Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd."

Transcription

1 Client: Project: Wind Speed. Reference: EXTREME MARQUEES PTY. LTD. Design check 6m, 8m, 10m, 12m Event Standard Tents (5m Bay) for 80km/hr Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked by: EAB Date: 18/11/2016 JOB NO: E

2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction Design Restrictions and Limitations Specifications General Aluminium Properties Buckling Constants Section Properties Design Loads Ultimate Load Combinations Serviceability Ultimate Wind Analysis Parameters Pressure Coefficients (C fig) Pressure summary Wind Load Diagrams Wind 1(case 1) Wind 1(case 2) Wind 2(Case1) Wind 2(case 2) Max Bending Moment due to critical load combination in major axis Max Bending Moment in minor axis due to critical load combination Max Shear in due to critical load combination Max Axial force in upright support and roof beam due to critical load combination Max reactions Summary Table: Checking Members Based on AS ALUMINIUM LSD Rafter Upright Supports Gable Pole Ridge & Eave Purlin Gable Beam Intermediate Purlin Brace Summary Conclusions Appendix A Base Anchorage Requirements Appendix B Hold Down Method Details P a g e

3 1 Introduction This Certification is the sole property for copyright to Mr. Ted Bennett of Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. The following structural drawings and calculations are for the transportable tents supplied by Extreme Marquees. The frame consists principally of extruded 6061-T6 aluminium components with hot dipped galvanized steel ridge and knee connection inserts and base plate. The report examines the effect of 3s gust wind of 80 km/hr on 12m 15m Event Standard Tent as the worst-case scenario. The relevant Australian Standards AS1170.0:2002 General principles, AS1170.1:2002 Permanent, imposed and other actions and AS1170.2:2011 Wind actions are used. The design check is in accordance with AS/NZS :1997 Aluminum limit state design. 3 P a g e

4 2 Design Restrictions and Limitations 2.1 The erected structure is for temporary use only. 2.2 It should be noted that if high gust wind speeds are anticipated or forecast in the locality of the tent, the temporary erected structure should be dismantled. 2.3 For forecast winds in excess of (refer to summary) all fabric shall be removed from the frames, and the structure should be completely dismantled. (Please note that the locality squall or gust wind speed is affected by factors such as terrain exposure and site elevations.) 2.4 The structure may only be erected in regions with wind classifications no greater than the limits specified on the attached wind analysis. 2.5 The wind classifications are based upon Terrain Category 2. Considerations have also been made to the regional wind terrain category, topographical location and site shielding from adjacent structures. Please note that in many instances topographical factors such as a location on the crest of a hill or on top of an escarpment may yield a higher wind speed classification than that derived for a higher wind terrain category in a level topographical region. For this reason, particular regard shall be paid to the topographical location of the structure. For localities which do not conform to the standard prescribed descriptions for wind classes as defined above, a qualified Structural Engineer may be employed to determine an appropriate wind class for that the particular site. 2.6 The structures in no circumstances shall ever be erected in tropical or severe tropical cyclonic condition as defined on the Map of Australia in AS , Figure The tent structure has not been designed to withstand snow and ice loadings such as when erected in alpine regions. 2.8 For the projects, where the site conditions approach the design limits, extra consideration should be given to pullout tests of the stakes and professional assessment of the appropriate wind classification for the site. 2.9 The tents are stabilized as using roof/wall cross bracing at end bays and every third bay in between as shown on the drawings It is important to use 60x60x2 profile for all intermediate purlins with spacing not exceeding 1300mm. This means 8 intermediate purlins are required per bay for the 12m tent structure (as illustrated) It is important to use 120x68x3 profile for all gable poles. 4 P a g e

5 3 Specifications 3.1 General Tent category Material Aluminum 6061-T6 Size 12m x 12m Model Event Standard 5 P a g e

6 3.2 Aluminium Properties Aluminium Properties Compressive yield strength Fcy 241 MPa Tensile yeild strength Fty 241 MPa Tensile ultimate strength Ftu 262 MPa Shear yield strength Fsy 138 MPa Bearing yeild strength Fby 386 MPa Bearing ultimate strength Fbu 552 MPa Yield stress (min{fcy:fty}) Fy 241 MPa Elastic modulus E MPa Shear modulus G MPa Value of coefficients kt 1.00 kc 1.00 Capacity factor (general yield) φy 0.95 Capacity factor (ultimate) φu 0.85 Capacity factor (bending) φb 0.85 Capacity factor (elastic shear buckling) φv 0.8 Capacity factor (inelastic shear buckling) φvp Buckling Constants Type of member and stresses Intercept, MPa Slope, MPa Intersection Compression in columns and beam flanges BC= Dc= 1.43 Cc= Compression in flat plates Bp= Dp= 2.06 Cp= Compressive bending stress in solid rectangular bars Bbr= Dbr= 4.57 Cbr= Compressive bending stress in round tubes Btb= Dtb= Ctb= Shear stress in flat plates Bs= Ds= 0.90 Cs= P a g e

7 3.4 Section Properties MEMBER(S) Section b d t yc Ag Zx Zy Sx Sy Ix Iy J rx ry mm mm mm mm mm 2 mm 3 mm 3 mm 3 mm 3 mm 4 mm 4 mm 4 mm mm Rafter 120X68X Upright Support 120X68X Gable Pole 120X68X Ridge & Eave Purlin 85X102X Gable Beam 85X102X Intermediate Purlin 60X60X Brace Design Loads 4.1 Ultimate Live Self weight Q G Distributed load (kpa) Design load factor (-) Factored imposed load (kpa) self weight 1.35, 1.2, self weight, 0.9 self weight 3s 80km/hr gust W C fig C fig 4.2 Load Combinations Serviceability Gravity = 1.0 G Wind = 1.0 G W 7 P a g e

8 4.2.2 Ultimate Downward = 1.35 G = 1.2 G + W u = 1.2 G + W u +W IS Upward = 0.9 G + W u 0.9 G + W u+w IP 5 Wind Analysis Wind towards surface (+ve), away from surface (-ve) Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. 5.1 Parameters Terrain category = 2 Site wind speed (V sit,β) = V RM d(m z,catm sm t) V R = 22.22m/s (80 km/hr) M d = 1 M s = 1 M t = 1 M z,cat = 0.91 (regional 3 s gust wind speed) (Table 4.1(B) AS1170.2) V sit,β = m/s Height of structure (h) = 3.7 m Width of structure (w) = 12 m Length of structure (l) = 15 m (mid of peak and eave) Pressure (P) = 0.5ρ air (V sit,β) 2 C fig C dyn = 0.245C fig kpa 5.2 Pressure Coefficients (C fig) Name Symbol Value Unit Notes Ref. Input Importance level 2 Annual probability of exceedance Regional gust wind speed 80 Km/hr Table Table 3.2 (AS1170.0) Temporary Table 3.3 Regional gust wind speed V R m/s Wind Direction Multipliers M d 1 Table 3.2 (AS1170.2) Terrain Category Multiplier M Z,Cat 0.91 Shield Multiplier M S (AS1170.2) Topographic Multiplier M t (AS1170.2) 8 P a g e

9 Site Wind Speed V Site,β m/s VSite,β=VR*Md*Mz,cat*MS,Mt Pitch α 20 Deg Pitch α rad Width B 12 m Width Span S w 4 m Length D 15 m Height Z 3.7 m Bay Span 5 m Purlin Spacing 1.3 m Number of Intermediate Purlin 8 h/d 0.25 h/b 0.31 Wind Pressure ρair ρ 1.2 Kg/m 3 dynamic response factor C dyn 1 Wind Pressure ρ*c fig Kg/m 2 ρ=0.5ρair*(vdes,β) 2 *Cfig*Cdyn 2.4 (AS1170.2) WIND DIRECTION 1 (Perpendicular to Length) Internal Pressure Opening Assumption Internal Pressure Coefficient (Without Dominant) MIN -0.1 Internal Pressure Coefficient (Without Dominant) MAX Internal Pressure Coefficient (With Dominant) MIN Internal Pressure Coefficient (With Dominant) MAX 0.2 N 0.7 Cpi= N*Cpe Combination Factor K C,i Internal Pressure Coefficient C p,i P a g e

10 MIN Internal Pressure Coefficient MAX C p,i 0.70 External Pressure 1. Windward Wall External Pressure Coefficient C P,e 0.7 Area Reduction Factor K a 1 Table 5.4 combination factor applied to internal pressures K C,e 0.8 local pressure factor K l 1 porous cladding reduction factor K p 1 aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e 0.56 Wind Wall Pressure P 0.14 kpa Edge Column Force F 0.34 kn/m Intermediate Column Force F 0.69 kn/m 2. Leeward Wall External Pressure Coefficient C P,e -0.4 Area Reduction Factor K a 1 Table 5.4 combination factor applied to internal pressures K C,e 0.8 local pressure factor K l 1 porous cladding reduction factor K p 1 aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e Lee Wall Pressure P kpa Edge Column Force F kn/m Intermediate Column Force F kn/m 3. Side Wall Area Reduction Factor K a 1 Table 5.4 combination factor applied to internal pressures K C,e 0.8 local pressure factor K l 1 porous cladding reduction factor K p 1 External Pressure Coefficient C P,e to 1h 10 P a g e

