Traffic Impact Study

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Traffic Impact Study"

Transcription

1 Traffic Impact Study Statham DRI One University Parkway Prepared for: Barrow County Prepared by: October 2012

2 Table of Contents Executive Summary i Section 1. Introduction 1 Project Description 1 Methodology 3 Micro-Simulation Model 6 Level of Service 6 Section 2. Existing Conditions 8 Existing Traffic Volumes 9 Existing Traffic Operations 13 Section 3. Future Conditions 17 Base Condition Traffic 17 Project Generated Traffic 19 Future Traffic Conditions 20 Section 4. Conclusions 34 Summary of Findings 34 Recommendations and Conclusions 34 Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Traffic Count Worksheets Level of Service Analysis Worksheets Trip Generation Worksheets

3 List of Figures No. Title Page 1 Project Location 2 2 Conceptual Development Plan 5 3 Level of Service Definitions and Criteria 7 4 Existing (2012) Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes 10 5 GDOT Traffic Count Location 12 6 Future Base Condition (2024) Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes 18 7 Project Generated Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes 29 8 Future Build (2024) Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes 30 List of Tables No. Title Page 1 Development Summary 3 2 GDOT Historical Traffic Count Data Existing Intersection Level of Service Summary 13 4 FY 2024 Trip Generation Analysis Base Condition Intersection Level of Service Summary Build Condition Intersection Level of Service Summary Build Condition Intersection Level of Service Summary after the Development 31

4 Executive Summary The following report provides a study of the traffic impacts related to the development of 238 acres located west of the City of Statham in Barrow County, Georgia. The subject property is currently undeveloped and the applicant proposes to construct a mixture of land uses that includes commercial, office, and residential complexes. The applicant anticipates completion of the development by the year The traffic study for this project entailed a detailed intersection analysis for the following intersections that are within two miles of the proposed development: Bethlehem Road/SR University Parkway/SR 316 Bethlehem Road/SR Atlanta Highway/SR 8 McCarty University Parkway/SR 316 Wall University Parkway/SR 316 Elder Wall Road Wall Foster Road Wall Atlanta Highway/SR 8 Hog Mountain Road/SR University Parkway/SR 316 The trips associated with this proposed development occur by the anticipated year of For the year 2024, there are expected to be a total of 43,369 vehicle trip ends per day. This includes approximately 3,200 and 4,420 additional vehicles during the AM and PM peak hours respectively. As a result, it is projected that there would be 2,141 (2-way directions) and 2,810 vehicles per hour accessing the Wall Road during the AM and PM peak hours respectively. This also approximately increases 1,100 and 1,500 vehicles (2-way directions) along the University Parkway and 300 and 110 vehicles along the Atlanta Highway during each peak hour. The project-generated trips were assigned to the study area network and the CORSIM modeling software was used to perform the capacity analysis. The capacity analysis utilized peak hour traffic volumes for the detailed intersection analysis. Base Condition traffic volumes for the years 2024 were derived using an annual 1.0% percent growth rate, which was added to the existing condition traffic counts. i

5 Results from the study revealed that each of the intersections analyzed currently operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS). There was not any transportation improvements required for the existing conditions. Traffic for the 2024 Base Conditions was increased to account for general traffic growth that is expected to occur without the construction of the proposed development. The results from the Base Condition analyses revealed that transportation improvements are not required for the future year Base Condition. It should be noted that when completing traffic analysis for a project within a transitioning urban area, a LOS D or better is considered adequate or acceptable. Levels of service worse than a LOS D would indicate that an intersection or approach is approaching capacity and cannot accommodate substantial increases in traffic without substantial increases in congestion and delay. The results from the Base Condition analysis have indicated that there are intersections that will be approaching capacity by the year 2024 and drivers will experience additional delay due to any future development. For instance, there has been a commercial establishment proposed for the intersection of Bethlehem Road (SR 211) and Atlanta Highway on acres that will most likely have a direct impact on this intersection. Subsequent to the construction of the proposed development, the peak period traffic volumes that were generated were distributed among the study area roadways according to existing traffic flow pattern. The additional traffic lowered the intersection levels of service (LOS) for the following un-signalized intersection locations: Year 2024 LOS AM(PM) Base Intersection Condition Build University Wall Road D (D) F (F) University McCarty Road C (C) D (E) Atlanta Wall Road C (C) F (F) Atlanta Bethlehem Road C (C) C (F) The required improvements at these intersections to raise the LOS to D or better are listed below: Signalization is proposed at the following Intersections University Wall Road University McCarty Road Atlanta Wall Road Atlanta Bethlehem Road ii

6 University Wall Road intersection geometry improvement Provide a additional left-turn lane on University Parkway eastbound approach to Wall Road Create a dual right turn bay on Wall Road southbound approach to University Parkway The intersection along Atlanta Highway at Bethlehem Road is considered to be indirect impact to the transportation network because the intersection is over two miles from the subject property. Any other unrelated developments in the vicinity of this intersection could directly adversely impact its operation. Thus, the proposed improvement at this intersection is suggestive. The vehicular trips generated for this evaluation were based upon the maximum land use potential for the proposed site. This accounts for the maximum traffic impact possible. Current market trends may result in less intense land uses that will not generate as many vehicular trips thus less traffic impact. The transportation improvement recommendations that have been provided may not be required with less intense land uses. The following table provides a general summary for the proposed development along the University Parkway: Name of Project Wolf Ridge Jurisdiction Barrow County Location University Parkway at Wall Road Uses and Intensities 238 acres of mixture of land use development, including commercial, office, and residential complexes. Project Phasing and Build Out Schedule One phase for the year 2024 Gross Trip Generation (ADT/AM Peak/PM Peak) 43,369/3,200/4,420 Signalization is required at the following Intersections University Wall Road University McCarty Road Atlanta Wall Road Atlanta Bethlehem Road Traffic Study Recommendations University Wall Road intersection geometry improvement Provide a additional left-turn lane on University Parkway eastbound approach to Wall Road Create a dual right turn bay on Wall Road southbound approach to University Parkway iii

7 Section 1 Introduction The following analysis provides a study of the traffic impacts related to the construction of a mixture of land uses located along SR 316 (University Parkway) just west of City of Statham in Barrow County, Georgia. The subject property is situated around the intersection of University Parkway and Wall Road. The project s location has been further illustrated on Figure 1. The purpose of the following report is to evaluate the traffic impacts related to the proposed land use. Atkins performed the following tasks for this analysis: Identified the existing conditions of the roadway facilities in the vicinity of the proposed site. Estimated the daily and peak hour traffic volumes for the proposed use, using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7 th Edition for the years 2012 and Performed a detailed evaluation of the operational characteristics of the roadway system in the vicinity of the site, both with and without the construction of the proposed development, utilizing the traffic simulation software, CORSIM. Project Description As previously indicated, the subject property is located on approximately 238 acres west of the City of Statham in Barrow County. The applicant for the subject property proposes to construct a Research and Business Park that includes a mixture of commercial, office, and residential developments. The applicant anticipates one phase of construction by the year Approximately 506 dwelling units are expected to be constructed, which will most likely consist of 340 multi-family units and 166 senior-adult living units. The development also includes 2 million square feet use of commercial, office, educational, and civic facilities. A summary of the proposed development is provided in Table 1. 1

8 2 Figure 1

9 Table 1 Development Summary Land Use Acreage Density Quantity Commercial ,000/Acre 493,500 sqft Flex Office/Industrial 35 12,000/Acre 439,000 sqft Office/Employment ,000 /Acre 757,000 sqft Multi-Family (unit) Units/Acre 340 units Senior Living (unit) Units/Acre 166 units School/Education ,000/Acre 312,000 sqft Civic 5 2,000/Acre 8,000 sqft Total Acreage acres Total Residential 506 units Total Non-residential 2,009,500 sqft The proposed development would be constructed in accordance with the Barrow County zoning ordinances, development guidelines and tree protection and replacement ordinances. A conceptual site plan for the subject property is provided on Figure 2. Methodology Traffic operations were analyzed for the subject property, which includes the intersections listed below. Bethlehem Road/SR University Parkway/SR 316 Bethlehem Road/SR Atlanta Highway/SR 8 McCarty University Parkway/SR 316 Wall University Parkway/SR 316 Elder Wall Road Wall Foster Road Wall Atlanta Highway/SR 8 Hog Mountain Road/SR University Parkway/SR 316 The development will be located surrounding the existing intersection of University Parkway at Wall Road. Vehicular access to the proposed development is primary through this intersection. A 3

10 small right-in and right-out driveway has been proposed to be constructed approximately 2500 feet east of the intersection to serve senior-adult living units located in the east edge of the southwest quadrant surrounding the intersection. Several connecting roads will be constructed inside the development to serve the traffic circulation as shown in Figure 2. As a result, the existing Wall Road within the development area immediately north of the University Parkway will be realigned also shown in Figure 2. 4

