Models of effective connectivity & Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM)
|
|
- Hilary Miles
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Models of effective connectivit & Dnamic Causal Modelling (DCM Presented b: Ariana Anderson Slides shared b: Karl Friston Functional Imaging Laborator (FIL Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging Universit College London Klaas Enno Stephan Laborator for Social & Neural Sstems Research Institute for Empirical Research in Economics Universit of Zurich
2 Overview Brain connectivit: tpes & definitions anatomical connectivit functional connectivit effective connectivit Dnamic causal models (DCMs DCM for fmri: Neural and hemodnamic levels Parameter estimation & inference Applications of DCM to fmri data Design of experiments and models Some empirical examples and simulations
3 Connectivit A central propert of an sstem Communication sstems Social networks (internet (Canberra, Australia FIgs. b Stephen Eick and A. Klovdahl; see
4 Structural, functional & effective connectivit anatomical/structural connectivit = presence of axonal connections Sporns 27, Scholarpedia functional connectivit = statistical dependencies between regional time series effective connectivit = causal (directed influences between neurons or neuronal populations
5 neuronal communication via snaptic contacts Anatomical connectivit visualisation b tracing techniques long-range axons association fibres
6 Different approaches to analsing functional connectivit Seed voxel correlation analsis Eigen-decomposition (PCA, SVD Independent component analsis (ICA an other technique describing statistical dependencies amongst regional time series
7 Does functional connectivit not simpl correspond to co-activation in SPMs? No, it does not - see the fictitious example on the right: Here both areas A and A 2 are correlated identicall to task T, et the have zero correlation among themselves: r(a,t = r(a 2,T =.7 but r(a,a 2 =! regional response A task T regional response A 2 Stephan 24, J. Anat.
8 Pros & Cons of functional connectivit analses Pros: useful when we have no experimental control over the sstem of interest and no model of what caused the data (e.g. sleep, hallucinatons, etc. Cons: interpretation of resulting patterns is difficult / arbitrar no mechanistic insight into the neural sstem of interest usuall suboptimal for situations where we have a priori knowledge and experimental control about the sstem of interest models of effective connectivit necessar
9 For understanding brain function mechanisticall, we need models of effective connectivit, i.e. models of causal interactions among neuronal populations.
10 Some models for computing effective connectivit from fmri data Structural Equation Modelling (SEM McIntosh et al. 99, 994; Büchel & Friston 997; Bullmore et al. 2 regression models (e.g. pscho-phsiological interactions, PPIs Friston et al. 997 Volterra kernels Friston & Büchel 2 Time series models (e.g. MAR, Granger causalit Harrison et al. 23, Goebel et al. 23 Dnamic Causal Modelling (DCM bilinear: Friston et al. 23; nonlinear: Stephan et al. 28
11 Overview Brain connectivit: tpes & definitions anatomical connectivit functional connectivit effective connectivit Dnamic causal models (DCMs DCM for fmri: Neural and hemodnamic levels Parameter estimation & inference Applications of DCM to fmri data Design of experiments and models Some empirical examples and simulations
12 Dnamic causal modelling (DCM DCM framework was introduced in 23 for fmri b Karl Friston, Lee Harrison and Will Penn (NeuroImage 9: part of the SPM software package currentl more than published papers on DCM
13 DCM vs GLM: Cheat Sheet GLM DCM Inference Within voxels Among ROIs On BOLD signal Neuronal Activation Answering Where the stimulus produced activation. How the stimulus activated the sstem of interconnected ROIs. Using Frequentist Estimation Baesian Estimation
14 Dnamic Causal Modeling (DCM Hemodnamic forward model: neural activit, BOLD Electromagnetic forward model: neural activit, EEG MEG LFP fmri Neural state equation: dx = dt F( x, u, EEG/MEG simple neuronal model complicated forward model complicated neuronal model simple forward model Stephan & Friston 27, Handbook of Brain Connectivit inputs
15 DCM for fmri: the basic idea Using a bilinear state equation, a cognitive sstem is modelled at its underling neuronal level (which is not directl accessible for fmri. The modelled neuronal dnamics (x is transformed into area-specific BOLD signals ( b a hemodnamic forward model (λ. z λ The aim of DCM is to estimate parameters at the neuronal level such that the modelled BOLD signals are maximall similar to the experimentall measured BOLD signals.
16 BOLD activit x (t activit x 2 (t activit x 3 (t neuronal states λ x hemodnamic model modulator input u 2 (t integration driving input u (t Stephan & Friston (27, Handbook of Brain Connectivit t t Neural state equation intrinsic connectivit modulation of connectivit direct inputs x ( j = ( A+ u j B x + Cu x A = x ( j B = u x C = u j x x
17 Bilinear DCM driving input modulation dx dt Two-dimensional Talor series (around x =, u =: 2 f f f = f ( x, u f ( x, + x + u + ux +... x u x u Bilinear state equation: dx dt m ( i = A + ui B x + Cu i=
18 Example: a linear sstem of dnamics in visual cortex x 3 FG left FG right x 4 LG LG x left right x 2 LG = lingual grus FG = fusiform grus Visual input in the - left (LVF - right (RVF visual field. RVF LVF u 2 u x = a x + a 2 x 2 + a 3 x 3 + c 2 u 2 x 2 = a 2 x + a 22 x 2 + a 24 x 4 + c 2 u x 3 = a 3 x + a 33 x 3 + a 34 x 4 x 4 = a 42 x 2 + a 43 x 3 + a 44 x 4
19 Example: a linear sstem of dnamics in visual cortex x 3 FG left FG right x 4 LG LG x left right x 2 LG = lingual grus FG = fusiform grus Visual input in the - left (LVF - right (RVF visual field. RVF LVF u 2 u state changes effective connectivit sstem state input parameters external inputs x = Ax + Cu = { A, C} x x 2 x 3 x 4 = a a 2 a 3 a 2 a 22 a 24 a 3 a 33 a 34 a 42 a 43 a 44 x x 2 x 3 x 4 + c 2 c 2 u u 2
20 Extension: bilinear dnamic sstem x 3 FG left FG right x 4 LG LG x left right x 2 m j= x = (A + u j B ( j x + Cu RVF CONTEXT LVF u 2 u 3 u x x 2 x 3 x 4 = a a 2 a 3 a 2 a 22 a 24 a 3 a 33 a 34 a 42 a 43 a 44 + u 3 (3 b 2 (3 b 34 x x 2 x 3 x 4 + c 2 c 2 u u 2 u 3
21 Example: u context-dependent deca u stimuli u + x context u 2 u 2 Z Z 2 u 2 x + x 2 x2 - x = Ax + u 2 B (2 x + Cu - Penn, Stephan, Mechelli, Friston NeuroImage (24 x x 2 = σ a2 a2 σ x + u2 2 b b 2 22 x + c u u 2
22 What tpe of design is good for DCM? An design that is good for a GLM of fmri data.
23 GLM vs. DCM DCM tries to model the same phenomena as a GLM, just in a different wa: It is a model, based on connectivit and its modulation, for explaining experimentall controlled variance in local responses. No activation detected b a GLM inclusion of this region in a DCM is useless! Stephan 24, J. Anat.
24 Multifactorial design: explaining interactions with DCM Task A Task factor Task B Stim/ Task A Stim2/ Task A Stimulus factor Stim Stim 2 T A /S T B /S T A /S 2 T B /S 2 X X 2 Stim / Task B Stim 2/ Task B GLM Let s assume that an SPM analsis shows a main effect of stimulus in X and a stimulus * task interaction in X 2. Stim X X 2 DCM How do we model this using DCM? Stim2 Task A Task B
25 Simulated data X Stimulus X +++ X 2 Stim Task A Stim 2 Task A Stim Task B Stim 2 Task B Stimulus Task A Task B X 2 Stephan et al. 27, J. Biosci.
26 X Stim Task A Stim 2 Task A Stim Task B Stim 2 Task B X 2 plus added noise (SNR=
27 DCM parameters = rate constants Integration of a first-order linear differential equation gives an exponential function: dx ax dt = = xt ( xexp( at Coupling parameter a is inversel proportional to the half life τ of z(t: x( τ =.5x = x exp( aτ.5x The coupling parameter a thus describes the speed of the exponential change in x(t a = ln2 /τ τ = ln 2 / a
28 Interpretation of DCM parameters Dnamic model (differential equations a neural parameters correspond to rate constants (inverse of time constants = Hz! speed at which effects take place τ n = {A, B,C,σ } a = ln2 /τ Identical temporal scaling in all areas b factorising A and B with σ: all connection strengths are relative to the self-connections. A σ A = σ a 2 a 2 Each parameter is characterised b the mean (η and covariance of its a posteriori distribution. Its mean can be compared statisticall against a chosen threshold γ. γ η
29 The problem of hemodnamic convolution Goebel et al. 23, Magn. Res. Med.
30 The hemodnamic model in DCM 6 hemodnamic parameters: dx dt t u m ( j = A u j B + x + Cu j= stimulus functions neural state equation h = { κ, γ, τ, α, ρ, ε} important for model fitting, but (usuall of no interest for statistical inference Computed separatel for each area (like the neural parameters region-specific HRFs! Friston et al. 2, NeuroImage Stephan et al. 27, NeuroImage f changes in volume τv = f v v = ε s = x κs γ( f s flow induction (rcbf /α ΔS λ( q, v = V k S k = 4.3ϑ E TE k k 2 3 = εr E TE vasodilator signal f = s v f Balloon model τq = s changes in dhb f E( f,e qe v q q + v ( q + k k ( v 2 3 /α q/v BOLD signal change equation hemodnamic state equations
31 How interdependent are neural and hemodnamic parameter estimates? A 5.8 B C ε Stephan et al. 27, NeuroImage
32 Overview: parameter estimation Combining the neural and hemodnamic states gives the complete forward model. An observation model includes measurement error e and confounds X (e.g. drift. Baesian parameter estimation b means of a Levenberg-Marquardt gradient ascent, embedded into an EM algorithm. Result: Gaussian a posteriori parameter distributions, characterised b mean η and covariance C. η hidden states z = {,, x s f,,} v q state equation z = F(x,u, f τv = stimulus function u x = (A + activit - dependent vasodilator signal changes in volume f v v s = z κs γ( f s flow - induction (rcbf f = s /α u j B j x + Cu v f modelled BOLD response changes in dhb q = f E( f,ρ qρ v / q / v q s parameters h = { κ, γ, τ, α, ρ} n = { A, B... B h n = {, } neural state equation, C} = λ(x = h(u, + Xβ + e m observation model
33 p-value: probabilit of getting the observed data in the effect s absence. If small, reject null hpothesis that there is no effect. Limitations: Problems of classical (frequentist statistics H : = p( H One can never accept the null hpothesis Given enough data, one can alwas demonstrate a significant effect Correction for multiple comparisons necessar Probabilit of observing the data, given no effect. Solution: infer posterior probabilit of the effect p( Probabilit of the effect, given the observed data
34 Baes Theorem Posterior Likelihood Prior P( = p( p( p( Reverend Thomas Baes Evidence Baes Theorem describes, how an ideall rational person processes information." Wikipedia
35 Baesian statistics new data prior knowledge p ( p( p( p( p( posterior likelihood prior Baes theorem allows one to formall incorporate prior knowledge into computing statistical probabilities. Priors can be of different sorts: empirical, principled or shrinkage priors. The posterior probabilit of the parameters given the data is an optimal combination of prior knowledge and new data, weighted b their relative precision.
36 Principles of Baesian inference Formulation of a generative model Likelihood p( prior distribution p( Observation of data Update of beliefs based upon observations, given a prior state of knowledge p( p( p(
37 Priors in DCM needed for Baesian estimation, embod constraints on parameter estimation express our prior knowledge or belief about parameters of the model hemodnamic parameters: empirical priors temporal scaling: principled prior coupling parameters: shrinkage priors Baes Theorem p( p( p( posterior likelihood prior
38 Shrinkage Priors Small & variable effect Large & variable effect Small but clear effect Large & clear effect
39 Inference about DCM parameters: Baesian single-subject analsis Gaussian assumptions about the posterior distributions of the parameters Use of the cumulative normal distribution to test the probabilit that a certain parameter (or contrast of parameters c T η is above a chosen threshold γ: p = φn c T η γ T c C c B default, γ is chosen as zero ("does the effect exist?".
40 Baesian single subject inference LDLVF FG left FG right p(c T η > = 98.7% LD LD LG left LG right RVF stim. Stephan et al. 25, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. LDRVF LVF stim. Contrast: Modulation LG right -> LG links b LDLVF vs. modulation LG left -> LG right b LDRVF
41 Inference about DCM parameters: Baesian fixed-effects group analsis Because the likelihood distributions from different subjects are independent, one can combine their posterior densities b using the posterior of one subject as the prior for the next: (... ( (,..., (... ( ( ( ( (, ( ( ( ( p p p p p p p p p p p p p N N N,...,,...,,..., = = = = N i i N i N N i N i C C C C η η Under Gaussian assumptions this is eas to compute: group posterior covariance individual posterior covariances group posterior mean individual posterior covariances and means
42 Baesian model selection (BMS Given competing hpotheses on structure & functional mechanisms of a sstem, which model is the best? Which model represents the best balance between model fit and model complexit? For which model m does p( m become maximal? Pitt & Miung (22, TICS
43 d m p m p m p (, ( ( = Model evidence: Various approximations, e.g.: - negative free energ - AIC - BIC Penn et al. (24 NeuroImage Baesian model selection (BMS ( ( 2 m p m p BF = Model comparison via Baes factor: ( (, (, ( m p m p m p m p = Baes rules: accounts for both accurac and complexit of the model allows for inference about structure (generalisabilit of the model
44 Baes factors To compare two models, we can just compare their log evidences. But: the log evidence is just some number not ver intuitive! A more intuitive interpretation of model comparisons is made possible b Baes factors: B = 2 p( p( Kass & Rafter classification: Kass & Rafter 995, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. m m 2 B 2 p(m Evidence to % weak 3 to % positive 2 to % strong > 5 > 99% Ver strong
45 Example studies of DCM for fmri DCM now an established tool for fmri & M/EEG analsis > studies published, incl. highprofile journals combinations of DCM with computational models
46 Thank ou
Models of effective connectivity & Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM)
Models of effective connectivit & Dnamic Causal Modelling (DCM) Slides obtained from: Karl Friston Functional Imaging Laborator (FIL) Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging Universit College London Klaas
More informationDynamic Causal Modelling for fmri
Dynamic Causal Modelling for fmri André Marreiros Friday 22 nd Oct. 2 SPM fmri course Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging London Overview Brain connectivity: types & definitions Anatomical connectivity
More informationEffective Connectivity & Dynamic Causal Modelling
Effective Connectivity & Dynamic Causal Modelling Hanneke den Ouden Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging Radboud University Nijmegen Advanced SPM course Zurich, Februari 13-14, 2014 Functional Specialisation
More informationDynamic causal modeling for fmri
Dynamic causal modeling for fmri Methods and Models for fmri, HS 2015 Jakob Heinzle Structural, functional & effective connectivity Sporns 2007, Scholarpedia anatomical/structural connectivity - presence
More informationWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL, UK.
Bayesian Inference Will Penny Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL, UK. SPM Course, Virginia Tech, January 2012 What is Bayesian Inference? (From Daniel Wolpert) Bayesian segmentation and normalisation
More informationDynamic causal modeling for fmri
Dynamic causal modeling for fmri Methods and Models for fmri, HS 2016 Jakob Heinzle Structural, functional & effective connectivity Sporns 2007, Scholarpedia anatomical/structural connectivity - presence
More informationBayesian Inference. Sudhir Shankar Raman Translational Neuromodeling Unit, UZH & ETH. The Reverend Thomas Bayes ( )
The Reverend Thomas Baes (1702-1761) Baesian Inference Sudhir Shankar Raman Translational Neuromodeling Unit, UZH & ETH With man thanks for some slides to: Klaas Enno Stephan & Ka H. Brodersen Wh do I
More informationDynamic Causal Modelling for EEG/MEG: principles J. Daunizeau
Dynamic Causal Modelling for EEG/MEG: principles J. Daunizeau Motivation, Brain and Behaviour group, ICM, Paris, France Overview 1 DCM: introduction 2 Dynamical systems theory 3 Neural states dynamics
More informationDynamic Causal Models
Dynamic Causal Models V1 SPC Will Penny V1 SPC V5 V5 Olivier David, Karl Friston, Lee Harrison, Andrea Mechelli, Klaas Stephan Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, ION, UCL, UK. Mathematics in
More informationExperimental design of fmri studies
Experimental design of fmri studies Sandra Iglesias Translational Neuromodeling Unit University of Zurich & ETH Zurich With many thanks for slides & images to: Klaas Enno Stephan, FIL Methods group, Christian
More informationThe General Linear Model (GLM)
he General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan ranslational Neuromodeling Unit (NU) Institute for Biomedical Engineering University of Zurich & EH Zurich Wellcome rust Centre for Neuroimaging Institute
More informationExperimental design of fmri studies
Experimental design of fmri studies Sandra Iglesias With many thanks for slides & images to: Klaas Enno Stephan, FIL Methods group, Christian Ruff SPM Course 2015 Overview of SPM Image time-series Kernel
More informationExperimental design of fmri studies
Experimental design of fmri studies Zurich SPM Course 2016 Sandra Iglesias Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU) Institute for Biomedical Engineering (IBT) University and ETH Zürich With many thanks for
More informationExperimental design of fmri studies & Resting-State fmri
Methods & Models for fmri Analysis 2016 Experimental design of fmri studies & Resting-State fmri Sandra Iglesias With many thanks for slides & images to: Klaas Enno Stephan, FIL Methods group, Christian
More informationStochastic Dynamic Causal Modelling for resting-state fmri
Stochastic Dynamic Causal Modelling for resting-state fmri Ged Ridgway, FIL, Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, London Overview Connectivity in the brain Introduction to
More informationCausal modeling of fmri: temporal precedence and spatial exploration
Causal modeling of fmri: temporal precedence and spatial exploration Alard Roebroeck Maastricht Brain Imaging Center (MBIC) Faculty of Psychology & Neuroscience Maastricht University Intro: What is Brain
More informationAn Implementation of Dynamic Causal Modelling
An Implementation of Dynamic Causal Modelling Christian Himpe 24.01.2011 Overview Contents: 1 Intro 2 Model 3 Parameter Estimation 4 Examples Motivation Motivation: How are brain regions coupled? Motivation
More informationBayesian inference J. Daunizeau
Bayesian inference J. Daunizeau Brain and Spine Institute, Paris, France Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK Overview of the talk 1 Probabilistic modelling and representation of uncertainty
More informationDCM: Advanced topics. Klaas Enno Stephan. SPM Course Zurich 06 February 2015
DCM: Advanced topics Klaas Enno Stephan SPM Course Zurich 06 February 205 Overview DCM a generative model Evolution of DCM for fmri Bayesian model selection (BMS) Translational Neuromodeling Generative
More informationExperimental design of fmri studies
Methods & Models for fmri Analysis 2017 Experimental design of fmri studies Sara Tomiello With many thanks for slides & images to: Sandra Iglesias, Klaas Enno Stephan, FIL Methods group, Christian Ruff
More informationThe General Linear Model (GLM)
The General Linear Model (GLM) Dr. Frederike Petzschner Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU) Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich & ETH Zurich With many thanks for slides & images
More informationModelling temporal structure (in noise and signal)
Modelling temporal structure (in noise and signal) Mark Woolrich, Christian Beckmann*, Salima Makni & Steve Smith FMRIB, Oxford *Imperial/FMRIB temporal noise: modelling temporal autocorrelation temporal
More informationDynamic Causal Modelling for evoked responses J. Daunizeau
Dynamic Causal Modelling for evoked responses J. Daunizeau Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, Zurich, Switzerland Brain and Spine Institute, Paris, France Overview 1 DCM: introduction 2 Neural
More informationDynamic Modeling of Brain Activity
0a Dynamic Modeling of Brain Activity EIN IIN PC Thomas R. Knösche, Leipzig Generative Models for M/EEG 4a Generative Models for M/EEG states x (e.g. dipole strengths) parameters parameters (source positions,
