SOIL STABILITY ANALYSES
|
|
- Jasmine York
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AMERICAN WATER ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC SOIL STABILITY ANALYSES OMLR 1 PERMIT APPLICATION VARRA PIT 2 AWES PROJECT # 0-0-VARRA July 27, 1 Prepared for: Prepared by: Varra Companies, Inc. AWES, LLC 80 Gage Street 809 Four Star Ct. Frederick, CO 8016 Fort Collins, CO 802 AWES 809 Four Star Court, Fort Collins, CO 802
2 Introduction The following report presents the results of a slope stability analysis for a proposed open cut gravel extraction operations at the Varra Pitt 2 operations near Platteville, Colorado. This analysis was performed at the request of Varra Companies, Inc., (Varra). This report is being submitted in partial fulfillment of an OMLR 1 Mine Permit Application. Background Information The proposed gravel quarry is located in the NW1/, S33, T3N, R67W of the 6 th Principal Meridian. The surrounding land use consists of agricultural, rural residential, commercial and open-cut gravel quarry operations. The proposed mine area occupies an estimated 2 acres. The water table at the site is located in unconsolidated alluvial deposits with an averaage depth to water of approximately six feet below ground surface. Soil conditions generally consist of varying thicknesses of top soil underlain by sand and gravel deposits, which in turn are underlain by sandy and argillaceous siltstones. Over the entire area the average saturated thickness of the sand and gravel deposits (prior to mining) is estimated at about 3 feet. It is our understanding that the sand and gravel will be dewatered during aggregate extraction. The site location is presented on Figure 1. Previous Investigations Terracon Consultants, Inc., (Terracon) conducted a sand and gravel study in September 08. The study consisted of drilling 22 soil borings from ground surface to bedrock to determine the potential aggregate mass within the proposed mine boundary. Selected sand and gravel samples were obtained for grain size distribution determinations. The depth to bedrock over the site varied between 13 and feet below ground surface. The majority of the study area consists of three to five feet of clayey sand underlain by sand and gravel with occasional clayey sand, silty sand and sand lenses. Bedrock consists of sandstone, siltstone and claystone. The Terracon report is provided as Attachment A.
3 Slope Stability Analysis Pit 2 Varra 1 Permit Application Weld County, Colorado Page 2 Overview of Stability Analyses The depth to bedrock varies between 13 and feet across the study area with the bedrock surface dipping steeply to the northwest. Soil strength testing was not performed as part of the Terracon study and in the absence of strength test data the following soil strength parameters were used in the stability analysis. Table 1 Soil Strength Properties Material Wet Unit Weight Saturated Unit Weight Cohesive Friction (lbs/cu ft.) (lbs/cu ft.) Intercept (PSF) Angle Top Soil Poorly Graded Sand Sand & Gravel Weathered Bedrock Bedrock The assumptions used in the bank stability analysis include the following: The static depth to groundwater at the distance to no pumping influence is 6 feet below ground surface and the water table will intersect the pit bank just above the mine floor (seepage face) during steady state dewatering. The pit depth will vary between 2 and feet below grade. Load surcharges of 2,00 pounds per square foot were simulated. During extraction activities the pit bank slope will vary between 3H:1V and 1.2H:1V. The software package PC-STABL was used to evaluate slope stability. Simulations using Spencer, Modified Bishop and Modified Janbu methods were run to determine the most conservative
4 Slope Stability Analysis Pit 2 Varra 1 Permit Application Weld County, Colorado Page 3 safety factor. The soil strength properties used in the analysis are presented on computer generated data sheets which are presented in Attachment B. Stability analyses were ran for three scenarios a 2 foot mine depth, a 3 foot mine depth and a foot mine depth. A series of trial and error simulations were ran to determine the mine wall slopes that would meet a safety factor of 1.3 or greater. A review of Attachment B shows proposed bank profiles are stable with a calculated safety factors that vary between 1.3 and 1.6. Discussion Slope failure analyses for proposed open cut gravel operations at the Varra Pitt 2 site indicate proposed slope cuts will be stable for dewatered or static water table conditions. As the depth to bedrock varies greatly it is recommended that the lower half (modeled at %) of the mine slope be maintained at 3H:1V and the remaining mine wall sloped at 1.2H:1V. This allows for maximum material extraction while maintaining an adequate safety factor. If any significant modifications to proposed pit wall slopes occur this analysis may not be representative of site conditions and additional simulations are recommended. Comments The discussions and recommendations in this report represent our professional opinions. Our conclusions, opinions and recommendations are based from information available at this time and we do not guarantee that undiscovered conditions will not become evident in the future. AWES' report was prepared in accordance with currently accepted engineering practices at this time and location and no other warranties, representations or certifications are implied or intended.
5 Slope Stability Analysis Pit 2 Varra 1 Permit Application Weld County, Colorado Page This report was prepared by AWES, LLC. Date: July 27, 1 Joby L. Adams, P.G. Principal/Hydrogeologist
6 REFERENCES Terracon Consultants, Inc., 08. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report and Sand/Gravel Study, Weld County, Colorado. Prepared for EDAW/AECOM, Fort Collins, CO, September 26, 08.
7 FIGURE
8
9 ATTACHMENT A Geotechnical Study Results
10 PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT AND SAND/GRAVEL STUDY PROPOSED SAND/GRAVEL MINE LAFARGE BEARSON PARCEL SE CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 17 AND COUNTY ROAD 28 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Terracon Project No September 26, 08 PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBMITTAL Prepared for: EDAW/AECOM East Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado Attn: Mr. John Ko Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. 1 North Howes Street Fort Collins, Colorado 8021 Phone: Fax:
11 Consulting Engineers and Scientists September 26, 08 1 N Howes Street Fort Collins, Colorado 8021 Phone (970) Fax (970) EDAW/AECOM East Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, Colorado 802 Attn: Re: Mr. John Ko Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report and Sand/Gravel Study Proposed Sand/Gravel Mine Southeast Corner of County Road 17 and County Road 28 Weld County, Colorado Terracon Project No Terracon has completed geotechnical engineering exploration for the proposed project to be located at the southwest corner of County Road 17 and County Road 28 in Weld County, Colorado. This study was performed in general accordance with the proposal prepared by EDAW (Project # ) dated September, 08. The results of our engineering study are attached. These results include the Boring Location Map, laboratory test results, Logs of Boring, and the geotechnical recommendations needed to aid in the design and construction of foundations and other earth connected phases of this project. Other design and construction recommendations, based upon geotechnical conditions, are presented in the report. Supplementary geotechnical engineering exploration should be performed at the site when final design plans become available and preliminary design studies are complete. Supplemental geotechnical explorations will be used to confirm or modify the recommendations contained in this preliminary report. Delivering Success for Clients and Employees Since 196 More than 9 Offices Nationwide ii
12 Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report and Sand/Gravel Study Proposed Sand/Gravel Mine- Weld County, Colorado Terracon Project No Terracon PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBMITTAL We appreciate being of service to you in the geotechnical engineering phase of this project, and are prepared to assist you during the construction phases as well. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions concerning this report or any of our testing, inspection, design and consulting services. Sincerely, TERRACON CONSULTANTS, INC. Raymond L. Denton, II, P.E. Geotechnical Department Manager Copies to: Addressee () iii
13 Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report and Sand/Gravel Study Proposed Sand/Gravel Mine- Weld County, Colorado Terracon Project No Terracon PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBMITTAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Letter of Transmittal... ii INTRODUCTION... 1 SITE EXPLORATION... 1 Field Exploration... 1 Laboratory Testing... 2 SITE CONDITIONS... 3 SUURFACE CONDITIONS... 3 Economic Mineral Potential... 3 Soil and Bedrock Conditions... Field and Laboratory Test Results... Groundwater Conditions... 6 PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS... 6 Sand/Gravel Mining and Geotechnical Considerations... 6 Other Geotechnical Considerations... 7 GENERAL COMMENTS... 7 Figure No. BORING LOCATION DIAGRAM... 1 APPENDIX A: LOGS OF BORING APPENDIX B: LABORATORY TEST RESULTS APPENDIX C: GENERAL NOTES iv
14 PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT AND SAND/GRAVEL STUDY INTRODUCTION PROPOSED SAND/GRAVEL MINE SE CORNER OF CR 17 AND CR 28 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Terracon Project No September 26, 08 This report contains the results of our preliminary geotechnical engineering exploration for the proposed project to be located at referenced site. The site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Weld County Road 17 and Weld County Road 28 in Weld County, Colorado. The purpose of these services is to provide information and preliminary geotechnical engineering recommendations relative to: subsurface soil and bedrock conditions. groundwater conditions. feasibility for use of site as a gravel mining pit The recommendations contained in this report are based upon the results of field and laboratory testing, engineering analyses, our experience with similar soil conditions and structures, and our understanding of the proposed project. PROJECT INFORMATION Based on preliminary information provided by LaFarge, the proposed project will include the development of an approximate 168-acre parcel. Currently the site is being considered to be utilized as a sand and gravel mining operation pit. SITE EXPLORATION PROCEDURES The scope of the services performed for this project to date have included site reconnaissance by an geotechnical engineer, a subsurface exploration program, laboratory testing and preliminary engineering analysis. Field Exploration: A total of 22 test borings were drilled between September 3, 08 to September 1, 08 to depths of about to 63 feet below existing site grade at the approximate locations shown on the Boring Location Diagram, Figure 1. The borings were drilled across the site at approximate 00 foot grid spacings in order to asses the general subsurface conditions. Portions of the site were inaccessible at this time due to current 1