11 5

12 6 Figure 2

13 The time periods analyzed for this evaluation were during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. The study methodology for the proposed project included the following tasks: 1. Utilize the traffic simulation model CORSIM to evaluate the operating conditions in the study area to establish Base Conditions for the years 2012 and Develop AM and PM peak hour vehicle trip end estimates for each phase of the proposed land use using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7 th edition. 3. Use the traffic analysis software CORSIM to evaluate operating conditions in the study area using 2012 and 2024 Base Condition traffic along with traffic that would be generated by the proposed development. 4. Use traffic analysis results to identify access requirements and to identify any necessary roadway system enhancements that may be required both with and without the construction of the proposed development. Micro-Simulation Model Capacity analysis procedures for the subject property have been performed using the traffic simulation software CORSIM. This software provided the most accurate tool for assessing traffic operations and evaluating the impact of development. CORSIM is a computer model developed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) that simulates one hour of traffic and monitors the status of each vehicle as it travels through the network. CORSIM tabulates the average delay per vehicle for each approach to each intersection that was designated for analysis within the study area. In order to interpret CORSIM analysis measurements into terms that could be translated into improvement recommendations, the average delay per vehicle calculations were converted into level-of-service (LOS) categories. Level of Service LOS is a measure used to describe traffic operations that translates traffic conditions into a letter grade ranging from A to F. Figure 3, which is based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, illustrates and describes each LOS and lists the criteria used in their determination. The average vehicle delay at each intersection is calculated by CORSIM and then translated to LOS. 7

14 EAR169 EAR169 EAR169 EAR169 EAR169 EAR169 EAR169 EAR169 LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTION SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION MAXIMUM DELAY (In Seconds) UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION MAXIMUM DELAY (In Seconds) A LITTLE OR NO DELAY. At signalized intersections, no vehicle must wait longer than one signal in order to travel through the intersection B SHORT DELAYS. At signalized intersections, a vehicle might have to wait through more than one signal indication to pass through the intersection on a rare occasion C AVERAGE DELAYS. At signalized intersections, a vehicle would be required to wait through more than one signal indication to pass through the intersection on an intermittent basis, and occasionally backups could occur behind left turning vehicles D LONG DELAYS. At signalized intersections, delays may become extensive with some vehicles requiring two or more signal indications to pass through the intersection. However, sufficient signal cycles with lower demand are available to permit the periodic clearance of the intersection E VERY LONG DELAYS. At signalized intersections, very long queues and high levels of congestion are prevalent which result in lengthy delays F EXCESSIVELY LONG DELAYS. The capacity of the roadway or intersection has been exceeded resulting in extremely high levels of congestion. >80.0 >50.0 LEVEL OF SERVICE A LEVEL OF SERVICE B LEVEL OF SERVICE C LEVEL OF SERVICE D LEVEL OF SERVICE E LEVEL OF SERVICE F Traffic Impact Study Presbyterian Village Level of Service Definitions and Criteria Figure 3 8

15 Section 2 Existing Conditions As previously discussed, the subject property is located along the University Parkway surrounding the intersection at Wall Road. This area of Barrow County is within close proximity to State Route 316, the Athens Perimeter and US Highway 78, which is critical in providing sufficient access for this type of development within the County, as well as the general driving public. The applicant is proposing to construct a mixture of land use development on approximately 238 acres. The major existing transportation facilities within the study area network can be described as follows: Main travel facilities in the area are: University Parkway (SR 316) is a four-lane, rural major arterial with a separated median. This roadway travels in an east-west direction and traverses the subject property. This roadway facility provides a major through connection between Athens and metropolitan Atlanta region. Atlanta Highway (SR 8) is a rural two-lane major collector facility traveling an east-west direction parallel to the SR 316 to the north. Wall Road is a two-lane, rural local roadway facility that primarily serves the residential area between the University Parkway and Atlanta highway/sr 8. Wall Road is about 1.5 miles in length and travels in a north-south direction. Other peripheral facilities in the area include: Hog Mountain Road (SR 53) is a two-lane, rural major collector roadway facility that travels in a north-south direction and intersects University Parkway approximately 1.5 miles west of the Wall Road intersection. McCarty Road is two-lane neighborhood road that travels in a north-south direction and intersects University Parkway approximately 1 mile east of the Wall Road intersection. Bethlehem Road (SR 211) is a major collector road 0.5 mile east of McCarty Road. It connects both University Parkway to the south and Atlanta Highway to the North. 9

16 Elder Road is a residential neighborhood road that intersects the Wall Road approximately 1,000 feet north of University Parkway. Foster Road is also a residential neighborhood road that intersects the Wall Road approximately 0.6 miles south of University Parkway. Existing Traffic Volumes Traffic counts were taken at each of the identified intersections within the study area. These data were collected on April 11 nd, 2012 for both the morning AM and evening PM peak hours. These traffic volumes were utilized to evaluate the operational efficiency of each intersection. The peak-hour turning movement volumes and geometric configurations for each of the intersections are illustrated on Figure 4. Detailed traffic counts are provided in Appendix A. Several Georgia Department of Transportation count stations are also located within the vicinity of the proposed project. Counts at these locations were reviewed for the years 2005 through 2011, in order to determine historical trends and to assist in the traffic distribution for this analysis. The historical traffic counts are provided in Table 2 and their locations have been illustrated on Figure 5. 10

17 11 Figure 4

18 Table 2 GDOT Historical Traffic Count Data Location Count Station Year Annual Percent Growth University Pkwy at Wall Rd % Bethlehem Rd (btw University Pkwy & Atlanta Hwy) % Atlanta Hwy (btw Bethlehem Rd & Wall Rd) % University Pkwy (E of Bethlehem Rd) % Atlanta Hwy (W of Bethlehem Rd) % Atlanta Hwy (W of Wall Rd) % Bethlehem Rd (N of Atlanta Hwy) % 8th St (btw University Pkwy & Atlanta Rd) % 12

19 13 Figure 5

20 Existing Traffic Operations A CORSIM analysis was performed for the existing conditions. The results from CORSIM provided the LOS determination for each of the intersections located within the study area. These results are summarized in Table 3 and more detailed results are provided in Appendix B. The analysis for the subject property has assumed that a LOS D or better will be considered adequate (or acceptable) for the roadways within the study area. It should be noted that when completing traffic analysis for a project within a transitioning urban area, a LOS D or better is considered adequate or acceptable. Levels of service worse than a LOS D would indicate that an intersection or approach is approaching capacity and cannot accommodate substantial increases in traffic without substantial increases in congestion and delay. Table 3 reveals that each of the intersections currently operate at a overall LOS D or better in both the AM and PM peak periods. Table Existing Intersection Level of Service Summary LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left C C University Pkwy (SR Hog Mountain Rd (signalized) Northbound Thru C C Right C B OVERALL C C Left C C Southbound Thru D D Right C C OVERALL C C Left C C Eastbound Thru C C Right C C OVERALL C C Left D C Westbound Thru C C Right C C OVERALL C C Intersection Total C C 14

21 LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left C A University Pkwy (SR Wall Rd (unsignalized) Northbound Thru D F Right C C OVERALL D E Left E A Southbound Thru F E Right A A OVERALL C C Left C D Eastbound Thru C C Right A A OVERALL C D Left C C Westbound Thru C C Right A B OVERALL C C Intersection Total C D LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left A A University Pkwy (SR McCarty Rd (unsignalized) Northbound Thru B A Right A A OVERALL B A Left B A Southbound Thru A A Right C C OVERALL C C Left B C Eastbound Thru C C Right A A OVERALL B C Left D C Westbound Thru C B Right A A OVERALL D C Intersection Total C C 15

22 LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left C B University Pkwy (SR Bethlehem Rd (signalized) Northbound Thru D D Right B B OVERALL C C Left C C Southbound Thru C C Right B B OVERALL B C Left D C Eastbound Thru C C Right A A OVERALL C C Left E C Westbound Thru C C Right B B OVERALL C C Intersection Total C C LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left A A Atlanta Wall Rd (unsignalized) Northbound Right B B OVERALL B B Thru A A Eastbound Right A A OVERALL A A Left C C Westbound Thru B B OVERALL C C Intersection Total C B 16

23 LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left C C Atlanta Bethlehem Rd (unsignalized) Northbound Right C C OVERALL C C Thru A A Eastbound Right A A OVERALL A A Left B A Westbound Thru A A OVERALL B A Intersection Total B C LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left B B Wall Elder Rd (unsignalized) Southbound Right A B OVERALL A B Left A A Eastbound Thru A A OVERALL A A Thru A A Westbound Right A A OVERALL A A Intersection Total A A LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left A A Wall Foster Rd (unsignalized) Southbound Right A B OVERALL A B Left A A Eastbound Thru B A OVERALL A A Thru A A Westbound Right A A OVERALL A A Intersection Total A B 17

24 Section 3 Future Conditions To accurately assess the traffic impact of the proposed development, a Base Condition that represents traffic without the proposed development was prepared. This Base Condition includes the traffic which is for the year 2024, assuming that the proposed development did not occur. There were not any scheduled roadway improvements identified within the study area; therefore, none were included in the Base Conditions. Subsequent to preparing the Base Condition transportation network, the next step was to determine the number of trips entering and exiting the subject property that would be generated by the proposed development. Finally, traffic operations were analyzed with the projectgenerated trips added to the Base Condition. Base Condition Traffic Based on the historical Georgia Department of Transportation traffic counts shown in Table 2, all locations but one have experienced decline in recent years due to the current recession. An annual moderate increase of 1.00 percent in traffic volumes on the study area roads was assumed as the basis for a reasonable future year forecast. Traffic volumes were projected for both the AM and PM peak hours. Traffic volumes for the Base Condition are illustrated on Figures 6. 18

25 19 Figure 6

26 Project Generated Traffic The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7 th edition, was used to determine the number of trips entering and exiting the subject property during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Table 4 displays the AM and PM peak hour traffic generated by the subject property s proposed use. As discussed previously, the applicant expects there to be a total of 506 occupied dwelling units for the year These occupied dwelling units will most likely consist of 340 multi-family dwelling units and 166 senior-adult living units. The proposed development will also include 2 million square feet of commercial, offices, civic, and educational facilities. According to the ITE trip generation rates, the total trips generated by the development are approximately 3,200 vehicles in the AM peak hour and 4,420 vehicles in the PM peak hour. The total daily trips are estimated to be around 43,370 vehicle trips. Detailed trip generation information is included in Appendix C. Table 4 FY 2024 Trip Generation Analysis ITE AM Peak PM Peak Land Use SF&Units Daily Code In Out In Out 820 Commercial 493,500 20, Flex Office/Industrial 439,000 3, Office/Employment 757,000 8,327 1, Multi-Family (unit) 340 1, Senior Living (unit) School/Education 312,000 8, Civic 8, Total 43,369 2, ,728 2,691 20

27 Future Traffic Conditions The future peak hour traffic volumes were analyzed for both the AM and PM peak hours for both the Base and Build conditions. First, the study area network utilized the future background traffic volumes for Base Condition to determine the LOS for the identified intersections within the study area. Then, for the Build Condition, the project-generated traffic was included on the same network, in order to determine the traffic impacts caused by the proposed development. As stated earlier, the traffic simulation model CORSIM was utilized to evaluate the operating conditions of the study area network. Trip reduction is not applied to the development, so the analysis presents the worst scenario case. Detailed analysis sheets for all traffic scenarios are provided in Appendix B. The results of the intersection analysis for the year 2024 Base Condition, which does not include the traffic generated by the proposed development, are summarized in Table 5. These results have revealed that each of the intersections analyzed are anticipated to operate at overall LOS D or better for both the AM and PM peak hours. The results from the Base Condition analysis have indicated that there are intersections that will be approaching capacity by the year 2024 and drivers will experience additional delay due to any future development. For instance, there has been a commercial establishment proposed for the intersection of Bethlehem Road (SR 211) and Atlanta Highway on acres that will most likely have a direct impact on this intersection. 21

28 Table Base Condition Intersection Level of Service Summary LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left C C University Pkwy (SR Hog Mountain Rd (signalized) Northbound Thru C C Right C B OVERALL C C Left C C Southbound Thru C D Right C B OVERALL C C Left D C Eastbound Thru C C Right C C OVERALL C C Left D C Westbound Thru C C Right C B OVERALL C C Intersection Total C C LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left C A University Pkwy (SR Wall Rd (unsignalized) Northbound Thru C F Right C B OVERALL C F Left F A Southbound Thru F E Right B B OVERALL D C Left C D Eastbound Thru C C Right A A OVERALL C D Left C D Westbound Thru C C Right A C OVERALL C D Intersection Total D D 22

29 LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left A A University Pkwy (SR McCarty Rd (unsignalized) Northbound Thru A A Right A A OVERALL A A Left B B Southbound Thru A A Right C C OVERALL C C Left D C Eastbound Thru C C Right A A OVERALL D C Left C C Westbound Thru C B Right A A OVERALL C C Intersection Total C C LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left B D University Pkwy (SR Bethlehem Rd (signalized) Northbound Thru C C Right B B OVERALL C C Left C C Southbound Thru C C Right B B OVERALL B C Left D C Eastbound Thru C C Right A A OVERALL C C Left D C Westbound Thru C C Right B C OVERALL C C Intersection Total C C 23

30 LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left B A Atlanta Wall Rd (unsignalized) Northbound Right B B OVERALL B B Thru A A Eastbound Right A A OVERALL A A Left C C Westbound Thru C B OVERALL C C Intersection Total C C LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left C C Atlanta Bethlehem Rd (unsignalized) Northbound Right C C OVERALL C C Thru A A Eastbound Right A A OVERALL A A Left B A Westbound Thru A A OVERALL B A Intersection Total C C LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left A B Wall Elder Rd (unsignalized) Southbound Right A A OVERALL A A Left A A Eastbound Thru A A OVERALL A A Thru A A Westbound Right A A OVERALL A A Intersection Total A A 24

31 LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left A A Wall Foster Rd (unsignalized) Southbound Right A A OVERALL A A Left B B Eastbound Thru A A OVERALL B B Thru A A Westbound Right A A OVERALL A A Intersection Total B A Traffic analysis of the Build Condition included the project-generated traffic that was distributed and assigned to the roadways within the study area network according to the existing traffic distribution pattern in the highway network. The distribution for the project-generated traffic is displayed on Figures 7 while the Build Condition traffic volumes which include both the future year volumes and the projected generated volumes are displayed on Figures 8. According to the ITE trip generation analysis shown in table 4, the new development will generate approximately additional 3,200 and 4,420 vehicles during the AM and PM peak hours respectively. As illustrated on the development site plan, the project-generated traffic mainly accesses the highway system through Wall Road, which creates additional traffic burden on Wall Road s intersections with both the University Parkway and the Atlanta Highway, deteriorating the intersection operating condition. Table 6 shows the intersection Level of Service under the Built Condition. 25

32 Table Build Condition Intersection Level of Service Summary LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left B D University Pkwy (SR Hog Mountain Rd (signalized) Northbound Thru C D Right C B OVERALL C C Left C D Southbound Thru C D Right B A OVERALL C D Left C C Eastbound Thru C C Right B B OVERALL C C Left C C Westbound Thru C C Right B B OVERALL C C Intersection Total C C LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left F F University Pkwy (SR Wall Rd (unsignalized) Northbound Thru F F Right F F OVERALL F F Left F F Southbound Thru F F Right F F OVERALL F F Left F F Eastbound Thru F F Right A F OVERALL F F Left A C Westbound Thru B B Right B C OVERALL A C Intersection Total F F 26

33 LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left A A University Pkwy (SR McCarty Rd (unsignalized) Northbound Thru F F Right A A OVERALL F F Left A E Southbound Thru A A Right F D OVERALL D E Left C E Eastbound Thru B B Right A A OVERALL C E Left C C Westbound Thru A B Right A A OVERALL C C Intersection Total D E LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left C C University Pkwy (SR Bethlehem Rd (signalized) Northbound Thru C C Right B B OVERALL C C Left C C Southbound Thru C C Right B B OVERALL B C Left F C Eastbound Thru C B Right A B OVERALL C B Left C D Westbound Thru C C Right B B OVERALL C C Intersection Total C C 27

34 LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left F F Atlanta Wall Rd (unsignalized) Northbound Right F F OVERALL F F Thru A A Eastbound Right A A OVERALL A A Left F C Westbound Thru B B OVERALL F C Intersection Total F F LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left D F Atlanta Bethlehem Rd (unsignalized) Northbound Right C F OVERALL C F Thru A A Eastbound Right A A OVERALL A A Left A B Westbound Thru A A OVERALL A B Intersection Total C F LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left A A Wall Foster Rd (unsignalized) Southbound Right A A OVERALL A A Left B A Eastbound Thru A B OVERALL B A Thru A A Westbound Right A A OVERALL A A Intersection Total B A 28

35 As table 6 shows, the following four intersections are anticipated to operate below LOS D due to the proposed development. University Wall Road University McCarty Road Atlanta Wall Road Atlanta Bethlehem Road The Wall Road and Elder Road intersection could not be thoroughly assessed due to the roadway realignment as a part of the development. Depending on the realignment, the traffic pattern will likely be changed after the development. Additionally, the intersection along Atlanta Highway at Bethlehem Road is considered to be indirect impact to the transportation network because the intersection is over two miles from the subject property. Any other unrelated developments in the vicinity of this intersection could have a direct adverse impact its operation. Therefore the exact impact from the development on this intersection is less certain than other three. The four intersections listed previously serve as main access points to the development through either University Parkway or Atlanta Highway. It is obvious that once the development is constructed, the intersections will require improvements that will include new traffic signals to accommodate the project-generated traffic. The majority of the development occurs on the north side the University Parkway according to the site plan. The travel demand from the west requires additional intersection geometry changes in order to mitigate the traffic impact at the intersection of Wall Road and University Parkway. This requires a double left-turning bay on the eastbound approach of the University Parkway and a dual right-turn approach on the southbound Wall Road. The existing highway geometry on the northbound approach on Wall Road will operate at an acceptable LOS since majority of the development is concentrated north of the University Parkway. The measures can raise the intersection LOS to D or better. The small portion of the development located at the east edge of the southeast quadrant serves the senior-adult living units and civic centers. It will be served by a right-in-right-out driveway on the University Parkway. The traffic impact from this portion of the development is negligible with approximately 30 and 40 vehicles in the AM and PM peak respectively. No additional improvements are required. Table 7 shows the intersection Level of Service after the implementation of the improvements. All intersections will operate at overall LOS C or better under future traffic condition. 29

36 30 Figure 7

37 31 Figure 8

38 Table Build Condition Intersection Level of Service Summary after the Proposed Improvements LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left C D University Pkwy (SR Hog Mountain Rd (signalized) Northbound Thru C D Right C C OVERALL C D Left C E Southbound Thru D D Right C C OVERALL C E Left C C Eastbound Thru D C Right C C OVERALL D C Left D D Westbound Thru C C Right C C OVERALL C C Intersection Total C C LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left C C University Pkwy (SR Wall Rd (unsignalized) Northbound Thru D C Right C B OVERALL C C Left C C Southbound Thru C C Right B B OVERALL C C Left D E Eastbound Thru C C Right A C OVERALL D D Left D D Westbound Thru D D Right C C OVERALL C D Intersection Total C C 32

39 LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left A A University Pkwy (SR McCarty Rd (signalized) Northbound Thru B D Right A A OVERALL B D Left C D Southbound Thru A A Right C C OVERALL C C Left C D Eastbound Thru C C Right A A OVERALL A C Left C C Westbound Thru B C Right A A OVERALL A C Intersection Total A C LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left D C University Pkwy (SR Bethlehem Rd (signalized) Northbound Thru C C Right C C OVERALL C C Left C C Southbound Thru C C Right B C OVERALL C C Left E D Eastbound Thru C C Right A C OVERALL C C Left D D Westbound Thru C C Right B B OVERALL C C Intersection Total C C 33

40 LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left D C Atlanta Wall Rd (signalized) Northbound Right C C OVERALL C C Thru C C Eastbound Right B C OVERALL C C Left C D Westbound Thru B C OVERALL C C Intersection Total C C LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left C C Atlanta Bethlehem Rd (signalized) Northbound Right B B OVERALL B B Thru C C Eastbound Right C C OVERALL C C Left B B Westbound Thru B B OVERALL B A Intersection Total B B LOS Intersection Approach Movement AM PM Left A B Wall Foster Rd (unsignalized) Southbound Right A B OVERALL A B Left A B Eastbound Thru A B OVERALL A B Thru A A Westbound Right A A OVERALL A A Intersection Total A B 34

41 Section 4 Conclusions Summary of Findings In order to assess the impact of the proposed development, existing conditions were analyzed based upon actual traffic counts utilizing the CORSIM traffic simulation model. Then Base Conditions were prepared to reflect the future conditions of the proposed development for the year A growth rate of 1.00 percent per year was utilized to represent an increase in the existing traffic volumes and there were not any planned roadway improvements identified in the vicinity of the development. Then project-generated traffic that is anticipated to be produced by the proposed development was generated using the latest edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual and distributed within the study area network. Finally, the CORSIM traffic simulation model was used to calculate levels-of-service using traffic volumes and their associated delays. The findings of this study suggest that there are not any transportation improvements necessary for the Base Condition that does not include the traffic generated by the proposed development. All intersection levels of service operate at D and above in the 2024 condition. As traffic volumes increase due to the new development, it will require additional improvements that include providing traffic signals and enhanced intersection geometry. This is necessary to maintain the acceptable intersection operating LOS at the impacted intersections. Recommendations and Conclusions The proposed development is estimated to be fully occupied by the year 2024, and there are a total of 43,369 daily vehicular trip ends that are expected to be generated by the proposed development. During the AM peak hour there would approximately 2,141 (2-way directions) vehicles projected to access Wall Road and 2,810 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. This also approximately increases 1,100 and 1,500 vehicles (2-way directions) along the University Parkway and 300 and 110 vehicles along the Atlanta Highway during each peak. The results of this analysis suggest that the additional traffic generated by the new development can be effectively mitigated by the proposed improvements on the impacted intersections. 35

42 These required transportation improvements are listed below: Signalization is proposed at the following Intersections: University Wall Road University McCarty Road Atlanta Wall Road Atlanta Bethlehem Road University Wall Road intersection geometry improvement: Provide a additional left-turn lane on University Parkway eastbound approach to Wall Road Create a dual right turn bay on Wall Road southbound approach to University Parkway The intersection at Atlanta Highway and Bethlehem Road is more than two miles away from the development. The exact traffic impact from this development is much less certain because any other unrelated development in the vicinity of this intersection will have a direct impact. Additionally, the vehicular trips generated for this evaluation were based upon the maximum land use potential for the proposed site. This accounts for the maximum traffic impact possible. Current market trends may result in less intense land uses that will not generate as many vehicular trips thus less traffic impact. The transportation improvement recommendations that have been provided may not be required with less intense land uses. Therefore, the proposed improvement at this intersection is suggestive. 36

43 Appendices 37

44 Appendix A 38

45 Atkins INTERSECTION : Bethlehem Rd (SR Atlanta Hwy (SR 8) PROJECT : Statham DRI DATE COUNT : Wednesday, April 11, 2012 JOB NO. : CONDITION : COMP.BY : JRA Bethlehem Rd (SR 211) Atlanta Hwy (SR 8) Bethlehem Rd (SR 211) Atlanta Hwy (SR 8) TIME SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND INTERVAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL TOTALS 7:00-7: :15-7: :30-7: :45-8: :00-8: :15-8: :30-8: :45-9: TOTAL :30-11: :45-12: :00-12: :15-12: :30-12: :45-1: :00-1: :15-1: TOTAL :00-4: :15-4: :30-4: :45-5: :00-5: :15-5: :30-5: :45-6: TOTAL GRAND TOTAL AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 TO 8:15 SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC MID-DAY PEAK HOUR 11:30 TO 12:30 L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC PM PEAK HOUR 5:00 TO 6:00 L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC INTERSECTION : UNSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED ACTUATED PRETIM ED SEM I-ACTUATED CONTROL

46 Atkins INTERSECTION : Bethlehem Rd (SR University Pkwy (SR 316) PROJECT : Statham DRI DATE COUNT : Wednesday, April 11, 2012 JOB NO. : CONDITION : COMP.BY : JRA Bethlehem Rd University Pkwy Bethlehem Rd University Pkwy TIME SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND INTERVAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL TOTALS 7:00-7: :15-7: :30-7: :45-8: :00-8: :15-8: :30-8: :45-9: TOTAL :30-11: :45-12: :00-12: :15-12: :30-12: :45-1: :00-1: :15-1: TOTAL :00-4: :15-4: :30-4: :45-5: :00-5: :15-5: :30-5: :45-6: TOTAL GRAND TOTAL AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 TO 8:15 SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC MID-DAY PEAK HOUR 11:30 TO 12:30 L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC PM PEAK HOUR 4:45 TO 5:45 L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC INTERSECTION : UNSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED ACTUATED PRETIM ED SEM I-ACTUATED CONTROL

47 Atkins INTERSECTION : Hog Mountain University Pkwy (SR 316) PROJECT : Statham DRI DATE COUNT : Wednesday, April 11, 2012 JOB NO. : CONDITION : COMP.BY : JRA Hog M ountain Rd University Pkwy (SR 316) Hog M ountain Rd University Pkwy (SR 316) TIME SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND INTERVAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL TOTALS 7:00-7: :15-7: :30-7: :45-8: :00-8: :15-8: :30-8: :45-9: TOTAL :30-11: :45-12: :00-12: :15-12: :30-12: :45-1: :00-1: :15-1: TOTAL :00-4: :15-4: :30-4: :45-5: :00-5: :15-5: :30-5: :45-6: TOTAL GRAND TOTAL AM PEAK HOUR 7:00 TO 8:00 SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC MID-DAY PEAK HOUR 11:30 TO 12:30 L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC PM PEAK HOUR 4:45 TO 5:45 L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC INTERSECTION : UNSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED ACTUATED PRETIM ED SEM I-ACTUATED CONTROL

48 Atkins INTERSECTION : McCarty University Pkwy (SR 316) PROJECT : Statham DRI DATE COUNT : Wednesday, April 11, 2012 JOB NO. : CONDITION : COMP.BY : JRA McCarty Rd University Pkwy (SR 316) McCarty Rd University Pkwy (SR 316) TIME SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND INTERVAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL TOTALS 7:00-7: :15-7: :30-7: :45-8: :00-8: :15-8: :30-8: :45-9: TOTAL :30-11: :45-12: :00-12: :15-12: :30-12: :45-1: :00-1: :15-1: TOTAL :00-4: :15-4: :30-4: :45-5: :00-5: :15-5: :30-5: :45-6: T OT A L GRAND TOTAL AM PEAK HOUR 7:00 TO 8:00 SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC MID-DAY PEAK HOUR 11:30 TO 12:30 L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC PM PEAK HOUR 5:00 TO 6:00 L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC INTERSECTION : UNSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED ACTUATED PRETIM ED SEM I-ACTUATED CONTROL

49 Atkins INTERSECTION : Wall Atlanta Hwy (SR 8) PROJECT : Statham DRI DATE COUNT : Wednesday, April 11, 2012 JOB NO. : CONDITION : COMP.BY : JRA Wall Rd Atlanta Hwy (SR 8) Wall Rd Atlanta Hwy (SR 8) TIME SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND INTERVAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL TOTALS 7:00-7: :15-7: :30-7: :45-8: :00-8: :15-8: :30-8: :45-9: TOTAL :30-11: :45-12: :00-12: :15-12: :30-12: :45-1: :00-1: :15-1: TOTAL :00-4: :15-4: :30-4: :45-5: :00-5: :15-5: :30-5: :45-6: TOTAL GRAND TOTAL AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 TO 8:15 SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC MID-DAY PEAK HOUR 11:30 TO 12:30 L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC PM PEAK HOUR 5:00 TO 6:00 L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC INTERSECTION : UNSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED ACTUATED PRETIM ED SEM I-ACTUATED CONTROL

50 Atkins INTERSECTION : Wall Elder Rd PROJECT : Statham DRI DATE COUNT : Wednesday, April 11, 2012 JOB NO. : CONDITION : COMP.BY : JRA Wall Rd Elder Rd Wall Rd Elder Rd TIME SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND INTERVAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL TOTALS 7:00-7: :15-7: :30-7: :45-8: :00-8: :15-8: :30-8: :45-9: TOTAL :30-11: :45-12: :00-12: :15-12: :30-12: :45-1: :00-1: :15-1: TOTAL :00-4: :15-4: :30-4: :45-5: :00-5: :15-5: :30-5: :45-6: TOTAL GRAND TOTAL AM PEAK HOUR 7:00 TO 8:00 SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC MID-DAY PEAK HOUR 11:30 TO 12:30 L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC PM PEAK HOUR 4:45 TO 5:45 L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC INTERSECTION : UNSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED ACTUATED PRETIM ED SEM I-ACTUATED CONTROL

51 Atkins INTERSECTION : Wall Foster Rd PROJECT : Statham DRI DATE COUNT : Wednesday, April 11, 2012 JOB NO. : CONDITION : COMP.BY : JRA Wall Rd Foster Rd Wall Rd Foster Rd TIME SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND INTERVAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL TOTALS 7:00-7: :15-7: :30-7: :45-8: :00-8: :15-8: :30-8: :45-9: TOTAL :30-11: :45-12: :00-12: :15-12: :30-12: :45-1: :00-1: :15-1: TOTAL :00-4: :15-4: :30-4: :45-5: :00-5: :15-5: :30-5: :45-6: TOTAL GRAND TOTAL AM PEAK HOUR 7:00 TO 8:00 SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC MID-DAY PEAK HOUR 11:30 TO 12:30 L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC PM PEAK HOUR 5:00 TO 6:00 L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC INTERSECTION : UNSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED ACTUATED PRETIM ED SEM I-ACTUATED CONTROL

52 Atkins INTERSECTION : Wall University Pkwy (SR 316) PROJECT : Statham DRI DATE COUNT : Wednesday, April 11, 2012 JOB NO. : CONDITION : COMP.BY : JRA Wall Rd University Pkwy (SR 316) Wall Rd University Pkwy (SR 316) TIME SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND INTERVAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL L T R TOTAL TOTALS 7:00-7: :15-7: :30-7: :45-8: :00-8: :15-8: :30-8: :45-9: T OT A L :30-11: :45-12: :00-12: :15-12: :30-12: :45-1: :00-1: :15-1: TOTAL :00-4: :15-4: :30-4: :45-5: :00-5: :15-5: :30-5: :45-6: T OT A L GRAND TOTAL AM PEAK HOUR 7:00 TO 8:00 SOUTHBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND EASTBOUND L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC MID-DAY PEAK HOUR 11:30 TO 12:30 L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC PM PEAK HOUR 5:00 TO 6:00 L T R L T R L T R L T R TURN VOLUM E APPROACH TOTAL PEAK HOUR FAC INTERSECTION : UNSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED ACTUATED PRETIM ED SEM I-ACTUATED CONTROL

53 Appendix B

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78 Appendix C

79

80

81

82

83

84

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Platte Canyon Villas Arapahoe County, Colorado (Arapahoe County Case Number: Z16-001) For

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Platte Canyon Villas Arapahoe County, Colorado (Arapahoe County Case Number: Z16-001) For TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For Platte Canyon Villas Arapahoe County, Colorado (Arapahoe County Case Number: Z16-001) February 2015 Revised: August 2015 April 2016 July 2016 September 2016 Prepared for: KB Home

More information

Market Street PDP. Nassau County, Florida. Transportation Impact Analysis. VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Nassau County Growth Management

Market Street PDP. Nassau County, Florida. Transportation Impact Analysis. VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Nassau County Growth Management Transportation Impact Analysis Market Street PDP Nassau County, Florida Submitted to Nassau County Growth Management Prepared for TerraPointe Services, Inc. Prepared by VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.

More information

WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project

WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary Page 2.0 Introduction 2.1 DEVELOPMENT

More information

FINAL Traffic Report for the Proposed Golden Valley Road and Newhall Ranch Road Projects in the City of Santa Clarita, California May 5, 2005

FINAL Traffic Report for the Proposed Golden Valley Road and Newhall Ranch Road Projects in the City of Santa Clarita, California May 5, 2005 FINAL Traffic Report for the Proposed Golden Valley Road and Newhall Ranch Road Projects in the City of Santa Clarita, California May 5, 2005 Prepared For: EDAW, Inc. 1420 Kettner Boulevard, Suite 620

More information

CVS Derwood. Local Area Transportation Review

CVS Derwood. Local Area Transportation Review CVS Derwood Montgomery County, Maryland May 27, 2016 Local Area Transportation Review Prepared for: JC Bar Properties, Inc. Steve Fleming, PE 415 Fallowfield Road, Suite 301 Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011

More information

NATHAN HALE HIGH SCHOOL PARKING AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. Table of Contents

NATHAN HALE HIGH SCHOOL PARKING AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. Table of Contents Parking and Traffic Analysis Seattle, WA Prepared for: URS Corporation 1501 4th Avenue, Suite 1400 Seattle, WA 98101-1616 Prepared by: Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering 11410 NE 122nd Way, Suite

More information

PLAZA MEXICO RESIDENCES

PLAZA MEXICO RESIDENCES PLAZA MEXICO RESIDENCES TRAFFIC STUDY PREPARED FOR: 3000 E. IMPERIAL, LLC. 6940 Beach Boulevard, D-501 Buena Park, California 90621 PREPARED BY: OCTOBER 5, 2017 translutions the transportatio n solutions

More information

Appendix C Traffic Study

Appendix C Traffic Study Final Environmental Impact Statement Appendix C Traffic Study Schofield Generating Station Project, Hawaii October 2015 C-1 Final Environmental Impact Statement This page intentionally left blank. Schofield

More information

April 10, Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213

April 10, Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213 Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213 Subject: Revised Castle Hills BASIS Charter School Traffic Impact Analysis Review City of Castle Hills,

More information

MEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections:

MEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections: MEMORANDUM DATE: JULY 6, 2012 TO: FROM: RE: CC: MELANIE KNIGHT BRAD BYVELDS/ JENNIFER LUONG 1050 SOMERSET STREET PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS OUR FILE NO. 111152 NEIL MALHOTRA The purpose of this memo

More information

Table of Contents Introduction... 4 Study Area... 5

Table of Contents Introduction... 4 Study Area... 5 Table of Contents Introduction... 4 Study Area... 5 Streets and s... 5 Traffic Volumes... 8 Recent and Anticipated Development... 10 Crash Analysis... 10 Projected Traffic Volumes... 11 Trip Generation...

More information

JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone:

JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone: JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH 45243 Email: jackpflum1@gmail.com Telephone: 513.919.7814 MEMORANDUM REPORT Traffic Impact Analysis Proposed Soccer

More information

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014 Appendix C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014 CONTENTS List of Figures-... 3 List of Tables... 4 Introduction... 1 Application of the Lubbock Travel Demand

More information

Focused Traffic Analysis for the One Lincoln Park Project

Focused Traffic Analysis for the One Lincoln Park Project September 15, 2015 Mr. Bill Johnson Coldwell Banker 511 Sir Francis Drake Boulevard Greenbrae, CA 94904 Focused Traffic Analysis for the One Lincoln Park Project Dear Mr. Johnson; As requested, W-Trans

More information

Appendix I: Traffic Study

Appendix I: Traffic Study City of Fontana Sierra Lakes Commerce Center Draft EIR Appendix I: Traffic Study FirstCarbon Solutions H:\Client (PN JN)\0144\01440050\EIR\1 ADEIR\01440050 Sec99 99 Appendix Dividers.doc THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY

More information

SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS. October 29, Mr. Carter Redish Carter Group Architects, Inc S. El Camino Real, Suite F San Clemente, CA 92672

SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS. October 29, Mr. Carter Redish Carter Group Architects, Inc S. El Camino Real, Suite F San Clemente, CA 92672 October 29, 2018 Mr. Carter Redish Carter Group Architects, Inc. 1810 S. El Camino Real, Suite F San Clemente, CA 92672 SUBJECT: CANYON STEEL FOCUSED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Dear Mr. Carter Redish: Urban

More information

Expanding the GSATS Model Area into

Expanding the GSATS Model Area into Appendix A Expanding the GSATS Model Area into North Carolina Jluy, 2011 Table of Contents LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE 1. Introduction... 1 1.1 Background... 1 1.2 Existing Northern Extent of

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY MANUFACTURING COMPANY

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY MANUFACTURING COMPANY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For MANUFACTURING COMPANY Prepared For: Airway Heights, WA Prepared By: SUNBURST ENGINEERING, P. S. 4310 S. Ball Dr. Veradale, WA 99037 April, 2013 TRAFFIC IMP ACT STUDY Manufacturing

More information

DOLLAR GENERAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (REVISED) May 20, 2015

DOLLAR GENERAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (REVISED) May 20, 2015 DOLLAR GENERAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (REVISED) May 20, 2015 May 20, 2015 Mr. Dan Biswas, VP of Development CJS DEVELOPMENT II, LLC 5111 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 200 Scottsdale, CA 85250

More information

APPENDIX I: Traffic Forecasting Model and Assumptions

APPENDIX I: Traffic Forecasting Model and Assumptions APPENDIX I: Traffic Forecasting Model and Assumptions Appendix I reports on the assumptions and traffic model specifications that were developed to support the Reaffirmation of the 2040 Long Range Plan.

