III. DISEÑO OPERACIONAL Y TRÁNSITO
|
|
- Beverley Hilda Pitts
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Estudios Técnicos y Ambientales del Corredor Segregado de Alta Capacidad (COSAC I) y sus terminales de transferencia. III. DISEÑO OPERACIONAL Y TRÁNSITO ANEXO 36. TRÁNSITO III.2. TRANSITO.- ANEXOS. Anexo 36
2 Estudios Técnicos y Ambientales del Corredor Segregado de Alta Capacidad (COSAC I) y sus terminales de transferencia. III. DISEÑO OPERACIONAL Y TRÁNSITO ÍNDICE 1. TRÁNSITO EN LAS INTERSECCIONES (tda) ACTUALIZACIÓN DEL TRÁNSITO EN LAS INTERSECCIONES AVENIDA BOLOGNESI. RESULTADOS DE LA SIMULACIÓN...36 III.2. TRANSITO.- ANEXOS. Anexo 36
3 Estudios Técnicos y Ambientales del Corredor Segregado de Alta Capacidad (COSAC I) y sus terminales de transferencia. III. DISEÑO OPERACIONAL Y TRÁNSITO 1. TRÁNSITO EN LAS INTERSECCIONES (TDA) III.2. TRANSITO.- ANEXOS. Anexo 36 1
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 Estudios Técnicos y Ambientales del Corredor Segregado de Alta Capacidad (COSAC I) y sus terminales de transferencia. III. DISEÑO OPERACIONAL Y TRÁNSITO 2. ACTUALIZACIÓN DEL TRÁNSITO EN LAS INTERSECCIONES III.2. TRANSITO.- ANEXOS. Anexo 36 30
33 AVENIDA TUPAC AMARU. PREVISIÓN DE TRÁNSITO EN INTERSECCIONES Norte Sur Sur Norte Este Oeste Oeste Este Intersección L T R L T R L T R L T R Alisos Almendros Izaguirre Tomás Valle Juan Nicolini Honorio Delgado Habich Caquetá
34 Estudios Técnicos y Ambientales del Corredor Segregado de Alta Capacidad (COSAC I) y sus terminales de transferencia. III. DISEÑO OPERACIONAL Y TRÁNSITO 3. AVENIDA BOLOGNESI. RESULTADOS DE LA SIMULACIÓN III.2. TRANSITO.- ANEXOS. Anexo 36 36
35 INPUT FILE NAME: C:\TSIS Projects\Avenida Bolognesi\Bolognesi03.trf RUN DATE : 05/12/03 TTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRR AAAAAAA FFFFFFFFFFF TTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAA FFFFFFFFFFF TTTTTTTTTTT RRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAA FFFFFFFFFFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAA FFFFFFF TTT RRRRRRRRRR AAAAAAAAAAA FFFFFFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF TTT RRR RRR AAA AAA FFF VERSION 5.1 (BUILD #301) RELEASE DATE FEBRUARY 2003 TRAF SIMULATION MODEL DEVELOPED FOR U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FHWA OFFICE OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY
36 TRAF SIMULATION MODEL DEVELOPED FOR U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FHWA OFFICE OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY 0 Simulaci¾n Avenida Bolognesi. COSAC - LIMA 0 DATE = 2/22/ USER = Miguel Angel Reguero 0 AGENCY = TARYET RUN CONTROL DATA VALUE RUN PARAMETERS AND OPTIONS 0 0 RUN IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1 RUN TYPE CODE = ( 1, 2, 3) TO RUN (SIMULATION, ASSIGNMENT, BOTH) (-1,-2,-3) TO CHECK (SIMULATION, ASSIGNMENT, BOTH) ONLY NETSIM ENVIRONMENTAL OPTIONS FUEL/EMISSION RATE TABLES ARE PRINTED 0 SIMULATION: PERFORMED ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES: CALCULATED RATE TABLES: EMBEDDED TRAJECTORY FILE: NOT WRITTEN 0 CODE = (0,1,2) FOR UNIFORM DISTRIBUTION, NORMAL DISTRIBUTION, ERLANG DISTRIBUTION 0 INITIALIZATION CODE (0,1) = (DO NOT, DO) FORCE FULL INITIALIZATION PERIOD 0 INPUT UNITS CODE = (0,1) IF INPUT IS IN (ENGLISH, METRIC) UNITS 0 OUTPUT UNITS CODE = (0,1,2,3) IF OUTPUT IS IN (SAME AS INPUT, ENGLISH, METRIC, BOTH) UNITS 700 CLOCK TIME AT START OF SIMULATION (HHMM) 0 SIGNAL TRANSITION CODE = (0,1,2,3) IF(NO, IMMEDIATE, 2-CYCLE, 3-CYCLE) TRANSITION WAS REQUESTED 7581 RANDOM NUMBER SEED 7781 RANDOM NUMBER SEED TO GENERATE TRAFFIC STREAM FOR NETSIM OR LEVEL I SIMULATION 7981 RANDOM NUMBER SEED TO GENERATE EMISSION HEADWAYS FOR NETSIM SIMULATION 900 DURATION (SEC) OF TIME PERIOD NO LENGTH OF A TIME INTERVAL, SECONDS 3 MAXIMUM INITIALIZATION TIME, NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS 0 NUMBER OF TIME INTERVALS BETWEEN SUCCESSIVE STANDARD OUTPUTS 0 TIME INTERMEDIATE OUTPUT WILL BEGIN AT INTERVALS OF 0 SECS. FOR 0 SECS. FOR MICROSCOPIC MODELS 0 NETSIM MOVEMENT-SPECIFIC OUTPUT CODE = (0,1) (IF NOT, IF) REQUESTED FOR NETSIM SUBNETWORK 0 NETSIM GRAPHICS OUTPUT CODE = (0,1) IF GRAPHICS OUTPUT (IS NOT, IS) REQUESTED
37 1*********************************************************************************************************************************** TIME PERIOD 1 - NETSIM DATA 1 *********************************************************************************************************************************** 0 -LANES- -CHANNEL- NETSIM LINKS F C U U LOST Q DIS FREE LANE LENGTH L PKT GRD LINK R DESTINATION NODE OPP. TIME HDWY. SPEED RTOR PED ALIGN STREET LINK FT / M L L R PCT TYPE B LEFT THRU RGHT DIAG NODE SEC SEC MPH/KMPH CODE CODE -MENT NAME ( 5, 6) 284/ / * ( 6, 5) 284/ / * ( 7, 6) 388/ / * ( 6, 7) 388/ / * ( 8, 7) 231/ / * ( 9, 2) 240/ / * ( 2, 9) 240/ / * ( 9, 10) 402/ / * ( 10, 9) 402/ / * ( 4, 11) 591/ / * ( 132, 1) 50/ / * ( 132, 11) 924/ / * ( 11, 4) 591/ / * ( 12, 11) 221/ / * ( 13, 12) 233/ / * ( 2, 16) 92/ / * ( 16, 8) 272/ / * ( 8, 16) 272/ / * ( 103, 2) 50/ / * ( 16, 2) 92/ / * ( 17, 18) 244/ / * ( 18, 19) 224/ / * ( 104, 19) 274/ / * ( 19, 20) 510/ / * ( 20, 21) 229/ / * ( 15, 22) 843/ / * ( 22, 17) 399/ / * ( 20, 22) 330/ / * ( 101, 23) 304/ / * ( 22, 23) 320/ / * ( 19, 24) 383/ / * ( 3, 27) 423/ / * ( 27, 3) 423/ / * ( 10, 28) 516/ / * ( 28, 27) 349/ / * ( 27, 28) 349/ / * ( 28, 10) 516/ / * ( 105, 27) 50/ / * ( 133, 29) 419/ / * ( 133, 1) 50/ / * ( 29, 30) 304/ / * ( 30, 29) 304/ / * ( 30, 31) 312/ / * ( 31, 30) 312/ / * ( 29, 32) 246/ / *
38 0 -LANES- -CHANNEL- NETSIM LINKS (CONT.) F C U U LOST Q DIS FREE LANE LENGTH L PKT GRD LINK R DESTINATION NODE OPP. TIME HDWY. SPEED RTOR PED ALIGN STREET LINK FT / M L L R PCT TYPE B LEFT THRU RGHT DIAG NODE SEC SEC MPH/KMPH CODE CODE -MENT NAME ( 32, 35) 246/ / * ( 30, 33) 258/ / * ( 33, 36) 236/ / * ( 37, 34) 234/ / * ( 34, 31) 263/ / * ( 32, 33) 298/ / * ( 33, 34) 310/ / * ( 37, 36) 312/ / * ( 36, 35) 278/ / * ( 38, 39) 198/ / * ( 39, 40) 306/ / * ( 35, 38) 392/ / * ( 36, 39) 387/ / * ( 41, 40) 464/ / * ( 39, 42) 395/ / * ( 41, 42) 476/ / * ( 125, 8) 52/ / * ( 124, 41) 606/ / * ( 123, 43) 584/ / * ( 43, 41) 315/ / * ( 44, 43) 585/ / * ( 122, 10) 61/ / * ( 119, 46) 314/ / * ( 46, 45) 87/ / * ( 45, 44) 159/ / * ( 100, 47) 398/ / * ( 47, 13) 386/ / * ( 121, 48) 115/ / * ( 48, 45) 253/ / * ( 1, 49) 206/ / * ( 49, 5) 116/ / * ( 5, 49) 116/ / * ( 49, 1) 206/ / * ( 129, 32) 358/ / * ( 3, 51) 159/ / * ( 51, 3) 159/ / * ( 13, 52) 160/ / * ( 52, 14) 307/ / * ( 23, 52) 785/ / * ( 4, 53) 357/ / * ( 53, 54) 618/ / * ( 54, 55) 567/ / * ( 55, 56) 569/ / * ( 56, 57) 683/ / * ( 59, 54) 418/ / * 1
39 0 -LANES- -CHANNEL- NETSIM LINKS (CONT.) F C U U LOST Q DIS FREE LANE LENGTH L PKT GRD LINK R DESTINATION NODE OPP. TIME HDWY. SPEED RTOR PED ALIGN STREET LINK FT / M L L R PCT TYPE B LEFT THRU RGHT DIAG NODE SEC SEC MPH/KMPH CODE CODE -MENT NAME ( 54, 59) 418/ / * ( 55, 60) 411/ / * ( 21, 56) 393/ / * ( 24, 57) 284/ / * ( 57, 58) 531/ / * ( 25, 58) 280/ / * ( 58, 25) 280/ / * ( 58, 61) 688/ / * ( 61, 26) 630/ / * ( 61, 50) 574/ / * ( 50, 61) 574/ / * ( 117, 62) 183/ / * ( 62, 63) 529/ / * ( 63, 64) 297/ / * ( 44, 64) 268/ / * ( 64, 44) 268/ / * ( 64, 69) 363/ / * ( 69, 64) 363/ / * ( 46, 63) 282/ / * ( 63, 68) 384/ / * ( 67, 68) 620/ / * ( 68, 67) 620/ / * ( 68, 69) 369/ / * ( 69, 68) 369/ / * ( 41, 73) 555/ / * ( 73, 41) 555/ / * ( 73, 72) 128/ / * ( 72, 73) 128/ / * ( 72, 75) 190/ / * ( 75, 72) 190/ / * ( 69, 70) 386/ / * ( 70, 69) 386/ / * ( 70, 71) 153/ / * ( 71, 70) 153/ / * ( 71, 72) 603/ / * ( 72, 71) 603/ / * ( 43, 71) 597/ / * ( 40, 73) 631/ / * ( 40, 76) 260/ / * ( 76, 37) 137/ / * ( 75, 74) 290/ / * ( 31, 77) 298/ / * ( 77, 31) 298/ / * ( 77, 78) 225/ / * ( 78, 77) 225/ / * 1
40 0 -LANES- -CHANNEL- NETSIM LINKS (CONT.) F C U U LOST Q DIS FREE LANE LENGTH L PKT GRD LINK R DESTINATION NODE OPP. TIME HDWY. SPEED RTOR PED ALIGN STREET LINK FT / M L L R PCT TYPE B LEFT THRU RGHT DIAG NODE SEC SEC MPH/KMPH CODE CODE -MENT NAME ( 74, 79) 272/ / * ( 79, 76) 296/ / * ( 74, 81) 210/ / * ( 81, 83) 233/ / * ( 83, 78) 254/ / * ( 81, 80) 245/ / * ( 80, 37) 300/ / * ( 77, 82) 258/ / * ( 82, 80) 235/ / * ( 34, 82) 288/ / * ( 82, 83) 243/ / * ( 80, 79) 168/ / * ( 65, 84) 164/ / * ( 84, 51) 117/ / * ( 51, 84) 117/ / * ( 84, 65) 164/ / * ( 86, 87) 123/ / * ( 87, 50) 295/ / * ( 66, 89) 203/ / * ( 89, 65) 263/ / * ( 65, 89) 263/ / * ( 89, 66) 203/ / * ( 66, 90) 211/ / * ( 90, 66) 211/ / * ( 50, 97) 513/ / * ( 97, 50) 513/ / * ( 97, 94) 435/ / * ( 94, 97) 435/ / * ( 94, 93) 269/ / * ( 93, 94) 269/ / * ( 111, 91) 401/ / * ( 91, 92) 148/ / * ( 92, 93) 697/ / * ( 94, 95) 598/ / * ( 95, 94) 598/ / * ( 95, 96) 144/ / * ( 96, 95) 144/ / * ( 95, 87) 854/ / * ( 95, 92) 228/ / * ( 91, 96) 221/ / * ( 96, 88) 228/ / * ( 88, 85) 319/ / * ( 85, 86) 303/ / * ( 108, 85) 528/ / * ( 110, 88) 478/ / * 1
