Eindhoven University of Technology
|
|
- Victoria Nash
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Eindhoven University of Technology MASTER Strengthening of reinforced concrete structures with externally bonded carbon fibre reinforcement experimental research on strengthening of structures in multispan or cantilever situations Bukman, L.M. Award date: 3 Link to publication Disclaimer This document contains a student thesis (bachelor's or master's), as authored by a student at Eindhoven University of Technology. Student theses are made available in the TU/e repository upon obtaining the required degree. The grade received is not published on the document as presented in the repository. The required complexity or quality of research of student theses may vary by program, and the required minimum study period may vary in duration. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain
2 Strengthening of reinforced concrete structures with externally bonded carbon fibre reinforcement Experimental research on strengthening of structures in multispan or cantilever situations Appendix Linda Bukman A-3.
3 Table of contents Appendix Serviceability limit state Appendix Peeling-off caused at shear cracks Appendix 3 M-κ relation 4 Appendix 4 Material properties single span situation Appendix 5 Critical cross-sections 4 Appendix 6 Mechanisms of failure 7 Appendix 7 Material properties multi span situation 5 Appendix 8 High-speed camera 6 Appendix 9 Data beam to 6 35 Appendix ESPI measurement beam 4 57 i Table of Contents
4 Appendix One of the requirements that have to be met when strengthening a structure with FRP EBR concerns the serviceability limit state. In many of the decisions on the final arrangement of the fibre composite reinforcement, the serviceability limit state appears to be a restricting factor. The following minor calculation makes this statement more conceivable. The stiffness of a concrete structure can be approached by: EI structure.5 E A d s s with: E s A s d modulus of elasticity of steel reinforcement cross-section of steel reinforcement depth of the member When strengthening a structure, material is added to the cross-section. This material has a certain cross-section and stiffness of its own. If FRP EBR is used, the added cross-section and stiffness of the added material can be expressed as A f =αa s and E f =βe s. The stiffness of the structure may now be approached by: EI EI structure structure.5 E A d.5 E A d s s s s +.5 βe αa d ( + αβ ) s s The added FRP EBR cross-section, necessary to reach a certain M s, is considerably less than the steel cross-section necessary to achieve the same strength increase. This implies α is less than. As the stiffness of FRP EBR is generally (slightly) less than that of steel, β is also less than This implies the factor αβ is usually smaller than. Which means that if a beam is strengthened to a certain capacity (M s ), the relative increase in stiffness of the structure using FRP EBR, is considerably less than when steel is used. The increase in stiffness, depending on the factor αβ, is graphically displayed in figure A... The red line represents the original unstrengthened structure (αβ=). If steel is added to strengthen a structure (αβ=), no increase in curvature is found. If, on the other hand, a certain type of FRP EBR is used to strengthen a structure (<αβ<) an increase in curvature is found. Increased curvature causes increased deflections. And increased deflections can cause the serviceability limit state to be the restricting factor in many decisions on the final arrangement of the FRP EBR. Ms Mu M (knm) κ ( ) αβ= αβ=.75 αβ=.5 αβ= αβ=.5 Figure A..: increase in stiffness of a structure, depending on αa and βe κ Appendix Serviceability limit state
5 Appendix Displacements of crack faces, relatively to each other, are considered to initiate debonding for mechanism A (peeling of at shear cracks). The cause and the results of the displacements are examined in this appendix. In figure A.., an uncracked beam is displayed. The moment over the beam, as well as the curvature over the beam are given. The curvature is linear over the beam; of constant value between the supports and a constant increase between the supports and the loading points. ds F F ds Μ ds In figure A.., a cracked beam is displayed. The moment over the beam is linear, like for the uncracked beam. Only the course of the curvature over the beam is different. As the cracks do not offer as much resistance to deformation as the rest of the beam, the curvature concentrates around cracks. For the area between the loading points, where the curvature is of constant value, this implies the crack faces move horizontally from each other. For the area between the loading point and the support, where the curvature increases, this implies the increase in curvature over the distance between the cracks is concentrated is the cracks. This concentrated curvature will cause the crack faces to move vertically as well as horizontally to each other. κ Figure A..: course of curvature over beam F F ds ds ds Μ κ Figure A..: course of curvature over cracked beam For the deriving of mechanism A (peeling-off at shear cracks), it is assumed the displacements of the crack faces cause tensile stress perpendicular to the FRP EBR, which initiates debonding. If a shear crack develops, and the crack faces move relatively from each other, the fibre will have to bridge the distance between the crack faces (figure A..3). This causes a very high strain in the fibre. As the fibre starts debonding, this strain will become less: l ( v + l) + w = ( l + l ) v + w vl + l + = ( l + l As v and w are very small: ) w v α l ( l + l + l) = v l and ( l + l) = v l + l l+ l ε = l l ( l + l) l = l P ε = vl + l l vl + l = l l T Figure A..3: displacement of the crack faces α K Appendix Peeling-off caused at shear cracks
6 As the modulus of elasticity and the cross-section of the fibre remain constant, the strain in the fibre is proportional to the angel α. The equilibrium of forces makes it possible to determine forces P and T from figure A..3. K = E A ε P = cos α K = cosα E A ε T = sin α K = sinα E A ε P T α 9 Figure A..4: force parallel to the FRP EBR α 9 Figure A..5: force perpendicular to the FRP EBR Appendix 3 Peeling-off caused at shear cracks
7 Appendix 3 A prediction of the M-κ relation of the different beams tested in the first set of tests is given in section 4.3 of chapter 4. The prediction for the strengthened cross-section is based on full composite action (figure A.3.). The concrete grade is assumed to be C35 and the yielding strength of the internal reinforcement is assumed to be 5 N/mm. The assumed σ-ε relations of concrete, steel and fibre reinforcement are given in figure A.3.. After the experiments were performed, the actual material properties could be used to adjust the predictions of section 4.3. These adjusted predictions can be found in section 4.4. To be able to quickly draw a M-κ relation for a certain beam, a model was made in MathCAD. An example of a M-κ calculation is given below. This is the first prediction of the M-κ relation. For the calculation of any other cross-section, the properties can be changed and the model will automatically calculate the new M-κ relation. ε'c N's N'b x ds df = h εs Ns fibre ε εf Nf Figure A.3.: full composite action σc (N/mm) f 'c σs (N/mm) f s σf (N/mm) f f ε'c (e-3) εy εs εsu εf εfu Figure A.3.: σ-ε relations of concrete, steel and fibre M-κ relations unstrengthened cross-section Concrete properties When a M-κ relation is calculated during the preparations of the experiments, the concrete strength is estimated, the modulus of elasticity is determined through VBC 995, and the yielding strain is taken equal to the theoretical yielding strain of.75. When a M-κ relation is calculated after the experiments are performed, the actual measured values for the concrete compressive stain, the concrete tensile strain and the modulus of elasticity are used. The yielding strain after the experiments is taken equal to the measured concrete compressive strain divided by the measured modulus of elasticity. Height cross-section h := 45 mm Width cross-section b := mm Concrete compressive cube strength B:= 5 N mm Appendix 3 4 M-κ relation
8 Modulus of elasticity of concrete E' b := 3475 N mm Yielding strain of concrete ε' by :=.75 3 Ultimate strain in concrete ε' bu := Steel reinforcement properties Yield stress of steel reinforcement FeB := 5 N mm Cross-sectional area of long. tensile steel reinforcement A st := 45 mm Concrete cover tensile steel reinforcement c st := 33 mm Diameter tensile steel reinforcement φ st := mm Cross-sectional area of long. compr. steel reinforcement A sc := mm Concrete cover compressive steel reinforcement c sc := 33 mm 4 x Diameter compressive steel reinforcement φ sc := mm x Modulus of elasticity of steel reinforcement E s := Ultimate strain in steel reinforcement ε su :=.35 N mm Derived parameters Cross-sectional area concrete A c := hb A c = 9 4 mm φ st Effective depth tensile reinforcement d st := h c st d st = 4 mm φ sc Effective depth compressive reinf. d sc := c sc + d sc = 39 mm Concrete compr. strength f' b :=.85 B f' b = 4.5 Concrete tensile strength f b := B f b = 3.55 N mm N mm f' b Modulus of elasticity ULS E' bu := ε' by E' bu =.49 4 N mm FeB Yield strain of steel reinforcement ε sy := ε E sy =.5 3 s Appendix 3 5 M-κ relation
9 Crack moment unstrengthened section Force definition: N' bcrack ( x, ε b ) b x E' x := b ε b ( h x) N bcrack ( x, ε b ) N sccrack ( x, ε b ) N stcrack ( x, ε b ) Guess value: := b E' b ε b ( h x) x c sc φ sc := ( h x) ( d st x) := ( h x) E s A st ε b E s A sc ε b f b x := ε b := ε E' b =. 4 b Given N' bcrack x, ε b ( ) N sccrack ( x, ε b ) ( ) + N bcrack x, ε b ( ) N stcrack x, ε b x := Find( x) x = 9.3 mm ε b =. 4 N' bcrack ( x, ε b ) N bcrack ( x, ε b ) N sccrack ( x, ε b ) N stcrack ( x, ε b ) M := N bcrack x, ε b = kn = kn =.775 kn = 7.65 kn ( ) h ( ) N sccrack x, ε b M =.6 7 Nmm x ( h x) x 3 c sc φ sc N stcrack x, ε b x ( ) d st 3 ε b κ := ( h x) κ = Appendix 3 6 M-κ relation
10 Yielding moment unstrengthened section Force definition: ( ) := bif ε' b < ε' bu N' b x, ε' b x ε' 3, b E' b, 4 x f' b N st := A st FeB ( ) := E s A sc N sc x, ε' b ε' b x c sc x φ sc Guess value: x := ε' b :=. Given x ε' b ε d st x sy ( ) N sc ( x, ε' b ) N' b x, ε' b + N st x ε' b N' b x, ε' b ( ) := Find x, ε' b x = mm ( ) =.8 5 ( ) = N sc x, ε' b N st =.6 5 N' b ( x, ε' b ) ( ) N sc x, ε' b N st = 6 kn = 8.6 kn = kn ε' b = x M := N st d st N' 3 b x, ε' b M = Nmm ( ) x 3 c sc φ sc κ := if ε' b <.75 3, κ = ε sy ( d st x) ε' b, x Ultimate moment unstrengthened section Guess value: x:= 5 Given ε' b ε' bu ( ) N sc ( x, ε' b ) N' b x, ε' b + N st Appendix 3 7 M-κ relation
11 x ε' b N' b x, ε' b ( ) := Find x, ε' b x =.739 mm ε' b = ( ) = ( ) = 5.56 N sc x, ε' b N st =.6 5 M 3 := d st N st 4 ( ) N' b x, ε' b M 3 = Nmm 7 8 x N' b ( x, ε' b ) ( ) N sc x, ε' b N st = 6 kn N sc x, ε' b = kn = 5.56 kn ( ) c sc + φ sc ε' b κ 3 := x κ 3 = M-κ relation strengthened cross-section Fibre properties Width of fibre d f := 6 mm Thickness of fibre t f :=. mm Cross-section of fibre A f := d f t f A f = 9 mm Modulus of elasticity of fibre E f := 65 Fibre tensile strength f f := 8 Crack moment strengthened section (before experiments) Force definition: N' bcrack ( x, ε b ) b x E' x := b ε b ( h x) N bcrack ( x, ε b ) N sccrack ( x, ε b ) N stcrack ( x, ε b ) := b E' b ε b ( h x) ( ) ε b E f N fcrack ε b := x c sc φ sc := ( h x) ( d st x) := ( h x) E s A st ε b A f E s A sc ε b N mm N mm Appendix 3 8 M-κ relation
12 Guess value: f b x := ε b := ε E' b =. 4 b Given N' bcrack x, ε b ( ) N sccrack ( x, ε b ) ( ) + N bcrack x, ε b N stcrack ( x, ε b ) N fcrack ( ε b ) x := Find( x) x = 3.73 ε b =. 4 N' bcrack ( x, ε b ) ( ) N bcrack x, ε b ( ) N fcrack ε b N sccrack x, ε b = kn = kn = 3.36 kn ( ) ( ) N stcrack x, ε b M s := N bcrack x, ε b =.8 kn = kn ( ) h ( ) h x ( h x) N stcrack x, ε b ( ) x + N fcrack ε b N 3 sccrack x, ε b M s = Nmm 3 x ( ) d st x 3 c sc φ sc ε b κ s := ( h x) κ s = Yielding moment strengthened section (before experiments) Force definition: ( ) := bif ε' b < ε' bu N' b x, ε' b N st := A st FeB N sc x, ε' b ( ) := E s A sc N f ( x, ε' b ) ( h x) := x ε' b ε' b x ε' 3, b E' b, 4 x f' b x c sc φ sc E f A f Guess value: x := 5 ε' b :=.8 x Appendix 3 9 M-κ relation
13 Given x ε' b ε d st x sy ( ) N sc ( x, ε' b ) N' b x, ε' b ( ) + N st N f x, ε' b x ε' b N' b x, ε' b ( ) := Find x, ε' b x = mm ε' b = ( ) = ( ) =.65 4 N sc x, ε' b N st =.6 5 ( ) = N f x, ε' b N' b ( x, ε' b ) ( ) N sc x, ε' b N st = 6 kn N f ( x, ε' b ) = kn =.65 kn = kn ( ) h x x M s := N st d st + N 3 f x, ε' b N' 3 b x, ε' b M s =.35 8 Nmm ( ) x 3 c sc φ sc ε sy κ s := ( d st x) κ s = Ultimate moment strengthened section (before experiments) Guess value: x:= 5 Given ε' b ε' bu ( ) N sc ( x, ε' b ) N' b x, ε' b ( ) + N f x, ε' b N st x ε' b N' b x, ε' b ( ) := Find x, ε' b x =. mm ( ) = ( ) = N sc x, ε' b N' b ( x, ε' b ) ( ) N sc x, ε' b = kn = kn ε' b = Appendix 3 M-κ relation
14 N st =.6 5 ( ) = N f x, ε' b N st = 6 kn ( ) N f x, ε' b = kn ( ) h 7 M 3s d st 8 x N 7 := st + N f x, ε' b 8 x N sc x, ε' b M 3s = Nmm ( ) 7 8 x c sc φ sc ε' b κ 3s := x κ 3s = Breaking fibre moment strengthened section (before experiments) Guess value: x:= 5 Given N f x, ε' b ( ) 688 ( ) N sc ( x, ε' b ) N' b x, ε' b x ε' b N' b x, ε' b ( ) + N f x, ε' b ( ) N st := Find x, ε' b x = mm ( ) = ( ) = N sc x, ε' b N st =.6 5 ( ) = N f x, ε' b N' b ( x, ε' b ) ( ) N sc x, ε' b N st = 6 kn ( ) N f x, ε' b = kn = kn = 68.8 kn ε' b = ( ) h 7 M fbs d st 8 x N 7 := st + N f x, ε' b 8 x N sc x, ε' b M fbs =.99 8 Nmm ( ) 7 8 x c sc φ sc ε' b κ fbs := x κ fbs =.79 5 Nmm Appendix 3 M-κ relation
15 Appendix 4 To be able to compare analytical and experimental data, material properties of the specimen are obtained. Concrete Three batches of concrete are used to pour the five beams tested in the single span situation. The properties of all three batches are tested. For this purpose, cylinders and cubes are poured from each batch. Only from batch two, no cylinders could be poured, since the amount of concrete was insufficient. An outside party delivered the first two batches of concrete to the laboratory, while the third batch is produced in the laboratory itself. Test results per batch are summarized in table A.4.. At age of tests Batch Age F c F split F t E (days) (kn) (kn) (kn) (N/mm) Table A.4.: test results per batch Batch is used to pour beam and. Batch was supposed to provide concrete for beam 3, 4 and 5. As mentioned, batch supplied an insufficient amount of concreted. Therefore, only beam 5,4 and about /3 of beam 3 could be poured with batch. Batch 3 is used to finish beam 3 and forms the compression zone of beam 3. Since the two concrete specifications for beam 3, make calculations very complicated, it is decided to simply use the specifications of batch for beam 3. Using the mean values of the obtained rsults, an overview of beam properties is given in table A.4.. The value for the mean concrete tensile stress (f bm ) of batch is derived from the splitting force values of batch. Since there aren t enough cubes to perform splitting tests for the second batch, f bm for batch is calculated according to VBC 995. As no cylinders are available, the modulus of elasticity of the beams produced with batch is also calculated according to VBC 995. Age at test f cm f b f bm E b (days) (N/mm ) (N/mm ) (N/mm ) (N/mm ) Beam Beam (preloading) Beam Beam Beam Beam Table A.4.: beam properties Appendix 4 Material properties single span situation
16 Steel For the internal steel reinforcement, steel bars S5 are used. No tests have been performed to verify the yielding stress. The M-κ relations, drawn of the beams before the test are performed, consider the yielding stress of the longitudinal steel reinforcement to be 5 N/mm. After beam was preloaded, it appeared the analytical and the actual yielding strength did not correspond. Both the modulus of elasticity and the yielding strength can be altered to reduce the difference. Correcting the yielding strength is the most transparent option. The corrected value for f y is found to be 55 N/mm. The corrected value is used to draw analytical the M-κ relations of the beams when tested. FRP EBR No tests have been performed to verify the tensile stress of the externally bonded carbon fibre reinforcement. Information provided by the supplier is used: f f = 8 N/mm E f = 65 N/mm Appendix 4 3 Material properties single span situation
17 Appendix 5 To be able to apply the models that describe the mechanisms of failure, a critical section has to be agreed on. In this critical cross-section, the acting forces will be compared to the resisting forces. Since all models were derived from a single span situation, the critical cross-sections in single span structures are derived with the models. A translation to the critical sections in a multi span situation has to be made. Mechanism A; peeling-off caused at shear cracks This model describes a mechanism of failure caused by high shear forces. The shear force in the area in which the FRB EBR is present is therefore restricted to V odu. This implies the cross-section with maximum shear force is the critical cross-section. In single span situations, this section is situated at the end of the FRP EBR. The actual moment in this section of the beam can be determined from the shifted moment line. According to CUR 9, the critical shear force (V dmax ) is located at distance d s from the end of the FRP EBR (figure A.5.). Vd As Af ds Vdmax shifted moment M Figure A.5.: critical section in single span situation ds h In CUR 9, the translation to a multi span situation has been made. It is assumed all loads to a distance d s from the support are directly passed on to the support. In this case, the critical cross-section in a multi span situation is located at a distance d s from the support. According to CUR 9, this is where V dmax is located (figure A.5.). Vd Vdmax? ds Vdmax Af As ds h However, if the actual moment has to be determined from the shifted moment line, the actual shear force at a distance d s from the support is located in the section at the edge of the support (V dmax?). M shifted moment Figure A.5.: critical section at support in multi span situation Appendix 5 4 Critical cross-sections
