# FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

## Transcription

1 ECE45/55: Feedback Control Systems. 9 FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9.: PD and lead compensation networks The frequency-response methods we have seen so far largely tell us about stability and stability margins of a closed-loop system based on open-loop response. Now, we look at frequency-response based design methods which primarily aim at improving stability margins. Also, given the relationship between PM and performance, we have some idea of transient response as well. Start thinking of Bode-magnitude and Bode-phase plots as LEGO to make the frequency response we want. PD compensation Compensator D(s) = K ( + TD s). We have seen from root-locus that this has a stabilizing effect. Magnitude and phase effect: K 9 K. T D T D. T D T D Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli T D T D

2 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9 2 PD controller increases phase for frequencies over ω./td.so, locate /T D < crossover so that phase margin at crossover is better. Problem: Magnitude response continues to increase as frequency increases. This amplifies high-frequency sensor noise. Lead compensation [ ] Ts + Compensator D(s) = K αts +, α <. Approximate PD control for frequencies up to ω = αt. Magnitude and phase effect: K α φ max K T ω max αt. T The phase contributed at frequency ω is T ω max αt αt φ = tan (T ω) tan (αt ω). To find where the maximum phase contribution is, we take the derivative of φ with respect to ω and set it to zero dφ dω = dtan (T ω) dω = T T 2 ω 2 + dtan (αt ω) dω αt α 2 T 2 ω 2 + = Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

3 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9 3 α 2 T 3 ω 2 + T = αt 3 ω 2 + αt T 3 ω 2 α(α ) = T (α ) ω max = T α. For this frequency, the amount of phase added is φ max = tan (T ω max ) tan (αt ω max ) ( ) ( ) α = tan α tan α }{{}}{{} θ θ 2 To get a simpler expression, consider the triangles to the right. + α φ max θ θ 2 We can solve for φmax using the law of cosines. This gives: α α + α 2 α α ( α) 2 = ( + α) + (α + α 2 ) 2 + α α + α 2 cos (φ max ) 2α + α 2 = + 2α + α α α + α 2 cos (φ max ) 4α cos (φ max ) = 2 + α α + α = 2 α 2 ( + α). Now, we remember that cos 2 (θ) + sin 2 (θ) =, so sin 2 (φ max ) = 4α ( + α) 2 = ( + α)2 4α ( + α) 2 So, we conclude that = ( α)2 ( + α) 2. Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

4 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9 4 ( ) α φ max = sin + α We can invert this to find α to add a certain phase φmax α = sin(φ max) + sin(φ max ). We can show that ωmax occurs mid-way between T and on a log αt scale ( ) ( ) ( ) log(ω max ) = log T = log + log αt T αt. = 2 [ ( ) ( )] log + log. T αt 9 8 How much can we improve phase with a lead network? φmax If we need more phase improvement, we can use a double-lead compensator: D(s) = K [ ] Ts + 2. αts + Need to compromise between good phase margin and good sensor noise rejection at high frequency. /α Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

5 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN : Design method # for lead controllers Design specification include: Desired steady-state error. Desired phase margin. Compute steady-state error of compensated system. Set equal to desired steady-state error by computing K. Evaluate the PM of the uncompensated system using the value of K from above. ω max initially set to crossover frequency. Add a small amount of PM (5 to 2 )totheneededphaselead. (Lead network moves crossover point, so need to design conservatively): Gives φ max. Determine α = sin(φ max ) + sin(φ max ). Determine T = ω max α. Iterate if necessary (choose a slightly different ωmax or φ max ). EXAMPLE: Plant G(s) = s(s + ) Specification : Want steady-state error for ramp input <.. Specification 2: Want overshoot Mp < 25%. Start by computing steady-state error [ ] e ss = lim s R(s) s + D(s)G(s) [ ] = lim = s s + D(s) D(). (s+) Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

6 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9 6 [ ] Ts + D(s) = K αts + So, D() = K so D() = K. =.... K =. In Bode plot below, red line is original plant. Green line is plant with added gain of K =, butnoleadcompensator. We see that the new crossover is at 3 rad s,soω max = 3rads. Overshoot specification Mp < 25% gives PM > 45. Evaluating (red line) Bode diagram of KG(s) at crossover, we see we have a phase margin of 8.Needabout27 more to meet spec. Note, addition of pole and zero from lead network will shift crossover frequency somewhat. To be safe, design for added phase of 37 instead of 27. α = sin(37 ) + sin(37 ) =.25. T =.25(3) =.667. So, D(s) = [ 2s/3 + 2s/2 + ]. In plots below, the blue line is the Bode plot of the compensated system KD(s)G(s). Also, uncompensated root locus is plotted top-right; compensated root locus is plotted bottom-right. We find that we just missed specifications: PM = 44.Iterateif desired to meet specs. Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

7 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9 7 Magnitude Phase ω (rad/sec) ω (rad/sec) Imag Axis Imag Axis Real Axis Real Axis Amplitude Step Response Amplitude Ramp Response Time (sec.) Summary of design example Time (sec.). Determine dc-gain so that steady-state errors meet spec. 2. Select α and T to achieve an acceptable PM at crossover. Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

8 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN : Design method #2 for lead controllers Design specifications Desired closed-loop bandwidth requirements (rather than e ss ). Desired PM requirements. Choose open-loop crossover frequency ωc to be half the desired closed-loop bandwidth. Evaluate KG = G( jω c ) and φ G = G( jω c ). Compute phase lead required φmax = PM φ G 8. Compute α = sin(φ max ) + sin(φ max ). Compute T = αωc. Compensation is [ ] Ts + D(s) = K αts + α D( jω c ) =K + α α + = K α + α α + = K. α Open-loop gain at ωc is designed to be : D( jω c ) G( jω c ) = K α G( jω c ) = Our design is now complete. K = α K G. Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

9 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9 9 EXAMPLE: Desired gain crossover frequency of radians per second. Desired PM of 6. G(s) = s(s + ). KG = j( j + ) =., φ G = φmax = = sin(φ max ) α = + sin(φ max ) =.37. T = α =.35. K D = α K G = Matlab code to automate this procedure: % [K,T,alpha]=bod_lead(np,dp,wc,PM) % Computes the lead compensation of the plant np/dp to have % phase margin PM (in degrees) at crossover frequency wc (in radians/sec). % e.g., [K,T,alpha]=bod_lead([],[ ],5,6); function [K,T,alpha]=bod_lead(np,dp,wc,PM) % first compute the plant response at wc. [magc,phc]=bode(np,dp,wc); % now, compute the needed phase lead at wc and convert to radians % for use with "sine" phir=(-8+pm-phc)*pi/8; if abs(phir)pi/2, fprintf('a simple phase lead/lag cannot change the phase by more\n'); fprintf('than +/- 9 degrees.\n'); error('aborting.'); end; % Compute alpha, T, and K for compensator alpha=(-sin(phir))/(+sin(phir)); T=/(wc*sqrt(alpha)); K=sqrt(alpha)/magc; Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

10 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9 % compute the new open-loop system by convolving the plant polynomials % with the compensator polynomials. nol=conv(np,k*[t ]); dol=conv(dp,[alpha*t ]); % check the solution by plotting the Bode plot for the new open-loop % polynomials. Include the frequency w= % to get the full resonance response to show the gain margin. Also, plot % the uncompensated Bode response. w=logspace(-2,)*wc; w(34)=wc; clf; [mag,ph]=bode(np,dp,w); [mag2,ph2]=bode(nol,dol,w); subplot(2); semilogx(w/wc,2*log(mag),'--'); hold on; semilogx(w/wc,2*log(mag2)); grid; plot(w/wc,*w+,'g-'); ylabel('magnitude (db)'); title('phase-lead design (uncompensated=dashed; compensated=solid)'); subplot(22); semilogx(w/wc,ph,'--'); hold on; semilogx(w/wc,ph2); grid; plot(w/wc,*w-8+pm,'g-'); ylabel('phase'); xlabel('frequency/wc (i.e., ""=wc)'); Matlab results: Magnitude (db) Phase Phase lead design (uncompensated=dashed; compensated=solid) Frequency/wc (i.e., ""=wc) Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

11 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9 9.4: PI and lag compensation PI compensation In many problems it is important to keep bandwidth low, and also reduce steady-state error. PI compensation used here. K D(s) = K [ + T I s ]..ωt I ωt I ωt I K 9 ωt I ωt I Infinite gain at zero frequency Reduces steady-state error to step, ramp, etc. But also has integrator anti-windup problems. Adds phase below breakpoint. We want to keep breakpoint frequency very low to keep from destabilizing system. Lag compensation T I ω c. Approximates PI, but without integrator overflow. [ ] Ts + D(s) = α α>. αts + Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

12 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9 2 Primary objective of lag is to add 2 log α db gain to low frequencies without changing PM. α αt T αt T 9 Steady-state response improves with little effect on transient response. Typical process Assumption is that we need to modify (increase) the dc-gain of the loop transfer function. If we apply only a gain, then ω c typically increases and the phase margin decreases. NOT GOOD. Instead, use lag compensation to lower high-frequency gain. Assume plant has gain K (adjustable), or that we insert a gain K into the system. Adjust the open-loop gain K to meet phase margin requirements (plus about 5 slop factor) at crossover without additional compensation. Draw Bode diagram of system using the gain K from above. Evaluate low-frequency gain. Determine α to meet low-frequency gain requirements. Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

13 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9 3 Choose one corner frequency ω = (the zero) to be about one T decade below crossover frequency. (This way, the phase added by the lag compensator will minimally affect PM. Thephaseaddedat crossover will be about 5,henceourpreviousslopfactor). The other corner frequency is at ω = αt. Iterate design to meet spec. EXAMPLE: K G(s) = (.5 s + ) (s + ) ( 2 s + ). Bode plot for plant is red line, below. Uncompensated root locus is top-right plot. We want to design compensator for PM 25, K p = 9.. Set K = 4.5 for PM = 3.Thisgivescrossoveratω c.2 rads/sec. (Green line on Bode plot.) 2. Low-frequency gain now about 3 db or (3/2) = Should be raised by a factor of 2 to get K p = 9. So,α = Choose corner frequency at ω =.2 rads/sec. =.2, ort = 5. T 5. We then know other corner frequency ω = αt =..4 Step Response From: U() Altogether, we now have the compensator [ ] 5s + D(s) = 2. s + Amplitude To: Y() Time (sec.) Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

14 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN Magnitude Phase ω (rad/sec) ω (rad/sec) Imag Axis Imag Axis Real Axis Real Axis Please understand that the recipes in these notes are not meant to be exhaustive! And, we often require both lead and lag to meet specs. Many other approaches to control design using frequency-response methods exist. In fact, once you are comfortable with Bode plots, you can add poles and zeros like LEGOs to build whatever frequency response you might like (within the limitations of Bode s gain-phase theorem). Our next section gives some guidance on this. Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

15 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN : Design based on sensitivity Goal: Develop conditions on Bode plot of loop transfer function D(s)G(s) that will ensure good performance with respect to sensitivity, steady-state errors and sensor noise. Steady-state performance = lower bound on system low-freq. gain. Sensor noise = upper bound on high-frequency gain. Consider also the risk of an unmodeled system resonance: Magnitude may go over. Can cause instability. Must ensure that high-frequency gain is low so magnitude does not go over. Magnitude Frequency Together, these help us design a desired loop frequency response: Magnitude must be high at low frequencies, and Low at high frequencies. Magnitude of D(s)G(s) Steady-state Error Boundary Sensor noise and plant sensitivity boundary Sensitivity functions The presence of noises also enters our design considerations. w(t) r(t) D(s) G(s) y(t) v(t) Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

16 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9 6 Y (s) = W (s) + G(s)D(s)[R(s) V (s) Y (s)] [ + G(s)D(s)] Y (s) = W (s) + G(s)D(s)[R(s) V (s)] or, Y (s) = G(s)D(s) W (s) + [R(s) V (s)]. + G(s)D(s) + G(s)D(s) Tracking error = R(s) Y (s) G(s)D(s) E(s) = R(s) W (s) [R(s) V (s)] + G(s)D(s) + G(s)D(s) = + G(s)D(s) [R(s) W (s)] + G(s)D(s)V (s) + G(s)D(s) Define the sensitivity function S(s) to be S(s) = + G(s)D(s) which is the transfer function from r(t) to e(t) and from w(t) to e(t). The complementary sensitivity function T (s) = S(s) S(s) = G(s)D(s) + G(s)D(s) = T (s) which is the transfer function from r(t) to y(t). If V =, then and Y (s) = S(s)W (s) + T (s)r(s) E(s) = S(s)[R(s) W (s)]. The sensitivity function here is related to the one we saw several weeks ago SG T = T G G T = = + D(s)G(s) D(s)G(s) [ + D(s)G(s)] 2 + D(s)G(s) = S(s). G(s)[ + D(s)G(s)] G(s) Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

17 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9 7 So S(s) is the sensitivity of the transfer function to plant perturbations. Recall that T (s) + S(s) =, regardlessofd(s) and G(s). We would like T (s) =. ThenS(s) = ; Disturbanceiscancelled, design is insensitive to plant perturbation, steady-state error. BUT, forphysicalplants,g(s) for high frequencies (which forces S(s) ). Furthermore, the transfer function between V (s) and E(s) is T (s). To reduce high frequency noise effects, T (s) as frequency increases, and S(s). Typical sensitivity and complementary sensitivity (closed-loop transfer) functions are: S( jω) Performance Spec. T ( jω) Stability Spec. Another view of sensitivity: So, + D( jω)g( jω) is the distance between the Nyquist + D( jω)g( jω) curve to the point, and S( jω) =. D( jω)g( jω) + D( jω)g( jω) I(s) R(s) Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

18 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9 8 Alargevalueof S( jω) indicates a nearly unstable Nyquist plot. The maximum value of S is a more accurate measure of stability than PM or GM. So,wewantmax S( jω) small. How small? Note: E( jω) = S( jω)r( jω) E( jω) = S( jω)r( jω) S( jω) R( jω) put a frequency-based error bound Let W (ω) = R( jω)/e b.then, E( jω) S( jω) R( jω) e b S( jω) W (ω). EXAMPLE: Aunity-feedbacksystemistohaveanerrorlessthan.5 for all unity-amplitude sinusoids below 5 rads/sec. Draw W ( jω) for this design. Spectrum of R( jω) is unity for ω 5. Since eb =.5, W (ω) =.5 = 2 5 for this range Magnitude 2 5 Frequency (rads/sec.) We can translate this requirement into a loop-gain requirement. When errors are small, loop gain is high, so S( jω) D( jω)g( jω) and D( jω)g( jω) W (ω) or, D( jω)g( jω) W (ω) Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

