Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) Central Fiber s Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS HECP and Enviro-Gold PLUS HECP over Sandy Loam

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) Central Fiber s Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS HECP and Enviro-Gold PLUS HECP over Sandy Loam"

Transcription

1 Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) of Central Fiber s Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS HECP and Enviro-Gold PLUS HECP over Sandy Loam May 2015 Submitted to: AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 249 Washington, D.C Attn: Keith Platte, NTPEP kplatte@aashto.org Submitted by: TRI/Environmental, Inc Bee Caves Road Austin, TX C. Joel Sprague Project Manager

2 May 30, 2015 Mr. Keith Platte AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 249 Washington, D.C Subject: Large-Scale Slope (ASTM D6459) Central Fiber, Canton, OH Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro-Gold PLUS Dear Mr. Platte: This letter report presents the results for large-scale slope erosion tests performed on Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro-Gold PLUS hydraulically-applied erosion control product (HECP) over sandy loam. All testing work was performed in general accordance with the ASTM D 6459, Standard Test Method for Determination of Rolled Erosion Control Product (RECP) Performance in Protecting Hillslopes from Rainfall-Induced Erosion modified as necessary to accommodate hydraulically-applied mulch. The product was allowed to cure on the slopes for approximately 48 hours prior to testing. Generated results were used to develop the following general cover factor (C-Factor) for the tested material: C-Factor Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro-Gold 2000lbs/acre = for cumulative R-Factor 162; Eqn: C = R TRI is pleased to present this final report. Please feel free to call if we can answer any questions or provide any additional information. Sincerely, C. Joel Sprague, P.E. Senior Engineer Geosynthetics Services Division Cc: Jay Sprague - TRI

3 Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro-Gold PLUS over Sandy Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP May 30, SLOPE TESTING REPORT Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro-Gold PLUS over Sandy Loam TESTING EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES Overview of Test and Apparatus TRI/Environmental, Inc.'s (TRI's) large-scale slope erosion testing facility is located at the Denver Downs Research Farm in Anderson, SC. Testing oversight is provided by C. Joel Sprague, P.E. The large-scale testing reported herein was performed in accordance with ASTM D 6459 modified as necessary to accommodate hydraulically-applied mulch, on 3:1 slopes using loamy soil test plots measuring 40 ft long x 8 ft wide. The simulated rainfall was produced by ten rain trees arranged around the perimeter of each test slope. Each rain tree has four sprinkler heads atop a 15 ft riser pipe. The rainfall system has been calibrated prior to testing to determine the number of sprinkler heads and associated pressure settings necessary to achieve target rainfall intensities and drop sizes. The target rainfall intensities are 2, 4, and 6 in/hr and are applied in sequence for 20 minutes each. Three replicate test slopes covered by the same hydraulically-applied erosion control product (HECP) submitted were tested. The application rate of the HECP was 2000 lb/acre. (Note: The mixing ratio was 100 gallons of water to 50 lb mulch.) The product was allowed to cure on the slopes for approximately 48 hours prior to testing. The erosion resistance provided by the product tested is obtained by comparing the protected slope results to control (bare soil) results. Tables and graphs of rainfall versus soil loss are generated from the accumulated data. Hydraulic Erosion Control Product (HECP) The following information and index properties were determined from the supplied products. Table 1. Tested Product Information & Index Properties Product Information and Index Property / Test Units Sampled Product Product Identification - Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro- Gold PLUS Manufacturing Plant Location - Canton, OH Thermo-Mechanically Processed Virgin Wood Fiber % 97 (minimum) Organic Polymer Tackifier % 3% ± 1% Moisture Content % 12% ± 3% Tensile Strength (ASTM D 6818 modified)* lb/in 0.13 Tensile Elongation (ASTM D 6818 modified)* % 7.86 Thickness (ASTM 6525 modified)* mils 107 Light Penetration (ASTM 6567 modified)* % cover 97.4 Water Absorption (ASTM 1117 / ECTC TASC 00197)* % wt change Mass / Unit Area (ASTM D 6566 modified)* osy 6.67 Note: Index specimens were made using the currently proposed ASTM procedure. * = These values are from independent testing of randomly sampled product. N/A specimen could not be made for test.

4 Test Soil Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro-Gold PLUS over Sandy Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP May 30, The test soil used in the test plots had the following characteristics. Table 2. TRI-Loam Characteristics Soil Characteristic Test Method Value % Gravel 0 % Sand 45 ASTM D 422 % Silt 35 % Clay 20 Liquid Limit, % 35 ASTM D 4318 Plasticity Index, % 6 Soil Classification USDA Loam Soil Classification USCS Clayey Sand (SC) K-Factor D Preparation of the Test Slopes The initial slope soil veneer (12-inch thick minimum) is placed and compacted. Compaction is verified to be 90% (± 3%) of Proctor Standard density using ASTM D 2937 (drive-cylinder method). Subsequently, the test slopes undergo a standard preparation procedure prior to each slope test. First, any rills or depressions resulting from previous testing are filled in with test soil and subject to heavy compaction. The entire test plot is then tilled to a depth not less than four inches. The test slope is then raked to create a slope that is smooth both side-to-side and top-tobottom. Finally, a steel drum roller is rolled down-and-up the slope 3 times proceeding from one side of the plot to the other. The submitted erosion control product is then installed as directed by the client. Installation of Erosion Control Product on Test Slopes As noted, the submitted erosion control product was installed as directed by the client. For the tests reported herein, the HECP was mixed at a rate of 50 lbs mulch per 100 gallons of water and applied at the rate of 2000 lb/acre. The applied material was allowed to cure for approximately 48 hours prior to testing. Specific Test Procedure Immediately prior to testing, rain gauges are placed at the quarter points (i.e. 10, 20, 30 ft) on the slope. The slope is then exposed to sequential 20-minute rainfalls having target intensities of 2, 4, and 6 inches per hour. All runoff is collected during the testing. Additionally, periodic sediment concentration grab samples are taken and runoff rate measurements are made. Between rainfall intensities, the rainfall is stopped and rainfall depth is read in the three rain gauges, valves are adjusted to facilitate the subsequent rainfall intensity, and empty collection vessels are positioned to collect subsequent runoff. After allowing for sediments to settle, water is decanted from the collected runoff. The remaining solids are used to determine bulk soil loss. Bulk soil loss is measured by drying all collected sediments.

5 Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro-Gold PLUS over Sandy Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP May 30, Figure 2. Typical Sampling Figure 1. Rainfall Testing Facility (set up for a control run) Pictures of slope preparation are shown in Figure 4. Figure 3. Typical Control Result Figure 4. Typical Prepared Soil Slope & HECP Application Pictures of the eroded slopes are shown in Figures 5 thru 7.

6 Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro-Gold PLUS over Sandy Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP May 30, Figure 5a. Test Slope #1 Cured Slope Figure 5b. Test Slope #1 At the End of the 4 in/hr Event Figure 5c. Test Slope #1 At Midpoint of 6 in/hr Event Figure 5d. Test Slope #1 At End of 6 in/hr Event Figure 6a. Test Slope #2 Cured Slope at Start of Testing Figure 6b. Test Slope #2 At End of 4 in/hr Event

7 Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro-Gold PLUS over Sandy Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP May 30, Figure 6c. Test Slope #2 At Midpoint of the 6 in/hr Event Figure 6d. Test Slope #2 At End of 6 in/hr Event Figure 7a. Test Slope #3 Cured Slope Figure 7b. Test Slope #3 At the End of the 4 in/hr Event Figure 7c. Test Slope #3 At Midpoint of the 6 in/hr Event Figure 7d. Test Slope #3 End of the 6 in/hr Event

8 TEST RESULTS Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro-Gold PLUS over Sandy Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP May 30, The Cover Management (C) Factor from the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) of the USDA-ARS Agricultural handbook 703 is the reported performance measure for slopes determined from this testing. The C-Factor and R-Factor reported herein are related through RUSLE by the following relationship: A = R x K x LS x C x P where: A = the computed soil loss in tons per acre (measured/calculated from test); R = the rainfall erosion index (measured/calculated from test); K = the erodibility of the soil (calculated from test see Figure 9); LS = the topographic factor (2.78 for 8 x 40 ft slope); C = the cover factor = ratio of protect soil loss to control soil loss (1.0 for control); and P = the practice factor (1.0 for all test slopes). Total soil loss and the associated rainfall depth measured during the testing are the principle data used to determine the C Factor. The cumulative C-Factors shown in Table 3 are the ratio of the soil loss from the protected condition at a calculated cumulative R-Factor divided by the cumulative soil loss from the control plot (Figure 9) at that same R-Factor. In all cases, the soil loss and associated rainfall data for both protected and control conditions are used to develop a normalized cumulative graph of R-Factor versus C-Factor (R factor = total kinetic energy of the storm (E) times its maximum 30-minute Intensity (I)). The maximum average normalized cumulative R-Factor calculated for the target test events: 2 in/hr for 20 minutes + 4 in/hr for 20 minutes + 6 in/hr for 20 minutes, is R = 231 assuming all raindrops achieve terminal velocity. Since this is not the case, the R-Factor must be scaled to reflect the kinetic energy associated with the actual velocity achieved by each size of raindrop. For the tests reported herein, the C-Factor associated with this scaled R-Factor of 162 is the reported performance value. This facilitates product-to-product comparison of test results at a common point of the storm event. Graphs of R-Factor versus C-Factor for the protected condition and Soil Loss versus R-Factor for the control condition are shown in Figures 8 and 9, respectively. Figure 8 includes the best regression line fit to the test data to facilitate the determination of the C-factor. Figure 8 additionally allows users of this report to evaluate performance at other points in the model storm by selecting the R factor (and the corresponding C Factor) that may fit local conditions. According to the test procedure ASTM D6459, a test may be stopped in the event of catastrophic soil loss, as determined by the lab. AASHTO NTPEP ECP Panel has determined this practice places an undue amount of subjectivity into the test. In lieu of stopping the test, the test is run to completion. The runoff and sediment loss just prior to catastrophic failure is separated from that occurring after. This additional point is used in the creating of the Soil Loss verses R Factor Graph. The tests reported herein did not experience catastrophic slope failure. Linear (R 2 =0.28), power (R 2 = 0.52), and polynomial (R 2 = 0.31) fits were the best fits evaluated. The overall C-Factor information shown in Table 4 is derived from Figure 8 which relates the C- Factors and associated R-Factors given in Table 3.

