PM diagram of the Transfer Function and its use in the Design of Controllers


 Abraham Newton
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 PM diagram of the Transfer Function and its use in the Design of Controllers Santiago Garrido, Luis Moreno Abstract This paper presents the graphical chromatic representation of the phase and the magnitude of the transfer function G(s) of a system and its educational use in the design of the most typical controllers. The magnitude is represented in decibels and the phase is represented by colours. This representation permits to put a face to the transfer functions, deepening our intuitive understanding of transfer functions. An important characteristic of this diagram is that permits to read the phase and the gain margins directly and the imaginary axis cut represents the Bode diagram. It permits to see intuitively the connexions among the different diagrams. It is also possible to put the grid with damping ratio ζ and frequency ω n. In summary, this PM diagram can be useful, especially in Control Education because improves the intuition about transfer functions, and it can be used in a Classical Control Course to complement the design of controllers using the Root Locus diagram. Index Terms Root Locus, PID controller, Lead network, Bode plot, Phase margin, Gain margin. I. INTRODUCTION A picture is worth a thousand words. There are many possible representations of the transfer function G(s) of a system such as the Root Locus, the Bode diagram, the Nyquist diagram and the Nichols diagram. In all of them, it is possible to see some characteristics of the system and to create different kinds of controllers to improve the behaviour of the system. Nowadays, with tools such as SISOTOOL of Matlab, it is possible to see many of these diagrams at the same time and the time response of the system to tune the controller. The graphical representation of functions is one of the most important mathematical tools because it allows us to understand the behaviour of the functions. While it is easy to represent the graph of a real function in the plane, the graph of a single variable complex function is more problematic. The reason adduced about why we can not represent the Transfer Function is because G(s) : C C and as C is equivalent to represent two real variables, it is necessary to have 4 axis to represent the Transfer Function G(s). Our brain is trained to visualize objects in three spatial dimensions, while the graphs of complex functions live in a fourdimensional space. Hence most of us are unable to imagine such an object. Complex functions have the reputation of being mysterious entities; seeing these strange objects may help to overcome the fear one might feel while dealing with them. Santiago Garrido and Luis Moreno are with the Robotics Lab., Carlos III University, Madrid, Spain. The Phase Magnitude (PM) diagram makes it possible to put a face to the functions, deepening our intuitive understanding of basic and advanced concepts in complex analysis. They reveal intrinsic structures behind the formulas, literally open our eyes to the wonderful realm of complex functions, and may serve students, teachers, scientists, and engineers as simple and efficient tools in their work. A possibility is to represent the magnitude and the phase of the function in each point with level curves. Cavicchi[6],[7] tried this solution in 996 and 23, but the problem was the bad resolution and the difficulty of reading his diagrams. But the situation has changed with the modern mathematical program computers that permit us to represent the fourth spatial dimension using the colourcoded values of the phase on the domain of the function. This is the solution adopted in this paper. Another problem with the representation of transfer functions is that they are rational and they have poles. In these points the function goes to infinity and far from the poles and zeros, the function is quite plane. In these conditions, the level curves are too close near the poles and zeros, and there are not level curves in the almost plane zones. A possible solution to solve this problem is the technique adopted in the Complex Variable books [3], [4], [5]: to represent the arctan of the function G(s), but in this case the magnitude level curves are not equally spaced and the diagram can t be used numerically. The best solution for Control applications is the solution adopted by Bode in its diagram: to use the vertical scale in decibels y = 2 log (x), because in this way the zones near the poles have less level curves and the level curves are equally spaced: the space between two consecutive magnitude level curves is the same in decibels. The solution adopted in this paper is inspired in [3], but represents the complex function by its module in decibels: 2 log G(s) and its phase in rescaled hsv coded colours. In the figures of the examples of controllers each phase band represents and each magnitude band 2 db. In this case the module level curves are equally spaced, and it is possible to read in the representation almost directly the gain and the phase that has to add the controller and use the values directly in the solution of problems and exercises. Different extensions of Root Locus and related diagrams have been used by many researchers. Ogata[] treats the Constant Gain Locus diagram and the Contour Roots in his book. Also, Kuo[2] refers to the Contour Root Locus. Cavicchi[6], [7] uses the PhaseRoot diagram that represent the level curves of gain and phase. More recently, Cerone[8] proposes the Constant Magnitude Loci for Control Education.
