SECTION IV ASSESSING VULNERABILITY AND RISK

Transcription

1 SECTION IV ASSESSING VULNERABILITY AND RISK

2 Describing vulnerability in terms of potential dollar loss provides the local government, the State and the federal government with a common framework with which to quantitatively measure the effects of hazards on the community and more accurately determine the benefit-cost ratio of investments in mitigation activities. It is an essential component to risk assessment and the ability to implement a strategy to prevent or reduce future losses. In Florida, it is a vital tool for decision-makers who must make the sometimes difficult decisions regarding growthmanagement, land development regulations, and funding for infrastructure and mitigation projects. Data Source Reference - Natural Hazards, Table 4.2, and Data Source Reference Man-Made Hazards, Table 4.3, list available data for hazards identified in this document. A. RISK ANALYSIS In this section the hazards, listed in Chapter 3 that affect Hillsborough County are defined in terms of the potential risk to population, property and cost of reconstruction. For each hazard a map has been created and the respective analysis performed by way of a multi-faceted approach that is described in the following Methodology portion of this section. One of the improved aspects of this update is the implementation of new resources used for the analysis. New Resources One of the major aspects of the 2015 update to the is the utilization of many new resources. One of these major sources is from the Southern Wildfire Risk Assessment Portal (SouthWRAP) to conduct wildfire assessment. The complete results of the 50 page analysis are found in Appendix P of this LMS document. This is considered a major asset of the plan being that Hillsborough County has a significant Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) and therefore needs to address mitigation techniques to prepare for wildfires. As a means of citation for the various resources used for the risk analysis, Table 4.1 is provided on the following page. The table cites the various resources used and their respective web site URL for future reference purposes. Page IV-2

3 Table 4.1: Risk Analysis Resources Risk\Threat Data Source URL Year Civil Disturbance Department of Homeland Security Coastal Oil Spill Environmental Protection Agency Coastal - Riverine Erosion Florida Department of Environmental Protection Dam\Levee Failure USACE National Levee Database Drought US Drought Portal Exotic Pests Florida Invasive Species Partnership Extreme Temperature National Climate Data Center Flooding FEMA Flood Map Service Center Hazardous Material Spill Florida Division of Emergency Management National Transportation Safety Board Hurricanes NWS National Hurricane Center Infrastructure Disruption\Utility Failure Florida Public Service Commission Hillsborough County Public Utilities Mass Migration US Customs and Border Protection Nuclear Power Plant USNRC List of Power Reactor Units Pandemic Centers for Disease Control - FluAid Port Vessel Collision NOAA - Port Tomorrow Planning Tool Sinkholes Florida Department of Environmental Protection Special Events Hillsborough County Sheriff - Tampa Police No specific database 2014 Terrorism Department of Homeland Security Thunderstorm National Climate Data Center Tornadoes National Climate Data Center Transportation Incident National Transportation Safety Board Tsunami National Geophysical Data Center Volcano National Geophysical Data Center Wildfire Southern Wildfire Risk Analysis Portal Winter Storm National Climate Data Center Page IV-3

