Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.
|
|
- Warren Bates
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Client: EXTREME MARQUEES PTY. LTD. Project: Design check 24.4m x 12.2m x 6.4m The Platoon Tent Structure (3m Bay) for 80km/hr Wind Speed. Reference: Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked by: EAB Date: 21/02/2017 JOB NO: E
2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 3 Design Restrictions and Limitations Specifications General Steel Properties Members Design Loads Ultimate Load Combinations Serviceability Ultimate Wind Analysis Parameters Pressure Coefficients (C fig) Pressure summary Wind Load Diagrams Wind 1(case 1) Wind 1(case 2) Wind 2(Case1) Wind 2(case 2) Max Bending Moment due to critical load combination in major axis Max Bending Moment in minor axis due to critical load combination Max Shear in due to critical load combination Max Axial force in upright support and roof beam due to critical load combination Max reactions Checking Members Based on AS4100: Summary Conclusions Appendix A Base Anchorage Requirements Appendix B Hold Down Method Details P a g e
3 1 Introduction This Certification is the sole property for copyright to Mr. Ted Bennett of Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. The following structural drawings and calculations are for the transportable tents supplied by Extreme Marquees. The frame consists principally of extruded hot dipped galvanized steel trusses and base plates. The report examines the effect of 3s gust wind of 80 km/hr on 24.4m 12.2m x 6.4m The Platoon Tent as the worstcase scenario. The relevant Australian Standards AS1170.0:2002 General principles, AS1170.1:2002 Permanent, imposed and other actions and AS1170.2:2011 Wind actions are used. The design check is in accordance with AS/NZS 4100:1998 Steel Structures. 3 P a g e
4 Design Restrictions and Limitations Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. 2.1 The erected structure is for temporary use only. 2.2 It should be noted that if high gust wind speeds are anticipated or forecast in the locality of the tent, the temporary erected structure should be dismantled. 2.3 For forecast winds in excess of (refer to summary) all fabric shall be removed from the frames, and the structure should be completely dismantled. (Please note that the locality squall or gust wind speed is affected by factors such as terrain exposure and site elevations.) 2.4 The structure may only be erected in regions with wind classifications no greater than the limits specified on the attached wind analysis. 2.5 The wind classifications are based upon Terrain Category 2. Considerations have also been made to the regional wind terrain category, topographical location and site shielding from adjacent structures. Please note that in many instances topographical factors such as a location on the crest of a hill or on top of an escarpment may yield a higher wind speed classification than that derived for a higher wind terrain category in a level topographical region. For this reason, particular regard shall be paid to the topographical location of the structure. For localities which do not conform to the standard prescribed descriptions for wind classes as defined above, a qualified Structural Engineer may be employed to determine an appropriate wind class for that the particular site. 2.6 The structures in no circumstances shall ever be erected in tropical or severe tropical cyclonic condition as defined on the Map of Australia in AS , Figure The tent structure has not been designed to withstand snow and ice loadings such as when erected in alpine regions. 2.8 For the projects, where the site conditions approach the design limits, extra consideration should be given to pullout tests of the stakes and professional assessment of the appropriate wind classification for the site. 2.9 The tents are stabilized as using roof/wall cross bracing at end bays as shown on the drawings. 4 P a g e
5 2 Specifications 2.1 General Tent category Material Steel 350 Mpa Size Model 24.4m x 12.2m The Platoon 5 P a g e
6 2.2 Steel Properties Steel Properties Minimum Yeild Stress Fy 350 Mpa Young s modulus E 2.0 Mpa Possion Ratio Ftu 0.25 Shear yield strength Fsy 138 Mpa Bearing yield strength Fby 386 Mpa Bearing ultimate strength Fbu 552 Mpa 2.3 Members Sections 300mm Truss 60 x 1.5 CHS (Top & Bottom Chord) 300mm Truss 60 x 1.5 CHS (Web ) Cross Brace Cable Brace Roof Purlin Gable Beam & Pole 60 x 1.5 CHS 8 60 x 1.5 CHS 60 x 1.5 CHS 3 Design Loads 3.1 Ultimate Live Self weight Q G Distributed load (kpa) Design load factor (-) Factored imposed load (kpa) self weight 1.35, 1.2, self weight, 0.9 self weight 3s 80km/hr gust W C fig C fig 3.2 Load Combinations Serviceability Gravity = 1.0 G Wind = 1.0 G W Ultimate Downward = 1.35 G 6 P a g e