2 (a) A single zero (b) A double zero (c) A triple zero Fig. : PM diagram of a zero, a double zero and a triple zero In Fig. are shown the PM diagram of a single zero, G(s) = s, a double zero, G(s) = s 2, and a triple zero G(s) = s 3. As it can be seen the order of the colours is the same as that the original complex plane C. In the case of a double zero, the different colours appear twice and in the case of a triple zero, the different colours appear three times. In Fig. 2 are shown the PM diagram of a single pole, G(s) = /s, a double pole, G(s) = /s 2, and a triple pole G(s) = /s 3. The different colours appear once, twice and three times but in the opposite orientation. In all the PM diagrams presented in this work, the magnitude or modulus of the transfer function G(s) is represented in decibels, i.e., it is represented 2 log G(s). In this way, the difference between two consecutive lines is the same in decibels. The other set of level curves, the coloured ones, represent the phase arg(g(s)). In this case, the scale is linear with red representing and cyan representing 8. That means that the cyan line is the Root Locus and the red line is the Inverse Root Locus. An important characteristic of this diagram is that it permits to read the phase margin directly because it is the phase distance from the actual closed poles position following the same magnitude line until the intersection with the imaginary axis and the Gain Margin that it is the magnitude distance following the cyan line that represents 8 until its intersection with the imaginary axis. The imaginary axis cut represent the Bode diagram. It is also possible to put the grid with damping ratio ζ and the frequency ω n. In the drawings, we have used linear scales for the real and imaginary axis, but if there are poles and zeros placed in different decades, it would be better to put log scales. In order to use these diagrams to calculate controllers C(s) for a system G(s), it is possible to read the phase, calculate the controller C (s) with gain that adds that phase, represent the PM diagram of C (s)g(s), and then multiply by the gain needed to have C(s) = K c C (s). The use of the SISOTOOL has a strange characteristic. You can add zeros and poles and change its positions, and change the gain until by trial and error you have the closed loop poles in the desired position. However, in the educational books about Control the process is different, you know the desired position of the closed loop poles and you have to calculate the controller in order to have the closed loop poles in the required positions. II. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS The PM diagram permits to read directly the magnitude and the phase of the transfer function in each point. Its difference between the present closed loop poles and the desired ones gives the phase and the gain that has to be added by the controller. The phase and magnitudes can be read directly (approximately) or by clicking in the position to be given by Matlab (more precise). A. Ideal PD design. Suppose you have the system G(s) = (s + )(s + 2) This system has the closed loop poles placed in s,2 =.5 ±.86j as shown in Fig. 4 (point on the right). Its magnitude is G( j) =.5 and its phase is arg(g( j)) = 8 The desired specifications give us that the desired closed loop poles have to be placed in s,2 = 3.4 ± 3.4j, as shown in Fig. 4 (point on the left). The magnitude and phase of G(s) in these points are G( 3.4±3.4j) =.788 and arg(g( 3.4 ± 3.4j)) = If the desired controller is an ideal P D controller C(s) = K c (s + b), then the phase can be calculated using Fig. 5 as [ arctan 3.4 ] b 3.4 [ 8 arctan 3.4 ] arctan =
3 (a) A single pole (b) A double pole (c) A triple pole Fig. 2: PM diagram of a pole, a double pole and a triple pole (a) G(s) = (s+3)(s+4) (s+)(s+2) (b) G(s) = (s+)(s+2)(s+3) (c) G(s) = Fig. 3: PM diagram of different transfer functions (s+)(s+2)(s+3)(s+4) i.e. arctan 3.4 b 3.4 = 54.2 and that means that b = In order to calculate the gain, the magnitude condition can be applied: K = d d 2 d = The desired controller is ( 3.4) 2 = 3.28 C(s) = K(s + b) = 3.28(s + ) = s + b = K c = 7.8 s + = 7.8( +.9s) b The operations can be simplified using the PM diagram of the Fig. 4: The controller will be designed in two steps: The first step is the design of a controller of gain that aport the desired phase (Fig. 4) and the second step is to calculate the necessary gain. Between the cyan square and the green square in (Fig. 4) there are five and a half lines of phase (each one of ) and that means that the required phase of the controller has to be approximately φ = 54. Obviously, the best way of measuring the angle is that it appears in the data tip, as shown in Fig. 4. Applying arctan 3.4 b 3.4 = 54 the zero has to be in b =. The controller of gain that aport the necessary phase is C (s) = s + Now, we represent the function C (s)g(s) = s + = ( +.9s) (s + )(s + 2) as shown in Fig. 6. Now, we are going to design the second step: to calculate the necessary gain to pass from the point
