Transportation Noise Assessment. 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Transportation Noise Assessment. 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive. Ottawa, Ontario"

Transcription

1 Transportation Noise Assessment 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE Traffic Noise REV 1 Prepared For: Ontario Inc. Roberto Campagna 24 George Street West Ottawa, Ontario K1S 3J2 Prepared By: Thomas Couper, B.A.Sc., Project Manager Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Associate April 9, Walgreen Road, Ottawa, Ontario K0A 1L0 T (613) F (613)

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document describes a transportation noise assessment performed for a proposed four-storey condominium development in Ottawa, Ontario. The buildings will rise 14 meters above local grade. Figure 1 illustrates a site plan with surrounding context. The major sources of roadway noise affecting the development is traffic along Fifth Avenue and Queen Elizabeth Drive. For clarity within this report, the north and south buildings have been labelled Building A and Building B, respectively. The assessment is based on: (i) theoretical noise prediction methods that conform to the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) and City of Ottawa requirements; (ii) noise level criteria as specified by the City of Ottawa s Environmental Noise Control Guidelines (ENCG); (iii) future vehicular traffic volumes based on the City of Ottawa s Official Plan roadway classifications; and (iv) architectural drawings received from Barry J. Hobin & Associates Architects Incorporated. The results of the current study indicate that noise levels due to roadway traffic over the site will range between 32 and 68 dba during the daytime period (07:00-23:00) and between 25 and 60 dba during the nighttime period (23:00-07:00). The highest traffic noise levels will occur along the east side of the development, nearest to Queen Elizabeth Drive. Minimum building construction in all areas is required to satisfy the Ontario Building Code (2012). In addition, the following Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings are required for building components where noise levels exceed 65 dba (see Figures 4 and 5). (i) (ii) Bedroom Windows Bedroom windows on Building A facing east, and Building B facing east and south, will require a minimum STC of 31 All other bedroom windows are to satisfy Ontario Building Code (OBC 2012) requirements (i) (ii) Living Room Windows Living room windows on Building A facing east, and Building B facing east and south, will require a minimum STC of 26 All other living room windows are to satisfy Ontario Building Code (OBC 2012) requirements 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment i

3 (i) Exterior Walls Exterior wall components on the east façades require a minimum STC of 45 which will be achieved with brick cladding or an acoustical equivalent according to NRC test data 1 A review of window supplier literature indicates that the specified STC ratings can be achieved by a variety of window systems having a combination of glass thickness and inter-pane spacing. We have not specified any particular window configurations, as there are several manufacturers and various combinations of window components that will offer the necessary sound attenuation rating. However, it is the responsibility of the manufacturer to ensure that the specified window achieves the required STC. This can only be assured by using window configurations that have been certified by laboratory testing. The requirements for STC ratings assume that the remaining components of the building are constructed and installed according to the minimum standards of the Ontario Building Code. The specified STC requirements also apply to swinging and/or sliding patio doors. All specified building components will require review by a qualified acoustical engineer for conformance to the recommendations of this report prior to building permit application. In addition to upgraded windows, the installation of individual air conditioning units (or similar mechanical system) will be required for all units. Warning Clause (Type D 2 ) will also be required in all Agreements of Lease, Purchase and Sale, as outlined in Section 6 of this report. According to the ENCG, if occupants of the condominium are not afforded a common outdoor amenity area, any balconies/terraces are considered an outdoor living area provided they are at least 4 meters in depth, uncovered and exterior to the building. OLA receptors were placed at select terrace locations on the 4 th floor that met the aforementioned criteria. Although all balconies/terraces will have a 1.1 meter guardrail surrounding the exposed perimeter (as per OBC requirements), some guardrails have been architecturally designed using stone, while others are glass. Where noise levels on specific 4 th floor terraces are above the ENCG criteria, it is not architecturally feasible to replace the guardrail with a noise screen in excess of 1.1 meters in height. As such, for select terraces on the 4 th floor that currently incorporate a glass guardrail, it is recommended that a sealed glass screen of 1.1 meters in height be installed. Balconies/terraces that incorporate a stone guardrail do not require additional construction elements as this design is sufficient. 1 J.S. Bradley and J.A. Birta. Laboratory Measurements of the Sound Insulation of Building Façade Elements, National Research Council October ENCG Table Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment ii

4 Furthermore, Warning Clauses Type A 3 and Type B 4 will be required for select units, as tabulated in Table 8 in Section 5.3. Once floor plans have been finalized, specific Warning Clauses can be applied to individual units. 3 Ministry of the Environment Publication NPC Ministry of the Environment Publication NPC Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment iii

5 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE 1 3. OBJECTIVES 2 4. METHODOLOGY Background Roadway Traffic Noise Criteria for Roadway Traffic Noise Roadway Traffic Volumes Theoretical Roadway Noise Predictions Indoor Noise Calculations 6 5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Roadway Noise Levels STC Requirements Noise Barrier Calculation 9 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 FIGURES APPENDICES: Appendix A STAMSON 5.04 Input and Output Data 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment iv

6 1. INTRODUCTION Gradient Wind Engineering Inc. (GWE) was retained by Bassi Construction Ltd. on behalf of to undertake a transportation noise assessment of a proposed condominium development in Ottawa, Ontario. This report summarizes the methodology, results and recommendations related to a roadway traffic noise. GWE s scope of work involved assessing exterior and interior noise levels generated by local roadway traffic. The assessment was performed on the basis of theoretical noise calculation methods conforming to the City of Ottawa 5 and Ministry of the Environment 6 guidelines. Noise calculations were based on architectural drawings received from Barry J. Hobin & Associates Architects Incorporated, with future traffic volumes corresponding to the City of Ottawa s Official Plan (OP) roadway classifications. 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE The focus of this transportation noise assessment is a proposed four-storey condominium. The development is located along Queen Elizabeth Drive, between Fourth Avenue and Fifth Avenue. The major sources of noise in the area is traffic along Fifth Avenue and Queen Elizabeth Drive. The site is surrounded with residential developments to the north, south and west. Figure 1 illustrates a complete site plan with surrounding context. For clarity within this report, the north and south buildings have been labelled Building A and Building B, respectively. Upon completion, the development will rise 14 meters above local grade. There are no common outdoor amenity areas. Most units have individual balconies/terraces. Only a select few terraces on the 4 th floor are deeper than 4 meters and are considered to be outdoor living areas (OLA) for the associated dwelling units, as there are no other common outdoor amenity spaces provided. 5 City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Control Guidelines, SS Wilson Associates, May 10, Ministry of the Environment Publication NPC Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment 1

7 3. OBJECTIVES The main goals of this work are to: (i) calculate the future noise levels on the study building produced by local roadway traffic and (ii) ensure that interior noise levels do not exceed the allowable limits specified by the City of Ottawa s Environmental Noise Control Guidelines as outlined in Section 4.2 and 4.4 of this report. 4. METHODOLOGY 4.1 Background Noise can be defined as any obtrusive sound. It is created at a source, transmitted through a medium, such as air, and intercepted by a receiver. Noise may be characterized in terms of the power of the source or the sound pressure at a specific distance. While the power of a source is characteristic of that particular source, the sound pressure depends on the location of the receiver and the path that the noise takes to reach the receiver. Measurement of noise is based on the decibel unit, dba, which is a logarithmic ratio referenced to a standard noise level ( Pascals). The A suffix refers to a weighting scale, which better represents how the noise is perceived by the human ear. With this scale, a doubling of power results in a 3 dba increase in measured noise levels and is just perceptible to most people. An increase of 10 dba is often perceived to be twice as loud. 4.2 Roadway Traffic Noise Criteria for Roadway Traffic Noise For vehicle traffic, the equivalent sound energy level, L EQ, provides a measure of the time varying noise levels, which is well correlated with the annoyance of sound. It is defined as the continuous sound level, which has the same energy as a time varying noise level over a period of time. For roadways, the L EQ is commonly calculated on the basis of a 16-hour (L EQ16) daytime (07:00-23:00) / 8-hour (L EQ8) nighttime (23:00-07:00) split to assess its impact on residential buildings. The City of Ottawa s Environmental Noise Control Guidelines (ENCG) specifies that the recommended indoor noise limit range (that is relevant to this study) is 45 dba for living rooms and 40 dba for bedrooms, as listed in Table 1. Based on GWE s experience, more comfortable indoor noise levels should be targeted toward 42 dba and 37 dba respectively, to control peak noise and deficiencies in building envelope construction. 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment 2