11 External Pressure Coefficient C P,e h to 2h External Pressure Coefficient C P,e h to 3h External Pressure Coefficient C P,e -0.2 >3h aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e to 1h aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e h to 2h aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e h to 3h aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e >3h Side Wall Pressure P kpa 0 to 1h Side Wall Pressure P kpa 1h to 2h Side Wall Pressure P kpa 2h to 3h Side Wall Pressure P kpa >3h 4. Roof Up Wind Slope α>10 o Area Reduction Factor K a 1 combination factor applied to internal pressures K C,e 0.8 local pressure factor K l 1 porous cladding reduction factor K p 1 External Pressure Coefficient MIN External Pressure Coefficient MAX C P,e C P,e 0.15 aerodynamic shape factor MIN C fig,e aerodynamic shape factor MAX C fig,e 0.12 Pressure MIN P kpa Pressure MAX P 0.03 kpa Edge Rafter Force MIN F kn/m Edge Rafter Force Max F 0.07 kn/m Intermediate Rafter Force MIN F kn/m Intermediate Rafter Force MAX F 0.15 kn/m 5. Roof Down Wind Slope Area Reduction Factor K a 1 combination factor applied to internal pressures K C,e 0.8 local pressure factor K l 1 porous cladding reduction factor K p 1 External Pressure Coefficient C P,e -0.6 aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e P a g e

12 Pressure MIN P kpa Pressure MAX P kpa Edge Rafter Force MIN F kn/m Edge Rafter Force MAX F kn/m Intermediate Rafter Force MIN F kn/m Intermediate Rafter Force MAX F kn/m WIND DIRECTION 2 (Parallel to Length) Internal Pressure Opening Assumption Internal Pressure Coefficient (Without Dominant) MIN Internal Pressure Coefficient (Without Dominant) MAX Internal Pressure Coefficient (With Dominant) MIN Internal Pressure Coefficient (With Dominant) MAX 0.2 N 0.7 Cpi= N*Cpe Combination Factor K C,i 1 Internal Pressure Coefficient MIN Internal Pressure Coefficient MAX C p,i 0.70 C p,i 0.70 External Pressure 1. Windward Wall External Pressure Coefficient C P,e 0.7 Area Reduction Factor K a 1 Table 5.4 combination factor applied to internal pressures K C,e 0.8 local pressure factor K l 1 porous cladding reduction factor K p 1 aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e 0.56 Wind Wall Pressure P 0.14 kpa 12 P a g e

13 Edge Column Force F 0.27 kn/m Intermediate Column Force F 0.55 kn/m 2. Leeward Wall External Pressure Coefficient C P,e -0.5 Area Reduction Factor K a 1 Table 5.4 combination factor applied to internal pressures K C,e 0.8 local pressure factor K l 1 porous cladding reduction factor K p 1 aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e -0.4 Lee Wall Pressure P kpa Edge Column Force F kn/m Intermediate Column Force F kn/m 3. Side Wall Area Reduction Factor K a 1 Table 5.4 combination factor applied to internal pressures K C,e 0.8 local pressure factor K l 1 porous cladding reduction factor K p 1 External Pressure Coefficient C P,e to 1h External Pressure Coefficient C P,e h to 2h External Pressure Coefficient C P,e h to 3h External Pressure Coefficient C P,e -0.2 >3h aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e to 1h aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e h to 2h Side Wall Pressure P kpa 0 to 1h Side Wall Pressure P kpa 1h to 2h Side Wall Pressure P kpa 2h to 3h Side Wall Pressure P kpa >3h 4. Roof α<10 o Area Reduction Factor K a 1 13 P a g e

14 combination factor applied to internal pressures K C,e 0.8 local pressure factor K l 1 porous cladding reduction factor K p 1 External Pressure Coefficient MIN External Pressure Coefficient MIN External Pressure Coefficient MIN External Pressure Coefficient MIN External Pressure Coefficient MIN C P,e to 0.5h C P,e to 1h C P,e h to 2h C P,e h to 3h C P,e >3h External Pressure Coefficient MAX External Pressure Coefficient MAX External Pressure Coefficient MAX External Pressure Coefficient MAX External Pressure Coefficient MAX C P,e to 0.5h C P,e to 1h C P,e h to 2h C P,e h to 3h C P,e 0.20 >3h aerodynamic shape factor MIN C fig,e to 0.5h aerodynamic shape factor MIN C fig,e to 1h aerodynamic shape factor MIN C fig,e h to 2h aerodynamic shape factor MIN C fig,e h to 3h aerodynamic shape factor MIN C fig,e >3h aerodynamic shape factor MAX C fig,e to 0.5h aerodynamic shape factor MAX C fig,e to 1h aerodynamic shape factor MAX C fig,e 0 1h to 2h aerodynamic shape factor MAX C fig,e h to 3h aerodynamic shape factor MAX C fig,e 0.16 >3h Pressure MIN P kpa 0 to 0.5h Pressure MIN P kpa 0.5 to 1h Pressure MIN P kpa 1h to 2h Pressure MIN P kpa 2h to 3h Pressure MIN P kpa >3h Pressure MAX P kpa 0 to 0.5h Pressure MAX P kpa 0.5 to 1h 14 P a g e

15 Pressure MAX P 0.00 kpa 1h to 2h Pressure MAX P 0.02 kpa 2h to 3h Pressure MAX P 0.04 kpa >3h Edge Purlin Force MIN F kn/m 0 to 0.5h Edge Purlin Force MIN F kn/m 0.5 to 1h Edge Purlin Force MIN F kn/m 1h to 2h Edge Purlin Force MIN F kn/m 2h to 3h Edge Purlin Force MIN F kn/m >3h Edge Purlin Force MAX F kn/m 0 to 0.5h Edge Purlin Force MAX F kn/m 0.5 to 1h Edge Purlin Force MAX F 0.00 kn/m 1h to 2h Edge Purlin Force MAX F 0.01 kn/m 2h to 3h Edge Purlin Force MAX F 0.03 kn/m >3h Intermediate Purlin Force MIN F kn/m 0 to 0.5h Intermediate Purlin Force MIN F kn/m 0.5 to 1h Intermediate Purlin Force MIN F kn/m 1h to 2h Intermediate Purlin Force MIN F kn/m 2h to 3h Intermediate Purlin Force MIN F kn/m >3h Intermediate Purlin Force MAX F kn/m 0 to 0.5h Intermediate Purlin Force MAX F kn/m 0.5 to 1h Intermediate Purlin Force MAX F 0.00 kn/m 1h to 2h Intermediate Purlin Force MAX F 0.03 kn/m 2h to 3h Intermediate Purlin Force MAX F 0.05 kn/m >3h 15 P a g e

16 5.2.1 Pressure summary WIND EXTERNAL PRESSURE Direction1 (Perpendicular to Length) Direction2 (Parallel to Length) Windward (kpa) Leeward (kpa) Length (m) (m) (Kpa) (Kpa) 0-1h Sidewall (m) 1h - 2h h - 3h >3h Min (Kpa) Max (Kpa) Length (m) (m) Min (Kpa) Max (Kpa) Upwind Slope h Roof Downwind Slope h-1h h-2h h-3h >3h Wind Internal Pressure (kpa) Min (kpa) Max (kpa) Min (kpa) Max (kpa) Proportion of Cpe Proportion of Cpe Proportion of Cpe Proportion of Cpe Direction 1 Direction 2 AS P a g e

17 5.3 Wind Load Diagrams Wind 1(case 1) Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd Wind 1(case 2) 17 P a g e

18 5.3.3 Wind 2(Case1) Wind 2(case 2) After 3D model analysis, each member is checked based on adverse load combination. In this regard the maximum bending moment, shear and axial force due to adverse load combinations for each member are presented as below: 18 P a g e

19 5.3.5 Max Bending Moment due to critical load combination in major axis Max Bending Moment in minor axis due to critical load combination 19 P a g e

20 5.3.7 Max Shear in due to critical load combination Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd Max Axial force in upright support and roof beam due to critical load combination 20 P a g e

21 5.3.9 Max reactions Summary Table: Max Reaction (Bearing) N * = 3.1 kn Max Reaction (Uplift) N * = 5.5 kn MEMBER(S) Section b d t Vx Vy P (Axial) Mx My Negative -> Compression Positive -> Tension mm mm mm kn kn kn kn.m kn.m Rafter 120X68X Upright Support 120X68X Gable Pole 120X68X Ridge & Eave Purlin 85X102X E E-16 Gable Beam 85X102X E Intermediate Purlin 60X60X Brace P a g e

22 6 Checking Members Based on AS ALUMINIUM LSD 6.1 Rafter NAME 120X68X3 Alloy and temper SYMBO L Rafter 6061-T6 VALUE UNIT NOTES REF AS Tension Ftu = 262 MPa Ultimate T3.3(A) Fty = 241 MPa Yield Compression Fcy = 241 MPa Shear Fsu = 165 MPa Ultimate Fsy = 138 MPa Yield Bearing Fbu = 551 MPa Ultimate Fby = 386 MPa Yield Modulus of elasticity E = MPa Compressive kt = 1.0 kc = 1.0 T3.4(B) FEM ANALYSIS RESULTS Axial force P = 0 kn compression P = kn Tension In plane moment Mx = knm Out of plane moment My = knm DESIGN STRESSES Gross cross section area Ag = 1092 mm 2 In-plane elastic section modulus Zx = mm 3 Out-of-plane elastic section Zy = mod. 3 mm 3 Stress from axial force f a = P/Ag = 0.00 MPa compression = 3.19 MPa Tension Stress from in-plane bending f bx = Mx/Zx = MPa compression Stress from out-of-plane bending Tension Tension in rectangular tubes f by = My/Zy = MPa compression 22 P a g e

23 ϕf L = MPa O R ϕf L = MPa COMPRESSION Compression in columns, axial, gross section 1. General Unsupported length of member L = 6400 mm Effective length factor k = 1 Radius of gyration about buckling axis (Y) ry = mm Radius of gyration about buckling axis (X) rx = mm Slenderness ratio klb/ry = Slenderness ratio kl/rx = Slenderness parameter λ = Dc* = 90.3 S1* = 0.33 S2* = 1.23 ϕcc = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa 2. Sections not subject to torsional or torsional-flexural buckling Largest slenderness ratio for kl/r = flexural buckling Uniform compression in components of columns, gross section - flat plates 1. Uniform compression in components of columns, gross section - flat plates with both edges supported Max. distance between toes of fillets of supporting elements for plate b' = 62 t = 3 mm Slenderness b/t = Limit 1 S1 = Limit 2 S2 = k1 = 0.35 T3.3(D) Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa 23 P a g e

24 Most adverse compressive limit state stress Most adverse tensile limit state stress Most adverse compressive & Tensile capacity factor Fa = MPa Fa = MPa fa/fa = 0.01 PASS BENDING - IN-PLANE Compression in beams, extreme fibre, gross section rectangular tubes, box sections Unbraced length for bending Lb = 1300 mm Second moment of area (weak axis) Iy = 8.80E+05 mm 4 Torsion modulus J = 1.91E+06 mm 3 Elastic section modulus Z = mm 3 Slenderness S = Limit 1 S1 = 0.39 Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa (2) Compression in components of beams (component under uniform compression), gross section - flat plates with both edges supported Max. distance between toes of fillets of supporting elements b' = 62 mm for plate t = 3 mm Slenderness b/t = Limit 1 S1 = Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa k1 = 0.5 T3.3(D) k2 = 2.04 T3.3(D) Most adverse in-plane bending limit state stress Most adverse in-plane bending capacity factor Fbx = MPa fbx/fbx = 0.40 PASS BENDING - OUT-OF-PLANE 24 P a g e

25 NOTE: Limit state stresses, ϕf L are the same for out-of-plane bending (doubly symmetric section) Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Most adverse out-of-plane bending limit state stress Most adverse out-of-plane bending capacity factor F by = MPa f by/f by = 0.09 PASS COMBINED ACTIONS Combined compression and bending 4.1.1(2) Fa = MPa Fao = MPa Fbx = MPa Fby = MPa SHEAR Shear in webs (Major Axis) fa/fa = Check: fa/fa + fbx/fbx + fby/fby 1.0 i.e PASS (3) 4.1.1(2) Clear web height h = 114 mm t = 3 mm Slenderness h/t = 38 Limit 1 S1 = Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Stress From Shear force f sx = V/Aw 3.39 MPa Shear in webs (Minor Axis) Clear web height b = 62 mm t = 3 mm Slenderness b/t = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa 25 P a g e

26 Stress From Shear force f sy = V/Aw 1.21 MPa 6.2 Upright Supports NAME SYMBOL VALUE UNIT NOTES REF Upright 120X68X3 Support AS1664. Alloy and temper 6061-T6 1 Tension Ftu = 262 MPa Ultimate T3.3(A) Fty = 241 MPa Yield Compression Fcy = 241 MPa Shear Bearing Fsu = 165 MPa Ultimate Fsy = 138 MPa Yield Fbu = 551 MPa Ultimate Fby = 386 MPa Yield Modulus of elasticity E = MPa Compressive kt = 1.0 kc = 1.0 T3.4(B) FEM ANALYSIS RESULTS Axial force P = 0 kn compression P = kn Tension In plane moment Mx = knm Out of plane moment My = knm DESIGN STRESSES Gross cross section area Ag = 1092 mm 2 In-plane elastic section modulus Zx = mm 3 Out-of-plane elastic section Zy = mod. 3 mm 3 Stress from axial force f a = P/Ag = 0.00 MPa compression = 2.77 MPa Tension Stress from in-plane bending f bx = Mx/Zx = MPa compression Stress from out-of-plane bending f by = My/Zy = 4.48 MPa compression 26 P a g e

27 Tension Tension in rectangular tubes ϕf L = MPa O R ϕf L = MPa COMPRESSION Compression in columns, axial, gross section 1. General Unsupported length of member L = 2600 mm Effective length factor k = 1 Radius of gyration about buckling axis (Y) ry = mm Radius of gyration about buckling axis (X) rx = mm Slenderness ratio klb/ry = Slenderness ratio kl/rx = Slenderness parameter λ = 1.71 Dc* = 90.3 S1* = 0.33 S2* = 1.23 ϕcc = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa 2. Sections not subject to torsional or torsional-flexural buckling Largest slenderness ratio for kl/r = flexural buckling Uniform compression in components of columns, gross section - flat plates 1. Uniform compression in components of columns, gross section - flat plates with both edges supported Max. distance between toes of fillets of supporting elements for plate b' = 62 t = 3 mm Slenderness b/t = Limit 1 S1 = k1 = 0.35 T3.3(D) 27 P a g e

28 Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Most adverse compressive limit state stress Most adverse tensile limit state stress Most adverse compressive & Tensile capacity factor Fa = MPa Fa = MPa fa/fa = 0.01 PASS BENDING - IN-PLANE Compression in beams, extreme fibre, gross section rectangular tubes, box sections Unbraced length for bending Lb = 2600 mm Second moment of area (weak axis) Iy = 8.80E+05 mm 4 Torsion modulus J = 1.91E+06 mm 3 Elastic section modulus Z = mm 3 Slenderness S = Limit 1 S1 = 0.39 Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa (2) Compression in components of beams (component under uniform compression), gross section - flat plates with both edges supported Max. distance between toes of fillets of supporting b' = 62 mm elements for plate t = 3 mm Slenderness b/t = Limit 1 S1 = Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa k1 = 0.5 T3.3(D) k2 = 2.04 T3.3(D) Most adverse in-plane bending limit state stress Fbx = MPa 28 P a g e

29 Most adverse in-plane bending capacity factor fbx/fbx = 0.39 PASS BENDING - OUT-OF-PLANE NOTE: Limit state stresses, ϕf L are the same for out-of-plane bending (doubly symmetric section) Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Most adverse out-of-plane bending limit state stress Most adverse out-of-plane bending capacity factor F by = MPa f by/f by = 0.02 PASS COMBINED ACTIONS Combined compression and bending 4.1.1(2) Fa = MPa Fao = MPa Fbx = MPa Fby = MPa SHEAR Shear in webs (Major Axis) fa/fa = Check: fa/fa + fbx/fbx + fby/fby 1.0 i.e PASS (3) 4.1.1(2) Clear web height h = 114 mm t = 3 mm Slenderness h/t = 38 Limit 1 S1 = Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Stress From Shear force f sx = V/Aw 3.30 MPa Shear in webs (Minor Axis) Clear web height b = 62 mm 29 P a g e

30 t = 3 mm Slenderness b/t = 7 Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Stress From Shear force f sy = V/Aw 0.12 MPa 6.3 Gable Pole NAME SYMBOL VALUE UNIT NOTES REF 120X68X3 Gable Pole Alloy and temper 6061-T6 AS Tension Ftu = 262 MPa Ultimate T3.3(A) Fty = 241 MPa Yield Compression Fcy = 241 MPa Shear Bearing Fsu = 165 MPa Ultimate Fsy = 138 MPa Yield Fbu = 551 MPa Ultimate Fby = 386 MPa Yield Modulus of elasticity E = MPa Compressive kt = 1.0 kc = 1.0 T3.4(B) FEM ANALYSIS RESULTS Axial force P = kn compression P = 0 kn Tension In plane moment Mx = knm Out of plane moment My = knm DESIGN STRESSES Gross cross section area Ag = 1092 mm 2 In-plane elastic section modulus Zx = mm 3 Out-of-plane elastic section mod. Zy = mm 3 Stress from axial force f a = P/Ag = 2.58 MPa compression = 0.00 MPa Tension 30 P a g e

