SAMPLE PROJECT IN THE MIDDLE EAST DOCUMENT NO. STR-CALC UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 117 ENGINEER PROJECT. Pages REVISION TITLE

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SAMPLE PROJECT IN THE MIDDLE EAST DOCUMENT NO. STR-CALC UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 117 ENGINEER PROJECT. Pages REVISION TITLE"

Transcription

1 PROJECT ENGINEER DOCUMENT NO. STR-CALC REVISION TITLE Pages UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 117

2 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 2 of 117 Table of Contents 1 Summary 3 2 Basic Data Standards and References Materials Performance Criteria Programs used for the structural analysis 5 3 Layout and Dimensions Key Location: Wall Type Façade Elevation: Wall Type Design Narrative Load Path Coupled Mullion Mullion Structural Systems Critical Panel Evaluation CW In-plane Performance 14 5 Loading Dead Load, QD Wind Load, QW 16 6 Section Properties Structural System Mullion Profiles Stack Joint Transom Profiles Transom 1 Profile Transom 2 Profile Sword Profile 42 7 Section Properties Structural System Mullion Profiles Stack Joint Transom Profiles Transom 1 Profile Transom 2 Profile Sword Profile 56 8 Analysis & Code Check Structural System Mullion Check Check Stack Joint Header and Sill Transom Transom 1 (Type 1) Transom 2 (Type 1) Check Stainless Steel Spandrel Panel 74 9 Analysis & Code Check Structural System Mullion Check Check Stack Joint Header and Sill Transom Transom 1 (Type 2) Transom 2 (Type 2) Check Stainless Steel Spandrel Panel Joints & Connections Mullion Shear Connectors Header Transom Connection Check Sill Transom Connection Check Transom - 1 Connection Check Transom - 2 (System 1) Connection Check Transom - 2 (System 2) Connection Check Sword Connection Check 113

3 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 3 of Back Pan Check SUMMARY This set of structural calculation covers only Wall Type 3 curtain wall system. This includes the typical units except those located at the corners in which the structural calculations are submitted under a separate cover. The results of the system analyses and all associated structural calculations in the succeeding sections of this report are summarized as follows: Element Material Table 1 Results Summary Stress Utilization Deflection Utilization Critical Male Mullion 6063-T6 98 % 98 % Biaxial bending 8.1 Female Mullion 6063-T6 43 % 62 % Bending 8.1 Section Referenc e Stack Joint - Header 6063-T6 65 % 38 % Biaxial bending Stack Joint - Sill 6063-T6 35 % 38 % Bending Transom 1 (Type1) 6063-T6 43 % 45 % Biaxial bending Transom 1 (Type2) 6063-T6 52 % 62 % Biaxial bending Transom 2 (Type1) 6063-T6 44 % 41 % Biaxial bending Transom 2 (Type2) 6063-T6 59 % 71 % Biaxial bending Sword (Type 1) 6063-T6 8 % - No bending (only shear) Sword (Type 2) 7022-T % - Biaxial bending Thermal Break Polyamide 95 % - Shear Connections - Screw ST4.8 A % - Shear

4 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 4 of BASIC DATA 2.1 Standards and References Codes and Standards Table Codes and Standards Nr. Code/Standard Title 1 ASTM F593 Standard Specification for Stainless Steel Bolts, Hex Cap Screws, and Studs 2 ASTM 1300 Standard Practice for Determining Load Resistance of Glass in Buildings 3 ADM 2005 The Aluminum Association Inc. "Aluminum Design Manual", 4 AAMA TIR-A8-04 Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing Systems 5 AAMA TIR-A Metal Curtain Wall Fasteners 6 EN ISO 1478:1999 Tapping screw thread 7 ISO :1997 Mechanical properties of corrosion-resistant stainless-steel fasteners -Part 1: Bolts, screws and studs 8 ISO 7049: 1983 Cross recessed pan head tapping screws Document reference Table Project Specification by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP (SOM) Nr. Document Title 1 SOM Section Structural Steel - Part 1 - General 2 SOM Section Steel deck - Part 1 - General 3 SOM Section Strongback metal framing - Part 1 - General 4 SOM Section Exterior wall - Part 1 - General 5 SOM Section Glazing - Part 1 - General 6 SOM Section Window wall - Part 1 - General 7 SOM Section Wall louvers - Part 1 - General Drawing reference Table Drawings by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP (SOM) Nr. Drawing Nr. Title 1 AL-00-AR-502 Rev 009 Building enclosure wind pressure diagrams (addendum 051) Table Schmidlin Drawings Nr. Drawing Nr. Title 1 SD-001 Wall type 1: SD-001 Rev 00 2 SD-102 Wall type 1-5: SD-102 Rev 00 3 SD-113 Wall type 1-5: SD-113 Rev 00 4 SD-150 Wall type 1-5: SD-150 Rev 00 5 SD-151 Wall type 1-5: SD-151 Rev 00 6 SD-170 Wall type 1-5: SD-170 Rev 00 7 SD-171 Wall type 1-5: SD-171 Rev 00

5 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 5 of Materials Material Properties Material Extrusion 6063-T6 Sheets 5005-H14 Sword T6 Sword T651 Modulus of Elasticity, E (N/mm 2 ) Table Properties of Aluminum Min. Tensile Yield Strength, Modulus of Elasticity for deflection, E (N/mm 2 ) Fty (N/mm 2 ) Min. Tensile Ultimate Strength, Ftu (N/mm 2 ) Reference ADM 2005 Table 3.3-1M ADM 2005 Table 3.3-1M ADM 2005 Table 3.3-1M EN - AW7022 Table Properties of Stainless Steel Material Modulus Modulus Min. Tensile Yield Min. Tensile Reference of Elasticity, E (N/mm 2 ) of Elasticity for deflection, E (N/mm 2 ) Strength, Fty (N/mm 2 ) Ultimate Strength, Ftu (N/mm 2 ) Gr ASTM A240 Material A2/A (S31603) Modulus of Elasticity, E (N/mm 2 ) Table Properties of Screws Modulus Min. Tensile Yield of Elasticity for Strength, deflection, E (N/mm 2 ) Fty (N/mm 2 ) Min. Tensile Ultimate Strength, Ftu (N/mm 2 ) Reference EN ISO (ASTM A240) Note: 1 A4 austenitic steel is equivalent to S31603 (low carbon-316l) based on similar chemical properties in ASTM A240 and EN ISO , 2.3 Performance Criteria The deflection limits are based on the performance requirements stated in SOM Project Specification on Window Wall. Table Deflection Limits [ 1.3.B. Deflections, SOM 08900] Criteria Member Glass Entire Assembly Span 4800mm 1/175 of the clear span, or 19mm 25mm 38mm Span > 4800mm 1/250 of the clear span, or 38mm 25mm 63mm Parallel to wall plane 75% of the clearance Programs used for the structural analysis Table Deflection Limits [Others] Criteria Member In-plane deflection 75% clearance Table Computer Software Criteria Usage Description MS Office Excel 2003 Checking profile Spreadsheet AutoCAD 2004 Obtaining section properties Drafting ANSYS 2004 Finite Element Analysis ANSYS (R) Release 9.OA1 UP , ANSYS (R) Mechanical Toolbar Release 9.OA1 UP , Copyright 2004 SAS IP, Inc.

6 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 6 of LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS The typical units of Wall Type 3, has a general height of 3.70m. For the width of the units, refer to Table on Critical Panel Evaluation. 3.1 Key Location: Wall Type 3 Wall Type 3 is located at levels 7, 8, 25, 33, 37, 52 & 63 indicated by ( ) mark. 3.2 Façade Elevation: Wall Type 3 Fig Wall Type 3 Key Location Stack Jojnt Header Transom Transom 1 (Type 1) Stack Jojnt Header Transom Transom 1 (Type 2) Mullion Male & Female Mullion Male & Female Transom 2 (Type 1) Stack Joint Sill Transom Transom 2 (Type 2) Stack Joint Sill Transom (a) Structural System - 1 (b) Structural System - 2 Fig Wall Type 3 Layout

7 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 7 of DESIGN NARRATIVE 4.1 Load Path Vertical Loads Vertical loads, due to the weight of the curtain wall unit including all attachments, are transferred equally by the vertical mullions on both sides of the CW unit. Each mullion has a bracket that is mated to another brackets that are mounted on the floor slab of the base building Lateral Loads Fig Dead Load Supports Lateral load, due to wind load applied perpendicular to the face of the unit, is (1) transferred through the mullions and to the brackets that are mounted on the floor slab of the base building (see Fig. 3). Part of the loads (2) are transferred directly to the bracket and the other part goes through the sword and finally to the bracket on CW unit below. WIND LOAD WIND LOAD Fig Wind Load Supports

8 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 8 of Coupled Mullion The Mullions consist of a coupled pair of two distinct aluminum profiles which are so called male and female parts (see Figure below). A continuous part of the male profile penetrates a continuous groove part of the female to serve as shear connector in coupling them together in resisting bending due to lateral loads. Fig Couple Mullion Profiles (a) Deflection. Given the fact that with the shear connector the pair of mullion work together in bending about the minor-axis, both parts will deflect along the major-axis, at the same rate δ MALE = δ FEMALE (b) Bending Stiffness. Since both parts have equal deflection, the stiffness of both parts are responsible for the load carrying capacity. Assuming that the longitudinal shear, due to friction of the shear connector contact with the female groove, is negligible, the total stiffness, EI of the coupled mullion setup is given as: EITOTAL = EIMALE + EI FEMALE (c) Load Sharing. Each part of the mullion setup share a certain amount of the internal moment in proportion to their stiffness: M MALE EI MALE = MTOTAL EITOTAL M FEMALE EI FEMALE = M TOTAL EITOTAL (d) Effective Section Modulus. The effective section properties of the mullion profile is predicted by adopting the procedure outlined in AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing Systems.

9 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 9 of 117 (e) Determining the Design Value of Gc. The procedure below outlines the determination of the design shear modulus (Gc) of the thermal barrier being utilized as a medium for composite action between connected extrusion parts. 1. A test beam is performed to determine the elasticity constant (c) of the combined profile assembly. The elasticity constant is determined as the unit deformation of the assembly under an applied longitudinal shear force. This deformation is the combined effect of slippage and shear deformation of the thermal break material. The test is performed under different temperature conditions of -20 C, +20 C and +80 C. c = F l l where: c = elasticity constant in N/mm 2 = applied force in N l = deformation in mm l = length of the specimen in mm Fig Shear Test Specimen 2. Test Results. Please refer to Appendix A for the complete test report. Test Results Temperature Shear strength Tensile strength Elasticity constant, c Factor of safety for design strength 1-20 C 55.1 N/mm 28.9 N/mm 89 N/mm C 50.4 N/mm - 69 N/mm C 50.8 N/mm 61.3 N/mm 57 N/mm Note: 1 In checking the longitudinal shear (shear flow) in the thermal barrier, a factor of safety of 3.0 is considered when calculated using a more precise FEM analysis. In cases where equation (28) of AAMA-TIR-A8-04 is used to approximate the shear flow, a lower factor of safety is considered since the accuracy of this equation depends on the degree of symmetry of the two faces being combined. In the case of the profiles used in the system, the two faces are always very far from being symmetrical. 3. Design value Gc is calculated considering the relationship: h ( ) Gc = c where: Gc = shear modulus of the core in N/mm2 b h = height of the thermal break in mm. b = total thickness of the thermal break in mm. Design Value of Gc. For h = 27mm and b = 4mm Temperature Elasticity constant, c Shear Modulus, Gc -20 C 89 N/mm N/mm C 69 N/mm N/mm C 57 N/mm N/mm 2 4. Predictions of effective moment of Inertia (I e) are calculated for a range of Gc based on the shear test results. The results are plotted on predicted effective I versus span L graph. Upper -20 C Gc = N/mm 2 Lower +80 C Gc = N/mm 2 Using the conservative value from the test, the design value of Gc used in the analysis is when the thermal break is elevated temperature of +80 C: Gc = N / mm 2

10 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 10 of Mullion Structural Systems The sword inside the mullion has to transfer the shear reaction force of the CW unit above to the unit below. But sometimes an amount of bending moment is transferred between mullions after a certain amount of rotation at the ends of the mullion during service condition. Effectively at that stage, the mullion is acting as a continuous beam system. Due to the gap between the extrusion dimensions and the sword dimensions a certain slip (free slip angle ) occurs and therefore the continuous system may only occur after a certain rotation at the beam ends. q q (a) Section (b) Structural System - 1 (c) Structural System - 2 Fig Mullion Structural Systems Applying the above theory to optimize the use of the mullion profiles two systems of structural behavior are resolved with the following objective: The same male and female profile will be used throughout the entire job, and Only the swords will vary, in length and the grade of material Structural System 1 ( ): Sword is shorter and used as a shear connector only. That is, no contact between the sword and the aluminum extrusion during service conditions, making it incapable of transferring moment between mullions above or below. Therefore, the mullions act as simple beams. This is applied where there is little load on the mullions. ρ, end rotation h SW Sword (short) gap/2 gap/2 q L SW EI' L M MAX δ MAX Deflected Mullion Mullion α, free slip angle Load Moment Deflection Fig Structural System - 1

11 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 11 of Structural System 2 ( ): Sword is longer and is utilized to transfer moment. That is, there is contact between the sword and the aluminum extrusion during service condition, allowing transfer of bending moment between the mullion profiles. Therefore, the system acts as a continuous beam. This system is used for cases where system 1 is not sufficient to cater the loads. (a) Stage 1 ( ): The system is initially behaving as a simple beam. That is, no contact between the sword and the aluminum extrusion, making it incapable of transferring moment between mullion profiles. (b) Stage 2 ( ): The system finally behaves as a continuous beam. That is, there is contact between the sword and the aluminum extrusion, allowing transfer of bending moment between the mullion profiles. STAGE 1 (ρ<α): Simple Beam ρ, end rotation h SW Sword (short) gap/2 gap/2 q 1 L SW EI' L M 1 δ 1 Deflected Mullion Mullion α, free slip angle Load Moment Deflection STAGE 2(ρ<α): Continuous Beam ρ, end rotation M SW Sword (longer) Sword q 2 EI L M 2 w 2 F couple,sw Sword F couple,sw Deflected Mullion Moment Deflection Load Coupling forces Fig Structural System - 2

12 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 12 of Structural System Layout The figure below shows the locations where structural systems 1 and 2 are applied. Note that corner panels are not included in this set of structural calculations but nevertheless have been indicated as system 2. (3 CW UNITS BOTH SIDES) WING - A SYSTEM 2 (3 CW UNITS BOTH SIDES) WING - A SYSTEM 1 (ALL THE REST) SYSTEM 1 (ALL THE REST) SYSTEM 1 SYSTEM 1 (ALL THE REST) (ALL THE REST) WING - C WING - B WING - C WING - B SYSTEM 1 SYSTEM 2 (ALL THE REST) SYSTEM 2 (3 CW UNITS BOTH SIDES) LEVEL 7&8 TIER 0 (3 CW UNITS BOTH SIDES) SYSTEM 1 (ALL THE REST) SYSTEM 2 SYSTEM 2 (3 CW UNITS BOTH SIDES) (5 CW UNITS BOTH SIDES) LEVEL 25 TIER 1 SYSTEM 2 (3 CW UNITS BOTH SIDES) WING - A SYSTEM 2 (3 CW UNITS BOTH SIDES) WING - A SYSTEM 1 (ALL THE REST) SYSTEM 1 (ALL THE REST) SYSTEM 1 (ALL THE REST) SYSTEM 1 (ALL THE REST) WING - C WING - B WING - C WING - B SYSTEM 2 (5 CW UNITS BOTH SIDES) SYSTEM 1 (ALL THE REST) LEVEL 33 TIER 2 SYSTEM 2 (3 CW UNITS BOTH SIDES) SYSTEM 2 (3 CW UNITS BOTH SIDES) SYSTEM 1 (ALL THE REST) LEVEL 37 TIER 3 SYSTEM 2 (3 CW UNITS BOTH SIDES) SYSTEM 2 (3 CW UNITS BOTH SIDES) WING - A SYSTEM 2 (3 CW UNITS BOTH SIDES) WING - A SYSTEM 1 (ALL THE REST) SYSTEM 1 (ALL THE REST) SYSTEM 1 (ALL THE REST) SYSTEM 1 (ALL THE REST) WING - C WING - B WING - C WING - B SYSTEM 1 SYSTEM 2 (ALL THE REST) SYSTEM 2 (3 CW UNITS BOTH SIDES) LEVEL 52 TIER 4 (5 CW UNITS BOTH SIDES) SYSTEM 2 Fig Structural System Layout SYSTEM 1 SYSTEM 2 (ALL THE REST) (14 CW UNITS BOTH SIDES) (3 CW UNITS BOTH SIDES) LEVEL 63 TIER 5

13 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 13 of Critical Panel Evaluation To evaluate the most critical panel two criteria are to be checked, the stress index and the deflection index. The indices of each panel type are determined from the variable parameters in calculating the bending moment and deflections. The criteria for this evaluation are summarized in the tables below. The panel under the most critical circumstances will be the subject of the structural system analysis in the succeeding sections of this report. Constant Member Analysis Parameters - Span (H) Stress - Cross-sectional properties. Mullion - Span (H) Deflection - Cross-sectional properties. - Tributary widths (bu& bl) Stress - Cross-sectional properties Transom Deflection - Tributary widths (bu & bl) - Cross-sectional properties Table Critical Panel Evaluation Critical Variable Parameters Index Uniform load - Tributary width (W) - Wind load, Qw - Panel width (W) - Wind load, Qw - Span (W) - Wind load, Qw - Span (W) - Wind load, Qw Uniform load Bending moment Deflection System - 1 System - 2 W Qw = 4.83 KN/m Wing B (Zone C) QW = ±3.5 KPa W = m Qw W 2 = 7.58 KN Qw W 4 = 19.2 KN m 2 Wing B (Zone C) QW = ±3.0 KPa W = 1.59 m W Qw = 8.7 KN/m Qw W 2 = 16.9 KN Qw W 4 = 63.7 KN m 2 Wing B (Zone D) QW = ±4.5 KPa W = 1.94 m Wind load, ±Q w [KN/m 2 ] WING - A Table Panel Parameters WING - B WING - C Structural System System 1 System 2 System 1 System 2 System 1 System 2 Loading Zone A B C D 1 A B C D 1 A B C D 1 Level 7 & 8 (Tier 0) Level 25 (Tier 1) Level 33 (Tier 2) Level 37 (Tier 3) Level 52 (Tier 4) Level 63 (Tier 5) Panel width (up to ), m W = Mullion, Stress Index W Q w = Mullion, Deflection Index W Q w = Transom, Stress Index Q w W 2 = Transom, Deflection Index Q w W 4 = Note: 1 Structural system 2 extends to the shaded cell in the table. Fig Key Plan for Wind Load Distribution

14 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 14 of CW In-plane Performance The in-plane behavior of the CW structural members is dealt due to the following situations: (a) In-plane Wind load. Wind load applied to the protruding surface of the vertical fins produces torsion as well as bending on the weak axis of the mullion profiles. This wind load is calculated as per the 1997 UBC code as a parapet wall with pressure coefficient of 1.3 inward and outward. See 5.2 on Wind loads. Wind force normal Wind force on protrusions (fins) Fig Wind Load on Fins (b) Slab deflection. Due to slab deflection two loading scenarios occur on the system which are addressed in this set of calculation: Where the slab has uneven deflection at the bracket locations of a given CW unit, the bracket that is located on the lower point of the deflected slab will become a dead bracket which means it is carrying no weight because the slab is hanging below. This results to a one-side supported unit wherein the other bracket carries the whole weight and causes the CW unit to rotate due to the eccentric application of its weight (dead load). Couple force is then produced to counteract the rotation. The couple is a set of horizontal forces acting on the live bracket and on the sword. At the apex of the deflected slab, live brackets occur at the same point for two adjacent CW units. Thus, the bracket mounted on the slab shall be designed to cater for this double loading. Error! Objects cannot be created from editing field codes. Fig Racking of CW Units

15 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 15 of LOADING 5.1 Dead Load, QD Table Weight of Structural System - 1, Total weight = 3.07 kn (313 kg.) Element Refer. Specific Wt. Real constant 1 Unit Wt. Real constant 2 Total wt. k1 = k1 k2 W = k2 Aluminum Extrusion 0.53 kn Male mullion 6.1.1(a) 27.0 kn/m 3 A = 2414 mm kn/m L = 3.70m 0.24 kn Female mullion 6.1.2(a) 27.0 kn/m 3 A = 883 mm kn/m L = 3.70m 0.09 kn Header transom 6.2.1(a) 27.0 kn/m 3 A = 946 mm kn/m L = 1.39m 0.04 kn Sill transom 6.2.2(a) 27.0 kn/m 3 A = 1282 mm kn/m L = 1.39m 0.05 kn Transom (a) 27.0 kn/m 3 A = 1067 mm kn/m L = 1.39m 0.04 kn Transom (a) 27.0 kn/m 3 A = 984 mm kn/m L = 1.39m 0.04 kn Sword kn/m 3 A = 2100 mm kn/m L = 0.50m 0.03 kn Upper spandrel panel 0.41 kn/m kn Stainless Steel Sheet M kn/ m 3 t = 1.5mm 0.12 kn/m 2 A = 0.65 m kn Steel Sheet M kn/m 3 t = 1.5mm 0.12 kn/m 2 A = 0.65 m kn Insulation M9 0.7 kn/m 3 t = 70mm 0.05 kn/m 2 A = 0.65 m kn Steel Sheet M kn/m 3 t = 1.5mm 0.12 kn/m 2 A = 0.65 m kn Vision panel 0.45 kn/m kn Glass GL kn/m 3 t = 18mm 0.45 kn/m 2 A = 3.93 m kn Lower Spandrel panel 0.45 kn/m kn Glass GL kn/m 3 t = 18mm 0.45 kn/m 2 A = 0.54 m kn Accessories 0.05 kn/m kn Thermal break, setting block, gaskets, sealant, screws, etc. approx.10%w A = 5.12 m kn Table Weight of Structural System - 2, Total weight = 4.63 kn (472 kg.) Element Refer. Specific Wt. Real constant 1 Unit Wt. Real constant 2 Total wt. k1 = k1 k2 W = k2 Aluminum Extrusion 0.76 kn Male mullion 6.1.1(a) 27.0 kn/m 3 A = 2414 mm kn/m L = 3.70m 0.24 kn Female mullion 6.1.2(a) 27.0 kn/m 3 A = 883 mm kn/m L = 3.70m 0.09 kn Header transom 7.2.1(a) 27.0 kn/m 3 A = 946 mm kn/m L = 1.94m 0.05 kn Sill transom 7.2.2(a) 27.0 kn/m 3 A = 1282 mm kn/m L = 1.94m 0.07 kn Transom (a) 27.0 kn/m 3 A = 2181 mm kn/m L = 1.94m 0.11 kn Transom (a) 27.0 kn/m 3 A = 2050 mm kn/m L = 1.94m 0.11 kn Sword kn/m 3 A = 2100 mm kn/m L = 1.42m 0.09 kn Upper spandrel panel 0.41 kn/m kn Stainless Steel Sheet M kn/ m 3 t = 1.5mm 0.12 kn/m 2 A = 0.91 m kn Steel Sheet M kn/m 3 t = 1.5mm 0.12 kn/m 2 A = 0.91 m kn Insulation M9 0.7 kn/m 3 t = 70mm 0.05 kn/m 2 A = 0.91 m kn Steel Sheet M kn/m 3 t = 1.5mm 0.12 kn/m 2 A = 0.91 m kn Vision panel 0.50 kn/m kn Glass GL kn/m 3 t = mm 0.50 kn/m 2 A = 5.51 m kn Lower Spandrel panel 0.50 kn/m kn Glass GL kn/m 3 t = mm 0.50 kn/m 2 A = 0.76 m kn Accessories 0.05 kn/m kn Thermal break, setting block, gaskets, sealant, screws, etc. approx.10%w A = 7.18 m kn

16 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 16 of Wind Load, QW Applied wind loads are in accordance to SOM Drawing Nr. AL-00-AR-502 Building Enclosure Wind Pressure Diagrams (Addendum 057) Wind Load on Wall Elements. A comprehensive summary of the wind load stated above is found on Table Wind loads on Vertical Fins. The positive values from wind load zone `E on parapet walls are considered for the wind Loads on the vertical fins. The negative values on parapet walls are not considered because this includes the trapped air at return corners which does not happen on the vertical fins. Table Wind Load on Vertical Fins Vertical Fin 1 LOAD, KN/m 2 Zone E Level 7 & Level Level Level Level Level Note. 1 Values for the parapet walls are conservatively adopted for the vertical fins.

17 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 17 of SECTION PROPERTIES STRUCTURAL SYSTEM Mullion Profiles Male Mullion (a) Cross-sectional Properties. The properties of the profile cross-section are calculated using ANSYS beam plot section command. Fig Section Properties (b) Effective Section Modulus. The effective section properties of the mullion profile are predicted by adopting the procedure outlined in AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing Systems of AAMA TIR-A8-04 defines the effective shear area, A as the sum of the areas of the web elements. In this case, all elements that are oriented parallel to the shear direction are considered effective in resisting shear A1 = 266.5mm2 c.g A2a = 623.7mm2 286 c.g. c.g.2 DIAGONALLY ORIENTED WEBS: A2b = 674.1mm A2 = A2a+ A2bxcos(13deg.) A2 = mm2 13 A = A1 + A2 A = mm2 SECTION PROPERTIES SHEAR AREA Fig Parameters in Determining the Effective Section Modulus DISTANCES

18 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 18 of 117 Effective Section Modulus Calculation Male Mullion (System 1) AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L = 3.70 m. Unsupported span of the member E = Mpa Young's modulus of aluminum faces G c = Mpa Design shear modulus of thermal break w = 1.0 kn/m Considered uniform unit load M = w L 2 /8 = 1.7 KN m Maximum bending moment due to unit load A = m Shear area of aluminum h = mm Overall depth of extrusion g = 17.9 mm Gap (clearance) between faces D c = 27.0 mm Maximum cavity depth b = 4.0 mm Average width of thermal break core a 1 = mm 2 a 2 = mm 2 Cross sectional area I o1 = 2.43E+05 mm 4 I o2 = 6.29E+06 mm 4 Moment of inertia c 11 = 30.4 mm c 22 = mm Extreme fiber dist. to c.g.of f D = h - (c 11 +c 22 ) = mm Distance between centroidal axes of both faces 7.5.4(1) I c = a 1 a 2 D 2 /(a 1 +a 2 ) = 1.09E+07 mm 4 For the case where both faces are same material 7.5.4(2) I o = I o1 +I o2 = 6.53E+06 mm 4 Lower bound on stiffness I'e (no composite action) 7.5.4(3) I = I c + I o = 1.74E+07 mm 4 Upper bound on stiffness I'e (full composite action) 7.5.4(5) Composite Analysis G p = I b D 2 G c /(I c D c ) = 2.01E+06 N Geometric and core material parameter 7.5.4(6) c = G p /(E I o ) = 4.46E-06 /mm 2 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges 7.5.4(Table3) D 0 = w E I o I c /(G p 2 I) = 0.07 mm Constant for the elastic curve formula D 1 = -w L I c /(2G p I)-wL 3 /(24E I) = 0.00 Ditto D 2 = w I c /(2G p I) = 1.6E-07 /mm Ditto D 3 = w L/(12E I) = 2.6E-10 /mm 2 Ditto D 4 = -w/(24e I) = -3.5E-14 /mm 3 D 5 = 0.00 r = (L/2)(c) 0.5 = (Table5) F 1 = -w I c e -r /[c G p I(e r +e -r )] = -2.8E-05 mm Complementary constants F 2 = F 1 e 2r = mm Ditto 7.5.4(8a) p = x(c) 0.5 = 3.91 for x = L/2 = 1850 mm 7.5.4(8) y =D 5 x 5 +D 4 x 4 +D 3 x 3 +D 2 x2+d 1 x+d 0 +F 1 e p +F 2 /e p = 2.57 mm Calculated effective maximum deflection, D5 = (21) y'' =20D 5 x 3 +12D 4 x 2 +6D 3 x+2d 2 +c(f 1 e p +F 2 /e p ) = 1.72E-06 /mm 7.5.4(10) I e = w L 4 /(76.8E y) = 1.38E+07 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia w/o shear deformation 7.5.4(17) I' e = I e /{ 1+[25.6I e /(L 2 A)} = 1.36E+07 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia considering shear def (19) S e1 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 1 D)+E c 11 y''] = 1.34E+05 mm 3 Effective section face (20) S e2 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 2 D)+E c 22 y''] = 1.05E+05 mm 3 Effective section face (25a) Shear Flow Data y''' =6D 3 +c 1.5 (F 1 -F 2 ) = 2.20E-09 /mm (24) V c /w = w L/2 -E I o y''' = mm Shear resisted by thermal break per unif. unit load 7.5.4(28) V c /(D w) = 5.79 Shear flow per uniform unit load, w 2.00E+07 Effective I Curve Moment of Inertia [mm 4] 1.50E E E+07 I (fully composite) Ie for upper bound Gc Ie for lower bound Gc I'e for upper bound Gc I'e for lower bound Gc Io (non-composite) 5.00E Span, L [m]

19 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 19 of 117 (c) Allowable Stress Under Lateral Buckling The moment of inertia about the minor axis (Iy) and the torsional constant (J) are conservatively calculated as the sum of the individual properties of face 1 (Izz,1, J1) and face 2 (Izz,2,J2) profiles. ADM 2005: Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L b1 = 2.84 m Unbraced length for face-1 under compression L b2 = 3.70 m Unbraced length for face-2 under compression I y = 6.4E+05 mm 4 Moment of inertia of profile J = 8.8E+05 mm 4 Torsional constant of profile S c1 = 1.3E+05 mm 3 Section modulus for face 1 under compression S c2 = 1.1E+05 mm 3 Section modulus for face 2 under compression 3.3-1M F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Alloy compressive yield strength E = Mpa Young's Modulus Buckling Analysis n y = 1.65 Factor of safety on yield strength B c = F cy [1+(F cy /15510) 0.5 ] = Buckling formula intercept for comp. in beam flanges D c = (B c /10)(B c /E) 0.5 = 0.98 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges C c = 0.41(B c /D c ) = Buckling formula intersection for comp. in beam flanges S 1 = [(B c -F cy )/1.6D c ] 2 = Lower bound slender limit S 2 = (C c /1.6) 2 = Upper bound slender limit Face-1: S = L b1 S c1 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = Slenderness ratio for face-1 under compression Criteria = S1 < S < S2 Intermediate beam-compression member F c1 = 1/n y (B c -1.6D c S 0.5 ) = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB Face-2: S = L b2 S c2 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = Slenderness ratio for face-2 under compression Criteria = S1 < S < S2 Intermediate beam-compression member F c2 = 1/n y (B c -1.6D c S 0.5 ) = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB (d) Allowable Stress Under Local Buckling Element 2 c.g. Element 3 Fig Elements Critical Under Local Buckling

20 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 20 of 117 The governing allowable stress, under local buckling as calculated below, is summarized as follows: ace 1, considering elements 1, & 2 ace 2, considering element 3 c1 = MPa c2 = 131.0MPa Element 1 ADM 2005, : Uniform Compression in Elements of Beams - Flat Elements Supported on Both Edges Clause Action Notes b = 30.5 m Width of the flat element t = 1.8 mm Thickness of the flat element 3.3-1M F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Alloy compressive yield strength E = Mpa Young's Modulus n y = 1.65 Factor of safety on yield strength k 1 = 0.35 Coefficient for determining slenderness limit B p = F cy [1+(F cy ) 1/3 /21.7] = Buckling formula intercept for comp. in flat element D p = (B p /10)(B p /E) 0.5 = 1.18 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in flat elements S 1 = (B p -F cy )/1.6D p = 23.0 Lower bound slender limit S 2 = k 1 B p /1.6D p = 39.5 Upper bound slender limit b/t = 16.9 Slenderness ratio Criteria = b/t < S1 Short compression element F c = F cy /n y = Mpa Allowable compressive stress Element 2 ADM 2005, : Compression in Elements of Beams - Flat Elements Supported on Both Edges Clause Action Notes b = 45.8 m Width of the flat element t = 1.8 mm Thickness of the flat element Cc = mm Distance from N.A. to heavily compressed edge Co = mm Distance from N.A. to other edge 3.3-1M F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Alloy compressive yield strength E = Mpa Young's Modulus n y = 1.65 Factor of safety on yield strength k 1 = 0.50 Coefficient for determining slenderness limit Co/Cc = 0.66 m = 1.15+Co/(2Cc) = 1.48 for -1 < Co/Cc < B br = 1.3F cy [1+(F cy ) 1/3 /13.3] = Buckling formula intercept for comp. in flat element D br = (B br /20)(6B br /E) 0.5 = 2.57 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in flat elements S 1 = (B br -1.3F cy )/m D br = 24.2 Lower bound slender limit S 2 = k 1 B br /m D br = 41.1 Upper bound slender limit h/t = 25.4 Slenderness ratio Criteria = S1 < h/t < S2 Intermediate compression element F c = (1/n y )[B br -m D br (h/t)] = Mpa Allowable compressive stress

21 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 21 of 117 Element 3 ADM 2005, : Compression in Elements of Beams - Flat Elements Supported on Both Edges Clause Action Notes b = 66.3 m Width of the flat element t = 2.5 mm Thickness of the flat element Cc = mm Distance from N.A. to heavily compressed edge Co = mm Distance from N.A. to other edge 3.3-1M F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Alloy compressive yield strength E = Mpa Young's Modulus n y = 1.65 Factor of safety on yield strength k 1 = 0.50 Coefficient for determining slenderness limit Co/Cc = 0.54 m = 1.15+Co/(2Cc) = 1.42 for -1 < Co/Cc < B br = 1.3F cy [1+(F cy ) 1/3 /13.3] = Buckling formula intercept for comp. in flat element D br = (B br /20)(6B br /E) 0.5 = 2.57 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in flat elements S 1 = (B br -1.3F cy )/m D br = 25.2 Lower bound slender limit S 2 = k 1 B br /m D br = 42.9 Upper bound slender limit h/t = 26.5 Slenderness ratio Criteria = S1 < h/t < S2 Intermediate compression element F c = (1/n y )[B br -m D br (h/t)] = Mpa Allowable compressive stress Female Mullion (a) Cross-sectional Properties. The properties of the profile cross-section are calculated using ANSYS beam plot section command. Fig Section Properties (b) Effective Section Modulus. The effective section properties of the mullion profile is predicted by adopting the procedure outlined in AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing Systems of AAMA TIR-A8-04 defines the effective shear area, A as the sum of the areas of the web elements. In this case, all elements that are oriented parallel to the shear direction are considered effective in resisting shear.

