University of Science and Technology, Sudan Department of Chemical Engineering.
|
|
- Clementine Shaw
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ISO 91:28 Certified Volume 3, Issue 6, November 214 Design and Decoupling of Control System for a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) Georgeous, N.B *1 and Gasmalseed, G.A, Abdalla, B.K (1-2) University of Science and Technology, Sudan Department of Chemical Engineering. Abstract: To apply the methods of stability analysis and tuning, it is necessary first to develop a control strategy for possible noninteracting and interacting loops. Then the transfer functions were identified by mathematical modeling and the overall gains were cited from the literature. Pairing of the loops were undertaken and the interact in loops were coupled according to the RGA (Relative Gain Array), thus the loops with minimal interaction were selected and put in block diagrams. The characteristic equations were obtained for both closed and open loops. An exothermic reaction in a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) was selected as a case study. The loops were subjected to tuning, stability and offset investigation. Summary of the adjustable parameters, offsets and response behavior were tabulated for comparison between the methods. It is clear that all the methods are in agreement, but the Bode criteria showed a superior consistency over other methods. It is recommended that the method of Bode has to be preferentially selected for tuning and stability analysis. Index Terms: Methods of tuning, Stability, Transfer function identification, Offset investigation. I. INTRODUCTION A control system is composed of interacting loops and that the number of feasible alternative configurations needed to be configured are very large. It must be recognized that for a process with n controlled variables and n manipulated variables there are n different ways to form control the loops [1]. The question is which one to selected? The answer is to consider the interaction between the loops for all n loops and then the RGA is applied to select a loop when the interaction is minimal. The RGA provides such a methodology by pairing the input and output that give minimum interaction when together coupled, RGA was first proposed by Bristol and today it is a very popular tool for selection of control loops giving minimal interaction [1].The methods of pairings and the RGA were applied to an exothermic reaction in a jacketed CSTR, the process is a 2 2 controlled and manipulated variables. The method of stability and tuning were applied using Routh-Hurwitz, direct substitution, root-locus, and Bode and Nyquist criteria. II. OBJECTIVES 1- To select the loops with minimal interaction in CSTR. 2- To study the dynamics of a CSTR. 3- To investigate the methods of tuning and stability analysis. 4- To compare the accuracy of these methods with respect to stability, adjustable parameters and offset. III. LITERATURE REVIEW Multiple input, multiple output (MIMO) systems describe processes with more than one input and more than one output which require multiple control loops. Examples of MIMO systems include heat exchangers, chemical reactors, and distillation columns. These systems can be complicated through loop interactions that result in variables with unexpected effects. Decoupling the variables of that system will improve the control of that process [2]. An example of a MIMO system is a jacketed CSTR in which the formation of the product is dependent upon the reactor temperature and feed flow rate. The process is controlled by two loops, a composition control loop and a temperature control loop. Changes to the feed rate are used to control the product composition and changes to the reactor temperature are made by increasing or decreasing the temperature of the jacket. However, changes made to the feed would change the reaction mass, and hence the temperature, and changes made to temperature would change the reaction rate, and hence influence the composition. This is an example of loop interactions. Loop interactions need to be avoided because changes in one loop might cause destabilizing changes in another loop [2]. To avoid loop interactions, MIMO systems can be decoupled into separate loops known as single 9
2 ISO 91:28 Certified Volume 3, Issue 6, November 214 input, single output (SISO) systems. Decoupling may be done using several different techniques, including restructuring the pairing of variables, minimizing interactions by detuning conflicting control loops, opening loops and putting them in manual control, and using linear combinations of manipulated and/or controlled variables. If the system can t be decoupled, then other methods such as neural networks or model predictive control should be used to characterize the system [2,3,4]. There are two ways to see if a system can be decoupled. One way is with mathematical models and the other way is a more intuitive educated guessing method. Mathematical methods for simplifying MIMO control schemes include the relative gain array (RGA) [2]. The RGA provides a quantitative approach to the analysis of the interactions between the controls and the output, and thus provides a method of pairing manipulated and controlled variables to generate a control scheme. The RGA is a normalized form of the gain matrix that describes the impact of each control variable on the output, relative to each control variable's impact on other variables. The process interaction of open-loop and closed-loop control systems are measured for all possible input-output variable pairings [5]. A ratio of this open-loop gain to this closed-loop gain is determined and the results are displayed in a matrix. The array will be a matrix with one column for each input variable and one row for each output variable in the MIMO system [5]. The best pairing is discovered by taking the maximum value of RGA Matrix for each row. A digital computer can be used to control simultaneously several outputs, the control program is composed of several subprograms, each one used to control a different loop. Furthermore, the control program should be able to coordinate the execution of the various subprograms so that each loop and all together function properly [6]. Although a controller may be stable when implemented as an analog controller, it could be unstable when implemented as a digital controller due to a large sampling interval. During sampling the aliasing modifies the cutoff parameters. Thus the sample rate characterizes the transient response and stability of the compensated system, and must update the values at the controller input often enough so as to not cause instability. When substituting the frequency into the z operator, regular stability criteria still apply to discrete control systems. Nyquist criteria apply to z-domain transfer functions as well as being general for complex valued functions. Bode stability criteria apply similarly. Jury criterion determines the discrete system stability about its characteristic polynomial [6]. The system stability can be tested by considering its response to a finite input signal. This means the analysis of system dynamics in the actual time domain which is usually cumbersome and time consuming. Several methods have been developed to deduce the system stability from its characteristic equation. They are short-cut methods for providing information without finding out the actual response of the system. They give information from the s-domain without going back to the actual time-domain. All these methods are based on the criterion that a sufficient condition for stability of a control loop is to have a characteristic equation with only negative real roots and or complex roots with negative real parts. The short-cut methods for assessment of the stability of a system include the direct method, the Routh Hurwitz stability criterion and graphical methods of investigating the behavior of the roots of the characteristic equation, i.e. Root Locus method and Nyquist stability criterion. Bode plots are common graphical method. It depends only upon the open loop transfer function (OLTF). The OLTF relates the feedback or measured variable to the set point, when the feedback loop is disconnected from the comparator when the loop is broken or opened. IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Interaction, coupling and control of CSTR Consider a process with two controlled outputs and two manipulated inputs (Figure 1.). The transfer functions are: 1.G C1(s) = K C1,.(1) 2.G C2(s) = K C2,.(2) 3.G f1(s) =,.(3) 1
3 ISO 91:28 Certified Volume 3, Issue 6, November G f2(s) =,.(4) 5.G m1(s) =,.(5) 6.G m2(s) =,.(6) 7. H 11(s) =,.(7) 8.H 12(s) =,.(8) 9.H 21(s) =,.(9) 1.H 22(s) =..(1) Loop 1 G m1(s) - G C1(s) G f1(s) H 11,sp H 21 H 12 G,sp + - C2(s) G f2(s) + + H 22 Loop 2 G m2(s) Fig 1. Block diagram of CSTR with two controlled outputs and two manipulative variables. The Routh Hurwitz stability criterion is used for determination the stability of a system, the characteristic equation of closed loop is used. Also Bode plots, root-locus method and Nyquist stability criterion are used for determination the stability of a system, the OLTF is used. The amplitude ratio (AR) is used to get the ultimate gain(k U ) and Ziegler-Nichols tuning is brought to edge of stability under proportional control and it is used for tuning the adjustable parameters, which are substituted in overall gains for study the response. Loop 1 is closed and loop 2 is open, the transfer function is:.(11).(12) 11
4 Amplitude ISO 91:28 Certified Volume 3, Issue 6, November 214.(13) The characteristic equation of closed loop is:.15 s s s s + (1+ K C1 ) =.(14) Putting the characteristic equation in Routh Array: Table 1: Routh-Hurwitz Array S (1+ K C1 ) S S (1+ K C1 ) S 1 ( K C1 ) S (1+ K C1 ) For the system to be critically stable: ( K C1 ) =, K C1 = K U1 = 7.633, The system become stable for all values of K C1 K U The auxiliary equation is1.45s s =, s= iω; ω co = rad / sec; Pu = = = 3.99 sec. Tuning: Applying Ziegler- Nichols method ( Z-N method): Table 2: Z-N adjustable parameters for loop 1 Controller mode K C1 τ I ( sec) τ D ( sec) P PI PID Substituting the value of K C1 = of proportional controller (P- action) in characteristic equation,.15 s s s s = and in first column of Routh array. All elements of the first column were positive and there is no change of sign, therefore the system is stable. Response: Substituting the value of K C1 in the transfer function of loop1 (G (s) ) and introducing an impulse forcing function: 1 Peak amplitude:.849 At time (seconds): Settling time (seconds): Fig 2. Impulse response when loop1 is closed. 12
5 Amplitude Phase (deg) Magnitude (db) ISO 91:28 Certified Bode analysis and tuning: Open loop transfer function (OLTF) of loop 1is: Volume 3, Issue 6, November 214.(15) Bode Diagram Frequency (rad/s): 1.58 Phase (deg): Frequency (rad/s) Fig 3. Bode diagram when loop1 is open From Bode diagram, ω co =1.58 rad /sec and the amplitude ratio (AR)= 1, Pu = = 3.98 sec, the amplitude ratio (AR) is used to get K C1. 1=.(16) Substituting the value of ω co = 1.58 rad / sec in the equation to get K C1,K C1 = K U1 = Response: For K c1 = Peak amplitude:.886 At time (seconds): Settling time (seconds): Fig 4.Impulse response when loop1 is closed. 13
