Structural Calculations For:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Structural Calculations For:"

Transcription

1 Structural Calculations For: Project: Address: Job No. Revision: Date: 1400 N. Vasco Rd. Livermore, CA D Delta 1 - Plan Check May 8, 2015 Client: Ferreri & Blau

2 MEMBER REPORT Roof, Typical Roof Joist with Mechanical 1 piece(s) 20" TJI 32" OC PASSED All locations are measured from the outside face of left support (or left cantilever end). All dimensions are horizontal. Design Results Location Allowed Result LDF Load: Combination (Pattern) Member Reaction (lbs) 33' 6 1/2" 1926 (2.80") Passed (100%) D Lr (All Spans) Shear (lbs) 33' 6 1/2" 4181 Passed (46%) D Lr (All Spans) Moment (Ft-lbs) 16' 6" Passed (84%) D Lr (All Spans) Live Load Defl. (in) 16' 10 1/2" Passed (L/509) D Lr (All Spans) Total Load Defl. (in) 17' 1/16" Passed (L/227) D Lr (All Spans) Deflection criteria: LL (L/240) and TL (L/180). Bracing (Lu): All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 4' 9 7/8" o/c unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. System : Roof Member Type : Joist Building Use : Residential Building Code : IBC Design Methodology : ASD Member Pitch: 0.25/12 Bearing Length Loads to Supports (lbs) Supports Total Available Required Dead Blocking Panels are assumed to carry no loads applied directly above them and the full load is applied to the member being designed. At hanger supports, the Total Bearing dimension is equal to the width of the material that is supporting the hanger ¹ See Connector grid below for additional information and/or requirements. Roof Live Total Accessories 1 - Beveled Plate - DF 3.50" 3.50" 2.55" Blocking 2 - Hanger on 20" DF beam 3.50" Hanger¹ 2.80" See note ¹ Connector: Simpson Strong-Tie Connectors Support Model Seat Length Top Nails Face Nails Member Nails Accessories 2 - Face Mount Hanger Connector not found N/A N/A N/A N/A Dead Roof Live Loads Location Spacing (0.90) (non-snow: 1.25) Comments 1 - Uniform (PSF) 0 to 33' 10" 32" Roof 2 - Point (lb) 16' 6" N/A Point (lb) 23' 6" N/A Weyerhaeuser Notes Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of its products will be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software. Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for installation details. ( Accessories (Rim Board, Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks) are not designed by this software. Use of this software is not intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction. The designer of record, builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project. Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards. The product application, input design loads, dimensions and support information have been provided by Forte Software Operator Forte Software Operator Justen Peek DP Advanced Engineering Inc. (925) jp@advengineering.com Job Notes 5/12/2015 5:43:02 PM Forte v4.6, Design Engine: V Roof Joist Calcs.4te Page 1 of 1

3 Drag / Collector Force Diagram Generator INPUT DATA TOTAL SHEAR FORCE (ASD) F p = kips NUMBER OF SEGMENTS n = 3 Segment Length, ft Shear Wall? YES NO YES ANALYSIS TOTAL DRAG LENGTH L drag = 67 ft TOTAL SHEAR WALL LENGTH L wall = ft DIAPHRAGM SHEAR STRESS v diaphragm = F p / v drag = 354 plf SHEAR WALL SHEAR STRESS v shear wall = F p / v wall = 855 plf Section Point Distance, ft Axial Force Drag Axial Force, kips Distance, ft DRAG / COLLECTOR FORCE DIAGRAM SHEAR WALL & DRAG ELEVATION

4 Drag / Collector Force Diagram Generator INPUT DATA TOTAL SHEAR FORCE (ASD) F p = kips NUMBER OF SEGMENTS n = 2 Segment 1 2 Length, ft Shear Wall? NO YES ANALYSIS TOTAL DRAG LENGTH L drag = ft TOTAL SHEAR WALL LENGTH L wall = 40 ft DIAPHRAGM SHEAR STRESS v diaphragm = F p / v drag = 356 plf SHEAR WALL SHEAR STRESS v shear wall = F p / v wall = 589 plf Section Point Distance, ft Axial Force Drag Axial Force, kips Distance, ft DRAG / COLLECTOR FORCE DIAGRAM SHEAR WALL & DRAG ELEVATION

5 Drag / Collector Force Diagram Generator INPUT DATA TOTAL SHEAR FORCE (ASD) F p = kips NUMBER OF SEGMENTS n = 8 Segment Length, ft Shear Wall? NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES ANALYSIS TOTAL DRAG LENGTH TOTAL SHEAR WALL LENGTH L drag = ft L wall = ft DIAPHRAGM SHEAR STRESS v diaphragm = F p / v drag = 149 plf SHEAR WALL SHEAR STRESS v shear wall = F p / v wall = 446 plf Section Point Distance, ft Axial Force Drag Axial Force, kips Distance, ft DRAG / COLLECTOR FORCE DIAGRAM SHEAR WALL & DRAG ELEVATION

6 Drag / Collector Force Diagram Generator INPUT DATA TOTAL SHEAR FORCE (ASD) F p = kips NUMBER OF SEGMENTS n = 3 Segment Length, ft Shear Wall? NO YES NO ANALYSIS TOTAL DRAG LENGTH L drag = ft TOTAL SHEAR WALL LENGTH L wall = 16 ft DIAPHRAGM SHEAR STRESS v diaphragm = F p / v drag = 173 plf SHEAR WALL SHEAR STRESS v shear wall = F p / v wall = 1455 plf Section Point Distance, ft Axial Force Drag Axial Force, kips Distance, ft DRAG / COLLECTOR FORCE DIAGRAM SHEAR WALL & DRAG ELEVATION

7 Drag / Collector Force Diagram Generator INPUT DATA TOTAL SHEAR FORCE (ASD) F p = kips NUMBER OF SEGMENTS n = 9 Segment Length, ft Shear Wall? NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO ANALYSIS TOTAL DRAG LENGTH L drag = 92 ft TOTAL SHEAR WALL LENGTH L wall = 12 ft DIAPHRAGM SHEAR STRESS v diaphragm = F p / v drag = 44 plf SHEAR WALL SHEAR STRESS v shear wall = F p / v wall = 336 plf Section Point Distance, ft Axial Force Drag Axial Force, kips Distance, ft DRAG / COLLECTOR FORCE DIAGRAM SHEAR WALL & DRAG ELEVATION