More informationBayesian inference J. Daunizeau
Bayesian inference J. Daunizeau Brain and Spine Institute, Paris, France Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK Overview of the talk 1 Probabilistic modelling and representation of uncertainty
More informationThe General Linear Model. Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London
The General Linear Model Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course Lausanne, April 2012 Image time-series Spatial filter Design matrix Statistical Parametric
More informationAnatomical Background of Dynamic Causal Modeling and Effective Connectivity Analyses
Anatomical Background of Dynamic Causal Modeling and Effective Connectivity Analyses Jakob Heinzle Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering University and ETH Zürich
More informationDynamic Causal Modelling for EEG and MEG
Dynamic Causal Modelling for EEG and MEG Stefan Kiebel Ma Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig, Germany Overview 1 M/EEG analysis 2 Dynamic Causal Modelling Motivation 3 Dynamic
More informationMIXED EFFECTS MODELS FOR TIME SERIES
Outline MIXED EFFECTS MODELS FOR TIME SERIES Cristina Gorrostieta Hakmook Kang Hernando Ombao Brown University Biostatistics Section February 16, 2011 Outline OUTLINE OF TALK 1 SCIENTIFIC MOTIVATION 2
More informationThe Joy of Path Diagrams Doing Normal Statistics
Intro to SEM SEM and fmri DBN Effective Connectivit Theor driven process Theor is specified as a model Alternative theories can be tested Specified as models Theor A Theor B Data The Jo of Path Diagrams
More informationNew Machine Learning Methods for Neuroimaging
New Machine Learning Methods for Neuroimaging Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit University College London, UK Dept of Computer Science University of Helsinki, Finland Outline Resting-state networks
More informationStatistical Inference
Statistical Inference Jean Daunizeau Wellcome rust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course Edinburgh, April 2010 Image time-series Spatial filter Design matrix Statistical Parametric
More informationAn introduction to Bayesian inference and model comparison J. Daunizeau
An introduction to Bayesian inference and model comparison J. Daunizeau ICM, Paris, France TNU, Zurich, Switzerland Overview of the talk An introduction to probabilistic modelling Bayesian model comparison
More informationA prior distribution over model space p(m) (or hypothesis space ) can be updated to a posterior distribution after observing data y.
June 2nd 2011 A prior distribution over model space p(m) (or hypothesis space ) can be updated to a posterior distribution after observing data y. This is implemented using Bayes rule p(m y) = p(y m)p(m)
More informationStatistical Inference
Statistical Inference J. Daunizeau Institute of Empirical Research in Economics, Zurich, Switzerland Brain and Spine Institute, Paris, France SPM Course Edinburgh, April 2011 Image time-series Spatial
More informationDCM for fmri Advanced topics. Klaas Enno Stephan
DCM for fmri Advanced topics Klaas Enno Stephan Overview DCM: basic concepts Evolution of DCM for fmri Bayesian model selection (BMS) Translational Neuromodeling Dynamic causal modeling (DCM) EEG, MEG
More informationBayesian Inference. Chris Mathys Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging UCL. London SPM Course
Bayesian Inference Chris Mathys Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging UCL London SPM Course Thanks to Jean Daunizeau and Jérémie Mattout for previous versions of this talk A spectacular piece of information
More informationEvent-related fmri. Christian Ruff. Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research Department of Economics University of Zurich
Event-related fmri Christian Ruff Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research Department of Economics University of Zurich Institute of Neurology University College London With thanks to the FIL
More informationComparing hemodynamic models with DCM
www.elsevier.com/locate/ynimg NeuroImage 38 (2007) 387 401 Comparing hemodynamic models with DCM Klaas Enno Stephan, a, Nikolaus Weiskopf, a Peter M. Drysdale, b,c Peter A. Robinson, b,c,d and Karl J.
More informationDynamic Causal Modelling for EEG and MEG. Stefan Kiebel
Dynamic Causal Modelling for EEG and MEG Stefan Kiebel Overview 1 M/EEG analysis 2 Dynamic Causal Modelling Motivation 3 Dynamic Causal Modelling Generative model 4 Bayesian inference 5 Applications Overview
More informationFunctional Connectivity and Network Methods
18/Sep/2013" Functional Connectivity and Network Methods with functional magnetic resonance imaging" Enrico Glerean (MSc), Brain & Mind Lab, BECS, Aalto University" www.glerean.com @eglerean becs.aalto.fi/bml
More informationExtracting fmri features
Extracting fmri features PRoNTo course May 2018 Christophe Phillips, GIGA Institute, ULiège, Belgium c.phillips@uliege.be - http://www.giga.ulg.ac.be Overview Introduction Brain decoding problem Subject
More informationModel Comparison. Course on Bayesian Inference, WTCN, UCL, February Model Comparison. Bayes rule for models. Linear Models. AIC and BIC.
