10/1 = h 0 /b 0 = 10/20 = h i /b i = 7/7 = = 6.5 cm decisive g = tan 40 sin 40 = 6.99 cm Max = 1.0 cm 7. g = 6.99 cm Members are at least class 2 sections 9. Θ 1 = Θ 2 = = 19.5 cm Check of eccentricities: e h = = Condition satisfied, which means, that the moments resulting from eccentricities may be neglected in the design of the connection. The tension chord does not have to be verified for the moments of eccentricities as well. Determination of the design resistance: 1. Condition (Verification of the chord force) Determination of the plastic shear resistance according to DIN EN :2005: A h 0 f y,d V pl,0,d = b = = kn 0 + h sin With v ed = = 0.599, k α = = 0.45 and n 0,Rd = = N 0,Rd can be determined according to section 11 as follows: 1950 N 0,Rd = = kn N 0,d = 950 kn Condition satisfied! 2. Condition (Verification of the brace force) The following ratios are necessary for the use of the diagrams: t i 5 b i 7 b 0 20 h 0 10 b i 7 t = = 0.5; = = 0.35; = = 20; = = 0.5; = = b 0 20 t 0 1 b 0 20 t i 0.5 With the diagrams n 1,Rd 1,0 and for n 2,Rd is provided. The maximum brace force can be determined as follows: N i,rd = , sin = kn = kn decisive N i,rd = kn N i,d = 350 kn Condition satisfied! Design-support for MSH sections 19
20 Example 4: K overlap joint with SHS Check of validity: (see table 5) b 1 b b = = = b 0 14 h 0 2. = 1.0 and class 1 cross section b 0 b i h i 3. and 4. = = and class 1 cross section t i t i 4.7 x % b 5. λ 0V = = 45% and i and b = % j 6. Θ i >30 Determination of the design resistance: For λ 0V = 0.45 case 2 is decisive. n Rd has to be interpolated using the cases 1 and 3. With the ratios t i 4 b 1 80 b t = = , = = 0.57 and = = 22.2 the diagrams provide: b t Check of eccentricities: Using the eccentricity e the ratio e/h n Rd, n Rd, can be determined (see section 8): Interpolation: e = 3.68 cm (45 25) n Rd = ( ) = 0.76 N 1,Rd = = 323 kn Verification of the design joint resistance: N 1,Ed 300 = = 0.93 N 1,Rd 323 e = = h 0 14 Condition satisfied, which means, that the moments resulting from eccentricities may be neglected in the design of the connection. For the design of the compression chord the eccentricities have to be regarded. Example 5: Lattice girder L = 40 m Rectangular hollow sections made of S 355 J2H (hot rolled). The example deals with a roof girder designed as a warren truss. The single span girder is loaded by the self-weight, snow and suction forces due to wind. The loads are combined according to DIN EN 1990:2002. Afterwards the verifications against buckling and for the joint resistances are carried out. Loading table: Load case Dead load G Snow S Wind (suction) Ws P kn 7.8 kn 6.9 kn P kn 15.6 kn 13.8 kn (The dead load includes the self-weight of the girder.) Decisive load combinations according to DIN EN 1990:2002: LCC 1: 1.35 * G * S LCC 2: 0.9 * G * Ws Internal forces LCC 1: LCC 2: Load at each node: P 1,d = = 50 kn P 1,d = 3 kn P 2,d = P 1,d /2 = 25 kn P 2,d = 1.5 kn Bearing reaction: A d = = 200 kn A d = = 12 kn max. force in upper chord: (200 25) ( ) O M = 2.5 = 775 kn O M = 46.5 kn max. force in lower chord: U M = /2 = 800 kn U M = 48 kn max. force in braces: D 1 = ± (200 25) 2 = ± kn D 1 = ± 14.9 kn 20 VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES
21 Buckling of the upper chord member (SHS 140 x 8): The nodes of the upper chords are fixed laterally. Buckling length for hollow section chord members according to Annex BB.1.3 of DIN EN : L cr = = 450 cm. Using the design-support of section 6 the required cross section can be chosen. With. N Ed = 775 kn and L cr = 4.5 m follows a hollow profile 140 x 140 x 8: I = 1195 cm 4, N pl = 1475 kn (see section 15). π N cr = 2 EI π = = 1223 kn; N λ = pl 1475 = = 1.1 χ (buckling curve a, see sect. 5) L 2 cr N cr 1223 N Ed 775 Verification against buckling for O M : χ N = /1.0 = 0.9 < 1.0 pl /γ M1 Buckling of the lower chord member (SHS 140 x 6.3) : Perpendicular to the girder-plane the lower chord is fixed at the bearings and in mid-span by structural