8 TABLE 1: INDOOR SOUND LEVEL CRITERIA (ROAD & RAIL) 7 Type of Space Time Period Road L EQ (dba) General offices, reception areas, retail stores, etc. 07:00 23: Living/dining/den areas of residences, hospitals, schools, nursing/retirement homes, day-care centres, theatres, places of worship, libraries, individual or semi-private offices, conference rooms, etc. Rail 07:00 23: Sleeping quarters of hotels/motels 23:00 07: Sleeping quarters of residences, hospitals, nursing/retirement homes, etc. 23:00 07: Predicted noise levels at the plane of window (POW) and outdoor living area (OLA) dictate the action required to achieve the recommended sound levels. When noise levels at these areas exceed the criteria outlined in Table 2, specific outdoor, ventilation and Warning Clause requirements may apply. In addition, when noise levels exceed the criteria outlined in Table 3, upgraded building components must be designed. 7 Adapted from ENCG Table Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment 3

9 TABLE 2: ROAD & RAIL NOISE COMBINED OUTDOOR NOISE, VENTILATION AND WARNING CLAUSE REQUIREMENTS 8 Time Period L EQ (dba) Ventilation Requirements Outdoor Noise Control Measures Warning Clause Outdoor Living Area (OLA) L EQ(16hr) < 55 N/A Not required Not required Daytime 55 < L EQ(16hr) 60 N/A May not be required but should be considered Type A (07:00 23:00) L EQ(16hr) > 60 N/A Required to reduce the L EQ to below 60 dba and as close to 55 dba where feasible Type B Plane of Window (POW) L EQ(16hr) < 55 Not required N/A Not required Daytime (07:00 23:00) 55 < L EQ(16hr) 65 Forced air heating with provision for central air conditioning N/A Type C L EQ(16hr) > 65 Central air conditioning N/A Type D L EQ(8hr) < 50 Not required N/A Not required Nighttime (23:00 07:00) 50 < L EQ(8hr) 60 Forced air heating with provision for central air conditioning N/A Type C L EQ(8hr) > 60 Central air conditioning N/A Type D - Required if resultant L EQ exceeds 55 dba - Required if resultant L EQ exceeds 55 dba and if it is administratively, economically and/or technically feasible TABLE 3: ROAD & RAIL NOISE BUILDING COMPONENT REQUIREMENTS 9 Source L EQ (dba) Building Component Requirements Road Rail L EQ(16hr) > 65 (Daytime) L EQ(8hr) > 60 (Nighttime) L EQ(16hr) > 60 (Daytime) L EQ(8hr) > 55(Nighttime) Building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria 8 Adapted from ENCG Table Adapted from ENCG Table Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment 4

10 4.2.2 Roadway Traffic Volumes The ENCG dictates that noise calculations should consider future sound levels based on a roadway s classification at the mature state of development. Therefore, traffic volumes are based on the roadway classifications outlined in the City of Ottawa s Official Plan (OP) and Transportation Master Plan 10. Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes are then based on data in Table 1.7 of the ENCG for each roadway classification. Alternatively, the MOE and common industry practice recommends using existing traffic volumes projected to exist ten years into the future with an average annual growth rate of 2% per year. Table 4 summarizes the AADT values used for each roadway included in this assessment. To ensure compliance with the reasonable worst-case situation, the following steps were taken: Recent traffic-count data was acquired (where applicable) from the City of Ottawa and the Ministry of Transportation, upon which a growth rate of 2% per year was applied and extrapolated to the year of 2024 Traffic volumes based on roadway classification at mature state of development were obtained from Table 1.7 of the ENCG. The Transportation Master Plan Affordable 2031 Roadway Network provides additional details on future roadway expansions. In all cases, the higher of the Official Plan versus projected values were used to calculate future noise levels. Table 4 summarizes the AADT values used for each roadway included in this assessment. TABLE 4: ROADWAY TRAFFIC DATA Roadway Roadway Class Speed Limit (km/h) Official Plan AADT Available Traffic AADT From Count Year of Traffic AADT Projected 2024 AADT Fifth Avenue 2-UCU 40 8,000 N/A N/A N/A Queen Elizabeth Drive - Traffic volumes taken from the National Capital Commission N/A 60 N/A 8, , City of Ottawa Transportation Master Plan, November Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment 5

11 4.2.3 Theoretical Roadway Noise Predictions Noise predictions were performed with the aid of the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) computerized noise assessment program, STAMSON 5.04, for road and rail analysis. Appendix A includes the STAMSON 5.04 input and output data. Roadway noise calculations were performed by treating each road segment as separate line sources of noise, and by using existing building locations as noise barriers. In addition to the traffic volumes summarized in Table 4, theoretical noise predictions were based on the following parameters: Truck traffic on all roadways was taken to comprise 5% heavy trucks and 7% medium trucks The day/night split was taken to be 92% / 8% respectively for all streets Absorptive and reflective intermediate ground surfaces based on specific source-receiver path ground characteristics The study site was treated as having flat topography Noise receptors were strategically placed at 21 locations around the study area (see Figures 2 and 3). 4.3 Indoor Noise Calculations The difference between outdoor and indoor noise levels is the noise attenuation provided by the building envelope. According to common industry practice, complete walls and individual wall elements are rated according to the Sound Transmission Class (STC). The STC ratings of common residential walls built in conformance with the Ontario Building Code (2012) typically exceed STC 35, depending on exterior cladding, thickness and interior finish details. For example, brick veneered walls can achieve STC 55. Standard good quality double-glazed non-operable windows can have STC ratings ranging from 25 to 40 depending on the window manufacturer, pane thickness and inter-pane spacing. As previously mentioned, the windows are the known weak point in a partition. According to the ENCG, when daytime noise levels (from road and rail sources) at the plane of the window exceed 65 dba, calculations must be performed to evaluate the sound transmission quality of the building components to ensure acceptable indoor noise levels. The calculation procedure 11 considers: 11 Building Practice Note: Controlling Sound Transmission into Buildings by J.D. Quirt, National Research Council of Canada, September Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment 6

12 Window type and area as a percentage of total room floor area Exterior wall type and area as a percentage of the total room floor area Acoustic absorption characteristics of the room Outdoor noise source type and approach geometry Indoor sound level criteria, which varies according to the intended use of a space Based on published research 12, exterior walls possess specific sound attenuation characteristics that are used as a basis for calculating the required STC ratings of windows in the same partition. Due to the limited information available at the time of the study, which was prepared for site plan approval, detailed floor layouts have not been finalized; therefore, detailed STC calculations could not be performed at this time. As a guideline, the anticipated STC requirements for windows have been estimated based on the overall noise reduction required for each intended use of space (STC = outdoor noise level targeted indoor noise level). 5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 5.1 Roadway Noise Levels Appendix A contains the complete set of input and output data from all STAMSON 5.04 calculations. The results of the roadway noise calculations are summarized in Table 5 below. Receptor Number TABLE 5: EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS DUE TO ROAD TRAFFIC Plane of Window Receptor Location Noise Level (dba) Day Night 1 POW Building A 3 rd Floor North Side POW Building A 3 rd Floor East Side POW Building A 3 rd Floor South Side POW Building A 3 rd Floor East Side POW Building A 3 rd Floor South Side POW Building A 3 rd Floor West Side POW Building A 3 rd Floor West Side CMHC, Road & Rail Noise: Effects on Housing 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment 7