Course on Bayesian Inference, WTCN, UCL, February 2013 A prior distribution over model space p(m) (or hypothesis space ) can be updated to a posterior distribution after observing data y. This is implemented
More informationStatistical Analysis Aspects of Resting State Functional Connectivity
Statistical Analysis Aspects of Resting State Functional Connectivity Biswal s result (1995) Correlations between RS Fluctuations of left and right motor areas Why studying resting state? Human Brain =
More informationNeuroImage. Tractography-based priors for dynamic causal models
NeuroImage 47 (2009) 1628 1638 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect NeuroImage journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ynimg Tractography-based priors for dynamic causal models Klaas Enno Stephan
More informationM/EEG source analysis
Jérémie Mattout Lyon Neuroscience Research Center Will it ever happen that mathematicians will know enough about the physiology of the brain, and neurophysiologists enough of mathematical discovery, for
More informationGroup analysis. Jean Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London. SPM Course Edinburgh, April 2010
Group analysis Jean Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course Edinburgh, April 2010 Image time-series Spatial filter Design matrix Statistical Parametric Map
More informationDynamic Causal Modelling : Advanced Topics
Dynamic Causal Modelling : Advanced Topics Rosalyn Moran Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech Zurich SPM Course, Feb 19 th 2016 Overview
More informationContents. Introduction The General Linear Model. General Linear Linear Model Model. The General Linear Model, Part I. «Take home» message
DISCOS SPM course, CRC, Liège, 2009 Contents The General Linear Model, Part I Introduction The General Linear Model Data & model Design matrix Parameter estimates & interpretation Simple contrast «Take
More informationPrinciples of DCM. Will Penny. 26th May Principles of DCM. Will Penny. Introduction. Differential Equations. Bayesian Estimation.
26th May 2011 Dynamic Causal Modelling Dynamic Causal Modelling is a framework studying large scale brain connectivity by fitting differential equation models to brain imaging data. DCMs differ in their
More informationBiophysical models of fmri responses Klaas E Stephan, Lee M Harrison, Will D Penny and Karl J Friston
Biophysical models of fmri responses Klaas E Stephan, Lee M Harrison, Will D Penny and Karl J Friston Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fmri) is used to investigate where the neural implementation
More informationExperimental Design. Rik Henson. With thanks to: Karl Friston, Andrew Holmes
Experimental Design Rik Henson With thanks to: Karl Friston, Andrew Holmes Overview 1. A Taxonomy of Designs 2. Epoch vs Event-related 3. Mixed Epoch/Event Designs A taxonomy of design Categorical designs
More informationBayesian Treatments of. Neuroimaging Data Will Penny and Karl Friston. 5.1 Introduction
Bayesian Treatments of 5 Neuroimaging Data Will Penny and Karl Friston 5.1 Introduction In this chapter we discuss the application of Bayesian methods to neuroimaging data. This includes data from positron
More informationStatistical inference for MEG
Statistical inference for MEG Vladimir Litvak Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London, UK MEG-UK 2014 educational day Talk aims Show main ideas of common methods Explain some of
More informationMéthode logique multivaluée de René Thomas et logique temporelle
Méthode logique multivaluée de René Thomas et logique temporelle Gilles Bernot Universit of Nice sophia antipolis, I3S laborator, France Menu 1. Models and formal logic 2. Thomas models for gene networks
More informationSearching for Nested Oscillations in Frequency and Sensor Space. Will Penny. Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging. University College London.
in Frequency and Sensor Space Oscillation Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging. University College London. Non- Workshop on Non-Invasive Imaging of Nonlinear Interactions. 20th Annual Computational Neuroscience
More informationDynamic causal models of neural system dynamics:current state and future extensions.
Dynamic causal models of neural system dynamics:current state and future extensions. Klaas Stephan, Lee Harrison, Stefan Kiebel, Olivier David, Will Penny, Karl Friston To cite this version: Klaas Stephan,
More informationBeyond Univariate Analyses: Multivariate Modeling of Functional Neuroimaging Data
Beyond Univariate Analyses: Multivariate Modeling of Functional Neuroimaging Data F. DuBois Bowman Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Center for Biomedical Imaging Statistics Emory University,
More informationSpatial Source Filtering. Outline EEG/ERP. ERPs) Event-related Potentials (ERPs( EEG
Integration of /MEG/fMRI Vince D. Calhoun, Ph.D. Director, Image Analysis & MR Research The MIND Institute Outline fmri/ data Three Approaches to integration/fusion Prediction Constraints 2 nd Level Fusion
More informationDynamic causal models of brain responses
Okinawa Computational Neuroscience Course; Thurs 13 th Nov. 2004 Dynamic causal models of brain responses Klaas E. Stephan, Lee M. Harrison, Will D. Penny, Karl J. Friston The Wellcome Dept. of Imaging
More informationWill Penny. SPM short course for M/EEG, London 2015
SPM short course for M/EEG, London 2015 Ten Simple Rules Stephan et al. Neuroimage, 2010 Model Structure The model evidence is given by integrating out the dependence on model parameters p(y m) = p(y,