8 PROJECT: CLIENT: Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE GOVERNING CODE: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: California Building Code, 2013 Edition New HVAC Unit on Roof Lateral Load System - Wood Framed Shear Walls LATERAL DESIGN CRITERIA: SEISMIC & SITE DATA - MCE MAP VALUES Ss % g S % g Site Class D Site coefficients and adjusted maximum considered eq. spectral response accel. parameters Fa Fv S MS =FaS S (EQ ) S M1 =FvS (EQ ) Design spectral response acceleration parameters. S DS =(2/3)S MS g (EQ ) S D1 =(2/3)S M g (EQ ) Importance Factor SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY BASED ON SHORT-PERIOD RESPONSE ACCELERATIONS: VALUE OF S DS 1 OR V S1 IS GREATER THAN.75 S DS < 0.167g A A A USE CATAGORY E 0.167g S DS < 0.33g B B C PER CBC g S DS < 0.50g C C D USE CATEGORY D 0.50g S DS D D D USE CATEGORY D SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY BASED ON 1-SEC RESPONSE ACCELERATIONS: VALUE OF S D1 S D1 < 0.067g 0.067g S D1 < 0.133g 0.133g S D1 < 0.20g 0.20g S D1 1 OR V S1 IS GREATER THAN 0.75 A A A USE CATAGORY E B B C PER CBC C C D USE CATEGORY D D D D USE CATEGORY D

9 PROJECT: 4 0 CLIENT: Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SEISMIC DESIGN FORCE (48HC-05): 4 ASCE 7-10 Table , a p 2.5 ASCE 7-10 Table , R p 6.0 Height of Equipment, Z 16.0 ft Height of Roof, h 16.0 ft Weight of Equipment, W P lbs 0.4a P S DS W F P P = [1+2(Z/h)] (R P /I P ) F P-MAX = 1.6S DS W P I P lbs lbs F P-min = 0.3S DS W P I P 260 lbs 2.0 F P-DESIGN = F P 434 lbs F v-design = 0.2S DS W P 174 lbs WIND DESIGN FORCE: Exposure Type C 3 q h = *K z *K zt *K d *V lb/sf K Z = ASCE 7-10 Table K Zt = ASCE 7-10 Section K d = ASCE 7-10 Table V= Basic Wind Speed 110 mph (GC r ) h = ASCE 7-10 Section (GC r ) v = ASCE 7-10 Section A f = Area of Equipment 21.4 sq-ft A r = Area of Equipment 24.1 sq-ft F h = q h (GC r ) h A f 962 lbs F v = q h (GC r ) v A r 858 lbs

10 PROJECT: 4 0 CLIENT: OVERTURNING DESIGN: Equipment Dimensions: Depth, D= 3.90 ft Length, L= 6.20 ft Height, H= 3.45 ft Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SEISMIC: Worst Case Uplift Reaction Load Case: 0.6D+0.7E R 1 = 18 lbs Net Uplift, Anchors Required Worst Case Downward Reaction Load Case: 1.0D+0.7E R 2 = -369 lbs WIND: Worst Case Uplift Reaction Load Case: 0.6D+0.6W R 1 = 336 lbs Net Uplift, Anchors Required Worst Case Downward Reaction Load Case: 1.0D+0.6W R 2 = -293 lbs

11 PROJECT: 4 0 CLIENT: Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ANCHORAGE RESULTS FOR UNIT TO CURB: The new unit is to be installed with (4) 5/8" diameter lag screws, (1) in each corner, embedded 4" into 4x6 purlin ALLOWABLE DOWEL SHEAR VALUES ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUE PER 2012 NDS TABLE 11K ANCHOR DIAMETER Minimum embedment 4" Load Duration increase taken as, C D =1.6 for seismic loading VERIFY CAPACITY EXCEEDS DEMAND: Number of Bolts in Shear= 4 Capacity Perpendicular to Grain= 704 lbs per bolt Required Capacity Perpendicular to Grain= 144 lbs per bolt ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL VALUES ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL VALUE PER 2012 NDS TABLE 11.2A ANCHOR DIAMETER EMBEDMENT DEPTH EMBEDMENT DEPTH SPECIFIC GRAVITY, G SPECIFIC GRAVITY ALLOWABLE SHEAR PARALLEL TO GRAIN (LBS) ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL* *Unthreaded upper 1.5" of embedment ignored for allowable withdrawal Load Duration increase taken as, C D =1.6 for seismic loading VERIFY CAPACITY EXCEEDS NEW DEMAND: Number of Bolts in Withdrawal= 2 Capacity= 1788 lbs per anchor Required Uplift= 168 lbs per anchor ALLOWABLE SHEAR PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN (LBS) VERIFY CAPACITY FOR COMBINED SHEAR AND TENSION: ALLOWABLE DESIGN VALUE IN DIRECTION ALPHA PER NDS EQN W'p 1788 LBS Z' 704 LBS a 49 DEG (W'p)Z' Capacity = Z'a = =1081 LBS (W'p)cos 2 a + Z' sin 2 a Required =221 LBS Force Ratio =0.20 Design OK

12 PROJECT: 4 0 CLIENT: Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SEISMIC DESIGN FORCE (48HC-08): 4 ASCE 7-10 Table , a p 2.5 ASCE 7-10 Table , R p 6.0 Height of Equipment, Z 16.0 ft Height of Roof, h 16.0 ft Weight of Equipment, W P lbs 0.4a P S DS W F P P = [1+2(Z/h)] (R P /I P ) F P-MAX = 1.6S DS W P I P lbs lbs F P-min = 0.3S DS W P I P 408 lbs 2.0 F P-DESIGN = F P 680 lbs F v-design = 0.2S DS W P 272 lbs WIND DESIGN FORCE: Exposure Type C 3 q h = *K z *K zt *K d *V lb/sf K Z = ASCE 7-10 Table K Zt = ASCE 7-10 Section K d = ASCE 7-10 Table V= Basic Wind Speed 110 mph (GC r ) h = ASCE 7-10 Section (GC r ) v = ASCE 7-10 Section A f = Area of Equipment 30.2 sq-ft A r = Area of Equipment 36.4 sq-ft F h = q h (GC r ) h A f 1360 lbs F v = q h (GC r ) v A r 1294 lbs