13 Receptor Number TABLE 5 (CONT D): EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS DUE TO ROAD TRAFFIC Plane of Window Receptor Location Noise Level (dba) Day Night 8 OLA Building A 1 st Floor West Side POW Building A 3 rd Floor East Side POW Building A 3 rd Floor East Side OLA Building A 4 th Floor East Side OLA Building A 4 th Floor East Side OLA Building A 4 th Floor East Side POW Building B 3rd Floor North Side POW Building B 3rd Floor East Side POW Building B 3rd Floor South Side POW Building B 3rd Floor West Side POW Building B 3 rd Floor East Side OLA Building B 4 th Floor East Side OLA Building B 4 th Floor South Side OLA Building B 4 th Floor - South Side The results of the current analysis indicate that noise levels will range between 32 and 68 dba during the daytime period (07:00-23:00) and between 25 and 60 dba during the nighttime period (23:00-07:00). The highest noise level (i.e. 68 dba) occurs on the east side (Receptor 2), which is closest to Queen Elizabeth Drive. 5.2 STC Requirements The noise levels predicted due to road traffic exceed the criteria listed in the ENCG for building components. As discussed in Section 4.3 the anticipated STC requirements for windows have been estimated based on the overall noise reduction required for each intended use of space (STC = outdoor noise level targeted indoor noise level). As per City of Ottawa requirements, detailed STC calculations will be required to be completed prior to building permit application for each unit type. The STC requirements for windows are summarized below for various units within the development (see Figures 4 and 5): 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment 8

14 (i) (ii) Bedroom Windows Bedroom windows on Building A facing east, and Building B facing east and south, will require a minimum STC of 31 All other bedroom windows are to satisfy Ontario Building Code (OBC 2012) requirements (i) (ii) Living Room Windows Living room windows on Building A facing east, and Building B facing east and south, will require a minimum STC of 26 All other living room windows are to satisfy Ontario Building Code (OBC 2012) requirements (i) Exterior Walls Exterior wall components on the east façades require a minimum STC of 45 which will be achieved with brick cladding or an acoustical equivalent according to NRC test data 13 Results of the calculations also indicate that all units will require individual air conditioning units, or similar mechanical ventilation, which will allow occupants to keep windows closed and maintain a comfortable living environment. In addition to ventilation requirements, Warning Clauses will also be required be placed on all Lease, Purchase and Sale Agreements, as summarized in Table 6 below. TABLE 6: SITE VENTILATION AND WARNING CLAUSE REQUIREMENTS Location Ventilation Requirements Warning Clause All Units Central Air Conditioning Type D 5.3 Noise Barrier Calculation According to the ENCG, if occupants of the condominium are not afforded a common outdoor amenity area, any balconies/terraces are considered an outdoor living area provided they are at least 4 meters in depth, uncovered and exterior to the building. OLA receptors were placed at select terrace locations on the 4 th floor that met the aforementioned criteria. Although all balconies/terraces will have a 1.1 meter guardrail surrounding the exposed perimeter (as per OBC requirements), some guardrails have been architecturally designed using stone, while others are glass. Where noise levels on specific terraces on 13 J.S. Bradley and J.A. Birta. Laboratory Measurements of the Sound Insulation of Building Façade Elements, National Research Council October Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment 9

15 the 4 th floor are above the ENCG criteria, it is not architecturally feasible to replace the guardrail with a noise screen in excess of 1.1 meters in height. As such, for terraces on the 4 th floor that currently incorporate a glass guardrail, it is recommended that a sealed glass screen of 1.1 meters in height be installed. Balconies/terraces that incorporate a stone guardrail do not require additional construction elements as this design is sufficient. Table 7 summarises the noise impacts on the outdoor living areas. Receptor Number TABLE 7: OUTDOOR LIVING AREA NOISE LEVELS (dba) No Barrier 1.1 Meter Sealed Guardrail Day Night Day Night N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (Not Applicable) Mitigation not required as noise levels are below ENCG criteria In addition to the recommendations above, Warning Clauses will be required for select units. As the floor plans have not currently been finalized, it is not possible to apply specific clauses to individual units. Table 8 below outlines the applicable Warning Clause for individual receptor locations. It is recommended that once floor plans have been finalized, each unit be referenced to the appropriate receptor for the specific Warning Clause. 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment 10

16 TABLE 8: RESULTS OF BARRIER INVESTIGATION Reference Receptors Location Warning Clause 8 Ground Floor Terrace N/A 11 4 th Floor Balcony Type A 12 4 th Floor Balcony Type A 13 4 th Floor Balcony Type B 19 4 th Floor Balcony Type B 20 4 th Floor Balcony Type B 21 4 th Floor Balcony N/A 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The results of the current study indicate that noise levels due to roadway traffic over the site will range between 32 and 68 dba during the daytime period (07:00-23:00) and between 25 and 60 dba during the nighttime period (23:00-07:00). The highest traffic noise levels will occur along the east side of the development, nearest to Queen Elizabeth Drive. Minimum building construction in all areas is required to satisfy the Ontario Building Code (2012). In addition, the following Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings are required for building components where noise levels exceed 65 dba (see Figures 4 and 5). (i) (ii) Bedroom Windows Bedroom windows on Building A facing east, and Building B facing east and south, will require a minimum STC of 31 All other bedroom windows are to satisfy Ontario Building Code (OBC 2012) requirements (i) (ii) Living Room Windows Living room windows on Building A facing east, and Building B facing east and south, will require a minimum STC of 26 All other living room windows are to satisfy Ontario Building Code (OBC 2012) requirements 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment 11

17 (i) Exterior Walls Exterior wall components on the east façades require a minimum STC of 45 which will be achieved with brick cladding or an acoustical equivalent according to NRC test data 14 A review of window supplier literature indicates that the specified STC ratings can be achieved by a variety of window systems having a combination of glass thickness and inter-pane spacing. We have not specified any particular window configurations, as there are several manufacturers and various combinations of window components that will offer the necessary sound attenuation rating. However, it is the responsibility of the manufacturer to ensure that the specified window achieves the required STC. This can only be assured by using window configurations that have been certified by laboratory testing. The requirements for STC ratings assume that the remaining components of the building are constructed and installed according to the minimum standards of the Ontario Building Code. The specified STC requirements also apply to swinging and/or sliding patio doors. All specified building components will require review by a qualified acoustical engineer for conformance to the recommendations of this report prior to building permit application. In addition to upgraded windows, the installation of individual air conditioning units (or similar mechanical system) will be required for all units. The following Warning Clause (Type D 15 ) will be required in all Agreements of Lease, Purchase and Sale for all units: Dwelling units in this building have been supplied with central air conditioning which will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City of Ottawa s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. According to the ENCG, if occupants of the condominium are not afforded a common outdoor amenity area, any balconies/terraces are considered an outdoor living area provided they are at least 4 meters in depth, uncovered and exterior to the building. OLA receptors were placed at select terrace locations on the 4 th floor that met the aforementioned criteria. Although all balconies/terraces will have a 1.1 meter guardrail surrounding the exposed perimeter (as per OBC Requirements), some guardrails have been 14 J.S. Bradley and J.A. Birta. Laboratory Measurements of the Sound Insulation of Building Façade Elements, National Research Council October Ministry of the Environment Publication NPC Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment 12