18 Mechanism B; peeling-off caused by high shear stress This model describes a mechanism of failure caused by high shear stress. The shear stress, in the area in which the FRB EBR is present, is restricted to τ osu. In the model, the magnitude of the shear stress is derived from the shear force. The model only applies for cross-sections in which the internal reinforcement is yielding. This implies the cross-section with the highest shear force, in the area of the beam where the internal reinforcement is yielding, is the critical cross-section. The actual moment can be determined from the shifted moment line. According to CUR 9, for single span structures the critical shear force (V de ) is located at distance d s from the cross-section where the internal reinforcement starts yielding (figure A.5.3). In CUR 9, the translation to a multi span situation has been made. If assumed all loads to a distance d s from the support are directly passed on to the support, the critical crosssection is located at d s from the support. The actual shear force in this section is equal to the shear force at d s from that section, which is at the edge of the support. According to CUR 9, the highest shear force (V de ), in the area of the beam where the internal reinforcement is yielding, is located at the cross-section at the edge of the support (figure A.5.4). Vd shifted moment M ds Vde Figure A.5.3: critical section mechanism B in single span situation shifted moment Vd M ds Vde Figure A.5.4: critical section mechanism B at support in multi span situation Me Me As Af Af As ds ds h h Mechanism C; peeling-off at the end anchorage This model describes a mechanism of failure caused by insufficient anchorage length. This anchorage length (l f ) is the length of the fibre from cross-section x to the end of the fibre. Cross-section x is the point where the total force in the internal reinforcement and the FRP EBR (N r ) is equal to the yielding strength of the internal steel (A s f y ). According to CUR 9, the actual moment is determined from the shifted moment line (figure A.5.5). This single span situation can be translated to a multi span situation. This has not been done in CUR 9. Ny lf(x) Nf(x) derived from shifted moment ds F Ns Nf x Nr=Ns+Nf=Md/zr Figure A.5.5: critical section mechanism C in single span situation As Af Nr ds h Appendix 5 5 Critical cross-sections
19 The theoretical point at which the FRP EBR can be ended is the point where the total force in the internal reinforcement and the FRP EBR (N r ) is equal to the yielding strength of the internal steel (A s f y ). The anchorage length is the length of the fibre from this point to the end of the FRP EBR (figure A.5.6). The actual moment in this cross-section of the beam is assumed to be determined from the shifted moment line. derived from shifted moment Nr=Ns+Nf=Md/zr ds x Nf Ns Figure A.5.6: critical section mechanism C at support in multi span situation Nf lf Ny Af As ds h Mechanism D; end shear failure This model describes a mechanism of failure caused by a plate-end shear crack. The shear force is therefore restricted to V ouu. In CUR 9, it is assumed V ouu is equal to V dmax from mechanism A. In a single span situation, V dmax is located at the end of he FRP. This is the location a plate-end shear crack will occur (figure A.5.). The specific translation to a multi span situation has not been made in CUR 9. If however V dmax from mechanism A is used, as suggested, the critical cross-section will not be located near the end of the FRP in a multi span situation (see figure A.5.). The fact that for ω s the unplated region of the beam should be considered, can also lead to unclear situations for multi span structures, as the reinforcement in the unplated region of the beam could differ from section to section. Appendix 5 6 Critical cross-sections
20 Appendix 6 In order to determine the failure loads of second set of beams, using different fibre lengths, a model is made in MathCAD. This model is based on CUR 9. Even though all material properties and can be altered, the model is derived for the situation as tested in the second set of tests. It is only valid for this situation. Experimental set up Geometry of the beam Figure A.6.: beam and loading scheme Figure A.6.: loading scheme Forces applied to the beam (F) F := N From support to midspan b := 75 mm Cantilever a := 65 mm Moment over beam Figure A.6.3: moment over beam M( x) if x b 5 F a :=, + F x, guess value: x := 6 mm Appendix 6 7 Mechanisms of failure
21 Given M( x) x := Find( x) x = 5 mm b x a + b =.53 Location of M= in percentage of (a+b) Shear force over beam Shear force for x b V( x) := F V ( x ) =. 5 N Properties of the beam Concrete properties Height cross-section h con := 45 mm Width cross-section b con := mm Concrete compressive cube strength B:= 5 N mm Modulus of elasticity of concrete E' b := 5 N mm Yielding strain of concrete ε' by :=.75 3 Ultimate strain in concrete ε' bu := Steel reinforcement properties Yield stress of steel reinforcement FeB := 555 Modulus of elasticity of steel reinforcement E s := Ultimate strain in steel reinforcement ε su :=.35 N mm N mm Cross-sectional area of tensile steel reinforcement at C A st.c := 45 mm Diameter tensile steel reinforcement at C φ st.c := mm Cross-sectional area of tensile steel reinforcement at B A st.b := 63 mm Appendix 6 8 Mechanisms of failure
22 Diameter tensile steel reinforcement at B φ st.b := 6 mm Concrete cover tensile steel reinforcement c st := 33 mm Cross-sectional area of compr. steel reinforcement at C A sc.c := mm Diameter compressive steel reinforcement at C φ sc.c := 8 mm Cross sectional area of compr. steel reinforcement at B A sc.b := mm Diameter compressive steel reinforcement at B φ sc.b := 8 mm Concrete cover compressive steel reinforcement c sc := 33 mm Fibre properties Length of fibre l f := 46 mm Width of fibre b f := 8 mm Thickness of fibre t f :=. mm Cross-section of fibre A f := b f t f A f = 96 mm Modulus of elasticity of fibre E f := 65 Fibre tensile strength f fu := 8 N mm N mm Derived parameters Cross-sectional area concrete A con := h con b con A con = 9 4 mm Effective depth tensile steel reinf. at C d st.c := h con c st d st.c = 4 mm φ st.c Effective depth compressive steel reinf. at C d sc.c := h con c sc d sc.c = 43 mm φ sc.c Effective depth tensile steel reinf. at B d st.b := h con c st d st.b = 49 mm φ st.b Effective depth compressive steel reinf. at B d sc.b := h con c sc d sc.b = 43 mm φ sc.b Effective depth fibre reinforcement d f := h con d f = 45 mm Design value of concrete compr. strength f' b :=.85 B f' b = 4.5 N mm Appendix 6 9 Mechanisms of failure
23 Design value of concrete tensile strength f b := B N f b = 3.55 mm Ultimate tensile force in steel reinforcement N stu.c := FeB A st.c Ultimate tensile force in fibre reinforcement N fu := f fu A f N stu.c =.59 5 N N fu = N Total ultimate tensile force N ru := N stu.c + N fu N ru = N Total cross-sectional area of steel reinf at C A C := A st.c + A sc.c A C = 553 mm A st.c Steel reinforcement ratio at C ω s.c := ω s.c =.55 d st.c b con Total cross-sectional area of steel reinf at B A B := A st.b + A sc.b A B = 74 mm A st.b Steel reinforcement ratio at B ω s.b := ω s.b =.737 d st.b b con A f Fibre reinforcement ratio ω f := A con ω f =.7 E f Equivalent reinforcement ratio ω eq.c := ω s.c + ω f E s ω eq.c = Depth of compression zone x u.c := 3 FeB A st.c f' b b con x u.c = mm 7 Seizing point of compressive force x s.c := 8 x u.c x s.c = 5.33 mm d st.c N stu.c + Effective depth of tensile force d r.c := N ru d r.c = mm Lever arm total tensile and compr. Force z r.c := d r.c x s.c z r.c = mm d f N fu Appendix 6 Mechanisms of failure
