Environmental Noise Assessment. St-Charles Market. Ottawa, Ontario
|
|
- Samson Bailey
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Environmental Noise Assessment St-Charles Market Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE Noise Prepared For: Jenna Maw LineBox Studio Inc. 126 York Street, Suite 502 Ottawa, Ontario K1N 5T2 Prepared By: Michael Lafortune, Environmental Technologist Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Partner Vincent Ferraro, M.Eng., P.Eng., Managing Partner December 11, Walgreen Road, Ottawa, Ontario K0A 1L0 T (613)
2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document describes an environmental noise assessment performed for a proposed mixed-use development titled St-Charles Market in Ottawa, Ontario. The C-shape eight-storey building will rise approximately 25 metres above local grade. Figure 1 illustrates a site plan with surrounding context. The major source of roadway noise affecting the development is traffic along Beechwood Avenue. The assessment is based on: (i) theoretical noise prediction methods that conform to the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) and City of Ottawa requirements; (ii) noise level criteria as specified by the City of Ottawa s Environmental Noise Control Guidelines (ENCG); (iii) future vehicular traffic volumes based on the City of Ottawa s Official Plan roadway classifications; and (iv) architectural drawings received from LineBox Studio Inc. The results of the current analysis indicate that noise levels will range between 47 and 73 dba during the daytime period (07:00-23:00) and between 39 and 65 dba during the nighttime period (23:00-07:00). The highest noise level (i.e. 73 dba) occurs on the east wing north façade, which is nearest and most exposed to Beechwood Avenue. Minimum building construction in all areas is required to satisfy the Ontario Building Code (2012). In addition, Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings are required for building components where noise levels exceed 65 dba (see Figure 4 to 6). Results of the calculations also indicate that all units will require central air conditioning (or similar mechanical system), which will allow occupants to keep windows closed and maintain a comfortable living environment. A Warning Clause (Type D 1 ) will also be required be placed on all Lease, Purchase and Sale Agreements. Noise levels at the 7 th floor common terraces are expected to approach 61 and 62 dba during the daytime period (Receptors 21 and 22 respectively). According to the ENCG, if these terraces are to be used as outdoor living areas, noise control measures (barriers) are required to reduce the L EQ to below 60 dba and as close to 55 dba as technically, economically and administratively feasible. Investigation into the application of a 1.1 metre (m) noise mitigating guard rail surrounding the terraces proved that noise levels can be reduced to 56 and 58 dba, as illustrated in Figure 7. Although noise levels at the terrace remain 1 City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Control Guidelines, SS Wilson Associates, May 10, 2006 Environmental Noise Assessment i
3 elevated, any inclusion of a noise barrier with a height greater than 1.1 m would negatively impact the terraces architecturally. Therefore it is not feasible to reduce the noise levels to below 55 dba. As mitigated noise levels are above 55 dba, a Warning Clause (Type B 2 ) is required. Noise levels from the existing stationary sources are expected to fall below ambient noise levels during most periods of the day and marginally exceed ambient noise levels when deliveries at the adjacent commercial building occur. However occasional deliveries are excluded from the sound level criteria as per the ENCG. Because we have already recommended upgraded building components and the use of central air conditioning for the developments eastern façade to control traffic noise levels, stationary noise impacts are expected to be negligible. Due to the presence of existing stationary noise in the area, a Warning Clause (Type E 3 ) will be required for all units on Agreements of Lease, Purchase and Sale. 2 City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Control Guidelines, SS Wilson Associates, May 10, ibid Environmental Noise Assessment ii
4 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE 1 3. OBJECTIVES 2 4. METHODOLOGY Background Roadway Traffic Noise Criteria for Roadway Traffic Noise Roadway Traffic Volumes Theoretical Roadway Noise Predictions Indoor Noise Calculations Qualitative Stationary Noise 7 5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Roadway Noise Levels Noise Control Measures for Transportation Sources Noise Barrier Calculation Stationary Noise Levels CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12 FIGURES APPENDICES: Appendix A STAMSON 5.04 Input and Output Data (Roadway Traffic Noise) Appendix B STAMSON 5.04 Input and Output Data (Barrier Calculation) Environmental Noise Assessment iii
5 1. INTRODUCTION Gradient Wind Engineering Inc. (GWE) was retained by LineBox Studio Inc. to undertake an environmental noise study of a proposed mixed-use development titled St-Charles Market in Ottawa, Ontario. This report summarizes the methodology, results and recommendations related to an environmental noise assessment. GWE s scope of work involved assessing exterior and interior noise levels generated by local roadway traffic as well as providing a qualitative assessment of stationary noise impacts. The assessment was performed on the basis of theoretical noise calculation methods conforming to the City of Ottawa 4 and Ministry of the Environment 5 guidelines. Noise calculations were based on architectural drawings received from LineBox Studio Inc., with future traffic volumes corresponding to the City of Ottawa s Official Plan (OP) roadway classifications. 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE The focus of this environmental noise assessment is a proposed development consisting of an L-shaped eight-storey building surrounding the existing St. Charles Church. The development is located on the southeast corner of the St. Charles Street & Beechwood Avenue intersection. The major source of roadway noise is Beechwood Avenue. The site is surrounded on all sides with mixed-use land, specifically Residential and Traditional Mainstreet zones. Figure 1 illustrates a complete site plan with surrounding context. Upon completion, the development will rise approximately 25 metres (m) above local grade. The ground floor and 2 nd floor will house commercial, common and residential space, while the remaining floors will occupy residential and common space only. Two outdoor living areas (OLA s) are considered on site, specifically at the east and west 7 th -floor common terraces. 4 City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Control Guidelines, SS Wilson Associates, May 10, Ministry of the Environment Publication NPC-300 Environmental Noise Assessment 1
6 3. OBJECTIVES The main goals of this work are to: (i) calculate the future noise levels on the study building produced by local roadway traffic, (ii) ensure that interior noise levels do not exceed the allowable limits specified by the City of Ottawa s Environmental Noise Control Guidelines as outlined in Section 4 of this report. 4. METHODOLOGY 4.1 Background Noise can be defined as any obtrusive sound. It is created at a source, transmitted through a medium, such as air, and intercepted by a receiver. Noise may be characterized in terms of the power of the source or the sound pressure at a specific distance. While the power of a source is characteristic of that particular source, the sound pressure depends on the location of the receiver and the path that the noise takes to reach the receiver. Measurement of noise is based on the decibel unit, dba, which is a logarithmic ratio referenced to a standard noise level ( Pascals). The A suffix refers to a weighting scale, which better represents how the noise is perceived by the human ear. With this scale, a doubling of power results in a 3 dba increase in measured noise levels and is just perceptible to most people. An increase of 10 dba is often perceived to be twice as loud. 4.2 Roadway Traffic Noise Criteria for Roadway Traffic Noise For vehicle traffic, the equivalent sound energy level, L EQ, provides a measure of the time varying noise levels, which is well correlated with the annoyance of sound. It is defined as the continuous sound level, which has the same energy as a time varying noise level over a period of time. For roadways, the L EQ is commonly calculated on the basis of a 16-hour (L EQ16) daytime (07:00-23:00) / 8-hour (L EQ8) nighttime (23:00-07:00) split to assess its impact on residential buildings. The City of Ottawa s Environmental Noise Control Guidelines (ENCG) specifies that the recommended indoor noise limits (that are relevant to this study) are 40, 45 and 50 dba for residence sleeping quarters, living rooms and retail spaces respectively, as listed in Table 1. Based on GWE s experience, more comfortable indoor noise levels should be targeted toward 37, 42 and 47 dba to control peak noise, and deficiencies in building envelope construction. Environmental Noise Assessment 2
7 TABLE 1: INDOOR SOUND LEVEL CRITERIA (ROAD & RAIL) 6 Type of Space Time Period Road L EQ (dba) General offices, reception areas, retail stores, etc. 07:00 23: Living/dining/den areas of residences, hospitals, schools, nursing/retirement homes, day-care centres, theatres, places of worship, libraries, individual or semi-private offices, conference rooms, etc. Rail 07:00 23: Sleeping quarters of hotels/motels 23:00 07: Sleeping quarters of residences, hospitals, nursing/retirement homes, etc. 23:00 07: Predicted noise levels at the plane of window (POW) and outdoor living area (OLA) dictate the action required to achieve the recommended sound levels. When noise levels at these areas exceed the criteria outlined in Table 2, specific outdoor, ventilation and Warning Clause requirements may apply. In addition, when noise levels exceed the criteria outlined in Table 3, upgraded building components must be designed. 6 Adapted from ENCG Table 1.6 Environmental Noise Assessment 3
8 TABLE 2: ROAD & RAIL NOISE COMBINED OUTDOOR NOISE, VENTILATION AND WARNING CLAUSE REQUIREMENTS 7 Time Period L EQ (dba) Ventilation Requirements Outdoor Noise Control Measures Warning Clause Outdoor Living Area (OLA) L EQ(16hr) < 55 N/A Not required Not required Daytime (07:00 23:00) 55 < L EQ(16hr) 60 L EQ(16hr) > 60 N/A N/A May not be required but should be considered Required to reduce the L EQ to below 60 dba and as close to 55 dba where feasible Type A Type B Plane of Window (POW) L EQ(16hr) < 55 Not required N/A Not required Daytime (07:00 23:00) 55 < L EQ(16hr) 65 Forced air heating with provision for central air conditioning N/A Type C L EQ(16hr) > 65 Central air conditioning N/A Type D L EQ(8hr) < 50 Not required N/A Not required Nighttime (23:00 07:00) 50 < L EQ(8hr) 60 Forced air heating with provision for central air conditioning N/A Type C L EQ(8hr) > 60 Central air conditioning N/A Type D - Required if resultant L EQ exceeds 55 dba - Required if resultant L EQ exceeds 55 dba and if it is administratively, economically and/or technically feasible TABLE 3: ROAD & RAIL NOISE BUILDING COMPONENT REQUIREMENTS 8 Source L EQ (dba) Building Component Requirements Road Rail L EQ(16hr) > 65 (Daytime) L EQ(8hr) > 60 (Nighttime) L EQ(16hr) > 60 (Daytime) L EQ(8hr) > 55(Nighttime) Building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria 7 Adapted from ENCG Table Adapted from ENCG Table 1.8 Environmental Noise Assessment 4
9 4.2.2 Roadway Traffic Volumes The ENCG dictates that noise calculations should consider future sound levels based on a roadway s classification at the mature state of development. Therefore, traffic volumes are based on the roadway classifications outlined in the City of Ottawa s Official Plan (OP) and Transportation Master Plan 9 which provides additional details on future roadway expansions. Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes are then based on data in Table 1.7 of the ENCG for each roadway classification. Table 4 (below) summarizes the AADT values used for each roadway included in this assessment. In the absence of an available posted speed limit for Beechwood Avenue, we have assumed one based on the type of roadway. TABLE 4: ROADWAY TRAFFIC DATA Roadway Roadway Class Speed Limit (km/h) Official Plan AADT Beechwood Avenue 4-UAU 60 30, Theoretical Roadway Noise Predictions Noise predictions were performed with the aid of the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) computerized noise assessment program, STAMSON 5.04, for road and rail analysis. Appendix A includes the STAMSON 5.04 input and output data. Roadway noise calculations were performed by treating each road segment as separate line sources of noise, and by using existing building locations as noise barriers. In addition to the traffic volumes summarized in Table 4, theoretical noise predictions were based on the following parameters: 9 City of Ottawa Transportation Master Plan, November 2013 Environmental Noise Assessment 5
10 Truck traffic on all roadways was taken to comprise 5% heavy trucks and 7% medium trucks, as per ENCG requirements for noise level predictions The day/night split was taken to be 92% / 8% respectively for all streets Absorptive and reflective intermediate ground surfaces based on specific source-receiver path ground characteristics The study site was treated as having flat topography Noise receptors were strategically placed at 22 locations around the study area (see Figures 2 and 3). 4.3 Indoor Noise Calculations The difference between outdoor and indoor noise levels is the noise attenuation provided by the building envelope. According to common industry practice, complete walls and individual wall elements are rated according to the Sound Transmission Class (STC). The STC ratings of common residential walls built in conformance with the Ontario Building Code (2012) typically exceed STC 35, depending on exterior cladding, thickness and interior finish details. For example, brick veneered walls can achieve STC 55. Standard good quality double-glazed non-operable windows can have STC ratings ranging from 25 to 40 depending on the window manufacturer, pane thickness and inter-pane spacing. As previously mentioned, the windows are the known weak point in a partition. According to the ENCG, when daytime noise levels (from road and rail sources) at the plane of the window exceed 65 dba, calculations must be performed to evaluate the sound transmission quality of the building components to ensure acceptable indoor noise levels. The calculation procedure 10 considers: Window type and total area as a percentage of total room floor area Exterior wall type and total area as a percentage of the total room floor area Acoustic absorption characteristics of the room Outdoor noise source type and approach geometry Indoor sound level criteria, which varies according to the intended use of a space 10 Building Practice Note: Controlling Sound Transmission into Buildings by J.D. Quirt, National Research Council of Canada, September 1985 Environmental Noise Assessment 6
11 Based on published research 11, exterior walls possess specific sound attenuation characteristics that are used as a basis for calculating the required STC ratings of windows in the same partition. Due to the limited information available at the time of the study, which was prepared for site plan approval, detailed floor layouts and building elevations have not been finalized; therefore, detailed STC calculations could not be performed at this time. As a guideline, the anticipated STC requirements for windows have been estimated based on the overall noise reduction required for each intended use of space (STC = outdoor noise level targeted indoor noise levels). A review of window supplier literature indicates that the specified STC ratings can be achieved by a variety of window systems having a combination of glass thickness and inter-pane spacing. We have not specified any particular window configurations, as there are several manufacturers and various combinations of window components that will offer the necessary sound attenuation rating. However, it is the responsibility of the manufacturer to ensure that the specified window achieves the required STC. This can only be assured by using window configurations that have been certified by laboratory testing. The requirements for STC ratings assume that the remaining components of the building are constructed and installed according to the minimum standards of the Ontario Building Code. The specified STC requirements also apply to swinging and/or sliding patio doors. All specified building components will require review by a qualified acoustical engineer for conformance to the recommendations of this report prior to building permit application. 4.4 Qualitative Stationary Noise The Ontario Ministry of the Environment has published the D-series guidelines to assist planners and municipalities in the planning process to minimize the impacts industrial facilities and sensitive land uses will have on one another. In the document D-6 Compatibility between industrial facilities and sensitive land uses 12 general areas of influence and minimum separation distance are recommended to minimize the potential for incompatible land uses creating an adverse effect on sensitive land use. Under the guidelines, industrial facilities are characterized into three categories depending on their size and potential output of noise, odour, dust and / or vibration. Sensitive land use under the guideline can include land uses such as residential, parks, schools, childcare facilities, senior citizens residences, hospitals, churches and other places of worship. 11 CMHC, Road & Rail Noise: Effects on Housing 12 MOE Guideline D-6, Environmental Planning & Analysis Branch, July 1995 Environmental Noise Assessment 7