6 Imaginary Axis Amplitude Imaginary Axis (seconds -1 ) Root Locus: ISO 91:28 Certified Volume 3, Issue 6, November Root Locus Gain: 7.52 Pole: i Damping:.273 Overshoot (%): 99.1 Frequency (rad/s): Real Axis (seconds -1 ) Fig 5.Root-Locus diagram when loop1 is open From root-locus diagram, ω co = 1.57 rad / sec and the amplitude ratio (AR) = 1, K C1 = K U1 = Response: For K c1 = Peak amplitude:.875 At time (seconds): Settling time (seconds): Fig 6. Impulse response when loop1 is closed. Nyquist stability criterion:.8 Nyquist Diagram Real: Imag:.326 Frequency (rad/s): Real Axis Fig 7. Nyquist diagram when loop1 is open From Nyquist diagram, ω co = 1.58 rad / sec.the characteristic equation of closed loop is:.15 s s s s + (1+ K C1 ) =.(14).15 ω iω ω iω + (1+ K C1 ) =.(17) 14
7 Amplitude ISO 91:28 Certified Volume 3, Issue 6, November ω ω 2 + (1+ K C1 ) =.(18) Substituting the value of ω co = 1.58 rad / sec to get K C1, K C1 = K U1 = Response: For K c1 = Peak amplitude:.854 At time (seconds): Settling time (seconds): Fig 8. Impulse response when loop1 is closed Table 3: Comparison between the methods for continuous stirred tank reactor ( CSTR ) of loop1 Method K U P U (sec) K C Routh Durwitz Bode Root-Locus Nyquist Table 4: Comparison between the methods for continuous stirred tank reactor ( CSTR ) of loop1 Method Overshoot Rise Settling time(sec) time(sec) Routh-Durwitz Bode Root-Locus Nyquist Loop 2 is closed and loop 1 is open, the transfer function is:.(19) The characteristic equation is:.4 S s s s s + (1+ 2K C2 ) =.(2) The preceding procedure is applied. Table 5: Routh-Hurwitz Array S S (1+ 2K C2 ) S ( K C2 ) S 2 ( K C2 ) (1+ 2K C2 ) 15
8 Phase (deg) Magnitude (db) Amplitude ISO 91:28 Certified Volume 3, Issue 6, November 214 S 1 ( ) S (1+2 K C2 ) K U2 = 1.629, ω co =.96 rad / sec, Pu = = 6.94 sec, K C2 =.815. Response: For K c2 = Peak amplitude:.37 At time (seconds): Settling time (seconds): Fig 9. Impulse response when loop2 is closed Bode analysis and tuning: Open loop transfer function (OLTF) of loop 2is:.(21) 5 Bode Diagram Frequency (rad/s):.96 Phase (deg): Frequency (rad/s) Fig 1. Bode diagram when loop2 is open 16
9 Amplitude Imaginary Axis (seconds -1 ) Amplitude ISO 91:28 Certified Volume 3, Issue 6, November 214 From Bode diagram, ω co =.96 rad / sec, Pu = = sec, and the amplitude ratio (AR) = 1=.(22) K C2 = K U2 = Response : For K c2 = Peak amplitude:.371 At time (seconds): Settling time (seconds): Fig 11. Impulse response when loop2 is closed Root Locus: 6 Root Locus 4 2 Gain: 1.64 Pole: i Damping: Overshoot (%): 12 Frequency (rad/s): Real Axis (seconds -1 ) Fig 12. Root-Locus diagram when loop2 is open From root-locus diagram, ω co =.99 rad / sec and the amplitude ratio (AR) = 1, K C2 = K U2 = Response: For K c2 = Peak amplitude:.373 At time (seconds): Settling time (seconds): Fig 13. Impulse response when loop2 is closed 17
10 Amplitude Imaginary Axis ISO 91:28 Certified Nyquist stability criterion: Volume 3, Issue 6, November Nyquist Diagram Real: -.62 Imag:.572 Frequency (rad/s): Real Axis Fig 14. Nyquist diagram when loop2 is open From Nyquist diagram, ω co =.96rad / sec, The characteristic equation is:.4 S s s s s + (1+2K C2 ) =, 2.4 ω ω 2 + (1+2K C2 ) =, Substituting the value of ω co =.96 rad / sec to get K C2.K C2 = K U2 = Response : For K c2 = Peak amplitude:.371 At time (seconds): Settling time (seconds): Fig 15. Impulse response when loop2 is closed Table 4. Comparison between the methods for continuous stirred tank reactor ( CSTR ) of loop2 Method K U P U (sec) K C Routh-Durwitz Bode Root-Locus Nyquist Table 5. Comparison between the methods for continuous stirred tank reactor ( CSTR ) of loop2 Method Overshoot Rise time(sec) Settling time(sec) Routh-Durwitz Bode Root-Locus Nyquist
11 ISO 91:28 Certified Relative Gain Array (RGA): Volume 3, Issue 6, November 214 The ratio between the two loop gain is λ 11, λ 11 = =.(23) λ 11 =.(24) s, λ 11 = -.667, λ 12 = = = λ 11 = -.667<,, then m 2 cause a strong effect on y 1 and in the opposite direction from that caused by m 1. In this interaction effect is very dangerous and must be avoid pairing m 1 with y 2. Nomenclature Symbols K U Ultimate gain P U Ultimate period(sec) K C Controller gain Offset Indices C Refer to controller f Refer to valve m Refer to measuring element 1 Refer to loop1 19
12 2 Refer to loop2 ISO 91:28 Certified Volume 3, Issue 6, November 214 V. CONCLUSION It is clear that all the methods are in agreement, but the Bode criterion has to be preferentially selected for tuning and stability analysis. For CSTR, λ 11 = -.667, then m 2 cause a strong effect on y 1 and in the opposite direction from that caused by m 1. In this interaction effect is very dangerous. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors wish to thank the Collage of Higher Studies and Research of Karary University for their help and for giving us opportunity for carrying out research in partial fulfillment for Ph.D in Chemical Engineering. REFERENCES [1] Stephanopoulos, G. (25), Chemical Process Control, Prentice-Hall, India. [2] Tham, M.T. (1999). "Multivariable Control: An Introduction to Decoupling Control". Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Newcastle upon Tyne. [3] McMillan, Gregory K. (1983) Tuning and Control Loop Performance. Instrument Society of America. ISBN [4] Lee, Jay H., Choi, Jin Hoon, and Lee, Kwang Soon. (1997). "3.2 Interaction and I/O Pairing". Chemical Engineering Research Information Center. [5] Berber, Ridvan. (1994).Methods of Model Based Process Control, Kluwer Academic Publishers. [6] FRANKLIN, G.F.; POWELL, J.D. (1981). Digital control of dynamical systems. USA, California: Addison-Wesley. ISBN
Cascade Control of a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR)
Journal of Applied and Industrial Sciences, 213, 1 (4): 16-23, ISSN: 2328-4595 (PRINT), ISSN: 2328-469 (ONLINE) Research Article Cascade Control of a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) 16 A. O. Ahmed
