Applicability of cranial features for the calculation of vole body mass
|
|
- Katherine Stella Ellis
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Ann. Zool. Fennici 45: ISSN X (print), ISSN (online) Helsinki 26 June 08 Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 08 Applicability of cranial features for the calculation of vole body mass Zbigniew Borowski 1, *, Marek Keller 2 & Agnieszka Włodarska 2 1) Department of Forest Ecology and Wildlife Management, Forest Research Institute, Sekocin Las, PL Raszyn, Poland (* Z.Borowski@ibles.waw.pl) 2) Department of Forest Protection and Ecology, Nowoursynowska 159, PL Warszawa, Poland Received 21 Mar. 06, revised version received 19 Mar. 08, accepted 4 Jan. 08 Borowski, Z., Keller, M. & Włodarska, A. 08: Applicability of cranial features for the calculation of vole body mass. Ann. Zool. Fennici 45: While the non-random capture of prey by predators is well-known, few studies have investigated or compared the individual characteristics of prey selected by predators. This is due to the difficulty in assessing prey features based on the remains from pellets or faeces. This article shows relationships between craniometric features and body mass of the root vole (Microtus oeconomus). The comparisons involved 10 skull parameters: mandible length excluding incisors (ML), rostrum breadth (RB), mandibular tooth-row length (MT), foramina incisiva length (FI), upper- and lower-incisor lengths (UIL, LIL), upper- and lower-incisor breadths (UIB, LIB), upper- and lowerincisor weights (UIW, LIW). From cranial parameters listed above, only UIL was correlated with body mass with high accurancy. In this reason we highly recommended this parameter as a good indicator for calculating vole body mass. Introduction Predator prey relationship is one of the central issues in ecology (e.g. Schoener 1971, Korpimäki & Norrdahl 1991, Sih et al. 1998). Accurate estimates of predator diets are required to understand e.g. food web structures and the role of predation in prey population dynamics. Predator diets can be estimated directly and indirectly. Direct methods are limited to occasions when direct observations of feeding by predators are possible and, consequently, can only be used for selected carnivorous species (e.g. lions, wolves). Indirect methods, based on the recovery of non-digested prey structures, are used most often in the reconstruction of predator diets (e.g. Goszczyński 1977, Pearson 1985, Longland & Jenkins 1987, Jędrzejewska & Jędrzejewski 1998). The impact of predators on prey populations is usually estimated by comparing the number of predators in the area with the number of individuals from the prey population consumed within a given period. Usually, when calculating the share of biomass that a particular prey species accounts for in a predator s diet, mean prey body mass is used in the calculation (e.g. Andersson & Erlinge 1977, Jędrzejewska & Jędrzejewski 1998). However, predators do not kill prey with a mean body mass only. On the one hand, according to the assumptions of optimal foraging theory, predators should maximize net energy intake by
2 Ann. Zool. Fennici Vol. 45 Applicability of cranial features for the calculation of vole body mass 175 capturing larger rather than smaller individuals (Krebs 1978). On the other hand, many studies have shown that small prey individuals are more vulnerable to predation than larger ones (e.g. Halle 1988, Blem et al. 1993, Mappes et al. 1993, Koivunen et al. 1998, Trejo & Guthman 03). It seems that prey selection by predators is primarily limited by the probability of encounter between predator and prey (Temple 1987, Juanes 1994). The non-random selection of prey by small rodent-eating predators is a result of the following factors: hunting habitat selection, differences in hunting strategies, prey status, habitat familiarity by prey and behavioural differences between prey individuals (Dickman et al. 1991, Metzgar 1967, Koivunen et al. 1998, Ims & Andreassen 00, Trejo & Guthmann 03). Predators selectively kill individuals in relation to their sex, body mass/age, activity, condition (nutritional status) and microhabitat use (Longland & Jenkins 1987, Dickman et al. 1991, Dickman 1992, Mappes et al. 1993, Murray 02, Zalewski 1996, Ims & Andreassen 00, Trejo & Guthmann 03). Therefore, predator diet analyses should focus not only on recognized prey species but also on the differences among individuals within a prey species. This paper describes a model relating selected craniometric features of skulls (possible to measure from prey remains) and the body mass of individuals of the root vole (Microtus oeconomus) a prey often consumed by different predator species (Romanowski 1988, Jędrzejewska & Jędrzejewski 1998, Balčiauskienė et al. 04). Materials and methods The research entailed measurements of 1 root voles caught in open marches near Barwik, in the lower basin of the River Biebrza, Biebrza National Park (ca. 53 N, 23 E). Animals were obtained from snap-traps, or found dead in live traps, in the summers (June August) of 1996 and 1997, the autumns (October November) of 1996, 1997 and 02, and the winters (February) of 1996 and A total of 77 females and 73 males were captured (Table 1), weighed and sexed. In the laboratory, dead voles were decapitated, and their heads boiled before skin and muscle were removed. After several days of soaking in water the incisors were separable from the mandible and upper jaw. The skulls were then air-dried and characterized as described by Goszczyński (1977), Pagels and Blem (1984) and Canova et al. (1999), i.e. mandible length excluding incisors (ML), rostral breadth (RB), mandibular-toothrow length (MT), and the foramina incisiva length (FI) were measured. Six additional features were measured i.e. upper-incisor length (UIL), lower-incisor length (LIL), upper-incisor breadth (UIB), lower-incisor breadth (LIB), lower-incisor weight (LIM), and upper-incisor weight (UIM) (Fig. 1). Length measurements to the nearest 0.1 mm were made using an electronic slide calliper. Weights of teeth were determined on a laboratory balance to the nearest 0.1 g. In cases, when any bones were damaged during cleaning, we excluded these individuals from analysis. In case of the incisor length, mandible length, and toothrow length, the results are averages of measurements from the left- and right-hand sides. We analyzed each cranial parameter using General Linear Models (GLM) with logarithmic link function and Gaussian error distribution specifications for the response variable; body mass. To find the best fitted relationship between craniometric features and body mass we used Akaike s Information Criterion (AIC) and then, for model evaluation, we used model s weight Table. 1. Body mass (mean ± SD) of the root voles (Microtus oeconomus) caught in Biebrza National Park, Poland. n = sample size. Summer Autumn Winter Male 35.0 ± 12.6 (n = ) 29.2 ± 10.8 (n = 22) 26.8 ± 8.8 (n = 11) Female 27.9 ± 9.57 (n = 42) 25.6 ± 5.1 (n = 21) 18.9 ± 4.9 (n = 14) All voles 31.8 ± 11.8 (n = 82) 27.6 ± 9.0 (n = 43) 22.5 ± 7.8 (n = 25)