12 There are no industrial facilities within the recommended minimum separation distance from the study area. The D-6 guideline allows for development within the influence zone in cases of infill, provided the appropriate studies are conducted to ensure the potential for an adverse effect is minimized. Several commercial buildings are along Beechwood Avenue and include retail outlets and restaurants. Although they are not industrial facilities under the D-6 guideline, they could be considered a Class I industry, where a recommended minimum separation distance from sensitive land uses is 20 m and the potential influence zone is 70 m. Commercial facilities that are within 70 m of the development include a dentistry clinic and a fast-food restaurant at 170 Beechwood Avenue. Based on our assessment, the only significant existing stationary source in the area is the mechanical equipment on the roof of the adjacent dentistry clinic and a fast-food restaurant as well as potential truck activity in the alleyway between the development and adjacent commercial building. 5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 5.1 Roadway Noise Levels Appendix A contains the complete set of input and output data from all STAMSON 5.04 calculations. The results of the roadway noise calculations are summarized in Table 5. Environmental Noise Assessment 8
13 Receptor Number TABLE 5: EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS DUE TO ROAD TRAFFIC Plane of Window Receptor Location Noise Level (dba) Day Night 1 POW Ground Level East Wing North Façade POW Ground Level East Wing East Façade POW Ground Level East Wing South Façade POW Ground Level West Wing West Façade POW Ground Level West Wing North Façade POW Ground Level West Wing East Façade POW Ground Level North Façade POW Ground Level East Wing West Façade POW 6 th Floor East Wing North Façade POW 6 th Floor East Wing East Façade POW 6 th Floor East Wing South Façade POW 6 th Floor West Wing West Façade POW 6 th Floor West Wing North Façade POW 6 th Floor West Wing East Façade POW 6 th Floor North Façade POW 6 th Floor East Wing West Façade POW 7 th Floor West Wing North Façade POW 8 th Floor East Wing North Façade POW 8 th Floor West Wing West Façade POW 8 th Floor East Wing West Façade OLA 7 th Floor West Wing Terrace OLA 7 th Floor East Wing Terrace The results of the current analysis indicate that noise levels will range between 47 and 73 dba during the daytime period (07:00-23:00) and between 39 and 65 dba during the nighttime period (23:00-07:00). The highest noise level (i.e. 73 dba) occurs on the east wing north façade, which is nearest and most exposed to Beechwood Avenue. Environmental Noise Assessment 9
14 5.2 Noise Control Measures for Transportation Sources The noise levels predicted due to road traffic exceed the criteria listed in the ENCG for building components. As discussed in Section 4.3, the anticipated STC requirements for windows have been estimated based on the overall noise reduction required for each intended use of space (STC = outdoor noise level targeted indoor noise levels). As per city of Ottawa requirements, detailed STC calculations will be required to be completed prior to building permit application for each unit type. The STC requirements for the windows are summarized below for various units within the development (see Figure 4 to 6): Bedroom Windows (i) Bedroom windows facing north on the east wing will require a minimum STC of 36 (ii) Bedroom windows facing east on the east wing will require a minimum STC of 32 (iii) Bedroom windows facing west on the east wing will require a minimum STC of 31 (iv) Bedroom windows facing north on the west wing will require a minimum STC of 30 (v) All other bedroom windows are to satisfy Ontario Building Code (OBC 2012) requirements Living Room Windows (i) Living room windows facing north on the east wing will require a minimum STC of 31 (ii) Living room windows facing east on the east wing will require a minimum STC of 27 (iii) Living room windows facing west on the east wing will require a minimum STC of 26 (iv) Living room windows facing north on the west wing will require a minimum STC of 25 (v) All other living room windows are to satisfy Ontario Building Code (OBC 2012) requirements Retail Windows (i) Retail windows facing north on the east wing will require a minimum STC of 26 (ii) Retail windows facing east on the east wing will require a minimum STC of 22 (iii) Retail windows facing west on the east wing will require a minimum STC of 21 (iv) Retail windows facing north on the west wing will require a minimum STC of 20 (v) All other retail windows are to satisfy Ontario Building Code (OBC 2012) requirements Environmental Noise Assessment 10
15 (i) Exterior Walls Exterior wall components on the aforementioned façades require a minimum STC of 45 which will be achieved with brick cladding or an acoustical equivalent according to NRC test data 13 Results of the calculations also indicate that all units will require central air conditioning (or similar mechanical system), which will allow occupants to keep windows closed and maintain a comfortable living environment. A Warning Clause (Type D) will also be required be placed on all Lease, Purchase and Sale Agreements. 5.3 Noise Barrier Calculation Noise levels at the 7 th floor common terraces are expected to approach 61 and 62 dba during the daytime period (Receptor 21 and 22 respectively). According to the ENCG, if these terraces are to be used as outdoor living areas, noise control measures (barriers) are required to reduce the L EQ to below 60 dba and as close to 55 dba as technically, economically and administratively feasible. Investigation into the application of a 1.1 m noise mitigating guardrail surrounding the terraces proved that noise levels can be reduced to 56 and 58 dba, as illustrated in Figure 7. Although noise levels at the terrace remain elevated, any inclusion of a noise barrier with a height greater than 1.1 m would negatively impact the terraces architecturally. Therefore it is not feasible to reduce the noise levels to below 55 dba. As mitigated noise levels are above 55 dba, a Warning Clause (Type B) is required. Table 6 summarizes the results of the barrier investigations at the 7 th floor terraces. TABLE 6: RESULTS OF BARRIER INVESTIGATION Location 7 th Floor Common Terrace West 7 th Floor Common Terrace East Reference Receptors Barrier Height (m) Daytime L EQ Noise Levels (dba) Without With Barrier Barrier J.S. Bradley and J.A. Birta. Laboratory Measurements of the Sound Insulation of Building Façade Elements, National Research Council October Environmental Noise Assessment 11
16 5.4 Stationary Noise Levels Based on our experience of similar retail buildings, impacts from the adjacent commercial building at 170 Beechwood Avenue are expected to be below ambient noise levels produced by roadway traffic. During deliveries, the noise levels from trucks may marginally exceed ambient noise levels. However, the ENCG excludes occasional deliveries from the sound level criteria. Furthermore, because we have already recommended upgraded building components and the use of central air conditioning for the developments eastern façade to control traffic noise levels, noise impacts are expected to be negligible. 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The results of the current analysis indicate that noise levels will range between 47 and 73 dba during the daytime period (07:00-23:00) and between 39 and 65 dba during the nighttime period (23:00-07:00). The highest noise level (i.e. 73 dba) occurs on the east wing north façade, which is nearest and most exposed to Beechwood Avenue. Minimum building construction in all areas is required to satisfy the Ontario Building Code (2012). In addition, Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings are required for building components where noise levels exceed 65 dba (see Figures 4 to 6). In addition to upgraded windows, the installation of central air conditioning (or similar mechanical system) will be required for all units. The following Warning Clause (Type D 14 ) in all Agreements of Lease, Purchase and Sale will be required: Dwelling units in this building have been supplied with central air conditioning which will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City of Ottawa s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. Noise levels at the 7 th floor common terraces are expected to approach 61 and 62 dba during the daytime period (Receptor 21 and 22 respectively). According to the ENCG, if these terraces are to be used as outdoor living areas, noise control measures (barriers) are required to reduce the L EQ to below 60 dba and as close to 55 dba as technically, economically and administratively feasible. Investigation into the application of a 1.1 m noise mitigating guard rail surrounding the terraces proved that noise levels can be 14 City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Control Guidelines, SS Wilson Associates, May 10, 2006 Environmental Noise Assessment 12
