Control Systems I. Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Control Systems I. Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition" Transcription

1 Control Systems I Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition adings: Guzzella, Chapter Åstrom and Murray, Chapter Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich November 17, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

2 Tentative schedule # Date Topic 1 Sept. 22 Introduction, Signals and Systems 2 Sept. 29 Modeling, Linearization 3 Oct. 6 Analysis 1: Time response, Stability 4 Oct. 13 Analysis 2: Diagonalization, Modal coordinates. 5 Oct. 20 Transfer functions 1: Definition and properties 6 Oct. 27 Transfer functions 2: Poles and Zeros 7 Nov. 3 Analysis of feedback systems: internal stability, root locus 8 Nov. 10 Frequency response 9 Nov. 17 Analysis of feedback systems 2: the Nyquist condition 10 Nov. 24 Specifications for feedback systems 11 Dec. 1 Loop Shaping 12 Dec. 8 PID control 13 Dec. 15 plementation issues 14 Dec. 22 Robustness E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

3 Putting it all together: Bode plots for complicated transfer functions E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

4 Example Sketch the Bode plots of s + 4 G(s) = 100 s(s s + 100) First thing: write the transfer function in the Bode form: s/4 + 1 G(s) = 4 s(s 2 /100 + s/10 + 1) Second: draw the Bode plot for each factor in the transfer function. Third: add all of the above together to get the final Bode plot. E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

5 Example (s/4 + 1) G(s) = 4 s(s 2 /100 + s/10 + 1) 60 Bode Diagram 40 Magnitude (db) Phase (deg) Frequency (rad/s) E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

6 Example (s/4 + 1) G(s) = 4 s(s 2 /100 + s/10 + 1) 60 Bode Diagram 40 Magnitude (db) Phase (deg) Frequency (rad/s) E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

7 Example 60 (s/4 + 1) G(s) = 4 s(s 2 /100 + s/10 + 1) Bode Diagram 40 Magnitude (db) Phase (deg) Frequency (rad/s) E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

8 Bode s Law In the Bode plot, the magnitude slope and the phase are not independent. In particular, if the system is open-loop stable and minimum-phase, then if the slope of the Bode magnitude plot is κ db/decade over a range of more than 1 decade, the phase in that range will be approximately κ 90. E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

9 The polar plot E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

10 The polar plot In the polar plot, the frequency response G(jω) is plotted on the complex plane as a parametric function of ω. No special rules for drawing it, but the same principles we used in the Bode plot apply. In fact, it is convenient to sketch a Bode plot first, so that we can have a good idea of what the polar plot looks like, especially in view of the following. The only things that really matter in the polar plot are: Where the plot intersects the unit circle ( G(jω) = 1) Where the plot crosses the real axis ( G(jω) = l 180 ). E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

11 Polar plot Integrator E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

12 Polar plot single real, stable pole E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

13 Polar plot complex-conjugate, stable poles E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

14 Polar plot complicated transfer function Bode Diagram Magnitude (db) Phase (deg) Frequency (rad/s) E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

15 Towards Nyquist s theorem E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

16 The principle of variation of the argument Let D C be a bounded, simply-connected region of the complex plane, and let Γ be its boundary. As s moves along the closed curve Γ, G(s) describes another closed curve. G(s) D markable fact: The number of times G(s) encircles the origin, or, equivalently, the total variation in its argument G(s), as s moves along Γ, counts the number of zeros and poles of G(s) in D. E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

17 No poles/zeros in D member that if G(s) = (s z)/(s p), then G(s) = (s z) (s p). If D contains no poles/zeros, the net variation of the argument of G(s) across one complete cycle of Γ is zero. E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

18 A zero in D member that if G(s) = (s z)/(s p), then G(s) = (s z) (s p). If D contains one zero, the net variation of the argument of G(s) across one complete cycle of Γ is 2π. E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