elements. Buckling length for hollow section chord members according to Annex BB.1.3 of DIN EN : L cr = = 1800 cm π 2 EI π ,9 N pl 1181 N cr = L 2 = cr = 62.9 kn; λ = = = 4.33 χ (buckling curve a, see sect. 5) N cr 62.9 N Ed 46.5 Verification against buckling for U M : χ N pl /γ = M /1.0 = 0.77 < 1.0 Buckling of the brace members (SHS 80 x 5): The brace members are welded continuously to the chord members. Since b i = 0.8 cm < 0.6 b 0 = = 8.4 cm and the connection to the chords is presumed as continuously welded the buckling length for the brace members according to Annex BB.1.3 of DIN EN is: L cr = = 265 cm This length is valid for in-plane as well as out-of-plane buckling of the brace members. π 2 EI π N pl 523 N cr = L 2 = cr = 403 kn; λ = = N cr = 1.14 χ (buckling curve a, see sect. 5) 403 N Ed Verification against buckling for D 1 : χ N pl /γ = = 0.84 < 1.0 M /1.0 Design joint resistance of node 1: 1. b i /b 0 = 8/14 = b i /t i = h i /t i = 8/0.5 = and b 0 /t 0 = 14/0.63 = and 5. h i /b i = 1 (QHP) = 3.0 cm 6. and 7. g = 3.1 cm 8 where e = 2 mm = 9.0 cm 14 (The eccentricity is within the range according to section 8) 8. Members are at least class 2 sections 9. Θ 1 = Θ 2 = b 1 + b b = = Determination of N i,rd : b 1 + b 2 With k n = 1.0 (tension chord) and 2 b = 0.57 the diagram in section 9 provides: n Rd 0.20 N i,rd = = 334 kn N Verification of the design joint resistance: i,d N = = 0.74 < 1.0 i,rd 334 Design-support for MSH sections 21
22 14 Circular MSH sections according DIN EN Dimensions Bending and Torsion fy = 35.5 kn/cm 2 d t A G U l = l T /2 W el i max S N pl V pl M pl Class mm mm cm 2 kg/m m 2 /m cm 4 cm 3 cm cm 3 kn kn knm S For further available dimensions see MSH technical information 1 22 VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES
23 Dimensions Bending and Torsion fy = 35.5 kn/cm 2 d t A G U l = l T /2 W el i max S N pl V pl M pl Class mm mm cm 2 kg/m m 2 /m cm 4 cm 3 cm cm 3 kn kn knm S For further available dimensions see MSH technical information 1 Design-support for MSH sections 23
24 15 Square MSH sections according DIN EN Dimensions Bending fy = 35.5 kn/cm 2 b x b t A G U ly = lz W el iy = iz l T N pl V pl M pl Class mm mm cm 2 kg/m m 2 /m cm 4 cm 3 cm cm 4 kn kn knm S x x x x x x x x x x x For further available dimensions see MSH technical information 1 24 VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES
25 Dimensions Bending fy = 35.5 kn/cm 2 b x b t A G U ly = lz W el iy = iz l T N pl V pl M pl Class mm mm cm 2 kg/m m 2 /m cm 4 cm 3 cm cm 4 kn kn knm S x x x x x x x x x For further available dimensions see MSH technical information 1 Design-support for MSH sections 25
26 16 Rectangular MSH sections according DIN EN Dimensions Bending strong and weak axis fy = 35.5 kn/cm 2 h x b t A G ly W el.y i y lz W el.z i z l T N pl Mpl.y M pl.z Class mm mm cm 2 kg/m cm 4 cm 3 cm cm 4 cm 3 cm cm 4 kn knm knm S x x x x x x x x x x x x x For further available dimensions see MSH technical information 1 26 VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES
27 Dimensions Bending strong and weak axis fy = 35.5 kn/cm 2 h x b t A G ly W el.y i y lz W el.z i z l T N pl Mpl.y M pl.z Class mm mm cm 2 kg/m cm 4 cm 3 cm cm 4 cm 3 cm cm 4 kn knm knm S x x x x x x x x x x For further available dimensions see MSH technical information 1. Design-support for MSH sections 27
Design of Compression Members
Design of Compression Members 2.1 Classification of cross sections Classifying cross-sections may mainly depend on four critical factors: 1- Width to thickness (c/t) ratio. 2- Support condition. 3- Yield
More informationStructural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 0 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic Loads
More informationMade by PTY/AAT Date Jan 2006
Job No. VALCOSS Sheet of 9 Rev A P.O. Box 000, FI-0044 VTT Tel. +358 0 7 Fax +358 0 7 700 Design Example 3 Stainless steel lattice girder made Made by PTY/AAT Date Jan 006 RFCS Checked by MAP Date Feb
More informationStructural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode 3 Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 20 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic
More informationUniversity of Sheffield. Department of Civil Structural Engineering. Member checks - Rafter 44.6
Member checks - Rafter 34 6.4Haunch (UB 457 x 191 x 89) The depth of a haunch is usually made approximately twice depth of the basic rafter sections, as it is the normal practice to use a UB cutting of
More informationDesign of Beams (Unit - 8)
Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Contents Introduction Beam types Lateral stability of beams Factors affecting lateral stability Behaviour of simple and built - up beams in bending (Without vertical stiffeners)
More informationFundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures
Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures Civil Engineering for Bachelors 133FSTD Teacher: Zdeněk Sokol Office number: B619 1 Syllabus of lectures 1. Introduction, history of steel structures,
More informationMetal Structures Lecture XIII Steel trusses
Metal Structures Lecture XIII Steel trusses Contents Definition #t / 3 Geometry and cross-sections #t / 7 Types of truss structures #t / 15 Calculations #t / 29 Example #t / 57 Results of calculations
More information3. Stability of built-up members in compression
3. Stability of built-up members in compression 3.1 Definitions Build-up members, made out by coupling two or more simple profiles for obtaining stronger and stiffer section are very common in steel structures,
More informationPLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder
16 PLATE GIRDERS II 1.0 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the current practice for the design of plate girders adopting meaningful simplifications of the equations derived in the chapter on Plate Girders
More informationApplication nr. 7 (Connections) Strength of bolted connections to EN (Eurocode 3, Part 1.8)
Application nr. 7 (Connections) Strength of bolted connections to EN 1993-1-8 (Eurocode 3, Part 1.8) PART 1: Bolted shear connection (Category A bearing type, to EN1993-1-8) Structural element Tension
More informationInfluence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes
October 2014 Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of Abstract tubular columns and arches Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal Contact:
More informationARCHIVES OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, LIX, 4, 2013 CALCULATION OF WELDING TRUSSES OVERLAP JOINTS MADE OF RECTANGULAR HOLLOW SECTIONS 1.
DOI:.478/ace--4 ARCHIVES OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, LIX, 4, CALCULATION OF WELDING TRUSSES OVERLAP JOINTS MADE OF RECTANGULAR HOLLOW SECTIONS J. BRÓDKA, M. BRONIEWICZ The basis for calculating of resistance
More informationDESIGN GUIDES FOR HIGH STRENGTH STRUCTURAL HOLLOW SECTIONS MANUFACTURED BY SSAB - FOR EN 1090 APPLICATIONS
DESIGN GUIDES FOR HIGH STRENGTH STRUCTURAL HOLLOW SECTIONS MANUFACTURED BY SSAB - FOR EN 1090 APPLICATIONS SSAB produces a wide variety of hollow sections in different steel grades according to European
More informationAdvanced Analysis of Steel Structures
Advanced Analysis of Steel Structures Master Thesis Written by: Maria Gulbrandsen & Rasmus Petersen Appendix Report Group B-204d M.Sc.Structural and Civil Engineering Aalborg University 4 th Semester Spring
More informationSTEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 8: Description of member resistance calculator
STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE Multi-Store Steel Buildings Part 8: Description of member resistance calculator Multi-Store Steel Buildings Part : Description of member resistance calculator 8 - ii FOREWORD
More informationStructural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 22 : Design of an unbraced sway frame with rigid joints Summary: NOTE This example
More informationAccordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.
C3 Flexural Members C3.1 Bending The nominal flexural strength [moment resistance], Mn, shall be the smallest of the values calculated for the limit states of yielding, lateral-torsional buckling and distortional
More informationBasis of Design, a case study building
Basis of Design, a case study building Luís Simões da Silva Department of Civil Engineering University of Coimbra Contents Definitions and basis of design Global analysis Structural modeling Structural
More informationC6 Advanced design of steel structures
C6 Advanced design of steel structures prepared b Josef achacek List of lessons 1) Lateral-torsional instabilit of beams. ) Buckling of plates. 3) Thin-walled steel members. 4) Torsion of members. 5) Fatigue
More informationSTEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams
STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite
More informationApplication nr. 3 (Ultimate Limit State) Resistance of member cross-section
Application nr. 3 (Ultimate Limit State) Resistance of member cross-section 1)Resistance of member crosssection in tension Examples of members in tension: - Diagonal of a truss-girder - Bottom chord of
More informationEurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps
Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps a brief guide on element design to EC3 Tim McCarthy Email tim.mccarthy@umist.ac.uk Slides available on the web http://www2.umist.ac.uk/construction/staff/
More informationDesign of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN
Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN 1992-1-1 and EN 1992-2 Validation Examples Brno, 21.10.2010 IDEA RS s.r.o. South Moravian Innovation Centre, U Vodarny 2a, 616 00 BRNO tel.: +420-511
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV UNIT I STRESS, STRAIN DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS PART A (2 MARKS)
More informationModule 6. Approximate Methods for Indeterminate Structural Analysis. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Module 6 Approximate Methods for Indeterminate Structural Analysis Lesson 35 Indeterminate Trusses and Industrial rames Instructional Objectives: After reading this chapter the student will be able to
More informationAPOLLO SCAFFOLDING SERVICES LTD SPIGOT CONNECTION TO EUROCODES DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS
Alan White Design APOLLO SCAFFOLDING SERVICES LTD SPIGOT CONNECTION TO EUROCODES DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS Alan N White B.Sc., M.Eng., C.Eng., M.I.C.E., M.I.H.T. JUL 2013 Somerset House 11 Somerset Place
More information1C8 Advanced design of steel structures. prepared by Josef Machacek
1C8 Advanced design of steel structures prepared b Josef achacek List of lessons 1) Lateral-torsional instabilit of beams. ) Buckling of plates. 3) Thin-walled steel members. 4) Torsion of members. 5)
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)
Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of one-way ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are
More informationPlastic Design of Portal frame to Eurocode 3
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering Plastic Design of Portal frame to Eurocode 3 Worked Example University of Sheffield Contents 1 GEOMETRY... 3 2 DESIGN BRIEF... 4 3 DETERMINING LOADING ON
More information7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces
7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces 7.3.1 General In the previous chapters of Draft IS: 800 LSM version, we have stipulated the codal provisions for determining the stress distribution in
More informationε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram
CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite
More informationDeterministic and stochastic investigation of welded, high strength steel T joint
Szakály Ferenc Student, MSc in Computational Structural Engineering, BUTE (M.Sc.) Deterministic and stochastic investigation of welded, high strength steel T joint Scientific Student s Association Thesis
More informationBridge deck modelling and design process for bridges
