# Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

## Transcription

1 Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

2 Lead Lag Compensator Design Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

3 Motivation The PID controller involves three components: Proportional feedback Integral feedback Derivative feedback Problem in PID design: Requirement of pure integrators and pure differentiators, which are difficult to realize Pure integrator pole may travel to the right half plane because of realization inaccuracies. E( s) U( s) Question: Can the difficulties of the PID design be avoided, without compromising much on the basic design philosophy? Answer: YES! Through Lead- Lag compensator design. 3

4 Ideal Integral Compensation for Improving SS Error: PI Controller Point A: Desired pole location (already satisfactory transient response). No need to change its location. However, need to improve the steady-state error. K ( s + a) Ka K I = K + = K + (PI) s s s 4

5 Lag Compensator (for Improving Steady State Error) K v 0 = Kz1z2 p p 1 2 Note: Pole-zero pair should be close to each other 1 0 ( ) K v 1 = ( Kz1z2 )( zc ) ( p p )( p ) 1 2 z c = Kv K 0 > v0 p c (provided z > p ) K K, provided z / p 1. Hence put the pair close to origin. v v c c c like PI controller c c 5

6 Lag Compensator (for Improving Steady State Error) Root locus before compensation Root locus after compensation No appreciable change in Root locus & closed loop pole location: No difference in transient response, but improvement in SS error! 6

7 Lead Compensator (for Improving Transient Response) Objective: To improve transient performance, avoiding the pure PD realization Advantages; Avoids realization difficulties (e.g. avoids requirement of additional power supplies in electrical circuits) Reduces noise amplification due to differentiation Drawback: Addition of a pure zero in PD controller tends to reduce the number of branches of Root Locus that travel to RH plane, whereas Led compensators are not capable of doing that. 7

8 Geometry of Lead Compensator (Root locus of original system does not pass through it) θ θ θ θ + θ = (2k + 1) where ( θ θ ) = θ : Angular contribution of compensator 2 1 c 0 8

9 Many Possibilities of Lead Compensators Different selections results in: Different gain values to reach the desired point Different static error constants (that leads to different SS errors); hence different closed loop response in strict sense! 9

10 Lead-Lag Compensator Design Design Steps: First, evaluate the performance of the uncompensated system. If necessary, design a lead compensator to improve the transient response. Next, design a lag compensator to improve the steady state error. Simulate the system to be sure that all requirements have been met. Redesign the compensators (i.e. retune the compensator gains), if the simulation performance in not satisfactory. Ref: N. S. Nise: Control Systems Engineering, 4 th Ed., Wiley,

11 Frequency Response Analysis Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

12 Concept of Frequency Response ( )( ) M ( ω) φ ( ω) = M ( ω) φ ( ω) M( ω) φ( ω) 0 0 i i SS output sinusoid Frequency Response Input sinusoid [ ] = M ( ω) M( ω) φ ( ω) + φ( ω) M ( ω) = i M M 0 0 ( ω) ( ω) φ( ω) = φ ( ω) φ ( ω) i i i 12

13 Concept of Frequency Response rt = A t+ B t= A + B t B A ( ) cosω sinω cos ω tan ( / ) ( ) = M t M = A + B = B A icos ω φi, where i, φi tan ( / ) After appropriate analysis: c () t = M M cos t ( ω φ φ ) ( )( ) ss i G i G M φ = M φ M φ i i G G where G ( ω), φ ( ω) M = G j = G j G 13

14 What is frequency response? Magnitude and phase relationship between sinusoidal input and the steady state output of a linear system is termed as frequency response. Commonly used frequency response analysis: Bode plot Nyquist plot Nichols chart Cs () T() s =, s = jω, Rs () C( jω) T( jω) = = M φ R( jω) M = T( jω), φ = T( jω) 14

15 Bode Plot Analysis Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

16 Bode Plot Analysis Bode plot consists of two simultaneous graphs: Magnitude in db (20 log G(jω) ) vs. frequency (in logω) Phase (in degrees) vs. frequency (in logω) Steps: K( s+ z1)( s+ z2) ( s+ zk ) Gs () = m s ( s+ p )( s+ p ) ( s+ p ) 1 2 Then 20log K + 20log ( s+ z1) log ( s+ zk ) 20log G( jω) = m 20log s 20log ( s+ p1 ) 20log ( s+ p ) m ( 1 k ) ( 1 k ) G( jω) = ( s+ z ) + + ( s+ z ) s + ( s+ p ) + + ( s+ p ) n n s jω s jω 16

17 Bode Diagrams: Advantages All algebra is through addition and subtraction, and that too mostly through straight line asymptotic approximations Low frequency response contains sufficient information about the physical characteristics of most of the practical systems. Experimental determination of a transfer function is possible through Bode plot analysis. 17

18 Bode Diagrams In Bode diagrams, frequency ratios are expressed in terms of: Octave: it is a frequency band from ω 1 to 2ω 1. Decade: it is a frequency band from ω 1 to 10ω 1, where ω 1 is any frequency value. The basic factors which occur frequently in an arbitrary transfer function are: Gain K Integral and derivatives: ( jω ) ± jω T ±, T = First order factors: Quadratic Factors: ( ) 1 1 a + ξ( j ω ω ) + ( jω ω ) ( 2 ) ± n n 18

19 Bode Diagrams For Constant Gain K, log-magnitude curve is a horizontal straight line at the magnitude of (20 log K) db and phase angle is 0 deg. Varying the gain K, raises or lowers the logmagnitude curve of the transfer function by the corresponding constant amount, but has no effect on the phase curve Logarithmic representation of the frequencyresponse curve of factor ( j( ω / a) + 1) can be approximated by two straight-line asymptotes Frequency at which the two asymptotes meet is called the corner frequency or break frequency. 19

20 Example 1: Gs () = s+ a, G( jω) = jω + a At low frequencies, Magnitude/Phase response: At high frequencies, Magnitude/Phase response: ω << a, G( jω) a 20log M = 20log a, G( jω) = 0 ω >> a, G( jω) jω log M = 20log ω, G( jω) = 90 ω G( jω) = jω+ a = a j + 1 ω = a a Corner frequency: c 20

21 Bode Plot for (s +a) 21

22 Bode diagrams of some standard first order terms Ref: N. S. Nise, Control Systems Engineering, 4 th Ed. Wiley, Bode plots for: a. G(s) = s b. G(s) = 1/s c. G(s) = (s + a) d. G(s) = 1/(s + a) 22

23 Example 2: Gs () = Ks ( + 3) ss ( + 1)( s+ 2) 23

24 Example 2: Gs () = Ks ( + 3) ss ( + 1)( s+ 2) 24

25 First Order Terms: Comparison of Actual and Asymptotic Behavior Magnitude comparison Phase comparison Ref: N. S. Nise, Control Systems Engineering, 4 th Ed. Wiley,

26 Bode plot for second order systems System with conjugate zeros when 2 2 Gs () = s + 2ξωns+ ωn System with conjugate poles when Gs () = s ξωns+ ωn For complex conjugate poles and zeros, the slope changes by 40dB/decade ± 0< ξ< 1 0< ξ< 1 26

27 For low frequencies (ω<<ω n ), Log magnitude becomes 0dB (20log 1= 0), hence low frequency asymptote is a straight horizontal line For high frequencies (ω>>ω n ), the log magnitude becomes High frequency asymptote is a straight line with slope of -40dB/decade The phase angle of the quadratic factor is 27

28 Scaled Response for Magnitude Plot Phase Plot 28

29 Scaled Response for Magnitude Plot Phase Plot 29

30 Example 3: Gs () = ( s + 3) ( s 2)( s 2s 25) Second order system is normalized Gs () = s s s s 2 Bode magnitude plot starts from 20logK = 24.44dB and continues until the next corner frequency at 2 rad/s 30

31 Magnitude Plot 31

32 Phase plot 32

33 Nyquist Plot Analysis Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

34 Presenting frequency response characteristics (Polar plots) Frequency response of transfer functions can be represented by Polar plots, also called Nyquist plots, as shown in the figure. M = G( jω) φ = G( jω) 34

35 General nature of Nyquist curves Ref: K. Ogata: Modern Control Engineering, 3rd Ed., Prentice Hall,

36 Nyquist plots for several standard transfer functions Ref: K. Ogata: Modern Control Engineering, 3rd Ed., Prentice Hall,

37 Nyquist stability criterion Special case: (G(s)H(s) has neither poles nor zeros on the jω axis) If a contour, that encircles the entire right half plane is mapped through G(s)H(s). Then number of closed loop poles, Z, in right half of s-plane equals the number of open loop poles P, that are in right half of s-plane minus the number of counter-clockwise revolutions N around -1 of the mapping, i.e. Z = P - N. a. contour does not enclose closed-loop poles b. contour does enclose closed loop poles 37

38 Example 1 Open loop poles in the right half of s- plane are 2,4, i.e, P = 2 Number of encirclements of (-1), N = 2 Z = P-N = 0, hence the system is stable. 38

39 Example 2: Gs () K ss ( + 3)( s+ 5) There are no open loop poles in the right half of s-plane, i.e, P = 0. Number of encirclements N = 0. Z = P - N = 0, hence the system is stable. Value of K which determines the stability is It implies if K < then system is stable. if K > 120.5, critical point is encircled and N = -1. In that case Z = P - N = 1, and hence the system is unstable = 39

40 Robustness Concepts Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

41 Definitions The closed loop poles can be determined through characteristic equation 1 + GsHs ( ) ( ) = 0, s= jω GsHs () () = 1+ j0= Phase cross over frequency (ω pc ) 0 Frequency at which the phase angle of the transfer function becomes -180 o 0 G( jω) H( jω) = 180 Gain cross over frequency (ω gc ) Frequency at which the magnitude of the open loop transfer function, is unity, i.e. IG(jω)H(jω) =1. These frequencies play an important role in determining the stability margins of the system. 41

42 Gain and Phase Margins through Nyquist Plots γ 0 = 180 φ K g = 1 G( jω) System is said to be Stable, if G M and Φ both are positive, i.e. M ω pc > ω gc Marginally stable, if G M and Φ both are zero i.e. ω M pc = ω gc Unstable, if G M and Φ both are negative i.e. M ω pc < ω gc 42

43 Gain and Phase Margins through Bode Plots For a stable minimum-phase system, GM/PM indicates how much gain/phase can be increased before the system becomes unstable. For an unstable system, GM/PM is indicative of how much gain/phase must be decreased to make the system stable. 43

44 Frequency Response Characteristics Consider a closed loop transfer function of second order system Gs () = s 2 n ξωns+ ωn The closed loop frequency response ω The frequency at which the M reaches its peak value is called resonant frequency (ω P ) 2 ω = ω 1 2ξ At ω P, the slope of the magnitude curve is zero. P n 44

45 Frequency Response Characteristics The maximum value of magnitude is known as the resonant peak (M p ) M P = 1 2 2ξ 1 ξ Bandwidth (ω BW ) is the frequency at which the magnitude response curve is 3dB down from its value at zero frequency. ( ) ωbw = ωn 1 2ξ + 4ξ 4ξ + 2 f ( ξ ) T 4/ ξ / ω s ( ) n 45

46 References (Classical Control Systems) N. S. Nise: Control Systems Engineering, 4 th Ed., Wiley, K. Ogata: Modern Control Engineering, 3 rd Ed., Prentice Hall, J. J. Distefano III et al.: Feedback and Control Systems, 2 nd Ed., Mc Graw Hill, 1990 (Schaum s Outline Series). B. N. Pamadi: Performance, Stability, Dynamics and Control of Airplanes, AIAA Education Series, R. C. Nelson: Flight Stability and Automatic Control, AIAA Education Series, E. Kreyszig: Advanced Engineering Mathematics, 8th Ed., Wiley,

47 Some Points to Remember Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

48 Some Points to Remember Block diagrams are not circuit diagrams! Stability and robustness are necessary of any good control design. After that, one must look for performance (fast response, optimality etc.) High controller gains: Good benefits Robust stability, Good tracking Bad effects Control saturation, Noise amplification Inter-coupling of variables, nonlinearities, control and state saturation limits, time delays, quantization errors etc. are always present: Classical SISO approach may not be adequate; Advanced techniques are needed. 48

49 49

50 50

### ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques

CAIRO UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ENGINEERING ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 00/0 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques [] For the following system, Design a compensator such

### Homework 7 - Solutions

Homework 7 - Solutions Note: This homework is worth a total of 48 points. 1. Compensators (9 points) For a unity feedback system given below, with G(s) = K s(s + 5)(s + 11) do the following: (c) Find the

### ROOT LOCUS. Consider the system. Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to. H(s) H ( s) = ( s)

C1 ROOT LOCUS Consider the system R(s) E(s) C(s) + K G(s) - H(s) C(s) R(s) = K G(s) 1 + K G(s) H(s) Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to 1+ K G ( s)

### KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUB.NAME : CONTROL SYSTEMS BRANCH : ECE YEAR : II SEMESTER: IV 1. What is control system? 2. Define open

### KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUB.NAME : CONTROL SYSTEMS STAFF NAME: Mr. P.NARASIMMAN BRANCH : ECE Mr.K.R.VENKATESAN YEAR : II SEMESTER

### Robust Performance Example #1

Robust Performance Example # The transfer function for a nominal system (plant) is given, along with the transfer function for one extreme system. These two transfer functions define a family of plants

### Transient response via gain adjustment. Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = 2. The closed loop transfer function is. s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2 n

Design via frequency response Transient response via gain adjustment Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = ωn 2. The closed loop transfer function is s(s+2ζω n ) T(s) = ω 2 n s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2

### The requirements of a plant may be expressed in terms of (a) settling time (b) damping ratio (c) peak overshoot --- in time domain

Compensators To improve the performance of a given plant or system G f(s) it may be necessary to use a compensator or controller G c(s). Compensator Plant G c (s) G f (s) The requirements of a plant may

### 1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise

EE C128 / ME134 Problem Set 6 Solution Fall 2011 1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise Consider a close loop system with unity feedback. For each G(s), hand sketch the Nyquist diagram, determine Z = P N, algebraically

### The Nyquist criterion relates the stability of a closed system to the open-loop frequency response and open loop pole location.

Introduction to the Nyquist criterion The Nyquist criterion relates the stability of a closed system to the open-loop frequency response and open loop pole location. Mapping. If we take a complex number

### Automatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year

Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21-211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21-211 1 / 39 Feedback

### INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL

ECE4540/5540: Digital Control Systems INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL.: Introduction In ECE450/ECE550 Feedback Control Systems, welearnedhow to make an analog controller D(s) to control a linear-time-invariant

### FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN

ECE45/55: Feedback Control Systems. 9 FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9.: PD and lead compensation networks The frequency-response methods we have seen so far largely tell us about stability and stability margins

### Frequency domain analysis

Automatic Control 2 Frequency domain analysis Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 2010-2011 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 2010-2011

### (b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:

1. (a) The open loop transfer function of a unity feedback control system is given by G(S) = K/S(1+0.1S)(1+S) (i) Determine the value of K so that the resonance peak M r of the system is equal to 1.4.

### r + - FINAL June 12, 2012 MAE 143B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic

MAE 43B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic FINAL June, One sheet of hand-written notes (two pages). Present your reasoning and calculations clearly. Inconsistent etchings will not be graded. Write answers

### Dr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review

Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics

### Root Locus Methods. The root locus procedure

Root Locus Methods Design of a position control system using the root locus method Design of a phase lag compensator using the root locus method The root locus procedure To determine the value of the gain

### EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems

1 / 17 EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems Section 7: McMaster University Winter 2018 2 / 17 Outline 1 4 / 17 Cascade compensation Throughout this lecture we consider the case of H(s) = 1. We

### Root Locus Design Example #4

Root Locus Design Example #4 A. Introduction The plant model represents a linearization of the heading dynamics of a 25, ton tanker ship under empty load conditions. The reference input signal R(s) is

### Today (10/23/01) Today. Reading Assignment: 6.3. Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10

Today Today (10/23/01) Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10 Reading Assignment: 6.3 Last Time In the last lecture, we discussed control design through shaping of the loop gain GK:

### PM diagram of the Transfer Function and its use in the Design of Controllers

PM diagram of the Transfer Function and its use in the Design of Controllers Santiago Garrido, Luis Moreno Abstract This paper presents the graphical chromatic representation of the phase and the magnitude

### Analysis of SISO Control Loops

Chapter 5 Analysis of SISO Control Loops Topics to be covered For a given controller and plant connected in feedback we ask and answer the following questions: Is the loop stable? What are the sensitivities

### Richiami di Controlli Automatici

Richiami di Controlli Automatici Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II detommas@unina.it Ottobre 2012 Corsi AnsaldoBreda G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici

### EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems

1 / 30 EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems Section 9: of and using Techniques McMaster University Winter 2017 2 / 30 Outline 1 2 3 4 / 30 domain analysis Analyze closed loop using open loop

### DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUBJECT CODE & NAME: CONTROL SYSTEMS YEAR / SEM: II / IV UNIT I SYSTEMS AND THEIR REPRESENTATION PARTA [2

### Frequency Response Analysis

Frequency Response Analysis Consider let the input be in the form Assume that the system is stable and the steady state response of the system to a sinusoidal inputdoes not depend on the initial conditions

### Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises

Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises To Accompany Control Systems Engineering 4 th Edition By Norman S. Nise John Wiley & Sons Copyright 2004 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. No part

### 100 (s + 10) (s + 100) e 0.5s. s 100 (s + 10) (s + 100). G(s) =

1 AME 3315; Spring 215; Midterm 2 Review (not graded) Problems: 9.3 9.8 9.9 9.12 except parts 5 and 6. 9.13 except parts 4 and 5 9.28 9.34 You are given the transfer function: G(s) = 1) Plot the bode plot

### H(s) = s. a 2. H eq (z) = z z. G(s) a 2. G(s) A B. s 2 s(s + a) 2 s(s a) G(s) 1 a 1 a. } = (z s 1)( z. e ) ) (z. (z 1)(z e at )(z e at )

.7 Quiz Solutions Problem : a H(s) = s a a) Calculate the zero order hold equivalent H eq (z). H eq (z) = z z G(s) Z{ } s G(s) a Z{ } = Z{ s s(s a ) } G(s) A B Z{ } = Z{ + } s s(s + a) s(s a) G(s) a a

### Systems Analysis and Control

Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 24: Compensation in the Frequency Domain Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Lead Compensators Performance Specs Altering

### Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3.. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid -

### 16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2

16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2 September 22, 2010 In this recitation, we will consider two problems from Chapter 8 of the Van de Vegte book. R + - E G c (s) G(s) C Figure 1: The standard block diagram

### Dynamic circuits: Frequency domain analysis

Electronic Circuits 1 Dynamic circuits: Contents Free oscillation and natural frequency Transfer functions Frequency response Bode plots 1 System behaviour: overview 2 System behaviour : review solution

### Lecture 17 Date:

Lecture 17 Date: 27.10.2016 Feedback and Properties, Types of Feedback Amplifier Stability Gain and Phase Margin Modification Elements of Feedback System: (a) The feed forward amplifier [H(s)] ; (b) A

### Analysis of Discrete-Time Systems

TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 1 Analysis of Discrete-Time Systems Overview Stability Sensitivity and Robustness Controllability, Reachability, Observability, and Detectabiliy TU Berlin Discrete-Time

### VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE

VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur 603 203 DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK V SEMESTER IC650 CONTROL SYSTEMS Regulation 203 Academic Year 207 8 Prepared

### Lecture 1 Root Locus

Root Locus ELEC304-Alper Erdogan 1 1 Lecture 1 Root Locus What is Root-Locus? : A graphical representation of closed loop poles as a system parameter varied. Based on Root-Locus graph we can choose the

### Recitation 11: Time delays

Recitation : Time delays Emilio Frazzoli Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems Massachusetts Institute of Technology November, 00. Introduction and motivation. Delays are incurred when the controller

### Performance of Feedback Control Systems

Performance of Feedback Control Systems Design of a PID Controller Transient Response of a Closed Loop System Damping Coefficient, Natural frequency, Settling time and Steady-state Error and Type 0, Type

### Chapter 10 Feedback. PART C: Stability and Compensation

1 Chapter 10 Feedback PART C: Stability and Compensation Example: Non-inverting Amplifier We are analyzing the two circuits (nmos diff pair or pmos diff pair) to realize this symbol: either of the circuits

### Steady State Frequency Response Using Bode Plots

School of Engineering Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering 332:224 Principles of Electrical Engineering II Laboratory Experiment 3 Steady State Frequency Response Using Bode Plots 1 Introduction

### SAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE SAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015 Lecturer: Michael Ruderman Problem 1: Frequency-domain analysis and control design (15 pt) Given is a

### Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) Design II

Lecture 8 Linear Quadratic Regulator LQR) Design II Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore Outline Stability and Robustness properties

### The Frequency-Response

6 The Frequency-Response Design Method A Perspective on the Frequency-Response Design Method The design of feedback control systems in industry is probably accomplished using frequency-response methods

### Root Locus Design Example #3

Root Locus Design Example #3 A. Introduction The system represents a linear model for vertical motion of an underwater vehicle at zero forward speed. The vehicle is assumed to have zero pitch and roll

### Additional Closed-Loop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 14)

Appendix J Additional Closed-Loop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 4) APPENDIX CONTENTS J. Closed-Loop Behavior J.2 Bode Stability Criterion J.3 Nyquist Stability Criterion J.4 Gain

NADAR SARASWATHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY Vadapudupatti, Theni-625531 Question Bank for the Units I to V SE05 BR05 SU02 5 th Semester B.E. / B.Tech. Electrical & Electronics engineering IC6501

### EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Thu. May 14, pm. Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators.

Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Thu. May 4, 25 5-8 pm Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 4 2 4 3 6 4 8 5 3

### Lecture 1: Feedback Control Loop

Lecture : Feedback Control Loop Loop Transfer function The standard feedback control system structure is depicted in Figure. This represend(t) n(t) r(t) e(t) u(t) v(t) η(t) y(t) F (s) C(s) P (s) Figure

### Frequency Response DR. GYURCSEK ISTVÁN

DR. GYURCSEK ISTVÁN Frequency Response Sources and additional materials (recommended) Dr. Gyurcsek Dr. Elmer: Theories in Electric Circuits, GlobeEdit, 2016, ISBN:978-3-330-71341-3 Ch. Alexander, M. Sadiku:

### Using Lyapunov Theory I

Lecture 33 Stability Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Using Lyapunov heory I Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore Outline Motivation Definitions

### Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3. 8. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid

### CDS 101/110a: Lecture 10-2 Control Systems Implementation

CDS 101/110a: Lecture 10-2 Control Systems Implementation Richard M. Murray 5 December 2012 Goals Provide an overview of the key principles, concepts and tools from control theory - Classical control -

### MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall K(s +1)(s +2) G(s) =.

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering. Dynamics and Control II Fall 7 Problem Set #7 Solution Posted: Friday, Nov., 7. Nise problem 5 from chapter 8, page 76. Answer:

### CHAPTER 1 Basic Concepts of Control System. CHAPTER 6 Hydraulic Control System

CHAPTER 1 Basic Concepts of Control System 1. What is open loop control systems and closed loop control systems? Compare open loop control system with closed loop control system. Write down major advantages

### x(t) = x(t h), x(t) 2 R ), where is the time delay, the transfer function for such a e s Figure 1: Simple Time Delay Block Diagram e i! =1 \e i!t =!

1 Time-Delay Systems 1.1 Introduction Recitation Notes: Time Delays and Nyquist Plots Review In control systems a challenging area is operating in the presence of delays. Delays can be attributed to acquiring

### Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) I

Optimal Control, Guidance and Estimation Lecture Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) I Pro. Radhakant Padhi Dept. o Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute o Science - Bangalore Generic Optimal Control Problem

### FEEDBACK AND STABILITY

FEEDBCK ND STBILITY THE NEGTIVE-FEEDBCK LOOP x IN X OUT x S + x IN x OUT Σ Signal source _ β Open loop Closed loop x F Feedback network Output x S input signal x OUT x IN x F feedback signal x IN x S x

### UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. EE105 Lab Experiments

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences EE15 Lab Experiments Bode Plot Tutorial Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Bode Plots Basics

### 1 Chapter 9: Design via Root Locus

1 Figure 9.1 a. Sample root locus, showing possible design point via gain adjustment (A) and desired design point that cannot be met via simple gain adjustment (B); b. responses from poles at A and B 2

### Laplace Transform Analysis of Signals and Systems

Laplace Transform Analysis of Signals and Systems Transfer Functions Transfer functions of CT systems can be found from analysis of Differential Equations Block Diagrams Circuit Diagrams 5/10/04 M. J.