17 reduced to 56 and 58 dba, as illustrated in Figure 7. Although noise levels at the terrace remain elevated, any inclusion of a noise barrier with a height greater than 1.1 m would negatively impact the terraces architecturally. Therefore it is not feasible to reduce the noise levels to below 55 dba. As mitigated noise levels are above 55 dba, a Warning Clause (Type B 15 ) is required: Purchasers/tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing (road) (Transitway) (rail) (air) traffic may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the City s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. Noise levels from the existing stationary sources are expected to fall below ambient noise levels during most periods of the day and marginally exceed ambient noise levels when deliveries at the adjacent commercial building occur. However, occasional deliveries are excluded from the sound level criteria as per the ENCG. Because we have already recommended upgraded building components and the use of central air conditioning for the developments eastern façade to control traffic noise levels, noise impacts are expected to be negligible. Due to the presence of existing stationary noise in the area, a Warning Clause (Type E 16 ) will be required for all units on Agreements of Lease, Purchase and Sale as outlined below: Purchasers/ tenants are advised that due to the proximity of the adjacent commercial facilities, noise from the commercial facilities may at times be audible Additionally, the following restrictive covenant shall also be included in all Agreements of Lease, Purchase and Sale: The Transferee covenants with the Transferor that the above clause, verbatim, shall be included in all subsequent Agreements of Purchase and Sale and deeds conveying the lands described herein, which shall run with the said lands and is for the benefit of the subsequent owners of the said lands and the owner of the adjacent road. 15 City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Control Guidelines, SS Wilson Associates, May 10, ibid Environmental Noise Assessment 13
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 APPENDIX A STAMSON INPUT AND OUTPUT DATA (ROADWAY TRAFFIC NOISE) Environmental Noise Assessment A 1
27 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :09:22 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r1.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Beech (day/night) Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Beech (day/night) --- Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Environmental Noise Assessment A 2
28 Results segment # 1: Beech (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: Beech (night) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): Environmental Noise Assessment A 3
29 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :10:53 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r2.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Beech (day/night) Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Beech (day/night) --- Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 5.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 3.00 / 3.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 Environmental Noise Assessment A 4
30 Results segment # 1: Beech (day) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Environmental Noise Assessment A 5
31 Results segment # 1: Beech (night) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): Environmental Noise Assessment A 6
32 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :11:42 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r3.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Beech (day/night) Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Beech (day/night) --- Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : m Barrier receiver distance : 1.00 / 1.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 Environmental Noise Assessment A 7
33 Results segment # 1: Beech (day) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: Beech (night) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): Environmental Noise Assessment A 8
34 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :11:56 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r4.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: BeechL (day/night) Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: BeechL (day/night) ---- Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 8.00 m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 Environmental Noise Assessment A 9
35 Road data, segment # 2: BeechR (day/night) Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: BeechR (day/night) ---- Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Environmental Noise Assessment A 10
36 Results segment # 1: BeechL (day) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: BeechR (day) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Environmental Noise Assessment A 11
37 Results segment # 1: BeechL (night) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: BeechR (night) ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): Environmental Noise Assessment A 12
38 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :12:04 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r5.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: BeechL (day/night) Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: BeechL (day/night) ---- Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 8.00 m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 Environmental Noise Assessment A 13
39 Road data, segment # 2: BeechR (day/night) Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: BeechR (day/night) ---- Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 Environmental Noise Assessment A 14
40 Results segment # 1: BeechL (day) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: BeechR (day) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Environmental Noise Assessment A 15
41 Results segment # 1: BeechL (night) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Environmental Noise Assessment A 16
42 Results segment # 2: BeechR (night) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): Environmental Noise Assessment A 17
43 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :12:12 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r6.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Beech (day/night) Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Beech (day/night) --- Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 Environmental Noise Assessment A 18
44 Results segment # 1: Beech (day) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Environmental Noise Assessment A 19
45 Results segment # 1: Beech (night) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): Environmental Noise Assessment A 20
46 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :12:19 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r7.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: BeechL (day/night) Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: BeechL (day/night) ---- Angle1 Angle2 : deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : m Barrier receiver distance : 4.00 / 4.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 Environmental Noise Assessment A 21
47 Road data, segment # 2: BeechR (day/night) Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: BeechR (day/night) ---- Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : 0.00 deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 Environmental Noise Assessment A 22
48 Results segment # 1: BeechL (day) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: BeechR (day) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Environmental Noise Assessment A 23
49 Results segment # 1: BeechL (night) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: BeechR (night) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): Environmental Noise Assessment A 24
50 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :12:26 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r8.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Beech (day/night) Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Beech (day/night) --- Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : m Barrier receiver distance : 2.00 / 2.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 Environmental Noise Assessment A 25
51 Results segment # 1: Beech (day) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Environmental Noise Assessment A 26
52 Results segment # 1: Beech (night) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): Environmental Noise Assessment A 27
53 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :12:32 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r9.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Beech (day/night) Car traffic volume : 24288/2112 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 1932/168 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1380/120 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 60 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Beech (day/night) --- Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : / m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Environmental Noise Assessment A 28
Transportation Noise Assessment. 590 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Assessment 590 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE16-019 Transportation Noise Prepared For: Kevin Yemm Richcraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard, Suite 201 Ottawa,
More informationTransportation Noise Assessment. 560 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Assessment 560 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE13-034 Transportation Noise Prepared For: Kevin Yemm Richcraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard, Suite 201 Ottawa,
More informationRoadway Traffic Noise Assessment. 407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario
407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-042 Traffic Noise Prepared For: Tony Kazarian AK Global Management Inc. 680 Eagleson Road Ottawa, Ontario K2M 2G9 Canada Prepared By: Omar Daher, B.Eng.,
More informationRoadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. 315 Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario
Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment 315 Chapel Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-002 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: Leanne Moussa Allsaints 10 Blackburn Avenue K1N 6P8 Ottawa, Ontario Prepared
More informationTransportation Noise Assessment. 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive. Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Assessment 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE14-121 - Traffic Noise REV 1 Prepared For: 2253664 Ontario Inc. Roberto Campagna 24 George Street West Ottawa, Ontario
More informationTransportation Noise Assessment Prince of Wales Residential Development Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Assessment 1003 Prince of Wales Residential Development Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE13-031 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: Kent Bugatsch Inc. 63 Pamilla Street Ottawa, Ontario K1S 3K7
More informationTransportation Noise Assessment. 121 Parkdale Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Assessment 121 Parkdale Avenue Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE 14-010 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: Michel Gagnon 98 Rue Lois Gatineau, Québec J8Y 3R7 Prepared By: Thomas Couper, B.A.Sc.,
More informationFeasibility Noise Assessment. Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment. Ottawa, Ontario
Feasibility Noise Assessment Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-067 - Feasibility Noise Prepared For: Stuart Craig 2300 Yonge Street, Suite 500 Toronto, Ontario M4P 1E4
More informationTraffic Noise Impact Study. 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street. Ottawa, Ontario
383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE16-104 - Prepared For: Anand Aggarwal 2507701 Ontario Inc. Manor Park Management 231 Brittany Drive, Suite D Ottawa, Ontario K1K 0R8 Prepared
More informationTransportation Noise Assessment. 809 Richmond Road. Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Assessment 809 Richmond Road Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE16-024 - Transportation Noise Prepared For: Walter Boyce OCEF Corp 200-368 Slater Street Ottawa, Ontario K1R 5C1 Prepared By:
More informationRoadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario
Conservancy Subdivision Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17 151 Traffic Noise Prepared For: Andrew Finnson Barrhaven Conservancy East Inc. Ottawa, Ontario Prepared By: Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Principal Omar Daher,
More informationTransportation Noise Feasibility Assessment & 3930 Riverside Drive Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Feasibility Assessment 3960 & 3930 Riverside Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE18 039 Transportation Noise Prepared For: Alex Turner 225 Metcalfe Street, Suite 708 Ottawa, Ontario K2P
More information3443 INNES ROAD NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT
3443 INNES ROAD NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Prepared By: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Kanata, Ontario K2M 1P6 December 2017 Novatech File No. 117077 Ref No.: R-2017-192 December 19,
More informationRoadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario
Conservancy Subdivision Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17 151 Traffic Noise Prepared For: Andrew Finnson Barrhaven Conservancy East Inc. Ottawa, Ontario Prepared By: Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Principal Omar Daher,
More informationTransportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Assessment Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-009 - Transportation Noise Prepared For: Michaela Jones The Salvation Army 2 Overlea
More informationEnvironmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment City Park Redevelopment Phase 2 Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-068 Noise & Vibration Phase 2 November 13, 2018 PREPARED FOR Stuart Craig RioTrin Prop (Gloucester
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development (Infill) 747 Liverpool Road Pickering, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development (Infill) 747 Liverpool Road Pickering, Ontario Prepared for: Madison Liverpool Limited 369 Rimrock Road Toronto, Ontario, M3J 3G2 Prepared by Victor
More informationpatersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1088 Maritime Way - Ottawa Prepared For
Geotechnical Engineering patersongroup Environmental Engineering Hydrogeology Geological Engineering Materials Testing Building Science Archaeological Services Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed
More informationTransportation Noise & Vibration Feasibility Assessment. 383 Albert Street & 340 Queen Street Ottawa, Ontario
383 Albert Street & 340 Queen Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE18-111 Noise & Vibration Prepared For: Neil Malhotra Claridge Homes 2001-210 Gladstone Avenue Ottawa, ON K2P 0Y6 Prepared By: Michael Lafortune,
More informationHABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2129 Nantes Street Detailed Noise Study
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2129 Nantes Street Detailed Noise Study HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2129 Nantes Street DETAILED NOISE STUDY Prepared by: NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. 240 Michael Cowpland Drive,
More information115 ECHO DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA DETAILED NOISE STUDY
Dix B 115 ECHO DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA DETAILED NOISE STUDY Prepared for: UNIFORM URBAN DEVELOPMENTS Suite 300, 117 Centrepointe Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2G 5X3 Prepared by: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael
More informationpatersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1136 Martime Way - Ottawa Prepared For
Geotechnical Engineering patersongroup Environmental Engineering Hydrogeology Geological Engineering Materials Testing Building Science Archaeological Services Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed
More informationREP Taggart 1140 Wellington Noise Control Study Page 1 of 18
REP Taggart 1140 Wellington Noise Control Study Page 1 of 18 2013-10-15 Simon Taggart Project Coordinator The Taggart Group 3187 Albion Road South Ottawa, Ontario K1V 8Y3 T: 613.526.2400 ext 320 C: 613.857.0353
More informationNOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 114 ISABELLA STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OTTAWA, ONTARIO