22 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 22 of 117 c.g.1 c.g. c.g.2 Fig Parameters in Determining the Effective Section Modulus

23 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 23 of 117 Effective Section Modulus Calculation Female Mullion (System 1) AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L = 3.70 m. Unsupported span of the member E = Mpa Young's modulus of aluminum faces G c = Mpa Design shear modulus of thermal break w = 1.0 kn/m Considered uniform unit load M = w L 2 /8 = 1.7 KN m Maximum bending moment due to unit load A = m Shear area of aluminum h = mm Overall depth of extrusion g = 17.9 mm Gap (clearance) between faces D c = 27.0 mm Maximum cavity depth b = 4.0 mm Average width of thermal break core a 1 = mm 2 a 2 = mm 2 Cross sectional area I o1 = 2.37E+05 mm 4 I o2 = 3.84E+04 mm 4 Moment of inertia c 11 = 29.8 mm c 22 = 20.7 mm Extreme fiber dist. to c.g.of f D = h - (c 11 +c 22 ) = 69.0 mm Distance between centroidal axes of both faces 7.5.4(1) I c = a 1 a 2 D 2 /(a 1 +a 2 ) = 9.67E+05 mm 4 For the case where both faces are same material 7.5.4(2) I o = I o1 +I o2 = 2.75E+05 mm 4 Lower bound on stiffness I'e (no composite action) 7.5.4(3) I = I c + I o = 1.24E+06 mm 4 Upper bound on stiffness I'e (full composite action) 7.5.4(5) Composite Analysis G p = I b D 2 G c /(I c D c ) = 3.49E+05 N Geometric and core material parameter 7.5.4(6) c = G p /(E I o ) = 1.84E-05 /mm 2 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges 7.5.4(Table3) D 0 = w E I o I c /(G p 2 I) = 0.12 mm Constant for the elastic curve formula D 1 = -w L I c /(2G p I)-wL 3 /(24E I) = Ditto D 2 = w I c /(2G p I) = 1.1E-06 /mm Ditto D 3 = w L/(12E I) = 3.6E-09 /mm 2 Ditto D 4 = -w/(24e I) = -4.9E-13 /mm 3 D 5 = 0.00 r = (L/2)(c) 0.5 = (Table5) F 1 = -w I c e -r /[c G p I(e r +e -r )] = -1.6E-08 mm Complementary constants F 2 = F 1 e 2r = mm Ditto 7.5.4(8a) p = x(c) 0.5 = 7.93 for x = L/2 = 1850 mm 7.5.4(8) y =D 5 x 5 +D 4 x 4 +D 3 x 3 +D 2 x2+d 1 x+d 0 +F 1 e p +F 2 /e p = mm Calculated effective maximum deflection, D5 = (21) y'' =20D 5 x 3 +12D 4 x 2 +6D 3 x+2d 2 +c(f 1 e p +F 2 /e p ) = 2.22E-05 /mm 7.5.4(10) I e = w L 4 /(76.8E y) = 1.10E+06 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia w/o shear deformation 7.5.4(17) I' e = I e /{ 1+[25.6I e /(L 2 A)} = 1.09E+06 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia considering shear def (19) S e1 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 1 D)+E c 11 y''] = 2.30E+04 mm 3 Effective section face (20) S e2 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 2 D)+E c 22 y''] = 1.80E+04 mm 3 Effective section face (25a) Shear Flow Data y''' =6D 3 +c 1.5 (F 1 -F 2 ) = 3.12E-08 /mm (24) V c /w = w L/2 -E I o y''' = mm Shear resisted by thermal break per unif. unit load 7.5.4(28) V c /(D w) = Shear flow per uniform unit load, w Moment of Inertia [mm 4] 1.50E E E E E+06 Effective I Curve Ie I (fully for upper composite) bound I'e Gc for upper bound Gc Ie for lower bound I'e Gc for lower bound Gc Io (non-composite) Span, L [m]

24 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 24 of 117 (c) Allowable Stress Under Lateral Buckling The moment of inertia about the minor axis (Iy) and the torsional constant (J) are conservatively calculated as the sum of the individual properties of face 1 (Izz,1, J1) and face 2 (Izz,2,J2) profiles. ADM 2005: Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L b = 2.84 m Unbraced length of the member for bending I y = 9.9E+04 mm 4 Moment of inertia of profile J = 6.7E+04 mm 4 Torsional constant of profile S c1 = 2.3E+04 mm 3 Section modulus for face 1 under compression S c2 = 1.8E+04 mm 3 Section modulus for face 2 under compression 3.3-1M F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Alloy compressive yield strength E = Mpa Young's Modulus Buckling Analysis n y = 1.65 Factor of safety on yield strength B c = F cy [1+(F cy /15510) 0.5 ] = Buckling formula intercept for comp. in beam flanges D c = (B c /10)(B c /E) 0.5 = 0.98 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges C c = 0.41(B c /D c ) = Buckling formula intersection for comp. in beam flanges S 1 = [(B c -F cy )/1.6D c ] 2 = Lower bound slender limit S 2 = (C c /1.6) 2 = Upper bound slender limit Face-1: S = L b S c1 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = Slenderness ratio for face-1 under compression Criteria = S1 < S < S2 Intermediate beam-compression member F c1 = 1/n y (B c -1.6D c S 0.5 ) = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB Face-2: S = L b S c2 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = Slenderness ratio for face-2 under compression Criteria = S1 < S < S2 Intermediate beam-compression member F c2 = 1/n y (B c -1.6D c S 0.5 ) = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB (d) Allowable Stress Under Local Buckling Element 1 Fig Elements Critical Under Local Buckling The governing allowable stress, under local buckling as calculated below, is summarized as follows: ace 1, considering element 1 c1 = 96.1MPa ace 2, no element is critical under local buckling.

25 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 25 of 117 Element 1 ADM 2005, : Uniform Compression in Elements of Beams - Flat Elements Supported on One Edge Clause Action Notes b = 27.3 m Width of the flat element t = 3.0 mm Thickness of the flat element 3.3-1M F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Alloy compressive yield strength E = Mpa Young's Modulus n y = 1.65 Factor of safety on yield strength k 1 = 0.35 Coefficient for determining slenderness limit B p = F cy [1+(F cy ) 1/3 /21.7] = Buckling formula intercept for comp. in flat element D p = (B p /10)(B p /E) 0.5 = 1.18 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in flat elements S 1 = (B p -F cy )/5.1D p = 7.2 Lower bound slender limit S 2 = k 1 B p /5.1D p = 12.4 Upper bound slender limit b/t = 9.1 Slenderness ratio Criteria = S1 < b/t < S2 Intermediate compression element F c = (1/n y )[B p -5.1D p (b/t)] = Mpa Allowable compressive stress

26 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 26 of Stack Joint Transom Profiles Header Transom (a) Cross-sectional Properties. The properties of the profile cross-section are calculated using ANSYS finite element analysis. Fig Section Properties (b) Effective Section Modulus. The effective section properties of the mullion profile is predicted by adopting the procedure outlined in AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing Systems of AAMA TIR-A8-04 defines the effective shear area, A as the sum of the areas of the web elements. In this case, all elements that are oriented parallel to the shear direction are considered effective in resisting shear. A1 = 225.5mm2 A2 = 121.1mm2 FACE-2 c.g.2 FACE-1 c.g. c.g.1 A = A1 + A2 A = 346.6mm2 Fig Parameters in Determining the Effective Section Modulus

27 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 27 of 117 Effective Section Modulus Calculation Header Transom (System 1) AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L = 1.59 m. Unsupported span of the member E = Mpa Young's modulus of aluminum faces G c = Mpa Design shear modulus of thermal break w = 1.0 kn/m Considered uniform unit load M = w L 2 /8 = 0.3 KN m Maximum bending moment due to unit load A = m Shear area of aluminum h = mm Overall depth of extrusion g = 17.9 mm Gap (clearance) between faces D c = 27.0 mm Maximum cavity depth b = 4.0 mm Average width of thermal break core a 1 = mm 2 a 2 = mm 2 Cross sectional area I o1 = 9.41E+04 mm 4 I o2 = 2.36E+04 mm 4 Moment of inertia c 11 = 23.4 mm c 22 = 16.5 mm Extreme fiber dist. to c.g.of f D = h - (c 11 +c 22 ) = 64.5 mm Distance between centroidal axes of both faces 7.5.4(1) I c = a 1 a 2 D 2 /(a 1 +a 2 ) = 9.27E+05 mm 4 For the case where both faces are same material 7.5.4(2) I o = I o1 +I o2 = 1.18E+05 mm 4 Lower bound on stiffness I'e (no composite action) 7.5.4(3) I = I c + I o = 1.05E+06 mm 4 Upper bound on stiffness I'e (full composite action) 7.5.4(5) Composite Analysis G p = I b D 2 G c /(I c D c ) = 2.67E+05 N Geometric and core material parameter 7.5.4(6) c = G p /(E I o ) = 3.29E-05 /mm 2 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges 7.5.4(Table3) D 0 = w E I o I c /(G p 2 I) = 0.10 mm Constant for the elastic curve formula D 1 = -w L I c /(2G p I)-wL 3 /(24E I) = 0.00 Ditto D 2 = w I c /(2G p I) = 1.7E-06 /mm Ditto D 3 = w L/(12E I) = 1.8E-09 /mm 2 Ditto D 4 = -w/(24e I) = -5.8E-13 /mm 3 D 5 = 0.00 r = (L/2)(c) 0.5 = (Table5) F 1 = -w I c e -r /[c G p I(e r +e -r )] = -1.1E-05 mm Complementary constants F 2 = F 1 e 2r = mm Ditto 7.5.4(8a) p = x(c) 0.5 = 4.56 for x = L/2 = 795 mm 7.5.4(8) y =D 5 x 5 +D 4 x 4 +D 3 x 3 +D 2 x2+d 1 x+d 0 +F 1 e p +F 2 /e p = 2.21 mm Calculated effective maximum deflection, D5 = (21) y'' =20D 5 x 3 +12D 4 x 2 +6D 3 x+2d 2 +c(f 1 e p +F 2 /e p ) = 7.64E-06 /mm 7.5.4(10) I e = w L 4 /(76.8E y) = 5.47E+05 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia w/o shear deformation 7.5.4(17) I' e = I e /{ 1+[25.6I e /(L 2 A)} = 5.38E+05 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia considering shear def (19) S e1 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 1 D)+E c 11 y''] = 1.66E+04 mm 3 Effective section face (20) S e2 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 2 D)+E c 22 y''] = 1.61E+04 mm 3 Effective section face (25a) Shear Flow Data y''' =6D 3 +c 1.5 (F 1 -F 2 ) = 3.01E-08 /mm (24) V c /w = w L/2 -E I o y''' = mm Shear resisted by thermal break per unif. unit load 7.5.4(28) V c /(D w) = 8.54 Shear flow per uniform unit load, w Effective I Curve Moment of Inertia [mm 4] 1.00E E E+05 I (fully composite) Ie for upper bound Gc I'e for upper bound Gc Ie for lower bound Gc I'e for lower bound Gc Io (non-composite) 0.00E Span, L [m]

28 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 28 of 117 (c) Allowable Stress Under Lateral Buckling The moment of inertia about the minor axis (Iy) and the torsional constant (J) are conservatively calculated as the sum of the individual properties of face 1 (Iyy,1, J1) and face 2 (Iyy,2,J2) profiles. ADM 2005: Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L b = 1.59 m Unbraced length of the member for bending I y = 7.4E+05 mm 4 Moment of inertia of profile J = 8.4E+04 mm 4 Torsional constant of profile S c1 = 1.7E+04 mm 3 Section modulus for face 1 under compression S c2 = 1.6E+04 mm 3 Section modulus for face 2 under compression 3.3-1M F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Alloy compressive yield strength E = Mpa Young's Modulus Buckling Analysis n y = 1.65 Factor of safety on yield strength B c = F cy [1+(F cy /15510) 0.5 ] = Buckling formula intercept for comp. in beam flanges D c = (B c /10)(B c /E) 0.5 = 0.98 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges C c = 0.41(B c /D c ) = Buckling formula intersection for comp. in beam flanges S 1 = [(B c -F cy )/1.6D c ] 2 = Lower bound slender limit S 2 = (C c /1.6) 2 = Upper bound slender limit Face-1: S = L b S c1 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = Slenderness ratio for face-1 under compression Criteria = S1 < S < S2 Intermediate beam-compression member F c1 = 1/n y (B c -1.6D c S 0.5 ) = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB Face-2: S = L b S c2 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = Slenderness ratio for face-2 under compression Criteria = S1 < S < S2 Intermediate beam-compression member F c2 = 1/n y (B c -1.6D c S 0.5 ) = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB (d) Allowable Stress Under Local Buckling Element 2 c.g. Element 1 FACE-2 FACE-1 Fig Elements Critical Under Local Buckling The governing allowable stress, under local buckling as calculated below, is summarized as follows: ace 1, considering element 1 c1 = 88.2MPa ace 2, considering element 2 c2 = 34.8MPa

29 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 29 of 117 Element 1 ADM 2005, : Uniform Compression in Elements of Beams - Flat Elements Supported on Both Edges Clause Action Notes b = 64.7 m Width of the flat element t = 1.8 mm Thickness of the flat element 3.3-1M F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Alloy compressive yield strength E = Mpa Young's Modulus n y = 1.65 Factor of safety on yield strength k 1 = 0.35 Coefficient for determining slenderness limit B p = F cy [1+(F cy ) 1/3 /21.7] = Buckling formula intercept for comp. in flat element D p = (B p /10)(B p /E) 0.5 = 1.18 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in flat elements S 1 = (B p -F cy )/1.6D p = 23.0 Lower bound slender limit S 2 = k 1 B p /1.6D p = 39.5 Upper bound slender limit b/t = 35.9 Slenderness ratio Criteria = S1 < b/t < S2 Intermediate compression element F c = (1/n y )[B p -1.6D p (b/t)] = Mpa Allowable compressive stress Element 2 ADM 2005, : Uniform Compression in Elements of Beams - Flat Elements Supported on One Edge Clause Action Notes b = 59.8 m Width of the flat element t = 2.0 mm Thickness of the flat element 3.3-1M F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Alloy compressive yield strength E = Mpa Young's Modulus n y = 1.65 Factor of safety on yield strength k 1 = 0.35 Coefficient for determining slenderness limit K 2 = 2.27 Ditto B p = F cy [1+(F cy ) 1/3 /21.7] = Buckling formula intercept for comp. in flat element D p = (B p /10)(B p /E) 0.5 = 1.18 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in flat elements S 1 = (B p -F cy )/5.1D p = 7.2 Lower bound slender limit S 2 = k 1 B p /5.1D p = 12.4 Upper bound slender limit b/t = 29.9 Slenderness ratio Criteria = S2 < b/t Slender compression element F c = k 2 /n y (B p E) 0.5 /(5.1b/t)= Mpa Allowable compressive stress

30 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 30 of Sill Transom (a) Cross-sectional Properties. The properties of the profile cross-section are calculated using ANSYS beam plot section command. Fig Section Properties (b) Effective Section Modulus. The effective section properties of the mullion profile is predicted by adopting the procedure outlined in AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing Systems of AAMA TIR-A8-04 defines the effective shear area, A as the sum of the areas of the web elements. In this case, all elements that are oriented parallel to the shear direction are considered effective in resisting shear. A1 = 280.8mm2 A2 = 115.2mm2 2 x P 37.3 Z c.g. FACE-2 c.g.2 c.g.1 FACE-1 A = A1 + A2 A = 396.0mm2 Fig Parameters in Determining the Effective Section Modulus

31 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 31 of 117 Effective Section Modulus Calculation Sill Transom (System 1) AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L = 1.59 m. Unsupported span of the member E = Mpa Young's modulus of aluminum faces G c = Mpa Design shear modulus of thermal break w = 1.0 kn/m Considered uniform unit load M = w L 2 /8 = 0.3 KN m Maximum bending moment due to unit load A = m Shear area of aluminum h = mm Overall depth of extrusion g = 17.9 mm Gap (clearance) between faces D c = 27.0 mm Maximum cavity depth b = 4.0 mm Average width of thermal break core a 1 = mm 2 a 2 = mm 2 Cross sectional area I o1 = 4.20E+05 mm 4 I o2 = 1.20E+04 mm 4 Moment of inertia c 11 = 32.8 mm c 22 = 18.8 mm Extreme fiber dist. to c.g.of f D = h - (c 11 +c 22 ) = 59.4 mm Distance between centroidal axes of both faces 7.5.4(1) I c = a 1 a 2 D 2 /(a 1 +a 2 ) = 8.12E+05 mm 4 For the case where both faces are same material 7.5.4(2) I o = I o1 +I o2 = 4.32E+05 mm 4 Lower bound on stiffness I'e (no composite action) 7.5.4(3) I = I c + I o = 1.24E+06 mm 4 Upper bound on stiffness I'e (full composite action) 7.5.4(5) Composite Analysis G p = I b D 2 G c /(I c D c ) = 3.08E+05 N Geometric and core material parameter 7.5.4(6) c = G p /(E I o ) = 1.03E-05 /mm 2 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges 7.5.4(Table3) D 0 = w E I o I c /(G 2 p I) = 0.20 mm Constant for the elastic curve formula D 1 = -w L I c /(2G p I)-wL 3 /(24E I) = 0.00 Ditto D 2 = w I c /(2G p I) = 1.1E-06 /mm Ditto D 3 = w L/(12E I) = 1.5E-09 /mm 2 Ditto D 4 = -w/(24e I) = -4.9E-13 /mm 3 D 5 = 0.00 r = (L/2)(c) 0.5 = (Table5) F 1 = -w I c e -r /[c G p I(e r +e -r )] = -1.2E-03 mm Complementary constants F 2 = F 1 e 2r = mm Ditto 7.5.4(8a) p = x(c) 0.5 = 2.56 for x = L/2 = 795 mm 7.5.4(8) y =D 5 x 5 +D 4 x 4 +D 3 x 3 +D 2 x2+d 1 x+d 0 +F 1 e p +F 2 /e p = 1.67 mm Calculated effective maximum deflection, D5 = (21) y'' =20D 5 x 3 +12D 4 x 2 +6D 3 x+2d 2 +c(f 1 e p +F 2 /e p ) = 5.48E-06 /mm 7.5.4(10) I e = w L 4 /(76.8E y) = 7.22E+05 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia w/o shear deformation 7.5.4(17) I' e = I e /{ 1+[25.6I e /(L 2 A)} = 7.09E+05 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia considering shear def (19) S e1 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 1 D)+E c 11 y''] = 2.11E+04 mm 3 Effective section face (20) S e2 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 2 D)+E c 22 y''] = 2.02E+04 mm 3 Effective section face (25a) Shear Flow Data y''' =6D 3 +c 1.5 (F 1 -F 2 ) = 1.60E-08 /mm (24) V c /w = w L/2 -E I o y''' = mm Shear resisted by thermal break per unif. unit load 7.5.4(28) V c /(D w) = 5.36 Shear flow per uniform unit load, w 1.50E+06 Effective I Curve Moment of Inertia [mm 4] 1.00E E E+05 I (fully composite) Ie for upper bound Gc I'e for upper bound Gc Ie for lower bound Gc I'e for lower bound Gc Io (non-composite) 0.00E Span, L [m]

32 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 32 of 117 (c) Allowable Stress Under Lateral Buckling The moment of inertia about the minor axis (Iy) and the torsional constant (J) are conservatively calculated as the sum of the individual properties of face 1 (Iyy,1, J1) and face 2 (Iyy,2,J2) profiles. ADM 2005: Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L b = 1.59 m Unbraced length of the member for bending I y = 9.9E+05 mm 4 Moment of inertia of profile J = 8.2E+04 mm 4 Torsional constant of profile S c1 = 2.1E+04 mm 3 Section modulus for face 1 under compression S c2 = 2.0E+04 mm 3 Section modulus for face 2 under compression 3.3-1M F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Alloy compressive yield strength E = Mpa Young's Modulus Buckling Analysis n y = 1.65 Factor of safety on yield strength B c = F cy [1+(F cy /15510) 0.5 ] = Buckling formula intercept for comp. in beam flanges D c = (B c /10)(B c /E) 0.5 = 0.98 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges C c = 0.41(B c /D c ) = Buckling formula intersection for comp. in beam flanges S 1 = [(B c -F cy )/1.6D c ] 2 = Lower bound slender limit S 2 = (C c /1.6) 2 = Upper bound slender limit Face-1: S = L b S c1 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = Slenderness ratio for face-1 under compression Criteria = S1 < S < S2 Intermediate beam-compression member F c1 = 1/n y (B c -1.6D c S 0.5 ) = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB Face-2: S = L b S c2 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = Slenderness ratio for face-2 under compression Criteria = S1 < S < S2 Intermediate beam-compression member F c2 = 1/n y (B c -1.6D c S 0.5 ) = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB (d) Allowable Stress Under Local Buckling FACE-1 FACE-2 c.g. Element 1 Fig Elements Critical Under Local Buckling The governing allowable stress, under local buckling as calculated below, is summarized as follows: ace 1, considering element 1 c1 = 69.9MPa ace 2, no element is critical under local buckling.

33 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 33 of 117 Element 1 ADM 2005, : Uniform Compression in Elements of Beams - Flat Elements Supported on One Edge Clause Action Notes b = 55.0 m Width of the flat element t = 3.7 mm Thickness of the flat element 3.3-1M F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Alloy compressive yield strength E = Mpa Young's Modulus n y = 1.65 Factor of safety on yield strength k 1 = 0.35 Coefficient for determining slenderness limit K 2 = 2.27 Ditto B p = F cy [1+(F cy ) 1/3 /21.7] = Buckling formula intercept for comp. in flat element D p = (B p /10)(B p /E) 0.5 = 1.18 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in flat elements S 1 = (B p -F cy )/5.1D p = 7.2 Lower bound slender limit S 2 = k 1 B p /5.1D p = 12.4 Upper bound slender limit b/t = 14.9 Slenderness ratio Criteria = S2 < b/t Slender compression element F c = k 2 /n y (B p E) 0.5 /(5.1b/t)= Mpa Allowable compressive stress

34 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 34 of Transom 1 Profile Transom -1 (Type 1) (a) Cross-sectional Properties. The properties of the profile cross-section are calculated using ANSYS beam plot section command. Fig Section Properties (b) Effective Section Modulus. The effective section properties of the mullion profile is predicted by adopting the procedure outlined in AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing Systems of AAMA TIR-A8-04 defines the effective shear area, A as the sum of the areas of the web elements. In this case, all elements that are oriented parallel to the shear direction are considered effective in resisting shear. A1 = 242.2mm2 A2 = 154.7mm2 FACE-2 c.g.2 c.g.1 FACE-1 c.g. A = A1 + A2 A = 396.9mm2 Fig Parameters in Determining the Effective Section Modulus

35 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 35 of 117 Effective Section Modulus Calculation Transom 1 (Type 1: System 1) AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L = 1.59 m. Unsupported span of the member E = Mpa Young's modulus of aluminum faces G c = Mpa Design shear modulus of thermal break w = 1.0 kn/m Considered uniform unit load M = w L 2 /8 = 0.3 KN m Maximum bending moment due to unit load A = 96.9 m Shear area of aluminum h = mm Overall depth of extrusion g = 17.9 mm Gap (clearance) between faces D c = 27.0 mm Maximum cavity depth b = 4.0 mm Average width of thermal break core a 1 = mm 2 a 2 = mm 2 Cross sectional area I o1 = 3.15E+05 mm 4 I o2 = 3.52E+04 mm 4 Moment of inertia c 11 = 30.7 mm c 22 = 14.2 mm Extreme fiber dist. to c.g.of f D = h - (c 11 +c 22 ) = 61.1 mm Distance between centroidal axes of both faces 7.5.4(1) I c = a 1 a 2 D 2 /(a 1 +a 2 ) = 9.47E+05 mm 4 For the case where both faces are same material 7.5.4(2) I o = I o1 +I o2 = 3.50E+05 mm 4 Lower bound on stiffness I'e (no composite action) 7.5.4(3) I = I c + I o = 1.30E+06 mm 4 Upper bound on stiffness I'e (full composite action) 7.5.4(5) Composite Analysis G p = I b D 2 G c /(I c D c ) = 2.92E+05 N Geometric and core material parameter 7.5.4(6) c = G p /(E I o ) = 1.21E-05 /mm 2 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges 7.5.4(Table3) D 0 = w E I o I c /(G p 2 I) = 0.21 mm Constant for the elastic curve formula D 1 = -w L I c /(2G p I)-wL 3 /(24E I) = 0.00 Ditto D 2 = w I c /(2G p I) = 1.3E-06 /mm Ditto D 3 = w L/(12E I) = 1.5E-09 /mm 2 Ditto D 4 = -w/(24e I) = -4.7E-13 /mm 3 D 5 = 0.00 r = (L/2)(c) 0.5 = (Table5) F 1 = -w I c e -r /[c G p I(e r +e -r )] = -8.2E-04 mm Complementary constants F 2 = F 1 e 2r = mm Ditto 7.5.4(8a) p = x(c) 0.5 = 2.76 for x = L/2 = 795 mm 7.5.4(8) y =D 5 x 5 +D 4 x 4 +D 3 x 3 +D 2 x2+d 1 x+d 0 +F 1 e p +F 2 /e p = 1.75 mm Calculated effective maximum deflection, D5 = (21) y'' =20D 5 x 3 +12D 4 x 2 +6D 3 x+2d 2 +c(f 1 e p +F 2 /e p ) = 5.72E-06 /mm 7.5.4(10) I e = w L 4 /(76.8E y) = 6.91E+05 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia w/o shear deformation 7.5.4(17) I' e = I e /{ 1+[25.6I e /(L 2 A)} = 6.44E+05 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia considering shear def (19) S e1 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 1 D)+E c 11 y''] = 1.91E+04 mm 3 Effective section face (20) S e2 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 2 D)+E c 22 y''] = 2.51E+04 mm 3 Effective section face (25a) Shear Flow Data y''' =6D 3 +c 1.5 (F 1 -F 2 ) = 1.75E-08 /mm (24) V c /w = w L/2 -E I o y''' = mm Shear resisted by thermal break per unif. unit load 7.5.4(28) V c /(D w) = 6.09 Shear flow per uniform unit load, w 1.50E+06 Effective I Curve Moment of Inertia [mm 4] 1.00E E E+05 I (fully composite) Ie for upper bound Gc I'e for upper bound Gc Ie for lower bound Gc I'e for lower bound Gc Io (non-composite) 0.00E Span, L [m]

36 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 36 of 117 (c) Allowable Stress Under Lateral Buckling The moment of inertia about the minor axis (Iy) and the torsional constant (J) are conservatively calculated as the sum of the individual properties of face 1 (Iyy,1, J1) and face 2 (Iyy,2,J2) profiles. ADM 2005, : Compression in Beams, Extreme Fiber, Gross Section - Tubular Shapes Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L b = 1.39 m Unbraced length of the member for bending I y = 6.4E+05 mm 4 Moment of inertia of profile J = 5.3E+05 mm 4 Torsional constant of profile S c1 = 1.9E+04 mm 3 Section modulus for face 1 under compression S c2 = 2.5E+04 mm 4 Section modulus for face 2 under compression 3.3-1M F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Alloy compressive yield strength E = Mpa Young's Modulus Buckling Analysis n y = 1.65 Factor of safety on yield strength B c = F cy [1+(F cy /15510) 0.5 ] = Buckling formula intercept for comp. in beam flanges D c = (B c /10)(B c /E) 0.5 = 0.98 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges C c = 0.41(B c /D c ) = Buckling formula intersection for comp. in beam flanges S 1 = [(B c -F cy )/1.6D c ] 2 = Lower bound slender limit S 2 = (C c /1.6) 2 = Upper bound slender limit Face-1: S = L b S c1 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = 90.7 Slenderness ratio for face-1 under compression Criteria = S S1 Short beam-compression meber F c1 = F cy /n y = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB Face-2: S = L b S c2 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = Slenderness ratio for face-2 under compression Criteria = S S1 Short beam-compression meber F c2 = F cy /n y = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB (d) Allowable Stress Under Local Buckling c.g. Element 1 Fig Elements Critical Under Local Buckling The governing allowable stress, under local buckling as calculated below, is summarized as follows: ace 1, considering element 1 c1 = 92.4MPa ace 2, no element is critical under local buckling.

37 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 37 of 117 Element 1 ADM 2005, : Uniform Compression in Elements of Beams - Flat Elements Supported on Both Edges Clause Action Notes b = 64.4 m Width of the flat element t = 2.0 mm Thickness of the flat element 3.3-1M F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Alloy compressive yield strength E = Mpa Young's Modulus n y = 1.65 Factor of safety on yield strength k 1 = 0.35 Coefficient for determining slenderness limit B p = F cy [1+(F cy ) 1/3 /21.7] = Buckling formula intercept for comp. in flat element D p = (B p /10)(B p /E) 0.5 = 1.18 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in flat elements S 1 = (B p -F cy )/1.6D p = 23.0 Lower bound slender limit S 2 = k 1 B p /1.6D p = 39.5 Upper bound slender limit b/t = 32.2 Slenderness ratio Criteria = S1 < b/t < S2 Intermediate compression element F c = (1/n y )[B p -1.6D p (b/t)] = Mpa Allowable compressive stress 6.4 Transom 2 Profile Transom 2 (Type 1) (a) Cross-sectional Properties. The properties of the profile cross-section are calculated using ANSYS beam plot section command. Fig Section Properties (b) Effective Section Modulus. The effective section properties of the mullion profile is predicted by adopting the procedure outlined in AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing Systems of AAMA TIR-A8-04 defines the effective shear area, A as the sum of the areas of the web elements. In this case, all elements that are oriented parallel to the shear direction are considered effective in resisting shear.