4 B. METHODOLOGY The hazard risk analysis for Hillsborough County was performed under a dual methodology approach. As a means of replacement of the MEMPHIS data utilized in the 2009 Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS), two independent analysis were utilized in the 2015 update. These analysis were subsequently evaluated for a comparison in determination of the risk severity for Hillsborough County. The two separate analysis include a risk analysis performed utilizing data obtained from the Hillsborough County Property Appraiser and one performed using the FEMA risk analysis tool, HAZUS. Hillsborough County Property Appraiser Data s and Structures The first hazard analysis was performed using data maintained by the Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. The Geomatics Section of Hillsborough County Public Works in cooperation with the Hazard Mitigation Section established a matrix of parameters (see matrix and other risk tables at the end of this section) which was used to both establish the current conditions in Hillsborough County as well as the expected threat conditions the County might face. Current conditions were identified by separating existing structures by occupancy and usage (i.e. single family residential, mobile home, multi-family residential, commercial, and industrial, etc.) These classifications were subsequently broken down into temporal periods based on revisions of the building codes historically in use in the State of Florida and Hillsborough County. This timeline resulted in eight (8) separate time categories ranging from those structures built prior to 1980 to those constructed within 2015 up until the date the analysis was run in March of 2015; thereby allowing a very current estimate of the data. Separating the construction periods based on date ranges allows for a discrete evaluation based on what building codes were in effect at the time of construction. In doing so allows for precise evaluation for specific dates such as those structure built prior to the inception of the Florida Code in 2001 (effective March 1, 2002), the date in 2004 when Florida Product Approval first was implemented, changes in the wind speed maps of the Florida Code including changes to the Wind Bone Debris Region (WBDR) and finally aspects such as the most recent implementation of structures being rated based on Risk Category and the resultant higher wind construction specifications required for structures of greater risk (i.e. greater significance to the community). In addition to the separation of the matrix based on the occupancy of structures and the date of construction, the matrix allows for the analysis based on distinctive types of construction including the materials and engineering used for the structural components of the building as well as the roof design of the structures. In its entirety, the matrix establishes discrete conditions for eight (8) unique building uses\occupancies; eight (8) time frames of construction separated by years of respective building code implementation; six (6) different classifications of wall\structural methods by which Page IV-4

5 the building is comprised and five (5) unique roofing types classified by design and components used to construct the roof. By establishing a complex series of possible combinations, the data; all of which is current and maintained by the Hillsborough County Property Appraiser, allows for very precise and distinct evaluation of the current conditions of Hillsborough County based on specific evaluation of the structures found in Hillsborough County and not an tire broad-based approach of grouping that could lead to erroneous assumptions. The thought process behind an elaborate risk matrix being that two structures in close geographic vicinity could undergo different effects of any given risk event (wind, flood, etc.) based on the time they were built. Comparatively, two structures in close geographic vicinity with different roof types could undergo different effects from any given risk event even though they may have been constructed under the same building code. While the basic parameters of the Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) may not always require such distinctive and discrete evaluation, the concept behind such precision established at this point allows for future development and enhancement as needs arise. Municipalities and Geography A critical distinction of the matrix identification of structures is the geographic separation of where a structure is located including identification of being within the municipalities incorporated as part of the 2015 LMS update. These municipalities in addition to unincorporated Hillsborough County include; the City of Tampa, the City of Temple Terrace and the City of Plant City. The distinction of the data set as described in the matrix is identical for each of the municipalities as it was detailed previously for Hillsborough County. This separation allows for a discrete evaluation of structures within each respective municipality as well as the larger countywide area. In addition to separation by municipality, a geographical aspect was incorporated into the matrix. This geographical separation was established with parameters including the isotachs (lines of equal wind speed) established by the Florida Code to determine respective wind speed for construction standards. Eight (8) unique regions were created including those within the Wind-Borne Debris Region (WBDR), outside of the WBDR, and areas within additional wind speed rating areas ranging from 130 mph to 150 mph. These parameters are effective for evaluating structures based on possible hurricane or high wind events. In order to address possible flood concerns, geographic regions were established and incorporated into the matrix. These regions include areas based on hurricane storm surge flooding for all of the respective hurricane categories from 1 through 5. Areas identified as National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Repetitive Loss are also identified as well as those identified as being at risk for potential erosion. Both coastal erosion, areas within the FEMA NFIP V-zone (velocity zone) as well as areas identified as riverine erosion are classified. Once again, all of these geographical separation can be individually evaluated by municipality for both a wind and\or flood event. Page IV-5