4 Fig. 4: PM diagram of G(s) = (s+)(s+2). The original closed loop poles are s,2 =.5 ±.86j (on the right), and the desired poles are s,2 3.4 ± 3.4j (on the left) Im Fig. 6: PM diagram of the Transfer Function G(s) = of the ideal PD design s+ (s+)(s+2) 3.4j b Fig. 5: Application of the phase condition for the ideal PD design on right of Fig. 6 that are the actual closed loop poles to the point on the left that represent the desired poles. The actual closed loop poles of this system are in s =.59 ±.68j. In this figure, these closed loop poles are in the Root Locus (cyan line) and have magnitude db =. In order to find the gain, it is necessary to read the magnitude at the desired closed loop poles, C (s)g(s) s= j = 25 db =.56, then K c = /.56 = 7.8. The desired controller is s + b C(s) = K c = 7.8 s + = 7.8( +.9s) b B. Design of a lead network. Consider the system G(s) =. It is desired to find a controller with a static coefficient of velocity error K v = 2s, and phase margin of 5. 4K Re The first step is to find the value of K in order to have the required K v K v = lim s sg(s) = lim s s 4K = 2K = 2 s(s + 2) therefore, K =. Now, we represent the PM diagram of G(s) = 4 as shown in Fig.7. In this diagram, we find the point of the imaginary axis with magnitude line of db, the phase margin is the number of phase bands between the actual position and that cyan band that represents 8. In this case there are a bit less than two bands, approximately 8. The lead network C(s) = s + z α s + p = s + T α s + αt has to add a phase φ = γ desired γ actual + 5 = = 37 and the parameter α of the network can be calculated as α = sin(φ) + sin(φ) =.24 As the lead network adds a magnitude of log(α)db in its middle point ω c = αt, we search the point with magnitude K m = log(α) = 6.2 db
5 Fig. 7: PM diagram of G(s) = 4 This point correspond to frequency ω c = 9 rad/sec. Choosing this frequency as the new frequency of transition ω c = αt, it is possible to find the corner frequencies of the lead network and T = αω c = 4.4 αt = ω c α = 8.4 In summary, the lead network is C(s) = 8.4 s s = 4.723s s Where the multiplicative constant α is to have gain equal to. The closed loop poles of the system with the lead network are placed in 6.9 ± 8j as shown in Fig. 8 and its Bode, that it are the values in the imaginary axis of this figure, is shown in Fig.9. III. PHASE MARGIN, GAIN MARGIN AND BODE DIAGRAM It is possible to use the Matlab command sgrid to put over the PM diagram in order to read the values of the damping ratio ζ and the natural frequency ω n as shown in Fig. that represent the system G(s) = (s + )(s + 2)(s + 3) Fig. 8: PM diagram of C(s)G(s) = s+4.4 Magnitude (db) Phase (deg) Bode Diagram 4 s Frequency (rad/s) Fig. 9: Bode plot of the uncompensated system G(s) = 4 (blue), the compensated system C(s)G(s) = s (green), and the lead network C(s) = s s+4.4 s+8.4 (red)
6 In this case, the closed loop poles are placed in s,2 =.8 ±.8j, because of this G(s,2 ) = = db. The cut of the imaginary axis is the Bode diagram shown in Fig.. The gain margin is the value of the intersection of the Root Locus (cyan line) with the imaginary axis, in this case GM = 4.8 db, and the Phase Margin is the number of colour bands following the same zero gain line (white Line) until the intersection with the imaginary axis, multiplied by the value of each band,. In this case there are 8 bands, approximately P M = 8. Finally, in this figure the bandwidth (BW) is the distance over the imaginary axis from the origin to the point in which G(s) = 3 db. In this example, BW =.2 rad/sec. Imag Axis Root Locus Editor for Open Loop (OL) Real Axis Magnitude (db) Phase (deg) G.M.: 4.6 db Freq: 3.32 rad/s Stable loop Open Loop Bode Editor for Open Loop (OL) P.M.: 8.3 deg Freq:.3 rad/s Frequency (rad/s) Fig. : Root Locus and Bode diagram of G(s) = (s+)(s+2)(s+3) Fig. 2: PM diagram Graphic User Interface of the PM Diagram Matlab Toolbox the Bode diagram. It also can be read the bandwidth. Finally the PM diagram permits unify the time and frequency analysis. Fig. : PM diagram of G(s) = (s+)(s+2)(s+3) The authors have written a PM Diagram Toolbox for Matlab that include an Graphic User Interface shown in Fig. 2. IV. CONCLUSIONS This paper presents a graphical chromatic representation of transfer functions that it is very visual and intuitive. In Control Education, it can be used to design controllers in an easier way and more intuitive than with the Root Locus diagram. It also give us an deeper knowledge of the transfer function and unifies the analysis in time and frequency because the cut of the PM diagram with the imaginary axis is the Bode diagram. The Phase and Gain margins can be read directly in the PM diagram in a very visual and natural way, without using REFERENCES [] Ogata, K., Modern Control Engineering, 5th. ed. Prentice Hall, 29. [2] Kuo, B. C., Automatic Control Systems, 6th ed.. Prentice Hall, 99. [3] Wegert, E., Visual Complex Functions: An Introduction With Phase Portraits. BirkhŁuser, 22. [4] Needham, T. Visual Complex Analysis. Clarendon Press, 998. [5] Mathews, J., Howell, R., Complex Analysis for Mathematics and Engineering. Jones and Bartlett Learning, 2. [6] Cavicchi, T.J., PhaseRoot Locus and Relative Stability. IEEE Contr. Syst. Mag., vol 6, pp , 996. [7] Cavicchi, T.J., Phase Margin Revisited: PhaseRoot Locus, Bode Plots, and Phase Shifters. IEEE Trans on Education. vol 46(). pp , 23. [8] Cerone, v., Canale, M. and Regruto, D., Loopshaping Design with Constant Magnitude Loci in Control Education. Int. J. Engng. Ed. vol 24(), pp , 28
Systems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 24: Compensation in the Frequency Domain Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Lead Compensators Performance Specs Altering
More informationHomework 7  Solutions