38 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 38 of 117 A1 = 263.2mm2 A2 = 151.4mm x P DL FACE-2 c.g.2 c.g.1 FACE-1 c.g. A = A1 + A2 A = 414.6mm2 Fig Parameters in Determining the Effective Section Modulus

39 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 39 of 117 Effective Section Modulus Calculation Transom 2 (Type 1: System 1) AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L = 1.59 m. Unsupported span of the member E = Mpa Young's modulus of aluminum faces G c = Mpa Design shear modulus of thermal break w = 1.0 kn/m Considered uniform unit load M = w L 2 /8 = 0.3 KN m Maximum bending moment due to unit load A = m Shear area of aluminum h = mm Overall depth of extrusion g = 17.9 mm Gap (clearance) between faces D c = 27.0 mm Maximum cavity depth b = 4.0 mm Average width of thermal break core a 1 = mm 2 a 2 = mm 2 Cross sectional area I o1 = 2.96E+05 mm 4 I o2 = 2.91E+04 mm 4 Moment of inertia c 11 = 31.0 mm c 22 = 12.7 mm Extreme fiber dist. to c.g.of f D = h - (c 11 +c 22 ) = 62.3 mm Distance between centroidal axes of both faces 7.5.4(1) I c = a 1 a 2 D 2 /(a 1 +a 2 ) = 8.52E+05 mm 4 For the case where both faces are same material 7.5.4(2) I o = I o1 +I o2 = 3.25E+05 mm 4 Lower bound on stiffness I'e (no composite action) 7.5.4(3) I = I c + I o = 1.18E+06 mm 4 Upper bound on stiffness I'e (full composite action) 7.5.4(5) Composite Analysis G p = I b D 2 G c /(I c D c ) = 3.06E+05 N Geometric and core material parameter 7.5.4(6) c = G p /(E I o ) = 1.36E-05 /mm 2 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges 7.5.4(Table3) D 0 = w E I o I c /(G 2 p I) = 0.17 mm Constant for the elastic curve formula D 1 = -w L I c /(2G p I)-wL 3 /(24E I) = 0.00 Ditto D 2 = w I c /(2G p I) = 1.2E-06 /mm Ditto D 3 = w L/(12E I) = 1.6E-09 /mm 2 Ditto D 4 = -w/(24e I) = -5.1E-13 /mm 3 D 5 = 0.00 r = (L/2)(c) 0.5 = (Table5) F 1 = -w I c e -r /[c G p I(e r +e -r )] = -4.9E-04 mm Complementary constants F 2 = F 1 e 2r = mm Ditto 7.5.4(8a) p = x(c) 0.5 = 2.94 for x = L/2 = 795 mm 7.5.4(8) y =D 5 x 5 +D 4 x 4 +D 3 x 3 +D 2 x2+d 1 x+d 0 +F 1 e p +F 2 /e p = 1.79 mm Calculated effective maximum deflection, D5 = (21) y'' =20D 5 x 3 +12D 4 x 2 +6D 3 x+2d 2 +c(f 1 e p +F 2 /e p ) = 6.01E-06 /mm 7.5.4(10) I e = w L 4 /(76.8E y) = 6.74E+05 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia w/o shear deformation 7.5.4(17) I' e = I e /{ 1+[25.6I e /(L 2 A)} = 6.63E+05 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia considering shear def (19) S e1 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 1 D)+E c 11 y''] = 1.83E+04 mm 3 Effective section face (20) S e2 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 2 D)+E c 22 y''] = 2.25E+04 mm 3 Effective section face (25a) Shear Flow Data y''' =6D 3 +c 1.5 (F 1 -F 2 ) = 1.85E-08 /mm (24) V c /w = w L/2 -E I o y''' = mm Shear resisted by thermal break per unif. unit load 7.5.4(28) V c /(D w) = 6.11 Shear flow per uniform unit load, w 1.50E+06 Effective I Curve Moment of Inertia [mm 4] 1.00E E E+05 I (fully composite) Ie for upper bound Gc I'e for upper bound Gc Ie for lower bound Gc I'e for lower bound Gc Io (non-composite) 0.00E Span, L [m]

40 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 40 of 117 (c) Allowable Stress Under Lateral Buckling The moment of inertia about the minor axis (Iy) and the torsional constant (J) are conservatively calculated as the sum of the individual properties of face 1 (Iyy,1, J1) and face 2 (Iyy,2,J2) profiles. ADM 2005, : Compression in Beams, Extreme Fiber, Gross Section - Tubular Shapes Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L b = 1.39 m Unbraced length of the member for bending I y = 5.5E+05 mm 4 Moment of inertia of profile J = 4.9E+05 mm 4 Torsional constant of profile S c1 = 1.8E+04 mm 3 Section modulus for face 1 under compression S c2 = 2.3E+04 mm 4 Section modulus for face 2 under compression 3.3-1M F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Alloy compressive yield strength E = Mpa Young's Modulus Buckling Analysis n y = 1.65 Factor of safety on yield strength B c = F cy [1+(F cy /15510) 0.5 ] = Buckling formula intercept for comp. in beam flanges D c = (B c /10)(B c /E) 0.5 = 0.98 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges C c = 0.41(B c /D c ) = Buckling formula intersection for comp. in beam flanges S 1 = [(B c -F cy )/1.6D c ] 2 = Lower bound slender limit S 2 = (C c /1.6) 2 = Upper bound slender limit Face-1: S = L b S c1 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = 97.4 Slenderness ratio for face-1 under compression Criteria = S S1 Short beam-compression meber F c1 = F cy /n y = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB Face-2: S = L b S c2 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = Slenderness ratio for face-2 under compression Criteria = S S1 Short beam-compression meber F c2 = F cy /n y = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB (d) Allowable Stress Under Local Buckling c.g. Element 1 Fig Elements Critical Under Local Buckling The governing allowable stress, under local buckling as calculated below, is summarized as follows: ace 1, considering element 1 c1 = 89.0MPa ace 2 No element is critical under lateral buckling.

41 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 41 of 117 Element 1 ADM 2005, : Uniform Compression in Elements of Beams - Flat Elements Supported on Both Edges Clause Action Notes b = 70.4 m Width of the flat element t = 2.0 mm Thickness of the flat element 3.3-1M F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Alloy compressive yield strength E = Mpa Young's Modulus n y = 1.65 Factor of safety on yield strength k 1 = 0.35 Coefficient for determining slenderness limit B p = F cy [1+(F cy ) 1/3 /21.7] = Buckling formula intercept for comp. in flat element D p = (B p /10)(B p /E) 0.5 = 1.18 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in flat elements S 1 = (B p -F cy )/1.6D p = 23.0 Lower bound slender limit S 2 = k 1 B p /1.6D p = 39.5 Upper bound slender limit b/t = 35.2 Slenderness ratio Criteria = S1 < b/t < S2 Intermediate compression element F c = (1/n y )[B p -1.6D p (b/t)] = Mpa Allowable compressive stress

42 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 42 of Sword Profile Sword (Type-1) (a) Cross-sectional Properties. Fig Sword Length 140 Fig Sword Cross-Section

43 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 43 of SECTION PROPERTIES STRUCTURAL SYSTEM Mullion Profiles Male Mullion Section properties of male mullion for Structural system 1 and 2 are the same. Please refer to Female Mullion Section properties of female mullion for Structural system 1 and 2 are the same. Please refer to 6.1.2

44 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 44 of Stack Joint Transom Profiles Header Transom (a) Cross-sectional Properties. The properties of the profile cross-section are calculated using ANSYS finite element analysis. Fig Section Properties (b) Effective Section Modulus. The effective section properties of the mullion profile is predicted by adopting the procedure outlined in AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing Systems of AAMA TIR-A8-04 defines the effective shear area, A as the sum of the areas of the web elements. In this case, all elements that are oriented parallel to the shear direction are considered effective in resisting shear. A1 = 225.5mm2 A2 = 121.1mm2 FACE-2 c.g.2 FACE-1 c.g. c.g.1 A = A1 + A2 A = 346.6mm2 Fig Parameters in Determining the Effective Section Modulus

45 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 45 of 117 Effective Section Modulus Calculation Header Transom (System 2) AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L = 1.94 m. Unsupported span of the member E = Mpa Young's modulus of aluminum faces G c = Mpa Design shear modulus of thermal break w = 1.0 kn/m Considered uniform unit load M = w L 2 /8 = 0.5 KN m Maximum bending moment due to unit load A = m Shear area of aluminum h = mm Overall depth of extrusion g = 17.9 mm Gap (clearance) between faces D c = 27.0 mm Maximum cavity depth b = 4.0 mm Average width of thermal break core a 1 = mm 2 a 2 = mm 2 Cross sectional area I o1 = 9.41E+04 mm 4 I o2 = 2.36E+04 mm 4 Moment of inertia c 11 = 23.4 mm c 22 = 16.5 mm Extreme fiber dist. to c.g.of f D = h - (c 11 +c 22 ) = 64.5 mm Distance between centroidal axes of both faces 7.5.4(1) I c = a 1 a 2 D 2 /(a 1 +a 2 ) = 9.27E+05 mm 4 For the case where both faces are same material 7.5.4(2) I o = I o1 +I o2 = 1.18E+05 mm 4 Lower bound on stiffness I'e (no composite action) 7.5.4(3) I = I c + I o = 1.05E+06 mm 4 Upper bound on stiffness I'e (full composite action) 7.5.4(5) Composite Analysis G p = I b D 2 G c /(I c D c ) = 2.67E+05 N Geometric and core material parameter 7.5.4(6) c = G p /(E I o ) = 3.29E-05 /mm 2 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges 7.5.4(Table3) D 0 = w E I o I c /(G 2 p I) = 0.10 mm Constant for the elastic curve formula D 1 = -w L I c /(2G p I)-wL 3 /(24E I) = Ditto D 2 = w I c /(2G p I) = 1.7E-06 /mm Ditto D 3 = w L/(12E I) = 2.2E-09 /mm 2 Ditto D 4 = -w/(24e I) = -5.8E-13 /mm 3 D 5 = 0.00 r = (L/2)(c) 0.5 = (Table5) F 1 = -w I c e -r /[c G p I(e r +e -r )] = -1.5E-06 mm Complementary constants F 2 = F 1 e 2r = mm Ditto 7.5.4(8a) p = x(c) 0.5 = 5.57 for x = L/2 = 970 mm 7.5.4(8) y =D 5 x 5 +D 4 x 4 +D 3 x 3 +D 2 x2+d 1 x+d 0 +F 1 e p +F 2 /e p = 4.12 mm Calculated effective maximum deflection, D5 = (21) y'' =20D 5 x 3 +12D 4 x 2 +6D 3 x+2d 2 +c(f 1 e p +F 2 /e p ) = 9.82E-06 /mm 7.5.4(10) I e = w L 4 /(76.8E y) = 6.49E+05 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia w/o shear deformation 7.5.4(17) I' e = I e /{ 1+[25.6I e /(L 2 A)} = 6.41E+05 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia considering shear def (19) S e1 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 1 D)+E c 11 y''] = 1.80E+04 mm 3 Effective section face (20) S e2 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 2 D)+E c 22 y''] = 1.68E+04 mm 3 Effective section face (25a) Shear Flow Data y''' =6D 3 +c 1.5 (F 1 -F 2 ) = 3.25E-08 /mm (24) V c /w = w L/2 -E I o y''' = mm Shear resisted by thermal break per unif. unit load 7.5.4(28) V c /(D w) = Shear flow per uniform unit load, w Effective I Curve Moment of Inertia [mm 4] 1.00E E E+05 I (fully composite) Ie for upper bound Gc I'e for upper bound Gc Ie for lower bound Gc I'e for lower bound Gc Io (non-composite) 0.00E Span, L [m]

46 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 46 of 117 (c) Allowable Stress Under Lateral Buckling The moment of inertia about the minor axis (Iy) and the torsional constant (J) are conservatively calculated as the sum of the individual properties of face 1 (Iyy,1, J1) and face 2 (Iyy,2,J2) profiles. ADM 2005: Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L b = 1.94 m Unbraced length of the member for bending I y = 7.4E+05 mm 4 Moment of inertia of profile J = 8.4E+04 mm 4 Torsional constant of profile S c1 = 1.8E+04 mm 3 Section modulus for face 1 under compression S c2 = 1.7E+04 mm 3 Section modulus for face 2 under compression 3.3-1M F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Alloy compressive yield strength E = Mpa Young's Modulus Buckling Analysis n y = 1.65 Factor of safety on yield strength B c = F cy [1+(F cy /15510) 0.5 ] = Buckling formula intercept for comp. in beam flanges D c = (B c /10)(B c /E) 0.5 = 0.98 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges C c = 0.41(B c /D c ) = Buckling formula intersection for comp. in beam flanges S 1 = [(B c -F cy )/1.6D c ] 2 = Lower bound slender limit S 2 = (C c /1.6) 2 = Upper bound slender limit Face-1: S = L b S c1 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = Slenderness ratio for face-1 under compression Criteria = S1 < S < S2 Intermediate beam-compression member F c1 = 1/n y (B c -1.6D c S 0.5 ) = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB Face-2: S = L b S c2 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = Slenderness ratio for face-2 under compression Criteria = S1 < S < S2 Intermediate beam-compression member F c2 = 1/n y (B c -1.6D c S 0.5 ) = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB (d) Allowable Stress Under Local Buckling The governing allowable stress, under local buckling as calculated in 6.2.1(d), is summarized as follows: ace 1, considering element 1 ace 2, considering element 2 c1 = 88.2MPa c2 = 34.8MPa

47 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 47 of Sill Transom (a) Cross-sectional Properties. The properties of the profile cross-section are calculated using ANSYS beam plot section command. Fig Section Properties (b) Effective Section Modulus. The effective section properties of the mullion profile is predicted by adopting the procedure outlined in AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing Systems of AAMA TIR-A8-04 defines the effective shear area, A as the sum of the areas of the web elements. In this case, all elements that are oriented parallel to the shear direction are considered effective in resisting shear. A1 = 280.8mm2 A2 = 115.2mm2 2 x P Z 37.3 c.g. FACE-2 c.g.2 c.g.1 FACE-1 A = A1 + A2 A = 396.0mm2 Fig Parameters in Determining the Effective Section Modulus

48 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 48 of 117 Effective Section Modulus Calculation Sill Transom (System 2) AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L = 1.94 m. Unsupported span of the member E = Mpa Young's modulus of aluminum faces G c = Mpa Design shear modulus of thermal break w = 1.0 kn/m Considered uniform unit load M = w L 2 /8 = 0.5 KN m Maximum bending moment due to unit load A = m Shear area of aluminum h = mm Overall depth of extrusion g = 17.9 mm Gap (clearance) between faces D c = 27.0 mm Maximum cavity depth b = 4.0 mm Average width of thermal break core a 1 = mm 2 a 2 = mm 2 Cross sectional area I o1 = 4.20E+05 mm 4 I o2 = 1.20E+04 mm 4 Moment of inertia c 11 = 32.8 mm c 22 = 18.8 mm Extreme fiber dist. to c.g.of f D = h - (c 11 +c 22 ) = 59.4 mm Distance between centroidal axes of both faces 7.5.4(1) I c = a 1 a 2 D 2 /(a 1 +a 2 ) = 8.12E+05 mm 4 For the case where both faces are same material 7.5.4(2) I o = I o1 +I o2 = 4.32E+05 mm 4 Lower bound on stiffness I'e (no composite action) 7.5.4(3) I = I c + I o = 1.24E+06 mm 4 Upper bound on stiffness I'e (full composite action) 7.5.4(5) Composite Analysis G p = I b D 2 G c /(I c D c ) = 3.08E+05 N Geometric and core material parameter 7.5.4(6) c = G p /(E I o ) = 1.03E-05 /mm 2 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges 7.5.4(Table3) D 0 = w E I o I c /(G 2 p I) = 0.20 mm Constant for the elastic curve formula D 1 = -w L I c /(2G p I)-wL 3 /(24E I) = Ditto D 2 = w I c /(2G p I) = 1.1E-06 /mm Ditto D 3 = w L/(12E I) = 1.9E-09 /mm 2 Ditto D 4 = -w/(24e I) = -4.9E-13 /mm 3 D 5 = 0.00 r = (L/2)(c) 0.5 = (Table5) F 1 = -w I c e -r /[c G p I(e r +e -r )] = -4.0E-04 mm Complementary constants F 2 = F 1 e 2r = mm Ditto 7.5.4(8a) p = x(c) 0.5 = 3.12 for x = L/2 = 970 mm 7.5.4(8) y =D 5 x 5 +D 4 x 4 +D 3 x 3 +D 2 x2+d 1 x+d 0 +F 1 e p +F 2 /e p = 3.17 mm Calculated effective maximum deflection, D5 = (21) y'' =20D 5 x 3 +12D 4 x 2 +6D 3 x+2d 2 +c(f 1 e p +F 2 /e p ) = 7.42E-06 /mm 7.5.4(10) I e = w L 4 /(76.8E y) = 8.45E+05 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia w/o shear deformation 7.5.4(17) I' e = I e /{ 1+[25.6I e /(L 2 A)} = 8.33E+05 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia considering shear def (19) S e1 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 1 D)+E c 11 y''] = 2.23E+04 mm 3 Effective section face (20) S e2 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 2 D)+E c 22 y''] = 1.99E+04 mm 3 Effective section face (25a) Shear Flow Data y''' =6D 3 +c 1.5 (F 1 -F 2 ) = 1.81E-08 /mm (24) V c /w = w L/2 -E I o y''' = mm Shear resisted by thermal break per unif. unit load 7.5.4(28) V c /(D w) = 7.26 Shear flow per uniform unit load, w 1.50E+06 Effective I Curve Moment of Inertia [mm 4] 1.00E E E+05 I (fully composite) Ie for upper bound Gc I'e for upper bound Gc Ie for lower bound Gc I'e for lower bound Gc Io (non-composite) 0.00E Span, L [m]

49 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 49 of 117 (c) Allowable Stress Under Lateral Buckling The moment of inertia about the minor axis (Iy) and the torsional constant (J) are conservatively calculated as the sum of the individual properties of face 1 (Iyy,1, J1) and face 2 (Iyy,2,J2) profiles. ADM 2005: Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L b = 1.94 m Unbraced length of the member for bending I y = 9.9E+05 mm 4 Moment of inertia of profile J = 8.2E+04 mm 4 Torsional constant of profile S c1 = 2.2E+04 mm 3 Section modulus for face 1 under compression S c2 = 2.0E+04 mm 3 Section modulus for face 2 under compression 3.3-1M F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Alloy compressive yield strength E = Mpa Young's Modulus Buckling Analysis n y = 1.65 Factor of safety on yield strength B c = F cy [1+(F cy /15510) 0.5 ] = Buckling formula intercept for comp. in beam flanges D c = (B c /10)(B c /E) 0.5 = 0.98 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges C c = 0.41(B c /D c ) = Buckling formula intersection for comp. in beam flanges S 1 = [(B c -F cy )/1.6D c ] 2 = Lower bound slender limit S 2 = (C c /1.6) 2 = Upper bound slender limit Face-1: S = L b S c1 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = Slenderness ratio for face-1 under compression Criteria = S1 < S < S2 Intermediate beam-compression member F c1 = 1/n y (B c -1.6D c S 0.5 ) = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB Face-2: S = L b S c2 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = Slenderness ratio for face-2 under compression Criteria = S1 < S < S2 Intermediate beam-compression member F c2 = 1/n y (B c -1.6D c S 0.5 ) = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB (d) Allowable Stress Under Local Buckling The governing allowable stress, under local buckling as calculated in 6.2.2(d), is summarized as follows: ace 1, considering element 1 c1 = 69.9MPa ace 2, no element is critical under local buckling.

50 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 50 of Transom 1 Profile Transom 1 (Type 2) (a) Cross-sectional Properties. The properties of the profile cross-section are calculated using ANSYS beam plot section command. Fig Section Properties (b) Effective Section Modulus. The effective section properties of the mullion profile is predicted by adopting the procedure outlined in AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing Systems of AAMA TIR-A8-04 defines the effective shear area, A as the sum of the areas of the web elements. In this case, all elements that are oriented parallel to the shear direction are considered effective in resisting shear. A1 = 342.1mm2 A2 = 161.0mm2 2 x P Z 38.7 c.g.2 c.g.1 c.g. FACE-2 FACE-1 A = A1 + A2 A = 503.1mm2 Fig Parameters in Determining the Effective Section Modulus

51 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 51 of 117 Effective Section Modulus Calculation Transom 1 (Type 2: System 2) AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L = 1.94 m. Unsupported span of the member E = Mpa Young's modulus of aluminum faces G c = Mpa Design shear modulus of thermal break w = 1.0 kn/m Considered uniform unit load M = w L 2 /8 = 0.5 KN m Maximum bending moment due to unit load A = m Shear area of aluminum h = mm Overall depth of extrusion g = 17.9 mm Gap (clearance) between faces D c = 27.0 mm Maximum cavity depth b = 4.0 mm Average width of thermal break core a 1 = mm 2 a 2 = mm 2 Cross sectional area I o1 = 7.30E+05 mm 4 I o2 = 3.72E+04 mm 4 Moment of inertia c 11 = 23.6 mm c 22 = 15.9 mm Extreme fiber dist. to c.g.of f D = h - (c 11 +c 22 ) = 66.5 mm Distance between centroidal axes of both faces 7.5.4(1) I c = a 1 a 2 D 2 /(a 1 +a 2 ) = 1.81E+06 mm 4 For the case where both faces are same material 7.5.4(2) I o = I o1 +I o2 = 7.67E+05 mm 4 Lower bound on stiffness I'e (no composite action) 7.5.4(3) I = I c + I o = 2.58E+06 mm 4 Upper bound on stiffness I'e (full composite action) 7.5.4(5) Composite Analysis G p = I b D 2 G c /(I c D c ) = 3.59E+05 N Geometric and core material parameter 7.5.4(6) c = G p /(E I o ) = 6.78E-06 /mm 2 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges 7.5.4(Table3) D 0 = w E I o I c /(G 2 p I) = 0.29 mm Constant for the elastic curve formula D 1 = -w L I c /(2G p I)-wL 3 /(24E I) = 0.00 Ditto D 2 = w I c /(2G p I) = 9.8E-07 /mm Ditto D 3 = w L/(12E I) = 9.1E-10 /mm 2 Ditto D 4 = -w/(24e I) = -2.3E-13 /mm 3 D 5 = 0.00 r = (L/2)(c) 0.5 = (Table5) F 1 = -w I c e -r /[c G p I(e r +e -r )] = -1.8E-03 mm Complementary constants F 2 = F 1 e 2r = mm Ditto 7.5.4(8a) p = x(c) 0.5 = 2.53 for x = L/2 = 970 mm 7.5.4(8) y =D 5 x 5 +D 4 x 4 +D 3 x 3 +D 2 x2+d 1 x+d 0 +F 1 e p +F 2 /e p = 2.00 mm Calculated effective maximum deflection, D5 = (21) y'' =20D 5 x 3 +12D 4 x 2 +6D 3 x+2d 2 +c(f 1 e p +F 2 /e p ) = 4.29E-06 /mm 7.5.4(10) I e = w L 4 /(76.8E y) = 1.33E+06 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia w/o shear deformation 7.5.4(17) I' e = I e /{ 1+[25.6I e /(L 2 A)} = 1.31E+06 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia considering shear def (19) S e1 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 1 D)+E c 11 y''] = 5.10E+04 mm 3 Effective section face (20) S e2 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 2 D)+E c 22 y''] = 4.13E+04 mm 3 Effective section face (25a) Shear Flow Data y''' =6D 3 +c 1.5 (F 1 -F 2 ) = 1.05E-08 /mm (24) V c /w = w L/2 -E I o y''' = mm Shear resisted by thermal break per unif. unit load 7.5.4(28) V c /(D w) = 6.24 Shear flow per uniform unit load, w 3.00E+06 Effective I Curve Moment of Inertia [mm 4] 2.50E E E E E+06 I (fully composite) Ie for upper bound Gc Ie I'e for for lower upper bound bound Gc Gc I'e for lower bound Gc Io (non-composite) 5.00E Span, L [m]

52 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 52 of 117 (c) Allowable Stress Under Lateral Buckling The moment of inertia about the minor axis (Iy) and the torsional constant (J) are conservatively calculated as the sum of the individual properties of face 1 (Iyy,1, J1) and face 2 (Iyy,2,J2) profiles. ADM 2005: Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L b = 1.94 m Unbraced length of the member for bending I y = 1.0E+06 mm 4 Moment of inertia of profile J = 9.9E+05 mm 4 Torsional constant of profile S c1 = 4.5E+04 mm 3 Section modulus for face 1 under compression S c2 = 4.3E+04 mm 3 Section modulus for face 2 under compression 3.3-1M F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Alloy compressive yield strength E = Mpa Young's Modulus Buckling Analysis n y = 1.65 Factor of safety on yield strength B c = F cy [1+(F cy /15510) 0.5 ] = Buckling formula intercept for comp. in beam flanges D c = (B c /10)(B c /E) 0.5 = 0.98 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges C c = 0.41(B c /D c ) = Buckling formula intersection for comp. in beam flanges S 1 = [(B c -F cy )/1.6D c ] 2 = Lower bound slender limit S 2 = (C c /1.6) 2 = Upper bound slender limit Face-1: S = L b S c1 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = Slenderness ratio for face-1 under compression Criteria = S1 < S < S2 Intermediate beam-compression member F c1 = 1/n y (B c -1.6D c S 0.5 ) = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB Face-2: S = L b S c2 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = Slenderness ratio for face-2 under compression Criteria = S1 < S < S2 Intermediate beam-compression member F c2 = 1/n y (B c -1.6D c S 0.5 ) = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB (d) Allowable Stress Under Local Buckling No element is critical under local buckling.

53 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 53 of Transom 2 Profile Transom 2 (Type 2) (a) Cross-sectional Properties. The properties of the profile cross-section are calculated using ANSYS beam plot section command. Fig Section Properties (b) Effective Section Modulus. The effective section properties of the mullion profile is predicted by adopting the procedure outlined in AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing Systems of AAMA TIR-A8-04 defines the effective shear area, A as the sum of the areas of the web elements. In this case, all elements that are oriented parallel to the shear direction are considered effective in resisting shear. A1 = 334.8mm2 A2 = 199.3mm x P Z c.g.1 c.g. FACE-2 c.g.2 FACE-1 A = A1 + A2 A = 534.1mm2 Fig Parameters in Determining the Effective Section Modulus

54 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 54 of 117 Effective Section Modulus Calculation Transom 2 (Type 2: System 2) AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L = 1.94 m. Unsupported span of the member E = Mpa Young's modulus of aluminum faces G c = Mpa Design shear modulus of thermal break w = 1.0 kn/m Considered uniform unit load M = w L 2 /8 = 0.5 KN m Maximum bending moment due to unit load A = m Shear area of aluminum h = mm Overall depth of extrusion g = 17.9 mm Gap (clearance) between faces D c = 27.0 mm Maximum cavity depth b = 4.0 mm Average width of thermal break core a 1 = mm 2 a 2 = mm 2 Cross sectional area I o1 = 7.30E+05 mm 4 I o2 = 2.84E+04 mm 4 Moment of inertia c 11 = 23.8 mm c 22 = 13.9 mm Extreme fiber dist. to c.g.of f D = h - (c 11 +c 22 ) = 68.3 mm Distance between centroidal axes of both faces 7.5.4(1) I c = a 1 a 2 D 2 /(a 1 +a 2 ) = 1.37E+06 mm 4 For the case where both faces are same material 7.5.4(2) I o = I o1 +I o2 = 7.58E+05 mm 4 Lower bound on stiffness I'e (no composite action) 7.5.4(3) I = I c + I o = 2.13E+06 mm 4 Upper bound on stiffness I'e (full composite action) 7.5.4(5) Composite Analysis G p = I b D 2 G c /(I c D c ) = 4.13E+05 N Geometric and core material parameter 7.5.4(6) c = G p /(E I o ) = 7.91E-06 /mm 2 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges 7.5.4(Table3) D 0 = w E I o I c /(G p 2 I) = 0.20 mm Constant for the elastic curve formula D 1 = -w L I c /(2G p I)-wL 3 /(24E I) = 0.00 Ditto D 2 = w I c /(2G p I) = 7.8E-07 /mm Ditto D 3 = w L/(12E I) = 1.1E-09 /mm 2 Ditto D 4 = -w/(24e I) = -2.8E-13 /mm 3 D 5 = 0.00 r = (L/2)(c) 0.5 = (Table5) F 1 = -w I c e -r /[c G p I(e r +e -r )] = -8.4E-04 mm Complementary constants F 2 = F 1 e 2r = mm Ditto 7.5.4(8a) p = x(c) 0.5 = 2.73 for x = L/2 = 970 mm 7.5.4(8) y =D 5 x 5 +D 4 x 4 +D 3 x 3 +D 2 x2+d 1 x+d 0 +F 1 e p +F 2 /e p = 2.02 mm Calculated effective maximum deflection, D5 = (21) y'' =20D 5 x 3 +12D 4 x 2 +6D 3 x+2d 2 +c(f 1 e p +F 2 /e p ) = 4.56E-06 /mm 7.5.4(10) I e = w L 4 /(76.8E y) = 1.33E+06 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia w/o shear deformation 7.5.4(17) I' e = I e /{ 1+[25.6I e /(L 2 A)} = 1.30E+06 mm 4 Effective moment of inertia considering shear def (19) S e1 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 1 D)+E c 11 y''] = 4.96E+04 mm 3 Effective section face (20) S e2 = M/[(M-E I o y'')/(a 2 D)+E c 22 y''] = 3.37E+04 mm 3 Effective section face (25a) Shear Flow Data y''' =6D 3 +c 1.5 (F 1 -F 2 ) = 1.10E-08 /mm (24) V c /w = w L/2 -E I o y''' = mm Shear resisted by thermal break per unif. unit load 7.5.4(28) V c /(D w) = 5.81 Shear flow per uniform unit load, w 2.50E+06 Effective I Curve Moment of Inertia [mm 4] 2.00E E E E+06 I (fully composite) Ie for upper bound Gc I'e for upper bound Gc Ie for lower bound Gc I'e for lower bound Gc Io (non-composite) 5.00E Span, L [m]

55 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 55 of 117 (c) Allowable Stress Under Lateral Buckling The moment of inertia about the minor axis (Iy) and the torsional constant (J) are conservatively calculated as the sum of the individual properties of face 1 (Iyy,1, J1) and face 2 (Iyy,2,J2) profiles. ADM 2005: Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Clause Action Notes Extrusion Parameters L b = 1.94 m Unbraced length of the member for bending I y = 9.7E+05 mm 4 Moment of inertia of profile J = 9.4E+05 mm 4 Torsional constant of profile S c1 = 5.0E+04 mm 3 Section modulus for face 1 under compression S c2 = 3.4E+04 mm 3 Section modulus for face 2 under compression 3.3-1M F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Alloy compressive yield strength E = Mpa Young's Modulus Buckling Analysis n y = 1.65 Factor of safety on yield strength B c = F cy [1+(F cy /15510) 0.5 ] = Buckling formula intercept for comp. in beam flanges D c = (B c /10)(B c /E) 0.5 = 0.98 Buckilng formula slope for comp. in beam flanges C c = 0.41(B c /D c ) = Buckling formula intersection for comp. in beam flanges S 1 = [(B c -F cy )/1.6D c ] 2 = Lower bound slender limit S 2 = (C c /1.6) 2 = Upper bound slender limit Face-1: S = L b S c1 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = Slenderness ratio for face-1 under compression Criteria = S1 < S < S2 Intermediate beam-compression member F c1 = 1/n y (B c -1.6D c S 0.5 ) = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB Face-2: S = L b S c2 /[0.5(I y J) 0.5 ] = Slenderness ratio for face-2 under compression Criteria = S1 < S < S2 Intermediate beam-compression member F c2 = 1/n y (B c -1.6D c S 0.5 ) = Mpa Allowable compressive stress for LTB (d) Allowable Stress Under Local Buckling No element is critical under local buckling.

56 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 56 of Sword Profile Sword (Type-2) (a) Cross-sectional Properties. Fig Sword Length 140 Fig Sword Cross-Section

57 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 57 of ANALYSIS & CODE CHECK STRUCTURAL SYSTEM 1 Refer to 4.3 for discussions on structural system 1. Summary of Section Properties for Structural System 1 I' e S e1 S e2 (V c /D)/w F c1 F c2 Local, F c1 Local, F Section Properties c2 mm 4 mm 3 mm 3 N/mm/N/mm Mpa Mpa Mpa Mpa Reference (b) (c) (d) Structural System - 1 Male Mullion E E E Female Mullion E E E Header Transom E E E Sill Transom E E E Transom E E E Transom E E E Mullion Check The mullions are subjected to biaxial bending stresses due to (i) wind load normal to the plane of the unit, and (ii) wind load parallel to the plane of the unit. The latter is being caused by the wind load on the protruding vertical fin on the façade unit. For discussion on this modes of bending refer to Biaxial Bending Analysis of Mullion ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action Notes Male Mullion Bending Stress ratio, f yy-,m /F c1,m = 0.74 Major axis face 1 under wind suction Stress ratio, f yy+,m /F c2,m = 0.95 Major axis face 2 under wind pressure Stress ratio, f zz1,m /F c,m = 0.13 Minor axis face 1 under lateral wind load Stress ratio, f zz2,m /F c,m = 0.07 Minor axis face 2 under lateral wind load Biaxial bending, f yy-,m /F c1,m f zz1,m /F c,m = % Suction + 50% lateral wind: comp. on face f yy-,m /F c1,m + f zz1,m /F c,m = % Suction + 100% lateral wind: comp. on face 1 Biaxial bending, f yy+,m /F c2,m f zz2,m /F c,m = % Pressure + 50% lateral wind: comp. on face f yy+,m /F c2,m + f zz2,m /F c,m = % Pressure + 100% lateral wind: comp. on face 3 Maximum stress ratio = 0.98 <1.00 O.K! Female Mullion Bending Stress ratio, f yy-,f /F c1,f = 0.36 Major axis face 1 under wind suction Stress ratio, f yy+,f /F c2,f = 0.43 Major axis face 2 under wind pressure Stress ratio, f zz1,f /F c,f = 0 Minor axis face 1 under lateral wind load Stress ratio, f zz2,f /F c,f = 0 Minor axis face 2 under lateral wind load Biaxial bending, f yy-,f /F c1,f f zz1,f /F c,f = % Suction + 50% lateral wind: comp. on face f yy-,f /F c1,f + f zz1,f /F c,f = % Suction + 100% lateral wind: comp. on face 1 Biaxial bending, f yy+,f /F c2,f f zz2,f /F c,f = % Pressure + 50% lateral wind: comp. on face f yy+,f /F c2,f + f zz2,f /F c,f = % Pressure + 100% lateral wind: comp. on face 3 Maximum stress ratio = 0.43 <1.00 O.K! Sword Bending Stress ratio, f yy-,sw /F c,sw = 0 Major axis bending under wind suction Stress ratio, f yy+,sw /F c,sw = 0 Major axis bending under wind pressure Stress ratio, f zz,sw /F c,sw = 0 Minor axis bending under lateral wind load Biaxial bending, f yy-,sw /F c,sw f zz,sw /F c,sw = 0.00 Suction + 50% lateral wind load Biaxial bending, 0.5 f yy-,sw /F c,sw + f zz,sw /F c,sw = % Suction + lateral wind load Biaxial bending, f yy+,sw /F c,sw f zz,sw /F c,sw = 0.00 Pressure + 50% lateral wind load Biaxial bending, 0.5 f yy+,sw /F c,sw + f zz,sw /F c,sw = % Pressure + lateral wind load Maximum stress ratio = 0.00 <1.00 O.K!