7 = 1.2 G + W u = 1.2 G + W u +W IS Upward = 0.9 G + W u 0.9 G + W u+w IP 4 Wind Analysis Wind towards surface (+ve), away from surface (-ve) 4.1 Parameters Terrain category = 2 Site wind speed (V sit,β) = V RM d(m z,catm sm t) V R = 22.22m/s (80 km/hr) M d = 1 M s = 1 M t = 1 M z,cat = 0.91 (regional 3 s gust wind speed) (Table 4.1(B) AS1170.2) V sit,β = m/s Height of structure (h) = 5.25 m Width of structure (w) = 12.2 m Length of structure (l) = 24.4 m (mid of peak and eave) Pressure (P) = 0.5ρ air (V sit,β) 2 C fig C dyn = 0.245C fig kpa 4.2 Pressure Coefficients (C fig) Name Symbol Value Unit Notes Ref. Input Importance level 2 Table Table 3.2 (AS1170.0) Annual probability of exceedance - Table 3.3 Regional gust wind speed 80 Km/hr Table 3.1 (AS1170.2) Regional gust wind speed V R m/s Wind Direction Multipliers M d 1 Table 3.2 (AS1170.2) Terrain Category Multiplier M Z,Cat 0.91 Table 4.1 (AS1170.2) Shield Multiplier M S (AS1170.2) Topographic Multiplier M t (AS1170.2) Site Wind Speed V Site,β m/s VSite,β=VR*Md*Mz,cat*MS,Mt Pitch α 20 Deg 7 P a g e
8 Pitch α rad Width B 12.2 m Width Span S w - m Length D 24 m Height Z 5.25 m Bay Span 3 m Purlin Spacing 2.2 m Number of Intermediate Purlin 4 h/d 0.22 h/b 0.43 Wind Pressure ρair ρ 1.2 Kg/m 3 dynamic response factor C dyn 1 Wind Pressure ρ*c fig Kg/m 2 ρ=0.5ρair*(vdes,β) 2 *Cfig*Cdyn 2.4 (AS1170.2) WIND DIRECTION 1 (Perpendicular to Length) Internal Pressure Opening Assumption Internal Pressure Coefficient (Without Dominant) MIN Internal Pressure Coefficient (Without Dominant) MAX Internal Pressure Coefficient (With Dominant) MIN Internal Pressure Coefficient (With Dominant) MAX N 0.3 Combination Factor K C,i 1 Internal Pressure Coefficient MIN C p,i 0.70 Internal Pressure Coefficient MAX C p,i 0.70 Table 5.1 A (AS1170.2) Table 5.1 B (AS1170.2) External Pressure 8 P a g e
9 1. Windward Wall C P,e 0.7 Table 5.2 A Area Reduction Factor K a 1 Table 5.4 combination factor applied to internal pressures K C,e 0.8 local pressure factor K l 1 porous cladding reduction factor K p 1 aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e 0.56 Wind Wall Pressure P 0.14 kpa Edge Column Force F 0.21 kn/m Intermediate Column Force F 0.41 kn/m 2. Leeward Wall C P,e -0.4 Table 5.2 B Area Reduction Factor K a 1 Table 5.4 combination factor applied to internal pressures K C,e 0.8 local pressure factor K l 1 porous cladding reduction factor K p 1 aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e Lee Wall Pressure P kpa Edge Column Force F kn/m Intermediate Column Force F kn/m 3. Side Wall Table 5.2 C Area Reduction Factor K a 1 Table 5.4 combination factor applied to internal pressures K C,e 0.8 local pressure factor K l 1 porous cladding reduction factor K p 1 C P,e to 1h C P,e h to 2h C P,e h to 3h C P,e -0.2 >3h aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e to 1h aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e h to 2h aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e h to 3h aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e >3h Side Wall Pressure P kpa 0 to 1h Side Wall Pressure P kpa 1h to 2h 9 P a g e
10 Side Wall Pressure P kpa 2h to 3h Side Wall Pressure P kpa >3h 4. Roof α>10 o r (rise) r 2.3 m h/r h/r 2.28 Breadth Effect 1.18 (b/d)^0.25>1 Rise-to-span ratio r/d Roof Windward Quarter U U 3.05 m Area Reduction Factor K a 1 combination factor applied to internal pressures K C,e 0.8 local pressure factor K l 1 porous cladding reduction factor K p 1 MIN C P,e Table C3 MAX C P,e 0 Factored External Pressure Coefficient MIN C P,e Factored External Pressure Coefficient MAX C P,e 0.00 aerodynamic shape factor MIN C fig,e aerodynamic shape factor MAX C fig,e 0.00 Pressure MIN P kpa Pressure MAX P 0.00 kpa Edge Rafter Force MIN F kn/m Edge Rafter Force Max F 0.00 kn/m Intermediate Rafter Force MIN F kn/m Intermediate Rafter Force MAX F 0.00 kn/m 4.2 Roof Centre Half T T 6.1 m Area Reduction Factor K a 1 combination factor applied to internal pressures K C,e 0.8 local pressure factor K l 1 porous cladding reduction factor K p 1 MIN C P,e Table C3 MAX C P,e Factored External Pressure Coefficient MIN C P,e Factored External Pressure Coefficient MAX C P,e aerodynamic shape factor MIN C fig,e P a g e
11 aerodynamic shape factor MAX C fig,e Pressure MIN P kpa Pressure MAX P kpa Edge Rafter Force MIN F kn/m Edge Rafter Force Max F kn/m Intermediate Rafter Force MIN F kn/m Intermediate Rafter Force MAX F kn/m 4.1 Roof Windward Quarter D D 3.05 m Area Reduction Factor K a 1 combination factor applied to internal pressures K C,e 0.8 local pressure factor K l 1 porous cladding reduction factor K p 1 MIN C P,e Table C3 MAX C P,e 0 Factored External Pressure Coefficient MIN C P,e Factored External Pressure Coefficient MAX C P,e 0.00 aerodynamic shape factor MIN C fig,e aerodynamic shape factor MAX C fig,e 0.00 Pressure MIN P kpa Pressure MAX P 0.00 kpa Edge Rafter Force MIN F kn/m Edge Rafter Force Max F 0.00 kn/m Intermediate Rafter Force MIN F kn/m Intermediate Rafter Force MAX F 0.00 kn/m WIND DIRECTION 2 (Parallel to Length) Internal Pressure Opening Assumption Internal Pressure Coefficient (Without Dominant) MIN Internal Pressure Coefficient (Without Dominant) MAX Table 5.1 A (AS1170.2) 11 P a g e