19 A pole in D member that if G(s) = (s z)/(s p), then G(s) = (s z) (s p). If D contains one pole, the net variation of the argument of G(s) across one complete cycle of Γ is 2π. E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

20 The general case Theorem (Variation of the argument [Proof in A&M, pp ]) N = Z - P The number N of times that G(s) encircles the origin of the complex plane as s moves along the boundary Γ of a bounded simply-connected region of the plane satisfies N = Z P, where Z and P are the numbers of zeros and poles of G(s) in D, respectively. Note that the encirclements are counted positive if in the same direction as s moves along Γ, and negative otherwise. E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

21 How do we use these results for feedback control? E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

22 The Nyquist or D contour For closed-loop stability, the closed-loop poles, which corresponds to the roots (i.e., zeros!) of the characteristic polynomial 1 + kl(s), must have negative real part. The poles of 1 + kl(s) are also the poles of L(s). Construct the region D as a D-shaped region containing an arbitrarily large (but finite) part of the complex right-half plane. As s moves along the boundary of this region, 1 + kl(s) encircles the origin N = Z P times, where Z is the number of unstable closed-loop poles (zeros of 1 + kl(s) in the rhp); P is the number of unstable open-loop poles (poles of 1 + kl(s) in the rhp); E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

23 The Nyquist plot The previous statement can be rephrased: As s moves along the boundary of this region, L(s) encircles the 1/k point N = Z P times, where Z is the number of unstable closed-loop poles (zeros of 1 + kl(s) in the Nyquist contour); P is the number of unstable open-loop poles (poles of 1 + kl(s) in the Nyquist contour); Symmetry of poles/zeros about the real axis implies that L( jω) = L(jω), hence the plot of L(s) when s moves on the boundary of the Nyquist contour is just the polar plot + its symmetric plot about the real axis. This is what is called the Nyquist plot. The key feature of the Nyquist plot is the number of encirclements of the 1/k point. E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

24 The Nyquist condition Theorem Consider a closed-loop system with loop transfer function kl(s), which has P poles in the region enclosed by the Nyquist contour. Let N be the net number of clockwise encirclements of 1/k by L(s) when s moves along the Nyquist contour in the clockwise direction. The closed loop system has Z = N + P poles in the Nyquist contour. In particular: If the open-loop system is stable, the closed-loop system is stable as long as the Nyquist plot of L(s) does NOT encircle the 1/k point. If the open-loop system has P poles, the closed-loop system is stable as long as the Nyquist plot of L(s) encircles the 1/k point P times in the negative (counter-clockwise) direction. E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

25 Nyquist condition single real, stable pole L(s) = 2 s + 1 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

26 Nyquist condition open-loop unstable system L(s) = s + 2 s 2 1 = s + 2 s E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

27 Dealing with open-loop poles on the imaginary axis If there are open-loop poles on the imaginary axis, make small indentations in the Nyquist contour, e.g., leaving the imaginary poles on the left. Be careful on how you close the Nyquist plot at infinity: If moving CCW around the poles, then close the plot CW. E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

28 Nyquist poles on the imaginary axis L(s) = 2 (s 2 + 1)(s + 1) E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

29 The Nyquist condition on Bode plots If the open-loop is stable, then we know that in order for the closed-loop to be stable the Nyquist plot of L(s) should NOT encircle the 1 point. In other words, L(jω) < 1 whenever L(jω) = 180. On the Bode plot, this means that the magnitude plot should be below the 0 db line if/when the phase plot crosses the 180 line. member that this condition is valid only if the open loop is stable. In all other cases (including non-minimum phase zeros) it is strongly recommended to double check any conclusion on closed-loop stability using other methods (Nyquist, root locus). E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

30 Gain and Phase Margin The distance from the Nyquist plot to the 1 point is a measure of robustness. On the bode plot, it is easy to measure this distance in terms of gain and phase margin Bode Diagram Magnitude (db) Phase (deg) E. Frazzoli 10 (ETH) Lecture 9: Control 10 1 Systems I /11/ / 31

31 Summary In this lecture, we learned: How to sketch a polar plot (and hence a Nyquist plot), based on Bode plots The Nyquist condition to determine closed-loop stability using a Nyquist plot. How to check the Nyquist condition on a Bode plot. How to quickly assess the robustness of a feedback control system. Now we have three graphical methods to study closed-loop stability given the (open-)loop transfer function. 1 Root locus: always correct if applicable (assumes finite-dimensional system) 2 Nyquist: always correct, always appplicable; 3 Bode: very useful for control system design, however may be misleading in determining closed-loop stability (e.g., for open-loop unstable systems). So far we have only looked at analysis issues, i.e., how to determine closed-loop stability; from now on we will concentrate on control synthesis, i.e., how to design a feedback control system that makes a system behave as desired. E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 9: Control Systems I 17/11/ / 31

Control Systems I. Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition Control Systems I Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition Readings: Åstrom and Murray, Chapter 9.1 4 www.cds.caltech.edu/~murray/amwiki/index.php/first_edition Jacopo Tani Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control

Control Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications Control Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications Readings: Guzzella, Chapter 10 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich November 24, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture

Control Systems I. Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method. Readings: Guzzella 9.1-3, Emilio Frazzoli Control Systems I Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method Readings: Guzzella 9.1-3, 13.3 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich November 3, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH)

Systems Analysis and Control Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 23: Drawing The Nyquist Plot Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Review of Nyquist Drawing the Nyquist Plot Using the

Topic # Feedback Control Topic #4 16.31 Feedback Control Stability in the Frequency Domain Nyquist Stability Theorem Examples Appendix (details) This is the basis of future robustness tests. Fall 2007 16.31 4 2 Frequency Stability

Systems Analysis and Control Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 23: Drawing The Nyquist Plot Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Review of Nyquist Drawing the Nyquist Plot Using

Control Systems I. Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich Control Systems I Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich October 27, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 6: Control Systems I 27/10/2017

Control Systems I. Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method. Readings: Jacopo Tani. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich Control Systems I Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method Readings: Jacopo Tani Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich November 2, 2018 J. Tani, E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 7:

r + - FINAL June 12, 2012 MAE 143B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic MAE 43B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic FINAL June, One sheet of hand-written notes (two pages). Present your reasoning and calculations clearly. Inconsistent etchings will not be graded. Write answers

Frequency methods for the analysis of feedback systems. Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems. Nyquist approach to study stability Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems 1. Motivation 2. Graphical representation of frequency response: Bode and Nyquist curves 3. Nyquist stability theorem 4. Stability margins Frequency methods

Control Systems I. Lecture 5: Transfer Functions. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich Control Systems I Lecture 5: Transfer Functions Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich October 20, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 5: Control Systems I 20/10/2017

1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise EE C128 / ME134 Problem Set 6 Solution Fall 2011 1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise Consider a close loop system with unity feedback. For each G(s), hand sketch the Nyquist diagram, determine Z = P N, algebraically

1 (s + 3)(s + 2)(s + a) G(s) = C(s) = K P + K I MAE 43B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic FINAL June 9, Problem. ( points) Consider a plant in feedback with the PI controller G(s) = (s + 3)(s + )(s + a) C(s) = K P + K I s. (a) (4 points) For a given constant

Systems Analysis and Control Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 22: The Nyquist Criterion Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Complex Analysis The Argument Principle The Contour

Control Systems I. Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Control Systems I Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich October 13, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH)

Course Outline. Closed Loop Stability. Stability. Amme 3500 : System Dynamics & Control. Nyquist Stability. Dr. Dunant Halim Amme 3 : System Dynamics & Control Nyquist Stability Dr. Dunant Halim Course Outline Week Date Content Assignment Notes 1 5 Mar Introduction 2 12 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 19 Mar System Response

Frequency Response Techniques 4th Edition T E N Frequency Response Techniques SOLUTION TO CASE STUDY CHALLENGE Antenna Control: Stability Design and Transient Performance First find the forward transfer function, G(s). Pot: K 1 = 10

Lecture 15 Nyquist Criterion and Diagram Lecture Notes of Control Systems I - ME 41/Analysis and Synthesis of Linear Control System - ME86 Lecture 15 Nyquist Criterion and Diagram Department of Mechanical Engineering, University Of Saskatchewan,

Control Systems I. Lecture 2: Modeling. Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3, Guzzella Ch Emilio Frazzoli Control Systems I Lecture 2: Modeling Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3, Guzzella Ch. 2-3 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich September 29, 2017 E. Frazzoli

ECE 486 Control Systems ECE 486 Control Systems Spring 208 Midterm #2 Information Issued: April 5, 208 Updated: April 8, 208 ˆ This document is an info sheet about the second exam of ECE 486, Spring 208. ˆ Please read the following

K(s +2) s +20 K (s + 10)(s +1) 2. (c) KG(s) = K(s + 10)(s +1) (s + 100)(s +5) 3. Solution : (a) KG(s) = s +20 = K s s 321 16. Determine the range of K for which each of the following systems is stable by making a Bode plot for K = 1 and imagining the magnitude plot sliding up or down until instability results. Verify

Classify a transfer function to see which order or ramp it can follow and with which expected error. Dr. J. Tani, Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 5-059-00 Control Systems I (Autumn 208) Exercise Set 0 Topic: Specifications for Feedback Systems Discussion: 30.. 208 Learning objectives: The student can grizzi@ethz.ch,

Control Systems. Frequency Method Nyquist Analysis. Frequency Method Nyquist Analysis chibum@seoultech.ac.kr Outline Polar plots Nyquist plots Factors of polar plots PolarNyquist Plots Polar plot: he locus of the magnitude of ω vs. the phase of ω on polar

CHAPTER 7 : BODE PLOTS AND GAIN ADJUSTMENTS COMPENSATION CHAPTER 7 : BODE PLOTS AND GAIN ADJUSTMENTS COMPENSATION Objectives Students should be able to: Draw the bode plots for first order and second order system. Determine the stability through the bode plots.

Linear Control Systems Lecture #3 - Frequency Domain Analysis. Guillaume Drion Academic year Linear Control Systems Lecture #3 - Frequency Domain Analysis Guillaume Drion Academic year 2018-2019 1 Goal and Outline Goal: To be able to analyze the stability and robustness of a closed-loop system

16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2 16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2 September 22, 2010 In this recitation, we will consider two problems from Chapter 8 of the Van de Vegte book. R + - E G c (s) G(s) C Figure 1: The standard block diagram

H(s) = s. a 2. H eq (z) = z z. G(s) a 2. G(s) A B. s 2 s(s + a) 2 s(s a) G(s) 1 a 1 a. } = (z s 1)( z. e ) ) (z. (z 1)(z e at )(z e at ) .7 Quiz Solutions Problem : a H(s) = s a a) Calculate the zero order hold equivalent H eq (z). H eq (z) = z z G(s) Z{ } s G(s) a Z{ } = Z{ s s(s a ) } G(s) A B Z{ } = Z{ + } s s(s + a) s(s a) G(s) a a

Analysis of SISO Control Loops Chapter 5 Analysis of SISO Control Loops Topics to be covered For a given controller and plant connected in feedback we ask and answer the following questions: Is the loop stable? What are the sensitivities

The Nyquist criterion relates the stability of a closed system to the open-loop frequency response and open loop pole location. Introduction to the Nyquist criterion The Nyquist criterion relates the stability of a closed system to the open-loop frequency response and open loop pole location. Mapping. If we take a complex number

Homework 7 - Solutions Homework 7 - Solutions Note: This homework is worth a total of 48 points. 1. Compensators (9 points) For a unity feedback system given below, with G(s) = K s(s + 5)(s + 11) do the following: (c) Find the

Digital Control Systems Digital Control Systems Lecture Summary #4 This summary discussed some graphical methods their use to determine the stability the stability margins of closed loop systems. A. Nyquist criterion Nyquist

Control Systems I. Lecture 1: Introduction. Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 1, Guzzella Ch. 1. Emilio Frazzoli Control Systems I Lecture 1: Introduction Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 1, Guzzella Ch. 1 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich September 22, 2017 E. Frazzoli

Class 13 Frequency domain analysis Class 13 Frequency domain analysis The frequency response is the output of the system in steady state when the input of the system is sinusoidal Methods of system analysis by the frequency response, as

Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore Lead Lag Compensator Design Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst.

Nyquist Criterion For Stability of Closed Loop System Nyquist Criterion For Stability of Closed Loop System Prof. N. Puri ECE Department, Rutgers University Nyquist Theorem Given a closed loop system: r(t) + KG(s) = K N(s) c(t) H(s) = KG(s) +KG(s) = KN(s)

MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Frequency Domain Design Intro Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University /5/27 Outline Closed Loop Transfer

Frequency Response Analysis Frequency Response Analysis Consider let the input be in the form Assume that the system is stable and the steady state response of the system to a sinusoidal inputdoes not depend on the initial conditions

Recitation 11: Time delays Recitation : Time delays Emilio Frazzoli Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems Massachusetts Institute of Technology November, 00. Introduction and motivation. Delays are incurred when the controller

Robust Performance Example #1 Robust Performance Example # The transfer function for a nominal system (plant) is given, along with the transfer function for one extreme system. These two transfer functions define a family of plants

MAE 143B - Homework 9 MAE 43B - Homework 9 7.2 2 2 3.8.6.4.2.2 9 8 2 2 3 a) G(s) = (s+)(s+).4.6.8.2.2.4.6.8. Polar plot; red for negative ; no encirclements of, a.s. under unit feedback... 2 2 3. 4 9 2 2 3 h) G(s) = s+ s(s+)..2.4.6.8.2.4

(Continued on next page) (Continued on next page) 18.2 Roots of Stability Nyquist Criterion 87 e(s) 1 S(s) = =, r(s) 1 + P (s)c(s) where P (s) represents the plant transfer function, and C(s) the compensator. The closedloop characteristic

ROOT LOCUS. Consider the system. Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to. H(s) H ( s) = ( s) C1 ROOT LOCUS Consider the system R(s) E(s) C(s) + K G(s) - H(s) C(s) R(s) = K G(s) 1 + K G(s) H(s) Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to 1+ K G ( s)

STABILITY ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES ECE4540/5540: Digital Control Systems 4 1 STABILITY ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES 41: Bilinear transformation Three main aspects to control-system design: 1 Stability, 2 Steady-state response, 3 Transient response

Robust Control 3 The Closed Loop Robust Control 3 The Closed Loop Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University /2/2002 Outline Closed Loop Transfer Functions Traditional Performance Measures Time

Module 3F2: Systems and Control EXAMPLES PAPER 2 ROOT-LOCUS. Solutions Cambridge University Engineering Dept. Third Year Module 3F: Systems and Control EXAMPLES PAPER ROOT-LOCUS Solutions. (a) For the system L(s) = (s + a)(s + b) (a, b both real) show that the root-locus

Control Systems I. Lecture 2: Modeling and Linearization. Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch Jacopo Tani Control Systems I Lecture 2: Modeling and Linearization Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3 Jacopo Tani Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich September 28, 2018 J. Tani, E.

Intro to Frequency Domain Design Intro to Frequency Domain Design MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University Outline Closed Loop Transfer Functions

DESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD 206 Spring Semester ELEC733 Digital Control System LECTURE 7: DESIGN USING TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE CLASSICAL METHOD For a unit ramp input Tz Ez ( ) 2 ( z ) D( z) G( z) Tz e( ) lim( z) z 2 ( z ) D( z)

MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems Frequency Domain Design Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University 5/8/25 Outline Closed Loop Transfer Functions

Introduction. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31 Introduction Classical Control Robust Control u(t) y(t) G u(t) G + y(t) G : nominal model G = G + : plant uncertainty Uncertainty sources : Structured : parametric uncertainty, multimodel uncertainty Unstructured

Course roadmap. ME451: Control Systems. What is Root Locus? (Review) Characteristic equation & root locus. Lecture 18 Root locus: Sketch of proofs ME451: Control Systems Modeling Course roadmap Analysis Design Lecture 18 Root locus: Sketch of proofs Dr. Jongeun Choi Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan State University Laplace transform

ECE 345 / ME 380 Introduction to Control Systems Lecture Notes 8 Learning Objectives ECE 345 / ME 380 Introduction to Control Systems Lecture Notes 8 Dr. Oishi oishi@unm.edu November 2, 203 State the phase and gain properties of a root locus Sketch a root locus, by

6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control 6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control Lecture 17: Robust Stability Readings: DDV, Chapters 19, 20 Emilio Frazzoli Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology April 6, 2011 E. Frazzoli

Plan of the Lecture. Goal: wrap up lead and lag control; start looking at frequency response as an alternative methodology for control systems design. Plan of the Lecture Review: design using Root Locus; dynamic compensation; PD and lead control Today s topic: PI and lag control; introduction to frequency-response design method Goal: wrap up lead and

FEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control FEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control Lecture 5: Uncertainty and Robustness in SISO Systems [Ch.7-(8)] Elling W. Jacobsen, Automatic Control Lab, KTH Lecture 5:Uncertainty and Robustness () FEL3210 MIMO

MAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008 MAS07 CONTROL THEORY. HOVLAND: EXAM SOLUTION 2008 MAS07 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008 Geir Hovland, Mechatronics Group, Grimstad, Norway June 30, 2008 C. Repeat question B, but plot the phase curve

Nyquist Plots / Nyquist Stability Criterion Nyquist Plots / Nyquist Stability Criterion Given Nyquist plot is a polar plot for vs using the Nyquist contour (K=1 is assumed) Applying the Nyquist criterion to the Nyquist plot we can determine the

Topic # Feedback Control Systems Topic #20 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Closed-loop system analysis Bounded Gain Theorem Robust Stability Fall 2007 16.31 20 1 SISO Performance Objectives Basic setup: d i d o r u y G c (s) G(s) n control

Frequency domain analysis Automatic Control 2 Frequency domain analysis Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 2010-2011 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 2010-2011

Response to a pure sinusoid Harvard University Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences ES 145/215 - INTRODUCTION TO SYSTEMS ANALYSIS WITH PHYSIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS Fall Lecture 14: The Bode Plot Response to a pure sinusoid

MAE 143B - Homework 9 MAE 143B - Homework 9 7.1 a) We have stable first-order poles at p 1 = 1 and p 2 = 1. For small values of ω, we recover the DC gain K = lim ω G(jω) = 1 1 = 2dB. Having this finite limit, our straight-line

x(t) = x(t h), x(t) 2 R ), where is the time delay, the transfer function for such a e s Figure 1: Simple Time Delay Block Diagram e i! =1 \e i!t =! 1 Time-Delay Systems 1.1 Introduction Recitation Notes: Time Delays and Nyquist Plots Review In control systems a challenging area is operating in the presence of delays. Delays can be attributed to acquiring

Procedure for sketching bode plots (mentioned on Oct 5 th notes, Pg. 20) Procedure for sketching bode plots (mentioned on Oct 5 th notes, Pg. 20) 1. Rewrite the transfer function in proper p form. 2. Separate the transfer function into its constituent parts. 3. Draw the Bode

