OGC bsi Update Session. Christophe Castaing & Bart De Lathouwer 11 th December, 2015 GeoBIM, Amsterdam

Transcription

1 bsi Update Session Christophe Castaing & Bart De Lathouwer 11 th December, 2015 GeoBIM, Amsterdam

2 Agenda Introduction & Setting the stage bsi and update InfraRoom projects InfraGML FutureCity Pilot Panel Discussion 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

3 Introduction 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

4 Planning Conceptual Design Detailed Design Construction Maintenance Management Setting the stage Reduce overall cost (of failure) (12 13% (or is it 20%?)) Even a 1% decrease is a huge saving Increase efficiency, decrease loss of information Heterogeneous environment, disciplines, 2014 Open Geospatial Consortium

5 Planning Conceptual Design Detailed Design Construction Maintenance Management Setting the stage Reduce overall cost (of failure) (12 13% (or is it 20%?)) Even a 1% decrease is a huge saving Increase efficiency, decrease loss of information Seamless interoperability between phases, use of open models 2014 Open Geospatial Consortium

6 Planning Conceptual Design Detailed Design Construction Maintenance Management Setting the stage Where are Geo and BIM on this map? 2014 Open Geospatial Consortium

7 Planning Conceptual Design Detailed Design Construction Maintenance Management Setting the stage Quid Civil Engineering? Mix of Geospatial and BIM 2014 Open Geospatial Consortium

8 Planning Conceptual Design Detailed Design Construction Maintenance Management Setting the stage Increase interoperability prevent loss of information preserve design information 2014 Open Geospatial Consortium

9 Collaboration, bsi and ISO TC 59 Memorandum of Understanding Work on joint standards Not the first time we touch on the topic AECOO-1 Testbed (2009), delivery of BIM through OWS Relevant working groups (in ) CityGML, IndoorGML, Urban Planning DWG, Land & Infra DWG 2014 Open Geospatial Consortium

10 Infrastructure Room Projects in progress C.CASTAING 11/12/

11 QEZ3 Bim manager C.CASTAING 11/12/

12 OVER ALL Architecture ASSET Management Projects in progress IFC align 1.0 IFC align 1.1 IFC ROADS IFC RAILS IFC Bridge C.CASTAING 11/12/

13 Industries and Standards for rail Infrastructure Manufacturing systems buildings Embedded equipment C.CASTAING 11/12/

14 Structures CSNE-EXEMPLE REQUIREMENTS SYSTEMS BREAKDOWN SPATIAL BREAKDOWN AUB Aubencheul-au-bac CSNE COM-AUB Eurocodes MOI-AUB EC2 Génie Civil EC3 Terrassement EC8 Géotechnique Exigences tenue séisme Étanchéité COM-MOI ICTAAL PAS-MOI Exigences VRD Exigences Systèmes Rétablissement COM- PAS PAS- Passel CONTRACT Écluse Pompe MON- PAS BIEF 2 Quai Tbdt.RIB CCTP-CSNE Exigences ACSNE-1 PF-CSNE Exigences RET-BIEF1-D15 Quai de transbordement Grue Quai Céréalier Plate-forme d activité COM- MON EC L0 BIEF 1 D1 5 MON - Monmacq Quai Tbdt.THO COM- Compiègne C.CASTAING 11/12/

15 Standards and interoperability 1/SCALE Inspire cityg ml RailXML ISO topoml ifc landinfragml Ifc_alignmen t Ifc_roads/ra ils CEN senso rml PPBIM PLCS bsi UCI C.CASTAING 11/12/

16 Standards in the Industry Lifecycle City GML IFC PLCS? C.CASTAING 11/12/2015

17 Organisation bsi ISO Vienna agreement AFNOR BSI CEN UIC C.CASTAING 11/12/

18 Overall architecture 11/12/2015 C.CASTAING 18

19 11/12/2015 C.CASTAING 19

20 LandInfra Addresses Civil Engineering space Follow on to LandXML Fully defined conceptual model Common UML model synchronized between and bsi For encoding in GML, other encodings Public review completed in early 2015 Bentley at Lead as Editor and DWG / SWG chair Conceptual model standard approved during the Sydney TC Copyright 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

21 FutureCity Pilot Bart De Lathouwer Director, Interoperability Programs 11 th December, 2015 GeoBIM, Amsterdam

22 FutureCities Pilot Coordinated effort between and buildingsmart International Seeking sponsors, most of work is intended to occur in Europe Pilot will demonstrate and enhance the ability of cities to use diverse, interoperating spatial technologies to deliver improved quality of life, civic initiatives, and resilience Copyright 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

23 Sponsors Sant Cugat del Vallès 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

24 An Framework for Smart Cities Smart Cities Spatial Information Framework Influenced by: s geospatial, sensor, processing, mobile standards work Survey of Smart City Standards Activities: JTC 1, ITU, ISO, BSI, DIN, others Survey of CityGML implementations Smart Cities Spatial Information Framework Goals: Pilot Smart Cities Spatial Framework in select cities ( Advance an Best Practice for Location Enabled Smart Cities