13 PROJECT: 4 0 CLIENT: OVERTURNING DESIGN: Equipment Dimensions: Depth, D= 4.96 ft Length, L= 7.34 ft Height, H= 4.12 ft Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SEISMIC: Worst Case Uplift Reaction Load Case: 0.6D+0.7E R 1 = 15 lbs Net Uplift, Anchors Required Worst Case Downward Reaction Load Case: 1.0D+0.7E R 2 = -565 lbs WIND: Worst Case Uplift Reaction Load Case: 0.6D+0.6W R 1 = 449 lbs Net Uplift, Anchors Required Worst Case Downward Reaction Load Case: 1.0D+0.6W R 2 = -413 lbs

14 PROJECT: 4 0 CLIENT: Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ANCHORAGE RESULTS FOR UNIT TO CURB: The new unit is to be installed with (4) 5/8" diameter lag screws, (1) in each corner, embedded 4" into 4x6 purlin ALLOWABLE DOWEL SHEAR VALUES ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUE PER 2012 NDS TABLE 11K ANCHOR DIAMETER Minimum embedment 4" Load Duration increase taken as, C D =1.6 for seismic loading VERIFY CAPACITY EXCEEDS DEMAND: Number of Bolts in Shear= 4 Capacity Perpendicular to Grain= 704 lbs per bolt Required Capacity Perpendicular to Grain= 204 lbs per bolt ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL VALUES ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL VALUE PER 2012 NDS TABLE 11.2A ANCHOR DIAMETER EMBEDMENT DEPTH EMBEDMENT DEPTH SPECIFIC GRAVITY, G SPECIFIC GRAVITY ALLOWABLE SHEAR PARALLEL TO GRAIN (LBS) ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL* *Unthreaded upper 1.5" of embedment ignored for allowable withdrawal Load Duration increase taken as, C D =1.6 for seismic loading VERIFY CAPACITY EXCEEDS NEW DEMAND: Number of Bolts in Withdrawal= 2 Capacity= 1788 lbs per anchor Required Uplift= 225 lbs per anchor ALLOWABLE SHEAR PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN (LBS) VERIFY CAPACITY FOR COMBINED SHEAR AND TENSION: ALLOWABLE DESIGN VALUE IN DIRECTION ALPHA PER NDS EQN W'p 1788 LBS Z' 704 LBS a 48 DEG (W'p)Z' Capacity = Z'a = =1054 LBS (W'p)cos 2 a + Z' sin 2 a Required =304 LBS Force Ratio =0.29 Design OK

HELIODYNE SOLAR COLLECTOR RACK STRUCTURES FOR HELIODYNE, INC. Structural calculations. Gobi 410 at 45 degrees. for WCM HELIODYNE RACK

HELIODYNE SOLAR COLLECTOR RACK STRUCTURES FOR HELIODYNE, INC. Structural calculations. Gobi 410 at 45 degrees. for WCM HELIODYNE RACK HELIODYNE RACK PROJECT: JOB NO: 2008-36 SHEET: DESIGNED BY: WCM DATE: CHECKED BY: SCOPE: KTD DATE: Racking Calculation Report 1 OF 1/22/2011 1/22/2011 17 Structural calculations for HELIODYNE SOLAR COLLECTOR

More information

Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures

Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures where: F a = 1.0 for rock sites which may be assumed if there is 10 feet of soil between the rock surface and the bottom of spread footings

More information

Beam Design - FLOOR JOIST

Beam Design - FLOOR JOIST Beam Design - FLOOR JOIST 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Sawn Lumber Species: Douglas Fir-Larch Grade: DF No.2 Size: 2 x 10 Design Span (L): 11.83 ft. Clear

More information

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.

CHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No. CHAPTER 5 Question Brief Explanation No. 5.1 From Fig. IBC 1613.5(3) and (4) enlarged region 1 (ASCE 7 Fig. -3 and -4) S S = 1.5g, and S 1 = 0.6g. The g term is already factored in the equations, thus

More information

Beam Design - Shed Roof Back Wall Beam-S

Beam Design - Shed Roof Back Wall Beam-S Beam Design - Shed Roof Back Wall Beam-S 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Glulam Species: Western Species Grade: 24F-V4 1.8E DF/DF Size: 2.5 x 6 Design Span (L):

More information

Beam Design - Awning

Beam Design - Awning Beam Design - Awning 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Sawn Lumber Species: Douglas Fir-Larch Grade: DF No.2 Size: 4 x 12 Design Span (L): 21.50 ft. Clear Span:

More information

Beam Design - Pine Tree

Beam Design - Pine Tree - Pine Tree 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Sawn Lumber Species: Southern Pine Grade: SP DSS Size: 2 x 8 Design Span (L): 11.83 ft. Clear Span: 11.67 ft. Total

More information

Beam Design - Trotin Project

Beam Design - Trotin Project Beam Design - Trotin Project 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Glulam Species: Western Species Grade: 24F-V4 1.8E DF/DF Size: 3.125 x 13.5 Design Span (L): 14.98

More information

Earthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept

Earthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept Earthquake Loads According to IBC 2003 The process of determining earthquake loads according to IBC 2003 Spectral Design Method can be broken down into the following basic steps: Determination of the maimum

More information

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: PNEUTEK, INC.