Smart Property Advisors Ltd. 802-500 Laurier Avenue West Ottawa, ON NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 114 ISABELLA STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OTTAWA, ONTARIO Prepared by: SMART PROPERTY ADVISORS LTD. 802 500
More informationTransportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Assessment Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-009 - Transportation Noise R2 Prepared For: Michaela Jones The Salvation Army
More informationEnvironmental Noise and Vibration Assessments Place D Orleans Drive. Ottawa, Ontario
s 1220-1226 Place D Orleans Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-154 Noise & Vibration Prepared For: Choice Properties REIT 22 St. Clair Avenue East, Suite 500 Toronto, ON M4T 2S5 c/o Pamela Whyte Parsons
More informationTransportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi-Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario
Transportation Noise Assessment Salvation Army Multi-Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-009 - Transportation Noise R3 Prepared For: Michaela Jones The Salvation Army
More informationJ. E. COULTER ASSOCIATES LIMITED -ii- APPENDIX B: GUIDELINES
J. E. COULTER ASSOCIATES LIMITED -ii- APPENDIX B: GUIDELINES NPC-115 NPC-115 Construction Equipment 1. Scope This Publication sets sound emission standards for various items of new construction
More informationDETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS BRONTE ROAD DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF OAKVILLE
SS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers REPORT NO. WA10-93 REVISION 3 DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS BRONTE ROAD DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF OAKVILLE SUBMITTED TO: BALLANTRY
More information1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 NOISE DESCRIPTORS 5 3 NOISE SENSITIVE POINTS OF RECEPTION 5 4 PROPOSED LAND USE 7 5 GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA 8
Durham Live Tourist Destination Page 2 of 24 29 May 2014 1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 NOISE DESCRIPTORS 5 3 NOISE SENSITIVE POINTS OF RECEPTION 5 4 PROPOSED LAND USE 7 5 GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA 8 5.1 ROAD & RAIL
More informationAppendix C STAMSON Noise Model Output File for Tunnel Alternative (Alternative 3)
Appendix C STAMSON Noise Model Output File for Tunnel Alternative (Alternative 3) Detroit River International Crossing Study STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 21-02-2007 01:14:41 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT
More informationNoise Maps, Report & Statistics, Dublin City Council Noise Mapping Project Roads and Traffic Department
Noise Maps, Report & Statistics, Dublin City Council Noise Mapping Project Roads and Traffic Department Produced by Traffic Noise & Air Quality Unit November 2007 Contact: brian.mcmanus@dublincity.ie Ph;
More informationYorkdale Development Master Plan Environmental Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Toronto, ON
ASSESSMENT REPORT - Project: 16419 Yorkdale Development Master Plan Environmental Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Toronto, ON Prepared for: Oxford Properties Group Royal Bank Plaza North Tower 200
More informationAppendix G Noise Modeling Files
Appendix G Noise Modeling Files County of Butte Rio d Oro Specific Plan Noise Study July 2014 Rio d Oro Specific Plan Noise Study Prepared for: JKB Development 2370 West Monte Vista Ave. Turlock, CA 95381
More informationAPPENDIXD. Traffic Noise Technical Report
APPENDIXD Traffic Noise Technical Report Environmental Assessment - Lincoln County, SD 85 th Street: Sundowner Avenue to Louise Avenue November 2017 F I N A L R E P O R T TRAFFIC NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT
More informationENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
REPORT REFERENCE: SA 4968 rev 1 ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT British Standard 8233: 2014. CLIENT: MJ Gleeson SITE: Berengrave Nursery, 61 Berengrave Road, Rainham, Kent, ME 7NL SURVEY DATES: Noise
More informationPedestrian Level Wind Study. West Village 70 Mississauga Road South & 181 Lakeshore Road West. Mississauga, Ontario
Pedestrian Level Wind Study West Village 70 Mississauga Road South & 181 Lakeshore Road West Mississauga, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-112-PLW Prepared For: c/o Emily Rosen Diamondcorp 22 St. Clair Avenue East,
More informationMINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY 404 EXTENSION FINAL NOISE STUDY. Assignment Number: 2013-E-0017 #3
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY 404 EXTENSION FINAL NOISE STUDY Assignment Number: 2013-E-0017 #3 Submitted to: The Ministry of Transportation 1201 Wilson Avenue Downsview, Ontario M3M 1J8 Submitted
More informationNoise from Oil & Gas Facilities Acoustics 101 and Best Practices for Noise Control. Rob Stevens, HGC Engineering
Noise from Oil & Gas Facilities Acoustics 101 and Best Practices for Noise Control Rob Stevens, HGC Engineering Noise From Oil & Gas Facilities Acoustics 101 and Best Practices for Noise Control Rob Stevens
More informationGIS-BASED VISUALISATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE
Proceedings of the 9 th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology Rhodes island, Greece, 1 3 September 2005 GIS-BASED VISUALISATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE A. KONSTANTINIDIS 1, K. EVANGELIDIS
More informationAssessment & Specifications for Noise Controls
Project 772600 Rev 1 Cargill North Vancouver Grain Terminal Assessment & Specifications for Noise Controls TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...1 1.1 Background...1 1.2 Site Description...1 2. SOUND LEVEL
More informationDirective on the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise
Directive on the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise This Directive has been ratified by the European Parliament and is awaiting publication in the Official Journal.( around 23/5/02) The Directive
More informationAnswer - SAQ 1. The intensity, I, is given by: Back
Answer - SAQ 1 The intensity, I, is given by: Noise Control. Edited by Shahram Taherzadeh. 2014 The Open University. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 142 Answer - SAQ 2 It shows that the human
More informationCOULD THE GUNSHOT BE HEARD?
COULD THE GUNSHOT BE HEARD? October 9, 2003 Paul D. Schomer Schomer & Associates Champaign, IL 61821 INTRODUCTION Statement of Problem On the evening of November 21, 1991, a NJ State Trooper gave chase
More informationZoning Ordinance. Requirements Used Districts R1 R2 R2.6 R3 R4 R5 B1 B2 B3 B4 M1 M2 RH Density Low Low Med Med High High Gen Local CBD Local LT Hvy Ag
The ordinance shall be known as the Zoning Ordinance of Wetumpka, Alabama, and the map herein referred to as the Zoning Map of Wetumpka, Alabama. The map and all explanatory matter thereon are hereby adopted
More informationSTAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Appeal by Fast Signs of the Decision of the Chief Building Official for One Variance Respecting a Proposed First Party Wall Sign 10-21 Four Seasons Place Date: January 18,
More informationMAY 5, Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc.
MAY 5, 2011 Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street Jacobs Engineering Group Group Inc. Inc. 1 Introductions Agenda Overview of Interchange Project Overview of noise barrier
More information1600 Prairie Drive , FAX
Hennepin County Transportation Department Transportation Department 612-596-0300, Phone 1600 Prairie Drive 612-321-3410, FAX Medina, MN 55340-5421 www.hennepin.us December 30, 2015 Subject: Bottineau Boulevard
More informationKEY: R-1 Low Density Residential. R-2 Medium Density Residential. R-3 High Density Residential. S-C Service Commercial. D-C Downtown Commercial
KEY: R-1 Low Density Residential R-2 Medium Density Residential R-3 High Density Residential S-C Service Commercial D-C Downtown Commercial M-C Medical Commercial H-I Heavy Industrial PARKING MATRIX A
More informationCERTIFIED RESOLUTION. introduction: and dated May 29, 2017, as attached, as appropriate
15322 Buena Vista Avenue, White Rock BC, Canada V4B 1Y6 www.whiterockcity.ca City of White Rock P: 604.541.22121 F: 604.541.9348 /2tC% City Clerk s Office IT E ROC K June 13,2017 Stephanie Lam, Deputy
More informationFundamentals of Sound
Sound is an important consideration in the selection of mechanical equipment. The purpose of this article is to present a procedure for evaluating the sound levels created by evaporative cooling equipment
More informationZONING. 195 Attachment 1
ZONING 195 Attachment 1 Use Regulation Schedule Town of Chelmsford [Amended 10-16-2000 ATM by Art. 20; 5-3-2001 ATM by Art. 17; 10-15-2001 ATM by Art. 22; 4-29-2002 ATM by Art. 22; 10-24-2002 ATM by Art.
More informationresearch highlight Wind-Rain Relationships in Southwestern British Columbia Introduction Methodology Figure 2 Lower Mainland meteorological stations
research highlight June 2007 Technical Series 07-114 Introduction Building envelope failures in southwestern British Columbia has brought to light the strong influence of wind-driven rain on building envelopes.
More informationAppendix E FTA NOISE MODELING WORKSHEETS AND DETAILED METHODOLOGY
Appendix E FTA NOISE MODELING WORKSHEETS AND DETAILED METHODOLOGY APPENDIX E General Noise Assessment The FTA General Noise Assessment procedure was used for calculating noise from transit sources associated
More informationSTRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR SG10 SYSTEM BALUSTRADES USING 21.5mm LAMINATED TOUGHENED GLASS without the need for a handrail BY BALCONY SYSTEMS LIMITED Unit 6 Systems House Eastbourne Road Blindly Heath
More informationAcoustic spaces: comfort and social sustainability
European congress Eco-Technologies for the future 9 June 2010 Acoustic materials and spaces for sustainability Professor Jian Kang School of Architecture, University of Sheffield, UK Outline Acoustics
More informationRegal House #CREATESOMETHING. ALL ENQUIRIES 53,647 sq.ft. RE-DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY SUITABLE FOR A VARIETY OF USES OFFICE HOTEL RESIDENTIAL
SK1 3AA #CREATESOMETHING RE-DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY OFFICE HOTEL RESIDENTIAL Stockport has everything Excellent motorway access First class rail links Efficient local bus services Easy access to Manchester
More informationSHADOW IMPACT STUDY REPORT
SHADOW IMPACT STUDY REPORT 175 Zoo Park Road Town of Wasaga Beach Date: September 2017 Prepared for: Simcoe County Housing Corporation Prepared by: MacNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning Limited
More informationWEST VALLEY BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS. January 9, 2015
400-420 WEST VALLEY BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS January 9, 2015 Kunzman Associates, Inc. 400-420 WEST VALLEY BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS January 9, 2015 Prepared
More informationEnergy Use in Homes. A series of reports on domestic energy use in England. Energy Efficiency
Energy Use in Homes A series of reports on domestic energy use in England Energy Efficiency Energy Use in Homes A series of reports on domestic energy use in England This is one of a series of three reports
More information1 Wind Turbine Acoustics. Wind turbines generate sound by both mechanical and aerodynamic
Wind Turbine Acoustics 1 1 Wind Turbine Acoustics Wind turbines generate sound by both mechanical and aerodynamic sources. Sound remains an important criterion used in the siting of wind farms. Sound emission
More informationTREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 4B10
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 4B10 From: Date: Subject: Staff December 14, 2018 Council Meeting Local Government Comprehensive Plan Review
More informationZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS. Table 4-2 Permitted Uses by Zoning Districts Use Types AG RR R-1 R-2 R-3 MH LC CC DC GC LI GI P Addl Reg
ZONING DITRICT REGULATION Table 4-2 Permitted Uses by Zoning Districts Agricultural Uses Horticulture P P P P P P P P P 39.06.002a Crop Production P P P 39.06.002a Type I Animal Production Type II Animal
More informationSnow and Ice Removal
Policy # 6.6 Procedure # - Replaces 5.10 & 5.10A Revises - Date Approved February 10, 2014 Method of Approval Resolution #17 1. PRINCIPLES The City of Dauphin desires to maintain the City streets, lanes,
More informationSnow and Ice Control POLICY NO. P-01/2015. CITY OF AIRDRIE Snow and Ice Control Policy
Page 1 CITY OF AIRDRIE Snow and Ice Control Effective Date: Approved By: Approved On: March 17, 2015 City Council March 16, 2015 Revision Date: Resolution #: ------ PURPOSE: The City of Airdrie is responsible
More informationBuilding Envelope Requirements Overview Page 3-4
Building Envelope Requirements Overview Page 3-4 The benefit of a high reflectance surface is obvious: while dark surfaces absorb the sun s energy (visible light, invisible infrared. and ultraviolet radiation)
More informationCOUNCIL POLICY MANUAL
COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL SECTION: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: SNOW & ICE CONTROL POLICY 2012/2013 GOAL: Pages: 1 of 10 Approval Date: Dec. 3, 2012 Res. # 1001/2012 To annually identify the winter maintenance costs
More informationPW 001 SNOW REMOVAL AND SANDING FOR ROADWAYS AND SIDEWALKS October 6, 2014 (#223-14) Original October 19, 2015; October 15, 2018 Public Works
Policy Statement: The Village of Kitscoty will provide snow and ice control on municipal streets and sidewalks according to determined priorities. Purpose: To provide direction and information to employees
More informationAppendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014
Appendix C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014 CONTENTS List of Figures-... 3 List of Tables... 4 Introduction... 1 Application of the Lubbock Travel Demand
More informationOccupant Behavior Related to Space Cooling in a High Rise Residential Building Located in a Tropical Region N.F. Mat Hanip 1, S.A. Zaki 1,*, A. Hagish
Occupant Behavior Related to Space Cooling in a High Rise Residential Building Located in a Tropical Region N.F. Mat Hanip 1, S.A. Zaki 1,*, A. Hagishima 2, J. Tanimoto 2, and M.S.M. Ali 1 1 Malaysia-Japan
More informationBUILDING AND SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE (Effective July1, 2013)
BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION TELEPHONE (949) 724-6300 BUILDING AND SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE (Effective July1, 2013) Payment: When a plan is required by the Administrative Authority to be submitted, a plan check
More informationDubai Municipality LRT Noise and Vibration Impact Stage 2
Dubai Municipality LRT Noise and Vibration Impact Stage 2 Environmental Impact 11 th of April, 2004 Environmental Impact Report According to the PS007 Agreement, Environmental Impact Report Based on Noise
More informationPaine Field Airport Existing and Future Environmental Assessment, Initiation of Commercial Service Noise Analysis
Paine Field Airport Existing and Future Environmental Assessment, Initiation of Commercial Service Noise Analysis July 2012 Prepared by: BridgeNet International 3151 Airway Avenue Building I-2 Costa Mesa,
More informationCHAPTER 26 PLANNING AND ZONING ARTICLE XIV. AIRPORT OVERLAY ZONING
CHAPTER 26 PLANNING AND ZONING ARTICLE XIV. AIRPORT OVERLAY ZONING Section 26-XIV-1. Purpose and Findings Section 26-XIV-2. Definitions Section 26-XIV-3. Maps & Boundaries Section 26-XIV-4. Airport Height
More informationST. DAVID S COURT DUBLIN 5
ST. DAVID S COURT DUBLIN 5 ST. DAVID S COURT DUBLIN 5 St. David s Court is a modern development of four and five-bedroom family homes nestled in a quiet suburban setting located off the Malahide Road.