12 Internal Pressure Coefficient (With Dominant) MIN Internal Pressure Coefficient (With Dominant) MAX 0.2 N 0.3 Cpi= N*Cpe Combination Factor K C,i Internal Pressure Coefficient MIN C p,i 0.70 Internal Pressure Coefficient MAX C p,i 0.70 External Pressure Table 5.1 B (AS1170.2) 1. Windward Wall C P,e 0.7 Table 5.2 A Area Reduction Factor K a 1 Table 5.4 combination factor applied to internal pressures K C,e 0.8 local pressure factor K l 1 porous cladding reduction factor K p 1 aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e 0.56 Wind Wall Pressure P 0.14 kpa Edge Column Force F #VALUE! kn/m Intermediate Column Force F #VALUE! kn/m 2. Leeward Wall C P,e -0.3 Table 5.2 B Area Reduction Factor K a 1 Table 5.4 combination factor applied to internal pressures K C,e 0.8 local pressure factor K l 1 porous cladding reduction factor K p 1 aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e Lee Wall Pressure P kpa Edge Column Force F #VALUE! kn/m Intermediate Column Force F #VALUE! kn/m 3. Side Wall Table 5.2 C Area Reduction Factor K a 1 Table 5.4 combination factor applied to internal pressures K C,e 0.8 local pressure factor K l 1 porous cladding reduction factor K p 1 C P,e to 1h C P,e h to 2h C P,e h to 3h 12 P a g e
13 C P,e -0.2 >3h aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e to 1h aerodynamic shape factor C fig,e h to 2h Side Wall Pressure P kpa 0 to 1h Side Wall Pressure P kpa 1h to 2h Side Wall Pressure P kpa 2h to 3h Side Wall Pressure P kpa >3h 4. Roof α<10 o Area Reduction Factor K a 1 Table 5.3 A combination factor applied to internal pressures K C,e 0.8 local pressure factor K l 1 porous cladding reduction factor K p 1 MIN C P,e to 0.5h MIN C P,e to 1h MIN C P,e h to 2h MIN C P,e h to 3h MIN C P,e >3h MAX MAX MAX MAX MAX C P,e to 0.5h C P,e to 1h C P,e h to 2h C P,e h to 3h C P,e 0.20 >3h aerodynamic shape factor MIN C fig,e to 0.5h aerodynamic shape factor MIN C fig,e to 1h aerodynamic shape factor MIN C fig,e h to 2h aerodynamic shape factor MIN C fig,e h to 3h aerodynamic shape factor MIN C fig,e >3h aerodynamic shape factor MAX C fig,e to 0.5h aerodynamic shape factor MAX C fig,e to 1h 13 P a g e
14 aerodynamic shape factor MAX C fig,e 0 1h to 2h aerodynamic shape factor MAX C fig,e h to 3h aerodynamic shape factor MAX C fig,e 0.16 >3h Pressure MIN P kpa 0 to 0.5h Pressure MIN P kpa 0.5 to 1h Pressure MIN P kpa 1h to 2h Pressure MIN P kpa 2h to 3h Pressure MIN P kpa >3h Pressure MAX P kpa 0 to 0.5h Pressure MAX P kpa 0.5 to 1h Pressure MAX P 0.00 kpa 1h to 2h Pressure MAX P 0.02 kpa 2h to 3h Pressure MAX P 0.04 kpa >3h Edge Purlin Force MIN F kn/m 0 to 0.5h Edge Purlin Force MIN F kn/m 0.5 to 1h Edge Purlin Force MIN F kn/m 1h to 2h Edge Purlin Force MIN F kn/m 2h to 3h Edge Purlin Force MIN F kn/m >3h Edge Purlin Force MAX F kn/m 0 to 0.5h Edge Purlin Force MAX F kn/m 0.5 to 1h Edge Purlin Force MAX F 0.00 kn/m 1h to 2h Edge Purlin Force MAX F 0.02 kn/m 2h to 3h Edge Purlin Force MAX F 0.04 kn/m >3h Intermediate Purlin Force MIN F kn/m 0 to 0.5h Intermediate Purlin Force MIN F kn/m 0.5 to 1h Intermediate Purlin Force MIN F kn/m 1h to 2h Intermediate Purlin Force MIN F kn/m 2h to 3h Intermediate Purlin Force MIN F kn/m >3h Intermediate Purlin Force MAX F kn/m 0 to 0.5h Intermediate Purlin Force MAX F kn/m 0.5 to 1h Intermediate Purlin Force MAX F 0.00 kn/m 1h to 2h Intermediate Purlin Force MAX F 0.04 kn/m 2h to 3h Intermediate Purlin Force MAX F 0.09 kn/m >3h 14 P a g e
15 4.2.1 Pressure summary Roof WIND EXTERNAL PRESSURE Direction1 (Perpendicular to Length) Direction2 (Parallel to Length) Windward (kpa) Leeward (kpa) Sidewall (m) Windward Quarter Centre Half Leeward Quarter Length (m) (m) (Kpa) (Kpa) 0-1h h - 2h h - 3h >3h Length (m) (m) d 0.25d d 0.75d - 1d Wind Internal Pressure (kpa) Min (Kpa) Max (Kpa) Length (m) (m) Min (Kpa) Max (Kpa) h h-1h h-2h h-3h >3h Min (kpa) Max (kpa) Min (kpa) Max (kpa) Proportion of Cpe Proportion of Cpe Proportion of Cpe Proportion of Cpe Direction 1 Direction 2 AS P a g e
16 4.3 Wind Load Diagrams Wind 1(case 1) Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd Wind 1(case 2) 16 P a g e
17 4.3.3 Wind 2(Case1) Wind 2(case 2) After 3D model analysis, each member is checked based on adverse load combination. In this regard the maximum bending moment, shear and axial force due to adverse load combinations for each member are presented as below: 17 P a g e
18 4.3.5 Max Bending Moment due to critical load combination in major axis Max Bending Moment in minor axis due to critical load combination 18 P a g e
19 4.3.7 Max Shear in due to critical load combination Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd Max Axial force in upright support and roof beam due to critical load combination 19 P a g e
20 4.3.9 Max reactions Max Reaction (Bearing) N * = 5.3 kn Max Reaction (Uplift) N * = 8.35 kn 5 Checking Members Based on AS4100:1998 All Members pass 20 P a g e
21 6 Summary 6.1 Conclusions a. The 12.2m x 24.4m The Platoon Tent structure as specified has been analyzed with a conclusion that it has the capacity to withstand wind speeds up to and including 80km/hr. b. For forecast winds in excess of 80km/hr all fabric shall be removed from the frames, and the structure should be completely dismantled. c. Wall cross bracing as well as roof cable bracing are required at each end bay to resist against lateral movement due to wind direction2. d. For uplift due to 80km/hr, 10 kn (1T) holding down weight/per leg for upright support is required. e. The bearing pressure of soil should be clarified and checked by an engineer prior to any construction for considering foundation and base plate. f. Bracing Cables are required to have the minimum tensile strength (SWL) equal to 10kN. g. Design of fabric by others. Yours faithfully, E.A. Bennett M.I.E. Aust. NPER P a g e
22 7 Appendix A Base Anchorage Requirements 24.4m x 12.2m x 6.4m The Platoon Tent Structure: Tent Span Sile Type Required Weight Per Leg A 1000kg B 1000kg 12.2 m C 1000kg D 1000kg E 1000kg Definition of Soil Types: Type A : Loose sand such as dunal sand. Uncompacted site filling may also be included in this soil type. Type B : Medium to stiff clays or silty clays Type C: Moderately compact sand or gravel eg. of alluvial origin. Type D : Compact sand and gravel eg. Weathered sandstone or compacted quarry rubble hardstand Type E : Concrete slab on ground. Number of dyna bolts and slab thickness to be designed. 22 P a g e
23 8 Appendix B Hold Down Method Details 23 P a g e
Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.
Client: Project: Extreme Marquees Design check 5m 9m Function Standard Tent Structure for 80km/hr Wind 4m 9m Function Standard Tent Structure for 80km/hr Wind 3m 9m Function Standard Tent Structure for
More informationCivil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.
Client: Project: Reference: Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Design check 6m 6m Pavilion Marquees Structure for 40km/hr Wind Spead Extreme Marquees Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked by: EAB Date: 22/03/2017
More informationCivil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.
Client: Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Project: Design check 6m, 8m, 8m, 10m, 12m, 14m & 16m Single Pole Star Shade Structure for 45km/hr Wind Spead Reference: Extreme Marquees Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked
More informationCivil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.
Client: Easy Signs Pty. Ltd. Project: Design check 3m 3m, 3m 4.5m & 3m 6m Folding Marquees for Pop-up Gazebos for 45km/hr Wind Speed Reference: Easy Signs Pty. Ltd. Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked
More informationCivil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.
Client: Project: Wind Speed. Reference: EXTREME MARQUEES PTY. LTD. Design check 6m, 8m, 10m, 12m Event Standard Tents (5m Bay) for 80km/hr Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked
More informationCivil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.
Client: EXTREME MARQUEES PTY. LTD. Project: Design check 8m, 9m, 10m, 12m, 15m, 16m, 18m Event Deluxe Tents (5m Bay) for 100km/hr Wind Speed. Reference: Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Technical Data Report by:
More informationCivil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.
Client: EXTREME MARQUEES PTY. LTD. Project: Design check 6m, 8m, 9m, 10m, 12m Function Deluxe Tents (3m Bay) for 80km/hr Wind Speed. Reference: Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked
More informationCivil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.
Client: Project: Speed. Reference: EXTREME MARQUEES PTY. LTD. Design check 3m Pinnacle Range Square Pagoda Tents for 70km/hr Wind Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked by: EAB Date:
More informationCivil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.
Client: Project: Reference: Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Design check 3m 3m Folding Marquees Structure for 91.8km/hr Wind Spead Extreme Marquees Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked by: EAB Date: 04/11/2016
More informationRegulation 1507: Certificate of Compliance Design
Building Act 1993 Building Interim Regulations 2017 Regulation 1507: Certificate of Compliance Design To Victorian Building Authority Relevant building surveyor: Postal address: PO Box 536 Melbourne VIC
More informationRegulation 1507: Certificate of Compliance Design
To Victorian Building Authority Relevant building surveyor: Postal address: PO Box 536 Melbourne VIC 3001 Building Act 1993 Building Regulations 2006 Regulation 1507: Certificate of Compliance Design Chief
More informationCivil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.