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: PNEUTEK, INC. ICC ES Report ICC ES () 7 () www.icc es.org Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ESR 1 Reissued /1 This report is subject to renewal /. DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: 1 STEEL ING REPORT

More information

Structural Analysis Report of Anchorage Design for Propane Exchange Cage Aluminum

Structural Analysis Report of Anchorage Design for Propane Exchange Cage Aluminum Structural Analysis Report of Anchorage Design for Propane Exchange Cage Aluminum Conducted at: Various Locations San Jose, CA Prepared for: 21739 State Hwy 64 Canton, TX 75103 11/21/13 November 21, 2013

More information

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of Client: ProVent PV1805 Project: CBISC-05 Iso Curb CBISPRS Upper curb rail Unit: YORK ZX 04-07; XX A7; ZY, ZQ, XY, XQ 04-06 Curb Information Hcurb upper = 5.5 in (Height of upper curb rail) Lcurb = 70.375

More information

Dr. Ceasar Hearne. Structural Calculations. Project Address: 1700 East 3000 North, Layton, Utah

Dr. Ceasar Hearne. Structural Calculations. Project Address: 1700 East 3000 North, Layton, Utah Dr. Ceasar Hearne Structural Calculations Project Address: 1700 East 3000 North, Layton, Utah This engineering report is valid only for the aforementioned building located at the address above. This report

More information

QUAKE BRAKE TM MODEL QBC-12 SEISMIC SWAY BRACING KIT FEATURING

QUAKE BRAKE TM MODEL QBC-12 SEISMIC SWAY BRACING KIT FEATURING QUAKE BRAKE TM MODEL QBC-12 SEISMIC SWAY BRACING KIT FEATURING The QUAKE BRAKE TM Seismic Dampening Device. The QUAKE BRAKE TM was Certified NEBS Level 3 Zone Compliant after being tested in accordance

More information

*Refer to IBC Section , applicable when fall protection is required. Glass stresses are designed for a safety factor of of 4.0 (IBC ).

*Refer to IBC Section , applicable when fall protection is required. Glass stresses are designed for a safety factor of of 4.0 (IBC ). Architectural Railing Division C.R.Laurence Co., Inc. 2503 E Vernon Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90058 (T) 800.421.6144 (F) 800.587.7501 www.crlaurence.com 12 JAN 2011 SUBJ: TAPER-LOC SYSTEM DRY-GLAZE LAMINATED

More information

For sunshades using the Zee blades wind loads are reduced by 10 psf.

For sunshades using the Zee blades wind loads are reduced by 10 psf. C.R. Laurence Co., Inc. 2503 East Vernon Los Angeles, CA 90058 24 July 2009 SUBJ: CR LAURENCE UNIVERSAL SUN SHADES The CRL Universal Aluminum Sun Shades were evaluated in accordance with the 2006 International

More information

GENERAL INFORMATION FOR COLUMN BASE REACTIONS

GENERAL INFORMATION FOR COLUMN BASE REACTIONS U09Y0061A - GaragePlus - RV Storage R1 of 12 1050 North Watery Lane Ph: (435) 919-3100 Brigham City, UT 84302Fax: (435) 919-3101 Page R1 of Date: 3/24/09 GENERAL INFORMATION FOR COLUMN BASE REACTIONS FOR

More information

Allowable Design Stresses (psi)

Allowable Design Stresses (psi) 8 0 0. 2 2 1. 2 3 2 6 w w w. a n t h o n y f o r e s t. c o m 2 Allowable Design Stresses (psi) Power Beam Section Properties and Allowable Capacities 7.0 9.0 9.2 10.9 11.6 13.6 15.6 17.5 11.1 14.1 14.5

More information

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-92 ( **) Unit: ZF180

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-92 ( **) Unit: ZF180 6593 Riverdale St. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-92 (80-266-19**) Unit: ZF180 Curb Information Hcurb = 18 in (Height of curb) Lcurb = 115.25 in (Length of curb) wcurb = 84 in (Width of curb)

More information

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of

6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of 6593 Riverdale St. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-91 (80-266-18**) Unit: YORK ZJ,ZR 180-300 / ZF 210-300 / XP 180-240 Curb Information Hcurb = 18 in (Height of curb) Lcurb = 126.25 in (Length

More information

10012 Creviston DR NW Gig Harbor, WA fax

10012 Creviston DR NW Gig Harbor, WA fax C.R. Laurence Co., Inc. ATTN: Chris Hanstad 2503 East Vernon Los Angeles, CA 90058 27 March 2013 SUBJ: CRL SRS STANDOFF RAILING SYSTEM GLASS BALUSTRADE GUARDS The SRS Standoff Railing System is an engineered

More information

Structural Analysis Report of Anchorage Design for Propane Exchange Cage

Structural Analysis Report of Anchorage Design for Propane Exchange Cage Structural Analysis Report of Anchorage Design for Propane Exchange Cage Conducted at: Various Locations San Jose, CA Prepared for: 21739 State Hwy 64 Canton, TX 75103 March 5, 2014 3/5/14 Prepared by:

More information

CH. 5 TRUSSES BASIC PRINCIPLES TRUSS ANALYSIS. Typical depth-to-span ratios range from 1:10 to 1:20. First: determine loads in various members

CH. 5 TRUSSES BASIC PRINCIPLES TRUSS ANALYSIS. Typical depth-to-span ratios range from 1:10 to 1:20. First: determine loads in various members CH. 5 TRUSSES BASIC PRINCIPLES Typical depth-to-span ratios range from 1:10 to 1:20 - Flat trusses require less overall depth than pitched trusses Spans: 40-200 Spacing: 10 to 40 on center - Residential

More information

2018 WFCM Changes. Wood Frame Construction Manual for One- and Two-Family Dwellings (STD350)

2018 WFCM Changes. Wood Frame Construction Manual for One- and Two-Family Dwellings (STD350) 2018 WFCM Changes Wood Frame Construction Manual for One- and Two-Family Dwellings (STD350) John Buddy Showalter, P.E. Vice President, Technology Transfer American Wood Council Lori Koch, P.E. Manager,

More information

Characteristics of a Force Loads on Structures. Dead Load. Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake. Load Combinations ASD LRFD

Characteristics of a Force Loads on Structures. Dead Load. Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake. Load Combinations ASD LRFD Architecture 314 Structures I Characteristics of a Force Loads on Structures Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake Load Combinations ASD LRFD University of Michigan, TCAUP Structures I Slide 1 of 27

More information

1 Exterior Wall Members & Accessories

1 Exterior Wall Members & Accessories JamStud Introduction Table of Contents JamStud Introduc on...1 JamStud Assembly Comparisons...2 JamStud Design Considera ons...3- JamStud Sec on Proper es...5- JamStud Non Load Bearing Design Example...7-

