Structural Calculations For:
|
|
- Lorin Harvey
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Structural Calculations For: Project: Address: Job No. Revision: Date: 1400 N. Vasco Rd. Livermore, CA D Delta 1 - Plan Check May 8, 2015 Client: Ferreri & Blau
2 MEMBER REPORT Roof, Typical Roof Joist with Mechanical 1 piece(s) 20" TJI 32" OC PASSED All locations are measured from the outside face of left support (or left cantilever end). All dimensions are horizontal. Design Results Location Allowed Result LDF Load: Combination (Pattern) Member Reaction (lbs) 33' 6 1/2" 1926 (2.80") Passed (100%) D Lr (All Spans) Shear (lbs) 33' 6 1/2" 4181 Passed (46%) D Lr (All Spans) Moment (Ft-lbs) 16' 6" Passed (84%) D Lr (All Spans) Live Load Defl. (in) 16' 10 1/2" Passed (L/509) D Lr (All Spans) Total Load Defl. (in) 17' 1/16" Passed (L/227) D Lr (All Spans) Deflection criteria: LL (L/240) and TL (L/180). Bracing (Lu): All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 4' 9 7/8" o/c unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. System : Roof Member Type : Joist Building Use : Residential Building Code : IBC Design Methodology : ASD Member Pitch: 0.25/12 Bearing Length Loads to Supports (lbs) Supports Total Available Required Dead Blocking Panels are assumed to carry no loads applied directly above them and the full load is applied to the member being designed. At hanger supports, the Total Bearing dimension is equal to the width of the material that is supporting the hanger ¹ See Connector grid below for additional information and/or requirements. Roof Live Total Accessories 1 - Beveled Plate - DF 3.50" 3.50" 2.55" Blocking 2 - Hanger on 20" DF beam 3.50" Hanger¹ 2.80" See note ¹ Connector: Simpson Strong-Tie Connectors Support Model Seat Length Top Nails Face Nails Member Nails Accessories 2 - Face Mount Hanger Connector not found N/A N/A N/A N/A Dead Roof Live Loads Location Spacing (0.90) (non-snow: 1.25) Comments 1 - Uniform (PSF) 0 to 33' 10" 32" Roof 2 - Point (lb) 16' 6" N/A Point (lb) 23' 6" N/A Weyerhaeuser Notes Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of its products will be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software. Refer to current Weyerhaeuser literature for installation details. ( Accessories (Rim Board, Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks) are not designed by this software. Use of this software is not intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction. The designer of record, builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall project. Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards. The product application, input design loads, dimensions and support information have been provided by Forte Software Operator Forte Software Operator Justen Peek DP Advanced Engineering Inc. (925) jp@advengineering.com Job Notes 5/12/2015 5:43:02 PM Forte v4.6, Design Engine: V Roof Joist Calcs.4te Page 1 of 1
3 Drag / Collector Force Diagram Generator INPUT DATA TOTAL SHEAR FORCE (ASD) F p = kips NUMBER OF SEGMENTS n = 3 Segment Length, ft Shear Wall? YES NO YES ANALYSIS TOTAL DRAG LENGTH L drag = 67 ft TOTAL SHEAR WALL LENGTH L wall = ft DIAPHRAGM SHEAR STRESS v diaphragm = F p / v drag = 354 plf SHEAR WALL SHEAR STRESS v shear wall = F p / v wall = 855 plf Section Point Distance, ft Axial Force Drag Axial Force, kips Distance, ft DRAG / COLLECTOR FORCE DIAGRAM SHEAR WALL & DRAG ELEVATION
4 Drag / Collector Force Diagram Generator INPUT DATA TOTAL SHEAR FORCE (ASD) F p = kips NUMBER OF SEGMENTS n = 2 Segment 1 2 Length, ft Shear Wall? NO YES ANALYSIS TOTAL DRAG LENGTH L drag = ft TOTAL SHEAR WALL LENGTH L wall = 40 ft DIAPHRAGM SHEAR STRESS v diaphragm = F p / v drag = 356 plf SHEAR WALL SHEAR STRESS v shear wall = F p / v wall = 589 plf Section Point Distance, ft Axial Force Drag Axial Force, kips Distance, ft DRAG / COLLECTOR FORCE DIAGRAM SHEAR WALL & DRAG ELEVATION
5 Drag / Collector Force Diagram Generator INPUT DATA TOTAL SHEAR FORCE (ASD) F p = kips NUMBER OF SEGMENTS n = 8 Segment Length, ft Shear Wall? NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES ANALYSIS TOTAL DRAG LENGTH TOTAL SHEAR WALL LENGTH L drag = ft L wall = ft DIAPHRAGM SHEAR STRESS v diaphragm = F p / v drag = 149 plf SHEAR WALL SHEAR STRESS v shear wall = F p / v wall = 446 plf Section Point Distance, ft Axial Force Drag Axial Force, kips Distance, ft DRAG / COLLECTOR FORCE DIAGRAM SHEAR WALL & DRAG ELEVATION