### The Relation Between the 3-D Bode Diagram and the Root Locus. Insights into the connection between these classical methods. By Panagiotis Tsiotras

F E A T U R E The Relation Between the -D Bode Diagram and the Root Locus Insights into the connection between these classical methods Bode diagrams and root locus plots have been the cornerstone of control

### Andrea Zanchettin Automatic Control AUTOMATIC CONTROL. Andrea M. Zanchettin, PhD Spring Semester, Linear systems (frequency domain)

1 AUTOMATIC CONTROL Andrea M. Zanchettin, PhD Spring Semester, 2018 Linear systems (frequency domain) 2 Motivations Consider an LTI system Thanks to the Lagrange s formula we can compute the motion of

### PD, PI, PID Compensation. M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada

PD, PI, PID Compensation M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada 1 Outline PD compensation. PI compensation. PID compensation. 2 PD Control L= loop gain s cl = desired closed-loop

### FEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEMS

FEEDBAC CONTROL SYSTEMS. Control System Design. Open and Closed-Loop Control Systems 3. Why Closed-Loop Control? 4. Case Study --- Speed Control of a DC Motor 5. Steady-State Errors in Unity Feedback Control

### Classical Dual-Inverted-Pendulum Control

PRESENTED AT THE 23 IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL 4399 Classical Dual-Inverted-Pendulum Control Kent H. Lundberg James K. Roberge Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachusetts

### Exam. 135 minutes + 15 minutes reading time

Exam January 23, 27 Control Systems I (5-59-L) Prof. Emilio Frazzoli Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes + 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 45 Number of Points: 53 Permitted aids: Important: 4 pages

### RELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS. Ryszard Gessing

RELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS Ryszard Gessing Politechnika Śl aska Instytut Automatyki, ul. Akademicka 16, 44-101 Gliwice, Poland, fax: +4832 372127, email: gessing@ia.gliwice.edu.pl

### Studio Exercise Time Response & Frequency Response 1 st -Order Dynamic System RC Low-Pass Filter

Studio Exercise Time Response & Frequency Response 1 st -Order Dynamic System RC Low-Pass Filter i i in R out Assignment: Perform a Complete e in C e Dynamic System Investigation out of the RC Low-Pass

### DESIGN MICROELECTRONICS ELCT 703 (W17) LECTURE 3: OP-AMP CMOS CIRCUIT. Dr. Eman Azab Assistant Professor Office: C

MICROELECTRONICS ELCT 703 (W17) LECTURE 3: OP-AMP CMOS CIRCUIT DESIGN Dr. Eman Azab Assistant Professor Office: C3.315 E-mail: eman.azab@guc.edu.eg 1 TWO STAGE CMOS OP-AMP It consists of two stages: First

### Definitions. Decade: A ten-to-one range of frequency. On a log scale, each 10X change in frequency requires the same distance on the scale.

Circuits II EECS 3220 Lecture notes on making Bode plots Definitions Network Transfer Function: The function H s Xout s X in s where X out represents the voltage or current response of the network to X

### MAK 391 System Dynamics & Control. Presentation Topic. The Root Locus Method. Student Number: Group: I-B. Name & Surname: Göksel CANSEVEN

MAK 391 System Dynamics & Control Presentation Topic The Root Locus Method Student Number: 9901.06047 Group: I-B Name & Surname: Göksel CANSEVEN Date: December 2001 The Root-Locus Method Göksel CANSEVEN

### Power System Operations and Control Prof. S.N. Singh Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. Module 3 Lecture 8

Power System Operations and Control Prof. S.N. Singh Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Module 3 Lecture 8 Welcome to lecture number 8 of module 3. In the previous

### Transient Response of a Second-Order System

Transient Response of a Second-Order System ECEN 830 Spring 01 1. Introduction In connection with this experiment, you are selecting the gains in your feedback loop to obtain a well-behaved closed-loop

### Fundamental of Control Systems Steady State Error Lecturer: Dr. Wahidin Wahab M.Sc. Aries Subiantoro, ST. MSc.

Fundamental of Control Systems Steady State Error Lecturer: Dr. Wahidin Wahab M.Sc. Aries Subiantoro, ST. MSc. Electrical Engineering Department University of Indonesia 2 Steady State Error How well can

### 6.302 Feedback Systems Recitation 16: Compensation Prof. Joel L. Dawson

Bode Obstacle Course is one technique for doing compensation, or designing a feedback system to make the closed-loop behavior what we want it to be. To review: - G c (s) G(s) H(s) you are here! plant For

### School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. DC Motor Position Control The block diagram for position control of the servo table is given by:

Root Locus Motivation Sketching Root Locus Examples ME375 Root Locus - 1 Servo Table Example DC Motor Position Control The block diagram for position control of the servo table is given by: θ D 0.09 See

### Sinusoidal Forcing of a First-Order Process. / τ

Frequency Response Analysis Chapter 3 Sinusoidal Forcing of a First-Order Process For a first-order transfer function with gain K and time constant τ, the response to a general sinusoidal input, xt = A

### ECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 6 Solution April 17, (s/2 + 1) s(2s + 1)[(s/8) 2 + (s/20) + 1]

ECE382/ME482 Spring 25 Homework 6 Solution April 17, 25 1 Solution to HW6 P8.17 We are given a system with open loop transfer function G(s) = 4(s/2 + 1) s(2s + 1)[(s/8) 2 + (s/2) + 1] (1) and unity negative

### APPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS

Version: 1 CONTROL APPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS TEX d: Feb. 17, 214 PREVIEW We show that the transfer function and conditions of stability for linear systems can be studied using Laplace transforms. Table

### Chapter 12. Feedback Control Characteristics of Feedback Systems

Chapter 1 Feedbac Control Feedbac control allows a system dynamic response to be modified without changing any system components. Below, we show an open-loop system (a system without feedbac) and a closed-loop

### AA/EE/ME 548: Problem Session Notes #5

AA/EE/ME 548: Problem Session Notes #5 Review of Nyquist and Bode Plots. Nyquist Stability Criterion. LQG/LTR Method Tuesday, March 2, 203 Outline:. A review of Bode plots. 2. A review of Nyquist plots

### Design via Root Locus

Design via Root Locus I 9 Chapter Learning Outcomes J After completing this chapter the student will be able to: Use the root locus to design cascade compensators to improve the steady-state error (Sections

### D G 2 H + + D 2

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.302 Feedback Systems Final Exam May 21, 2007 180 minutes Johnson Ice Rink 1. This examination consists

### Overview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piece-wise linear approximations First-order terms Second-order terms (complex poles & zeros)

Overview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piece-wise linear approximations First-order terms Second-order terms (complex poles & zeros) J. McNames Portland State University ECE 222 Bode Plots Ver.

### PID Control. Objectives

PID Control Objectives The objective of this lab is to study basic design issues for proportional-integral-derivative control laws. Emphasis is placed on transient responses and steady-state errors. The

### Lecture 15 Nyquist Criterion and Diagram

Lecture Notes of Control Systems I - ME 41/Analysis and Synthesis of Linear Control System - ME86 Lecture 15 Nyquist Criterion and Diagram Department of Mechanical Engineering, University Of Saskatchewan,

### Learn2Control Laboratory

Learn2Control Laboratory Version 3.2 Summer Term 2014 1 This Script is for use in the scope of the Process Control lab. It is in no way claimed to be in any scientific way complete or unique. Errors should

### Inverted Pendulum. Objectives

Inverted Pendulum Objectives The objective of this lab is to experiment with the stabilization of an unstable system. The inverted pendulum problem is taken as an example and the animation program gives

### Step Response for the Transfer Function of a Sensor

Step Response f the Transfer Function of a Sens G(s)=Y(s)/X(s) of a sens with X(s) input and Y(s) output A) First Order Instruments a) First der transfer function G(s)=k/(1+Ts), k=gain, T = time constant

### An Internal Stability Example

An Internal Stability Example Roy Smith 26 April 2015 To illustrate the concept of internal stability we will look at an example where there are several pole-zero cancellations between the controller and

### FREQUENCY-RESPONSE ANALYSIS

ECE450/550: Feedback Control Systems. 8 FREQUENCY-RESPONSE ANALYSIS 8.: Motivation to study frequency-response methods Advantages and disadvantages to root-locus design approach: ADVANTAGES: Good indicator

. The frequency response of the plant in a unity feedback control systems is shown in Figure. a) What is the static velocity error coefficient K v for the system? b) A lead compensator with a transfer

### Lecture 13: Internal Model Principle and Repetitive Control

ME 233, UC Berkeley, Spring 2014 Xu Chen Lecture 13: Internal Model Principle and Repetitive Control Big picture review of integral control in PID design example: 0 Es) C s) Ds) + + P s) Y s) where P s)

### Control Systems Design

ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 13: Stability Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 13: Stability p.1/20 Outline Input-Output