EU-Russia Regulatory Dialogue Construction Sector Subgroup 1 Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges Application to a composite twin-girder bridge according to Eurocode 4 Laurence Davaine
More informationSECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS
SECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1 INTRODUCTION TO COLUMN BUCKLING Introduction Elastic buckling of an ideal column Strength curve for an ideal column Strength of practical column Concepts of effective
More informationMade by SMH Date Aug Checked by NRB Date Dec Revised by MEB Date April 2006
Job No. OSM 4 Sheet 1 of 8 Rev B Telephone: (0144) 45 Fax: (0144) 944 Made b SMH Date Aug 001 Checked b NRB Date Dec 001 Revised b MEB Date April 00 DESIGN EXAMPLE 9 - BEAM WITH UNRESTRAINED COMPRESSION
More informationPlastic design of continuous beams
Budapest University of Technology and Economics Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601 Lecture no. 4: Plastic design of continuous
More informationS TRUCTUR A L PR E- A N A LYSIS TA B LES
M a d e f o r b u i l d i n g b u i l t f o r l i v i n g S TRUTUR A L PR E- A N A LYSIS TA LES I M P R I N T KLH Massivholz GmbH Publisher and responsible for the content: KLH Massivholz GmbH Version:
More informationBUCKLING OF VARIABLE CROSS-SECTIONS COLUMNS IN THE BRACED AND SWAY PLANE FRAMES
ROCZNIKI INŻYNIERII BUDOWLANEJ ZESZYT 16/016 Komisja Inżynierii Budowlanej Oddział Polskiej Akademii Nauk w Katowicach BUCKLING OF VARIABLE CROSS-SECTIONS COLUMNS IN THE BRACED AND SWAY PLANE FRAMES Ružica
More informationCHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams
CHAPTER 4 Design of R C Beams Learning Objectives Identify the data, formulae and procedures for design of R C beams Design simply-supported and continuous R C beams by integrating the following processes
More informationOUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS. You should judge your progress by completing the self assessment exercises. CONTENTS
Unit 2: Unit code: QCF Level: 4 Credit value: 15 Engineering Science L/601/1404 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS 1. Be able to determine the behavioural characteristics of elements of static engineering
More informationCE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-
CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing Openings in RC Flexural Members- Assoc Pr Tan Kiang Hwee Department Civil Engineering National In this lecture DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
More informationCHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE
CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE 6.1 GENERAL It shall be in accordance with JSCE Standard Specification (Design), 6.1. The collapse mechanism in statically indeterminate structures shall not be considered.
More informationTORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES)
Page1 TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES) Restrained warping for the torsion of thin-wall open sections is not included in most commonly used frame analysis programs. Almost
More informationFire resistance assessment of composite steel-concrete structures
Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 78 November 0 Fire resistance assessment of composite steelconcrete structures Basic design methods Worked examples CAJOT
More informationFinite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges
01/02/2016 Marco Donà Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges 1 Plastic hinge approach A plastic hinge represents a concentrated post-yield behaviour in one or more degrees of freedom. Hinges only
More informationDesign of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602
Design of wall panel according to EN 160 Example 3: Wall panel with wind load 1.1 Issue Design of a wall panel at an industrial building Materials with a compressive strength 3,5, density class 500, welded
More informationINFLUENCE OF FLANGE STIFFNESS ON DUCTILITY BEHAVIOUR OF PLATE GIRDER
International Journal of Civil Structural 6 Environmental And Infrastructure Engineering Research Vol.1, Issue.1 (2011) 1-15 TJPRC Pvt. Ltd.,. INFLUENCE OF FLANGE STIFFNESS ON DUCTILITY BEHAVIOUR OF PLATE
More informationWhere and are the factored end moments of the column and >.