6 Drag / Collector Force Diagram Generator INPUT DATA TOTAL SHEAR FORCE (ASD) F p = kips NUMBER OF SEGMENTS n = 3 Segment Length, ft Shear Wall? NO YES NO ANALYSIS TOTAL DRAG LENGTH L drag = ft TOTAL SHEAR WALL LENGTH L wall = 16 ft DIAPHRAGM SHEAR STRESS v diaphragm = F p / v drag = 173 plf SHEAR WALL SHEAR STRESS v shear wall = F p / v wall = 1455 plf Section Point Distance, ft Axial Force Drag Axial Force, kips Distance, ft DRAG / COLLECTOR FORCE DIAGRAM SHEAR WALL & DRAG ELEVATION
7 Drag / Collector Force Diagram Generator INPUT DATA TOTAL SHEAR FORCE (ASD) F p = kips NUMBER OF SEGMENTS n = 9 Segment Length, ft Shear Wall? NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO ANALYSIS TOTAL DRAG LENGTH L drag = 92 ft TOTAL SHEAR WALL LENGTH L wall = 12 ft DIAPHRAGM SHEAR STRESS v diaphragm = F p / v drag = 44 plf SHEAR WALL SHEAR STRESS v shear wall = F p / v wall = 336 plf Section Point Distance, ft Axial Force Drag Axial Force, kips Distance, ft DRAG / COLLECTOR FORCE DIAGRAM SHEAR WALL & DRAG ELEVATION
8 PROJECT: CLIENT: Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE GOVERNING CODE: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: California Building Code, 2013 Edition New HVAC Unit on Roof Lateral Load System - Wood Framed Shear Walls LATERAL DESIGN CRITERIA: SEISMIC & SITE DATA - MCE MAP VALUES Ss % g S % g Site Class D Site coefficients and adjusted maximum considered eq. spectral response accel. parameters Fa Fv S MS =FaS S (EQ ) S M1 =FvS (EQ ) Design spectral response acceleration parameters. S DS =(2/3)S MS g (EQ ) S D1 =(2/3)S M g (EQ ) Importance Factor SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY BASED ON SHORT-PERIOD RESPONSE ACCELERATIONS: VALUE OF S DS 1 OR V S1 IS GREATER THAN.75 S DS < 0.167g A A A USE CATAGORY E 0.167g S DS < 0.33g B B C PER CBC g S DS < 0.50g C C D USE CATEGORY D 0.50g S DS D D D USE CATEGORY D SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY BASED ON 1-SEC RESPONSE ACCELERATIONS: VALUE OF S D1 S D1 < 0.067g 0.067g S D1 < 0.133g 0.133g S D1 < 0.20g 0.20g S D1 1 OR V S1 IS GREATER THAN 0.75 A A A USE CATAGORY E B B C PER CBC C C D USE CATEGORY D D D D USE CATEGORY D
9 PROJECT: 4 0 CLIENT: Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SEISMIC DESIGN FORCE (48HC-05): 4 ASCE 7-10 Table , a p 2.5 ASCE 7-10 Table , R p 6.0 Height of Equipment, Z 16.0 ft Height of Roof, h 16.0 ft Weight of Equipment, W P lbs 0.4a P S DS W F P P = [1+2(Z/h)] (R P /I P ) F P-MAX = 1.6S DS W P I P lbs lbs F P-min = 0.3S DS W P I P 260 lbs 2.0 F P-DESIGN = F P 434 lbs F v-design = 0.2S DS W P 174 lbs WIND DESIGN FORCE: Exposure Type C 3 q h = *K z *K zt *K d *V lb/sf K Z = ASCE 7-10 Table K Zt = ASCE 7-10 Section K d = ASCE 7-10 Table V= Basic Wind Speed 110 mph (GC r ) h = ASCE 7-10 Section (GC r ) v = ASCE 7-10 Section A f = Area of Equipment 21.4 sq-ft A r = Area of Equipment 24.1 sq-ft F h = q h (GC r ) h A f 962 lbs F v = q h (GC r ) v A r 858 lbs
10 PROJECT: 4 0 CLIENT: OVERTURNING DESIGN: Equipment Dimensions: Depth, D= 3.90 ft Length, L= 6.20 ft Height, H= 3.45 ft Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SEISMIC: Worst Case Uplift Reaction Load Case: 0.6D+0.7E R 1 = 18 lbs Net Uplift, Anchors Required Worst Case Downward Reaction Load Case: 1.0D+0.7E R 2 = -369 lbs WIND: Worst Case Uplift Reaction Load Case: 0.6D+0.6W R 1 = 336 lbs Net Uplift, Anchors Required Worst Case Downward Reaction Load Case: 1.0D+0.6W R 2 = -293 lbs
11 PROJECT: 4 0 CLIENT: Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ANCHORAGE RESULTS FOR UNIT TO CURB: The new unit is to be installed with (4) 5/8" diameter lag screws, (1) in each corner, embedded 4" into 4x6 purlin ALLOWABLE DOWEL SHEAR VALUES ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUE PER 2012 NDS TABLE 11K ANCHOR DIAMETER Minimum embedment 4" Load Duration increase taken as, C D =1.6 for seismic loading VERIFY CAPACITY EXCEEDS DEMAND: Number of Bolts in Shear= 4 Capacity Perpendicular to Grain= 704 lbs per bolt Required Capacity Perpendicular to Grain= 144 lbs per bolt ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL VALUES ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL VALUE PER 2012 NDS TABLE 11.2A ANCHOR DIAMETER EMBEDMENT DEPTH EMBEDMENT DEPTH SPECIFIC GRAVITY, G SPECIFIC GRAVITY ALLOWABLE