3 176 Borowski et al. Ann. ZOOL. Fennici Vol. 45 Fig. 1. Cranial measurements of Microtus oeconomus from Biebrza National Park, Poland. ML = mandible length excluding incrisors, MT = mandibular-toothrow length, FI = foramina incisiva length, RB = rostral breath, LIL = lower-incisor length, UIL = upper-incisor length, LIB = lower-incisor breadth, UIB = upper-incisor breadth. (Burnham & Anderson 02). The best models had the lowest AIC values and the highest weight (Johnson & Omland 04). Relationships between body mass and cranial measurements are described with the models. All statistical analyses were carried out using the R statistical software (R Development Core Team 05). Results From all 10 cranial parameters tested in this study, we evaluated four with the lowest AIC values (Table 2). Moreover, the results make it clear that these parameters vary non-linearly (exponential function) with body mass, hence may successfully be employed in estimating root vole s body mass. Comparing given features and body mass, it would appear that the most accurate estimate of body mass may arise from measurements of the upper-incisor length (UIL), AIC = 973.2, which precision (weight) is very high Contrary to the UIL, the following three evaluated cranial parameters with the lowest AIC value (rostrum breadth (RB), AIC = 992.1, mandible length excluding incisors (ML), AIC = 996.9, and upper-incisor breadth (UIB), AIC = ) give us much lower accuracy in vole body mass prediction (Fig. 2). The distance between the best model (UIL) and subsequent model (RB) with the next lowest AIC value ( AIC) is relatively big and amounts to (Table 2). This indicates, that the accuracy of vole body mass prediction based on UIL parameter is very high and amounts to 0.99 (Table 2). Discussion Our results clearly demonstrate, that from all 10 tested craniometric features the upper-incisor length (UIL) correlates best with the root vole body mass. This strong relationship between upper-incisor length and body mass of voles is
4 Ann. Zool. Fennici Vol. 45 Applicability of cranial features for the calculation of vole body mass 177 explained by the fact, that rodents have teeth that never stop growing and heavier (older) voles should have proportionally longer incisors. In relation to our results UIL should be used for calculation of the root vole body mass from remains and for determination of prey selection by different predators. Usefulness of this parameter is particularly well visible, when we compare an accuracy of body mass prediction based on UIL with other craniometric parameters characterised with low AIC value, such as: rostrum breadth (RB), mandible length excluding incisors (ML) and upper-incisor breadth (UIB) (Table 2). However, other studies showed a wide range of craniometric features highly correlated with small mammals body mass (e.g. Goszczyński 1977, Pagels & Blem 1984, Dickman et al. 1991, Blem et al. 1993, Canova et al. 1999, Trejo & Guthmann 03, Balčiauskienė et al. 04). In our opinion, differences in results between our study and studies described above, may result from differences in species and habitats (Sikorski 1982, Balčiauskienė et al. 04). Moreover, the authors of cited studies did not calculate the relationship between UIL and body mass of small mammals. We have to be conscious that the applicability of craniometric features is strictly related to their presence in predators pellets and/or faces. Lack of information about UIL in earlier studies may suggest that this incisor preserved worse than other craniometric features. However, results obtained by Pokrzywka (03) show, that UIL and ML were two best preserved root vole remains in long-eared owl pellets. Similarly, also study conducted by Zalewski (1996) show that UIL preserve well in the fox scats. The limitation of the usage of craniometric features for calculation of body mass of prey eaten by predators is the fact that, the accuracy of this method strictly depends on the level of preservation of skull fragments. Our calculations presented here are based on complete prey remains (without any broken elements) and are very precise. Prey body mass estimates based on prey remains from predator faeces, stomach contents and spewings is less accurate. In some cases, when we are unable to calculate body mass based on UIL, we can use less precise parameter such as: mandible length (ML) as this is the most Table 2. Summary of generalized linear models (GLM) of the relationship between cranial measurements and body mass of the root vole (Microtus oeconomus). Models with each one examined parameter are included in the set. The GLM used was with Gaussian error distribution and logarithmic link function. The models were ranked by Akaike s Information Criterion (AIC), cranial parameters with the lowest AIC value the best predict the body mass. Since number of parameters in the same in each model ranking by AIC is equivalent to that by residual deviance. Cranial variables Model Deviance AIC AIC Weight F Upper-incisor length (UIL) y = exp(0.34x ) Rostral breadth (RB) y = exp( 1.53x + 0.3) Mandible length excluding incisors (ML) y = exp(0.25x ) Upper-incisor breadth(uib) y = exp( 0.15x ) Lower-incisor weight (LIW) y = exp(2.35x ) Upper-incisorweight(UIW) y = exp(3.31x ) Lower-incisor length(lil) y = exp(3.24x ) Lower-incisor breadth (LIB) y = exp(3.32x ) Mandibular-toothrow length (MT) y = exp( 0.34x ) Foramina incisiva lenght (FI) y = exp(0.14x )