15 Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report and Sand/Gravel Study Proposed Sand/Gravel Mine- Weld County, Colorado Terracon Project No Terracon PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBMITTAL agricultural operations. Borings in these locations will be drilled at a later date. The borings were advanced with a truck-mounted drilling rig, utilizing -1/-inch inside diameter (approx 8- inch outside diameter) hollow-stem, auger. The borings were located in the field by a hand held GPS. Elevations were estimated at each boring location by interpolation from contours indicated on topographic mapping provided by Northern Engineering. The accuracy of boring locations and elevations should only be assumed to the level implied by the methods used. Lithologic logs of each boring were recorded by an engineering geologist during the drilling operations. At selected intervals, samples of the subsurface materials were taken by driving split-spoon and ring barrel samplers. Representative bulk samples of subsurface materials were also obtained at approximate to -foot intervals. Penetration resistance measurements were obtained by driving the split-spoon or ring barrel into the subsurface materials with a 10-pound hammer falling inches. The penetration resistance value is a useful index to the consistency, relative density or hardness of the materials encountered. Groundwater measurements were made in each boring at the time of site exploration. A majority of the borings were backfilled after drilling operations due to safety considerations; therefore subsequent groundwater measurements were not obtained in these borings. Laboratory Testing: Samples retrieved during the field exploration were returned to the laboratory for observation by the project geotechnical engineer, and were classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System described in Appendix C. Samples of bedrock were classified in accordance with the general notes for Rock Classification. At that time, an applicable laboratory testing program was formulated to determine gradation characteristics of the subsurface materials. Following the completion of the laboratory testing, the field descriptions were confirmed or modified as necessary and Logs of Borings were prepared. These logs are presented in Appendix A. Laboratory test results are presented in Appendix B. These results were used for assessing the feasibility of utilizing the site as a sand/gravel pit and for the preliminary geotechnical engineering analyses. Laboratory tests were performed in general accordance with the applicable local or other accepted standards. 2
16 Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report and Sand/Gravel Study Proposed Sand/Gravel Mine- Weld County, Colorado Terracon Project No Terracon PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBMITTAL SITE CONDITIONS The site was vacant and to our knowledge had not been previously developed and was used for agricultural purposes. The site was bounded on the north by County Road 28 and agricultural land beyond, and on the east, south and west by agricultural property. The ground surface was rowed/tilled and generally soft and moist due to the on-going agriculture and irrigation practices. Vegetation consisted of crops of corn. An existing single family residence and associated outbuildings was located at the approximate center of the site with access to the north to County Road 28. Site drainage was generally poor and in the form of surface sheet flow. Several areas of standing water were noted, particularly at the northeast corner of the site. Additionally, several underground petroleum lines and a tank installation is present on the site. SUURFACE CONDITIONS Geology: Surficial geologic conditions at the site, as mapped by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) ( 1 Colton, 1978), consist of the Piney Creek Alluvium of Quaternary Age. This material generally consists of sandy to gravely alluvium. These materials, as mapped in this area, are generally on the order of about to feet in thickness. Bedrock underlying the surface units consists of the Fox Hills Sandstone of Upper Cretaceous Age. This formation is generally comprised of silty siltstone interbedded with gray fissile shale. The thickness of this unit has been reported to be on the order of 0 to 00 feet. Economic Mineral Potential: Mapping performed by the USGS ( 2 Schwochow, Shroba, and Wicklein, 197) indicates that the site lies in an area of flood-plain and valley fill deposits along present stream courses with stream deposits consisting of relatively clean and sound gravel. This is consistent with the materials encountered in our borings. Mapping performed by the USGS ( 3 Rodger B. Colton, 197) indicates that the site contains a gravel deposit underlying flood plains and terraces. The materials are described as pebbles and clasts generally well rounded, unweathered, and contain little deleterious lime (CaCO3). 1 Colton, Roger B., 1978, Geologic Map of the Boulder-Fort Collins-Greeley Area, Colorado, United States Geological Survey, Map I-8-G. 2 Schwochow, S.D., Shroba, R.R., and Wicklein, P.C., 197, Sand, Gravel, and Quarry Aggregate Resources of the Colorado Front Range Counties, Colorado Geological Survey, Special Publication -A, Plate 1. 3 Rodger B. Colton., and Fitch, Harold R., 197, Map Showing Potential Sources of Gravel and Crushed Rock Aggregate in the Boulder-Fort Collins-Greeley Area, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado, United States Geological Survey, Map I-8-D. 3
17 Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report and Sand/Gravel Study Proposed Sand/Gravel Mine- Weld County, Colorado Terracon Project No Terracon PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBMITTAL Clasts are composed chiefly of quartzite, granite, gneiss, and pegmatite. Grain size distribution by weight is mapped near the area as 3% clay and silt, % sand, 9% granular gravel, and % pebbles. The material contains few or no reactive constituents and is a source of quality gravel for the Longmont area. Gravel thicknesses of these deposits mapped in the area range from approximately 1 to 28 feet in thickness. Based on the materials encountered in our borings, it is likely that commercially extractable mineral deposits will be encountered on the project site. Due to the relatively flat nature of the site, geologic hazards at the site are anticipated to be low. Seismic activity in the area is anticipated to be low, and the property should be relatively stable from a structural standpoint. With proper site grading around the proposed mine, erosional problems at the site should be reduced. Soil and Bedrock Conditions: As presented on the Logs of Borings, surface soils to depths of about 13 to feet consist predominantly of overburden sands with gravels. Claystone, siltstone, and/or sandstone bedrock was encountered below the overburden sands and extended to the total depths of exploration of about to 63 feet below existing site grade. A bedrock contour map has been generated based on preliminary information and is provided in Figure 2. Field and Laboratory Test Results: Field test results indicate the sand soils vary from loose to very dense in relative density. The bedrock varies from medium hard to hard in hardness. Gradations performed on the bulk samples obtained from the test borings indicate that the overburden materials generally classify as sands with the following characteristics: Boring No. Sample depth Depth to Bedrock (ft) %gravel %sand %silt/clay B1 9-1 ft B ft B ft B2 - ft B2 0-0 ft B3-0 ft B3 9- ft B - ft B - ft B 0-7 ft B 0- ft B - ft B - ft B -0 ft B 0-7 ft
18 Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report and Sand/Gravel Study Proposed Sand/Gravel Mine- Weld County, Colorado Terracon Project No Terracon PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBMITTAL B6 - ft B6-2 ft B8 0- ft B8 - ft B - ft B 0-7 ft B11 - ft B11 - ft B13 0- ft B13 - ft B13 - ft B13-0 ft B16 - ft B16 - ft B17 9- ft B17 - ft B17-38 ft B19 0- ft B19 - ft B21 0- ft B21 - ft B22 0- ft B22 - ft B22 - ft B ft B ft B ft B ft B2 - ft B2-1 ft B26 0- ft B26 - ft B27 - ft B27 - ft B27-3 ft B ft B ft B ft B ft Average It should be noted that the gradations were performed primarily on bulk samples obtained from auger cuttings. Efforts were made to obtain a representative sampling of the subsurface materials at the depths indicated, however the depths of the samples and gradations presented
19 Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report and Sand/Gravel Study Proposed Sand/Gravel Mine- Weld County, Colorado Terracon Project No Terracon PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBMITTAL should be considered approximate only. The gradation analysis curves are presented at the conclusion of the report. Groundwater Conditions: Groundwater was generally encountered at depths of about 3 to feet (average of about 6 feet) below existing site grade in the test borings at the time of field exploration. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of about 0 at the southeast corner of the site. A groundwater contour map has been generated based on preliminary information and has been provided in Figure 3. A majority of the borings were backfilled after drilling due to cave-in conditions and safety considerations, therefore subsequent groundwater measurements were not obtained in these borings. These observations represent groundwater conditions at the time of the field exploration, and may not be indicative of other times or at other locations. Groundwater levels can be expected to fluctuate with varying seasonal and weather conditions. Based upon review of U.S. Geological Survey Maps, ( Hillier, et al, 1979), regional groundwater beneath the project area is expected to be encountered in unconsolidated alluvial deposits on the site at depths ranging from to and greater than feet below present ground surface. Fluctuations in groundwater levels can best be determined by implementation of a groundwatermonitoring plan. Such a plan would include installation of groundwater-monitoring wells and periodic measurement of groundwater levels over a sufficient period of time. The possibility of groundwater fluctuations should be considered when developing design and construction plans for the project. PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS The preliminary recommendations presented in this report are based on the assumption that the subsurface conditions do not deviate appreciably from those encountered in the borings. Supplementary geotechnical engineering exploration should be performed at the site upon completion of initial design studies. Supplemental geotechnical explorations will be used to confirm or modify the recommendations contained in this preliminary report. Sand/Gravel Mining and Geotechnical Considerations: Based upon the materials encountered during the preliminary geotechnical exploration of the site and the results of the laboratory testing, the site appears to be feasible for the purpose of mining various quantities of 1 Hillier, Donald E.; and Schneider, Paul A., Jr., 1979, Depth to Water Table ( ) in the Boulder-Fort Collins- Greeley Area, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado, United States Geological Survey, Map I-8-I. 6