SHEAR PARALLEL TO GRAIN (LBS) ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL* *Unthreaded upper 1.5" of embedment ignored for allowable withdrawal Load Duration increase taken as, C D =1.6 for seismic loading VERIFY CAPACITY EXCEEDS NEW DEMAND: Number of Bolts in Withdrawal= 2 Capacity= 1788 lbs per anchor Required Uplift= 168 lbs per anchor ALLOWABLE SHEAR PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN (LBS) VERIFY CAPACITY FOR COMBINED SHEAR AND TENSION: ALLOWABLE DESIGN VALUE IN DIRECTION ALPHA PER NDS EQN W'p 1788 LBS Z' 704 LBS a 49 DEG (W'p)Z' Capacity = Z'a = =1081 LBS (W'p)cos 2 a + Z' sin 2 a Required =221 LBS Force Ratio =0.20 Design OK
12 PROJECT: 4 0 CLIENT: Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SEISMIC DESIGN FORCE (48HC-08): 4 ASCE 7-10 Table , a p 2.5 ASCE 7-10 Table , R p 6.0 Height of Equipment, Z 16.0 ft Height of Roof, h 16.0 ft Weight of Equipment, W P lbs 0.4a P S DS W F P P = [1+2(Z/h)] (R P /I P ) F P-MAX = 1.6S DS W P I P lbs lbs F P-min = 0.3S DS W P I P 408 lbs 2.0 F P-DESIGN = F P 680 lbs F v-design = 0.2S DS W P 272 lbs WIND DESIGN FORCE: Exposure Type C 3 q h = *K z *K zt *K d *V lb/sf K Z = ASCE 7-10 Table K Zt = ASCE 7-10 Section K d = ASCE 7-10 Table V= Basic Wind Speed 110 mph (GC r ) h = ASCE 7-10 Section (GC r ) v = ASCE 7-10 Section A f = Area of Equipment 30.2 sq-ft A r = Area of Equipment 36.4 sq-ft F h = q h (GC r ) h A f 1360 lbs F v = q h (GC r ) v A r 1294 lbs
13 PROJECT: 4 0 CLIENT: OVERTURNING DESIGN: Equipment Dimensions: Depth, D= 4.96 ft Length, L= 7.34 ft Height, H= 4.12 ft Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SEISMIC: Worst Case Uplift Reaction Load Case: 0.6D+0.7E R 1 = 15 lbs Net Uplift, Anchors Required Worst Case Downward Reaction Load Case: 1.0D+0.7E R 2 = -565 lbs WIND: Worst Case Uplift Reaction Load Case: 0.6D+0.6W R 1 = 449 lbs Net Uplift, Anchors Required Worst Case Downward Reaction Load Case: 1.0D+0.6W R 2 = -413 lbs
14 PROJECT: 4 0 CLIENT: Ferreri & Blau JOB NO.: D CALCS BY: J. Peek DATE: 5/8/2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ANCHORAGE RESULTS FOR UNIT TO CURB: The new unit is to be installed with (4) 5/8" diameter lag screws, (1) in each corner, embedded 4" into 4x6 purlin ALLOWABLE DOWEL SHEAR VALUES ALLOWABLE SHEAR VALUE PER 2012 NDS TABLE 11K ANCHOR DIAMETER Minimum embedment 4" Load Duration increase taken as, C D =1.6 for seismic loading VERIFY CAPACITY EXCEEDS DEMAND: Number of Bolts in Shear= 4 Capacity Perpendicular to Grain= 704 lbs per bolt Required Capacity Perpendicular to Grain= 204 lbs per bolt ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL VALUES ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL VALUE PER 2012 NDS TABLE 11.2A ANCHOR DIAMETER EMBEDMENT DEPTH EMBEDMENT DEPTH SPECIFIC GRAVITY, G SPECIFIC GRAVITY ALLOWABLE SHEAR PARALLEL TO GRAIN (LBS) ALLOWABLE WITHDRAWAL* *Unthreaded upper 1.5" of embedment ignored for allowable withdrawal Load Duration increase taken as, C D =1.6 for seismic loading VERIFY CAPACITY EXCEEDS NEW DEMAND: Number of Bolts in Withdrawal= 2 Capacity= 1788 lbs per anchor Required Uplift= 225 lbs per anchor ALLOWABLE SHEAR PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN (LBS) VERIFY CAPACITY FOR COMBINED SHEAR AND TENSION: ALLOWABLE DESIGN VALUE IN DIRECTION ALPHA PER NDS EQN W'p 1788 LBS Z' 704 LBS a 48 DEG (W'p)Z' Capacity = Z'a = =1054 LBS (W'p)cos 2 a + Z' sin 2 a Required =304 LBS Force Ratio =0.29 Design OK
HELIODYNE SOLAR COLLECTOR RACK STRUCTURES FOR HELIODYNE, INC. Structural calculations. Gobi 410 at 45 degrees. for WCM HELIODYNE RACK
HELIODYNE RACK PROJECT: JOB NO: 2008-36 SHEET: DESIGNED BY: WCM DATE: CHECKED BY: SCOPE: KTD DATE: Racking Calculation Report 1 OF 1/22/2011 1/22/2011 17 Structural calculations for HELIODYNE SOLAR COLLECTOR
More informationChapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures
Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures where: F a = 1.0 for rock sites which may be assumed if there is 10 feet of soil between the rock surface and the bottom of spread footings
More informationBeam Design - FLOOR JOIST
Beam Design - FLOOR JOIST 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Sawn Lumber Species: Douglas Fir-Larch Grade: DF No.2 Size: 2 x 10 Design Span (L): 11.83 ft. Clear
More informationCHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.