More informationChemical Process Dynamics and Control. Aisha Osman Mohamed Ahmed Department of Chemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Red Sea University
Chemical Process Dynamics and Control Aisha Osman Mohamed Ahmed Department of Chemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Red Sea University 1 Chapter 4 System Stability 2 Chapter Objectives End of this
More informationISSN: [Nehal* et al., 6(4): April, 2017] Impact Factor: 4.116
IJESRT INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES & RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY COMPARISON BETWEEN PID CONTROLLER IN CONVENTIONAL CONTROL AND PID IN SIMULINK IN REFINING GOLD SCRAPS Nehal EL Fadil HasabSeedo*,
More informationIndex Accumulation, 53 Accuracy: numerical integration, sensor, 383, Adaptive tuning: expert system, 528 gain scheduling, 518, 529, 709,
Accumulation, 53 Accuracy: numerical integration, 83-84 sensor, 383, 772-773 Adaptive tuning: expert system, 528 gain scheduling, 518, 529, 709, 715 input conversion, 519 reasons for, 512-517 relay auto-tuning,
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUB.NAME : CONTROL SYSTEMS BRANCH : ECE YEAR : II SEMESTER: IV 1. What is control system? 2. Define open
More informationIndex. INDEX_p /15/02 3:08 PM Page 765
INDEX_p.765-770 11/15/02 3:08 PM Page 765 Index N A Adaptive control, 144 Adiabatic reactors, 465 Algorithm, control, 5 All-pass factorization, 257 All-pass, frequency response, 225 Amplitude, 216 Amplitude
More informationTable of Laplacetransform
Appendix Table of Laplacetransform pairs 1(t) f(s) oct), unit impulse at t = 0 a, a constant or step of magnitude a at t = 0 a s t, a ramp function e- at, an exponential function s + a sin wt, a sine fun
More informationFeedback Control of Linear SISO systems. Process Dynamics and Control
Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems Process Dynamics and Control 1 Open-Loop Process The study of dynamics was limited to open-loop systems Observe process behavior as a result of specific input signals
More informationMULTILOOP PI CONTROLLER FOR ACHIEVING SIMULTANEOUS TIME AND FREQUENCY DOMAIN SPECIFICATIONS
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol. 1, No. 8 (215) 113-1115 School of Engineering, Taylor s University MULTILOOP PI CONTROLLER FOR ACHIEVING SIMULTANEOUS TIME AND FREQUENCY DOMAIN SPECIFICATIONS
More informationVALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur
VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur 603 203. DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING SUBJECT QUESTION BANK : EC6405 CONTROL SYSTEM ENGINEERING SEM / YEAR: IV / II year
More information(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:
1. (a) The open loop transfer function of a unity feedback control system is given by G(S) = K/S(1+0.1S)(1+S) (i) Determine the value of K so that the resonance peak M r of the system is equal to 1.4.
More informationAdvanced Control of the Waste Water Treatment Unit in White Nile Tannery
International Journal of Engineering, Applied and Management Sciences Paradigms, Vol. 43, Issue Publishing Month: January 27 Advanced Control of the Waste Water Treatment Unit in White Nile Tannery Tahani
More informationGuide to Selected Process Examples :ili3g eil;]iil
Guide to Selected Process Examples :ili3g eil;]iil Because of the strong interplay between process dynamics and control perfor mance, examples should begin with process equipment and operating conditions.
More informationSolutions for Tutorial 10 Stability Analysis
Solutions for Tutorial 1 Stability Analysis 1.1 In this question, you will analyze the series of three isothermal CSTR s show in Figure 1.1. The model for each reactor is the same at presented in Textbook
More informationCHAPTER 6 CLOSED LOOP STUDIES
180 CHAPTER 6 CLOSED LOOP STUDIES Improvement of closed-loop performance needs proper tuning of controller parameters that requires process model structure and the estimation of respective parameters which
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 1
Outline Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Prerequisites Block diagram for system modeling Modeling Mechanical Electrical Outline Introduction Background Basic Systems Models/Transfers functions 1 Introduction
More informationRoot Locus Methods. The root locus procedure
Root Locus Methods Design of a position control system using the root locus method Design of a phase lag compensator using the root locus method The root locus procedure To determine the value of the gain
More informationControl System Design
ELEC ENG 4CL4: Control System Design Notes for Lecture #15 Friday, February 6, 2004 Dr. Ian C. Bruce Room: CRL-229 Phone ext.: 26984 Email: ibruce@mail.ece.mcmaster.ca (3) Cohen-Coon Reaction Curve Method
More informationSTABILITY OF CLOSED-LOOP CONTOL SYSTEMS
CHBE320 LECTURE X STABILITY OF CLOSED-LOOP CONTOL SYSTEMS Professor Dae Ryook Yang Spring 2018 Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering 10-1 Road Map of the Lecture X Stability of closed-loop control
More informationMulti-Input Multi-output (MIMO) Processes CBE495 LECTURE III CONTROL OF MULTI INPUT MULTI OUTPUT PROCESSES. Professor Dae Ryook Yang
Multi-Input Multi-output (MIMO) Processes CBE495 LECTURE III CONTROL OF MULTI INPUT MULTI OUTPUT PROCESSES Professor Dae Ryook Yang Fall 2013 Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering Korea University
More informationImproved Identification and Control of 2-by-2 MIMO System using Relay Feedback
CEAI, Vol.17, No.4 pp. 23-32, 2015 Printed in Romania Improved Identification and Control of 2-by-2 MIMO System using Relay Feedback D.Kalpana, T.Thyagarajan, R.Thenral Department of Instrumentation Engineering,
More information6.1 Sketch the z-domain root locus and find the critical gain for the following systems K., the closed-loop characteristic equation is K + z 0.