20 Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report and Sand/Gravel Study Proposed Sand/Gravel Mine- Weld County, Colorado Terracon Project No Terracon PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBMITTAL sand and gravel sized aggregate. However, the majority of the gravels are smaller than ¾ - inches in diameter. The depth of the sand and gravel overburden is approximately 13 to feet with the average depth about 39 feet below existing site grade. Relatively shallow bedrock was encountered at the site in Boring Nos. 2, 26, and 29 at depths of 1 to 23 feet. We recommend that LaFarge analyze the gradations provided herein carefully to determine the economic and physical viability of developing the site for mining. If the preliminary assessments look favorable for mining the site, we recommend that further exploration be performed with a reverse air circulation drill rig in order to collect additional sand and gravel samples since large samples of the subsurface materials are not practical with conventional hollow stem auger methods due to heaving sands and groundwater conditions. As previously outlined, groundwater was encountered across the site at depths ranging from about 3 to feet below existing site grade. If deeper mining operations are being considered, dewatering of the site will likely be required and an experienced contractor should be consulted to assist with determining the feasibility of dewatering in such conditions. It has been our experience that slurry cut-off walls are effective for dewatering when the depth to bedrock is less than about 0 to 60 feet due to the practical installation depths of these systems. Slurry walls must typically be keyed-in to bedrock or other relatively impervious stratum in order to be effective. Therefore, the use of very large equipment may be required for slurry wall installations, based on the depth to bedrock at the site. Other dewatering alternatives for the purpose of mining would consist of installing well-points in specific areas that are being excavated. Other Geotechnical Considerations: Protection of the existing single family residence will require particular care during excavation and dewatering activities. Significant dewatering of the site will likely cause some settlement of the structure and associated outbuildings. Additional analysis will be required to determine the approximate magnitude of this settlement. Slope stability analyses will be required to determine the required slope inclinations required to maintain stability of the structure during mining operations. Other options for stabilizing the structure could include shoring systems. A thorough evaluation and documentation of the existing structure conditions is recommended prior to beginning any construction activities. GENERAL COMMENTS Supplemental exploration and analyses should be undertaken in order to develop final design parameters and to confirm and/or modify the preliminary recommendations and conclusions contained in this report. This report should not be relied upon for final design, and should only be used for planning and budget purposes. 7
21 Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report and Sand/Gravel Study Proposed Sand/Gravel Mine- Weld County, Colorado Terracon Project No Terracon PRELIMINARY DRAFT SUBMITTAL Terracon should be retained to review the final design plans and specifications so comments can be made regarding interpretation and implementation of our geotechnical recommendations in the design and specifications. Terracon should also be retained to provide testing and observation during the excavation, grading, foundation and construction phases of the project. The analysis and recommendations presented in this preliminary report are based upon the data obtained from the borings performed at the indicated locations and from other information discussed in this report. This report does not reflect variations that may occur between borings, across the site, or due to the modifying effects of weather. The nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until during or after construction. If variations appear, we should be immediately notified so that further evaluation and supplemental recommendations can be provided. The scope of services for this project does not include, either specifically or by implication, any environmental or biological (e.g., mold, fungi, bacteria) assessment of the site or identification or prevention of pollutants, hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner is concerned about the potential for such contamination or pollution, other studies should be undertaken. This preliminary report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client for specific application to the project discussed and has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. No warranties, either express or implied, are intended or made. Site safety, excavation support, and dewatering requirements are the responsibility of others. In the event that changes are planned in the nature, design, or location of the project as outlined in this report, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless Terracon reviews the changes, and either verifies or modifies the conclusions of this report in writing. 8
22
23
24
25 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. 1 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf SANDY LEAN CLAY Medium stiff, brown, gray SILTY SAND Loose to medium dense, brown, tan BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/ CLAYSTONE Gray, very hard BOTTOM OF BORING The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft WL WL WL WD 2.6 Initial Water Level Reading AB 6 0/0. BORING STARTED BORING COMPLETED RIG CME 7 FOREMAN CMG APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
26 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. 2 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf. SANDY LEAN CLAY Soft, dark brown SAND WITH GRAVEL Medium dense, tan 1 RS RS BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 63 SILTSTONE Hard, blue/greyish BOTTOM OF BORING The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft WL WL WL.0 WD BACKFILLED 8 9 BORING STARTED RIG 0/0.3 0/0.3 CME 7 FOREMAN Initial Water Level Reading APPROVED RLD JOB # 60 BORING COMPLETED EB 0806
27 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. 3 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf SANDY LEAN CLAY Medium stiff, dark brown 1 RS 6 9 SAND WITH GRAVEL Medium dense, tan 2 3 RS SILTSTONE Hard, blue/greyish 0 7 BOTTOM OF BORING 8 3 0/0.2 BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft BORING STARTED WL 9.0 WD BACKFILLED BORING COMPLETED WL RIG CME 7 FOREMAN EB WL Initial Water Level Reading APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
28 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf SILTY SAND Brown, wet at 9. CLAYEY SAND Dark brown SANDSTONE Very hard, light brown/reddish BOTTOM OF BORING 0 3 0/0.2 BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft WL.0 WD 2.2 AB WL WL Initial Water Level Reading BORING STARTED BORING COMPLETED RIG HP Buggy FOREMAN PG APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
29 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf SAND WITH GRAVEL Light brown SANDSTONE Very hard, light brown/reddish BOTTOM OF BORING /0.2 BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft WL.0 WD BACKFILLED WL WL Initial Water Level Reading BORING STARTED BORING COMPLETED RIG CME 7 FOREMAN PG APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
30 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. 6 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf SANDY CLAY Medium stiff, dark brown CL 1 RS 8 8 SAND WITH GRAVEL Medium dense, brown 2 RS 2 1 GRAVEL WITH SAND Tan 3 2 SAND WITH GRAVEL Brown SILTSTONE Hard, blue/greyish /0.2 BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 60 BOTTOM OF BORING /0.2 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft BORING STARTED WL 8.0 WD 2.7 AB BORING COMPLETED WL RIG CME 7 FOREMAN EB WL Initial Water Level Reading APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
31 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. 8 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf 2 POORLY GRADED GRAVEL WITH SAND Brown SAND WITH GRAVEL Loose to medium dense, brown 1 RS RS 33 1 RS 6 RS RS 22 8 RS 3 RS 0 11 RS 8 SILTSTONE Hard, blue/greyish 6 0 BOTTOM OF BORING /.3 BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft WL.0 WD BACKFILLED WL WL Initial Water Level Reading BORING STARTED BORING COMPLETED RIG CME 7 FOREMAN EB APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
32 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf CLAYEY SAND Very loose, dark brown 1 RS 8 SAND WITH GRAVEL Medium dense, brown 2 3 RS SILTSTONE Hard, greyish/blue 0 7 BOTTOM OF BORING 8 0/0.3 BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft BORING STARTED WL 6.0 WD BACKFILLED BORING COMPLETED WL RIG CME 7 FOREMAN EB WL Initial Water Level Reading APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
33 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. 11 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf. 9 SANDY CLAY Medium stiff, brown SILTY SAND Orangeish brown SAND WITH GRAVEL Brown CL SW 1 2 RS RS SILTSTONE Hard, greyish blue 6 0/.3 0 BOTTOM OF BORING 0 7 0/0. BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft WL 9.0 WD BACKFILLED WL WL Initial Water Level Reading BORING STARTED BORING COMPLETED RIG CME 7 FOREMAN EB APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
34 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. 13 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf GRAVEL WITH SAND Well sorted, brown 7 SAND WITH GRAVEL Reddish brown SANDSTONE Very hard, light brown/olive 0. BOTTOM OF BORING 0 6 NR 0/0.2 BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft WL.0 WD BACKFILLED WL WL Initial Water Level Reading BORING STARTED BORING COMPLETED RIG CME 7 FOREMAN PG APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
35 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. 16 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf 2 CLAYEY SAND Brown SAND WITH GRAVEL Very loose to loose, brown 1 RS RS SILTSTONE Hard, grey BOTTOM OF BORING 0 3 0/0.2 BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft WL.0 WD BACKFILLED WL WL Initial Water Level Reading BORING STARTED BORING COMPLETED RIG CME 7 FOREMAN EB APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
36 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. 17 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf CLAYEY SAND Brown SC 1 RS 7 9 SAND WITH GRAVEL Loose, brown 2 3 RS 16 1 GRAVEL WITH SAND (0." to 1." gravels) 2 29 SAND WITH GRAVEL tan 3 38 SILTSTONE Medium hard to hard, blueish/grey /0. BOTTOM OF BORING 8 0/0.3 BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft BORING STARTED WL 8.0 WD BACKFILLED BORING COMPLETED WL RIG CME 7 FOREMAN EB WL Initial Water Level Reading APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
37 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. 19 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf 2 CLAYEY SAND Dark brown POORLY GRADED SAND WITH TRACE GRAVEL Brown SAND WITH GRAVEL Medium dense, trace silt and clay at 1 ft. SC RS RS SILTSTONE Hard, greyish/olive 7 0/0.3 0 BOTTOM OF BORING 0 8 0/0.3 BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft BORING STARTED WL.0 WD BACKFILLED BORING COMPLETED WL RIG CME 7 FOREMAN EB WL Initial Water Level Reading APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
38 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. 21 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf CLAYEY SAND Medium stiff to very stiff, brown SC 1 RS 7 9 SAND WITH GRAVEL Brown 2 3 RS SILTSTONE Hard, grey 2 BOTTOM OF BORING 3 0/0.2 BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft WL.0 WD BACKFILLED WL WL Initial Water Level Reading BORING STARTED BORING COMPLETED RIG CME 7 FOREMAN EB APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
39 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. 22 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf SANDY CLAY Dark brown 13 SILTY SAND light brown, trace gravel 1 CL SANDSTONE Hard, light brown BOTTOM OF BORING /0.6 BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft BORING STARTED WL 6.0 WD 3.2 AB BORING COMPLETED WL RIG HP Buggy FOREMAN PG WL Initial Water Level Reading APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
40 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. 23 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf SILTY SAND Brown, tan 1 11 SANDY LEAN CLAY Brown SILTY SAND Brown, tan 1 2 SAND WITH GRAVEL Tan, brown 3 2 SILTY SAND Brown, tan CLAYSTONE Very hard, grey BOTTOM OF BORING 6 1 0/0.1 BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft WL WD BACKFILLED WL WL Initial Water Level Reading BORING STARTED BORING COMPLETED RIG CME 7 FOREMAN CMG APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