58 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 58 of Superposition Under Biaxial Bending The table above summarizes the biaxial bending analyses of the mullion in the succeeding sections as follows: (i) Mullion Analysis under Wind Load Normal to Plane of the Unit mullion check under wind suction, refer to 81.2, mullion check under wind pressure, refer to 8.1.3, bf bm STACK JOINT - HEADER WIND LOAD TRIBUTARY AREA ON FEMALE MULLION TRANSOM - 1 WIND LOAD TRIBUTARY AREA ON MALE MULLION H FEMALE MULLION MALE MULLION WIND LOAD M yy,1 δ z,1 WIND LOAD M yy,1 δ z,1 TRANSOM - 2 STACK JOINT - SILL W Mom - yy Def - z Mom - yy Def - z ELEVATION WIND SUCTION SYSTEM - 1 WIND PRESSURE SYSTEM - 1 Fig Wind Load Normal to the Plane of the Unit (ii) Mullion Analysis under Wind Load Parallel to Plane of the Unit mullion check under lateral wind load, refer to In checking the minor axis bending of the mullion, it is assumed that the upper spandrel panel is a rigid diaphragm in the axis on mullion bending, this by virtue of the double skin 1.5mm infill metal sheets. With this assumption, the mode of mullion bending is similar to a propped cantilever beam with the spandrel panel as its rigid support. Error! Objects cannot be created from editing field codes. Fig Mullion under Lateral Wind Load on Vertical Fin

59 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 59 of Mullion Check for Wind Suction ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action 4.4 CW Unit Parameters H = 3.70 m Unsupported span of mullion W = 1.39 m Tributary width for wind load Wind load on wall element, Q z = Kpa Suction normal to the plane of CW unit Mullion Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 E = Mpa 6.1.1(b) Male Profile: Effective moment of Inertia, I' e,m = 1.36E+07 mm 4 About y-y axis, composite male profile Effective section modulus, S e1,m = 1.34E+05 mm 3 About y-y axis, on face 1 (for wind suction) 6.1.2(b) Female Profile: Effective moment of Inertia, I' e,f = 1.09E+06 mm 4 About y-y axis, composite female profile Effective section modulus, S e1,f = 2.23E+04 mm 3 About y-y axis, on face 1 (for wind suction) Sword Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy,sw = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 E Sw = Mpa Sword length, L Sw = 120 mm Portion of sword penetrating the mullion profile Sword cross-section, d Sw x t Sw = 140 x 15 mm Sword slack on its depth, gap z = 2.0 mm Total gaps on each side of the sword Bending Analysis Uniform load, q z = W Q z = KN/m Parallel to the major axis of mullion 4.3 Slip angle, α yy = tan -1 (gap z /L Sw ) = rad Sword's freedom of rotation before it carries moment Stage 1: Initial load, q z,i = 24α yy E I' e /H 3 = 7.99 KN/m Amount of load to produce rotation mullion ends Applied load for simple beam bending, q z,1 = 4.85 KN/m qzi > qz : Structural system 1 (Stage 2 is null) Midspan moment, M yy,1 = q z,1 H 2 /8 = 8.30 KN m Bending moment in the mullion assembly - Stage 2: Net load, q z,2 = q z - q z,1 = 0.00 KN/m Balance load after undergoing rotation, ends Midspan moment, M yy,2 = q z,2 H 2 /24 = 0.00 KN m Bending moment in the mullion assembly Support moment, M yy,sw = q z,2 H 2 /12 = 0.00 KN m Bending moment in the sword Couple force on sword, F z,sw = M yy,sw /L Sw = 0.00 KN Developed couple on sword Total midspan moment, M yy = M yy,1 + M yy,2 = 8.30 KN m Total bending moment in the mullion assembly 4.2(c) Check Mullion Profile I' e = I 'e,m + I' e,f = 1.5E+07 mm 4 About y-y axis, composite profile 4.2(d) Male Mullion: Moment, M yy,m = M yy (I' e,m /I' e ) = 7.68 KN m Shared moment by male mullion Bending stress, f yy,m = M yy,m /S e1,m = 61.9 Mpa Maximum bending stress 6.1.1(c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1,m = 83.8 Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1,m = Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 1 Stress ratio, f yy,m /F c1,m = 0.74 <1.00 O.K! 4.2(d) Female Mullion: Moment, M yy,f = M yy (I' e,f /I' e ) = 0.62 KN m Shared moment by male mullion Bending stress, f yy,f = M yy,f /S e2,f = 27.6 Mpa Maximum bending stress 6.1.2(c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1,f = 76.0 Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1,f = 96.1 Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 1 Stress ratio, f yy,f /F c1,f = 0.36 <1.00 O.K! Check Sword S yy,sw = t Sw d 2 Sw /6 = 4.9E+04 mm 4 Section modulus Bending: Bending stress, f yy,sw = M yy,sw /S yy,sw = 0.0 Mpa Considering plastic modulus Allowable stress, F c,sw = 1.3 F cy,sw /n y = Mpa Allowable compressive stress under bending Stress ratio, f yy,sw /F c,sw = 0.00 <1.00 O.K! Shear: Shear on sword, V z,sw = q z H/2 = 8.97 KN Lateral shear force Shear stress, f sz,sw = V z,sw /(0.9d Sw t Sw ) = 4.7 Mpa Allowable shear stress, F s = F ty,sw /[(3) 0.5 n y ] = 59.5 Mpa F ty = F cy, n y = 1.65 Stress ratio, f sz,sw /F s = 0.08 <1.00 O.K! Check Deflection δ z,1 = 5/384 q z,1 H 4 /E I' e = mm Stage 1: simple beam deflection - δ z,2 = 1/384 q z,2 H 4 /E I' e = 0.00 mm Stage 2: continuous beam deflection Total deflection, δ z = d z,1 + d z,2 = mm Calculated maximum deflection 2.3 Allowable deflection, δ allow = mm Criteria: Span/175 or 19mm Strain ratio, δ z /δ allow = 0.62 <1.00 O.K! Shear Flow Check Parameters q z-,m = q z- (I' e,m /I' e ) = KN/m Uniform load shared by the male mullion q z-,f = q z- (I' e,f /I' e ) = KN/m Uniform load shared by the female mullion Notes

60 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 60 of Mullion Check for Wind Pressure ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action 4.4 CW Unit Parameters H = 3.70 m Unsupported span of mullion W = 1.39 m Tributary width for wind load Wind load on wall element, Q z = 3.50 Kpa Pressure normal to the plane of CW unit Mullion Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 E = Mpa 6.1.1(b) Male Profile: Effective moment of Inertia, I' e,m = 1.36E+07 mm 4 About y-y axis, composite male profile Effective section modulus, S e2,m = 1.05E+05 mm 3 About y-y axis, on face 2 (for wind pressure) 6.2.1(b) Female Profile: Effective moment of Inertia, I' e,f = 1.09E+06 mm 4 About y-y axis, composite female profile Effective section modulus, S e2,f = 1.80E+04 mm 3 About y-y axis, on face 2 (for wind pressure) Sword Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy,sw = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 E Sw = Mpa Sword length, L Sw = 120 mm Portion of sword penetrating the mullion profile Sword cross section, d Sw x t Sw = 140 x 15 mm Sword slack on its depth, gap z = 2.0 mm Total gaps on each side of the sword Bending Analysis Uniform load, q z = W Q z = 4.85 KN/m Parallel to the major axis of mullion 4.3 Slip angle, α yy = tan -1 (gap z /L Sw ) = rad Sword's freedom of rotation before it carries moment Stage 1: Initial load, q z,i = 24α yy E I' e /H 3 = 7.99 KN/m Amount of load to produce rotation mullion ends Applied load for simple beam bending, q z,1 = 4.85 KN/m qzi > qz : Structural system 1 (Stage 2 is null) Midspan moment, M yy,1 = q z,1 H 2 /8 = 8.30 KN m Bending moment in the mullion assembly - Stage 2: Net load, q z,2 = q z - q z,1 = 0.00 KN/m Balance load after undergoing rotation, ends Midspan moment, M yy,2 = q z,2 H 2 /24 = 0.00 KN m Bending moment in the mullion assembly Support moment, M yy,sw = q z,2 H 2 /12 = 0.00 KN m Bending moment in the sword Couple force on sword, F z,sw = M yy,sw /L Sw = 0.00 KN Developed couple on sword Total midspan moment, M yy = M yy,1 + M yy,2 = 8.30 KN m Total bending moment in the mullion assembly 4.2(c) Check Mullion Profile I' e = I 'e,m + I' e,f = 1.5E+07 mm 4 About y-y axis, composite profile 4.2(d) Male Mullion: Moment, M yy,m = M yy (I' e,m /I' e ) = 7.68 KN m Shared moment by male mullion Bending stress, f yy,m = M yy,m /S e2,m = 79.0 Mpa Maximum bending stress 6.1.1(c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2,m = 83.5 Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2,m = Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 2 Stress ratio, f yy,m /F c2,m = 0.95 <1.00 O.K! 4.2(d) Female Mullion: Moment, M yy,f = M yy (I' e,f /I' e ) = 0.62 KN m Shared moment by male mullion Bending stress, f yy,f = M yy,f /S e2,f = 34.2 Mpa Maximum bending stress 6.1.2(c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2,f = 79.1 Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2,f = - Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 2 Stress ratio, f yy,f /F c2,f = 0.43 <1.00 O.K! Check Sword S yy,sw = t Sw d 2 Sw /6 = 4.9E+04 mm 4 Section modulus Bending: Bending stress, f yy,sw = M yy,sw /S yy,sw = 0.0 Mpa Considering plastic modulus Allowable stress, F c,sw = 1.3 F cy,sw /n y = Mpa Allowable compressive stress under bending Stress ratio, f yy,sw /F c,sw = 0.00 <1.00 O.K! Shear: Shear on sword, V z,sw = q z H/2 = 8.97 KN Lateral shear force Shear stress, f sz,sw = V z,sw /(0.9d Sw t Sw ) = 4.7 Mpa Allowable shear stress, F s = F ty,sw /[(3) 0.5 n y ] = 59.5 Mpa F ty = F cy, n y = 1.65 Stress ratio, f sz,sw /F s = 0.08 <1.00 O.K! Check Deflection δ z,1 = 5/384 q z,1 H 4 /E I' e = mm Stage 1: simple beam deflection - δ z,2 = 1/384 q z,2 H 4 /E I' e = 0.00 mm Stage 2: continuous beam deflection Total deflection, δ z = d z,1 + d z,2 = mm Calculated maximum deflection 2.3 Allowable deflection, δ allow = mm Criteria: Span/175 or 19mm Strain ratio, δ z /δ allow = 0.62 <1.00 O.K! Shear Flow Check Parameters q z+,m = q z+ (I' e,m /I' e ) = 4.49 KN/m Uniform load shared by the male mullion q z+,f = q z+ (I' e,f /I' e ) = 0.36 KN/m Uniform load shared by the female mullion Notes

61 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 61 of Mullion Check for Lateral Wind Load Element 1 - critical element under wind suction c.g. Element 4 - critical element under wind pressure Fig Values of cy for Critical Elements under Biaxial Bending ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action Notes 4.4 Unitized Parameters H = 3.70 m Height of the unitized panel h = 3.23 m Height of the unsupported span in y axis b = 0.19 m Width of vertical fin projection Wind load on fin, Q y = 3.0 Kpa Normal to the axis of fin protrusion Mullion Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 E = Mpa 6.1.1(b) Male Profile: Effective moment of Inertia, I zz,m = 6.50E+05 mm 4 About z-z axis, non-composite male profie Dist. to c.g. of fiber considered, c y1,m = 35.1 mm Along y axis, on face 1 Dist. to c.g. of fiber considered, c y2,m = 18.8 mm Along y axis, on face Sword Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy,sw = 160 Mpa 6063-T6 E Sw = Mpa Sword length, L Sw = 120 mm Portion of sword penetrating the mullion profile Sword depth, d Sw x t Sw = 140 x 15 mm Sword slack on its thickness, gap y = 2.0 mm Total gaps on each side of the sword Bending Analysis Uniform load, q y = b Q y = 0.56 KN/m Parallel to the major axis of mullion 4.3 Slip angle, α zz = tan -1 (gap y /L Sw ) = 0.02 rad Sword's freedom of rotation before it carries moment Stage 1: Initial load, q y,i = 48α zz E I zz,m /h 3 = 1.06 KN/m Amount of load to produce rotation mullion ends Applied load for propped beam bending, q y,1 = 0.56 KN/m qzi > qz : Structural system 1 (Stage 2 is null) Midspan moment, M zz,1 = 3q y,1 h(h/2)/8 + q y (H/2) 2 /2 = 0.30 KN m Bending moment in the male mullion Stage 2: Net load, q y,2 = q y - q y,1 = 0.00 KN/m Balance load after undergoing rotation, ends Midspan moment, M zz,2 = q y,2 h 2 /24 = 0.00 KN m Bending moment in the male mullion Support moment, M zz,sw = q y,2 h 2 /12 = 0.00 KN m Bending moment in the sword Couple force on sword, F y,sw = M zz,sw /L Sw = 0.00 KN Developed couple on sword Total midspan moment, M zz = M zz,1 + M zz,2 = 0.30 KN m Total minor axis bending moment in the male mullion Check Male Mullion Profile f zz1,m = M zz /(I zz,m /c y1,m ) = 16.0 Mpa Minor axis bending stress on critical face Face 1: Allow. comp. stress, F c = 1.17 F cy /n y = Mpa Under bending about minor axis Stress ratio, f zz1,m /F c = 0.13 <1.00 O.K! Face 2: f zz1,m = M zz /(I zz,m /c y1,m ) = 8.6 Mpa Minor axis bending stress on critical face 2 Allow. comp. stress, F c = 1.17 F cy /n y = Mpa Under bending about minor axis Stress ratio, f zz1,m /F c = 0.07 <1.00 O.K! Check Sword Section modulus, S zz,sw = d Sw t 2 Sw /6 = 5.25E+03 mm 4 Bending: Bending stress, f zz,sw = M zz,sw /S zz,sw = 0.0 Mpa Considering plastic modulus Allow. bending comp. Stress, F c,sw = 1.3 F cy,sw /n y = Mpa Stress ratio, f zz,sw /F c,sw = 0.00 <1.00 O.K! Shear: Shear on sword, V y,sw = q y H/2 = 1.04 KN Lateral shear force Shear stress, f sy,sw = V y,sw /(0.9d Sw t Sw ) = 0.5 Mpa Allowable shear stress, F s = F ty,sw /[(3) 0.5 n y ] = 56.0 Mpa Fty = Fcy, ny = 1.65 Stress ratio, f sy,sw /F s = 0.01 <1.00 O.K! Check Deflection of Mullion δ z,1 = q z,1 /185 h 4 /E I zz.m = 7.36 mm Stage 1: propped cantilever beam deflection δ z,2 = 1/384 q z,2 H 4 /E I zz,m = 0.00 mm Stage 2: continuous beam deflection Total lateral deflection, δ z = d z,1 + d z,2 = 7.36 mm Calculated maximum deflection 2.3 Allowable lateral deflection, δ allow = 7.50 mm Criteria: 75% of 10mm clearance Strain ratio, δ z /δ allow = 0.98 <1.00 O.K!

62 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 62 of Check Sword Under Slab Deflection. Refer to 4.3 for discussions on slab deflection and in-plane performance of the curtain wall units. W R h R v W t H W/2 R h Fig Reaction Forces under Deflected Slab ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action Notes I. Claculated shear on sword in the preceeding section Suction Wind on Mullion: Shear, V z-,m = 8.30 kn Calculated maximum shear on male mullion Shear, V z-,f = 0.70 kn Calculated maximum shear on female mullion Total sword shear, V z-,sw = V z-,m + V z-,f = 9.00 kn Total major axis shear on sword under wind suction Pressure Wind on Mullion: Shear, V z+,m = 8.30 kn Calculated maximum shear on male mullion Shear, V z+,f = 0.70 kn Calculated maximum shear on female mullion Total sword shear, V z+,sw = V z+,m + V z+,f = 9.00 kn Total major axis shear on sword under wind pressure Lateral Wind on Mullion: Sword shear, V y,sw = 1.41 kn Minor axis shear on sword under lateral wind II. Shear on sword due to slab deflection 5.2 CW Unit Parameters: Width of unit, W = 1.39 m Clear span between dead load support brackets Height of unit, H = 3.70 m Approx. vertical dist. bet. dead load bracket and sword j 5.1 Total weight of the unit, W t = 3.07 kn Calculated weight of all components 3.3-1M Sword Parameters: Sword, F ty = 170 Mpa Shear yield strength Depth, d Sw = 140 mm Sword gross depth Sword thickness, t Sw = 15 mm Sword gross thickness Reaction, R h = W t (W/2H) = 0.6 kn Lateral reaction force due to one lamed bracket support Sword shear, V yδ,sw = R h = 0.6 kn Minor axis shear on sword due tor slab deflection III. Combined shear on sword Suction wind + Lateral wind + Slab defleftion: Shear, V = [V 2 z-,sw +(V y,sw +V yδ,sw ) 2 ) 0.5 = 9.2 kn Combined major and minor axis shear in sword Shear stress, f s = V/(0.9d Sw t Sw ) = 4.9 Mpa Total shear stress in sword Allowable shear stress, F s = F ty /1.732n y = 59.5 Mpa where n y = 1.65 for yield failure Stress ratio = 0.08 <1.00 O.K! Pressure wind + Lateral wind + Slab defleftion: Shear, V = [V 2 z-,sw +(V y,sw +V yδ,sw ) 2 ) 0.5 = 9.2 kn Combined major and minor axis shear in sword Shear stress, f s = V/(0.9d Sw t Sw ) = 4.9 Mpa Total shear stress in sword Allowable shear stress, F s = F ty /1.732n y = 59.5 Mpa where n y = 1.65 for yield failure Stress ratio = 0.08 <1.00 O.K! Note that the calculated shear in the mullion is equal to the shear in the sword: V = V + V where: Vz,Sw = Max. shear on sword in the major axis z, Sw z, m z, f Vz,m = Max. shear on the male mullion in the major axis. Vz,f = Max. shear on the female mullion in the major axis.

63 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 63 of Check Thermal Break Shear (a) Check Longitudinal Shear in Male Mullion The FEM Model Equation (28.a) of AAMA-TIR-A8-04 is an approximation for shear flow in a thermal barrier. The accuracy of this equation depends on the degree of symmetry of the two faces being combined. In the case of the male mullion profile, the two faces are very far from being symmetrical. Therefore a more precise FEM analysis is performed to calculate the actual shear flow in the thermal barrier. The assembly is modeled to include both faces of the male mullion profile as custom beam sections and the pair of thermal break strips as shell elements. Stiff link elements at 100mm spacing along the entire span join both faces with the edges of the thermal strips. Boundary conditions are defined at end spans and at intermediate points at the location of the transoms. The amount of uniform wind load shared by the male mullion (with its female partner) is applied as a point load on every node that are spaced 100mm along the whole span. Face-1 Link 100mm on centre Thermal break, 2 nos, 2mm thick Lateral and torsional restraints by the transoms on face-1 Link 100mm on centre Face-1 Face-2 Face-2 Wind load: 4.5N/mmm Roller support on face-2 Hinge support on face-2 Face-1 and face-2 are coupled together at this end (a) Male mullion Cross-section Fig Male mullion Thermal break Model (b) Male mullion - Boundary conditions

64 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 64 of 117 Clause Action Notes Parameters L = 3.70 m Unsupported span of beam assembly Beam Assembly: h = mm Height of thermal break strip b = 2.00 mm Thickness of thermal break strip q z = 4.50 kn/m Applied uniform wind load on the assembly 6.2.1(b) Aluminium: E Al = Mpa Young's modulus of aluminium extrusion µ Al = 0.33 Poisson's ratio of aluminium extrusion Thermal Break: E Pm = 2000 Mpa Young's modulus of thermal break (polyamide) µ Pm = 0.49 Poisson's ratio of thermal break (polyamide) 4.2(f) Test shear strength, Q c = N/mm Taken from shear test of thermal break assembly Link element: E Lk, I Lk, A Lk = 1.00E+09 Mpa Link element properties (very large number) ANSYS FEM Analysis Results Notes Check Shear Flow Shear stress, f v = 7.27 Mpa Result maximum shear stress in YZ plane Max. shear flow, q c = f v b = N/mm Calculated shear flow in the thermal break Allowable shear flow, Q'c = Qc/F.S. = N/mm Considerig a factor of safety, F.S. of 3.0 Stress ratio = 0.87 <1.00 O.K!

65 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 65 of 117 Analysis results - Shear stress Diagram Fig Shear stress on YZ Plane Result verification Deflection Diagram The result of the analysis is verified by checking if the resulting deflection is close to the manually calculated deflection in Manually calculated deflection in : max = 11.78mm ANSYS FEM model deflection = 11.73mm = max Therefore, the result is reliable. Fig Male mullion - Deflection

66 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 66 of 117 (b) Check Longitudinal Shear in emale Mullion AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes 6.1.2(b) Extrusion Parameters V c /(D w) = 5.75 mm Shear flow per uniform unit load, w 4.2(f) Test shear strength, Q c = N/mm Taken from shear test of thermal break assembly Suction Wind: q z- = kn/m Applied uniform wind suctinon load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 2.1 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.08 <1.00 O.K! Pressure Wind: q z+ = 0.36 kn Applied uniform wind pressure load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 2.1 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.08 <1.00 O.K!

67 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 67 of Check Stack Joint Header and Sill Transom Check Header & Sill Transom under Wind Suction ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action Notes 4.4 Unitized Parameters Unsupported span, W = 1.59 m 3.2 Upper panel height, h u = 0.39 m Lower panel height, h l = 0.47 m Cross-sectional area of header profile, A g,h = mm 2 P z 6.2.1(a) Cross-sectional area of sill profile, A g,s = mm 2 a 5.1 Weight of infill, if any, Q z = 0.00 Kpa Weight of glass above the transom, Q DL = 0.45 Kpa 4.4 Wind load on wall element, Q y = Kpa Setting block location, a = 190 mm 6.2.1(b) Eccentricity of setting block location, e = 37.3 mm Reference point for torsional deflection, r = 66.0 mm Transom Alloying material = Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy = 6063-T6 170 Mpa 6.2.1(b) Header Transom: Effective moment of Inertia, I' e,h = 5.38E+05 mm 4 Effective section modulus (face 1), S e1,h = 1.66E+04 mm (a) Moment of inertia, I yy,h = 7.40E+05 mm (b) Dist. of top extreme fibre on face 1, c z1,h = 53.4 mm 6.2.2(b) Sill Transom: Effective moment of inertia, I' e,s = Effective section modulus (face 1), S e1,s = 7.09E+05 mm E+04 mm (c) Moment of inertia, I yy,s = 9.90E+05 mm 4 Torsional constant, J s = 8.20E+04 mm 4 TRANSOM - 1 Wind load tributary area TRANSOM - 2 STACK JOINT - SILL 6.2.2(b) Dist. of top extreme fibre on face 1, c z1,s = 42.3 mm z P z e Analysis Glass weight, P z = Q DL h u W/2 = 0.14 KN q Upper tributary width, b u = (h u /2)[1-h u /(2W)] = 0.17 m y r Lower tributary width, b l = (h l /2)[1-h l /(2W)] = 0.20 m rotation c.g. Moment, M zz = Q y (b u +b l ) W 2 /8 = KN/m Check Stack Joint Profiles I' e = I 'e,h + I' e,s = 1.2E+06 mm 4 About y-y axis, composite profile Header Transom M yy,h = (1.25 A g,h γ)w 2 /8 = 0.01 kn-m Accessories assumed 25% add'l to transom weight Dead Load: Bending stress, f yy,h = M yy,h /(I yy,h /c z1,h ) = 0.7 Mpa Maximum bending stress Allow. bending comp. stress, F c,h = 1.17 F cy /n y = Mpa Under bending about weak axis 4.2(d) Suction Wind: Moment, M zz,h = M zz (I' e,h /I' e ) = KN m Shared moment by header transom Bending stress, f zz,h = M zz,h /S e1,h = 9.1 Mpa Maximum bending stress on face (c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1,h = Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1,h = 88.2 Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 1 Dead Load + Suction Wind: f yy,h /F c,h + f zz,h /F c1,h = 0.10 <1.00 O.K! Sill Transom M yy,s = P z a + (1.25 A g,s γ +Q DL h u )W 2 /8 = 0.04 kn-m Accessories assumed 25% add'l to transom weight Dead Load: Bending stress, f yy,s = M yy,s /(I yy,s /c z1,s ) = 1.7 Mpa Maximum bending stress Allow. bending comp. stress, F c,s = 1.17 F cy /n y = Mpa Under bending about weak axis 4.2(d) Suction Wind: Moment, M zz,s = M zz (I' e,s /I' e ) = kn-m Shared moment by sill transom Bending stress, f zz,s = M zz,s /S e1,s = 9.5 Mpa Maximum bending stress on face (c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1,s = 99.3 Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1,s = 69.9 Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 1 Dead Load + Suction Wind: f yy,s /F c,s + f zz,s /F c1,s = 0.15 <1.00 O.K! Check Deflection δ z,h = (5/384)(1.25 A g,h γ)w 4 ]//E I yy,h = 0.05 mm Deflection under dead load 2.3 Header Transom Allowable deflection, δ z,allow = mm Criteria: 75% of 20mm clearance Dead Load: Strain ratio, δ z /δ z,allow = 0.00 <1.00 O.K! δ z,s1 = [(P z a/24)(3w 2-4a 2 )+(5/384)(1.25 A g,s γ +Q DL h u )W 4 ]//E I yy,s = 0.17 mm Deflection under dead load Sill Transom δ z,2 = (P z e) W r/(j s G) = 0.26 mm Add'l deflection due to torsion under eccentric load Dead Load: δ z = δ z,1 + δ z,2 = 0.43 mm Total deflection at the fibre closest to glass edge 2.3 Allowable deflection, δ z,allow = 3.00 mm Criteria: 75% of 4mm clearance Strain ratio, δ z /δ z,allow = 0.14 <1.00 O.K! Stack Joint Profiles δ y = (5/384) Q y (b u +b l )W 4 /[E I' e ] = 1.08 mm Calculated maximum deflection 2.3 Suction Wind: Allowable deflection, δ y,allow = 9.09 mm Criteria: Span/175 or 19mm Strain Ratio, δ y,max /δ y,allow = 0.12 <1.00 O.K! Shear Flow Check Parameters q y,h = Q y (b u +b l ) (I' e,h /I' e ) = KN/m Uniform load shared by the header transom q y,s = Q y (b u +b l ) (I' e,s /I' e ) = KN/m Uniform load shared by the sill transom End Connection Check Parameters V y,h = q y,h W/2 = 0.4 kn Horizontal reaction force on header profile Header Transom: V z,h = (1.25 A g,s γ)w/2 = 0.0 kn Vertical reaction force due to dead load on header profil Sill Trasnom: V y,s = q y,s W/2 = 0.5 kn Horizontal reaction force on sill profile V z,h = P z + (1.25 A g,s γ +Q z h u )W/2 = 0.2 kn Vertical reaction force due to dead load on sill profile FEMALE MULLION W TRANSOM - 2 SILL HEADER ELEVATION Pz a MALE MULLION Wind load tributary area b u b l Equiv. rectangular tributary width Weight of sheets 2 x P WIND LOAD SECTION y z e hu h l H

68 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 68 of Stack Joint Header and Sill Transom (under Wind Pressure) ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action Notes 4.4 Unitized Parameters Unsupported span, W = 1.59 m 3.2 Upper panel height, h u = 0.39 m Lower panel height, h l = 0.47 m Cross-sectional area of header profile, A g,h = mm 2 P z 6.2.1(a) Cross-sectional area of sill profile, A g,s = mm 2 a 5.1 Weight of infill, if any, Q z = 0.00 Kpa Weight of glass above the transom, Q DL = 0.45 Kpa 4.4 Wind load on wall element, Q y = 3.00 Kpa Setting block location, a = 190 mm 6.2.1(b) Eccentricity of setting block location, e = 37.3 mm Reference point for torsional deflection, r = 66.0 mm Transom Alloying material = Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy = 6063-T6 170 Mpa Header Transom: Effective moment of Inertia, I' e,h = 5.38E+05 mm 4 Effective section modulus (face 2), S e2,h = 1.61E+04 mm 3 Moment of inertia, I yy,h = 7.40E+05 mm (b) Dist. of top extreme fibre on face 2, c z2,h = 53.4 mm Sill Transom: Effective moment of inertia, I' e,s = 7.09E+05 mm (a) Effective section modulus (face 2), S e2,s = 2.02E+04 mm (b) Moment of inertia, I yy,s = 9.90E+05 mm (b) Torsional constant, J s = 8.20E+04 mm 4 Dist. of top extreme fibre on face 2, c z2,s = 42.3 mm 6.2.2(c) Glass weight, P z = Q DL h u W/2 = 0.14 KN Upper tributary width, b u = (h u /2)[1-h u /(2W)] = 0.17 m 6.2.2(b) Lower tributary width, b l = (h l /2)[1-h l /(2W)] = 0.20 m Analysis Moment, M zz = Q y (b u +b l ) W 2 /8 = 0.35 KN/m I' e = I 'e,h + I' e,s = 1.2E+06 mm 4 About y-y axis, composite profile M yy,h = (1.25 A g,h γ)w 2 /8 = 0.01 kn-m Accessories assumed 25% add'l to transom weight Dead Load: Bending stress, f yy,h = M yy,h /(I yy,h /c z2,h ) = 0.7 Mpa Maximum bending stress Check Stack Joint Profiles Allow. bending comp. stress, F c,h = 1.17 F cy /n y = Mpa Under bending about weak axis Header TrSuction Wind: Moment, M zz,h = M zz (I' e,h /I' e ) = 0.15 KN m Shared moment by header transom Bending stress, f zz,h = M zz,h /S e2,h = 9.4 Mpa Maximum bending stress on face Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2,h = Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face 2 4.2(d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2,h = 34.8 Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 2 Dead Load + Suction Wind: f yy,h /F c,h + f zz,h /F c2,h = 0.27 <1.00 O.K! 6.2.1(c) M yy,s = P z a + (1.25 A g,s γ +Q DL h u )W 2 /8 = 0.04 kn-m Accessories assumed 25% add'l to transom weight 6.2.1(d) Dead Load: Bending stress, f yy,s = M yy,s /(I yy,s /c z2,s ) = 1.7 Mpa Maximum bending stress Allow. bending comp. stress, F c,s = 1.17 F cy /n y = Mpa Under bending about weak axis Sill TransoSuction Wind: Moment, M zz,s = M zz (I' e,s /I' e ) = 0.20 kn-m Shared moment by sill transom Bending stress, f zz,s = M zz,s /S e2,s = 9.9 Mpa Maximum bending stress on face Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2,s = 99.6 Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face 2 4.2(d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2,s = - Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 2 Dead Load + Suction Wind: f yy,s /F c,s + f zz,s /F c2,s = 0.11 <1.00 O.K! 6.2.2(c) δ z,h = (5/384)(1.25 A g,h γ)w 4 ]//E I yy,h = 0.05 mm Deflection under dead load 6.2.2(d) Header Transom Allowable deflection, δ z,allow = mm Criteria: 75% of 20mm clearance Dead Load: Strain ratio, δ z /δ z,allow = 0.00 <1.00 O.K! Check Deflection P z a/24)(3w 2-4a 2 )+(5/384)(1.25 A g,s γ +Q DL h u )W 4 ]//E I yy,s = 0.17 mm Deflection under dead load 2.3 Sill Transom δ z,2 = (P z e) W r/(j s G) = 0.26 mm Add'l deflection due to torsion under eccentric load Dead Load: δ z = δ z,1 + δ z,2 = 0.43 mm Total deflection at the fibre closest to glass edge Allowable deflection, δ z,allow = 3.00 mm Criteria: 75% of 4mm clearance Strain ratio, δ z /δ z,allow = 0.14 <1.00 O.K! Stack Joint Profiles δ y = (5/384) Q y (b u +b l )W 4 /[E I' e ] = 1.08 mm Calculated maximum deflection 2.3 Suction Wind: Allowable deflection, δ y,allow = 9.09 mm Criteria: Span/175 or 19mm Strain Ratio, δ y,max /δ y,allow = 0.12 <1.00 O.K! q y,h = Q y (b u +b l ) (I' e,h /I' e ) = 0.48 KN/m Uniform load shared by the header transom 2.3 q y,s = Q y (b u +b l ) (I' e,s /I' e ) = 0.63 KN/m Uniform load shared by the sill transom V y,h = q y,h W/2 = 0.4 kn Horizontal reaction force on header profile Shear FlowHeader Transom: V z,h = (1.25 A g,s γ)w/2 = 0.0 kn Vertical reaction force due to dead load on header profi Sill Trasnom: V y,s = q y,s W/2 = 0.5 kn Horizontal reaction force on sill profile End Connection Check Parameters V z,h = P z + (1.25 A g,s γ +Q z h u )W/2 = 0.2 kn Vertical reaction force due to dead load on sill profile FEMALE MULLION W TRANSOM - 2 SILL HEADER TRANSOM - 1 Wind load tributary area TRANSOM - 2 STACK JOINT - SILL ELEVATION q y rotation P z Pz a MALE MULLION e r Wind load tributary area b u b l Equiv. rectangular tributary width Weight of sheets z c.g. WIND LOAD 2 x P SECTION z y e hu h l H

69 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 69 of Check Thermal Break Shear (a) Check Longitudinal Shear in Header Transom AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes 6.2.1(b) Extrusion Parameters V c /(D w) = 8.54 mm Shear flow per uniform unit load, w 4.2(f) Test shear strength, Q c = N/mm Taken from shear test of thermal break assembly Suction Wind: q z- = kn/m Applied uniform wind suctinon load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 4.1 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.16 <1.00 O.K! Pressure Wind: q z+ = 0.48 kn Applied uniform wind pressure load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 4.1 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.16 <1.00 O.K! (b) Check Longitudinal Shear in Sill Transom AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes 6.2.2(b) Extrusion Parameters V c /(D w) = 7.13 mm Shear flow per uniform unit load, w 4.2(f) Test shear strength, Q c = N/mm Taken from shear test of thermal break assembly Suction Wind: q z- = kn/m Applied uniform wind suctinon load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 4.5 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.18 <1.00 O.K! Pressure Wind: q z+ = 0.63 kn Applied uniform wind pressure load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 4.5 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.18 <1.00 O.K!