9 Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro-Gold PLUS over Sandy Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP May 30, Table 3. Summary Data Table Protected Slopes Slope # & Product 1 Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro-Gold PLUS 2 Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro-Gold PLUS 3 Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro-Gold PLUS Test # (run # - target intensity) Intensity (in/hr) Runoff (gallons) Cum. R- Factor Soil Loss (lbs / plot / event) Cum. Soil Loss (Tons/Acre) Control Soil Loss at Cumulative R-Factor (Tons/Acre) Cumulative C-Factor Table 4. Overall C-Factor Product C-Factor Calculation Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro-Gold 2000 lbs/acre C = R

10 Soil Loss (T/A) C-Factor Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro-Gold PLUS over Sandy Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP May 30, C-Factor vs. R-Factor (Second Nature Wood Fiber Plus / Enviro-Gold 2000 lb/acre on TRI-Loam; 3:1 Slope) All Slopes - NORMALIZED C = R C-Factor = for R-Factor = 162 Power (All Slopes - NORMALIZED) y = x R² = The cummulative R-Factor calculated for the following events: 2 in/hr for 20 min + 4 in/hr for 20 min + 6 in/hr for 20 min, is R = 162 and the associated C- Factor is determined from the best-fit regression eqn R-Factor Figure 8. R-Factor vs. C-Factor Tested Product Soil Loss vs RUSLE R (Control Testing of TRI-Loam; 3:1 Slope; : 13 tests) From RUSLE: A = R K LS C P For Control: LS = 2.78; P = 1.0; C = 1.0 K = (A/R) / 2.78 = m / 2.78 K = / 2.78 = 0.14 y = x R² = 1 y = x R² = Scaled Because Terminal Velocity Not Achieved: The cummulative R-Factor calculated for the following events: 2 in/hr for 20 min + 4 in/hr for 20 min + 6 in/hr for 20 min, is R = 162 and the associated soil loss is 63.0 tons/acre RUSLE R (US Customary Units) If Terminal Velocity Achieved: The cummulative R-Factor calculated for the following events: 2 in/hr for 20 min + 4 in/hr for 20 min + 6 in/hr for 20 min, is R = 231 and the associated soil loss is 63.0 tons/acre Figure 9. R-Factor vs. Soil Loss Control Tests

11 Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro-Gold PLUS over Sandy Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP May 30, 2015 Appendix APPENDIX A RECORDED DATA Test Record Sheets Sediment Concentration Data Runoff Data Soil Moisture Content Soil Loss Tables

12 Slope #: 1 DDRF Rainfall Testing Target Rain: 2 in/hr Sediment Concentration Grab Samples Followed by Runoff Rate Measurements # Time Sample Taken Date: 15-May-15 Start Rain: Sampling 8:21 AM End Rain: 8:41 AM 1 3:00 X interval: 0:03 End Runoff: 8:44 AM 2 6:00 X Product: Second Nature Wood Fiber Plus Rain Time (min): Test Time (min): :00 X Descr:. Central Fiber - NTPEP 4 12:00 X Lot #: Anchors: Anchorage: 2000 Lbs / Acre 5 15:00 X TOP OF SLOPE 6 18:00 X w c1 = 17.5% (circle "x" for open valves) Set valves to 16 psi. 7 d = 19 mm 8 x x X x i = 2.24 in/hr P = 10 psi 9 A 10 X 11 X P = 10 psi B 12 x x 13 x C P = 10 psi X 14 x X 15 x P = 10 psi D x 12 X x 13 x E P = 10 psi X 14 x x 15 X P = 10 psi F x x x Runoff Rate Measurements Time to Collect 1 x G P = 10 psi x # Time, minutes Gallon, Seconds x X x P = 10 psi H x X x x I P = 10 psi X x X x P = 10 psi J x 6 X 7 X 8 d = 18 mm 9 i = 2.13 in/hr Temp. 70 deg 10 w c3 = 20.3% Hum. 70 % 11 d = 19 mm 12 i = 2.24 in/hr Average Depth: 19 mm 13 w c2 = 21.5% Avg Rainfall Intensity: 2.20 in/hr 14 Notes: 0 mph breeze. Approx 80 gal collected

13 Slope #: 1 DDRF Rainfall Testing Target Rain: 4 in/hr Sediment Concentration Grab Samples Followed by Runoff Rate Measurements # Time Sample Taken Date: 15-May-15 Start Rain: Sampling 8:45 AM End Rain: 9:05 AM 1 0:00 X interval: 0:02 End Runoff: 9:08 AM 2 0:00 X Rain Time (min): Test Time (min): :00 X Second Nature Wood Product: Fiber Plus Descr:. Central Fiber - NTPEP 4 0:00 X Lot #: Anchors: Anchorage: 2000 Lbs / Acre 5 0:00 X TOP OF SLOPE Set valves to 16 psi. 6 0:00 X w c1 = 17.5% x x X X 7 0:00 X d = 35 mm P = 12 psi 8 0:00 X i = 4.13 in/hr 9 0:00 A X X 10 0:00 X X P = 10 psi B 11 X x 12 x C P = 10 psi X 13 x X 14 x P = 10 psi D X 15 X x 12 X E P = 10 x 13 X X 14 X P = 10 psi F X 15 x x x G P = 10 psi X Runoff Rate Measurements Time to Collect 1 x X # Time, minutes Gallon, Seconds x P = 10 psi H x X X X I P = 10 psi X x X X P = 10 psi J x X X d = 37 mm i = 4.37 in/hr w c2 = 20.1% Temp. 71 deg d = 34 mm Hum. 77 % 11 i = 4.02 in/hr 12 w c3 = 19.9% Average Depth: 35 mm 13 Avg Rainfall Intensity: 4.17 in/hr 14 Notes: 0 mph breeze. Approx 165 gal collected

14 Slope #: 1 DDRF Rainfall Testing Target Rain: 6 in/hr Sediment Concentration Grab Samples Followed by Runoff Rate Measurements # Time Specimen Taken Date: 15-May-15 Start Rain: Sampling 9:10 AM End Rain: 9:30 AM 1 0:00 X interval: 0:02 End Runoff: 9:32 AM 2 0:00 X Product: Lot #: Second Nature Wood Fiber Plus Rain Time (min): Test Time (min): :00 X Descr:. Central Fiber - NTPEP 4 0:00 X Anchors: Anchorage: 2000 Lbs / Acre 5 0:00 X TOP OF SLOPE Set valves to 16 psi. 6 0:00 X w c1 = 17.5% (circle "x" for open valves) 7 0:00 X d = 51 mm 8 x X 0:00 X X X i = 6.02 in/hr P = 10 psi 9 0:00 X A 10 0:00 X X 11 X P = 10 psi B 12 X X 13 X C P = 10 psi X 14 x X 15 X P = 10 psi D X 12 X x 13 X E P = 10 psi X 14 X X 15 X P = 10 psi F X X x Runoff Rate Measurements Time to Collect 1 x G P = 10 psi X # Time, minutes Gallon, Seconds x X X P = 10 psi H X X X X I P = 10 psi X X X X P = 10 psi J X X X d = 52 mm i = 6.14 in/hr Temp. 72 deg w c2 = 20.1% Hum. 79 % 11 d = 52 mm 12 i = 6.14 in/hr Average Depth: 52 mm 13 w c3 = 19.9% Avg Rainfall Intensity: 6.10 in/hr 14 Notes: 0 mph breeze. Approx 240 gal collected

15 Slope #: 2 DDRF Rainfall Testing Target Rain: 2 in/hr Sediment Concentration Grab Samples Followed by Runoff Rate Measurements # Time Sample Taken Date: 15-May-15 Start Rain: Sampling 9:36 AM End Rain: 9:56 AM 1 3:00 X interval: 0:03 End Runoff: 9:58 AM 2 6:00 X Rain Time (min): Test Time (min): :00 X Second Nature Wood Product: Fiber Plus Descr:. Central Fiber - NTPEP 4 12:00 X Lot #: Anchors: Anchorage: 2000 Lbs / Acre 5 15:00 X TOP OF SLOPE Set valves to 16 psi. 6 18:00 X w c1 = 21.7% (circle "x" for open valves) 7 d = 18 mm 8 x x X x i = 2.13 in/hr P = 10 psi 9 A 10 X 11 B P = 10 psi X 12 X x 13 X P = 10 psi C x 14 x x 15 x D P = 10 psi x 12 x X 13 x P = 10 psi E x 14 X x 15 x F P = 10 psi X x x Runoff Rate Measurements Time to Collect 1 x P = 10 psi G x # Time Gallon, Seconds X x x H P = 10 psi x x X x P = 10 psi I x X x X J P = 10 psi x 6 d = 17 mm 9 X 7 X 8 i = 2.01 in/hr Temp. 74 deg 10 w c3 = 20.3% Hum. 81 % 11 d = 19 mm 12 i = 2.24 in/hr Average Depth: 18 mm 13 w c2 = 21.5% Avg Rainfall Intensity: 2.13 in/hr 14 Notes: 0 mph breeze. Approx 45 gal collected