41 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. 2 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT Very loose to loose, brown SP SM 1 RS 6 9 CLAYEY SAND Brown SC 2 3 RS 1 1 SILTY SAND Brown, with trace gravel from 16 ft. to 22 ft SILTSTONE Hard, grey/olive BOTTOM OF BORING 2 6 0/0. BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft WL 8.0 WD BACKFILLED WL WL Initial Water Level Reading BORING STARTED BORING COMPLETED RIG CME 7 FOREMAN EB APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
42 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. 2 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf 1 SILTY SAND Trace gravel CLAYEY SAND Trace gravel, brown SILTY SAND Very loose to medium dense, brown SC SM RS RS CLAYSTONE Hard, grey 1 BOTTOM OF BORING 0/0. BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft BORING STARTED WL.0 WD BACKFILLED BORING COMPLETED WL RIG CME 7 FOREMAN EB WL Initial Water Level Reading APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
43 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. 26 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf CLAYEY SAND Fine grained, brown SC CLAY Dark brown CLAYSTONE Hard, grey/blackish BOTTOM OF BORING /. BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft WL 3.0 WD BACKFILLED WL WL Initial Water Level Reading BORING STARTED BORING COMPLETED RIG CME 7 FOREMAN PG APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
44 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. 27 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf SILTY SAND WITH TRACE FINE GRAVEL Brown SAND WITH GRAVEL Brown SANDSTONE Hard, light brown 3 0 BOTTOM OF BORING 0 7 0/0.6 BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft BORING STARTED WL 7.0 WD AB BORING COMPLETED WL RIG HP Buggy FOREMAN PG WL Initial Water Level Reading APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
45 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. 28 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf SILTY SAND Brown, tan, medium dense SM CLAYSTONE Very hard, grey BOTTOM OF BORING 3 0/0.2 BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft BORING STARTED WL 0 WD DRY AB BORING COMPLETED WL RIG CME 7 FOREMAN CMG WL Initial Water Level Reading APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
46 SITE Lafarge SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado LOG OF BORING NO. 29 ARCHITECT / ENGINEER PROJECT SAMPLES Bearson Gravel Study TESTS Page 1 of 1 GRAPHIC LOG DESCRIPTION DEPTH, ft. USCS SYMBOL NUMBER TYPE RECOVERY, in. BLOWS / ft. WATER CONTENT, % DRY UNIT WT pcf UNCONFINED STRENGTH, psf SILTY SAND Brown, tan SM 2 SM SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL Tan, brown, very dense SILTY SAND Brown, tan SANDSTONE Very hard, grey, Fe Ox 1 SM /0.6 0/0.6 0/ BOTTOM OF BORING 7 1 0/0.1 BOREHOLE_ GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 The stratification lines represent the approximate boundary lines between soil and rock types: in-situ, the transition may be gradual. WATER LEVEL OERVATIONS, ft BORING STARTED WL WD DRY AB BORING COMPLETED WL RIG CME 7 FOREMAN CMG WL Initial Water Level Reading APPROVED RLD JOB # 0806
47
48 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS 2 1 1/ / 3/ HYDROMETER PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES coarse GRAVEL fine coarse medium SAND fine SILT OR CLAY TC_GRAIN_SIZE GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 Specimen Identification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu 1 9.0ft (9 to 1 feet) NP NP NP ft (19 to 2 feet) NP NP NP ft (29 to 3 feet) NP NP NP ft ( to feet) NP NP NP ft (0 to 0 feet) NP NP NP Specimen Identification D0 D60 D D %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay 1 9.0ft ft ft ft ft GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Project: Bearson Gravel Study Site: SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado Job #: 0806 Date:
49 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS 2 1 1/ / 3/ HYDROMETER PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES coarse GRAVEL fine coarse medium SAND fine SILT OR CLAY TC_GRAIN_SIZE GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 Specimen Identification 3 9.0ft 3.0ft.0ft.0ft 7.0ft Specimen Identification 3 9.0ft 3.0ft.0ft.0ft 7.0ft Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu (9 to feet) NP NP NP ( to 0 feet) NP NP NP ( to feet) NP NP NP ( to feet) NP NP NP (0 to 7 feet) NP NP NP D0 D60 D D %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Project: Bearson Gravel Study Site: SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado Job #: 0806 Date: 19.6
50 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS 2 1 1/ / 3/ HYDROMETER PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES coarse GRAVEL fine coarse medium SAND fine SILT OR CLAY TC_GRAIN_SIZE GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 Specimen Identification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu 0.0ft ( 0 to feet) NP NP NP.0ft ( to feet) NP NP NP ft ( to feet) NP NP NP 0.0ft ( to 0 feet) NP NP NP ft (0 to 7 feet) Specimen Identification D0 D60 D D %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay 0.0ft ft ft ft ft GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Project: Bearson Gravel Study Site: SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado Job #: 0806 Date:
51 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS 2 1 1/ / 3/ HYDROMETER PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES coarse GRAVEL fine coarse medium SAND fine SILT OR CLAY TC_GRAIN_SIZE GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 Specimen Identification 6.0ft 6.0ft 8 0.0ft 8.0ft.0ft Specimen Identification 6.0ft 6.0ft 8 0.0ft 8.0ft.0ft D Classification ( to feet) ( to 2 feet) (0 to feet) ( to feet) ( to feet) D60 D D LL PL NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP %Gravel %Sand GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION PI Cc Cu NP NP NP NP NP %Silt %Clay Project: Bearson Gravel Study Site: SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado Job #: 0806 Date:
52 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS 2 1 1/ / 3/ HYDROMETER PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES GRAVEL coarse fine coarse medium SAND fine SILT OR CLAY TC_GRAIN_SIZE GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 Specimen Identification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu 0.0ft (0 to 7 feet) NP NP NP ft ( to feet) NP NP NP ft ( to feet) NP NP NP ft (0 to feet) NP NP NP ft ( to feet) NP NP NP Specimen Identification D0 D60 D D %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay 0.0ft ft ft ft ft GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Project: Bearson Gravel Study Site: SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado Job #: 0806 Date:
53 0 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES 2 1 1/ / 3/8 6 U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES GRAVEL coarse fine coarse medium SAND fine SILT OR CLAY TC_GRAIN_SIZE GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 Specimen Identification Classification LL PL 13.0ft ( to feet) NP NP ft ( to 0 feet) NP NP 16.0ft ( to feet) NP NP 16.0ft ( to feet) NP NP ft (9 to feet) NP NP Specimen Identification D0 D60 D D %Gravel %Sand 13.0ft ft ft ft ft GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION PI Cc Cu NP NP NP NP NP %Silt %Clay Project: Bearson Gravel Study Site: SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado Job #: 0806 Date:
54 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS 2 1 1/ / 3/ HYDROMETER PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES coarse GRAVEL fine coarse medium SAND fine SILT OR CLAY TC_GRAIN_SIZE GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 Specimen Identification 17.0ft 17.0ft ft ft 0.0ft Specimen Identification 17.0ft 17.0ft ft 19.0ft ft D Classification ( to feet) ( to 38 feet) (0 to feet) ( to feet) (0 to feet) D60 D D LL PL PI Cc Cu NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Project: Bearson Gravel Study Site: SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado Job #: 0806 Date:
55 0 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS 2 1 1/ / 3/ HYDROMETER PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES coarse GRAVEL fine coarse medium SAND fine SILT OR CLAY TC_GRAIN_SIZE GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 Specimen Identification 21.0ft 22.0ft 22.0ft 22.0ft ft Specimen Identification 21.0ft 22.0ft 22.0ft 22.0ft ft D Classification ( to 22 feet) (0.0 to feet) ( to feet) ( to feet) (0.0 to 9 feet) D60 D D LL PL PI Cc Cu NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Project: Bearson Gravel Study Site: SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado Job #: 0806 Date:
56 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS 2 1 1/ / 3/ HYDROMETER PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES coarse GRAVEL fine coarse medium SAND fine SILT OR CLAY TC_GRAIN_SIZE GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 Specimen Identification ft ft 23.0ft 2.0ft 2.0ft Specimen Identification ft ft 23.0ft 2.0ft 2.0ft D Classification (19 to 29 feet) (29 to 39 feet) (39 to feet) ( to feet) ( to 1 feet) D60 D D LL PL PI Cc Cu NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP NP %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Project: Bearson Gravel Study Site: SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado Job #: 0806 Date:
57 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS 2 1 1/ / 3/ HYDROMETER PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES coarse GRAVEL fine coarse medium SAND fine SILT OR CLAY TC_GRAIN_SIZE GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 Specimen Identification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu 26.0ft (0.0 to feet) NP NP NP 26.0ft ( to feet) NP NP NP 27.0ft ( to feet) NP NP NP ft ( to feet) NP NP NP ft ( to 3 feet) NP NP NP Specimen Identification D0 D60 D D %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay 26.0ft ft ft ft ft GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Project: Bearson Gravel Study Site: SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado Job #: 0806 Date:
58 0 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES / 1/2 3/8 3 6 U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES GRAVEL coarse fine coarse medium SAND fine SILT OR CLAY Specimen Identification ft ft ft ft Classification (9 to 19 feet) (19 to 29 feet) (29 to 39 feet) (0 to 9 feet) LL NP NP NP NP PL NP NP NP NP PI NP NP NP NP Cc Cu TC_GRAIN_SIZE GPJ BORING.GDT 9/26/08 Specimen Identification D ft ft ft 9.0ft 9.. D D D %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Project: Bearson Gravel Study Site: SEC OF WELD CO. ROADS 17 & 28 Weld County, Colorado Job #: 0806 Date:
59