More information

6711 LEE HIGHWAY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA

6711 LEE HIGHWAY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 6711 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA Prepared for: NVR, Inc. Prepared by: Wells + Associates, Inc. Michael J. Workosky, PTP, TOPS, TSOS John J. Andrus William L. Zeid, PE 703.917.6620 May 4, 2017

More information

Metro Emergency Security Operations Center (ESOC) 410 Center Street City of Los Angeles

Metro Emergency Security Operations Center (ESOC) 410 Center Street City of Los Angeles Metro Emergency Security Operations Center (ESOC) 410 Center Street City of Los Angeles Traffic Study August 31, 2015 AECOM 515 South Flower Street, 4 th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Job Number: 60323255

More information

The Highline Development Traffic Impact Study

The Highline Development Traffic Impact Study The Highline Development Traffic Impact Study Columbia Falls, Montana Prepared For: TD&H Engineering 450 Corporate Drive, Suite 101 Kalispell, MT 59901 June, 2018 130 South Howie Street Helena, Montana

More information

KAISER SOUTH NORTHERN VIRGINIA HUB TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA TABLE OF CONTENTS. Section 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 12

KAISER SOUTH NORTHERN VIRGINIA HUB TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA TABLE OF CONTENTS. Section 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 12 KAISER SOUTH NORTHERN VIRGINIA HUB TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Purpose of Report and Study Objectives... 1 Site Location and Study Area...

More information

VHD Daily Totals. Population 14.5% change. VMT Daily Totals Suffolk 24-hour VMT. 49.3% change. 14.4% change VMT

VHD Daily Totals. Population 14.5% change. VMT Daily Totals Suffolk 24-hour VMT. 49.3% change. 14.4% change VMT 6.9 Suffolk 6-54 VMT Population and Travel Characteristics Population 14.5% change 2014 1,529,202 VHD Daily Totals 2014 251,060 49.3% change 2040 1,788,175 2040 374,850 VMT Daily Totals 2014 39,731,990

More information

WOODRUFF ROAD CORRIDOR ORIGIN-DESTINATION ANALYSIS

WOODRUFF ROAD CORRIDOR ORIGIN-DESTINATION ANALYSIS 2018 WOODRUFF ROAD CORRIDOR ORIGIN-DESTINATION ANALYSIS Introduction Woodruff Road is the main road to and through the commercial area in Greenville, South Carolina. Businesses along the corridor have

More information

TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT

TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT Square One Drive Extension Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Environmental Study Report Appendix B Transportation and Traffic Analysis Report TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT FINAL DRAFT

More information

HALFF 16196? TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN. Richardson ISD Aikin Elementary School Dallas, Texas North Bowser Road Richardson, Texas 75081

HALFF 16196? TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN. Richardson ISD Aikin Elementary School Dallas, Texas North Bowser Road Richardson, Texas 75081 30280 16196? TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN Exhibit 572B Aikin Elementary School Planned Development District No. 572 Approved City Plan Commission October20, 2016 July 12, 2016 Prepared for HALFF AVO 31586 PHO1

More information

MnDOT Method for Calculating Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) From CORSIM Model Output

MnDOT Method for Calculating Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) From CORSIM Model Output MnDOT Method for Calculating Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) From CORSIM Model Output Rev. April 29, 2005 MnDOT Method for Calculating Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) From CORSIM Model Output Table of

More information

TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE GAFFEY POOL PROJECT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA CITY OF LOS ANGELES, BUREAU OF ENGINEERING OCTOBER 2013 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY

TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE GAFFEY POOL PROJECT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA CITY OF LOS ANGELES, BUREAU OF ENGINEERING OCTOBER 2013 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE GAFFEY POOL PROJECT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 2013 PREPARED FOR CITY OF LOS ANGELES, BUREAU OF ENGINEERING PREPARED BY DRAFT TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE GAFFEY POOL PROJECT October

More information

ALTA VISTA COMMERCIAL/ RESIDENTIAL PROJECT

ALTA VISTA COMMERCIAL/ RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ALTA VISTA COMMERCIAL/ RESIDENTIAL PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared For: Paul Conzelman SC Development 2151 Michelson Drive, Suite 140 Irvine, CA 92612 Prepared By: 2030 Main Street, Suite 1200

More information

Final City of Colusa STREETS & ROADWAYS MASTER PLAN. October J Street Suite 390 Sacramento, CA 95814

Final City of Colusa STREETS & ROADWAYS MASTER PLAN. October J Street Suite 390 Sacramento, CA 95814 Final City of Colusa STREETS & ROADWAYS MASTER PLAN October 2009 660 J Street Suite 390 Sacramento, CA 95814 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 1 Report Organization...1 II. ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY... 2

More information

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council TO: ATTENTION: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Jeffrey L. Stewart, City Manager Len Gorecki, Director of Public Works Jerry Stock, City Engineer Public Hearing to Consider

More information

III. FORECASTED GROWTH

III. FORECASTED GROWTH III. FORECASTED GROWTH In order to properly identify potential improvement projects that will be required for the transportation system in Milliken, it is important to first understand the nature and volume

More information

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY WHEELER STREET CLOSURE

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY WHEELER STREET CLOSURE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY WHEELER STREET CLOSURE Village of Greene, Chenango County, New York Prepared for: VILLAGE OF GREENE 49 Genesee Street Greene, NY 13778 Prepared by: LARSON DESIGN GROUP 1000

More information

6 th Line Municipal Class Environmental Assessment

6 th Line Municipal Class Environmental Assessment 6 th Line Municipal Class Environmental Assessment County Road 27 to St John s Road Town of Innisfil, ON September 6, 2016 APPENDIX L: TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MEMORANDUM Accessible formats are available

More information

The Sunland Park flyover ramp is set to close the week of March 19 until early summer

The Sunland Park flyover ramp is set to close the week of March 19 until early summer March 2, 2018 The Sunland Park flyover ramp is set to close the week of March 19 until early summer GO 10 is targeting the week of March 19 to close the Sunland Park Drive flyover entrance ramp to I 10

More information

January 12, Mr. Ryan Granger TMGB Wilson, LLC 2221 Health Drive SW, Suite 2200 Wyoming, Michigan 49519

January 12, Mr. Ryan Granger TMGB Wilson, LLC 2221 Health Drive SW, Suite 2200 Wyoming, Michigan 49519 January 12, 2018 Mr. Ryan Granger TMGB Wilson, LLC 2221 Health Drive SW, Suite 2200 Wyoming, Michigan 49519 Re: Proposed Reserve at Rivertown Mixed-Use Development Updated Trip Generation and Site Driveway

More information

APPENDIX IV MODELLING

APPENDIX IV MODELLING APPENDIX IV MODELLING Kingston Transportation Master Plan Final Report, July 2004 Appendix IV: Modelling i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 OBJECTIVE... 1 3.0 URBAN TRANSPORTATION MODELLING

More information

Subject: Desert Palisades Specific Plan - Tram Way Access Sight Distance

Subject: Desert Palisades Specific Plan - Tram Way Access Sight Distance Endo Engineering Traffic Engineering Air Quality Studies Noise Assessments July 13, 2015 Mr. Ed Freeman Pinnacle View, LLC P.O. Box 1754 Lake Oswego, OR 97035-0579 Subject: Desert Palisades Specific Plan

More information

FARM 1065 PORTION 1, ATLANTIS TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT

FARM 1065 PORTION 1, ATLANTIS TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT FARM 1065 PORTION 1, ATLANTIS TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT February 2018 FIRST ISSUE Prepared by: JG AFRIKA (PTY) LTD Branch: Cape Town PO Box 38561 Postal code: 7430 Telephone: 021 530 1800 Email: wink@

More information

S.170 th Street Micro-Simulation Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Port of Seattle/Aviation Planning

S.170 th Street Micro-Simulation Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Port of Seattle/Aviation Planning Seattle-acoma International Airport Port of Seattle/Aviation Planning Port of Seattle PO OF SEAE Aviation Planning Airport Operations January 24, 2013 Summary he Port is planning to relocate the cell phone

More information

Trip Generation Study: A 7-Eleven Gas Station with a Convenience Store Land Use Code: 945

Trip Generation Study: A 7-Eleven Gas Station with a Convenience Store Land Use Code: 945 Trip Generation Study: A 7-Eleven Gas Station with a Convenience Store Land Use Code: 945 Introduction The Brigham Young University Institute of Transportation Engineers student chapter (BYU ITE) completed

More information

Brandywine Road Speed Study FINAL REPORT

Brandywine Road Speed Study FINAL REPORT Brandywine Road Speed Study FINAL REPORT City of Albuquerque Brandywine Road Speed Study Final Report Albuquerque, New Mexico City of Albuquerque May, 2016 Brandywine Road Speed Study Final Report City

More information

Signalized Intersections

Signalized Intersections Signalized Intersections Kelly Pitera October 23, 2009 Topics to be Covered Introduction/Definitions D/D/1 Queueing Phasing and Timing Plan Level of Service (LOS) Signal Optimization Conflicting Operational

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TERRE HAUTE CONVENTION CENTER WABASH AVENUE & 9 TH STREET TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA PREPARED FOR 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201 Indianapolis, IN 46240 Phone: (317) 202-0864 Fax: (317)

More information

Parking Regulations Dundas Street West, from Bathurst Street to Dovercourt Road

Parking Regulations Dundas Street West, from Bathurst Street to Dovercourt Road STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Parking Regulations Dundas Street West, from Bathurst Street to Dovercourt Road Date: October 28, 2008 To: From: Toronto and East York Community Council Director, Transportation

More information

CHAPTER 3. CAPACITY OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS

CHAPTER 3. CAPACITY OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS CHAPTER 3. CAPACITY OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 1. Overview In this chapter we explore the models on which the HCM capacity analysis method for signalized intersections are based. While the method has

More information

California Urban Infill Trip Generation Study. Jim Daisa, P.E.