18 architecturally designed using stone, while others are glass. Where noise levels on specific terraces on the 4 th floor are above the ENCG criteria, it is not architecturally feasible to replace the guardrail with a noise screen in excess of 1.1 meters in height. As such, for terraces on the 4 th floor that currently incorporate a glass guardrail, it is recommended that a sealed glass screen of 1.1 meters in height be installed. The screen must have no embedded gaps in the construction. Balconies/terraces that incorporate a stone guardrail do not require additional construction elements as this design is sufficient. Furthermore, Warning Clauses Type A 16 and Type B 17 will be required for select units, as tabulated in Table 8 in Section 5.3. Once floor plans have been finalized, specific Warning Clauses can be applied to individual units. Warning Clause Type A: Purchasers/tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing road traffic may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the City s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. Warning Clause Type B: Purchasers/tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing road traffic may on occasions interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the City s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. Additionally, the following restrictive covenant shall also be included in all Agreements of Lease, Purchase and Sale: The Transferee covenants with the Transferor that the above clause, verbatim, shall be included in all subsequent Agreements of Purchase and Sale and deeds conveying the lands described herein, which shall run with the said lands and is for the benefit of the subsequent owners of the said lands and the owner of the adjacent road. 16 Ministry of the Environment Publication NPC Ministry of the Environment Publication NPC Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment 13

19 This concludes our assessment and report. If you have any questions or wish to discuss our findings please advise us. In the interim, we thank you for the opportunity to be of service. Yours truly, Gradient Wind Engineering Inc. Thomas Couper, B.A.Sc. Project Manager GWE Transportation Noise Assessment REV 1 Joshua Foster, P.Eng. Associate 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment 14

20

21

22

23

24

25 APPENDIX A STAMSON INPUT AND OUTPUT DATA 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 1

26 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :49:44 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: POR1.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: QED 1 (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 9821/854 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 781/68 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 558/49 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: QED 1 (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 9.25 / 9.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 2

27 Road data, segment # 2: QED 2 (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 9821/854 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 781/68 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 558/49 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: QED 2 (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 9.25 / 9.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: QED 1 (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: QED 2 (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 3

28 Results segment # 1: QED 1 (night) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: QED 2 (night) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 4

29 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :49:54 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: POR2.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: QED 1 (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 9821/854 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 781/68 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 558/49 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: QED 1 (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 9.25 / 9.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 5

30 Road data, segment # 2: QED 2 (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 9821/854 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 781/68 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 558/49 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: QED 2 (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 9.25 / 9.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: QED 1 (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: QED 2 (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 6

31 Results segment # 1: QED 1 (night) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: QED 2 (night) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 7

32 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :50:03 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: POR3.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: QED (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 9821/854 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 781/68 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 558/49 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: QED (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 9.25 / 9.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 8

33 Road data, segment # 2: Fifth (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 6477/563 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 515/45 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 368/32 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 8000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: Fifth (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : 1.00 deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 9.25 / 9.25 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 9

34 Results segment # 1: QED (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: Fifth (day) 1.50! 9.25! 7.84! 7.84 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 10

35 Results segment # 1: QED (night) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: Fifth (night) 1.50! 9.25! 7.84! 7.84 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 11

36 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :50:12 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: POR4.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: QED 1 (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 9821/854 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 781/68 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 558/49 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: QED 1 (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 9.25 / 9.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 12

37 Road data, segment # 2: QED 2 (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 9821/854 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 781/68 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 558/49 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: QED 2 (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 9.25 / 9.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 13

38 Road data, segment # 3: Fifth (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 6477/563 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 515/45 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 368/32 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 8000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 3: Fifth (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 9.25 / 9.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 14

39 Results segment # 1: QED 1 (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: QED 2 (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 3: Fifth (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 15

40 Results segment # 1: QED 1 (night) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: QED 2 (night) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 3: Fifth (night) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 16

41 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :50:23 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: POR5.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: QED 1 (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 9821/854 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 781/68 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 558/49 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: QED 1 (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 9.25 / 9.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 17

42 Road data, segment # 2: QED 2 (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 9821/854 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 781/68 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 558/49 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: QED 2 (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 9.25 / 9.25 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 18

43 Road data, segment # 3: Fifth (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 6477/563 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 515/45 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 368/32 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 8000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 3: Fifth (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 9.25 / 9.25 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 9.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 3.00 / 3.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 19

44 Results segment # 1: QED 1 (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: QED 2 (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 3: Fifth (day) 1.50! 9.25! 8.48! 8.48 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 20

45 Results segment # 1: QED 1 (night) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: QED 2 (night) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 3: Fifth (night) 1.50! 9.25! 8.48! 8.48 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 21

46 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :50:32 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: POR6.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Fifth (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 6477/563 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 515/45 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 368/32 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 40 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 8000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Fifth (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 9.25 / 9.25 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 9.00 m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 22

47 Results segment # 1: Fifth (day) 1.50! 9.25! 3.89! 3.89 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: Fifth (night) 1.50! 9.25! 3.89! 3.89 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): Queen Elizabeth Drive: Transportation Noise Assessment A 23

Transportation Noise Assessment. 590 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 590 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario Transportation Noise Assessment 590 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE16-019 Transportation Noise Prepared For: Kevin Yemm Richcraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard, Suite 201 Ottawa,

More information

Transportation Noise Assessment Prince of Wales Residential Development Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment Prince of Wales Residential Development Ottawa, Ontario Transportation Noise Assessment 1003 Prince of Wales Residential Development Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE13-031 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: Kent Bugatsch Inc. 63 Pamilla Street Ottawa, Ontario K1S 3K7

More information

Transportation Noise Assessment. 560 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 560 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario Transportation Noise Assessment 560 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE13-034 Transportation Noise Prepared For: Kevin Yemm Richcraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard, Suite 201 Ottawa,

More information

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment. 407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment. 407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario 407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-042 Traffic Noise Prepared For: Tony Kazarian AK Global Management Inc. 680 Eagleson Road Ottawa, Ontario K2M 2G9 Canada Prepared By: Omar Daher, B.Eng.,

More information

Transportation Noise Assessment. 121 Parkdale Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 121 Parkdale Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario Transportation Noise Assessment 121 Parkdale Avenue Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE 14-010 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: Michel Gagnon 98 Rue Lois Gatineau, Québec J8Y 3R7 Prepared By: Thomas Couper, B.A.Sc.,

More information

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. 315 Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. 315 Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment 315 Chapel Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-002 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: Leanne Moussa Allsaints 10 Blackburn Avenue K1N 6P8 Ottawa, Ontario Prepared

More information

Environmental Noise Assessment. St-Charles Market. Ottawa, Ontario

Environmental Noise Assessment. St-Charles Market. Ottawa, Ontario Environmental Noise Assessment St-Charles Market Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-120 - Noise Prepared For: Jenna Maw LineBox Studio Inc. 126 York Street, Suite 502 Ottawa, Ontario K1N 5T2 Prepared By: Michael

More information

Traffic Noise Impact Study. 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Traffic Noise Impact Study. 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street. Ottawa, Ontario 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE16-104 - Prepared For: Anand Aggarwal 2507701 Ontario Inc. Manor Park Management 231 Brittany Drive, Suite D Ottawa, Ontario K1K 0R8 Prepared

More information

Feasibility Noise Assessment. Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment. Ottawa, Ontario

Feasibility Noise Assessment. Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment. Ottawa, Ontario Feasibility Noise Assessment Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-067 - Feasibility Noise Prepared For: Stuart Craig 2300 Yonge Street, Suite 500 Toronto, Ontario M4P 1E4

More information

Transportation Noise Assessment. 809 Richmond Road. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 809 Richmond Road. Ottawa, Ontario Transportation Noise Assessment 809 Richmond Road Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE16-024 - Transportation Noise Prepared For: Walter Boyce OCEF Corp 200-368 Slater Street Ottawa, Ontario K1R 5C1 Prepared By:

More information

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario Conservancy Subdivision Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17 151 Traffic Noise Prepared For: Andrew Finnson Barrhaven Conservancy East Inc. Ottawa, Ontario Prepared By: Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Principal Omar Daher,

More information

Transportation Noise Feasibility Assessment & 3930 Riverside Drive Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Feasibility Assessment & 3930 Riverside Drive Ottawa, Ontario Transportation Noise Feasibility Assessment 3960 & 3930 Riverside Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE18 039 Transportation Noise Prepared For: Alex Turner 225 Metcalfe Street, Suite 708 Ottawa, Ontario K2P

More information

3443 INNES ROAD NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

3443 INNES ROAD NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 3443 INNES ROAD NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Prepared By: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Kanata, Ontario K2M 1P6 December 2017 Novatech File No. 117077 Ref No.: R-2017-192 December 19,

More information

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario Conservancy Subdivision Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17 151 Traffic Noise Prepared For: Andrew Finnson Barrhaven Conservancy East Inc. Ottawa, Ontario Prepared By: Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Principal Omar Daher,

More information

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario Transportation Noise Assessment Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-009 - Transportation Noise Prepared For: Michaela Jones The Salvation Army 2 Overlea

More information

115 ECHO DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA DETAILED NOISE STUDY

115 ECHO DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA DETAILED NOISE STUDY Dix B 115 ECHO DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA DETAILED NOISE STUDY Prepared for: UNIFORM URBAN DEVELOPMENTS Suite 300, 117 Centrepointe Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2G 5X3 Prepared by: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael

More information

Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment

Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment City Park Redevelopment Phase 2 Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-068 Noise & Vibration Phase 2 November 13, 2018 PREPARED FOR Stuart Craig RioTrin Prop (Gloucester

More information

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2129 Nantes Street Detailed Noise Study

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2129 Nantes Street Detailed Noise Study HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2129 Nantes Street Detailed Noise Study HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2129 Nantes Street DETAILED NOISE STUDY Prepared by: NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. 240 Michael Cowpland Drive,

More information

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1088 Maritime Way - Ottawa Prepared For

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1088 Maritime Way - Ottawa Prepared For Geotechnical Engineering patersongroup Environmental Engineering Hydrogeology Geological Engineering Materials Testing Building Science Archaeological Services Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed

More information

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development (Infill) 747 Liverpool Road Pickering, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development (Infill) 747 Liverpool Road Pickering, Ontario Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development (Infill) 747 Liverpool Road Pickering, Ontario Prepared for: Madison Liverpool Limited 369 Rimrock Road Toronto, Ontario, M3J 3G2 Prepared by Victor

More information

Transportation Noise & Vibration Feasibility Assessment. 383 Albert Street & 340 Queen Street Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise & Vibration Feasibility Assessment. 383 Albert Street & 340 Queen Street Ottawa, Ontario 383 Albert Street & 340 Queen Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE18-111 Noise & Vibration Prepared For: Neil Malhotra Claridge Homes 2001-210 Gladstone Avenue Ottawa, ON K2P 0Y6 Prepared By: Michael Lafortune,

More information

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1136 Martime Way - Ottawa Prepared For

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1136 Martime Way - Ottawa Prepared For Geotechnical Engineering patersongroup Environmental Engineering Hydrogeology Geological Engineering Materials Testing Building Science Archaeological Services Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed

More information

REP Taggart 1140 Wellington Noise Control Study Page 1 of 18

REP Taggart 1140 Wellington Noise Control Study Page 1 of 18 REP Taggart 1140 Wellington Noise Control Study Page 1 of 18 2013-10-15 Simon Taggart Project Coordinator The Taggart Group 3187 Albion Road South Ottawa, Ontario K1V 8Y3 T: 613.526.2400 ext 320 C: 613.857.0353

More information

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 114 ISABELLA STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OTTAWA, ONTARIO

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 114 ISABELLA STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OTTAWA, ONTARIO Smart Property Advisors Ltd. 802-500 Laurier Avenue West Ottawa, ON NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 114 ISABELLA STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OTTAWA, ONTARIO Prepared by: SMART PROPERTY ADVISORS LTD. 802 500

More information

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario Transportation Noise Assessment Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-009 - Transportation Noise R2 Prepared For: Michaela Jones The Salvation Army

More information

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi-Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi-Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario Transportation Noise Assessment Salvation Army Multi-Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-009 - Transportation Noise R3 Prepared For: Michaela Jones The Salvation Army

More information

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessments Place D Orleans Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessments Place D Orleans Drive. Ottawa, Ontario s 1220-1226 Place D Orleans Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-154 Noise & Vibration Prepared For: Choice Properties REIT 22 St. Clair Avenue East, Suite 500 Toronto, ON M4T 2S5 c/o Pamela Whyte Parsons

More information

J. E. COULTER ASSOCIATES LIMITED -ii- APPENDIX B: GUIDELINES

J. E. COULTER ASSOCIATES LIMITED -ii- APPENDIX B: GUIDELINES J. E. COULTER ASSOCIATES LIMITED -ii- APPENDIX B: GUIDELINES NPC-115 NPC-115 Construction Equipment 1. Scope This Publication sets sound emission standards for various items of new construction

More information

DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS BRONTE ROAD DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF OAKVILLE

DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS BRONTE ROAD DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF OAKVILLE SS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers REPORT NO. WA10-93 REVISION 3 DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS BRONTE ROAD DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF OAKVILLE SUBMITTED TO: BALLANTRY

More information

Appendix C STAMSON Noise Model Output File for Tunnel Alternative (Alternative 3)

Appendix C STAMSON Noise Model Output File for Tunnel Alternative (Alternative 3) Appendix C STAMSON Noise Model Output File for Tunnel Alternative (Alternative 3) Detroit River International Crossing Study STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 21-02-2007 01:14:41 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT

More information

1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 NOISE DESCRIPTORS 5 3 NOISE SENSITIVE POINTS OF RECEPTION 5 4 PROPOSED LAND USE 7 5 GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA 8

1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 NOISE DESCRIPTORS 5 3 NOISE SENSITIVE POINTS OF RECEPTION 5 4 PROPOSED LAND USE 7 5 GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA 8 Durham Live Tourist Destination Page 2 of 24 29 May 2014 1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 NOISE DESCRIPTORS 5 3 NOISE SENSITIVE POINTS OF RECEPTION 5 4 PROPOSED LAND USE 7 5 GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA 8 5.1 ROAD & RAIL

More information

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT REFERENCE: SA 4968 rev 1 ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT British Standard 8233: 2014. CLIENT: MJ Gleeson SITE: Berengrave Nursery, 61 Berengrave Road, Rainham, Kent, ME 7NL SURVEY DATES: Noise

More information

Yorkdale Development Master Plan Environmental Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Toronto, ON

Yorkdale Development Master Plan Environmental Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Toronto, ON ASSESSMENT REPORT - Project: 16419 Yorkdale Development Master Plan Environmental Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Toronto, ON Prepared for: Oxford Properties Group Royal Bank Plaza North Tower 200

More information

APPENDIXD. Traffic Noise Technical Report

APPENDIXD. Traffic Noise Technical Report APPENDIXD Traffic Noise Technical Report Environmental Assessment - Lincoln County, SD 85 th Street: Sundowner Avenue to Louise Avenue November 2017 F I N A L R E P O R T TRAFFIC NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT

More information

Noise Maps, Report & Statistics, Dublin City Council Noise Mapping Project Roads and Traffic Department

Noise Maps, Report & Statistics, Dublin City Council Noise Mapping Project Roads and Traffic Department Noise Maps, Report & Statistics, Dublin City Council Noise Mapping Project Roads and Traffic Department Produced by Traffic Noise & Air Quality Unit November 2007 Contact: brian.mcmanus@dublincity.ie Ph;

More information

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY 404 EXTENSION FINAL NOISE STUDY. Assignment Number: 2013-E-0017 #3

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY 404 EXTENSION FINAL NOISE STUDY. Assignment Number: 2013-E-0017 #3 MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY 404 EXTENSION FINAL NOISE STUDY Assignment Number: 2013-E-0017 #3 Submitted to: The Ministry of Transportation 1201 Wilson Avenue Downsview, Ontario M3M 1J8 Submitted

More information

GIS-BASED VISUALISATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE

GIS-BASED VISUALISATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE Proceedings of the 9 th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology Rhodes island, Greece, 1 3 September 2005 GIS-BASED VISUALISATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE A. KONSTANTINIDIS 1, K. EVANGELIDIS

More information

Directive on the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise

Directive on the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise Directive on the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise This Directive has been ratified by the European Parliament and is awaiting publication in the Official Journal.( around 23/5/02) The Directive

More information

Energy Use in Homes. A series of reports on domestic energy use in England. Energy Efficiency

Energy Use in Homes. A series of reports on domestic energy use in England. Energy Efficiency Energy Use in Homes A series of reports on domestic energy use in England Energy Efficiency Energy Use in Homes A series of reports on domestic energy use in England This is one of a series of three reports

More information

Building Envelope Requirements Overview Page 3-4

Building Envelope Requirements Overview Page 3-4 Building Envelope Requirements Overview Page 3-4 The benefit of a high reflectance surface is obvious: while dark surfaces absorb the sun s energy (visible light, invisible infrared. and ultraviolet radiation)

More information

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. West Village 70 Mississauga Road South & 181 Lakeshore Road West. Mississauga, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. West Village 70 Mississauga Road South & 181 Lakeshore Road West. Mississauga, Ontario Pedestrian Level Wind Study West Village 70 Mississauga Road South & 181 Lakeshore Road West Mississauga, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-112-PLW Prepared For: c/o Emily Rosen Diamondcorp 22 St. Clair Avenue East,

More information

Noise from Oil & Gas Facilities Acoustics 101 and Best Practices for Noise Control. Rob Stevens, HGC Engineering

Noise from Oil & Gas Facilities Acoustics 101 and Best Practices for Noise Control. Rob Stevens, HGC Engineering Noise from Oil & Gas Facilities Acoustics 101 and Best Practices for Noise Control Rob Stevens, HGC Engineering Noise From Oil & Gas Facilities Acoustics 101 and Best Practices for Noise Control Rob Stevens

More information

Answer - SAQ 1. The intensity, I, is given by: Back

Answer - SAQ 1. The intensity, I, is given by: Back Answer - SAQ 1 The intensity, I, is given by: Noise Control. Edited by Shahram Taherzadeh. 2014 The Open University. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 142 Answer - SAQ 2 It shows that the human

More information

research highlight Wind-Rain Relationships in Southwestern British Columbia Introduction Methodology Figure 2 Lower Mainland meteorological stations

research highlight Wind-Rain Relationships in Southwestern British Columbia Introduction Methodology Figure 2 Lower Mainland meteorological stations research highlight June 2007 Technical Series 07-114 Introduction Building envelope failures in southwestern British Columbia has brought to light the strong influence of wind-driven rain on building envelopes.

More information

MAY 5, Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc.

MAY 5, Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc. MAY 5, 2011 Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street Jacobs Engineering Group Group Inc. Inc. 1 Introductions Agenda Overview of Interchange Project Overview of noise barrier

More information

Acoustic spaces: comfort and social sustainability

Acoustic spaces: comfort and social sustainability European congress Eco-Technologies for the future 9 June 2010 Acoustic materials and spaces for sustainability Professor Jian Kang School of Architecture, University of Sheffield, UK Outline Acoustics

More information

COULD THE GUNSHOT BE HEARD?

COULD THE GUNSHOT BE HEARD? COULD THE GUNSHOT BE HEARD? October 9, 2003 Paul D. Schomer Schomer & Associates Champaign, IL 61821 INTRODUCTION Statement of Problem On the evening of November 21, 1991, a NJ State Trooper gave chase

More information

Assessment & Specifications for Noise Controls

Assessment & Specifications for Noise Controls Project 772600 Rev 1 Cargill North Vancouver Grain Terminal Assessment & Specifications for Noise Controls TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...1 1.1 Background...1 1.2 Site Description...1 2. SOUND LEVEL

More information

Regal House #CREATESOMETHING. ALL ENQUIRIES 53,647 sq.ft. RE-DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY SUITABLE FOR A VARIETY OF USES OFFICE HOTEL RESIDENTIAL

Regal House #CREATESOMETHING. ALL ENQUIRIES 53,647 sq.ft. RE-DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY SUITABLE FOR A VARIETY OF USES OFFICE HOTEL RESIDENTIAL SK1 3AA #CREATESOMETHING RE-DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY OFFICE HOTEL RESIDENTIAL Stockport has everything Excellent motorway access First class rail links Efficient local bus services Easy access to Manchester

More information

1600 Prairie Drive , FAX

1600 Prairie Drive , FAX Hennepin County Transportation Department Transportation Department 612-596-0300, Phone 1600 Prairie Drive 612-321-3410, FAX Medina, MN 55340-5421 www.hennepin.us December 30, 2015 Subject: Bottineau Boulevard

More information

Appendix G Noise Modeling Files

Appendix G Noise Modeling Files Appendix G Noise Modeling Files County of Butte Rio d Oro Specific Plan Noise Study July 2014 Rio d Oro Specific Plan Noise Study Prepared for: JKB Development 2370 West Monte Vista Ave. Turlock, CA 95381

More information

Date: March 31, 2014 PATE; fyril 2.3,2 >H

Date: March 31, 2014 PATE; fyril 2.3,2 >H aj BRAMPTON fifs Rower City XH-l-f r.t "»* City Council The Corporation of the City of Brampton SRAMPTON CITY COUNCIL Date: March 31, 2014 PATE; fyril 2.3,2 >H File: POO GR VisWhtoJed ^t'th-meeh'^a Subject:

More information

Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3

Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3 SECTION DIRECTORY General Information Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3 Combination Assembly Recommendations and Limitations Composite Configurations...COMB-4 Typical Sealant

More information

Published in: Proceeding of 9th SENVAR / 2nd ISESEE, Shah Alam, Malaysia, December 2008

Published in: Proceeding of 9th SENVAR / 2nd ISESEE, Shah Alam, Malaysia, December 2008 Evaluation on Lighting Condition and Visual Legibility of Road Surfaces and Traffic Signs in Bandung City Mangkuto, R.A.; Soelami, F.X.N.; Soegijanto, R.M. Published in: Proceeding of 9th SENVAR / 2nd

More information

APPENDIX IV MODELLING

APPENDIX IV MODELLING APPENDIX IV MODELLING Kingston Transportation Master Plan Final Report, July 2004 Appendix IV: Modelling i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 OBJECTIVE... 1 3.0 URBAN TRANSPORTATION MODELLING

More information

SHADOW IMPACT STUDY REPORT

SHADOW IMPACT STUDY REPORT SHADOW IMPACT STUDY REPORT 175 Zoo Park Road Town of Wasaga Beach Date: September 2017 Prepared for: Simcoe County Housing Corporation Prepared by: MacNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning Limited

More information

COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL

COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL SECTION: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: SNOW & ICE CONTROL POLICY 2012/2013 GOAL: Pages: 1 of 10 Approval Date: Dec. 3, 2012 Res. # 1001/2012 To annually identify the winter maintenance costs

More information

Fundamentals of Sound

Fundamentals of Sound Sound is an important consideration in the selection of mechanical equipment. The purpose of this article is to present a procedure for evaluating the sound levels created by evaporative cooling equipment

More information

PAUL RUDOLPH Oriental Masonic Gardens

PAUL RUDOLPH Oriental Masonic Gardens 1 PAUL RUDOLPH Oriental Masonic Gardens Latitude _ 41.3 N Longitude _ 72.9 W Climate: transition between Cfa _ Humid Subtropical and Dfa_ Humid Continental climate 2 Paul Rudolph INTRODUCTION Fig. 1 -

More information

CERTIFIED RESOLUTION. introduction: and dated May 29, 2017, as attached, as appropriate

CERTIFIED RESOLUTION. introduction: and dated May 29, 2017, as attached, as appropriate 15322 Buena Vista Avenue, White Rock BC, Canada V4B 1Y6 www.whiterockcity.ca City of White Rock P: 604.541.22121 F: 604.541.9348 /2tC% City Clerk s Office IT E ROC K June 13,2017 Stephanie Lam, Deputy

