Automatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year


 Holly Shepherd
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
2 Feedback control problem Feedback control problem measurement noise n model uncertainty G(s) d process disturbance r reference! " e!! tracking error C(s) u input G(s)!! y output Objective: make the tracking error e(t) = r(t) y(t), despite the dynamics of the openloop system G(s) (slow, unstable, etc.) disturbance d(t) affecting the process model uncertainty G(s) (the system is not exactly as we modeled it) measurement noise n(t) Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
3 Feedback control problem Feedback control problem r reference! " measurement noise e!! tracking error n C(s) model uncertainty G(s) u input G(s) d!! process disturbance y output To achieve the objective, we want to design a feedback control law satisfying a number of requirements: stability in nominal conditions ( G(s) =, d(t) =, n(t) = ) stability in perturbed conditions static performances (tracking error for constant r(t)) dynamic performances (transients and frequency response) noise attenuation (be insensitive to measurement noise n(t)) Tuesday, May 4, 21 feasibility of the controller (strictly proper transfer function C(s)) Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
4 Feedback control problem Closedloop function n G(s) d r! " e!! C(s) u G(s)!! y The closedloop function is the transfer function from r to y W(s) = H yr (s) = C(s)G(s) 1 + C(s)G(s) We call loop function the transfer function Tuesday, May 4, 21 L(s) = C(s)G(s) For L(jω) 1 we get W(jω) 1, W(jω) For L(jω) 1 we get W(jω) Given G(s), we will choose C(s) to shape the loop function response L(jω) Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
5 Feedback control problem Sensitivity functions n G(s) d r! " e!! C(s) u G(s)!! y The sensitivity function S(s) is the function Tuesday, May 4, 21 S(s) = W(s)/W(s) G(s)/G(s) = W(s) G(s) G(s) W(s) = L(s) The sensitivity function S(s) is also the transfer function from d to y Y(s) D(s) = L(s) = S(s) The complementary sensitivity function T(s) is the transfer function from n to y T(s) = Y(s) N(s) = L(s) 1 + L(s) = W(s) Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
6 Performance specifications Performance specifications: frequency domain sensitivity transfer function from d to y 1 S(s) = 1 + C(s)G(s) complementary sensitivity transfer function from n to y T(s) = C(s)G(s) 1 + C(s)G(s) = W(s) We want to be immune (=small tracking errors) to both process disturbances and measurement noise both S and T small Problem: S(s) + T(s) = 1! How to make both them small? Solution: keep S small at low frequencies, and hence W 1 (=good tracking) keep T small at high frequencies (=good noise rejection) Magnitude (db) db good tracking C(jω)G(jω) 1 frequency (rad/s) Constraint on performance: tracking cannot be too good at high frequencies! C(jω)G(jω) 1 good noise rejection Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
7 Performance specifications Performance specifications: frequency domain We usually refer to regular closedloop responses (i.e., similar to 2ndorder underdamped systems) 1 W(s) = W (jω) resonant M r 1 + 2ζ s + 1 peak ω n ω 2 s 2 n B 3 closedloop bandwidth 3 db the resonant peak M r is the max value of W(jω) the bandwidth of the closed loop system is the range of frequencies at which W(jω) 2 ( W(jω) 2, in general) W() 1 note that = 2 log db 1 2 3dB For 2nd order systems W(s): Mr W 1 = 2ζ 1, ζ 2 BW 3 = ω n 1 2ζ ζ 2 + 4ζ 4 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
8 Performance specifications Performance specifications: steadystate tracking We look at tracking of constant setpoints, ramps, etc., R(s) = 1 s k Write the loop function in Bode form L(s) = K s h L 1(s), with L 1 () = 1 Compute lim t + e(t) using final value theorem for h k 1: lim t + e(t) = lim s = lim s se(s) = lim s(r(s) W(s)R(s)) = lim s s s h k+1 s h + KL 1 (s) = L(s) if h k K if h =, k = 1 1 K if h = k 1, k > 1 1 s k 1 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
9 Performance specifications Performance specifications: steadystate tracking lim e(t) = t + if h k K if h =, k = 1 1 K if h = k 1, k > 1 Constraint on type h of L(s) = C(s)G(s) = KL 1(s) s h : need h k 1 to track r(t) = t k 1 need h k to track t k 1 with zero asymptotic error special case: need h 1 to track constant setpoints with zero offset in steadystate (integral action!) Constraint on Bode gain K of L(s): need K sufficiently large to bound steadystate tracking error when h = k 1 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
10 Performance specifications Performance specifications: time response ŝ y(t) r(t) rise time t r peak overshoot settling time t s r(t) = 1 for t Tuesday,, May 4, 21 r(t) = for t < time t We look at the shape of the transient closedloop response due to a unit step the rise time t r is the time required to rise from to 1% of steadystate (1 9% for nonoscillating systems) the settling time t s is the time to reach and stay within a specified tolerance band (usually 2% or 5%) the peak overshoot ŝ is the max relative deviation from steadystate, ŝ = max t y(t) 1 y(+ ) Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
11 Performance specifications Relations between frequency and time response Usually we refer to the step response of a secondorder closedloop system peak overshoot r(t) ŝ y(t) rise time tr settling time ts W(s) = ζ s + 1 ω n ω 2 s 2 n Tuesday, May 4, 21 time t In this case we have ŝ = e πζ 1 ζ 2, t r = 1 1 π tan 1 ω n 1 ζ 2 1 ζ 2 Good average formulas for closedloop systems W(s) are ζ, t s[5%] 3 ζω n t s[2%] 4 ζω n t r B W 3 3 ŝ.85 MW r 1 where t r [s], B W 3 [rad/s], ŝ [no unit], MW r [not in db] Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
12 Performance specifications Relations between frequency and time response Relations between frequency and time response for secondorder closedloop systems as a function of the damping factor ζ B 3 ω n M r ω n t r ζ ζ ζ B 3 t r ζ 1 + ŝ M r ζ ŝ ζ Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
13 Synthesis via loop shaping Controller synthesis via loop shaping Typical closedloop specifications include static specs system type h tracking error e(+ ) in steadystate for r(t) = t k Bode gain K and dynamic specs peak overshoot ŝ resonant peak M r rise time t r bandwidth B 3 Designing a regulator that meets all specs in one shot can be a hard task In loopshaping synthesis the controller C(s) is designed in a series of steps C(s) r! y " C 1 (s) C 2 (s) G(s) where C 1 (s) satisfies static specs, while C 2 (s) dynamic specs Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
14 Synthesis via loop shaping Synthesis of C 1 (s) (static performance) The general form of C 1 (s) is C 1 (s) = K c s h c where K c is the controller gain and h c is the type of the controller If the type of G(s) is h g and the desired type is h d, then h c = max{, h d h g } The gain K c is chosen by imposing the desired steadystate tracking error K c G() e d if r d = 1 K c G() e d if r d > Example: G(s) = 1 (s + 1) Track a step reference with zero steadystate error r d = 1 since the type of G(s) is h g =, h c = max{, 1} = 1, and C 1 (s) = 1 s steadystate error e d to unit ramp reference is not required, so K c is free Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
15 Synthesis via loop shaping Mapping closedloop specs to openloop specs Closedloop specifications must be translated into specifications on the loop transfer function L(jω) = C(jω)G(jω) In particular closedloop specs should be translated into a desired phase margin M L p and desired crossover frequency ωl c of L(jω) We have some approximate formulas to do that: M L p 2.3 MW r 1.25 where M r is in not expressed in db, and M p is expressed in rad, and ω L c [.5,.8]BW 3 The next step of loop shaping is to synthesize C 2 (s) so that L(jω) has the right phase margin M L p M pd and crossover frequency ω L c = ω cd Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
16 Synthesis via loop shaping Synthesis of C 2 (s) (dynamic performance) The general form of C 2 (s) is C 2 (s) = i (1 + τ is) i (1 + 2ζ i s ω ni j (1 + T js) j (1 + 2ζ js ω nj + s2 ω 2 ) ni + s2 ) ω 2 nj C 2 (s) must be designed to guarantee closedloop asymptotic stability C 2 (s) must be designed to satisfy the dynamic specifications We focus here on controllers containing only real poles/zeros Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
17 Leadlag networks magnitude [db] phase [rad] Lead network A lead network has transfer function C Lead (s) = 1 + τs 1 + ατs where τ >, < α < 1 C Lead (s) provides phase lead in the frequency range [ 1 τ, α τ ] The maximum phase lead is at ω max = 1 logarithmic scale) 1/τ 1/(ατ) φmax ωmax frequency [rad/s] 2 log 1 ( 1 α π/2 π/4 Tuesday, May 4, 21 τ (midpoint between 1 and 1 α τ ατ in ) Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
18 phase [rad] magnitude [db] Lecture: Loop shaping Leadlag networks Lead network G(jω) G(jω)C Lead (jω) 1 ατ 1 ω c ω! τ G(jω) (G(jω)C Lead (jω)) M p M p The main goal of the lead network is to increase the phase margin As a side effect, the loop gain is increased at high frequencies (=reduced complementary sensitivity) Tuesday, May 4, 21 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
19 Leadlag networks Lead network Bode Diagram 3 25 Magnitude (db) Phase (deg) alpha=.5 alpha=.1 alpha=.15 6 alpha=.2 alpha=.3 alpha=.4 alpha=.5 3 alpha=.6 alpha=.7 alpha=.8 alpha= Frequency (rad/sec) C Lead (s) = 1 + s 1 + αs τ = 1 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
20 Leadlag networks magnitude [db] phase [rad] Lag network A lag network has transfer function C Lag (s) = 1 + ατs 1 + τs where τ >, < α < 1 C Lag (s) provides phase lag in the frequency range [ 1 τ, α τ ] The maximum phase lag is at ω min = 1 logarithmic scale) 1/τ 1/(ατ) φmin ωmin frequency [rad/s] Tuesday, May 4, 21 τ (midpoint between 1 and 1 α τ 2 log 1 (α) π/4 π/2 ατ in Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
21 phase [rad] magnitude [db] Lecture: Loop shaping Leadlag networks Lag network G(jω) 1 τ 1 ατ G(j!)C Lag (j!) ω c ω c M p The main goal of the lag network is to decrease the loop gain at high frequencies (=reduce complementary sensitivity) To avoid decreasing the phase margin, set ω min at low frequencies, where the loop gain Tuesday, May L(jω) 4, 21 is still high, therefore avoiding ω c ω min Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
22 Leadlag networks Lag network Bode Diagram Magnitude (db) Phase (deg) alpha=.5 alpha=.1 alpha=.15 3 alpha=.2 alpha=.3 alpha=.4 alpha=.5 6 alpha=.6 alpha=.7 alpha=.8 alpha= Frequency (rad/sec) Note that C Lag (s) = 1 + αs 1 + s τ = ατjω 1 + τjω 1 + τjω = db 1 + ατjω db and that 1 + ατjω 1 + τjω = 1 + τjω 1 + ατjω Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
23 Leadlag networks magnitude [db] phase [rad] Leadlag network A leadlag network has transfer function C Lead Lag (s) = (1 + α 1τ 1 s) (1 + τ 1 s) where τ 1, τ 2 >, < α 1, α 2 < 1 (1 + τ 2 s) (1 + α 2 τ 2 s) The leadlag network C Lead Lag (s) provides the coupled effect of a lead and a lag network: increase the phase margin without increasing the closedloop bandwidth ω γ 1/τ1 1/(ατ1) 1/(ατ2) 1/τ2 φmax ωmin ωmax φmin frequency [rad/s] 2 log 1 (α) π/2 π/2 Tuesday, May 4, 21 A special form of leadlag networks most used in industrial practice are proportional integral derivative (PID) controllers (see more later...) PID temperature controller Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
24 Loopshaping example Example of loop shaping Bode Diagram 5 Openloop transfer function of the process Magnitude (db) 5 System: G Gain Margin (db): 13.6 At frequency (rad/sec): 2.83 Closed Loop Stable? Yes 1 G(s) = s(s + 2)(s + 4) = s (1 +.5s)(1 +.25s) Phase (deg) System: G Phase Margin (deg): 47 Delay Margin (sec):.77 At frequency (rad/sec): 1.7 Closed Loop Stable? Yes Frequency (rad/sec) Closedloop specifications 1 Track a ramp reference r(t) = t with finite steadystate error e d.2 2 Risetime of unit step response t r.4 s 3 Overshoot of unit step reference ŝ 25% Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
25 Loopshaping example Example of loop shaping Static performance 1 Track a ramp reference r(t) = t with finite steadystate error e d.2 Since G(s) is of type r g = 1, no need to add integrators C 1 (s) = K c = K c s h c s = K c Choose K c by looking at steadystate tracking error of unit ramp 1 K c 1.25 e d =.2 K c 4 Finally, set C 1 (s) = 4 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
26 Loopshaping example Example of loop shaping Dynamic performance 2 Risetime of unit step response t r.4 Since B 3 3/t r, we get a closedloop bandwidth constraint B 3 3 = 3 = 7.5 rad/s t r.4 As the desired ω c [.5,.8]B 3, we get a target for the crossover frequency of the loop function L(jω) ω c 4.7 rad/s 2 Overshoot of unit step reference ŝ 25% As ŝ.85 M r 1 and M p 2.3 M r we get M r 1 or 1.25 M r = The resulting specification on the phase margin of L(jω) is M p.664 rad 38 deg Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
27 Loopshaping example Example of loop shaping Dynamic performance Let s examine the current loop gain L 1 (s) = C 1 (s)g(s) = s = jω c = j4.7 Bode diagram of L 1 (s) 4 s(s + 2)(s + 4) for 1 Phase (deg) Magnitude (db) System: GC1 Frequency (rad/sec): 4.7 Magnitude (db): 11.3 System: GC1 Frequency (rad/sec): 4.7 Phase (deg): 26 L 1 (j4.7) = 11.4 db L 1 (j4.7) 26 deg at ω = 4.7 rad/s we need to increase the gain by M = = 11.4 db and the phase by φ = 26 (18 38) = 64 deg Frequency (rad/sec) Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
28 Loopshaping example Example of loop shaping Lead network A suitable network is a lead network. As we need to gain φ = 64 deg, we choose a cascade of two identical lead networks C Lead (s) = 1 + τs 1 + ατs to gain 32 deg at ω c = 4.7 rad/s, we set α =.3 and 4.7 = 1 τ α, or τ =.39 s 25 Bode Diagram s C 2Lead (s) = s Magnitude (db) 15 9 System: CLead Frequency (rad/sec): 4.7 Magnitude (db): 1.4 Phase (deg) 6 3 System: CLead Frequency (rad/sec): 4.7 Phase (deg): Frequency (rad/sec) Note that at the desired crossover frequency ω c = 4.7 rad/s, C 2Lead (j4.7) = 1.4 db Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
29 Loopshaping example Example of loop shaping Resulting controller The gain difference = 1 db at ω c = 4.7 rad/s is tolerable If the gain difference was too large, we should also have designed and cascaded a lag network The resulting feedback controller is s C(s) = C 1 (s)c 2Lead (s) = s Bode Diagram Phase (deg) Magnitude (db) System: L Frequency (rad/sec): 5.54 Magnitude (db): 3 System: L Phase Margin (deg): 41.5 Delay Margin (sec):.168 At frequency (rad/sec): 4.32 Closed Loop Stable? Yes Bode plot of loop transfer function L(jω) = C(jω)G(jω) B 3 = 5.54 rad/s M p = 41.5 deg Frequency (rad/sec) Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
30 Loopshaping example Example of loop shaping Validation of the controller 1 Track a ramp reference r(t) = t with finite steadystate error e d closed loop ramp response Amplitude Input: In(1) Time (sec): 2 Amplitude: 2 System: W Time (sec): 2 Amplitude: 1.8 tracking error e(2) = =.2 MATLAB»W = L/(1+L);»t = :.1:2.5;»ramp=t;»lsim(W,ramp,t); Time (sec) Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
31 Loopshaping example Example of loop shaping Validation of the controller 2 Risetime of unit step response t r.4 3 Overshoot of unit step reference ŝ 25% 1.4 closed loop step response 1.2 System: W Time (sec):.674 Amplitude: 1.28 Amplitude System: W Time (sec):.449 Amplitude: 1 MATLAB»step = ones(1,length(t));»lsim(w,step,t); Time (sec) Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
32 PID controllers Proportional integral derivative (PID) controllers PID (proportional integrative derivative) controllers are the most used controllers in industrial automation since the 3s u(t) = K p e(t) + 1 t de(t) e(τ)dτ + T d T i dt where e(t) = r(t) y(t) is the tracking error Initially constructed by analog electronic components, today they are implemented digitally ad hoc digital devices just few lines of C code included in the control unit Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
33 PID controllers PID parameters r e 1 st i u y K p G(s) st d C(s) u(t) = K p e(t) + 1 t de(t) e(τ)dτ + T d T i dt K p is the controller gain, determining the aggressiveness (=closedloop bandwidth) of the controller T i is the reset time, determining the weight of the integral action T d is the derivative time, determining the phase lead of the controller Wednesday, May 5, 21 we call the controller P, PD, PI, or PID depending on the feedback terms included in the control law Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
34 PID controllers Derivative term The derivative term has transfer function st d, a high pass filter To avoid amplifying highfrequency noise (and to make the PID transfer function proper) st d gets replaced by st d st d 1 + s T d N No effect of the new pole s = N at low frequencies, but the highfrequency T d gain is limited to N (typically N = 3 2) The derivative term has the effect of predicting the future tracking error de(t) ê(t + T d ) = e(t) + T d (linear extrapolation) dt e(t) de(t) e(t)+td dt e(t+td) There are more advanced controllers that use a more refined prediction, based on the mathematical model of the process (model predictive control, MPC See more later...) t t+td Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
35 PID controllers Frequency response of PD controller {}} { N + 1 G PD (s) = K p 1 + st 1 + T d s d N 1 + s T = Kp d N N + 1 T d s } N {{ + 1 } N }{{} PD regulator α = 1 τ N+1 25 τ 2 Magnitude (db) Phase (deg) K p = 1 K d = 1 N = Frequency (rad/sec) The PD controller is equivalent to a lead network Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
36 PID controllers Frequency response of PI controller G PI (s) = K p st i = K p/t i (1 + T i s) s PI regulator 5 4 Magnitude (db) K p = 1 T i = 1 Phase (deg) Frequency (rad/sec) The PI controller introduces integral action The zero 1 T i compensates the decrease of phase margin of the integrator Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
37 PID controllers Implementation of PID controller r b! "! " e 1 st i C(s)!! u K p G(s) y " std 1+s Td N u(t) = K p br(t) y(t) + 1 st i (r(t) y(t)) Wednesday, May 5, 21 The proportional action only uses a fraction b 1 of the reference signal r. st d 1 + s T d N y(t) The reference signal r is not included in the derivative term (r(t) may have abrupt changes) Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
38 PID controllers Final remarks on loop shaping Loopshaping techniques are most adequate for SISO (singleinput singleoutput) systems They provide good insight in frequency domain properties of the closed loop (bandwidth, noise filtering, robustness to uncertainty, etc.) Most traditional singleloop industrial controllers are PID, and over 9% of PIDs are PI Curiosity: PID Temperature Control Retrofit KIT for Gaggia This PID controller kit is designed for retrofitting into the Gaggia Classic, Gaggia Coffee, and Gaggia Coffee Deluxe espresso machine. By adding a PID controller to the heater control circuit, brewing water temperature can be controlled to ±1 F accuracy. Thus, it will significantly improve the taste of your espresso. Users can also easily adjust the brew water temperature to suit their own tastes. Auber Instruments Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
39 PID controllers EnglishItalian Vocabulary loop shaping peak overshoot rise time settling time lead network lag network sintesi per tentativi sovraelongazione massima tempo di salita tempo di assestamento rete anticipatrice rete attenuatrice Translation is obvious otherwise. Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year / 39
Chapter 2. Classical Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control
Chapter 2 Classical Control System Design Overview Ch. 2. 2. Classical control system design Introduction Introduction Steadystate Steadystate errors errors Type Type k k systems systems Integral Integral
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 8  Solutions. HW 8  Solutions
EE C28 / ME C34 Fall 24 HW 8  Solutions HW 8  Solutions. Transient Response Design via Gain Adjustment For a transfer function G(s) = in negative feedback, find the gain to yield a 5% s(s+2)(s+85) overshoot
More informationFrequency domain analysis
Automatic Control 2 Frequency domain analysis Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 20102011 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 20102011
More informationEE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems
1 / 17 EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems Section 7: McMaster University Winter 2018 2 / 17 Outline 1 4 / 17 Cascade compensation Throughout this lecture we consider the case of H(s) = 1. We
More informationFREQUENCYRESPONSE DESIGN
ECE45/55: Feedback Control Systems. 9 FREQUENCYRESPONSE DESIGN 9.: PD and lead compensation networks The frequencyresponse methods we have seen so far largely tell us about stability and stability margins
More informationELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 LeadLag Compensation Techniques
CAIRO UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ENGINEERING ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 00/0 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 LeadLag Compensation Techniques [] For the following system, Design a compensator such
More informationTransient response via gain adjustment. Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = 2. The closed loop transfer function is. s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2 n
Design via frequency response Transient response via gain adjustment Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = ωn 2. The closed loop transfer function is s(s+2ζω n ) T(s) = ω 2 n s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2
More informationIntroduction to Feedback Control
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? OpenLoop vs ClosedLoop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? ClosedLoop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More informationHomework 7  Solutions
Homework 7  Solutions Note: This homework is worth a total of 48 points. 1. Compensators (9 points) For a unity feedback system given below, with G(s) = K s(s + 5)(s + 11) do the following: (c) Find the
More informationMAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008
MAS07 CONTROL THEORY. HOVLAND: EXAM SOLUTION 2008 MAS07 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008 Geir Hovland, Mechatronics Group, Grimstad, Norway June 30, 2008 C. Repeat question B, but plot the phase curve
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO THE CONTROL THEORY
OpenLoop controller An OpenLoop (OL) controller is characterized by no direct connection between the output of the system and its input; therefore external disturbance, nonlinear dynamics and parameter
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 24: Compensation in the Frequency Domain Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Lead Compensators Performance Specs Altering
More informationRobust Performance Example #1
Robust Performance Example # The transfer function for a nominal system (plant) is given, along with the transfer function for one extreme system. These two transfer functions define a family of plants
More information(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:
1. (a) The open loop transfer function of a unity feedback control system is given by G(S) = K/S(1+0.1S)(1+S) (i) Determine the value of K so that the resonance peak M r of the system is equal to 1.4.
More information6.1 Sketch the zdomain root locus and find the critical gain for the following systems K., the closedloop characteristic equation is K + z 0.
6. Sketch the zdomain root locus and find the critical gain for the following systems K (i) Gz () z 4. (ii) Gz K () ( z+ 9. )( z 9. ) (iii) Gz () Kz ( z. )( z ) (iv) Gz () Kz ( + 9. ) ( z. )( z 8. ) (i)
More informationToday (10/23/01) Today. Reading Assignment: 6.3. Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10
Today Today (10/23/01) Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10 Reading Assignment: 6.3 Last Time In the last lecture, we discussed control design through shaping of the loop gain GK:
More informationPerformance of Feedback Control Systems
Performance of Feedback Control Systems Design of a PID Controller Transient Response of a Closed Loop System Damping Coefficient, Natural frequency, Settling time and Steadystate Error and Type 0, Type
More informationVALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur
VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur 603 203. DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING SUBJECT QUESTION BANK : EC6405 CONTROL SYSTEM ENGINEERING SEM / YEAR: IV / II year
More informationLecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science  Bangalore
Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science  Bangalore Lead Lag Compensator Design Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst.
More informationAnalysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain
Chapter 6 Analysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain 6. Concepts of feedback control Given a system, we can classify it as an open loop or a closed loop depends on the usage of the feedback.
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 8: Response Characteristics Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Characteristics of the Response Stability Real
More informationEE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems
1 / 30 EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems Section 9: of and using Techniques McMaster University Winter 2017 2 / 30 Outline 1 2 3 4 / 30 domain analysis Analyze closed loop using open loop
More informationControl Systems II. ETH, MAVT, IDSC, Lecture 4 17/03/2017. G. Ducard
Control Systems II ETH, MAVT, IDSC, Lecture 4 17/03/2017 Lecture plan: Control Systems II, IDSC, 2017 SISO Control Design 24.02 Lecture 1 Recalls, Introductory case study 03.03 Lecture 2 Cascaded Control
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUB.NAME : CONTROL SYSTEMS STAFF NAME: Mr. P.NARASIMMAN BRANCH : ECE Mr.K.R.VENKATESAN YEAR : II SEMESTER
More informationINTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL
ECE4540/5540: Digital Control Systems INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL.: Introduction In ECE450/ECE550 Feedback Control Systems, welearnedhow to make an analog controller D(s) to control a lineartimeinvariant
More informationEE 4343/ Control System Design Project LECTURE 10
Copyright S. Ikenaga 998 All rights reserved EE 4343/5329  Control System Design Project LECTURE EE 4343/5329 Homepage EE 4343/5329 Course Outline Design of Phaselead and Phaselag compensators using
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUB.NAME : CONTROL SYSTEMS BRANCH : ECE YEAR : II SEMESTER: IV 1. What is control system? 2. Define open
More informationLecture: Sampling. Automatic Control 2. Sampling. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Automatic Control 2 Sampling Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of rento Academic year 20102011 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of rento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 20102011 1 / 31 imediscretization
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review
Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the splane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics
More informationLoop shaping exercise
Loop shaping exercise Excerpt 1 from Controlli Automatici  Esercizi di Sintesi, L. Lanari, G. Oriolo, EUROMA  La Goliardica, 1997. It s a generic book with some typical problems in control, not a collection
More informationExam. 135 minutes + 15 minutes reading time
Exam January 23, 27 Control Systems I (559L) Prof. Emilio Frazzoli Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes + 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 45 Number of Points: 53 Permitted aids: Important: 4 pages
More informationRichiami di Controlli Automatici
Richiami di Controlli Automatici Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II detommas@unina.it Ottobre 2012 Corsi AnsaldoBreda G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici
More information100 (s + 10) (s + 100) e 0.5s. s 100 (s + 10) (s + 100). G(s) =
1 AME 3315; Spring 215; Midterm 2 Review (not graded) Problems: 9.3 9.8 9.9 9.12 except parts 5 and 6. 9.13 except parts 4 and 5 9.28 9.34 You are given the transfer function: G(s) = 1) Plot the bode plot
More informationLecture 1: Feedback Control Loop
Lecture : Feedback Control Loop Loop Transfer function The standard feedback control system structure is depicted in Figure. This represend(t) n(t) r(t) e(t) u(t) v(t) η(t) y(t) F (s) C(s) P (s) Figure
More informationCHAPTER 7 STEADYSTATE RESPONSE ANALYSES
CHAPTER 7 STEADYSTATE RESPONSE ANALYSES 1. Introduction The steady state error is a measure of system accuracy. These errors arise from the nature of the inputs, system type and from nonlinearities of
More information16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2
16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2 September 22, 2010 In this recitation, we will consider two problems from Chapter 8 of the Van de Vegte book. R +  E G c (s) G(s) C Figure 1: The standard block diagram
More informationFEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEMS
FEEDBAC CONTROL SYSTEMS. Control System Design. Open and ClosedLoop Control Systems 3. Why ClosedLoop Control? 4. Case Study  Speed Control of a DC Motor 5. SteadyState Errors in Unity Feedback Control
More informationIntegral action in state feedback control
Automatic Control 1 in state feedback control Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 1 Academic year 21211 1 /
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture : Different Types of Control Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Limits of Proportional Feedback Performance
More informationLecture 7:Time Response PoleZero Maps Influence of Poles and Zeros Higher Order Systems and Pole Dominance Criterion
Cleveland State University MCE441: Intr. Linear Control Lecture 7:Time Influence of Poles and Zeros Higher Order and Pole Criterion Prof. Richter 1 / 26 FirstOrder Specs: Step : Pole Real inputs contain
More informationSAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE SAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015 Lecturer: Michael Ruderman Problem 1: Frequencydomain analysis and control design (15 pt) Given is a
More information06 Feedback Control System Characteristics The role of error signals to characterize feedback control system performance.
Chapter 06 Feedback 06 Feedback Control System Characteristics The role of error signals to characterize feedback control system performance. Lesson of the Course Fondamenti di Controlli Automatici of
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 8: Response Characteristics Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Characteristics of the Response Stability Real Poles
More informationAn Internal Stability Example
An Internal Stability Example Roy Smith 26 April 2015 To illustrate the concept of internal stability we will look at an example where there are several polezero cancellations between the controller and
More information6.302 Feedback Systems Recitation 16: Compensation Prof. Joel L. Dawson
Bode Obstacle Course is one technique for doing compensation, or designing a feedback system to make the closedloop behavior what we want it to be. To review:  G c (s) G(s) H(s) you are here! plant For
More informationFeedback Control of Linear SISO systems. Process Dynamics and Control
Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems Process Dynamics and Control 1 OpenLoop Process The study of dynamics was limited to openloop systems Observe process behavior as a result of specific input signals
More informationIMC based automatic tuning method for PID controllers in a Smith predictor configuration
Computers and Chemical Engineering 28 (2004) 281 290 IMC based automatic tuning method for PID controllers in a Smith predictor configuration Ibrahim Kaya Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering,
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3.. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid 
More informationDesired Bode plot shape
Desired Bode plot shape 0dB Want high gain Use PI or lag control Low freq ess, type High low freq gain for steady state tracking Low high freq gain for noise attenuation Sufficient PM near ω gc for stability
More informationAnalysis of SISO Control Loops
Chapter 5 Analysis of SISO Control Loops Topics to be covered For a given controller and plant connected in feedback we ask and answer the following questions: Is the loop stable? What are the sensitivities
More informationThe requirements of a plant may be expressed in terms of (a) settling time (b) damping ratio (c) peak overshoot  in time domain
Compensators To improve the performance of a given plant or system G f(s) it may be necessary to use a compensator or controller G c(s). Compensator Plant G c (s) G f (s) The requirements of a plant may
More informationEECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 15, am. Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators.
Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Wed. Dec. 5, 2 8 am Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 2 2 6 3 4 4 5 6 6 7 8 2 Total
More informationProfessor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall 2010 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley
Professor Fearing EE C8 / ME C34 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley. 35 pts Lag compensation. For open loop plant Gs ss+5s+8 a Find compensator gain Ds k such that the
More informationSchool of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. ME375 Feedback Control  1
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? OpenLoop vs ClosedLoop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? ClosedLoop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More informationAPPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS
Version: 1 CONTROL APPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS TEX d: Feb. 17, 214 PREVIEW We show that the transfer function and conditions of stability for linear systems can be studied using Laplace transforms. Table
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Basic Feedback Analysis & Design
AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Basic Feedback Analysis & Design Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University Routh s Stability
More informationDue Wednesday, February 6th EE/MFS 599 HW #5
Due Wednesday, February 6th EE/MFS 599 HW #5 You may use Matlab/Simulink wherever applicable. Consider the standard, unityfeedback closed loop control system shown below where G(s) = /[s q (s+)(s+9)]
More informationRoot Locus Design Example #3
Root Locus Design Example #3 A. Introduction The system represents a linear model for vertical motion of an underwater vehicle at zero forward speed. The vehicle is assumed to have zero pitch and roll
More informationRoot Locus Design Example #4
Root Locus Design Example #4 A. Introduction The plant model represents a linearization of the heading dynamics of a 25, ton tanker ship under empty load conditions. The reference input signal R(s) is
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3. 8. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid
More informationLecture 12. Upcoming labs: Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:3012:30
289 Upcoming labs: Lecture 12 Lab 20: Internal model control (finish up) Lab 22: Force or Torque control experiments [Integrative] (23 sessions) Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:3012:30 Today: Recap
More informationECE317 : Feedback and Control
ECE317 : Feedback and Control Lecture : Steadystate error Dr. Richard Tymerski Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University 1 Course roadmap Modeling Analysis Design Laplace
More informationControl System (ECE411) Lectures 13 & 14
Control System (ECE411) Lectures 13 & 14, Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Colorado State University Fall 2016 SteadyState Error Analysis Remark: For a unity feedback system
More informationRELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS. Ryszard Gessing
RELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS Ryszard Gessing Politechnika Śl aska Instytut Automatyki, ul. Akademicka 16, 44101 Gliwice, Poland, fax: +4832 372127, email: gessing@ia.gliwice.edu.pl
More informationSolutions to SkillAssessment Exercises
Solutions to SkillAssessment Exercises To Accompany Control Systems Engineering 4 th Edition By Norman S. Nise John Wiley & Sons Copyright 2004 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. No part
More informationPID controllers, part I
Faculty of Mechanical and Power Engineering Dr inŝ. JANUSZ LICHOTA CONTROL SYSTEMS PID controllers, part I Wrocław 2007 CONTENTS Controller s classification PID controller what is it? Typical controller
More informationSingular Value Decomposition Analysis
Singular Value Decomposition Analysis Singular Value Decomposition Analysis Introduction Introduce a linear algebra tool: singular values of a matrix Motivation Why do we need singular values in MIMO control
More informationNADAR SARASWATHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY Vadapudupatti, Theni
NADAR SARASWATHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY Vadapudupatti, Theni625531 Question Bank for the Units I to V SE05 BR05 SU02 5 th Semester B.E. / B.Tech. Electrical & Electronics engineering IC6501
More informationTradeoffs and Limits of Performance
Chapter 9 Tradeoffs and Limits of Performance 9. Introduction Fundamental limits of feedback systems will be investigated in this chapter. We begin in Section 9.2 by discussing the basic feedback loop
More informationME 375 Final Examination Thursday, May 7, 2015 SOLUTION
ME 375 Final Examination Thursday, May 7, 2015 SOLUTION POBLEM 1 (25%) negligible mass wheels negligible mass wheels v motor no slip ω r r F D O no slip e in Motor% Cart%with%motor%a,ached% The coupled
More informationAppendix A MoReRT Controllers Design Demo Software
Appendix A MoReRT Controllers Design Demo Software The use of the proposed ModelReference Robust Tuning (MoReRT) design methodology, described in Chap. 4, to tune a twodegreeoffreedom (2DoF) proportional
More information12.7 Steady State Error
Lecture Notes on Control Systems/D. Ghose/01 106 1.7 Steady State Error For first order systems we have noticed an overall improvement in performance in terms of rise time and settling time. But there
More informationTopic # Feedback Control. StateSpace Systems Closedloop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback
Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control StateSpace Systems Closedloop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Copyright 21 by Jonathan How. All Rights reserved 1 Fall
More informationAdditional ClosedLoop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 14)
Appendix J Additional ClosedLoop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 4) APPENDIX CONTENTS J. ClosedLoop Behavior J.2 Bode Stability Criterion J.3 Nyquist Stability Criterion J.4 Gain
More informationLaplace Transform Analysis of Signals and Systems
Laplace Transform Analysis of Signals and Systems Transfer Functions Transfer functions of CT systems can be found from analysis of Differential Equations Block Diagrams Circuit Diagrams 5/10/04 M. J.
More informationOverview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piecewise linear approximations Firstorder terms Secondorder terms (complex poles & zeros)
Overview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piecewise linear approximations Firstorder terms Secondorder terms (complex poles & zeros) J. McNames Portland State University ECE 222 Bode Plots Ver.