Homework 7  Solutions Note: This homework is worth a total of 48 points. 1. Compensators (9 points) For a unity feedback system given below, with G(s) = K s(s + 5)(s + 11) do the following: (c) Find the
More informationELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 LeadLag Compensation Techniques
CAIRO UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ENGINEERING ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 00/0 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 LeadLag Compensation Techniques [] For the following system, Design a compensator such
More informationr +  FINAL June 12, 2012 MAE 143B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic
MAE 43B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic FINAL June, One sheet of handwritten notes (two pages). Present your reasoning and calculations clearly. Inconsistent etchings will not be graded. Write answers
More informationToday (10/23/01) Today. Reading Assignment: 6.3. Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10
Today Today (10/23/01) Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10 Reading Assignment: 6.3 Last Time In the last lecture, we discussed control design through shaping of the loop gain GK:
More informationECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 6 Solution April 17, (s/2 + 1) s(2s + 1)[(s/8) 2 + (s/20) + 1]
ECE382/ME482 Spring 25 Homework 6 Solution April 17, 25 1 Solution to HW6 P8.17 We are given a system with open loop transfer function G(s) = 4(s/2 + 1) s(2s + 1)[(s/8) 2 + (s/2) + 1] (1) and unity negative
More informationLecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science  Bangalore
Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science  Bangalore Lead Lag Compensator Design Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst.
More information1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise
EE C128 / ME134 Problem Set 6 Solution Fall 2011 1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise Consider a close loop system with unity feedback. For each G(s), hand sketch the Nyquist diagram, determine Z = P N, algebraically
More informationFrequency (rad/s)
. The frequency response of the plant in a unity feedback control systems is shown in Figure. a) What is the static velocity error coefficient K v for the system? b) A lead compensator with a transfer
More informationMAK 391 System Dynamics & Control. Presentation Topic. The Root Locus Method. Student Number: Group: IB. Name & Surname: Göksel CANSEVEN
MAK 391 System Dynamics & Control Presentation Topic The Root Locus Method Student Number: 9901.06047 Group: IB Name & Surname: Göksel CANSEVEN Date: December 2001 The RootLocus Method Göksel CANSEVEN
More informationEE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems
1 / 30 EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems Section 9: of and using Techniques McMaster University Winter 2017 2 / 30 Outline 1 2 3 4 / 30 domain analysis Analyze closed loop using open loop
More informationThe Relation Between the 3D Bode Diagram and the Root Locus. Insights into the connection between these classical methods. By Panagiotis Tsiotras
F E A T U R E The Relation Between the D Bode Diagram and the Root Locus Insights into the connection between these classical methods Bode diagrams and root locus plots have been the cornerstone of control
More information(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:
1. (a) The open loop transfer function of a unity feedback control system is given by G(S) = K/S(1+0.1S)(1+S) (i) Determine the value of K so that the resonance peak M r of the system is equal to 1.4.
More informationECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 7 Solution April 17, K(s + 0.2) s 2 (s + 2)(s + 5) G(s) =
ECE382/ME482 Spring 25 Homework 7 Solution April 17, 25 1 Solution to HW7 AP9.5 We are given a system with open loop transfer function G(s) = K(s +.2) s 2 (s + 2)(s + 5) (1) and unity negative feedback.
More informationRoot Locus Methods. The root locus procedure
Root Locus Methods Design of a position control system using the root locus method Design of a phase lag compensator using the root locus method The root locus procedure To determine the value of the gain
More informationRobust Performance Example #1
Robust Performance Example # The transfer function for a nominal system (plant) is given, along with the transfer function for one extreme system. These two transfer functions define a family of plants
More informationDynamic circuits: Frequency domain analysis
Electronic Circuits 1 Dynamic circuits: Contents Free oscillation and natural frequency Transfer functions Frequency response Bode plots 1 System behaviour: overview 2 System behaviour : review solution
More informationPhase Margin Revisited: PhaseRoot Locus, Bode Plots, and Phase Shifters
168 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, VOL. 46, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2003 Phase Margin Revisited: PhaseRoot Locus, Bode Plots, and Phase Shifters Thomas J. Cavicchi Abstract In learning undergraduate controls,
More informationPD, PI, PID Compensation. M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada
PD, PI, PID Compensation M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada 1 Outline PD compensation. PI compensation. PID compensation. 2 PD Control L= loop gain s cl = desired closedloop
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall K(s +1)(s +2) G(s) =.