5 178 Borowski et al. Ann. ZOOL. Fennici Vol. 45 y = exp(0.34x ) y = exp( 1.53x + 0.3) Body mass (g) Upper-incisor length (mm) Rostral breadth (mm) y = exp(0.25x ) y = exp( 0.15x ) Body mass (g) Mandible length excluding incisors (mm) Upper-incisor breadth (mm) Fig. 2. Relationship between body mass and four cranial features that are, according to AIC, the best predictors of body mass. Dashed lines show 95% prediction intervals. digestion-resistant part of prey (e.g. Raczynski & Ruprecht 1974, Goszczyński 1977, Blem et al. 1993, Zalewski 1996, Pokrzywka 03). Those planning to use the model presented here to assess the body mass of voles eaten by predators must be aware that such comparisons have limitations and are usually accompanied by a certain amount of error. It results from the fact that body mass of small mammals changes with social and environmental factors, whereas skull parameters do not change in a directional manner (Churchfield 1990, Canova et al. 1999). Furthermore, craniometric features may differ between individuals of a given species living in the same area but in different habitats (Sikorski 1982, Balčiauskienė et al. 04). Notwithstanding these reservations, the comparisons made by Canova et al. (1999) show that the error reflecting the above factors is much smaller than that resulting from determinations of body mass on the basis of means taken from the literature. Despite the fact that the process of prey removal by predators is not random, usage of average or maximum adult body mass of prey from the literature is still a common method for the estimation of predator feeding habits (e.g. Marti 1976, Anderson & Erlinge 1977, Morris & Burgiss 1988, Yalden & Morris 1990, Jędrzejewska & Jędrzejewski 1998). Canova et al showed that measured prey body mass and prey body mass taken from the literature may differ by more than %, which is why predator trophic niche overlap calculated using literature data may be overestimated (e.g. Jędrzejewska & Jędrzejewski 1998, Zalewski et al. 1995, Zalewski 1996). Results from this study indicate that two tested cranial parameters (UIL and ML) are good and usefully indicators of body mass. Based on the formulas given here it is possible to calculate vole body mass even when only one tooth is available. Our study and data collected by other authors on different small mammal species
6 Ann. Zool. Fennici Vol. 45 Applicability of cranial features for the calculation of vole body mass 179 (Pucek & Zejda 1968, Janes & Barss 1985, Halle 1988, Dickman et al and Canova et al. 1999) suggest that the relationship between cranial measurements and body mass is a common phenomenon among small mammals. Acknowledgements We wish to thank Dr. James Richards for linguistic corrections and K. Barton for help with the statistical analysis. ZB was supported by grant BLP-702 from the General Directorate of Polish Forestry. References Andersson, M. & Erlinge, S. 1977: Influence of predators on rodent populations. Oikos 29: Balčiauskienė, L., Balčiauskas, L. & Mažeikytė, J. R. 04: Sex-and age-related differences in tooth row length of small mammals: voles. Acta Zoologica Lituanica 1: Blem, C. R., Blem L. B., Felix, J. H. & Holt, D. W. 1993: Estimation of body mass of voles from crania in shorteared owl pellets. The American Midland Naturalist 129: Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. 02: Model selection and multimodel inference. Springer, New York. Canova, C., Yingmei, Z. & Fasola, M. 1999: Estimating fresh mass of small mammals in owl diet from cranial measurements in pellets remains. Avocetta 23: Churchfield, S. 1990: The natural history of shrews. Christopher Helm, A. & C. Black, London. Dickman C. R. 1992: Predation and habitat shift in the house mouse, Mus domesticus. Ecology 73: Dickman, C. R., Predavec, M. & Lynam, A. J. 1991: Differential predation of size and sex classes of mice by the barn owl, Tyto alba. Oikos 62: Goszczyński, J. 1977: Connection between predatory birds and mammals and their prey. Acta Theriologica 22: Halle, S. 1988: Avian predation upon a mixed community of common voles (Microtus arvalis) and wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus). Oecologia 75: Ims, R. & Andreassen, H. 00: Spatial synchronization of vole population dynamics by predatory birds. Nature 8: Janes, S. W. & Barss, J. M. 1985: Predation by three owl species on northern pocket gophers of different body mass. Oecologia 67: Jędrzejewska, B. & Jędrzejewski, W. 1998: Predation in vertebrate communities: The Białowieża Primeval Forest as a case study. Springer Verlag, Berlin. Johnson, J. B. & Omland K. S. 04: Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2: Juanes, F. 1994: What determines prey size selectivity in piscivorous fishes? In: Stouder, D. J., Fresh, K. L & Feller, R. J. (eds.), Theory and application in fish feeding ecology: Belle W. Baruch Library in Marine Sciences, University of South California Press, USA. Koivunen, V., Korpimäki, E. & Hakkarinen H. 1998: Refuge sites of voles under owl predation risk: priority of dominant individuals? Behavioral Ecology 3: Korpimäki, E. & Norrdahl, K. 1991: Do breeding nomadic avian predators dampen population fluctuations of voles? Oikos 62: Krebs, J. R. 1978: Optimal foraging: decision rules for predators. In: Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B. (eds.), Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach: Sinauer, Sunderland MA. Longland, W. S. & Jenkins, S. H. 1987: Sex and age affect vulnerability of desert rodents to owl predation. Journal of Mammalogy 68: Mappes, T., Halonen, M., Suhonen, J. & Ylönen, H. 1993: Selective avian predation on a population of the field vole, Microtus agrestis, greater vulnerability of males and subordinates. Ethology Ecology and Evolution 5: Marti, C. D. 1976: A review of prey selection by the longeared owl. Condor 78: Metzgar, L. H. 1967: An experimental comparison of screech owl predation on resident and transient white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus). Journal of Mammalogy 48: Morris, P. A. & Burgiss, M. J. 1988: A method for estimating total body weight of avian prey items in the diet of owls. Bird Study 35: Murray, D. L. 02: Differential body condition and vulnerability to predation in snowshoe hares. Journal of Animal Ecology 71: Pagels, J. F. & Blem, C. R. 1984: Prediction of body weights of small mammals from skull measurements. Acta Theriologica 29: Pearson, O. P. 1985: Predation. In: Tamarin, R. H. (ed.), Biology of New World Microtus: Special Publication no. 8, American Society of Mammalogy. Pokrzywka, M. 03: Selektywność drapieżnictwa uszatki (Asio otus) na norniku północnym (Microtus oeconomus) w warunkach torfowisk niskich Biebrzańskiego Parku Narodowego. M.Sc. thesis, Agricultural University of Warsaw, Warsaw. Pucek, Z. & Zejda, J. 1968: Technique for determining age in the red-backed vole, Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreber, 1780). Small Mammal Newsletters 4: R Development Core Team 05: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, available at Raczyński, J. & Ruprecht, A. L. 1974: The effect of digestion on the osteological composition of owl pellets. Acta Ornithologica 14: Romanowski, J. 1988: Trophic ecology of Asio otus (L.) and Athene noctua (Scop.) in the suburbs of Warsaw. Polish Ecological Studies 14: Schoener, T. W Theory of feeding strategies.
7 180 Borowski et al. Ann. ZOOL. Fennici Vol. 45 Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic 2: Sih, A., Englund, G. & Wooster, D. 1998: Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: Sikorski, M. D. 1982: Craniometric variation of Apodemus agrarius (Pallas, 1771) in urban green areas. Acta Theriologica 27: Temple, S. A. 1987: Do predators always capture substandard individuals disproportionately from prey populations? Ecology 3: Trejo, A. & Guthmann, N. 03: Owl selection on size and sex classes of rodents: activity and microhabitat use by prey. Journal of Mammalogy 84: Yalden, D. W. & Morris, P. A. 1990: The analysis of owl pellets. Occasional Publication Mammal Society. No. 13. London Zalewski, A. 1996: Choice of age classes of bank voles Clethrionomys glareolus by pine marten Martes martes and tawny owl Strix aluco in Białowieża National Park. Acta Oecologica 17: Zalewski, A., Jędrzejewski, W. & Jędrzejewska, B. 1995: Pine marten home ranges, numbers and predation on vertebrates in a deciduous forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Annales Zoologici Fennici 32: This article is also available in pdf format at
Tyto alba (Barn Owl) Prey Preference Based on Species and Size Monica DiFiori September 18, 2013 Biology 182 Lab Prof. O Donnell
Tyto alba (Barn Owl) Prey Preference Based on Species and Size Monica DiFiori September 18, 2013 Biology 182 Lab Prof. O Donnell Introduction Various studies have been performed in an attempt to shed light
More informationPrediction of the body mass of the bank vole Myodes glareolus from skull measurements
Estonian Journal of Ecology, 009, 58,, 77 85 doi: 10.3176/eco.009..01 Prediction of the body mass of the bank vole Myodes glareolus from skull measurements Laima Balčiauskienė! and Linas Balčiauskas Institute
More informationPECKIANA Volume 8 (2012) pp
PECKIANA Volume 8 (2012) pp. 203 207 ISSN 1618-1735 The reactions of the common dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius) and the yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis) to the odour of nest Abstract Arboreal
More informationResidues of anticoagulant rodenticides in biota in Germany Pathway of anticoagulants in the food-web
Residues of anticoagulant rodenticides in biota in Germany Pathway of anticoagulants in the food-web Anke Geduhn 1, Alexandra Esther 1, Detlef Schenke², Jens Jacob 1 1 JKI - Institute for Plant Protection
More informationSelective predation of tawny owls (Strix aluco) on yellow-necked mice (Apodemus flavicollis) and bank voles (Myodes glareolus)
Ann. Zool. Fennici 49: 321 330 ISSN 0003-455X (print), ISSN 1797-2450 (online) Helsinki 30 November 2012 Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2012 Selective predation of tawny owls (Strix
More informationWhat two types of organisms are there?
A rabbit is chased by a lynx These animals are interacting! What two types of organisms are there? Abiotic? Biotic? Never been alive -water -temperature -rocks -sunlight -air -rotting bodies A rabbit is
More informationBIOS 6150: Ecology Dr. Stephen Malcolm, Department of Biological Sciences
BIOS 6150: Ecology Dr. Stephen Malcolm, Department of Biological Sciences Week 6: Predation and predatory behavior: Lecture summary: Nature of predation. Diet breadth & choice. Optimal foraging. Functional
More informationSummertime activity patterns of common weasels Mustela nivalis vulgaris under differing prey abundances in grassland habitats
Acta Theriologica 50 (1): 67 79, 2005. PL ISSN 0001 7051 Summertime activity patterns of common weasels Mustela nivalis vulgaris under differing prey abundances in grassland habitats Miriam J. BRANDT*
More informationSize and overlap of home range in a high density population of the Japanese field vole Microtus montebelli
Acta Theriologica 40 (3): 249-256, 1995. PL ISSN 0001-7051 Size and overlap of home range in a high density population of the Japanese field vole Microtus montebelli Kohtaro URAYAMA Urayama K. 1995. Size
More informationFood Web and Ecological Relationships Quiz
Biology II Ms. Chen Name: Food Web and Ecological Relationships Quiz Date: Multiple Choice (2 pts each) Directions: Circle the best answer. 1. The loss of the producers in an ecosystem would most likely
More informationForaging. This week in Animal Behaviour. How do animals choose? Do animals choose their food?
This week in Animal Behaviour Lecture 22: Cooperation Lecture 23: Foraging Lecture 24: TBA Text chapters 10-11 LAB: Project 2 proposal seminars Midterm 2 on Tuesday Nov. 8 Foraging 1. Models of foraging
More informationGENERAL ECOLOGY STUDY NOTES
1.0 INTRODUCTION GENERAL ECOLOGY STUDY NOTES A community is made up of populations of different organisms living together in a unit environment. The manner in which these organisms relate together for
More informationVole population dynamics: experiments on predation
Vole population dynamics: experiments on predation Janne Sundell Department of Ecology and Systematics Division of Population Biology University of Helsinki Finland Academic dissertation To be presented,
More informationLab Exercise 9 Microfaunas and Past Environments
Lab Exercise 9 Microfaunas and Past Environments Objectives Name: To identify different skeletal elements. To use a key to identify skulls and mandibles to species. To infer the environment the owl lived
More informationSkull Analysis 1. Determine the structural adaptations that enhance an animal s survival. Skull 1 Skull 2 Skull 3. Upper Incisors.
Stayin Alive VCE Biology Unit 1: How do living things stay alive? VCE Biology Unit 1 How do living things stay alive? Skull Analysis 1. Determine the structural adaptations that enhance an animal s survival.