41 0 -LANES- -CHANNEL- NETSIM LINKS (CONT.) F C U U LOST Q DIS FREE LANE LENGTH L PKT GRD LINK R DESTINATION NODE OPP. TIME HDWY. SPEED RTOR PED ALIGN STREET LINK FT / M L L R PCT TYPE B LEFT THRU RGHT DIAG NODE SEC SEC MPH/KMPH CODE CODE -MENT NAME (8001, 1) 0/ / * (8002, 4) 0/ / * (8003, 78) 0/ / * (8004, 75) 0/ / * (8005, 90) 0/ / * (8006, 93) 0/ / * ( 25, 26) 566/ / * ( 24, 25) 498/ / * ( 21, 24) 690/ / * ( 60, 21) 506/ / * ( 15, 60) 355/ / * ( 59, 15) 155/ / * ( 14, 59) 81/ / * ( 4, 14) 539/ / * ( 14, 4) 539/ / * ( 12, 98) 851/ / * ( 99, 98) 130/ / * ( 98, 100) 269/ / * ( 7, 8) 231/ / * ( 8, 101) 50/ / * ( 100, 101) 605/ / * ( 101, 102) 290/ / * ( 102, 17) 96/ / * ( 17, 103) 53/ / * ( 102, 103) 94/ / * ( 10, 104) 50/ / * ( 131, 104) 376/ / * ( 26, 105) 122/ / * ( 26, 107) 360/ / * ( 107, 86) 566/ / * ( 107, 109) 163/ / * ( 109, 108) 126/ / * ( 88, 110) 478/ / * ( 108, 110) 428/ / * ( 110, 112) 198/ / * ( 112, 111) 209/ / * (8010, 114) 0/ / * ( 114, 113) 211/ / * ( 67, 115) 452/ / * ( 113, 116) 197/ / * ( 116, 115) 263/ / * ( 115, 118) 165/ / * ( 118, 117) 114/ / * ( 27, 119) 55/ / * ( 117, 120) 168/ / * 1
42 0 -LANES- -CHANNEL- NETSIM LINKS (CONT.) F C U U LOST Q DIS FREE LANE LENGTH L PKT GRD LINK R DESTINATION NODE OPP. TIME HDWY. SPEED RTOR PED ALIGN STREET LINK FT / M L L R PCT TYPE B LEFT THRU RGHT DIAG NODE SEC SEC MPH/KMPH CODE CODE -MENT NAME ( 120, 119) 412/ / * ( 119, 121) 325/ / * ( 44, 122) 597/ / * ( 121, 122) 489/ / * ( 122, 123) 404/ / * ( 2, 124) 50/ / * ( 123, 124) 247/ / * ( 42, 125) 272/ / * ( 124, 126) 107/ / * ( 126, 125) 246/ / * ( 38, 127) 145/ / * ( 125, 127) 271/ / * ( 35, 128) 223/ / * ( 127, 128) 371/ / * ( 128, 130) 274/ / * ( 130, 129) 118/ / * ( 103, 131) 239/ / * ( 67, 106) 570/ / * (8011, 106) 0/ / * ( 113, 106) 57/ / * ( 106, 113) 57/ / * ( 66, 113) 55/ / * ( 113, 66) 55/ / * ( 112, 66) 54/ / * ( 66, 112) 54/ / * ( 1, 132) 50/ / * ( 11, 132) 924/ / * (8007, 132) 0/ / * ( 29, 133) 419/ / * ( 1, 133) 50/ / * ( 132, 99) 205/ / * ( 129, 133) 205/ / * ( 128, 6) 50/ / * ( 6, 100) 50/ / * 1
43 * INDICATES DEFAULT VALUES WERE SPECIFIED LINK TYPE LANE CHANNELIZATION RTOR PEDESTRIAN CODES CODES CODES IDENTIFIES THE 0 UNRESTRICTED 0 RTOR PERMITTED 0 NO PEDESTRIANS DISTRIBUTION USED FOR 1 LEFT TURNS ONLY 1 RTOR PROHIBITED 1 LIGHT QUEUE DISCHARGE AND 2 BUSES ONLY 2 MODERATE START-UP LOST TIME 3 CLOSED 3 HEAVY CHARACTERISTICS. 4 RIGHT TURNS ONLY 5 CAR - POOLS 6 CAR - POOLS + BUSES 7 RIGHT TURNS + RIGHT DIAGONAL AND/OR THROUGH 8 LEFT TURNS + LEFT DIAGONAL AND/OR THROUGH 9 ALL PERMITTED MOVEMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE GEOMETRY AND ADJACENT LANE CHANNELIZATIONS D DIAGONAL TRAFFIC ONLY T THROUGH TRAFFIC ONLY TOTAL LINKS: 259 TOTAL NON-ENTRY NODES: 133 (ALLOWED: 8999) OPTIONAL NETSIM LANE ALIGNMENTS LINK RECEIVING LINK LANE ALIGNED LANES ON RECEIVING LINK ( 5, 6) ( 6, 7) 1 1 ( 6, 5) ( 5, 49) 1 1 ( 7, 6) ( 6, 5) 1 1 ( 6, 7) ( 7, 8) 1 1 ( 8, 7) ( 7, 6) 1 1 ( 4, 11) ( 11, 132) 1 1 ( 4, 11) ( 11, 132) 2 2 ( 132, 1) ( 1, 133) 1 1 ( 132, 1) ( 1, 133) 2 2 ( 132, 11) ( 11, 4) 1 1 ( 132, 11) ( 11, 4) 2 2 ( 11, 4) ( 4, 53) 1 1 ( 11, 4) ( 4, 53) 2 2 ( 2, 16) ( 16, 8) 1 1 1
44 ( 16, 8) ( 8, 7) 1 1 ( 8, 16) ( 16, 2) 1 1 ( 133, 1) ( 1, 132) 1 1 ( 133, 1) ( 1, 132) 2 2 ( 125, 8) ( 8, 101) 1 1 ( 125, 8) ( 8, 101) 2 2 ( 124, 41) ( 41, 73) 1 1 ( 124, 41) ( 41, 73) 2 2 ( 43, 41) ( 41, 40) 1 1 ( 43, 41) ( 41, 40) 2 2 ( 1, 49) ( 49, 5) 1 1 ( 49, 5) ( 5, 6) 1 1 ( 5, 49) ( 49, 1) 1 1 ( 41, 73) ( 73, 72) 1 1 ( 41, 73) ( 73, 72) 2 2 ( 73, 41) ( 41, 42) 1 1 ( 73, 41) ( 41, 42) 2 2 ( 72, 73) ( 73, 41) 1 1 ( 72, 73) ( 73, 41) 2 2 ( 99, 98) ( 98, 100) 1 1 ( 98, 100) ( 100, 101) 1 1 ( 7, 8) ( 8, 16) 1 1 ( 35, 128) ( 128, 6) 1 1 ( 35, 128) ( 128, 6) 2 2 ( 127, 128) ( 128, 130) 1 1 ( 127, 128) ( 128, 130) 2 2 ( 6, 100) ( 100, 47) 1 1 ( 6, 100) ( 100, 47) 2 2
45 NETSIM TURNING MOVEMENT DATA TURN MOVEMENT PERCENTAGES TURN MOVEMENT POSSIBLE POCKET LENGTH (IN FEET/METERS) LINK LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL LEFT THROUGH RIGHT DIAGONAL LEFT RIGHT ( 5, 6) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 6, 5) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 7, 6) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 6, 7) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 8, 7) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 9, 2) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 2, 9) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 9, 10) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 10, 9) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 4, 11) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 132, 1) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 132, 11) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 11, 4) YES YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 12, 11) YES NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 13, 12) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 2, 16) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 16, 8) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 8, 16) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 103, 2) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 16, 2) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 17, 18) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 18, 19) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 104, 19) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 19, 20) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 20, 21) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 15, 22) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 22, 17) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 20, 22) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 101, 23) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 22, 23) YES NO NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 19, 24) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 3, 27) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 27, 3) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 10, 28) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 28, 27) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 27, 28) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 28, 10) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 105, 27) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 133, 29) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 133, 1) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 29, 30) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 30, 29) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 30, 31) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 31, 30) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 29, 32) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 32, 35) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 30, 33) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 33, 36) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 37, 34) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 34, 31) YES NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 32, 33) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 33, 34) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 37, 36) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 1