24 Mechanism A Peeling-off caused at shear cracks Resisting shear stress τ odrep := ω eq.c Material factor γ m := τ odrep =.343 τ odrep Design value of resisting shear stress τ odu := γ m N mm N τ odu =.343 mm Resisting shear force V odu := τ odu b con d st.c V odu =.4 5 N Unity check: V( x) =.996 V odu Mechanism B Peeling-off caused by high shear forces Design value of bond shear strength f hrep := f b Resisting shear stress τ osrep :=.8 f hrep Material factor γ m := τ osrep Design value of resistng shear stress τ osu := γ m Resisting shear force V osu := τ osu z r.c b f V osu =.6 5 N Unity check: V( x) =.57 V osu Appendix 6 Mechanisms of failure
25 Mechanism C Peeling-off at the end anchorage Shifted moment line 5 F dst.b Mb=5/3 Mc F dst.b Md=Mb=5/3 Mc 5 F A B C D E P(xshifted) x lan Mc dst.c Yielding moment of tensile steel reinforcement at C: ( ) N stu.c z r.c Px shifted := P( ) =.43 8 Nmm Function for non-shifted moment: Q( p) if p b 5 F a, + F p, := Function shifted moment: Mx ( shifted ) if x d st.c x shifted b d st.c F x shifted + F d :=, st.c 5 F a, Guess value: x shifted := Given ( ) Px ( shifted ) Find( x shifted ) Mx shifted x shifted := x shifted =.57 3 mm Available anchorage length l an := l f b + x shifted l an = mm Maximum FRP tensile force that can be anchored k :=.783 k :=.4 b f b con k b := max,.6 k b b =.4 f + 4 f hm := f b N vfmax := k k b b f k E f t f f hm N vfmax = N Appendix 6 Mechanisms of failure
26 Maximum anchorage length k E f t f l vfmax := l f vfmax = mm hm Force in FRP Mx ( shifted ) N f ( x shifted ) := N A st.c E f x shifted s z r.c + A f E f ( ) = N Required anchorage length Ql vf := l vf N vfmax l vfmax + N f x shifted ( ) ( l vf ) N vfmax guess value l vf := mm ( ) ( l vfmax ) Given ( ) Find( l vf ) Ql vf l vf := l vf = 7. mm Unity check: l vf =.99 l an N f ( x shifted ) =.9 N vfmax Mechanism D End shear failure Distance between the end of the FRP and the support L:= b l f L = 5 mm Factor k 3 := 4 Resisting shear stress τ ourep := k 3 f b Material factor γ m := τ ourep =.5 ω s.c 4 L N mm τ ourep Design value of resisting shear force τ ouu := γ m τ ouu =.5 N mm Appendix 6 3 Mechanisms of failure
27 Resisting design shear capacity V ouu := τ ouu b con d st.c V ouu =.83 5 N x shifted := b d st.c x shifted = ( ) Mx shifted = Nmm ( ) Mx shifted Slenderness ratio λ v := d st.c V( x) λ v =.993 Unity check: V( x) =.67 V ouu + L d st.c =.757 λ v Additional application restriction: 4 ω s.c a L := d ω st.c L 3 a L =.73 3 mm s.c b =.75 3 mm Unity check: a L =.99 b Appendix 6 4 Mechanisms of failure
28 Appendix 7 To be able to compare analytical and experimental data, material properties of the specimen are obtained. Concrete Two batches of concrete are used to pour the six beams tested in the multi span situation. The properties of both batches are tested. For this purpose, cylinders and cubes are poured from each batch. Concrete properties per batch are summarized in table A.7.. Batch is used to pour beam, 3 and 5, batch is used to pour beam, 4 and 6. At age of property tests Batch Age F c F split F t E (days) (kn) (kn) (kn) (N/mm ) Table A.7.: concrete properties per batch Using the mean values of the above specifications, an overview of beam properties is given in table A.7.. The values for the mean concrete tensile stress (f bm ) are derived from the splitting force values. Age at test f cm f b f bm E b (days) (N/mm ) (N/mm ) (N/mm ) (N/mm ) Beam Beam (preloading) Beam Beam Beam Beam Beam (preloading) Beam Table A.7.: beam properties Steel For the internal steel reinforcement, steel bars S5 are used. The M-κ relations drawn of the beams before the test are performed, consider the yielding stress of the longitudinal steel reinforcement to be 55 N/mm, as obtained from the single span tests. A test has been performed to verify the actual yielding stress. This appeared to be 5 N/mm. FRP EBR No tests have been performed to verify the tensile stress of the externally bonded carbon fibre reinforcement. Information provided by the supplier is used: f f = 8 N/mm E f = 65 N/mm Appendix 7 5 Material properties multi span situation
29 Appendix 8 8. High-speed images beam In the following figure, some images of the high-speed camera recording of beam are displayed. As not all 3 images can be displayed, only the images around the actual moment of failure are selected. The images are taken every.4 milliseconds. Figure A.8.: image ; beam Figure A.8.: image ; beam Figure A.8.3: image 3; beam Figure A.8.4: image 4; beam Figure A.8.5: image 5; beam Appendix 8 6 High-speed camera
30 Figure A.8.6: image 6; beam Figure A.8.7: image 7; beam Figure A.8.8: image 8; beam Figure A.8.9: image 9; beam Figure A.8.: image ; beam Figure A.8.: image ; beam Appendix 8 7 High-speed camera
31 Figure A.8.: image ; beam Figure A.8.3: image 3; beam Figure A.8.4: image 4; beam Figure A.8.5: image 5; beam Figure A.8.6: image 6; beam Figure A.8.7: image 7; beam Appendix 8 8 High-speed camera
32 8. High speed images beam In the following figure, some images of the high-speed camera recording of beam are displayed. As not all 3 images can be displayed, only the images around the actual moment of failure are selected. The images are taken every.8 milliseconds. Figure A.8.8: image ; beam Figure A.8.9: image ; beam Figure A.8.: image 3; beam Figure A.8.: image 4; beam Figure A.8.: image 5; beam Appendix 8 9 High-speed camera
33 Figure A.8.3: image 6; beam Figure A.8.4: image 7; beam Figure A.8.5: image 8; beam Figure A.8.6: image 9; beam Figure A.8.7: image ; beam Figure A.8.8: image ; beam Appendix 8 3 High-speed camera
34 Figure A.8.9: image ; beam Figure A.8.3: image 3; beam Figure A.8.3: image 4; beam Figure A.8.3: image 5; beam Figure A.8.33: image 6; beam Figure A.8.34: image 7; beam Appendix 8 3 High-speed camera
35 8.3 High-speed images beam 5 In the following figure, some images of the high-speed camera recording of beam are displayed. As not all 3 images can be displayed, only the images around the actual moment of failure are selected. The images are taken every.8 milliseconds. Figure A.8.35: image ; beam 5 Figure A.8.36: image ; beam 5 Figure A.8.37: image 3; beam 5 Figure A.8.38: image 4; beam 5 Figure A.8.39: image 5; beam 5 Appendix 8 3 High-speed camera
36 Figure A.8.4: image 6; beam 5 Figure A.8.4: image 7; beam 5 Figure A.8.4: image 8; beam 5 Figure A.8.43: image 9; beam 5 Figure A.8.44: image ; beam 5 Figure A.8.45: image ; beam 5 Appendix 8 33 High-speed camera
37 Figure A.8.46: image ; beam 5 Figure A.8.47: image 3; beam 5 Figure A.8.48: image 4; beam 5 Figure A.8.49: image 5; beam 5 Figure A.8.49: image 6; beam 5 Appendix 8 34 High-speed camera
38 Appendix 9 9. Data beam In the following figures, all data from beam are displayed. If data are given in relation to a moment, the concerning moment is the moment at midspan x 5 mm Figure A.9.: place of strain gauges on beam 8 6 M-strain beam moment [knm] strain [mm/m] Figure A.9.3: strain against moment at midspan of beam strain [mm/m] strain over fibre; beam place on beam [mm] 6 knm 6 knm 5 knm 4 knm 3 knm knm knm knm 9 knm 8 knm 7 knm 6 knm 5 knm 4 knm 3 knm knm knm knm Figure A.9.: strain over fibre beam Appendix 9 35 Data beam to 6
39 A B C D E Figure A.9.4: place of displacement measurements on beam 8 6 displacements beam A E B D C 4 moment [knm] displacements [mm] Figure A.9.5: displacements of beam displacement [mm] displacements beam A E B C D place on beam [mm] knm knm 3 knm 4 knm 5 knm 6 knm 7 knm 8 knm 9 knm knm knm knm 3 knm 4 knm 5 knm 6 knm 6 knm Figure A.9.6: displacements over beam Appendix 9 36 Data beam to 6
40 Figure A.9.7: place of LVDT s on beam deformation LVDT's beam moment [knm] deformation [mm] Figure A.9.8: deformation of LVDT s on beam (length of LVDT=3 mm) 5 Beam moment [knm] kappa [*e-6 mm-] Figure A.9.9: M-κ relation beam Appendix 9 37 Data beam to 6
41 9. Data beam In the following figures, all data from beam are displayed. If data are given in relation to a moment, the concerning moment is the moment at midspan x 5 mm Figure A.9.: place of strain gauges on beam 8 M-strain beam moment [knm] strain [mm/m] Figure A.9.: strain against moment at midspan of beam strain [mm/m] strain over fibre; beam place on beam [mm] 55 knm 5 knm 4 knm 3 knm knm knm knm 9 knm 8 knm 7 knm 6 knm 5 knm 4 knm 3 knm knm knm knm Figure A.9.: strain over fibre beam Appendix 9 38 Data beam to 6
42 A B C D E Figure A.9.3: place of displacement measurements on beam 8 displacements beam 6 A E B D C 4 moment [knm] displacement [mm] Figure A.9.4: displacements of beam displacements 5 A B C D E knm knm 3 knm 4 knm displacement [mm] knm 6 knm 7 knm 8 knm 9 knm knm knm knm 3 knm - 4 knm 5 knm place on beam [mm] Figure A.9.5: displacements over beam 55 knm Appendix 9 39 Data beam to 6
43 Figure A.9.6: place of LVDT s on beam deformations LVDT's beam moment [knm] deformation [mm] Figure A.9.7: deformation of LVDT s on beam (length of LVDT=3 mm) 5 Beam moment [knm] kappa [*e-6 mm-] Figure A.9.8: M-κ relation beam Appendix 9 4 Data beam to 6