CHAPTER 5 Question Brief Explanation No. 5.1 From Fig. IBC 1613.5(3) and (4) enlarged region 1 (ASCE 7 Fig. -3 and -4) S S = 1.5g, and S 1 = 0.6g. The g term is already factored in the equations, thus
More informationBeam Design - Shed Roof Back Wall Beam-S
Beam Design - Shed Roof Back Wall Beam-S 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Glulam Species: Western Species Grade: 24F-V4 1.8E DF/DF Size: 2.5 x 6 Design Span (L):
More informationBeam Design - Awning
Beam Design - Awning 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Sawn Lumber Species: Douglas Fir-Larch Grade: DF No.2 Size: 4 x 12 Design Span (L): 21.50 ft. Clear Span:
More informationBeam Design - Pine Tree
- Pine Tree 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Sawn Lumber Species: Southern Pine Grade: SP DSS Size: 2 x 8 Design Span (L): 11.83 ft. Clear Span: 11.67 ft. Total
More informationBeam Design - Trotin Project
Beam Design - Trotin Project 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Glulam Species: Western Species Grade: 24F-V4 1.8E DF/DF Size: 3.125 x 13.5 Design Span (L): 14.98
More informationEarthquake Loads According to IBC IBC Safety Concept
Earthquake Loads According to IBC 2003 The process of determining earthquake loads according to IBC 2003 Spectral Design Method can be broken down into the following basic steps: Determination of the maimum
More informationDIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: PNEUTEK, INC.
ICC ES Report ICC ES () 7 () www.icc es.org Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ESR 1 Reissued /1 This report is subject to renewal /. DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: 1 STEEL ING REPORT
More informationStructural Analysis Report of Anchorage Design for Propane Exchange Cage Aluminum
Structural Analysis Report of Anchorage Design for Propane Exchange Cage Aluminum Conducted at: Various Locations San Jose, CA Prepared for: 21739 State Hwy 64 Canton, TX 75103 11/21/13 November 21, 2013
More information6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of
Client: ProVent PV1805 Project: CBISC-05 Iso Curb CBISPRS Upper curb rail Unit: YORK ZX 04-07; XX A7; ZY, ZQ, XY, XQ 04-06 Curb Information Hcurb upper = 5.5 in (Height of upper curb rail) Lcurb = 70.375
More informationDr. Ceasar Hearne. Structural Calculations. Project Address: 1700 East 3000 North, Layton, Utah
Dr. Ceasar Hearne Structural Calculations Project Address: 1700 East 3000 North, Layton, Utah This engineering report is valid only for the aforementioned building located at the address above. This report
More informationQUAKE BRAKE TM MODEL QBC-12 SEISMIC SWAY BRACING KIT FEATURING
QUAKE BRAKE TM MODEL QBC-12 SEISMIC SWAY BRACING KIT FEATURING The QUAKE BRAKE TM Seismic Dampening Device. The QUAKE BRAKE TM was Certified NEBS Level 3 Zone Compliant after being tested in accordance
More information*Refer to IBC Section , applicable when fall protection is required. Glass stresses are designed for a safety factor of of 4.0 (IBC ).
Architectural Railing Division C.R.Laurence Co., Inc. 2503 E Vernon Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90058 (T) 800.421.6144 (F) 800.587.7501 www.crlaurence.com 12 JAN 2011 SUBJ: TAPER-LOC SYSTEM DRY-GLAZE LAMINATED
More informationFor sunshades using the Zee blades wind loads are reduced by 10 psf.
C.R. Laurence Co., Inc. 2503 East Vernon Los Angeles, CA 90058 24 July 2009 SUBJ: CR LAURENCE UNIVERSAL SUN SHADES The CRL Universal Aluminum Sun Shades were evaluated in accordance with the 2006 International
More informationGENERAL INFORMATION FOR COLUMN BASE REACTIONS
U09Y0061A - GaragePlus - RV Storage R1 of 12 1050 North Watery Lane Ph: (435) 919-3100 Brigham City, UT 84302Fax: (435) 919-3101 Page R1 of Date: 3/24/09 GENERAL INFORMATION FOR COLUMN BASE REACTIONS FOR
More informationAllowable Design Stresses (psi)
8 0 0. 2 2 1. 2 3 2 6 w w w. a n t h o n y f o r e s t. c o m 2 Allowable Design Stresses (psi) Power Beam Section Properties and Allowable Capacities 7.0 9.0 9.2 10.9 11.6 13.6 15.6 17.5 11.1 14.1 14.5
More information6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-92 ( **) Unit: ZF180
6593 Riverdale St. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-92 (80-266-19**) Unit: ZF180 Curb Information Hcurb = 18 in (Height of curb) Lcurb = 115.25 in (Length of curb) wcurb = 84 in (Width of curb)
More information6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of
6593 Riverdale St. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-91 (80-266-18**) Unit: YORK ZJ,ZR 180-300 / ZF 210-300 / XP 180-240 Curb Information Hcurb = 18 in (Height of curb) Lcurb = 126.25 in (Length
More information10012 Creviston DR NW Gig Harbor, WA fax
C.R. Laurence Co., Inc. ATTN: Chris Hanstad 2503 East Vernon Los Angeles, CA 90058 27 March 2013 SUBJ: CRL SRS STANDOFF RAILING SYSTEM GLASS BALUSTRADE GUARDS The SRS Standoff Railing System is an engineered
More informationStructural Analysis Report of Anchorage Design for Propane Exchange Cage
Structural Analysis Report of Anchorage Design for Propane Exchange Cage Conducted at: Various Locations San Jose, CA Prepared for: 21739 State Hwy 64 Canton, TX 75103 March 5, 2014 3/5/14 Prepared by:
More informationCH. 5 TRUSSES BASIC PRINCIPLES TRUSS ANALYSIS. Typical depth-to-span ratios range from 1:10 to 1:20. First: determine loads in various members
CH. 5 TRUSSES BASIC PRINCIPLES Typical depth-to-span ratios range from 1:10 to 1:20 - Flat trusses require less overall depth than pitched trusses Spans: 40-200 Spacing: 10 to 40 on center - Residential
More information2018 WFCM Changes. Wood Frame Construction Manual for One- and Two-Family Dwellings (STD350)
2018 WFCM Changes Wood Frame Construction Manual for One- and Two-Family Dwellings (STD350) John Buddy Showalter, P.E. Vice President, Technology Transfer American Wood Council Lori Koch, P.E. Manager,
More informationCharacteristics of a Force Loads on Structures. Dead Load. Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake. Load Combinations ASD LRFD
Architecture 314 Structures I Characteristics of a Force Loads on Structures Load Types Dead Live Wind Snow Earthquake Load Combinations ASD LRFD University of Michigan, TCAUP Structures I Slide 1 of 27
More information1 Exterior Wall Members & Accessories
JamStud Introduction Table of Contents JamStud Introduc on...1 JamStud Assembly Comparisons...2 JamStud Design Considera ons...3- JamStud Sec on Proper es...5- JamStud Non Load Bearing Design Example...7-
More information1 Exterior Wall Members & Accessories
JamStud Introduction Table of Contents JamStud Introduc on...1 JamStud Assembly Comparisons...2 JamStud Design Considera ons...3- JamStud Sec on Proper es...5- JamStud Non Load Bearing Design Example...7-
More informationMAXIMUM SUPERIMPOSED UNIFORM ASD LOADS, psf SINGLE SPAN DOUBLE SPAN TRIPLE SPAN GAGE
F-DEK ROOF (ASD) 1-1/2" high x 6" pitch x 36" wide SECTION PROPERTIES GAGE Wd 22 1.63 20 1.98 18 2.62 16 3.30 I D (DEFLECTION) 0.142 0.173 0.228 fy = 40 ksi Sp Sn 0.122 0.135 708 815 905 1211 1329 2365
More informationThe first NDS (1944) was based on allowable stress design (ASD). Copyright American Wood Council. All rights reserved.
History ASD and LRFD with the 2005 NDS Part 1 Member Design Presented by: John Buddy Showalter, P.E. Vice President, Technology Transfer The first NDS (1944) was based on allowable stress design (ASD).
More informationSway Column Example. PCA Notes on ACI 318
Sway Column Example PCA Notes on ACI 318 ASDIP Concrete is available for purchase online at www.asdipsoft.com Example 11.2 Slenderness Effects for Columns in a Sway Frame Design columns C1 and C2 in the
More information20.0 L SR 3/4 2L /2x /2x3/6x3/8 L /2x /2x3/6 L /2x /2x3/6 L /2x /2x3/6 3.4666 5 @ 4 884.6 DESIGNED APPURTENANE LOADING TYPE ELEVATION TYPE ELEVATION (9) FV90-2 20 Pirod 3' Low Profile Platform 20 TOWER
More informationSection Downloads. Section Downloads. Handouts & Slides can be printed. Other documents cannot be printed Course binders are available for purchase
Level II: Section 04 Simplified Method (optional) Section Downloads Section Downloads Handouts & Slides can be printed Version.0 Other documents cannot be printed Course binders are available for purchase
More information2018 NDS Changes. National Design Specification for Wood Construction (STD120)
2018 NDS Changes National Design Specification for Wood Construction (STD120) John Buddy Showalter, P.E. Vice President, Technology Transfer American Wood Council 13847IP The American Wood Council is a
More information24' SEE DWG FOR SCREWING 2 PLY TOGETHER NOTE: FLOOR TRUSSES 19.2" O.C. **ALL FLOOR TRUSSES ARE THE SAME** 1'5"6 1'7"3 1'7"3 1'7"3 1'7"3 1'7"3
89043 FLOOR TRUSSES 19.2" O.C. NO PLUMBING (BEDROOMS) SEE DWG FOR SCREWING 2 PLY TOGETHER NOTE: 1'5"6 24" CHASE 2 PLY FX F **ALL FLOOR TRUSSES ARE THE SAME** Lot: CHAPEL Layout: DCS Designer: Robert Herron
More informationWorld Shelters. U-Dome 200. Dome Shelter. Engineering Report: Dome Structure ER October South G St., Suite 3 Arcata, CA USA
Page 1 of 30 ER-87496 World Shelters 550 South G St., Suite 3 Arcata, CA 95521 USA Telephone: +1-707-822-6600 Email: info @ worldshelters.org U-Dome 200 Dome Shelter Engineering Report: Dome Structure
More informationSeismic load calculations per the NYS 2002 code
Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Presentations and other scholarship 2004 Seismic load calculations per the NYS 2002 code Abi Aghayere Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.rit.edu/other
More informationSIP PANEL DESIGN EXAMPLES USING NTA IM 14 TIP 02 SIP DESIGN GUIDE AND LISTING REPORT DATA
NTA IM 14 TIP 0 SIP PANEL DESIGN EXAMPLES USING NTA IM 14 TIP 0 SIP DESIGN GUIDE AND LISTING REPORT DATA INTRODUCTION It is intended that this document e used in conjunction with competent engineering
More informationDESIGN EXAMPLES APPENDIX A
APPENDIX A DESIGN EXAMPLES Comparative Shrinkage of Sawn Timber and Glulam Beams / 499 Simple Beam Design / 500 Upside-Down Beam Analysis / 50 Tension-face Notch / 504 Compression-face Notch / 505 Sloped
More informationSection Downloads. Design Process. Design Principles Outline. Basic Design Principles. Design Process. Section 06: Design Principles.