46 ( 36, 35) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 38, 39) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 39, 40) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 35, 38) YES NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 36, 39) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 41, 40) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 39, 42) NO NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 41, 42) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 125, 8) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 124, 41) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 123, 43) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 43, 41) YES YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 44, 43) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 122, 10) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 119, 46) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 46, 45) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 45, 44) YES YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 100, 47) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 47, 13) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 121, 48) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 48, 45) YES NO NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 1, 49) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 49, 5) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 5, 49) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 49, 1) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 129, 32) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 3, 51) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 51, 3) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 13, 52) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 52, 14) YES NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 23, 52) YES NO NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 4, 53) YES NO NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 53, 54) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 54, 55) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 55, 56) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 56, 57) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 59, 54) YES NO NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 54, 59) NO NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 55, 60) NO NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 21, 56) YES NO NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 24, 57) YES NO NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 57, 58) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 25, 58) YES NO NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 58, 25) NO NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 58, 61) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 61, 26) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 61, 50) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 50, 61) NO NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 117, 62) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 62, 63) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 63, 64) YES NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 44, 64) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 64, 44) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 64, 69) YES NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 69, 64) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 46, 63) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 63, 68) YES NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 67, 68) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 68, 67) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0
47 ( 68, 69) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 69, 68) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 41, 73) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 73, 41) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 73, 72) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 72, 73) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 72, 75) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 75, 72) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 69, 70) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 70, 69) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 70, 71) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 71, 70) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 71, 72) YES NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 72, 71) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 43, 71) YES NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 40, 73) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 40, 76) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 76, 37) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 75, 74) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 31, 77) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 77, 31) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 77, 78) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 78, 77) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 74, 79) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 79, 76) NO NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 74, 81) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 81, 83) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 83, 78) YES NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 81, 80) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 80, 37) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 77, 82) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 82, 80) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 34, 82) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 82, 83) YES NO NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 80, 79) NO NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 65, 84) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 84, 51) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 51, 84) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 84, 65) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 86, 87) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 87, 50) YES NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 66, 89) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 89, 65) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 65, 89) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 89, 66) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 66, 90) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 90, 66) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 50, 97) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 97, 50) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 97, 94) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 94, 97) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 94, 93) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 93, 94) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 111, 91) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 91, 92) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 92, 93) YES NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 94, 95) YES YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 95, 94) YES NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 95, 96) YES NO NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 96, 95) YES YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0
48 ( 95, 87) YES NO NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 95, 92) NO NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 91, 96) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 96, 88) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 88, 85) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 85, 86) YES NO NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 108, 85) NO NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 110, 88) NO NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 (8001, 1) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 (8002, 4) YES YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 (8003, 78) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 (8004, 75) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 (8005, 90) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 (8006, 93) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 25, 26) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 24, 25) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 21, 24) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 60, 21) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 15, 60) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 59, 15) NO YES NO YES 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 14, 59) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 4, 14) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 14, 4) YES YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 12, 98) NO NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 99, 98) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 98, 100) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 7, 8) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 8, 101) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 100, 101) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 101, 102) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 102, 17) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 17, 103) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 102, 103) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 10, 104) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 131, 104) NO NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 26, 105) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 26, 107) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 107, 86) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 107, 109) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 109, 108) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 88, 110) NO NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 108, 110) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 110, 112) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 112, 111) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 (8010, 114) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 114, 113) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 67, 115) NO NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 113, 116) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 116, 115) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 115, 118) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 118, 117) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 27, 119) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 117, 120) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 120, 119) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 119, 121) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 44, 122) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 121, 122) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 122, 123) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 2, 124) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0
49 ( 123, 124) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 42, 125) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 124, 126) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 126, 125) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 38, 127) NO NO YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 125, 127) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 35, 128) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 127, 128) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 128, 130) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 130, 129) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 103, 131) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 67, 106) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 (8011, 106) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 113, 106) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 106, 113) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 66, 113) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 113, 66) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 112, 66) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 66, 112) YES NO NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 1, 132) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 11, 132) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 (8007, 132) YES YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 29, 133) NO YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 1, 133) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 132, 99) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 129, 133) YES YES YES NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 128, 6) NO YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0 ( 6, 100) YES YES NO NO 0/ 0 0/ 0
50 ENTRY LINK VOLUMES LINK FLOW RATE TRUCKS CAR POOLS HOV VIOLATORS (VEH/HOUR) (PERCENT) (PERCENT) (PERCENT) (8001, 1) (8002, 4) (8003, 78) (8004, 75) (8005, 90) (8006, 93) (8010, 114) (8011, 106) (8007, 132) NETSIM VEHICLE TYPE SPECIFICATIONS VEHICLE LENGTH Q DSCHG HDWY FLEET COMPONENT PERCENTAGES PERF. TYPE FEET/METERS FACTOR (PCT) AVG. OCCUP. AUTO TRUCK CARPOOL BUS INDEX 1** 16.0/ ** 35.0/ ** 16.0/ ** 40.0/ ** 14.0/ ** 53.0/ ** 53.0/ ** 64.0/ ** 14.0/ ** INDICATES THAT ALL PARAMETERS FOR VEHICLE TYPE ASSUME DEFAULT VALUES
51 1 DEFAULT LINK GEOMETRIC DATA WIDTH OF LANES 12 FEET LONGITUDINAL DISTANCE FROM THE STOP 4 FEET LINE TO THE NEAR CURB FORWARD SIGHT DISTANCE AT STOP LINE 1000 FEET LANE CHANGE DATA PARAMETERS VALUE UNITS ENGLISH / METRIC DURATION OF LANE CHANGE MANEUVER 3* SECONDS MEAN DRIVER REACTION TIME 10* TENTHS OF A SECOND TIME REQUIRED FOR SUCCESSIVE LANE CHANGES 20* TENTHS OF A SECOND DECELERATION AT BEGINNING OF LANE CHANGE MANEUVER 5* / 2 FEET [METERS] / SECOND**2 DIFFERENCE IN VEHICLE'S DECELERATION OVER THE DISTANCE BETWEEN ITS POSITION WHEN IT BEGINS TO RESPOND TO AN OBSTRUCTION AND THE POSITION OF THE OBSTRUCTION - FOR MANDATORY LANE CHANGE: 10* / 3 FEET [METERS] / SECOND**2 FOR DISCRETIONARY LANE CHANGE: 5* / 2 FEET [METERS] / SECOND**2 PANIC DECELERATION RATE OF LEAD VEHICLE FOR COMPUTATION OF CAR-FOLLOWING LAW 12* / 4 FEET [METERS] / SECOND**2 PANIC DECELERATION RATE OF FOLLOWER VEHICLE FOR COMPUTATION OF CAR-FOLLOWING LAW 12* / 4 FEET [METERS] / SECOND**2 DRIVER TYPE FACTOR USED TO COMPUTE DRIVER AGGRESSIVENESS 25* URGENCY THRESHOLD 2* / 1 10 * SECONDS**2 / FEET [METERS] SAFETY FACTOR FOR COMPUTATION OF PERCEIVED RISK OF LANE CHANGE 8* FACTOR * 10 PERCENT OF DRIVERS WHO COOPERATE WITH A LANE CHANGER 50* % HEADWAY BELOW WHICH ALL DRIVERS WILL ATTEMPT TO CHANGE LANES 20* TENTHS OF A SECOND HEADWAY ABOVE WHICH NO DRIVERS WILL ATTEMPT TO CHANGE LANES 50* TENTHS OF A SECOND FORWARD DISTANCE SCANNED BY DRIVER FOR A TURN MOVEMENT / BUS STATION IN ORDER TO ASSESS NEED FOR A LANE CHANGE 300* / 91 FEET / [METERS] * INDICATES DEFAULT VALUES WERE SPECIFIED 1
52 1 EMBEDDED DATA CHANGES IN EFFECT SCALAR OR CHANGED BY ARRAY C O N T E N T S CARD TYPE SPLPCT LTLAGP
53 MAXIMUM ACCELERATION TABLE PERFORMANCE INDEX FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC GRADE CORRECTION FACTORS FOR ACCELERATION (USED BY FRESIM ONLY) PERFORMANCE INDEX FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC GRADE CORRECTION FACTORS FOR FUEL CONSUMPTION (USED BY FRESIM ONLY) PERFORMANCE INDEX FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC FT/SEC PROPERTIES OF BUS STATIONS DISTANCE FROM MEAN STATION LANE LINK UPSTREAM NODE CAPACITY DWELL TYPE PERCENT OF BUSES NO. SERVICED FEET / METERS (BUSES) (SEC) STOPPING 31 0 ( 10, 28) ( 28, 10) ( 89, 66) ( 66, 89) THE TYPE CODE IDENTIFIES THE APPLICABLE STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF DWELL TIME 1 BUS ROUTE PATHS ROUTE SEQUENCE OF NODES DEFINING PATH
54 BUS STATIONS BY ROUTE ROUTE SEQUENCE OF STATIONS SERVICED BY ROUTE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF BUS ROUTES ALLOWED 500 MAXIMUM NUMBER OF BUS MANEUVERS ALLOWED MAXIMUM NUMBER OF BUS STATIONS ALLOWED 99 1 BUS VOLUMES ROUTE VOLUME MEAN HEADWAY OFFSET (VEH/HR) (SEC) (SEC) ***** WARNING Unreasonable headway specified for route 1. Value input was 30. Check Record Type ***** WARNING Unreasonable headway specified for route 2. Value input was 30. Check Record Type **** THERE WERE 2 WARNING MESSAGES IN DATA. LINK ( 133, 1) ESTIMATED APPROACH SPEED FOR A TYPE 10 DRIVER = 57 FT/SEC; ACTUAL LENGTH = 50 FEET LINK ( 1, 133) ESTIMATED APPROACH SPEED FOR A TYPE 10 DRIVER = 57 FT/SEC; ACTUAL LENGTH = 50 FEET LINK ( 66, 112) ESTIMATED APPROACH SPEED FOR A TYPE 10 DRIVER = 57 FT/SEC; ACTUAL LENGTH = 54 FEET LINK ( 66, 113) ESTIMATED APPROACH SPEED FOR A TYPE 10 DRIVER = 57 FT/SEC; ACTUAL LENGTH = 55 FEET LINK ( 132, 1) ESTIMATED APPROACH SPEED FOR A TYPE 10 DRIVER = 57 FT/SEC; ACTUAL LENGTH = 50 FEET LINK ( 128, 6) ESTIMATED APPROACH SPEED FOR A TYPE 10 DRIVER = 57 FT/SEC; ACTUAL LENGTH = 50 FEET LINK ( 113, 66) ESTIMATED APPROACH SPEED FOR A TYPE 10 DRIVER = 57 FT/SEC; ACTUAL LENGTH = 55 FEET LINK ( 1, 132) ESTIMATED APPROACH SPEED FOR A TYPE 10 DRIVER = 57 FT/SEC; ACTUAL LENGTH = 50 FEET LINK ( 2, 124) ESTIMATED APPROACH SPEED FOR A TYPE 10 DRIVER = 57 FT/SEC; ACTUAL LENGTH = 50 FEET LINK ( 8, 101) ESTIMATED APPROACH SPEED FOR A TYPE 10 DRIVER = 57 FT/SEC; ACTUAL LENGTH = 50 FEET LINK ( 125, 8) ESTIMATED APPROACH SPEED FOR A TYPE 10 DRIVER = 57 FT/SEC; ACTUAL LENGTH = 52 FEET LINK ( 103, 2) ESTIMATED APPROACH SPEED FOR A TYPE 10 DRIVER = 57 FT/SEC; ACTUAL LENGTH = 50 FEET LINK ( 6, 100) ESTIMATED APPROACH SPEED FOR A TYPE 10 DRIVER = 57 FT/SEC; ACTUAL LENGTH = 50 FEET LINK ( 27, 119) ESTIMATED APPROACH SPEED FOR A TYPE 10 DRIVER = 57 FT/SEC; ACTUAL LENGTH = 55 FEET LINK ( 17, 103) ESTIMATED APPROACH SPEED FOR A TYPE 10 DRIVER = 57 FT/SEC; ACTUAL LENGTH = 53 FEET LINK ( 105, 27) ESTIMATED APPROACH SPEED FOR A TYPE 10 DRIVER = 57 FT/SEC; ACTUAL LENGTH = 50 FEET LINK ( 10, 104) ESTIMATED APPROACH SPEED FOR A TYPE 10 DRIVER = 57 FT/SEC; ACTUAL LENGTH = 50 FEET BASED ON ESTIMATED APPROACH SPEEDS THESE LINKS MAY BE TOO SHORT. THEY NEED TO BE AT LEAST AS LONG AS A TYPE 10 DRIVER CAN TRAVEL IN ONE SECOND. OTHER FACTORS SUCH AS CONTROL DEVICES MAY REDUCE THE APPROACH SPEEDS AND THEREFORE REDUCE THE REQUIRED MINIMUM LINK LENGTHS. IN THAT CASE THIS WARNING CAN BE IGNORED. SHORT LINKS CAN CAUSE UNPREDICTABLE RESULTS INCLUDING FATAL ERRORS. 