44 9.3 Combinations beam and In the following figures, a combination of the data from beam and are displayed. If data are given in relation to a moment, the concerning moment is the moment at midspan. 8 6 strain at midspan beam and 4 moment [knm] strain [mm/m] Figure A.9.9: M-strain in FRP EBR at midspan beam and 8 displacements at midspan beam and 6 4 moment [knm] displacements at midspan [mm] - -5 Figure A.9.: M-displacement at midspan relation beam and Appendix 9 4 Data beam to 6
45 8 6 4 M-kappa and moment [knm] kappa [*e-6 mm-] Figure A.9.: M-κ at midspan relation beam and displacements beam and 5 A E B C D displacement [mm] kNmbeam 5kNmbeam knm beam knm beam 5 knm beam 5 knm beam 6 knm beam 55 knm beam place on beam [mm] Figure A.9.: displacements over beam and Appendix 9 4 Data beam to 6
46 9.4 Data beam 3 In the following figures, all data from beam 3 are displayed. If data are given in relation to a moment, the concerning moment is the moment at midspan x 6 mm Figure A.9.3: place of strain gauges on beam 3 8 M-strain beam 3 6 moment [knm] strain [mm/m] Figure A.9.4: strain against moment at midspan of beam 3 strain [mm/m] strain over fibre; beam place on beam [mm] 8 knm knm knm knm 9 knm 8 knm 7 knm 6 knm 5 knm 4 knm 3 knm knm knm knm Figure A.9.5: strain over fibre beam 3 Appendix 9 43 Data beam to 6
47 A B C D E Figure A.9.6: place of displacement measurements on beam 8 displacements beam EA DB C moment [knm] displacements [mm] Figure A.9.7: displacements of beam 3 displacements beam 3 displacement [mm] A B C D E knm knm 3 knm 4 knm 5 knm 6 knm 7 knm 8 knm 9 knm knm knm - knm 8 knm place on beam [mm] Figure A.9.8: displacements over beam 3 Appendix 9 44 Data beam to 6
48 Figure A.9.9: place of LVDT s on beam 3 deformations LVDT's beam moment [knm] deformations [mm] Figure A.9.3: deformation of LVDT s on beam 3 (length of LVDT=3 mm) 5 Beam 3 moment [knm] kappa [*e-6 mm-] Figure A.9.3: M-κ relation beam 3 Appendix 9 45 Data beam to 6
49 9.5 Data beam 4 In the following figures, all data from beam 4 are displayed. If data are given in relation to a moment, the concerning moment is the moment at midspan x 6 mm Figure A.9.3: place of strain gauges on beam 4 8 M-strain beam moment [knm] strain [mm/m] Figure A.9.33: strain against moment at midspan of beam 4 4 strain over fibre; beam 4 strain [mm/m] place on beam [mm] 6 knm knm knm knm 9 knm 8 knm 7 knm 6 knm 5 knm 4 knm 3 knm knm knm knm Figure A.9.34: strain over fibre beam 4 Appendix 9 46 Data beam to 6
50 A B C D E Figure A.9.35: place of displacement measurements on beam 8 displacements beam A E B D C moment [knm] displacement [mm] Figure A.9.36: displacements of beam 4 displacements beam 4 5 A B C D E knm knm 3 knm 4 knm displacement [mm] -5-5 knm 6 knm 7 knm 8 knm 9 knm knm -5 knm knm 5 knm - 6 knm place on beam [mm] Figure A.9.37: displacements over beam 4 Appendix 9 47 Data beam to 6
51 Figure A.9.38: place of LVDT s on beam 4 deformations LVDT's beam moment [knm] deformations [mm] Figure A.9.39: deformation of LVDT s on beam 4 (length of LVDT=3 mm) 5 Beam 4 moment [knm] kappa [*e-6 mm-] Figure A.9.4: M-κ relation beam 4 Appendix 9 48 Data beam to 6
52 9.6 Data beam 5 In the following figures, all data from beam 5 are displayed. If data are given in relation to a moment, the concerning moment is the moment at midspan x 3 mm Figure A.9.4: place of strain gauges on beam 5 8 M-strain beam moment [knm] strain [mm/m] Figure A.9.4: strain against moment at midspan of beam 5 4 strain over fibre; beam 5 strain [mm/m] place on beam [mm] 9 knm knm knm knm 9 knm 8 knm 7 knm 6 knm 5 knm 4 knm 3 knm knm knm knm Figure A.9.43: strain over fibre beam 5 Appendix 9 49 Data beam to 6
53 A B C D E Figure A.9.44: place of displacement measurements on beam 8 displacements beam 5 6 moment [knm] 4 8 E A D B C displacement [mm] Figure A.9.45: displacements of beam 5 displacements over beam 5 5 A B C D E knm knm 3 knm 4 knm displacement [mm] knm 6 knm 7 knm 8 knm 9 knm knm knm knm 9 knm place on beam [mm] Figure A.9.46: displacements over beam 5 Appendix 9 5 Data beam to 6
54 Figure A.9.47: place of LVDT s on beam 5 deformations LVDT's beam moment [knm] deformation [mm] Figure A.9.48: deformation of LVDT s on beam 5 (length of LVDT=3 mm) 5 Beam 5 moment [knm] kappa [*e-6 mm-] Figure A.9.49: M-κ relation beam 5 Appendix 9 5 Data beam to 6
55 9.7 Data beam 6 In the following figures, all data from beam 6 are displayed. If data are given in relation to a moment, the concerning moment is the moment at midspan x 3 mm Figure A.9.5: place of strain gauges on beam 6 8 M-strain beam moment [knm] strain [m/m] Figure A.9.5: strain against moment at midspan of beam 6 strain [mm/m] strain over fibre; beam place on beam [mm] 37 knm 3 knm knm knm knm 9 knm 8 knm 7 knm 6 knm 5 knm 4 knm 3 knm knm knm knm Figure A.9.5: strain over fibre beam 6 Appendix 9 5 Data beam to 6
56 A B C D E Figure A.9.53: place of displacement measurements on beam 8 displacements beam EA DB C moment [knm] displacement [mm] Figure A.9.54: displacements of beam 6 displacements beam 6 displacement [mm] A B C D E knm knm 3 knm 4 knm 5 knm 6 knm 7 knm 8 knm 9 knm knm knm knm - 3 knm 36 knm place on beam [mm] Figure A.9.55: displacements over beam 6 Appendix 9 53 Data beam to 6
57 Figure A.9.56: place of LVDT s on beam 5 deformations LVDT's beam moment [knm] deformation [mm] Figure A.9.57: deformation of LVDT s on beam 6 (length of LVDT=3 mm) 5 Beam 6 moment [knm] kappa [*e-6 mm-] Figure A.9.58: M-κ relation beam 6 Appendix 9 54 Data beam to 6
58 9.8 Combinations beam 3 and 6 In the following figures, a combination of the data from beam 3 to 6 is displayed. If data are given in relation to a moment, the concerning moment is the moment at midspan. 8 M-strain beam 3 to End of fibre Midspan moment [knm] = beam 3 = beam 4 = beam 5 = beam strain [m/m] Figure A.9.59: M-strain in FRP EBR at midspan beam 3 to 6 4 strain over fibre; beam 3 to strain [mm/m] = beam 3 = beam 4 = beam 5 = beam place on beam [mm] Figure A.9.6: Strain over fibre beam 3 to 6 Appendix 9 55 Data beam to 6
59 8 displacements midspan beam 3 to moment [knm] = beam 3 = beam 4 = beam 5 = beam displacement [mm] Figure A.9.6: displacements at midspan beam 3 to 6 8 Beam 3 to moment [knm] kappa [*e-6 mm-] Figure A.9.6: M-κ relation at midspan beam 3 to 6 = beam 3 = beam 4 = beam 5 = beam 6 Appendix 9 56 Data beam to 6
60 Appendix One of the cracks around midspan of beam 4 is monitored with ESPI. The concerning crack is marked in figure A.., and displayed in figure A.. and A..3. In this appendix, all data obtained from the measurement can be found. The aim of the ESPI measurement and the verification of the results can be found in Chapter 5, section Figure A..: crack monitored by ESPI Figure A..: monitored surface at kn (just after cracking) Figure A..3: monitored surface at 3 kn (just before failure). Strain in x-direction around monitored crack In the following figures, the stain in the x-direction around the monitored crack is displayed. The figures on the left visualize the surface around the crack after a certain load increase. Reference is taken from a point somewhere in the dark blue area. The displacements over the lines B, G and R are separately displayed in the figures on the right; the letter representing the color of the line (Black, Green and Red). The location of the lines is given in figure A..4. Figure A..4: Strain in x-direction step Figure A..5: Plot strain in x-direction step Figure A..6: Strain in x-direction step Figure A..7: Plot strain in x-direction step Appendix 57 ESPI measurement beam 4
61 Figure A..8: Strain in x-direction step 3 Figure A..9: Plot strain in x-direction step 3 Figure A..: Strain in x-direction step 4 Figure A..: Plot strain in x-direction step 4 Figure A..: Strain in x-direction step 5 Figure A..3: Plot strain in x-direction step 5. Displacements in x-direction around monitored crack In the following figures, the displacements in the x-direction around the monitored crack are displayed. The figures on the left visualize the surface around the crack after a certain load increase. Reference is taken from a point somewhere in the green area. The displacements over the lines B, G and R are separately displayed in the figure on the right; the letter representing the color of the line (Black, Green and Red). The location of the lines is given in figure A..4. Appendix 58 ESPI measurement beam 4
62 Figure A..4: Displacements in x-direction step Figure A..5: Plot displacement sin x-direction step Figure A..6: Displacements in x-direction step Figure A..7: Plot displacements in x-direction step Figure A..8: Displacements in x-direction step 3 Figure A..9: Plot displacements in x-direction step 3 Appendix 59 ESPI measurement beam 4