16 Slope #: 2 DDRF Rainfall Testing Target Rain: 4 in/hr Sediment Concentration Grab Samples Followed by Runoff Rate Measurements # Time Sample Taken Date: 15-May-15 Start Rain: Sampling 10:01 AM End Rain: 10:21 AM 1 0:00 X interval: 0:02 End Runoff: 10:23 AM 2 0:00 X Rain Time (min): Test Time (min): :00 X Second Nature Wood Product: Fiber Plus Descr:. Central Fiber - NTPEP 4 0:00 X Lot #: Anchors: Anchorage: 2000 Lbs / Acre 5 0:00 X TOP OF SLOPE Set valves to 16 psi. 6 0:00 X w c1 = 21.7% (circle "x" for open valves) 7 0:00 X d = 36 mm 8 x x 0:00 X X X i = 4.25 in/hr P = 10 psi 9 0:00 X A 10 0:00 X X 11 B P = 10 psi X 12 X X 13 X P = 10 psi C x 14 X x 15 x D P = 10 psi x 12 x X 13 x P = 10 psi E X 14 X x 15 X F P = 10 psi X x X Runoff Rate Measurements Time to Collect 1 x P = 10 psi G x # Time Gallon, Seconds X x X H P = 10 psi X x X X P = 10 psi I x X x X J P = 10 psi X d = 34 mm X X i = 4.02 in/hr Temp. 75 deg w c3 = 20.3% Hum. 82 % 11 d = 34 mm 12 i = 4.02 in/hr Average Depth: 35 mm 13 w c2 = 21.5% Avg Rainfall Intensity: 4.09 in/hr 14 Notes: 0 mph breeze. Approx 120 gal collected

17 Slope #: 2 DDRF Rainfall Testing Target Rain: 6 in/hr Sediment Concentration Grab Samples Followed by Runoff Rate Measurements # Time Sample Taken Date: 15-May-15 Start Rain: Sampling 10:27 AM End Rain: 10:47 AM 1 0:00 X interval: 0:02 End Runoff: 10:49 AM 2 0:00 X Rain Time (min): Test Time (min): :00 X Second Nature Wood Product: Fiber Plus Descr:. Central Fiber - NTPEP 4 0:00 X Lot #: Anchors: Anchorage: 2000 Lbs / Acre 5 0:00 X TOP OF SLOPE Set valves to 16 psi. 6 0:00 X w c1 = 21.7% (circle "x" for open valves) 7 0:00 X d = 52 mm 8 x X 0:00 X X X i = 6.14 in/hr P = 10 psi 9 0:00 X A 10 0:00 X X 11 B P = 10 psi X 12 X X 13 X P = 10 psi C X 14 X x 15 X D P = 10 psi X 12 x X 13 X P = 10 psi E X 14 X X 15 X F P = 10 psi X x X Runoff Rate Measurements Time to Collect 1 X P = 10 psi G x # Time Gallon, Seconds X x X H P = 10 psi X X X X P = 10 psi I X X X X J P = 10 psi X d = 51 mm X X i = 6.02 in/hr Temp. 77 deg w c3 = 20.3% Hum. 80 % 11 d = 51 mm 12 i = 6.02 in/hr Average Depth: 51 mm 13 w c2 = 21.5% Avg Rainfall Intensity: 6.06 in/hr 14 Notes: 0 mph breeze. Approx 250 gal collected

18 Slope #: 3 DDRF Rainfall Testing Target Rain: 2 in/hr Sediment Concentration Grab Samples Followed by Runoff Rate Measurements # Time Sample Taken Date: 11:11 15-May-15 AM Start Rain: 10:51 AM End Rain: 1 3:00 X Sampling interval: 0:03 End Runoff: 11:13 AM 2 6:00 X Rain Time (min): Test Time (min): :00 X Second Nature Wood Product: Fiber Plus Descr:. Central Fiber - NTPEP 4 12:00 X Lot #: Anchors: Anchorage: 2000 Lbs / Acre 5 15:00 X TOP OF SLOPE Set valves to 16 psi. 6 18:00 X w c1 = 20.3% (circle "x" for open valves) 7 d = 18 mm 8 x x X x i = 2.13 in/hr P = 10 psi 9 A 10 X 11 B P = 10 psi X 12 X x 13 X P = 10 psi C x 14 x x 15 x D P = 10 psi x 12 x X 13 X P = 10 psi E x 14 x x 15 x F P = 10 psi X x x Runoff Rate Measurements Time to Collect 1 x P = 10 psi G x # Time Gallon, Seconds X x x H P = 10 psi x x X x P = 10 psi I x X x X J P = 10 psi x 6 d = 17 mm 9 X 7 X 8 i = 2.01 in/hr Temp. 74 deg 10 w c3 = 18.8% Hum. 79 % 11 d = 17 mm 12 i = 2.01 in/hr Average Depth: 17 mm 13 w c2 = 14.5% Avg Rainfall Intensity: 2.05 in/hr 14 Notes: 0 mph breeze. Approx 75 gal collected

19 Slope #: 3 DDRF Rainfall Testing Target Rain: 4 in/hr Sediment Concentration Grab Samples Followed by Runoff Rate Measurements # Time Sample Taken Date: 15-May-15 Start Rain: Sampling 11:15 AM End Rain: 11:35 AM 1 0:00 X interval: 0:02 End Runoff: 11:37 AM 2 0:00 X Rain Time (min): Test Time (min): :00 X Second Nature Wood Product: Fiber Plus Descr:. Central Fiber - NTPEP 4 0:00 X Lot #: Anchors: Anchorage: 2000 Lbs / Acre 5 0:00 X TOP OF SLOPE Set valves to 16 psi. 6 0:00 X w c1 = 20.3% (circle "x" for open valves) 7 0:00 X d = 35 mm 8 x X0:00 X x X i = 4.13 in/hr P = 10 psi 9 0:00 X A 10 0:00 X X 11 B P = 10 psi X 12 X X 13 X P = 10 psi C x 14 X x 15 x D P = 10 psi x 12 x X 13 X P = 10 psi E X 14 X X 15 x F P = 10 psi X x x Runoff Rate Measurements Time to Collect 1 x P = 10 psi G x # Time Gallon, Seconds X x X H P = 10 psi X x X X P = 10 psi I x X x X J P = 10 psi X d = 34 mm X X i = 4.02 in/hr Temp. 73 deg w c3 = 18.8% Hum. 83 % 11 d = 34 mm 12 i = 4.02 in/hr Average Depth: 34 mm 13 w c2 = 14.5% Avg Rainfall Intensity: 4.06 in/hr 14 Notes: 0 mph breeze. Approx 120 gal collected

20 Slope #: 3 DDRF Rainfall Testing Target Rain: 6 in/hr Sediment Concentration Grab Samples Followed by Runoff Rate Measurements # Time Sample Taken Date: 15-May-15 Start Rain: Sampling 11:41 AM End Rain: 12:01 PM 1 0:00 X interval: 0:02 End Runoff: 12:04 PM 2 0:00 X Rain Time (min): Test Time (min): :00 X Second Nature Wood Product: Fiber Plus Descr:. Central Fiber - NTPEP 4 0:00 X Lot #: Anchors: Anchorage: 2000 Lbs / Acre 5 0:00 X TOP OF SLOPE Set valves to 16 psi. 6 0:00 X w c1 = 20.3% (circle "x" for open valves) 7 0:00 X d = 52 mm 8 x X0:00 X X X i = 6.14 in/hr P = 10 psi 9 0:00 X A 10 0:00 X X 11 B P = 10 psi X 12 X X 13 X P = 10 psi C X 14 X x 15 X D P = 10 psi X 12 x X 13 X P = 10 psi E X 14 X X 15 X F P = 10 psi X x X Runoff Rate Measurements Time to Collect 1 X P = 10 psi G x # Time Gallon, Seconds X X X H P = 10 psi X X X X P = 10 psi I x X X X J P = 10 psi X d = 51 mm X X i = 6.02 in/hr Temp. 77 deg w c3 = 18.8% Hum. 79 % 11 d = 51 mm 12 i = 6.02 in/hr Average Depth: 51 mm 13 w c2 = 14.5% Avg Rainfall Intensity: 6.06 in/hr 14 Notes: 0 mph breeze. Approx 250 gal collected

21 Sample Number Test Time, minutes Total Weight, g Decanted Weight, g Dry Weight, g Slope #1 - Sediment Concentration Bottle Weight, g Dry Sediment Weight, mg Total Water Wt., g Total Volume of Water, l Sediment Concentration, mg/l Runoff Sampling Time Time to Collect 1 gal Associated Runoff, gal Associated Sediment Conc, mg/l Associated Solids Loss, lbs 2.20 in/hr avg 15-May AVG = in/hr avg 0.00 Total Solids Lost: May AVG = in/hr avg Total Solids Lost: May AVG = Total Solids Lost: 42.22

22 Sample Number Test Time, minutes Total Weight, g Decanted Weight, g Dry Weight, g Slope #2 - Sediment Concentration Bottle Weight, g Dry Sediment Weight, mg Total Water Wt., g Total Volume of Water, l Sediment Concentration, mg/l Runoff Sampling Time Time to Collect 1 gal Associated Runoff, gal Associated Sediment Conc, mg/l Associated Solids Loss, lbs 2.13 in/hr avg 15-May AVG = in/hr avg Total Solids Lost: May AVG = in/hr avg Total Solids Lost: May AVG = Total Solids Lost:

23 Sample Number Test Time, minutes Total Weight, g Decanted Weight, g Dry Weight, g Slope #3 - Sediment Concentration Bottle Weight, g Dry Sediment Weight, mg Total Water Wt., g Total Volume of Water, l Sediment Concentration, mg/l Runoff Sampling Time Time to Collect 1 gal Associated Runoff, gal Associated Sediment Conc, mg/l Associated Solids Loss, lbs 2.05 in/hr avg 15-May AVG = in/hr avg Total Solids Lost: May AVG = in/hr avg Total Solids Lost: May AVG = Total Solids Lost: 98.91

24 Sample Number Test Time, minutes Time per Gallon, sec Interval Time, min 15-May-15 Slope #1 Total Time, min Collection Mid-Time, min Runoff Rate, gal/min Associated Runoff, gal Cumulative Runoff, gal in/hr end Total Runoff (approx) 4.17 in/hr end Total Runoff (approx) 6.10 in/hr end Total Runoff (approx)

25 Sample Number Test Time, minutes Time per Gallon, sec Interval Time, min 15-May-15 Slope #2 Total Time, min Collection Mid-Time, min Runoff Rate, gal/min Associate d Runoff, gal Cumulative Runoff, gal in/hr end Total Runoff (approx) 4.09 in/hr end Total Runoff (approx) 6.06 in/hr end Total Runoff (approx)