Section Downloads Section 06: Design Principles 1 Download & Print TTT I Sec 06 Slides TTT I Sec 06 Handout Section 05 Truss Materials Design Values PS 20 Section 01 TPI 1-2007 Selection 6.4.2 Repetitive
More informationCase Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.
ARCH 631 Note Set 11 S017abn Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. Building description The building is a three-story office building
More informationGeneral Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD
General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 1 General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 2 AISC ASD and LRFD AISC ASD = American Institute of Steel Construction = Allowable Stress Design AISC Ninth
More informationOpenings for Wood Framed Shear Walls
Advancements Click to edit in Force Master Transfer title stylearound Openings for Wood Framed Shear Walls Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Alese Ashuckian, PE, LEED AP Engineered
More informationEntrance exam Master Course
- 1 - Guidelines for completion of test: On each page, fill in your name and your application code Each question has four answers while only one answer is correct. o Marked correct answer means 4 points
More informationhost structure (S.F.D.)
TABLE 00.4 FBC Typical Mansard Beam [AAF] Allowable Span of Mansard Screen Enclosure Self-Mating Beams in accordance with requirements of Table 00.4 (and the 005 Aluminum Design Manual) using 6005T5 alloy:
More informationA q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e
A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e H a t o R e y, P u e r t o R i c o G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g I n f o r m a t i o n Building Facts: 7-story parking structure + luxury apartments 900,000
More informationDIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING SECTION: STEEL ROOF DECKING REPORT HOLDER: NEW MILLENNIUM BUILDING SYSTEMS, LLC
0 Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ICC ES Report ICC ES 000 (800) 423 6587 (562) 699 0543 www.icc es.org ESR 2657 Reissued 05/2017 This report is subject to renewal 03/2018. DIVISION: 05 00 00 METALS SECTION:
More informationPUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT
Structural Concrete Software System TN191_PT7_punching_shear_aci_4 011505 PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT 1. OVERVIEW Punching shear calculation applies to column-supported slabs, classified
More informationEXTERIOR FRAMING EXTERIOR FRAMING
1 EXTERIOR FRAMING BUILDSTRONG www.buildstrong.com 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Product Identification...........................5 General Product Information....................... 4-5 Compliance Guaranteed...............................
More informationStructural, Snow & Wind Loading Appraisal Report
Company Name Or Logo Here Structural, Snow & Wind Loading Appraisal Report In accordance with Guide to the Installation of Photovoltaic Systems 2012 2 nd Edition Reference number 001 Company Name Solar
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)
Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of one-way ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are
More informationWood Design. fv = shear stress fv-max = maximum shear stress Fallow = allowable stress Fb = tabular bending strength = allowable bending stress
Wood Design Notation: a = name for width dimension A = name for area Areq d-adj = area required at allowable stress when shear is adjusted to include self weight b = width of a rectangle = name for height
More informationCurved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003
Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003 Guide Specifications (1993-2002) 2.3 LOADS 2.4 LOAD COMBINATIONS
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Structural Description The two pinned (at the bases) portal frame is stable in its plane due to the moment connection
More information2018 North Carolina Residential Code Prescriptive Tables for Selection of Support Elements for Beams, Girders, and Headers: Example Problems
2018 North Carolina Residential Code Prescriptive Tables for Selection of Support Elements for Beams, Girders, and Structural Building Components Association (SBCA) August 10, 2018 SBCA is an APPROVED
More informationPEER/SSC Tall Building Design. Case study #2
PEER/SSC Tall Building Design Case study #2 Typical Plan View at Ground Floor and Below Typical Plan View at 2 nd Floor and Above Code Design Code Design Shear Wall properties Shear wall thickness and
More informationDES140: Designing for Lateral-Torsional Stability in Wood Members
DES140: Designing for Lateral-Torsional Stability in Wood embers Welcome to the Lateral Torsional Stability ecourse. 1 Outline Lateral-Torsional Buckling Basic Concept Design ethod Examples In this ecourse,
More informationInnovative Products February 2016
Bison Pedestals & Accessories Material Testing Test Description Bison Results ASTM D792 ASTM D638 ASTM G155 ASTM G26 ASTM D790 ASTM D256 0 ASTM D5420 50.0 ASTM D2240 ASTM D648 231 ASTM D648 231 ASTM D635
More informationSTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT. WHISPER ft GUYED WIND TURBINE TEP # Revision 0 November 6, 2006 PORTABLE DOCUMENT FORMAT.
Structural Analysis Report Whisper 500 30-ft Guyed Wind Turbine TEP # 061289 November 6, 2006 Page 1 of 7 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORT WHISPER 500 30-ft GUYED WIND TURBINE TEP # 061289 Revision 0 November
More informationThe Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of Engineering EVALUATION OF LIMIT DESIGN FOR EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT MASONRY WALLS
The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Engineering EVALUATION OF LIMIT DESIGN FOR EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT MASONRY WALLS A Thesis in Architectural Engineering by Bradley S. Frederick
More information2/23/ WIND PRESSURE FORMULA 2. PERCENT OF ALLOWABLE STRESS 3. FATIGUE DESIGN
Original Title Presented by Northwest Signal copyright 2010 Designing & Building Structural Steel Products since 1976 Primary Users Traffic Signal Strain & Mast Arm Poles Cantilever & Bridge Sign Structures
More informationStandard Specification for Computing Reference Resistance of Wood-Based Materials and Structural Connections for Load and Resistance Factor Design 1
Designation: Standard Specification for Computing Reference Resistance of Wood-Based Materials and Structural Connections for Load and Resistance Factor Design 1 This standard is issued under the fixed
More informationCivil & Structural Engineering Design Services Pty. Ltd.