60 GENERAL NOTES DRILLING & SAMPLING SYMBOLS: : Split Spoon /8" I.D., 2" O.D., unless otherwise noted HS: Hollow Stem Auger ST: Thin-Walled Tube - 2" O.D., unless otherwise noted PA: Power Auger RS: Ring Sampler - 2.2" I.D., 3" O.D., unless otherwise noted HA: Hand Auger DB: Diamond Bit Coring - ", N, B RB: Rock Bit : Bulk Sample or Auger Sample WB: Wash Boring or Mud Rotary The number of blows required to advance a standard 2-inch O.D. split-spoon sampler () the last inches of the total 18-inch penetration with a 10-pound hammer falling inches is considered the Standard Penetration or N-value. For 3 O.D. ring samplers (RS) the penetration value is reported as the number of blows required to advance the sampler inches using a 10- pound hammer falling inches, reported as blows per foot, and is not considered equivalent to the Standard Penetration or Nvalue. WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT SYMBOLS: WL: Water Level WS: While Sampling WCI: Wet Cave in WD: While Drilling DCI: Dry Cave in BCR: Before Casing Removal AB: After Boring ACR: After Casing Removal Water levels indicated on the boring logs are the levels measured in the borings at the times indicated. Groundwater levels at other times and other locations across the site could vary. In pervious soils, the indicated levels may reflect the location of groundwater. In low permeability soils, the accurate determination of groundwater levels may not be possible with only short-term observations. DESCRIPTIVE SOIL CLAIFICATION: Soil classification is based on the Unified Classification System. Coarse Grained Soils have more than 0% of their dry weight retained on a #0 sieve; their principal descriptors are: boulders, cobbles, gravel or sand. Fine Grained Soils have less than 0% of their dry weight retained on a #0 sieve; they are principally described as clays if they are plastic, and silts if they are slightly plastic or non-plastic. Major constituents may be added as modifiers and minor constituents may be added according to the relative proportions based on grain size. In addition to gradation, coarse-grained soils are defined on the basis of their in-place relative density and fine-grained soils on the basis of their consistency. (RS) Blows/Ft. FINE-GRAINED SOILS COARSE-GRAINED SOILS BEDROCK () Blows/Ft. Consistency (RS) Blows/Ft. () Blows/Ft. Relative Density (RS) Blows/Ft. () Blows/Ft. Consistency < Very Soft 0-6 < 3 Very Loose < < Weathered 3-3- Soft Loose Firm -9-8 Medium Stiff Medium Dense Medium Hard Stiff Dense Hard Very Stiff > 98 > 0 Very Dense > 119 > 79 Very Hard > 2 > Hard RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF SAND AND GRAVEL Descriptive Terms of Other Constituents Percent of Dry Weight Major Component of Sample GRAIN SIZE TERMINOLOGY Particle Size Trace < 1 Boulders Over in. (0mm) With 1 29 Cobbles in. to 3 in. (0mm to 7 mm) Modifier > Gravel 3 in. to # sieve (7mm to.7 mm) Sand Silt or Clay # to #0 sieve (.7mm to 0.07mm) Passing #0 Sieve (0.07mm) RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF FINES PLASTICITY DESCRIPTION Descriptive Terms of Other Constituents Trace With Modifiers Percent of Dry Weight Term Plasticity Index < > Non-plastic Low Medium High
61 Coarse Grained Soils More than 0% retained on No. 0 sieve UNIFIED SOIL CLAIFICATION SYSTEM Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests A Group Symbol Soil Classification Group Name B Gravels Clean Gravels Cu and 1 Cc 3 E GW Well graded gravel F More than 0% of coarse Less than % fines C fraction retained on Cu < and/or 1 > Cc > 3 E GP Poorly graded gravel F No. sieve Gravels with Fines More Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravel F,G, H than % fines C Fines classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravel F,G,H Sands 0% or more of coarse fraction passes No. sieve Clean Sands Cu 6 and 1 Cc 3 E SW Well graded sand I Less than % fines D Cu < 6 and/or 1 > Cc > 3 E SP Poorly graded sand I Sands with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sand G,H,I More than % fines D Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sand G,H,I Fine-Grained Soils 0% or more passes the No. 0 sieve Silts and Clays Liquid limit less than 0 Silts and Clays Liquid limit 0 or more inorganic PI > 7 and plots on or above A line J CL Lean clay K,L,M PI < or plots below A line J ML Silt K,L,M organic Liquid limit - oven Organic clay K,L,M,N < 0.7 OL dried Liquid limit - not Organic silt K,L,M,O dried inorganic PI plots on or above A line CH Fat clay K,L,M organic PI plots below A line MH Elastic silt K,L,M Liquid limit - oven dried Liquid limit - not dried < 0.7 OH Highly organic soils Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor PT Peat Organic clay K,L,M,P Organic silt K,L,M,Q A Based on the material passing the 3-in. (7-mm) sieve B If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add with cobbles or boulders, or both to group name. C Gravels with to % fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well graded gravel with silt, GW-GC well graded gravel with clay, GP-GM poorly graded gravel with silt, GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay. D Sands with to % fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well graded sand with silt, SW-SC well graded sand with clay, SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt, SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay 2 E (D) Cu = D 60 /D Cc = D x D60 F If soil contains 1% sand, add with sand to group name. G If fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM, or SC-SM. H If fines are organic, add with organic fines to group name. I If soil contains 1% gravel, add with gravel to group name. J If Atterberg limits plot in shaded area, soil is a CL-ML, silty clay. K If soil contains 1 to 29% plus No. 0, add with sand or with gravel, whichever is predominant. L If soil contains % plus No. 0 predominantly sand, add sandy to group name. M If soil contains % plus No. 0, predominantly gravel, add gravelly to group name. N PI and plots on or above A line. O PI < or plots below A line. P PI plots on or above A line. Q PI plots below A line.
62 ROCK CLAIFICATION (Based on ASTM C-29) Sedimentary Rocks Sedimentary rocks are stratified materials laid down by water or wind. The sediments may be composed of particles or pre-existing rocks derived by mechanical weathering, evaporation or by chemical or organic origin. The sediments are usually indurated by cementation or compaction. Chert Claystone Conglomerate Very fine-grained siliceous rock composed of micro-crystalline or cyrptocrystalline quartz, chalcedony or opal. Chert is various colored, porous to dense, hard and has a conchoidal to splintery fracture. Fine-grained rock composed of or derived by erosion of silts and clays or any rock containing clay. Soft massive and may contain carbonate minerals. Rock consisting of a considerable amount of rounded gravel, sand and cobbles with or without interstitial or cementing material. The cementing or interstitial material may be quartz, opal, calcite, dolomite, clay, iron oxides or other materials. Dolomite A fine-grained carbonate rock consisting of the mineral dolomite [CaMg(CO 3 ) 2 ]. May contain noncarbonate impurities such as quartz, chert, clay minerals, organic matter, gypsum and sulfides. Reacts with hydrochloric acid (HCL). Limestone Sandstone Shale Siltstone A fine-grained carbonate rock consisting of the mineral calcite (CaCO 3 ). May contain noncarbonate impurities such as quartz, chert, clay minerals, organic matter, gypsum and sulfides. Reacts with hydrochloric acid (HCL). Rock consisting of particles of sand with or without interstitial and cementing materials. The cementing or interstitial material may be quartz, opal, calcite, dolomite, clay, iron oxides or other material. Fine-grained rock composed of or derived by erosion of silts and clays or any rock containing clay. Shale is hard, platy, of fissile may be gray, black, reddish or green and may contain some carbonate minerals (calcareous shale). Fine grained rock composed of or derived by erosion of silts or rock containing silt. Siltstones consist predominantly of silt sized particles (0.062 to mm in diameter) and are intermediate rocks between claystones and sandstones and may contain carbonate minerals.
63 LABORATORY TEST SIGNIFICANCE AND PURPOSE TEST SIGNIFICANCE PURPOSE California Bearing Ratio Consolidation Used to evaluate the potential strength of subgrade soil, subbase, and base course material, including recycled materials for use in road and airfield pavements. Used to develop an estimate of both the rate and amount of both differential and total settlement of a structure. Pavement Thickness Design Foundation Design Direct Shear Dry Density Expansion Gradation Liquid & Plastic Limit, Plasticity Index Permeability ph Resistivity R-Value Soluble Sulphate Unconfined Compression Water Content Used to determine the consolidated drained shear strength of soil or rock. Used to determine the in-place density of natural, inorganic, fine-grained soils. Used to measure the expansive potential of fine-grained soil and to provide a basis for swell potential classification. Used for the quantitative determination of the distribution of particle sizes in soil. Used as an integral part of engineering classification systems to characterize the fine-grained fraction of soils, and to specify the fine-grained fraction of construction materials. Used to determine the capacity of soil or rock to conduct a liquid or gas. Used to determine the degree of acidity or alkalinity of a soil. Used to indicate the relative ability of a soil medium to carry electrical currents. Used to evaluate the potential strength of subgrade soil, subbase, and base course material, including recycled materials for use in road and airfield pavements. Used to determine the quantitative amount of soluble sulfates within a soil mass. To obtain the approximate compressive strength of soils that possess sufficient cohesion to permit testing in the unconfined state. Used to determine the quantitative amount of water in a soil mass. Bearing Capacity, Foundation Design, and Slope Stability Index Property Soil Behavior Foundation and Slab Design Soil Classification Soil Classification Groundwater Flow Analysis Corrosion Potential Corrosion Potential Pavement Thickness Design Corrosion Potential Bearing Capacity Analysis for Foundations Index Property Soil Behavior
64 REPORT TERMINOLOGY (Based on ASTM D63) Allowable Soil Bearing Capacity Alluvium Aggregate Base Course Backfill Bedrock Bench Caisson (Drilled Pier or Shaft) Coefficient of Friction Colluvium Compaction Concrete Slab-on- Grade Differential Movement Earth Pressure The recommended maximum contact stress developed at the interface of the foundation element and the supporting material. Soil, the constituents of which have been transported in suspension by flowing water and subsequently deposited by sedimentation. A layer of specified material placed on a subgrade or subbase usually beneath slabs or pavements. A specified material placed and compacted in a confined area. A natural aggregate of mineral grains connected by strong and permanent cohesive forces. Usually requires drilling, wedging, blasting or other methods of extraordinary force for excavation. A horizontal surface in a sloped deposit. A concrete foundation element cast in a circular excavation which may have an enlarged base. Sometimes referred to as a cast-in-place pier or drilled shaft. A constant proportionality factor relating normal stress and the corresponding shear stress at which sliding starts between the two surfaces. Soil, the constituents of which have been deposited chiefly by gravity such as at the foot of a slope or cliff. The densification of a soil by means of mechanical manipulation A concrete surface layer cast directly upon a base, subbase or subgrade, and typically used as a floor system. Unequal settlement or heave between, or within foundation elements of structure. The pressure exerted by soil on any boundary such as a foundation wall. ESAL Equivalent Single Axle Load, a criteria used to convert traffic to a uniform standard, (18,000 pound axle loads). Engineered Fill Equivalent Fluid Existing Fill (or Man-Made Fill) Existing Grade Specified material placed and compacted to specified density and/or moisture conditions under observations of a representative of a geotechnical engineer. A hypothetical fluid having a unit weight such that it will produce a pressure against a lateral support presumed to be equivalent to that produced by the actual soil. This simplified approach is valid only when deformation conditions are such that the pressure increases linearly with depth and the wall friction is neglected. Materials deposited throughout the action of man prior to exploration of the site. The ground surface at the time of field exploration.