26 Sample Number Test Time, minutes Time per Gallon, sec Interval Time, min 15-May-15 Slope #3 Total Time, min Collection Mid-Time, min Runoff Rate, gal/min Associated Runoff, gal Cumulative Runoff, gal in/hr end Total Runoff (approx) 4.06 in/hr end Total Runoff (approx) 6.06 in/hr end Total Runoff (approx)

27 WATER CONTENT DETERMINATION Run #: Slope No Test Date: 15-May May May-15 Avg Moisture Content: 18.41% 18.26% 16.14% Location T-1 T-2 T-3 Wt. Of cup + wet soil, g Wt. Of cup + dry soil, g Wt. Of cup, g Wt. Of dry soil, g Wt. Of water, g Water Content, w% 19.0% 18.4% 17.6% Location M-1 M-2 M-3 Wt. Of cup + wet soil, g Wt. Of cup + dry soil, g Wt. Of cup, g Wt. Of dry soil, g Wt. Of water, g Water Content, w% 18.4% 18.6% 16.2% Location B-1 B-2 B-3 Wt. Of cup + wet soil, g Wt. Of cup + dry soil, g Wt. Of cup, g Wt. Of dry soil, g Wt. Of water, g Water Content, w% 17.9% 17.8% 14.6%

28 SLOPE #1 - Sediment Weights Total Dry Sediments: in/hr Typ. TSS in Wt. Of pan + wet soil, lb Wt. Of pan + dry soil, lb Decanted Wt. Of pan, lb 0 Runoff, lb/gal Wt. Of dry soil, lb Wt. Of water, lb Water Content, w% 0.0 Total Wet Sediments, lb - % dry solids Dry Sediments, lbs 0.06 Total Dry Sediments: in/hr Typ. TSS in Wt. Of pan + wet soil, lb Wt. Of pan + dry soil, lb Decanted Wt. Of pan, lb 0 Runoff, lb/gal Wt. Of dry soil, lb Wt. Of water, lb Water Content, w% 0.0 Total Wet Sediments, lb - % dry solids Dry Sediments, lbs 0.45 Total Dry Sediments: in/hr Typ. TSS in Wt. Of pan + wet soil, lb Wt. Of pan + dry soil, lb Decanted Wt. Of pan, lb 0 Runoff, lb/gal Wt. Of dry soil, lb Wt. Of water, lb Water Content, w% 0.0 Total Wet Sediments, lb - Sediments, gal Sediments, gal Sediments, gal % dry solids Dry Sediments, lbs 40.96

29 SLOPE #2 - Sediment Weights Total Dry Sediments: in/hr Typ. TSS in Wt. Of pan + wet soil, lb Wt. Of pan + dry soil, lb Decanted Wt. Of pan, lb 0 Runoff, lb/gal Wt. Of dry soil, lb Wt. Of water, lb Water Content, w% 0.0 Total Wet Sediments, lb - % dry solids Dry Sediments, lbs 0.05 Total Dry Sediments: in/hr Wt. Of pan + wet soil, lb Wt. Of pan + dry soil, lb Wt. Of pan, lb 0 Wt. Of dry soil, lb Wt. Of water, lb Water Content, w% 0.0 Total Wet Sediments, lb - % dry solids Dry Sediments, lbs Total Dry Sediments: in/hr Typ. TSS in Wt. Of pan + wet soil, lb Wt. Of pan + dry soil, lb Decanted Wt. Of pan, lb 0 Runoff, lb/gal Wt. Of dry soil, lb Wt. Of water, lb Water Content, w% 0.0 Total Wet Sediments, lb - Sediments, gal Typ. TSS in Decanted Runoff, lb/gal Sediments, gal Sediments, gal % dry solids Dry Sediments, lbs

30 SLOPE #3 - Sediment Weights Total Dry Sediments: in/hr Typ. TSS in Wt. Of pan + wet soil, lb Wt. Of pan + dry soil, lb Decanted Wt. Of pan, lb 0 Runoff, lb/gal Wt. Of dry soil, lb Wt. Of water, lb Water Content, w% 0.0 Total Wet Sediments, lb - % dry solids Dry Sediments, lbs 0.16 Total Dry Sediments: in/hr Typ. TSS in Wt. Of pan + wet soil, lb Wt. Of pan + dry soil, lb Decanted Wt. Of pan, lb 0 Runoff, lb/gal Wt. Of dry soil, lb Wt. Of water, lb Water Content, w% 0.0 Total Wet Sediments, lb - % dry solids Dry Sediments, lbs 0.46 Total Dry Sediments: in/hr Typ. TSS in Wt. Of pan + wet soil, lb Wt. Of pan + dry soil, lb Decanted Wt. Of pan, lb 0 Runoff, lb/gal Wt. Of dry soil, lb Wt. Of water, lb Water Content, w% 0.0 Total Wet Sediments, lb - Sediments, gal Sediments, gal Sediments, gal % dry solids Dry Sediments, lbs

31 Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro-Gold PLUS over Sandy Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP May 30, 2015 Appendix APPENDIX B TEST SOIL Test Soil Grain Size Distribution Curve Compaction Curves Veneer Soil Compaction Verification

32 Percent Finer 3/25/ Plasticity (ASTM D 4318) Liquid Limit: 35 Plastic Limit: 29 Plastic Index: 6 Soil classifies as a clayey sand (SC) in accordance with ASTM D 2487 DDRF ASTM D 6459 Blended Test Soil ASTM D 6459 Target Loam Range Particle Size (mm) Corporate Laboratory: 9063 Bee Caves Road, Austin, TX / TEST / / sallen@tri-env.com Denver Downs Research Facility: 4915 Clemson Blvd., Anderson, SC / / jsprague@tri-env.com

33 Proctor Compaction Test 120 Project: DDRF 115 Sample No.: SLOPE COMPOSITE Test Date: March 25, Test Method: ASTM D Method A Dry Density (pcf) Maximum Dry Density (pcf): 99.2 Optimum Moisture Content (%): Moisture Content (%) James Sprague, 11/08/13 Tested by: J.E.Sprague The testing herein is based upon accepted industry practice as well as the test method listed. Test results reported herein do not apply to samples other than those tested. TRI neither accepts responsibility for nor makes claim as to the final use and purpose of the material. TRI observes and maintains client confidentiality. TRI limits reproduction of this report, except in full, without prior approval of TRI Bee Caves Road Austin, TX (512) (512) TEST

34 Compaction Worksheet ASTM D 2937 Location: DDRF SLOPES Date:3/25/2014 Drive Cylinder: Dia., mm = 98 Length, mm = 127 Volume, ft 3 = Compaction Tube # Wt. of Wet Soil + Mold (g) Wt. of Mold (g) Wt. of Wet Soil (g) Moisture Content Tare Number B T M Wt. of Tare (g) Wt. of Wet Soil + Tare (g) Wt. of Dry Soil + Tare (g) Water Content, w (%) Wet density, ɣ wet = W' / V h (lb/ft 3 ) = Dry density, ɣ dry = ɣ wet / [1 + w] (lb/ft 3 ) = Max Std. Proctor Dry density (lb/ft 3 ) = Opt. Moisture (%) = Compaction as % of Std. Proctor = 93.0% 94.0% 88.4% 89.6% 92.3% 92.2% Avg Compaction as % of Std. Proctor = 91.6% James Sprague, 3/25/14 Quality Review/Date Tested by: J.E. Sprague The testing herein is based upon accepted industry practice as well as the test method listed. Test results reported herein do not apply to samples other than those tested. TRI neither accepts responsibility for nor makes claim as to the final use and purpose of the material. TRI observes and maintains client confidentiality. TRI limits reproduction of this report, except in full, without prior approval of TRI Bee Caves Road Austin, TX (512) (512) TEST

35 Second Nature Wood Fiber PLUS / Enviro-Gold PLUS over Sandy Loam Slope Erosion Testing for NTPEP May 30, 2015 Appendix APPENDIX C RAINFALL DATA Raindrop Size Distribution Rainfall Calibration

36 % of Raindrops by Mass Raindrop Size Distribution November mm mm mm mm mm mm Rainfall Intensity, in/hr Target raindrop size and distribution (no more than 10 % greater than 6 mm (0.24 in.) and no more than 10 % smaller than 1 mm (0.04 in.)).

37 DDRF Rainfall Calibration Slope 1 - Target 2 in/hr Date: 8-Nov-13 Start Time: 8:45 AM End Time: 9:00 AM Test Time: 15 min. (circle "x" for open valves) TOP OF SLOPE X X X X P = 9 psi A d = 11 mm 1 2 d = 12 mm X i = 1.73 in/hr B i = 1.89 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 12 mm 3 4 d = 11 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 1.89 in/hr C i = 1.73 in/hr X X d = 12 mm 5 6 d = 13 mm X X i = 1.89 in/hr D i = 2.05 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 13 mm 7 8 d = 13 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 2.05 in/hr E i = 2.05 in/hr X X d = 13 mm 9 10 d = 14 mm X X i = 2.05 in/hr F i = 2.20 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 13 mm d = 13 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 2.05 in/hr G i = 2.05 in/hr X X d = 13 mm d = 12 mm X X i = 2.05 in/hr H i = 1.89 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 12 mm d = 15 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 1.89 in/hr I i = 2.36 in/hr X X d = 13 mm d = 13 mm X X i = 2.05 in/hr J i = 2.05 in/hr P = 9 X d = 11 mm d = 12 mm X i = 1.73 in/hr i = 1.89 in/hr X Bottom Catch: 95 gal Inlet Pressure: 16 psi Average Wind: 0 mph Average Depth: mm Average Rainfall Intensity: 1.98 in/hr Christiansen Uniformity Coefficient: 94