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering. Dynamics and Control II Fall 7 Problem Set #7 Solution Posted: Friday, Nov., 7. Nise problem 5 from chapter 8, page 76. Answer:
More informationRichiami di Controlli Automatici
Richiami di Controlli Automatici Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II detommas@unina.it Ottobre 2012 Corsi AnsaldoBreda G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici
More informationLecture 14  Using the MATLAB Control System Toolbox and Simulink Friday, February 8, 2013
Today s Objectives ENGR 105: Feedback Control Design Winter 2013 Lecture 14  Using the MATLAB Control System Toolbox and Simulink Friday, February 8, 2013 1. introduce the MATLAB Control System Toolbox
More informationFREQUENCYRESPONSE DESIGN
ECE45/55: Feedback Control Systems. 9 FREQUENCYRESPONSE DESIGN 9.: PD and lead compensation networks The frequencyresponse methods we have seen so far largely tell us about stability and stability margins
More informationExample on Root Locus Sketching and Control Design
Example on Root Locus Sketching and Control Design MCE44  Spring 5 Dr. Richter April 25, 25 The following figure represents the system used for controlling the robotic manipulator of a Mars Rover. We
More informationDesired Bode plot shape
Desired Bode plot shape 0dB Want high gain Use PI or lag control Low freq ess, type High low freq gain for steady state tracking Low high freq gain for noise attenuation Sufficient PM near ω gc for stability
More information16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2
16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2 September 22, 2010 In this recitation, we will consider two problems from Chapter 8 of the Van de Vegte book. R +  E G c (s) G(s) C Figure 1: The standard block diagram
More informationCompensator Design for Helicopter Stabilization
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Technology 4 (212 ) 74 81 C3IT212 Compensator Design for Helicopter Stabilization Raghupati Goswami a,sourish Sanyal b, Amar Nath Sanyal c a Chairman,
More informationAnalysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits Lecture 12. Feedback
Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits Lecture 12 Feedback Michael H. Perrott March 11, 2012 Copyright 2012 by Michael H. Perrott All rights reserved. Open Loop Versus Closed Loop Amplifier
More informationSolutions to SkillAssessment Exercises
Solutions to SkillAssessment Exercises To Accompany Control Systems Engineering 4 th Edition By Norman S. Nise John Wiley & Sons Copyright 2004 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. No part
More informationTopic # Feedback Control. StateSpace Systems Closedloop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback
Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control StateSpace Systems Closedloop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Copyright 21 by Jonathan How. All Rights reserved 1 Fall
More informationROOT LOCUS. Consider the system. Root locus presents the poles of the closedloop system when the gain K changes from 0 to. H(s) H ( s) = ( s)
C1 ROOT LOCUS Consider the system R(s) E(s) C(s) + K G(s)  H(s) C(s) R(s) = K G(s) 1 + K G(s) H(s) Root locus presents the poles of the closedloop system when the gain K changes from 0 to 1+ K G ( s)
More informationAdditional ClosedLoop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 14)
Appendix J Additional ClosedLoop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 4) APPENDIX CONTENTS J. ClosedLoop Behavior J.2 Bode Stability Criterion J.3 Nyquist Stability Criterion J.4 Gain
More informationOverview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piecewise linear approximations Firstorder terms Secondorder terms (complex poles & zeros)
Overview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piecewise linear approximations Firstorder terms Secondorder terms (complex poles & zeros) J. McNames Portland State University ECE 222 Bode Plots Ver.
More information7.4 STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE TO DRAW THE ROOT LOCUS DIAGRAM
ROOT LOCUS TECHNIQUE. Values of on the root loci The value of at any point s on the root loci is determined from the following equation G( s) H( s) Product of lengths of vectors from poles of G( s)h( s)
More informationProfessor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall 2010 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley
Professor Fearing EE C8 / ME C34 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley. 35 pts Lag compensation. For open loop plant Gs ss+5s+8 a Find compensator gain Ds k such that the
More informationSAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE SAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015 Lecturer: Michael Ruderman Problem 1: Frequencydomain analysis and control design (15 pt) Given is a
More informationRoot Locus Design Example #4
Root Locus Design Example #4 A. Introduction The plant model represents a linearization of the heading dynamics of a 25, ton tanker ship under empty load conditions. The reference input signal R(s) is
More informationAutomatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21211 1 / 39 Feedback
More informationEECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 15, am. Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators.
Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Wed. Dec. 5, 2 8 am Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 2 2 6 3 4 4 5 6 6 7 8 2 Total
More informationSchool of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. DC Motor Position Control The block diagram for position control of the servo table is given by:
Root Locus Motivation Sketching Root Locus Examples ME375 Root Locus  1 Servo Table Example DC Motor Position Control The block diagram for position control of the servo table is given by: θ D 0.09 See
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUBJECT CODE & NAME: CONTROL SYSTEMS YEAR / SEM: II / IV UNIT I SYSTEMS AND THEIR REPRESENTATION PARTA [2
More informationExam. 135 minutes + 15 minutes reading time
Exam January 23, 27 Control Systems I (559L) Prof. Emilio Frazzoli Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes + 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 45 Number of Points: 53 Permitted aids: Important: 4 pages
More informationLearn2Control Laboratory
Learn2Control Laboratory Version 3.2 Summer Term 2014 1 This Script is for use in the scope of the Process Control lab. It is in no way claimed to be in any scientific way complete or unique. Errors should
More information100 (s + 10) (s + 100) e 0.5s. s 100 (s + 10) (s + 100). G(s) =
1 AME 3315; Spring 215; Midterm 2 Review (not graded) Problems: 9.3 9.8 9.9 9.12 except parts 5 and 6. 9.13 except parts 4 and 5 9.28 9.34 You are given the transfer function: G(s) = 1) Plot the bode plot
More informationECE137B Final Exam. There are 5 problems on this exam and you have 3 hours There are pages 119 in the exam: please make sure all are there.
