STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED"

Scarlett Wiggins
5 years ago
Views:

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Appeal by Fast Signs of the Decision of the Chief Building Official for One Variance Respecting a Proposed First Party Wall Sign 10-21 Four Seasons Place Date: January

: 12-245112 PURPOSE OF THE APPEAL To appeal the decision of the Chief Building Official which refused a variance to Chapter 694, Signs, General to allow Fast Signs to obtain a permit for the erection

The sign is proposed to be located on the west facing parapet wall of the existing office building located on the premises. The proposed wall sign is to display static copy and be 4.

1 STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Appeal by Fast Signs of the Decision of the Chief Building Official for One Variance Respecting a Proposed First Party Wall Sign Four Seasons Place Date: January 18, 2013 Ward: File No.: Ward 3 Etobicoke Centre TP IBMS File No.: PURPOSE OF THE APPEAL To appeal the decision of the Chief Building Official which refused a variance to Chapter 694, Signs, General to allow Fast Signs to obtain a permit for the erection and display of one illuminated wall sign (expressed as a logo or corporate symbol). The sign is proposed to be located on the west facing parapet wall of the existing office building located on the premises. The proposed wall sign is to display static copy and be 4.47 metres wide by 1.29 metres long, at a height of approximately 54.0 metres. In accordance with the original decision of the Chief Building Official, rendered on October 23, 2012, this report recommends that the requested variance from Chapter 694 be refused as it does not meet the criteria established in A of Chapter 694. Figure 1: Four Seasons Place - Sign District Map Excerpt Fast Signs One First Party Sign Variance Four Seasons Place 1

2 REQUESTED VARIANCES Table 1 Summary of Requested Variances Section Requirement Proposal D(4)(d) A wall sign displaying the logo or corporate symbol of a business located on the premises provided each sign shall display identical sign copy. The proposed wall sign does not display identical copy. RECOMMENDATIONS The Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, recommends that: 1. The Sign Variance Committee refuse the variance requested from the requirement of D(4)(d) to allow the issuance of a sign permit authorizing the erection and display of one wall sign at the westerly-facing uppermost parapet wall of the building, in addition to other existing uppermost storey signs, whereas the proposed sign is not identical in sign copy. SITE CONTEXT AND SIGN ATTRIBUTES: Table 2 Summary of Area Surrounding Four Seasons Place Sign District Designation of Property: CR-Commercial Residential District Designations of Surrounding Properties: North East South West "R" sign district "R" sign district "CR" sign district "CR" sign district Land Uses and Attributes of Surrounding Properties: North South East West Burnhamthorpe Adult Learning Centre Single-family residential Hwy. 427 ramp; singlestorey food retailer Highway 427 Table 3 Summary of Proposed Sign Attributes Sign Type: Wall Sign Copy Type: Static Sign Copy Type Permitted? Yes Sign Orientation: West Sign Dimensions (width x length): 4.47 metres x 1.29 metres Fast Signs One First Party Sign Variance Four Seasons Place 2

3 COMMENTS Chapter 694 was enacted to assist in facilitating aesthetic improvements to the City and improving the quality and character of the streets and the public realm. As such, discouraging sign clutter, which detracts from the physical and visual character of the public realm, is one of the main objectives of Chapter 694. While recognizing the need for businesses to identify themselves, the regulations in Chapter 694 permit first party identification signs located on the top storey of a building, such as the sign proposed in this application. However, in order to address concerns of sign clutter, Chapter 694 requires that all signs located at the top storey of the building display identical sign copy. Criteria Established by A of Chapter 694: In order to review, consider and make recommendations on sign variance applications, criteria to evaluate an application for a variance is provided in Chapter A states that an application for a variance from the provisions of Chapter 694 may only be granted where it is established that the proposed sign meets each of these criteria. Table 4 below reviews this signage proposal against the criteria listed in A. Fast Signs One First Party Sign Variance Four Seasons Place 3