38 DDRF Rainfall Calibration Slope 1 - Target 4 in/hr Date: 8-Nov-13 Start Time: 9:15 AM End Time: 9:30 AM Test Time: 15 min. (circle "x" for open valves) TOP OF SLOPE X X X X P = 9 psi A d = 24 mm 1 2 d = 23 mm X i = 3.78 in/hr B i = 3.62 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 25 mm 3 4 d = 23 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 3.94 in/hr C i = 3.62 in/hr X X d = 26 mm 5 6 d = 25 mm X X i = 4.09 in/hr D i = 3.94 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 26 mm 7 8 d = 27 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 4.09 in/hr E i = 4.25 in/hr X X d = 27 mm 9 10 d = 27 mm X X i = 4.25 in/hr F i = 4.25 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 26 mm d = 26 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 4.09 in/hr G i = 4.09 in/hr X X d = 27 mm d = 27 mm X X i = 4.25 in/hr H i = 4.25 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 27 mm d = 25 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 4.25 in/hr I i = 3.94 in/hr X X d = 26 mm d = 26 mm X X i = 4.09 in/hr J i = 4.09 in/hr P = 9 psi X d = 25 mm d = 25 mm X i = 3.94 in/hr i = 3.94 in/hr X Bottom Catch: 205 gal Inlet Pressure: 16 psi Average Wind: 0 mph Average Depth: mm Average Rainfall Intensity: 4.04 in/hr Christiansen Uniformity Coefficient: 96

39 DDRF Rainfall Calibration Slope 1 - Target 6 in/hr Date: 8-Nov-13 Start Time: 9:43 AM End Time: 9:58 AM Test Time: 15 min. (circle "x" for open valves) TOP OF SLOPE X X X X P = 9 psi A d = 37 mm 1 2 d = 36 mm X i = 5.83 in/hr B i = 5.67 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 37 mm 3 4 d = 38 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 5.83 in/hr C i = 5.98 in/hr X X d = 38 mm 5 6 d = 40 mm X X i = 5.98 in/hr D i = 6.30 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 38 mm 7 8 d = 39 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 5.98 in/hr E i = 6.14 in/hr X X d = 40 mm 9 10 d = 41 mm X X i = 6.30 in/hr F i = 6.46 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 38 mm d = 40 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 5.98 in/hr G i = 6.30 in/hr X X d = 37 mm d = 39 mm X X i = 5.83 in/hr H i = 6.14 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 37 mm d = 42 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 5.83 in/hr I i = 6.61 in/hr X X d = 36 mm d = 38 mm X X i = 5.67 in/hr J i = 5.98 in/hr P = 9 psi X d = 36 mm d = 36 mm X i = 5.67 in/hr i = 5.67 in/hr X Bottom Catch: 300 gal Inlet Pressure: 16 psi Average Wind: 0 mph Average Depth: mm Average Rainfall Intensity: 6.01 in/hr Christiansen Uniformity Coefficient: 96

40 DDRF Rainfall Calibration Slope 2 - Target 2 in/hr Date: 8-Nov-13 Start Time: 10:30 AM End Time: 10:45 AM Test Time: 15 min. (circle "x" for open valves) TOP OF SLOPE X X X X P = 9 psi A d = 11 mm 1 2 d = 12 mm X i = 1.73 in/hr B i = 1.89 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 13 mm 3 4 d = 13 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 2.05 in/hr C i = 2.05 in/hr X X d = 14 mm 5 6 d = 13 mm X X i = 2.20 in/hr D i = 2.05 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 13 mm 7 8 d = 13 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 2.05 in/hr E i = 2.05 in/hr X X d = 14 mm 9 10 d = 14 mm X X i = 2.20 in/hr F i = 2.20 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 14 mm d = 13 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 2.20 in/hr G i = 2.05 in/hr X X d = 14 mm d = 14 mm X X i = 2.20 in/hr H i = 2.20 in/hr P = 9 psi X X d = 14 mm d = 13 mm X X P = 9 psi i = 2.20 in/hr I i = 2.05 in/hr X X d = 13 mm d = 12 mm X X i = 2.05 in/hr J i = 1.89 in/hr P = 9 psi X d = 11 mm d = 12 mm X i = 1.73 in/hr i = 1.89 in/hr X Bottom Catch: 100 gal Inlet Pressure: 16 psi Average Wind: 0 mph Average Depth: 13 mm Average Rainfall Intensity: 2.05 in/hr Christiansen Uniformity Coefficient: 95

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) Flexterra Ultra over Sandy Loam

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) Flexterra Ultra over Sandy Loam Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) of Flexterra Ultra over Sandy Loam December 2009 Submitted to: AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 249 Washington, D.C. 20001 Attn:

More information

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) Winters Excelsior s Straw Bio, Double Biodegradable Net Straw Blanket over Loam

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) Winters Excelsior s Straw Bio, Double Biodegradable Net Straw Blanket over Loam Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) of Winters Excelsior s Straw Bio, Double Biodegradable Net Straw Blanket over Loam June 2014 Submitted to: AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite

More information

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) Hydromulch 2000 over Sandy Loam

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) Hydromulch 2000 over Sandy Loam Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459 modified) of Hydromulch 2000 over Sandy Loam December 2009 Submitted to: AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 249 Washington, D.C. 20001 Attn:

More information

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) East Coast Erosion Control s ECS-2, Double Net Straw Blanket over Loam

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) East Coast Erosion Control s ECS-2, Double Net Straw Blanket over Loam Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) of East Coast Erosion Control s ECS-2, Double Net Straw Blanket over Loam January 2014 Submitted to: AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 249

More information

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) American Excelsior s AEC Premier Straw Double Net FibreNet, Erosion Control Blanket (ECB) over Loam

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) American Excelsior s AEC Premier Straw Double Net FibreNet, Erosion Control Blanket (ECB) over Loam Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) of American Excelsior s AEC Premier Straw Double Net FibreNet, Erosion Control Blanket (ECB) over Loam November 2016 Submitted to: AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North

More information

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) East Coast Erosion Blanket ECC-2B, Double Net Coconut Fiber Blanket over Sandy Loam

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) East Coast Erosion Blanket ECC-2B, Double Net Coconut Fiber Blanket over Sandy Loam Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) of East Coast Erosion Blanket ECC-2B, Double Net Coconut Fiber Blanket over Sandy Loam February 2010 Submitted to: AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North Capitol Street,

More information

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) US Erosion Control Products US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket over Loam

Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) US Erosion Control Products US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket over Loam Large-Scale Slope Erosion Testing (ASTM D 6459) of US Erosion Control Products US-2S, Double Net Straw Blanket over Loam June 2012 Submitted to: AASHTO/NTPEP 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 249 Washington,

More information

Large-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (ASTM D 7351) SedCatch Sediment Basket Inlet Filter Exposed to 6% Sediment Load

Large-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (ASTM D 7351) SedCatch Sediment Basket Inlet Filter Exposed to 6% Sediment Load Large-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (ASTM D 7351) of SedCatch Sediment Basket Inlet Filter Exposed to 6% Sediment Load February 2010 Submitted to: SedCatch Environmental Products 8380 Point O

More information

Large-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (ASTM D 7351) SedCatch Sediment Basket Inlet Filter Exposed to 1.5% Sediment Load

Large-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (ASTM D 7351) SedCatch Sediment Basket Inlet Filter Exposed to 1.5% Sediment Load Large-Scale Sediment Retention Device Testing (ASTM D 7351) of SedCatch Sediment Basket Inlet Filter Exposed to 1.5% Sediment Load February 2010 Submitted to: SedCatch Environmental Products 8380 Point

More information

EVALUATING SEDIMENT BARRIERS

EVALUATING SEDIMENT BARRIERS EVALUATING SEDIMENT BARRIERS Presented at IECA 2014, Nashville, TN C. Joel Sprague, P.E. TRI/Environmental, Inc. PO Box 9192, Greenville, SC 29604 Phone: 864/242-2220; Fax: 864/242-3107; jsprague@tri-env.com

More information

What Is Water Erosion? Aren t they the same thing? What Is Sediment? What Is Sedimentation? How can Sediment Yields be Minimized?

What Is Water Erosion? Aren t they the same thing? What Is Sediment? What Is Sedimentation? How can Sediment Yields be Minimized? Jerald S. Fifield, Ph.D. CISEC HydroDynamics Incorporated Parker, CO 303-841-0377 Aren t they the same thing? What Is Sediment? Soil particles deposited or suspended in water or air The process of depositing

More information

Sediment Capture in Pervious Concrete Pavement tsystems: Effects on Hydrological Performance and Suspended Solids

Sediment Capture in Pervious Concrete Pavement tsystems: Effects on Hydrological Performance and Suspended Solids Concrete Sustainability Conference April 14 th 2010, Tempe, AZ Sediment Capture in Pervious Concrete Pavement tsystems: Effects on Hydrological l Performance and Suspended Solids Discharge Luis A. Mata,

More information

Stone Outlet Sediment Trap

Stone Outlet Sediment Trap 3.12 Sediment Control Description: A stone outlet sediment trap is a small detention area formed by placing a stone embankment with an integral stone filter outlet across a drainage swale for the purpose

More information

TPDES: Soil, Erosion and Sedimentation Methods

TPDES: Soil, Erosion and Sedimentation Methods SAWS TPDES: Soil, Erosion and Sedimentation Methods Philip Handley Supervisor-Resource Protection & Compliance August 25, 2014 TPDES: Soil, Erosion and Sedimentation Methods Soil Common term: Dirt Common

More information

Laboratory #5 ABE 325 Erosion Processes Laboratory

Laboratory #5 ABE 325 Erosion Processes Laboratory Laboratory #5 ABE 325 Erosion Processes Laboratory Objective: To better understand the process of rill erosion and to understand the interaction between flow rate, sediment yield, slope, and a soil additive.