1 INITIALIZATION STATISTICS TIME INTERVAL SUBNETWORK PRIOR CONTENT CURRENT CONTENT PERCENT NUMBER TYPE (VEHICLES) (VEHICLES) DIFFERENCE 1 NETSIM NETSIM NETSIM INITIALIZATION TIME EXHAUSTED, SIMULATION WILL BE PERFORMED ANYWAY 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 89, 66) STARTS 219 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 89, 66) ENDS 231 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 12 SECONDS 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 89, 66) STARTS 255 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 89, 66) ENDS 268 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 13 SECONDS 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 89, 66) STARTS 272 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION
55 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 89, 66) ENDS 273 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 1 SECONDS 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 89, 66) STARTS 284 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 89, 66) ENDS 290 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 6 SECONDS 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 123, 124) STARTS 635 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 123, 124) ENDS 637 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 2 SECONDS 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 123, 124) STARTS 667 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 123, 124) ENDS 668 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 1 SECONDS 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 123, 124) STARTS 669 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 123, 124) ENDS 673 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 4 SECONDS 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 123, 124) STARTS 742 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 123, 124) ENDS 745 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 3 SECONDS 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 132, 99) STARTS 774 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 132, 99) ENDS 775 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 1 SECONDS 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 120, 119) STARTS 819 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 120, 119) ENDS 821 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 2 SECONDS 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 120, 119) STARTS 822 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 120, 119) ENDS 824 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 2 SECONDS 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 106, 113) STARTS 878 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 106, 113) ENDS 881 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 3 SECONDS 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 106, 113) STARTS 882 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION 0 SPILLBACK ON NETSIM LINK ( 106, 113) ENDS 884 SECONDS INTO SIMULATION AFTER A DURATION OF 2 SECONDS
56 1 NETSIM PERSON MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS LINK PERSON PERSON DELAY TRAVEL TIME MILE TRIPS PERSON-MIN PERSON-MIN ( 5, 6) ( 6, 5) ( 7, 6) ( 6, 7) ( 8, 7) ( 9, 2) ( 2, 9) ( 9, 10) ( 10, 9) ( 4, 11) ( 132, 1) ( 132, 11) ( 11, 4) ( 12, 11) ( 13, 12) ( 2, 16) ( 16, 8) ( 8, 16) ( 103, 2) ( 16, 2) ( 17, 18) ( 18, 19) ( 104, 19) ( 19, 20) ( 20, 21) ( 15, 22) ( 22, 17) ( 20, 22) ( 101, 23) ( 22, 23) ( 19, 24) ( 3, 27) ( 27, 3) ( 10, 28) ( 28, 27) ( 27, 28) ( 28, 10) ( 105, 27) ( 133, 29) ( 133, 1) ( 29, 30) ( 30, 29) ( 30, 31) ( 31, 30) NETSIM PERSON MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS LINK PERSON PERSON DELAY TRAVEL TIME MILE TRIPS PERSON-MIN PERSON-MIN ( 29, 32) ( 32, 35) ( 30, 33)
CE351 Transportation Systems: Planning and Design
CE351 Transportation Systems: Planning and Design TOPIC: Level of Service (LOS) at Traffic Signals 1 Course Outline Introduction to Transportation Highway Users and their Performance Geometric Design Pavement
More informationCHAPTER 3. CAPACITY OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
CHAPTER 3. CAPACITY OF SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 1. Overview In this chapter we explore the models on which the HCM capacity analysis method for signalized intersections are based. While the method has
More informationMnDOT Method for Calculating Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) From CORSIM Model Output
MnDOT Method for Calculating Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) From CORSIM Model Output Rev. April 29, 2005 MnDOT Method for Calculating Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) From CORSIM Model Output Table of
More informationChapter 5 Traffic Flow Characteristics
Chapter 5 Traffic Flow Characteristics 1 Contents 2 Introduction The Nature of Traffic Flow Approaches to Understanding Traffic Flow Parameters Connected with Traffic Flow Categories of Traffic Flow The
More informationJEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH Telephone:
JEP John E. Jack Pflum, P.E. Consulting Engineering 7541 Hosbrook Road, Cincinnati, OH 45243 Email: jackpflum1@gmail.com Telephone: 513.919.7814 MEMORANDUM REPORT Traffic Impact Analysis Proposed Soccer
More information1 h. Page 1 of 12 FINAL EXAM FORMULAS. Stopping Sight Distance. (2 ) N st U Where N=sample size s=standard deviation t=z value for confidence level
Page 1 of 12 FINAL EXAM FORMULAS Stopping Sight Distance 2 2 V V d 1.47Vt 1.075 i f a 2 2 Vi Vf d 1.47Vt 30( f 0.01 G) Where d = distance (ft) V = speed (mph) t = time (sec) a=deceleration rate (ft/sec
More informationWEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project
WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Single Family Residential Project WEBER ROAD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary Page 2.0 Introduction 2.1 DEVELOPMENT
More informationCHAPTER 5 DELAY ESTIMATION FOR OVERSATURATED SIGNALIZED APPROACHES
CHAPTER 5 DELAY ESTIMATION FOR OVERSATURATED SIGNALIZED APPROACHES Delay is an important measure of effectiveness in traffic studies, as it presents the direct cost of fuel consumption and indirect cost
More informationKINEMATICS WHERE ARE YOU? HOW FAST? VELOCITY OR SPEED WHEN YOU MOVE. Typical Cartesian Coordinate System. usually only the X and Y axis.
KINEMATICS File:The Horse in Motion.jpg - Wikimedia Foundation 1 WHERE ARE YOU? Typical Cartesian Coordinate System usually only the X and Y axis meters File:3D coordinate system.svg - Wikimedia Foundation
More informationTraffic signal design-ii
CHAPTER 4. TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN-II NPTEL May 3, 007 Chapter 4 Traffic signal design-ii 4.1 Overview In the previous chapter, a simple design of cycle time was discussed. Here we will discuss how the cycle
More informationAnalytical Delay Models for Signalized Intersections
Analytical Delay Models for Signalized Intersections Ali Payidar Akgungor and A. Graham R. Bullen INTRODUCTION Delay is the most important measure of effectiveness (MOE) at a signalized intersection because
More informationDesign Priciples of Traffic Signal
Design Priciples of Traffic Signal Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering Prof. Tom V. Mathew Contents 1 Overview 1 2 Definitions and notations 2 3 Phase design 3 3.1 Two phase signals.................................