More informationOrganism Species Population Community Ecosystem
Name: Date: Period: Ecosystems and Their Interactions S8.B.3.1 Getting the idea The environment is everything that surrounds an organism. Organisms cooperate and compete with each other to get everything
More informationQuizizz Biome/Food Chain Quiz with Sci Method/EDP Review
Quizizz Biome/Food Chain Quiz with Sci Method/EDP Review Name : Class : Date : 1. Despite having plenty of sun and rain, the tropical rainforest has very poor. a) biodiversity b) soil c) animal life d)
More informationSMALL MAMMALS (INSECTIVORA AND RODENTIA) AS PREY OF LITTLE OWL (ATHENE NOCTUA SCOP.) IN THE SOUTH-WESTERN PART OF ROMANIA
SMALL MAMMALS (INSECTIVORA AND RODENTIA) AS PREY OF LITTLE OWL (ATHENE NOCTUA SCOP.) IN THE SOUTH-WESTERN PART OF ROMANIA IOANA NAE *, DUMITRU MURARIU ** The diet of the little owl, Athene noctua Scop.,
More information1. The graph below represents a change in event A that leads to changes in events B and C.
1. The graph below represents a change in event A that leads to changes in events B and C. Which row in the chart best identifies each event in the graph? A) 1 B) 2 C) 3 D) 4 2. A stable ecosystem is characterized
More informationUnit 2: Ecology. 3.1 What is Ecology?
Unit 2: Ecology 3.1 What is Ecology? Ecologists study environments at different. - Ecology is the study of the interactions among, and between and their. An is an individual living thing, such as an alligator.
More informationMrs. Fanek Ecology Date
Name Period Mrs. Fanek Ecology Date 1. The graph below represents a change in event A that leads to changes in events B and C. Which row in the chart best identifies each event in the graph? A) 1 B) 2
More informationInfluence of seasonality, temperature and rainfall on the winter diet of the long-eared owl, Asio otus
Folia Zool. 52(1): 67 76 (2003) Influence of seasonality, temperature and rainfall on the winter diet of the long-eared owl, Asio otus Diego RUBOLINI 1 *, Andrea PIROVANO 2 and Sergio BORGHI 3 1 Dipartimento
More informationUNIT 5. ECOSYSTEMS. Biocenosis Biotope Biotic factors Abiotic factors
UNIT 5. ECOSYSTEMS 1. Define: ecosystem, biocenosis, biotope, abiotic factor, biotic factor 2. Complete using this word: ecosphere, biosphere, ecology, ecosystem a) The is all of the living thing on Earth.
More informationNo recent temporal changes in body size of three Danish rodents
Acta Theriol (2012) 57:59 63 DOI 10.1007/s13364-011-0052-y ORIGINAL PAPER No recent temporal changes in body size of three Danish rodents Yoram Yom-Tov & Shlomith Yom-Tov & Thomas Secher Jensen & Hans
More informationTypes of Consumers. herbivores
no energy = no life Types of Consumers herbivores herbivore us vegetation to swallow or devour Types of Consumers herbivores the organisms that eat plants carnivores carnivore us flesh to swallow or devour
More informationСПИСАНИЯ с Импакт фактор за 2016 година в областта на екологията
Rank СПИСАНИЯ с Импакт фактор за 2016 година в областта на екологията Full Journal Title Total Cites Journal Impact Factor Eigenfactor Score 1 Trends in ecology & evolution 32,332 15.268 0.039290 2 Annual
More informationChapter 6 Vocabulary. Environment Population Community Ecosystem Abiotic Factor Biotic Factor Biome
Biomes Chapter 6 Vocabulary Environment Population Community Ecosystem Abiotic Factor Biotic Factor Biome How Are Organisms On Earth Connected? All living things on Earth share resources, such as air,
More information2017 Pre-AP Biology Ecology Quiz Study Guide
2017 Pre-AP Biology Ecology Quiz Study Guide 1. Identify two processes that break-down organic molecules and return CO 2 to the atmosphere: 2. Identify one process that removes CO 2 from the atmosphere
More informationBIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 8: Predator foraging & prey defense. 2. Predation: 3. Predator diet breadth and preference:
BIOS 3010: Ecology Lecture 8: Predator foraging & prey defense 1. Lecture Summary: What is predation? Predator diet breadth. Preference & switching. Optimal foraging. Marginal value theorem. Functional
More informationSection A: Multiple choice (30 Marks)
Grade 7 Science Unit 1 SAMPLE TEST Section A: Multiple choice (30 Marks) 1. Which term defines a group of interacting living and non-living things? A. community B. ecosystem C. habitat D. niche 2. Which
More informationPopulation Ecology. Study of populations in relation to the environment. Increase population size= endangered species
Population Basics Population Ecology Study of populations in relation to the environment Purpose: Increase population size= endangered species Decrease population size = pests, invasive species Maintain
More informationThrough their research, geographers gather a great deal of data about Canada.
Ecozones What is an Ecozone? Through their research, geographers gather a great deal of data about Canada. To make sense of this information, they often organize and group areas with similar features.
More informationJANNE SUNDELL*, OTSO HUITU, HEIKKI HENTTONEN, ASKO KAIKUSALO, ERKKI KORPIMÄKI, HANNU PIETIÄINEN*, PERTTI SAUROLA and ILKKA HANSKI*
Ecology 2004 73, Large-scale spatial dynamics of vole populations in Finland Blackwell Publishing Ltd. revealed by the breeding success of vole-eating avian predators JANNE SUNDELL*, OTSO HUITU, HEIKKI
More informationEducation Transformation Office (ETO) 8 th Grade Unit # 6 Assessment
Education Transformation Office (ETO) 8 th Grade Unit # 6 Assessment 1. Which of the following types of organisms mostly likely occupies the location marked X in the food web below? A. Primary consumer
More informationHome Range Size and Body Size
Feb 11, 13 Home Range Size and Body Size Introduction Home range is the area normally traversed by an individual animal or group of animals during activities associated with feeding, resting, reproduction,
More informationPredict the effect of increased competition for abiotic and biotic resources on a food web. colored pencils graph paper ruler
Edit File QUICK LAB Effect of Abiotic and Biotic Factors No organism exists in isolation. Organisms depend on and compete for the abiotic, or non-living, factors in its environment. For example, organisms
More informationThis is an electronic reprint of the original article. This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail.
This is an electronic reprint of the original article. This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Author(s): Korpela, Katri; Helle, Pekka; Henttonen, Heikki; Korpimäki,
More informationStudent Name: Teacher: Date: District: London City. Assessment: 07 Science Science Test 4. Description: Life Science Final 1.