Client: EXTREME MARQUEES PTY. LTD. Project: Design check 24.4m x 12.2m x 6.4m The Platoon Tent Structure (3m Bay) for 80km/hr Wind Speed. Reference: Extreme Marquees Pty Ltd Technical Data Report by: KZ
More informationStructural Analysis Report of Anchorage Design for Propane Exchange Cage
Structural Analysis Report of Anchorage Design for Propane Exchange Cage Conducted at: Various Locations San Jose, CA Prepared for: 21739 State Hwy 64 Canton, TX 75103 11/08/13 November 8, 2013 Expires
More informationSTRUCTURAL VERIFICATION OF A 60.7 M DOME ROOF FOR TANK FB 2110
CTS Netherlands B.V. Riga 10 2993 LW Barendrecht The Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)180 531027 (office) Fax: +31 (0)180 531848 (office) E-mail: info@cts-netherlands.com Website: www.cts-netherlands.com Chamber
More informationALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE HEADWALLS AASHTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN
ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE EADWALLS AASTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN LANE ENTERPRISES, INC. www.lane-enterprises.com Required Backfill and Load Cases: ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE EADWALLS BASIS OF DESIGN Backfill
More informationJourney Through a Project: Shake-table Test of a Reinforced Masonry Structure
Journey Through a Project: Shake-table Test of a Reinforced Masonry Structure P. Benson Shing and Andreas Koutras Department of Structural Engineering University of California, San Diego NHERI @ UCSD Workshop,
More informationEdward C. Robison, PE, SE. 02 January Architectural Metal Works ATTN: Sean Wentworth th ST Emeryville, CA 94608
Edward C. Robison, PE, SE ks ATTN: Sean Wentworth 1483 67 th ST Emeryville, CA 94608 02 January 2013 SUBJ: 501 CORTE MADERA AVE, CORTE MADERA, CA 94925 BALCONY GUARD BASE PLATE MOUNTS The guards for the
More informationHuntly Christie 1/26/2018 Christie Lites 100 Carson Street Toronto, ON M8W3R9
Huntly Christie 1/26/2018 Christie Lites 100 Carson Street Toronto, ON M8W3R9 Structural Analysis for 20.5x20.5 Plated Box Truss Tables CRE Project # 16.614.01 Table of Contents for Analysis Package General
More informationThe following pages are an excerpt from the North American Product Technical Guide, Volume 1: Direct Fastening Technical Guide, Edition 18.
The following pages are an excerpt from the North American Product Technical Guide, Volume 1: Direct Fastening Technical Guide, Edition. Please refer to the publication in its entirety for complete details
More informationBalcony balustrades using the SG12 laminated glass system: PAGE 1 (SG12FF010717) Structural Calculations for SG12 System balustrades using 21.5mm laminated toughened glass without the need for a handrail
More informationPreliminary Examination - Dynamics
Name: University of California, Berkeley Fall Semester, 2018 Problem 1 (30% weight) Preliminary Examination - Dynamics An undamped SDOF system with mass m and stiffness k is initially at rest and is then
More informationMECHANICS OF MATERIALS. Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola
MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola Mechanics of materials branch of mechanics that studies the internal effects of stress and strain in a solid body. stress is associated with the
More informationDesign of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge
Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge CL (Bridge is symmetric about CL) 0.8 L 0.2 L 0.6 L 0.2 L 0.8 L L = 80 ft Bridge Span = 2.6 L = 2.6 80 = 208 Bridge Width = 30 No. of girders = 6, Width of each girder
More informationAISC LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System
Model: Verification11_3 Typical Floor Beam #10 W21x44 (10,3,10) AISC 360-05 LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System Floor Loads: Slab Self-weight: Concrete above flute + concrete in flute + metal
More informationLecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I)
Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I) By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Introduction Earthquake
More informationFeeney Architectural Products Design-Rail Glass Infill 09/09/2010 Page 1 of 51
Feeney Architectural Products Design-Rail Glass Infill 09/09/2010 Page 1 of 51 Feeney Inc. 2603 Union Sreet Oakland, CA94607 09 SEP 2010 SUBJ: FEENEY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN-RAIL ALUMINUM RAILING GLASS INFILL
More informationDL CMU wall = 51.0 (lb/ft 2 ) 0.7 (ft) DL beam = 2.5 (lb/ft 2 ) 18.0 (ft) 5
SUJECT: HEADER EAM SELECTION SHEET 108 of 131 INTERIOR HEADER EAM SELECTION - ay length = 36 ft. (stairwell) INTERIOR HEADER EAM Header eam 1 2 Total ay Length = 36 (ft) Total ay Width = 10 (ft) 20.5 Fill
More informationSpecial edition paper
Development of New Aseismatic Structure Using Escalators Kazunori Sasaki* Atsushi Hayashi* Hajime Yoshida** Toru Masuda* Aseismatic reinforcement work is often carried out in parallel with improvement
More informationES230 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS
ES230 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Exam 1 Study Guide. Exam 1: Wednesday, February 8 th, in-class Updated 2/5/17 Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will
More informationSEAoT State Conference Seminar Topics. Early knowledge needed. 11/5/2009. Wind Versus Seismic Which Controls? The Code
/5/29 SEAoT State Conference 29 Austin, Texas Wind Versus Seismic Which Controls? by Larry Griffis P.E. Walter P. Moore and Associates, Inc. Seminar Topics ASCE 7 Simplified Wind Provisions ASCE 7 Seismic
More informationExample 1 - Single Headed Anchor in Tension Away from Edges BORRADOR. Calculations and Discussion
