Traffic Noise Impact Study. 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Traffic Noise Impact Study. 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street. Ottawa, Ontario"

Transcription

1 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE Prepared For: Anand Aggarwal Ontario Inc. Manor Park Management 231 Brittany Drive, Suite D Ottawa, Ontario K1K 0R8 Prepared By: Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Partner Omar Daher, B.Eng., EIT, Junior Environmental Scientist April 20, Walgreen Road, Ottawa, Ontario K0A 1L0 T (613)

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document describes a roadway traffic noise impact study for three proposed buildings that form part of a single development located at 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street in downtown Ottawa, Ontario. The three towers are known as Towers A, B, and C, and are 10, 27, and 27 storeys above grade, respectively. Tower A is nearest to Albert Street, located north on the site; Tower B is nearest to Bay Street and Slater Street on the southwest corner of the site; Tower C is nearest to Slater Street and Lyon Street on the southeast corner of the site. Figure 1 illustrates a site plan with surrounding context. The major source of noise affecting the development is roadway traffic along Albert Street, Slater Street, and Lyon Street. The assessment is based on: (i) theoretical noise prediction methods that conform to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) and City of Ottawa requirements; (ii) noise level criteria as specified by the City of Ottawa s Environmental Noise Control Guidelines (ENCG); (iii) future vehicular traffic volumes based on the City of Ottawa s Official Plan roadway classifications; and (iv) architectural drawings received from Woodman Architect & Associates Ltd. The results of the current study indicate that the dominant source of noise impacting the site is due to roadway traffic. Noise levels from roadway traffic will range between approximately 50 and 70 dba during the daytime period (07:00-23:00) and between 42 and 62 dba during the nighttime period (23:00-07:00). The highest noise level (i.e. 70 dba) occurs along the south and east façades of Tower C. Upgraded building components with higher sound attenuation properties are required where noise levels exceed 65 dba, as indicated in Figures 3-4. In addition to upgraded building components, all units in Towers A, B, and C will require air conditioning (or similar mechanical system), which will allow occupants to keep windows closed and maintain a comfortable living environment. In addition to ventilation requirements, it will also be required to include Warning Clauses in all Lease, Purchase and Sale Agreements, as summarized in Section 6. Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway i

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE 1 3. OBJECTIVES 2 4. METHODOLOGY Background Criteria for Roadway Traffic Noise Roadway Noise Assessment Theoretical Roadway Traffic Noise Predictions Roadway Traffic Volumes Indoor Noise Calculations 5 5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Roadway Traffic Noise Levels Noise Control Measures 8 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 FIGURES APPENDICES: Appendix A STAMSON 5.04 Input and Output Data (CD) Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway ii

4 1. INTRODUCTION Gradient Wind Engineering Inc. (GWE) was retained by Manor Park Management to undertake a traffic noise impact study for three proposed buildings that form part of a single development located at 383 Slater Street/400 Albert Street in Ottawa, Ontario. This report summarizes the methodology, results, and recommendations related to a roadway traffic noise assessment. GWE s scope of work involved assessing exterior and interior noise levels generated by local roadway traffic, throughout the site. The assessment was performed on the basis of theoretical noise calculation methods conforming to the City of Ottawa 1 and Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) 2 guidelines. Noise calculations were based on architectural drawings provided by Woodman Architect Inc., with future traffic volumes corresponding to the City of Ottawa s Official Plan (OP) roadway classifications. 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE The focus of this roadway traffic noise impact study is the proposed mixed-use, multi-building, development to be located at 383 Slater Street/400 Albert Street in Ottawa, Ontario. The site is situated on a parcel of land bounded by Albert Street to the north, Lyon Street north to the east, Slater Street to the south, and Bay Street to the west. In the near-field, the site is surrounded by the urban environment of downtown Ottawa, with the exception of the Nanny Goat Hill Community Garden to the southwest west. The proposed development features three buildings, referred to as Blocks A, B, and C, located on the north, southwest, and southeast portions of the site, respectively. The three buildings share four levels of underground parking, accessed from Bay Street, at the northwest corner of Block B. Block A is a 10-storey hotel, rising meters, measured from grade to the top of the roof slab. The main hotel entrance is along Albert Street, at the centre of the north elevation. The building features an exterior dining terrace at the ground floor and a rooftop terrace serving as an outdoor living area. Blocks B and C both feature 27-storey towers, which reach a height of meters, measured from grade to the top of the mechanical penthouse. The towers rise above six-storey podia with rectangular planforms, the long axis aligned in the east-west directions. At grade, Block B contains a residential lobby accessible from the south elevation and retail space accessible from the east elevation. Block C contains 1 City of Ottawa, Environmental Noise Control Guidelines, January Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change Publication NPC-300 Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway 1

5 a residential lobby accessible from the east elevation and retail spaces accessible from the east and west elevations. There is a rooftop terrace serving as an outdoor living area above the 6 th floor of Tower C. The major source of noise is roadway traffic along Albert Street, Lyon Street, and Slater Street. The site is surrounded with a mix of residential and commercial, low to high-rise buildings. Figure 1 illustrates a complete site plan with surrounding context. 3. OBJECTIVES The main goals of this work are to: (i) calculate the future noise levels on the study buildings produced by local roadway traffic, (ii) ensure that interior noise levels do not exceed the allowable limits specified by the City of Ottawa s Environmental Noise Control Guidelines (ENCG) as outlined in Section 4.2 of this report. 4. METHODOLOGY 4.1 Background Noise can be defined as any obtrusive sound. It is created at a source, transmitted through a medium, such as air, and intercepted by a receiver. Noise may be characterized in terms of the power of the source or the sound pressure at a specific distance. While the power of a source is characteristic of that particular source, the sound pressure depends on the location of the receiver and the path that the noise takes to reach the receiver. Measurement of noise is based on the decibel unit, dba, which is a logarithmic ratio referenced to a standard noise level ( Pascals). The A suffix refers to a weighting scale, which better represents how the noise is perceived by the human ear. With this scale, a doubling of power results in a 3 dba increase in measured noise levels and is just perceptible to most people. An increase of 10 dba is often perceived to be twice as loud. 4.2 Criteria for Roadway Traffic Noise For surface transportation, the equivalent sound energy level, L eq, provides a measure of the time varying noise levels, which is well correlated with the annoyance of sound. It is defined as the continuous sound level, which has the same energy as a time varying noise level over a period of time. For roadways, the L eq is commonly calculated on the basis of a 16-hour (L eq16) daytime (07:00-23:00) / 8-hour (L eq8) nighttime (23:00-07:00) split to assess its impacts on buildings. Table 1 below describes the applicable indoor noise level limits for both roadway and railway. The City of Ottawa s ENCG specifies that the recommended indoor noise limit range (that is relevant to this study) is 45 and 40 for residence living/dining areas and Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway 2

6 sleeping quarters respectively, as listed in Table 1. Based on GWE s experience, more comfortable indoor noise levels should be targeted toward 42 and 37 dba to control peak noise, and deficiencies in building envelope construction. TABLE 1: INDOOR SOUND LEVEL CRITERIA (ROAD & RAIL) 3 Type of Space Time Period Road L EQ (dba) Rail General offices, reception areas, retail stores, etc. 07:00 23: Living/dining/den areas of residences, hospitals, schools, nursing/retirement homes, day-care centres, theatres, places of worship, libraries, individual or semi-private offices, conference rooms, etc. 07:00 23: Sleeping quarters of hotels/motels 23:00 07: Sleeping quarters of residences, hospitals, nursing/retirement homes, etc. 23:00 07: Predicted noise levels at the plane of window (POW) dictate the action required to achieve the recommended sound levels. An open window is considered to provide a 10 dba reduction in noise, while a standard closed window is capable of providing a minimum 20 dba noise reduction. Therefore, where noise levels exceed 55 dba daytime and 50 dba nighttime, the ventilation for the building should consider the need for having windows and doors closed, which normally triggers the need for central air conditioning (or similar systems). Where noise levels exceed 65 dba daytime and 60 dba nighttime, building components will require higher levels of sound attenuation. 3 Adapted from ENCG Table 1.6 Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway 3

7 4.3 Roadway Noise Assessment Theoretical Roadway Traffic Noise Predictions Noise predictions were performed with the aid of the MOECC computerized noise assessment program, STAMSON 5.04, for road analysis. Appendix A includes the STAMSON 5.04 input and output data. Roadway noise calculations were performed by treating each road segment as separate line sources of noise, and by using existing building locations as noise barriers. In addition to the traffic volumes summarized in Table 2 below, theoretical noise predictions were based on the following parameters: Truck traffic on all roadways was taken to comprise 5% heavy trucks and 7% medium trucks, as per ENCG requirements for noise level predictions The day/night split was taken to be 92% / 8% respectively for all streets Absorptive and reflective intermediate ground surfaces based on specific source-receiver path ground characteristics The study site was treated as having flat/gently sloping topography In some cases, the building is closer than 15 m to the centreline of the roadway. It should be noted that the minimum distance which can be specified in STAMSON is 15 m. Noise levels within this distance are not expected to vary significantly and the only acceptable noise model for use by the City of Ottawa is STAMSON. Noise receptors were strategically identified at 30 locations around the study area, as illustrated in Figure Roadway Traffic Volumes The ENCG dictates that noise calculations should consider future sound levels based on a roadway s classification at the mature state of development. Therefore, traffic volumes are based on the roadway classifications outlined in the City of Ottawa s Official Plan (OP) and Transportation Master Plan 4, which provide additional details on future roadway expansions. Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes are then based on data in Table B1 of the ENCG for each roadway classification. Table 2 (below) summarizes the AADT values used for each roadway included in this assessment. 4 City of Ottawa Transportation Master Plan, November 2013 Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway 4

8 TABLE 2: ROADWAY TRAFFIC DATA Roadway Roadway Class Speed Limit (km/h) Official Plan AADT Albert Street Slater Street Lyon Street 2- Lane Urban Arterial (2-UAU) 2- Lane Urban Arterial (2-UAU) 2- Lane Urban Arterial (2-UAU) 50 15, , , Indoor Noise Calculations When calculations reveal that outdoor noise levels are sufficiently high as to require investigation of indoor noise levels, calculations are performed to verify the Sound Transmission Class (STC) requirements for building components. The difference between outdoor and indoor noise levels is the noise attenuation provided by the building envelope. According to common industry practice, complete walls and individual wall elements are rated according to the Sound Transmission Class (STC). The STC ratings of common residential walls built in conformance with the Ontario Building Code (2012) typically exceed STC 35, depending on exterior cladding, thickness, and interior finish details. For example, brick veneered walls can achieve STC 55. Standard good quality double-glazed non-operable windows can have STC ratings ranging from 25 to 40, depending on the window manufacturer, pane thickness, and inter-pane spacing. As previously mentioned, windows are the known weak point in a partition. When daytime noise levels (from road and rail sources) at the plane of the window exceed 65 dba, calculations must be performed to evaluate the sound transmission quality of the building components to ensure acceptable indoor noise levels. As a guideline, the anticipated STC requirements for windows have been estimated based on the overall noise reduction required for each intended use of space (STC = outdoor noise level targeted indoor noise levels). Note the City of Ottawa may require detailed window STC calculations be competed prior to building permit based on window sizes and floor plan layouts. Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway 5

9 5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 5.1 Roadway Traffic Noise Levels The results of the roadway noise calculations are summarized below in Table 3 for receptors identified at the various heights, as well as for two outdoor living areas (OLA). Appendix A contains the complete set of input and output data from all STAMSON 5.04 calculations. The results of the current study indicate that noise levels due to roadway traffic over the site will range between 50 and 70 dba during the daytime period (07:00-23:00) and between 42 and 62 dba during the nighttime period (23:00-07:00). The highest noise level (i.e. 70 dba) occurs on the east and south facades of Tower C (Receptors 2, 4, 15, and 22), which are nearest and most exposed to Lyon Street and Slater Street. Outdoor noise levels are below the ENCG objective noise level of 55 dba. As such, noise control measures or mitigation are not required. Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway 6

10 TABLE 3: EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS DUE TO ROADWAY TRAFFIC Receptor Number Zone Location STAMSON 5.04 Noise Level (dba) Day Night 1 POW Ground Level Tower A East Façade POW Ground Level Tower C East Façade POW 3 nd Floor Tower C East Façade POW 3 nd Floor Tower C South Façade POW 3 nd Floor Tower C West Façade POW 3 nd Floor Tower B South Façade POW 3 nd Floor Tower B West Façade POW 3 nd Floor Tower B East Façade POW 6 th Floor Tower A North Façade POW 6 th Floor Tower A East Façade POW 6 th Floor Tower A West Façade POW 9 th Floor Tower A South Façade POW 9 th Floor Tower A West Façade POW 18 th Floor Tower C East Façade POW 18 th Floor Tower C South Façade POW 18 th Floor Tower C West Façade POW 18 th Floor Tower B East Façade POW 18 th Floor Tower B South Façade POW 18 th Floor Tower B West Façade POW 18 th Floor Tower B North Façade POW 26 th Floor Tower C East Façade POW 26 th Floor Tower C South Façade POW 26 th Floor Tower C West Façade POW 26 th Floor Tower B East Façade POW 26 th Floor Tower B South Façade POW 26 th Floor Tower B West Façade POW 26 th Floor Tower C North Façade Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway 7

11 TABLE 3: EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS DUE TO ROADWAY TRAFFIC (CONTINUED) Receptor Number Zone Location STAMSON 5.04 Noise Level (dba) Day Night 28 POW 3 rd Floor Tower C North Façade OLA Tower A Roof terrace OLA Tower C Outdoor terrace at 6 th floor Noise Control Measures The noise levels predicted due to roadway traffic on certain façades of the three towers exceed the criteria listed in ENCG for building components. Therefore, upgraded building components will be required. The STC requirements for the windows of the three towers are summarized in Table 4 below for various units on various building facades within the development (see Figures 3-4): TABLE 4: STC REQUIREMENTS Location Facade Retail room window STC Living room window STC Bedroom window STC Tower A (Hotel) North East South Tower B West East North Tower C South East Note: Exterior wall components on these façades require a minimum STC of 45, where a window/wall system is used. Wall assemblies meeting STC 45 would include steel stud walls minimum 92 mm deep filled with batt insulation, exterior dense glass sheeting, and 16 mm gypsum board on the inside. Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway 8

12 A review of window supplier literature indicates that the specified STC ratings can be achieved by a variety of window systems having a combination of glass thickness and inter-pane spacing. We have not specified any particular window configurations, as there are several manufacturers and various combinations of window components that will offer the necessary sound attenuation rating. However, it is the responsibility of the manufacturer to ensure that the specified window achieves the required STC. This can only be assured by using window configurations that have been certified by laboratory testing. The requirements for STC ratings assume that the remaining components of the building are constructed and installed according to the minimum standards of the Ontario Building Code. The specified STC requirements also apply to swinging and/or sliding patio doors. All specified building components will require review by a qualified acoustical engineer for conformance to the recommendations of this report prior to building permit application. Results of the calculations also indicate that all units in Towers A, B, and C will require air conditioning (or similar mechanical system), which will allow occupants to keep windows closed and maintain a comfortable living environment. In addition to ventilation requirements, it will also be required to include Warning Clauses in all Lease, Purchase and Sale Agreements, as summarized in Section CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The results of the current study indicate that roadway traffic is the dominant source of noise impacting the site. Noise levels due to roadway traffic will range between 50 and 70 dba during the daytime period (07:00-23:00) and between 42 and 62 dba during the nighttime period (23:00-07:00). The highest noise level (i.e. 70 dba) occurs along the south and east façades of Tower C. In addition, higher Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings are required for building components where noise levels exceeded 65 dba, as described in Section 5.2 (See Figures 3-4). Results of the calculations also indicate that all units in Towers A, B, and C will require air conditioning (or similar mechanical system), which will allow occupants to keep windows closed and maintain a comfortable living environment. In addition to ventilation requirements, it will also be required to include Warning Clauses in all Lease, Purchase and Sale Agreements, as summarized below: Purchasers/tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing roadway traffic Manor Park Management 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street, Ottawa: Roadway 9

13

14

15

16

17

18 APPENDIX A STAMSON INPUT AND OUTPUT DATA A1

19 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :11:51 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r1.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Albert (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Albert (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 7.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 9.00 / 9.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A2

20 Road data, segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 7.00 m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A3

21 Road data, segment # 3: Lyon2 (day/night) - Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 3: Lyon2 (day/night) - Angle1 Angle2 : deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : 0.00 deg Barrier height : 7.00 m Barrier receiver distance : 9.00 / 9.00 m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A4

22 Results segment # 1: Albert (day) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba A5

23 Results segment # 2: Lyon (day) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba A6

24 Results segment # 3: Lyon2 (day) Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba A7

25 Results segment # 1: Albert (night) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba A8

26 Results segment # 2: Lyon (night) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba A9

27 Results segment # 3: Lyon2 (night) Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): A10

28 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :11:59 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r2.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Albert (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Albert (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A11

29 Road data, segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A12

30 Road data, segment # 3: Slater (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 3: Slater (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A13

31 Results segment # 1: Albert (day) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba A14

32 Results segment # 2: Lyon (day) - ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 3: Slater (day) - ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba A15

33 Results segment # 1: Albert (night) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 1.50! 1.50! 1.50 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba A16

34 Results segment # 2: Lyon (night) - ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 3: Slater (night) - ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): A17

35 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :11:45 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r3.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Albert (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Albert (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A18

36 Road data, segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A19

37 Road data, segment # 3: Slater (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 3: Slater (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A20

38 Results segment # 1: Albert (day) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 8.70! 3.79! 3.79 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: Lyon (day) - ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba A21

39 Results segment # 3: Slater (day) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 8.70! 4.25! 4.25 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba A22

40 Results segment # 1: Albert (night) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 8.70! 3.79! 3.79 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba A23

41 Results segment # 2: Lyon (night) - ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 3: Slater (night) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 8.70! 4.25! 4.25 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): A24

42 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :12:29 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r4.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A25

43 Road data, segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A26

44 Results segment # 1: Slater (day) - ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: Lyon (day) - ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba A27

45 Results segment # 1: Slater (night) - ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: Lyon (night) - ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): A28

46 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :12:54 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r5.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A29

47 Results segment # 1: Slater (day) - ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: Slater (night) - ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): A30

48 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :15:44 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r6.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A31

49 Results segment # 1: Slater (day) - ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: Slater (night) - ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): A32

50 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :16:23 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r7.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A33

51 Road data, segment # 2: Albert (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: Albert (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A34

52 Results segment # 1: Slater (day) - ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: Albert (day) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 8.70! 3.24! 3.24 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: Slater (night) - ROAD ( ) = dba A35

53 Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: Albert (night) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 8.70! 3.24! 3.24 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): A36

54 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :16:57 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r8.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Slater (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A37

55 Road data, segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 2: Lyon (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A38

56 Road data, segment # 3: Lyon 2 (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 3: Lyon 2 (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 8.70 / 8.70 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 8.00 m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : 0.00 m Receiver elevation : 0.00 m Barrier elevation : 0.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 A39

57 Results segment # 1: Slater (day) - ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba A40

58 Results segment # 2: Lyon (day) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 8.70! 7.10! 7.10 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 3: Lyon 2 (day) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 8.70! 1.73! 1.73 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: db A41

59 Results segment # 1: Slater (night) - ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Results segment # 2: Lyon (night) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 8.70! 7.10! 7.10 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba A42

60 Results segment # 3: Lyon 2 (night) - Barrier height for grazing incidence Source! Receiver! Barrier! Elevation of Height (m)! Height (m)! Height (m)! Barrier Top (m) ! 8.70! 1.73! 1.73 ROAD ( ) = dba Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): A43

61 STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :12:58 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r9.te Description: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Albert (day/night) Car traffic volume : 12144/1056 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 966/84 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 690/60 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Albert (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : / m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 A44

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. 315 Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. 315 Chapel Street. Ottawa, Ontario Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment 315 Chapel Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-002 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: Leanne Moussa Allsaints 10 Blackburn Avenue K1N 6P8 Ottawa, Ontario Prepared

More information

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment. 407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Assessment. 407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario 407 Nelson Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-042 Traffic Noise Prepared For: Tony Kazarian AK Global Management Inc. 680 Eagleson Road Ottawa, Ontario K2M 2G9 Canada Prepared By: Omar Daher, B.Eng.,

More information

Transportation Noise Assessment. 590 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 590 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario Transportation Noise Assessment 590 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE16-019 Transportation Noise Prepared For: Kevin Yemm Richcraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard, Suite 201 Ottawa,

More information

Transportation Noise Assessment. 560 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 560 Rideau Street. Ottawa, Ontario Transportation Noise Assessment 560 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE13-034 Transportation Noise Prepared For: Kevin Yemm Richcraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard, Suite 201 Ottawa,

More information

Feasibility Noise Assessment. Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment. Ottawa, Ontario

Feasibility Noise Assessment. Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment. Ottawa, Ontario Feasibility Noise Assessment Westgate Shopping Centre Redevelopment Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-067 - Feasibility Noise Prepared For: Stuart Craig 2300 Yonge Street, Suite 500 Toronto, Ontario M4P 1E4

More information

Transportation Noise Assessment. 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive. Ottawa, Ontario Transportation Noise Assessment 370 Queen Elizabeth Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE14-121 - Traffic Noise REV 1 Prepared For: 2253664 Ontario Inc. Roberto Campagna 24 George Street West Ottawa, Ontario

More information

Transportation Noise Assessment Prince of Wales Residential Development Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment Prince of Wales Residential Development Ottawa, Ontario Transportation Noise Assessment 1003 Prince of Wales Residential Development Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE13-031 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: Kent Bugatsch Inc. 63 Pamilla Street Ottawa, Ontario K1S 3K7

More information

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario Conservancy Subdivision Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17 151 Traffic Noise Prepared For: Andrew Finnson Barrhaven Conservancy East Inc. Ottawa, Ontario Prepared By: Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Principal Omar Daher,

More information

Transportation Noise Feasibility Assessment & 3930 Riverside Drive Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Feasibility Assessment & 3930 Riverside Drive Ottawa, Ontario Transportation Noise Feasibility Assessment 3960 & 3930 Riverside Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE18 039 Transportation Noise Prepared For: Alex Turner 225 Metcalfe Street, Suite 708 Ottawa, Ontario K2P

More information

Transportation Noise Assessment. 121 Parkdale Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 121 Parkdale Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario Transportation Noise Assessment 121 Parkdale Avenue Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE 14-010 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: Michel Gagnon 98 Rue Lois Gatineau, Québec J8Y 3R7 Prepared By: Thomas Couper, B.A.Sc.,

More information

Transportation Noise Assessment. 809 Richmond Road. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. 809 Richmond Road. Ottawa, Ontario Transportation Noise Assessment 809 Richmond Road Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE16-024 - Transportation Noise Prepared For: Walter Boyce OCEF Corp 200-368 Slater Street Ottawa, Ontario K1R 5C1 Prepared By:

More information

Environmental Noise Assessment. St-Charles Market. Ottawa, Ontario

Environmental Noise Assessment. St-Charles Market. Ottawa, Ontario Environmental Noise Assessment St-Charles Market Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-120 - Noise Prepared For: Jenna Maw LineBox Studio Inc. 126 York Street, Suite 502 Ottawa, Ontario K1N 5T2 Prepared By: Michael

More information

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario

Roadway Traffic Noise Feasibility Assessment. Conservancy Subdivision. Ottawa, Ontario Conservancy Subdivision Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17 151 Traffic Noise Prepared For: Andrew Finnson Barrhaven Conservancy East Inc. Ottawa, Ontario Prepared By: Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Principal Omar Daher,

More information

3443 INNES ROAD NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

3443 INNES ROAD NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 3443 INNES ROAD NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT Prepared By: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Kanata, Ontario K2M 1P6 December 2017 Novatech File No. 117077 Ref No.: R-2017-192 December 19,

More information

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario Transportation Noise Assessment Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-009 - Transportation Noise Prepared For: Michaela Jones The Salvation Army 2 Overlea

More information

Transportation Noise & Vibration Feasibility Assessment. 383 Albert Street & 340 Queen Street Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise & Vibration Feasibility Assessment. 383 Albert Street & 340 Queen Street Ottawa, Ontario 383 Albert Street & 340 Queen Street Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE18-111 Noise & Vibration Prepared For: Neil Malhotra Claridge Homes 2001-210 Gladstone Avenue Ottawa, ON K2P 0Y6 Prepared By: Michael Lafortune,

More information

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1088 Maritime Way - Ottawa Prepared For

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1088 Maritime Way - Ottawa Prepared For Geotechnical Engineering patersongroup Environmental Engineering Hydrogeology Geological Engineering Materials Testing Building Science Archaeological Services Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed

More information

Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment

Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment City Park Redevelopment Phase 2 Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-068 Noise & Vibration Phase 2 November 13, 2018 PREPARED FOR Stuart Craig RioTrin Prop (Gloucester

More information

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2129 Nantes Street Detailed Noise Study

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2129 Nantes Street Detailed Noise Study HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2129 Nantes Street Detailed Noise Study HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 2129 Nantes Street DETAILED NOISE STUDY Prepared by: NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. 240 Michael Cowpland Drive,

More information

115 ECHO DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA DETAILED NOISE STUDY

115 ECHO DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA DETAILED NOISE STUDY Dix B 115 ECHO DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA DETAILED NOISE STUDY Prepared for: UNIFORM URBAN DEVELOPMENTS Suite 300, 117 Centrepointe Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2G 5X3 Prepared by: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael

More information

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1136 Martime Way - Ottawa Prepared For

patersongroup Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed Multi-Storey Building 1136 Martime Way - Ottawa Prepared For Geotechnical Engineering patersongroup Environmental Engineering Hydrogeology Geological Engineering Materials Testing Building Science Archaeological Services Environmental Noise Control Study Proposed

More information

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development (Infill) 747 Liverpool Road Pickering, Ontario

Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development (Infill) 747 Liverpool Road Pickering, Ontario Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development (Infill) 747 Liverpool Road Pickering, Ontario Prepared for: Madison Liverpool Limited 369 Rimrock Road Toronto, Ontario, M3J 3G2 Prepared by Victor

More information

REP Taggart 1140 Wellington Noise Control Study Page 1 of 18

REP Taggart 1140 Wellington Noise Control Study Page 1 of 18 REP Taggart 1140 Wellington Noise Control Study Page 1 of 18 2013-10-15 Simon Taggart Project Coordinator The Taggart Group 3187 Albion Road South Ottawa, Ontario K1V 8Y3 T: 613.526.2400 ext 320 C: 613.857.0353

More information

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 114 ISABELLA STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OTTAWA, ONTARIO

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 114 ISABELLA STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OTTAWA, ONTARIO Smart Property Advisors Ltd. 802-500 Laurier Avenue West Ottawa, ON NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 114 ISABELLA STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OTTAWA, ONTARIO Prepared by: SMART PROPERTY ADVISORS LTD. 802 500

More information

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario Transportation Noise Assessment Salvation Army Multi Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-009 - Transportation Noise R2 Prepared For: Michaela Jones The Salvation Army