31 Stress from in-plane bending f bx = Mx/Zx = MPa compression Stress from out-of-plane bending Tension Tension in rectangular tubes f by = My/Zy = MPa compression ϕf L = MPa OR ϕf L = MPa COMPRESSION Compression in columns, axial, gross section 1. General Unsupported length of member L = 4060 mm Effective length factor k = 1 Radius of gyration about buckling axis (Y) ry = mm Radius of gyration about buckling axis (X) rx = mm Slenderness ratio klb/ry = Slenderness ratio kl/rx = Slenderness parameter λ = 1.71 Dc* = 90.3 S1* = 0.33 S2* = 1.23 ϕcc = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa 2. Sections not subject to torsional or torsional-flexural buckling Largest slenderness ratio for kl/r = flexural buckling Uniform compression in components of columns, gross section - flat plates 1. Uniform compression in components of columns, gross section - flat plates with both edges supported k1 = 0.35 T3.3(D) 31 P a g e

32 Max. distance between toes of fillets of supporting elements for plate b' = 62 t = 3 mm Slenderness b/t = Limit 1 S1 = Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Most adverse compressive limit state stress Most adverse tensile limit state stress Most adverse compressive & Tensile capacity factor Fa = MPa Fa = MPa fa/fa = 0.04 PASS BENDING - IN-PLANE Compression in beams, extreme fibre, gross section rectangular tubes, box sections Unbraced length for bending Lb = 2600 mm Second moment of area (weak axis) Iy = mm 4 Torsion modulus J = mm 3 Elastic section modulus Z = mm 3 Slenderness S = Limit 1 S1 = 0.39 Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa (2) Compression in components of beams (component under uniform compression), gross section - flat plates with both edges supported Max. distance between toes of fillets of supporting elements for plate k1 = 0.5 T3.3(D) k2 = 2.04 T3.3(D) b' = 62 mm t = 3 mm Slenderness b/t = Limit 1 S1 = P a g e

33 Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Most adverse in-plane bending limit state stress Most adverse in-plane bending capacity factor Fbx = MPa fbx/fbx = 0.19 PASS BENDING - OUT-OF-PLANE NOTE: Limit state stresses, ϕf L are the same for out-of-plane bending (doubly symmetric section) Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Most adverse out-of-plane bending limit state stress Most adverse out-of-plane bending capacity factor F by = MPa f by/f by = 0.37 PASS COMBINED ACTIONS Combined compression and bending 4.1.1(2) Fa = MPa Fao = MPa Fbx = MPa Fby = MPa SHEAR Shear in webs (Major Axis) fa/fa = Check: fa/fa + fbx/fbx + fby/fby 1.0 i.e PASS (3) 4.1.1(2) Clear web height h = 114 mm t = 3 mm Slenderness h/t = 38 Limit 1 S1 = Limit 2 S2 = P a g e

34 Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Stress From Shear force f sx = V/Aw 0.50 MPa Shear in webs (Minor Axis) Clear web height b = 62 mm t = 3 mm Slenderness b/t = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Stress From Shear force f sy = V/Aw 3.86 MPa 6.4 Ridge & Eave Purlin NAME SYMBOL VALUE UNIT NOTES REF 85X102X2 Ridge & Eave Purlin Alloy and temper 6061-T6 AS Tension Ftu = 262 MPa Ultimate T3.3(A) Fty = 241 MPa Yield Compression Fcy = 241 MPa Shear Bearing Fsu = 165 MPa Ultimate Fsy = 138 MPa Yield Fbu = 551 MPa Ultimate Fby = 386 MPa Yield Modulus of elasticity E = MPa Compressive kt = 1.0 kc = 1.0 T3.4(B) FEM ANALYSIS RESULTS Axial force P = kn compression P = 0 kn Tension In plane moment Mx = knm Out of plane moment My = 1.105E-16 knm DESIGN STRESSES 34 P a g e

35 Gross cross section area Ag = 732 mm 2 In-plane elastic section Zx = modulus 5 mm 3 Out-of-plane elastic section Zy = mod. 1 mm 3 Stress from axial force f a = P/Ag = 0.92 MPa compression = 0.00 MPa Tension Stress from in-plane bending f bx = Mx/Zx = MPa compression Stress from out-of-plane bending Tension Tension in rectangular tubes f by = My/Zy = 0.00 MPa compression ϕf L = MPa O R ϕf L = MPa COMPRESSION Compression in columns, axial, gross section 1. General Unsupported length of member L = 5000 mm Effective length factor k = 1 Radius of gyration about buckling axis (Y) ry = mm Radius of gyration about buckling axis (X) rx = mm Slenderness ratio klb/ry = Slenderness ratio kl/rx = Slenderness parameter λ = 2.69 Dc* = 90.3 S1* = 0.33 S2* = 1.23 ϕcc = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa 2. Sections not subject to torsional or torsional-flexural buckling P a g e

36 Largest slenderness ratio for flexural buckling kl/r = Uniform compression in components of columns, gross section - flat plates 1. Uniform compression in components of columns, gross section - flat plates with both edges supported Max. distance between toes of fillets of supporting elements for plate b' = 98 t = 2 mm Slenderness b/t = 49 Limit 1 S1 = Limit 2 S2 = k1 = 0.35 T3.3(D) Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Most adverse compressive limit state stress Most adverse tensile limit state stress Most adverse compressive & Tensile capacity factor Fa = MPa Fa = MPa fa/fa = 0.03 PASS BENDING - IN-PLANE Compression in beams, extreme fibre, gross section rectangular tubes, box sections Unbraced length for bending Lb = 5000 mm Second moment of area (weak axis) Iy = mm 4 Torsion modulus J = mm 3 Elastic section modulus Z = mm 3 Slenderness S = Limit 1 S1 = 0.39 Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa (2) 36 P a g e

37 Compression in components of beams (component under uniform compression), gross section - flat plates with both edges supported Max. distance between toes of fillets of supporting elements for plate k1 = 0.5 T3.3(D) k2 = 2.04 T3.3(D) b' = 98 mm t = 2 mm Slenderness b/t = 49 Limit 1 S1 = Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Most adverse in-plane bending limit state stress Most adverse in-plane bending capacity factor Fbx = MPa fbx/fbx = 0.51 PASS BENDING - OUT-OF- PLANE NOTE: Limit state stresses, ϕf L are the same for out-of-plane bending (doubly symmetric section) Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Most adverse out-of-plane bending limit state stress Most adverse out-of-plane bending capacity factor F by = MPa f by/f by = 0.00 PASS COMBINED ACTIONS Combined compression and bending 4.1.1(2) Fa = MPa Fao = MPa Fbx = MPa Fby = MPa fa/fa = Check: fa/fa + fbx/fbx + fby/fby (3) 37 P a g e

38 i.e PASS SHEAR Shear in webs (Major Axis) 4.1.1(2) Clear web height h = 81 mm t = 2 mm Slenderness h/t = 40.5 Limit 1 S1 = Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Stress From Shear force f sx = V/Aw 0.09 MPa Shear in webs (Minor Axis) Clear web height b = 98 mm t = 2 mm Slenderness b/t = 49 Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Stress From Shear force f sy = V/Aw 0.00 MPa 6.5 Gable Beam NAME SYMBOL VALUE UNIT NOTES REF 85X102X2 Gable Beam Alloy and temper 6061-T6 AS Tension Ftu = 262 MPa Ultimate T3.3(A) Fty = 241 MPa Yield Compression Fcy = 241 MPa Shear Bearing Fsu = 165 MPa Ultimate Fsy = 138 MPa Yield Fbu = 551 MPa Ultimate Fby = 386 MPa Yield Modulus of elasticity E = MPa Compressive kt = 1.0 T3.4(B) 38 P a g e

39 kc = 1.0 FEM ANALYSIS RESULTS Axial force P = kn compression P = 0 kn Tension In plane moment Mx = 2.776E-17 knm Out of plane moment My = knm DESIGN STRESSES Gross cross section area Ag = 732 mm 2 In-plane elastic section modulus Zx = mm 3 Out-of-plane elastic section mod. Zy = mm 3 Stress from axial force f a = P/Ag = 9.72 MPa compression = 0.00 MPa Tension Stress from in-plane bending f bx = Mx/Zx = 0.00 MPa compression Stress from out-of-plane bending Tension Tension in rectangular tubes f by = My/Zy = 9.62 MPa compression ϕf L = MPa OR ϕf L = MPa COMPRESSION Compression in columns, axial, gross section 1. General Unsupported length of member L = 4000 mm Effective length factor k = 1 Radius of gyration about buckling axis (Y) ry = mm Radius of gyration about buckling axis (X) rx = mm Slenderness ratio klb/ry = Slenderness ratio kl/rx = Slenderness parameter λ = 2.15 Dc* = P a g e

40 S1* = 0.33 S2* = 1.23 ϕcc = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa 2. Sections not subject to torsional or torsional-flexural buckling Largest slenderness ratio for kl/r = flexural buckling Uniform compression in components of columns, gross section - flat plates 1. Uniform compression in components of columns, gross section - flat plates with both edges supported Max. distance between toes of fillets of supporting elements for plate b' = 98 t = 2 mm Slenderness b/t = 49 Limit 1 S1 = Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa k1 = 0.35 T3.3(D) Most adverse compressive limit state stress Most adverse tensile limit state stress Most adverse compressive & Tensile capacity factor Fa = MPa Fa = MPa fa/fa = 0.21 PASS BENDING - IN-PLANE Compression in beams, extreme fibre, gross section rectangular tubes, box sections Unbraced length for bending Lb = 4000 mm Second moment of area (weak axis) Iy = mm 4 Torsion modulus J = mm 3 Elastic section modulus Z = mm 3 Slenderness S = Limit 1 S1 = P a g e