Client: Project: Wind Speed. Reference: EXTREME MARQUEES PTY. LTD. Design check 8m & 10m Pinnacle Range Square Pagoda Tents for 80km/hr Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Technical Data Report by: KZ Checked by:
More informationFRAME ANALYSIS. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
FRAME ANALYSIS Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email: iznisyahrizal@utm.my Introduction 3D Frame: Beam, Column & Slab 2D Frame Analysis Building
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Structural Description The two pinned (at the bases) portal frame is stable in its plane due to the moment connection
More informationKIBÆK TENT BOOK - 12 M WITHOUT GUY LINES. Static calculations of 12 m tent. Prepared for: Kibæk pressening. Revision 0, March 23, 2016
Svend Ole Hansen ApS SCT. JØRGENS ALLÉ 5C DK-1615 KØBENHAVN V DENMARK TEL: (+45) 33 25 38 38 WWW.SOHANSEN.DK WIND ENGINEERING FLUID DYNAMICS KIBÆK TENT BOOK - 12 M WITHOUT GUY LINES Static calculations
More informationLICENCE. for. Click on the red box above to activate the Licence Agreement scroll bar. WEB LINKS
LICENCE for Licensee: Date: Click on the red box above to activate the Licence Agreement scroll bar. WEB LINKS Check if this document is current Find similar documents Visit our website International Standards
More informationENG1001 Engineering Design 1
ENG1001 Engineering Design 1 Structure & Loads Determine forces that act on structures causing it to deform, bend, and stretch Forces push/pull on objects Structures are loaded by: > Dead loads permanent
More informationStructural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 0 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic Loads
More informationEAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design
UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA 1 st. Semester Examination 2004/2005 Academic Session October 2004 EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design Time : 3 hours Instruction to candidates: 1. Ensure that this paper contains
More informationStructural, Snow & Wind Loading Appraisal Report
Company Name Or Logo Here Structural, Snow & Wind Loading Appraisal Report In accordance with Guide to the Installation of Photovoltaic Systems 2012 2 nd Edition Reference number 001 Company Name Solar
More informationAnnex - R C Design Formulae and Data
The design formulae and data provided in this Annex are for education, training and assessment purposes only. They are based on the Hong Kong Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013 (HKCP-2013).
More informationDesign of Beams (Unit - 8)
Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Contents Introduction Beam types Lateral stability of beams Factors affecting lateral stability Behaviour of simple and built - up beams in bending (Without vertical stiffeners)
More informationEntrance exam Master Course
- 1 - Guidelines for completion of test: On each page, fill in your name and your application code Each question has four answers while only one answer is correct. o Marked correct answer means 4 points
More informationCH. 5 TRUSSES BASIC PRINCIPLES TRUSS ANALYSIS. Typical depth-to-span ratios range from 1:10 to 1:20. First: determine loads in various members
CH. 5 TRUSSES BASIC PRINCIPLES Typical depth-to-span ratios range from 1:10 to 1:20 - Flat trusses require less overall depth than pitched trusses Spans: 40-200 Spacing: 10 to 40 on center - Residential
More information7 STATICALLY DETERMINATE PLANE TRUSSES
7 STATICALLY DETERMINATE PLANE TRUSSES OBJECTIVES: This chapter starts with the definition of a truss and briefly explains various types of plane truss. The determinancy and stability of a truss also will
More informationLoad combinations will be created according to the below option.
Eurocode Wizards The Eurocode Wizard option shows a dialogue box where various pre-defined beams, frames, rafters and trusses can be stated easily and roof, snow, wind and imposed loads as well as load
More informationmy!wind Ltd 5 kw wind turbine Static Stability Specification
my!wind Ltd 5 kw wind turbine Static Stability Specification 1 P a g e 0 3 / 0 4 / 2 0 1 4 Contents Contents... 2 List of Changes... 2 Appendixes... 2 General remarks... 3 1. Introduction... 4 2. Geometry...
More informationPLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder
16 PLATE GIRDERS II 1.0 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the current practice for the design of plate girders adopting meaningful simplifications of the equations derived in the chapter on Plate Girders
More informationmy!wind Ltd 5 kw wind turbine Static Stability Specification
my!wind Ltd 5 kw wind turbine Static Stability Specification 1 P a g e 0 3 / 0 4 / 2 0 1 4 Contents Contents... 2 List of Changes... 2 Appendixes... 2 General remarks... 3 1. Introduction... 4 2. Geometry...
More informationCase Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.
ARCH 631 Note Set 11 S017abn Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. Building description The building is a three-story office building
More informationProject Name Wind Analysis Report Presented to: Client Logo Revision Generated by Date Reviewed by Date Comment
Project Name Wind Analysis Report Presented to: Client Logo Revision Generated by Date Reviewed by Date Comment 0 1 2 3 1.1.0 Introduction According to the approved Design Basis The wind speed is considered
More informationCE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-
CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing Openings in RC Flexural Members- Assoc Pr Tan Kiang Hwee Department Civil Engineering National In this lecture DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
More informationStructural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode 3 Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 20 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic
More informationDesign of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602
Design of wall panel according to EN 160 Example 3: Wall panel with wind load 1.1 Issue Design of a wall panel at an industrial building Materials with a compressive strength 3,5, density class 500, welded
More informationApplication nr. 7 (Connections) Strength of bolted connections to EN (Eurocode 3, Part 1.8)
Application nr. 7 (Connections) Strength of bolted connections to EN 1993-1-8 (Eurocode 3, Part 1.8) PART 1: Bolted shear connection (Category A bearing type, to EN1993-1-8) Structural element Tension
More informationSabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are
More informationCHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams
CHAPTER 4 Design of R C Beams Learning Objectives Identify the data, formulae and procedures for design of R C beams Design simply-supported and continuous R C beams by integrating the following processes
More informationSERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN
CHAPTER 11 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN Article 49. Cracking Limit State 49.1 General considerations In the case of verifications relating to Cracking Limit State, the effects of actions comprise
More informationFor sunshades using the Zee blades wind loads are reduced by 10 psf.