More informationKINEMATICS. File:The Horse in Motion.jpg - Wikimedia Foundation. Monday, June 17, 13
KINEMATICS File:The Horse in Motion.jpg - Wikimedia Foundation 1 WHERE ARE YOU? Typical Cartesian Coordinate System usually only the X and Y axis meters File:3D coordinate system.svg - Wikimedia Foundation
More information2.1 Traffic Stream Characteristics. Time Space Diagram and Measurement Procedures Variables of Interest
2.1 Traffic Stream Characteristics Time Space Diagram and Measurement Procedures Variables of Interest Traffic Stream Models 2.1 Traffic Stream Characteristics Time Space Diagram Speed =100km/h = 27.78
More informationFUNDAMENTALS OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING By Jon D. Fricker and Robert K. Whitford
FUNDAMENTALS OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING By Jon D. Fricker and Robert K. Whitford This table includes typos Dr. Saito found besides the ones listed in the authors official errata sheet. Please note that
More informationCHAPTER 2. CAPACITY OF TWO-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS
CHAPTER 2. CAPACITY OF TWO-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS 1. Overview In this chapter we will explore the models on which the HCM capacity analysis method for two-way stop-controlled (TWSC) intersections
More informationh CIVIL ENGINEERING FLUID MECHANICS section. ± G = percent grade divided by 100 (uphill grade "+")
FLUID MECHANICS section. TRANSPORTATION U.S. Customary Units a = deceleration rate (ft/sec ) A = absolute value of algebraic difference in grades (%) e = superelevation (%) f = side friction factor ± G
More informationSignalized Intersections
Signalized Intersections Kelly Pitera October 23, 2009 Topics to be Covered Introduction/Definitions D/D/1 Queueing Phasing and Timing Plan Level of Service (LOS) Signal Optimization Conflicting Operational
More informationThe Highline Development Traffic Impact Study
The Highline Development Traffic Impact Study Columbia Falls, Montana Prepared For: TD&H Engineering 450 Corporate Drive, Suite 101 Kalispell, MT 59901 June, 2018 130 South Howie Street Helena, Montana
More informationMEMORANDUM. The study area of the analysis was discussed with City staff and includes the following intersections:
MEMORANDUM DATE: JULY 6, 2012 TO: FROM: RE: CC: MELANIE KNIGHT BRAD BYVELDS/ JENNIFER LUONG 1050 SOMERSET STREET PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS OUR FILE NO. 111152 NEIL MALHOTRA The purpose of this memo
More informationTraffic flow theory involves the development of mathematical relationships among
CHAPTER 6 Fundamental Principles of Traffic Flow Traffic flow theory involves the development of mathematical relationships among the primary elements of a traffic stream: flow, density, and speed. These
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Platte Canyon Villas Arapahoe County, Colorado (Arapahoe County Case Number: Z16-001) For
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For Platte Canyon Villas Arapahoe County, Colorado (Arapahoe County Case Number: Z16-001) February 2015 Revised: August 2015 April 2016 July 2016 September 2016 Prepared for: KB Home
More informationActive Traffic & Safety Management System for Interstate 77 in Virginia. Chris McDonald, PE VDOT Southwest Regional Operations Director
Active Traffic & Safety Management System for Interstate 77 in Virginia Chris McDonald, PE VDOT Southwest Regional Operations Director Interstate 77 at Fancy Gap Mountain Mile markers 0-15 Built in late
More informationCVS Derwood. Local Area Transportation Review
CVS Derwood Montgomery County, Maryland May 27, 2016 Local Area Transportation Review Prepared for: JC Bar Properties, Inc. Steve Fleming, PE 415 Fallowfield Road, Suite 301 Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011
More informationTo convert a speed to a velocity. V = Velocity in feet per seconds (ft/sec) S = Speed in miles per hour (mph) = Mathematical Constant
To convert a speed to a velocity V S ( 1.466) V Velocity in feet per seconds (ft/sec) S Speed in miles per hour (mph) 1.466 Mathematical Constant Example Your driver just had a rear-end accident and says
More informationCONTINUING PLANNING PROGRAM LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC DATA PRODUCT REPORT [OH Corridors]
CONTINUING PLANNING PROGRAM LOCAL TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC DATA PRODUCT REPORT [OH Corridors] Travel Time and Delay Analysis for Belpre (OH) and Marietta (OH) Fiscal Year 2009 Report WOOD WASHINGTON
More informationAssignment 4:Rail Analysis and Stopping/Passing Distances
CEE 3604: Introduction to Transportation Engineering Fall 2012 Date Due: September 28, 2012 Assignment 4:Rail Analysis and Stopping/Passing Distances Instructor: Trani Problem 1 You are ased to evaluate
More informationOrganized Chain-Up and VSL
Organized Chain-Up and VSL Jim Mahugh, PE WSDOT SC Region Traffic Engineer North/West Passage VSL Peer Exchange January 28, 2015 Snoqualmie Pass 2 Limits of VSL EB: MP 48.12 to 66.56 WB: MP 46.69 to 66.90
More informationTRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY WHEELER STREET CLOSURE
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY WHEELER STREET CLOSURE Village of Greene, Chenango County, New York Prepared for: VILLAGE OF GREENE 49 Genesee Street Greene, NY 13778 Prepared by: LARSON DESIGN GROUP 1000
More informationRoundabout Level of Service
Roundabout Level of Service Rahmi Akçelik Director Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd email: rahmi.akcelik@sidrasolutions.com web: www.sidrasolutions.com 8 January 2009 Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Fundamental
More informationSubject: Desert Palisades Specific Plan - Tram Way Access Sight Distance
Endo Engineering Traffic Engineering Air Quality Studies Noise Assessments July 13, 2015 Mr. Ed Freeman Pinnacle View, LLC P.O. Box 1754 Lake Oswego, OR 97035-0579 Subject: Desert Palisades Specific Plan
More informationChecklist: Deposing the Driver in an Auto Accident
Checklist: Deposing the Driver in an Auto Accident 1. PERSONAL BACKGROUND All names ever used Present and past residences for 10 years If the deponent has rented a residence, get the name and address of
More information[LLNVS01000 L EA0000 LVRCF A 18X MO# ] Notice of Temporary Closure of Public Land in Clark County, Nevada
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 03/07/2019 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2019-04135, and on govinfo.gov 4310-HC DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
More informationTraffic Progression Models
Traffic Progression Models Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering Prof. Tom V. Mathew Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Characterizing Platoon 2 2.1 Variables describing platoon............................
More informationUncertainty in the Yellow Change Interval
Uncertainty in the Yellow Change Interval Abstract The difference between legal and illegal when it comes to running a red light is not black and white. Engineering is never exact. Tolerance is routine
More informationDOLLAR GENERAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (REVISED) May 20, 2015
DOLLAR GENERAL PROJECT FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (REVISED) May 20, 2015 May 20, 2015 Mr. Dan Biswas, VP of Development CJS DEVELOPMENT II, LLC 5111 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 200 Scottsdale, CA 85250
More informationSignalized Intersection Delay Models
Transportation System Engineering 56. Signalized Intersection Delay Models Chapter 56 Signalized Intersection Delay Models 56.1 Introduction Signalized intersections are the important points or nodes within
More informationFY 2010 Continuing i Planning Program Product Report. Local Transportation and Traffic Data. Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission
FY 2010 Continuing i Planning Program Product Report Local Transportation and Traffic Data Travel Time and Delay Data for Belpre and Marietta, Ohio Wood-Washington-Wirt Interstate Planning Commission CONTINUING
More informationMADISON, WI STONE HOUSE DEVELOPMENT 1000 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION STUDY DECEMBER 14, 2015
MADISON, WI STONE HOUSE DEVELOPMENT 1000 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION STUDY DECEMBER 14, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS... 3 Proposed Development... 3 Methodology... 3 Phase 1 Development...
More informationTRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY MANUFACTURING COMPANY
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For MANUFACTURING COMPANY Prepared For: Airway Heights, WA Prepared By: SUNBURST ENGINEERING, P. S. 4310 S. Ball Dr. Veradale, WA 99037 April, 2013 TRAFFIC IMP ACT STUDY Manufacturing
More informationFDOT Level 2 Roundabout b/c Evaluation
FDOT Level 2 Roundabout b/c Evaluation This spreadsheet tool compares the cost of a roundabout to the cost of a traditional intersection, as specified by the user. A traditional intersection is defined
More information1.225 Transportation Flow Systems Quiz (December 17, 2001; Duration: 3 hours)
1.225 Transportation Flow Systems Quiz (December 17, 2001; Duration: 3 hours) Student Name: Alias: Instructions: 1. This exam is open-book 2. No cooperation is permitted 3. Please write down your name
More informationCalifornia Urban Infill Trip Generation Study. Jim Daisa, P.E.