41 Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa (2) Compression in components of beams (component under uniform compression), gross section - flat plates with both edges supported Max. distance between toes of fillets of supporting elements for plate k1 = 0.5 T3.3(D) k2 = 2.04 T3.3(D) b' = 98 mm t = 2 mm Slenderness b/t = 49 Limit 1 S1 = Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Most adverse in-plane bending limit state stress Most adverse in-plane bending capacity factor Fbx = MPa fbx/fbx = 0.00 PASS BENDING - OUT-OF-PLANE NOTE: Limit state stresses, ϕf L are the same for out-of-plane bending (doubly symmetric section) Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Most adverse out-of-plane bending limit state stress Most adverse out-of-plane bending capacity factor F by = MPa f by/f by = 0.09 PASS COMBINED ACTIONS Combined compression and bending 4.1.1(2) Fa = MPa Fao = MPa Fbx = MPa Fby = MPa P a g e

42 SHEAR Shear in webs (Major Axis) fa/fa = Check: fa/fa + fbx/fbx + fby/fby 1.0 i.e PASS (3) 4.1.1(2) Clear web height h = 81 mm t = 2 mm Slenderness h/t = 40.5 Limit 1 S1 = Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Stress From Shear force f sx = V/Aw 0.11 MPa Shear in webs (Minor Axis) Clear web height b = 98 mm t = 2 mm Slenderness b/t = 49 Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Stress From Shear force f sy = V/Aw 0.25 MPa 6.6 Intermediate Purlin NAME SYMBOL VALUE UNIT NOTES REF Intermediate 60X60X2 Purlin AS1664. Alloy and temper 6061-T6 1 Tension Ftu = 262 MPa Ultimate T3.3(A) Fty = 241 MPa Yield Compression Fcy = 241 MPa Shear Fsu = 165 MPa Ultimate Fsy = 138 MPa Yield Bearing Fbu = 551 MPa Ultimate 42 P a g e

43 Fby = 386 MPa Yield Modulus of elasticity E = MPa Compressive kt = 1.0 kc = 1.0 T3.4(B) FEM ANALYSIS RESULTS Axial force P = kn compression P = 0 kn Tension In plane moment Mx = knm Out of plane moment My = knm DESIGN STRESSES Gross cross section area Ag = 464 mm 2 In-plane elastic section Zx = mm 3 modulus 6 Out-of-plane elastic section Zy = mod. 6 mm 3 Stress from axial force f a = P/Ag = 1.72 MPa compression = 0.00 MPa Tension Stress from in-plane bending Stress from out-of-plane bending Tension Tension in rectangular tubes f bx = Mx/Zx = MPa compression f by = My/Zy = 1.23 MPa compression ϕf L = MPa O R ϕf L = MPa COMPRESSION Compression in columns, axial, gross section 1. General Unsupported length of member L = 5000 mm Effective length factor k = 1 Radius of gyration about buckling axis (Y) ry = mm 43 P a g e

44 Radius of gyration about buckling axis (X) rx = mm Slenderness ratio klb/ry = Slenderness ratio kl/rx = Slenderness parameter λ = 3.94 Dc* = 90.3 S1* = 0.33 S2* = 1.23 ϕcc = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa 2. Sections not subject to torsional or torsional-flexural buckling Largest slenderness ratio kl/r = for flexural buckling Uniform compression in components of columns, gross section - flat plates 1. Uniform compression in components of columns, gross section - flat plates with both edges supported Max. distance between toes of fillets of supporting elements for plate b' = 56 t = 2 mm Slenderness b/t = 28 Limit 1 S1 = Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa k1 = 0.35 T3.3(D) Most adverse compressive limit state stress Most adverse tensile limit state stress Most adverse compressive & Tensile capacity factor Fa = MPa Fa = MPa fa/fa = 0.12 PASS BENDING - IN-PLANE Compression in beams, extreme fibre, gross section rectangular tubes, box sections Unbraced length for Lb = 5000 mm 44 P a g e

45 bending Second moment of area (weak axis) Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. Iy = mm 4 Torsion modulus J = mm 3 Elastic section modulus Z = mm 3 Slenderness S = Limit 1 S1 = 0.39 Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa (2) Compression in components of beams (component under uniform compression), gross section - flat plates with both edges supported Max. distance between toes of fillets of supporting elements for plate k1 = 0.5 T3.3(D) k2 = 2.04 T3.3(D) b' = 56 mm t = 2 mm Slenderness b/t = 28 Limit 1 S1 = Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Most adverse in-plane bending limit state stress Most adverse in-plane bending capacity factor Fbx = MPa fbx/fbx = 0.69 PASS BENDING - OUT-OF- PLANE NOTE: Limit state stresses, ϕf L are the same for out-of-plane bending (doubly symmetric section) Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Most adverse out-of-plane bending limit state stress Most adverse out-of-plane bending capacity factor F by = MPa f by/f by = 0.01 PASS 45 P a g e

46 COMBINED ACTIONS Combined compression and bending 4.1.1(2) Fa = MPa Fao = MPa Fbx = MPa Fby = MPa SHEAR Shear in webs (Major Axis) fa/fa = Check: fa/fa + fbx/fbx + fby/fby 1.0 i.e PASS (3) 4.1.1(2) Clear web height h = 56 mm t = 2 mm Slenderness h/t = 28 Limit 1 S1 = Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Stress From Shear force f sx = V/Aw 0.13 MPa Shear in webs (Minor Axis) Clear web height b = 56 mm t = 2 mm Slenderness b/t = 28 Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Stress From Shear force f sy = V/Aw 0.07 MPa 6.7 Brace NAME SYMBO L VALUE UNIT NOTES REF 60X60X2 Brace Alloy and temper 6061-T6 AS P a g e

47 1 Tension Ftu = 262 MPa Ultimate T3.3(A) Fty = 241 MPa Yield Compression Fcy = 241 MPa Shear Fsu = 165 MPa Ultimate Fsy = 138 MPa Yield Bearing Fbu = 551 MPa Ultimate Fby = 386 MPa Yield Modulus of elasticity E = MPa Compressive kt = 1.0 kc = 1.0 T3.4(B) FEM ANALYSIS RESULTS Axial force P = kn compression P = 0 kn Tension In plane moment Mx = 0 knm Out of plane moment My = knm DESIGN STRESSES Gross cross section area Ag = 464 mm 2 In-plane elastic section Zx = modulus 6 mm 3 Out-of-plane elastic section Zy = mod. 6 mm 3 Stress from axial force f a = P/Ag = 5.83 MPa compression = 0.00 MPa Tension Stress from in-plane bending f bx = Mx/Zx = 0.00 MPa compression Stress from out-of-plane bending Tension Tension in rectangular tubes f by = My/Zy = 5.83 MPa compression ϕf L = MPa O R ϕf L = MPa COMPRESSION 47 P a g e

48 3.4.8 Compression in columns, axial, gross section 1. General Unsupported length of member L = 5640 mm Effective length factor k = 1 Radius of gyration about buckling axis (Y) ry = mm Radius of gyration about buckling axis (X) rx = mm Slenderness ratio klb/ry = Slenderness ratio kl/rx = Slenderness parameter λ = 4.45 Dc* = 90.3 S1* = 0.33 S2* = 1.23 ϕcc = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa 2. Sections not subject to torsional or torsional-flexural buckling Largest slenderness ratio for kl/r = flexural buckling Uniform compression in components of columns, gross section - flat plates 1. Uniform compression in components of columns, gross section - flat plates with both edges supported Max. distance between toes of fillets of supporting elements for plate b' = 56 t = 2 mm Slenderness b/t = 28 Limit 1 S1 = Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa k1 = 0.35 T3.3(D) Most adverse compressive limit state stress Most adverse tensile limit state stress Fa = MPa Fa = MPa 48 P a g e

49 Most adverse compressive & Tensile capacity factor fa/fa = 0.50 PASS BENDING - IN-PLANE Compression in beams, extreme fibre, gross section rectangular tubes, box sections Unbraced length for bending Lb = 5640 mm Second moment of area (weak Iy = axis) 7 mm 4 Torsion modulus J = mm 3 Elastic section modulus Z = mm 3 Slenderness S = Limit 1 S1 = 0.39 Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa (2) Compression in components of beams (component under uniform compression), gross section - flat plates with both edges supported Max. distance between toes of fillets of supporting elements for plate k1 = 0.5 T3.3(D) k2 = 2.04 T3.3(D) b' = 56 mm t = 2 mm Slenderness b/t = 28 Limit 1 S1 = Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Most adverse in-plane bending limit state stress Most adverse in-plane bending capacity factor Fbx = MPa fbx/fbx = 0.00 PASS BENDING - OUT-OF-PLANE NOTE: Limit state stresses, ϕf L are the same for out-of-plane bending (doubly symmetric section) 49 P a g e