More information

**Temporary Erosion Control**

**Temporary Erosion Control** Construction operations And methods **Temporary Erosion Control** The test will more than likely just have a basic word problem dealing with Erosion control, if it has anything on the test. So just review,

More information

Erosion and Sedimentation Basics

Erosion and Sedimentation Basics Erosion and Sedimentation Basics Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District G.W. Bates, PE, CPESC Outline: 1. Terms & Concepts 2. Causes of Erosion 3. The Erosion/Sedimentation Process 4. Erosion

More information

Drivable Grass Report for Hydraulic Performance Testing

Drivable Grass Report for Hydraulic Performance Testing Drivable Grass Report for Hydraulic Performance Testing Prepared for Soil Retention Products, Inc. Prepared by Michael D. Turner Amanda L. Cox Christopher I. Thornton March 2011 Colorado State University

More information

Procedure for Determining Near-Surface Pollution Sensitivity

Procedure for Determining Near-Surface Pollution Sensitivity Procedure for Determining Near-Surface Pollution Sensitivity Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Ecological and Water Resources County Geologic Atlas Program March 2014 Version 2.1 I.

More information

Civil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx

Civil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx 2365 Haggerty Road South * Canton, Michigan 48188 P: 734-397-3100 * F: 734-397-3131 * www.manniksmithgroup.com August 29, 2012 Mr. Richard Kent Washtenaw County Parks and Recreation Commission 2330 Platt

More information

Sprinkler Irrigation

Sprinkler Irrigation Sprinkler Irrigation Definition Pressurized irrigation through devices called sprinklers Sprinklers are usually located on pipes called laterals Water is discharged into the air and hopefully infiltrates

More information

Selected Site BMPs: Why s the Water Muddy? John C. Hayes, Ph.D., P. E. Biosystems Engineering Clemson University

Selected Site BMPs: Why s the Water Muddy? John C. Hayes, Ph.D., P. E. Biosystems Engineering Clemson University Selected Site BMPs: Why s the Water Muddy? John C. Hayes, Ph.D., P. E. Biosystems Engineering Clemson University The BMP worked fine until last week when it rained! Turbidity Best Management Practices

More information

Project: ITHACA-TOMPKINS REGIONAL AIRPORT EXPANSION Project Location: ITHACA, NY Project Number: 218-34 Key to Soil Symbols and Terms TERMS DESCRIBING CONSISTENCY OR CONDITION COARSE-GRAINED SOILS (major

More information

Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG copyright 2009

Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG   copyright 2009 Engineering: What's soil got to do with it? Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG crobinson@wtamu.edu, http://www.wtamu.edu/~crobinson, copyright 2009 Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary soil, noun 1 : firm land

More information

CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS

CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS T E C H N O L O G I E S PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT FOR Southern Manufacturing Division of Accord Industries IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA BUILDING CODE (HIGH VELOCITY HURRICANE ZONES)

More information

International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research

International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research EVALUATION OF THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF RUNOFF WATER FROM A STRAWBERRY RANCH SLOPING GROUND DURING WINTER STORM EVENTS IN THE CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST Gerardo Spinelli 1*, Sacha Lozano 1, Ben Burgoa

More information

Field Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E:

Field Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E: March 31, 201 11 Northstar Avenue 83301 Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E: taa@jub.com Re: Geotechnical Data Report Preliminary Phase 1 Field Exploration Revision No. 1 Proposed Rapid Infiltration Basin

More information

2012 Rainfall, Runoff, Water Level & Temperature Beebe Lake Wright County, MN (# )

2012 Rainfall, Runoff, Water Level & Temperature Beebe Lake Wright County, MN (# ) www.fixmylake.com 18029 83 rd Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55311 mail@freshwatersci.com (651) 336-8696 2012 Rainfall, Runoff, Water Level & Temperature Beebe Lake Wright County, MN (#86-0023) Prepared

More information

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: VELUX AMERICA, INC. PRODUCT: SUN TUNNEL Domes TYPES: Acrylic and Polycarbonate

PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT. Rendered to: VELUX AMERICA, INC. PRODUCT: SUN TUNNEL Domes TYPES: Acrylic and Polycarbonate PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT Rendered to: VELUX AMERICA, INC. PRODUCT: SUN TUNNEL Domes TYPES: Acrylic and Polycarbonate Report No.: E3490.01-106-31 Report Date: 07/13/15 Test Record Retention Date: 06/18/19

More information

Mr. Michael Malone CPS Energy 145 Navarro Street San Antonio, Texas Project No

Mr. Michael Malone CPS Energy 145 Navarro Street San Antonio, Texas Project No January 17, 2018 Mr. Michael Malone 145 Navarro Street San Antonio, Texas 78205 Project No. 0337367 Environmental Resources Management CityCentre Four 840 West Sam Houston Pkwy N. Suite 600 Houston, Texas

More information

B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS. N B-1 SYMBOLS: Exploratory Boring Location Project Mngr: BORE LOCATION PLAN Project No. GK EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G1063.02 GK Scale: Checked By: 1045 Central Parkway North, Suite 103 San Antonio, Texas 78232

More information

ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES

ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES July 16, 211 Vista Design, Inc. 11634 Worcester Highway Showell, Maryland 21862 Attention: Reference: Dear Mr. Polk: Mr. Richard F. Polk, P.E. Geotechnical Engineering Report Charles County RFP No. 11-9

More information

Mechanical Engineering Division June 1, 2010

Mechanical Engineering Division June 1, 2010 Mechanical Engineering Division June 1, 2010 Mr. Jimmy H. Allen Leading Edge Group, Inc. 33 Lynn Batts Lane, Suite #4204 San Antonio, TX 78218 Subject: SwRI Final Report Project 18122.07.003.50cal and

More information

6. Circle the correct answer: SINK A drains faster or SINK B drains faster Why?

6. Circle the correct answer: SINK A drains faster or SINK B drains faster Why? NAME date ROY G BIV Water Cycle and Water Movement in the Ground Test 5. 6. Circle the correct answer: SINK A drains faster or SINK B drains faster Why? 7. Circle the correct answer: SINK A retains more

More information

Stormwater Guidelines and Case Studies. CAHILL ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants West Chester, PA (610)

Stormwater Guidelines and Case Studies. CAHILL ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants West Chester, PA (610) Stormwater Guidelines and Case Studies CAHILL ASSOCIATES Environmental Consultants West Chester, PA (610) 696-4150 www.thcahill.com Goals and Challenges for Manual State Stormwater Policy More Widespread

More information

Provide sediment tubes for ditch check and Type A inlet structure filter applications that meet the minimum performance requirements of Table 1.

Provide sediment tubes for ditch check and Type A inlet structure filter applications that meet the minimum performance requirements of Table 1. Supplemental Technical Specification for SEDIMENT TUBES SCDOT Designation: SC-M-815-1 (03/08) 1.0 Sediment Tubes This Supplemental Specification replaces sections 815.1.1.2, 815.2.3, 815.4.5, 815.5, and

More information

@Copyright 2016 SKAPS Industries.

@Copyright 2016 SKAPS Industries. SKAPS INDUSTRIES 571 Industrial Pkwy, Commerce, GA 30529 Phone: (706) 336 7000 Fax: (706) 336 7007 E Mail: contact@skaps.com SKAPS GEOCOMPOSITE DROP IN SPECIFICATIONS @Copyright 2016 SKAPS Industries www.skaps.com

More information

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 475910 476000 476090 476180 476270 476360 105 16' 21'' W 476450 476540 476630 476720 476810 4453350 4453440 4453260 4453350 4453170 4453260 4453080 4453170 4453080 475820 475910 4452990 476000 476090 476180

More information

Sediment Trap. A temporary runoff containment area, which promotes sedimentation prior to discharge of the runoff through a stabilized spillway.

Sediment Trap. A temporary runoff containment area, which promotes sedimentation prior to discharge of the runoff through a stabilized spillway. Sediment Trap SC-15 Source: Caltrans Construction Site Best Management Practices Manual, 2003. Description A temporary runoff containment area, which promotes sedimentation prior to discharge of the runoff

More information

Soil and Water Conservation Engineering Prof. Rajendra Singh Department of Agricultural and Food Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Soil and Water Conservation Engineering Prof. Rajendra Singh Department of Agricultural and Food Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur Soil and Water Conservation Engineering Prof. Rajendra Singh Department of Agricultural and Food Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur Lecture 04 Soil Erosion - Mechanics Hello friends

More information

SILT FENCE EFFECTIVENESS

SILT FENCE EFFECTIVENESS SILT FENCE EFFECTIVENESS Michelle G. Holloway, Department of Earth Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688. E-mail: MLG@jaguar1.usouthal.edu. Sediment is the number one pollutant in Dog

More information

Measuring the Effectiveness of Cure Materials

Measuring the Effectiveness of Cure Materials National Concrete Consortium Embassy Suites, Indianapolis, In Measuring the Effectiveness of Cure Materials Dan G. Zollinger, Ph.D., P.E. Professor, Texas A&M University Zachry Department of Civil Engineering

More information

Dr. L. I. N. de Silva. Student Name Registration Number: Assessed By: Lecturers Remarks

Dr. L. I. N. de Silva. Student Name Registration Number: Assessed By: Lecturers Remarks Module - CE 2042 Soil Mechanics and Geology-1 Assignment Tests for Particle Size Distribution Analysis Marks 10% Learning Ability to conduct particle size distribution analysis of soils Outcome Ability

More information

ALS-Resistant Kochia Management in a Corn - Sugarbeet Rotation 2005 to 2006 and 2007 to Robert Wilson

ALS-Resistant Kochia Management in a Corn - Sugarbeet Rotation 2005 to 2006 and 2007 to Robert Wilson ALS-Resistant Kochia Management in a Corn - Sugarbeet Rotation 5 to and 7 to 8. Robert Wilson A field study was initiated in 5 near Scottsbluff, Nebraska to evaluate the effectiveness of controlling ALS-resistant

More information

Sediment and Erosion Design Guide

Sediment and Erosion Design Guide Sediment and Erosion Design Guide Sediment Transport & Bulking Factors Goals of this Session Review key principals Review basic relationships and available tools Review bulking factor relationships Purposes

More information

Land and Water Summative Assessment. Name Date

Land and Water Summative Assessment. Name Date Land and Water Summative Assessment Name Date Read each question carefully and select the best answer. 1. Abby built a model to study how rain changes the land. She shaped the land into single, smooth

More information

STREUVER FIDELCO CAPPELLI, LLC YONKERS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT For: PALISADES POINT

STREUVER FIDELCO CAPPELLI, LLC YONKERS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT For: PALISADES POINT STREUVER FIDELCO CAPPELLI, LLC YONKERS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PHASE 1 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT For: PALISADES POINT Prepared by: PAULUS, SOKOLOWSKI & SARTOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 1. Methodology

More information

May 22, Mr. Tim Tyler TRWME Properties, LLC 240 Hwy. 65 N Conway, AR RE: Royal Oaks Vista Subdivision Site. Dear Mr.