63 Figure A..: Displacements in x-direction step 4 Figure A..: Plot displacements in x-direction step 4 Figure A..: Displacements in x-direction step 5 Figure A..3: Plot displacements in x-direction step 5.3 Strain in y-direction around monitored crack In the following figures, the strain in the y-direction around the monitored crack is displayed. The figures on the left visualize the surface around the crack after a certain load increase. Reference is taken from a point somewhere in the soft blue area. The displacements over the lines B, G and R are separately displayed in the figures on the; the letter representing the color of the line (Black, Green and Red). The location of the lines is given in figure A..4. Figure A..4: Strain in y-direction step Figure A..5: Plot strain in y-direction step Appendix 6 ESPI measurement beam 4
64 Figure A..6: Strain in y-direction step Figure A..7: Plot strain in y-direction step Figure A..8: Strain in y-direction step 3 Figure A..9: Plot strain in y-direction step 3 Figure A..3: Strain in y-direction step 4 Figure A..3: Plot strain in y-direction step 4 Appendix 6 ESPI measurement beam 4
65 Figure A..3: Strain in y-direction step 5 Figure A..33: Plot strain in y-direction step 5.4 Displacements in y-direction around monitored crack In the following figures, the displacements in the y-direction around the monitored crack are displayed. The figures on the left visualize the surface around the crack after a certain load increase. Reference is taken from a point somewhere in the yellow area. The displacements over the lines B, G and R are separately displayed in the figures on the right; the letter representing the color of the line (Black, Green and Red). The location of the lines is given in figure A..34. Figure A..34: Displacements in y-direction step Figure A..35: Plot displacements in y-direction step Figure A..36: Displacements in y-direction step Figure A..37: Plot displacements in y-direction step Appendix 6 ESPI measurement beam 4
66 Figure A..38: Displacements in y-direction step 3 Figure A..39: Plot displacements in y-direction step 3 Figure A..4: Displacements in y-direction step 4 Figure A..4: Plot displacements in y-direction step 4 Figure A..4: Displacements in y-direction step 5 Figure A..43: Plot displacements in y-direction step 5 Appendix 63 ESPI measurement beam 4
Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602
Design of wall panel according to EN 160 Example 3: Wall panel with wind load 1.1 Issue Design of a wall panel at an industrial building Materials with a compressive strength 3,5, density class 500, welded
More informationEntrance exam Master Course
- 1 - Guidelines for completion of test: On each page, fill in your name and your application code Each question has four answers while only one answer is correct. o Marked correct answer means 4 points
More information9.5 Compression Members
9.5 Compression Members This section covers the following topics. Introduction Analysis Development of Interaction Diagram Effect of Prestressing Force 9.5.1 Introduction Prestressing is meaningful when
More informationSoftware Verification
EXAMPLE 16 racked Slab Analysis RAKED ANALYSIS METHOD The moment curvature diagram shown in Figure 16-1 depicts a plot of the uncracked and cracked conditions, Ψ 1 State 1, and, Ψ State, for a reinforced
More information2012 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS
R10 SET - 1 II B.Tech II Semester, Regular Examinations, April 2012 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS (Com. to ME, AME, MM) Time: 3 hours Max. Marks: 75 Answer any FIVE Questions All Questions carry Equal Marks ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
More informationDesign of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN
Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN 1992-1-1 and EN 1992-2 Validation Examples Brno, 21.10.2010 IDEA RS s.r.o. South Moravian Innovation Centre, U Vodarny 2a, 616 00 BRNO tel.: +420-511
More informationCivil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7
Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7 Dr. Colin Caprani, Chartered Engineer 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 1.1 Background... 3 1.2 Failure Modes... 5 1.3 Design Aspects...
More informationDelhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:
Serial : IG1_CE_G_Concrete Structures_100818 Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: E-mail: info@madeeasy.in Ph: 011-451461 CLASS TEST 018-19 CIVIL ENGINEERING
More informationPre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension
Pre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension but strong in compression Steel tendon is first stressed
More informationε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram
CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case
More informationSRI CHANDRASEKHARENDRA SARASWATHI VISWA MAHAVIDHYALAYA
SRI CHANDRASEKHARENDRA SARASWATHI VISWA MAHAVIDHYALAYA (Declared as Deemed-to-be University under Section 3 of the UGC Act, 1956, Vide notification No.F.9.9/92-U-3 dated 26 th May 1993 of the Govt. of
More informationChapter 5 CENTRIC TENSION OR COMPRESSION ( AXIAL LOADING )
Chapter 5 CENTRIC TENSION OR COMPRESSION ( AXIAL LOADING ) 5.1 DEFINITION A construction member is subjected to centric (axial) tension or compression if in any cross section the single distinct stress
More informationSeismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design
Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Elmer E. Marx, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Michael Keever, California Department
More informationCE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-
CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing Openings in RC Flexural Members- Assoc Pr Tan Kiang Hwee Department Civil Engineering National In this lecture DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
More informationName :. Roll No. :... Invigilator s Signature :.. CS/B.TECH (CE-NEW)/SEM-3/CE-301/ SOLID MECHANICS
Name :. Roll No. :..... Invigilator s Signature :.. 2011 SOLID MECHANICS Time Allotted : 3 Hours Full Marks : 70 The figures in the margin indicate full marks. Candidates are required to give their answers
More informationTHEME IS FIRST OCCURANCE OF YIELDING THE LIMIT?
CIE309 : PLASTICITY THEME IS FIRST OCCURANCE OF YIELDING THE LIMIT? M M - N N + + σ = σ = + f f BENDING EXTENSION Ir J.W. Welleman page nr 0 kn Normal conditions during the life time WHAT HAPPENS DUE TO
More informationSTRENGTH OF MATERIALS-I. Unit-1. Simple stresses and strains
STRENGTH OF MATERIALS-I Unit-1 Simple stresses and strains 1. What is the Principle of surveying 2. Define Magnetic, True & Arbitrary Meridians. 3. Mention different types of chains 4. Differentiate between
More informationSoftware Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAFE 014 EXAMPLE 16 racked Slab Analysis RAKED ANALYSIS METHOD The moment curvature diagram shown in Figure 16-1 depicts a plot of the uncracked and cracked conditions, 1 State 1, and, State,
More information7.4 The Elementary Beam Theory
7.4 The Elementary Beam Theory In this section, problems involving long and slender beams are addressed. s with pressure vessels, the geometry of the beam, and the specific type of loading which will be
More informationSERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN
CHAPTER 11 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN Article 49. Cracking Limit State 49.1 General considerations In the case of verifications relating to Cracking Limit State, the effects of actions comprise
More informationQUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS
QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State Hooke s law. 3. Define modular ratio,
More informationQUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A
DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State
More informationThere are three main types of structure - mass, framed and shells.
STRUCTURES There are three main types of structure - mass, framed and shells. Mass structures perform due to their own weight. An example would be a dam. Frame structures resist loads due to the arrangement
More informationBending Stress. Sign convention. Centroid of an area
Bending Stress Sign convention The positive shear force and bending moments are as shown in the figure. Centroid of an area Figure 40: Sign convention followed. If the area can be divided into n parts
More informationPOST-PEAK BEHAVIOR OF FRP-JACKETED REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS
POST-PEAK BEHAVIOR OF FRP-JACKETED REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS - Technical Paper - Tidarut JIRAWATTANASOMKUL *1, Dawei ZHANG *2 and Tamon UEDA *3 ABSTRACT The objective of this study is to propose a new
More informationPURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.