50 Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Most adverse out-of-plane bending limit state stress Most adverse out-of-plane bending capacity factor F by = MPa f by/f by = 0.03 PASS COMBINED ACTIONS Combined compression and bending 4.1.1(2) Fa = MPa Fao = MPa Fbx = MPa Fby = MPa SHEAR Shear in webs (Major Axis) fa/fa = Check: fa/fa + fbx/fbx + fby/fby 1.0 i.e PASS (3) 4.1.1(2) Clear web height h = 56 mm t = 2 mm Slenderness h/t = 28 Limit 1 S1 = Limit 2 S2 = Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Stress From Shear force f sx = V/Aw 0.13 MPa Shear in webs (Minor Axis) Clear web height b = 56 mm t = 2 mm Slenderness b/t = 28 Factored limit state stress ϕf L = MPa Stress From Shear force f sy = V/Aw 0.08 MPa 50 P a g e

51 7 Summary 7.1 Conclusions a. The 12m x 15m Event Standard Tent structure as specified has been analyzed with a conclusion that it has the capacity to withstand wind speeds up to and including 80km/hr. b. For forecast winds in excess of 80km/hr all fabric shall be removed from the frames, and the structure should be completely dismantled. c. Wall cross bracing as well as roof cable bracing are required at each end bay and every third bay in between to resist against lateral movement due to wind direction2. d. For uplift due to 80km/hr, 4.5 kn (650kg) holding down weight/per leg for upright support is required. e. For uplift due to 80km/hr, 3.5 kn (450kg) hold down weight/ per leg for gable pole is required. f. The bearing pressure of soil should be clarified and checked by an engineer prior to any construction for considering foundation and base plate. g. Bracing Cables are required to have the minimum tensile strength (SWL) equal to 15kN. h. It is important to use 60x60x2 profile for all intermediate purlins with spacing not exceeding 1300mm. This means 8 intermediate purlins are required per bay (as illustrated below). i. It is important to use 120x68x3 profile for all gable poles. MEMBER(S) Section b d t mm mm mm Rafter 120X68X Upright Support 120X68X Gable Pole 120X68X Ridge & Eave Purlin 85X102X Gable Beam 85X102X Intermediate Purlin 60X60X Brace Yours faithfully, E.A. Bennett M.I.E. Aust. NPER P a g e

52 8 Appendix A Base Anchorage Requirements 12m x 12m Event Standard Tent: Tent Span Sile Type Required Weight Per Leg A 650kg B 650kg 12 m C 650kg D 650kg E 600kg A 600kg B 600kg 10 m C 600kg D 600kg E 600kg A 500kg B 500kg 8 m C 500kg D 500kg E 500kg A 450kg B 450kg 6 m C 450kg D 450kg E 450kg Definition of Soil Types: Type A : Loose sand such as dunal sand. Uncompacted site filling may also be included in this soil type. Type B : Medium to stiff clays or silty clays Type C: Moderately compact sand or gravel eg. of alluvial origin. Type D : Compact sand and gravel eg. Weathered sandstone or compacted quarry rubble hardstand Type E : Concrete slab on ground. Number of dyna bolts and slab thickness to be designed. 52 P a g e

53 9 Appendix B Hold Down Method Details 53 P a g e

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. Client: EXTREME MARQUEES PTY. LTD. Project: Design check 8m, 9m, 10m, 12m, 15m, 16m, 18m Event Deluxe Tents (5m Bay) for 100km/hr Wind Speed. Reference: Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Technical Data Report by:

More information

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. Client: EXTREME MARQUEES PTY. LTD. Project: Design check 6m, 8m, 9m, 10m, 12m Function Deluxe Tents (3m Bay) for 80km/hr Wind Speed. Reference: Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked

More information

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. Client: EXTREME MARQUEES PTY. LTD. Project: Design check 24.4m x 12.2m x 6.4m The Platoon Tent Structure (3m Bay) for 80km/hr Wind Speed. Reference: Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Technical Data Report by: KZ

More information

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. Client: Project: Speed. Reference: EXTREME MARQUEES PTY. LTD. Design check 3m Pinnacle Range Square Pagoda Tents for 70km/hr Wind Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked by: EAB Date:

More information

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. Client: Project: Reference: Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Design check 6m 6m Pavilion Marquees Structure for 40km/hr Wind Spead Extreme Marquees Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked by: EAB Date: 22/03/2017

More information

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. Client: Project: Extreme Marquees Design check 5m 9m Function Standard Tent Structure for 80km/hr Wind 4m 9m Function Standard Tent Structure for 80km/hr Wind 3m 9m Function Standard Tent Structure for

More information

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. Client: Easy Signs Pty. Ltd. Project: Design check 3m 3m, 3m 4.5m & 3m 6m Folding Marquees for Pop-up Gazebos for 45km/hr Wind Speed Reference: Easy Signs Pty. Ltd. Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked

More information

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. Client: Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Project: Design check 6m, 8m, 8m, 10m, 12m, 14m & 16m Single Pole Star Shade Structure for 45km/hr Wind Spead Reference: Extreme Marquees Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked

More information

Regulation 1507: Certificate of Compliance Design

Regulation 1507: Certificate of Compliance Design Building Act 1993 Building Interim Regulations 2017 Regulation 1507: Certificate of Compliance Design To Victorian Building Authority Relevant building surveyor: Postal address: PO Box 536 Melbourne VIC

More information

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. Client: Project: Wind Speed. Reference: EXTREME MARQUEES PTY. LTD. Design check 8m & 10m Pinnacle Range Square Pagoda Tents for 80km/hr Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked by:

More information

Regulation 1507: Certificate of Compliance Design

Regulation 1507: Certificate of Compliance Design To Victorian Building Authority Relevant building surveyor: Postal address: PO Box 536 Melbourne VIC 3001 Building Act 1993 Building Regulations 2006 Regulation 1507: Certificate of Compliance Design Chief

More information

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. Client: Project: Reference: Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Design check 3m 3m Folding Marquees Structure for 91.8km/hr Wind Spead Extreme Marquees Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked by: EAB Date: 04/11/2016

More information

Engineering Science OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 4 COLUMNS

Engineering Science OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 4 COLUMNS Unit 2: Unit code: QCF Level: Credit value: 15 Engineering Science L/601/10 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL COLUMNS 1. Be able to determine the behavioural characteristics of elements of static engineering systems

More information

FRAME ANALYSIS. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

FRAME ANALYSIS. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia FRAME ANALYSIS Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email: iznisyahrizal@utm.my Introduction 3D Frame: Beam, Column & Slab 2D Frame Analysis Building

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Structural Description The two pinned (at the bases) portal frame is stable in its plane due to the moment connection

More information

ENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 4 COLUMNS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL 4 H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P

ENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 4 COLUMNS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL 4 H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P ENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL COLUMNS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P This material is duplicated in the Mechanical Principles module H2 and those studying

More information

KIBÆK TENT BOOK - 12 M WITHOUT GUY LINES. Static calculations of 12 m tent. Prepared for: Kibæk pressening. Revision 0, March 23, 2016

KIBÆK TENT BOOK - 12 M WITHOUT GUY LINES. Static calculations of 12 m tent. Prepared for: Kibæk pressening. Revision 0, March 23, 2016 Svend Ole Hansen ApS SCT. JØRGENS ALLÉ 5C DK-1615 KØBENHAVN V DENMARK TEL: (+45) 33 25 38 38 WWW.SOHANSEN.DK WIND ENGINEERING FLUID DYNAMICS KIBÆK TENT BOOK - 12 M WITHOUT GUY LINES Static calculations

More information

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Contents Introduction Beam types Lateral stability of beams Factors affecting lateral stability Behaviour of simple and built - up beams in bending (Without vertical stiffeners)

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 0 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic Loads

More information

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING LECTURE VIII Dr. Jason E. Charalambides Failure in Flexure!

More information

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data The design formulae and data provided in this Annex are for education, training and assessment purposes only. They are based on the Hong Kong Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013 (HKCP-2013).

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode 3 Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 20 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic

More information

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1. C3 Flexural Members C3.1 Bending The nominal flexural strength [moment resistance], Mn, shall be the smallest of the values calculated for the limit states of yielding, lateral-torsional buckling and distortional

More information

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN CHAPTER 11 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN Article 49. Cracking Limit State 49.1 General considerations In the case of verifications relating to Cracking Limit State, the effects of actions comprise

More information

host structure (S.F.D.)

host structure (S.F.D.) TABLE 00.4 FBC Typical Mansard Beam [AAF] Allowable Span of Mansard Screen Enclosure Self-Mating Beams in accordance with requirements of Table 00.4 (and the 005 Aluminum Design Manual) using 6005T5 alloy:

More information

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of one-way ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are

More information

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi Chapter 04 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Compression Members By Dr. Jawad Talib Al-Nasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering

More information

APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES

APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES 163 APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES A1.1 DESIGN AS PER NORTH AMERICAN SPECIFICATION OF COLD FORMED STEEL (AISI S100: 2007) 1. Based on Initiation of Yielding: Effective yield moment, M n

More information

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 1 General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 2 AISC ASD and LRFD AISC ASD = American Institute of Steel Construction = Allowable Stress Design AISC Ninth

More information

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown. D : SOLID MECHANICS Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown. Q.2 Consider the forces of magnitude F acting on the sides of the regular hexagon having

More information

For sunshades using the Zee blades wind loads are reduced by 10 psf.