25 What are we going to do and make Scenarios : Sensor/value associated to City model Flooding, Air Quality, River height,. Analysis purposes, what if scenarios Making city data available in an interoperable format Technology : IFC <->CityGML Serving IFC through Services Building City Models from existing data Dynamizer (real time sensor input) 2012 Open Geospatial Consortium

26 Contributing Cities Barcelona Royal Borough of Greenwish Milano Through technico di Milano Cần Thơ (Vietnam) World Bank (Utrecht) (France) 2012 Open Geospatial Consortium

27 Timing RFQ End of December 2015 Seek participation Cost covering 31 January 16, Selection of participants 29 February 16, Kick-off Intermediate results TC Dublin Resilient Cities, July INSPIRE Conference Final results, September 16 TC Orlando SmartCity Congress 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

28 bsi Panel Discussion Christophe Castaing & Bart De Lathouwer 11 th December, 2015 GeoBIM, Amsterdam

29 Panel Phil Jackson (UK BIM Taskforce) François Robida (BRGM) Cristian Otter (Geonius) Vincent De Breuck (TucRail) 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

30 Planning Conceptual Design Detailed Design Construction Operate & Manage Setting the stage Increase interoperability prevent loss of information preserve design information 2014 Open Geospatial Consortium

31 Reactions of the panel on standards for construction a question on systems under the rail approach a question of existing conditions managements A question on the structures approach question on standards and interoperability C.CASTAING 11/12/

32 Notes Intros From the field: we standards to do our work How to pass information (not just geom) from 1 part of the process to another Link things Influence of geology on infrastructure Ability to co-operate, there is a need and will Standards are a must Interop betwen SDO s Impact of digital transformation, exchange pubtwwen public and private Information and interoperability 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

33 Notes (Rail) Do we have a full view of what we have to exchange? Short: no Infrastructure exchange with the real world and the build environment They interface closely Information is different per stake-holder View on information View = Customer needs (schema) General schema that will fit, depending on requirement Can that be done We zork on islands, when put together => mess 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

34 3D for clash detection Do you need 3D in FM? (infrastucture) Balance of design and info exchange? Conceptual design, keep end design in mind Lots of models to integrate (model, road, infra, terrain,...) Tpt data, loss of info Keep information attached to objects (Geology-geotechnical) Lifecycle of infra is long (era) 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

35 Sub-surface/geo-hazards Describe consistently Not easy to stdz, Create 3D models of sub-surface, but hardly reused -> consolidate Try to reuse 100 units for design 70% used for exchange 30% added value 90 engineers for design, 30 for coordination (only) 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

36 Liberate designer Reduce labor amount to communicate The info that the next designer needs Better use of the designers Coordination of data flow Have a data flow chart, understand that flow Think first! (initial time gained, lost afterwards) Interop to win time (not lose time) Dont pass designs/plans, but models Time lost on convertion Conversion of geom type Models comparison if designed async Change detection 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

37 Geom conversion To and from (geotechnical) Exchange from geo-technical Metadata!! Lack off, quality low Lose rational of design (without MD) Need for MD (albeit a boring topic) Provide raw data vs specific (web) services Cfr weather forcast (you dont get raw data, but specific forecast) 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

38 Metadata Dataset might be used for a single purpose Fit for purpose Metadata is just as important of the model Quality of data Provenance, new data, LOD,... Geometrical, Metadata, geometry (balance) 60% geo related, 40% CAD related What is % of metadata? (historical)gis was not 3D, CAD went 3D CAD and GIS coming together 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

39 CAD,GIS,BIM = process Available, centralized (interope) Use the same terms (vocabulary, obj lib) (from designer) Lots of Geo data avail, now also avail at start Early models contain geo data (context) Understand each others data, through context Don t focus on terms GIS/CAD 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

40 20% is geom/topo Rest if other info (that needs to be retained, context) That other info is used elsewhere in the process Not a global std to manage everything (!) Std are never finished (Need to take that into account) Eg INSPIRE List of terms changes over time The reference terminology changes (take this into account) 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

41 Manage data for life-cycle Each designer has it own requirements (each have own model) Model now, will not be the same as in 10 years How to simplify, manageable units Use of data dictionary Lifecycle of data > lifecycle of software Interop is ability to communicate What with willingness Move towards open data Will lead to more exchange amd more open data 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

42 (open data) For public data But some parts need to be private (contracts, privacy, IPR,...) Info requiremnts from organizational req, project req Need to feed through the process (HS2) Asset info will be there forever (Open data) Information security (eg for critical infra) Design: Better models (because of more (open) data) Better design, better decisions 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

43 (open data) Leads to better information management (measure only once) Open data in large infra projects Needs management, business model Continuity of digital information Beginning to end 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium

44 Align terminology (universal schema) Quality/MD Ability compare datasets Std will guide designers and avoid diff models Don t boil the ocean baby steps, transmit geom/attribs amongst apps not at a stage to allow full model edits along the way Exchnage of 3D geology models connection with the other domains SDO to work together Put together: doman experts, soft dev, designers,... (community) domain focus(end user involvement), not IT focus 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium