arxiv: v1 [physics.ed-ph] 4 May 2016

Transcription

1 arxv:65.339v [physcs.ed-ph] 4 May 6 Orbtal motons of astronomcal bodes and ther Centre of Mass from dfferent reference frames: a conceptual step between the Geocentrc and Helocentrc models André G C Guerra and Paulo Smeão Carvalho,3 Departamento de Físca e Astronoma, Centro de Físca do Porto, Faculdade de Cêncas, Unversdade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, s/n, Porto, Portugal Departamento de Físca e Astronoma, UEC, Faculdade de Cêncas, Unversdade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, s/n, Porto, Portugal IFIMUP-IN, Rua do Campo Alegre, s/n, Porto, Portugal E-mal: aguerra@fc.up.pt, psmeao@fc.up.pt May 6 Abstract. The moton of astronomcal bodes and the centre of mass of the system s not always well perceved by students. One of the struggles s the conceptual change of reference frame, whch s the same that held back the acceptance of the Helocentrc model over the Geocentrc one. To address the queston, the noton of centre of mass, moton equatons (and ther numercal soluton for a system of multple bodes), and change of referental s ntroduced. The dscusson s done based on conceptual and real world examples, usng the solar system. Consequently, through the use of smple do t yourself methods and basc equatons, students can debate complex motons, and have a wder and potentally effectve understandng of physcs. Keywords: Reference Frame, Centre of Mass, Moton Equatons, Numercal Soluton, Geocentrc Model, Helocentrc Model Submtted to: Phys. Educ.. Introducton The noton of referental s one of the man causes why students have dffcultes nterpretng motons n astronomy. Ths s not completely surprsng, snce the change of referental nvolves abstract reasonng, whch s usually not completely developed n all populaton, especally young students []. Indeed, several examples of msconceptons Correspondng author.

2 Orbtal motons and the Centre of Mass were dentfed among students n many contents of physcs and astronomy that requre formal thnkng [, 3]. Lookng back to the hstory of physcs, the metculous observatons of nature by Arstotle (384 3 BC) lead hm to a phlosophcal descrpton of the unverse. Ths was based on a smple, logc and very appealng common sense language. For Arstotle, the was the centre of the unverse; the was the only referental he knew. Such geocentrc descrpton was lately mproved by Ptolemy (c. c. 7), n hs work Almagest [4 7], where the motons of the planets, Moon and Sun around the, were presented as a physcal model supported by mathematcal descrptons of the orbts. The geocentrc model had several advantages at that tme:. t dd not contradct Arstotle s descrptons,. t was supported by the relgous deals of the mddle age n Europe, and. t was based on a local frame of reference (the ) and followed a concrete reasonng. That s why t prevaled for about 4 centures. When Coperncus ( ) took the (prevously) rejected deas of Arstarchus of Samos (c. 3 c. 3 BC) and proposed the Helocentrc model, he and hs followers quckly realzed they had two major ssues to overcome: a huge and vsble relgous dspute, and a not-so-vsble but stll mportant cogntve barrer. The cogntve barrer arose because t was necessary to put oneself outsde the to fully understand the observatons taken from t. It was ths combnaton of factors that mantaned the debate of Geocentrc and Helocentrc-based models up to the moment when humanknd sent satelltes out of the n the th century. Nowadays, students stll reman confused whenever changes of referental are needed to understand astronomcal phenomena, such as moon phases, seasons, eclpses, or the moton of planets around a common centre of mass (). Some smple but potentally effectve deas concernng the topc of referental were developed durng the th Summer School of Physcs of Unversty of Porto for hgh secondary level students, and are presented here. The concepts addressed are: of a system, trajectory of bodes n the referental, and absolute trajectory of the same bodes. In ths approach, some computng s used to smulate the trajectores of the bodes, and to dscuss the mplcatons of the ntal condtons (mass and speed) on the descrpton of the phenomena.. Theory and Computatonal Method Before dvng nto the subject of referental changes, t s mportant to ntroduce the theory needed for solvng the problems numercally [8]. Consder a system composed by a number of dstnct bodes, randomly dstrbuted, orbtng each other. For ths setup, t s useful to defne the locaton of the of the system. The bodes moton due to gravty forces can be computed wth respect to a system centered on the, or to an nertal reference system.

3 Orbtal motons and the Centre of Mass 3.. Centre of mass of a system The of a multple bodes system can be defned as the unque pont, wthn the system, whch can be used to descrbe the system s response to external forces. The mass of the (m ) s the sum ( ) of the mass of all N bodes, each wth mass m, N m m. () The poston ( r ) and velocty ( v ) of the are related to each body locaton ( r ) and velocty ( v ), and can be computed by.. Moton Equatons r m v m = N m r, () = N m v. (3) To calculate the moton of the bodes n the system, Newton s second law has to be used, F = m a, (4) that relates the forces actng on a body ( F ) and ts acceleraton ( a). Admttng two bodes (of mass m and m ) n free space, the gravtatonal force actng on body s F = G m m r r, (5) where r s the unt vector that ponts from body to body, and G s the gravtatonal constant. Usng the noton of unt vector n equaton 5, the result s = F = G m m r 3 r. (6) The acceleraton of body can thus be obtan from both equatons 4 and 6, a = G m r. (7) r3 The same can be appled to body, just changng m to m and nvertng the drecton of r n equaton Numercal Soluton There are many methods to solve equaton 7. Here a numercal one s used because a general soluton for a system of multple bodes s searched, and there s no analytcal soluton. The smplest numercal method s the Euler one (and can even be appled wth a spreadsheet edtor [9]). It states that for a general functon f(t), t s possble to

4 Orbtal motons and the Centre of Mass 4 compute ts value at an nstant t {n+}, wth an ntal value f {n} (at nstant t {n} ), usng the relaton ( ) {n} df f {n+} = f {n} + t, (8) dt where (df/dt) {n} s the functon dervatve at nstant t {n}, and t = t {n+} t {n}. Applyng ths method to the multple body system, and knowng that d v/dt = a, the velocty of a body can be estmated (accordng to equaton 8) by v {n+} = v {n} + t a {n}, (9) where from equaton 7, the acceleraton for body, subject to the gravty of the others, s N a {n} Gm j {n} = r {n} j, () j 3 r j=,j where r j s the vector pontng from body to body j. Applyng the same scheme to the poston (d r/dt = v), t yelds r {n+} = r {n} + t v {n}. () The Euler method s consdered a frst-order numercal method, where the global error s proportonal to the step sze ( t). As the examples latter dscussed nvolve astronomcal bodes (where the steps used can be of the order of days), an adjustment to the above formulae can be made, to have a greater accuracy. One smple adjustment s to compute the poston wth a second order dervatve, usng the followng equaton, r {n+} = r {n} + v {n} t + {n} a ( t). () The above sequence of equatons (9, and ) s repeated successvely, untl a predetermned fnal nstant s reached. A way to verfy how much error s ntroduced by the numercal soluton, s to calculate the varaton n the total mechancal energy []..3. Frames of Reference All prevous equatons descrbe the moton n an nertal reference system. Ths frame does not have translatonal or rotatonal acceleraton, relatve to the fxed stars []. The Helocentrc frame s an example of an nertal referental for the -Moon system, where the Sun s at the orgn of the reference frame. Sometmes, the moton of the bodes can be smplfed when descrbed at the reference system (where the orgn s at the ). In ths case, t s necessary to mpose mathematcally that v s zero, as well as r. Ths mples that the veloctes and poston of the bodes n the referental, respectvely v and r, are related to the absolute ones by, v = v v, (3) r = r r. (4)

5 Orbtal motons and the Centre of Mass 5 Ths change of reference frame s a smple translaton of the nertal reference frame, and can be appled to any general pont by replacng v and r by the respectve velocty and poston of that pont. No rotaton s ntroduced here. 3. Examples Wth the equatons presented n the prevous secton, several multple bodes systems can be solved. Some examples, explored wth students at the th Summer School of Physcs, are presented here. The frst one s a generc two body system (whch can be two stars or two planets). The next ones correspond to real examples n the solar system, whch nclude the Sun, and the planets, Moon, Mars and Jupter. To deal wth real examples, the Jet Propulson Laboratory HORIZON Ephemerdes, correspondng to th Aprl 6, were used to extract the bodes real poston and velocty []. 3.. Example Two Bodes General System The of a two bodes system s always lyng between them, closer to the more massve body, or n the mddle f they have the same mass. Admttng one of the bodes has an ntal velocty (table ), students easly understand that both wll start movng around each other, due to the gravtatonal nteracton between them. The trajectory of the bodes can be computed wth a smple spreadsheet edtor, as can be consulted n reference [3]. Table : Two bodes system ntal condtons Body Mass [ kg] Poston (x, y) [ 3 km] Velocty (v x, v y ) [km/s] 59.7 (, ) (, ) (357., ) (,.5) It s therefore not surprsng that students conclude the both bodes descrbe, n the reference system, closed ellptcal trajectores around a common pont, the (fgure ). However, as the bodes moton nfluence the velocty of the, the result n the nertal referental s a helcal-lke moton of the lower massve body, whle the more massve one experences a composton of translaton n space and rotaton around the (fgure ). Such werd trajectores are counter-ntutve and provde a good frst dscusson about why we observe unlke trajectores n dfferent reference systems.

6 Orbtal motons and the Centre of Mass 6 # = 43 days and hours) Body Body Reference Frame XX Poston [m] # 8 Fgure : Two body system motons on the reference frame. Data was computed for a tme nterval of 9 days (only 43 days are shown here). # Body Body = 9 days and hours) 3 - Inertal Reference Frame XX Poston [m] # 8 Fgure : Two body system motons on an nertal reference frame. Data was computed for a tme nterval of 9 days. 3.. Example -Moon System The -Moon system has some smlartes to the prevous example, but now the s about ten tmes more massve (the Moon s mass s.3% of the ). Therefore, the of ths system s much closer to the. In the referental, the Moon descrbes an ellptcal moton, whereas the does not seem to move (fgure 3a). However, a closer observaton of the reveals that n fact t moves, but the of the system s always located nsde the planet

7 Orbtal motons and the Centre of Mass 7 (fgure 3b). # 8 5 = 7 days and hours) # 6 = 7 days and hours) 4 Moon Reference Frame XX Poston [m] # 8 (a) and Moon seen from the -6 Pont of Vew XX Poston [m] # 7 (b) The seen from Fgure 3: The -Moon system moton. In (a) the graphcally overlaps the. Data was computed for a tme nterval of 9 days (only 7 days are shown here). Because the les nsde the, the frst astronomers had the percepton that the Moon orbted the and not a common pont (the )! That only happened because ther astronomcal observatons were taken from the local referental! 3.3. Example 3 Sun--Moon System Movng from the -Moon system to the more general Sun--Moon system, we have to consderer that the, n fact, orbts around the Sun and therefore has already a velocty n space. At ths stage, students are already aware that the most massve body (the Sun) s affected by the gravtatonal forces of the other two ( and Moon). Thus, takng nto account the prevous example, they can predct that the centre of the Sun experments some moton on the nertal reference system, whch means that the solar system as a whole moves n space! What they really may fnd surprsng s that ths moton s very small when compared to the Sun dmenson (whch has about 99.8% of the total solar system mass), and ths s why we state that the planets orbt only around the Sun n the solar system. The relatve motons of the and Moon can also be observed from the of ths system of bodes. Fgure 4 shows a zoom of the trajectores of these bodes whle they orbt the Sun. Students can see that the Moon s trajectory s a composton of ts orbt around the, and the around the Sun. Therefore, the Moon ntersects the trajectory of the each tme t completes an orbtal revoluton, resultng n an oscllatng moton around the trajectory. The fnal stage of ths topc s to let students understand why the (apparent) retrograde moton s seen from the. For ths purpose, a more complex system

8 Orbtal motons and the Centre of Mass 8 must be projected # = 8 days and 9 hours) Moon Inertal Reference Frame XX Poston [m] # Fgure 4: A close-up of the -Moon system, orbtng the Sun, seen from an nertal reference frame. Data was computed for a tme nterval of 4 days (only a few days are shown here) Example 4 More Complex Systems The prncples for the mechancs of a more complex system do not dffer from those n the prevous examples. The example consdered here s the motons of the, Mars and Jupter around the Sun. The resultng trajectores of these bodes on an nertal reference frame can be seen n fgure 5. Even though they nfluence each other, through gravtatonal forces, the planets follow almost crcular orbts around the Sun, as was expected. However, ths s only true when seen from an nertal reference frame, or the Sun snce hs moton s neglgble when compared to the planets ones. To evaluate the (apparent) moton of those planets as seen from a local referental (the ), students only need to apply equatons (3) and (4), replacng v and r by v and r, respectvely, to obtan the velocty and poston n the reference frame. Plots for the case of Sun--Mars and Sun--Jupter systems are gven n fgures 6 and 7, respectvely. The loops observed on Mars and Jupter trajectores correspond to apparent retrograde motons. In ancent tmes these loops lead Ptolemy to formulate the epcycle theory for the Geocentrc model, as an attempt to explan the phenomena observed for the fve known planets at that tme: Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupter and Saturn. Instead

9 Orbtal motons and the Centre of Mass 9 #.8.6 = 4333 days and hours) Mars Jupter Sun Inertal Reference Frame XX Poston [m] # Fgure 5: The moton of the Sun--Mars-Jupter system, as seen from an nertal reference frame. In ths mage the Sun graphcally overlaps the. Data was computed for a tme nterval of 4333 days. # = 776 days and 3 hours) Mars Sun Pont of Vew XX Poston [m] # Fgure 6: The moton of the Sun--Mars system, as seen from the. In ths mage the Sun graphcally overlaps the. Data was computed for a tme nterval of 748 days (only 776 days are shown here). of makng the Geocentrc model more accepted, the complexty of such theory weakened t. Students can thus realse that the Helocentrc model proposed by Coperncus offers a smpler explanaton of the planets moton, clearly revealng why the retrograde motons are observed from the. To obtan all these plots an educatonal program [4] was developed (for a x64

10 Orbtal motons and the Centre of Mass # = 4333 days and hours) Jupter Sun Pont of Vew XX Poston [m] # Fgure 7: The moton of the Sun--Jupter system, as seen from the. In ths mage the Sun graphcally overlaps the. Data was computed for a tme nterval of 4333 days. Wndows operatng system), based on MATLAB software. Ths program allows to see step by step the bodes motons, whch makes t easer and more engagng for students to understand, especally when they observe Mars and Jupter makng retrograde motons, as seen from the. 4. Concluson Students usually gve very lttle mportance to the meanng of Centre of Mass of a system, because they tend to confne t to the partcle model problems. The approach descrbed n the context of astronomy gves a new and wder perspectve of understandng of the role of n the dynamcs of a system of bodes. In partcular, t promotes students reasonng about how the trajectores of bodes can be seen n dfferent reference frames, whch s essental to understand natural phenomena such as the Corols effect or the tdes. Ths approach also allows students to realse that apparently complex motons can be explaned wth basc and smple laws. In fact, the most nterestng about ths approach s that students, wth very smple mathematcs but sgnfcant physcs reasonng, can obtan these results by themselves, only consderng gravtatonal nteractons and no pre-establshed formulas. The use of a smple spreadsheet where a convenent, but accessble, manpulaton of equatons can be made to solve the problems numercally, s a very engagng strategy that nvolves actvely students n team-based learnng and results n an effectve understandng of physcs.

11 REFERENCES Acknowledgements The work of A. G., and P. C., s supported by the Fundação para a Cênca e a Tecnologa (Portuguese Agency for Research) fellowshp PD/BD/3536/5, and Project UID/NAN/54/3, respectvely. References [] Shayer M and Adey P 983 Towards a Scence of Scence Teachng: Cogntve development and currculum demand (London: Henemann Educatonal Books) ISBN [] Drver R, Guesne E and Tberghen A Chlden s Ideas n Scence (Phladelpha: Open Unversty Press) ISBN [3] Arons A B 997 Teachng Introductory Physcs (New York: John Wley & Sons, Inc.) ISBN [4] Serzedello M Físca!? Isso para mm é Grego (São Paulo: Hn Ed. e Publedtoral) ISBN coleção Produção Académca [5] de la Cotardère P Hstóra das Cêncas (Lsboa: Edções Texto & Grafa, Lda.) ISBN portuguese verson of Hstore des Scences, Tallander, 4 [6] 6 Ptolemy URL [7] 6 Almagest and references wthn. URL Almagest [8] Burge E J 97 Physcs Educaton 6 3 ISSN 39 [9] Slegr J and Kraus I Physcs Educaton ISSN 3-9 [] Kng W H 989 Physcs Educaton 4 39 ISSN 39 [] Curts H D Orbtal Mechancs For Engneerng Students nd ed (Amsterdam: Butterworth-Henemann) ISBN [] Jet Propulson Laboratory 6 HORIZONS System URL gov/?horzons [3] Guerra A G C 6 Excel Numerc Soluton (address to be provded by the journal) [4] Guerra A G C 6 Orbtal Motons (address to be provded by the journal)