BENDING STRESS The effect of a bending moment applied to a cross-section of a beam is to induce a state of stress across that section. These stresses are known as bending stresses and they act normally
More informationSTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction
CHAPTER 2 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Introduction The primary purpose of structural analysis is to establish the distribution of internal forces and moments over the whole part of a structure and to identify
More informationReview Lecture. AE1108-II: Aerospace Mechanics of Materials. Dr. Calvin Rans Dr. Sofia Teixeira De Freitas
Review Lecture AE1108-II: Aerospace Mechanics of Materials Dr. Calvin Rans Dr. Sofia Teixeira De Freitas Aerospace Structures & Materials Faculty of Aerospace Engineering Analysis of an Engineering System
More informationNORMAL STRESS. The simplest form of stress is normal stress/direct stress, which is the stress perpendicular to the surface on which it acts.
NORMAL STRESS The simplest form of stress is normal stress/direct stress, which is the stress perpendicular to the surface on which it acts. σ = force/area = P/A where σ = the normal stress P = the centric
More informationModule 6. Approximate Methods for Indeterminate Structural Analysis. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Module 6 Approximate Methods for Indeterminate Structural Analysis Lesson 35 Indeterminate Trusses and Industrial rames Instructional Objectives: After reading this chapter the student will be able to
More informationFailure interaction curves for combined loading involving torsion, bending, and axial loading
Failure interaction curves for combined loading involving torsion, bending, and axial loading W M Onsongo Many modern concrete structures such as elevated guideways are subjected to combined bending, torsion,
More informationHardened Concrete. Lecture No. 16
Hardened Concrete Lecture No. 16 Fatigue strength of concrete Modulus of elasticity, Creep Shrinkage of concrete Stress-Strain Plot of Concrete At stress below 30% of ultimate strength, the transition
More informationAppendix J. Example of Proposed Changes
Appendix J Example of Proposed Changes J.1 Introduction The proposed changes are illustrated with reference to a 200-ft, single span, Washington DOT WF bridge girder with debonded strands and no skew.
More informationSymmetric Bending of Beams
Symmetric Bending of Beams beam is any long structural member on which loads act perpendicular to the longitudinal axis. Learning objectives Understand the theory, its limitations and its applications
More informationSTEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams
STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite
More informationChapter 4. Test results and discussion. 4.1 Introduction to Experimental Results
Chapter 4 Test results and discussion This chapter presents a discussion of the results obtained from eighteen beam specimens tested at the Structural Technology Laboratory of the Technical University
More informationCIVIL DEPARTMENT MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1. Brach: CE YEAR:
MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1 SEMESTER: V 1) Find the least moment of Inertia about the centroidal axes X-X and Y-Y of an unequal angle section 125 mm 75 mm 10 mm as shown in figure 2) Determine
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet
E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC N/A) 35 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of longitudinal steel, f y 460 N/mm 2 Yield
More informationSabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are
More informationInfluence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes
October 2014 Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of Abstract tubular columns and arches Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal Contact:
More informationDESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL
DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL When the height of the retaining wall exceeds about 6 m, the thickness of the stem and heel slab works out to be sufficiently large and the design becomes
More informationChapter 12. Static Equilibrium and Elasticity
Chapter 12 Static Equilibrium and Elasticity Static Equilibrium Equilibrium implies that the object moves with both constant velocity and constant angular velocity relative to an observer in an inertial
More informationFracture Mechanics of Non-Shear Reinforced R/C Beams
Irina Kerelezova Thomas Hansen M. P. Nielsen Fracture Mechanics of Non-Shear Reinforced R/C Beams DANMARKS TEKNISKE UNIVERSITET Report BYG DTU R-154 27 ISSN 161-2917 ISBN 97887-7877-226-5 Fracture Mechanics
More informationEARTHQUAKE SIMULATION TESTS OF BRIDGE COLUMN MODELS DAMAGED DURING 1995 KOBE EARTHQUAKE
EARTHQUAKE SIMULATION TESTS OF BRIDGE COLUMN MODELS DAMAGED DURING 1995 KOBE EARTHQUAKE J. Sakai 1, S. Unjoh 2 and H. Ukon 3 1 Senior Researcher, Center for Advanced Engineering Structural Assessment and
More informationEarthquake-resistant design of indeterminate reinforced-concrete slender column elements
Engineering Structures 29 (2007) 163 175 www.elsevier.com/locate/engstruct Earthquake-resistant design of indeterminate reinforced-concrete slender column elements Gerasimos M. Kotsovos a, Christos Zeris
More informationStructural Analysis I Chapter 4 - Torsion TORSION
ORSION orsional stress results from the action of torsional or twisting moments acting about the longitudinal axis of a shaft. he effect of the application of a torsional moment, combined with appropriate
More informationInfluence of bond-slip on the behaviour of reinforced concrete beam to column joints
Tailor Made Concrete Structures Walraven & Stoelhorst (eds) 2008 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-47535-8 Influence of bond-slip on the behaviour of reinforced concrete beam to column joints
More informationBE Semester- I ( ) Question Bank (MECHANICS OF SOLIDS)
BE Semester- I ( ) Question Bank (MECHANICS OF SOLIDS) All questions carry equal marks(10 marks) Q.1 (a) Write the SI units of following quantities and also mention whether it is scalar or vector: (i)
More informationCONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110
E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column Effects From Structural Analysis Axial force, N (tension-ve and comp +ve) (ensure >= 0) 8000kN OK Major
More informationPERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK
PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM - 613 403 - THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Sub : Strength of Materials Year / Sem: II / III Sub Code : MEB 310
More informationPlastic design of continuous beams
Budapest University of Technology and Economics Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601 Lecture no. 4: Plastic design of continuous
More informationBending Load & Calibration Module
Bending Load & Calibration Module Objectives After completing this module, students shall be able to: 1) Conduct laboratory work to validate beam bending stress equations. 2) Develop an understanding of
More informationServiceability Deflection calculation
Chp-6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation Deflection example Structural Design Profession is concerned with: Limit States Philosophy: Strength Limit State (safety-fracture, fatigue, overturning
More informationISHIK UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING
ISHIK UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK FOR THE MECHANICS OF MATERIALS-I 1. A rod 150 cm long and of diameter 2.0 cm is subjected to an axial pull of 20 kn. If the modulus
More informationEstimation of the Residual Stiffness of Fire-Damaged Concrete Members
Copyright 2011 Tech Science Press CMC, vol.22, no.3, pp.261-273, 2011 Estimation of the Residual Stiffness of Fire-Damaged Concrete Members J.M. Zhu 1, X.C. Wang 1, D. Wei 2, Y.H. Liu 2 and B.Y. Xu 2 Abstract:
More informationGEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE
GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE Prof. J. N. Mandal Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India. Tel.022-25767328 email: cejnm@civil.iitb.ac.in Module-13 LECTURE-
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite
More informationDEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENIGINEERING, UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY LAHORE (KSK CAMPUS).
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENIGINEERING, UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY LAHORE (KSK CAMPUS). Lab Director: Coordinating Staff: Mr. Muhammad Farooq (Lecturer) Mr. Liaquat Qureshi (Lab Supervisor)
More informationSERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS
CHAPTER REINFORCED CONCRETE Reinforced Concrete Design A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition Fifth Edition SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil
More informationGATE SOLUTIONS E N G I N E E R I N G
GATE SOLUTIONS C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G From (1987-018) Office : F-16, (Lower Basement), Katwaria Sarai, New Delhi-110016 Phone : 011-65064 Mobile : 81309090, 9711853908 E-mail: info@iesmasterpublications.com,
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV UNIT I STRESS, STRAIN DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS PART A (2 MARKS)
More informationULTIMATE SHEAR OF BEAMS STRENGTHENED WITH CFRP SHEETS
ULTIMATE SHEAR OF BEAMS STRENGTHENED WITH CFRP SHEETS U. Ianniruberto and M. Imbimbo Department of Civil Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata Via di Tor Vergata 0, 0033, Rome, Italy SUMMARY: The
More informationASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NSM-CFRP FLEXURAL STRENGTHENING CONFIGURATIONS FOR CONTINUOUS RC SLABS
AEMENT OF TE EFFECTIVENE OF NM-CFRP FLEXURAL TRENGTENING CONFIGURATION FOR CONTINUOU RC LAB Matteo Breveglieri Joaquim A.O. Barros Gláucia M. Dalfré Alessandra Aprile Abstract The experimental programs
More informationPrediction of static response of Laced Steel-Concrete Composite beam using effective moment of inertia approach
Prediction of static response of Laced Steel-Concrete Composite beam using effective moment of inertia approach Thirumalaiselvi A 1, 2, Anandavalli N 1,2, Rajasankar J 1,2, Nagesh R. Iyer 2 1 Academy of
More informationPh.D. Preliminary Examination Analysis
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Spring Semester 2014 Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Materials Name:......................................... Ph.D.
