Granger Mediation Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Time Series
|
|
- Griselda Shields
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Granger Mediation Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Time Series Yi Zhao and Xi Luo Department of Biostatistics Brown University June 8, 2017
2 Overview 1 Introduction 2 Model and Method 3 Simulation Study 4 An fmri Study 5 Discussion
3 Introduction
4 Motivation Credit: NSF Task-related functional MRI (fmri) fmri: measures brain activities task fmri: perform task under fmri scanner response conflict task GO trial: push the button STOP trial: withhold the pushing 1 / 29
5 Motivation Credit: NSF Task-related functional MRI (fmri) fmri: measures brain activities task fmri: perform task under fmri scanner response conflict task GO trial: push the button STOP trial: withhold the pushing 1 / 29
6 Motivation Task-related functional MRI (fmri) fmri: measures brain activities Credit: NSF task fmri: perform task under fmri scanner response conflict task GO trial: push the button STOP trial: withhold the pushing Objective identify causal effects of task stimulus on brain activity infer brain connectivity (effective connectivity) 1 / 29
7 Functional MRI Data uniformly spaced voxels 264 putative functional regions 1 1 Power et al., Neuron, / 29
8 Functional MRI Data uniformly spaced voxels 264 putative functional regions 1 1 Power et al., Neuron, / 29
9 Functional MRI Data uniformly spaced voxels 264 putative functional regions1 time series or functional data 1 Power et al., Neuron, / 29
10 Response conflict task Brain regions of interest primary motor cortex (PMC): responsible for movement presupplementary motor area (presma): primary region for motor response prohibition Objective Quantify the causal effects stimulus presma, stimulus PMC presma PMC 2 2 Obeso et al., Brain Stimulation, / 29
11 Response conflict task Brain regions of interest primary motor cortex (PMC): responsible for movement presupplementary motor area (presma): primary region for motor response prohibition Objective Quantify the causal effects stimulus presma, stimulus PMC presma PMC 2 2 Obeso et al., Brain Stimulation, / 29
12 Brain activities can be modeled as a linear superposition of task and spontaneous random fluctuations 3 task-related signal stimulus presma random fluctuation stimulus PMC 3 Cole et al., Neuron, / 29
13 Brain activities can be modeled as a linear superposition of task and spontaneous random fluctuations 3 task-related signal stimulus presma random fluctuation stimulus PMC 3 Cole et al., Neuron, / 29
14 Brain activities can be modeled as a linear superposition of task and spontaneous random fluctuations 3 task-related signal stimulus presma random fluctuation stimulus PMC 3 Cole et al., Neuron, / 29
15 A E 1 presma (M) B Unmeasured confounding (U) E 2 Stimulus (Z) C PMC (R) M = ZA + E 1 R = ZC + MB + E 2 Task-related signal indirect effect (AB): stimulus presma PMC direct effect (C): stimulus PMC Random fluctuation spatiotemporal dependency Unmeasured confounding random fluctuation of other regions 4 ; system errors: head motion 5 4 Fox et al., Nature Neuroscience (2006), Mason et al., Science (2007) 5 Sobel and Lindquist, JASA, / 29
16 A E 1 presma (M) B Unmeasured confounding (U) E 2 Stimulus (Z) C PMC (R) M = ZA + E 1 R = ZC + MB + E 2 Task-related signal indirect effect (AB): stimulus presma PMC direct effect (C): stimulus PMC Random fluctuation spatiotemporal dependency Unmeasured confounding random fluctuation of other regions 4 ; system errors: head motion 5 4 Fox et al., Nature Neuroscience (2006), Mason et al., Science (2007) 5 Sobel and Lindquist, JASA, / 29
17 A E 1 presma (M) B Unmeasured confounding (U) E 2 Stimulus (Z) C PMC (R) M = ZA + E 1 R = ZC + MB + E 2 Task-related signal indirect effect (AB): stimulus presma PMC direct effect (C): stimulus PMC Random fluctuation spatiotemporal dependency Unmeasured confounding random fluctuation of other regions 4 ; system errors: head motion 5 4 Fox et al., Nature Neuroscience (2006), Mason et al., Science (2007) 5 Sobel and Lindquist, JASA, / 29
18 A E 1 presma (M) B Unmeasured confounding (U) E 2 Stimulus (Z) C PMC (R) M = ZA + E 1 R = ZC + MB + E 2 Task-related signal indirect effect (AB): stimulus presma PMC direct effect (C): stimulus PMC Random fluctuation spatiotemporal dependency Unmeasured confounding random fluctuation of other regions 4 ; system errors: head motion 5 4 Fox et al., Nature Neuroscience (2006), Mason et al., Science (2007) 5 Sobel and Lindquist, JASA, / 29