6 Other Risks One of the most basic yet important results of creating a risk analysis using in-house data is the ability to evaluate for risks that might not otherwise be available for study in a pre-packaged risk analysis tool. Hillsborough County has gone to great lengths to incorporate additional risk above and beyond the traditional natural hazards risks commonly identified in a Local Mitigation Strategy. These include hazards such as sinkholes, hazardous chemical spills from both fixed facilities and transportation routes and dam or levee failures for the human-made water retention structures found within the County. Utilizing the same matrix provides the ability to not only identify the number of homes within a given municipality that might be affected but also determine the date of construction for the quantity of those given structures. Parameters such as this are critical in determining how some structures and their respective occupants may endure any given event. This is especially critical in a no-notice event such as a chemical spill or sinkhole where advance warning and preparation such as those made during the time before a hurricane can be done. HAZUS As a means of both secondary information as well as a comparison to the hazard analysis performed using Hillsborough County Property Appraiser data, the HAZUS software was utilized to run an analysis of Hillsborough County. Two separate HAZUS reports were generated. The first was obtained from the State of Florida Department of Emergency Management portal. A HAZUS report entitled HAZUS_Probabilistic_Hurricane_Assessment_Summary was generated by Richard Butgereit on 11/6/2014 and placed in the Hillsborough County file for usage. This 206 page report was downloaded as a PDF and its contents reviewed for analysis. Subsequently, a HAZUS analysis was run on April 2, 2015 by Hillsborough County. Conducting a second HAZUS analysis allowed for several measures to be achieved including confirmation of both similarities and differences between the two HAZUS analysis as well as a control measure method for the analysis generated by the results from the usage of the Hillsborough County Property Appraiser data. In addition, having multiple HAZUS reports generated allowed for an update of the data results based on the February 6, 2015 release of the new HAZUS-MH 2.2 and subsequent updated data sets which accompanied the release. Being that the first HAZUS report was generated on 11/6/2014, members of the Hillsborough County Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group decided that multiple analysis might provide a better means of evaluation should any of the data have changed. Page IV-6

7 C. Risk Analysis Quantitative Data The aforementioned risk analysis produced a significant amount of quantitative data. The following tables provide an example of the numerical data derived from the analysis. These tables were the results from the evaluation run from the large matrix developed which was described in the aforementioned Methodology section. All of these tables have been included at the end of this section as some spreadsheets are of considerable size and warrant larger page size dimensioning. D. Risk Analysis Maps The following pages contain the collection of maps derived from the risk analysis conducted for Hillsborough County. Numerous maps were created and this comprehensive set graphically depict the results from the risk analysis matrix that was developed as part of Hillsborough County s risk analysis methodology described earlier. The map element in this section have been classified by their design classification. These classifications result in five (5) major map categories including, census based maps, community maps, critical facilities, hazard vulnerability and structural maps based on geography. Census Based Maps The maps in this section depict the data associated with a particular set of residents of Hillsborough County. This data was deemed vital during the 2015 LMS update as one of the goals of the update was to identify how vulnerable populations might be addressed as part of the mitigation strategy. Knowing where individuals of vulnerable populations resided within Hillsborough County was the first step in being able to address their needs when facing any respective risk. Page IV-7

8 FIGURE 4.1: AGED 65 AND OVER DENSITY FIGURE 4.2: DISABLED DENSITY Page IV-8

9 FIGURE 4.3: LANGUAGE ISOLATION DENSITY FIGURE 4.4: MINORITY DENSITY Page IV-9

10 FIGURE 4.5: POVERTY DENSITY FIGURE 4.6: SINGLE PARENT DENSITY Page IV-10

11 FIGURE 4.7: TOTAL POPULATION DENSITY Page IV-11

12 Community Maps Community maps represent those elements that make-up the social, environmental and infrastructure components of Hillsborough County. Providing a graphical representation of these items aids in disseminating the information to the citizens of what comprises the characteristics of the County. In doing so, the disciplines of planning, mitigation and resiliency can be presented. FIGURE 4.8: PLAN AREAS, OVERLAY AND SPECIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Page IV-12

13 FIGURE 4.9: MUNICIPALITIES AND COMMUNITY AREAS FIGURE 4.10: EXISTING LAND USES Page IV-13

14 FIGURE 4.11: FUTURE LAND USES - JURISDICTIONS FIGURE 4.12: FUTURE LAND USES UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH CO. Page IV-14

15 FIGURE 4.13: GREENWAY TRAILS FIGURE 4.14: ROADS AND RAILROADS Page IV-15

16 FIGURE 4.15: SIGNIFICANT WILDLIFE HABITAT FIGURE 4.16: WETLANDS AND WATER BODIES Page IV-16

17 Critical Facilities Maps Critical facilities maps are those maps that depict the geographical location of those facilities and structures which play vital roles in the daily operations of the County. These can include locations such as communication centers, transportation hubs, law enforcement stations and even schools; many of which may serve as evacuation shelters in time of an emergency event. FIGURE 4.17: AIRPORTS Page IV-17

18 FIGURE 4.18: COMMUNICATIONS FIGURE 4.19: FEDERAL AND STATE FACILITIES Page IV-18

19 FIGURE 4.20: FIRE AND RESCUE FACILITIES FIGURE 4.21: HOSPITAL AND CLINIC FACILITIES Page IV-19

20 FIGURE 4.22: LAW ENFORCEMENT FACILITIES FIGURE 4.23: LOCAL GOVERNMENT FACILITIES Page IV-20

21 FIGURE 4.24: NURSING HOMES, HOSPICE AND ASSISTED LIVING FACILITIES FIGURE : SCHOOLS Page IV-21

22 FIGURE 4.25: SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) FACILITIES Page IV-22

23 Hazard Vulnerability Maps The hazard vulnerability maps depict those risks; both natural and human-made that can pose a threat to the citizens of Hillsborough County. The graphical as well as geospatial presentation of these risks in an illustrative format is vital to residents understanding the risks they may face based on their location within the County. Having the risk analysis presented in the form of a map can be extremely effective in conveying the risk analysis message. FIGURE 4.30: HAZARDOUS MATERIAL RISK BOUNDARIES Page IV-23

24 FIGURE 4.31: SINKHOLE WITH 1 MILE BUFFER FIGURE : SINKHOLE AREA BY COVER LAYER Page IV-24

25 FIGURE 4.32: DAM AND LEVEE LOCATION AND INUNDATION AREA FIGURE 4.33: REPETITIVE FLOOD LOSS DENSITY Page IV-25

26 FIGURE 4.34: WILDFIRE RISK FIGURE 4.35: KARST GEOLOGY Page IV-26

27 FIGURE 4.36: MUCK SOILS FIGURE 4.37: NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFIP) FLOODZONES Page IV-27

28 FIGURE 4.38: RAILROADS 1 MILE BUFFER FIGURE 4.39: RIVERINE AND COASTAL EROSION Page IV-28

29 FIGURE 4.40: SHIPPING CHANNEL 2 MILE BUFFER FIGURE 4.41: STORM SURGE SIGNS Page IV-29

30 FIGURE 4.42: STORM SURGE CHEMICAL SITES FIGURE 4.43: TRUCK ROUTES 1 MILE BUFFER Page IV-30

31 FIGURE 4.44: URBAN SERVICE AREAS FIGURE 4.45: WIND MAP OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE HISTORICAL ISOTACHS Page IV-31

32 FIGURE : DANGEROUS ANIMALS Page IV-32

33 FIGURE 4.46: WIND BORNE DEBRIS REGION Page IV-33

34 FIGURE 4.47: EVACUATIONS ZONES 1 & 2 Page IV-34

35 FIGURE 4.48: EVACUATION ZONES 3, 4 & 5 Page IV-35

36 Structural Maps The final section of maps of the 2015 is comprised of structural maps. These maps depict the various occupancy type structures (i.e. residential, commercial, etc.) within the spatial context of the geography of Hillsborough County. Included in this spatial relationship are characteristics such as the date the structure was built and its location in regards to the wind speed lines established by the Florida Code. Developing a visual tool of this spatial and temporal relationship allows for users of the LMS to determine what areas of the County might be affected by any given risk or threat event based on the location of the event in the region. This series of maps also is delineated by each of the municipalities within the Hillsborough County area. FIGURE 4.49: HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BUILD DATE Page IV-36

37 FIGURE 4.50: HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY CRITICAL FACILITIES FIGURE 4.51: HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES Page IV-37

38 FIGURE 4.52: HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY GOVERNMENT & INSTITUTIONAL FIGURE 4.53: HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY INDUSTRIAL Page IV-38

39 FIGURE 4.54: HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY MOBILE HOMES FIGURE 4.55: HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY MULTI-FAMILY Page IV-39

40 FIGURE : HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SINGLE FAMILY FIGURE 4.56: CITY OF TAMPA BUILD DATE Page IV-40

41 FIGURE 4.57: CITY OF PLANT CITY BUILD DATE FIGURE 4.58: CITY OF TEMPLE TERRACE BUILD DATE Page IV-41

42 E. RISK ANALYSIS RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROGRAMS Emergency Management Standard by the Emergency Management Accreditation Program (EMAP) The Emergency Management Standard by the Emergency Management Accreditation Program is designed as a tool for continuous improvement as part of voluntary accreditation. The City of Tampa and the Office of Emergency Management of unincorporated Hillsborough County are working to achieve this certification throughout 2015 and While the information contained within the 2015 Local Mitigation Strategy update will be beneficial in the efforts to achieve EMAP certification, the impact results of the risk analysis are unchanged by the certification process. Urban Strategic Initiative Area (UASI) & Threat Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) The Urban Strategic Initiative Area and Threat Hazard Identification Risk Assessment; both FEMA sponsored programs, work to address common risk assessment process that helps the whole community including individuals, businesses, faith-based organizations, nonprofit groups, schools and academia and all levels of government understand its risks and estimate capability requirements. While the information contained within the 2015 Local Mitigation Strategy update will be beneficial in the efforts to for UASI and THIRA implementation, the impact results of the risk analysis are unchanged by the participation in these two endeavors. Page IV-42

43 F. SECTION IV: SOURCES AND OTHER INFORMATION Primary data sourcing includes the Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. Additional data used is referenced in Table 4.1 on page IV SECTION IV: FIGURES AND TABLES Table 4.1 Hazard Analysis Reference Table IV-3 Figure 4.1 Aged 65 and Over Density IV-8 Figure 4.2 Disabled Density IV-8 Figure 4.3 Language Isolation Density IV-9 Figure 4.4 Minority Density IV-9 Figure 4.5 Poverty Density IV-10 Figure 4.6 Single Parent Density IV-10 Figure 4.7 Total Population Density IV-11 Figure 4.8 Plan Areas, Overlays and Special Zoning Districts IV-12 Figure 4.9 Municipalities and Community Areas IV-13 Figure 4.10 Existing Land Uses IV-13 Figure 4.11 Future Land Uses Jurisdictions IV-14 Figure 4.12 Future Land Uses Unincorporated Hillsborough County IV-14 Figure 4.13 Greenway Trails IV-15 Figure 4.14 Roads and Railroads IV-15 Figure 4.15 Significant Wildlife Habitat IV-16 Figure 4.16 Wetlands and Water Bodies IV-16 Figure 4.17 Airports IV-17 Figure 4.18 Communications IV-18 Figure 4.19 Federal and State Facilities IV-18 Figure 4.20 Fire and Rescue Facilities IV-19 Figure 4.21 Hospital and Clinic Facilities IV-19 Figure 4.22 Law Enforcement Facilities IV-20 Figure 4.23 Local Government Facilities IV-20 Figure 4.24 Nursing Homes, Hospice and Assisted Living Facilities IV-21 Figure Schools IV-21 Figure 4.25 SWFWMD Facilities IV-22 Figure 4.30 Hazardous Materials Risk Boundaries IV-23 Figure 4.31 Sinkhole With 1 Mile Buffer IV-23 Figure Sinkhole Area by Cover Layer IV-24 Figure 4.32 Dam and Levee Location and Inundation Area IV-25 Figure 4.33 Repetitive Flood Loss IV-25 Figure 4.34 Wildfire Risk IV-26 Figure 4.35 Karst Geology IV-26 Figure 4.36 Muck Soils IV-27 Figure 4.37 National Flood Insurance Program Floodzones IV-27 Figure 4.38 Railroads 1 Mile Buffer IV-28 Figure 4.39 Riverine and Coastal Erosion IV-28 Figure 4.40 Shipping Channel 2 Mile Buffer IV-29 Figure 4.41 Storm Surge Signs IV-29 Figure 4.42 Storm Surge Chemical Sites IV-30 Page IV-43