California Urban Infill Trip Generation Study. Jim Daisa, P.E. California Urban Infill Trip Generation Study Jim Daisa, P.E. What We Did in the Study Develop trip generation rates for land uses in urban areas of California Establish a California urban land use trip

More information

FY 2010 Continuing i Planning Program Product Report. Local Transportation and Traffic Data. Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission

FY 2010 Continuing i Planning Program Product Report. Local Transportation and Traffic Data. Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission FY 2010 Continuing i Planning Program Product Report Local Transportation and Traffic Data Travel Time and Delay Data for Belpre and Marietta, Ohio Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission CONTINUING

More information

Appendix C Final Methods and Assumptions for Forecasting Traffic Volumes

Appendix C Final Methods and Assumptions for Forecasting Traffic Volumes Fairview Ave. and Main St. Improvements and Local Streets Plan Appendices Ada County Highway District Appendix C Final Methods and Assumptions for Forecasting Traffic Volumes January 3, 207 Appendices

More information

Kitsap County 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update. Appendix A: Growth Estimates

Kitsap County 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update. Appendix A: Growth Estimates Kitsap County 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update Appendix A: Growth Estimates Appendix A 1 April 2016 Kitsap County 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update Appendix A: Growth Estimates Land Capacity Land capacity

More information

930 Old Northern Rd & 4 Post Office Rd, Glenorie

930 Old Northern Rd & 4 Post Office Rd, Glenorie Proposed Mixed Use Development 930 Old Northern & 4, Glenorie TRAFFIC AND PARKING ASSESSMENT REPORT 13 December 2016 Ref 16264 Suite 6, 20 Young Street, Neutral Bay NSW 2089 - PO Box 1868, Neutral Bay

More information

A Study of Red Light Cameras in Kansas City, MO

A Study of Red Light Cameras in Kansas City, MO A Study of Red Light s in Kansas City, MO Prepared by the Special Operations Division Executive Summary This paper will analyze the crash data for the 29 red light cameras located in 17 intersections in

More information

Technical Memorandum #2 Future Conditions

Technical Memorandum #2 Future Conditions Technical Memorandum #2 Future Conditions To: Dan Farnsworth Transportation Planner Fargo-Moorhead Metro Council of Governments From: Rick Gunderson, PE Josh Hinds PE, PTOE Houston Engineering, Inc. Subject:

More information

APPENDIX I - AREA PLANS

APPENDIX I - AREA PLANS ROUTE 37 WEST LAND USE PLAN ROUTE 37 WEST LAND USE PLAN Recent land use decisions and development trends have drawn attention to the land within the Route 37 western by-pass area between Route 50 and

More information

CITY OF NEW LONDON WINTER ROAD & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE POLICY

CITY OF NEW LONDON WINTER ROAD & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE POLICY CITY OF NEW LONDON WINTER ROAD & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE POLICY GENERAL The purpose of this policy is to set up acceptable procedures and policies for the winter maintenance of public areas in the City of

More information

3.0 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS

3.0 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS 3.0 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION NEEDS In order to better determine future roadway expansion and connectivity needs, future population growth and land development patterns were analyzed as part of

More information

Travel Demand Management Plan

Travel Demand Management Plan Travel Demand Management Plan Tryg s & Apartment Building 8 West Lake Street Minneapolis, MN AUTHORIZED PROPERTY REPRESENTATIVE: By Dated: Mr. Johnny Carlson Trammell Crow Chicago Development, Inc. 5 South

More information

North Carolina s First Quadrant Left: History and Lessons Learned

North Carolina s First Quadrant Left: History and Lessons Learned North Carolina s First Quadrant Left: History and Lessons Learned Michael P. Reese, P.E. (Corresponding Author) Congestion Management Section Project Engineer North Carolina Department of Transportation

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis. for the STARBUCKS STORE. Located at 9900 BALBOA BOULEVARD. Submitted to CITY OF LOS ANGELES. January 2017.

Traffic Impact Analysis. for the STARBUCKS STORE. Located at 9900 BALBOA BOULEVARD. Submitted to CITY OF LOS ANGELES. January 2017. Traffic Impact Analysis for the STARBUCKS STORE Located at 9900 BALBOA BOULEVARD Submitted to CITY OF LOS ANGELES January 2017 Submitted By January 5, 2017 Ken A. Aitchison, P.E. Transportation Engineering

More information

Prepared for. 3D/International, Inc West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, Texas November 2006

Prepared for. 3D/International, Inc West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, Texas November 2006 DRAFT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR PHASED DEVELOPMENT OF TAMU CC Prepared for 3D/International, Inc. 1900 West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, Texas 77027 November 2006 Interim Review Only Document Incomplete:

More information

North Carolina s First Quadrant Left: History and Lessons Learned

North Carolina s First Quadrant Left: History and Lessons Learned 0 0 0 North Carolina s First Quadrant Left: History and Lessons Learned Michael P. Reese, P.E. (Corresponding Author) Congestion Management Section Project Engineer North Carolina Department of Transportation

More information

MADISON, WI STONE HOUSE DEVELOPMENT 1000 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION STUDY DECEMBER 14, 2015

MADISON, WI STONE HOUSE DEVELOPMENT 1000 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION STUDY DECEMBER 14, 2015 MADISON, WI STONE HOUSE DEVELOPMENT 1000 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION STUDY DECEMBER 14, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS... 3 Proposed Development... 3 Methodology... 3 Phase 1 Development...

More information

The effects of impact fees on urban form and congestion in Florida

The effects of impact fees on urban form and congestion in Florida The effects of impact fees on urban form and congestion in Florida Principal Investigators: Andres G. Blanco Ruth Steiner Presenters: Hyungchul Chung Jeongseob Kim Urban and Regional Planning Contents

More information

2011 South Western Region Travel Time Monitoring Program Congestion Management Process. Executive Summary

2011 South Western Region Travel Time Monitoring Program Congestion Management Process. Executive Summary 2011 South Western Region Travel Monitoring Program Executive Summary Prepared by: South Western Regional Planning Agency 888 Washington Blvd, 3rd Floor Stamford, CT 06901 Telephone: 203.6.5190 Facsimile:

More information

Greater Toronto Area Cordon Count Summary Analysis of Traffic Trends 1985 to 2011

Greater Toronto Area Cordon Count Summary Analysis of Traffic Trends 1985 to 2011 Greater Toronto Area Cordon Count Summary Analysis of Traffic Trends 1985 to 2011 Prepared by: Data Management Group Department of Civil Engineering University of Toronto Telephone: (416) 978-3916 Table

More information

TRAFFIC ALERT FOR WEEK OF February 4 8, 2008

TRAFFIC ALERT FOR WEEK OF February 4 8, 2008 TRAFFIC ALERT FOR WEEK OF February 4 8, 2008 Highway work zones in the Staunton District The following is a list of highway work that might affect traffic in the Staunton transportation district during

More information

PROPOSED PROJECT. Section PROJECT DESCRIPTION

PROPOSED PROJECT. Section PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION This Environmental Assessment describes the proposed improvements

More information

I-10 East at Redd closes for 24 hours this Sunday, Feb 11. Then, I-10 West at Resler closes for 27 hours on Feb 25

I-10 East at Redd closes for 24 hours this Sunday, Feb 11. Then, I-10 West at Resler closes for 27 hours on Feb 25 NEWS RELEASE a TxDOT Project For immediate release EL PASO DISTRICT Jennifer Wright (915) 790-4340 Jennifer.Wright3@txdot.gov February 9, 2018 I-10 East at Redd closes for 24 hours this Sunday, Feb 11

More information

Alternatives Analysis

Alternatives Analysis Alternatives Analysis Prepared for: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority Prepared by: AECOM/Jacobs-JJG Joint Venture Atlanta, GA November 2012 Page Left Intentionally Blank ii TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

US 169/I-70 North Loop Planning & Environmental Linkages Study

US 169/I-70 North Loop Planning & Environmental Linkages Study US 169/I-70 North Loop Planning & Environmental Linkages Study VISSIM Calibration Document Draft April 13, 2018 Page i Table of Contents 1. Overview... 1 2. Data Types... 2 3. Model Parameter Adjustments...