70 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 70 of Transom 1 (Type 1) Check Profile under Biaxial Bending ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action Notes 4.4 Unitized Parameters Unsupported span, W = 1.59 m 3.2 Upper panel height, h u = 0.47 m Lower panel height, h l = 2.84 m 6.3.1(a) Cross-sectional area of profile, A g = mm Weight of infill, if any, Q z = 0.46 Kpa Weight of glass above the transom, Q DL = 0.00 Kpa 4.4 Design wind suction, Q y- = Kpa Design wind pressure, Q y+ = 3.00 Kpa Setting block location, a = 190 mm 6.3.1(b) Eccentricity of setting block location, e = 24.5 mm Reference point for torsional deflection, r = 55.4 mm Transom Alloying material = Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy = 6063-T6 170 Mpa Modulus of Elasticity, E = Mpa Shear Modulus of alloy, G = Mpa Unit weight of alloy, γ = 27 kn/m (b) Effective moment of inertia, I' e = 6.4E+05 mm 4 Effective section modulus (face 1), S e1 = (face 2), S e2 = 1.9E+04 mm 3 2.5E+04 mm (c) Moment of inertia, I yy = 6.4E+05 mm 4 Torsional constant, J = 5.3E+05 mm (b) Dist. from c.g. to extreme top fibre on face 1, c z1 = 34.6 mm Dist. from c.g. to extreme top fibre on face 2, c z2 = 34.6 mm Analysis Glass weight, P z = Q DL h u W/2 = 0.00 KN Applied as pair loads of glass chair Upper tributary width, b u = (h u /2)[1-h u /(2W)] = 0.20 m Width of the equivalent rectangular tributary area Lower tributary width, b l = W/3 = 0.53 m Width of the equivalent rectangular tributary area Uniform wind suction load, q y- = Q y- (b u +b l ) = Also used for checking of thermal break shear flow Uniform wind pressure load, q y+ = Q y+ (b u +b l ) = 2.19 Also used for checking of thermal break shear flow Check Transom M yy = P z a + (1.25 A g γ +Q z h u )W 2 /8 = 0.08 kn-m Accessories assumed 25% add'l to transom weight Dead Load: Bending stress, f yy = M yy /(I yy /c z ) = 4.3 Mpa Maximum bending stress Allow. bending comp. stress, F c = 1.17 F cy /n y = Mpa Under bending about weak axis Suction Wind: Moment, M zz- = q y- W 2 /8 = kn-m Bending moment about z-z axis Bending stress, f zz- = M zz- /S e1 = 36.2 Mpa Maximum bending stress 6.3.1(c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1 = Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1 = 92.4 Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 1 Pressure Wind: Moment, M zz+ = q y+ W 2 /8 = 0.69 kn-m Bending moment about z-z axis Bending stress, f zz+ = M zz+ /S e2 = 27.6 Mpa Maximum bending stress 6.3.1(c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2 = Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2 = - Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 2 Dead Load + Suction Wind: f yy /F c + f zz- /F c1 = 0.43 <1.00 O.K! Pressure Wind + Dead Load: f yy /F c + f zz+ /F c2 = 0.30 <1.00 O.K! STACK JOINT - HEADER Wind load tributary area Weight of sheets Weight of infill (insulation) Equiv. rectangular MALE MULLION tributary width δ z,1 = [(P z a/24)(3w 2-4a 2 )+(5/384)(1.25 A g γ +Q DL h u )W 4 ]//E I yy = 0.48 mm Deflection under dead load Check Deflection δ z,2 = (P z e) W r/(j G) = 0.00 mm Add'l deflection due to torsion under eccentric load Dead Load: δ z = δ z,1 + δ z,2 = 0.48 mm Total deflection at the fibre closest to glass edge 2.3 Allowable deflection, δ z,allow = 3.00 mm Criteria: 75% of 4mm clearance Strain ratio, δ z /δ z,allow = 0.16 <1.00 O.K! Suction Wind: δ y- = (5/384) Q y- (b u +b l )W 4 /[E I' e ] = mm Maximum deflection under suction wind Pressure Wind: δ y+ = (5/384) Q y+ (b u +b l )W 4 /[E I' e ] = 4.11 mm Maximum deflection under pressure wind 2.3 Allowable deflection, δ y,allow = 9.09 mm Criteria: Span/175 or 19mm Strain Ratio, δ y,max /δ y,allow = 0.45 <1.00 O.K! End Connection Check Parameters V y- = q y- W/2 = 1.7 kn End shear under wind suction V y+ = q y+ W/2 = 1.7 kn End shear under wind pressure V z = P z + (1.25 A g,s γ +Q z h u )W/2 = 0.2 kn End shear under dead load q z TRANSOM - 1 FEMALE MULLION TRANSOM - 2 STACK JOINT - SILL ELEVATION q y rotation z e r b u bl WIND LOAD 2 x P z c.g. e h u h l SECTION y H

71 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 71 of Check Thermal Break Shear (a) Check Longitudinal Shear in Transom 1 AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes 6.3.1(b) Extrusion Parameters V c /(D w) = 6.09 mm Shear flow per uniform unit load, w 4.2(f) Test shear strength, Q c = N/mm Taken from shear test of thermal break assembly Suction Wind: q z- = kn/m Applied uniform wind suctinon load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 13.3 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.53 <1.00 O.K! Pressure Wind: q z+ = 2.19 kn Applied uniform wind pressure load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 13.3 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.53 <1.00 O.K!

72 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 72 of Transom 2 (Type 1) Check Profile under Biaxial Bending ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action 4.4 Unitized Parameters Unsupported span, W = 1.59 m 3.2 Upper panel height, h u = 2.84 m Lower panel height, h l = 0.39 m 6.4.1(a) Cross-sectional area of profile, A g = mm Weight of infill, if any, Q z = 0.00 Kpa Weight of glass above the transom, Q DL = 0.45 Kpa 4.4 Design wind suction, Q y- = Kpa Design wind pressure, Q y+ = 3.00 Kpa Setting block location, a = 190 mm 6.4.1(b) Eccentricity of setting block location, e = 27.1 mm Reference point for torsional deflection, r = 56.8 mm Transom Alloying material = Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy = 6063-T6 170 Mpa Modulus of Elasticity, E = Mpa Shear Modulus of alloy, G = Mpa Unit weight of alloy, γ = 27 kn/m (b) Effective moment of inertia, I' e = 6.6E+05 mm 4 Effective section modulus (face 1), S e1 = (face 2), S e2 = 1.8E+04 mm 3 2.3E+04 mm (c) Moment of inertia, I yy = 5.5E+05 mm 4 Torsional constant, J = 4.9E+05 mm (b) Dist. from c.g. to extreme top fibre on face 1, c z1 = 37.5 mm Dist. from c.g. to extreme top fibre on face 2, c z2 = 17.5 mm Analysis Glass weight, P z = Q DL h u W/2 = 1.02 KN Applied as pair loads of glass chair Upper tributary width, b u = W/3 = 0.53 m Width of the equivalent rectangular tributary area Lower tributary width, b l = (h l /2)[1-h l /(2W)] = 0.17 m Width of the equivalent rectangular tributary area Uniform wind suction load, q y- = Q y- (b u +b l ) = Also used for checking of thermal break shear flow Uniform wind pressure load, q y+ = Q y+ (b u +b l ) = 2.10 Also used for checking of thermal break shear flow Check Transom M yy = P z a + (1.25 A g γ +Q z h u )W 2 /8 = 0.20 kn-m Accessories assumed 25% add'l to transom weight Dead Load: Bending stress, f yy = M yy /(I yy /c z ) = 13.9 Mpa Maximum bending stress Allow. bending comp. stress, F c = 1.17 F cy /n y = Mpa Under bending about weak axis Suction Wind: Moment, M zz- = q y- W 2 /8 = kn-m Bending moment about z-z axis Bending stress, f zz- = M zz- /S e1 = 36.3 Mpa Maximum bending stress 6.4.1(c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1 = Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1 = 89.0 Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 1 Pressure Wind: Moment, M zz+ = q y+ W 2 /8 = 0.66 kn-m Bending moment about z-z axis Bending stress, f zz+ = M zz+ /S e2 = 29.5 Mpa Maximum bending stress 6.4.1(c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2 = Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2 = - Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 2 Dead Load + Suction Wind: f yy /F c + f zz- /F c1 = 0.52 <1.00 O.K! Pressure Wind + Dead Load: f yy /F c + f zz+ /F c2 = 0.40 <1.00 O.K! δ z,1 = [(P z a/24)(3w 2-4a 2 )+(5/384)(1.25 A g γ +Q DL h u )W 4 ]//E I yy = 1.65 mm Deflection under dead load Check Deflection δ z,2 = (P z e) W r/(j G) = 0.20 mm Add'l deflection due to torsion under eccentric load Dead Load: δ z = δ z,1 + δ z,2 = 1.85 mm Total deflection at the fibre closest to glass edge 2.3 Allowable deflection, δ z,allow = 3.00 mm Criteria: 75% of 4mm clearance Strain ratio, δ z /δ z,allow = 0.62 <1.00 O.K! Suction Wind: δ y- = (5/384) Q y- (b u +b l )W 4 /[E I' e ] = mm Maximum deflection under suction wind Pressure Wind: δ y+ = (5/384) Q y+ (b u +b l )W 4 /[E I' e ] = 3.83 mm Maximum deflection under pressure wind 2.3 Allowable deflection, δ y,allow = 9.09 mm Criteria: Span/175 or 19mm Strain Ratio, δ y,max /δ y,allow = 0.42 <1.00 O.K! End Connection Check Parameters V y- = q y- W/2 = 1.7 kn End shear under wind suction V y+ = q y+ W/2 = 1.7 kn End shear under wind pressure V z = P z + (1.25 A g,s γ +Q z h u )W/2 = 1.0 kn End shear under dead load Notes a P z W STACK JOINT - HEADER TRANSOM - 1 FEMALE MULLION Wind load tributary area TRANSOM - 2 STACK JOINT - SILL Pz MALE MULLION a Equivalent rectangular tributary width ELEVATION q y rotation z e r bu bl c.g. WIND LOAD 2 x P z e h H u hl SECTION y

73 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 73 of Check Thermal Break Shear (a) Check Longitudinal Shear in Transom 2 AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes 6.4.1(b) Extrusion Parameters V c /(D w) = 6.11 mm Shear flow per uniform unit load, w 4.2(f) Test shear strength, Q c = N/mm Taken from shear test of thermal break assembly Suction Wind: q z- = kn/m Applied uniform wind suctinon load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 12.8 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.51 <1.00 O.K! Pressure Wind: q z+ = 2.10 kn Applied uniform wind pressure load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 12.8 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.51 <1.00 O.K!

74 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 74 of Check Stainless Steel Spandrel Panel Details For structural system 1, the 1.5mm thick stainless steel spandrel panel is reinforced with a continuous bent aluminum sheet bonded at the back of the sheet via structural silicone. Fig Spandrel Panel Details Where: K = 341.5mm mm Thick Aluminium Reinforcement The metal sheet and its reinforcement are considered as non-composite or layered elements. Which means the structural sealant bonding is not considered to transfer shear between the metals. Therefore, every adjacent nodes that are co-incident on the plane of the metal sheet are coupled in the in-out direction (as shown below). 1.5mm thk sheet 4mm thk reinforce ment In-out Coupling Fig Coupled Nodes

75 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 75 of Check Sheet for Full Wind Load Shell Element Model with Boundary conditions Perimeter Restraint in Z - dir. Wind load: - Coupled Restraint in Fig Spandrel Sheet Applied Load & Boundary Conditions (a) Calculations Summary ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action Notes Metal Sheet Parameters Width, W = 1385 mm Net dimension considering width of mullions Height, h = 400 mm Net height considering grip of glazing bead Wind load, Q = -3.5 KN/m 2 Design wind load in suction Alloy, F ty = 170 Mpa Tensile yield strength of Stainless steel S31203 ANSYS FEM Anlysis Results Notes Check Stress VM =0.707[(S min -S min ) 2 +S 2 max +S 2 min ) 0.5 = Mpa Von mises stress results (from ANSYS FEM anlaysis) Allowable stress, F c = 1.3F ty /n y = Mpa For rectangular solid plates Stress ratio, VM/F c = 0.84 <1.00 O.K! Check Deflection δ max = 6.82 mm Maximum deflection (from ANSYS FEM analysis) Allowable deflection, δ allow = 8.00 mm Architectural requirement (span/60 = 400mm/80) Strain ratio, δ z /δ allow = 0.85 <1.00 O.K!

76 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 76 of 117 (b) Analysis Results (i.) Von Mises Stress Diagram (ii.) Deflection Diagram Fig Spandrel Sheet Analysis Results

77 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 77 of ANALYSIS & CODE CHECK STRUCTURAL SYSTEM 2 Refer to 4.3 for discussions on structural system 2. Summary of Section Properties for Structural System 2 I' e S e1 S e2 (V c /D)/w F c1 F c2 Local, F c1 Local, F Section Properties c2 mm 4 mm 3 mm 3 N/mm/N/mm Mpa Mpa Mpa Mpa Reference (b) (c) (d) Structural System - 2 Male Mullion E E E Female Mullion E E E Header Transom E E E Sill Transom E E E Transom E E E Transom E E E Mullion Check The mullions are subjected to biaxial bending stresses due to (i) wind load normal to the plane of the unit, and (ii) wind load parallel to the plane of the unit. The latter is being caused by the wind load on the protruding vertical fin on the façade unit. For discussion on this modes of bending refer to Biaxial Bending Analysis of Mullion ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action Notes Male Mullion Bending Stress ratio, f yy-,m /F c1,m = 0.61 Major axis face 1 under wind suction Stress ratio, f yy+,m /F c1,m = 0.78 Major axis face 2 under wind pressure Stress ratio, f zz1,m /F c,m = 0.20 Minor axis face 1 under lateral wind load Stress ratio, f zz2,m /F c,m = 0.11 Minor axis face 2 under lateral wind load Biaxial bending, f yy-,m /F c1,m f zz1,m /F c,m = % Suction + 50% lateral wind: comp. on face f yy-,m /F c1,m + f zz1,m /F c,m = % Suction + 100% lateral wind: comp. on face 1 Biaxial bending, f yy+,m /F c2,m f zz2,m /F c,m = % Pressure + 50% lateral wind: comp. on face f yy+,m /F c2,m + f zz2,m /F c,m = % Pressure + 100% lateral wind: comp. on face 3 Maximum stress ratio = 0.84 <1.00 O.K! Female Mullion Bending Stress ratio, f yy-,f /F c1,f = 0.30 Major axis face 1 under wind suction Stress ratio, f yy+,f /F c1,f = 0.35 Major axis face 2 under wind pressure Stress ratio, f zz1,f /F c,f = 0 Minor axis face 1 under lateral wind load Stress ratio, f zz2,f /F c,f = 0 Minor axis face 2 under lateral wind load Biaxial bending, f yy-,f /F c1,f f zz1,f /F c,f = % Suction + 50% lateral wind: comp. on face f yy-,f /F c1,f + f zz1,f /F c,f = % Suction + 100% lateral wind: comp. on face 1 Biaxial bending, f yy+,f /F c2,f f zz2,f /F c,f = % Pressure + 50% lateral wind: comp. on face f yy+,f /F c2,f + f zz2,f /F c,f = % Pressure + 100% lateral wind: comp. on face 3 Maximum stress ratio = 0.35 <1.00 O.K! Sword Bending Stress ratio, f yy-,sw /F c,sw = 0.43 Major axis bending under wind suction Stress ratio, f yy+,sw /F c,sw = 0.43 Major axis bending under wind pressure Stress ratio, f zz,sw /F c,sw = 0.15 Minor axis bending under lateral wind load Biaxial bending, f yy-,sw /F c,sw f zz,sw /F c,sw = 0.51 Suction + 50% lateral wind load Biaxial bending, 0.5 f yy-,sw /F c,sw + f zz,sw /F c,sw = % Suction + lateral wind load Biaxial bending, f yy+,sw /F c,sw f zz,sw /F c,sw = 0.51 Pressure + 50% lateral wind load Biaxial bending, 0.5 f yy+,sw /F c,sw + f zz,sw /F c,sw = % Pressure + lateral wind load Maximum stress ratio = 0.51 <1.00 O.K!

78 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 78 of Superposition Under Biaxial Bending The table above summarizes the biaxial bending analyses of the mullion in the succeeding sections as follows: (i) Mullion Analysis under Wind Load Normal to Plane of the Unit mullion check under wind suction, refer to 9.1.2, mullion check under wind pressure, refer to 9.1.3, and b f b m Stage 1: Simple beam Stage 2: Continuous beam Stage 1: Simple beam Stage 2: Continuous beam STACK JOINT - HEADER M yy,sw M yy,sw TRANSOM - 1 H FEMALE MULLION MALE MULLION M yy,1 δ z,1 M yy,2 δ z,2 Myy,1 δ z,1 M yy,2 δz,2 TRANSOM - 2 STACK JOINT - SILL M yy,sw M yy,sw W Mom - yy Def - z Mom - yy Def - z Mom - yy Def - z Mom - yy Def - z ELEVATION WIND SUCTION: SYSTEM - 2 WIND PRESSURE: SYSTEM - 2 Fig Wind Load Normal to the Unit Plane (ii) Mullion Analysis under Wind Load Parallel to Plane of the Unit mullion check under lateral wind load, refer to In checking the minor axis bending of the mullion, it is assumed that the upper spandrel panel is a rigid diaphragm in the axis on mullion bending, this by virtue of the double skin 1.5mm infill metal sheets. With this assumption, the mode of mullion bending is similar to a propped cantilever beam with the spandrel panel as its rigid support. Error! Objects cannot be created from editing field codes. Fig Mullion under Lateral Wind Load on Vertical Fin

79 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 79 of Mullion Check for Wind Suction ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action 4.4 CW Unit Parameters H = 3.70 m Unsupported span of mullion W = 1.94 m Tributary width for wind load Wind load on wall element, Q z = Kpa Suction normal to the plane of CW unit Mullion Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 E = Mpa 7.1.1(b) Male Profile: Effective moment of Inertia, I' e,m = 1.36E+07 mm 4 About y-y axis, composite male profile Effective section modulus, S e1,m = 1.34E+05 mm 3 About y-y axis, on face 1 (for wind suction) 7.1.2(b) Female Profile: Effective moment of Inertia, I' e,f = 1.09E+06 mm 4 About y-y axis, composite female profile Effective section modulus, S e1,f = 2.23E+04 mm 3 About y-y axis, on face 1 (for wind suction) Sword Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy,sw = 490 Mpa 7022-T651 E Sw = Mpa Sword length, L Sw = 600 mm Portion of sword penetrating the mullion profile Sword cross-section, d Sw x t Sw = 140 x 15 mm Sword slack on its depth, gap z = 2.0 mm Total gaps on each side of the sword Bending Analysis Uniform load, q z = W Q z = KN/m Parallel to the major axis of mullion 4.3 Slip angle, α yy = tan -1 (gap z /L Sw ) = rad Sword's freedom of rotation before it carries moment 4.3.2(a) Stage 1: Initial load, q z,i = 24α yy E I' e /H 3 = 1.60 KN/m Amount of load to produce rotation mullion ends Applied load for simple beam bending, q z,1 = 1.60 KN/m qzi < qz : Structural system 2 Midspan moment, M yy,1 = q z,1 H 2 /8 = 2.74 KN m Bending moment in the mullion assembly 4.3.2(b) Stage 2: Net load, q z,2 = q z - q z,1 = 7.13 KN/m Balance load after undergoing rotation, ends Midspan moment, M yy,2 = q z,2 H 2 /24 = 4.07 KN m Bending moment in the mullion assembly Support moment, M yy,sw = q z,2 H 2 /12 = 8.14 KN m Bending moment in the sword Couple force on sword, F z,sw = M yy,sw /L Sw = KN Developed couple on sword Total midspan moment, M yy = M yy,1 + M yy,2 = 6.80 KN m Total bending moment in the mullion assembly 4.2(c) Check Mullion Profile I' e = I 'e,m + I' e,f = 1.5E+07 mm 4 About y-y axis, composite profile 4.2(d) Male Mullion: Moment, M yy,m = M yy (I' e,m /I' e ) = 6.30 KN m Shared moment by male mullion Bending stress, f yy,m = M yy,m /S e1,m = 50.8 Mpa Maximum bending stress 7.1.1(c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1,m = 83.8 Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1,m = Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 1 Stress ratio, f yy,m /F c1,m = 0.61 <1.00 O.K! 4.2(d) Female Mullion: Moment, M yy,f = M yy (I' e,f /I' e ) = 0.50 KN m Shared moment by male mullion Bending stress, f yy,f = M yy,f /S e2,f = 22.6 Mpa Maximum bending stress 7.1.2(c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1,f = 76.0 Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1,f = 96.1 Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 1 Stress ratio, f yy,f /F c1,f = 0.30 <1.00 O.K! Check Sword S yy,sw = t Sw d 2 Sw /6 = 4.9E+04 mm 4 Section modulus Bending: Bending stress, f yy,sw = M yy,sw /S yy,sw = Mpa Considering plastic modulus Allowable stress, F c,sw = 1.3 F cy,sw /n y = Mpa Allowable compressive stress under bending Stress ratio, f yy,sw /F c,sw = 0.43 <1.00 O.K! Shear: Shear on sword, V z,sw = q z H/2 = KN Lateral shear force Shear stress, f sz,sw = V z,sw /(0.9d Sw t Sw ) = 8.5 Mpa Allowable shear stress, F s = F ty,sw /[(3) 0.5 n y ] = Mpa F ty = F cy, n y = 1.65 Stress ratio, f sz,sw /F s = 0.05 <1.00 O.K! 4.3.2(a) Check Deflection δ z,1 = 5/384 q z,1 H 4 /E I' e = 3.85 mm Stage 1: simple beam deflection 4.3.2(b) δ z,2 = 1/384 q z,2 H 4 /E I' e = 3.44 mm Stage 2: continuous beam deflection Total deflection, δ z = d z,1 + d z,2 = 7.29 mm Calculated maximum deflection 2.3 Allowable deflection, δ allow = mm Criteria: Span/175 or 19mm Strain ratio, δ z /δ allow = 0.38 <1.00 O.K! Shear Flow Check Parameters q z-,m = q z- (I' e,m /I' e ) = KN/m Uniform load shared by the male mullion q z-,f = q z- (I' e,f /I' e ) = KN/m Uniform load shared by the female mullion Notes

80 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 80 of Mullion Check for Wind Pressure ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action 4.4 CW Unit Parameters H = 3.70 m Unsupported span of mullion W = 1.94 m Tributary width for wind load Wind load on wall element, Q z = 4.50 Kpa Pressure normal to the plane of CW unit Mullion Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 E = Mpa 7.1.1(b) Male Profile: Effective moment of Inertia, I' e,m = 1.36E+07 mm 4 About y-y axis, composite male profile Effective section modulus, S e2,m = 1.05E+05 mm 3 About y-y axis, on face 2 (for wind pressure) 7.1.2(b) Female Profile: Effective moment of Inertia, I' e,f = 1.09E+06 mm 4 About y-y axis, composite female profile Effective section modulus, S e2,f = 1.80E+04 mm 3 About y-y axis, on face 2 (for wind pressure) Sword Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy,sw = 490 Mpa 7022-T651 E Sw = Mpa Sword length, L Sw = 600 mm Portion of sword penetrating the mullion profile Sword cross section, d Sw x t Sw = 140 x 15 mm Sword slack on its depth, gap z = 2.0 mm Total gaps on each side of the sword Bending Analysis Uniform load, q z = W Q z = 8.73 KN/m Parallel to the major axis of mullion 4.3 Slip angle, α yy = tan -1 (gap z /L Sw ) = rad Sword's freedom of rotation before it carries moment 4.3.2(a) Stage 1: Initial load, q z,i = 24α yy E I' e /H 3 = 1.60 KN/m Amount of load to produce rotation mullion ends Applied load for simple beam bending, q z,1 = 1.60 KN/m qzi < qz : Structural system 2 Midspan moment, M yy,1 = q z,1 H 2 /8 = 2.74 KN m Bending moment in the mullion assembly 4.3.2(b) Stage 2: Net load, q z,2 = q z - q z,1 = 7.13 KN/m Balance load after undergoing rotation, ends Midspan moment, M yy,2 = q z,2 H 2 /24 = 4.07 KN m Bending moment in the mullion assembly Support moment, M yy,sw = q z,2 H 2 /12 = 8.14 KN m Bending moment in the sword Couple force on sword, F z,sw = M yy,sw /L Sw = KN Developed couple on sword Total midspan moment, M yy = M yy,1 + M yy,2 = 6.80 KN m Total bending moment in the mullion assembly 4.2(c) Check Mullion Profile I' e = I 'e,m + I' e,f = 1.5E+07 mm 4 About y-y axis, composite profile 4.2(d) Male Mullion: Moment, M yy,m = M yy (I' e,m /I' e ) = 6.30 KN m Shared moment by male mullion Bending stress, f yy,m = M yy,m /S e2,m = 64.8 Mpa Maximum bending stress 7.1.1(c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2,m = 83.4 Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2,m = Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 2 Stress ratio, f yy,m /F c2,m = 0.78 <1.00 O.K! 4.2(d) Female Mullion: Moment, M yy,f = M yy (I' e,f /I' e ) = 0.50 KN m Shared moment by male mullion Bending stress, f yy,f = M yy,f /S e2,f = 28.0 Mpa Maximum bending stress 7.1.2(c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2,f = 80.3 Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2,f = - Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 2 Stress ratio, f yy,f /F c2,f = 0.35 <1.00 O.K! Check Sword S yy,sw = t Sw d 2 Sw /6 = 4.9E+04 mm 4 Section modulus Bending: Bending stress, f yy,sw = M yy,sw /S yy,sw = Mpa Considering plastic modulus Allowable stress, F c,sw = 1.3 F cy,sw /n y = Mpa Allowable compressive stress under bending Stress ratio, f yy,sw /F c,sw = 0.43 <1.00 O.K! Shear: Shear on sword, V z,sw = q z H/2 = KN Lateral shear force Shear stress, f sz,sw = V z,sw /(0.9d Sw t Sw ) = 8.5 Mpa Allowable shear stress, F s = F ty,sw /[(3) 0.5 n y ] = Mpa F ty = F cy, n y = 1.65 Stress ratio, f sz,sw /F s = 0.05 <1.00 O.K! 4.3.2(a) Check Deflection δ z,1 = 5/384 q z,1 H 4 /E I' e = 3.85 mm Stage 1: simple beam deflection 4.3.2(b) δ z,2 = 1/384 q z,2 H 4 /E I' e = 3.44 mm Stage 2: continuous beam deflection Total deflection, δ z = d z,1 + d z,2 = 7.29 mm Calculated maximum deflection 2.3 Allowable deflection, δ allow = mm Criteria: Span/175 or 19mm Strain ratio, δ z /δ allow = 0.38 <1.00 O.K! Shear Flow Check Parameters q z+,m = q z+ (I' e,m /I' e ) = 8.08 KN/m Uniform load shared by the male mullion q z+,f = q z+ (I' e,f /I' e ) = 0.65 KN/m Uniform load shared by the female mullion Notes

81 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 81 of Mullion Check for Lateral Wind Load Element 1 - critical element under wind suction c.g. Element 4 - critical element under wind pressure Fig Values of cy for Critical Elements under Biaxial Bending ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action 4.4 Unitized Parameters H = 3.70 m Height of the unitized panel h = 3.23 m Height of the unsupported span in y axis b = 0.19 m Width of vertical fin projection Wind load on fin, Q y = 3.00 Kpa Normal to the axis of fin protrusion Mullion Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 E = Mpa 7.1.1(b) Male Profile: Effective moment of Inertia, I zz,m = 6.50E+05 mm 4 About z-z axis, non-composite male profie Dist. to c.g. of fiber considered, c y1,m = 35.1 mm Along y axis, on face 1 Dist. to c.g. of fiber considered, c y2,m = 18.8 mm Along y axis, on face Sword Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy,sw = 490 Mpa 7022-T651 E Sw = Mpa Sword length, L Sw = 600 mm Portion of sword penetrating the mullion profile Sword depth, d Sw x t Sw = 140 x 15 mm Sword slack on its thickness, gap y = 2.0 mm Total gaps on each side of the sword Bending Analysis Uniform load, q y = b Q y = 0.57 KN/m Parallel to the major axis of mullion 4.3 Slip angle, α zz = tan -1 (gap y /L Sw ) = 0.00 rad Sword's freedom of rotation before it carries moment Stage 1: Initial load, q y,i = 48α zz E I zz,m /h 3 = 0.21 KN/m Amount of load to produce rotation mullion ends Applied load for propped beam bending, q y,1 = 0.21 KN/m qzi < qz : Structural system 2 Midspan moment, M zz,1 = 3q y,1 h(h/2)/8 + q y (H/2) 2 /2 = 0.30 KN m Bending moment in the male mullion Stage 2: Net load, q y,2 = q y - q y,1 = 0.36 KN/m Balance load after undergoing rotation, ends Midspan moment, M zz,2 = q y,2 h 2 /24 = 0.16 KN m Bending moment in the male mullion Support moment, M zz,sw = q y,2 h 2 /12 = 0.31 KN m Bending moment in the sword Couple force on sword, F y,sw = M zz,sw /L Sw = 0.52 KN Developed couple on sword Total midspan moment, M zz = M zz,1 + M zz,2 = 0.46 KN m Total minor axis bending moment in the male mullion Check Male Mullion Profile f zz1,m = M zz /(I zz,m /c y1,m ) = 24.7 Mpa Minor axis bending stress on critical face Face 1: Allow. comp. stress, F c = 1.17 F cy /n y = Mpa Under bending about minor axis Stress ratio, f zz1,m /F c = 0.20 <1.00 O.K! Face 2: f zz1,m = M zz /(I zz,m /c y1,m ) = 13.2 Mpa Minor axis bending stress on critical face 2 Allow. comp. stress, F c = 1.17 F cy /n y = Mpa Under bending about minor axis Stress ratio, f zz1,m /F c = 0.11 <1.00 O.K! Check Sword Section modulus, S zz,sw = d Sw t 2 Sw /6 = 5.25E+03 mm 4 Bending: Bending stress, f zz,sw = M zz,sw /S zz,sw = 59.2 Mpa Considering plastic modulus Allow. bending comp. Stress, F c,sw = 1.3 F cy,sw /n y = Mpa Stress ratio, f zz,sw /F c,sw = 0.15 <1.00 O.K! Shear: Shear on sword, V y,sw = q y H/2 = 1.05 KN Lateral shear force Shear stress, f sy,sw = V y,sw /(0.9d Sw t Sw ) = 0.6 Mpa Allowable shear stress, F s = F ty,sw /[(3) 0.5 n y ] = Mpa Fty = Fcy, ny = 1.65 Stress ratio, f sy,sw /F s = 0.00 <1.00 O.K! Check Deflection of Mullion δ z,1 = q z,1 /185 h 4 /E I zz.m = 2.79 mm Stage 1: propped cantilever beam deflection δ z,2 = 1/384 q z,2 H 4 /E I zz,m = 2.26 mm Stage 2: continuous beam deflection Total lateral deflection, δ z = d z,1 + d z,2 = 5.06 mm Calculated maximum deflection 2.3 Allowable lateral deflection, δ allow = 7.50 mm Criteria: 75% of 10mm clearance Strain ratio, δ z /δ allow = 0.67 <1.00 O.K! Notes

82 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 82 of Check Sword Under Slab Deflection. Refer to 4.3 for discussions on slab deflection and in-plane performance of the curtain wall units. W R h R v W t H W/2 R h Fig Reaction Forces under Deflected Slab ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action Notes I. Claculated shear on sword in the preceeding section Suction Wind on Mullion: Shear, V z-,m = kn Calculated maximum shear on male mullion Shear, V z-,f = 2.30 kn Calculated maximum shear on female mullion Total sword shear, V z-,sw = V z-,m + V z-,f = kn Total major axis shear on sword under wind suction Pressure Wind on Mullion: Shear, V z+,m = kn Calculated maximum shear on male mullion Shear, V z+,f = 2.30 kn Calculated maximum shear on female mullion Total sword shear, V z+,sw = V z+,m + V z+,f = kn Total major axis shear on sword under wind pressure Lateral Wind on Mullion: Sword shear, V y,sw = 1.41 kn Minor axis shear on sword under lateral wind II. Shear on sword due to slab deflection 5.2 CW Unit Parameters: Width of unit, W = 1.94 m Clear span between dead load support brackets Height of unit, H = 3.70 m Approx. vertical dist. bet. dead load bracket and sword j 5.1 Total weight of the unit, W t = 4.63 kn Calculated weight of all components 3.3-1M Sword Parameters: Sword, F ty = 490 Mpa Shear yield strength Depth, d Sw = 140 mm Sword gross depth Sword thickness, t Sw = 15 mm Sword gross thickness Reaction, R h = W t (W/2H) = 1.2 kn Lateral reaction force due to one lamed bracket support Sword shear, V yδ,sw = R h = 1.2 kn Minor axis shear on sword due tor slab deflection III. Combined shear on sword Suction wind + Lateral wind + Slab defleftion: Shear, V = [V 2 z-,sw +(V y,sw +V yδ,sw ) 2 ) 0.5 = 16.4 kn Combined major and minor axis shear in sword Shear stress, f s = V/(0.9d Sw t Sw ) = 8.7 Mpa Total shear stress in sword Allowable shear stress, F s = F ty /1.732n y = Mpa where n y = 1.65 for yield failure Stress ratio = 0.05 <1.00 O.K! Pressure wind + Lateral wind + Slab defleftion: Shear, V = [V 2 z-,sw +(V y,sw +V yδ,sw ) 2 ) 0.5 = 16.4 kn Combined major and minor axis shear in sword Shear stress, f s = V/(0.9d Sw t Sw ) = 8.7 Mpa Total shear stress in sword Allowable shear stress, F s = F ty /1.732n y = Mpa where n y = 1.65 for yield failure Stress ratio = 0.05 <1.00 O.K! Note that the calculated shear in the mullion is equal to the shear in the sword: V = V + V where: Vz,Sw = Max. shear on sword in the major axis z, Sw z, m z, f Vz,m = Max. shear on the male mullion in the major axis. Vz,f = Max. shear on the female mullion in the major axis.

