Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems. Process Dynamics and Control


 Arline Austin
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems Process Dynamics and Control 1
2 OpenLoop Process The study of dynamics was limited to openloop systems Observe process behavior as a result of specific input signals 2
3 ClosedLoop System In study and design of control systems, we are concerned with the dynamic behavior of a controlled or Closedloop Systems Feedback Control System 3
4 Feedback Control Control is meant to provide regulation of process outputs about a reference,, despite inherent disturbances Controller System Feedback Control System The deviation of the plant output,,from its intended reference is used to make appropriate adjustments in the plant input, 4
5 Feedback Control Process is a combination of sensors and actuators Controller is a computer (or operator) that performs the required manipulations Computer Actuator Process Sensor e.g. Classical one degreeoffreedom feedback control loop 5
6 Block Diagram of ClosedLoop Process ClosedLoop Transfer Function Computer Actuator Process Sensor  OpenLoop Process Transfer Function  Controller Transfer Function  Sensor Transfer Function  Actuator Transfer Function 6
7 ClosedLoop Transfer Function For analysis, we assume that the impact of actuator and sensor dynamics are negligible Closedloop process reduces to the block diagram: Feedback Control System 7
8 Closedloop Transfer Functions The closedloop process has Two inputs The reference signal The disturbance signal Two outputs The manipulated (control) variable signal The output (controlled) variable signal We want to see how the inputs affect the outputs Transfer functions relating, and, 8
9 Closedloop Transfer function There are four basic transfer functions They arise from three socalled sensitivity functions Highlights the dilemma of control system design Only one degree of freedom to shape the three sensitivity functions 9
10 Closedloop Transfer Functions Sensitivity functions: The sensitivity function: The complementary sensitivity function: The control sensitivity function: 10
11 Closedloop Transfer Functions Overall transfer function for the output: SERVO RESPONSE REGULATORY RESPONSE Servo response is the response of the output to setpoint change Regulatory response is the response of the output to disturbance changes 11
12 Closedloop Transfer Functions Servo mechanism requires that: Regulatory response requires that: Since The two objectives are complementary 12
13 Closedloop Transfer Functions Note that or requires that the controller is large This leads to large control sensitivity 13
14 PID Controller Most widespread choice for the controller is the PID controller The acronym PID stands for: P  Proportional I  Integral D  Derivative PID Controllers: greater than 90% of all control implementations dates back to the 1930s very well studied and understood optimal structure for first and second order processes (given some assumptions) always first choice when designing a control system 14
15 PID Control PID Control Equation Proportional Action Derivative Action Integral Action Controller Bias PID Controller Parameters K c Proportional gain Integral Time Constant Derivative Time Constant Controller Bias 15
16 PID Control PID Controller Transfer Function or: Note: numerator of PID transfer function cancels second order dynamics denominator provides integration to remove possibility of steadystate errors 16
17 PID Control Controller Transfer Function: or, Note: Many variations of this controller exist Easily implemented in MATLAB/SIMULINK each mode (or action) of controller is better studied individually 17
18 Proportional Feedback Form: Transfer function: or, Closedloop form: 18
19 Proportional Feedback Example: Given first order process: for Ponly feedback closedloop dynamics: ClosedLoop Time Constant 19
20 Proportional Feedback Final response: Note: for zero offset response we require Tracking Error Disturbance rejection Possible to eliminate offset with Ponly feedback (requires infinite controller gain) Need different control action to eliminate offset (integral) 20
21 Proportional Feedback Servo dynamics of a first order process under proportional feedback increasing controller gain eliminates offset 21
22 Highorder process e.g. second order underdamped process Proportional Feedback increasing controller gain reduces offset, speeds response and increases oscillation 22
23 Proportional Feedback Important points: proportional feedback does not change the order of the system started with a first order process closedloop process also first order order of characteristic polynomial is invariant under proportional feedback speed of response of closedloop process is directly affected by controller gain increasing controller gain reduces the closedloop time constant in general, proportional feedback reduces (does not eliminate) offset speeds up response for oscillatory processes, makes closedloop process more oscillatory 23
24 Integral Control Integrator is included to eliminate offset provides reset action usually added to a proportional controller to produce a PI controller PID controller with derivative action turned off PI is the most widely used controller in industry optimal structure for first order processes PI controller form Transfer function model 24
25 PI Feedback Closedloop response more complex expression degree of denominator is increased by one Assuming the closedloop system is stable, we get 25
26 PI Feedback Example PI control of a first order process Closedloop transfer function Note: offset is removed closedloop is second order 26
27 PI Feedback Example (contd) effect of integral time constant and controller gain on closedloop dynamics (time constant) natural period of oscillation damping coefficient integral time constant and controller gain can induce oscillation and change the period of oscillation 27
28 Effect of integral time constant on servo dynamics PI Feedback Small integral time constant induces oscillatory (underdamped) closedloop response 28
29 PI Feedback Effect of controller gain on servo dynamics affects speed of response increasing gain eliminates offset quicker 29