65 REPORT TERMINOLOGY (Based on ASTM D63) Expansive Potential Finished Grade Footing Foundation Frost Depth Grade Beam Groundwater Heave Lithologic Native Grade Native Soil Optimum Moisture Content Perched Water Scarify Settlement Skin Friction (Side Shear) Soil (Earth) Strain Stress Strip Subbase Subgrade The potential of a soil to expand (increase in volume) due to absorption of moisture. The final grade created as a part of the project. A portion of the foundation of a structure that transmits loads directly to the soil. The lower part of a structure that transmits the loads to the soil or bedrock. The depth at which the ground becomes frozen during the winter season. A foundation element or wall, typically constructed of reinforced concrete, used to span between other foundation elements such as drilled piers. Subsurface water found in the zone of saturation of soils or within fractures in bedrock. Upward movement. The characteristics which describe the composition and texture of soil and rock by observation. The naturally occurring ground surface. Naturally occurring on-site soil, sometimes referred to as natural soil. The water content at which a soil can be compacted to a maximum dry unit weight by a given compactive effort. Groundwater, usually of limited area maintained above a normal water elevation by the presence of an intervening relatively impervious continuous stratum. To mechanically loosen soil or break down existing soil structure. Downward movement. The frictional resistance developed between soil and an element of the structure such as a drilled pier. Sediments or other unconsolidated accumulations of solid particles produced by the physical and chemical disintegration of rocks, and which may or may not contain organic matter. The change in length per unit of length in a given direction. The force per unit area acting within a soil mass. To remove from present location. A layer of specified material in a pavement system between the subgrade and base course. The soil prepared and compacted to support a structure, slab or pavement system.
66 ATTACHMENT B PC-STABL Results
67
68
Project: ITHACA-TOMPKINS REGIONAL AIRPORT EXPANSION Project Location: ITHACA, NY Project Number: 218-34 Key to Soil Symbols and Terms TERMS DESCRIBING CONSISTENCY OR CONDITION COARSE-GRAINED SOILS (major
More informationB-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.
N B-1 SYMBOLS: Exploratory Boring Location Project Mngr: BORE LOCATION PLAN Project No. GK EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G1063.02 GK Scale: Checked By: 1045 Central Parkway North, Suite 103 San Antonio, Texas 78232
More informationNorthern Colorado Geotech
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PROPOSED CECIL FARMS DEVELOPMENT WELD COUNTY ROAD 7, BETWEEN ROADS 7 AND 7 SEVERANCE, COLORADO NORTHERN COLORADO GEOTECH PROJECT NO. 0-6 APRIL 0, 06 Prepared
More informationField Exploration. March 31, J-U-B ENGINEERS, Inc. 115 Northstar Avenue Twin Falls, Idaho Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E:
March 31, 201 11 Northstar Avenue 83301 Attn: Mr. Tracy Ahrens, P. E. E: taa@jub.com Re: Geotechnical Data Report Preliminary Phase 1 Field Exploration Revision No. 1 Proposed Rapid Infiltration Basin
More informationDecember 5, Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 Los Angeles, CA Mr. James Frost P: Dear Mr.
December 5, 2014 Junction Gateway, LLC 7551 W. Sunset Boulevard #203 90046 Attn: Re: Mr. James Frost P: 323.883.1800 Geotechnical Update Letter Sunset & Effie Mixed Use Development 4301 to 4311 Sunset
More informationGeotechnical Data Report
Geotechnical Data Report Downtown Greenville Future Conveyance Study December 1, 2015 Terracon Project No. 86155032 Prepared for: Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. December 1, 2015 561 Mauldin Road
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Bridge B Bridge Crossing: South 257 th West Avenue Creek County, Oklahoma June 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04155197 Prepared for: Garver, LLC Tulsa,
More informationCivil Engineering, Surveying and Environmental Consulting WASP0059.ltr.JLS.Mich Ave Bridge Geotech.docx
2365 Haggerty Road South * Canton, Michigan 48188 P: 734-397-3100 * F: 734-397-3131 * www.manniksmithgroup.com August 29, 2012 Mr. Richard Kent Washtenaw County Parks and Recreation Commission 2330 Platt
More informationPhoto 1 - Southerly view across 2700 parking lot toward existing building. Multi-residential building borders western side of property in upper right of view. Photo 2 - Southerly view across 2750 parking
More informationDATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS
DATA REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION GALVESTON CRUISE TERMINAL 2 GALVESTON, TEXAS SUBMITTED TO PORT OF GALVESTON 123 ROSENBERG AVENUE, 8TH FLOOR GALVESTON, TEXAS 77553 BY HVJ ASSOCIATES, INC. HOUSTON,
More informationPierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section
Page 1 of 7 Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section PROJECT NAME: DATE: APPLICATION NO.: PCDE NO.: LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREA (LHA) GEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT
More informationATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY
ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY Kevin M. Martin, P.E. KMM Geotechnical Consultants, LLC 7 Marshall Road Hampstead, NH 0384 603-489-6 (p)/ 603-489-8 (f)/78-78-4084(m) kevinmartinpe@aol.com
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Aggregate Resource Evaluation Proposed Bernand Quarry San Diego County, California
October 3, 2 Mr. Mark San Agustin Project No. 28-- Home Land Investments Document No. -92 2239 Curlew Street San Diego, CA 92 SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Aggregate Resource
More informationSOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART COARSE-GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% RETAINED ON NO.200 SIEVE FINE-GRAINED SOILS 50% OR MORE PASSES THE NO.200 SIEVE PRIMARY DIVISIONS GRAVELS MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED
More informationGeotechnical Data Report
Geotechnical Data Report ReWa Solar Farm at Durbin Creek Fountain Inn, South Carolina September 1, 2017 Terracon Project No. 86165043 Prepared for: Renewable Water Resources Greenville, South Carolina
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Polecat Creek Bridge (Bridge A) June 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04155197 Prepared for: Garver, LLC Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. TABLE
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Single-Span Bridge North Western Road & Hall of Fame Avenue August 25, 2015 Terracon Project No. 03155156 Prepared for: Olsson Associates Prepared by: Terracon Consultants,
More informationArdaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants
SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION 42-INCH FORCE MAIN REPLACEMENT CHIQUITA BOULEVARD S AND SW 34 TH STREET CAPE CORAL, LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials
More informationAPPENDIX E SOILS TEST REPORTS
Otsego County, NY Site Work Specifications APPENDIX E SOILS TEST REPORTS Blue Wing Services, Inc. July 1, 2010 Blue Wing Services May 20, 2010 Page 2 the site, was not made available to Empire at this
More informationGEOTECHNICAL REPORT. Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska.
Matanuska-Susitna Borough GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska March 2, 20 Prepared By: John Thornley, PE Geotechnical Engineer 333 Arctic Blvd.,
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Turner Turnpike Widening Bridge D Bridge Crossing: South 209 th West Avenue Creek County, Oklahoma June 1, 2016 Terracon Project No. 04155197 Prepared for: Garver, LLC Tulsa,
More informationAPPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION
Figure B-5.7 Figure B-5.8 Preliminary Geotechnical and Environmental Report Appendix C Hydrogeologic Investigation APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION December 21, 2011 WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION PROJECT
More informationM E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI
M E M O R A N D U M TO: FROM: Mr. Mark Schilling Gulf Interstate Engineering Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI DATE: November 11, 2014 RE: Summary of Findings Geotechnical
More informationLimited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Classroom Additions Albany County Campus Laramie, Wyoming
Limited Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Classroom Additions Albany County Campus 2300 Missile Drive, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 Phone 307-635-0222 www.stratageotech.com Limited Geotechnical Engineering
More informationpatersongroup Mineral Aggregate Assessment 3119 Carp Road Ottawa, Ontario Prepared For Mr. Greg LeBlanc March 7, 2014 Report: PH2223-REP.