More information

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR SG10 SYSTEM BALUSTRADES USING 21.5mm LAMINATED TOUGHENED GLASS without the need for a handrail BY BALCONY SYSTEMS LIMITED Unit 6 Systems House Eastbourne Road Blindly Heath

More information

2267 N o r t h 1500 W C l i n t o n U T 84015

2267 N o r t h 1500 W C l i n t o n U T 84015 P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n M e m b e r s C h a i r J a c o b B r i g g s V i c e C h a i r G a r y T y l e r T o n y T h o m p s o n J o l e n e C r e s s a l l A n d y H a l e D e r e c k B a

More information

Energy Use in Homes 2007

Energy Use in Homes 2007 Energy Use in Homes 2007 A series of reports on domestic energy use in England Space and Water Heating Energy Use in Homes 2007 A series of reports on domestic energy use in England This is one of a series

More information

2018 North Carolina Residential Code Prescriptive Tables for Selection of Support Elements for Beams, Girders, and Headers: Example Problems

2018 North Carolina Residential Code Prescriptive Tables for Selection of Support Elements for Beams, Girders, and Headers: Example Problems 2018 North Carolina Residential Code Prescriptive Tables for Selection of Support Elements for Beams, Girders, and Structural Building Components Association (SBCA) August 10, 2018 SBCA is an APPROVED

More information

1 Wind Turbine Acoustics. Wind turbines generate sound by both mechanical and aerodynamic

1 Wind Turbine Acoustics. Wind turbines generate sound by both mechanical and aerodynamic Wind Turbine Acoustics 1 1 Wind Turbine Acoustics Wind turbines generate sound by both mechanical and aerodynamic sources. Sound remains an important criterion used in the siting of wind farms. Sound emission

More information

MEASUREMENTS OF SOUND ABSORPTION TIMBERCRETE

MEASUREMENTS OF SOUND ABSORPTION TIMBERCRETE A.B.N. 73 107 291 494 C O N S U L T I N G A C O U S T I C A L E N G I N E E R S MEASUREMENTS OF SOUND ABSORPTION TIMBERCRETE 100 mm ANCIENT STONE BRICK REPORT NUMBER: 4546-2 PREPARED FOR: Timbercrete Pty

More information

JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone:

JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone: JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH 45243 Email: jackpflum1@gmail.com Telephone: 513.919.7814 MEMORANDUM REPORT Traffic Impact Analysis Proposed Soccer

More information

ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS. Table 4-2 Permitted Uses by Zoning Districts Use Types AG RR R-1 R-2 R-3 MH LC CC DC GC LI GI P Addl Reg

ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS. Table 4-2 Permitted Uses by Zoning Districts Use Types AG RR R-1 R-2 R-3 MH LC CC DC GC LI GI P Addl Reg ZONING DITRICT REGULATION Table 4-2 Permitted Uses by Zoning Districts Agricultural Uses Horticulture P P P P P P P P P 39.06.002a Crop Production P P P 39.06.002a Type I Animal Production Type II Animal

More information

Energy Use in Homes 2004

Energy Use in Homes 2004 Energy Use in Homes 2004 A series of reports on domestic energy use in England Space and Water Heating Energy Use in Homes 2004 A series of reports on domestic energy use in England This is one of a series

More information

Occupant Behavior Related to Space Cooling in a High Rise Residential Building Located in a Tropical Region N.F. Mat Hanip 1, S.A. Zaki 1,*, A. Hagish

Occupant Behavior Related to Space Cooling in a High Rise Residential Building Located in a Tropical Region N.F. Mat Hanip 1, S.A. Zaki 1,*, A. Hagish Occupant Behavior Related to Space Cooling in a High Rise Residential Building Located in a Tropical Region N.F. Mat Hanip 1, S.A. Zaki 1,*, A. Hagishima 2, J. Tanimoto 2, and M.S.M. Ali 1 1 Malaysia-Japan

More information

BUILDING AND SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE (Effective July1, 2013)

BUILDING AND SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE (Effective July1, 2013) BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION TELEPHONE (949) 724-6300 BUILDING AND SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE (Effective July1, 2013) Payment: When a plan is required by the Administrative Authority to be submitted, a plan check

More information

PW 001 SNOW REMOVAL AND SANDING FOR ROADWAYS AND SIDEWALKS October 6, 2014 (#223-14) Original October 19, 2015; October 15, 2018 Public Works

PW 001 SNOW REMOVAL AND SANDING FOR ROADWAYS AND SIDEWALKS October 6, 2014 (#223-14) Original October 19, 2015; October 15, 2018 Public Works Policy Statement: The Village of Kitscoty will provide snow and ice control on municipal streets and sidewalks according to determined priorities. Purpose: To provide direction and information to employees

More information

Appendix E FTA NOISE MODELING WORKSHEETS AND DETAILED METHODOLOGY

Appendix E FTA NOISE MODELING WORKSHEETS AND DETAILED METHODOLOGY Appendix E FTA NOISE MODELING WORKSHEETS AND DETAILED METHODOLOGY APPENDIX E General Noise Assessment The FTA General Noise Assessment procedure was used for calculating noise from transit sources associated

More information

Method of Measuring Machinery Sound Within an Equipment Space

Method of Measuring Machinery Sound Within an Equipment Space ANSI/AHRI Standard 575 (Formerly ARI Standard 575) 2008 Standard for Method of Measuring Machinery Sound Within an Equipment Space Price $15.00 (M) $30.00 (NM) Printed in U.S.A. 8Copyright 1994, by Air-Conditioning

More information

FOR SALE. Chapel Lane, West Ella, East Yorkshire, HU10 7SE RESIDENTIAL CONVERSION AND NEW BUILD OPPORTUNITY

FOR SALE. Chapel Lane, West Ella, East Yorkshire, HU10 7SE RESIDENTIAL CONVERSION AND NEW BUILD OPPORTUNITY Chapel Lane, West Ella, East Yorkshire, HU10 7SE FOR SALE RESIDENTIAL CONVERSION AND NEW BUILD OPPORTUNITY Conversion, extension and adaptation of former chapel to form a detached three bedroom dwelling

More information

Section 14F Purpose of the Wairakei Residential Zone

Section 14F Purpose of the Wairakei Residential Zone Section 14F 14F Purpose of the Wairakei Residential Zone The purpose of the Wairakei Residential Zone is to provide for an intensified urban character within Papamoa East. The zone recognises Wairakei

More information

Snow and Ice Control POLICY NO. P-01/2015. CITY OF AIRDRIE Snow and Ice Control Policy

Snow and Ice Control POLICY NO. P-01/2015. CITY OF AIRDRIE Snow and Ice Control Policy Page 1 CITY OF AIRDRIE Snow and Ice Control Effective Date: Approved By: Approved On: March 17, 2015 City Council March 16, 2015 Revision Date: Resolution #: ------ PURPOSE: The City of Airdrie is responsible

More information

Chapter 11. Noise Impacts of Transportation Systems. Transportation Decision-making Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming

Chapter 11. Noise Impacts of Transportation Systems. Transportation Decision-making Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming Transportation Decision-making Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming Chapter 11 Noise Impacts of Transportation Systems Kumares Sinha and Samuel Labi 1 2 Real Experiences of Transportation Noise

More information

Engineer's Report. Main Street Business Area. Festoon Lighting and Sidewalk Cleaning Assessment District (Fiscal Year )

Engineer's Report. Main Street Business Area. Festoon Lighting and Sidewalk Cleaning Assessment District (Fiscal Year ) Engineer's Report for the Main Street Business Area Festoon Lighting and Sidewalk Cleaning Assessment District (Fiscal Year 2008-09) Prepared under the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982

More information

Dubai Municipality LRT Noise and Vibration Impact Stage 2

Dubai Municipality LRT Noise and Vibration Impact Stage 2 Dubai Municipality LRT Noise and Vibration Impact Stage 2 Environmental Impact 11 th of April, 2004 Environmental Impact Report According to the PS007 Agreement, Environmental Impact Report Based on Noise