Student Name: Teacher: Date: District: London City Assessment: 07 Science Science Test 4 Description: Life Science Final 1 Form: 301 1. A food chain is shown. Sunlight Grass Rabbit Snake What is the abiotic
More informationAut1 Aut 2 Spring 1 Spring 2 Summer 1 Summer 2 Kings and Queens Rocks
Curriculum Overview Science Years 3/4 Cycle A 2016/17 Aut1 Aut 2 Spring 1 Spring 2 Summer 1 Summer 2 Rocks living Identify and describe the together different things can be grouped functions of different
More informationAcademic Year Second Term. Science Revision sheets
Academic Year 2015-2016 Second Term Science Revision sheets Name: Date: Grade:3/ Q1 : Choose the letter of the choice that best answer the questions 1. Which of these is what a plant does that makes more
More informationActa Theriologica, 17, 31: ,
Acta Theriologica, 17, 31: 412 413, 1972 413 pulation of the mouflon and was now described as the Slovakian mouflon, O. a. sinesella Turcek, 1949. In the United States the first introductions with the
More informationNIGEL G. YOCCOZ*, NILS CHR. STENSETH*, HEIKKI HENTTONEN and ANNE-CAROLINE PRÉVOT-JULLIARD*
Ecology 2001 70, Effects of food addition on the seasonal densitydependent structure of bank vole Clethrionomys Blackwell Science, Ltd glareolus populations NIGEL G. YOCCOZ*, NILS CHR. STENSETH*, HEIKKI
More informationTalks are generally led by the keepers and may vary between different staff members. We will adapt this talk according to the age of students.
Key Stage 3 & Key Stage 4 HABITATS & ADAPTATIONS General points about this talk: Talks generally last 30-40 minutes and take place out in the Park in all weathers; please ensure that your pupils wear suitable
More informationDefine Ecology. study of the interactions that take place among organisms and their environment
Ecology Define Ecology Define Ecology study of the interactions that take place among organisms and their environment Describe each of the following terms: Biosphere Biotic Abiotic Describe each of the
More informationUnit 8 Review. Ecology
Unit 8 Review Ecology Initial questions are worth 1 point each. Each question will be followed by an explanation All questions will be asked a second time at the very end, each of those questions will
More informationGeneralization of Prey Fear Response to Predatory Risk in Deer Mice. (Peromyscus maniculatus) to Owl Calls. BIOS 35502: Practicum in Field Biology
Generalization of Prey Fear Response to Predatory Risk in Deer Mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) to Owl Calls BIOS 35502: Practicum in Field Biology Marie Tosa Advisor: Michael J. Cramer 2010 1 ABSTRACT: Predator
More informationHonors Biology Ecology Concept List
1. For each pair of terms, explain how the meanings of the terms differ. a. mutualism and commensalism b. parasitism and predation c. species richness and species diversity d. primary succession and secondary
More informationPopulations and Ecosystems. 1. Two different species with the same ecological niche are placed in the same habitat. These two species will most likely
Name: ate: 1. Two different species with the same ecological niche are placed in the same habitat. These two species will most likely. have different food requirements. compete for the same environmental
More informationFW662 Lecture 9 Immigration and Emigration 1. Lecture 9. Role of immigration and emigration in populations.
FW662 Lecture 9 Immigration and Emigration 1 Lecture 9. Role of immigration and emigration in populations. Reading: Sinclair, A. R. E. 1992. Do large mammals disperse like small mammals? Pages 229-242
More informationMAKING THE FOREST AND TUNDRA WILDLIFE CONNECTION
MAKING THE FOREST AND TUNDRA WILDLIFE CONNECTION Grade Level: 5-12 Alaska State Content Standards: SA14, SA15 Subject: Science Skills: Classifying, Predicting Duration: 45 minutes Group Size: whole group
More informationInteractions between predators and prey
Interactions between predators and prey What is a predator? Predator An organism that consumes other organisms and inevitably kills them. Predators attack and kill many different prey individuals over
More informationNICHE BREADTH AND RESOURCE PARTIONING
22 NICHE BREADTH AND RESOURCE PARTIONING Objectives Compute niche breadth for two organisms coexisting in a community. Compute niche overlap for the two coexisting organisms. Use the Solver function to
More informationChapter 4 AND 5 Practice
Name: Chapter 4 AND 5 Practice 1. Events that occur in four different ecosystems are shown in the chart below. Which ecosystem would most likely require the most time for ecological succession to restore
More informationAP Environmental Science I. Unit 1-2: Biodiversity & Evolution
NOTE/STUDY GUIDE: Unit 1-2, Biodiversity & Evolution AP Environmental Science I, Mr. Doc Miller, M.Ed. North Central High School Name: ID#: NORTH CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL NOTE & STUDY GUIDE AP Environmental
More informationGood Morning! When the bell rings we will be filling out AP Paper work.
Good Morning! Turn in HW into bin or email to smithm9@fultonschools.org If you do not want to tear the lab out of your notebook take a picture and email it. When the bell rings we will be filling out AP
More informationInteractions of life
Interactions of life Objectives Describe how organisms obtain energy for life. Explain how organisms interact. Recognize that every organism occupies a niche. Energy Living organisms need a constant supply
More informationHW/CW #5 CHAPTER 3 PRACTICE
HW/CW #5 CHAPTER 3 PRACTICE 1. The portion of Earth in which all life exists is known as A) the climax stage B) the biosphere C) a population D) a biotic community 2. The study of the interactions between
More informationbiotic factors camouflage carnivore chloroplast
non-living parts of an organism's environment Eg air currents, temperature, moisture, light, and soil type special features about an organism that help it survive and reproduce living things that is different
More informationPredation. Predation & Herbivory. Lotka-Volterra. Predation rate. Total rate of predation. Predator population 10/23/2013. Review types of predation
Predation & Herbivory Chapter 14 Predation Review types of predation Carnivory Parasitism Parasitoidism Cannabalism Lotka-Volterra Predators control prey populations and prey control predator populations
More informationUnsuspicious immigrant or ecological threat:
Unsuspicious immigrant or ecological threat: a long-term fieldwork study on the introduced raccoon in Germany R.Vitt Outline raccoon settlement and current situation in Germany applied research on raccoons:
More informationEcosystem Review. EOG released questions
Ecosystem Review EOG released questions 1. Which food chain is in the correct order? A grasshopper grass snake frog hawk B grasshopper frog hawk snake grass C grass grasshopper frog snake hawk D grass
More informationSki touring and fauna: which interactions?
Ski touring and fauna: which interactions? Antoine DUPARC Workshop "Wildlife and winter sport activities" Lescheraines March 4th 2016 Increase of interaction human/fauna Increase of human activities all
More informationScience Grade 4. Unit 1 Healthy Habitats
Science Grade 4 Unit 1 Healthy Habitats What is a habitat Habitat - The place where an animal or a plant normally lives or grows and that provides them with everything they need to survive. Habitat A habitat
More informationHABITAT-SPECIFIC DEMOGRAPHY OF SYMPATRIC VOLE POPULATIONS OVER 25 YEARS
Journal of Mammalogy, 86(3):561 568, 2005 HABITAT-SPECIFIC DEMOGRAPHY OF SYMPATRIC VOLE POPULATIONS OVER 25 YEARS LOWELL L. GETZ,* MADAN K. OLI, JOYCE E. HOFMANN, AND BETTY MCGUIRE Department of Animal
More informationBiology (Biology_Hilliard)
Name: Date: 1. There are two types of modern whales: toothed whales and baleen whales. Baleen whales filter plankton from the water using baleen, plates made of fibrous proteins that grow from the roof
More informationQuizizz. Mean Green Science: Interdependency Date and: Life Science Quiz 2. Name : Class : What is a producer?
Quizizz Name : Class : Mean Green Science: Interdependency Date and: Life Science Quiz 2 1. What is a producer? a) an organism that gets energy from eating other organisms c) an organism that gets energy
More informationDesert Animals Survive Because
Being Nocturnal Is An Adaptation That Helps Desert Animals Survive Because Most desert animals are nocturnal because it allows them to avoid extreme heat during the day. Some predators are How do animals
More informationInsect-eaters. eaters (Insectivores)
Insect-eaters eaters (Insectivores) Insect-eating mammals are called insectivores. In Britain, our wild insectivorous mammals include the hedgehog, water shrew, common shrew, pygmy shrew, greater white-toothed
More informationCHAPTER 3 - ECOSYSTEMS
CHAPTER 3 - ECOSYSTEMS Lesson 1 Parts of Ecosystems An ecosystem is made of living and nonliving parts that all work together. Every organism in an ecosystem has a part to play. An ecosystem is all of
More informationCHAPTER. Evolution and Community Ecology
CHAPTER 5 Evolution and Community Ecology Lesson 5.2 Species Interactions The zebra mussel has completely displaced 20 native mussel species in Lake St. Clair. Lesson 5.2 Species Interactions The Niche
More information1 29 g, 18% Potato chips 32 g, 23% 2 30 g, 18% Sugar cookies 35 g, 30% 3 28 g, 19% Mouse food 27 g, 18%
1. When testing the benefits of a new fertilizer on the growth of tomato plants, the control group should include which of the following? A Tomato plants grown in soil with no fertilizer B Tomato plants
More informationEcology - the study of how living things interact with each other and their environment
Ecology Ecology - the study of how living things interact with each other and their environment Biotic Factors - the living parts of a habitat Abiotic Factors - the non-living parts of a habitat examples:
More informationTEMPERATURE, PREDATION RISK AND GRASSHOPPER BEHAVIOR. BIOS 569 Field Practicum in Environmental Biology. Molly Chambers
Chambers TEMPERATURE, PREDATION RISK AND GRASSHOPPER BEHAVIOR BIOS 9 Field Practicum in Environmental Biology Molly Chambers Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL 87 Angela Laws UNDERC Chambers ABSTRACT A field
More informationAQUATIC MACROINVERTEBRATE DRIFT DYNAMICS IN A FREESTONE STREAM IN THE ADIRONDACK PARK, New York
AQUATIC MACROINVERTEBRATE DRIFT DYNAMICS IN A FREESTONE STREAM IN THE ADIRONDACK PARK, New York Nick Griffin Department of Environmental and Forest Biology SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry
More informationA novel record of aardwolf Proteles cristata feeding behaviour
A novel record of aardwolf Proteles cristata feeding behaviour Terrestrial members of the order Carnivora show great variation in their diet; some specialising on vertebrates, invertebrates, or plant matter,
More information2. Which sequence shows a correct pathway for the flow of energy in a food chain? A. bacteria grass fox owl. B. grass grasshopper frog snake
1. The diagram below illustrates the relationships between organisms in an ecosystem. 2. Which sequence shows a correct pathway for the flow of energy in a food chain? A. bacteria grass fox owl. grass
More informationREVISION: POPULATION ECOLOGY 01 OCTOBER 2014
REVISION: POPULATION ECOLOGY 01 OCTOBER 2014 Lesson Description In this lesson we revise: Introduction to Population Ecology What s Happening in the Environment Human Population: Analysis & Predictions
More informationLecture 2: Individual-based Modelling
Lecture 2: Individual-based Modelling Part I Steve Railsback Humboldt State University Department of Mathematics & Lang, Railsback & Associates Arcata, California USA www.langrailsback.com 1 Outline 1.
More informationEFFECTS OF PRIOR POPULATION DENSITY ON USE OF SPACE BY MEADOW VOLES, MICROTUS PENNSYLVANICUS
EFFECTS OF PRIOR POPULATION DENSITY ON USE OF SPACE BY MEADOW VOLES, MICROTUS PENNSYLVANICUS STEPHEN R. PUGH AND RICHARD S. OSTFELD University of New Hampshire at Manchester, 220 Hackett Hill Road, Manchester,
More informationSÁNDOR FARAGÓ Co-ordinates: N E
Effects of Ecological Factors to the Grey Partridge Population in the Lajta Project (Western Hungary) SÁNDOR FARAGÓ University of West Hungary Faculty of Forestry Institute of Wildlife Management and Vertebrate
More informationBand 1 - Science All. Working Scientifically Animals Including Humans Materials. Plants. Seasonal Changes
Band 1 - Science All Working Scientifically Materials Ask simple questions and recognise that they can be answered in different ways (Year 1 focus). I can ask questions and know they can be answered in
More informationYear/Cycle Autumn 1 Autumn 2 Spring 1 Spring 2 Summer 1 Summer 2 Y1 Animals, inc humans
Science - Whole School Coverage of the National Curriculum 2018-19 Year/Cycle Autumn 1 Autumn 2 Spring 1 Spring 2 Summer 1 Summer 2 Y1 Animals, inc Everyday Plants identify and name a animals including
More informationIlkka Hanski and small mammals: from shrew metapopulations to vole and lemming cycles
Ann. Zool. Fennici 54: 153 162 ISSN 0003-455X (print), ISSN 1797-2450 (online) Helsinki 15 May 2017 Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2017 Ilkka Hanski: The legacy of a multifaceted ecologist
More informationEcology: Part 1 Mrs. Bradbury
Ecology: Part 1 Mrs. Bradbury Biotic and Abiotic Factors All environments include living and non-living things, that affect the organisms that live there. Biotic Factors all the living organisms in an
More informationLesson Eight The Meeting of the Dinosaurs Evidence Given by Dinosaur Footprints
Lesson Eight The Meeting of the Dinosaurs Evidence Given by Dinosaur Footprints Summary During the first set of activities, students focused on the basics, learning about rocks, minerals, time, and fossils.
More informationSELF-GUIDED LEARNING EXPEDITION LIFE SCIENCE. Name GRADE LEVEL: 4 5 STUDENT GUIDE
SELF-GUIDED LEARNING EXPEDITION Name GRADE LEVEL: 4 5 STUDENT GUIDE LIFE SCIENCE On this expedition, you will visit the following areas in order to complete activities related to the theme Organisms and
More informationTania Ostolaza Fernández sharpandsavvy.es UNIT 5. RELATIONSHIPS IN ECOSYSTEMS ACTIVITIES
UNIT 5. RELATIONSHIPS IN ECOSYSTEMS ACTIVITIES CHECK YOUR LEARNING Answer the following questions. Use full sentences and be careful with your handwriting. INTERRELATIONSHIPS. FOOD CHAINS & FOOD WEBS.
More informationAdditional Case Study: Calculating the Size of a Small Mammal Population
Student Worksheet LSM 14.1-2 Additional Case Study: Calculating the Size of a Small Mammal Population Objective To use field study data on shrew populations to examine the characteristics of a natural
More information5 th Grade Ecosystems Mini Assessment Name # Date. Name # Date
An ecosystem is a community of organisms and their interaction with their environment. (abiotic, biotic, niche, habitat, population, community)- 1. Which effect does a decrease in sunlight have on a pond
More informationName: Section: Number:
Name: Section: Number: 2 3 Vocabulary Word Definition competition p.114 parasite p.117 host p.117 succession p.118 extinct p.120 endangered p.120 hazardous waste p.126 4 5 6 7 Lesson 1: How are ecosystems
More informationEffects of rain and foot disturbances on pit size and location preference of antlions (Myrmeleon immaculatus)
Effects of rain and foot disturbances on pit size and location preference of antlions (Myrmeleon immaculatus) Angela Feng University of Michigan Biological Station EEB 381 Ecology August 17, 2010 Professor
More informationBiomes, Populations, Communities and Ecosystems Review
Multiple Choice Biomes, Populations, Communities and Ecosystems Review 1. The picture below is a school (group) of Jack fish. What type of distribution does this represent? A) Random B) Even C) Uniform
More informationStudy Island. Generation Date: 04/03/2014 Generated By: Cheryl Shelton Title: Grade 7 Life & Physical Science. 1. Decomposers are organisms that
Study Island Copyright 2014 Edmentum - All rights reserved. Generation Date: 04/03/2014 Generated By: Cheryl Shelton Title: Grade 7 Life & Physical Science 1. Decomposers are organisms that A. feed upon
More informationS7L The diagram below is of a food web in a southern salt marsh.
S7L4-3 1. The diagram below is of a food web in a southern salt marsh. When the snails feed on a type of fungus that grows on the cordgrass, they scrape and damage the cordgrass. What would MOST LIKELY
More informationNatal versus breeding dispersal: Evolution in a model system
Evolutionary Ecology Research, 1999, 1: 911 921 Natal versus breeding dispersal: Evolution in a model system Karin Johst 1 * and Roland Brandl 2 1 Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig-Halle Ltd, Department
More informationPREDATOR AND PREY HABITAT SELECTION GAMES: THE EFFECTS OF HOW PREY BALANCE FORAGING AND PREDATION RISK
ISRAEL JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, Vol. 50, 2004, pp. 233 254 PREDATOR AND PREY HABITAT SELECTION GAMES: THE EFFECTS OF HOW PREY BALANCE FORAGING AND PREDATION RISK BARNEY LUTTBEG* AND ANDREW SIH Department of
More information2009 WMU 525 Moose. Section Authors: Nathan Carruthers and Dave Moyles
2009 WMU 525 Moose Section Authors: Nathan Carruthers and Dave Moyles Suggested Citation: Carruthers, N. and D. Moyles. WMU 525 Moose. Pages 78 83. In: N. Webb and R. Anderson. Delegated aerial ungulate
More informationBIOLOGY Unit 2: Ecology Review Guide
BIOLOGY 621 - Unit 2: Ecology Review Guide Worksheets to look over: BLUE notes packets on: o "Unit Two: Ecology" o "Feeding Relationships" o "Succession & Growth" Do Now's on: o "Food Web & Food Chains"
More informationINVESTIGATING ANIMALS RENEWABLE BIOMASS USING A TREE-FITTING MODEL ABSTRACT
Vlachos et al., The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 24(1): 2014, Page: J. Anim. 50-56Plant Sci. 24(1):2014 ISSN: 1018-7081 INVESTIGATING ANIMALS RENEWABLE BIOMASS USING A TREE-FITTING MODEL C. Vlachos,
More informationLABORATORY #12 -- BIOL 111 Predator-Prey cycles
LABORATORY #12 -- BIOL 111 Predator-Prey cycles One of the most influential kinds of relationships that species of animals can have with one another is that of predator (the hunter and eater) and prey
More information