More informationDesign of Beams (Unit - 8)
Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Contents Introduction Beam types Lateral stability of beams Factors affecting lateral stability Behaviour of simple and built - up beams in bending (Without vertical stiffeners)
More informationEurocode 8 Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings
in the Euro-Mediterranean Area Eurocode 8 Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings Paolo Emilio Pinto Università di Roma La Sapienza Urgency of guidance documents for assessment and retrofit in
More informationMaterials: engineering, science, processing and design, 2nd edition Copyright (c)2010 Michael Ashby, Hugh Shercliff, David Cebon.
Modes of Loading (1) tension (a) (2) compression (b) (3) bending (c) (4) torsion (d) and combinations of them (e) Figure 4.2 1 Standard Solution to Elastic Problems Three common modes of loading: (a) tie
More informationOUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS. You should judge your progress by completing the self assessment exercises. CONTENTS
Unit 2: Unit code: QCF Level: 4 Credit value: 15 Engineering Science L/601/1404 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS 1. Be able to determine the behavioural characteristics of elements of static engineering
More informationThe University of Melbourne Engineering Mechanics
The University of Melbourne 436-291 Engineering Mechanics Tutorial Four Poisson s Ratio and Axial Loading Part A (Introductory) 1. (Problem 9-22 from Hibbeler - Statics and Mechanics of Materials) A short
More informationStructural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 0 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic Loads
More informationIf you take CT5143 instead of CT4143 then write this at the first of your answer sheets and skip problem 4 and 6.
Delft University of Technology Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Structural Mechanics Section Write your name and study number at the top right-hand of your work. Exam CT4143 Shell Analysis
More informationResearch on the bending moment-curvature relationship of wide notch concrete beam strengthened with EBR CFRP plate
Research on the bending moment-curvature relationship of wide notch concrete beam strengthened with EBR CFRP plate,, a Zhenhua Ren, 3, Xiantao Zeng and Wenjun Qu College of Civil Engineering of Tongji
More informationLecture 15 Strain and stress in beams
Spring, 2019 ME 323 Mechanics of Materials Lecture 15 Strain and stress in beams Reading assignment: 6.1 6.2 News: Instructor: Prof. Marcial Gonzalez Last modified: 1/6/19 9:42:38 PM Beam theory (@ ME
More information6. Bending CHAPTER OBJECTIVES
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Determine stress in members caused by bending Discuss how to establish shear and moment diagrams for a beam or shaft Determine largest shear and moment in a member, and specify where
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Beam BS8110 v Member Design - RC Beam XX
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Effects From Structural Analysis Design axial force, F (tension -ve and compression +ve) (ensure < 0.1f cu b w h 0
More informationFinite Element Analysis of FRP Debonding Failure at the Tip of Flexural/Shear Crack in Concrete Beam
Marquette University e-publications@marquette Civil and Environmental Engineering Faculty Research and Publications Civil and Environmental Engineering, Department of 12-1-2013 Finite Element Analysis
More informationSlenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A )
Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A23.3-94) Slender Concrete Column Design in Sway Frame Buildings Evaluate slenderness effect for columns in a
More informationME Final Exam. PROBLEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) M (x) y. z (neutral axis) beam cross-sec+on. 20 kip ft. 0.2 ft. 10 ft. 0.1 ft.
ME 323 - Final Exam Name December 15, 2015 Instructor (circle) PROEM NO. 4 Part A (2 points max.) Krousgrill 11:30AM-12:20PM Ghosh 2:30-3:20PM Gonzalez 12:30-1:20PM Zhao 4:30-5:20PM M (x) y 20 kip ft 0.2
More informationCHAPTER OBJECTIVES Use various methods to determine the deflection and slope at specific pts on beams and shafts: 2. Discontinuity functions
1. Deflections of Beams and Shafts CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Use various methods to determine the deflection and slope at specific pts on beams and shafts: 1. Integration method. Discontinuity functions 3. Method
More informationSlender Structures Load carrying principles
Slender Structures Load carrying principles Basic cases: Extension, Shear, Torsion, Cable Bending (Euler) v017-1 Hans Welleman 1 Content (preliminary schedule) Basic cases Extension, shear, torsion, cable
More informationProf. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay
51 Module 4: Lecture 2 on Stress-strain relationship and Shear strength of soils Contents Stress state, Mohr s circle analysis and Pole, Principal stressspace, Stress pathsin p-q space; Mohr-coulomb failure
More informationFlange Curling in Cold Formed Profiles
Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Sep 4, 28 Flange Curling in Cold Formed Profiles Jönsson, Jeppe; Ramonas, Gediminas Published in: Proceedings of Nordic Steel Construction Conference 22 Publication date:
More informationDepartment of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601. Lecture no. 6: SHEAR AND TORSION
Budapest University of Technology and Economics Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601 Lecture no. 6: SHEAR AND TORSION Reinforced
More informationBridge deck modelling and design process for bridges
EU-Russia Regulatory Dialogue Construction Sector Subgroup 1 Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges Application to a composite twin-girder bridge according to Eurocode 4 Laurence Davaine
More informationA PROPOSAL OF DESIGN PROCEDURE FOR FLEXURAL STRENGTHENING RC BEAMS WITH FRP SHEET
N. Kishi, E-89, 1/8 A PROPOSAL OF DESIGN PROCEDURE FOR FLEXURAL STRENGTHENING RC BEAMS WITH FRP SHEET Yusuke Kurihashi Norimitsu Kishi Hiroshi Mikami Sumiyuki Sawada Civil Engrg. Research Muroran Inst.
More informationSTRAIN GAUGES YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
STRAIN GAUGES YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 1 YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY ENGINEERING FACULTY MECHANICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY 1. Objective: Strain Gauges Know how the change in resistance
More informationLecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures
Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Contents Analysis Approaches Point of Inflection Method Equivalent
More informationPrediction of premature failure load in FRP or steel plated RC beams
Loughborough University Institutional Repository Prediction of premature failure load in FRP or steel plated RC beams This item was submitted to Loughborough University's Institutional Repository by the/an
More informationCRACK FORMATION AND CRACK PROPAGATION INTO THE COMPRESSION ZONE ON REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM STRUCTURES
S. Kakay et al. Int. J. Comp. Meth. and Exp. Meas. Vol. 5 No. (017) 116 14 CRACK FORMATION AND CRACK PROPAGATION INTO THE COMPRESSION ZONE ON REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM STRUCTURES SAMDAR KAKAY DANIEL BÅRDSEN
More informationMODELLING NON-LINEAR BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL FIBRE REINFORCED CONCRETE
6th RILEM Symposium on Fibre-Reinforced Concretes (FRC) - BEFIB - September, Varenna, Italy MODELLING NON-LINEAR BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL FIBRE REINFORCED CONCRETE W. A. Elsaigh, J. M. Robberts and E.P. Kearsley
More informationBending and Shear in Beams
Bending and Shear in Beams Lecture 3 5 th October 017 Contents Lecture 3 What reinforcement is needed to resist M Ed? Bending/ Flexure Section analysis, singly and doubly reinforced Tension reinforcement,
More informationFIS Specifications for Flex Poles (Edition May 2008) Original Text: German
FIS Specifications for Flex Poles (Edition May 2008) Original Text: German 1 Field of Application and Basic Information The following FIS specifications for flex poles are intended to ensure that flex
More informationFlexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections
4 5000 4000 (increased d ) (increased f (increased A s or f y ) c or b) Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections Moment (kip-in.) 3000 2000 1000 0 0 (basic) (A s 0.5A s ) 0.0005 0.001 0.0015
More informationUNIT-II MOVING LOADS AND INFLUENCE LINES
UNIT-II MOVING LOADS AND INFLUENCE LINES Influence lines for reactions in statically determinate structures influence lines for member forces in pin-jointed frames Influence lines for shear force and bending
More informationProject data Project name Project number Author Description Date 26/04/2017 Design code AISC dome anchor. Material.
Project data Project name Project number Author Description Date 26/04/2017 Design code AISC 360-10 Material Steel A36, A529, Gr. 50 Concrete 4000 psi dome anchor Connection Name Description Analysis Design
More informationChapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter
Chapter 1 Materials 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter A Area of concrete cross-section C s Constant depending on the type of curing C t Creep coefficient (C t = ε sp /ε i ) C u Ultimate creep coefficient
More informationCHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE
CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE 6.1 GENERAL It shall be in accordance with JSCE Standard Specification (Design), 6.1. The collapse mechanism in statically indeterminate structures shall not be considered.
More informationVORONOI APPLIED ELEMENT METHOD FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS: THEORY AND APPLICATION FOR LINEAR AND NON-LINEAR MATERIALS
The 4 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October -7, 008, Beijing, China VORONOI APPLIED ELEMENT METHOD FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS: THEORY AND APPLICATION FOR LINEAR AND NON-LINEAR MATERIALS K.
More informationReinforced Concrete Structures
Reinforced Concrete Structures MIM 232E Dr. Haluk Sesigür I.T.U. Faculty of Architecture Structural and Earthquake Engineering WG Ultimate Strength Theory Design of Singly Reinforced Rectangular Beams
More information