More information

1.0 BACKGROUND. January 6, 2006 Proj #

1.0 BACKGROUND. January 6, 2006 Proj # January 6, 2006 Proj # 4565-01 Mr. Eugene Wat Director of Engineering City of Port Moody 100 Newport Drive Box 36 Port Moody, BC V3H 3E1 Dear Mr. Wat: RE: ALDERSIDE ROAD & IOCO ROAD PEDESTRIAN CROSSING

More information

NATIONAL ANNEX TO STANDARD. SFS-EN EUROCODE 1: ACTIONS ON STRUCTURES Part 1 3: General Actions. Snow loads

NATIONAL ANNEX TO STANDARD. SFS-EN EUROCODE 1: ACTIONS ON STRUCTURES Part 1 3: General Actions. Snow loads 1 ANNEX 4 NATIONAL ANNEX TO STANDARD SFS-EN 1991-1-3 EUROCODE 1: ACTIONS ON STRUCTURES Part 1 3: General Actions. Snow loads Preface This National Annex is used together with standard SFS-EN 1991-1-3:

More information

Effect of Environmental Factors on Free-Flow Speed

Effect of Environmental Factors on Free-Flow Speed Effect of Environmental Factors on Free-Flow Speed MICHAEL KYTE ZAHER KHATIB University of Idaho, USA PATRICK SHANNON Boise State University, USA FRED KITCHENER Meyer Mohaddes Associates, USA ABSTRACT

More information

WEST VALLEY BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS. January 9, 2015

WEST VALLEY BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS. January 9, 2015 400-420 WEST VALLEY BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS January 9, 2015 Kunzman Associates, Inc. 400-420 WEST VALLEY BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS January 9, 2015 Prepared

More information

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Appeal by Fast Signs of the Decision of the Chief Building Official for One Variance Respecting a Proposed First Party Wall Sign 10-21 Four Seasons Place Date: January 18,

More information

Energy Use in Homes 2004

Energy Use in Homes 2004 Energy Use in Homes 2004 A series of reports on domestic energy use in England Thermal Insulation Energy Use in Homes 2004 A series of reports on domestic energy use in England This is one of a series

More information

3D ANALYSIS AND INVESTIGATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE FROM ROADS OF THE ADELAIDE CBD AND THEIR IMPACT ON BUILDINGS

3D ANALYSIS AND INVESTIGATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE FROM ROADS OF THE ADELAIDE CBD AND THEIR IMPACT ON BUILDINGS 6th International Conference and Workshop on the Built Environment in Developing Countries, 4-5 December 2012, Adelaide, Australia 3D ANALYSIS AND INVESTIGATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE FROM ROADS OF THE ADELAIDE

More information

KEY: R-1 Low Density Residential. R-2 Medium Density Residential. R-3 High Density Residential. S-C Service Commercial. D-C Downtown Commercial

KEY: R-1 Low Density Residential. R-2 Medium Density Residential. R-3 High Density Residential. S-C Service Commercial. D-C Downtown Commercial KEY: R-1 Low Density Residential R-2 Medium Density Residential R-3 High Density Residential S-C Service Commercial D-C Downtown Commercial M-C Medical Commercial H-I Heavy Industrial PARKING MATRIX A

More information

LIST OF PUBLISHED STANDARDS

LIST OF PUBLISHED STANDARDS Report : 08-06- Page o : Of 9 LST OF PUBLSHED STDRDS Total Count: 9 umber SS umber nt pproved mendment SBS/TC 076 SS 40-:997/SO 40-:997 coustics - Measurement of sound insulation in buildings and of building

More information

White Paper Luminance & Illuminance. Brief explanation of photometry for the application of tunnel lighting control

White Paper Luminance & Illuminance. Brief explanation of photometry for the application of tunnel lighting control White Paper Luminance & Illuminance Brief explanation of photometry for the application of tunnel lighting control 1 General This document gives a brief explanation of photometry, the basics of tunnel

More information

DAYLIGHT, SUNLIGHT AND OVERSHADOWING The EXO Building at Point Village North Wall Quay & East Wall Road, Dublin 1.

DAYLIGHT, SUNLIGHT AND OVERSHADOWING The EXO Building at Point Village North Wall Quay & East Wall Road, Dublin 1. DAYLIGHT, SUNLIGHT AND OVERSHADOWING The EXO Building at Point Village North Wall Quay & East Wall Road, Dublin 1. For Grant Thornton, on behalf of the Specified Assets of Henry A. Crosbie (In Receivership)

More information

1 BAKER HOUSE DINING: LIGHTING DIAGNOSTIC

1 BAKER HOUSE DINING: LIGHTING DIAGNOSTIC Shauna Jin + Caitlin Mueller 4.401: Lighting and Acoustics Analyses 27 April 2006 1 BAKER HOUSE DINING: LIGHTING DIAGNOSTIC 1.1 Sunlight Penetration The Baker House Dining room is exposed mostly to southern

More information

Here Comes the Sun. Rachel Wagner. Duluth Energy Design Conference 26 February

Here Comes the Sun. Rachel Wagner. Duluth Energy Design Conference 26 February Here Comes the Sun Duluth Energy Design Conference 26 February 2014 Photo by Dave Swenson Rachel Wagner Here Comes the Sun 1 Wagner Zaun Architecture 17 N Lake Avenue Duluth, MN 55802 www.wagnerzaun.com

More information

Paine Field Airport Existing and Future Environmental Assessment, Initiation of Commercial Service Noise Analysis

Paine Field Airport Existing and Future Environmental Assessment, Initiation of Commercial Service Noise Analysis Paine Field Airport Existing and Future Environmental Assessment, Initiation of Commercial Service Noise Analysis July 2012 Prepared by: BridgeNet International 3151 Airway Avenue Building I-2 Costa Mesa,

More information

Re: Draft OPA 320 Recommended Amendments to Various Neighbourhood Policies Statutory Public Meeting to be held on Monday 16 November 2015

Re: Draft OPA 320 Recommended Amendments to Various Neighbourhood Policies Statutory Public Meeting to be held on Monday 16 November 2015 PG8.5.5 ANALOGICA George S. Belza Partner 9 Madeline Road Toronto, Ontario Canada M2N 2S7 T: 416 223 9584 F: 416 223 5665 E: belana@axxent.ca E-Mailed to: pgmc@toronto.ca Wednesday 04 November 2015 Planning

More information

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014 Appendix C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014 CONTENTS List of Figures-... 3 List of Tables... 4 Introduction... 1 Application of the Lubbock Travel Demand

More information

INSPIRE in the context of EC Directive 2002/49/EC on Environmental Noise

INSPIRE in the context of EC Directive 2002/49/EC on Environmental Noise INSPIRE in the context of EC Directive 2002/49/EC on Environmental Noise Simon Shilton Acustica Ltd, United Kingdom Nigel Jones Extrium Ltd, United Kingdom About the Authors www.acustica.co.uk Acoustics

More information

WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project

WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary Page 2.0 Introduction 2.1 DEVELOPMENT

More information

HOTEL KANATA 160 HEARST WAY KANATA, ONTARIO SERVICING REPORT. Prepared for: David Johnston Architect. Prepared By:

HOTEL KANATA 160 HEARST WAY KANATA, ONTARIO SERVICING REPORT. Prepared for: David Johnston Architect. Prepared By: HOTEL KANATA 160 HEARST WAY KANATA, ONTARIO SERVICING REPORT Prepared for: David Johnston Architect Prepared By: BaseTech Consulting Inc. 309 Roywood Crescent Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 1A6 BCI Project No.

More information

Neighborhood Locations and Amenities

Neighborhood Locations and Amenities University of Maryland School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation Fall, 2014 Neighborhood Locations and Amenities Authors: Cole Greene Jacob Johnson Maha Tariq Under the Supervision of: Dr. Chao

More information