Geotechnical Engineering Environmental Engineering group Hydrogeology Geological Engineering Archaeological Studies Materials Testing 3119 Carp Road Prepared For Mr. Greg LeBlanc March 7, 2014 Paterson
More informationPreliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Gooseberry Point Pedestrian Improvements Whatcom County, Washington SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
File No. 12-100 Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering Consultants Mr. Kevin Brown, P.E. Gray & Osborne, Inc. 3710 168 th Street NE, Suite B210 Arlington, Washington 98223 Subject: Draft Report Preliminary
More informationDepth (ft) USCS Soil Description TOPSOIL & FOREST DUFF
Test Pit No. TP-6 Location: Latitude 47.543003, Longitude -121.980441 Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 1,132 feet Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description 0 1.5 1.5 5.0 SM 5.0 8.0 SM Loose to medium dense,
More informationENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods
ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods Geotechnical Involvement in Project Phases Planning Design Alternatives Preparation of Detailed Plans Final Design
More informationDate: April 2, 2014 Project No.: Prepared For: Mr. Adam Kates CLASSIC COMMUNITIES 1068 E. Meadow Circle Palo Alto, California 94303
City of Newark - 36120 Ruschin Drive Project Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix C: Geologic Information FirstCarbon Solutions H:\Client (PN-JN)\4554\45540001\ISMND\45540001 36120
More informationENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
July 16, 211 Vista Design, Inc. 11634 Worcester Highway Showell, Maryland 21862 Attention: Reference: Dear Mr. Polk: Mr. Richard F. Polk, P.E. Geotechnical Engineering Report Charles County RFP No. 11-9
More informationArdaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants
SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE HENDRY COUNTY, FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants OFFICES Orlando, 88 S. Orange Avenue, Orlando,
More informationPreliminary Geotechnical Investigation Cadiz / Trigg County I-24 Business Park. Cadiz, Kentucky
Environmental & Geoscience, LLC 834 Madisonville Road Hopkinsville, KY 440 70.44.000 FAX 70.44.8300 www.wedrill.com A member of Trinity Energy & Infrastructure Group, LLC Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Study, Conifer Senior High School Football Field Improvements, Conifer, Colorado
2390 South Lipan Street Denver, CO 80223 phone: (303) 742-9700 fax: (303) 742-9666 email: kadenver@kumarusa.com www.kumarusa.com Office Locations: Denver (HQ), Colorado Springs, Fort Collins, and Frisco,
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report Richland Creek Trunk Sewer Greenville, South Carolina March 31, 2014 Terracon Project No. 86145008 Prepared for: Renewable Water Resources Greenville, South Carolina Prepared
More informationGeotechnical Investigation Juneau Seawalk - Taku Fisheries to Miner s Wharf Juneau, Alaska DM&A Job No
Duane Miller & Associates 5821 Arctic Boulevard, Suite A Anchorage, AK 99518-1654 (907) 644-3200 Fax 644-0507 Arctic & Geotechnical Engineering May 4, 2006 Tetra Tech/KCM, Inc. 1971 First Avenue Seattle,
More informationAppendix G GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION
Appendix G GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION JOB NUMBER: 3268.001 DATE: 10-14-13 BY: CC SITE 0 2000 1"=2000' VICINITY MAP CARGILL PARCEL HICKORY STREET AND ENTERPRISE DRIVE NEWARK, CALIFORNIA FOR
More information3.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
AECOM 500 W Jefferson St. Suite 1600 Louisville, KY 40202 www.aecom.com 502-569-2301 tel 502-569-2304 fax October 17, 2018 Big Rivers Electric Corporation Sebree Generating Station 9000 Highway 2096 Robards,
More informationTP-1 N61E 0 DARK BROWN SANDY SILT (ML) stiff, wet with roots (Disturbed Surficial Soil) DEPTH (FEET) 5 REDDISH BROWN SANDSTONE intensely fractured, weak to friable, deeply weathered, tight (Franciscan
More informationREPORT ON SLOPE STABILITY INVESTIGATION DON MILLS ROAD AND EGLINTON AVENUE EAST TORONTO, ONTARIO. Prepared for:
REPORT ON SLOPE STABILITY INVESTIGATION DON MILLS ROAD AND EGLINTON AVENUE EAST TORONTO, ONTARIO Prepared for: TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY Prepared By: SIRATI & PARTNERS CONSULTANTS LIMITED
More informationNAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT NAPLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (APF) TAXIWAY D REALIGNMENT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS NORTH QUADRANT ADDENDUM NUMBER TWO March, The following Addendum is hereby made a part of the Plans
More informationCITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH 2 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT 3
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CITY OF CAPE CORAL NORTH UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT City of Cape Coral Procurement Division Cultural Park Boulevard, nd Floor Cape Coral, FL ISSUED FOR BID VOLUME of GEOTECHNICAL
More informationArdaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants
SUBSURFACE SOIL EXPLORATION ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LELY AREA STORMWATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (LASIP) COUNTY BARN ROAD AND WING SOUTH CHANNELS NAPLES, COLLIER CO., FLORIDA Ardaman & Associates, Inc.
More informationIV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS The following section is a summary of the geotechnical report conducted for the proposed project. The Report of Geotechnical Investigation Proposed
More informationClay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG copyright 2009
Engineering: What's soil got to do with it? Clay Robinson, PhD, CPSS, PG crobinson@wtamu.edu, http://www.wtamu.edu/~crobinson, copyright 2009 Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary soil, noun 1 : firm land
More informationSITE INVESTIGATION 1
SITE INVESTIGATION 1 Definition The process of determining the layers of natural soil deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical properties is generally referred to as site investigation.
More informationSUBSURFACE EXPLORATION REPORT FOR THE MARITIME INFRACTURE REHABILITATION AT WHISKEY ISLAND BULK TERMINAL CLEVELAND, OHIO PGI PROJECT NO.
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION REPORT FOR THE MARITIME INFRACTURE REHABILITATION AT WHISKEY ISLAND BULK TERMINAL CLEVELAND, OHIO PGI PROJECT NO. G1G PREPARED FOR KS ASSOCIATES, INC. PREPARED BY PRO GEOTECH, INC.
More informationGeneral. DATE December 10, 2013 PROJECT No TO Mary Jarvis Urbandale/Riverside South Development Corporation
DATE December 10, 201 PROJECT No. 10-1121-0260- TO Mary Jarvis Urbandale/Riverside South Development Corporation CC Justin Robitaille, Urbandale Jonathan Párraga, J.L. Richards & Associates Limited FROM
More informationBoreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.
Implementation Boreholes 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3. Rotary Drilling Boring Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 4. Percussion Drilling The right choice of method depends on: Ground
More informationIN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION
IN SITU SPECIFIC GRAVITY VS GRAIN SIZE: A BETTER METHOD TO ESTIMATE NEW WORK DREDGING PRODUCTION Nancy Case O Bourke, PE 1, Gregory L. Hartman, PE 2 and Paul Fuglevand, PE 3 ABSTRACT In-situ specific gravity
More information16 January 2018 Job Number: RICHARD NEWMAN C\- CLARK FORTUNE MCDONALD AND ASSOCIATES PO BOX 553 QUEENSTOWN
16 January 2018 Job Number: 50595 RICHARD NEWMAN C\- CLARK FORTUNE MCDONALD AND ASSOCIATES PO BOX 553 QUEENSTOWN CHANSEN@CFMA.CO.NZ STORMWATER DISPOSAL ASSESSMENT Dear Richard, RDAgritech were requested
More informationGotechnical Investigations and Sampling
Gotechnical Investigations and Sampling Amit Prashant Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar Short Course on Geotechnical Investigations for Structural Engineering 12 14 October, 2017 1 Purpose of
More informationJune 9, R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western Region PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON
PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED MARTIN RIVER BRIDGE MILE 306.7 MACKENZIE HIGHWAY Submitted by : R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western
More informationENGINEER S CERTIFICATION OF FAULT AREA DEMONSTRATION (40 CFR )
PLATTE RIVER POWER AUTHORITY RAWHIDE ENERGY STATION BOTTOM ASH TRANSFER (BAT) IMPOUNDMENTS LARIMER COUNTY, CO ENGINEER S CERTIFICATION OF FAULT AREA DEMONSTRATION (40 CFR 257.62) FOR COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUALS
More informationCEMEX Eliot Quarry. Lake A Evaluation Report. Alameda County, California
May 7, 2015 May 7, 2015 Project No. GT13-16 Prepared for: CEMEX 5180 Golden Foothills, Parkway El Dorado Hills, California 95762 7400 Shoreline Drive, Ste. 6 Stockton, California 95219 Tel: 209-472-1822
More informationpatersongroup Consulting Engineers April 20, 2010 File: PG1887-LET.01R Novatech Engineering Consultants Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive
patersongroup April 20, 2010 File: PG1887-LET.01R Novatech Engineering Consultants Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 Attention: Mr. Adam Thompson Consulting Engineers 28 Concourse
More informationAPPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
The City of Winnipeg Bid Opportunity No. 529-2017 Template Version: C420170317 - RW APPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Quality Engineering Valued Relationships KGS Group 2017 Industrial Street Rehabilitation
More informationSafe bearing capacity evaluation of the bridge site along Syafrubesi-Rasuwagadhi road, Central Nepal
Bulletin of the Department of Geology Bulletin of the Department of Geology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal, Vol. 12, 2009, pp. 95 100 Safe bearing capacity evaluation of the bridge site along
More informationGeotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Geotechnical Recommendations for Proposed Additions to the Three Mile Creek Severe Weather Attenuation Tank Project PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: DATE: June 28, 218 PROJECT NUMBER: 697482
More informationGEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT FOR STATIC TEST FACILITY FOR PROPELLANTS AT BDL, IBRAHIMPATNAM. Graphics Designers, M/s Architecture & Engineering 859, Banjara Avenue, Consultancy
More informationReport of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration. CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio. February, 2011
11242843_GeoTech_Preliminary - Feburary 2011_1/40 Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration CSO-012 Sewer Separation Cincinnati, Hamilton County, Ohio February, 2011 11242843_GeoTech_Preliminary -
More informationSoil Mechanics Brief Review. Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E.
Soil Mechanics Brief Review Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E. 1 BASIC ROCK TYPES Igneous Rock (e.g. granite, basalt) Rock formed in place by cooling from magma Generally very stiff/strong and often abrasive
More informationGeotechnical Engineering Report
Geotechnical Engineering Report SH-9 Bridge over Wewoka Creek Hughes County, Oklahoma Job Piece No. 27059(04) July 16, 2015 Terracon Project No. 04125055 Prepared for: Holloway, Updike, and Bellen, Inc.
More informationHydrogeological Assessment for Part of Lots 2 and 3, Concession 5, Township of Thurlow, County of Hastings 1.0 INTRODUCTION. 1.
February 10,2017 25506400 Ontario Ltd. Foxboro, ON Attention: Brad Newbatt Re: Hydrogeological Assessment for Part of Lots 2 and 3, Concession 5, Township of Thurlow, County of Hastings 1.0 INTRODUCTION
More informationREPORT OF PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION. VCU Basketball Practice Facility 1300/1328 West Marshall Street City of Richmond, Virginia.