California Urban Infill Trip Generation Study Jim Daisa, P.E. What We Did in the Study Develop trip generation rates for land uses in urban areas of California Establish a California urban land use trip
More informationAKTIVE SICHERHEIT 4.0. Prof. K. Kompass, Dr. S. Nitsche April 2017
AKTIVE SICHERHEIT 4.0 Prof. K. Kompass, Dr. S. Nitsche April 2017 L e v e l of p e r f o r m a n c e ASSISTED AND AUTOMATED DRIVING HIGHER LEVELS OF AUTOMATION ACTIVE SAFETY L e v e l of a u t o m a t
More informationApproved Corrections and Changes for the Highway Capacity Manual 2000
Approved Corrections and Changes for the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 Updated 7/8/2005 Previous update 2/27/2004 TRB Committee AHB40, Highway Capacity and Quality of Service Unless stated otherwise, corrections
More informationChapter 13. Editing Intermediate Files. Overview
Chapter 13 Editing Intermediate Files Overview The SACPRE intermediate file is an ASCII file that contains records or lines of information. In SACPRE and HEC-1 each record represents a command for the
More informationCE351 Transportation Systems: Planning and Design
CE351 Transportation Systems: Planning and Design TOPIC: HIGHWAY USERS PERFORMANCE (Part III) 1 ANOUNCEMENT Updated d Schedule on: http://wiki.cecs.pdx.edu/bin/view/main/slidesce 351 Course Outline Introduction
More informationAppendix C Traffic Study
Final Environmental Impact Statement Appendix C Traffic Study Schofield Generating Station Project, Hawaii October 2015 C-1 Final Environmental Impact Statement This page intentionally left blank. Schofield
More informationLIC SR INTERCHANGE OPERATIONS STUDY
LIC SR 16 18.20 - INTERCHANGE OPERATIONS STUDY Project Summary Location SR 16 & W. Church St. Interchange Newark, Ohio Licking County PID 99478 Study Sponsor ODOT District 5 Proposed Work Add Left Turn
More informationMarch Grade Crossing Analysis
March 2014 Grade Crossing Analysis T E C H N I C A L M E M O R A N D U M South Florida Freight and Passenger Rail Enhancement Study Phase 1A - Rehabilitate Existing Northwood Connection; FPID: 434948-1
More informationTypical information required from the data collection can be grouped into four categories, enumerated as below.
Chapter 6 Data Collection 6.1 Overview The four-stage modeling, an important tool for forecasting future demand and performance of a transportation system, was developed for evaluating large-scale infrastructure
More informationVIRGINIA S I-77 VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT SYSTEM FOR LOW VISIBILITY CONDITIONS
VIRGINIA S I-77 VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT SYSTEM FOR LOW VISIBILITY CONDITIONS Christopher D. McDonald, PE, PTOE Regional Operations Director, Southwest Region NRITS and ITS Arizona Annual Conference October
More informationModeling Driver Behavior During Merge Maneuvers
Southwest Region University Transportation Center Modeling Driver Behavior During Merge Maneuvers SWUTC/98/472840-00064-1 Center for Transportation Research University of Texas at Austin 3208 Red River,
More informationNATHAN HALE HIGH SCHOOL PARKING AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. Table of Contents
Parking and Traffic Analysis Seattle, WA Prepared for: URS Corporation 1501 4th Avenue, Suite 1400 Seattle, WA 98101-1616 Prepared by: Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering 11410 NE 122nd Way, Suite
More informationCEE 320 Midterm Examination (50 minutes)
CEE 320 Midterm Examination (50 minutes) Fall 2009 Please write your name on this cover. Please write your last name on all other exam pages This exam is NOT open book, but you are allowed to use one 8.5x11
More informationVertical Curve Profile Views. Vertical Alignment Fundamentals. Offsets. Offset Formulas 9/17/2009
9/17/009 Vertical Alignment Fundamentals Vertical Curve Profile Views CE 3 Transportation Engineering Dr. Ahmed Abdel-Rahim, Ph.D., P.E. Fig. 3.3 Fig. 3.4 Offsets Offsets are vertical distances from initial
More informationPLAZA MEXICO RESIDENCES
PLAZA MEXICO RESIDENCES TRAFFIC STUDY PREPARED FOR: 3000 E. IMPERIAL, LLC. 6940 Beach Boulevard, D-501 Buena Park, California 90621 PREPARED BY: OCTOBER 5, 2017 translutions the transportatio n solutions
More informationBROOKINGS May
Appendix 1. Technical Methodology This study combines detailed data on transit systems, demographics, and employment to determine the accessibility of jobs via transit within and across the country s 100
More informationSensitivity of estimates of travel distance and travel time to street network data quality
Sensitivity of estimates of travel distance and travel time to street network data quality Paul Zandbergen Department of Geography University of New Mexico Outline Street network quality Approaches to
More informationEvaluation of fog-detection and advisory-speed system
Evaluation of fog-detection and advisory-speed system A. S. Al-Ghamdi College of Engineering, King Saud University, P. O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia Abstract Highway safety is a major concern
More informationCITY OF NEW LONDON WINTER ROAD & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE POLICY
CITY OF NEW LONDON WINTER ROAD & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE POLICY GENERAL The purpose of this policy is to set up acceptable procedures and policies for the winter maintenance of public areas in the City of
More informationAppendix BAL Baltimore, Maryland 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability
(http://mobility.tamu.edu/mmp) Office of Operations, Federal Highway Administration Appendix BAL Baltimore, Maryland 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability This report is a supplement to:
More informationApril 10, Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213
Mr. Curt Van De Walle, City Manager City of Castle Hills 209 Lemonwood Drive Castle Hills, Texas 78213 Subject: Revised Castle Hills BASIS Charter School Traffic Impact Analysis Review City of Castle Hills,
More informationSignalized Intersection Delay Models
Chapter 35 Signalized Intersection Delay Models 35.1 Introduction Signalized intersections are the important points or nodes within a system of highways and streets. To describe some measure of effectiveness
More informationTraffic and Road Monitoring and Management System for Smart City Environment
Traffic and Road Monitoring and Management System for Smart City Environment Cyrel Ontimare Manlises Mapua Institute of Technology Manila, Philippines IoT on Traffic Law Enforcement to Vehicles with the
More informationTahlequah Public Schools Inclement Weather Transportation Plan
Tahlequah Public Schools Inclement Weather Transportation Plan Inclement Weather with Ice and Snow From time to time throughout the school year, weather may force a change in the District s normal operating
More informationKinematics II Mathematical Analysis of Motion
AP Physics Kinematics II Mathematical Analysis of Motion Introduction: Everything in the universe is in a state of motion. It might seem impossible to find a simple way to describe and understand the motion
More informationGIS ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
GIS ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY No longer the exclusive domain of cartographers, computer-assisted drawing technicians, mainframes, and workstations, geographic information system (GIS) mapping has migrated to
More informationEVALUATION OF SAFETY PERFORMANCES ON FREEWAY DIVERGE AREA AND FREEWAY EXIT RAMPS. Transportation Seminar February 16 th, 2009
EVALUATION OF SAFETY PERFORMANCES ON FREEWAY DIVERGE AREA AND FREEWAY EXIT RAMPS Transportation Seminar February 16 th, 2009 By: Hongyun Chen Graduate Research Assistant 1 Outline Introduction Problem
More informationWeather Information for Road Managers
Weather Information for Road Managers by Paul A. Pisano, Lynette C. Goodwin and Andrew D. Stern How Does Weather Affect Roads? The complex interactions between weather and roads have major affects on traffic
More informationPotential Issues with Advance Preemption. Roelof Engelbrecht Texas Transportation Institute
1 Potential Issues with Advance Preemption Roelof Engelbrecht Texas Transportation Institute 2 Rail Preemption Designed to transfer right-of-way to the track movement and clear vehicles off the track(s)
More informationData Collection. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1
Data Collection Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering Prof. Tom V. Mathew Contents 1 Overview 1 2 Survey design 2 2.1 Information needed................................. 2 2.2 Study area.....................................