6. Sketch the z-domain root locus and find the critical gain for the following systems K (i) Gz () z 4. (ii) Gz K () ( z+ 9. )( z 9. ) (iii) Gz () Kz ( z. )( z ) (iv) Gz () Kz ( + 9. ) ( z. )( z 8. ) (i)
More information7.4 STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE TO DRAW THE ROOT LOCUS DIAGRAM
ROOT LOCUS TECHNIQUE. Values of on the root loci The value of at any point s on the root loci is determined from the following equation G( s) H( s) Product of lengths of vectors from poles of G( s)h( s)
More informationChapter 6 - Solved Problems
Chapter 6 - Solved Problems Solved Problem 6.. Contributed by - James Welsh, University of Newcastle, Australia. Find suitable values for the PID parameters using the Z-N tuning strategy for the nominal
More informationTheory of Machines and Automatic Control Winter 2018/2019
Theory of Machines and Automatic Control Winter 2018/2019 Lecturer: Sebastian Korczak, PhD, Eng. Institute of Machine Design Fundamentals - Department of Mechanics http://www.ipbm.simr.pw.edu.pl/ Lecture
More informationDigital Control Systems
Digital Control Systems Lecture Summary #4 This summary discussed some graphical methods their use to determine the stability the stability margins of closed loop systems. A. Nyquist criterion Nyquist
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 21: Stability Margins and Closing the Loop Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Closing the Loop Effect on Bode Plot Effect
More informationContents. PART I METHODS AND CONCEPTS 2. Transfer Function Approach Frequency Domain Representations... 42
Contents Preface.............................................. xiii 1. Introduction......................................... 1 1.1 Continuous and Discrete Control Systems................. 4 1.2 Open-Loop
More informationDesign of de-coupler for an interacting tanks system
IOSR Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IOSR-JEEE) e-issn: 78-1676,p-ISSN: 3-3331, Volume 7, Issue 4 (Sep. - Oct. 13), PP 48-53 Design of de-coupler for an interacting tanks system Parag
More informationSRI VENKATESWARA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
COURSE DELIVERY PLAN - THEORY Page 1 of 7 Department of Chemical Engineering B.E/B.Tech/M.E/M.Tech : Chemical Engineering Regulation:2013 PG Specialisation : NA Sub. Code / Sub. Name : CH 6605 - Process
More informationIndex. Index. More information. in this web service Cambridge University Press
A-type elements, 4 7, 18, 31, 168, 198, 202, 219, 220, 222, 225 A-type variables. See Across variable ac current, 172, 251 ac induction motor, 251 Acceleration rotational, 30 translational, 16 Accumulator,
More informationMulti-Loop Control. Department of Chemical Engineering,
Interaction ti Analysis and Multi-Loop Control Sachin C. Patawardhan Department of Chemical Engineering, I.I.T. Bombay Outline Motivation Interactions in Multi-loop control Loop pairing using Relative
More informationSome special cases
Lecture Notes on Control Systems/D. Ghose/2012 87 11.3.1 Some special cases Routh table is easy to form in most cases, but there could be some cases when we need to do some extra work. Case 1: The first
More informationProcess Modelling, Identification, and Control
Jan Mikles Miroslav Fikar Process Modelling, Identification, and Control With 187 Figures and 13 Tables 4u Springer Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Topics in Process Control 1 1.2 An Example of Process Control
More informationDesign and Tuning of Fractional-order PID Controllers for Time-delayed Processes
Design and Tuning of Fractional-order PID Controllers for Time-delayed Processes Emmanuel Edet Technology and Innovation Centre University of Strathclyde 99 George Street Glasgow, United Kingdom emmanuel.edet@strath.ac.uk
More informationCHAPTER 10: STABILITY &TUNING
When I complete this chapter, I want to be able to do the following. Determine the stability of a process without control Determine the stability of a closed-loop feedback control system Use these approaches
More informationClosed-loop system 2/1/2016. Generally MIMO case. Two-degrees-of-freedom (2 DOF) control structure. (2 DOF structure) The closed loop equations become
Closed-loop system enerally MIMO case Two-degrees-of-freedom (2 DOF) control structure (2 DOF structure) 2 The closed loop equations become solving for z gives where is the closed loop transfer function
More informationControl Systems. University Questions
University Questions UNIT-1 1. Distinguish between open loop and closed loop control system. Describe two examples for each. (10 Marks), Jan 2009, June 12, Dec 11,July 08, July 2009, Dec 2010 2. Write
More informationCompensation 8. f4 that separate these regions of stability and instability. The characteristic S 0 L U T I 0 N S
S 0 L U T I 0 N S Compensation 8 Note: All references to Figures and Equations whose numbers are not preceded by an "S"refer to the textbook. As suggested in Lecture 8, to perform a Nyquist analysis, we
More informationCHAPTER 7 : BODE PLOTS AND GAIN ADJUSTMENTS COMPENSATION
CHAPTER 7 : BODE PLOTS AND GAIN ADJUSTMENTS COMPENSATION Objectives Students should be able to: Draw the bode plots for first order and second order system. Determine the stability through the bode plots.