ECE37B Final Exam There are 5 problems on this exam and you have 3 hours There are pages 9 in the exam: please make sure all are there. Do not open this exam until told to do so Show all work: Credit
More informationPerformance of Feedback Control Systems
Performance of Feedback Control Systems Design of a PID Controller Transient Response of a Closed Loop System Damping Coefficient, Natural frequency, Settling time and Steadystate Error and Type 0, Type
More informationQuanser NIELVIS Trainer (QNET) Series: QNET Experiment #02: DC Motor Position Control. DC Motor Control Trainer (DCMCT) Student Manual
Quanser NIELVIS Trainer (QNET) Series: QNET Experiment #02: DC Motor Position Control DC Motor Control Trainer (DCMCT) Student Manual Table of Contents 1 Laboratory Objectives1 2 References1 3 DCMCT Plant
More informationFrequency domain analysis
Automatic Control 2 Frequency domain analysis Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 20102011 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 20102011
More informationDesign via Root Locus
Design via Root Locus I 9 Chapter Learning Outcomes J After completing this chapter the student will be able to: Use the root locus to design cascade compensators to improve the steadystate error (Sections
More informationINTERACTIVE APPLICATIONS IN A MANDATORY CONTROL COURSE
INTERACTIVE APPLICATIONS IN A MANDATORY CONTROL COURSE Yves Piguet Roland Longchamp Calerga Sàrl, av. de la Chablière 35, 4 Lausanne, Switzerland. Email: yves.piguet@calerga.com Laboratoire d automatique,
More informationNADAR SARASWATHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY Vadapudupatti, Theni
NADAR SARASWATHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY Vadapudupatti, Theni625531 Question Bank for the Units I to V SE05 BR05 SU02 5 th Semester B.E. / B.Tech. Electrical & Electronics engineering IC6501
More informationUniversity of Science and Technology, Sudan Department of Chemical Engineering.
ISO 91:28 Certified Volume 3, Issue 6, November 214 Design and Decoupling of Control System for a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) Georgeous, N.B *1 and Gasmalseed, G.A, Abdalla, B.K (12) University
More informationCONTROL SYSTEMS, ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION  Vol. VIII  Design Techniques in the Frequency Domain  Edmunds, J.M. and Munro, N.
DESIGN TECHNIQUES IN THE FREQUENCY DOMAIN Edmunds, Control Systems Center, UMIST, UK Keywords: Multivariable control, frequency response design, Nyquist, scaling, diagonal dominance Contents 1. Frequency
More informationSolving Systems of Linear Equations
Section 2.3 Solving Systems of Linear Equations TERMINOLOGY 2.3 Previously Used: Equivalent Equations Literal Equation Properties of Equations Substitution Principle Prerequisite Terms: Coordinate Axes
More informationThe FrequencyResponse
6 The FrequencyResponse Design Method A Perspective on the FrequencyResponse Design Method The design of feedback control systems in industry is probably accomplished using frequencyresponse methods
More informationRoot Locus. Motivation Sketching Root Locus Examples. School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. ME375 Root Locus  1
Root Locus Motivation Sketching Root Locus Examples ME375 Root Locus  1 Servo Table Example DC Motor Position Control The block diagram for position control of the servo table is given by: D 0.09 Position
More informationChemical Process Dynamics and Control. Aisha Osman Mohamed Ahmed Department of Chemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Red Sea University
Chemical Process Dynamics and Control Aisha Osman Mohamed Ahmed Department of Chemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Red Sea University 1 Chapter 4 System Stability 2 Chapter Objectives End of this
More informationReglerteknik Allmän Kurs. Del 2. Lösningar till Exempelsamling. Läsår 2015/16
Reglerteknik Allmän Kurs Del Lösningar till Exempelsamling Läsår 5/6 Avdelningen för Reglerteknik, KTH, SE 44 Stockholm, SWEDEN AUTOMATIC CONTROL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS LINKÖPINGS UNIVERSITET Reglerteknik
More informationCHAPTER 7 STEADYSTATE RESPONSE ANALYSES
CHAPTER 7 STEADYSTATE RESPONSE ANALYSES 1. Introduction The steady state error is a measure of system accuracy. These errors arise from the nature of the inputs, system type and from nonlinearities of
More informationControl Systems 2. Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits. Roy Smith
Control Systems 2 Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits Roy Smith 2017314 4.1 Inputoutput controllability Control design questions: 1. How well can the plant be controlled? 2. What control structure
More informationStep Response for the Transfer Function of a Sensor
Step Response f the Transfer Function of a Sens G(s)=Y(s)/X(s) of a sens with X(s) input and Y(s) output A) First Order Instruments a) First der transfer function G(s)=k/(1+Ts), k=gain, T = time constant
More informationa. Closedloop system; b. equivalent transfer function Then the CLTF () T is s the poles of () T are s from a contribution of a
Root Locus Simple definition Locus of points on the s plane that represents the poles of a system as one or more parameter vary. RL and its relation to poles of a closed loop system RL and its relation
More informationNotes for ECE320. Winter by R. Throne
Notes for ECE3 Winter 45 by R. Throne Contents Table of Laplace Transforms 5 Laplace Transform Review 6. Poles and Zeros.................................... 6. Proper and Strictly Proper Transfer Functions...................