C.R. Laurence Co., Inc. 2503 East Vernon Los Angeles, CA 90058 24 July 2009 SUBJ: CR LAURENCE UNIVERSAL SUN SHADES The CRL Universal Aluminum Sun Shades were evaluated in accordance with the 2006 International
More information8 Deflectionmax. = 5WL 3 384EI
8 max. = 5WL 3 384EI 1 salesinfo@mechanicalsupport.co.nz PO Box 204336 Highbrook Auckland www.mechanicalsupport.co.nz 2 Engineering Data - s and Columns Structural Data 1. Properties properties have been
More informationBending Stress. Sign convention. Centroid of an area
Bending Stress Sign convention The positive shear force and bending moments are as shown in the figure. Centroid of an area Figure 40: Sign convention followed. If the area can be divided into n parts
More informationMechanics of Solids. Mechanics Of Solids. Suraj kr. Ray Department of Civil Engineering
Mechanics Of Solids Suraj kr. Ray (surajjj2445@gmail.com) Department of Civil Engineering 1 Mechanics of Solids is a branch of applied mechanics that deals with the behaviour of solid bodies subjected
More informationD : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown.
D : SOLID MECHANICS Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each. Q.1 Find the force (in kn) in the member BH of the truss shown. Q.2 Consider the forces of magnitude F acting on the sides of the regular hexagon having
More informationBalcony balustrades using the SG12 laminated glass system: PAGE 1 (SG12FF010717) Structural Calculations for SG12 System balustrades using 21.5mm laminated toughened glass without the need for a handrail
More informationMECHANICS OF STRUCTURES SCI 1105 COURSE MATERIAL UNIT - I
MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES SCI 1105 COURSE MATERIAL UNIT - I Engineering Mechanics Branch of science which deals with the behavior of a body with the state of rest or motion, subjected to the action of forces.
More informationComparison for MSC CJ62 rig of ISO versus SNAME for Clay and Sand site
Phase 2 ISO 19905-1 Benchmarking study GustoMSC 21 Oct 2010 Comparison for MSC CJ62 rig of ISO versus SNAME for Clay and Sand site www.gustomsc.com Basic data Jack-up: MSC design CJ62 type drilling rig
More informationK Design Graphs and Charts for Raft Foundations Spanning Local Depressions
K Design Graphs and Charts for Raft Foundations Spanning Local Depressions The reader is advised to read the text in Chapter 13 before using these charts. The charts and figures are repeated here for quick
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)
Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of one-way ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are
More informationPh.D. Preliminary Examination Analysis
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Spring Semester 2017 Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Materials Name:......................................... Ph.D.
More informationStructural Calculations For:
Structural Calculations For: Project: Address: Job No. Revision: Date: 1400 N. Vasco Rd. Livermore, CA 94551 D031014 Delta 1 - Plan Check May 8, 2015 Client: Ferreri & Blau MEMBER REPORT Roof, Typical
More information2D - STRIP ANCHOR LIFTING SYSTEM
2D - STRIP ANCHOR LIFTING SYSTEM WWW.TERWA.COM Terwa reserves the right to make changes to the documentation at any time Page 1 OVERVIEW LIFTING CLUTCHES AND TRANSPORT ANCHOR SA-B SA-ST SA-TTU UNIVERSAL
More informationCHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.
CHAPTER 5 Question Brief Explanation No. 5.1 From Fig. IBC 1613.5(3) and (4) enlarged region 1 (ASCE 7 Fig. -3 and -4) S S = 1.5g, and S 1 = 0.6g. The g term is already factored in the equations, thus
More informationAssignment 1 - actions
Assignment 1 - actions b = 1,5 m a = 1 q kn/m 2 Determine action on the beam for verification of the ultimate limit state. Axial distance of the beams is 1 to 2 m, cross section dimensions 0,45 0,20 m
More informationUniversity of Sheffield. Department of Civil Structural Engineering. Member checks - Rafter 44.6
Member checks - Rafter 34 6.4Haunch (UB 457 x 191 x 89) The depth of a haunch is usually made approximately twice depth of the basic rafter sections, as it is the normal practice to use a UB cutting of
More informationFailure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas
Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING LECTURE VIII Dr. Jason E. Charalambides Failure in Flexure!