More information

1 Exterior Wall Members & Accessories

1 Exterior Wall Members & Accessories JamStud Introduction Table of Contents JamStud Introduc on...1 JamStud Assembly Comparisons...2 JamStud Design Considera ons...3- JamStud Sec on Proper es...5- JamStud Non Load Bearing Design Example...7-

More information

MAXIMUM SUPERIMPOSED UNIFORM ASD LOADS, psf SINGLE SPAN DOUBLE SPAN TRIPLE SPAN GAGE

MAXIMUM SUPERIMPOSED UNIFORM ASD LOADS, psf SINGLE SPAN DOUBLE SPAN TRIPLE SPAN GAGE F-DEK ROOF (ASD) 1-1/2" high x 6" pitch x 36" wide SECTION PROPERTIES GAGE Wd 22 1.63 20 1.98 18 2.62 16 3.30 I D (DEFLECTION) 0.142 0.173 0.228 fy = 40 ksi Sp Sn 0.122 0.135 708 815 905 1211 1329 2365

More information

The first NDS (1944) was based on allowable stress design (ASD). Copyright American Wood Council. All rights reserved.

The first NDS (1944) was based on allowable stress design (ASD). Copyright American Wood Council. All rights reserved. History ASD and LRFD with the 2005 NDS Part 1 Member Design Presented by: John Buddy Showalter, P.E. Vice President, Technology Transfer The first NDS (1944) was based on allowable stress design (ASD).

More information

Sway Column Example. PCA Notes on ACI 318

Sway Column Example. PCA Notes on ACI 318 Sway Column Example PCA Notes on ACI 318 ASDIP Concrete is available for purchase online at www.asdipsoft.com Example 11.2 Slenderness Effects for Columns in a Sway Frame Design columns C1 and C2 in the

More information

20.0 L SR 3/4 2L /2x /2x3/6x3/8 L /2x /2x3/6 L /2x /2x3/6 L /2x /2x3/6 3.4666 5 @ 4 884.6 DESIGNED APPURTENANE LOADING TYPE ELEVATION TYPE ELEVATION (9) FV90-2 20 Pirod 3' Low Profile Platform 20 TOWER

More information

Section Downloads. Section Downloads. Handouts & Slides can be printed. Other documents cannot be printed Course binders are available for purchase

Section Downloads. Section Downloads. Handouts & Slides can be printed. Other documents cannot be printed Course binders are available for purchase Level II: Section 04 Simplified Method (optional) Section Downloads Section Downloads Handouts & Slides can be printed Version.0 Other documents cannot be printed Course binders are available for purchase

More information

2018 NDS Changes. National Design Specification for Wood Construction (STD120)

2018 NDS Changes. National Design Specification for Wood Construction (STD120) 2018 NDS Changes National Design Specification for Wood Construction (STD120) John Buddy Showalter, P.E. Vice President, Technology Transfer American Wood Council 13847IP The American Wood Council is a

More information

24' SEE DWG FOR SCREWING 2 PLY TOGETHER NOTE: FLOOR TRUSSES 19.2" O.C. **ALL FLOOR TRUSSES ARE THE SAME** 1'5"6 1'7"3 1'7"3 1'7"3 1'7"3 1'7"3

24' SEE DWG FOR SCREWING 2 PLY TOGETHER NOTE: FLOOR TRUSSES 19.2 O.C. **ALL FLOOR TRUSSES ARE THE SAME** 1'56 1'73 1'73 1'73 1'73 1'73 89043 FLOOR TRUSSES 19.2" O.C. NO PLUMBING (BEDROOMS) SEE DWG FOR SCREWING 2 PLY TOGETHER NOTE: 1'5"6 24" CHASE 2 PLY FX F **ALL FLOOR TRUSSES ARE THE SAME** Lot: CHAPEL Layout: DCS Designer: Robert Herron

More information

World Shelters. U-Dome 200. Dome Shelter. Engineering Report: Dome Structure ER October South G St., Suite 3 Arcata, CA USA

World Shelters. U-Dome 200. Dome Shelter. Engineering Report: Dome Structure ER October South G St., Suite 3 Arcata, CA USA Page 1 of 30 ER-87496 World Shelters 550 South G St., Suite 3 Arcata, CA 95521 USA Telephone: +1-707-822-6600 Email: info @ worldshelters.org U-Dome 200 Dome Shelter Engineering Report: Dome Structure

More information

Seismic load calculations per the NYS 2002 code

Seismic load calculations per the NYS 2002 code Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Presentations and other scholarship 2004 Seismic load calculations per the NYS 2002 code Abi Aghayere Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.rit.edu/other

More information

SIP PANEL DESIGN EXAMPLES USING NTA IM 14 TIP 02 SIP DESIGN GUIDE AND LISTING REPORT DATA

SIP PANEL DESIGN EXAMPLES USING NTA IM 14 TIP 02 SIP DESIGN GUIDE AND LISTING REPORT DATA NTA IM 14 TIP 0 SIP PANEL DESIGN EXAMPLES USING NTA IM 14 TIP 0 SIP DESIGN GUIDE AND LISTING REPORT DATA INTRODUCTION It is intended that this document e used in conjunction with competent engineering

More information

DESIGN EXAMPLES APPENDIX A

DESIGN EXAMPLES APPENDIX A APPENDIX A DESIGN EXAMPLES Comparative Shrinkage of Sawn Timber and Glulam Beams / 499 Simple Beam Design / 500 Upside-Down Beam Analysis / 50 Tension-face Notch / 504 Compression-face Notch / 505 Sloped

More information

Section Downloads. Design Process. Design Principles Outline. Basic Design Principles. Design Process. Section 06: Design Principles.