83 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 83 of Check Thermal Break Shear (a) Check Thermal Break Longitudinal Shear in Male Mullion The FEM Model Equation (28.a) of AAMA-TIR-A8-04 is an approximation for shear flow in a thermal barrier. The accuracy of this equation depends on the degree of symmetry of the two faces being combined. In the case of the male mullion profile, the two faces are very far from being symmetrical. Therefore a more precise FEM analysis is performed to calculate the actual shear flow in the thermal barrier. The assembly is modeled to include both faces of the male mullion profile as custom beam sections and the pair of thermal break strips as shell elements. Stiff link elements at 100mm spacing along the entire span join both faces with the edges of the thermal strips. Boundary conditions are defined at end spans and at intermediate points at the location of the transoms. The amount of uniform wind load shared by the male mullion (with its female partner) is applied as a point load on every node that are spaced 100mm along the whole span. Face-1 Face-2 Thermal break, 2 nos, 2mm thick Link 100mm on centre Lateral and torsional restraints by the transoms on face 1 Link 100mm on centre Face- 1 Face- 2 Sword Sword Wind load: 8.1N/mmm Coupled joint in vertical translation Sword Rigid constraint on sword Face-1 and face-2 are coupled together at this end Rigid constraint on sword (a) Male mullion Cross-section (b) Male mullion Elevation - Boundary conditions

84 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 84 of 117 Fig Male mullion Thermal break Model Clause Action Notes Parameters L = 3.70 m Unsupported span of beam assembly Beam Assembly: h = mm Height of thermal break strip b = 2.00 mm Thickness of thermal break strip q z = 8.08 kn/m Applied uniform wind load on the assembly Aluminium Extrusion: E Al = Mpa Young's modulus of aluminium extrusion µ Al = 0.33 Poisson's ratio of aluminium extrusion Aluminium Sword: Eal, Sw = Mpa Young's modulus of sword (modified by inspection) µ Al,Sw = 0.33 Poisson's ratio of aluminium sword Thermal Break: E Pm = 2000 Mpa Young's modulus of thermal break (polyamide) µ Pm = 0.49 Poisson's ratio of thermal break (polyamide) 4.2(f) Test shear strength, Q c = N/mm Taken from shear test of thermal break assembly Link element: E Lk, I Lk, A Lk = 1.00E+09 Mpa Link element properties (very large number) ANSYS FEM Analysis Results Notes Check Shear Flow Shear stress, f v = 5.24 Mpa Result maximum shear stress in YZ plane Max. shear flow, q c = f v b = N/mm Calculated shear flow in the thermal break Allowable shear flow, Q'c = Qc/F.S. = N/mm Considerig a factor of safety, F.S. of 3.0 Stress ratio = 0.62 <1.00 O.K! Analysis Results - Shear Stress Diagram Fig Shear stress on YZ Plane Investigate Shear Deformation Check that the there is no shear deformation of the thermal break at the right end. Whereas maximum shear deformation occurs at the far left end.

85 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 85 of 117 (a) Longitudinal shear deformation (a) Left end Maximum shear deformation Fig Longitudinal Shear Deformation (b) Right end Zero shear deformation

86 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 86 of 117 Result verification Deflection Diagram The result of the analysis is verified by checking if the resulting deflection is close to the manually calculated deflection in Manually calculated deflection in : max = 7.29mm ANSYS FEM model deflection = 9.37mm > max Therefore, the FEM analysis result is conservative. Fig Male mullion - Deflection (b) Check Thermal Break Shear on emale Mullion AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes 7.1.2(b) Extrusion Parameters V c /(D w) = mm Shear flow per uniform unit load, w 4.2(f) Test shear strength, Q c = N/mm Taken from shear test of thermal break assembly Suction Wind: q z- = kn/m Applied uniform wind suctinon load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 11.8 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.47 <1.00 O.K! Pressure Wind: q z+ = 0.65 kn Applied uniform wind pressure load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 11.8 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.47 <1.00 O.K!

87 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 87 of Check Stack Joint Header and Sill Transom Check Header & Sill Transom under Wind Suction ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action Notes 4.4 Unitized Parameters Unsupported span, W = 1.94 m 3.2 Upper panel height, h u = 0.39 m Lower panel height, h l = 0.47 m Cross-sectional area of header profile, A g,h = mm 2 P z 7.2.1(a) Cross-sectional area of sill profile, A g,s = mm 2 a 5.1 Weight of infill, if any, Q z = 0.00 Kpa Weight of glass above the transom, Q DL = 0.45 Kpa 4.4 Wind load on wall element, Q y = Kpa Setting block location, a = 190 mm 7.2.1(b) Eccentricity of setting block location, e = 37 mm Reference point for torsional deflection, r = 66.0 mm Transom Alloying material = Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy = 6063-T6 170 Mpa 7.2.1(b) Header Transom: Effective moment of Inertia, I' e,h = 4.66E+05 mm 4 Effective section modulus (face 1), S e1,h = 1.55E+04 mm (a) Moment of inertia, I yy,h = 7.40E+05 mm (b) Dist. of top extreme fibre on face 1, c z1,h = 53.4 mm 7.2.2(b) Sill Transom: Effective moment of inertia, I' e,s = 6.13E+05 mm 4 Effective section modulus (face 1), S e1,s = 2.01E+04 mm (c) Moment of inertia, I yy,s = 9.90E+05 mm 4 Torsional constant, J s = 8.20E+04 mm 4 TRANSOM - 1 Wind load tributary area TRANSOM - 2 STACK JOINT - SILL 7.2.2(b) Dist. of top extreme fibre on face 1, c z1,s = 42.3 mm e Analysis Glass weight, P z = Q DL h u W/2 = 0.17 KN q y r Upper tributary width, b u = (h u /2)[1-h u /(2W)] = 0.18 m Lower tributary width, b l = (h l /2)[1-h l /(2W)] = 0.21 m rotation Moment, M zz = Q y (b u +b l ) W 2 /8 = KN/m Check Stack Joint Profiles I' e = I 'e,h + I' e,s = 1.1E+06 mm 4 About y-y axis, composite profile Header Transom M yy,h = (1.25 A g,h γ)w 2 /8 = 0.02 kn-m Accessories assumed 25% add'l to transom weight Dead Load: Bending stress, f yy,h = M yy,h /(I yy,h /c z1,h ) = 1.1 Mpa Maximum bending stress Allow. bending comp. stress, F c,h = 1.17 F cy /n y = Mpa Under bending about weak axis 4.2(d) Suction Wind: Moment, M zz,h = M zz (I' e,h /I' e ) = KN m Shared moment by header transom Bending stress, f zz,h = M zz,h /S e1,h = 22.5 Mpa Maximum bending stress on face (c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1,h = 98.0 Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1,h = 88.2 Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 1 Dead Load + Suction Wind: f yy,h /F c,h + f zz,h /F c1,h = 0.26 <1.00 O.K! Sill Transom M yy,s = P z a + (1.25 A g,s γ +Q DL h u )W 2 /8 = 0.05 kn-m Accessories assumed 25% add'l to transom weight Dead Load: Bending stress, f yy,s = M yy,s /(I yy,s /c z1,s ) = 2.3 Mpa Maximum bending stress Allow. bending comp. stress, F c,s = 1.17 F cy /n y = Mpa Under bending about weak axis 4.2(d) Suction Wind: Moment, M zz,s = M zz (I' e,s /I' e ) = kn-m Shared moment by sill transom Bending stress, f zz,s = M zz,s /S e1,s = 22.9 Mpa Maximum bending stress on face (c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1,s = 97.4 Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1,s = 69.9 Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 1 Dead Load + Suction Wind: f yy,s /F c,s + f zz,s /F c1,s = 0.35 <1.00 O.K! Check Deflection δ z,h = (5/384)(1.25 A g,h γ)w 4 ]//E I yy,h = 0.12 mm Deflection under dead load 2.3 Header Transom Allowable deflection, δ z,allow = mm Criteria: 75% of 20mm clearance Dead Load: Strain ratio, δ z /δ z,allow = 0.01 <1.00 O.K! δ z,s1 = [(P z a/24)(3w 2-4a 2 )+(5/384)(1.25 A g,s γ +Q DL h u )W 4 ]//E I yy,s = 0.34 mm Deflection under dead load Sill Transom δ z,2 = (P z e) W r/(j s G) = 0.38 mm Add'l deflection due to torsion under eccentric load Dead Load: δ z = δ z,1 + δ z,2 = 0.72 mm Total deflection at the fibre closest to glass edge 2.3 Allowable deflection, δ z,allow = 3.00 mm Criteria: 75% of 4mm clearance Strain ratio, δ z /δ z,allow = 0.24 <1.00 O.K! Stack Joint Profiles δ y = (5/384) Q y (b u +b l )W 4 /[E I' e ] = 4.26 mm Calculated maximum deflection 2.3 Suction Wind: Allowable deflection, δ y,allow = mm Criteria: Span/175 or 19mm Strain Ratio, δ y,max /δ y,allow = 0.38 <1.00 O.K! Shear Flow Check Parameters q y,h = Q y (b u +b l ) (I' e,h /I' e ) = KN/m Uniform load shared by the header transom q y,s = Q y (b u +b l ) (I' e,s /I' e ) = KN/m Uniform load shared by the sill transom End Connection Check Parameters V y,h = q y,h W/2 = 0.7 kn Horizontal reaction force on header profile Header Transom: V z,h = (1.25 A g,s γ)w/2 = 0.0 kn Vertical reaction force due to dead load on header profil Sill Trasnom: V y,s = q y,s W/2 = 0.9 kn Horizontal reaction force on sill profile V z,h = P z + (1.25 A g,s γ +Q z h u )W/2 = 0.2 kn Vertical reaction force due to dead load on sill profile FEMALE MULLION W TRANSOM - 2 SILL HEADER ELEVATION P z Pz a MALE MULLION Wind load tributary area b u b l Equiv. rectangular tributary width Weight of sheets z c.g. 2 x P WIND LOAD SECTION z y e hu h l H

88 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 88 of Check Header & Sill Transom under Wind Pressure ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action Notes 4.4 Unitized Parameters Unsupported span, W = 1.94 m 3.2 Upper panel height, h u = 0.39 m Lower panel height, h l = 0.47 m Cross-sectional area of header profile, A g,h = mm (a) Cross-sectional area of sill profile, A g,s = mm Weight of infill, if any, Q z = 0.00 Kpa Weight of glass above the transom, Q DL = 0.45 Kpa 4.4 Wind load on wall element, Q y = 4.50 Kpa Setting block location, a = 190 mm 7.2.1(b) Eccentricity of setting block location, e = 47 mm Reference point for torsional deflection, r = 66.0 mm Transom Alloying material = Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy = 6063-T6 170 Mpa 7.2.1(b) Header Transom: Effective moment of Inertia, I' e,h = 4.66E+05 mm 4 Effective section modulus (face 2), S e2,h = 1.55E+04 mm (a) Moment of inertia, I yy,h = 7.40E+05 mm (b) Dist. of top extreme fibre on face 2, c z2,h = 53.4 mm 7.2.2(b) Sill Transom: Effective moment of inertia, I' e,s = 6.13E+05 mm 4 Effective section modulus (face 2), S e2,s = 2.04E+04 mm (c) Moment of inertia, I yy,s = 9.90E+05 mm 4 Torsional constant, J s = 8.20E+04 mm (b) Dist. of top extreme fibre on face 2, c z2,s = 42.3 mm Analysis Glass weight, P z = Q DL h u W/2 = 0.17 KN Applied as pair loads of glass chair Upper tributary width, b u = (h u /2)[1-h u /(2W)] = 0.18 m Width of the equivalent rectangular tributary area Lower tributary width, b l = (h l /2)[1-h l /(2W)] = 0.21 m Width of the equivalent rectangular tributary area Moment, M zz = Q y (b u +b l ) W 2 /8 = 0.81 KN/m Suction normal to the plane of CW unit Check Stack Joint Profiles I' e = I 'e,h + I' e,s = 1.1E+06 mm 4 About y-y axis, composite profile Header Transom M yy,h = (1.25 A g,h γ)w 2 /8 = 0.02 kn-m Accessories assumed 25% add'l to transom weight Dead Load: Bending stress, f yy,h = M yy,h /(I yy,h /c z2,h ) = 1.1 Mpa Maximum bending stress Allow. bending comp. stress, F c,h = 1.17 F cy /n y = Mpa Under bending about weak axis 4.2(d) Suction Wind: Moment, M zz,h = M zz (I' e,h /I' e ) = 0.35 KN m Shared moment by header transom Bending stress, f zz,h = M zz,h /S e2,h = 22.5 Mpa Maximum bending stress on face (c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2,h = 98.5 Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2,h = 34.8 Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 2 Dead Load + Suction Wind: f yy,h /F c,h + f zz,h /F c2,h = 0.65 <1.00 O.K! TRANSOM - 1 Wind load tributary area TRANSOM - 2 P z STACK JOINT - SILL q y ELEVATION rotation Sill Transom M yy,s = P z a + (1.25 A g,s γ +Q DL h u )W 2 /8 = 0.05 kn-m Accessories assumed 25% add'l to transom weight Dead Load: Bending stress, f yy,s = M yy,s /(I yy,s /c z2,s ) = 2.3 Mpa Maximum bending stress Allow. bending comp. stress, F c,s = 1.17 F cy /n y = Mpa Under bending about weak axis 4.2(d) Suction Wind: Moment, M zz,s = M zz (I' e,s /I' e ) = 0.46 kn-m Shared moment by sill transom Bending stress, f zz,s = M zz,s /S e2,s = 22.5 Mpa Maximum bending stress on face (c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2,s = 98.3 Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2,s = - Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 2 Dead Load + Suction Wind: f yy,s /F c,s + f zz,s /F c2,s = 0.25 <1.00 O.K! Check Deflection δ z,h = (5/384)(1.25 A g,h γ)w 4 ]//E I yy,h = 0.12 mm Deflection under dead load 2.3 Header Transom Allowable deflection, δ z,allow = mm Criteria: 75% of 20mm clearance Dead Load: Strain ratio, δ z /δ z,allow = 0.01 <1.00 O.K! δ z,s1 = [(P z a/24)(3w 2-4a 2 )+(5/384)(1.25 A g,s γ +Q DL h u )W 4 ]//E I yy,s = 0.34 mm Deflection under dead load Sill Transom δ z,2 = (P z e) W r/(j s G) = 0.48 mm Add'l deflection due to torsion under eccentric load Dead Load: δ z = δ z,1 + δ z,2 = 0.82 mm Total deflection at the fibre closest to glass edge 2.3 Allowable deflection, δ z,allow = 3.00 mm Criteria: 75% of 4mm clearance Strain ratio, δ z /δ z,allow = 0.27 <1.00 O.K! Stack Joint Profiles δ y = (5/384) Q y (b u +b l )W 4 /[E I' e ] = 4.26 mm Calculated maximum deflection 2.3 Suction Wind: Allowable deflection, δ y,allow = mm Criteria: Span/175 or 19mm Strain Ratio, δ y,max /δ y,allow = 0.38 <1.00 O.K! Shear Flow Check Parameters q y,h = Q y (b u +b l ) (I' e,h /I' e ) = 0.74 KN/m Uniform load shared by the header transom q y,s = Q y (b u +b l ) (I' e,s /I' e ) = 0.98 KN/m Uniform load shared by the sill transom End Connection Check Parameters V y,h = q y,h W/2 = 0.7 kn Horizontal reaction force on header profile Header Transom: V z,h = (1.25 A g,s γ)w/2 = 0.0 kn Vertical reaction force due to dead load on header profil Sill Trasnom: V y,s = q y,s W/2 = 0.9 kn Horizontal reaction force on sill profile V z,h = P z + (1.25 A g,s γ +Q z h u )W/2 = 0.2 kn Vertical reaction force due to dead load on sill profile P z a FEMALE MULLION W TRANSOM - 2 SILL HEADER Pz a MALE MULLION e r Wind load tributary area b u b l Equiv. rectangular tributary width Weight of sheets z WIND LOAD 2 x P c.g. SECTION z y e hu h l H

89 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 89 of Check Thermal Break Shear (a) Check Longitudinal Shear in Header Transom AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes 7.2.1(b) Extrusion Parameters V c /(D w) = mm Shear flow per uniform unit load, w 4.2(f) Test shear strength, Q c = N/mm Taken from shear test of thermal break assembly Suction Wind: q z- = kn/m Applied uniform wind suctinon load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 8.1 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.32 <1.00 O.K! Pressure Wind: q z+ = 0.74 kn Applied uniform wind pressure load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 8.1 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.32 <1.00 O.K! (b) Check Longitudinal Shear in Sill Transom AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes 7.2.2(b) Extrusion Parameters V c /(D w) = 7.26 mm Shear flow per uniform unit load, w 4.2(f) Test shear strength, Q c = N/mm Taken from shear test of thermal break assembly Suction Wind: q z- = kn/m Applied uniform wind suctinon load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 7.1 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.28 <1.00 O.K! Pressure Wind: q z+ = 0.98 kn Applied uniform wind pressure load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 7.1 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.28 <1.00 O.K!

90 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 90 of Transom 1 (Type 2) Check Profile under Biaxial Bending ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action Notes 4.4 Unitized Parameters Unsupported span, W = 1.94 m 3.2 Upper panel height, h u = 0.47 m Lower panel height, h l = 2.84 m 7.3.1(a) Cross-sectional area of profile, A g = mm Weight of infill, if any, Q z = 0.46 Kpa Weight of glass above the transom, Q DL = 0.00 Kpa 4.4 Design wind suction, Q y- = Kpa Design wind pressure, Q y+ = 4.50 Kpa Setting block location, a = 190 mm 7.3.1(b) Eccentricity of setting block location, e = 38.7 mm Reference point for torsional deflection, r = Transom Alloying material = Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy = Modulus of Elasticity, E = Shear Modulus of alloy, G = 67.2 mm 6063-T6 170 Mpa Mpa Mpa Unit weight of alloy, γ = 27 kn/m (b) Effective moment of inertia, I' e = 1.3E+06 mm 4 Effective section modulus (face 1), S e1 = (face 2), S e2 = 5.1E+04 mm 3 4.1E+04 mm (c) Moment of inertia, I yy = 1.0E+06 mm 4 Torsional constant, J = 9.9E+05 mm (b) Dist. from c.g. to extreme top fibre on face 1, c z1 = 34.3 mm Dist. from c.g. to extreme top fibre on face 2, c z2 = 34.3 mm Analysis Glass weight, P z = Q DL h u W/2 = 0.00 KN Applied as pair loads of glass chair Upper tributary width, b u = (h u /2)[1-h u /(2W)] = 0.21 m Width of the equivalent rectangular tributary area Lower tributary width, b l = W/3 = 0.65 m Width of the equivalent rectangular tributary area Uniform wind suction load, q y- = Q y- (b u +b l ) = Also used for checking of thermal break shear flow Uniform wind pressure load, q y+ = Q y+ (b u +b l ) = 3.84 Also used for checking of thermal break shear flow Check Transom M yy = P z a + (1.25 A g γ +Q z h u )W 2 /8 = 0.14 kn-m Accessories assumed 25% add'l to transom weight Dead Load: Bending stress, f yy = M yy /(I yy /c z ) = 4.7 Mpa Maximum bending stress Allow. bending comp. stress, F c = 1.17 F cy /n y = Mpa Under bending about weak axis Suction Wind: Moment, M zz- = q y- W 2 /8 = kn-m Bending moment about z-z axis Bending stress, f zz- = M zz- /S e1 = 35.4 Mpa Maximum bending stress 7.3.1(c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1 = Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1 = - Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 1 Pressure Wind: Moment, M zz+ = q y+ W 2 /8 = 1.81 kn-m Bending moment about z-z axis Bending stress, f zz+ = M zz+ /S e2 = 43.7 Mpa Maximum bending stress 7.3.1(c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2 = Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2 = - Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 2 Dead Load + Suction Wind: f yy /F c + f zz- /F c1 = 0.39 <1.00 O.K! Pressure Wind + Dead Load: f yy /F c + f zz+ /F c2 = 0.47 <1.00 O.K! STACK JOINT - HEADER δ z,1 = [(P z a/24)(3w 2-4a 2 )+(5/384)(1.25 A g γ +Q DL h u )W 4 ]//E I yy = 0.78 mm Deflection under dead load Check Deflection δ z,2 = (P z e) W r/(j G) = 0.00 mm Add'l deflection due to torsion under eccentric load Dead Load: δ z = δ z,1 + δ z,2 = 0.78 mm Total deflection at the fibre closest to glass edge 2.3 Allowable deflection, δ z,allow = 3.00 mm Criteria: 75% of 4mm clearance Strain ratio, δ z /δ z,allow = 0.26 <1.00 O.K! Suction Wind: δ y- = (5/384) Q y- (b u +b l )W 4 /[E I' e ] = mm Maximum deflection under suction wind Pressure Wind: δ y+ = (5/384) Q y+ (b u +b l )W 4 /[E I' e ] = 7.85 mm Maximum deflection under pressure wind 2.3 Allowable deflection, δ y,allow = mm Criteria: Span/175 or 19mm Strain Ratio, δ y,max /δ y,allow = 0.71 <1.00 O.K! End Connection Check Parameters V y- = q y- W/2 = 3.7 kn End shear under wind suction V y+ = q y+ W/2 = 3.7 kn End shear under wind pressure V z = P z + (1.25 A g,s γ +Q z h u )W/2 = 0.3 kn End shear under dead load q FEMALE TRANSOM MULLION - 1 z Wind load tributary area TRANSOM - 2 STACK JOINT - SILL ELEVATION qy rotation z bl MALE MULLION e r Weight of sheets Weight of infill (insulation) b u Equiv. rectangular tributary width WIND LOAD 2 x P c.g. z e hu Hhl SECTION y

91 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 91 of Check Thermal Break Shear (a) Check Longitudinal Shear in Transom-1 AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes 7.3.1(b) Extrusion Parameters V c /(D w) = 6.24 mm Shear flow per uniform unit load, w 4.2(f) Test shear strength, Q c = N/mm Taken from shear test of thermal break assembly Suction Wind: q z- = kn/m Applied uniform wind suctinon load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 24.0 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.95 <1.00 O.K! Pressure Wind: q z+ = 3.84 kn Applied uniform wind pressure load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 24.0 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.95 <1.00 O.K!

92 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 92 of Transom 2 (Type 2) Check Profile under Biaxial Bending ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action 4.4 Unitized Parameters Unsupported span, W = 1.94 m 3.2 Upper panel height, h u = 2.84 m Lower panel height, h l = 0.39 m 7.4.1(a) Cross-sectional area of profile, A g = mm Weight of infill, if any, Q z = 0.00 Kpa Weight of glass above the transom, Q DL = 0.45 Kpa 4.4 Design wind suction, Q y- = Kpa Design wind pressure, Q y+ = 4.50 Kpa Setting block location, a = 190 mm 7.4.1(b) Eccentricity of setting block location, e = 43.4 mm Reference point for torsional deflection, r = 72.3 mm Transom Alloying material = Alloying compressive yield strength, F cy = 6063-T6 170 Mpa Modulus of Elasticity, E = Shear Modulus of alloy, G = Mpa Mpa Unit weight of alloy, γ = 27 kn/m (b) Effective moment of inertia, I' e = 1.3E+06 mm 4 Effective section modulus (face 1), S e1 = (face 2), S e2 = 5.0E+04 mm 3 3.4E+04 mm (c) Moment of inertia, I 9.7E+05 mm 4 yy = Torsional constant, J = 9.4E+05 mm (b) Dist. from c.g. to extreme top fibre on face 1, c z1 = 38.6 mm Dist. from c.g. to extreme top fibre on face 2, c z2 = 12.1 mm Analysis Glass weight, P z = Q DL h u W/2 = 1.24 KN Applied as pair loads of glass chair Upper tributary width, b u = W/3 = 0.65 m Width of the equivalent rectangular tributary area Lower tributary width, b l = (h l /2)[1-h l /(2W)] = 0.18 m Width of the equivalent rectangular tributary area Uniform wind suction load, q y- = Q y- (b u +b l ) = Also used for checking of thermal break shear flow Uniform wind pressure load, q y+ = Q y+ (b u +b l ) = 3.70 Also used for checking of thermal break shear flow Check Transom M yy = P z a + (1.25 A g γ +Q z h u )W 2 /8 = 0.27 kn-m Accessories assumed 25% add'l to transom weight Dead Load: Bending stress, f yy = M yy /(I yy /c z ) = 10.7 Mpa Maximum bending stress Allow. bending comp. stress, F c = 1.17 F cy /n y = Mpa Under bending about weak axis Suction Wind: Moment, M zz- = q y- W 2 /8 = kn-m Bending moment about z-z axis Bending stress, f zz- = M zz- /S e1 = 35.1 Mpa Maximum bending stress 6.4.1(c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1 = Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c1 = 89.0 Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 1 Pressure Wind: Moment, M zz+ = q y+ W 2 /8 = 1.74 kn-m Bending moment about z-z axis Bending stress, f zz+ = M zz+ /S e2 = 51.6 Mpa Maximum bending stress 6.4.1(c) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2 = Mpa Under lateral buckling of beam section on face (d) Allowable bending comp. stress, F c2 = - Mpa Under local buckling of beam elements on face 2 Dead Load + Suction Wind: f yy /F c + f zz- /F c1 = 0.48 <1.00 O.K! Pressure Wind + Dead Load: f yy /F c + f zz+ /F c2 = 0.59 <1.00 O.K! δ z,1 = [(P z a/24)(3w 2-4a 2 )+(5/384)(1.25 A g γ +Q DL h u )W 4 ]//E I yy = 1.83 mm Deflection under dead load Check Deflection δ z,2 = (P z e) W r/(j G) = 0.31 mm Add'l deflection due to torsion under eccentric load Dead Load: δ z = δ z,1 + δ z,2 = 2.14 mm Total deflection at the fibre closest to glass edge 2.3 Allowable deflection, δ z,allow = 3.00 mm Criteria: 75% of 4mm clearance Strain ratio, δ z /δ z,allow = 0.71 <1.00 O.K! Suction Wind: δ y- = (5/384) Q y- (b u +b l )W 4 /[E I' e ] = mm Maximum deflection under suction wind Pressure Wind: δ y+ = (5/384) Q y+ (b u +b l )W 4 /[E I' e ] = 7.62 mm Maximum deflection under pressure wind 2.3 Allowable deflection, δ y,allow = mm Criteria: Span/175 or 19mm Strain Ratio, δ y,max /δ y,allow = 0.69 <1.00 O.K! End Connection Check Parameters V y- = q y- W/2 = 3.6 kn End shear under wind suction V y+ = q y+ W/2 = 3.6 kn End shear under wind pressure V z = P z + (1.25 A g,s γ +Q z h u )W/2 = 1.3 kn End shear under dead load Notes P z a W STACK JOINT - HEADER TRANSOM - 1 FEMALE MULLION Wind load tributary area TRANSOM - 2 STACK JOINT - SILL P z Equivalent rectangular tributary width ELEVATION q y rotation z MALE MULLION a e r b u b l c.g. WIND LOAD2 x P z e h SECTION y h u H l

93 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 93 of Check Thermal Break Shear (a) Check Longitudinal Shear in Transom-2 AAMA TIR-A8-04: Structural Performance of Composite Thermal Barrier Framing System Clause Action Notes 7.4.1(b) Extrusion Parameters V c /(D w) = 5.81 mm Shear flow per uniform unit load, w 4.2(f) Test shear strength, Q c = N/mm Taken from shear test of thermal break assembly Suction Wind: q z- = kn/m Applied uniform wind suctinon load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 21.5 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.85 <1.00 O.K! Pressure Wind: q z+ = 3.70 kn Applied uniform wind pressure load 7.5.7(28) Shear stress, q c = q z- V c /(D w) = 21.5 N/mm Max. longitudinal shear through the thermal break Design shear strength, Q' c = Q c /F.S. = 25.2 N/mm Considering a factor of safety, F.S. = 2.0 Stress ratio = 0.85 <1.00 O.K!