More informationA Hierarchical Model-based Optimization Control Method for Merging of Connected Automated Vehicles. Na Chen, Meng Wang, Tom Alkim, Bart van Arem
A Hierarchical Model-based Optimization Control Method for Merging of Connected Automated Vehicles Na Chen, Meng Wang, Tom Alkim, Bart van Arem 1 Background Vehicle-to-Vehicle communication Vehicle-to-Infrastructure
More informationVehicle Motion Equations:
1 Vehicle Motion Equations: v = at + v (2.2.4) x x = v2 2 v 2a (2.2.6) v 2 = v 2 + 2a(x x ) (2.2.6) x = 1 2 at2 + v t + x (2.2.7) D b = x cos α (2.2.10) x = vt D b = v 2 v 2 2g(f G) (2.2.14) e + f s =
More informationEstimating Transportation Demand, Part 2
Transportation Decision-making Principles of Project Evaluation and Programming Estimating Transportation Demand, Part 2 K. C. Sinha and S. Labi Purdue University School of Civil Engineering 1 Estimating
More informationSignalized Intersection Delay Models
Signalized Intersection Delay Models Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering Prof. Tom V. Mathew Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Types of delay 2 2.1 Stopped Time Delay................................
More informationS.170 th Street Micro-Simulation Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Port of Seattle/Aviation Planning
Seattle-acoma International Airport Port of Seattle/Aviation Planning Port of Seattle PO OF SEAE Aviation Planning Airport Operations January 24, 2013 Summary he Port is planning to relocate the cell phone
More informationTraffic Signal Timing: Green Time. CVEN 457 & 696 Lecture #18 Gene Hawkins
Traffic Signal Timing: Green Time CVEN 457 & 696 Lecture #18 Gene Hawkins The Problem N 25 134 77 128 643 216 181 517 171 111 154 56 NBLT = 181 vph NBTR = 688* vph SBLT = 216 vph SBTR = 771* vph WB = 321*
More informationFIELD MANUAL FOR CONFIGURING TRAFFIC-RESPONSIVE CONTROL ON TxDOT CLOSED-LOOP SYSTEMS
FIELD MANUAL FOR CONFIGURING TRAFFIC-RESPONSIVE CONTROL ON TxDOT CLOSED-LOOP SYSTEMS by Geza Pesti, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Research Engineer Texas Transportation Institute Nadeem Chaudhary, Ph.D., P.E.
More informationNational Rural ITS Conference 2006
National Rural ITS Conference 2006 Design of Automated Variable Speed Limits and Lane Assignments in Rural Areas Presented by: Tom Blaine P. E., POE New Mexico Department of Transportation Intelligent
More informationKinematics II Mathematical Analysis of Motion
AP Physics-B Kinematics II Mathematical Analysis of Motion Introduction: Everything in the universe is in a state of motion. It might seem impossible to find a simple way to describe and understand the
More informationTraffic Flow Theory & Simulation
Traffic Flow Theory & Simulation S.P. Hoogendoorn Lecture 4 Shockwave theory Shockwave theory I: Introduction Applications of the Fundamental Diagram February 14, 2010 1 Vermelding onderdeel organisatie
More informationTime Space Diagrams for Thirteen Shock Waves
Time Space Diagrams for Thirteen Shock Waves Benjamin Coifman Institute of Transportation Studies 19 McLaughlin Hall University of California Berkeley, CA 9472 zephyr@eecs.berkeley.edu http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~zephyr
More informationCritchfield Rd / SR-129
NOVEMBER 27, 2017 Critchfield Rd / SR-129 Intersection Safety Study Alternatives Report CRITCHFIELD INTERSECTION SAFETY STUDY Contents Introduction...1 Purpose...2 Existing Conditions...2 Proposed Alternatives...2
More informationSite-Specific Stochastic Study of
Site-Specific Stochastic Study of Multiple Truck Presence on Highway Bridges Peter Morales Grad. Research Assist Mayrai Gindy Ph.D Principal Investigator 2007 UPRM URI Summer Interchange Program Program
More informationSUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS. October 29, Mr. Carter Redish Carter Group Architects, Inc S. El Camino Real, Suite F San Clemente, CA 92672
October 29, 2018 Mr. Carter Redish Carter Group Architects, Inc. 1810 S. El Camino Real, Suite F San Clemente, CA 92672 SUBJECT: CANYON STEEL FOCUSED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Dear Mr. Carter Redish: Urban
More informationAirline Road: is a two lane residential roadway adjacent to the west side of the proposed school site with a speed limit of 30 mph.
HIGHLAND PARK ISD TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REPORT FOR PROPOSED HPISD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE ON NORTHWEST HIGHWAY BETWEEN AIRLINE ROAD AND DURHAM IN THE CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS PURPOSE OF STUDY The purpose of
More informationAppendix C Final Methods and Assumptions for Forecasting Traffic Volumes
Fairview Ave. and Main St. Improvements and Local Streets Plan Appendices Ada County Highway District Appendix C Final Methods and Assumptions for Forecasting Traffic Volumes January 3, 207 Appendices
More informationMonitoring Scour Critical Bridges During Floods For Local Bridge Owners. Presented by
Monitoring Scour Critical Bridges During Floods For Local Bridge Owners Presented by SAFETY FIRST DO NOT ENDANGER YOURSELF OR OTHERS WHILE MONITORING BRIDGES DO NOT ENTER FLOOD WATERS FLOOD WATERS INCLUDE
More informationCITY OF EAST PEORIA SNOW AND ICE CONTROL PROGRAM INTRODUCTION
CITY OF EAST PEORIA SNOW AND ICE CONTROL PROGRAM INTRODUCTION The responsibility for providing snow and ice control on East Peoria s 240 lane miles of streets and alleys rests with the Street Divisions
More informationAPPENDIX IV MODELLING
APPENDIX IV MODELLING Kingston Transportation Master Plan Final Report, July 2004 Appendix IV: Modelling i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 OBJECTIVE... 1 3.0 URBAN TRANSPORTATION MODELLING
More information[LLAZC X.L EA0000; AZ SRP ] Notice of Temporary Closures: Selected Public Lands in La Paz County, AZ
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/29/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-28217, and on FDsys.gov 4310-32 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau
More informationThe PEAC-WMD Gamma Radiation Dose Calculator
The PEAC-WMD Gamma Radiation Dose Calculator During the last couple of months newsletters I ve discussed some of the new computational tools included in the PEAC-WMD 2007 (v5.5) application. This month
More informationUsing High-Resolution Detector and Signal Data to Support Crash Identification and Reconstruction. Indrajit Chatterjee Gary Davis May, 2011
Using High-Resolution Detector and Signal Data to Support Crash Identification and Reconstruction Indrajit Chatterjee Gary Davis May, 2011 Introduction Road accidents are complex phenomenon. Causal factors
More informationEstimation of Measures of Effectiveness Based on Connected Vehicle Data
Estimation of Measures of Effectiveness Based on Connected Vehicle Data Juan Argote, Eleni Christofa, Yiguang Xuan, and Alexander Skabardonis Abstract Vehicle-infrastructure cooperation via the Connected
More informationH IG HWAY WINTER OPERATIONS SNOW REMOVAL AND ICE CONTROL POLICY. Revised January 4, 2016
! H IG HWAY WINTER OPERATIONS SNOW REMOVAL AND ICE CONTROL POLICY Adopted January 11, 2010 Revised January 4, 2016 Pol icy It is the goal and intent of the Town of Sullivan to provide timely, efficient
More informationSession 6: and Evaluation. M c Farland Management, LLC
Session 6: Performance Measurement and Evaluation State of the Practice Overview 1 Why Evaluate WRTM Strategies Understand system performance and benefits Specific benefits directly attributable to WRTM
More informationTraffic Impact Study
Traffic Impact Study Statham DRI One University Parkway Prepared for: Barrow County Prepared by: October 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary i Section 1. Introduction 1 Project Description 1 Methodology
More informationCity of Saginaw Right of Way Division Snow and Ice Removal Policy January 18, 2016
Snow and Ice Removal Policy January 18, 2016 It is the policy of the to provide snowplowing and ice removal services in order to: Provide safe traveling conditions for motorists and pedestrians Assist
More informationFlow and Capacity Characteristics on Two-Lane Rural Highways
128 TRANSPORTATON RESEARCH RECORD 1320 Flow and Capacity Characteristics on Two-Lane Rural Highways ABSHA PoLus, JosEPH CRAus, AND MosHE LrvNEH Traffic operation on two-lane rural highways is unique; no
More information