Section Downloads. Design Process. Design Principles Outline. Basic Design Principles. Design Process. Section 06: Design Principles. Section Downloads Section 06: Design Principles 1 Download & Print TTT I Sec 06 Slides TTT I Sec 06 Handout Section 05 Truss Materials Design Values PS 20 Section 01 TPI 1-2007 Selection 6.4.2 Repetitive

More information

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. ARCH 631 Note Set 11 S017abn Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. Building description The building is a three-story office building

More information

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 1 General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 2 AISC ASD and LRFD AISC ASD = American Institute of Steel Construction = Allowable Stress Design AISC Ninth

More information

Openings for Wood Framed Shear Walls

Openings for Wood Framed Shear Walls Advancements Click to edit in Force Master Transfer title stylearound Openings for Wood Framed Shear Walls Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Alese Ashuckian, PE, LEED AP Engineered

More information

Entrance exam Master Course

Entrance exam Master Course - 1 - Guidelines for completion of test: On each page, fill in your name and your application code Each question has four answers while only one answer is correct. o Marked correct answer means 4 points

More information

host structure (S.F.D.)

host structure (S.F.D.) TABLE 00.4 FBC Typical Mansard Beam [AAF] Allowable Span of Mansard Screen Enclosure Self-Mating Beams in accordance with requirements of Table 00.4 (and the 005 Aluminum Design Manual) using 6005T5 alloy:

More information

A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e

A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e H a t o R e y, P u e r t o R i c o G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g I n f o r m a t i o n Building Facts: 7-story parking structure + luxury apartments 900,000

More information

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING SECTION: STEEL ROOF DECKING REPORT HOLDER: NEW MILLENNIUM BUILDING SYSTEMS, LLC

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING SECTION: STEEL ROOF DECKING REPORT HOLDER: NEW MILLENNIUM BUILDING SYSTEMS, LLC 0 Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ICC ES Report ICC ES 000 (800) 423 6587 (562) 699 0543 www.icc es.org ESR 2657 Reissued 05/2017 This report is subject to renewal 03/2018. DIVISION: 05 00 00 METALS SECTION:

More information

PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT

PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT Structural Concrete Software System TN191_PT7_punching_shear_aci_4 011505 PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT 1. OVERVIEW Punching shear calculation applies to column-supported slabs, classified

More information

EXTERIOR FRAMING EXTERIOR FRAMING

EXTERIOR FRAMING EXTERIOR FRAMING 1 EXTERIOR FRAMING BUILDSTRONG www.buildstrong.com 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Product Identification...........................5 General Product Information....................... 4-5 Compliance Guaranteed...............................

More information

Structural, Snow & Wind Loading Appraisal Report

Structural, Snow & Wind Loading Appraisal Report Company Name Or Logo Here Structural, Snow & Wind Loading Appraisal Report In accordance with Guide to the Installation of Photovoltaic Systems 2012 2 nd Edition Reference number 001 Company Name Solar

More information

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of one-way ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are

More information

Wood Design. fv = shear stress fv-max = maximum shear stress Fallow = allowable stress Fb = tabular bending strength = allowable bending stress

Wood Design. fv = shear stress fv-max = maximum shear stress Fallow = allowable stress Fb = tabular bending strength = allowable bending stress Wood Design Notation: a = name for width dimension A = name for area Areq d-adj = area required at allowable stress when shear is adjusted to include self weight b = width of a rectangle = name for height

More information

Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003

Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003 Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003 Guide Specifications (1993-2002) 2.3 LOADS 2.4 LOAD COMBINATIONS

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Structural Description The two pinned (at the bases) portal frame is stable in its plane due to the moment connection

More information

2018 North Carolina Residential Code Prescriptive Tables for Selection of Support Elements for Beams, Girders, and Headers: Example Problems

2018 North Carolina Residential Code Prescriptive Tables for Selection of Support Elements for Beams, Girders, and Headers: Example Problems 2018 North Carolina Residential Code Prescriptive Tables for Selection of Support Elements for Beams, Girders, and Structural Building Components Association (SBCA) August 10, 2018 SBCA is an APPROVED

More information

PEER/SSC Tall Building Design. Case study #2

PEER/SSC Tall Building Design. Case study #2 PEER/SSC Tall Building Design Case study #2 Typical Plan View at Ground Floor and Below Typical Plan View at 2 nd Floor and Above Code Design Code Design Shear Wall properties Shear wall thickness and

More information

DES140: Designing for Lateral-Torsional Stability in Wood Members

DES140: Designing for Lateral-Torsional Stability in Wood Members DES140: Designing for Lateral-Torsional Stability in Wood embers Welcome to the Lateral Torsional Stability ecourse. 1 Outline Lateral-Torsional Buckling Basic Concept Design ethod Examples In this ecourse,

More information

Innovative Products February 2016

Innovative Products February 2016 Bison Pedestals & Accessories Material Testing Test Description Bison Results ASTM D792 ASTM D638 ASTM G155 ASTM G26 ASTM D790 ASTM D256 0 ASTM D5420 50.0 ASTM D2240 ASTM D648 231 ASTM D648 231 ASTM D635

More information

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT. WHISPER ft GUYED WIND TURBINE TEP # Revision 0 November 6, 2006 PORTABLE DOCUMENT FORMAT.

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT. WHISPER ft GUYED WIND TURBINE TEP # Revision 0 November 6, 2006 PORTABLE DOCUMENT FORMAT. Structural Analysis Report Whisper 500 30-ft Guyed Wind Turbine TEP # 061289 November 6, 2006 Page 1 of 7 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT WHISPER 500 30-ft GUYED WIND TURBINE TEP # 061289 Revision 0 November

More information

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of Engineering EVALUATION OF LIMIT DESIGN FOR EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT MASONRY WALLS

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of Engineering EVALUATION OF LIMIT DESIGN FOR EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT MASONRY WALLS The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Engineering EVALUATION OF LIMIT DESIGN FOR EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT MASONRY WALLS A Thesis in Architectural Engineering by Bradley S. Frederick

More information

2/23/ WIND PRESSURE FORMULA 2. PERCENT OF ALLOWABLE STRESS 3. FATIGUE DESIGN

2/23/ WIND PRESSURE FORMULA 2. PERCENT OF ALLOWABLE STRESS 3. FATIGUE DESIGN Original Title Presented by Northwest Signal copyright 2010 Designing & Building Structural Steel Products since 1976 Primary Users Traffic Signal Strain & Mast Arm Poles Cantilever & Bridge Sign Structures

More information

Standard Specification for Computing Reference Resistance of Wood-Based Materials and Structural Connections for Load and Resistance Factor Design 1

Standard Specification for Computing Reference Resistance of Wood-Based Materials and Structural Connections for Load and Resistance Factor Design 1 Designation: Standard Specification for Computing Reference Resistance of Wood-Based Materials and Structural Connections for Load and Resistance Factor Design 1 This standard is issued under the fixed

More information

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.