94 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 94 of Check Stainless Steel Spandrel Panel Details For structural system 2, the 1.5mm thick stainless steel spandrel panel is reinforced with a continuous bent stainless steel sheet bonded at the back of the sheet via structural silicone. Fig Spandrel Panel Details Where: K = 341.5mm mm Thick Stainless Steel Reinforcement The metal sheet and its reinforcement are considered as non-composite or layered elements. Which means the structural sealant bonding is not considered as to transfer shear between the metals. Therefore, every adjacent nodes that are co-incident on the plane of the metal sheet are coupled in the in-out direction (as shown below). 1.5mm thk sheet 4mm thk reinforce ment In-out Coupling Fig Coupled Nodes

95 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 95 of Check Sheet for Full Wind Load Shell Element Model with Boundary conditions Perimeter Restraint in Z - dir. Wind load: - Coupled Restraint in Fig Spandrel Sheet Applied Load & Boundary Conditions (a) Calculations Summary ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action Notes Metal Sheet Parameters Width, W = 1940 mm Net dimension considering width of mullions Height, h = 400 mm Net height considering grip of glazing bead Wind load, Q = -4.5 KN/m 2 Design wind load in suction Alloy, F ty = 170 Mpa Tensile yield strength of Stainless steel S31203 ANSYS FEM Anlysis Results Notes Check Stress VM =0.707[(S min -S min ) 2 +S 2 max +S 2 min ) 0.5 = Mpa Von mises stress results (from ANSYS FEM anlaysis) Allowable stress, F c = 1.3F ty /n y = Mpa For rectangular solid plates Stress ratio, VM/F c = 0.76 <1.00 O.K! Check Deflection δ max = 5.46 mm Maximum deflection (from ANSYS FEM analysis) Allowable deflection, δ allow = 8.00 mm Architectural requirement (span/60 = 400mm/80) Strain ratio, δ z /δ allow = 0.68 <1.00 O.K!

96 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 96 of 117 (b) Analysis Results (i.) Von Mises Stress Diagram (ii.) Deflection Diagram

97 3 PROJECT NAME DATE UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 97 of JOINTS & CONNECTIONS Fig Spandrel Sheet Analysis Results In all cases in this section, the most critical structural system-2 is checked for joint connections Mullion Shear Connectors qy-,m q q ± q y+,f q y Fig Male and Female Mullion Shear Connectors ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action Notes Mullion Parameters Yield strength, F cy = 170 Mpa 6063-T6 Aluminum alloy Male Profile: Male leg length, l m = 34.0 mm From the toe of fillet to the farthest contact edge Male leg thickness, t m = 3.0 mm Thickness at the toe of fillet Female Profile: Female leg length, l f = 26.5 mm From the toe of fillet to the farthest contact edge Female leg thickness, t f = 3.0 mm Thickness at the toe of fillet Allowable compressive stress, F c = 1.3F cy /n y = Mpa Bending for rectangular solid plates Allowable shear stress, F s = F ty /(1.732n y ) = Mpa Considering F ty is equal to F cy Loads Uniform wind suction load, q z- = kn/m Total suction load carried by the mullion assembly Wind suction: Shared load by male mullion, q z-,m = kn/m In proportion of male-to-total bending stiffness Shared load by female mullion, q z-,f = kn/m In proportion of female-to-total bending stiffness Wind pressure: Uniform wind pressure load, q z+ = 8.73 kn/m Total suction load carried by the mullion assembly Shared load by male mullion, q z+,m = 8.08 kn/m In proportion of male-to-total bending stiffness Shared load by female mullion, q z+,f = 0.65 kn/m In proportion of female-to-total bending stiffness Check Male Shear Connetor Wind suction: Max. load by male, q zmax-,m = 0.5 q z- = kn/m Assuming male and female have equal bending stiffness Applied load, q -,m = q zmax-,m - q z-,m = 3.72 kn/m Uniform load on protrusion of male mullion Bending moment, M m- = q -,m (1mm)(l m ) = N mm Considering a typical 1mm strip Bending stress, f b-,m = 6M m- /[(1mm)t 2 m ] = Mpa Maximum compressive stress of extreme fiber Shear stress, f s-,m = q -,m /t m = 1.24 Mpa 4.4 Stress ratio, f b-,m /F c + (f s-,m /F s ) 2 = 0.63 <1.00 O.K! Wind pressure: Max. load by male, q zmax+,m = 0.5 q z+ = 4.37 kn/m Assuming male and female have equal bending stiffness Applied load, q +,m = q zmax+,m - q z+,m = kn/m Uniform load on protrusion of male mullion Bending moment, M m+ = q +,m (1mm)(l m ) = N mm Considering a typical 1mm strip Bending stress, f b+,m = 6M m+ /[(1mm)t 2 m ] = Mpa Maximum compressive stress of extreme fiber Shear stress, f s+,m = q +m /t m = 5.72 Mpa 4.4 Stress ratio, f b+,m /F c + (f s+,m /F s ) 2 = 0.64 <1.00 O.K! Check Male Shear Connetor Wind suction: Max. load by male, q zmax-,f = 0.5 q z- = kn/m Assuming male and female have equal bending stiffness Applied load, q -,f = q zmax-,f - q z-,f = kn/m Uniform load on protrusion of male mullion Bending moment, M m- = q -,f (1mm)(l f ) = N mm Considering a typical 1mm strip Bending stress, f b-,f = 6M f- /[(1mm)t 2 f ] = Mpa Maximum compressive stress of extreme fiber Shear stress, f s-,f = q -,f /t f = 1.24 Mpa 4.4 Stress ratio, f b-,f /F c + (f s-,f /F s ) 2 = 0.49 <1.00 O.K!

98 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 98 of Glazing Bead Check W Stack joint - Header TRANSOM GLAZING BEAD Transom-1 b t h Female mullion Wind load tributary area Male mullion MULLION GLAZING BEAD Transom-2 b m Maximum tributary width tributary width Stack joint - Sill Fig CW unit Elevation MULLION GLAZING BEAD TRANSOM GLAZING BEAD MULLION GLAZING BEAD TRANSOM GLAZING BEAD Fig Glazing Bead Types

99 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 99 of Check Glazing Bead on Transom (a) Solid Model with Boundary conditions Lateral Lateral Outward Pressure Fig Glazing Bead on Transom - Boundary Conditions (20mm long representation)

100 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 100 of 117 (b) Calculations Summary ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action Notes 4.4 Glass Prameters Glass width, W = 1.94 m Width of glass supported by the glazing bead Glass height, h = 2.84 m Height of glass supported by the glazing bead 4.4 Wind load, Q = -4.5 KN/m 2 Design wind load in suction 3.3-1M Glazing Bead Parameters Alloy, F cy = 170 Mpa Compressive yield strength of alloy 10.1 Bearing width, w= 3.0 pressure point to gasket at the tip of glazing bead Transom glazing bead, b t = W/2 = 0.97 m Maximum trbutary width Pressure load, q t = b t Q/w = 1.46 N/mm 2 the pressure point to gasket at tip of bead ANSYS FEM Anlysis Results Notes Check Stress VM =0.707[S min -S min ) 2 +S 2 max +S 2 min ) 0.5 = Mpa Von mises stress results (from ANSYS FEM anlaysis) Allowable stress, F c = 1.3F cy /n y = Mpa For rectangular solid plates Stress ratio, VM/F c = 0.87 <1.00 O.K! Check Deflection δ max = 0.48 mm Maximum deflection (from ANSYS FEM analysis) Allowable deflection, δ allow = 1.00 mm For gasket Strain ratio, δ z /δ allow = 0.48 <1.00 O.K! (i.) Von Mises Stress Diagram (ii.) Deflection Diagram Fig Glazing Bead on Transom - Analysis Results

101 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 101 of Check Glazing Bead on Mullion (a) Solid Model with Boundary conditions Lateral Pressure Outward Lateral Fig Glazing Bead on Mullion - Boundary Conditions (20mm long representation)

102 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 102 of 117 (b) Calculations Summary ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action Notes 4.4 Glass Prameters Glass width, W = 1.94 m Width of glass supported by the glazing bead Glass height, h = 2.84 m Height of glass supported by the glazing bead 4.4 Wind load, Q = -4.5 KN/m 2 Design wind load in suction 3.3-1M Glazing Bead Parameters Alloy, F cy = 170 Mpa Compressive yield strength of alloy 10.1 Bearing width, w= 3.0 pressure point to gasket at the tip of glazing bead Mullion glazing bead, b m = W/2 = 0.97 m Maximum tributary width Pressure load, q m = b m Q/w = 1.46 N/mm 2 the pressure point to gasket at tip of bead ANSYS FEM Anlysis Results Notes Check Stress VM =0.707[S min -S min ) 2 +S 2 max +S 2 min ) 0.5 = Mpa Von mises stress results (from ANSYS FEM anlaysis) Allowable stress, F c = 1.3F cy /n y = Mpa For rectangular solid plates Stress ratio, VM/F c = 0.53 <1.00 O.K! Check Deflection δ max = 0.32 mm Maximum deflection (from ANSYS FEM analysis) Allowable deflection, δ allow = 1.00 mm For gasket Strain ratio, δ z /δ allow = 0.32 <1.00 O.K! (i.) Von Mises Stress Diagram (ii.) Deflection Diagram Fig Glazing Bead on Mullion - Analysis Results

103 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 103 of Header Transom Connection Check Connection Detail P V y f1 f3 V y +Y f Z Analysis of Screw Group Analysis of Group of Fasteners Fig Header Joint Connection Reference Action Notes Applied Forces Horizontal shear force, V y = 0.70 kn Under most critical wind load Eccentricity of V y, e z = 0.00 mm Eccentric application of wind load Vertical shear force, V z = 0.00 kn Under dead load Eccentricity of V z, e y = 0.00 mm Eccentric location of setting block Fastener Group Tension force, T = 0.00 kn Parallel to the axis of the fasteners Eccentricity of T, e ty = 0.00 mm Eccentric Application of the tension force Total applied moment, M = V y e z + V z e y = 0.00 knm Sum of the torsion and all effects of eccentricity Number of fasteners, n = 3 nos. Fasteners in the group Calculated: Shear Force Tension Size A y z Q z I y I z F v,y1 F v,y2 F v,y F v,z1 F v,z2 F v,z Fv F t Fastener mm 2 mm mm mm 3 mm 4 mm 4 kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn f1: ST f2: ST f3: ST Σ = Definition of Annotations A = Shear area of individual fasteners ey +z y, z = Coordinate location of individual fasteners from c.g. of fastener group Q z = A y+e ty = Statical moment of area about z-axis at center of T application I y = A z 2 = Inertia about y-axis of individual fasteners y y V 4 1 z f I z = A y 2 4 f1 = Inertia about z-axis of individual fasteners V F v,y1 = V y /n = Shear force in y-axis of individual fastener due to shear force, V y e y ty z 4 z 1 F v,y2 = M (A z/σi y ) = Shear force in y-axis of individual fastener due to moment, M T F v,y = F v,y1 + F v,y2 = Total shear force in y-axis of individual fastener z e z3 f 3 y 3 fasteners c.g. y 2 f 2 z2 +y F v,z1 = V z /n = Shear force in z-axis of individual fastener due to shear force, V z F v,z2 = M (A y/σi z ) = Shear force in z-axisof individual fastener due to moment, M F v,z = F v,z1 + F v,z2 = Total shear force in z-axis of individual fastener F v = (F v,z1 2 + F v,z2 2)0.5 = Total shear force in the individual fasteners F t = T(Q z /ΣQ z ) = Tension force in the individual fasteners

104 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 104 of Check Most Critical Screw The most critical screw among the group is fastener f3. AAMA TIR-A9-1991: Metal Curtain Wall Fasteners Clause Action Notes Applied Forces Applied Tension, F t = 0.00 KN. Calculated tension force in the most critical screw Applied Shear, F v = 0.23 KN. Calculated shear force in the most critical screw Connected Parts 1st connected part, F u1 = 205 Mpa. Thickness, t p1 = 2nd connected part, F u2 = Thickness, t p2 = Number of shear plane(s), m = Screw Parameters Screw size, d b = 3.0 mm. L e1 = 6.4 mm. Dist. from centre of screw to the nearest free edge 205 Mpa. F y2 = 170 Mpa. Yield strength of connected material 3.0 mm. L e2 = 5.0 mm. Dist. from centre of screw to the nearest free edge LE = 20.7 mm. Length of fastener engagement 1 plane(s) #8 (ST4.2) Pan head screw A4-70 Stainless steel (BS EN ISO ) F y = 450 Mpa. Minimum tensile yield strength (BS EN ISO ) F u = 700 Mpa. Minimum ultimate tensile strength 9. Table 25 D = 4.16 mm. Nominal thread diameter 9. Table 25 K = 3.19 mm. Basic minor diameter 9. Table 25 Thread pitch, P = 1.41 mm. Giving a value of N = 18 threads per inch 9. Table 25 DSMIN = 3.99 mm. Minimum major diameter of external thread 9. Table 25 ENMAX = 3.76 mm. Maximum pitch diameter of internal thread 9. Table 25 A(S) = (K)² = 7.99 mm 2 Tensile stress area for spaced threads 9. Table 25 A(R) = (K)² = 7.99 mm 2 Thread root area for spaced threads TSA(I) = π[dsmin][(12.7/n) (dsmin-enmax)] = 6.45 mm 2 Thread stripping area per thread, internal 6. Check Tension P t = 0.75Fy[A(S)] = 2.70 KN. Yielding failure allowable tension P t = 0.40Fu[A(S)] = 2.24 KN. Fracture failure governs allowable tension F t /P t = 0.00 <1.00 O.K! 6. Check Shear P v = 0.75Fy[A(R)]/1.732 = 1.56 KN. Yielding failure allowable shear P v = 0.40Fu[A(R)]/1.732 = 1.29 KN. Fracture failure governs allowable shear F s /(m P v ) = 0.18 <1.00 O.K! Interaction, [F t /P t ] 2 + [F s /(m P v )] 2 = Check Bearing Fb1 = (2/1.95)*Fu1/1.65 = Mpa. Allowable bearing stress on 1st connected part t p1 '= 3.00 mm. Effective bearing thickness P b1 = F b D t p1 ' = 1.6 KN. Allowable bearing capacity P b1 /(m F s ) = 0.14 <1.00 O.K! Fb2 = (2/1.95)*Fu2/1.65 = Mpa. Allowable bearing stress on 2nd connected part P b2 = F b D t p2 = 1.4 KN. Allowable bearing capacity P b2 /F s = 0.16 <1.00 O.K! 6063-T6 Aluminium Standard round hole 6063-T6 Aluminium Standard round hole 9. Check Pullout Fv = 0.4*Fsu = 52 Mpa. Fsu = Shear ultimate strength, see ADM Table 3.3-1M P p = [LE/25.4-1/N] F v TSA(I) N = 4.6 KN. Pullout strength on thread of 2nd connected part F t /P p = 0.00 <1.00 O.K!

105 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 105 of Sill Transom Connection Check Connection Detail V y f f X +Z +Y f2 5 V y 9.2 T Analysis of Screw Group Analysis of Group of Fasteners Fig Sill Joint Connection Reference Action Notes Applied Forces Horizontal shear force, V y = 0.90 kn Under most critical wind load Eccentricity of V y, e z = 0.00 mm Eccentric application of wind load Vertical shear force, V z = 0.20 kn Under dead load Eccentricity of V z, e y = mm Eccentric location of setting block Tension force, T = 0.20 kn Parallel to the axis of the fasteners Eccentricity of T, e ty = mm Eccentric Application of the tension force Total applied moment, M = V y e z + V z e y = knm Sum of the torsion and all effects of eccentricity Number of fasteners, n = 3 nos. Fasteners in the group Fastener Group Calculated: Shear Force Tension Size A y z Q z I y I z F v,y1 F v,y2 F v,y F v,z1 F v,z2 F v,z Fv F t Fastener mm 2 mm mm mm 3 mm 4 mm 4 kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn f1: ST f2: ST f3: ST Σ = Definition of Annotations A = Shear area of individual fasteners ey +z y, z = Coordinate location of individual fasteners from c.g. of fastener group Q z = A y+e ty = Statical moment of area about z-axis at center of T application I y = A z 2 = Inertia about y-axis of individual fasteners y y V 4 1 z f I z = A y 2 4 f1 = Inertia about z-axis of individual fasteners V F v,y1 = V y /n = Shear force in y-axis of individual fastener due to shear force, V y e y ty z 4 z 1 F v,y2 = M (A z/σi y ) = Shear force in y-axis of individual fastener due to moment, M T fasteners c.g. F v,y = F v,y1 + F v,y2 = Total shear force in y-axis of individual fastener +y z 3 z 2 F v,z1 = V z /n = Shear force in z-axis of individual fastener due to shear force, V z F v,z2 = M (A y/σi z ) = Shear force in z-axisof individual fastener due to moment, M f 3 f 2 F v,z = F v,z1 + F v,z2 = Total shear force in z-axis of individual fastener z e y 3 y 2 F v = (F v,z1 2 + F v,z2 2)0.5 = Total shear force in the individual fasteners F t = T(Q z /ΣQ z ) = Tension force in the individual fasteners

106 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 106 of Check Most Critical Screw The most critical screw among the group is fastener f2. AAMA TIR-A9-1991: Metal Curtain Wall Fasteners Clause Action Notes Applied Forces Applied Tension, F t = 0.09 KN. Calculated tension force in the most critical screw Applied Shear, F v = 0.69 KN. Calculated shear force in the most critical screw Connected Parts 1st connected part, F u1 = 205 Mpa. Thickness, t p1 = 2nd connected part, F u2 = Thickness, t p2 = Number of shear plane(s), m = Screw Parameters Screw size, d b = 3.0 mm. L e1 = 9.2 mm. Dist. from centre of screw to the nearest free edge 205 Mpa. F y2 = 170 Mpa. Yield strength of connected material 3.0 mm. L e2 = 5.0 mm. Dist. from centre of screw to the nearest free edge LE = 20.7 mm. Length of fastener engagement 1 plane(s) (BS EN ISO ) F y = 450 Mpa. Minimum tensile yield strength (BS EN ISO ) F u = 700 Mpa. Minimum ultimate tensile strength 9. Table 25 D = 4.83 mm. Nominal thread diameter 9. Table 25 K = 3.53 mm. Basic minor diameter 9. Table 25 Thread pitch, P = 1.59 mm. Giving a value of N = 16 threads per inch 9. Table 25 DSMIN = 4.62 mm. Minimum major diameter of external thread 9. Table 25 ENMAX = 4.24 mm. Maximum pitch diameter of internal thread 9. Table 25 A(S) = (K)² = 9.79 mm 2 Tensile stress area for spaced threads 9. Table 25 A(R) = (K)² = 9.79 mm 2 Thread root area for spaced threads TSA(I) = π[dsmin][(12.7/n) (dsmin-enmax)] = mm 2 Thread stripping area per thread, internal 6. Check Tension P t = 0.75Fy[A(S)] = 3.30 KN. Yielding failure allowable tension P t = 0.40Fu[A(S)] = 2.74 KN. Fracture failure governs allowable tension F t /P t = 0.03 <1.00 O.K! 6. Check Shear P v = 0.75Fy[A(R)]/1.732 = 1.91 KN. Yielding failure allowable shear P v = 0.40Fu[A(R)]/1.732 = 1.58 KN. Fracture failure governs allowable shear F s /(m P v ) = 0.44 <1.00 O.K! Interaction, [F t /P t ] 2 + [F s /(m P v )] 2 = 0.19 <1.00 O.K! 7. Check Bearing Fb1 = (2/1.95)*Fu1/1.65 = Mpa. Allowable bearing stress on 1st connected part t p1 '= 3.00 mm. Effective bearing thickness P b1 = F b D t p1 ' = 1.8 KN. Allowable bearing capacity P b1 /(m F s ) = 0.37 <1.00 O.K! Fb2 = (2/1.95)*Fu2/1.65 = Mpa. Allowable bearing stress on 2nd connected part P b2 = F b D t p2 = 1.6 KN. Allowable bearing capacity P b2 /F s = 0.43 <1.00 O.K! 6063-T6 Aluminium Standard round hole 6063-T6 Aluminium Standard round hole #10 (ST4.8) Pan head screw A4-70 Stainless steel 9. Check Pullout Fv = 0.4*Fsu = 52 Mpa. Fsu = Shear ultimate strength, see ADM Table 3.3-1M P p = [LE/25.4-1/N] F v TSA(I) N = 6.9 KN. Pullout strength on thread of 2nd connected part F t /P p = 0.01 <1.00 O.K! 12. Check Srew Engagement Torque, T = 6.0 N m. Applied tigthening torque on screw or bolt f = 0.47 Coefficient of friction for steel on aluminium R = D/2 = 2.42 mm. Major radius of screw thread r = D/ /N = 1.44 mm. Minor radius of screw thread r m = (R+r)/2 = 1.93 mm. Mean radius of screw thread a = 2cos -1 (r/r) = Angle defining limits of screw engagement A e = R 2 [π(a/180)-sin(a)] = 5.28 mm 2 Total area of screw thread engagement A t = π(r 2 -r 2 ) = mm 2 Thread area of fastener Re = Ae/At = 0.45 Ratio of engagement and total thread area sec(c) = { [24(R-r)] 2 +(8.5P) 2 } 0.5 /[24(R-r)] = 1.15 Secant of 1/2 the angle between faces of a thread SF =R e (T/r m )[P+2π r m f sec(c)]/[2π r m -P f sec(c)] = 1.01 kn Ultimate lateral frictional resistance of screw per thread P S = SF(LE/P)/2.34 = 5.63 kn Allowable design lateral frictional resistance of crew F t /P S = 0.02 <1.00 O.K!

107 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 107 of Transom - 1 Connection Check Connection Detail V z f f Z V y 6.3 +Y f f Analysis of Screw Group Analysis of Group of Fasteners Fig Transom-2 End Connection Reference Action Notes Applied Forces Horizontal shear force, V y = 3.70 kn Under most critical wind load Eccentricity of V y, e z = mm Eccentric application of wind load Vertical shear force, V z = 0.30 kn Under dead load Eccentricity of V z, e y = mm Eccentric location of setting block Fastener Group Tension force, T = 0.00 kn Parallel to the axis of the fasteners Eccentricity of T, e ty = 0.00 mm Eccentric Application of the tension force Total applied moment, M = V y e z + V z e y = knm Sum of the torsion and all effects of eccentricity Number of fasteners, n = 4 nos. Fasteners in the group Calculated: Shear Force Tension Fastener Size A y z Q z I y I z F v,y1 F v,y2 F v,y F v,z1 F v,z2 F v,z Fv F t mm 2 mm mm mm 3 mm 4 mm 4 kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn f1: ST f2: ST f3: ST f4: ST Σ = Definition of Annotations A = Shear area of individual fasteners ey +z y, z = Coordinate location of individual fasteners from c.g. of fastener group Q z = A y+e ty = Statical moment of area about z-axis at center of T application V y z e V z f 4 y 1 z 4 z3 f 3 T y 4 y 3 e ty fasteners c.g. y 2 f 1 f 2 z 1 z2 +y I y = A z 2 = Inertia about y-axis of individual fasteners I z = A y 2 = Inertia about z-axis of individual fasteners F v,y1 = V y /n = Shear force in y-axis of individual fastener due to shear force, V y F v,y2 = M (A z/σi y ) = Shear force in y-axis of individual fastener due to moment, M F v,y = F v,y1 + F v,y2 = Total shear force in y-axis of individual fastener F v,z1 = V z /n = Shear force in z-axis of individual fastener due to shear force, V z F v,z2 = M (A y/σi z ) = Shear force in z-axisof individual fastener due to moment, M F v,z = F v,z1 + F v,z2 = Total shear force in z-axis of individual fastener F v = (F v,z1 2 + F v,z2 2 ) 0.5 = Total shear force in the individual fasteners F t = T(Q z /ΣQ z ) = Tension force in the individual fasteners

108 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 108 of Check Most Critical Screw The most critical screw among the group is fastener f2. AAMA TIR-A9-1991: Metal Curtain Wall Fasteners Clause Action Notes Applied Forces Applied Tension, F t = 0.00 KN. Calculated tension force in the most critical screw Applied Shear, F v = 1.12 KN. Calculated shear force in the most critical screw Connected Parts 1st connected part, F u1 = 205 Mpa. Thickness, t p1 = 2nd connected part, F u2 = Thickness, t p2 = Number of shear plane(s), m = Screw Parameters Screw size, d b = 3.0 mm. L e1 = 16.5 mm. Dist. from centre of screw to the nearest free edge 205 Mpa. F y2 = 170 Mpa. Yield strength of connected material 3.0 mm. L e2 = 5.0 mm. Dist. from centre of screw to the nearest free edge LE = 20.7 mm. Length of fastener engagement 1 plane(s) #10 (ST4.8) Pan head screw A4-70 Stainless steel (BS EN ISO ) F y = 450 Mpa. Minimum tensile yield strength (BS EN ISO ) F u = 700 Mpa. Minimum ultimate tensile strength 9. Table 25 D = 4.83 mm. Nominal thread diameter 9. Table 25 K = 3.53 mm. Basic minor diameter 9. Table 25 Thread pitch, P = 1.59 mm. Giving a value of N = 16 threads per inch 9. Table 25 DSMIN = 4.62 mm. Minimum major diameter of external thread 9. Table 25 ENMAX = 4.24 mm. Maximum pitch diameter of internal thread 9. Table 25 A(S) = (K)² = 9.79 mm 2 Tensile stress area for spaced threads 9. Table 25 A(R) = (K)² = 9.79 mm 2 Thread root area for spaced threads TSA(I) = π[dsmin][(12.7/n) (dsmin-enmax)] = mm 2 Thread stripping area per thread, internal 6. Check Tension P t = 0.75Fy[A(S)] = 3.30 KN. Yielding failure allowable tension P t = 0.40Fu[A(S)] = 2.74 KN. Fracture failure governs allowable tension F t /P t = 0.00 <1.00 O.K! 6. Check Shear P v = 0.75Fy[A(R)]/1.732 = 1.91 KN. Yielding failure allowable shear P v = 0.40Fu[A(R)]/1.732 = 1.58 KN. Fracture failure governs allowable shear F s /(m P v ) = 0.71 <1.00 O.K! Interaction, [F t /P t ] 2 + [F s /(m P v )] 2 = Check Bearing Fb1 = (2/1.95)*Fu1/1.65 = Mpa. Allowable bearing stress on 1st connected part t p1 '= 3.00 mm. Effective bearing thickness P b1 = F b D t p1 ' = 1.8 KN. Allowable bearing capacity P b1 /(m F s ) = 0.61 <1.00 O.K! Fb2 = (2/1.95)*Fu2/1.65 = Mpa. Allowable bearing stress on 2nd connected part P b2 = F b D t p2 = 1.6 KN. Allowable bearing capacity P b2 /F s = 0.69 <1.00 O.K! 6063-T6 Aluminium Standard round hole 6063-T6 Aluminium Standard round hole 9. Check Pullout Fv = 0.4*Fsu = 52 Mpa. Fsu = Shear ultimate strength, see ADM Table 3.3-1M P p = [LE/25.4-1/N] F v TSA(I) N = 6.9 KN. Pullout strength on thread of 2nd connected part F t /P p = 0.00 <1.00 O.K!

109 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 109 of Transom - 2 (System 1) Connection Check Connection Detail V y f4 f Vz f Z +Y 3 f Analysis of Screw Group Analysis of Group of Fasteners Fig Transom-2 End Connection Reference Action Notes Applied Forces Horizontal shear force, V y = 1.70 kn Under most critical wind load Eccentricity of V y, e z = 0.00 mm Eccentric application of wind load Vertical shear force, V z = 1.00 kn Under dead load Eccentricity of V z, e y = mm Eccentric location of setting block Fastener Group Tension force, T = 0.00 kn Parallel to the axis of the fasteners Eccentricity of T, e ty = 0.00 mm Eccentric Application of the tension force Total applied moment, M = V y e z + V z e y = knm Sum of the torsion and all effects of eccentricity Number of fasteners, n = 4 nos. Fasteners in the group Calculated: Shear Force Tension Size A y z Q z I y I z F v,y1 F v,y2 F v,y F v,z1 F v,z2 F v,z Fv F t Fastener mm 2 mm mm mm 3 mm 4 mm 4 kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn f1: ST f2: ST f3: ST f4: ST Σ = Definition of Annotations A = Shear area of individual fasteners ey +z y, z = Coordinate location of individual fasteners from c.g. of fastener group Q z = A y+e ty = Statical moment of area about z-axis at center of T application I y = A z 2 = Inertia about y-axis of individual fasteners y y V 4 1 z f I z = A y 2 4 f1 = Inertia about z-axis of individual fasteners V F v,y1 = V y /n = Shear force in y-axis of individual fastener due to shear force, V y e y ty z 4 z 1 F v,y2 = M (A z/σi y ) = Shear force in y-axis of individual fastener due to moment, M T fasteners c.g. F v,y = F v,y1 + F v,y2 = Total shear force in y-axis of individual fastener +y z3 z2 F v,z1 = V z /n = Shear force in z-axis of individual fastener due to shear force, V z F v,z2 = M (A y/σi z ) = Shear force in z-axisof individual fastener due to moment, M f 3 f 2 F v,z = F v,z1 + F v,z2 = Total shear force in z-axis of individual fastener z e y 3 y 2 F v = (F v,z1 2 + F v,z2 2 ) 0.5 = Total shear force in the individual fasteners F t = T(Q z /ΣQ z ) = Tension force in the individual fasteners

110 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 110 of Check Most Critical Screw The most critical screw among the group is fastener f1. AAMA TIR-A9-1991: Metal Curtain Wall Fasteners Clause Action Notes Applied Forces Applied Tension, F t = 0.00 KN. Calculated tension force in the most critical screw Applied Shear, F v = 0.63 KN. Calculated shear force in the most critical screw Connected Parts 1st connected part, F u1 = 205 Mpa. Thickness, t p1 = 2nd connected part, F u2 = Thickness, t p2 = Number of shear plane(s), m = Screw Parameters Screw size, d b = 3.0 mm. L e1 = 16.5 mm. Dist. from centre of screw to the nearest free edge 205 Mpa. F y2 = 170 Mpa. Yield strength of connected material 3.0 mm. L e2 = 5.0 mm. Dist. from centre of screw to the nearest free edge LE = 20.7 mm. Length of fastener engagement 1 plane(s) #10 (ST4.8) Pan head screw A4-70 Stainless steel (BS EN ISO ) F y = 450 Mpa. Minimum tensile yield strength (BS EN ISO ) F u = 700 Mpa. Minimum ultimate tensile strength 9. Table 25 D = 4.83 mm. Nominal thread diameter 9. Table 25 K = 3.53 mm. Basic minor diameter 9. Table 25 Thread pitch, P = 1.59 mm. Giving a value of N = 16 threads per inch 9. Table 25 DSMIN = 4.62 mm. Minimum major diameter of external thread 9. Table 25 ENMAX = 4.24 mm. Maximum pitch diameter of internal thread 9. Table 25 A(S) = (K)² = 9.79 mm 2 Tensile stress area for spaced threads 9. Table 25 A(R) = (K)² = 9.79 mm 2 Thread root area for spaced threads TSA(I) = π[dsmin][(12.7/n) (dsmin-enmax)] = mm 2 Thread stripping area per thread, internal 6. Check Tension P t = 0.75Fy[A(S)] = 3.30 KN. Yielding failure allowable tension P t = 0.40Fu[A(S)] = 2.74 KN. Fracture failure governs allowable tension F t /P t = 0.00 <1.00 O.K! 6. Check Shear P v = 0.75Fy[A(R)]/1.732 = 1.91 KN. Yielding failure allowable shear P v = 0.40Fu[A(R)]/1.732 = 1.58 KN. Fracture failure governs allowable shear F s /(m P v ) = 0.40 <1.00 O.K! Interaction, [F t /P t ] 2 + [F s /(m P v )] 2 = Check Bearing Fb1 = (2/1.95)*Fu1/1.65 = Mpa. Allowable bearing stress on 1st connected part t p1 '= 3.00 mm. Effective bearing thickness P b1 = F b D t p1 ' = 1.8 KN. Allowable bearing capacity P b1 /(m F s ) = 0.34 <1.00 O.K! Fb2 = (2/1.95)*Fu2/1.65 = Mpa. Allowable bearing stress on 2nd connected part P b2 = F b D t p2 = 1.6 KN. Allowable bearing capacity P b2 /F s = 0.39 <1.00 O.K! 6063-T6 Aluminium Standard round hole 6063-T6 Aluminium Standard round hole 9. Check Pullout Fv = 0.4*Fsu = 52 Mpa. Fsu = Shear ultimate strength, see ADM Table 3.3-1M P p = [LE/25.4-1/N] F v TSA(I) N = 6.9 KN. Pullout strength on thread of 2nd connected part F t /P p = 0.00 <1.00 O.K!