44 Figure 4.43 Truck Routes 1 Mile Buffer IV-30 Figure 4.44 Urban Service Areas IV-31 Figure 4.45 Wind Map of Florida Code Historical Isotachs IV-31 Figure Dangerous Animals IV-32 Figure 4.46 Wind Borne Debris Region IV-33 Figure 4.47 Evacuation Zones 1 & 2 IV-34 Figure 4.48 Evacuation Zones 3, 4 & 5 IV-35 Figure 4.49 Hillsborough County Build Date IV-36 Figure 4.50 Hillsborough County Critical Facilities IV-37 Figure 4.51 Hillsborough County Commercial Properties IV-37 Figure 4.52 Hillsborough County Government & Institutional IV-38 Figure 4.53 Hillsborough County Industrial IV-38 Figure 4.54 Hillsborough County Mobile Homes IV-39 Figure 4.55 Hillsborough County Multi-Family IV-39 Figure Hillsborough County Single Family IV-40 Figure 4.56 City of Tampa Build Date IV-40 Figure 4.57 City of Plant City Build Date IV-41 Figure 4.58 City of Temple Terrace IV-41 Page IV-44

45 2. SECTION IV: DATA TABLES The following pages contain all the data tables created as part of the matrix development described in the Methodology section. Some tables are of considerable size so varying page dimensions occur. Page IV-45

46 Hillsborough County Risk Analysis Data Tables Characteristics - (Hillsborough County - Unincorporated) s Totals Total Values PA Class Code: A PA Class Code: B PA Class Code: C PA Class Code: D PA Class Code: S PA Class Code: Other Roof Type: Concrete Roof Type: Flat or Shed Roof Type: Hip or Gable Roof Type: Irregular Roof Type: Truss or Frame SF Res Pre $4,360,065, $4,101,646, $3,111,539, $2,073,742, $2,540,021, $3,373,727, $588,354, $460,769, Mobile Home Pre $67,345, $92,189, $78,380, $55,968, $35,599, $31,438, $4,527, $1,761, Multi-Family Res Pre $603,578, $1,146,024, $503,389, $696,898, $324,431, $439,020, $88,946, $74,761, Agricultural Pre Commercial Pre $403,007, $833,400, $488,563, $483,908, $295,914, $641,428, $48,689, $29,729, Industrial Pre $367,595, $536,820, $119,702, $246,761, $79,950, $282,679, $8,157, $2,372, Critical Facilities Pre $183,998, $35,092, $188,157, $77,689, $99,387, $215,860, $18,021, $ Gov/Instit (non CF) Pre $538,016, $342,546, $216,284, $135,812, $224,166, $241,443, $30,877, $18,637,

47 Hillsborough County Risk Analysis Data Tables Characteristics - (City of Tampa) s Totals Total Values PA Class Code: A PA Class Code: B PA Class Code: C PA Class Code: D PA Class Code: S PA Class Code: Other Roof Type: Concrete Roof Type: Flat or Shed Roof Type: Hip or Gable Roof Type: Irregular Roof Type: Truss or Frame SF Res Pre $3,269,756, $731,782, $852,498, $698,115, $813,959, $1,245,509, $209,894, $141,485, Mobile Home Pre $7,424, $859, $693, $839, $1,151, $456, $68, $30, Multi-Family Res Pre $585,891, $812,235, $397,055, $355,339, $197,709, $1,085,462, $89,394, $19,002, Agricultural Pre Commercial Pre $990,824, $1,482,176, $395,614, $391,077, $123,352, $372,077, $36,117, $16,648, Industrial Pre $279,492, $106,258, $12,946, $19,438, $6,687, $16,867, $11,693, $3,004, Critical Facilities Pre $370,245, $48,271, $64,782, $27,517, $28,899, $12,891, $122, $ Gov/Instit (non CF) Pre $926,943, $707,632, $287,897, $406,471, $205,363, $148,672, $24,426, $41,091,