More informationEssence of the Root Locus Technique
Essence of the Root Locus Technique In this chapter we study a method for finding locations of system poles. The method is presented for a very general setup, namely for the case when the closedloop
More information2.010 Fall 2000 Solution of Homework Assignment 8
2.1 Fall 2 Solution of Homework Assignment 8 1. Root Locus Analysis of Hydraulic Servomechanism. The block diagram of the controlled hydraulic servomechanism is shown in Fig. 1 e r e error + i Σ C(s) P(s)
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. EE105 Lab Experiments
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences EE15 Lab Experiments Bode Plot Tutorial Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Bode Plots Basics
More informationEEL2216 Control Theory CT1: PID Controller Design
EEL6 Control Theory CT: PID Controller Design. Objectives (i) To design proportionalintegralderivative (PID) controller for closed loop control. (ii) To evaluate the performance of different controllers
More informationAppendix 3B MATLAB Functions for Modeling and Timedomain analysis
Appendix 3B MATLAB Functions for Modeling and Timedomain analysis MATLAB control system Toolbox contain the following functions for the timedomain response step impulse initial lsim gensig damp ltiview
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3.. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid 
More informationAn Internal Stability Example
An Internal Stability Example Roy Smith 26 April 2015 To illustrate the concept of internal stability we will look at an example where there are several polezero cancellations between the controller and
More informationAlireza Mousavi Brunel University
Alireza Mousavi Brunel University 1 » Control Process» Control Systems Design & Analysis 2 OpenLoop Control: Is normally a simple switch on and switch off process, for example a light in a room is switched
More informationExperiment 13 Poles and zeros in the z plane: IIR systems
Experiment 13 Poles and zeros in the z plane: IIR systems Achievements in this experiment You will be able to interpret the poles and zeros of the transfer function of discretetime filters to visualize
More informationME 375 Final Examination Thursday, May 7, 2015 SOLUTION
ME 375 Final Examination Thursday, May 7, 2015 SOLUTION POBLEM 1 (25%) negligible mass wheels negligible mass wheels v motor no slip ω r r F D O no slip e in Motor% Cart%with%motor%a,ached% The coupled
More informationRoot Locus Design Example #3
Root Locus Design Example #3 A. Introduction The system represents a linear model for vertical motion of an underwater vehicle at zero forward speed. The vehicle is assumed to have zero pitch and roll
More informationLecture 1 Root Locus
Root Locus ELEC304Alper Erdogan 1 1 Lecture 1 Root Locus What is RootLocus? : A graphical representation of closed loop poles as a system parameter varied. Based on RootLocus graph we can choose the
More informationLecture 7:Time Response PoleZero Maps Influence of Poles and Zeros Higher Order Systems and Pole Dominance Criterion
Cleveland State University MCE441: Intr. Linear Control Lecture 7:Time Influence of Poles and Zeros Higher Order and Pole Criterion Prof. Richter 1 / 26 FirstOrder Specs: Step : Pole Real inputs contain
More information9/9/2011 Classical Control 1
MM11 Root Locus Design Method Reading material: FC pp.270328 9/9/2011 Classical Control 1 What have we talked in lecture (MM10)? Lead and lag compensators D(s)=(s+z)/(s+p) with z < p or z > p D(s)=K(Ts+1)/(Ts+1),
More informationFREQUENCYRESPONSE ANALYSIS
ECE450/550: Feedback Control Systems. 8 FREQUENCYRESPONSE ANALYSIS 8.: Motivation to study frequencyresponse methods Advantages and disadvantages to rootlocus design approach: ADVANTAGES: Good indicator
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review
Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the splane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics
More informationTradeoffs and Limits of Performance
Chapter 9 Tradeoffs and Limits of Performance 9. Introduction Fundamental limits of feedback systems will be investigated in this chapter. We begin in Section 9.2 by discussing the basic feedback loop
More informationDistributed RealTime Control Systems
Distributed RealTime Control Systems Chapter 9 Discrete PID Control 1 Computer Control 2 Approximation of Continuous Time Controllers Design Strategy: Design a continuous time controller C c (s) and then
More informationChapter 6 SteadyState Analysis of ContinuousTime Systems
Chapter 6 SteadyState Analysis of ContinuousTime Systems 6.1 INTRODUCTION One of the objectives of a control systems engineer is to minimize the steadystate error of the closedloop system response
More information6.302 Feedback Systems Recitation 16: Compensation Prof. Joel L. Dawson