19 Data structure Randomized stimulus Participant 1 presma time series Participant 2 PMC time series. Causal effects for Participant 1 Participant N 6 / 29
20 Data structure Randomized stimulus Participant 1 presma time series Participant 2 PMC time series. Causal effects for Participant 1 Participant N 6 / 29
21 Major challenges Unmeasured confounding Iterregional and temporal dependency Individual variation 7 / 29
22 Existing Methods Mediation Baron and Kenny (1996), Imai et al. (2010) Kenny et al. (2003): multilevel mediation Ten Have et al. (2007), Small (2011): instrumental variables Lindquist (2012): IV and functional mediation Robins et al. (2000), van der Laan and Petersen (2008), VanderWeele (2009): longitudinal mediation Granger causality (time series) Granger (1969) Granger causality of two time series time series y is said to Granger cause time series x if the current value of x can be predicted by the past values of x and y Goebel et al. (2003), Harrison et al. (2003), Valdes-Sosa (2004) vector autoregression (VAR) of fmri time series 8 / 29
23 Multilevel Granger mediation model Lower-level model fmri time series of one participant causal mediation + spatiotemporal dependency unmeasured confounding nonidentifiability issue Higher-level model individual variation identifiability and consistency 9 / 29
24 Model and Method
25 Lower-level model Z 1 Z 2 Z T 1 Z T M 1 ẽ 11 M 2 ẽ 12 M T 1 ẽ 1,T 1 M T ẽ 1T E 11 E 12 E 1,T 1 E 1T R 1 R 2 R T 1 R T E 21 E 22 E 2,T 1 E 2T ẽ 21 ẽ 22 ẽ 2,T 1 ẽ 2T Time 1 Time 2 Time T 1 Time T task-related signal: Z t M t, Z t R t, Z t M t R t spontaneous random fluctuations: E 1t M t, E 2t R t unmeasured confounding: U t 10 / 29
26 Lower-level model Z 1 Z 2 Z T 1 Z T M 1 ẽ 11 M 2 ẽ 12 M T 1 ẽ 1,T 1 M T ẽ 1T E 11 E 12 E 1,T 1 E 1T R 1 R 2 R T 1 R T E 21 E 22 E 2,T 1 E 2T ẽ 21 ẽ 22 ẽ 2,T 1 ẽ 2T Time 1 Time 2 Time T 1 Time T task-related signal: Z t M t, Z t R t, Z t M t R t spontaneous random fluctuations: E 1t M t, E 2t R t unmeasured confounding: U t 10 / 29
27 Lower-level model Z 1 Z 2 Z T 1 Z T M 1 ẽ 11 M 2 ẽ 12 M T 1 ẽ 1,T 1 M T ẽ 1T E 11 E 12 E 1,T 1 E 1T R 1 R 2 R T 1 R T E 21 E 22 E 2,T 1 E 2T ẽ 21 U 1 ẽ 22 U 2 ẽ 2,T 1 U T 1 ẽ 2T U T Time 1 Time 2 Time T 1 Time T task-related signal: Z t M t, Z t R t, Z t M t R t spontaneous random fluctuations: E 1t M t, E 2t R t unmeasured confounding: U t 10 / 29
28 Causal mediation with VAR(p) autoregressive error Regression models: task-induced brain activations Structural equation modeling for causal mediation M t = Z t A + E 1t R t = Z t C + M t B + E 2t Remaining residuals: resting-state random fluctuations 6 VAR(p) model E 1t = p j=1 ω 11 j E 1,t j + p j=1 ω 21 j E 2,t j + ɛ 1t E 2t = p j=1 ω 12 j E 1,t j + p j=1 ω 22 j E 2,t j + ɛ 2t ( ) ( ) ɛ1t σ 2 N (0, Σ), Σ = 1 δσ 1 δ 2 ɛ 2t δσ 1 σ 2 σ2 2 (ɛ 1t, ɛ 2t) Gaussian white noise, (ɛ 1t, ɛ 2t) 6 Fair et al., NeuroImage,2007 = (ɛ 1s, ɛ 2t) for s t 11 / 29
29 Causal mediation with VAR(p) autoregressive error Regression models: task-induced brain activations Structural equation modeling for causal mediation M t = Z t A + E 1t R t = Z t C + M t B + E 2t Remaining residuals: resting-state random fluctuations 6 VAR(p) model E 1t = p j=1 ω 11 j E 1,t j + p j=1 ω 21 j E 2,t j + ɛ 1t E 2t = p j=1 ω 12 j E 1,t j + p j=1 ω 22 j E 2,t j + ɛ 2t ( ) ( ) ɛ1t σ 2 N (0, Σ), Σ = 1 δσ 1 δ 2 ɛ 2t δσ 1 σ 2 σ2 2 (ɛ 1t, ɛ 2t) Gaussian white noise, (ɛ 1t, ɛ 2t) 6 Fair et al., NeuroImage,2007 = (ɛ 1s, ɛ 2t) for s t 11 / 29
30 Z 1 Z 2 Z T 1 Z T M 1 ẽ 11 M 2 ẽ 12 M T 1 ẽ 1,T 1 M T ẽ 1T E 11 E 12 E 1,T 1 E 1T R 1 R 2 R T 1 R T E 21 E 22 E 2,T 1 E 2T ẽ 21 U 1 ẽ 22 U 2 ẽ 2,T 1 U T 1 ẽ 2T U T E 1t = (ω 11j E 1,t j + ω 21j E 2,t j) + ν 1U t + ẽ 1t = (ω 11j E 1,t j + ω 21j E 2,t j) + ɛ 1t j E 2t = (ω 12j E 1,t j + ω 22j E 2,t j) + ν 2U t + ẽ 2t = (ω 12j E 1,t j + ω 22j E 2,t j) + ɛ 2t j j j Assumption: additive unmeasured confounding ν 1 ν 2 0 ɛ 1t, ɛ 2t correlated 12 / 29
31 Z 1 Z 2 Z T 1 Z T M 1 ẽ 11 M 2 ẽ 12 M T 1 ẽ 1,T 1 M T ẽ 1T E 11 E 12 E 1,T 1 E 1T R 1 R 2 R T 1 R T E 21 E 22 E 2,T 1 E 2T ẽ 21 U 1 ẽ 22 U 2 ẽ 2,T 1 U T 1 ẽ 2T U T E 1t = (ω 11j E 1,t j + ω 21j E 2,t j) + ν 1U t + ẽ 1t = (ω 11j E 1,t j + ω 21j E 2,t j) + ɛ 1t j E 2t = (ω 12j E 1,t j + ω 22j E 2,t j) + ν 2U t + ẽ 2t = (ω 12j E 1,t j + ω 22j E 2,t j) + ɛ 2t j j j Assumption: additive unmeasured confounding ν 1 ν 2 0 ɛ 1t, ɛ 2t correlated 12 / 29
32 Assumptions Mediation model (A1) no interference the treatment assignment regime is the same (A2) models are correctly specified (A3) Z t is randomized with positive probabilities (A4) no unmeasured confounding effect on mediator-outcome relationship unmeasured confounding U t only affects current time mediator and outcome, and the effect is additive Granger causality (A5) {(E 1t, E 2t )} t stationary 7 7 Chang and Glover, NeuroImage, / 29
33 Granger mediation analysis (GMA): causal mediation SEM + VAR(p) M t = Z t A + E 1t E 1t = p j=1, ω 11 j E 1,t j + p j=1 ω 21 j E 2,t j + ɛ 1t R t = Z t C + M t B + E 2t E 2t = p j=1 ω 12 j E 1,t j + p j=1 ω 22 j E 2,t j + ɛ 2t (E 1t, E 2t ) s not independent difficult to derive estimators in explicit form (ɛ 1t, ɛ 2t ) Gaussian white noise: (ɛ 1t, ɛ 2t ) = (ɛ 1s, ɛ 2s ) for t s reparametrize the model M t = Z t A + p j=1 φ 1 j Z t j + p j=1 ψ 11 j M t j + p j=1 ψ 21 j R t j + ɛ 1t R t = Z t C + M t B + p j=1 φ 2 j Z t j + p j=1 ψ 12 j M t j + p j=1 ψ 22 j R t j + ɛ 2t 14 / 29
34 GMA { M t = Z ta + E 1t R t = Z tc + M tb + E 2t { E 1t = j ω 11 j E 1,t j + j ω 21 j E 2,t j + ɛ 1t E 2t = j ω 12 j E 1,t j + j ω 22 j E 2,t j + ɛ 2t Reparametrized model M t = Z ta + j φ 1 j Z t j + j ψ 11 j M t j + j ψ 21 j R t j + ɛ 1t R t = Z tc + M tb + j φ 2 j Z t j + j ψ 12 j M t j + j ψ 22 j R t j + ɛ 2t Z t Z t+1 Z t Z t+1 ẽ 1t ẽ 1,t+1 M t ẽ 1t M t+1 ẽ 1,t+1 M t M t+1 E 1t E 1,t+1 R t R t+1 R t R t+1 E 2t E 2,t+1 ẽ 2t U t ẽ 2,t+1 U t+1 ẽ 2t U t ẽ 2,t+1 U t+1 Time t Time (t + 1) Time t Time (t + 1) 15 / 29
35 GMA { M t = Z ta + E 1t R t = Z tc + M tb + E 2t { E 1t = j ω 11 j E 1,t j + j ω 21 j E 2,t j + ɛ 1t E 2t = j ω 12 j E 1,t j + j ω 22 j E 2,t j + ɛ 2t Reparametrized model M t = Z ta + j φ 1 j Z t j + j ψ 11 j M t j + j ψ 21 j R t j + ɛ 1t R t = Z tc + M tb + j φ 2 j Z t j + j ψ 12 j M t j + j ψ 22 j R t j + ɛ 2t Z t Z t+1 Z t Z t+1 ẽ 1t ẽ 1,t+1 M t ẽ 1t M t+1 ẽ 1,t+1 M t M t+1 E 1t E 1,t+1 R t R t+1 R t R t+1 E 2t E 2,t+1 ẽ 2t U t ẽ 2,t+1 U t+1 ẽ 2t U t ẽ 2,t+1 U t+1 Time t Time (t + 1) Time t Time (t + 1) 15 / 29
36 GMA (causal mediation SEM + VAR(p)) { { M t = Z ta + E 1t E 1t = j, ω11 j E 1,t j + j ω21 j E 2,t j + ɛ 1t R t = Z tc + M tb + E 2t E 2t = j ω12 j E 1,t j + j ω22 j E 2,t j + ɛ 2t Lemma Reparametrized model { M t = Z ta + p j=1 φ1 j Z t j + p j=1 ψ11 j M t j + p j=1 ψ21 j R t j + ɛ 1t R t = Z tc + M tb + p j=1 φ2 j Z t j + p j=1 ψ12 j M t j + p j=1 ψ22 j R t j + ɛ 2t Given (φ j, Ψ j ) and (A, B, C), Ω j can be uniquely determined. 16 / 29
37 M t = Z t A + p j=1 φ 1 j Z t j + p j=1 ψ 11 j M t j + p j=1 ψ 21 j R t j + ɛ 1t R t = Z t C + M t B + p j=1 φ 2 j Z t j + p j=1 ψ 12 j M t j + p j=1 ψ 22 j R t j + ɛ 2t Given δ = Cor(ɛ 1t, ɛ 2t ), estimate the rest by conditional likelihood Let θ 1 = {A, {φ 1j }, {ψ 11j }, {ψ 21j }}, θ 2 = {C, {φ 2j }, {ψ 12j }, {ψ 22j }}, ˆθ 1 = (X X) 1 X M, ˆσ 1 2 = M (I P X )M/(T p) ˆθ 2 = (X (I P M )X) 1 X (I P M )R + δˆσ 2/ˆσ 1(X X) 1 X M ˆB = (M M) 1 M(I X(X (I P M )X) 1 X (I P M ))R δˆσ 2/ˆσ 1 ˆσ 2 2 = R (I P MX P M )R/(T p)(1 δ 2 ) 17 / 29
38 M t = Z t A + p j=1 φ 1 j Z t j + p j=1 ψ 11 j M t j + p j=1 ψ 21 j R t j + ɛ 1t R t = Z t C + M t B + p j=1 φ 2 j Z t j + p j=1 ψ 12 j M t j + p j=1 ψ 22 j R t j + ɛ 2t Given δ = Cor(ɛ 1t, ɛ 2t ), estimate the rest by conditional likelihood Let θ 1 = {A, {φ 1j }, {ψ 11j }, {ψ 21j }}, θ 2 = {C, {φ 2j }, {ψ 12j }, {ψ 22j }}, ˆθ 1 = (X X) 1 X M, ˆσ 2 1 = M (I P X )M/(T p) ˆθ 2 = (X (I P M )X) 1 X (I P M )R + δˆσ 2/ˆσ 1(X X) 1 X M ˆB = (M M) 1 M(I X(X (I P M )X) 1 X (I P M ))R δˆσ 2/ˆσ 1 ˆσ 2 2 = R (I P MX P M )R/(T p)(1 δ 2 ) Theorem For fixed δ ( 1, 1), given the initial p observations, the conditional likelihood of the reparametrized model achieves the same maximum. 17 / 29
39 (δ, θ 2, B, σ 2 ) not identifiable under lower-level model time series of one participant fmri study with hierarchically nested data structure participants time series individual variation in the causal effects and overparametrization in the lower-level model 18 / 29
40 Lower-level model: for participant i M it = Z it A i + E i1t E i1t = j, ω i 11j E i1,t j + j ω i 21j E i2,t j + ɛ i1t R it = Z it C i + M it B i + E i2t E i2t = j ω i 12j E i1,t j + j ω i 22j E i2,t j + ɛ i2t Higher-level model: linear model for the coefficients A i A ɛ A i b i = B i = B + ɛ B i = b + η i C i C ɛ C i A, B, and C are the population-level causal effects of interest η i N (0, Λ) (δ i, θ i2, B i, σ 2i ) not identifiable Assumption (A6): δ i = δ across participants 19 / 29
41 l(υ) = N T N log P(R it, M it Z it, Z (p) i, M (p) t 1 i, R (p) t 1 i, θ i1, θ i2, B t 1 i, δ, σ 1i, σ 2i ) + log P(b i b, Λ) i=1 } t=1 {{ } l 1 : lower-level time series i=1 }{{} l 2 : causal coefficients Υ = {δ, b, Λ, (θ i1, θ i2, B i ), (σ 1i, σ 2i )} optimization problem max Υ:{Λ,(σ 1i,σ 2i )} S l(υ) S: constraint set for variance components 20 / 29
42 l(υ) = N T N log P(R it, M it Z it, Z (p) i, M (p) t 1 i, R (p) t 1 i, θ i1, θ i2, B t 1 i, δ, σ 1i, σ 2i ) + log P(b i b, Λ) i=1 } t=1 {{ } l 1 : lower-level time series i=1 }{{} l 2 : causal coefficients Υ = {δ, b, Λ, (θ i1, θ i2, B i ), (σ 1i, σ 2i )} optimization problem max Υ:{Λ,(σ 1i,σ 2i )} S l(υ) S: constraint set for variance components Theorem Given δ, negative l is conditional convex. 20 / 29
43 l(υ) = N T N log P(R it, M it Z it, Z (p) i, M (p) t 1 i, R (p) t 1 i, θ i1, θ i2, B t 1 i, δ, σ 1i, σ 2i ) + log P(b i b, Λ) i=1 } t=1 {{ } l 1 : lower-level time series i=1 }{{} l 2 : causal coefficients Block coordinate-descent optimize over l(υ) joint optimization of a large number of parameters fast block search for conditional convex function Two-stage optimize over l 1 first, and then over l 2 easy to compute b i s latent parameters, not actually observed 21 / 29
44 l(υ) = N T N log P(R it, M it Z it, Z (p) i, M (p) t 1 i, R (p) t 1 i, θ i1, θ i2, B t 1 i, δ, σ 1i, σ 2i ) + log P(b i b, Λ) i=1 } t=1 {{ } l 1 : lower-level time series i=1 }{{} l 2 : causal coefficients Block coordinate-descent Two-stage log likelihood (l 1 + l2) δ^ = higher level log likelihood (l 2) δ^ = δ δ 21 / 29
45 Simulation Study
46 Simulation Study N = 50 subjects, T i Poisson(100), Z it Bern(0.5) Each time point is a randomized trial A = 0.5, B = 1, C = 0.5 Λ = 0.5I 3, σ i1 = 1, σ i2 = 2 (E 1t, E 2t ) stationary: p = 1, Ω transition matrix, (cov (E 0 ) = Ξ) ( ) ( ) E1t = Ω E1,t 1 + ɛ t, ɛ t N (0, Σ), Ξ = Ω ΞΩ + Σ E 2t E 2,t 1 Methods Granger mediation using block coordinate descent (GMA-h); Granger mediation with two-stage approach (GMA-ts); CMA-h (and CMA-ts) by Zhao and Luo (2014) (R macc package); multilevel SEM (KKB) 8 ; Baron and Kenny (BK) method. 8 Kenny et al., Psychological methods, / 29
47 δ estimate ˆδ δ δ^ GMA h GMA ts CMA h CMA ts True δ^ δ GMA h GMA ts CMA h CMA ts δ δ 23 / 29
48 Direct effect Indirect effect C^ GMA h GMA ts CMA h KKB (δ = 0) BK (δ = 0) True (C = 0.5) AB^ p GMA h GMA ts CMA h KKB (δ = 0) BK (δ = 0) True (AB = 0.5) δ δ 24 / 29
49 Ω ω^ 11 ω^ 21 ω^ 12 ω^ 22 True δ GMA-h estimates 25 / 29
50 Asymptotic property ˆδ ) MSE (ˆδ δ^ N GMA h GMA ts True (δ = 0.5) MSE(δ^) N GMA h GMA ts N: number of participants; T i = N: number of time points 26 / 29
51 An fmri Study
52 fmri study N = 96 with T i = 295 time points randomized STOP/GO trials outcome (R): time series of the primary motor cortex (PMC) mediator (M): time series of the presupplementary motor area (presma) Methods GMA-h, GMA-ts CMA-h KKB BK participant-level bootstrap repeated 500 times 27 / 29
53 Causal effects Transition matrix Ω GMA h GMA ts CMA h KKB (δ = 0) BK (δ = 0) Ω^ ω^ 11 = ω^ 12 = ω^ 21 = ω^ 22 = Direct Indirect (product) δ Indirect (difference) GMA-h (-0.012, 0.209) GMA-ts (-0.041, 0.178) CMA-h (-0.045, 0.201) ω 21 0: feedback effect of PMC (R) on presma (M) p = 1, estimate of Ω 1 under VAR(1) p = 2, Ω / 29
54 Discussion
55 Discussion 9 Propose a two-level mediation model for fmri time series. remove unmeasured confounding capture both interregional and temporal dependencies address individual variation issue Jointly optimize a large number of parameters Improve estimation accuracy and consistency Identify feedback effect of (outcome) PMC on (mediator) presma Future work theory about δ identifiability and consistency (convergence rate) covariates more general form of the spatio/temporal correlation structure spatial variation in the haemodynamic response function (HRF) relax the concurrent influence assumption of unmeasured confounding JSM Mental Health Section one of two highest rate papers 29 / 29
56 Acknowledgements Advisor Xi (Rossi) Luo, PhD, Department of Biostatistics, Brown University Dissertation Committee Reader Joseph Hogan, ScD, Department of Biostatistics, Brown University Jerome Sanes, PhD, Department of Neuroscience, Brown University Eli Upfal, PhD, Department of Computer Science, Brown University Yen-Tsung Huang, MD & ScD, Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Brown University Brian Caffo, PhD, Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
57 Thank you!
arxiv: v4 [stat.ap] 7 Jul 2017
Estimating Causal Mediation Effects under Correlated Errors arxiv:40.77v4 [stat.ap] 7 Jul 07 Yi Zhao Brown University, Providence RI, USA. Xi Luo Brown University, Providence RI, USA. E-mail: xi.rossi.luo@gmail.com
More informationarxiv: v1 [stat.me] 15 Sep 2017
Biometrics XXX, 1 26 XXX XXX DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00454.x Granger Mediation Analysis of Multiple Time Series with an Application to fmri arxiv:1709.05328v1 [stat.me] 15 Sep 2017 Yi Zhao Department
More informationMediation Analysis in Neuroimaging Studies
Mediation Analysis in Neuroimaging Studies Yi Zhao Department of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health January 15, 2019 Overview Introduction Functional mediation analysis High-dimensional
More informationPackage gma. September 19, 2017
Type Package Title Granger Mediation Analysis Version 1.0 Date 2018-08-23 Package gma September 19, 2017 Author Yi Zhao , Xi Luo Maintainer Yi Zhao
More informationMIXED EFFECTS MODELS FOR TIME SERIES
Outline MIXED EFFECTS MODELS FOR TIME SERIES Cristina Gorrostieta Hakmook Kang Hernando Ombao Brown University Biostatistics Section February 16, 2011 Outline OUTLINE OF TALK 1 SCIENTIFIC MOTIVATION 2
More informationFunctional Causal Mediation Analysis with an Application to Brain Connectivity. Martin Lindquist Department of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins University
Functional Causal Mediation Analysis with an Application to Brain Connectivity Martin Lindquist Department of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins University Introduction Functional data analysis (FDA) and causal
More informationA hierarchical group ICA model for assessing covariate effects on brain functional networks
A hierarchical group ICA model for assessing covariate effects on brain functional networks Ying Guo Joint work with Ran Shi Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Emory University 06/03/2013 Ying
More informationFunctional Mediation Analysis with an Application to Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data
Functional Mediation Analysis with an Application to Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data arxiv:1805.06923v1 [stat.ap] 17 May 2018 Yi Zhao Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins School of Public
More informationStructural Nested Mean Models for Assessing Time-Varying Effect Moderation. Daniel Almirall
1 Structural Nested Mean Models for Assessing Time-Varying Effect Moderation Daniel Almirall Center for Health Services Research, Durham VAMC & Duke University Medical, Dept. of Biostatistics Joint work
More informationDynamic Causal Modelling for fmri
Dynamic Causal Modelling for fmri André Marreiros Friday 22 nd Oct. 2 SPM fmri course Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging London Overview Brain connectivity: types & definitions Anatomical connectivity
More informationFlexible mediation analysis in the presence of non-linear relations: beyond the mediation formula.
FACULTY OF PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES Flexible mediation analysis in the presence of non-linear relations: beyond the mediation formula. Modern Modeling Methods (M 3 ) Conference Beatrijs Moerkerke
More informationHST 583 FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING DATA ANALYSIS AND ACQUISITION A REVIEW OF STATISTICS FOR FMRI DATA ANALYSIS
HST 583 FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING DATA ANALYSIS AND ACQUISITION A REVIEW OF STATISTICS FOR FMRI DATA ANALYSIS EMERY N. BROWN AND CHRIS LONG NEUROSCIENCE STATISTICS RESEARCH LABORATORY DEPARTMENT
More informationEffective Connectivity & Dynamic Causal Modelling
Effective Connectivity & Dynamic Causal Modelling Hanneke den Ouden Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging Radboud University Nijmegen Advanced SPM course Zurich, Februari 13-14, 2014 Functional Specialisation
More informationCausal modeling of fmri: temporal precedence and spatial exploration
Causal modeling of fmri: temporal precedence and spatial exploration Alard Roebroeck Maastricht Brain Imaging Center (MBIC) Faculty of Psychology & Neuroscience Maastricht University Intro: What is Brain
More informationModelling temporal structure (in noise and signal)
Modelling temporal structure (in noise and signal) Mark Woolrich, Christian Beckmann*, Salima Makni & Steve Smith FMRIB, Oxford *Imperial/FMRIB temporal noise: modelling temporal autocorrelation temporal
More informationCausal Inference for Mediation Effects
Causal Inference for Mediation Effects by Jing Zhang B.S., University of Science and Technology of China, 2006 M.S., Brown University, 2008 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
More informationExtracting fmri features
Extracting fmri features PRoNTo course May 2018 Christophe Phillips, GIGA Institute, ULiège, Belgium c.phillips@uliege.be - http://www.giga.ulg.ac.be Overview Introduction Brain decoding problem Subject
More informationModern Mediation Analysis Methods in the Social Sciences
Modern Mediation Analysis Methods in the Social Sciences David P. MacKinnon, Arizona State University Causal Mediation Analysis in Social and Medical Research, Oxford, England July 7, 2014 Introduction
More informationData Analysis I: Single Subject
Data Analysis I: Single Subject ON OFF he General Linear Model (GLM) y= X fmri Signal = Design Matrix our data = what we CAN explain x β x Betas + + how much x of it we CAN + explain ε Residuals what
More informationHigh-dimensional Multivariate Mediation with Application to Neuroimaging Data
High-dimensional Multivariate Mediation with Application to Neuroimaging Data arxiv:1511.09354v2 [stat.me] 5 Sep 2016 Oliver Y. Chén 1, Ciprian M. Crainiceanu 1, Elizabeth L. Ogburn 1, Brian S. Caffo 1,
More informationUniversity of California, Berkeley
University of California, Berkeley U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series Year 2011 Paper 288 Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Natural Direct Effect Wenjing Zheng Mark J.
More informationCausal Mechanisms Short Course Part II:
Causal Mechanisms Short Course Part II: Analyzing Mechanisms with Experimental and Observational Data Teppei Yamamoto Massachusetts Institute of Technology March 24, 2012 Frontiers in the Analysis of Causal
More informationStructural Nested Mean Models for Assessing Time-Varying Effect Moderation. Daniel Almirall
1 Structural Nested Mean Models for Assessing Time-Varying Effect Moderation Daniel Almirall Center for Health Services Research, Durham VAMC & Dept. of Biostatistics, Duke University Medical Joint work
More informationCausal mediation analysis: Definition of effects and common identification assumptions
Causal mediation analysis: Definition of effects and common identification assumptions Trang Quynh Nguyen Seminar on Statistical Methods for Mental Health Research Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public
More informationCasual Mediation Analysis
Casual Mediation Analysis Tyler J. VanderWeele, Ph.D. Upcoming Seminar: April 21-22, 2017, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Explanation in Causal Inference Methods for Mediation and Interaction
More information13.1 Causal effects with continuous mediator and. predictors in their equations. The definitions for the direct, total indirect,
13 Appendix 13.1 Causal effects with continuous mediator and continuous outcome Consider the model of Section 3, y i = β 0 + β 1 m i + β 2 x i + β 3 x i m i + β 4 c i + ɛ 1i, (49) m i = γ 0 + γ 1 x i +
More informationDiscussion of Papers on the Extensions of Propensity Score
Discussion of Papers on the Extensions of Propensity Score Kosuke Imai Princeton University August 3, 2010 Kosuke Imai (Princeton) Generalized Propensity Score 2010 JSM (Vancouver) 1 / 11 The Theme and
More informationAn Introduction to Causal Mediation Analysis. Xu Qin University of Chicago Presented at the Central Iowa R User Group Meetup Aug 10, 2016
An Introduction to Causal Mediation Analysis Xu Qin University of Chicago Presented at the Central Iowa R User Group Meetup Aug 10, 2016 1 Causality In the applications of statistics, many central questions
More informationConceptual overview: Techniques for establishing causal pathways in programs and policies
Conceptual overview: Techniques for establishing causal pathways in programs and policies Antonio A. Morgan-Lopez, Ph.D. OPRE/ACF Meeting on Unpacking the Black Box of Programs and Policies 4 September
More informationStatistical Methods for Causal Mediation Analysis
Statistical Methods for Causal Mediation Analysis The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Accessed Citable
More informationComputationally Efficient Estimation of Multilevel High-Dimensional Latent Variable Models
Computationally Efficient Estimation of Multilevel High-Dimensional Latent Variable Models Tihomir Asparouhov 1, Bengt Muthen 2 Muthen & Muthen 1 UCLA 2 Abstract Multilevel analysis often leads to modeling
More informationTitle. Description. var intro Introduction to vector autoregressive models
Title var intro Introduction to vector autoregressive models Description Stata has a suite of commands for fitting, forecasting, interpreting, and performing inference on vector autoregressive (VAR) models
More informationRatio of Mediator Probability Weighting for Estimating Natural Direct and Indirect Effects
Ratio of Mediator Probability Weighting for Estimating Natural Direct and Indirect Effects Guanglei Hong University of Chicago, 5736 S. Woodlawn Ave., Chicago, IL 60637 Abstract Decomposing a total causal
More informationSome Theories about Backfitting Algorithm for Varying Coefficient Partially Linear Model
Some Theories about Backfitting Algorithm for Varying Coefficient Partially Linear Model 1. Introduction Varying-coefficient partially linear model (Zhang, Lee, and Song, 2002; Xia, Zhang, and Tong, 2004;
More informationStatistical Analysis Aspects of Resting State Functional Connectivity
Statistical Analysis Aspects of Resting State Functional Connectivity Biswal s result (1995) Correlations between RS Fluctuations of left and right motor areas Why studying resting state? Human Brain =
More informationThe General Linear Model (GLM)
he General Linear Model (GLM) Klaas Enno Stephan ranslational Neuromodeling Unit (NU) Institute for Biomedical Engineering University of Zurich & EH Zurich Wellcome rust Centre for Neuroimaging Institute
More informationAn Efficient Estimation Method for Longitudinal Surveys with Monotone Missing Data
An Efficient Estimation Method for Longitudinal Surveys with Monotone Missing Data Jae-Kwang Kim 1 Iowa State University June 28, 2012 1 Joint work with Dr. Ming Zhou (when he was a PhD student at ISU)
More informationFunctional Connectivity and Network Methods
18/Sep/2013" Functional Connectivity and Network Methods with functional magnetic resonance imaging" Enrico Glerean (MSc), Brain & Mind Lab, BECS, Aalto University" www.glerean.com @eglerean becs.aalto.fi/bml
More information9 Graphical modelling of dynamic relationships in multivariate time series
9 Graphical modelling of dynamic relationships in multivariate time series Michael Eichler Institut für Angewandte Mathematik Universität Heidelberg Germany SUMMARY The identification and analysis of interactions
More information+ + ( + ) = Linear recurrent networks. Simpler, much more amenable to analytic treatment E.g. by choosing
Linear recurrent networks Simpler, much more amenable to analytic treatment E.g. by choosing + ( + ) = Firing rates can be negative Approximates dynamics around fixed point Approximation often reasonable
More informationWhen Should We Use Linear Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Longitudinal Data?
When Should We Use Linear Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Longitudinal Data? Kosuke Imai Princeton University Asian Political Methodology Conference University of Sydney Joint
More informationA Longitudinal Look at Longitudinal Mediation Models
A Longitudinal Look at Longitudinal Mediation Models David P. MacKinnon, Arizona State University Causal Mediation Analysis Ghent, Belgium University of Ghent January 8-9, 03 Introduction Assumptions Unique
More informationCausal inference in epidemiological practice
Causal inference in epidemiological practice Willem van der Wal Biostatistics, Julius Center UMC Utrecht June 5, 2 Overview Introduction to causal inference Marginal causal effects Estimating marginal
More informationExtending causal inferences from a randomized trial to a target population
Extending causal inferences from a randomized trial to a target population Issa Dahabreh Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University issa dahabreh@brown.edu January 16, 2019 Issa Dahabreh
More informationStatistical Analysis of Causal Mechanisms
Statistical Analysis of Causal Mechanisms Kosuke Imai Princeton University April 13, 2009 Kosuke Imai (Princeton) Causal Mechanisms April 13, 2009 1 / 26 Papers and Software Collaborators: Luke Keele,
More informationOn the Power of Tests for Regime Switching
On the Power of Tests for Regime Switching joint work with Drew Carter and Ben Hansen Douglas G. Steigerwald UC Santa Barbara May 2015 D. Steigerwald (UCSB) Regime Switching May 2015 1 / 42 Motivating
More informationRevision list for Pearl s THE FOUNDATIONS OF CAUSAL INFERENCE
Revision list for Pearl s THE FOUNDATIONS OF CAUSAL INFERENCE insert p. 90: in graphical terms or plain causal language. The mediation problem of Section 6 illustrates how such symbiosis clarifies the
More informationOptimization of Designs for fmri
Optimization of Designs for fmri UCLA Advanced Neuroimaging Summer School August 2, 2007 Thomas Liu, Ph.D. UCSD Center for Functional MRI Why optimize? Scans are expensive. Subjects can be difficult to
More informationHelp! Statistics! Mediation Analysis
Help! Statistics! Lunch time lectures Help! Statistics! Mediation Analysis What? Frequently used statistical methods and questions in a manageable timeframe for all researchers at the UMCG. No knowledge
More informationSEM REX B KLINE CONCORDIA D. MODERATION, MEDIATION
ADVANCED SEM REX B KLINE CONCORDIA D1 D. MODERATION, MEDIATION X 1 DY Y DM 1 M D2 topics moderation mmr mpa D3 topics cpm mod. mediation med. moderation D4 topics cma cause mediator most general D5 MMR
More informationFor more information about how to cite these materials visit
Author(s): Kerby Shedden, Ph.D., 2010 License: Unless otherwise noted, this material is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
More informationEEG/MEG Inverse Solution Driven by fmri
EEG/MEG Inverse Solution Driven by fmri Yaroslav Halchenko CS @ NJIT 1 Functional Brain Imaging EEG ElectroEncephaloGram MEG MagnetoEncephaloGram fmri Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging others 2 Functional
More informationNew Procedures for False Discovery Control
New Procedures for False Discovery Control Christopher R. Genovese Department of Statistics Carnegie Mellon University http://www.stat.cmu.edu/ ~ genovese/ Elisha Merriam Department of Neuroscience University
More informationBootstrapping the Grainger Causality Test With Integrated Data
Bootstrapping the Grainger Causality Test With Integrated Data Richard Ti n University of Reading July 26, 2006 Abstract A Monte-carlo experiment is conducted to investigate the small sample performance
More informationState-space Model. Eduardo Rossi University of Pavia. November Rossi State-space Model Fin. Econometrics / 53
State-space Model Eduardo Rossi University of Pavia November 2014 Rossi State-space Model Fin. Econometrics - 2014 1 / 53 Outline 1 Motivation 2 Introduction 3 The Kalman filter 4 Forecast errors 5 State
More informationSpecification Errors, Measurement Errors, Confounding
Specification Errors, Measurement Errors, Confounding Kerby Shedden Department of Statistics, University of Michigan October 10, 2018 1 / 32 An unobserved covariate Suppose we have a data generating model
More informationThe General Linear Model. Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London
The General Linear Model Guillaume Flandin Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London SPM Course Lausanne, April 2012 Image time-series Spatial filter Design matrix Statistical Parametric
More informationCausal Inference with a Continuous Treatment and Outcome: Alternative Estimators for Parametric Dose-Response Functions
Causal Inference with a Continuous Treatment and Outcome: Alternative Estimators for Parametric Dose-Response Functions Joe Schafer Office of the Associate Director for Research and Methodology U.S. Census
More informationQuasi-likelihood Scan Statistics for Detection of
for Quasi-likelihood for Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, National Health Research Institutes & Department of Mathematics, National Chung Cheng University 17 December 2011 1 / 25 Outline for
More informationUsing Estimating Equations for Spatially Correlated A
Using Estimating Equations for Spatially Correlated Areal Data December 8, 2009 Introduction GEEs Spatial Estimating Equations Implementation Simulation Conclusion Typical Problem Assess the relationship
More informationPh.D. Qualifying Exam Friday Saturday, January 6 7, 2017
Ph.D. Qualifying Exam Friday Saturday, January 6 7, 2017 Put your solution to each problem on a separate sheet of paper. Problem 1. (5106) Let X 1, X 2,, X n be a sequence of i.i.d. observations from a
More informationGARCH Models. Eduardo Rossi University of Pavia. December Rossi GARCH Financial Econometrics / 50
GARCH Models Eduardo Rossi University of Pavia December 013 Rossi GARCH Financial Econometrics - 013 1 / 50 Outline 1 Stylized Facts ARCH model: definition 3 GARCH model 4 EGARCH 5 Asymmetric Models 6
More informationExperimental design of fmri studies
Methods & Models for fmri Analysis 2017 Experimental design of fmri studies Sara Tomiello With many thanks for slides & images to: Sandra Iglesias, Klaas Enno Stephan, FIL Methods group, Christian Ruff
More informationSpecifying Latent Curve and Other Growth Models Using Mplus. (Revised )
Ronald H. Heck 1 University of Hawai i at Mānoa Handout #20 Specifying Latent Curve and Other Growth Models Using Mplus (Revised 12-1-2014) The SEM approach offers a contrasting framework for use in analyzing
More informationBayesian Inference. Chapter 4: Regression and Hierarchical Models
Bayesian Inference Chapter 4: Regression and Hierarchical Models Conchi Ausín and Mike Wiper Department of Statistics Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Advanced Statistics and Data Mining Summer School
More informationWhen Should We Use Linear Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Longitudinal Data?
When Should We Use Linear Fixed Effects Regression Models for Causal Inference with Longitudinal Data? Kosuke Imai Department of Politics Center for Statistics and Machine Learning Princeton University
More information2012 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media,
2012 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising
More informationarxiv: v1 [stat.me] 15 May 2011
Working Paper Propensity Score Analysis with Matching Weights Liang Li, Ph.D. arxiv:1105.2917v1 [stat.me] 15 May 2011 Associate Staff of Biostatistics Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland
More informationMFE Financial Econometrics 2018 Final Exam Model Solutions
MFE Financial Econometrics 2018 Final Exam Model Solutions Tuesday 12 th March, 2019 1. If (X, ε) N (0, I 2 ) what is the distribution of Y = µ + β X + ε? Y N ( µ, β 2 + 1 ) 2. What is the Cramer-Rao lower
More informationMediation and Interaction Analysis
Mediation and Interaction Analysis Andrea Bellavia abellavi@hsph.harvard.edu May 17, 2017 Andrea Bellavia Mediation and Interaction May 17, 2017 1 / 43 Epidemiology, public health, and clinical research
More informationIntegrative Methods for Functional and Structural Connectivity
Integrative Methods for Functional and Structural Connectivity F. DuBois Bowman Department of Biostatistics Columbia University SAMSI Challenges in Functional Connectivity Modeling and Analysis Research
More informationSC705: Advanced Statistics Instructor: Natasha Sarkisian Class notes: Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
SC705: Advanced Statistics Instructor: Natasha Sarkisian Class notes: Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) SEM is a family of statistical techniques which builds upon multiple regression,
More informationNew Machine Learning Methods for Neuroimaging
New Machine Learning Methods for Neuroimaging Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit University College London, UK Dept of Computer Science University of Helsinki, Finland Outline Resting-state networks
More informationUniversity of California, Berkeley
University of California, Berkeley U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series Year 2015 Paper 334 Targeted Estimation and Inference for the Sample Average Treatment Effect Laura B. Balzer
More informationExploratory Causal Analysis in Bivariate Time Series Data Abstract
Exploratory Causal Analysis in Bivariate Time Series Data Abstract Many scientific disciplines rely on observational data of systems for which it is difficult (or impossible) to implement controlled experiments
More informationCausal Effect Estimation Under Linear and Log- Linear Structural Nested Mean Models in the Presence of Unmeasured Confounding
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations Summer 8-13-2010 Causal Effect Estimation Under Linear and Log- Linear Structural Nested Mean Models in the Presence of
More informationMeasurement error effects on bias and variance in two-stage regression, with application to air pollution epidemiology
Measurement error effects on bias and variance in two-stage regression, with application to air pollution epidemiology Chris Paciorek Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley and Adam
More informationF & B Approaches to a simple model
A6523 Signal Modeling, Statistical Inference and Data Mining in Astrophysics Spring 215 http://www.astro.cornell.edu/~cordes/a6523 Lecture 11 Applications: Model comparison Challenges in large-scale surveys
More informationBeyond Univariate Analyses: Multivariate Modeling of Functional Neuroimaging Data
Beyond Univariate Analyses: Multivariate Modeling of Functional Neuroimaging Data F. DuBois Bowman Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Center for Biomedical Imaging Statistics Emory University,
More informationPropensity Score Weighting with Multilevel Data
Propensity Score Weighting with Multilevel Data Fan Li Department of Statistical Science Duke University October 25, 2012 Joint work with Alan Zaslavsky and Mary Beth Landrum Introduction In comparative
More informationStochastic Dynamic Causal Modelling for resting-state fmri
Stochastic Dynamic Causal Modelling for resting-state fmri Ged Ridgway, FIL, Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, London Overview Connectivity in the brain Introduction to
More informationIdentification and Inference in Causal Mediation Analysis
Identification and Inference in Causal Mediation Analysis Kosuke Imai Luke Keele Teppei Yamamoto Princeton University Ohio State University November 12, 2008 Kosuke Imai (Princeton) Causal Mediation Analysis
More informationIntroduction to Simple Linear Regression
Introduction to Simple Linear Regression Yang Feng http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~yangfeng Yang Feng (Columbia University) Introduction to Simple Linear Regression 1 / 68 About me Faculty in the Department
More informationIdentification, Inference, and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects
Identification, Inference, and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects Kosuke Imai Luke Keele Teppei Yamamoto First Draft: November 4, 2008 This Draft: January 15, 2009 Abstract Causal mediation
More informationThe General Linear Model (GLM)
The General Linear Model (GLM) Dr. Frederike Petzschner Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU) Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich & ETH Zurich With many thanks for slides & images
More informationThe ASL signal. Parenchy mal signal. Venous signal. Arterial signal. Input Function (Label) Dispersion: (t e -kt ) Relaxation: (e -t/t1a )
Lecture Goals Other non-bold techniques (T2 weighted, Mn contrast agents, SSFP, Dynamic Diffusion, ASL) Understand Basic Principles in Spin labeling : spin inversion, flow vs. perfusion ASL variations
More informationPartial factor modeling: predictor-dependent shrinkage for linear regression
modeling: predictor-dependent shrinkage for linear Richard Hahn, Carlos Carvalho and Sayan Mukherjee JASA 2013 Review by Esther Salazar Duke University December, 2013 Factor framework The factor framework
More informationModel Specification Testing in Nonparametric and Semiparametric Time Series Econometrics. Jiti Gao
Model Specification Testing in Nonparametric and Semiparametric Time Series Econometrics Jiti Gao Department of Statistics School of Mathematics and Statistics The University of Western Australia Crawley
More informationAbstract Title Page. Title: Degenerate Power in Multilevel Mediation: The Non-monotonic Relationship Between Power & Effect Size
Abstract Title Page Title: Degenerate Power in Multilevel Mediation: The Non-monotonic Relationship Between Power & Effect Size Authors and Affiliations: Ben Kelcey University of Cincinnati SREE Spring
More informationBayesian modelling of fmri time series
Bayesian modelling of fmri time series Pedro A. d. F. R. Højen-Sørensen, Lars K. Hansen and Carl Edward Rasmussen Department of Mathematical Modelling, Building 321 Technical University of Denmark DK-28
More informationBayesian Inference. Chapter 4: Regression and Hierarchical Models
Bayesian Inference Chapter 4: Regression and Hierarchical Models Conchi Ausín and Mike Wiper Department of Statistics Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Master in Business Administration and Quantitative
More informationSpatial Source Filtering. Outline EEG/ERP. ERPs) Event-related Potentials (ERPs( EEG
Integration of /MEG/fMRI Vince D. Calhoun, Ph.D. Director, Image Analysis & MR Research The MIND Institute Outline fmri/ data Three Approaches to integration/fusion Prediction Constraints 2 nd Level Fusion
More informationInference With Interference Between Units in an f MRI Experiment of Motor Inhibition
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Statistics Papers Wharton Faculty Research 2012 Inference With Interference Between Units in an f MRI Experiment of Motor Inhibition Xi Luo Dylan S. Small University
More informationExperimental design of fmri studies & Resting-State fmri
Methods & Models for fmri Analysis 2016 Experimental design of fmri studies & Resting-State fmri Sandra Iglesias With many thanks for slides & images to: Klaas Enno Stephan, FIL Methods group, Christian
More informationTowards a Regression using Tensors
February 27, 2014 Outline Background 1 Background Linear Regression Tensorial Data Analysis 2 Definition Tensor Operation Tensor Decomposition 3 Model Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Data Analysis
More informationA Unified Estimation Framework for State- Related Changes in Effective Brain Connectivity
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia From the SelectedWorks of Chee-Ming Ting PhD 6 A Unified Estimation Framework for State- Related Changes in Effective Brain Connectivity Chee-Ming Ting, PhD S. Balqis Samdin
More informationApproximate Bayesian Computation
Approximate Bayesian Computation Michael Gutmann https://sites.google.com/site/michaelgutmann University of Helsinki and Aalto University 1st December 2015 Content Two parts: 1. The basics of approximate
More informationUnpacking the Black-Box: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies
Unpacking the Black-Box: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies Kosuke Imai Princeton University Joint work with Keele (Ohio State), Tingley (Harvard), Yamamoto (Princeton)
More informationSIMPLE EXAMPLES OF ESTIMATING CAUSAL EFFECTS USING TARGETED MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION
Johns Hopkins University, Dept. of Biostatistics Working Papers 3-3-2011 SIMPLE EXAMPLES OF ESTIMATING CAUSAL EFFECTS USING TARGETED MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION Michael Rosenblum Johns Hopkins Bloomberg
More informationState-space Model. Eduardo Rossi University of Pavia. November Rossi State-space Model Financial Econometrics / 49
State-space Model Eduardo Rossi University of Pavia November 2013 Rossi State-space Model Financial Econometrics - 2013 1 / 49 Outline 1 Introduction 2 The Kalman filter 3 Forecast errors 4 State smoothing
More information