19 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN : Robustness Typically there is some uncertainty in the plant transfer function. We want our design to be robustly stable, and to robustly give good performance (often called H design). Uncertainty often expressed as multiplicative G( jω) = G n ( jω)[ + W 2 ( jω) ( jω)] W2 (ω) is a function of frequency expressing uncertainty, or size of possible error in transfer function as a function of frequency. W2 (ω) is almost always small at low frequencies. W2 (ω) increases at high frequencies as unmodeled structural flexibility is common. Typical W2 Magnitude Frequency (rads/sec.) ( jω) expresses uncertainty in phase. The only restriction is Design ( jω). Assume design for nominal plant Gn (s) is stable. Thus, + D( jω)g n ( jω) = ω. Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

20 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9 2 For robust stability, + D( jω)g n ( jω) + D( jω)g n ( jω) }{{} = by assumption + D( jω)g( jω) = ω + D( jω)g n ( jω)[ + W 2 (ω) ( jω)] = + D( jω)g n( jω) + D( jω)g n ( jω) W 2(ω) ( jω) = recall, T ( jω) = D( jω)g n( jω) + D( jω)g n ( jω), [ + T ( jω)w 2 (ω) ( jω)] = so, T ( jω)w 2 (ω) ( jω) < or, T ( jω) W 2 (ω) <. For high freqencies D( jω)gn ( jω) is typically small, so T ( jω) D( jω)g n ( jω). Thus D( jω)g n ( jω) W 2 (ω) < D( jω)g n ( jω) < W 2 (ω). EXAMPLE: The uncertainty in a plant model is described by a function W 2 (ω) which is zero until ω = 3 rads/sec, and increases linearly from there to a value of at ω =, rads/sec. It remains constant at for higher frequencies. Plot constraint on D( jω)g n ( jω). Where W2 (ω) =, thereisnoconstraintonthemagnitudeoftheloop gain. Above ω = 3, /W 2 (ω) is a hyperbola from to. at,. Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

21 ECE45/ECE55, FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9 2 Magnitude Frequency (rads/sec.) Combining W (ω) and W 2 (ω) requirements, 8 Log Magnitude Frequency (rads/sec.) Limitation: Crossover needs to be with slope. So,cannotmake constraints too strict, or design will be unstable. Lecture notes prepared by and copyright , Gregory L. Plett and M. Scott Trimboli

### ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques

CAIRO UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ENGINEERING ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 00/0 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques [] For the following system, Design a compensator such

### Today (10/23/01) Today. Reading Assignment: 6.3. Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10

Today Today (10/23/01) Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10 Reading Assignment: 6.3 Last Time In the last lecture, we discussed control design through shaping of the loop gain GK:

### INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL

ECE4540/5540: Digital Control Systems INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL.: Introduction In ECE450/ECE550 Feedback Control Systems, welearnedhow to make an analog controller D(s) to control a linear-time-invariant

### Automatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year

Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21-211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21-211 1 / 39 Feedback

### Systems Analysis and Control

Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 24: Compensation in the Frequency Domain Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Lead Compensators Performance Specs Altering

### Professor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall 2010 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley

Professor Fearing EE C8 / ME C34 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley. 35 pts Lag compensation. For open loop plant Gs ss+5s+8 a Find compensator gain Ds k such that the

### Transient response via gain adjustment. Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = 2. The closed loop transfer function is. s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2 n

Design via frequency response Transient response via gain adjustment Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = ωn 2. The closed loop transfer function is s(s+2ζω n ) T(s) = ω 2 n s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2

### Dr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review

Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics

### Homework 7 - Solutions

Homework 7 - Solutions Note: This homework is worth a total of 48 points. 1. Compensators (9 points) For a unity feedback system given below, with G(s) = K s(s + 5)(s + 11) do the following: (c) Find the

### Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore Lead Lag Compensator Design Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst.

### (b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:

1. (a) The open loop transfer function of a unity feedback control system is given by G(S) = K/S(1+0.1S)(1+S) (i) Determine the value of K so that the resonance peak M r of the system is equal to 1.4.

### FREQUENCY-RESPONSE ANALYSIS

ECE450/550: Feedback Control Systems. 8 FREQUENCY-RESPONSE ANALYSIS 8.: Motivation to study frequency-response methods Advantages and disadvantages to root-locus design approach: ADVANTAGES: Good indicator

### EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 15, am. Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators.

Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Wed. Dec. 5, 2 8- am Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 2 2 6 3 4 4 5 6 6 7 8 2 Total

### FEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEMS

FEEDBAC CONTROL SYSTEMS. Control System Design. Open and Closed-Loop Control Systems 3. Why Closed-Loop Control? 4. Case Study --- Speed Control of a DC Motor 5. Steady-State Errors in Unity Feedback Control

### The requirements of a plant may be expressed in terms of (a) settling time (b) damping ratio (c) peak overshoot --- in time domain

Compensators To improve the performance of a given plant or system G f(s) it may be necessary to use a compensator or controller G c(s). Compensator Plant G c (s) G f (s) The requirements of a plant may

### 16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2

16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2 September 22, 2010 In this recitation, we will consider two problems from Chapter 8 of the Van de Vegte book. R + - E G c (s) G(s) C Figure 1: The standard block diagram

### 1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise

EE C128 / ME134 Problem Set 6 Solution Fall 2011 1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise Consider a close loop system with unity feedback. For each G(s), hand sketch the Nyquist diagram, determine Z = P N, algebraically

### ROOT LOCUS. Consider the system. Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to. H(s) H ( s) = ( s)

C1 ROOT LOCUS Consider the system R(s) E(s) C(s) + K G(s) - H(s) C(s) R(s) = K G(s) 1 + K G(s) H(s) Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to 1+ K G ( s)

### Robust Performance Example #1

Robust Performance Example # The transfer function for a nominal system (plant) is given, along with the transfer function for one extreme system. These two transfer functions define a family of plants

### EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Thu. May 14, pm. Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators.

Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Thu. May 4, 25 5-8 pm Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 4 2 4 3 6 4 8 5 3

### EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems

1 / 30 EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems Section 9: of and using Techniques McMaster University Winter 2017 2 / 30 Outline 1 2 3 4 / 30 domain analysis Analyze closed loop using open loop

### KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUB.NAME : CONTROL SYSTEMS BRANCH : ECE YEAR : II SEMESTER: IV 1. What is control system? 2. Define open

### Dynamic circuits: Frequency domain analysis

Electronic Circuits 1 Dynamic circuits: Contents Free oscillation and natural frequency Transfer functions Frequency response Bode plots 1 System behaviour: overview 2 System behaviour : review solution

### KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUB.NAME : CONTROL SYSTEMS STAFF NAME: Mr. P.NARASIMMAN BRANCH : ECE Mr.K.R.VENKATESAN YEAR : II SEMESTER

### 100 (s + 10) (s + 100) e 0.5s. s 100 (s + 10) (s + 100). G(s) =

1 AME 3315; Spring 215; Midterm 2 Review (not graded) Problems: 9.3 9.8 9.9 9.12 except parts 5 and 6. 9.13 except parts 4 and 5 9.28 9.34 You are given the transfer function: G(s) = 1) Plot the bode plot

### 6.302 Feedback Systems Recitation 16: Compensation Prof. Joel L. Dawson

Bode Obstacle Course is one technique for doing compensation, or designing a feedback system to make the closed-loop behavior what we want it to be. To review: - G c (s) G(s) H(s) you are here! plant For

### Performance of Feedback Control Systems

Performance of Feedback Control Systems Design of a PID Controller Transient Response of a Closed Loop System Damping Coefficient, Natural frequency, Settling time and Steady-state Error and Type 0, Type

### Topic # Feedback Control. State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback

Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Copyright 21 by Jonathan How. All Rights reserved 1 Fall

### Lecture 1: Feedback Control Loop

Lecture : Feedback Control Loop Loop Transfer function The standard feedback control system structure is depicted in Figure. This represend(t) n(t) r(t) e(t) u(t) v(t) η(t) y(t) F (s) C(s) P (s) Figure

### ECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 7 Solution April 17, K(s + 0.2) s 2 (s + 2)(s + 5) G(s) =

ECE382/ME482 Spring 25 Homework 7 Solution April 17, 25 1 Solution to HW7 AP9.5 We are given a system with open loop transfer function G(s) = K(s +.2) s 2 (s + 2)(s + 5) (1) and unity negative feedback.

### Analysis of SISO Control Loops

Chapter 5 Analysis of SISO Control Loops Topics to be covered For a given controller and plant connected in feedback we ask and answer the following questions: Is the loop stable? What are the sensitivities

### Introduction to Feedback Control

Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? Open-Loop vs Closed-Loop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? Closed-Loop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System

### An Internal Stability Example

An Internal Stability Example Roy Smith 26 April 2015 To illustrate the concept of internal stability we will look at an example where there are several pole-zero cancellations between the controller and

### Desired Bode plot shape

Desired Bode plot shape 0dB Want high gain Use PI or lag control Low freq ess, type High low freq gain for steady state tracking Low high freq gain for noise attenuation Sufficient PM near ω gc for stability

### Overview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piece-wise linear approximations First-order terms Second-order terms (complex poles & zeros)

Overview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piece-wise linear approximations First-order terms Second-order terms (complex poles & zeros) J. McNames Portland State University ECE 222 Bode Plots Ver.

### APPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS

Version: 1 CONTROL APPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS TEX d: Feb. 17, 214 PREVIEW We show that the transfer function and conditions of stability for linear systems can be studied using Laplace transforms. Table

### r + - FINAL June 12, 2012 MAE 143B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic

MAE 43B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic FINAL June, One sheet of hand-written notes (two pages). Present your reasoning and calculations clearly. Inconsistent etchings will not be graded. Write answers

### Frequency Response Analysis

Frequency Response Analysis Consider let the input be in the form Assume that the system is stable and the steady state response of the system to a sinusoidal inputdoes not depend on the initial conditions

### H(s) = s. a 2. H eq (z) = z z. G(s) a 2. G(s) A B. s 2 s(s + a) 2 s(s a) G(s) 1 a 1 a. } = (z s 1)( z. e ) ) (z. (z 1)(z e at )(z e at )

.7 Quiz Solutions Problem : a H(s) = s a a) Calculate the zero order hold equivalent H eq (z). H eq (z) = z z G(s) Z{ } s G(s) a Z{ } = Z{ s s(s a ) } G(s) A B Z{ } = Z{ + } s s(s + a) s(s a) G(s) a a

### a. Closed-loop system; b. equivalent transfer function Then the CLTF () T is s the poles of () T are s from a contribution of a

Root Locus Simple definition Locus of points on the s- plane that represents the poles of a system as one or more parameter vary. RL and its relation to poles of a closed loop system RL and its relation

### Chapter 7 - Solved Problems

Chapter 7 - Solved Problems Solved Problem 7.1. A continuous time system has transfer function G o (s) given by G o (s) = B o(s) A o (s) = 2 (s 1)(s + 2) = 2 s 2 + s 2 (1) Find a controller of minimal

### PD, PI, PID Compensation. M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada

PD, PI, PID Compensation M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada 1 Outline PD compensation. PI compensation. PID compensation. 2 PD Control L= loop gain s cl = desired closed-loop

### ECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 6 Solution April 17, (s/2 + 1) s(2s + 1)[(s/8) 2 + (s/20) + 1]

ECE382/ME482 Spring 25 Homework 6 Solution April 17, 25 1 Solution to HW6 P8.17 We are given a system with open loop transfer function G(s) = 4(s/2 + 1) s(2s + 1)[(s/8) 2 + (s/2) + 1] (1) and unity negative

### DESIGN MICROELECTRONICS ELCT 703 (W17) LECTURE 3: OP-AMP CMOS CIRCUIT. Dr. Eman Azab Assistant Professor Office: C

MICROELECTRONICS ELCT 703 (W17) LECTURE 3: OP-AMP CMOS CIRCUIT DESIGN Dr. Eman Azab Assistant Professor Office: C3.315 E-mail: eman.azab@guc.edu.eg 1 TWO STAGE CMOS OP-AMP It consists of two stages: First

### 06 Feedback Control System Characteristics The role of error signals to characterize feedback control system performance.

Chapter 06 Feedback 06 Feedback Control System Characteristics The role of error signals to characterize feedback control system performance. Lesson of the Course Fondamenti di Controlli Automatici of

### Frequency domain analysis

Automatic Control 2 Frequency domain analysis Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 2010-2011 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 2010-2011

### Mechanical Systems Part A: State-Space Systems Lecture AL12

AL: 436-433 Mechanical Systems Part A: State-Space Systems Lecture AL Case study Case study AL: Design of a satellite attitude control system see Franklin, Powell & Emami-Naeini, Ch. 9. Requirements: accurate

### The Frequency-Response

6 The Frequency-Response Design Method A Perspective on the Frequency-Response Design Method The design of feedback control systems in industry is probably accomplished using frequency-response methods

### Exam. 135 minutes + 15 minutes reading time

Exam January 23, 27 Control Systems I (5-59-L) Prof. Emilio Frazzoli Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes + 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 45 Number of Points: 53 Permitted aids: Important: 4 pages

### Richiami di Controlli Automatici

Richiami di Controlli Automatici Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II detommas@unina.it Ottobre 2012 Corsi AnsaldoBreda G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici

### AN INTRODUCTION TO THE CONTROL THEORY

Open-Loop controller An Open-Loop (OL) controller is characterized by no direct connection between the output of the system and its input; therefore external disturbance, non-linear dynamics and parameter

### Root Locus Design Example #4

Root Locus Design Example #4 A. Introduction The plant model represents a linearization of the heading dynamics of a 25, ton tanker ship under empty load conditions. The reference input signal R(s) is

. The frequency response of the plant in a unity feedback control systems is shown in Figure. a) What is the static velocity error coefficient K v for the system? b) A lead compensator with a transfer

NADAR SARASWATHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY Vadapudupatti, Theni-625531 Question Bank for the Units I to V SE05 BR05 SU02 5 th Semester B.E. / B.Tech. Electrical & Electronics engineering IC6501

### Control Systems 2. Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits. Roy Smith

Control Systems 2 Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits Roy Smith 2017-3-14 4.1 Input-output controllability Control design questions: 1. How well can the plant be controlled? 2. What control structure

### EEE 184: Introduction to feedback systems

EEE 84: Introduction to feedback systems Summary 6 8 8 x 7 7 6 Level() 6 5 4 4 5 5 time(s) 4 6 8 Time (seconds) Fig.. Illustration of BIBO stability: stable system (the input is a unit step) Fig.. step)