30 Effect of integral action of regulatory response PI Feedback reducing integral time constant removes effect of disturbances makes behavior more oscillatory 30
31 PI Feedback Important points: integral action increases order of the system in closedloop PI controller has two tuning parameters that can independently affect speed of response final response (offset) integral action eliminates offset integral action should be small compared to proportional action tuned to slowly eliminate offset can increase or cause oscillation can be destabilizing 31
32 Derivative of error signal Used to compensate for trends in output measure of speed of error signal change provides predictive or anticipatory action Derivative Action P and I modes only response to past and current errors Derivative mode has the form if error is increasing, decrease control action if error is decreasing, decrease control action Usually implemented in PID form 32
33 PID Feedback Transfer Function Closedloop Transfer Function Slightly more complicated than PI form 33
34 PID Feedback Example: PID Control of a first order process Closedloop transfer function 34
35 PID Feedback Effect of derivative action on servo dynamics Increasing derivative action leads to a more sluggish servo response 35
36 PID Feedback Effect of derivative action on regulatory response increasing derivative action reduces impact of disturbances on controlled variable slows down servo response and affects oscillation of process 36
37 PD Feedback PD Controller Proportional Derivative Control is common in mechanical systems Arise in application for systems with an integrating behaviour Example : System in series with an integrator 37
38 PD Feedback Transfer Function Closedloop Transfer Function Slightly more complicated than PI form 38
39 PD Feedback DC Motor example: In terms of angular velocity (velocity control) In terms of the angle (position control) 39
40 PD Feedback Closedloop transfer function Simplifying Notice that Same effect as a PID controller. 40
41 Derivative Action Important Points: Characteristic polynomial is similar to PI derivative action does not increase the order of the system adding derivative action affects the period of oscillation of the process good for disturbance rejection poor for tracking the PID controller has three tuning parameters and can independently affect, speed of response final response (offset) servo and regulatory response derivative action should be small compared to integral action has a stabilizing influence difficult to use for noisy signals usually modified in practical implementation 41
42 Closedloop Stability Every control problem involves a consideration of closedloop stability General concepts: Bounded Input Bounded Output (BIBO) Stability: An (unconstrained) linear system is said to be stable if the output response is bounded for all bounded inputs. Otherwise it is unstable. Comments: Stability is much easier to prove than instability This is just one type of stability 42
43 Closedloop Stability Closedloop dynamics Let then, The closedloop transfer functions have a common denominator called the characteristic polynomial 43
44 Closedloop stability General Stability criterion: A closedloop feedback control system is stable if and only if all roots of the characteristic polynomial are negative or have negative real parts. Otherwise, the system is unstable. Unstable region is the right half plane of the complex plane. Valid for any linear systems. 44
45 Closedloop Stability Problem reduces to finding roots of a polynomial (for polynomial systems, without delay) Easy (1990s) way : MATLAB function ROOTS (or POLE) Traditional: 1. Routh array: Test for positivity of roots of a polynomial 2. Direct substitution Complex axis separates stable and unstable regions Find controller gain that yields purely complex roots 3. Root locus diagram Vary location of poles as controller gain is varied Of limited use 45
46 Closedloop stability Routh array for a polynomial equation is where Elements of left column must be positive to have roots with negative real parts 46
47 Example: Routh Array Characteristic polynomial Polynomial Coefficients Routh Array 2. 36s s 4! 0. 58s s s = 0 a5 = 2. 36, a4 = 149., a3 =! 0. 58, a2 = 121., a1 = 0. 42, a0 = a5( 2. 36) a3(! 0. 58) a1( 0. 42) a4( 149. ) a2( 121. ) a0( 0. 78) b1 (! 2. 50) b2 (! 0. 82) b3( 0) c1( 0. 72) c2 ( 0. 78) d1( 189. ) d2( 0) e1( 0. 78) Closedloop system is unstable 47
48 Direct Substitution Technique to find gain value that destabilizes the system. Observation: Process becomes unstable when poles appear on right half plane Find value of that yields purely complex poles Strategy: Start with characteristic polynomial Write characteristic equation: Substitute for complex pole Solve for and 48
49 Example: Direct Substitution Characteristic equation Substitution for Real Part Complex Part System is unstable if 49
50 Root Locus Diagram Old method that consists in plotting poles of characteristic polynomial as controller gain is changed e.g. Characteristic polynomial 50
51 Stability and Performance Given plant model, we assume a stable closedloop system can be designed Once stability is achieved  need to consider performance of closedloop process  stability is not enough All poles of closedloop transfer function have negative real parts  can we place these poles to get a good performance S C Space of all Controllers P S: Stabilizing Controllers for a given plant P: Controllers that meet performance 51
52 Controller Tuning Can be achieved by Direct synthesis : Specify servo transfer function required and calculate required controller  assume plant = model Internal Model Control: Morari et al. (86) Similar to direct synthesis except that plant and plant model are concerned Pole placement Tuning relations: CohenCoon  1/4 decay ratio designs based on ISE, IAE and ITAE Frequency response techniques Bode criterion Nyquist criterion Field tuning and retuning 52
53 Direct Synthesis From closedloop transfer function Isolate For a desired trajectory and plant model, controller is given by not necessarily PID form inverse of process model to yield polezero cancellation (often inexact because of process approximation) used with care with unstable process or processes with RHP zeroes 53
54 Direct Synthesis 1. Perfect Control cannot be achieved, requires infinite gain 2. Closedloop process with finite settling time For 1st order openloop process, For 2nd order openloop process,, it leads to PI control, get PID control 3. Processes with delay requires again, 1st order leads to PI control 2nd order leads to PID control 54
55 IMC Controller Tuning Closedloop transfer function In terms of implemented controller, G c 55
56 1. Process model factored into two parts IMC Controller Tuning where to 1. contains deadtime and RHP zeros, steadystate gain scaled 2. Controller where is the IMC filter The constant is chosen such the IMC controller is proper based on polezero cancellation 56
57 Example PID Design using IMC and Direct synthesis for the process Process parameters: 1. Direct Synthesis: (Taylor Series) (Padé) Servo Transfer function 57
58 Example 1. IMC Tuning: a) Taylor Series: Filter Controller (PI) b) Padé approximation: Filter Controller (Commercial PID) 58
59 Example Servo Response 59
60 Example Regulatory response 60
61 IMC Tuning For unstable processes, Must modify IMC filter such that the value of at is 1 Usual modification Strategy is to specify and solve for such that 61
62 Example Consider the process Consider the filter Let then solve for Yields a PI controller 62
63 Example Servo response 63
64 Pole placement Given a process model a controller of the form, and an arbitrary polynomial Under what condition does there exist a unique controller pair and such that 64
65 We say that and any common factors Pole placement are prime if they do not have Result: Assume that and are (co) prime. Let be an arbitraty polynomial of degree. Then there exist polynomials and of degree such that 65
66 Pole Placement Example This is a second order system The polynomials and are prime The required degree of the characteristic polynomial is The degree of the controller polynomial and are Controller is given by 66
67 Pole Placement Performance objective: 3rd order polynomial Characteristic polynomial is given by Solving for and coefficients on both sides by equating polynomial Obtain a system of 4 equations in 4 unknowns 67
68 Pole Placement System of equations Solution is Corresponding controller is a PI controller 68
69 Tuning Relations Process reaction curve method: based on approximation of process using first order plus delay model 1. Step in U is introduced 2. Observe behavior 3. Fit a first order plus dead time model Manual Control 69
70 Tuning Relations Process response Obtain tuning from tuning correlations ZieglerNichols CohenCoon ISE, IAE or ITAE optimal tuning relations 70
71 ZieglerNichols Tunings Controller Ponly PI PID  Note presence of inverse of process gain in controller gain  Introduction of integral action requires reduction in controller gain  Increase gain when derivation action is introduced Example: PI: PID: 71
72 Example ZieglerNichols Tunings: Servo response 72
73 Example Regulatory Response ZN tuning Oscillatory with considerable overshoot Tends to be conservative 73
74 CohenCoon Tuning Relations Designed to achieve 1/4 decay ratio fast decrease in amplitude of oscillation Controller K c T i T d Ponly ( 1/ )(! /" )[1 + " / 3! ] PI K p ( 1/ )(! /" )[0.9 + " /12! ] K p "[30 + 3( " /!)] ( " /! ) PID (1/ K p 3" + 16! )(! /" )[ ] 12! "[32 + 6( " /! )] ( " /! ) 4" 11+ 2( " /! ) Example: PI: K c =10.27 τ I =18.54 PID: K c =15.64 τ I =19.75 τ d =
75 Tuning relations CohenCoon: Servo More aggressive/ Higher controller gains Undesirable response for most cases 75
76 Tuning Relations CohenCoon: Regulatory Highly oscillatory Very aggressive 76
77 Integral Error Relations 1. Integral of absolute error (IAE) IAE " =! e ( t ) dt 0 2. Integral of squared error (ISE) penalizes large errors 3. Integral of timeweighted absolute error (ITAE) penalizes errors that persist ITAE is most conservative ITAE is preferred " ISE =! e ( t ) 2 dt 0 ITAE " =! t e ( t ) dt 0 77
78 ITAE Relations Choose K c, τ I and τ d that minimize the ITAE: For a first order plus dead time model, solve for:! ITAE! ITAE! ITAE = 0, = 0, = 0! Kc!" I!" d Design for Load and Setpoint changes yield different ITAE optimum Type of Type of Mode A B Input Controller Load PI P I Load PID P I D Set point PI P I Set point PID P I D
79 ITAE Relations From table, we get Load Settings: ( ) B Y = A! = KK d c = " " " " = I " Setpoint Settings: B " d ( ) c ", ( ) Y = A! = KK = " " = A + B! " I " Example 79
80 ITAE Relations Example (contd) Setpoint Settings Kc Load Settings: Kc ( )! KKc = = = K = = ( )! KKc = = = = = K 0. 3 ( ) ( )!! = " I 30 = !! I = = = ! d! = 0 308( ) = ! d = ! = ! "! = I 30 = !! I = = = ! d! = 0 381( ) = ! d = ! =
81 ITAE Relations Servo Response design for load changes yields large overshoots for setpoint changes 81
82 ITAE Relations Regulatory response 82
83 Tuning Relations In all correlations, controller gain should be inversely proportional to process gain Controller gain is reduced when derivative action is introduced Controller gain is reduced as increases! " Integral time constant and derivative constant should increase as increases In general, ZieglerNichols and CohenCoon tuning relations yield aggressive control with oscillatory response (requires detuning)! d! I = ITAE provides conservative performance (not aggressive)! " 83
Open Loop Tuning Rules
Open Loop Tuning Rules Based on approximate process models Process Reaction Curve: The process reaction curve is an approximate model of the process, assuming the process behaves as a first order plus
More informationCM 3310 Process Control, Spring Lecture 21
CM 331 Process Control, Spring 217 Instructor: Dr. om Co Lecture 21 (Back to Process Control opics ) General Control Configurations and Schemes. a) Basic SingleInput/SingleOutput (SISO) Feedback Figure
More informationIndex. INDEX_p /15/02 3:08 PM Page 765
INDEX_p.765770 11/15/02 3:08 PM Page 765 Index N A Adaptive control, 144 Adiabatic reactors, 465 Algorithm, control, 5 Allpass factorization, 257 Allpass, frequency response, 225 Amplitude, 216 Amplitude
More information(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:
1. (a) The open loop transfer function of a unity feedback control system is given by G(S) = K/S(1+0.1S)(1+S) (i) Determine the value of K so that the resonance peak M r of the system is equal to 1.4.