More informationStatistical Analysis of fmrl Data
Statistical Analysis of fmrl Data F. Gregory Ashby The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England Preface xi Acronyms xv 1 Introduction 1 What Is fmri? 2 The Scanning Session 4 Experimental Design
More informationGroup Analysis. Lexicon. Hierarchical models Mixed effect models Random effect (RFX) models Components of variance
Group Analysis J. Daunizeau Institute of Empirical Research in Economics, Zurich, Switzerland Brain and Spine Institute, Paris, France SPM Course Edinburgh, April 2011 Image time-series Spatial filter
More informationWill Penny. 21st April The Macroscopic Brain. Will Penny. Cortical Unit. Spectral Responses. Macroscopic Models. Steady-State Responses
The The 21st April 2011 Jansen and Rit (1995), building on the work of Lopes Da Sliva and others, developed a biologically inspired model of EEG activity. It was originally developed to explain alpha activity
More informationOptimization of Designs for fmri
Optimization of Designs for fmri UCLA Advanced Neuroimaging Summer School August 2, 2007 Thomas Liu, Ph.D. UCSD Center for Functional MRI Why optimize? Scans are expensive. Subjects can be difficult to
More informationDimensionality Reduction
Lecture 5 1 Outline 1. Overview a) What is? b) Why? 2. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) a) Objectives b) Explaining variability c) SVD 3. Related approaches a) ICA b) Autoencoders 2 Example 1: Sportsball
More informationComparing Dynamic Causal Models
Comparing Dynamic Causal Models W.D. Penny, K.E. Stephan, A. Mechelli and K.J. Friston, Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London. October 17, 2003 Abstract This article describes
More informationHST 583 FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING DATA ANALYSIS AND ACQUISITION A REVIEW OF STATISTICS FOR FMRI DATA ANALYSIS
HST 583 FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING DATA ANALYSIS AND ACQUISITION A REVIEW OF STATISTICS FOR FMRI DATA ANALYSIS EMERY N. BROWN AND CHRIS LONG NEUROSCIENCE STATISTICS RESEARCH LABORATORY DEPARTMENT
More informationWill Penny. SPM short course for M/EEG, London 2013
SPM short course for M/EEG, London 2013 Ten Simple Rules Stephan et al. Neuroimage, 2010 Model Structure Bayes rule for models A prior distribution over model space p(m) (or hypothesis space ) can be updated
More informationOverview of SPM. Overview. Making the group inferences we want. Non-sphericity Beyond Ordinary Least Squares. Model estimation A word on power
Group Inference, Non-sphericity & Covariance Components in SPM Alexa Morcom Edinburgh SPM course, April 011 Centre for Cognitive & Neural Systems/ Department of Psychology University of Edinburgh Overview
More informationEEG/MEG Inverse Solution Driven by fmri
EEG/MEG Inverse Solution Driven by fmri Yaroslav Halchenko CS @ NJIT 1 Functional Brain Imaging EEG ElectroEncephaloGram MEG MagnetoEncephaloGram fmri Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging others 2 Functional
More informationIntroduction to Linear Models
Introduction to Linear Models STA721 Linear Models Duke Universit Merlise Clde August 25, 2015 Coordinates Instructor: Merlise Clde 214 Old Chemistr Office Hours MWF 1:00-2:0 or right after class (or b
More informationPeak Detection for Images
Peak Detection for Images Armin Schwartzman Division of Biostatistics, UC San Diego June 016 Overview How can we improve detection power? Use a less conservative error criterion Take advantage of prior
More informationContinuous Time Particle Filtering for fmri
Continuous Time Particle Filtering for fmri Lawrence Murray School of Informatics University of Edinburgh lawrence.murray@ed.ac.uk Amos Storkey School of Informatics University of Edinburgh a.storkey@ed.ac.uk
More informationPart 2: Multivariate fmri analysis using a sparsifying spatio-temporal prior
Chalmers Machine Learning Summer School Approximate message passing and biomedicine Part 2: Multivariate fmri analysis using a sparsifying spatio-temporal prior Tom Heskes joint work with Marcel van Gerven
More informationHierarchy. Will Penny. 24th March Hierarchy. Will Penny. Linear Models. Convergence. Nonlinear Models. References
24th March 2011 Update Hierarchical Model Rao and Ballard (1999) presented a hierarchical model of visual cortex to show how classical and extra-classical Receptive Field (RF) effects could be explained
More informationINF Introduction to classifiction Anne Solberg Based on Chapter 2 ( ) in Duda and Hart: Pattern Classification
INF 4300 151014 Introduction to classifiction Anne Solberg anne@ifiuiono Based on Chapter 1-6 in Duda and Hart: Pattern Classification 151014 INF 4300 1 Introduction to classification One of the most challenging
More informationThe variational Laplace approach. to approximate Bayesian inference
he variational Laplace approach to approximate Baesian inference J. Daunizeau, Brain and Spine Institute, Paris, France EH, Zurich, France Address for correspondence: Jean Daunizeau Motivation, Brain and
More informationWill Penny. DCM short course, Paris 2012
DCM short course, Paris 2012 Ten Simple Rules Stephan et al. Neuroimage, 2010 Model Structure Bayes rule for models A prior distribution over model space p(m) (or hypothesis space ) can be updated to a
More informationHuman Brain Networks. Aivoaakkoset BECS-C3001"
Human Brain Networks Aivoaakkoset BECS-C3001" Enrico Glerean (MSc), Brain & Mind Lab, BECS, Aalto University" www.glerean.com @eglerean becs.aalto.fi/bml enrico.glerean@aalto.fi" Why?" 1. WHY BRAIN NETWORKS?"