REPORT OF PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION VCU Basketball Practice Facility 100/18 West Marshall Street City of Richmond, Virginia For Mr. Carl F. Purdin, AIA Assistant Director of Design Services VCU
More informationKANSAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report LAND SUBSIDENCE KIOWA COUNTY, KANSAS. May 2, 2007
KANSAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report 2007-22 LAND SUBSIDENCE KIOWA COUNTY, KANSAS Prepared by Michael T. Dealy L.G., Manager, Wichita Operations SITE LOCATION The site was approximately four miles
More informationB-1 SURFACE ELEVATION
5A 5B LOGGED BY El. S. Bhangoo DRILLING CONTRACTOR Pitcher Drilling DRILLING METHOD Rotary Wash BEGIN DATE 12-14-12 SAMPLER TYPE(S) AND SIZE(S) (ID) SPT, MC BOREHOLE BACKFILL AND COMPLETION COMPLETION
More information10. GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION PROGRAM
Geotechnical site investigations should be conducted in multiple phases to obtain data for use during the planning and design of the tunnel system. Geotechnical investigations typically are performed in
More informationPREPARED FOR MR. JOE WOOD CARTER & SLOOPE, INC PEAKE ROAD MACON, GEORGIA PREPARED BY
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EVALUATION MACON WATER AUTHORITY (MWA) SANITARY SEWER RELOCATION MACON, GEORGIA GEC PROJECT NO. 14077.2 PREPARED FOR MR. JOE WOOD CARTER & SLOOPE, INC.
More informationADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON
F I N A L A D D E N D U M 1 R E P O R T ADDENDUM 1 FISHER SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION URS JOB NO. 3376186 Prepared for Tetra Tech Inc. 142
More informationAPPENDIX C. Borehole Data
APPENDIX C Borehole Data MAJOR DIVISIONS SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART SYMBOLS GRAPH LETTER TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS ADDITIONAL MATERIAL
More informationNew WW Hastings Hospital Geotechnical Investigation RFP Addendum #1
88 E. Marshall Street, Suite 0 Tulsa, OK 76 98 8 9 Phone 98 8 798 FAX DATE: April 9, 0 ADDENDUM NO.: PROJECT: New WW Hastings Hospital BID PACKAGE NO: Geotechnical Investigation RFP SUBMITTED BY: CNCR
More informationAn Introduction to Field Explorations for Foundations
An Introduction to Field Explorations for Foundations J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A. Paul Guyer is a registered mechanical engineer, civil engineer, fire protection engineer and architect with over 35 years
More informationPRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT TOWN OF ASHLAND TOWN HALL 101 THOMPSON STREET ASHLAND, VIRGINIA JOB NUMBER: 39016 PREPARED FOR: PMA PLANNERS & ARCHITECTS 10325 WARWICK BOULEVARD NEWPORT NEWS,
More informationGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING II. Subject Code : 06CV64 Internal Assessment Marks : 25 PART A UNIT 1
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING II Subject Code : 06CV64 Internal Assessment Marks : 25 PART A UNIT 1 1. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION 1.1 Importance, Exploration Program 1.2 Methods of exploration, Boring, Sounding
More informationHydro One (Sept 2014) Hydro One (Sept 2014) Hydro One (Sept 2014)
TABLE 1 WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS MOE WWR No Well ID Location Installation Date Status Easting Coordinates Northing Source Elevation Screened Interval Screened Material Borehole Well Stick-up Ground Top
More informationPRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT. Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts. Prepared For:
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT Proposed Re-Development 44 Old Worcester Road Charlton, Massachusetts Prepared For: Meridian Associates, Inc. 500 Cummings Center, Suite 5950 Beverly, Massachusetts
More informationSLOPE STABILITY ASSESSMENT PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION 161 LAKESHORE ROAD EAST TOWN OF THE BLUE MOUNTAINS, ONTARIO
SLOPE STABILITY ASSESSMENT PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION 161 LAKESHORE ROAD EAST TOWN OF THE BLUE MOUNTAINS, ONTARIO PETO MacCALLUM LTD. 19 CHURCHILL DRIVE BARRIE, ONTARIO L4N 8Z5 PHONE: (705) 734-3900
More informationAN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY
CTL Engineering, Inc. 2860 Fisher Road, P.O. Box 4448, Columbus, Ohio 43204338 Phone: 614/2768123 Fax: 614/2766377 Email: ctl@ctleng.com AN EMPLOYEE OWNED COMPANY Consulting Engineers Testing Inspection
More informationChapter 12 Subsurface Exploration
Page 12 1 Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration 1. The process of identifying the layers of deposits that underlie a proposed structure and their physical characteristics is generally referred to as (a) subsurface
More informationAppendix 11-B Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
Appendix 11-B Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation 11.0 Soil, Geology, and Seismology PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATION ENGINEERING REPORT CPV VALLEY ENERGY CENTER Wawayanda,
More informationPreliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report
Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Park 3 Barrow County, Georgia July, Terracon Project No. 4906 Prepared For: Winder Barrow Industrial Authority Prepared By: Terracon Consultants, Inc. Atlanta,
More informationPERIODIC SAFETY FACTOR ASSESSMENT
PERIODIC SAFETY FACTOR ASSESSMENT CFR 257.73(e)(1) Pond 21, Pond 22, Pond 23, and Waste Water Sludge Pond Oklaunion Power Station Vernon, Texas October, 16 Prepared for: Public Service Company of Oklahoma
More informationPRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. State College Redevelopment State College Borough, Centre County, Pennsylvania. CMT Laboratories File No.
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL REPORT State College Redevelopment State College Borough, Centre County, Pennsylvania CMT Laboratories File No. 1638700 Prepared for: National Development Council One Battery Park
More informationCITY OF VALDEZ Project Title: East Pioneer Reconstruction Project No.: Contract No.: TO: All Recipients Date: April 14, 2014
CITY OF VALDEZ Project Title: East Pioneer Reconstruction Project No.: 13-3-1.32 Contract No.: 11 TO: All Recipients Date: April 14, 214 SUBJECT: Addendum No.1 This seventeen (17) page Addendum forms a
More informationDry Muliwai Sample Location Map
DMM2 DMM1 P:\AthruR\K838-Makua\GIS\Layouts\Dry Muliwai.mxd.mxd - 3/26/3 - JC DMM3 5 Dry Muliwai Sample Location Map Figure 2-4 P:\AthruR\K838-Makua\GIS\Layouts\orth Background Muliwai.mxd.mxd - 3/26/3
More informationAPPENDIX H SOIL SURVEY
Environmental Impact Statement Beryl Solar Farm APPENDIX H SOIL SURVEY Beryl Solar Farm 16 347 Final V1 H i Geotechnical Engineers & Engineering Geologists NATA Accredited Laboratories for Asphalt, Aggregate,
More informationAPPENDIX A. Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols
APPENDIX A Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols Page 153 of 168 EXPLANATION OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS The terms and symbols used on the borehole logs to summarize the results of field investigation
More informationNOA ASSESSMENT HARRIS QUARRY MENDOCINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS
NOA ASSESSMENT HARRIS QUARRY MENDOCINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Scope of Services... 1 Project Location and Description... 1 Geologic Setting... 1 Regional Geology... 1 Site
More informationGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES REPORT BRIDGE OVER BIG CREEK APPROXIMATELY.8 MILES EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF COUNTY ROAD EW1546 AND COUNTY ROAD 193 LEFLORE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA PROJECT No. J2-8616(5),
More informationTIERRA. Florida License No Florida License No
March 9, 208 TIERRA AECOM 7650 West Courtney Campbell Cswy Tampa, FL 33607 Attn: RE: Mr. Edgar Figueroa, P.E. Geotechnical Engineering Services Report Purchase Order No.: 9532 AECOM Project Number: 6055499
More informationConverse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services
Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services Ms. Rebecca Mitchell Mt. San Antonio College Facilities Planning & Management 1100 North
More informationReport of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for Ponds
Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for Ponds Malabar Road (SR 514) PD&E Study From East of Babcock Street (SR 507) to US 1 Brevard County, Florida FPID:
More informationGZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
GZA BORING NO.: GZ-1 SHEET: 1 of 1 PROJECT NO: 9.223. Drilling Co.: Geologic Type of Rig: Skid Boring Location: See Plan H. Datum: See Plan Rig Model: Mudline : Foreman: Ray Eastwood CME -.8 Final Boring
More informationUAS Student Residence
General Notes, Abbreviations and Symbols C100 MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET L6 Existing Site Topographic Conditions C101 MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET L5 Existing Site Topographic Conditions C102 DEPTH(FT.) 5 FROZEN
More informationREPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
REPORT OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY HULBERT 69 KV SWITCHING STATION S. 440 Road Hulbert, Cherokee County, Oklahoma ENERCON PROJECT NO. GRDA006 MARCH 7, 2012 PREPARED FOR: C/O ENERCON
More informationR-1 Conveyor Relocation Project Legend 0 500 1000 1500 ft. This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for general reference only. Data layers that appear on this map
More informationLEGEND ODOT CLASS A-3. A-3a. A-4a. A-6a. A-6b TOTAL VISUAL VISUAL VISUAL BORING LOCATION - PLAN VIEW
PROJECT THE PROJECT CONSISTS IN PART OF CONSTRUCTING A SINGLE-SPAN BRIDGE ON RELOCATED SHUMWAY HOOW ROAD OVER THE CSXT RAILROAD. THE STRUCTURE AS ANNED, IS A SINGLE-SPAN STRUCTURE WITH MSE WAS AT THE ABUTMENTS.
More informationWARM SPRINGS GRADE SEPARATION AT I-15
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT WARM SPRINGS GRADE SEPARATION AT I-15 CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA JULY 2006 MATERIALS DIVISION STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MATERIALS DIVISION GEOTECHNICAL SECTION GEOTECHNICAL
More informationPreliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report
Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report BOLIVAR BUSINESS PARK Bolivar, Missouri October 7, 2016 Project No. B5165061 Prepared for: City of Bolivar Bolivar, Missouri Prepared by: Terracon Consultants,
More informationREPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SITE INVESTIGATION KERSHAW COUNTY EXIT 87 OFFICE PARK. ELGIN, SOUTH CAROLINA S&ME Project No.
REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SITE INVESTIGATION KERSHAW COUNTY EXIT 87 OFFICE PARK ELGIN, SOUTH CAROLINA S&ME Project No. 1611-04-450 Prepared For: KERSHAW COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICE Post
More information