Example 1 - Single Headed Anchor in Tension Away from Edges Check the capacity of a single anchor, 1 in. diameter, F1554 Grade 36 headed bolt with heavy-hex head installed in the top of a foundation without
More informationIntroduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3
SECTION DIRECTORY General Information Introduction...COMB-2 Design Considerations and Examples...COMB-3 Combination Assembly Recommendations and Limitations Composite Configurations...COMB-4 Typical Sealant
More informationPresented by: Civil Engineering Academy
Presented by: Civil Engineering Academy Structural Design and Material Properties of Steel Presented by: Civil Engineering Academy Advantages 1. High strength per unit length resulting in smaller dead
More information8 ft. 5 k 5 k 5 k 5 k. F y = 36 ksi F t = 21 ksi F c = 10 ksi. 6 ft. 10 k 10 k
E 331, Fall 2004 HW 2.0 Solution 1 / 7 We need to make several decisions when designing a truss. First, we need to determine the truss shape. Then we need to determine the height of the truss and the member
More informationSheathing Braced Design of Wall Studs July 2011 Update. for
Civil Engineering at JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY Sheathing Braced Design of Wall Studs July 2011 Update www.ce.jhu.edu/bschafer/sheathedwalls for AISI Committee on Framing Standards Design Methods Subcommittee
More informationStructural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail. Our ref: JULB2NB Date of issue: March 2017
Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail PAGE 1 (ref: JULB2NB280317) Structural Calculations for Juliet balconies using BALCONY 2 System (Aerofoil) handrail Our ref: JULB2NB280317 Date
More informationAppendix K Design Examples
Appendix K Design Examples Example 1 * Two-Span I-Girder Bridge Continuous for Live Loads AASHTO Type IV I girder Zero Skew (a) Bridge Deck The bridge deck reinforcement using A615 rebars is shown below.
More informationSERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN
CHAPTER 11 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN Article 49. Cracking Limit State 49.1 General considerations In the case of verifications relating to Cracking Limit State, the effects of actions comprise
More informationANSI/SPRI ES-1 Test Reports UL Classified Products
Introduction to ES-1 The ANSI/SPRI ES-1 Roof Edge Standard is a reference for those who design, specify or install edge materials used with low slope roofs. This standard focuses primarily on design for
More informationNAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: Law of Sines:
NME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: EXM 3 PST PROBLEMS (LESSONS 21 TO 28) 100 points Thursday, November 16, 2017, 7pm to 9:30, Room 200 You are allowed to use a calculator and drawing equipment, only.
More informationtwo structural analysis (statics & mechanics) APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS
APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2017 lecture two structural analysis (statics & mechanics) Analysis 1 Structural Requirements strength serviceability
More informationSuspended high-rise. Suspended high-rise Copyright G G Schierle, press Esc to end, for next, for previous slide 1
Suspended high-rise Suspended high-rise Copyright G G Schierle, 2001-06 press Esc to end, for next, for previous slide 1 Suspended high-rise 1 Gravity load path 2 Differential deflection 3 Prestress to
More informationtwenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture
ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture twenty one concrete construction: Copyright Kirk Martini shear & deflection Concrete Shear 1 Shear in Concrete
More informationS TRUCTUR A L PR E- A N A LYSIS TA B LES
M a d e f o r b u i l d i n g b u i l t f o r l i v i n g S TRUTUR A L PR E- A N A LYSIS TA LES I M P R I N T KLH Massivholz GmbH Publisher and responsible for the content: KLH Massivholz GmbH Version:
More informationEAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design
UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA 1 st. Semester Examination 2004/2005 Academic Session October 2004 EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design Time : 3 hours Instruction to candidates: 1. Ensure that this paper contains
More informationChapter 7 INTERNAL FORCES
Chapter 7 INTERNAL FORCES READING QUIZ 1. In a multiforce member, the member is generally subjected to an internal. A) normal force B) shear force C) bending moment D) All of the above. 2. In mechanics,
More informationChapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams
Chapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams Introduction A beam is a long, slender structural member that resists loads that are generally applied transverse (perpendicular) to its longitudinal axis.
More informationNICE-PACK ALCOHOL PREP ROOM PLATFORM CALCULATIONS
DESIGN STATEMENT THIS GALVANISED STEEL PLATFORM IS ANALYSED USING THE ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN METHOD TO DETERMINE MATERIAL STRENGTH. MEMBER SIZES AND FASTENERS ARE CHOSEN NOT SO MUCH FOR THEIR STRENGTH
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 PRINCIPLES OF SEISMIC ISOLATION OF BRIDGES 3 3 ANALYSIS METHODS OF SEISMICALLY ISOLATED BRIDGES 5 3.1 Introduction 5 3.2 Loadings for the Analysis
More informationRETAINING WALL LOADS: Horizontal Equivalent Fluid Pressure = pcf. (Load Case = Soil)
QuickWall 8.0 - RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ================================================================================ Job ID : Job Description : Designed By : ================================================================================
More information