More information

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessments Place D Orleans Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessments Place D Orleans Drive. Ottawa, Ontario s 1220-1226 Place D Orleans Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-154 Noise & Vibration Prepared For: Choice Properties REIT 22 St. Clair Avenue East, Suite 500 Toronto, ON M4T 2S5 c/o Pamela Whyte Parsons

More information

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi-Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario

Transportation Noise Assessment. Salvation Army Multi-Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive. Ottawa, Ontario Transportation Noise Assessment Salvation Army Multi-Purpose Building 102 Bill Leathem Drive Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-009 - Transportation Noise R3 Prepared For: Michaela Jones The Salvation Army

More information

J. E. COULTER ASSOCIATES LIMITED -ii- APPENDIX B: GUIDELINES

J. E. COULTER ASSOCIATES LIMITED -ii- APPENDIX B: GUIDELINES J. E. COULTER ASSOCIATES LIMITED -ii- APPENDIX B: GUIDELINES NPC-115 NPC-115 Construction Equipment 1. Scope This Publication sets sound emission standards for various items of new construction

More information

DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS BRONTE ROAD DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF OAKVILLE

DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS BRONTE ROAD DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF OAKVILLE SS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers REPORT NO. WA10-93 REVISION 3 DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE AND APARTMENT BUILDINGS BRONTE ROAD DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF OAKVILLE SUBMITTED TO: BALLANTRY

More information

Appendix C STAMSON Noise Model Output File for Tunnel Alternative (Alternative 3)

Appendix C STAMSON Noise Model Output File for Tunnel Alternative (Alternative 3) Appendix C STAMSON Noise Model Output File for Tunnel Alternative (Alternative 3) Detroit River International Crossing Study STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 21-02-2007 01:14:41 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT

More information

1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 NOISE DESCRIPTORS 5 3 NOISE SENSITIVE POINTS OF RECEPTION 5 4 PROPOSED LAND USE 7 5 GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA 8

1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 NOISE DESCRIPTORS 5 3 NOISE SENSITIVE POINTS OF RECEPTION 5 4 PROPOSED LAND USE 7 5 GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA 8 Durham Live Tourist Destination Page 2 of 24 29 May 2014 1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 NOISE DESCRIPTORS 5 3 NOISE SENSITIVE POINTS OF RECEPTION 5 4 PROPOSED LAND USE 7 5 GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA 8 5.1 ROAD & RAIL

More information

Yorkdale Development Master Plan Environmental Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Toronto, ON

Yorkdale Development Master Plan Environmental Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Toronto, ON ASSESSMENT REPORT - Project: 16419 Yorkdale Development Master Plan Environmental Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Toronto, ON Prepared for: Oxford Properties Group Royal Bank Plaza North Tower 200

More information

Acoustic spaces: comfort and social sustainability

Acoustic spaces: comfort and social sustainability European congress Eco-Technologies for the future 9 June 2010 Acoustic materials and spaces for sustainability Professor Jian Kang School of Architecture, University of Sheffield, UK Outline Acoustics

More information

Noise Maps, Report & Statistics, Dublin City Council Noise Mapping Project Roads and Traffic Department

Noise Maps, Report & Statistics, Dublin City Council Noise Mapping Project Roads and Traffic Department Noise Maps, Report & Statistics, Dublin City Council Noise Mapping Project Roads and Traffic Department Produced by Traffic Noise & Air Quality Unit November 2007 Contact: brian.mcmanus@dublincity.ie Ph;

More information

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT REFERENCE: SA 4968 rev 1 ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT British Standard 8233: 2014. CLIENT: MJ Gleeson SITE: Berengrave Nursery, 61 Berengrave Road, Rainham, Kent, ME 7NL SURVEY DATES: Noise

More information

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY 404 EXTENSION FINAL NOISE STUDY. Assignment Number: 2013-E-0017 #3

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY 404 EXTENSION FINAL NOISE STUDY. Assignment Number: 2013-E-0017 #3 MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION HIGHWAY 404 EXTENSION FINAL NOISE STUDY Assignment Number: 2013-E-0017 #3 Submitted to: The Ministry of Transportation 1201 Wilson Avenue Downsview, Ontario M3M 1J8 Submitted

More information

APPENDIXD. Traffic Noise Technical Report

APPENDIXD. Traffic Noise Technical Report APPENDIXD Traffic Noise Technical Report Environmental Assessment - Lincoln County, SD 85 th Street: Sundowner Avenue to Louise Avenue November 2017 F I N A L R E P O R T TRAFFIC NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT

More information

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. West Village 70 Mississauga Road South & 181 Lakeshore Road West. Mississauga, Ontario

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. West Village 70 Mississauga Road South & 181 Lakeshore Road West. Mississauga, Ontario Pedestrian Level Wind Study West Village 70 Mississauga Road South & 181 Lakeshore Road West Mississauga, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-112-PLW Prepared For: c/o Emily Rosen Diamondcorp 22 St. Clair Avenue East,

More information

MAY 5, Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc.

MAY 5, Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street NOISE BARRIER ABUTTER MEETING. Tech Environmental, Inc. MAY 5, 2011 Noise Barrier Presentation SE Quadrant Noyes Street and Lincoln Street Jacobs Engineering Group Group Inc. Inc. 1 Introductions Agenda Overview of Interchange Project Overview of noise barrier

More information

COULD THE GUNSHOT BE HEARD?

COULD THE GUNSHOT BE HEARD? COULD THE GUNSHOT BE HEARD? October 9, 2003 Paul D. Schomer Schomer & Associates Champaign, IL 61821 INTRODUCTION Statement of Problem On the evening of November 21, 1991, a NJ State Trooper gave chase

More information

Fundamentals of Sound

Fundamentals of Sound Sound is an important consideration in the selection of mechanical equipment. The purpose of this article is to present a procedure for evaluating the sound levels created by evaporative cooling equipment

More information

Assessment & Specifications for Noise Controls

Assessment & Specifications for Noise Controls Project 772600 Rev 1 Cargill North Vancouver Grain Terminal Assessment & Specifications for Noise Controls TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...1 1.1 Background...1 1.2 Site Description...1 2. SOUND LEVEL

More information

GIS-BASED VISUALISATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE

GIS-BASED VISUALISATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE Proceedings of the 9 th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology Rhodes island, Greece, 1 3 September 2005 GIS-BASED VISUALISATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE A. KONSTANTINIDIS 1, K. EVANGELIDIS

More information

Noise from Oil & Gas Facilities Acoustics 101 and Best Practices for Noise Control. Rob Stevens, HGC Engineering

Noise from Oil & Gas Facilities Acoustics 101 and Best Practices for Noise Control. Rob Stevens, HGC Engineering Noise from Oil & Gas Facilities Acoustics 101 and Best Practices for Noise Control Rob Stevens, HGC Engineering Noise From Oil & Gas Facilities Acoustics 101 and Best Practices for Noise Control Rob Stevens

More information

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014 Appendix C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014 CONTENTS List of Figures-... 3 List of Tables... 4 Introduction... 1 Application of the Lubbock Travel Demand

More information

Answer - SAQ 1. The intensity, I, is given by: Back

Answer - SAQ 1. The intensity, I, is given by: Back Answer - SAQ 1 The intensity, I, is given by: Noise Control. Edited by Shahram Taherzadeh. 2014 The Open University. Published 2014 by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 142 Answer - SAQ 2 It shows that the human

More information

1 Wind Turbine Acoustics. Wind turbines generate sound by both mechanical and aerodynamic

1 Wind Turbine Acoustics. Wind turbines generate sound by both mechanical and aerodynamic Wind Turbine Acoustics 1 1 Wind Turbine Acoustics Wind turbines generate sound by both mechanical and aerodynamic sources. Sound remains an important criterion used in the siting of wind farms. Sound emission

More information

Appendix G Noise Modeling Files

Appendix G Noise Modeling Files Appendix G Noise Modeling Files County of Butte Rio d Oro Specific Plan Noise Study July 2014 Rio d Oro Specific Plan Noise Study Prepared for: JKB Development 2370 West Monte Vista Ave. Turlock, CA 95381

More information

Appendix E FTA NOISE MODELING WORKSHEETS AND DETAILED METHODOLOGY

Appendix E FTA NOISE MODELING WORKSHEETS AND DETAILED METHODOLOGY Appendix E FTA NOISE MODELING WORKSHEETS AND DETAILED METHODOLOGY APPENDIX E General Noise Assessment The FTA General Noise Assessment procedure was used for calculating noise from transit sources associated

More information

research highlight Wind-Rain Relationships in Southwestern British Columbia Introduction Methodology Figure 2 Lower Mainland meteorological stations

research highlight Wind-Rain Relationships in Southwestern British Columbia Introduction Methodology Figure 2 Lower Mainland meteorological stations research highlight June 2007 Technical Series 07-114 Introduction Building envelope failures in southwestern British Columbia has brought to light the strong influence of wind-driven rain on building envelopes.

More information

A Unique Building For the Discerning Client P O S T ROA D E A S T W E S T P O R T, C O N N E C T I C U T

A Unique Building For the Discerning Client P O S T ROA D E A S T W E S T P O R T, C O N N E C T I C U T A Unique Building For the Discerning Client 1 0 3 2 P O S T ROA D E A S T W E S T P O R T, C O N N E C T I C U T 1032 Post Road East Westport represents a unique opportunity to acquire or lease a brand

More information

Monitoring Survey in the Vicinity of St. Marys Cement: Interim Report

Monitoring Survey in the Vicinity of St. Marys Cement: Interim Report Technical Memorandum 2017-2018 Monitoring Survey in the Vicinity of St. Marys Cement: Interim Report Ontario Ministry of the Environment & Climate Change Report Prepared by: Terrestrial Assessment and

More information

III. FORECASTED GROWTH

III. FORECASTED GROWTH III. FORECASTED GROWTH In order to properly identify potential improvement projects that will be required for the transportation system in Milliken, it is important to first understand the nature and volume

More information

Dubai Municipality LRT Noise and Vibration Impact Stage 2

Dubai Municipality LRT Noise and Vibration Impact Stage 2 Dubai Municipality LRT Noise and Vibration Impact Stage 2 Environmental Impact 11 th of April, 2004 Environmental Impact Report According to the PS007 Agreement, Environmental Impact Report Based on Noise

More information

PAUL RUDOLPH Oriental Masonic Gardens

PAUL RUDOLPH Oriental Masonic Gardens 1 PAUL RUDOLPH Oriental Masonic Gardens Latitude _ 41.3 N Longitude _ 72.9 W Climate: transition between Cfa _ Humid Subtropical and Dfa_ Humid Continental climate 2 Paul Rudolph INTRODUCTION Fig. 1 -

More information

Investigations on effect of the orientation on thermal comfort in terraced housing in Malaysia

Investigations on effect of the orientation on thermal comfort in terraced housing in Malaysia Investigations on effect of the orientation on thermal comfort in terraced housing in Malaysia Dr Mohamed Ali Abdul Hussain Al-Obaidi 1 and Prof. Peter Woods 2 1 Senior lecturer, Center for Equatorial

More information

Energy Use in Homes. A series of reports on domestic energy use in England. Energy Efficiency

Energy Use in Homes. A series of reports on domestic energy use in England. Energy Efficiency Energy Use in Homes A series of reports on domestic energy use in England Energy Efficiency Energy Use in Homes A series of reports on domestic energy use in England This is one of a series of three reports

More information

conceptdesigns C0NCEPTDESIGNSARCHITETURE.CO.NZ architecture S t a g e Gisborne Beach House

conceptdesigns C0NCEPTDESIGNSARCHITETURE.CO.NZ architecture S t a g e Gisborne Beach House C0NCEPTDESIGNSARCHITETURE.CO.NZ conceptdesigns architecture S t a g e 2 A Gisborne Beach House GISBORNE BEACH BRIEF HOUSE conceptdesigns architecture Beth and Chris want to design and build their forever

More information

BUILDING AND SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE (Effective July1, 2013)

BUILDING AND SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE (Effective July1, 2013) BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION TELEPHONE (949) 724-6300 BUILDING AND SAFETY FEE SCHEDULE (Effective July1, 2013) Payment: When a plan is required by the Administrative Authority to be submitted, a plan check

More information

APPENDIX IV MODELLING

APPENDIX IV MODELLING APPENDIX IV MODELLING Kingston Transportation Master Plan Final Report, July 2004 Appendix IV: Modelling i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 OBJECTIVE... 1 3.0 URBAN TRANSPORTATION MODELLING

More information

Building Envelope Requirements Overview Page 3-4

Building Envelope Requirements Overview Page 3-4 Building Envelope Requirements Overview Page 3-4 The benefit of a high reflectance surface is obvious: while dark surfaces absorb the sun s energy (visible light, invisible infrared. and ultraviolet radiation)

More information

P r O P e r t y L I S T I N G. 701 Fifth Avenue, Seattle. The Most Prominent Building in the Seattle Skyline JOHN HANSEN.

P r O P e r t y L I S T I N G. 701 Fifth Avenue, Seattle. The Most Prominent Building in the Seattle Skyline JOHN HANSEN. 701 Fifth Avenue, Seattle The Most Prominent Building in the Seattle Skyline F e A T u r e s At 76 stories high, this skyscraper boasts unparalleled 360 degree views of Puget Sound, the Olympic Mountains,

More information

1 BAKER HOUSE DINING: LIGHTING DIAGNOSTIC

1 BAKER HOUSE DINING: LIGHTING DIAGNOSTIC Shauna Jin + Caitlin Mueller 4.401: Lighting and Acoustics Analyses 27 April 2006 1 BAKER HOUSE DINING: LIGHTING DIAGNOSTIC 1.1 Sunlight Penetration The Baker House Dining room is exposed mostly to southern

More information

PROPAGATION, NOISE CRITERIA

PROPAGATION, NOISE CRITERIA 2 ZVUKOVÁ INDOOR AND IZOLACE OUTDOOR V BUDOVÁCH SOUND PROPAGATION, NOISE CRITERIA kročejový zvuk Course: Building Physics AKUSTIKA V BUDOVÁCH - seminář ČKAIT (03/2017) JIŘÍ NOVÁČEK Department of Building

More information

schematic lighting design courtesy of william rawn associates

schematic lighting design courtesy of william rawn associates WHEELOCK COLLEGE CAMPUS CENTER AND STUDENT RESIDENCE schematic lighting design courtesy of william rawn associates anne k cheney lighting g electrical option advisor : dr. kevin houser b u i l d i n g

More information

3D ANALYSIS AND INVESTIGATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE FROM ROADS OF THE ADELAIDE CBD AND THEIR IMPACT ON BUILDINGS

3D ANALYSIS AND INVESTIGATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE FROM ROADS OF THE ADELAIDE CBD AND THEIR IMPACT ON BUILDINGS 6th International Conference and Workshop on the Built Environment in Developing Countries, 4-5 December 2012, Adelaide, Australia 3D ANALYSIS AND INVESTIGATION OF TRAFFIC NOISE FROM ROADS OF THE ADELAIDE

More information

WEST VALLEY BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS. January 9, 2015

WEST VALLEY BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS. January 9, 2015 400-420 WEST VALLEY BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS January 9, 2015 Kunzman Associates, Inc. 400-420 WEST VALLEY BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS January 9, 2015 Prepared

More information

Directive on the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise

Directive on the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise Directive on the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise This Directive has been ratified by the European Parliament and is awaiting publication in the Official Journal.( around 23/5/02) The Directive

More information

Chapter 11. Noise Impacts of Transportation Systems. Transportation Decision-making Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming

Chapter 11. Noise Impacts of Transportation Systems. Transportation Decision-making Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming Transportation Decision-making Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming Chapter 11 Noise Impacts of Transportation Systems Kumares Sinha and Samuel Labi 1 2 Real Experiences of Transportation Noise

More information

SHADOW IMPACT STUDY REPORT

SHADOW IMPACT STUDY REPORT SHADOW IMPACT STUDY REPORT 175 Zoo Park Road Town of Wasaga Beach Date: September 2017 Prepared for: Simcoe County Housing Corporation Prepared by: MacNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning Limited

More information

Solar Control in Traditional Architecture, Potentials for Passive Design in Hot and Arid Climate

Solar Control in Traditional Architecture, Potentials for Passive Design in Hot and Arid Climate Solar Control in Traditional Architecture, Potentials for Passive Design in Hot and Arid Climate Wael A. Yousef Mousa, MA.ᵃ Werner Lang, Prof. Dr.-Ing.ᵇ ᵃ ᵇInstitute of Energy Efficient and Sustainable

More information

Regal House #CREATESOMETHING. ALL ENQUIRIES 53,647 sq.ft. RE-DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY SUITABLE FOR A VARIETY OF USES OFFICE HOTEL RESIDENTIAL

Regal House #CREATESOMETHING. ALL ENQUIRIES 53,647 sq.ft. RE-DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY SUITABLE FOR A VARIETY OF USES OFFICE HOTEL RESIDENTIAL SK1 3AA #CREATESOMETHING RE-DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY OFFICE HOTEL RESIDENTIAL Stockport has everything Excellent motorway access First class rail links Efficient local bus services Easy access to Manchester

More information

DAYLIGHT, SUNLIGHT AND OVERSHADOWING The EXO Building at Point Village North Wall Quay & East Wall Road, Dublin 1.

DAYLIGHT, SUNLIGHT AND OVERSHADOWING The EXO Building at Point Village North Wall Quay & East Wall Road, Dublin 1. DAYLIGHT, SUNLIGHT AND OVERSHADOWING The EXO Building at Point Village North Wall Quay & East Wall Road, Dublin 1. For Grant Thornton, on behalf of the Specified Assets of Henry A. Crosbie (In Receivership)

More information

Published in: Proceeding of 9th SENVAR / 2nd ISESEE, Shah Alam, Malaysia, December 2008

Published in: Proceeding of 9th SENVAR / 2nd ISESEE, Shah Alam, Malaysia, December 2008 Evaluation on Lighting Condition and Visual Legibility of Road Surfaces and Traffic Signs in Bandung City Mangkuto, R.A.; Soelami, F.X.N.; Soegijanto, R.M. Published in: Proceeding of 9th SENVAR / 2nd

More information

ARCHITECTURE IN THE DAYLIGHT

ARCHITECTURE IN THE DAYLIGHT ARCHITECTURE IN THE DAYLIGHT Site Location MANUS LEUNG HARVARD GSD FALL 2015 The house is located in Jl. Intern Corn Kebun Jeruk Blok U3 No.18, Kembangan District of Jakarta 11640 Indonesia. 01 OBJECTIVES

More information

SHADOW STUDY REPORT REGARDING

SHADOW STUDY REPORT REGARDING SHADOW STUDY REPORT REGARDING an APPLICATION TO REDEVELOP Three 6 Storey Condominiums Regional Road 25 (Ontario Street) and Britannia Road Milton, Ontario KNYMH FILE # 17030 Prepared by: Krista Lilley

More information

Energy Use in Homes 2007

Energy Use in Homes 2007 Energy Use in Homes 2007 A series of reports on domestic energy use in England Space and Water Heating Energy Use in Homes 2007 A series of reports on domestic energy use in England This is one of a series

More information

APPENDIX B. Noise Primer

APPENDIX B. Noise Primer APPENDIX B Noise Primer NOISE PRIMER TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...1 2. BASIC SOUND PRINCIPLES...1 2.1. SOUND AS A WAVE...1 2.2. SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL...2 2.2.1. Decibel Math...4 2.2.2. Descriptive

More information

Paine Field Airport Existing and Future Environmental Assessment, Initiation of Commercial Service Noise Analysis

Paine Field Airport Existing and Future Environmental Assessment, Initiation of Commercial Service Noise Analysis Paine Field Airport Existing and Future Environmental Assessment, Initiation of Commercial Service Noise Analysis July 2012 Prepared by: BridgeNet International 3151 Airway Avenue Building I-2 Costa Mesa,

More information

HOTEL KANATA 160 HEARST WAY KANATA, ONTARIO SERVICING REPORT. Prepared for: David Johnston Architect. Prepared By:

HOTEL KANATA 160 HEARST WAY KANATA, ONTARIO SERVICING REPORT. Prepared for: David Johnston Architect. Prepared By: HOTEL KANATA 160 HEARST WAY KANATA, ONTARIO SERVICING REPORT Prepared for: David Johnston Architect Prepared By: BaseTech Consulting Inc. 309 Roywood Crescent Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 1A6 BCI Project No.