11 LIMITATION OF THE SLENDERNESS RATIO----( ) 1-Nonsway (braced) frames: The ACI Code, Section 6.2.5 recommends the following limitations between short and long columns in braced (nonsway) frames: 1. The
More informationEquivalent T-stubs (Component Method) as per DIN EN
Equivalent T-stubs (Component Method) as per DIN EN 1993-1-8 Nemetschek Frilo GmbH www.frilo.de info@frilo.de As of 23/11/2012 Contents Introduction 3 T-stub model 3 Examples for the T-stub model 9 Introduction
More informationLecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion
Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Design of
More information9-3. Structural response
9-3. Structural response in fire František Wald Czech Technical University in Prague Objectives of the lecture The mechanical load in the fire design Response of the structure exposed to fire Levels of
More informationT2. VIERENDEEL STRUCTURES
T2. VIERENDEEL STRUCTURES AND FRAMES 1/11 T2. VIERENDEEL STRUCTURES NOTE: The Picture Window House can be designed using a Vierendeel structure, but now we consider a simpler problem to discuss the calculation
More informationJob No. Sheet 1 of 7 Rev A. Made by ER/EM Date Feb Checked by HB Date March 2006
Job No. Sheet of 7 Rev A Design Example Design of a lipped channel in a Made by ER/EM Date Feb 006 Checked by HB Date March 006 DESIGN EXAMPLE DESIGN OF A LIPPED CHANNEL IN AN EXPOSED FLOOR Design a simply
More informationSTRUCTURAL RESPONSE OF K AND T TUBULAR JOINTS UNDER STATIC LOADING
STRUCTURAL RESPONSE OF K AND T TUBULAR JOINTS UNDER STATIC LOADING Luciano R. O. de Lima, Pedro C. G. da S. Vellasco, Sebastião A. L. de Andrade Structural Engineering Department, UERJ, Rio de Janeiro,
More informationQUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A
DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State
More informationSteel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes
Steel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes INTRODUCTION When the need for a new structure arises, an individual or agency has to arrange the funds required for its construction. The individual or
More informationDESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL
DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL When the height of the retaining wall exceeds about 6 m, the thickness of the stem and heel slab works out to be sufficiently large and the design becomes
More informationInteractive Buckling of Cold-Formed Steel Sections Applied in Pallet Rack Upright Members
Interactive Buckling of Cold-Formed Steel Sections Applied in Pallet Rack Upright Members D. Dubina, V. Ungureanu, A. Crisan Politehnica University of Timişoara Peculiarities of cold-formed thin-walled
More informationValidation of the Advanced Calculation Model SAFIR Through DIN EN Procedure
Validation of the Advanced Calculation Model SAFIR Through DIN EN 1991-1-2 Procedure Raul Zaharia Department of Steel Structures and Structural Mechanics The Politehnica University of Timisoara, Ioan Curea
More informationSabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are
More informationDESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMNS - II
DESIGN OF BEA-COLUNS-II 14 DESIGN OF BEA-COLUNS - II 1.0 INTRODUCTION Beam-columns are members subjected to combined bending and axial compression. Their behaviour under uniaxial bending, biaxial bending
More informationKarbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi
Chapter 05 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Beams By Dr. Jawad Talib Al-Nasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering 71 Introduction
More informationNTNU Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology Department of Marine Technology TMR 4195 DESIGN OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES
NTNU Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology Department of Marine Technology EXERCISE 4 TMR 495 DESIGN OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES Distr. Date: 9 th Feb 4 Sign: Q. Chen Mandatory Exercise This exercise
More informationFLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES
UNIT - I FLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES 1. What is meant by indeterminate structures? Structures that do not satisfy the conditions of equilibrium are called indeterminate structure. These
More informationTHE EC3 CLASSIFICATION OF JOINTS AND ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS
EUROSTEEL 2002, Coimbra, 19-20 September 2002, p.987-996 THE EC3 CLASSIFICATION OF JOINTS AND ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS Fernando C. T. Gomes 1 ABSTRACT The Eurocode 3 proposes a classification of beam-to-column
More information3 Hours/100 Marks Seat No.
*17304* 17304 14115 3 Hours/100 Marks Seat No. Instructions : (1) All questions are compulsory. (2) Illustrate your answers with neat sketches wherever necessary. (3) Figures to the right indicate full
More informationPURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.