### School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. ME375 Feedback Control - 1

Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? Open-Loop vs Closed-Loop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? Closed-Loop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System

### 9/9/2011 Classical Control 1

MM11 Root Locus Design Method Reading material: FC pp.270-328 9/9/2011 Classical Control 1 What have we talked in lecture (MM10)? Lead and lag compensators D(s)=(s+z)/(s+p) with z < p or z > p D(s)=K(Ts+1)/(Ts+1),

### Feedback design for the Buck Converter

Feedback design for the Buck Converter Portland State University Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland, Oregon, USA December 30, 2009 Abstract In this paper we explore two compensation

### Lecture 16 FREQUENCY RESPONSE OF SIMPLE CIRCUITS

Lecture 6 FREQUENCY RESPONSE OF SIMPLE CIRCUITS Ray DeCarlo School of ECE Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 47907-285 decarlo@ecn.purdue.edu EE-202, Frequency Response p 2 R. A. DeCarlo I. WHAT IS FREQUENCY

### 2.010 Fall 2000 Solution of Homework Assignment 8

2.1 Fall 2 Solution of Homework Assignment 8 1. Root Locus Analysis of Hydraulic Servomechanism. The block diagram of the controlled hydraulic servomechanism is shown in Fig. 1 e r e error + i Σ C(s) P(s)

### EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems

1 / 17 EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems Section 7: McMaster University Winter 2018 2 / 17 Outline 1 4 / 17 Cascade compensation Throughout this lecture we consider the case of H(s) = 1. We

### Root Locus Design Example #3

Root Locus Design Example #3 A. Introduction The system represents a linear model for vertical motion of an underwater vehicle at zero forward speed. The vehicle is assumed to have zero pitch and roll

### Additional Closed-Loop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 14)

Appendix J Additional Closed-Loop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 4) APPENDIX CONTENTS J. Closed-Loop Behavior J.2 Bode Stability Criterion J.3 Nyquist Stability Criterion J.4 Gain

### ESE319 Introduction to Microelectronics. Feedback Basics

Feedback Basics Stability Feedback concept Feedback in emitter follower One-pole feedback and root locus Frequency dependent feedback and root locus Gain and phase margins Conditions for closed loop stability

### CDS 101/110a: Lecture 10-2 Control Systems Implementation

CDS 101/110a: Lecture 10-2 Control Systems Implementation Richard M. Murray 5 December 2012 Goals Provide an overview of the key principles, concepts and tools from control theory - Classical control -

### Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3.. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid -

### Step Response for the Transfer Function of a Sensor

Step Response f the Transfer Function of a Sens G(s)=Y(s)/X(s) of a sens with X(s) input and Y(s) output A) First Order Instruments a) First der transfer function G(s)=k/(1+Ts), k=gain, T = time constant

### CHAPTER 7 STEADY-STATE RESPONSE ANALYSES

CHAPTER 7 STEADY-STATE RESPONSE ANALYSES 1. Introduction The steady state error is a measure of system accuracy. These errors arise from the nature of the inputs, system type and from nonlinearities of

### Lecture 7:Time Response Pole-Zero Maps Influence of Poles and Zeros Higher Order Systems and Pole Dominance Criterion

Cleveland State University MCE441: Intr. Linear Control Lecture 7:Time Influence of Poles and Zeros Higher Order and Pole Criterion Prof. Richter 1 / 26 First-Order Specs: Step : Pole Real inputs contain

### DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUBJECT CODE & NAME: CONTROL SYSTEMS YEAR / SEM: II / IV UNIT I SYSTEMS AND THEIR REPRESENTATION PARTA [2

### Laplace Transform Analysis of Signals and Systems

Laplace Transform Analysis of Signals and Systems Transfer Functions Transfer functions of CT systems can be found from analysis of Differential Equations Block Diagrams Circuit Diagrams 5/10/04 M. J.

### Control Systems II. ETH, MAVT, IDSC, Lecture 4 17/03/2017. G. Ducard

Control Systems II ETH, MAVT, IDSC, Lecture 4 17/03/2017 Lecture plan: Control Systems II, IDSC, 2017 SISO Control Design 24.02 Lecture 1 Recalls, Introductory case study 03.03 Lecture 2 Cascaded Control

### PM diagram of the Transfer Function and its use in the Design of Controllers

PM diagram of the Transfer Function and its use in the Design of Controllers Santiago Garrido, Luis Moreno Abstract This paper presents the graphical chromatic representation of the phase and the magnitude

### MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall K(s +1)(s +2) G(s) =.

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering. Dynamics and Control II Fall 7 Problem Set #7 Solution Posted: Friday, Nov., 7. Nise problem 5 from chapter 8, page 76. Answer:

### Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises

Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises To Accompany Control Systems Engineering 4 th Edition By Norman S. Nise John Wiley & Sons Copyright 2004 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. No part

### RELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS. Ryszard Gessing

RELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS Ryszard Gessing Politechnika Śl aska Instytut Automatyki, ul. Akademicka 16, 44-101 Gliwice, Poland, fax: +4832 372127, email: gessing@ia.gliwice.edu.pl

Advanced Digital Controls University of California, Los Angeles Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Report Author David Luong Winter 8 Table of Contents Abstract 4 Introduction..5 Physical

### III. The STM-8 Loop - Work in progress

III. The STM-8 Loop - Work in progress This contains the loop functions for a velocity input. The interaction between, forward gain, feedback function, loop gain and transfer function are well displayed.