For sunshades using the Zee blades wind loads are reduced by 10 psf. C.R. Laurence Co., Inc. 2503 East Vernon Los Angeles, CA 90058 24 July 2009 SUBJ: CR LAURENCE UNIVERSAL SUN SHADES The CRL Universal Aluminum Sun Shades were evaluated in accordance with the 2006 International

More information

STRUCTURAL VERIFICATION OF A 60.7 M DOME ROOF FOR TANK FB 2110

STRUCTURAL VERIFICATION OF A 60.7 M DOME ROOF FOR TANK FB 2110 CTS Netherlands B.V. Riga 10 2993 LW Barendrecht The Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)180 531027 (office) Fax: +31 (0)180 531848 (office) E-mail: info@cts-netherlands.com Website: www.cts-netherlands.com Chamber

More information

Mechanics of Materials Primer

Mechanics of Materials Primer Mechanics of Materials rimer Notation: A = area (net = with holes, bearing = in contact, etc...) b = total width of material at a horizontal section d = diameter of a hole D = symbol for diameter E = modulus

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite

More information

7 STATICALLY DETERMINATE PLANE TRUSSES

7 STATICALLY DETERMINATE PLANE TRUSSES 7 STATICALLY DETERMINATE PLANE TRUSSES OBJECTIVES: This chapter starts with the definition of a truss and briefly explains various types of plane truss. The determinancy and stability of a truss also will

More information

LICENCE. for. Click on the red box above to activate the Licence Agreement scroll bar. WEB LINKS

LICENCE. for. Click on the red box above to activate the Licence Agreement scroll bar. WEB LINKS LICENCE for Licensee: Date: Click on the red box above to activate the Licence Agreement scroll bar. WEB LINKS Check if this document is current Find similar documents Visit our website International Standards

More information

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi Chapter 05 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Beams By Dr. Jawad Talib Al-Nasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering 71 Introduction

More information

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder 16 PLATE GIRDERS II 1.0 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the current practice for the design of plate girders adopting meaningful simplifications of the equations derived in the chapter on Plate Girders

More information

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State Hooke s law. 3. Define modular ratio,

More information

The plastic moment capacity of a composite cross-section is calculated in the program on the following basis (BS 4.4.2):

The plastic moment capacity of a composite cross-section is calculated in the program on the following basis (BS 4.4.2): COMPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 2002 COMPOSITE BEAM DESIGN BS 5950-90 Technical Note Composite Plastic Moment Capacity for Positive Bending This Technical Note describes

More information

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC. BENDING STRESS The effect of a bending moment applied to a cross-section of a beam is to induce a state of stress across that section. These stresses are known as bending stresses and they act normally

More information

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State

More information

Bending Stress. Sign convention. Centroid of an area

Bending Stress. Sign convention. Centroid of an area Bending Stress Sign convention The positive shear force and bending moments are as shown in the figure. Centroid of an area Figure 40: Sign convention followed. If the area can be divided into n parts

More information

mportant nstructions to examiners: ) The answers should be examined by key words and not as word-to-word as given in the model answer scheme. ) The model answer and the answer written by candidate may

More information

ENG1001 Engineering Design 1

ENG1001 Engineering Design 1 ENG1001 Engineering Design 1 Structure & Loads Determine forces that act on structures causing it to deform, bend, and stretch Forces push/pull on objects Structures are loaded by: > Dead loads permanent

More information

FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS

FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS Write Known Data Estimate self-weight of the member. a. The self-weight may be taken as 10 percent of the applied dead UDL or dead point load distributed over all the length.

More information

7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces

7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces 7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces 7.3.1 General In the previous chapters of Draft IS: 800 LSM version, we have stipulated the codal provisions for determining the stress distribution in

More information

University of Sheffield. Department of Civil Structural Engineering. Member checks - Rafter 44.6

University of Sheffield. Department of Civil Structural Engineering. Member checks - Rafter 44.6 Member checks - Rafter 34 6.4Haunch (UB 457 x 191 x 89) The depth of a haunch is usually made approximately twice depth of the basic rafter sections, as it is the normal practice to use a UB cutting of

More information

EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design

EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA 1 st. Semester Examination 2004/2005 Academic Session October 2004 EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design Time : 3 hours Instruction to candidates: 1. Ensure that this paper contains

More information

ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members

ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures III. Compression Members C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department University of Maryland Compression Members Following subjects are covered:

More information

Steel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes

Steel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes Steel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes INTRODUCTION When the need for a new structure arises, an individual or agency has to arrange the funds required for its construction. The individual or

More information

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web:     Ph: Serial : IG1_CE_G_Concrete Structures_100818 Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: E-mail: info@madeeasy.in Ph: 011-451461 CLASS TEST 018-19 CIVIL ENGINEERING

More information

Huntly Christie 1/26/2018 Christie Lites 100 Carson Street Toronto, ON M8W3R9

Huntly Christie 1/26/2018 Christie Lites 100 Carson Street Toronto, ON M8W3R9 Huntly Christie 1/26/2018 Christie Lites 100 Carson Street Toronto, ON M8W3R9 Structural Analysis for 20.5x20.5 Plated Box Truss Tables CRE Project # 16.614.01 Table of Contents for Analysis Package General

More information

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are

More information

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column Effects From Structural Analysis Axial force, N (tension-ve and comp +ve) (ensure >= 0) 8000kN OK Major

More information

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No. CHAPTER 5 Question Brief Explanation No. 5.1 From Fig. IBC 1613.5(3) and (4) enlarged region 1 (ASCE 7 Fig. -3 and -4) S S = 1.5g, and S 1 = 0.6g. The g term is already factored in the equations, thus

More information

Compression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)

Compression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.) ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures III. Compression Members C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department University of Maryland Compression Members Following subjects are covered:

More information

4.3 Moment Magnification

4.3 Moment Magnification CHAPTER 4: Reinforced Concrete Columns 4.3 Moment Magnification Description An ordinary or first order frame analysis does not include either the effects of the lateral sidesway deflections of the column

More information

COLUMNS: BUCKLING (DIFFERENT ENDS)

COLUMNS: BUCKLING (DIFFERENT ENDS) COLUMNS: BUCKLING (DIFFERENT ENDS) Buckling of Long Straight Columns Example 4 Slide No. 1 A simple pin-connected truss is loaded and supported as shown in Fig. 1. All members of the truss are WT10 43

More information

Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will be on Exam 3.

Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will be on Exam 3. ES230 STRENGTH OF MTERILS Exam 3 Study Guide Exam 3: Wednesday, March 8 th in-class Updated 3/3/17 Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will be on

More information

CHAPTER 3 THE EFFECTS OF FORCES ON MATERIALS

CHAPTER 3 THE EFFECTS OF FORCES ON MATERIALS CHAPTER THE EFFECTS OF FORCES ON MATERIALS EXERCISE 1, Page 50 1. A rectangular bar having a cross-sectional area of 80 mm has a tensile force of 0 kn applied to it. Determine the stress in the bar. Stress

More information

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. ARCH 631 Note Set 11 S017abn Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. Building description The building is a three-story office building

More information

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar 5.4 Beams As stated previousl, the effect of local buckling should invariabl be taken into account in thin walled members, using methods described alread. Laterall stable beams are beams, which do not

More information

[8] Bending and Shear Loading of Beams

[8] Bending and Shear Loading of Beams [8] Bending and Shear Loading of Beams Page 1 of 28 [8] Bending and Shear Loading of Beams [8.1] Bending of Beams (will not be covered in class) [8.2] Bending Strain and Stress [8.3] Shear in Straight

More information

BRACING MEMBERS SUMMARY. OBJECTIVES. REFERENCES.