BENDING STRESS The effect of a bending moment applied to a cross-section of a beam is to induce a state of stress across that section. These stresses are known as bending stresses and they act normally
More informationDownloaded from Downloaded from / 1
PURWANCHAL UNIVERSITY III SEMESTER FINAL EXAMINATION-2002 LEVEL : B. E. (Civil) SUBJECT: BEG256CI, Strength of Material Full Marks: 80 TIME: 03:00 hrs Pass marks: 32 Candidates are required to give their
More informationGeneration of Biaxial Interaction Surfaces
COPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA AUGUST 2002 CONCRETE FRAE DESIGN BS 8110-97 Technical Note This Technical Note describes how the program checks column capacity or designs reinforced
More informationCIV 207 Winter For practice
CIV 07 Winter 009 Assignment #10 Friday, March 0 th Complete the first three questions. Submit your work to Box #5 on the th floor of the MacDonald building by 1 noon on Tuesday March 31 st. No late submissions
More informationSteel Frame Design Manual
Steel Frame Design Manual Eurocode 3-1:2005 with 8:2004 Eurocode 3-1:2005 with Eurocode 8:2004 Steel Frame Design Manual for ETABS 2016 ISO ETA122815M13 Rev 0 Proudly developed in the United States of
More informationQUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS
QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State Hooke s law. 3. Define modular ratio,
More informationSTEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN :2005)
GEODOMISI Ltd. - Dr. Costas Sachpazis Consulting Company for App'd by STEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN1993-1-1:2005) In accordance with EN1993-1-1:2005 incorporating Corrigenda February 2006 and April details type;
More informationShear Behaviour of Fin Plates to Tubular Columns at Ambient and Elevated Temperatures
Shear Behaviour of Fin Plates to Tubular Columns at Ambient and Elevated Temperatures Mark Jones Research Student, University of Manchester, UK Dr. Yong Wang Reader, University of Manchester, UK Presentation
More informationCompression perpendicular to the grain
Compression perpendicular to the grain Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Hans Joachim Blass Dr.-Ing. Rainer Görlacher Universität Karlsruhe Kaiserstr. 1 71 Karlsruhe Blass@holz.uka.de Goerlacher@holz.uka.de Summary
More informationSeismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design
Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Elmer E. Marx, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Michael Keever, California Department
More informationCHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS
(74) CHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS This chapter will be devoted to the analysis of prismatic members subjected to equal and opposite couples M and M' acting in the same longitudinal plane. Such members are
More information7 STATICALLY DETERMINATE PLANE TRUSSES
7 STATICALLY DETERMINATE PLANE TRUSSES OBJECTIVES: This chapter starts with the definition of a truss and briefly explains various types of plane truss. The determinancy and stability of a truss also will
More informationName :. Roll No. :... Invigilator s Signature :.. CS/B.TECH (CE-NEW)/SEM-3/CE-301/ SOLID MECHANICS
Name :. Roll No. :..... Invigilator s Signature :.. 2011 SOLID MECHANICS Time Allotted : 3 Hours Full Marks : 70 The figures in the margin indicate full marks. Candidates are required to give their answers
More informationCivil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7
Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7 Dr. Colin Caprani, Chartered Engineer 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 1.1 Background... 3 1.2 Failure Modes... 5 1.3 Design Aspects...
More informationLOAD BEARING CAPACITY OF SPLICED COLUMNS WITH SINGLE ROW BOLTED BUTT-PLATES
LOAD BEARING CAPACITY OF SPLICED COLUMNS WITH SINGLE ROW BOLTED BUTT-PLATES J.C.D. Hoenderkamp, H. H. Snijder Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands j.c.d.hoenderkamp@tue.nl h.h.snijder@tue.nl
More informationQuestion 1. Ignore bottom surface. Solution: Design variables: X = (R, H) Objective function: maximize volume, πr 2 H OR Minimize, f(x) = πr 2 H
Question 1 (Problem 2.3 of rora s Introduction to Optimum Design): Design a beer mug, shown in fig, to hold as much beer as possible. The height and radius of the mug should be not more than 20 cm. The
More informationCONNECTION DESIGN. Connections must be designed at the strength limit state
CONNECTION DESIGN Connections must be designed at the strength limit state Average of the factored force effect at the connection and the force effect in the member at the same point At least 75% of the
More informationCHAPTER 4. Stresses in Beams
CHAPTER 4 Stresses in Beams Problem 1. A rolled steel joint (RSJ) of -section has top and bottom flanges 150 mm 5 mm and web of size 00 mm 1 mm. t is used as a simply supported beam over a span of 4 m
More informationStructural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017
Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail PAGE 1 (ref: JULB2NB280317) Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail Our ref: JULB2NB280317 Date
More informationneeded to buckle an ideal column. Analyze the buckling with bending of a column. Discuss methods used to design concentric and eccentric columns.