Civil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd. Client: EXTREME MARQUEES PTY. LTD. Project: Design check 24.4m x 12.2m x 6.4m The Platoon Tent Structure (3m Bay) for 80km/hr Wind Speed. Reference: Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Technical Data Report by: KZ

More information

Structural Analysis Report of Anchorage Design for Propane Exchange Cage

Structural Analysis Report of Anchorage Design for Propane Exchange Cage Structural Analysis Report of Anchorage Design for Propane Exchange Cage Conducted at: Various Locations San Jose, CA Prepared for: 21739 State Hwy 64 Canton, TX 75103 11/08/13 November 8, 2013 Expires

More information

STRUCTURAL VERIFICATION OF A 60.7 M DOME ROOF FOR TANK FB 2110

STRUCTURAL VERIFICATION OF A 60.7 M DOME ROOF FOR TANK FB 2110 CTS Netherlands B.V. Riga 10 2993 LW Barendrecht The Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)180 531027 (office) Fax: +31 (0)180 531848 (office) E-mail: info@cts-netherlands.com Website: www.cts-netherlands.com Chamber

More information

ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE HEADWALLS AASHTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN

ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE HEADWALLS AASHTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE EADWALLS AASTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN LANE ENTERPRISES, INC. www.lane-enterprises.com Required Backfill and Load Cases: ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE EADWALLS BASIS OF DESIGN Backfill

More information

Journey Through a Project: Shake-table Test of a Reinforced Masonry Structure

Journey Through a Project: Shake-table Test of a Reinforced Masonry Structure Journey Through a Project: Shake-table Test of a Reinforced Masonry Structure P. Benson Shing and Andreas Koutras Department of Structural Engineering University of California, San Diego NHERI @ UCSD Workshop,

More information

Edward C. Robison, PE, SE. 02 January Architectural Metal Works ATTN: Sean Wentworth th ST Emeryville, CA 94608

Edward C. Robison, PE, SE. 02 January Architectural Metal Works ATTN: Sean Wentworth th ST Emeryville, CA 94608 Edward C. Robison, PE, SE ks ATTN: Sean Wentworth 1483 67 th ST Emeryville, CA 94608 02 January 2013 SUBJ: 501 CORTE MADERA AVE, CORTE MADERA, CA 94925 BALCONY GUARD BASE PLATE MOUNTS The guards for the

More information

Huntly Christie 1/26/2018 Christie Lites 100 Carson Street Toronto, ON M8W3R9

Huntly Christie 1/26/2018 Christie Lites 100 Carson Street Toronto, ON M8W3R9 Huntly Christie 1/26/2018 Christie Lites 100 Carson Street Toronto, ON M8W3R9 Structural Analysis for 20.5x20.5 Plated Box Truss Tables CRE Project # 16.614.01 Table of Contents for Analysis Package General

More information

The following pages are an excerpt from the North American Product Technical Guide, Volume 1: Direct Fastening Technical Guide, Edition 18.

The following pages are an excerpt from the North American Product Technical Guide, Volume 1: Direct Fastening Technical Guide, Edition 18. The following pages are an excerpt from the North American Product Technical Guide, Volume 1: Direct Fastening Technical Guide, Edition. Please refer to the publication in its entirety for complete details

More information

Balcony balustrades using the SG12 laminated glass system: PAGE 1 (SG12FF010717) Structural Calculations for SG12 System balustrades using 21.5mm laminated toughened glass without the need for a handrail

More information

Preliminary Examination - Dynamics

Preliminary Examination - Dynamics Name: University of California, Berkeley Fall Semester, 2018 Problem 1 (30% weight) Preliminary Examination - Dynamics An undamped SDOF system with mass m and stiffness k is initially at rest and is then

More information

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola Mechanics of materials branch of mechanics that studies the internal effects of stress and strain in a solid body. stress is associated with the

More information

Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge

Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge CL (Bridge is symmetric about CL) 0.8 L 0.2 L 0.6 L 0.2 L 0.8 L L = 80 ft Bridge Span = 2.6 L = 2.6 80 = 208 Bridge Width = 30 No. of girders = 6, Width of each girder

More information

AISC LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System

AISC LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System Model: Verification11_3 Typical Floor Beam #10 W21x44 (10,3,10) AISC 360-05 LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System Floor Loads: Slab Self-weight: Concrete above flute + concrete in flute + metal

More information

Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I)

Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I) Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I) By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Introduction Earthquake

More information

Feeney Architectural Products Design-Rail Glass Infill 09/09/2010 Page 1 of 51

Feeney Architectural Products Design-Rail Glass Infill 09/09/2010 Page 1 of 51 Feeney Architectural Products Design-Rail Glass Infill 09/09/2010 Page 1 of 51 Feeney Inc. 2603 Union Sreet Oakland, CA94607 09 SEP 2010 SUBJ: FEENEY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN-RAIL ALUMINUM RAILING GLASS INFILL

More information

DL CMU wall = 51.0 (lb/ft 2 ) 0.7 (ft) DL beam = 2.5 (lb/ft 2 ) 18.0 (ft) 5

DL CMU wall = 51.0 (lb/ft 2 ) 0.7 (ft) DL beam = 2.5 (lb/ft 2 ) 18.0 (ft) 5 SUJECT: HEADER EAM SELECTION SHEET 108 of 131 INTERIOR HEADER EAM SELECTION - ay length = 36 ft. (stairwell) INTERIOR HEADER EAM Header eam 1 2 Total ay Length = 36 (ft) Total ay Width = 10 (ft) 20.5 Fill

More information

Special edition paper

Special edition paper Development of New Aseismatic Structure Using Escalators Kazunori Sasaki* Atsushi Hayashi* Hajime Yoshida** Toru Masuda* Aseismatic reinforcement work is often carried out in parallel with improvement

More information

ES230 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS

ES230 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS ES230 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Exam 1 Study Guide. Exam 1: Wednesday, February 8 th, in-class Updated 2/5/17 Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will