More informationPublished in: Proceeding of 9th SENVAR / 2nd ISESEE, Shah Alam, Malaysia, December 2008
Evaluation on Lighting Condition and Visual Legibility of Road Surfaces and Traffic Signs in Bandung City Mangkuto, R.A.; Soelami, F.X.N.; Soegijanto, R.M. Published in: Proceeding of 9th SENVAR / 2nd
More informationSHADOW STUDY REPORT REGARDING
SHADOW STUDY REPORT REGARDING an APPLICATION TO REDEVELOP Three 6 Storey Condominiums Regional Road 25 (Ontario Street) and Britannia Road Milton, Ontario KNYMH FILE # 17030 Prepared by: Krista Lilley
More informationTABLE OF USE REGULATIONS
TABLE OF USE REGULATONS Y - Permitted as of right N - Prohibited BA - Special Permit/Board of Appeals PB - Special Permit/Planning Board SB - Special Permit/Selectboard PRNCPAL USE SR GR B CB L L A. Residential
More information930 Old Northern Rd & 4 Post Office Rd, Glenorie
Proposed Mixed Use Development 930 Old Northern & 4, Glenorie TRAFFIC AND PARKING ASSESSMENT REPORT 13 December 2016 Ref 16264 Suite 6, 20 Young Street, Neutral Bay NSW 2089 - PO Box 1868, Neutral Bay
More informationTraffic Impact Study
Traffic Impact Study Statham DRI One University Parkway Prepared for: Barrow County Prepared by: October 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary i Section 1. Introduction 1 Project Description 1 Methodology
More informationEngineer's Report. Main Street Business Area. Festoon Lighting and Sidewalk Cleaning Assessment District (Fiscal Year )
Engineer's Report for the Main Street Business Area Festoon Lighting and Sidewalk Cleaning Assessment District (Fiscal Year 2008-09) Prepared under the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982
More informationEnergy Use in Homes 2007
Energy Use in Homes 2007 A series of reports on domestic energy use in England Space and Water Heating Energy Use in Homes 2007 A series of reports on domestic energy use in England This is one of a series
More informationEnergy Use in Homes 2004
Energy Use in Homes 2004 A series of reports on domestic energy use in England Space and Water Heating Energy Use in Homes 2004 A series of reports on domestic energy use in England This is one of a series
More information1 BAKER HOUSE DINING: LIGHTING DIAGNOSTIC
Shauna Jin + Caitlin Mueller 4.401: Lighting and Acoustics Analyses 27 April 2006 1 BAKER HOUSE DINING: LIGHTING DIAGNOSTIC 1.1 Sunlight Penetration The Baker House Dining room is exposed mostly to southern
More information2267 N o r t h 1500 W C l i n t o n U T 84015
P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n M e m b e r s C h a i r J a c o b B r i g g s V i c e C h a i r G a r y T y l e r T o n y T h o m p s o n J o l e n e C r e s s a l l A n d y H a l e D e r e c k B a
More information2018 North Carolina Residential Code Prescriptive Tables for Selection of Support Elements for Beams, Girders, and Headers: Example Problems
2018 North Carolina Residential Code Prescriptive Tables for Selection of Support Elements for Beams, Girders, and Structural Building Components Association (SBCA) August 10, 2018 SBCA is an APPROVED
More informationSection 14F Purpose of the Wairakei Residential Zone
Section 14F 14F Purpose of the Wairakei Residential Zone The purpose of the Wairakei Residential Zone is to provide for an intensified urban character within Papamoa East. The zone recognises Wairakei
More information[N492] Using GIS in Noise exposure analysis
The 32nd International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering Jeju International Convention Center, Seogwipo, Korea, August 25-28, 2003 [N492] Using GIS in Noise exposure analysis Author:
More informationChapter 11. Noise Impacts of Transportation Systems. Transportation Decision-making Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming
Transportation Decision-making Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming Chapter 11 Noise Impacts of Transportation Systems Kumares Sinha and Samuel Labi 1 2 Real Experiences of Transportation Noise
More informationCity of Hermosa Beach Beach Access and Parking Study. Submitted by. 600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA
City of Hermosa Beach Beach Access and Parking Study Submitted by 600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.261.3050 January 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction to the Beach Access and Parking
More informationDAYLIGHT, SUNLIGHT AND OVERSHADOWING The EXO Building at Point Village North Wall Quay & East Wall Road, Dublin 1.
DAYLIGHT, SUNLIGHT AND OVERSHADOWING The EXO Building at Point Village North Wall Quay & East Wall Road, Dublin 1. For Grant Thornton, on behalf of the Specified Assets of Henry A. Crosbie (In Receivership)
More informationJordan Harrison, Planner III, San Francisco Recreation and Park Department
Date November 18, 2015 To: Through: From: Subject: Recreation and Park Commission Philip A. Ginsburg, General Manager Dawn Kamalanathan, Director, Capital & Planning Division Jordan Harrison, Planner III,
More informationEnergy Use in Homes 2004
Energy Use in Homes 2004 A series of reports on domestic energy use in England Thermal Insulation Energy Use in Homes 2004 A series of reports on domestic energy use in England This is one of a series
More informationLocal Area Key Issues Paper No. 13: Southern Hinterland townships growth opportunities
Draft Sunshine Coast Planning Scheme Review of Submissions Local Area Key Issues Paper No. 13: Southern Hinterland townships growth opportunities Key Issue: Growth opportunities for Southern Hinterland
More informationJEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone:
JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH 45243 Email: jackpflum1@gmail.com Telephone: 513.919.7814 MEMORANDUM REPORT Traffic Impact Analysis Proposed Soccer
More informationHere Comes the Sun. Rachel Wagner. Duluth Energy Design Conference 26 February
Here Comes the Sun Duluth Energy Design Conference 26 February 2014 Photo by Dave Swenson Rachel Wagner Here Comes the Sun 1 Wagner Zaun Architecture 17 N Lake Avenue Duluth, MN 55802 www.wagnerzaun.com
More informationSt. Mary s County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Article 5. REGULATION OF USES. Schedule 50.4 Use Classifications. Legend
St. Mary s County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance Article 5. REGULATION OF USES Schedule 50.4 Use Classifications Legend P Use is permitted in accordance with Chapter 51 General Standards L Use is permitted
More informationNeighborhood Locations and Amenities
University of Maryland School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation Fall, 2014 Neighborhood Locations and Amenities Authors: Cole Greene Jacob Johnson Maha Tariq Under the Supervision of: Dr. Chao
More informationEffect of Environmental Factors on Free-Flow Speed
Effect of Environmental Factors on Free-Flow Speed MICHAEL KYTE ZAHER KHATIB University of Idaho, USA PATRICK SHANNON Boise State University, USA FRED KITCHENER Meyer Mohaddes Associates, USA ABSTRACT
More informationOctober 16, Dear Mr. Hawkins:
IBI GROUP 101 410 Albert Street Waterloo ON N2L 3V3 Canada tel 519 585 2255 fax 519 585 2269 October 16, 2017 Mr. Trevor Hawkins Manager of Applications and Implementation Integrated Planning and Public
More information