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Discuss the behavior of columns. Discuss the buckling of columns. Determine the axial load needed to buckle an ideal column. Analyze the buckling with bending of a column. Discuss methods
More information1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6
Page 3 Page 4 Substructure Design. ARRANGEMENT a. Frame A-P3 L = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m b. Frame P3-P6 L = 25 m H 3 = 8.39 m L 2 = 3 m H 4 = 8.5 m L
More informationRoadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.
Example on Design of Slab Bridge Design Data and Specifications Chapter 5 SUPERSTRUCTURES Superstructure consists of 10m slab, 36m box girder and 10m T-girder all simply supported. Only the design of Slab
More informationFHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges
FHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, 2008 Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges By Firas I. Sheikh Ibrahim, PhD, PE Part B Gusset Plate Resistance in Accordance
More informationtwo structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS
APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) Analysis 1 Structural Requirements strength serviceability
More informationHilti North America Installation Technical Manual Technical Data MI System Version
MIC-SA-MAH 174671 Hilti North America Installation Technical Manual Technical Data MI System Version 1. 08.017 Terms of common cooperation / Legal disclaimer The product technical data published in these
More informationAPPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES
163 APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES A1.1 DESIGN AS PER NORTH AMERICAN SPECIFICATION OF COLD FORMED STEEL (AISI S100: 2007) 1. Based on Initiation of Yielding: Effective yield moment, M n
More informationCOLUMNS: BUCKLING (DIFFERENT ENDS)
COLUMNS: BUCKLING (DIFFERENT ENDS) Buckling of Long Straight Columns Example 4 Slide No. 1 A simple pin-connected truss is loaded and supported as shown in Fig. 1. All members of the truss are WT10 43
More informationNUMERICAL EVALUATION OF THE ROTATIONAL CAPACITY OF STEEL BEAMS AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES
8 th GRACM International Congress on Computational Mechanics Volos, 12 July 15 July 2015 NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF THE ROTATIONAL CAPACITY OF STEEL BEAMS AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES Savvas Akritidis, Daphne
More informationJob No. Sheet 1 of 6 Rev B. Made by IR Date Oct Checked by FH/NB Date Oct Revised by MEB Date April 2006
Job No. Sheet 1 of 6 Rev B, Route de Limours Tel : (0)1 0 85 5 00 Fax : (0)1 0 5 75 8 Revised by MEB Date April 006 DESIGN EXAMPLE 6 BOLTED JOINT A 0 0 angle loaded in tension is to be connected to a gusset
More informationAnnex - R C Design Formulae and Data
The design formulae and data provided in this Annex are for education, training and assessment purposes only. They are based on the Hong Kong Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013 (HKCP-2013).
More informationThe Ultimate Load-Carrying Capacity of a Thin-Walled Shuttle Cylinder Structure with Cracks under Eccentric Compressive Force
The Ultimate Load-Carrying Capacity of a Thin-Walled Shuttle Cylinder Structure with Cracks under Eccentric Compressive Force Cai-qin Cao *, Kan Liu, Jun-zhe Dong School of Science, Xi an University of
More informationBRACING MEMBERS SUMMARY. OBJECTIVES. REFERENCES.
BRACING MEMBERS SUMMARY. Introduce the bracing member design concepts. Identify column bracing members requirements in terms of strength and stiffness. The assumptions and limitations of lateral bracing
More information