More information

SEAoT State Conference Seminar Topics. Early knowledge needed. 11/5/2009. Wind Versus Seismic Which Controls? The Code

SEAoT State Conference Seminar Topics. Early knowledge needed. 11/5/2009. Wind Versus Seismic Which Controls? The Code /5/29 SEAoT State Conference 29 Austin, Texas Wind Versus Seismic Which Controls? by Larry Griffis P.E. Walter P. Moore and Associates, Inc. Seminar Topics ASCE 7 Simplified Wind Provisions ASCE 7 Seismic

More information

Example 1 - Single Headed Anchor in Tension Away from Edges BORRADOR. Calculations and Discussion

Example 1 - Single Headed Anchor in Tension Away from Edges BORRADOR. Calculations and Discussion Example 1 - Single Headed Anchor in Tension Away from Edges Check the capacity of a single anchor, 1 in. diameter, F1554 Grade 36 headed bolt with heavy-hex head installed in the top of a foundation without

More information

Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3

Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3 SECTION DIRECTORY General Information Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3 Combination Assembly Recommendations and Limitations Composite Configurations...COMB-4 Typical Sealant

More information

Presented by: Civil Engineering Academy

Presented by: Civil Engineering Academy Presented by: Civil Engineering Academy Structural Design and Material Properties of Steel Presented by: Civil Engineering Academy Advantages 1. High strength per unit length resulting in smaller dead

More information

8 ft. 5 k 5 k 5 k 5 k. F y = 36 ksi F t = 21 ksi F c = 10 ksi. 6 ft. 10 k 10 k

8 ft. 5 k 5 k 5 k 5 k. F y = 36 ksi F t = 21 ksi F c = 10 ksi. 6 ft. 10 k 10 k E 331, Fall 2004 HW 2.0 Solution 1 / 7 We need to make several decisions when designing a truss. First, we need to determine the truss shape. Then we need to determine the height of the truss and the member

More information

Sheathing Braced Design of Wall Studs July 2011 Update. for

Sheathing Braced Design of Wall Studs July 2011 Update.  for Civil Engineering at JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY Sheathing Braced Design of Wall Studs July 2011 Update www.ce.jhu.edu/bschafer/sheathedwalls for AISI Committee on Framing Standards Design Methods Subcommittee

More information

Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017

Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017 Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail PAGE 1 (ref: JULB2NB280317) Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail Our ref: JULB2NB280317 Date

More information

Appendix K Design Examples

Appendix K Design Examples Appendix K Design Examples Example 1 * Two-Span I-Girder Bridge Continuous for Live Loads AASHTO Type IV I girder Zero Skew (a) Bridge Deck The bridge deck reinforcement using A615 rebars is shown below.

More information

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN CHAPTER 11 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN Article 49. Cracking Limit State 49.1 General considerations In the case of verifications relating to Cracking Limit State, the effects of actions comprise

More information

ANSI/SPRI ES-1 Test Reports UL Classified Products

ANSI/SPRI ES-1 Test Reports UL Classified Products Introduction to ES-1 The ANSI/SPRI ES-1 Roof Edge Standard is a reference for those who design, specify or install edge materials used with low slope roofs. This standard focuses primarily on design for

More information

NAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: Law of Sines:

NAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: Law of Sines: NME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: EXM 3 PST PROBLEMS (LESSONS 21 TO 28) 100 points Thursday, November 16, 2017, 7pm to 9:30, Room 200 You are allowed to use a calculator and drawing equipment, only.

More information

two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS

two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) Analysis 1 Structural Requirements strength serviceability

More information

Suspended high-rise. Suspended high-rise Copyright G G Schierle, press Esc to end, for next, for previous slide 1

Suspended high-rise. Suspended high-rise Copyright G G Schierle, press Esc to end, for next, for previous slide 1 Suspended high-rise Suspended high-rise Copyright G G Schierle, 2001-06 press Esc to end, for next, for previous slide 1 Suspended high-rise 1 Gravity load path 2 Differential deflection 3 Prestress to

More information

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture twenty one concrete construction: Copyright Kirk Martini shear & deflection Concrete Shear 1 Shear in Concrete

More information

S TRUCTUR A L PR E- A N A LYSIS TA B LES

S TRUCTUR A L PR E- A N A LYSIS TA B LES M a d e f o r b u i l d i n g b u i l t f o r l i v i n g S TRUTUR A L PR E- A N A LYSIS TA LES I M P R I N T KLH Massivholz GmbH Publisher and responsible for the content: KLH Massivholz GmbH Version:

More information

EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design

EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA 1 st. Semester Examination 2004/2005 Academic Session October 2004 EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design Time : 3 hours Instruction to candidates: 1. Ensure that this paper contains

More information

Chapter 7 INTERNAL FORCES

Chapter 7 INTERNAL FORCES Chapter 7 INTERNAL FORCES READING QUIZ 1. In a multiforce member, the member is generally subjected to an internal. A) normal force B) shear force C) bending moment D) All of the above. 2. In mechanics,

More information

Chapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams

Chapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams Chapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams Introduction A beam is a long, slender structural member that resists loads that are generally applied transverse (perpendicular) to its longitudinal axis.

More information

NICE-PACK ALCOHOL PREP ROOM PLATFORM CALCULATIONS

NICE-PACK ALCOHOL PREP ROOM PLATFORM CALCULATIONS DESIGN STATEMENT THIS GALVANISED STEEL PLATFORM IS ANALYSED USING THE ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN METHOD TO DETERMINE MATERIAL STRENGTH. MEMBER SIZES AND FASTENERS ARE CHOSEN NOT SO MUCH FOR THEIR STRENGTH

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3 3 ANALYSIS METHODS OF SEISMICALLY ISOLATED BRIDGES 5 3.1 Introduction 5 3.2 Loadings for the Analysis

More information

RETAINING WALL LOADS: Horizontal Equivalent Fluid Pressure = pcf. (Load Case = Soil)

RETAINING WALL LOADS: Horizontal Equivalent Fluid Pressure = pcf. (Load Case = Soil) QuickWall 8.0 - RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ================================================================================ Job ID : Job Description : Designed By : ================================================================================

More information