More informationAdditional ClosedLoop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 14)
Appendix J Additional ClosedLoop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 4) APPENDIX CONTENTS J. ClosedLoop Behavior J.2 Bode Stability Criterion J.3 Nyquist Stability Criterion J.4 Gain
More informationAnalysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain
Chapter 6 Analysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain 6. Concepts of feedback control Given a system, we can classify it as an open loop or a closed loop depends on the usage of the feedback.
More informationCHAPTER 6 CLOSED LOOP STUDIES
180 CHAPTER 6 CLOSED LOOP STUDIES Improvement of closedloop performance needs proper tuning of controller parameters that requires process model structure and the estimation of respective parameters which
More informationTuning of Internal Model Control Proportional Integral Derivative Controller for Optimized Control
Tuning of Internal Model Control Proportional Integral Derivative Controller for Optimized Control Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the award of Degree of MASTER OF ENGINEERING
More informationIan G. Horn, Jeffery R. Arulandu, Christopher J. Gombas, Jeremy G. VanAntwerp, and Richard D. Braatz*
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 996, 35, 3437344 3437 PROCESS DESIGN AND CONTROL Improved Filter Design in Internal Model Control Ian G. Horn, Jeffery R. Arulandu, Christopher J. Gombas, Jeremy G. VanAntwerp, and
More information10/8/2015. Control Design. Poleplacement by statespace methods. Process to be controlled. State controller
Poleplacement by statespace methods Control Design To be considered in controller design * Compensate the effect of load disturbances * Reduce the effect of measurement noise * Setpoint following (target
More informationPID Control. Objectives
PID Control Objectives The objective of this lab is to study basic design issues for proportionalintegralderivative control laws. Emphasis is placed on transient responses and steadystate errors. The
More informationChapter 8. Feedback Controllers. Figure 8.1 Schematic diagram for a stirredtank blending system.
Feedback Controllers Figure 8.1 Schematic diagram for a stirredtank blending system. 1 Basic Control Modes Next we consider the three basic control modes starting with the simplest mode, proportional
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUB.NAME : CONTROL SYSTEMS BRANCH : ECE YEAR : II SEMESTER: IV 1. What is control system? 2. Define open
More informationVALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE
VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur 603 203 DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK V SEMESTER IC650 CONTROL SYSTEMS Regulation 203 Academic Year 207 8 Prepared
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review
Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the splane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUB.NAME : CONTROL SYSTEMS STAFF NAME: Mr. P.NARASIMMAN BRANCH : ECE Mr.K.R.VENKATESAN YEAR : II SEMESTER
More informationThe output voltage is given by,
71 The output voltage is given by, = (3.1) The inductor and capacitor values of the Boost converter are derived by having the same assumption as that of the Buck converter. Now the critical value of the
More informationIMC based automatic tuning method for PID controllers in a Smith predictor configuration
Computers and Chemical Engineering 28 (2004) 281 290 IMC based automatic tuning method for PID controllers in a Smith predictor configuration Ibrahim Kaya Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering,
More informationAutonomous Mobile Robot Design
Autonomous Mobile Robot Design Topic: Guidance and Control Introduction and PID Loops Dr. Kostas Alexis (CSE) Autonomous Robot Challenges How do I control where to go? Autonomous Mobile Robot Design Topic:
More informationSimple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning
Journal of Process Control 3 (2003) 29 309 www.elsevier.com/locate/jprocont Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning Sigurd Sogestad* Department of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian
More informationChapter 7  Solved Problems
Chapter 7  Solved Problems Solved Problem 7.1. A continuous time system has transfer function G o (s) given by G o (s) = B o(s) A o (s) = 2 (s 1)(s + 2) = 2 s 2 + s 2 (1) Find a controller of minimal
More informationTuning Method of PI Controller with Desired Damping Coefficient for a Firstorder Lag Plus Deadtime System
PID' Brescia (Italy), March 80, 0 FrA. Tuning Method of PI Controller with Desired Damping Coefficient for a Firstorder Lag Plus Deadtime System Yuji Yamakawa*. Yohei Okada** Takanori Yamazaki***. Shigeru
More informationUniversity of Science and Technology, Sudan Department of Chemical Engineering.