Bode Obstacle Course is one technique for doing compensation, or designing a feedback system to make the closedloop behavior what we want it to be. To review:  G c (s) G(s) H(s) you are here! plant For
More informationStudy on Control of First Order Plus Delay Using Smith Predictor
Journal of AlNahrain University Vol.18 (2), June, 2015, pp.1017 Science Study on Control of First Order Plus Delay Using Smith Predictor Saad A. Ahmed Department of Chemistry, College of EducationIbn
More informationAutonomous Mobile Robot Design
Autonomous Mobile Robot Design Topic: Guidance and Control Introduction and PID Loops Dr. Kostas Alexis (CSE) Autonomous Robot Challenges How do I control where to go? Autonomous Mobile Robot Design Topic:
More informationQuantitative Feedback Theory based Controller Design of an Unstable System
Quantitative Feedback Theory based Controller Design of an Unstable System Chandrima Roy Department of E.C.E, Assistant Professor Heritage Institute of Technology, Kolkata, WB Kalyankumar Datta Department
More informationFeedback design for the Buck Converter
Feedback design for the Buck Converter Portland State University Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland, Oregon, USA December 30, 2009 Abstract In this paper we explore two compensation
More informationEXAMPLE PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS
Similarly, the program for the fourthorder transfer function approximation with T = 0.1 sec is [num,denl = pade(0.1, 4); printsys(num, den, 'st) numlden = sa42o0sa3 + 1 80O0sA2840000~ + 16800000 sa4
More informationx(t) = x(t h), x(t) 2 R ), where is the time delay, the transfer function for such a e s Figure 1: Simple Time Delay Block Diagram e i! =1 \e i!t =!
1 TimeDelay Systems 1.1 Introduction Recitation Notes: Time Delays and Nyquist Plots Review In control systems a challenging area is operating in the presence of delays. Delays can be attributed to acquiring
More informationLab # 4 Time Response Analysis
Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Computer Engineering Dep. Feedback Control Systems Lab Eng. Tareq Abu Aisha Lab # 4 Lab # 4 Time Response Analysis What is the Time Response? It is an
More informationHomework 11 Solution  AME 30315, Spring 2015
1 Homework 11 Solution  AME 30315, Spring 2015 Problem 1 [10/10 pts] R +  K G(s) Y Gpsq Θpsq{Ipsq and we are interested in the closedloop pole locations as the parameter k is varied. Θpsq Ipsq k ωn
More informationIntroduction to Feedback Control
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? OpenLoop vs ClosedLoop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? ClosedLoop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More informationHomework Assignment 3
ECE382/ME482 Fall 2008 Homework 3 Solution October 20, 2008 1 Homework Assignment 3 Assigned September 30, 2008. Due in lecture October 7, 2008. Note that you must include all of your work to obtain full
More informationPID Tuning of Plants With Time Delay Using Root Locus
San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research Summer 2011 PID Tuning of Plants With Time Delay Using Root Locus Greg Baker San Jose State University
More informationSinusoidal Forcing of a FirstOrder Process. / τ
Frequency Response Analysis Chapter 3 Sinusoidal Forcing of a FirstOrder Process For a firstorder transfer function with gain K and time constant τ, the response to a general sinusoidal input, xt = A
More information1 Chapter 9: Design via Root Locus
1 Figure 9.1 a. Sample root locus, showing possible design point via gain adjustment (A) and desired design point that cannot be met via simple gain adjustment (B); b. responses from poles at A and B 2
More informationA MATLAB Toolbox for Teaching Model Order Reduction Techniques
A MATLAB Toolbox for Teaching Model Order Reduction Techniques Authors: Ali Eydgahi, Department of Engineering and Aviation Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD 853, aeydgahi@mail.umes.edu
More information16.31 Homework 2 Solution
16.31 Homework Solution Prof. S. R. Hall Issued: September, 6 Due: September 9, 6 Problem 1. (Dominant Pole Locations) [FPE 3.36 (a),(c),(d), page 161]. Consider the second order system ωn H(s) = (s/p
More informationComparative Study of Zero Effects in PolePlacement Control System Design Via the Shift and Delta Transforms
FACTA UNIVRSITATIS (NIŠ) SR.: LC. NRG. vol. 8, no. 3, December 25, 43945 Comparative Study of Zero ffects in PolePlacement Control System Design Via the Shift and Delta Transforms Dedicated to Professor
More informationTransient Response of a SecondOrder System
Transient Response of a SecondOrder System ECEN 830 Spring 01 1. Introduction In connection with this experiment, you are selecting the gains in your feedback loop to obtain a wellbehaved closedloop
More information