More informationStep Response for the Transfer Function of a Sensor
Step Response f the Transfer Function of a Sens G(s)=Y(s)/X(s) of a sens with X(s) input and Y(s) output A) First Order Instruments a) First der transfer function G(s)=k/(1+Ts), k=gain, T = time constant
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 2
Outline Outline Outline Review of Material from Lecture 2 New Stuff  Outline Review of Lecture System Performance Effect of Poles Review of Material from Lecture System Performance Effect of Poles 2 New
More informationControl Systems 2. Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits. Roy Smith
Control Systems 2 Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits Roy Smith 2017314 4.1 Inputoutput controllability Control design questions: 1. How well can the plant be controlled? 2. What control structure
More informationControl of Electromechanical Systems
Control of Electromechanical Systems November 3, 27 Exercise Consider the feedback control scheme of the motor speed ω in Fig., where the torque actuation includes a time constant τ A =. s and a disturbance
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall K(s +1)(s +2) G(s) =.
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering. Dynamics and Control II Fall 7 Problem Set #7 Solution Posted: Friday, Nov., 7. Nise problem 5 from chapter 8, page 76. Answer:
More informationPole placement control: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2
: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2 : a state O. Sename 1 1 Gipsalab, CNRSINPG, FRANCE Olivier.Sename@gipsalab.fr www.gipsalab.fr/ o.sename based November 21, 2017 Outline : a state
More informationDynamic circuits: Frequency domain analysis
Electronic Circuits 1 Dynamic circuits: Contents Free oscillation and natural frequency Transfer functions Frequency response Bode plots 1 System behaviour: overview 2 System behaviour : review solution
More informationIndex. Index. More information. in this web service Cambridge University Press
Atype elements, 4 7, 18, 31, 168, 198, 202, 219, 220, 222, 225 Atype variables. See Across variable ac current, 172, 251 ac induction motor, 251 Acceleration rotational, 30 translational, 16 Accumulator,
More informationROOT LOCUS. Consider the system. Root locus presents the poles of the closedloop system when the gain K changes from 0 to. H(s) H ( s) = ( s)
C1 ROOT LOCUS Consider the system R(s) E(s) C(s) + K G(s)  H(s) C(s) R(s) = K G(s) 1 + K G(s) H(s) Root locus presents the poles of the closedloop system when the gain K changes from 0 to 1+ K G ( s)
More informationLab # 4 Time Response Analysis
Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Computer Engineering Dep. Feedback Control Systems Lab Eng. Tareq Abu Aisha Lab # 4 Lab # 4 Time Response Analysis What is the Time Response? It is an
More informationEECS C128/ ME C134 Final Thu. May 14, pm. Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators.
Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Thu. May 4, 25 58 pm Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 4 2 4 3 6 4 8 5 3
More informationDistributed RealTime Control Systems
Distributed RealTime Control Systems Chapter 9 Discrete PID Control 1 Computer Control 2 Approximation of Continuous Time Controllers Design Strategy: Design a continuous time controller C c (s) and then
More informationPower System Control
Power System Control Basic Control Engineering Prof. Wonhee Kim School of Energy Systems Engineering, ChungAng University 2 Contents Why feedback? System Modeling in Frequency Domain System Modeling in
More informationPD, PI, PID Compensation. M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada
PD, PI, PID Compensation M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada 1 Outline PD compensation. PI compensation. PID compensation. 2 PD Control L= loop gain s cl = desired closedloop
More informationCDS 101/110a: Lecture 102 Control Systems Implementation
CDS 101/110a: Lecture 102 Control Systems Implementation Richard M. Murray 5 December 2012 Goals Provide an overview of the key principles, concepts and tools from control theory  Classical control 
More informationDynamic System Response. Dynamic System Response K. Craig 1
Dynamic System Response Dynamic System Response K. Craig 1 Dynamic System Response LTI Behavior vs. NonLTI Behavior Solution of Linear, ConstantCoefficient, Ordinary Differential Equations Classical
More informationControl Systems II. Gioele Zardini June 3, 2017
Control Systems II Gioele Zardini gzardini@studentethzch June 3, 207 Abstract This Skript is made of my notes from the lecture Control Systems II of Dr Gregor Ochsner (literature of Prof Dr Lino Guzzella)
More informationProportional, Integral & Derivative Control Design. Raktim Bhattacharya
AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Proportional, ntegral & Derivative Control Design Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University
More informationCM 3310 Process Control, Spring Lecture 21
CM 331 Process Control, Spring 217 Instructor: Dr. om Co Lecture 21 (Back to Process Control opics ) General Control Configurations and Schemes. a) Basic SingleInput/SingleOutput (SISO) Feedback Figure
More informationFATIMA MICHAEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
FATIMA MICHAEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY Senkottai Village, Madurai Sivagangai Main Road, Madurai  625 020. An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Institution DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION
More informationDynamic Response. Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu. Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology.
Dynamic Response Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology Chapter 3 Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu (EEE@IYTE) EE362 Feedback Control
More informationAlireza Mousavi Brunel University
Alireza Mousavi Brunel University 1 » Control Process» Control Systems Design & Analysis 2 OpenLoop Control: Is normally a simple switch on and switch off process, for example a light in a room is switched
More informationVALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE
VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur 603 203 DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK V SEMESTER IC650 CONTROL SYSTEMS Regulation 203 Academic Year 207 8 Prepared
More informationAn Introduction to Control Systems
An Introduction to Control Systems Signals and Systems: 3C1 Control Systems Handout 1 Dr. David Corrigan Electronic and Electrical Engineering corrigad@tcd.ie November 21, 2012 Recall the concept of a
More information