111 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 111 of Transom - 2 (System 2) Connection Check Connection Detail V z 15.3 f1 20x20x2.5t (15mm long) Aluminium Chair Additional screw V y f3 f f2 +Z +Y Analysis of Screw Group Analysis of Group of Fasteners Fig Transom-2 End Connection Reference Action Notes Applied Forces Horizontal shear force, V y = 3.60 kn Under most critical wind load Eccentricity of V y, e z = 0.00 mm Eccentric application of wind load Vertical shear force, V z = 1.30 kn Under dead load Eccentricity of V z, e y = mm Eccentric location of setting block Tension force, T = 0.00 kn Parallel to the axis of the fasteners Eccentricity of T, e ty = 0.00 mm Eccentric Application of the tension force Total applied moment, M = V y e z + V z e y = knm Sum of the torsion and all effects of eccentricity Number of fasteners, n = 4 nos. Fasteners in the group Fastener Group Calculated: Shear Force Tension Size A y z Q z I y I z F v,y1 F v,y2 F v,y F v,z1 F v,z2 F v,z Fv F t Fastener mm 2 mm mm mm 3 mm 4 mm 4 kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn f1: ST f2: ST f3: ST f4: ST V y z e V z Definition of Annotations e y 73 Σ = f 4 y 1 z 4 z 3 f 3 T y 4 y 3 e ty +z fasteners c.g. y 2 f 1 f 2 z 1 z 2 +y A = Shear area of individual fasteners y, z = Coordinate location of individual fasteners from c.g. of fastener group Q z = A y+e ty = Statical moment of area about z-axis at center of T application I y = A z 2 = Inertia about y-axis of individual fasteners I z = A y 2 = Inertia about z-axis of individual fasteners F v,y1 = V y /n = Shear force in y-axis of individual fastener due to shear force, V y F v,y2 = M (A z/σi y ) = Shear force in y-axis of individual fastener due to moment, M F v,y = F v,y1 + F v,y2 = Total shear force in y-axis of individual fastener F v,z1 = V z /n = Shear force in z-axis of individual fastener due to shear force, V z F v,z2 = M (A y/σi z ) = Shear force in z-axisof individual fastener due to moment, M F v,z = F v,z1 + F v,z2 = Total shear force in z-axis of individual fastener F v = (F v,z1 2 + F v,z2 2 ) 0.5 = Total shear force in the individual fasteners F t = T(Q z /ΣQ z ) = Tension force in the individual fasteners

112 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 112 of Check Most Critical Screw The most critical screw among the group is fastener f2. AAMA TIR-A9-1991: Metal Curtain Wall Fasteners Clause Action Notes Applied Forces Applied Tension, F t = 0.00 KN. Calculated tension force in the most critical screw Applied Shear, F v = 1.37 KN. Calculated shear force in the most critical screw Connected Parts 1st connected part, F u1 = 205 Mpa. Thickness, t p1 = 2nd connected part, F u2 = Thickness, t p2 = Number of shear plane(s), m = Screw Parameters Screw size, d b = 3.0 mm. L e1 = 16.5 mm. Dist. from centre of screw to the nearest free edge 205 Mpa. F y2 = 170 Mpa. Yield strength of connected material 3.0 mm. L e2 = 5.0 mm. Dist. from centre of screw to the nearest free edge LE = 20.7 mm. Length of fastener engagement 1 plane(s) #10 (ST4.8) Pan head screw A4-70 Stainless steel (BS EN ISO ) F y = 450 Mpa. Minimum tensile yield strength (BS EN ISO ) F u = 700 Mpa. Minimum ultimate tensile strength 9. Table 25 D = 4.83 mm. Nominal thread diameter 9. Table 25 K = 3.53 mm. Basic minor diameter 9. Table 25 Thread pitch, P = 1.59 mm. Giving a value of N = 16 threads per inch 9. Table 25 DSMIN = 4.62 mm. Minimum major diameter of external thread 9. Table 25 ENMAX = 4.24 mm. Maximum pitch diameter of internal thread 9. Table 25 A(S) = (K)² = 9.79 mm 2 Tensile stress area for spaced threads 9. Table 25 A(R) = (K)² = 9.79 mm 2 Thread root area for spaced threads TSA(I) = π[dsmin][(12.7/n) (dsmin-enmax)] = mm 2 Thread stripping area per thread, internal 6. Check Tension P t = 0.75Fy[A(S)] = 3.30 KN. Yielding failure allowable tension P t = 0.40Fu[A(S)] = 2.74 KN. Fracture failure governs allowable tension F t /P t = 0.00 <1.00 O.K! 6. Check Shear P v = 0.75Fy[A(R)]/1.732 = 1.91 KN. Yielding failure allowable shear P v = 0.40Fu[A(R)]/1.732 = 1.58 KN. Fracture failure governs allowable shear F s /(m P v ) = 0.87 <1.00 O.K! Interaction, [F t /P t ] 2 + [F s /(m P v )] 2 = Check Bearing Fb1 = (2/1.95)*Fu1/1.65 = Mpa. Allowable bearing stress on 1st connected part t p1 '= 3.00 mm. Effective bearing thickness P b1 = F b D t p1 ' = 1.8 KN. Allowable bearing capacity P b1 /(m F s ) = 0.74 <1.00 O.K! Fb2 = (2/1.95)*Fu2/1.65 = Mpa. Allowable bearing stress on 2nd connected part P b2 = F b D t p2 = 1.6 KN. Allowable bearing capacity P b2 /F s = 0.85 <1.00 O.K! 6063-T6 Aluminium Standard round hole 6063-T6 Aluminium Standard round hole 9. Check Pullout Fv = 0.4*Fsu = 52 Mpa. Fsu = Shear ultimate strength, see ADM Table 3.3-1M P p = [LE/25.4-1/N] F v TSA(I) N = 6.9 KN. Pullout strength on thread of 2nd connected part F t /P p = 0.00 <1.00 O.K!

113 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 113 of Sword Connection Check The sword is freely bearing on a stopper bolt underneath Connection Detail Check Stopper Bolt The stopper bolt carries only the weight of the sword. Therefore it is designed for shear due to the weight of the sword with a factor of safety of 2. Fv = 2(0.09 KN) 0.2KN Weight of sword = 0.09KN see 5.1 Fig Sword Connection AAMA TIR-A9-1991: Metal Curtain Wall Fasteners Clause Action Notes Applied Forces Applied Tension, F t = 0.00 KN. Calculated tension force in the most critical screw Applied Shear, F v = 0.20 KN. Calculated shear force in the most critical screw Connected Parts 1st connected part, F u1 = 205 Mpa. Thickness, t p1 = Screw Parameters Screw size, d b = 3.0 mm. L e1 = 50.0 mm. Dist. from centre of screw to the nearest free edge (BS EN ISO ) F y = 450 Mpa. Minimum tensile yield strength (BS EN ISO ) F u = 700 Mpa. Minimum ultimate tensile strength 9. Table 4 D = 8 mm. Nominal thread diameter 9. Table 4 Thread pitch, P = 1.00 mm. Giving a value of N = 25.4 threads per 25mm 9. Table 4 DSMIN = 7.80 mm. Minimum major diameter of external thread 9. Table 4 ENMAX = 7.10 mm. Maximum pitch diameter of internal thread 6. Eq. 1 A(S) = (π/4)[d-(24.75/n)] 2 = mm 2 Tensile stress area 6. Eq. 2 A(R) = (π/4)[d-(31.16/n)] 2 = mm 2 Thread root area TSA(I) = π[dsmin][(12.7/n) (dsmin-enmax)] = mm 2 Thread stripping area per thread, internal 6. Check Shear P v = 0.75Fy[A(R)]/1.732 = 7.02 KN. Yielding failure allowable shear P v = 0.40Fu[A(R)]/1.732 = 5.82 KN. Fracture failure governs allowable shear F s /(m P v ) = 0.03 <1.00 O.K! Interaction, [F t /P t ] 2 + [F s /(m P v )] 2 = T6 Aluminium Standard round hole M8 Hexagonal head screw A4-70 Stainless steel 7. Check Bearing Fb1 = (2/1.95)*Fu1/1.65 = Mpa. Allowable bearing stress on 1st connected part t p1 '= 3.00 mm. Effective bearing thickness P b1 = F b D t p1 ' = 3.1 KN. Allowable bearing capacity P b1 /(m F s ) = 0.07 <1.00 O.K!

114 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 114 of Back Pan Check Back Pan Details Fig Back Pan Details Check Back pan for Full Wind Load (a) Shell Element Model with Boundary conditions Hinge Wind suction Fixed rotation Fig Back Pan Applied Load & Boundary Conditions

115 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 115 of 117 (b) Calculations Summary ADM2005: Part I-A Specification for Aluminum Structures - Allowable Stress Design Reference Action Notes Metal Sheet Parameters Width, W = 1887 mm Net dimension considering width of mullions Height, h = mm Net height considering depth of transoms Wind load, Q = -4.5 KN/m 2 Design wind load in suction Alloy, F cy = 115 Mpa Compressive yield strength of H14 alloy sheet ANSYS FEM Anlysis Results Notes Check Stress VM =0.707[(S min -S min ) 2 +S 2 max +S 2 min ) 0.5 = Mpa Von mises stress results (from ANSYS FEM anlaysis) Allowable stress, F c = 1.3F cy /n y = Mpa For rectangular solid plates Stress ratio, VM/F c = 0.97 <1.00 O.K! Check Deflection δ max = 7.90 mm Maximum deflection (from ANSYS FEM analysis) Allowable deflection, δ allow = mm 75% of 30mm clearance Strain ratio, δ z /δ allow = 0.35 <1.00 O.K! (i.) Von Mises Stress Diagram (ii.) Deflection Diagram Fig Back Pan Analysis Results

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite

More information

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Contents Introduction Beam types Lateral stability of beams Factors affecting lateral stability Behaviour of simple and built - up beams in bending (Without vertical stiffeners)

More information

Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3

Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3 SECTION DIRECTORY General Information Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3 Combination Assembly Recommendations and Limitations Composite Configurations...COMB-4 Typical Sealant

More information

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC. BENDING STRESS The effect of a bending moment applied to a cross-section of a beam is to induce a state of stress across that section. These stresses are known as bending stresses and they act normally

More information

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are

More information

SAMPLE PROJECT IN THE MIDDLE EAST DOCUMENT NO. STR-CALC POINT-FIXED GLASS - STEELWORKS 18 ENGINEER PROJECT. Pages REVISION TITLE

SAMPLE PROJECT IN THE MIDDLE EAST DOCUMENT NO. STR-CALC POINT-FIXED GLASS - STEELWORKS 18 ENGINEER PROJECT. Pages REVISION TITLE PROJECT ENGINEER DOCUMENT NO. STR-CLC-325 0 REVISION TITLE Pages POINT-FIXED GLSS - STEELWORKS 18 POINT-FIXED GLSS SECONDRY STEELWORKS 2 of 18 Table of contents 1 Basic Data... 3 1.1 References... 3 1.2

More information

Steel Post Load Analysis

Steel Post Load Analysis Steel Post Load Analysis Scope The steel posts in 73019022, 73019024, and 73019025, are considered to be traditional building products. According to the 2015 International Building Code, this type of product

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 0 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic Loads

More information

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING LECTURE VIII Dr. Jason E. Charalambides Failure in Flexure!

More information

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 1 General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 2 AISC ASD and LRFD AISC ASD = American Institute of Steel Construction = Allowable Stress Design AISC Ninth

More information

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1. C3 Flexural Members C3.1 Bending The nominal flexural strength [moment resistance], Mn, shall be the smallest of the values calculated for the limit states of yielding, lateral-torsional buckling and distortional

More information

STRUCTURAL VERIFICATION OF A 60.7 M DOME ROOF FOR TANK FB 2110

STRUCTURAL VERIFICATION OF A 60.7 M DOME ROOF FOR TANK FB 2110 CTS Netherlands B.V. Riga 10 2993 LW Barendrecht The Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)180 531027 (office) Fax: +31 (0)180 531848 (office) E-mail: info@cts-netherlands.com Website: www.cts-netherlands.com Chamber

More information

Downloaded from Downloaded from / 1

Downloaded from   Downloaded from   / 1 PURWANCHAL UNIVERSITY III SEMESTER FINAL EXAMINATION-2002 LEVEL : B. E. (Civil) SUBJECT: BEG256CI, Strength of Material Full Marks: 80 TIME: 03:00 hrs Pass marks: 32 Candidates are required to give their

More information

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder 16 PLATE GIRDERS II 1.0 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the current practice for the design of plate girders adopting meaningful simplifications of the equations derived in the chapter on Plate Girders

More information

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN 1992-1-1 and EN 1992-2 Validation Examples Brno, 21.10.2010 IDEA RS s.r.o. South Moravian Innovation Centre, U Vodarny 2a, 616 00 BRNO tel.: +420-511

More information

host structure (S.F.D.)

host structure (S.F.D.) TABLE 00.4 FBC Typical Mansard Beam [AAF] Allowable Span of Mansard Screen Enclosure Self-Mating Beams in accordance with requirements of Table 00.4 (and the 005 Aluminum Design Manual) using 6005T5 alloy:

More information

Stress Analysis Lecture 4 ME 276 Spring Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy

Stress Analysis Lecture 4 ME 276 Spring Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy Stress Analysis Lecture 4 ME 76 Spring 017-018 Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy Shear and Moment Diagrams Beam Sign Convention The positive directions are as follows: The internal shear force causes a

More information

Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017

Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017 Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail PAGE 1 (ref: JULB2NB280317) Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail Our ref: JULB2NB280317 Date

More information

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State Hooke s law. 3. Define modular ratio,

More information

Project Name Structural Calculation for Feature Pressing

Project Name Structural Calculation for Feature Pressing Project Name Structural Calculation for Feature Pressing Presented to: Client Logo Revision Generated by Date Reviewed by Date Comment 0 1 2 3 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction & Loadings... 3 1.1 Introduction

More information

Application nr. 7 (Connections) Strength of bolted connections to EN (Eurocode 3, Part 1.8)

Application nr. 7 (Connections) Strength of bolted connections to EN (Eurocode 3, Part 1.8) Application nr. 7 (Connections) Strength of bolted connections to EN 1993-1-8 (Eurocode 3, Part 1.8) PART 1: Bolted shear connection (Category A bearing type, to EN1993-1-8) Structural element Tension

More information

Made by SMH Date Aug Checked by NRB Date Dec Revised by MEB Date April 2006

Made by SMH Date Aug Checked by NRB Date Dec Revised by MEB Date April 2006 Job No. OSM 4 Sheet 1 of 8 Rev B Telephone: (0144) 45 Fax: (0144) 944 Made b SMH Date Aug 001 Checked b NRB Date Dec 001 Revised b MEB Date April 00 DESIGN EXAMPLE 9 - BEAM WITH UNRESTRAINED COMPRESSION

More information

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. ARCH 631 Note Set 11 S017abn Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. Building description The building is a three-story office building

More information

9.5 Compression Members

9.5 Compression Members 9.5 Compression Members This section covers the following topics. Introduction Analysis Development of Interaction Diagram Effect of Prestressing Force 9.5.1 Introduction Prestressing is meaningful when

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode 3 Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 20 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic

More information

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams CHAPTER 4 Design of R C Beams Learning Objectives Identify the data, formulae and procedures for design of R C beams Design simply-supported and continuous R C beams by integrating the following processes

More information

Rigid and Braced Frames

Rigid and Braced Frames RH 331 Note Set 12.1 F2014abn Rigid and raced Frames Notation: E = modulus of elasticit or Young s modulus F = force component in the direction F = force component in the direction FD = free bod diagram

More information

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi Chapter 04 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Compression Members By Dr. Jawad Talib Al-Nasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering

More information

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: PNEUTEK, INC.

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: PNEUTEK, INC. ICC ES Report ICC ES () 7 () www.icc es.org Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ESR 1 Reissued /1 This report is subject to renewal /. DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: 1 STEEL ING REPORT

More information

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. Client: Project: Extreme Marquees Design check 5m 9m Function Standard Tent Structure for 80km/hr Wind 4m 9m Function Standard Tent Structure for 80km/hr Wind 3m 9m Function Standard Tent Structure for

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 22 : Design of an unbraced sway frame with rigid joints Summary: NOTE This example

More information

Critical Load columns buckling critical load

Critical Load columns buckling critical load Buckling of Columns Buckling of Columns Critical Load Some member may be subjected to compressive loadings, and if these members are long enough to cause the member to deflect laterally or sideway. To

More information

Longitudinal strength standard

Longitudinal strength standard (1989) (Rev. 1 199) (Rev. Nov. 001) Longitudinal strength standard.1 Application This requirement applies only to steel ships of length 90 m and greater in unrestricted service. For ships having one or

More information

3. Stability of built-up members in compression

3. Stability of built-up members in compression 3. Stability of built-up members in compression 3.1 Definitions Build-up members, made out by coupling two or more simple profiles for obtaining stronger and stiffer section are very common in steel structures,

More information

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV UNIT I STRESS, STRAIN DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS PART A (2 MARKS)

More information

CHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS

CHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS (74) CHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS This chapter will be devoted to the analysis of prismatic members subjected to equal and opposite couples M and M' acting in the same longitudinal plane. Such members are

More information

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data The design formulae and data provided in this Annex are for education, training and assessment purposes only. They are based on the Hong Kong Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013 (HKCP-2013).

More information

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602 Design of wall panel according to EN 160 Example 3: Wall panel with wind load 1.1 Issue Design of a wall panel at an industrial building Materials with a compressive strength 3,5, density class 500, welded

More information

FIXED BEAMS IN BENDING

FIXED BEAMS IN BENDING FIXED BEAMS IN BENDING INTRODUCTION Fixed or built-in beams are commonly used in building construction because they possess high rigidity in comparison to simply supported beams. When a simply supported

More information

APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES

APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES 163 APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES A1.1 DESIGN AS PER NORTH AMERICAN SPECIFICATION OF COLD FORMED STEEL (AISI S100: 2007) 1. Based on Initiation of Yielding: Effective yield moment, M n

More information

1 Exterior Wall Members & Accessories

1 Exterior Wall Members & Accessories JamStud Introduction Table of Contents JamStud Introduc on...1 JamStud Assembly Comparisons...2 JamStud Design Considera ons...3- JamStud Sec on Proper es...5- JamStud Non Load Bearing Design Example...7-

More information

1 Exterior Wall Members & Accessories

1 Exterior Wall Members & Accessories JamStud Introduction Table of Contents JamStud Introduc on...1 JamStud Assembly Comparisons...2 JamStud Design Considera ons...3- JamStud Sec on Proper es...5- JamStud Non Load Bearing Design Example...7-

More information

needed to buckle an ideal column. Analyze the buckling with bending of a column. Discuss methods used to design concentric and eccentric columns.

needed to buckle an ideal column. Analyze the buckling with bending of a column. Discuss methods used to design concentric and eccentric columns. CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Discuss the behavior of columns. Discuss the buckling of columns. Determine the axial load needed to buckle an ideal column. Analyze the buckling with bending of a column. Discuss methods

More information

Example 4: Design of a Rigid Column Bracket (Bolted)

Example 4: Design of a Rigid Column Bracket (Bolted) Worked Example 4: Design of a Rigid Column Bracket (Bolted) Example 4: Design of a Rigid Column Bracket (Bolted) Page : 1 Example 4: Design of a Rigid Column Bracket (Bolted) Determine the size of the

More information

EXTERIOR FRAMING EXTERIOR FRAMING

EXTERIOR FRAMING EXTERIOR FRAMING 1 EXTERIOR FRAMING BUILDSTRONG www.buildstrong.com 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Product Identification...........................5 General Product Information....................... 4-5 Compliance Guaranteed...............................

More information

Name :. Roll No. :... Invigilator s Signature :.. CS/B.TECH (CE-NEW)/SEM-3/CE-301/ SOLID MECHANICS

Name :. Roll No. :... Invigilator s Signature :.. CS/B.TECH (CE-NEW)/SEM-3/CE-301/ SOLID MECHANICS Name :. Roll No. :..... Invigilator s Signature :.. 2011 SOLID MECHANICS Time Allotted : 3 Hours Full Marks : 70 The figures in the margin indicate full marks. Candidates are required to give their answers

More information

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING. BEng (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2016/2017 MATHEMATICS & STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING. BEng (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2016/2017 MATHEMATICS & STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS TW21 UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING BEng (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2016/2017 MATHEMATICS & STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS MODULE NO: CIE4011 Date: Wednesday 11 th January 2017 Time:

More information

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown. D : SOLID MECHANICS Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown. Q.2 Consider the forces of magnitude F acting on the sides of the regular hexagon having

More information

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State

More information

= 50 ksi. The maximum beam deflection Δ max is not = R B. = 30 kips. Notes for Strength of Materials, ET 200

= 50 ksi. The maximum beam deflection Δ max is not = R B. = 30 kips. Notes for Strength of Materials, ET 200 Notes for Strength of Materials, ET 00 Steel Six Easy Steps Steel beam design is about selecting the lightest steel beam that will support the load without exceeding the bending strength or shear strength

More information

PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT

PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT Structural Concrete Software System TN191_PT7_punching_shear_aci_4 011505 PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT 1. OVERVIEW Punching shear calculation applies to column-supported slabs, classified

More information

COLUMNS: BUCKLING (DIFFERENT ENDS)

COLUMNS: BUCKLING (DIFFERENT ENDS) COLUMNS: BUCKLING (DIFFERENT ENDS) Buckling of Long Straight Columns Example 4 Slide No. 1 A simple pin-connected truss is loaded and supported as shown in Fig. 1. All members of the truss are WT10 43

More information

Special edition paper

Special edition paper Development of New Aseismatic Structure Using Escalators Kazunori Sasaki* Atsushi Hayashi* Hajime Yoshida** Toru Masuda* Aseismatic reinforcement work is often carried out in parallel with improvement

More information

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE Prof. J. N. Mandal Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India. Tel.022-25767328 email: cejnm@civil.iitb.ac.in Module-13 LECTURE-

More information

BEAMS AND PLATES ANALYSIS

BEAMS AND PLATES ANALYSIS BEAMS AND PLATES ANALYSIS Automotive body structure can be divided into two types: i. Frameworks constructed of beams ii. Panels Classical beam versus typical modern vehicle beam sections Assumptions:

More information

PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK

PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK PERIYAR CENTENARY POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE PERIYAR NAGAR - VALLAM - 613 403 - THANJAVUR. DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Sub : Strength of Materials Year / Sem: II / III Sub Code : MEB 310

More information

Chapter Objectives. Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads

Chapter Objectives. Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads Chapter Objectives Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads A Bridge Deck under Bending Action Castellated Beams Post-tensioned Concrete Beam Lateral Distortion of a Beam Due to Lateral Load

More information

Steel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes

Steel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes Steel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes INTRODUCTION When the need for a new structure arises, an individual or agency has to arrange the funds required for its construction. The individual or

More information

MECHANICS LAB AM 317 EXP 4 TORSION OF CIRCULAR RODS

MECHANICS LAB AM 317 EXP 4 TORSION OF CIRCULAR RODS MECHANICS LAB AM 317 EXP 4 TORSION OF CIRCULAR RODS I. OBJECTIVES I.1 To become familiar with torsion tests of rods with solid circular cross sections. I.2 To observe the relation between shear stress

More information

two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS

two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) Analysis 1 Structural Requirements strength serviceability

More information

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column Effects From Structural Analysis Axial force, N (tension-ve and comp +ve) (ensure >= 0) 8000kN OK Major

More information

Chapter Objectives. Copyright 2011 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd

Chapter Objectives. Copyright 2011 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd Chapter Objectives To generalize the procedure by formulating equations that can be plotted so that they describe the internal shear and moment throughout a member. To use the relations between distributed

More information

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN CHAPTER 11 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN Article 49. Cracking Limit State 49.1 General considerations In the case of verifications relating to Cracking Limit State, the effects of actions comprise

More information

*Refer to IBC Section , applicable when fall protection is required. Glass stresses are designed for a safety factor of of 4.0 (IBC ).

*Refer to IBC Section , applicable when fall protection is required. Glass stresses are designed for a safety factor of of 4.0 (IBC ). Architectural Railing Division C.R.Laurence Co., Inc. 2503 E Vernon Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90058 (T) 800.421.6144 (F) 800.587.7501 www.crlaurence.com 12 JAN 2011 SUBJ: TAPER-LOC SYSTEM DRY-GLAZE LAMINATED

More information

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges 01/02/2016 Marco Donà Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges 1 Plastic hinge approach A plastic hinge represents a concentrated post-yield behaviour in one or more degrees of freedom. Hinges only

More information

UNIT III DEFLECTION OF BEAMS 1. What are the methods for finding out the slope and deflection at a section? The important methods used for finding out the slope and deflection at a section in a loaded

More information

FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS

FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS Write Known Data Estimate self-weight of the member. a. The self-weight may be taken as 10 percent of the applied dead UDL or dead point load distributed over all the length.

More information

Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps

Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps a brief guide on element design to EC3 Tim McCarthy Email tim.mccarthy@umist.ac.uk Slides available on the web http://www2.umist.ac.uk/construction/staff/

More information

Equivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams

Equivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams University of Alberta Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Master of Engineering Report in Structural Engineering Equivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams

More information

UNIT- I Thin plate theory, Structural Instability:

UNIT- I Thin plate theory, Structural Instability: UNIT- I Thin plate theory, Structural Instability: Analysis of thin rectangular plates subject to bending, twisting, distributed transverse load, combined bending and in-plane loading Thin plates having

More information

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 17/P ZONE STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF HULL STRUCTURE OF ROLL ON/ROLL OFF SHIP

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 17/P ZONE STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF HULL STRUCTURE OF ROLL ON/ROLL OFF SHIP RULES PUBLICATION NO. 17/P ZONE STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF HULL STRUCTURE OF ROLL ON/ROLL OFF SHIP 1995 Publications P (Additional Rule Requirements), issued by Polski Rejestr Statków, complete or extend the

More information

Multi Linear Elastic and Plastic Link in SAP2000

Multi Linear Elastic and Plastic Link in SAP2000 26/01/2016 Marco Donà Multi Linear Elastic and Plastic Link in SAP2000 1 General principles Link object connects two joints, i and j, separated by length L, such that specialized structural behaviour may

More information

CIVIL DEPARTMENT MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1. Brach: CE YEAR:

CIVIL DEPARTMENT MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1. Brach: CE YEAR: MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1 SEMESTER: V 1) Find the least moment of Inertia about the centroidal axes X-X and Y-Y of an unequal angle section 125 mm 75 mm 10 mm as shown in figure 2) Determine

More information

Mechanics of Materials Primer

Mechanics of Materials Primer Mechanics of Materials rimer Notation: A = area (net = with holes, bearing = in contact, etc...) b = total width of material at a horizontal section d = diameter of a hole D = symbol for diameter E = modulus

More information

2012 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

2012 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS R10 SET - 1 II B.Tech II Semester, Regular Examinations, April 2012 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS (Com. to ME, AME, MM) Time: 3 hours Max. Marks: 75 Answer any FIVE Questions All Questions carry Equal Marks ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

More information

Balcony balustrades using the SG12 laminated glass system: PAGE 1 (SG12FF010717) Structural Calculations for SG12 System balustrades using 21.5mm laminated toughened glass without the need for a handrail

More information

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar 5.4 Beams As stated previousl, the effect of local buckling should invariabl be taken into account in thin walled members, using methods described alread. Laterall stable beams are beams, which do not

More information

Bending Load & Calibration Module

Bending Load & Calibration Module Bending Load & Calibration Module Objectives After completing this module, students shall be able to: 1) Conduct laboratory work to validate beam bending stress equations. 2) Develop an understanding of

More information

For sunshades using the Zee blades wind loads are reduced by 10 psf.

For sunshades using the Zee blades wind loads are reduced by 10 psf. C.R. Laurence Co., Inc. 2503 East Vernon Los Angeles, CA 90058 24 July 2009 SUBJ: CR LAURENCE UNIVERSAL SUN SHADES The CRL Universal Aluminum Sun Shades were evaluated in accordance with the 2006 International

More information

Advanced Structural Analysis EGF Section Properties and Bending

Advanced Structural Analysis EGF Section Properties and Bending Advanced Structural Analysis EGF316 3. Section Properties and Bending 3.1 Loads in beams When we analyse beams, we need to consider various types of loads acting on them, for example, axial forces, shear

More information

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS This module of CIE 428 covers the following subjects Column theory Column design per AISC Effective length Torsional and flexural-torsional buckling Built-up members READING:

More information

APOLLO SALES LTD PUBLIC ACCESS SCAFFOLD STEP DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS

APOLLO SALES LTD PUBLIC ACCESS SCAFFOLD STEP DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS Alan White Design APOLLO SALES LTD PUBLIC ACCESS SCAFFOLD STEP DESIGN CHECK CALCULATIONS Alan N White B.Sc., M.Eng., C.Eng., M.I.C.E., M.I.H.T. Feb 2014 Somerset House 11 Somerset Place GLASGOW G3 7JT

More information

five Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture

five Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture five mechanics www.carttalk.com of materials Mechanics of Materials 1 Mechanics of Materials MECHANICS MATERIALS

More information

Parametric Study of Shaft Subjected To Pure Bending

Parametric Study of Shaft Subjected To Pure Bending Page167 Parametric Study of Shaft Subjected To Pure Bending Amar Kumar Patel*, Akash Kumar Patel**, Prajnasu Biswal***, & Satya Narayan Tripathy**** *Mechanical Department, Gandhi Institute of Engineering

More information

6. Bending CHAPTER OBJECTIVES

6. Bending CHAPTER OBJECTIVES CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Determine stress in members caused by bending Discuss how to establish shear and moment diagrams for a beam or shaft Determine largest shear and moment in a member, and specify where

More information

Properties of Sections

Properties of Sections ARCH 314 Structures I Test Primer Questions Dr.-Ing. Peter von Buelow Properties of Sections 1. Select all that apply to the characteristics of the Center of Gravity: A) 1. The point about which the body

More information

TECHNICAL REPORT. Bending tests on glulam-clt beams connected with double-sided punched metal plate fasteners and inclined screws.

TECHNICAL REPORT. Bending tests on glulam-clt beams connected with double-sided punched metal plate fasteners and inclined screws. TECHNICAL REPORT Bending tests on glulam-clt beams connected with double-sided punched metal plate fasteners and inclined screws Nicolas Jacquier ISSN 14-1536 ISBN 978-91-7583-1-8 (pdf) Luleå 15 www.ltu.se

More information

CIV 207 Winter For practice

CIV 207 Winter For practice CIV 07 Winter 009 Assignment #10 Friday, March 0 th Complete the first three questions. Submit your work to Box #5 on the th floor of the MacDonald building by 1 noon on Tuesday March 31 st. No late submissions

More information

AERO 214. Lab II. Measurement of elastic moduli using bending of beams and torsion of bars

AERO 214. Lab II. Measurement of elastic moduli using bending of beams and torsion of bars AERO 214 Lab II. Measurement of elastic moduli using bending of beams and torsion of bars BENDING EXPERIMENT Introduction Flexural properties of materials are of interest to engineers in many different

More information

Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams

Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams Introduction One of the earliest studies concerned with the strength and deflection of beams was conducted by Galileo Galilei. Galileo was the first to discuss

More information

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7 Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7 Dr. Colin Caprani, Chartered Engineer 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 1.1 Background... 3 1.2 Failure Modes... 5 1.3 Design Aspects...

More information

Chapter 6: Cross-Sectional Properties of Structural Members

Chapter 6: Cross-Sectional Properties of Structural Members Chapter 6: Cross-Sectional Properties of Structural Members Introduction Beam design requires the knowledge of the following. Material strengths (allowable stresses) Critical shear and moment values Cross

More information

Huntly Christie 1/26/2018 Christie Lites 100 Carson Street Toronto, ON M8W3R9

Huntly Christie 1/26/2018 Christie Lites 100 Carson Street Toronto, ON M8W3R9 Huntly Christie 1/26/2018 Christie Lites 100 Carson Street Toronto, ON M8W3R9 Structural Analysis for 20.5x20.5 Plated Box Truss Tables CRE Project # 16.614.01 Table of Contents for Analysis Package General

More information

STEEL. General Information

STEEL. General Information General Information General Information TYPICAL STRESS-STRAIN CURVE Below is a typical stress-strain curve. Each material has its own unique stress-strain curve. Tensile Properties Tensile properties indicate

More information

Bending Stress. Sign convention. Centroid of an area

Bending Stress. Sign convention. Centroid of an area Bending Stress Sign convention The positive shear force and bending moments are as shown in the figure. Centroid of an area Figure 40: Sign convention followed. If the area can be divided into n parts

More information

SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS

SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS CHAPTER REINFORCED CONCRETE Reinforced Concrete Design A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition Fifth Edition SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil

More information

Entrance exam Master Course

Entrance exam Master Course - 1 - Guidelines for completion of test: On each page, fill in your name and your application code Each question has four answers while only one answer is correct. o Marked correct answer means 4 points

More information

1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6

1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6 Page 3 Page 4 Substructure Design. ARRANGEMENT a. Frame A-P3 L = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m b. Frame P3-P6 L = 25 m H 3 = 8.39 m L 2 = 3 m H 4 = 8.5 m L

More information

Unit III Theory of columns. Dr.P.Venkateswara Rao, Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engg., SVCE, Sriperumbudir

Unit III Theory of columns. Dr.P.Venkateswara Rao, Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engg., SVCE, Sriperumbudir Unit III Theory of columns 1 Unit III Theory of Columns References: Punmia B.C.,"Theory of Structures" (SMTS) Vol II, Laxmi Publishing Pvt Ltd, New Delhi 2004. Rattan.S.S., "Strength of Materials", Tata

More information

Beam Design and Deflections

Beam Design and Deflections Beam Design and Deflections tation: a = name for width dimension A = name for area Areq d-adj = area required at allowable stress when shear is adjusted to include self weight Aweb = area of the web of

More information