### Lecture 50 Changing Closed Loop Dynamic Response with Feedback and Compensation

Lecture 50 Changing Closed Loop Dynamic Response with Feedback and Compensation 1 A. Closed Loop Transient Response Waveforms 1. Standard Quadratic T(s) Step Response a. Q > 1/2 Oscillatory decay to a

### Laboratory III: Operational Amplifiers

Physics 33, Fall 2008 Lab III - Handout Laboratory III: Operational Amplifiers Introduction Operational amplifiers are one of the most useful building blocks of analog electronics. Ideally, an op amp would

### SAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE SAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015 Lecturer: Michael Ruderman Problem 1: Frequency-domain analysis and control design (15 pt) Given is a

### Lecture 17 Date:

Lecture 17 Date: 27.10.2016 Feedback and Properties, Types of Feedback Amplifier Stability Gain and Phase Margin Modification Elements of Feedback System: (a) The feed forward amplifier [H(s)] ; (b) A

### Distributed Real-Time Control Systems

Distributed Real-Time Control Systems Chapter 9 Discrete PID Control 1 Computer Control 2 Approximation of Continuous Time Controllers Design Strategy: Design a continuous time controller C c (s) and then

### Root Locus. Motivation Sketching Root Locus Examples. School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. ME375 Root Locus - 1

Root Locus Motivation Sketching Root Locus Examples ME375 Root Locus - 1 Servo Table Example DC Motor Position Control The block diagram for position control of the servo table is given by: D 0.09 Position

### Lecture 1 Root Locus

Root Locus ELEC304-Alper Erdogan 1 1 Lecture 1 Root Locus What is Root-Locus? : A graphical representation of closed loop poles as a system parameter varied. Based on Root-Locus graph we can choose the

### VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE

VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur 603 203 DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK V SEMESTER IC650 CONTROL SYSTEMS Regulation 203 Academic Year 207 8 Prepared

### Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3. 8. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid

### Dynamic Response. Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu. Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology.

Dynamic Response Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology Chapter 3 Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu (EEE@IYTE) EE362 Feedback Control

### x(t) = x(t h), x(t) 2 R ), where is the time delay, the transfer function for such a e s Figure 1: Simple Time Delay Block Diagram e i! =1 \e i!t =!

1 Time-Delay Systems 1.1 Introduction Recitation Notes: Time Delays and Nyquist Plots Review In control systems a challenging area is operating in the presence of delays. Delays can be attributed to acquiring

### Problem 1 (Analysis of a Feedback System - Bode, Root Locus, Nyquist) Consider the feedback system defined by the open loop transfer function 1.

1 EEE480 Final Exam, Spring 2016 A.A. Rodriguez Rules: Calculators permitted, One 8.5 11 sheet, closed notes/books, open minds GWC 352, 965-3712 Problem 1 (Analysis of a Feedback System - Bode, Root Locus,

### Lecture 9. Welcome back! Coming week labs: Today: Lab 16 System Identification (2 sessions)

232 Welcome back! Coming week labs: Lecture 9 Lab 16 System Identification (2 sessions) Today: Review of Lab 15 System identification (ala ME4232) Time domain Frequency domain 1 Future Labs To develop

### ME 304 CONTROL SYSTEMS Spring 2016 MIDTERM EXAMINATION II

ME 30 CONTROL SYSTEMS Spring 06 Course Instructors Dr. Tuna Balkan, Dr. Kıvanç Azgın, Dr. Ali Emre Turgut, Dr. Yiğit Yazıcıoğlu MIDTERM EXAMINATION II May, 06 Time Allowed: 00 minutes Closed Notes and

### Recitation 11: Time delays

Recitation : Time delays Emilio Frazzoli Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems Massachusetts Institute of Technology November, 00. Introduction and motivation. Delays are incurred when the controller

### School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. DC Motor Position Control The block diagram for position control of the servo table is given by:

Root Locus Motivation Sketching Root Locus Examples ME375 Root Locus - 1 Servo Table Example DC Motor Position Control The block diagram for position control of the servo table is given by: θ D 0.09 See

### Chapter 10 Feedback. PART C: Stability and Compensation

1 Chapter 10 Feedback PART C: Stability and Compensation Example: Non-inverting Amplifier We are analyzing the two circuits (nmos diff pair or pmos diff pair) to realize this symbol: either of the circuits

### Time Response of Systems

Chapter 0 Time Response of Systems 0. Some Standard Time Responses Let us try to get some impulse time responses just by inspection: Poles F (s) f(t) s-plane Time response p =0 s p =0,p 2 =0 s 2 t p =