May 22, Mr. Tim Tyler TRWME Properties, LLC 240 Hwy. 65 N Conway, AR RE: Royal Oaks Vista Subdivision Site. Dear Mr. May 22, 2008 Mr. Tim Tyler TRWME Properties, LLC 240 Hwy. 65 N Conway, AR 72032 RE: Royal Oaks Vista Subdivision Site AFIN: 12-00272 NPDES Permit No.: ARR150472 Dear Mr. Tyler: On March 26, 2008, I performed

More information

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT COMPUTATIONS. Mount Prospect

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT COMPUTATIONS. Mount Prospect STORMWATER MANAGEMENT COMPUTATIONS Mount Prospect MHG PROJECT No. 2011.173.11 November 6, 2014 Prepared for: Piney Meetinghouse Investments c/o Mr. Dennis Fling 14801 Clopper Road Boyds, MD 20841 (301)

More information

Correlation of unified and AASHTO soil classification systems for soils classification

Correlation of unified and AASHTO soil classification systems for soils classification Journal of Earth Sciences and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, 2018, 39-50 ISSN: 1792-9040 (print version), 1792-9660 (online) Scienpress Ltd, 2018 Correlation of unified and AASHTO classification

More information

NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (APF) TAXIWAY D REALIGNMENT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS NORTH QUADRANT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO March, The following Addendum is hereby made a part of the Plans

More information

Villages at Riverdale Thornton, CO

Villages at Riverdale Thornton, CO FINAL UTILITY REPORT Villages at Riverdale Thornton, CO October 14, 216 Revised: March 29, 217 JN: 1539 Prepared for: PCS Group, Inc. 11 16 th Street #3 B-18 Denver, CO 8265 P: 33.531.495 Prepared by:

More information

HOTEL KANATA 160 HEARST WAY KANATA, ONTARIO SERVICING REPORT. Prepared for: David Johnston Architect. Prepared By:

HOTEL KANATA 160 HEARST WAY KANATA, ONTARIO SERVICING REPORT. Prepared for: David Johnston Architect. Prepared By: HOTEL KANATA 160 HEARST WAY KANATA, ONTARIO SERVICING REPORT Prepared for: David Johnston Architect Prepared By: BaseTech Consulting Inc. 309 Roywood Crescent Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 1A6 BCI Project No.

More information

MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 4 S.E. MONTEREY ROAD STUART, FL 34996 DOUG SMITH Commissioner, District ED FIELDING Commissioner, District ANNE SCOTT Commissioner, District 3 SARAH HEARD Commissioner,

More information

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION 42-INCH FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT CHIQUITA BOULEVARD S AND SW 34 TH STREET CAPE CORAL, LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials

More information

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE COMPLIANCE TEST REPORT

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE COMPLIANCE TEST REPORT COMPLIANCE TESTING INFORMATION FACILITY DESCRIPTION: TESTING CERTIFICATION: Test Laboratory: United States Test Laboratory, LLC Report Number: 06N074 Laboratory Representative: Richard W. Mouser Witnessed

More information

Objectives: After completing this assignment, you should be able to:

Objectives: After completing this assignment, you should be able to: Data Analysis Assignment #1 Evaluating the effects of watershed land use on storm runoff Assignment due: 21 February 2013, 5 pm Objectives: After completing this assignment, you should be able to: 1) Calculate

More information

A Method, tor Determining the Slope. or Neutron Moisture Meter Calibration Curves. James E. Douglass

A Method, tor Determining the Slope. or Neutron Moisture Meter Calibration Curves. James E. Douglass Station Paper No. 154 December 1962 A Method, tor Determining the Slope or Neutron Moisture Meter Calibration Curves James E. Douglass U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Service Southeastern Forest

More information

IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION

IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION Nancy Case O Bourke, PE 1, Gregory L. Hartman, PE 2 and Paul Fuglevand, PE 3 ABSTRACT In-situ specific gravity

More information

P.E. Civil Exam Review: GEOMECHANICS. Jerry Vandevelde, P.E.

P.E. Civil Exam Review: GEOMECHANICS. Jerry Vandevelde, P.E. P.E. Civil Exam Review: GEOMECHANICS Jerry Vandevelde, P.E. gtv@gemeng.com GEOMECHANICS National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying http://www.ncees.org/ 3 STUDY REFERENCES Foundation Engineering;

More information

Standard Practice for Calculating Formulation Physical Constants of Paints and Coatings 1

Standard Practice for Calculating Formulation Physical Constants of Paints and Coatings 1 Designation: D 5201 05 Standard Practice for Calculating Formulation Physical Constants of Paints and Coatings 1 This standard is issued under the fixed designation D 5201; the number immediately following

More information

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON WESTERN INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE FZE. BEng (HONS) IN CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER ONE EXAMINATION 2016/2017 GROUND AND WATER STUDIES 1

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON WESTERN INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE FZE. BEng (HONS) IN CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER ONE EXAMINATION 2016/2017 GROUND AND WATER STUDIES 1 OCD59 UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON WESTERN INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE FZE BEng (HONS) IN CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER ONE EXAMINATION 2016/2017 GROUND AND WATER STUDIES 1 MODULE NO: CIE4009 Date: Saturday 14 January

More information

Roger Andy Gaines, Research Civil Engineer, PhD, P.E.

Roger Andy Gaines, Research Civil Engineer, PhD, P.E. Roger Andy Gaines, Research Civil Engineer, PhD, P.E. Research Civil Engineer/Regional Technical Specialist Memphis District August 24, 2010 Objectives Where we have been (recap of situation and what s

More information

Materials. Use materials meeting the following.

Materials. Use materials meeting the following. 208.01 Section 208. SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL 208.01 Description. Install and maintain erosion and sedimentation controls to minimize soil erosion and to control sedimentation from affecting

More information

ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY

ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY Kevin M. Martin, P.E. KMM Geotechnical Consultants, LLC 7 Marshall Road Hampstead, NH 0384 603-489-6 (p)/ 603-489-8 (f)/78-78-4084(m) kevinmartinpe@aol.com

More information

Module 5: Channel and Slope Protection Example Assignments

Module 5: Channel and Slope Protection Example Assignments Module 5: Channel and Slope Protection Example Assignments A) Example Project Assignment on Slope and Swale Design North America Green Software Example (Erosion Control Materials Design Software) The following

More information

Use of Launched Soil Nails to Stabilize Landslides in Summit County, Ohio

Use of Launched Soil Nails to Stabilize Landslides in Summit County, Ohio Use of Launched Soil Nails to Stabilize Landslides in Summit County, Ohio Mitchell W. Weber, P.G. Gannett Fleming Engineers & Architects, P.C. Greg Bachman, P.E., P.S. County of Summit Engineer Robert

More information

DRAFT. PRELIMINARY LANDSLIDE MODELING for KRAMER AVENUE LANDSLIDE SITKA, ALASKA. Prepared for: Andrew Friske 210 Kramer Ave. Sitka, Alaska 99835

DRAFT. PRELIMINARY LANDSLIDE MODELING for KRAMER AVENUE LANDSLIDE SITKA, ALASKA. Prepared for: Andrew Friske 210 Kramer Ave. Sitka, Alaska 99835 PRELIMINARY LANDSLIDE MODELING for KRAMER AVENUE LANDSLIDE SITKA, ALASKA Prepared for: Andrew Friske 210 Kramer Ave. Sitka, Alaska 99835 Prepared by: Northern Geotechnical Engineering, Inc. d.b.a. Terra

More information

CE330L Student Lab Manual Mineral Aggregate Properties

CE330L Student Lab Manual Mineral Aggregate Properties Mineral Aggregate Properties Introduction In this lab module several characteristics of aggregates are determined. Tests will be conducted on both coarse and fine aggregates. The results of some of these

More information

The Use of Expanded Shale, Clay and Slate Lightweight Aggregates in Granular Geotechnical Fills

The Use of Expanded Shale, Clay and Slate Lightweight Aggregates in Granular Geotechnical Fills Information Sheet 6660.0 January 2017 The Use of Expanded Shale, Clay and Slate Lightweight Aggregates in Granular Geotechnical Fills For over 50 years Rotary Kiln produced Expanded Shale, Clay & Slate

More information

Format of CLIGEN weather station statistics input files. for CLIGEN versions as of 6/2001 (D.C. Flanagan).

Format of CLIGEN weather station statistics input files. for CLIGEN versions as of 6/2001 (D.C. Flanagan). Format of CLIGEN weather station statistics input files for CLIGEN versions 4.1-5.1 as of 6/2001 (D.C. Flanagan). updated 12/11/2008 - Jim Frankenberger These files are also known as CLIGEN state files

More information

SOILS/AGGREGATE TECHNICIAN REVIEW

SOILS/AGGREGATE TECHNICIAN REVIEW (8:00 to 4:00) SOILS/GGREGTE TECHNICIN REVIEW Intro TTI Safety Rounding Procedure Thursday RIZ 201 SHTO T 11 RIZ 210 SHTO T 19 RIZ 211 SHTO T 255 RIZ 212 RIZ 233 RIZ 236 RIZ 225 RIZ 245 SHTO T 89 SHTO

More information

UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOFT CLAY REINFORCE WITH SINGLE 16MM DIAMETER ENCAPSULATED BOTTOM ASH COLUMN NABILAH BINTI MD MASHOD FAKEH

UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOFT CLAY REINFORCE WITH SINGLE 16MM DIAMETER ENCAPSULATED BOTTOM ASH COLUMN NABILAH BINTI MD MASHOD FAKEH 1 UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOFT CLAY REINFORCE WITH SINGLE 16MM DIAMETER ENCAPSULATED BOTTOM ASH COLUMN NABILAH BINTI MD MASHOD FAKEH B. ENG (HONS.) CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PAHANG 1 UNIVERSITI

More information

Sediment Trap. At multiple locations within the project site where sediment control is needed.