ISO 91:28 Certified Volume 3, Issue 6, November 214 Design and Decoupling of Control System for a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) Georgeous, N.B *1 and Gasmalseed, G.A, Abdalla, B.K (12) University
More informationChemical Process Dynamics and Control. Aisha Osman Mohamed Ahmed Department of Chemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Red Sea University
Chemical Process Dynamics and Control Aisha Osman Mohamed Ahmed Department of Chemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Red Sea University 1 Chapter 4 System Stability 2 Chapter Objectives End of this
More informationPID Tuning of Plants With Time Delay Using Root Locus
San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research Summer 2011 PID Tuning of Plants With Time Delay Using Root Locus Greg Baker San Jose State University
More informationSAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE SAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015 Lecturer: Michael Ruderman Problem 1: Frequencydomain analysis and control design (15 pt) Given is a
More informationAutomatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21211 1 / 39 Feedback
More informationK c < K u K c = K u K c > K u step 4 Calculate and implement PID parameters using the the ZieglerNichols tuning tables: 30
1.5 QUANTITIVE PID TUNING METHODS Tuning PID parameters is not a trivial task in general. Various tuning methods have been proposed for dierent model descriptions and performance criteria. 1.5.1 CONTINUOUS
More informationFEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEMS
FEEDBAC CONTROL SYSTEMS. Control System Design. Open and ClosedLoop Control Systems 3. Why ClosedLoop Control? 4. Case Study  Speed Control of a DC Motor 5. SteadyState Errors in Unity Feedback Control
More informationSimulation Study on Pressure Control using Nonlinear Input/Output Linearization Method and Classical PID Approach
Simulation Study on Pressure Control using Nonlinear Input/Output Linearization Method and Classical PID Approach Ufuk Bakirdogen*, Matthias Liermann** *Institute for Fluid Power Drives and Controls (IFAS),
More informationInverted Pendulum. Objectives
Inverted Pendulum Objectives The objective of this lab is to experiment with the stabilization of an unstable system. The inverted pendulum problem is taken as an example and the animation program gives
More informationPID control of FOPDT plants with dominant dead time based on the modulus optimum criterion
Archives of Control Sciences Volume 6LXII, 016 No. 1, pages 5 17 PID control of FOPDT plants with dominant dead time based on the modulus optimum criterion JAN CVEJN The modulus optimum MO criterion can
More informationB11. Closedloop control. Chapter 1. Fundamentals of closedloop control technology. Festo Didactic Process Control System
B11 Chapter 1 Fundamentals of closedloop control technology B12 This chapter outlines the differences between closedloop and openloop control and gives an introduction to closedloop control technology.
More informationController Design Based on Transient Response Criteria. Chapter 12 1
Controller Design Based on Transient Response Criteria Chapter 12 1 Desirable Controller Features 0. Stable 1. Quik responding 2. Adequate disturbane rejetion 3. Insensitive to model, measurement errors
More informationQuanser NIELVIS Trainer (QNET) Series: QNET Experiment #02: DC Motor Position Control. DC Motor Control Trainer (DCMCT) Student Manual
Quanser NIELVIS Trainer (QNET) Series: QNET Experiment #02: DC Motor Position Control DC Motor Control Trainer (DCMCT) Student Manual Table of Contents 1 Laboratory Objectives1 2 References1 3 DCMCT Plant
More informationControl of MIMO processes. 1. Introduction. Control of MIMO processes. Control of MultipleInput, Multiple Output (MIMO) Processes
Control of MIMO processes Control of MultipleInput, Multiple Output (MIMO) Processes Statistical Process Control Feedforward and ratio control Cascade control Split range and selective control Control
More informationDynamic Response. Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu. Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology.
Dynamic Response Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology Chapter 3 Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu (EEE@IYTE) EE362 Feedback Control
More informationAnalysis of SISO Control Loops
Chapter 5 Analysis of SISO Control Loops Topics to be covered For a given controller and plant connected in feedback we ask and answer the following questions: Is the loop stable? What are the sensitivities
More informationDynamics and PID control. Process dynamics
Dynamics and PID control Sigurd Skogestad Process dynamics Things take time Step response (response of output y to step in input u): k = Δy( )/ Δu process gain  process time constant (63%)  process time
More informationA unified doubleloop multiscale control strategy for NMP integratingunstable systems
Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience A unified doubleloop multiscale control strategy for NMP integratingunstable systems This content has been downloaded from IOPscience.