Robust fixed-order H Controller Design for Spectral Models by Convex Optimization Robust fixed-order H Controller Design for Spectral Models by Convex Optimization Alireza Karimi, Gorka Galdos and Roland Longchamp Abstract A new approach for robust fixed-order H controller design by

Transient response via gain adjustment. Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = 2. The closed loop transfer function is. s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2 n Design via frequency response Transient response via gain adjustment Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = ωn 2. The closed loop transfer function is s(s+2ζω n ) T(s) = ω 2 n s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2

Control System Design ELEC ENG 4CL4: Control System Design Notes for Lecture #11 Wednesday, January 28, 2004 Dr. Ian C. Bruce Room: CRL-229 Phone ext.: 26984 Email: ibruce@mail.ece.mcmaster.ca Relative Stability: Stability

CDS 101/110a: Lecture 10-1 Robust Performance CDS 11/11a: Lecture 1-1 Robust Performance Richard M. Murray 1 December 28 Goals: Describe how to represent uncertainty in process dynamics Describe how to analyze a system in the presence of uncertainty

Raktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Frequency Response-Design Method .. AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Frequency Response- Method Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. ... Response to

Stabilizing the dual inverted pendulum Stabilizing the dual inverted pendulum Taylor W. Barton Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA (e-mail: tbarton@mit.edu) Abstract: A classical control approach to stabilizing a

EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems 1 / 30 EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems Section 9: of and using Techniques McMaster University Winter 2017 2 / 30 Outline 1 2 3 4 / 30 domain analysis Analyze closed loop using open loop

The Frequency-Response 6 The Frequency-Response Design Method A Perspective on the Frequency-Response Design Method The design of feedback control systems in industry is probably accomplished using frequency-response methods

Control Systems 2. Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits. Roy Smith Control Systems 2 Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits Roy Smith 2017-3-14 4.1 Input-output controllability Control design questions: 1. How well can the plant be controlled? 2. What control structure

Nyquist Stability Criteria Nyquist Stability Criteria Dr. Bishakh Bhattacharya h Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering IIT Kanpur Joint Initiative of IITs and IISc - Funded by MHRD This Lecture Contains Introduction to

Lecture 5: Frequency domain analysis: Nyquist, Bode Diagrams, second order systems, system types Lecture 5: Frequency domain analysis: Nyquist, Bode Diagrams, second order systems, system types Venkata Sonti Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India, 562 This

2.004 Dynamics and Control II Spring 2008 MT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu.004 Dynamics and Control Spring 008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. Massachusetts nstitute of Technology

Boise State University Department of Electrical Engineering ECE461 Control Systems. Control System Design in the Frequency Domain Boise State University Department of Electrical Engineering ECE6 Control Systems Control System Design in the Frequency Domain Situation: Consider the following block diagram of a type- servomechanism:

ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques CAIRO UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ENGINEERING ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 00/0 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques [] For the following system, Design a compensator such

8.1.6 Quadratic pole response: resonance 8.1.6 Quadratic pole response: resonance Example G(s)= v (s) v 1 (s) = 1 1+s L R + s LC L + Second-order denominator, of the form 1+a 1 s + a s v 1 (s) + C R Two-pole low-pass filter example v (s) with

The loop shaping paradigm. Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2) Essential specifications (2) Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2). Loop shaping 2. Performance limitations The loop shaping paradigm. Estimate performance and robustness of the feedback system from the loop transfer L(jω)

Chapter 2. Classical Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control Chapter 2 Classical Control System Design Overview Ch. 2. 2. Classical control system design Introduction Introduction Steady-state Steady-state errors errors Type Type k k systems systems Integral Integral

Active Control? Contact : Website : Teaching Active Control? Contact : bmokrani@ulb.ac.be Website : http://scmero.ulb.ac.be Teaching Active Control? Disturbances System Measurement Control Controler. Regulator.,,, Aims of an Active Control Disturbances

School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. DC Motor Position Control The block diagram for position control of the servo table is given by: Root Locus Motivation Sketching Root Locus Examples ME375 Root Locus - 1 Servo Table Example DC Motor Position Control The block diagram for position control of the servo table is given by: θ D 0.09 See

Robust Loop Shaping Controller Design for Spectral Models by Quadratic Programming Robust Loop Shaping Controller Design for Spectral Models by Quadratic Programming Gorka Galdos, Alireza Karimi and Roland Longchamp Abstract A quadratic programming approach is proposed to tune fixed-order

CDS 101/110a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design CDS 11/11a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design Richard M. Murray 17 November 28 Goals: Describe canonical control design problem and standard performance measures Show how to use loop shaping to achieve

Richiami di Controlli Automatici Richiami di Controlli Automatici Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II detommas@unina.it Ottobre 2012 Corsi AnsaldoBreda G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici

Exercise 1 (A Non-minimum Phase System) Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 5-59- Control Systems I (HS 25) Solution Exercise Set Loop Shaping Noele Norris, 9th December 26 Exercise (A Non-minimum Phase System) To increase the rise time of the system, we

Analysis of Discrete-Time Systems TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 1 Analysis of Discrete-Time Systems Overview Stability Sensitivity and Robustness Controllability, Reachability, Observability, and Detectabiliy TU Berlin Discrete-Time

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder R. W. Erickson Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder 8.1. Review of Bode plots Decibels Table 8.1. Expressing magnitudes in decibels G db = 0 log 10

Root Locus Methods. The root locus procedure Root Locus Methods Design of a position control system using the root locus method Design of a phase lag compensator using the root locus method The root locus procedure To determine the value of the gain

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall K(s +1)(s +2) G(s) =. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering. Dynamics and Control II Fall 7 Problem Set #7 Solution Posted: Friday, Nov., 7. Nise problem 5 from chapter 8, page 76. Answer:

Andrea Zanchettin Automatic Control AUTOMATIC CONTROL. Andrea M. Zanchettin, PhD Spring Semester, Linear systems (frequency domain) 1 AUTOMATIC CONTROL Andrea M. Zanchettin, PhD Spring Semester, 2018 Linear systems (frequency domain) 2 Motivations Consider an LTI system Thanks to the Lagrange s formula we can compute the motion of

Exercise 1 (A Non-minimum Phase System) Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 5-59- Control Systems I (Autumn 27) Solution Exercise Set 2 Loop Shaping clruch@ethz.ch, 8th December 27 Exercise (A Non-minimum Phase System) To decrease the rise time of the system,

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall 2007 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering.4 Dynamics and Control II Fall 7 Problem Set #9 Solution Posted: Sunday, Dec., 7. The.4 Tower system. The system parameters are

AA/EE/ME 548: Problem Session Notes #5 AA/EE/ME 548: Problem Session Notes #5 Review of Nyquist and Bode Plots. Nyquist Stability Criterion. LQG/LTR Method Tuesday, March 2, 203 Outline:. A review of Bode plots. 2. A review of Nyquist plots

Outline. Classical Control. Lecture 1 Outline Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Prerequisites Block diagram for system modeling Modeling Mechanical Electrical Outline Introduction Background Basic Systems Models/Transfers functions 1 Introduction

Software Engineering 3DX3. Slides 8: Root Locus Techniques Software Engineering 3DX3 Slides 8: Root Locus Techniques Dr. Ryan Leduc Department of Computing and Software McMaster University Material based on Control Systems Engineering by N. Nise. c 2006, 2007 ISS0031 Modeling and Identification Lecture 5: Linear Systems. Transfer functions. Frequency Domain Analysis. Basic Control Design. Aleksei Tepljakov, Ph.D. September 30, 2015 Linear Dynamic Systems Definition Chapter 8. Converter Transer Functions 8.1. Review o Bode plots 8.1.1. Single pole response 8.1.2. Single zero response 8.1.3. Right hal-plane zero 8.1.4. Frequency inversion 8.1.5. Combinations 8.1.6.