Sediment Trap. At multiple locations within the project site where sediment control is needed. Sediment Trap SE-3 Objectives EC Erosion Control SE Sediment Control TR Tracking Control WE Wind Erosion Control Non-Stormwater NS Management Control Waste Management and WM Materials Pollution Control

More information

4. Soil Consistency (Plasticity) (Das, chapter 4)

4. Soil Consistency (Plasticity) (Das, chapter 4) 4. Soil Consistency (Plasticity) (Das, chapter 4) 1 What is Consistency? Consistency is a term used to describe the degree of firmness of fine-grained soils (silt and clay). The consistency of fine grained

More information

TESTING PROTOCAL. Via & US Mail. April 30, 2010

TESTING PROTOCAL. Via  & US Mail. April 30, 2010 Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. 330 Pfingsten Road Northbrook, Illinois 60062 847.272.7400 tel 847.291.5189 fax www.wje.com Via Email & US Mail General Manager 318 West Washington Street Valders

More information

Subsurface Erosion in Response to Land Management Changes and Soil Hydropedology. G.V. Wilson, J. R. Rigby, S.M. Dabney

Subsurface Erosion in Response to Land Management Changes and Soil Hydropedology. G.V. Wilson, J. R. Rigby, S.M. Dabney Subsurface Erosion in Response to Land Management Changes and Soil Hydropedology G.V. Wilson, J. R. Rigby, S.M. Dabney USDA-ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory Soil Pipeflow & Internal Erosion Impacts

More information

1' U. S. Forest Products Laboratory. Weathering and decay. U.S. Forest Serv. Forest Prod. Lab. Tech. Note 221 (rev,), 2 pp. 1956, (Processed.

1' U. S. Forest Products Laboratory. Weathering and decay. U.S. Forest Serv. Forest Prod. Lab. Tech. Note 221 (rev,), 2 pp. 1956, (Processed. Number 171 Portland, Oregon August 1959 EFFECT OF WEATHERING ON ACCURACY OF FUEL-MOISTURE-INDICATOR STICKS IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST by William Go Morris How much does weathering affect accuracy of fuel-moistureindicator

More information

Tikrit University College of Engineering Civil engineering Department

Tikrit University College of Engineering Civil engineering Department Tikrit University SOIL CLASSIFICATION College of Engineering Civil engineering Department Soil Mechanics 3 rd Class Lecture notes Up Copyrights 2016 Classification of soil is the separation of soil into

More information

KINEROS2/AGWA. Fig. 1. Schematic view (Woolhiser et al., 1990).

KINEROS2/AGWA. Fig. 1. Schematic view (Woolhiser et al., 1990). KINEROS2/AGWA Introduction Kineros2 (KINematic runoff and EROSion) (K2) model was originated at the USDA-ARS in late 1960s and released until 1990 (Smith et al., 1995; Woolhiser et al., 1990). The spatial

More information

Fluid Flow Analysis Penn State Chemical Engineering

Fluid Flow Analysis Penn State Chemical Engineering Fluid Flow Analysis Penn State Chemical Engineering Revised Spring 2015 Table of Contents LEARNING OBJECTIVES... 1 EXPERIMENTAL OBJECTIVES AND OVERVIEW... 1 PRE-LAB STUDY... 2 EXPERIMENTS IN THE LAB...

More information

Erosion. changing landforms. Purpose. Process Skills. Background. Time 1 1 ½ hours Grouping Pairs, small groups, or class.

Erosion. changing landforms. Purpose. Process Skills. Background. Time 1 1 ½ hours Grouping Pairs, small groups, or class. Purpose To demonstrate how several factors affect the rate of erosion. Process Skills Observe, Measure, Collect data, Interpret data, Form a hypothesis, Make a model, Identify and control variables, Draw

More information

SAND. By A S M Fahad Hossain Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering, AUST

SAND. By A S M Fahad Hossain Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering, AUST SAND By A S M Fahad Hossain Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering, AUST Definition Sand is a loose, fragmented, naturally-occurring material consisting of vary small particle (fine to medium

More information

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT

PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT TOWN OF ASHLAND TOWN HALL 101 THOMPSON STREET ASHLAND, VIRGINIA JOB NUMBER: 39016 PREPARED FOR: PMA PLANNERS & ARCHITECTS 10325 WARWICK BOULEVARD NEWPORT NEWS,

More information

TESTING of AGGREGATES for CONCRETE

TESTING of AGGREGATES for CONCRETE TESTING of AGGREGATES for CONCRETE The properties of the aggregates affect both the fresh and hardened properties of concrete. It is crucial to know the properties of the aggregates to be used in the making

More information

Photo 1 - Southerly view across 2700 parking lot toward existing building. Multi-residential building borders western side of property in upper right of view. Photo 2 - Southerly view across 2750 parking

More information

Solution:Example 1. Example 2. Solution: Example 2. clay. Textural Soil Classification System (USDA) CE353 Soil Mechanics Dr.

Solution:Example 1. Example 2. Solution: Example 2. clay. Textural Soil Classification System (USDA) CE353 Soil Mechanics Dr. CE353 Soil Mechanics CE353 Lecture 5 Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory SOIL CLASSIFICATION Lecture 5 SOIL CLASSIFICATION Dr. Talat A Bader Dr. Talat Bader 2 Requirements of a soil Systems Why do we need

More information

M E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI

M E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI M E M O R A N D U M TO: FROM: Mr. Mark Schilling Gulf Interstate Engineering Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI DATE: November 11, 2014 RE: Summary of Findings Geotechnical

More information

CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.2. Engineering Classification of Soil (AASHTO and USCS) (Das, Ch. 4)

CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.2. Engineering Classification of Soil (AASHTO and USCS) (Das, Ch. 4) CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.2 Engineering Classification of Soil (AASHTO and USCS) (Das, Ch. 4) Outline of this Lecture 1. Particle distribution and Atterberg Limits 2. Soil classification

More information

YEAR 2018 CCIL CORRELATION. MIX COMPLIANCE (Ontario)

YEAR 2018 CCIL CORRELATION. MIX COMPLIANCE (Ontario) MIX COMPLIANCE (Ontario) PLEASE NOTE: Type B Marshall Only and Type B Marshall and Superpave laboratories are required to carry out Marshall compliance testing using two Plant Mix samples. SAMPLES Two

More information

APPENDIX B ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS AND CONVERSION FACTORS Abbreviations

APPENDIX B ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS AND CONVERSION FACTORS Abbreviations APPENDIX B ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS AND CONVERSION FACTORS Abbreviations A ampere AASHTO American Association of State Highway & Transportation Officials ABS (%) Percent of Absorbed Moisture Abs. Vol. Absolute

More information

ROAD DUST SUPPRESSSANTS RESEARCH RESULTS

ROAD DUST SUPPRESSSANTS RESEARCH RESULTS ROAD DUST SUPPRESSSANTS RESEARCH RESULTS Thomas G. Sanders 1 and Jonathan Q. Addo 2 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80525. 2 Project Engineer,

More information

Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration. CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. February, 2011

Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration. CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. February, 2011 11242843_GeoTech_Preliminary - Feburary 2011_1/40 Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio February, 2011 11242843_GeoTech_Preliminary -

More information

Review of Anemometer Calibration Standards

Review of Anemometer Calibration Standards Review of Anemometer Calibration Standards Rachael V. Coquilla rvcoquilla@otechwind.com Otech Engineering, Inc., Davis, CA Anemometer calibration defines a relationship between the measured signals from

More information

SOIL MECHANICS-01 LAB COPY INSTRUCTER: ENGR HALLEMA ATAULLAH PREPARED BY: KAMRAN KHAN PRACTICLE NO. 01 TITLE: TO DETERMINE THE MOISRURE CONTENT OF A

SOIL MECHANICS-01 LAB COPY INSTRUCTER: ENGR HALLEMA ATAULLAH PREPARED BY: KAMRAN KHAN PRACTICLE NO. 01 TITLE: TO DETERMINE THE MOISRURE CONTENT OF A PRACTICLE NO. 01 TITLE: TO DETERMINE THE MOISRURE CONTENT OF A IVEN SOIL SAMPLE APPARARUS: 1) Pan 2) Electric balance 3) Electric oven MATERIALS: 1) Soil sample 2) Water RELATED CONCEPTS: Soil: It is an

More information

Geotechnical Engineering I CE 341

Geotechnical Engineering I CE 341 Geotechnical Engineering I CE 341 What do we learn in this course? Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering (1) Formation, Soil Composition, Type and Identification of Soils (2) Soil Structure and Fabric

More information

Module 4: Overview of the Fundamentals of Runoff and Erosion

Module 4: Overview of the Fundamentals of Runoff and Erosion Module 4: Overview of the Fundamentals of Runoff and Erosion Module 4a Goal Once we can better understand the forces which cause erosion and runoff, only then can we begin to minimize the negative results.

More information

CITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH 2 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT 3

CITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH 2 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT 3 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT City of Cape Coral Procurement Division Cultural Park Boulevard, nd Floor Cape Coral, FL ISSUED FOR BID VOLUME of GEOTECHNICAL

More information

Lake Sedimentation Survey of Siloam Springs State Park Lake, Adams County, Illinois

Lake Sedimentation Survey of Siloam Springs State Park Lake, Adams County, Illinois Contract Report 567 Lake Sedimentation Survey of Siloam Springs State Park Lake, Adams County, Illinois by Richard L. Allgire Office of Sediment & Wetland Studies Prepared for the Illinois Department of

More information

Soil Mechanics Brief Review. Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E.

Soil Mechanics Brief Review. Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E. Soil Mechanics Brief Review Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E. 1 BASIC ROCK TYPES Igneous Rock (e.g. granite, basalt) Rock formed in place by cooling from magma Generally very stiff/strong and often abrasive

More information