BRACING MEMBERS SUMMARY. OBJECTIVES. REFERENCES. BRACING MEMBERS SUMMARY. Introduce the bracing member design concepts. Identify column bracing members requirements in terms of strength and stiffness. The assumptions and limitations of lateral bracing

More information

National Exams May 2015

National Exams May 2015 National Exams May 2015 04-BS-6: Mechanics of Materials 3 hours duration Notes: If doubt exists as to the interpretation of any question, the candidate is urged to submit with the answer paper a clear

More information

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS This module of CIE 428 covers the following subjects Column theory Column design per AISC Effective length Torsional and flexural-torsional buckling Built-up members READING:

More information

Equivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams

Equivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams University of Alberta Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Master of Engineering Report in Structural Engineering Equivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams

More information

TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES)

TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES) Page1 TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES) Restrained warping for the torsion of thin-wall open sections is not included in most commonly used frame analysis programs. Almost

More information

Entrance exam Master Course

Entrance exam Master Course - 1 - Guidelines for completion of test: On each page, fill in your name and your application code Each question has four answers while only one answer is correct. o Marked correct answer means 4 points

More information

SECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS

SECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS SECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS 1 INTRODUCTION TO COLUMN BUCKLING Introduction Elastic buckling of an ideal column Strength curve for an ideal column Strength of practical column Concepts of effective

More information

3 Hours/100 Marks Seat No.

3 Hours/100 Marks Seat No. *17304* 17304 14115 3 Hours/100 Marks Seat No. Instructions : (1) All questions are compulsory. (2) Illustrate your answers with neat sketches wherever necessary. (3) Figures to the right indicate full

More information

Plastic Design of Portal frame to Eurocode 3

Plastic Design of Portal frame to Eurocode 3 Department of Civil and Structural Engineering Plastic Design of Portal frame to Eurocode 3 Worked Example University of Sheffield Contents 1 GEOMETRY... 3 2 DESIGN BRIEF... 4 3 DETERMINING LOADING ON

More information

SAMPLE PROJECT IN THE MIDDLE EAST DOCUMENT NO. STR-CALC UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 117 ENGINEER PROJECT. Pages REVISION TITLE

SAMPLE PROJECT IN THE MIDDLE EAST DOCUMENT NO. STR-CALC UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 117 ENGINEER PROJECT. Pages REVISION TITLE PROJECT ENGINEER DOCUMENT NO. STR-CALC-548 0 REVISION TITLE Pages UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 117 UNITISED CURTAIN WALL 2 of 117 Table of Contents 1 Summary 3 2 Basic Data 4 2.1 Standards and References 4 2.2

More information

Balcony balustrades using the SG12 laminated glass system: PAGE 1 (SG12FF010717) Structural Calculations for SG12 System balustrades using 21.5mm laminated toughened glass without the need for a handrail

More information

CH. 4 BEAMS & COLUMNS

CH. 4 BEAMS & COLUMNS CH. 4 BEAMS & COLUMNS BEAMS Beams Basic theory of bending: internal resisting moment at any point in a beam must equal the bending moments produced by the external loads on the beam Rx = Cc + Tt - If the

More information

Flexural-Torsional Buckling of General Cold-Formed Steel Columns with Unequal Unbraced Lengths

Flexural-Torsional Buckling of General Cold-Formed Steel Columns with Unequal Unbraced Lengths Proceedings of the Annual Stability Conference Structural Stability Research Council San Antonio, Texas, March 21-24, 2017 Flexural-Torsional Buckling of General Cold-Formed Steel Columns with Unequal

More information

my!wind Ltd 5 kw wind turbine Static Stability Specification

my!wind Ltd 5 kw wind turbine Static Stability Specification my!wind Ltd 5 kw wind turbine Static Stability Specification 1 P a g e 0 3 / 0 4 / 2 0 1 4 Contents Contents... 2 List of Changes... 2 Appendixes... 2 General remarks... 3 1. Introduction... 4 2. Geometry...

More information

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams CHAPTER 4 Design of R C Beams Learning Objectives Identify the data, formulae and procedures for design of R C beams Design simply-supported and continuous R C beams by integrating the following processes

More information

my!wind Ltd 5 kw wind turbine Static Stability Specification

my!wind Ltd 5 kw wind turbine Static Stability Specification my!wind Ltd 5 kw wind turbine Static Stability Specification 1 P a g e 0 3 / 0 4 / 2 0 1 4 Contents Contents... 2 List of Changes... 2 Appendixes... 2 General remarks... 3 1. Introduction... 4 2. Geometry...

More information

Job No. Sheet 1 of 7 Rev A. Made by ER/EM Date Feb Checked by HB Date March 2006

Job No. Sheet 1 of 7 Rev A. Made by ER/EM Date Feb Checked by HB Date March 2006 Job No. Sheet of 7 Rev A Design Example Design of a lipped channel in a Made by ER/EM Date Feb 006 Checked by HB Date March 006 DESIGN EXAMPLE DESIGN OF A LIPPED CHANNEL IN AN EXPOSED FLOOR Design a simply

More information

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement. Example on Design of Slab Bridge Design Data and Specifications Chapter 5 SUPERSTRUCTURES Superstructure consists of 10m slab, 36m box girder and 10m T-girder all simply supported. Only the design of Slab

More information

UNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN. 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2

UNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN. 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2 UNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2 Young s modulus E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2 Area1=900mm 2 Area2=400mm 2 Area3=625mm

More information

Unit III Theory of columns. Dr.P.Venkateswara Rao, Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engg., SVCE, Sriperumbudir

Unit III Theory of columns. Dr.P.Venkateswara Rao, Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engg., SVCE, Sriperumbudir Unit III Theory of columns 1 Unit III Theory of Columns References: Punmia B.C.,"Theory of Structures" (SMTS) Vol II, Laxmi Publishing Pvt Ltd, New Delhi 2004. Rattan.S.S., "Strength of Materials", Tata

More information

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case

More information

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar 5.10 Examples 5.10.1 Analysis of effective section under compression To illustrate the evaluation of reduced section properties of a section under axial compression. Section: 00 x 80 x 5 x 4.0 mm Using

More information

Mechanics of Solids. Mechanics Of Solids. Suraj kr. Ray Department of Civil Engineering

Mechanics of Solids. Mechanics Of Solids. Suraj kr. Ray Department of Civil Engineering Mechanics Of Solids Suraj kr. Ray (surajjj2445@gmail.com) Department of Civil Engineering 1 Mechanics of Solids is a branch of applied mechanics that deals with the behaviour of solid bodies subjected

More information

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV UNIT I STRESS, STRAIN DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS PART A (2 MARKS)

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 22 : Design of an unbraced sway frame with rigid joints Summary: NOTE This example

More information

PES Institute of Technology

PES Institute of Technology PES Institute of Technology Bangalore south campus, Bangalore-5460100 Department of Mechanical Engineering Faculty name : Madhu M Date: 29/06/2012 SEM : 3 rd A SEC Subject : MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Subject

More information

Properties of Sections

Properties of Sections ARCH 314 Structures I Test Primer Questions Dr.-Ing. Peter von Buelow Properties of Sections 1. Select all that apply to the characteristics of the Center of Gravity: A) 1. The point about which the body

More information

Unbraced Column Verification Example. AISC Design Examples AISC 13 th Edition. ASDIP Steel is available for purchase online at

Unbraced Column Verification Example. AISC Design Examples AISC 13 th Edition. ASDIP Steel is available for purchase online at Unbraced Column Verification Example AISC Design Examples AISC 3 th Edition IP Steel is available for purchase onle at www.asdipsoft.com H-9 Example H.4 W-Shape Subject to Combed Axial Compression and

More information

Tekla Structural Designer 2016i

Tekla Structural Designer 2016i Tekla Structural Designer 2016i Reference Guides (Australian Codes) September 2016 2016 Trimble Solutions Corporation part of Trimble Navigation Ltd. Table of Contents Analysis Verification Examples...

More information

Experimental investigation on monotonic performance of steel curved knee braces for weld-free beam-to-column connections

Experimental investigation on monotonic performance of steel curved knee braces for weld-free beam-to-column connections Experimental investigation on monotonic performance of steel curved knee braces for weld-free beam-to-column connections *Zeyu Zhou 1) Bo Ye 2) and Yiyi Chen 3) 1), 2), 3) State Key Laboratory of Disaster

More information

CH. 5 TRUSSES BASIC PRINCIPLES TRUSS ANALYSIS. Typical depth-to-span ratios range from 1:10 to 1:20. First: determine loads in various members

CH. 5 TRUSSES BASIC PRINCIPLES TRUSS ANALYSIS. Typical depth-to-span ratios range from 1:10 to 1:20. First: determine loads in various members CH. 5 TRUSSES BASIC PRINCIPLES Typical depth-to-span ratios range from 1:10 to 1:20 - Flat trusses require less overall depth than pitched trusses Spans: 40-200 Spacing: 10 to 40 on center - Residential

More information

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges 01/02/2016 Marco Donà Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges 1 Plastic hinge approach A plastic hinge represents a concentrated post-yield behaviour in one or more degrees of freedom. Hinges only

More information

Design of Steel Structures Dr. Damodar Maity Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati

Design of Steel Structures Dr. Damodar Maity Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati Design of Steel Structures Dr. Damodar Maity Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati Module - 6 Flexural Members Lecture 5 Hello today I am going to deliver the lecture

More information

CALCULATION MODE FOR ALUHD23/SH18 Traction and shear aluminium plate for Alufoot R system

CALCULATION MODE FOR ALUHD23/SH18 Traction and shear aluminium plate for Alufoot R system CALCULATION MODE FOR ALUHD23/SH18 Traction and shear aluminium plate for Alufoot R system INTRODUCTION ALUHD23/SH18 plate, being part of Alufoot system, is used in order to connect the CLT wall to the

More information

two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS

two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) Analysis 1 Structural Requirements strength serviceability

More information

CIVIL DEPARTMENT MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1. Brach: CE YEAR:

CIVIL DEPARTMENT MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1. Brach: CE YEAR: MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES- ASSIGNMENT NO 1 SEMESTER: V 1) Find the least moment of Inertia about the centroidal axes X-X and Y-Y of an unequal angle section 125 mm 75 mm 10 mm as shown in figure 2) Determine

More information