More informationSTRUCTURAL VERIFICATION OF A 60.7 M DOME ROOF FOR TANK FB 2110
CTS Netherlands B.V. Riga 10 2993 LW Barendrecht The Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)180 531027 (office) Fax: +31 (0)180 531848 (office) E-mail: info@cts-netherlands.com Website: www.cts-netherlands.com Chamber
More informationCHAPTER 4. Stresses in Beams
CHAPTER 4 Stresses in Beams Problem 1. A rolled steel joint (RSJ) of -section has top and bottom flanges 150 mm 5 mm and web of size 00 mm 1 mm. t is used as a simply supported beam over a span of 4 m
More informationRigid and Braced Frames
RH 331 Note Set 12.1 F2014abn Rigid and raced Frames Notation: E = modulus of elasticit or Young s modulus F = force component in the direction F = force component in the direction FD = free bod diagram
More informationFinite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges
01/02/2016 Marco Donà Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges 1 Plastic hinge approach A plastic hinge represents a concentrated post-yield behaviour in one or more degrees of freedom. Hinges only
More informationREINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 1. Design of Column (Examples and Tutorials)
For updated version, please click on http://ocw.ump.edu.my REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 1 Design of Column (Examples and Tutorials) by Dr. Sharifah Maszura Syed Mohsin Faculty of Civil Engineering and Earth
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite
More informationQUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A
DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A (2 Marks) 1. Define longitudinal strain and lateral strain. 2. State
More informationPlastic Design of Portal frame to Eurocode 3
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering Plastic Design of Portal frame to Eurocode 3 Worked Example University of Sheffield Contents 1 GEOMETRY... 3 2 DESIGN BRIEF... 4 3 DETERMINING LOADING ON
More informationWind Resistant Design AIJ Recommendations for Wind Loads on Buildings
Lecture 6 Wind Resistant Design AIJ Recommendations for Wind Loads on Buildings Tokyo Polytechnic University The 1st Century Center of Excellence Program Yukio Tamura Background Building Standard Law of
More informationDelhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:
Serial : IG1_CE_G_Concrete Structures_100818 Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: E-mail: info@madeeasy.in Ph: 011-451461 CLASS TEST 018-19 CIVIL ENGINEERING
More informationCONNECTION DESIGN. Connections must be designed at the strength limit state
CONNECTION DESIGN Connections must be designed at the strength limit state Average of the factored force effect at the connection and the force effect in the member at the same point At least 75% of the
More informationSection Downloads. Design Process. Design Principles Outline. Basic Design Principles. Design Process. Section 06: Design Principles.
Section Downloads Section 06: Design Principles 1 Download & Print TTT I Sec 06 Slides TTT I Sec 06 Handout Section 05 Truss Materials Design Values PS 20 Section 01 TPI 1-2007 Selection 6.4.2 Repetitive
More informationTekla Structural Designer 2016i
Tekla Structural Designer 2016i Reference Guides (Australian Codes) September 2016 2016 Trimble Solutions Corporation part of Trimble Navigation Ltd. Table of Contents Analysis Verification Examples...
More informationVerification of a Micropile Foundation
Engineering manual No. 36 Update 02/2018 Verification of a Micropile Foundation Program: File: Pile Group Demo_manual_en_36.gsp The objective of this engineering manual is to explain the application of
More informationSteel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes
Steel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes INTRODUCTION When the need for a new structure arises, an individual or agency has to arrange the funds required for its construction. The individual or
More informationMetal Structures Lecture XIII Steel trusses
Metal Structures Lecture XIII Steel trusses Contents Definition #t / 3 Geometry and cross-sections #t / 7 Types of truss structures #t / 15 Calculations #t / 29 Example #t / 57 Results of calculations
More informationRoadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.
Example on Design of Slab Bridge Design Data and Specifications Chapter 5 SUPERSTRUCTURES Superstructure consists of 10m slab, 36m box girder and 10m T-girder all simply supported. Only the design of Slab
More informationQUESTION BANK. SEMESTER: V SUBJECT CODE / Name: CE 6501 / STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS-I
QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: V SUBJECT CODE / Name: CE 6501 / STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS-I Unit 5 MOMENT DISTRIBUTION METHOD PART A (2 marks) 1. Differentiate between distribution factors and carry
More informationFLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS
FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS Write Known Data Estimate self-weight of the member. a. The self-weight may be taken as 10 percent of the applied dead UDL or dead point load distributed over all the length.
More informationSTRESS, STRAIN AND DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS
VELAMMAL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, MADURAI 625009 DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING CE8301 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS I -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationAdvanced Computational Analysis ACA REPORT REPORT NO: S Dr M Lacey BSc PhD CEng MIMechE On Behalf Of Fairground Inspection Services Ltd.
Advanced Computational Analysis ACA REPORT REPORT NO: S1369-1 Title: Structural Verification Of Static 4-Person Bungee Trampoline Device Client: Mr Jonathan Crick Author: Dr M Lacey BSc PhD CEng MIMechE
More informationCONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110
E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column Effects From Structural Analysis Axial force, N (tension-ve and comp +ve) (ensure >= 0) 8000kN OK Major
More informationDetermine the resultant internal loadings acting on the cross section at C of the beam shown in Fig. 1 4a.
E X M P L E 1.1 Determine the resultant internal loadings acting on the cross section at of the beam shown in Fig. 1 a. 70 N/m m 6 m Fig. 1 Support Reactions. This problem can be solved in the most direct
More information2/23/ WIND PRESSURE FORMULA 2. PERCENT OF ALLOWABLE STRESS 3. FATIGUE DESIGN
Original Title Presented by Northwest Signal copyright 2010 Designing & Building Structural Steel Products since 1976 Primary Users Traffic Signal Strain & Mast Arm Poles Cantilever & Bridge Sign Structures
More informationClayey sand (SC)
Pile Bearing Capacity Analysis / Verification Input data Project Task : PROJECT: "NEW STEAM BOILER U-5190 Part : A-1 Descript. : The objective of this Analysis is the Pile allowable bearing Capacity Analysis
More informationTechnical Note 16 Equivalent Static Method
Technical Note 16 Equivalent Static Method Contents Technical Note 21 -... 1 1 Introduction... 1 2 Operational Strain in the Pipeline... 2 3 Seismicity... 2 4 Vertical Uplift... 3 5 Vertical Bearing...
More informationDESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL
DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL When the height of the retaining wall exceeds about 6 m, the thickness of the stem and heel slab works out to be sufficiently large and the design becomes
More information3 Hours/100 Marks Seat No.
*17304* 17304 14115 3 Hours/100 Marks Seat No. Instructions : (1) All questions are compulsory. (2) Illustrate your answers with neat sketches wherever necessary. (3) Figures to the right indicate full
More informationCIV100 Mechanics. Module 5: Internal Forces and Design. by: Jinyue Zhang. By the end of this Module you should be able to:
CIV100 Mechanics Module 5: Internal Forces and Design by: Jinyue Zhang Module Objective By the end of this Module you should be able to: Find internal forces of any structural members Understand how Shear
More informationANSI/SPRI ES-1 Test Reports UL Classified Products
Introduction to ES-1 The ANSI/SPRI ES-1 Roof Edge Standard is a reference for those who design, specify or install edge materials used with low slope roofs. This standard focuses primarily on design for
More information2018 WFCM Changes. Wood Frame Construction Manual for One- and Two-Family Dwellings (STD350)
2018 WFCM Changes Wood Frame Construction Manual for One- and Two-Family Dwellings (STD350) John Buddy Showalter, P.E. Vice President, Technology Transfer American Wood Council Lori Koch, P.E. Manager,
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV UNIT I STRESS, STRAIN DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS PART A (2 MARKS)
More informationEvaluation of short piles bearing capacity subjected to lateral loading in sandy soil
Evaluation of short piles bearing capacity subjected to lateral loading in sandy soil [Jafar Bolouri Bazaz, Javad Keshavarz] Abstract Almost all types of piles are subjected to lateral loads. In many cases,
More informationBRACING MEMBERS SUMMARY. OBJECTIVES. REFERENCES.
BRACING MEMBERS SUMMARY. Introduce the bracing member design concepts. Identify column bracing members requirements in terms of strength and stiffness. The assumptions and limitations of lateral bracing
More informationEN Eurocode 7. Section 3 Geotechnical Data Section 6 Spread Foundations. Trevor L.L. Orr Trinity College Dublin Ireland.
EN 1997 1: Sections 3 and 6 Your logo Brussels, 18-20 February 2008 Dissemination of information workshop 1 EN 1997-1 Eurocode 7 Section 3 Geotechnical Data Section 6 Spread Foundations Trevor L.L. Orr
More information7 Vlasov torsion theory
7 Vlasov torsion theory P.C.J. Hoogenboom, October 006 Restrained Warping The typical torsion stresses according to De Saint Venant only occur if warping can take place freely (Fig. 1). In engineering
More informationDesign of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN
Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN 1992-1-1 and EN 1992-2 Validation Examples Brno, 21.10.2010 IDEA RS s.r.o. South Moravian Innovation Centre, U Vodarny 2a, 616 00 BRNO tel.: +420-511
More informationSpecial edition paper
Development of New Aseismatic Structure Using Escalators Kazunori Sasaki* Atsushi Hayashi* Hajime Yoshida** Toru Masuda* Aseismatic reinforcement work is often carried out in parallel with improvement
More informationBTECH MECHANICAL PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS. Level 3 Unit 5
BTECH MECHANICAL PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS Level 3 Unit 5 FORCES AS VECTORS Vectors have a magnitude (amount) and a direction. Forces are vectors FORCES AS VECTORS (2 FORCES) Forces F1 and F2 are in
More informationChapter Objectives. Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads
Chapter Objectives Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads A Bridge Deck under Bending Action Castellated Beams Post-tensioned Concrete Beam Lateral Distortion of a Beam Due to Lateral Load
More informationCHAPTER 5 Statically Determinate Plane Trusses
CHAPTER 5 Statically Determinate Plane Trusses TYPES OF ROOF TRUSS TYPES OF ROOF TRUSS ROOF TRUSS SETUP ROOF TRUSS SETUP OBJECTIVES To determine the STABILITY and DETERMINACY of plane trusses To analyse
More informationCh 4a Stress, Strain and Shearing
Ch. 4a - Stress, Strain, Shearing Page 1 Ch 4a Stress, Strain and Shearing Reading Assignment Ch. 4a Lecture Notes Sections 4.1-4.3 (Salgado) Other Materials Handout 4 Homework Assignment 3 Problems 4-13,
More informationCHAPTER 5 Statically Determinate Plane Trusses TYPES OF ROOF TRUSS
CHAPTER 5 Statically Determinate Plane Trusses TYPES OF ROOF TRUSS 1 TYPES OF ROOF TRUSS ROOF TRUSS SETUP 2 ROOF TRUSS SETUP OBJECTIVES To determine the STABILITY and DETERMINACY of plane trusses To analyse
More information= 50 ksi. The maximum beam deflection Δ max is not = R B. = 30 kips. Notes for Strength of Materials, ET 200
Notes for Strength of Materials, ET 00 Steel Six Easy Steps Steel beam design is about selecting the lightest steel beam that will support the load without exceeding the bending strength or shear strength
More information8-5 Conjugate-Beam method. 8-5 Conjugate-Beam method. 8-5 Conjugate-Beam method. 8-5 Conjugate-Beam method
The basis for the method comes from the similarity of eqn.1 &. to eqn 8. & 8. To show this similarity, we can write these eqn as shown dv dx w d θ M dx d M w dx d v M dx Here the shear V compares with
More information