More informationFeedback Control of Dynamic Systems
THIRD EDITION Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems Gene F. Franklin Stanford University J. David Powell Stanford University Abbas Emami-Naeini Integrated Systems, Inc. TT Addison-Wesley Publishing Company
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 23: Drawing The Nyquist Plot Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Review of Nyquist Drawing the Nyquist Plot Using the
More informationCh 14: Feedback Control systems
Ch 4: Feedback Control systems Part IV A is concerned with sinle loop control The followin topics are covered in chapter 4: The concept of feedback control Block diaram development Classical feedback controllers
More informationRobust and Optimal Control, Spring A: SISO Feedback Control A.1 Internal Stability and Youla Parameterization
Robust and Optimal Control, Spring 2015 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5-303B) A: SISO Feedback Control A.1 Internal Stability and Youla Parameterization A.2 Sensitivity and Feedback Performance A.3
More informationAnalysis of SISO Control Loops
Chapter 5 Analysis of SISO Control Loops Topics to be covered For a given controller and plant connected in feedback we ask and answer the following questions: Is the loop stable? What are the sensitivities
More informationAnalysis and Synthesis of Single-Input Single-Output Control Systems
Lino Guzzella Analysis and Synthesis of Single-Input Single-Output Control Systems l+kja» \Uja>)W2(ja»\ um Contents 1 Definitions and Problem Formulations 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Definitions 1 1.2.1 Systems
More informationCHAPTER 5 ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS OF THE CONTROLLER
114 CHAPTER 5 ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS OF THE CONTROLLER 5.1 INTRODUCTION Robust control is a branch of control theory that explicitly deals with uncertainty in its approach to controller design. It also refers
More informationDesign of Decentralised PI Controller using Model Reference Adaptive Control for Quadruple Tank Process
Design of Decentralised PI Controller using Model Reference Adaptive Control for Quadruple Tank Process D.Angeline Vijula #, Dr.N.Devarajan * # Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering Sri Ramakrishna
More informationSystems Engineering and Control
Cork Institute of Technology Bachelor of Engineering (Honours) in Mechanical Engineering - Award (NFQ Level 8) Autumn 2007 Systems Engineering and Control (Time: 3 Hours) Answer any FIVE Questions Examiners:
More informationEC CONTROL SYSTEM UNIT I- CONTROL SYSTEM MODELING
EC 2255 - CONTROL SYSTEM UNIT I- CONTROL SYSTEM MODELING 1. What is meant by a system? It is an arrangement of physical components related in such a manner as to form an entire unit. 2. List the two types
More informationControl System Design
ELEC ENG 4CL4: Control System Design Notes for Lecture #13 Monday, February 3, 2003 Dr. Ian C. Bruce Room: CRL-229 Phone ext.: 26984 Email: ibruce@mail.ece.mcmaster.ca (3) Cohen-Coon Reaction Curve Method
More information3.1 Overview 3.2 Process and control-loop interactions
3. Multivariable 3.1 Overview 3.2 and control-loop interactions 3.2.1 Interaction analysis 3.2.2 Closed-loop stability 3.3 Decoupling control 3.3.1 Basic design principle 3.3.2 Complete decoupling 3.3.3
More informationPossible Way of Control of Multi-variable Control Loop by Using RGA Method
Possible Way of Control of Multi-variable Control Loop by Using GA Method PAVEL NAVATIL, LIBO PEKA Department of Automation and Control Tomas Bata University in Zlin nam. T.G. Masarya 5555, 76 Zlin CZECH
More informationModeling and Control of Chemical Reactor Using Model Reference Adaptive Control
Modeling and Control of Chemical Reactor Using Model Reference Adaptive Control Padmayoga.R, Shanthi.M 2, Yuvapriya.T 3 PG student, Dept. of Electronics and Instrumentation, Valliammai Engineering College,
More informationMAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008
MAS07 CONTROL THEORY. HOVLAND: EXAM SOLUTION 2008 MAS07 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008 Geir Hovland, Mechatronics Group, Grimstad, Norway June 30, 2008 C. Repeat question B, but plot the phase curve
More informationIC6501 CONTROL SYSTEMS
DHANALAKSHMI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING CHENNAI DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING YEAR/SEMESTER: II/IV IC6501 CONTROL SYSTEMS UNIT I SYSTEMS AND THEIR REPRESENTATION 1. What is the mathematical
More informationControl of MIMO processes. 1. Introduction. Control of MIMO processes. Control of Multiple-Input, Multiple Output (MIMO) Processes
Control of MIMO processes Control of Multiple-Input, Multiple Output (MIMO) Processes Statistical Process Control Feedforward and ratio control Cascade control Split range and selective control Control
More informationFEEDBACK and CONTROL SYSTEMS
SCHA UM'S OUTLINE OF THEORY AND PROBLEMS OF FEEDBACK and CONTROL SYSTEMS Second Edition CONTINUOUS (ANALOG) AND DISCRETE (DIGITAL) JOSEPH J. DiSTEFANO, III, PhD. Departments of Computer Science and Mediane
More informationCourse Summary. The course cannot be summarized in one lecture.