More informationNetwork Modeling and Functional Data Methods for Brain Functional Connectivity Studies. Kehui Chen
Network Modeling and Functional Data Methods for Brain Functional Connectivity Studies Kehui Chen Department of Statistics, University of Pittsburgh Nonparametric Statistics Workshop, Ann Arbor, Oct 06,
More informationMachine learning strategies for fmri analysis
Machine learning strategies for fmri analysis DTU Informatics Technical University of Denmark Co-workers: Morten Mørup, Kristoffer Madsen, Peter Mondrup, Daniel Jacobsen, Stephen Strother,. OUTLINE Do
More informationModel-free Functional Data Analysis
Model-free Functional Data Analysis MELODIC Multivariate Exploratory Linear Optimised Decomposition into Independent Components decomposes data into a set of statistically independent spatial component
More information! Dimension Reduction
! Dimension Reduction Pamela K. Douglas NITP Summer 2013 Overview! What is dimension reduction! Motivation for performing reduction on your data! Intuitive Description of Common Methods! Applications in
More informationPiotr Majer Risk Patterns and Correlated Brain Activities
Alena My²i ková Piotr Majer Song Song Alena Myšičková Peter N. C. Mohr Peter N. C. Mohr Wolfgang K. Härdle Song Song Hauke R. Heekeren Wolfgang K. Härdle Hauke R. Heekeren C.A.S.E. Centre C.A.S.E. for
More informationMixed effects and Group Modeling for fmri data
Mixed effects and Group Modeling for fmri data Thomas Nichols, Ph.D. Department of Statistics Warwick Manufacturing Group University of Warwick Warwick fmri Reading Group May 19, 2010 1 Outline Mixed effects
More informationData Analysis I: Single Subject
Data Analysis I: Single Subject ON OFF he General Linear Model (GLM) y= X fmri Signal = Design Matrix our data = what we CAN explain x β x Betas + + how much x of it we CAN + explain ε Residuals what
More informationInverse Theory. COST WaVaCS Winterschool Venice, February Stefan Buehler Luleå University of Technology Kiruna
Inverse Theory COST WaVaCS Winterschool Venice, February 2011 Stefan Buehler Luleå University of Technology Kiruna Overview Inversion 1 The Inverse Problem 2 Simple Minded Approach (Matrix Inversion) 3
More informationTowards a Regression using Tensors
February 27, 2014 Outline Background 1 Background Linear Regression Tensorial Data Analysis 2 Definition Tensor Operation Tensor Decomposition 3 Model Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Data Analysis
More informationJean-Baptiste Poline
Edinburgh course Avril 2010 Linear Models Contrasts Variance components Jean-Baptiste Poline Neurospin, I2BM, CEA Saclay, France Credits: Will Penny, G. Flandin, SPM course authors Outline Part I: Linear
More informationMixed-effects Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling
Mixed-effects Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling Kenneth Knoblauch Inserm U 846 Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute Dept. Integrative Neurosciences Bron, France Laurence T. Maloney Department of
More informationOverview. Experimental Design. A categorical analysis. A taxonomy of design. A taxonomy of design. A taxonomy of design. 1. A Taxonomy of Designs
Experimental Design Overview Rik Henson With thanks to: Karl Friston, Andrew Holmes 1. A Taxonomy of Designs 2. Epoch vs Event-related 3. Mixed Epoch/Event Designs designs designs - and nonlinear interactions
More informationThe connected brain: Causality, models and intrinsic dynamics
The connected brain: Causality, models and intrinsic dynamics Adeel Razi + and Karl J. Friston The Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG. +
More informationGranger Mediation Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Time Series
Granger Mediation Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Time Series Yi Zhao and Xi Luo Department of Biostatistics Brown University June 8, 2017 Overview 1 Introduction 2 Model and Method 3
More informationWill Penny. SPM for MEG/EEG, 15th May 2012
SPM for MEG/EEG, 15th May 2012 A prior distribution over model space p(m) (or hypothesis space ) can be updated to a posterior distribution after observing data y. This is implemented using Bayes rule
More informationNeuroImage. Nonlinear dynamic causal models for fmri
NeuroImage 42 (2008) 649 662 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect NeuroImage journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ynimg Nonlinear dynamic causal models for fmri Klaas Enno Stephan a,b,, Lars
More informationUncertainty, precision, prediction errors and their relevance to computational psychiatry
Uncertainty, precision, prediction errors and their relevance to computational psychiatry Christoph Mathys Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging at UCL, London, UK Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational
More informationPCA, Kernel PCA, ICA
PCA, Kernel PCA, ICA Learning Representations. Dimensionality Reduction. Maria-Florina Balcan 04/08/2015 Big & High-Dimensional Data High-Dimensions = Lot of Features Document classification Features per
More informationSignal Processing for Functional Brain Imaging: General Linear Model (2)
Signal Processing for Functional Brain Imaging: General Linear Model (2) Maria Giulia Preti, Dimitri Van De Ville Medical Image Processing Lab, EPFL/UniGE http://miplab.epfl.ch/teaching/micro-513/ March
More informationINF Introduction to classifiction Anne Solberg
INF 4300 8.09.17 Introduction to classifiction Anne Solberg anne@ifi.uio.no Introduction to classification Based on handout from Pattern Recognition b Theodoridis, available after the lecture INF 4300
More information