48 Hillsborough County Risk Analysis Data Tables Characteristics - (City of Plant City) s Totals Total Values PA Class Code: A PA Class Code: B PA Class Code: C PA Class Code: D PA Class Code: S PA Class Code: Other Roof Type: Concrete Roof Type: Flat or Shed Roof Type: Hip or Gable Roof Type: Irregular Roof Type: Truss or Frame SF Res Pre $152,398, $152,385, $98,502, $47,612, $30,784, $73,501, $10,996, $8,874, Mobile Home Pre $1,791, $498, $186, $85, $53, $57, $79, $ Multi-Family Res Pre $13,673, $42,062, $18,043, $26,330, $342, $774, $ $ Agricultural Pre Commercial Pre $44,640, $29,435, $22,374, $11,901, $17,589, $20,673, $1,661, $1,588, Industrial Pre $30,041, $81,481, $49,372, $25,521, $8,254, $7,848, $299, $ Critical Facilities Pre $18,596, $21,944, $7,018, $ $358, $1,543, $ $ Gov/Instit (non CF) Pre $67,861, $19,000, $7,176, $1,660, $10,517, $8,723, $ $1,407,

49 Hillsborough County Risk Analysis Data Tables Characteristics - (City of Temple Terrace) s Totals Total Values PA Class Code: A PA Class Code: B PA Class Code: C PA Class Code: D PA Class Code: S PA Class Code: Other Roof Type: Concrete Roof Type: Flat or Shed Roof Type: Hip or Gable Roof Type: Irregular Roof Type: Truss or Frame SF Res Pre $264,274, $157,725, $23,709, $20,686, $19,242, $37,223, $1,184, $2,061, Mobile Home Pre $50, $ $ $ $ $ $17, $ Multi-Family Res Pre $57,896, $76,598, $14,687, $30,429, $8,947, $20,458, $ $ Agricultural Pre Commercial Pre $31,026, $75,519, $31,719, $31,500, $7,459, $34,077, $1,048, $683, Industrial Pre $291, $6,390, $892, $608, $1,287, $ $ $ Critical Facilities Pre $12,532, $603, $ $ $4,035, $ $ $ Gov/Instit (non CF) Pre $34,371, $11,000, $3,534, $ $415, $1,670, $ $

