Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Technical Team August 23, 2007

Transcription

1 Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study Technical Team August 23, 2007

2 Meeting Agenda Technology Choices Needs and Opportunities Transit Concepts Comparative Land Use Analysis Measures of Effectiveness System Design Issues Current Activities and Next Steps

3 Technology Choices

4 Heavy Rail New York Atlanta Washington DC

5 Light Rail Charlotte Houston Minneapolis

6 Commuter Rail Charlotte South Florida Chicago

7 DMU VS. Conventional Commuter Rail

8 Needs and Opportunities

9 Regional Rail Opportunities Pasco North Pinellas USF Plant City Lakeland & Orlando Existing CSX or New Track Westshore Brandon Peak Travel Downtown Park & Ride Lots St Petersburg South Shore Sarasota

10 Light Rail Opportunities USF Westshore Downtown Brandon New Track or Existing Track Continuous Service Links Major Centers Activity Center Gateway

11 Bus Opportunities Citrus Park USF Westshore Downtown Tampa Brandon BRT - Dedicated Lane or Traffic Priority Express Service South Shore Activity Center Gateway

12 Transit Needs & Opportunities

13 Transit Concepts

14 Transit Future Concept For Transit Concept, FTA documents require support of local land use policies and plans The Concept provides an updated framework and support Future works includes analysis of land use policies and adjustments, if needed

15 Concept A: Diagram

16 USF Downtown St Petersburg Part of Regional Transit System needs Tampa to St Petersburg Builds upon past work (Tampa Rail)

17 Concept B: Diagram

18 Brandon Westchase + S Tampa Enables Brandon to become a regional player Provides accessibility to suburban areas Enables Quality of Life choices Focuses development Serves County development and growth needs Provides access to TIA Airport Provides infill and revitalization opportunity Improves existing transit service for Choice Riders

19 Concept C: Diagram

20 Regional Commuter Rail Connection Provides commuter connections to Plant City and SouthShore Serves Hillsborough County s needs to support regional transit service to Lakeland, Manatee, Brooksville

21 Comparative Land Use Analysis for Transit Concepts

22 Concept A: Stations Urban Core

23 Concept A: HH Increment/ Acre by TAZ

24 Concept A: Jobs Increment/ Acre by TAZ

25 Concept A Incremental Growth in Station Areas

26 Concept A Trend 2050

27 Concept A Transit-Oriented 2050

28 Concept B: Stations Urban Corridors

29 Concept B: HH Increment/ Acre by TAZ

30 Concept B: Jobs Increment/ Acre by TAZ

31 Concept B Incremental Growth in Station Areas

32 2050 Trend TAZ Totals Concept B Trend 2050

33 Concept B2 TAZ Totals Concept B Transit-Oriented 2050

34 Concept C: Stations Urban Centers

35 Concept C: HH Increment/ Acre by TAZ

36 Concept C: Jobs Increment/ Acre by TAZ

37 Concept C Incremental Growth Concept C Incremental Growth in Station Areas

38 Concept C Trend 2050

39 Concept C Transit-Oriented 2050

40 Concept ABC: Stations

41 Concept ABC Incremental Growth

42 Concept ABC Trend 2050

43 Concept ABC Transit-Oriented 2050

44 Sub-Regions With TAZ Boundaries Northwest Northeast Tampa Temple Terrace Plant City Southeast

45 Employment Trend By Sub-Region 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 3% 3% 3% 34% 49% 44% 30% 18% 13% 4% 4% 6% 20% 21% 15% 10% 10% 12% 2000 Emp 2025 Emp 2000 TAZ 2025 TAZ 2050 Trend Northeast Northwest Plant City Southeast Tampa Temple Terrace

46 Employment Trend by Transit Concept for Sub-Regions 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 3% 3% 3% 2% 3% 34% 40% 42% 40% 44% 30% 28% 27% 28% 26% 6% 4% 4% 4% 3% 15% 15% 14% 14% 14% 12% 10% 11% 11% 10% 2050 Emp50- Trend Trend Concept Concept A B Concept Concept EMP50_A EMP50_B EMP50_C EMP50_ABC C ABC Northeast Northwest Plant City Southeast Tampa Temple Terrace

47 2050 Employment with Transit by Concept Concept A Concept B Concept C Concept ABC 2050 Forecast Employment 170, , , ,768 1,430,199 % of 2050 Forecast 11.94% 20.30% 15.11% 25.71%

48 Population Trend for Sub-Regions Share of Households 2000 Share of Households 2050

49 2050 Population with Transit by Concept Concept A Concept B Concept C Concept ABC 2050 Forecast Population 175, , , ,798 2,034,180 % of 2050 Forecast 8.62% 20.68% 15.49% 29.29%

50 Measures of Effectiveness

51 Land Use Population near Stations Employment near Stations Potential TOD Acreage Incremental increase in Land Value

52 Mobility Carrying capacity of Transit System Transit Ridership Miles and Hours of Travel Speed and Congestion

53 Environment Air Quality Fuel Consumption - Energy

54 Financial Capital Costs O&M Costs

55 Systems Integration Countywide and Regional Service Characteristics System Capacity

56 System Design Issues

57 System Design Issues Connecting Downtown and Westshore Downtown Tampa USF Area I-4 Corridor

58 Tampa Rail Project Locally Preferred Alternative

59 Tampa Rail Project Locally Preferred Alternative

60 Rail Concept with Regional and Airport Connection

61 Main Street Downtown Tampa Nebraska Avenue Ybor West Ybor/ 16 th Street Ybor East U. Of Tampa Arts Center Ashley Drive Riverfront Central Park Franklin Street Marion Street Union Station Downtown Tampa Conceptual Alignments

62 UCH Medical Center Fletcher Avenue 131 st Street USF Village 22 nd 22 nd Street 22 nd 22 nd Street Pine Drive 30 th 30 th Street McKinley/ Busch Gardens USF Area Conceptual Alignment USF/ Sundome Fowler/ MOSI

63 USF Conceptual Alignment 131 st Street Medical Center Fletcher Avenue USF Village Pine Drive USF/ Sundome

64 I-4 Right of Way CSX A Line CSX S Line Conceptual Alignments for I-4 and CSX

65 CSX S Line Conceptual Alignments for I-4 and CSX

66 Current Activities and Next Steps

67 Meetings MPO and Committees (Aug and Sep) Leadership Team (Aug 20) Technical Team (Aug 23) MOSI Open House (Aug 25)

68 Next Steps Transit Needs & Opportunities (May) Evaluation of Scenarios (Jun-Jul) Public Outreach (Aug) System Concept (Sept) Strategies (Oct-Nov)