More informationRobust Internal Model Control for Impulse Elimination of Singular Systems
International Journal of Control Science and Engineering ; (): 7 DOI:.59/j.control.. Robust Internal Model Control for Impulse Elimination of Singular Systems M. M. Share Pasandand *, H. D. Taghirad Department
More informationModel based control design
Model based control design Alf Isaksson September, 999 Supplied as supplement to course book in Automatic Control Basic course (Reglerteknik AK) Objective: To introduce some general approaches to model
More informationRoot Locus. Motivation Sketching Root Locus Examples. School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. ME375 Root Locus  1
Root Locus Motivation Sketching Root Locus Examples ME375 Root Locus  1 Servo Table Example DC Motor Position Control The block diagram for position control of the servo table is given by: D 0.09 Position
More informationLaboratory 11 Control Systems Laboratory ECE3557. State Feedback Controller for Position Control of a Flexible Joint
Laboratory 11 State Feedback Controller for Position Control of a Flexible Joint 11.1 Objective The objective of this laboratory is to design a full state feedback controller for endpoint position control
More informationProject Lab Report. Michael Hall. Hao Zhu. Neil Nevgi. Station 6. Ta: Yan Cui
Project Lab Report Michael Hall Hao Zhu Neil Nevgi Station 6 Ta: Yan Cui Nov. 12 th 2012 Table of Contents: Executive Summary 3 Modeling Report.47 System Identification 711 Control Design..1115 Simulation
More informationLearn2Control Laboratory
Learn2Control Laboratory Version 3.2 Summer Term 2014 1 This Script is for use in the scope of the Process Control lab. It is in no way claimed to be in any scientific way complete or unique. Errors should
More informationControl Systems! Copyright 2017 by Robert Stengel. All rights reserved. For educational use only.
Control Systems Robert Stengel Robotics and Intelligent Systems MAE 345, Princeton University, 2017 Analog vs. digital systems Continuous and Discretetime Dynamic Models Frequency Response Transfer Functions
More informationCBE507 LECTURE III Controller Design Using Statespace Methods. Professor Dae Ryook Yang
CBE507 LECTURE III Controller Design Using Statespace Methods Professor Dae Ryook Yang Fall 2013 Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering Korea University Korea University III 1 Overview States What
More informationAlireza Mousavi Brunel University
Alireza Mousavi Brunel University 1 » Control Process» Control Systems Design & Analysis 2 OpenLoop Control: Is normally a simple switch on and switch off process, for example a light in a room is switched
More informationEE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems
1 / 17 EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems Section 7: McMaster University Winter 2018 2 / 17 Outline 1 4 / 17 Cascade compensation Throughout this lecture we consider the case of H(s) = 1. We
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO THE CONTROL THEORY
OpenLoop controller An OpenLoop (OL) controller is characterized by no direct connection between the output of the system and its input; therefore external disturbance, nonlinear dynamics and parameter
More informationA NEW APPROACH TO MIXED H 2 /H OPTIMAL PI/PID CONTROLLER DESIGN
Copyright 2002 IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A NEW APPROACH TO MIXED H 2 /H OPTIMAL PI/PID CONTROLLER DESIGN Chyi Hwang,1 ChunYen Hsiao Department of Chemical Engineering National
More informationCompetences. The smart choice of Fluid Control Systems
Competences The smart choice of Fluid Control Systems Contents 1. Openloop and closedloop control Page 4 1.1. Function and sequence of an openloop control system Page 4 1.2. Function and sequence of
More informationControl Lab. Thermal Plant. Chriss Grimholt
Control Lab Thermal Plant Chriss Grimholt Process System Engineering Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology October 3, 23 C. Grimholt (NTNU) Thermal Plant October
More informationProcess Control and Instrumentation Prof. A. K. Jana Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
Process Control and Instrumentation Prof. A. K. Jana Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur Lecture  17 Feedback Control Schemes (Contd.) In the last class we discussed
More informationA New Internal Model Control Method for MIMO OverActuated Systems
Vol. 7, No., 26 A New Internal Model Control Method for MIMO OverActuated Systems Ahmed Dhahri University of Tuins El Manar, National Engineering School of Tunis, Laboratory of research in Automatic Control,
More informationProportional, Integral & Derivative Control Design. Raktim Bhattacharya
AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Proportional, ntegral & Derivative Control Design Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University
More informationComparative study of three practical IMC algorithms with inner controller of first and second order
Journal of Electrical Engineering, Electronics, Control and Computer Science JEEECCS, Volume 2, Issue 4, pages 228, 206 Comparative study of three practical IMC algorithms with inner controller of first
More informationPitch Rate CAS Design Project
Pitch Rate CAS Design Project Washington University in St. Louis MAE 433 Control Systems Bob Rowe 4.4.7 Design Project Part 2 This is the second part of an ongoing project to design a control and stability
More informationControl Systems II. ETH, MAVT, IDSC, Lecture 4 17/03/2017. G. Ducard
Control Systems II ETH, MAVT, IDSC, Lecture 4 17/03/2017 Lecture plan: Control Systems II, IDSC, 2017 SISO Control Design 24.02 Lecture 1 Recalls, Introductory case study 03.03 Lecture 2 Cascaded Control
More informationAPPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS
Version: 1 CONTROL APPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS TEX d: Feb. 17, 214 PREVIEW We show that the transfer function and conditions of stability for linear systems can be studied using Laplace transforms. Table
More informationINTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL
ECE4540/5540: Digital Control Systems INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL.: Introduction In ECE450/ECE550 Feedback Control Systems, welearnedhow to make an analog controller D(s) to control a lineartimeinvariant
More informationNADAR SARASWATHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY Vadapudupatti, Theni
NADAR SARASWATHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY Vadapudupatti, Theni625531 Question Bank for the Units I to V SE05 BR05 SU02 5 th Semester B.E. / B.Tech. Electrical & Electronics engineering IC6501
More information100 (s + 10) (s + 100) e 0.5s. s 100 (s + 10) (s + 100). G(s) =
1 AME 3315; Spring 215; Midterm 2 Review (not graded) Problems: 9.3 9.8 9.9 9.12 except parts 5 and 6. 9.13 except parts 4 and 5 9.28 9.34 You are given the transfer function: G(s) = 1) Plot the bode plot
More informationPD, PI, PID Compensation. M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada
PD, PI, PID Compensation M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada 1 Outline PD compensation. PI compensation. PID compensation. 2 PD Control L= loop gain s cl = desired closedloop
More informationAnalyzing Control Problems and Improving Control Loop Performance
OptiControls Inc. Houston, TX Ph: 7134596291 www.opticontrols.com info@opticontrols.com Analyzing Control s and Improving Control Loop Performance by Jacques F. Smuts Page: 1 Presenter Principal Consultant
More informationExam. 135 minutes + 15 minutes reading time
Exam January 23, 27 Control Systems I (559L) Prof. Emilio Frazzoli Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes + 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 45 Number of Points: 53 Permitted aids: Important: 4 pages
More informationAndrea Zanchettin Automatic Control AUTOMATIC CONTROL. Andrea M. Zanchettin, PhD Spring Semester, Linear systems (frequency domain)
1 AUTOMATIC CONTROL Andrea M. Zanchettin, PhD Spring Semester, 2018 Linear systems (frequency domain) 2 Motivations Consider an LTI system Thanks to the Lagrange s formula we can compute the motion of
More informationFeedback: Still the simplest and best solution
Feedback: Still the simplest and best solution Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian Univ. of Science and Tech. (NTNU) Trondheim, Norway skoge@ntnu.no Abstract Most engineers are
More information7.4 STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE TO DRAW THE ROOT LOCUS DIAGRAM
ROOT LOCUS TECHNIQUE. Values of on the root loci The value of at any point s on the root loci is determined from the following equation G( s) H( s) Product of lengths of vectors from poles of G( s)h( s)
More informationME 304 CONTROL SYSTEMS Spring 2016 MIDTERM EXAMINATION II
ME 30 CONTROL SYSTEMS Spring 06 Course Instructors Dr. Tuna Balkan, Dr. Kıvanç Azgın, Dr. Ali Emre Turgut, Dr. Yiğit Yazıcıoğlu MIDTERM EXAMINATION II May, 06 Time Allowed: 00 minutes Closed Notes and
More informationTradeoffs and Limits of Performance
Chapter 9 Tradeoffs and Limits of Performance 9. Introduction Fundamental limits of feedback systems will be investigated in this chapter. We begin in Section 9.2 by discussing the basic feedback loop
More informationApplication Note #3413
Application Note #3413 Manual Tuning Methods Tuning the controller seems to be a difficult task to some users; however, after getting familiar with the theories and tricks behind it, one might find the
More informationDesign Artificial Nonlinear Controller Based on Computed Torque like Controller with Tunable Gain
World Applied Sciences Journal 14 (9): 13061312, 2011 ISSN 18184952 IDOSI Publications, 2011 Design Artificial Nonlinear Controller Based on Computed Torque like Controller with Tunable Gain Samira Soltani
More informationCHBE320 LECTURE X STABILITY OF CLOSEDLOOP CONTOL SYSTEMS. Professor Dae Ryook Yang
CHBE320 LECTURE X STABILITY OF CLOSEDLOOP CONTOL SYSTEMS Professor Dae Ryook Yang Spring 208 Dept. of Chemial and Biologial Engineering 0 Road Map of the Leture X Stability of losedloop ontrol system
More informationRichiami di Controlli Automatici
Richiami di Controlli Automatici Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II detommas@unina.it Ottobre 2012 Corsi AnsaldoBreda G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici
More information06 Feedback Control System Characteristics The role of error signals to characterize feedback control system performance.