Course Summary Unit 1: Introduction Unit 2: Modeling in the Frequency Domain Unit 3: Time Response Unit 4: Block Diagram Reduction Unit 5: Stability Unit 6: Steady-State Error Unit 7: Root Locus Techniques
More informationMULTILOOP CONTROL APPLIED TO INTEGRATOR MIMO. PROCESSES. A Preliminary Study
MULTILOOP CONTROL APPLIED TO INTEGRATOR MIMO PROCESSES. A Preliminary Study Eduardo J. Adam 1,2*, Carlos J. Valsecchi 2 1 Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC) (Universidad
More informationMIMO Toolbox for Matlab
MIMO Toolbox for Matlab Oskar Vivero School of Electric and Electronic Engineering University of Manchester, Manchester, UK M60 1QD Email: oskar.vivero@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk Jesús Liceaga-Castro Departamento
More informationCourse roadmap. Step response for 2nd-order system. Step response for 2nd-order system
ME45: Control Systems Lecture Time response of nd-order systems Prof. Clar Radcliffe and Prof. Jongeun Choi Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan State University Modeling Laplace transform Transfer
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUBJECT CODE & NAME: CONTROL SYSTEMS YEAR / SEM: II / IV UNIT I SYSTEMS AND THEIR REPRESENTATION PARTA [2
More informationECSE 4962 Control Systems Design. A Brief Tutorial on Control Design
ECSE 4962 Control Systems Design A Brief Tutorial on Control Design Instructor: Professor John T. Wen TA: Ben Potsaid http://www.cat.rpi.edu/~wen/ecse4962s04/ Don t Wait Until The Last Minute! You got
More informationLecture plan: Control Systems II, IDSC, 2017
Control Systems II MAVT, IDSC, Lecture 8 28/04/2017 G. Ducard Lecture plan: Control Systems II, IDSC, 2017 SISO Control Design 24.02 Lecture 1 Recalls, Introductory case study 03.03 Lecture 2 Cascaded
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 23: Drawing The Nyquist Plot Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Review of Nyquist Drawing the Nyquist Plot Using
More informationSRM UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ODD Semester DAY floor
SRM UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ODD Semester-2014-2015 CONTROL SYSTEMS Course Code: Course Title: Control Systems Semester: V SEM B. Tech Third Year Course Timings: STAFF NAME: Anitha.G
More informationNyquist Stability Criteria
Nyquist Stability Criteria Dr. Bishakh Bhattacharya h Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering IIT Kanpur Joint Initiative of IITs and IISc - Funded by MHRD This Lecture Contains Introduction to
More informationLecture 5: Frequency domain analysis: Nyquist, Bode Diagrams, second order systems, system types
Lecture 5: Frequency domain analysis: Nyquist, Bode Diagrams, second order systems, system types Venkata Sonti Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India, 562 This
More informationProcess Modelling, Identification, and Control
Jan Mikles Miroslav Fikar 2008 AGI-Information Management Consultants May be used for personal purporses only or by libraries associated to dandelon.com network. Process Modelling, Identification, and
More informationControls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014
Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014 Problem 1 Consider the system block diagram given in Figure 1. Find the overall transfer function T(s) = C(s)/R(s). Note that this transfer function
More informationAdditional Closed-Loop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 14)
Appendix J Additional Closed-Loop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 4) APPENDIX CONTENTS J. Closed-Loop Behavior J.2 Bode Stability Criterion J.3 Nyquist Stability Criterion J.4 Gain
More informationRichiami di Controlli Automatici
Richiami di Controlli Automatici Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II detommas@unina.it Ottobre 2012 Corsi AnsaldoBreda G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method. Readings: Jacopo Tani. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method Readings: Jacopo Tani Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich November 2, 2018 J. Tani, E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 7:
More informationECE317 : Feedback and Control
ECE317 : Feedback and Control Lecture : Steady-state error Dr. Richard Tymerski Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University 1 Course roadmap Modeling Analysis Design Laplace
More informationLecture 10: Proportional, Integral and Derivative Actions
MCE441: Intr. Linear Control Systems Lecture 10: Proportional, Integral and Derivative Actions Stability Concepts BIBO Stability and The Routh-Hurwitz Criterion Dorf, Sections 6.1, 6.2, 7.6 Cleveland State
More informationDesign and Comparative Analysis of Controller for Non Linear Tank System
Design and Comparative Analysis of for Non Linear Tank System Janaki.M 1, Soniya.V 2, Arunkumar.E 3 12 Assistant professor, Department of EIE, Karpagam College of Engineering, Coimbatore, India 3 Associate
More informationDepartment of Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering M. E- CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERING CL7101 CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN Unit I- BASICS AND ROOT-LOCUS DESIGN PART-A (2 marks) 1. What are the
More informationLearn2Control Laboratory
Learn2Control Laboratory Version 3.2 Summer Term 2014 1 This Script is for use in the scope of the Process Control lab. It is in no way claimed to be in any scientific way complete or unique. Errors should
More informationAutomatic Control Systems
Automatic Control Systems Edited by Dr. Yuri Sokolov Contributing Authors: Dr. Victor Iliushko, Dr. Emaid A. Abdul-Retha, Mr. Sönke Dierks, Dr. Pascual Marqués. Published by Marques Aviation Ltd Southport,
More informationControl Systems. EC / EE / IN. For
Control Systems For EC / EE / IN By www.thegateacademy.com Syllabus Syllabus for Control Systems Basic Control System Components; Block Diagrammatic Description, Reduction of Block Diagrams. Open Loop
More informationCHAPTER 7 FRACTIONAL ORDER SYSTEMS WITH FRACTIONAL ORDER CONTROLLERS
9 CHAPTER 7 FRACTIONAL ORDER SYSTEMS WITH FRACTIONAL ORDER CONTROLLERS 7. FRACTIONAL ORDER SYSTEMS Fractional derivatives provide an excellent instrument for the description of memory and hereditary properties
More informationDigital Control: Summary # 7
Digital Control: Summary # 7 Proportional, integral and derivative control where K i is controller parameter (gain). It defines the ratio of the control change to the control error. Note that e(k) 0 u(k)
More informationPrinciples and Practice of Automatic Process Control
Principles and Practice of Automatic Process Control Third Edition Carlos A. Smith, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Chemical Engineering University of South Florida Armando B. Corripio, Ph.D., P.E. Gordon A.
More informationECE317 : Feedback and Control
ECE317 : Feedback and Control Lecture : Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion Examples Dr. Richard Tymerski Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University 1 Course roadmap Modeling
More informationComputation of Stabilizing PI and PID parameters for multivariable system with time delays
Computation of Stabilizing PI and PID parameters for multivariable system with time delays Nour El Houda Mansour, Sami Hafsi, Kaouther Laabidi Laboratoire d Analyse, Conception et Commande des Systèmes
More informationFATIMA MICHAEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
FATIMA MICHAEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY Senkottai Village, Madurai Sivagangai Main Road, Madurai - 625 020. An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Institution DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION
More informationControl Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications
Control Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications Readings: Guzzella, Chapter 10 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich November 24, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture
More informationCONTROL SYSTEMS LECTURE NOTES B.TECH (II YEAR II SEM) ( ) Prepared by: Mrs.P.ANITHA, Associate Professor Mr.V.KIRAN KUMAR, Assistant Professor
LECTURE NOTES B.TECH (II YEAR II SEM) (2017-18) Prepared by: Mrs.P.ANITHA, Associate Professor Mr.V.KIRAN KUMAR, Assistant Professor Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering MALLA REDDY
More informationR a) Compare open loop and closed loop control systems. b) Clearly bring out, from basics, Force-current and Force-Voltage analogies.
SET - 1 II B. Tech II Semester Supplementary Examinations Dec 01 1. a) Compare open loop and closed loop control systems. b) Clearly bring out, from basics, Force-current and Force-Voltage analogies..
More informationCYBER EXPLORATION LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS
CYBER EXPLORATION LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS 1 2 Cyber Exploration oratory Experiments Chapter 2 Experiment 1 Objectives To learn to use MATLAB to: (1) generate polynomial, (2) manipulate polynomials, (3)
More informationRobust Control 3 The Closed Loop
Robust Control 3 The Closed Loop Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University /2/2002 Outline Closed Loop Transfer Functions Traditional Performance Measures Time
More informationINSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad
INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad - 500 043 Electrical and Electronics Engineering TUTORIAL QUESTION BAN Course Name : CONTROL SYSTEMS Course Code : A502 Class : III
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review
Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics
More informationVALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE
VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur 603 203 DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK V SEMESTER IC650 CONTROL SYSTEMS Regulation 203 Academic Year 207 8 Prepared
More informationIntroduction to. Process Control. Ahmet Palazoglu. Second Edition. Jose A. Romagnoli. CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group. Taylor & Francis Group,
Introduction to Process Control Second Edition Jose A. Romagnoli Ahmet Palazoglu CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group Boca Raton London NewYork CRC Press is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa
More informationECE 486 Control Systems
ECE 486 Control Systems Spring 208 Midterm #2 Information Issued: April 5, 208 Updated: April 8, 208 ˆ This document is an info sheet about the second exam of ECE 486, Spring 208. ˆ Please read the following
More informationECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 7 Solution April 17, K(s + 0.2) s 2 (s + 2)(s + 5) G(s) =
ECE382/ME482 Spring 25 Homework 7 Solution April 17, 25 1 Solution to HW7 AP9.5 We are given a system with open loop transfer function G(s) = K(s +.2) s 2 (s + 2)(s + 5) (1) and unity negative feedback.
More informationAutomatic Control (MSc in Mechanical Engineering) Lecturer: Andrea Zanchettin Date: Student ID number... Signature...
Automatic Control (MSc in Mechanical Engineering) Lecturer: Andrea Zanchettin Date: 29..23 Given and family names......................solutions...................... Student ID number..........................
More informationEEE 184 Project: Option 1
EEE 184 Project: Option 1 Date: November 16th 2012 Due: December 3rd 2012 Work Alone, show your work, and comment your results. Comments, clarity, and organization are important. Same wrong result or same
More information