More information

Forecasts for the Reston/Dulles Rail Corridor and Route 28 Corridor 2010 to 2050

Forecasts for the Reston/Dulles Rail Corridor and Route 28 Corridor 2010 to 2050 George Mason University Center for Regional Analysis Forecasts for the Reston/Dulles Rail Corridor and Route 28 Corridor 21 to 25 Prepared for the Fairfax County Department of Planning and Zoning Lisa

More information

Appendix BAL Baltimore, Maryland 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Appendix BAL Baltimore, Maryland 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability (http://mobility.tamu.edu/mmp) Office of Operations, Federal Highway Administration Appendix BAL Baltimore, Maryland 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability This report is a supplement to:

More information

West Tennessee Construction June 14-21, 2017

West Tennessee Construction June 14-21, 2017 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Wednesday, June 14, 2017 CONTACT: Nichole Lawrence CELL: 731-225-6041 West Tennessee Construction June 14-21, 2017 BENTON COUNTY, I-40 Truck Climbing Lane Wednesday, June 7 through

More information

South Western Region Travel Time Monitoring Program Congestion Management Process Spring 2008 Report

South Western Region Travel Time Monitoring Program Congestion Management Process Spring 2008 Report South Western Region Travel Monitoring Program Congestion Management Process Spring 2008 Report Prepared by: South Western Regional Planning Agency 888 Washington Boulevard Stamford, CT 06901 Telephone:

More information

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY...

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY... TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY... 1 1.1 Purpose and Study Objective... 1 1.2 Executive Summary... 1 2.0 ROADWAY CONDITIONS... 5 2.1 Granville Parkway (South Intersection)... 8 2.2 Tuscany

More information

Project Level Traffic Forecast Report Business 40 Reconstruction Study Forsyth County

Project Level Traffic Forecast Report Business 40 Reconstruction Study Forsyth County Project Level Traffic Forecast Report Business 40 Reconstruction Study Forsyth County TIP No. U-2827 B WBS # 34872.1.1 June 2013 Prepared for North Carolina Department of Transportation Prepared by Project

More information

Proposed Scope of Work Village of Farmingdale Downtown Farmingdale BOA Step 2 BOA Nomination Study / Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement

Proposed Scope of Work Village of Farmingdale Downtown Farmingdale BOA Step 2 BOA Nomination Study / Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement Proposed Scope of Work Village of Farmingdale Downtown Farmingdale BOA Step 2 BOA Nomination Study / Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement The scope of work that follows incorporates and covers

More information

City of Camrose Winter Road Maintenance Policy

City of Camrose Winter Road Maintenance Policy City of Camrose Winter Road Maintenance Policy The purpose of this policy is to outline the level of service that the City of Camrose delivers regarding the maintenance of roads in winter conditions. 1.

More information

Roundabout Level of Service

Roundabout Level of Service Roundabout Level of Service Rahmi Akçelik Director Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd email: rahmi.akcelik@sidrasolutions.com web: www.sidrasolutions.com 8 January 2009 Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Fundamental

More information

King City URA 6D Concept Plan

King City URA 6D Concept Plan King City URA 6D Concept Plan King City s Evolution Among the fastest growing cities 2000 Census 1,949 2010 Census 3,111 60% increase 2016 Census estimate 3,817 23% increase Average annual rate 4.3% Surpassing

More information

CONTINUING PLANNING PROGRAM LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC DATA PRODUCT REPORT [OH Corridors]

CONTINUING PLANNING PROGRAM LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC DATA PRODUCT REPORT [OH Corridors] CONTINUING PLANNING PROGRAM LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC DATA PRODUCT REPORT [OH Corridors] Travel Time and Delay Analysis for Belpre (OH) and Marietta (OH) Fiscal Year 2009 Report WOOD WASHINGTON

More information

Accessing and Using Indiana Traffic Data

Accessing and Using Indiana Traffic Data Accessing and Using Indiana Traffic Data Purdue Road School March 6, 2013 Presented by: Gregory Katter, PE Asset Planning Indiana Traffic Data 1. Overview of Traffic Data Collection Program 2. Accessing

More information

APPENDIX G Halton Region Transportation Model

APPENDIX G Halton Region Transportation Model APPENDIX G Halton Region Transportation Model Halton Region Transportation Master Plan Working Paper No. 1 - Legislative Context Working Paper No. 2 - Active Transportation Halton Transportation Model

More information

Snow and Ice Control POLICY NO. P-01/2015. CITY OF AIRDRIE Snow and Ice Control Policy

Snow and Ice Control POLICY NO. P-01/2015. CITY OF AIRDRIE Snow and Ice Control Policy Page 1 CITY OF AIRDRIE Snow and Ice Control Effective Date: Approved By: Approved On: March 17, 2015 City Council March 16, 2015 Revision Date: Resolution #: ------ PURPOSE: The City of Airdrie is responsible

More information

Palmerston North Area Traffic Model

Palmerston North Area Traffic Model Palmerston North Area Traffic Model Presentation to IPWEA 7 November 2014 PNATM Presentation Overview Model Scope and type Data collected The model Forecasting inputs Applications PNCC Aims and Objectives

More information

Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict. Exhibit IV.B Amendment Language. Revise the FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

Goodlette/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict. Exhibit IV.B Amendment Language. Revise the FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Revise the FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS * FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES * Future Land Use Map * Mixed Use & Interchange Activity Centers Maps * Properties Consistent by Policy (5.9, 5.10, 5.11,

More information

Appendix J: Transportation and Circulation

Appendix J: Transportation and Circulation Appendix J: Transportation and Circulation J 1: Transportation Analysis Report J 2: Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) Approval Letter J 3: Construction Traffic Analysis J 1: Transportation

More information

MEMORANDUM. Trip Generation Analysis

MEMORANDUM. Trip Generation Analysis MEMORANDUM To: RMC Architects From: Matthew Palmer, PE Subject: Trip Generation, Parking Analysis & Level of Service Project: Port of Everett, GTC #13-053 Date: August 25, 2014 The trip generation and

More information

Background and Planning Context 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION

Background and Planning Context 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION Chapter 1: Background and Planning Context 1.1 INTRODUCTION Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company ( Metro-North or the Project Sponsor ) is proposing the construction of a new, expanded parking garage

More information

MEMORANDUM (DRAFT) DRAFT

MEMORANDUM (DRAFT) DRAFT 117 Commercial St. NE, Suite 310 Salem, OR 97301 503.391.8773 www.dksassociates.com MEMORANDUM (DRAFT) DATE: February 15, 2017 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Alex Dupey, MIG Scott Mansur, PE, PTOE; Garth Appanaitis,

More information

Per your request and authorization, we have prepared this traffic evaluation for the above referenced project.

Per your request and authorization, we have prepared this traffic evaluation for the above referenced project. Memorandum To: From: Re: Marc Stout, P.E. City Engineer, City of Roseville Chris Gregerson, P.E., T.E. Matt Weir, P.E., T.E., PTOE Douglas Boulevard Coffee Kiosk Traffic Evaluation Roseville, California

More information

March Grade Crossing Analysis

March Grade Crossing Analysis March 2014 Grade Crossing Analysis T E C H N I C A L M E M O R A N D U M South Florida Freight and Passenger Rail Enhancement Study Phase 1A - Rehabilitate Existing Northwood Connection; FPID: 434948-1

More information

TRAFFIC FORECAST METHODOLOGY

TRAFFIC FORECAST METHODOLOGY CHAPTER 5 TRAFFIC FORECAST METHODOLOGY Introduction Need for County-Level Traffic Forecasting 2030 HC-TSP Model Methodology Model Calibration Future Traffic Forecasts Hennepin County Transportation Systems

More information

MAY 5, Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc.

MAY 5, Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc. MAY 5, 2011 Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street Jacobs Engineering Group Group Inc. Inc. 1 Introductions Agenda Overview of Interchange Project Overview of noise barrier

More information

Freeway Work Zone Lane Capacity

Freeway Work Zone Lane Capacity Report Title Report Date: 2009 Freeway Work Zone Lane Capacity Principle Investigator Vendor Name and Address Name Drakopoulos, Alex «Vendor» Affiliation Marquette University Address 263 Haggerty Hall

More information

PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT Work in Progress

PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT Work in Progress IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS H. MINERAL RESOURCES 1.0 INTRODUCTION This section addresses the potential impacts of the Proposed Project on mineral resources (i.e., sand, gravel and petroleum). The

More information

APPENDIX C-6 - TRAFFIC MODELING REPORT, SRF CONSULTING GROUP

APPENDIX C-6 - TRAFFIC MODELING REPORT, SRF CONSULTING GROUP APPENDIX C-6 - TRAFFIC MODELING REPORT, SRF CONSULTING GROUP Scott County 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update Appendix C Scott County Traffic Model Final Report and Documentation March 2008 Prepared for: Scott

More information

Appendix B. Land Use and Traffic Modeling Documentation

Appendix B. Land Use and Traffic Modeling Documentation Appendix B Land Use and Traffic Modeling Documentation Technical Memorandum Planning Level Traffic for Northridge Sub-Area Study Office of Statewide Planning and Research Modeling & Forecasting Section

More information