Chapter 06 Feedback 06 Feedback Control System Characteristics The role of error signals to characterize feedback control system performance. Lesson of the Course Fondamenti di Controlli Automatici of
More informationDesign of Fuzzy PDControlled Overhead Crane System with AntiSwing Compensation
Engineering, 2011, 3, 755762 doi:10.4236/eng.2011.37091 Published Online July 2011 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/eng) Design of Fuzzy PDControlled Overhead Crane System with AntiSwing Compensation Abstract
More informationPole placement control: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2
: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2 : a state O. Sename 1 1 Gipsalab, CNRSINPG, FRANCE Olivier.Sename@gipsalab.fr www.gipsalab.fr/ o.sename based November 21, 2017 Outline : a state
More informationLecture 1: Feedback Control Loop
Lecture : Feedback Control Loop Loop Transfer function The standard feedback control system structure is depicted in Figure. This represend(t) n(t) r(t) e(t) u(t) v(t) η(t) y(t) F (s) C(s) P (s) Figure
More informationAppendix A MoReRT Controllers Design Demo Software
Appendix A MoReRT Controllers Design Demo Software The use of the proposed ModelReference Robust Tuning (MoReRT) design methodology, described in Chap. 4, to tune a twodegreeoffreedom (2DoF) proportional
More information2.010 Fall 2000 Solution of Homework Assignment 8
2.1 Fall 2 Solution of Homework Assignment 8 1. Root Locus Analysis of Hydraulic Servomechanism. The block diagram of the controlled hydraulic servomechanism is shown in Fig. 1 e r e error + i Σ C(s) P(s)
More informationLecture 50 Changing Closed Loop Dynamic Response with Feedback and Compensation
Lecture 50 Changing Closed Loop Dynamic Response with Feedback and Compensation 1 A. Closed Loop Transient Response Waveforms 1. Standard Quadratic T(s) Step Response a. Q > 1/2 Oscillatory decay to a
More information6.302 Feedback Systems Recitation 16: Compensation Prof. Joel L. Dawson
Bode Obstacle Course is one technique for doing compensation, or designing a feedback system to make the closedloop behavior what we want it to be. To review:  G c (s) G(s) H(s) you are here! plant For
More informationFall 2003 BMI 226 / CS 426 AUTOMATIC SYNTHESIS OF IMPROVED TUNING RULES FOR PID CONTROLLERS
Notes LL1 AUTOMATIC SYNTHESIS OF IMPROVED TUNING RULES FOR PID CONTROLLERS Notes LL2 AUTOMATIC SYNTHESIS OF IMPROVED TUNING RULES FOR PID CONTROLLERS The PID controller was patented in 1939 by Albert
More informationFeedback Basics. David M. Auslander Mechanical Engineering University of California at Berkeley. copyright 1998, D.M. Auslander
Feedback Basics David M. Auslander Mechanical Engineering University of California at Berkeley copyright 1998, D.M. Auslander 1 I. Feedback Control Context 2 What is Feedback Control? Measure desired behavior
More informationChapter 13 Digital Control
Chapter 13 Digital Control Chapter 12 was concerned with building models for systems acting under digital control. We next turn to the question of control itself. Topics to be covered include: why one
More informationCHAPTER 4 STATE FEEDBACK AND OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROLLERS
54 CHAPTER 4 STATE FEEDBACK AND OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROLLERS 4.1 INTRODUCTION In control theory, a controller is a device which monitors and affects the operational conditions of a given dynamic system.
More informationRELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS. Ryszard Gessing
RELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS Ryszard Gessing Politechnika Śl aska Instytut Automatyki, ul. Akademicka 16, 44101 Gliwice, Poland, fax: +4832 372127, email: gessing@ia.gliwice.edu.pl
More informationHomework 7  Solutions
Homework 7  Solutions Note: This homework is worth a total of 48 points. 1. Compensators (9 points) For a unity feedback system given below, with G(s) = K s(s + 5)(s + 11) do the following: (c) Find the
More informationLecture 7:Time Response PoleZero Maps Influence of Poles and Zeros Higher Order Systems and Pole Dominance Criterion
Cleveland State University MCE441: Intr. Linear Control Lecture 7:Time Influence of Poles and Zeros Higher Order and Pole Criterion Prof. Richter 1 / 26 FirstOrder Specs: Step : Pole Real inputs contain
More informationLecture plan: Control Systems II, IDSC, 2017
Control Systems II MAVT, IDSC, Lecture 8 28/04/2017 G. Ducard Lecture plan: Control Systems II, IDSC, 2017 SISO Control Design 24.02 Lecture 1 Recalls, Introductory case study 03.03 Lecture 2 Cascaded
More informationDynamics and TyreusLuyben Tuned Control of a Fatty Acid Methyl Ester Reactive Distillation Process
Dynamics and TyreusLuyben Tuned Control of a Fatty Acid Methyl Ester Reactive Distillation Process Abdulwahab GIWA 1, Saidat Olanipekun GIWA 2 1 Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Department, College
More informationDesign of Decentralised PI Controller using Model Reference Adaptive Control for Quadruple Tank Process
Design of Decentralised PI Controller using Model Reference Adaptive Control for Quadruple Tank Process D.Angeline Vijula #, Dr.N.Devarajan * # Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering Sri Ramakrishna
More informationControl Systems. State Estimation.
State Estimation chibum@seoultech.ac.kr Outline Dominant pole design Symmetric root locus State estimation We are able to place the CLPs arbitrarily by feeding back all the states: u = Kx. But these may
More informationAnalysis of DiscreteTime Systems
TU Berlin DiscreteTime Control Systems 1 Analysis of DiscreteTime Systems Overview Stability Sensitivity and Robustness Controllability, Reachability, Observability, and Detectabiliy TU Berlin DiscreteTime
More informationChapter 12. Feedback Control Characteristics of Feedback Systems
Chapter 1 Feedbac Control Feedbac control allows a system dynamic response to be modified without changing any system components. Below, we show an openloop system (a system without feedbac) and a closedloop
More informationa. Closedloop system; b. equivalent transfer function Then the CLTF () T is s the poles of () T are s from a contribution of a
Root Locus Simple definition Locus of points on the s plane that represents the poles of a system as one or more parameter vary. RL and its relation to poles of a closed loop system RL and its relation
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUBJECT CODE & NAME: CONTROL SYSTEMS YEAR / SEM: II / IV UNIT I SYSTEMS AND THEIR REPRESENTATION PARTA [2
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3. 8. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid
More information