More information

FUNDAMENTALS OF HVAC

FUNDAMENTALS OF HVAC FUNDAMENTALS OF HVAC Prof.Dr. Yusuf Ali KARA Res.Asst. Semih AKIN 1 INTRODUCTION Terminology: HVAC: Heating, ventilating, air-conditioning and refrigerating. Air conditioning is the process of treating

More information

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE Copyright SFA - InterNoise 2000 1 inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering 27-30 August 2000, Nice, FRANCE I-INCE Classification: 3.1 DEVELOPMENT OF

More information

MEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections:

MEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections: MEMORANDUM DATE: JULY 6, 2012 TO: FROM: RE: CC: MELANIE KNIGHT BRAD BYVELDS/ JENNIFER LUONG 1050 SOMERSET STREET PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS OUR FILE NO. 111152 NEIL MALHOTRA The purpose of this memo

More information

6 th Line Municipal Class Environmental Assessment

6 th Line Municipal Class Environmental Assessment 6 th Line Municipal Class Environmental Assessment County Road 27 to St John s Road Town of Innisfil, ON September 6, 2016 APPENDIX L: TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MEMORANDUM Accessible formats are available

More information

White Paper Luminance & Illuminance. Brief explanation of photometry for the application of tunnel lighting control

White Paper Luminance & Illuminance. Brief explanation of photometry for the application of tunnel lighting control White Paper Luminance & Illuminance Brief explanation of photometry for the application of tunnel lighting control 1 General This document gives a brief explanation of photometry, the basics of tunnel

More information

Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3

Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3 SECTION DIRECTORY General Information Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3 Combination Assembly Recommendations and Limitations Composite Configurations...COMB-4 Typical Sealant

More information

ADVANCED ROOF COATINGS: MATERIALS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS

ADVANCED ROOF COATINGS: MATERIALS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS ADVANCED ROOF COATINGS: MATERIALS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS Abstract J.M. Bell 1 and G.B. Smith 2 The use of low emittance and high solar reflectance coatings is widespread in window glazings, wall and roof

More information

Mitigation of Gypsum Mine Voids Under SR-2 in Ottawa County, Ohio

Mitigation of Gypsum Mine Voids Under SR-2 in Ottawa County, Ohio Subsurface Investigation and Conceptual Alternatives Mitigation of Gypsum Mine Voids Under SR-2 in Ottawa County, Ohio Presented By: Ohio Department of Transportation CH2M HILL CTL Engineering Technos,

More information

Method of Measuring Machinery Sound Within an Equipment Space

Method of Measuring Machinery Sound Within an Equipment Space ANSI/AHRI Standard 575 (Formerly ARI Standard 575) 2008 Standard for Method of Measuring Machinery Sound Within an Equipment Space Price $15.00 (M) $30.00 (NM) Printed in U.S.A. 8Copyright 1994, by Air-Conditioning

More information

2018 North Carolina Residential Code Prescriptive Tables for Selection of Support Elements for Beams, Girders, and Headers: Example Problems

2018 North Carolina Residential Code Prescriptive Tables for Selection of Support Elements for Beams, Girders, and Headers: Example Problems 2018 North Carolina Residential Code Prescriptive Tables for Selection of Support Elements for Beams, Girders, and Structural Building Components Association (SBCA) August 10, 2018 SBCA is an APPROVED

More information

CERTIFIED RESOLUTION. introduction: and dated May 29, 2017, as attached, as appropriate

CERTIFIED RESOLUTION. introduction: and dated May 29, 2017, as attached, as appropriate 15322 Buena Vista Avenue, White Rock BC, Canada V4B 1Y6 www.whiterockcity.ca City of White Rock P: 604.541.22121 F: 604.541.9348 /2tC% City Clerk s Office IT E ROC K June 13,2017 Stephanie Lam, Deputy

More information

ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS. Table 4-2 Permitted Uses by Zoning Districts Use Types AG RR R-1 R-2 R-3 MH LC CC DC GC LI GI P Addl Reg

ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS. Table 4-2 Permitted Uses by Zoning Districts Use Types AG RR R-1 R-2 R-3 MH LC CC DC GC LI GI P Addl Reg ZONING DITRICT REGULATION Table 4-2 Permitted Uses by Zoning Districts Agricultural Uses Horticulture P P P P P P P P P 39.06.002a Crop Production P P P 39.06.002a Type I Animal Production Type II Animal

More information

Speed Limit Review. Montague Road, West End. Prepared for Brisbane City Council CEB06842 CEB06842

Speed Limit Review. Montague Road, West End. Prepared for Brisbane City Council CEB06842 CEB06842 Speed Limit Review Montague Road, West End CEB06842 CEB06842 Prepared for Brisbane City Council 2 November 2016 Speed Limit Review Montague Road, West End Document Information Prepared for Brisbane City

More information

THE HISTORY OF WEATHER OBSERVING IN CHEYENNE, WYOMING,

THE HISTORY OF WEATHER OBSERVING IN CHEYENNE, WYOMING, THE HISTORY OF WEATHER OBSERVING IN CHEYENNE, WYOMING, 1870-2004 Downtown Cheyenne, Wyoming, circa 1890 From Wyoming State Archives, Department of State Parks and Cultural Resources Current as of January

More information

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS

STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR SG10 SYSTEM BALUSTRADES USING 21.5mm LAMINATED TOUGHENED GLASS without the need for a handrail BY BALCONY SYSTEMS LIMITED Unit 6 Systems House Eastbourne Road Blindly Heath

More information

APPENDIX 11A: BASELINE NOISE MONITORING RESULTS

APPENDIX 11A: BASELINE NOISE MONITORING RESULTS appendix 11a APPENDIX 11A: BASELINE NOISE MONITORING RESULTS Table 11.A.1: Summary of daytime noise measurements Location Time Measured Noise Levels (db re. 2x10-5 Pa) LAeq LA10 LA90 12:59 13:14 64 67

More information

April 10, Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213

April 10, Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213 Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213 Subject: Revised Castle Hills BASIS Charter School Traffic Impact Analysis Review City of Castle Hills,

More information

ST. DAVID S COURT DUBLIN 5

ST. DAVID S COURT DUBLIN 5 ST. DAVID S COURT DUBLIN 5 ST. DAVID S COURT DUBLIN 5 St. David s Court is a modern development of four and five-bedroom family homes nestled in a quiet suburban setting located off the Malahide Road.

More information

Experimental Performance and Numerical Simulation of Double Glass Wall Thana Ananacha

Experimental Performance and Numerical Simulation of Double Glass Wall Thana Ananacha Experimental Performance and Numerical Simulation of Double Glass Wall Thana Ananacha Abstract This paper reports the numerical and experimental performances of Double Glass Wall are investigated. Two

More information

Modeling and simulation of windows with noise mitigation and natural ventilation

Modeling and simulation of windows with noise mitigation and natural ventilation Modeling and simulation of windows with noise mitigation and natural ventilation Xiang YU ; Fangsen CUI ; ze-tiong TAN 2 ; Kui YAO 3 Institute of High Performance Computing, A*TAR, ingapore 2 Building

More information