50 Hillsborough County Risk Analysis Data Tables Characteristics - Hillsborough County - Unincorporated s Totals Total Values SF Res Tampa Plant City Temple Terrace Totals Total Values Totals Total Values Totals Total Values Pre $4,360,065, $3,269,756, $152,398, $264,274, $4,101,646, $731,782, $152,385, $157,725, $3,111,539, $852,498, $98,502, $23,709, $2,073,742, $698,115, $47,612, $20,686, $2,540,021, $813,959, $30,784, $19,242, $3,373,727, $1,245,509, $73,501, $37,223, $588,354, $209,894, $10,996,231 9 $1,184, $460,769, $141,485, $8,874, $2,061,670 Mobile Home Pre $67,345, $7,424, $1,791,834 3 $50, $92,189, $859, $498,108 0 $ $78,380, $693,849 7 $186,813 0 $ $55,968, $839,098 5 $85,442 0 $ $35,599, $1,151,180 3 $53,733 0 $ $31,438, $456,223 2 $57,697 0 $ $4,527,373 3 $68,513 2 $79,678 1 $17, $1,761,653 3 $30,247 2 $0 0 $0 Multi-Family Res Pre $603,578, $585,891, $13,673, $57,896, $1,146,024, $812,235, $42,062, $76,598, $503,389, $397,055, $18,043, $14,687, $696,898, $355,339, $26,330, $30,429, $324,431, $197,709,934 5 $342,724 2 $8,947, $439,020, $1,085,462, $774, $20,458, $88,946, $89,394,137 0 $0 0 $ $74,761, $19,002,357 8 $0 0 $0 Agricultural Pre Commercial Pre $403,007, $990,824, $44,640, $31,026, $833,400, $1,482,176, $29,435, $75,519, $488,563, $395,614, $22,374, $31,719, $483,908, $391,077, $11,901, $31,500, $295,914, $123,352, $17,589, $7,459, $641,428, $372,077, $20,673, $34,077, $48,689, $36,117,345 6 $1,661,885 1 $1,048, $29,729, $16,648,557 5 $1,588,537 8 $683,354 Industrial Pre $367,595, $279,492, $30,041,075 1 $291, $536,820, $106,258, $81,481,293 9 $6,390, $119,702, $12,946, $49,372,020 2 $892, $246,761, $19,438, $25,521,123 2 $608, $79,950, $6,687, $8,254,465 5 $1,287, $282,679, $16,867, $7,848,531 0 $ $8,157, $11,693,365 2 $299,484 0 $ $2,372,910 5 $3,004,160 0 $0 0 $0 Critical Facilities Pre $183,998, $370,245, $18,596,451 9 $12,532, $35,092, $48,271,164 4 $21,944,113 3 $603, $188,157,568 7 $64,782,312 4 $7,018,400 0 $ $77,689,655 7 $27,517,485 0 $0 0 $ $99,387,175 5 $28,899,766 1 $358,093 2 $4,035, $215,860,595 7 $12,891,052 7 $1,543,124 0 $ $18,021,954 2 $122,673 0 $0 0 $ $0 6 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Gov/Instit (non CF) Pre $538,016, $926,943, $67,861, $34,371, $342,546, $707,632, $19,000,139 8 $11,000, $216,284, $287,897, $7,176,472 4 $3,534, $135,812, $406,471,249 9 $1,660,010 0 $ $224,166, $205,363, $10,517,137 1 $415, $241,443, $148,672, $8,723,606 7 $1,670, $30,877, $24,426,076 0 $0 0 $ $18,637, $41,091,963 1 $1,407,735 0 $

51 Hillsborough County Risk Analysis Data Tables Wind and Flood Risks - (Hillsborough County - Unincorporated) s Totals 120 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - East of Bndy 120 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - West of Bndy 130 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - East of Bndy 130 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - West of Bndy 140 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - East of Bndy 140 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - Wast of Bndy 150 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - East of Bndy SF Res Pre Mobile Home Pre Multi-Family Res Pre Agricultural Pre Commercial Pre Industrial Pre Critical Facilities Pre Gov/Instit (non CF) Pre Census Total Pop Minority Over Disabled Poverty Lang. Isolated Single Parent MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - West of Bndy Repetitive Loss Areas Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Category 1 Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Categories 1 to 2 Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Categories 1 to 3 Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Categories 1 to 4 Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Categories 1 to 5 Coastal Erosion Areas (VE zones) Riverine Erosion Areas

52 Hillsborough County Risk Analysis Data Tables Wind and Flood Risks - (City of Tampa) s Totals 120 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - East of Bndy 120 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - West of Bndy 130 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - East of Bndy 130 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - West of Bndy 140 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - East of Bndy 140 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - Wast of Bndy 150 MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - East of Bndy SF Res Pre Mobile Home Pre Multi-Family Res Pre Agricultural Pre Commercial Pre Industrial Pre Critical Facilities Pre Gov/Instit (non CF) Pre Census Total Pop Minority Over Disabled Poverty Lang. Isolated Single Parent MPH Wind- Borne Debris & Hurr. Vul. Zone - West of Bndy Repetitive Loss Areas Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Category 1 Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Categories 1 to 2 Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Categories 1 to 3 Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Categories 1 to 4 Hurricane Stormsurge Flooding: Categories 1 to 5 Coastal Erosion Areas (VE zones) Riverine Erosion Areas