4 Table 4 Review of Sign Proposal Against Established Criteria in A Chapter 694 Reference Established Criteria Meets Criteria? (Yes/No) Comments A(1) Is warranted based on physical circumstances applicable to the property or premises No The applicant advises a larger sign removed, from the same location as the sign being proposed provides an electrical power source in place for the new sign. The applicant has also advised one of the deciding factors in the purchasing the property was the visual exposure to the 427 Highway. These factors are not related to the variance being applied for, as the variance is related to sign copy, not the ability to display a sign. Staff cannot determine that the variance sought is warranted based on the physical circumstances applicable to the property or premises A(2) Is consistent with the architecture of the building or development of the property No Although the subject building appears to be designed to accommodate the proposed sign type, it currently has two signs on the south and north elevations displaying identical content. The proposed sign is not consistent with the signs located on the premises A(3) Is consistent with buildings and other features of properties or premises within 120 metres of the location of the proposed sign No A second multi-storey office building exist approximately 50 metres to the south-west of the property is displaying similar signage which is identical on the building faces where it is displayed. The proposed sign would not be consistent with the signage displayed on the adjacent office building A(4) Will not alter the essential character of the area No The subject building has two existing signs on the south and north elevations displaying identical content. As well, the adjacent building on the premises has two existing signs on the south and west facing elevations displaying identical copy. To introduce the proposed sign which is not displaying identical copy to the other signs on the subject building may alter the essential character of the area A(5) Will not adversely affect adjacent properties Yes A(6) Will not adversely affect public safety Yes Residential and other sensitive land uses are not within immediate proximity of the subject property. The proposed sign is not expected to adversely affect adjacent properties. The proposed first party wall sign will require both a Building Permit and a Sign Permit to be erected. The proposed sign faces vehicular traffic travelling along Highway 427; the applicant has obtained the necessary approvals for the proposed sign from the Ministry of Transportation A(7) Is, in the opinion of the decision maker, not contrary to the public interest No The regulations in Chapter 694 serve to reduce sign clutter and enhance the public streetscape by maintaining consistency when it comes to signs. Granting the variances in this application and allowing the erection and display of the proposed sign will only maintain and enhance the current sign clutter at the subject and surrounding premises A(8) Is of a sign class or a sign type that is permitted in the sign district where the premises is located Yes Staff has confirmed the subject property is located within a CR-Commercial Residential sign district where first party wall signs (expressed as logos or corporate symbols) are permitted A(9) Is not expressly prohibited by B Yes Staff have confirmed that the proposed sign is not expressly prohibited by B of Chapter 694, Signs, General, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code. Fast Signs One First Party Sign Variance Four Seasons Place 4

5 CONCLUSION In consideration of the variance requested to obtain one variance to D (4)(d), of Chapter 694, Signs, General, required to allow the erection and display of one illuminated wall sign (expressed as a logo or corporate symbol) on the parapet wall that will not display identical copy as the other parapet wall signs; it has not been established that the proposal is in compliance with all of the criteria established in A. Therefore, it is recommended that the Sign Variance Committee refuse the requested variance. CONTACT Robert Bader Supervisor, Sign By-law Unit Tel: (416) rbader@toronto.ca SIGNATURE Ted Van Vliet Manager, Sign By-law Unit ATTACHMENTS 1. Applicant s Original Submission Package Fast Signs One First Party Sign Variance Four Seasons Place 5

6 ATTACHMENT 1: APPLICANT'S ORIGINAL SUBMISSION PACKAGE Fast Signs One First Party Sign Variance Four Seasons Place 6

7 Fast Signs One First Party Sign Variance Four Seasons Place 7

8 Fast Signs One First Party Sign Variance Four Seasons Place 8

9 Fast Signs One First Party Sign Variance Four Seasons Place 9

10 Fast Signs One First Party Sign Variance Four Seasons Place 10

11 Fast Signs One First Party Sign Variance Four Seasons Place 11

12 Fast Signs One First Party Sign Variance Four Seasons Place 12

13 Fast Signs One First Party Sign Variance Four Seasons Place 13

14 Fast Signs One First Party Sign Variance Four Seasons Place 14

Date: June 19, 2013 Meeting Date: July 5, Consideration of the City of Vancouver s Regional Context Statement

Section E 1.5 To: From: Regional Planning and Agriculture Committee Lee-Ann Garnett, Senior Regional Planner Planning, Policy and Environment Department Date: June 19, 2013 Meeting Date: July 5, 2013 Subject: