Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003
|
|
- Todd McLaughlin
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003
2 Guide Specifications ( ) 2.3 LOADS 2.4 LOAD COMBINATIONS AND LOAD FACTORS 2.5 DESIGN THEORY 2.6 FATIGUE 2.7 EXPANSION AND CONTRACTION 2.8 BEARINGS 2.9 DIAPHRAGMS, CROSS FRAMES, AND LATERAL BRACING 2.12 NONCOMPOSITE GIRDER DESIGN
3 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 Section 6 Section 7 Section 8 Section 9 Section 11 Section 12 Section 13 Limit States Loads Structural Analysis Flanges with One Web Webs Shear Connectors Bearings I Girders Splices and Connections Deflections Constructibility
4 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section STRENGTH LIMIT STATE (same as 2002; LFD only) 2.3 FATIGUE LIMIT STATE (use modified AASHTO LRFD Art with load factor of 0.75 instead; Uncracked section is used as per Art ) 2.4 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE (same as 2002; Deflection and Concrete Crack Control) 2.5 CONSTRUCTIBILITY LIMIT STATE (This limit state considers deflection, strength of steel and concrete and stability during critical stage of construction)
5 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 9 Deflection - Max. Preferable Span-to-Depth Ratio Las 50 = 25 d F - Live Load Deflections D LL+I < L/800 D LL+I+sidewalk < L/1000 y ** Effective for the full width and full length of the concrete deck
6 2.3 LOADS! Uplift must be investigated, without reduction for multiple lane loading and during concrete placement AASHTO 3.17 Check D + 2 (L + I) AASHTO and 1.5 (D + L + I) Anchor bolts! Impact same as current AASHTO ( I = 50 / (L + 125) 0.3 AASHTO Eq. 3.1 )** ** Revised in 2003.
7 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 3! Impact Art I-Girders. Load Effect Girder bending moment, torsion and deflections Reactions, shear, cross frame and diaphragm actions Art Box Girders. Load Effect Girder bending moment, torsion and deflections Reactions, shear, cross frame and diaphragm actions Impact Factor Vehicle Lane Impact Factor Vehicle Lane Art Fatigue - 15%
8 2.3 LOADS (cont.)! Centrifugal Force same as current AASHTO ( C = S 2 D = 6.68 S 2 / R AASHTO Eq. 3.2 ) ( S = the design speed in miles/hr )! Thermal Forces do not have to be considered if temperature movements are allowed to occur (more in Article 1.6 & 1.7)! Superelevation redistribution of wheel load
9 2.4 LOAD COMBINATIONS AND LOAD FACTORS (A) Construction Loads (Construction Staging) 1.3 (D p + C) (B) Service Loads (Stress range values and live load deflections) D + L r (C) where L r L I CF = L + I + CF = Basic live load = Impact loads = Centrifugal force Overloads D + 5/3 L r
10 2.4 LOAD COMBINATIONS AND LOAD FACTORS (cont.) For all loadings less than H20 Group IA: 1.3 [D L r ] (Single lane) Group II: 1.3 [D + W + F + SF + B + S + T] (EQ may replace W and ICE may replace SF) Group III: 1.3 [D + L r + 0.3W + WL + F + LF] (D) Maximum Design Loads Group I: 1.3 [D + 5/3 L r ] For uplifting reaction: 1.3 [0.9D + 5/3 L r ]
11 2.5 DESIGN THEORY! General Analysis should be of entire structure However, primary bending moment curvature effects may be neglected if the following conditions exist: No. of Girders Limiting Central Angle 2 3 or 4 5 or more 1 Span 2 o 3 o 4 o 2 or more Spans 3 o 4 o 5 o
12 2.5 DESIGN THEORY! Torsion Diaphragms must be provided and designed as primary members! Nonuniform Torsion otherwise known as warping or lateral flange bending, this effect always must be taken into account! Composite Design may be used, but shear connectors must be designed using procedures that will be discussed at a later point
13 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 5 The effects of curvature may be ignored if! Girders are concentric,! Bearing lines are not skewed more then 10 degrees from radial, and! The arc span divided by the girder radius is less then 0.06 radians where the arc span, L as, shall be taken as follows: For simple spans: L as = arc length of the girder, For end of spans of continuous members: L as = 0.9 times the arc length of the girder, For interior spans of continuous members: L as = 0.8 times the arc length of the girder.
14 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 4 Simplified formula for the lateral bending moment in I- girder flanges due to curvature. Where: 6Ml M lat = 5RD 2 Eq. (4-1) M lat = lateral flange bending moment (k-ft) M = vertical bending moment (k-ft) l = unbraced length (ft) R = Girder radius (ft) D = web depth (in)
15 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 4 Methods (Art. 4.3)! Approximate Methods: V-Load method for I-girder bridges M/R Method for Box-girder bridges! Refined Methods: Finite Strip method. Finite Element method. (including gird model considering torsional warping)
16 Equation & Solution for Concentrated Torsion M DESCUS Alternate Solution for Torsion and Warping Differential Equations M EC ω 1 = 2 a φ φ Z Z φ = A + B cosh + C sinh + a a MZ GJ Equation & Solution for Uniform Torsion m Equation & Solution for Linear Varying Torsion m 1 a 2 φ = φ φ = A + BZ 1 φ φ = 2 a φ = A + BZ m EC ω + C cosh mz LEC ω + C cosh Z a Z a + + Dsinh Dsinh Z a Z a 2 mz 2GJ 3 mz 6GJL
17 DESCUS Alternate Solution for Torsion and Warping Differential Equations Fixed-Fixed End Solution for Uniform and Linear Varying Torsion m Reference: Torsion Analysis published by Bethlehem Steel
18 DESCUS Alternate Solution for Torsion and Warping Differential Equations Fixed-Hinged End Solution for Uniform and Linear Varying Torsion m
19 DESCUS Alternate Solution for Torsion and Warping Differential Equations Stresses induced by Torsion & Warping Formula 1 τ = Gt φ t Formula 2 τ ω s = ES s φ ω t Formula 3 σ ω EW φ s = ns
20 DESCUS Alternate Solution for Torsion and Warping Differential Equations Stresses induced by Bending Formula 4 σ b = M b I y Formula 5 τ b = VQ It
21 2.5 DESIGN THEORY (cont.) Overload ** (f b + f w ) overload < 0.8 F y noncomposite < 0.95 F y composite ** Modified in 2003 New Specifications Art. 9.5 Permanent Deflections as (f b ) overload < 0.95 F y Continuously braced flanges & partially braced tension flanges (f b ) overload < F cr1 = F bs ρ w ρ s < 0.95 F y Partially braced compression flange (f b,web comp. ) overload < F cr 0.9Ek = 2 D t w F y
22 2.6 FATIGUE Same as Straight Bridge except for the contribution of torsional stress AASHTO Standard Spec. Allowable Fatigue Stress Range (Redundant or nonredundant; stress cycles & stress category) Stress cycles Stress category AASHTO LRFD (** 2003 New Guide Specs.) Infinite fatigue life (ADTT single-lane $ 2000 Trucks/day F n = ( F) threshold Finite fatigue life (ADTT single-lane < 2000) F n = F = ( A/N ) 1/3
23 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 4 " Fatigue Load Design truck only with constant 30' between 32-kip axles. (LRFD Art with a load factor of 0.75) ADTT single-lane = p x ADTT where p = 1.0 for one-lane bridge = 0.85 for two-lane bridge = 0.80 for three-lane or more bridge Class of Highway ADTT/ADT Rural Interstate 0.2 Urban Interstate 0.15 Other Rural 0.15 Other Urban 0.10
24 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 4 Fatigue Limit State ( ()f) # ()F) n (LRFD Eq ) Infinite Fatigue Life (ADTT single-lane $ 2000 trucks/day) High traffic volume F n = ()F) threshold = 24 ksi for Category A 16 B 12 BN 10 C 12 CN 7 D 4.5 E 2.6 EN
25 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 4 Fatigue Limit State (cont.) Finite Fatigue Life (ADTT single-lane < 2000 trucks/day) ( 365)( 75)( )( ADTT) single lane N = n Category A ()F) TH (ksi) Fn = F = A N n ( F ) TH A 2.5 H R > 40! R < 40! B 1.2 H Simple-span BN 6.1 H C 4.4 H Continuous CN 4.4 H (1) Interior D 2.2 H Support E 1.1 H (2) Elsewhere EN 3.9 H
26 2.7 EXPANSION AND CONTRACTION Must allow thermal movements to take place in directions radiating from fixed supports 2.8 BEARINGS! Must permit horizontal movements in directions radiating from fixed supports! Must allow angular rotation in a tangential vertical plane! Must hold down in cases of uplift
27 2.9 DIAPHRAGMS, CROSS FRAMES, AND LATERAL BRACING Same as current AASHTO except as follows:! Diaphragms/Crossframes shall be provided at each support and at intervals between Diaphragms/Crossframes shall extend in a single plane across full width of bridge! Diaphragms/Crossframes need not be located along skew at interior supports! Diaphragms/Crossframes should be full depth design as main structural element! Diaphragms/Crossframes/Lateral Bracing should be framed to transfer forces to flanges and webs, as necessary
28 2.9 DIAPHRAGMS, CROSS FRAMES, AND LATERAL BRACING (cont.) Suggested Diaphragm/Crossframe spacing Centerline Radius of Bridge (feet) Below to to Over (B) Lateral Bracing Max. stress of the bottom lateral wind bracing Suggested Max. Spacing (feet) ƒ b = ƒ d (DF) br ƒ d = Max. Stress in Crossframes from grid analysis ( DF) ( 016. L 10) 43 / ( SG) = SD bl L L R
29 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 9 Intermediate cross frames should be spaced as nearly uniform as practical to ensure that the flange strength equations are appropriate. Equation (C9-1) may be used as a guide for preliminary framing. l = 5 36 r σ Rb f Eq. (C9-1) Where: l r σ R b f = cross frame spacing (ft) = desired bending stress ratio, = girder radius (ft) = flange width (in) f l f b
30 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 5 fl 0. 5F y Eq. (5-1) where: F y = specified minimum yield stress (ksi) When f b is greater than or equal to the smaller of 0.33F y or 17 ksi, then: f l f b 0.5 Eq. (5-2) The unbraced arc length, l, in feet between brace points at cross frames or diaphragms shall satisfy the following: l 25b and R /10 where: b = minimum flange width in the panel (in) R = minimum girder radius within the panel (ft) Eq. (5-3)
31 2.12 NONCOMPOSITE GIRDER DESIGN (B) Maximum Normal Flange Stress! Compact Sections Compression Flange Requirement: (** New: 18) Allowables: where F bs = F y (1-3 λ 2 ) b 3200 t F F y = 1 F ρ ρ cr bs B w Eq. (5-4) where λ = 1 12l π b F y E ** Revised in 2003 ** 2003 New Guide Specs use the same equation, except l/b f in all the equations to be consistent with the units used
32 2.12 NONCOMPOSITE GIRDER DESIGN (cont.) ρ b = 1 + b l 2l l 1 f b 6 f R ** Revised in 2003 ρ w = l R + f f w b l l Rbf F bs ρ b F y ** Revised in 2003 ρ ρ 10. B w Tension Flange f b < F bu = F y ** Superseded
33 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 5 " Compact Compression (Art ) F cr = smaller F F cr1 cr 2 = = F F bs y ρ b ρ w f l 3 (Eq. 5-4) (Eq. 5-5) F cr for Partially Braced Tension Flange is the same as F cr for compact compression. F cr for Continuously Braced Tension Flange is F y
34 2.12 NONCOMPOSITE GIRDER DESIGN (cont.) (B) Maximum Normal Flange Stress (cont.)! Non-Compact Sections Compression Flange Requirement: Allowables: 3200 b 4400 < F t y Fy ** Superseded f b # F by = F bs ρ w ρ s (f b + f w ) # F y where Tension Flange F bs = F y (1-3 λ 2 ) (Same definition for ρ b and ρ w ) (f b + f w ) # F by = F y ** Superseded
35 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 5 " Non-Compact Compression (Art ) b t f f E 1.02 ( f + ) b f l 23 Eq. (5-7) F cr = F smaller F cr cr 2 1 = Fbsρbρ = F y w f l Eq. (5-8) Eq. (5-9)
36 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 5 ρb = 1+ ρ ρ w1 w2 1 l 12l R 75b f 1 = f l 12l 1 1 f b 75b f 12l b f.95 + l , R = f l fb 0 2 When f l f b 0 ρ w = min(ρ w1, ρ w2 ); f l f b < 0, ρ w = ρ w1 ** Revised in 2003 ** Revised in 2003 ** Revised in 2003
37 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 5 " Partially Braced Tension Flanges (Art. 5.3) F cr = smaller F F cr1 cr 2 = = F F bs y ρ b ρ w f l 3 Eq. (5-10) Eq. (5-11) " Tension Flanges and Continuously Braced Flanges (Art. 5.4) F cr = F y F cr = smaller F F cr1 cr 2 = = F F bs y ρ b ρ w f l 3
38 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 6 " Unstiffened Web (Art. 6.2) for R 700 feet for R > 700 feet D t w 100 Eq. (6-1) t D w ( R 700) Eq. (6-2) Where: D = distance along the web between flanges (in) t w = web thickness (in) R = minimum girder radius in the panel (ft)
39 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 6 " Web Bending Stresses (Art , & 6.4.1) where: F cr 0.9Ek = 2 D t w k = bend-duckling coefficient = 7.2 (D/D c ) 2 for unstiffened webs = 9.0 (D/D c ) 2 for transversely stiffened webs D 2 ds = k = 5.17( ) for 0.4 d for longitudinally s Dc = D 2 ds k = 11.64( ) for < 0.4 stiffened webs D d D c s Eq. (6-3) D c = depth of web in compression (in) d = distance between long. stiffener and comp. flange (in) c F y
40 2.12 NONCOMPOSITE GIRDER DESIGN (cont.) (C) Web Design! Webs Without Stiffeners V u = C V p where V p = 0.58 F y D t for D t w < 6000, F y K for 6000, K D 7500, F t F y w y K C = 1.0 C 6000, = D t w K F y
41 2.12 NONCOMPOSITE GIRDER DESIGN (cont.) for D t w > 7500, F y K C = K D t w 2 F y where buckling coefficient K = 5 ** 2003 New Guide Specs use the same equation, except E is included in all the equations to be consistent with LRFD format.
42 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 6 " Transversely Stiffened Webs D/t w < 150 For R 700 feet d o = D Eq. (6-7a) For R > 700 feet [ ( R 700) ] D D d o = 3 Eq. (6-7b) where: R = minimum girder radius in the panel (ft)
43 2.12 NONCOMPOSITE GIRDER DESIGN (cont.)! Transversely Stiffened Girders V u = C V p (Calculations for C and V p are the same as for webs without stiffeners except 5! Requirements for Transverse Stiffeners I # d o t 3 J where K = 5 + J do D 2 2 D = X do
44 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 6 " Transverse Web Stiffeners Width-to-Thickness Ratio Requirement b t s s 0.48 E F y Eq. (6-13) Where: t s = stiffener thickness (in) b s = stiffener width (in) F y = specified minimum yield stress of stiffener (ksi)
45 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 6 Moment of Inertia Requirement I = d t 3 ts o w Eq. (6-14) where: J = 2 X 0.5 Eq. (6-15) d / D J X = 1.0 for a 0.78 Eq. (6-16) X = a Z 1,775 Eq. (6-17) a = aspect ratio d o = D 2 Z = 0.079do 10 Eq. (6-18) Rtw d o = actual distance between transverse stiffeners (in) R = minimum girder radius in the panel (ft)
46 ! Longitudinally Stiffened Girders Not required if One stiffener required (D/5 from the compression flange) if Two stiffeners required (D/5 from both flanges) if! Requirements for Longitudinal Stiffeners 2.12 NONCOMPOSITE GIRDER DESIGN (cont.) D t F d R d R y o o ,. D t F d R d R y o o ,.. D t F y ,
47 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 6 " Longitudinal Web Stiffeners Moment of inertia Requirement I ls Dt 3 w ( 2 2.4a 0.13)β Eq. (6-19) where: Z β = +1 when the longitudinal stiffener is on the side 6 of the web away from the center of curvature β = Z +1 when the longitudinal stiffener is on the side 12 of the web toward the center of curvature
48 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 6 " When single transverse stiffeners are used, they preferably shall be attached to both flanges. When pairs of transverse stiffeners are used, they shall be fitted tightly to both flanges. " Transverse stiffeners used as connection plates shall be attached to the flanges by welding or bolting with adequate strength to transfer horizontal force in the cross members to the flanges. " Two longitudinal stiffeners may be used on web section where stress reversal occurs. " Longitudinal and transverse stiffeners preferably shall be attached on opposite sides of the web. " Bearing stiffeners shall be placed in pairs, bolted or welded to the girder web or diaphragm
49 CURVED COMPOSITE I-GIRDERS 2.13 GENERAL 2.14 EFFECTIVE FLANGE WIDTH 2.15 NONCOMPOSITE DEAD LOAD STRESSES 2.16 COMPOSITE SECTION STRESSES 2.17 SHEAR CONNECTORS
50 2.13 GENERAL! Girders shall be proportioned for ordinary bending and for nonuniform torsion (also called warping or lateral flange bending)! Usual moment of inertia method shall be used for bending! Any rational method shall be used for nonuniform torsion! For fatigue, perform stress analysis including bending and nonuniform torsion
51 2.14 EFFECTIVE FLANGE WIDTH AASHTO Standard Spec. (Art ;**2003 Art ) not to exceed: ¼ of the span length of the girder the distance center to center of girders 12 x the least thickness of the slab AASHTO LRFD (Art ) For interior beams, the least of: ¼ of the effective span length 12 x the average thickness of the slab + greater of (web thickness, ½ the width of the top flange of the girder) the average spacing of adjacent beams
52 2.15 NONCOMPOSITE DEAD LOAD STRESSES! (f b ) DL1 # F b determined from Art (B)! (f b + f w ) DL1 # F y determined from Art (B)! b t f DLI where f DL1 = (f b + f w ) DL1 ** Revised in 2003, same equations for noncomposite and composite
53 2.16 COMPOSITE SECTION STRESSES! Compact within Concrete f b # F y! Noncompact, compression flange braced by cross-frames or diaphragms f b # F by f b + f w # F y braced by concrete f b + (f w ) DL # F y ** Revised in 2003, same equations for noncomposite and composite
54 2.17 SHEAR CONNECTORS Same as current AASHTO for straight girders, except as modified by Article 1.19 (A)Fatigue (B) Ultimate Strength ** Covered in 2003 Section 7 Shear Connectors
55 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 7 - Strength N P = φ S sc u Eq. (7-1) where: φ sc =0.85 S u = strength of one shear connector according to AASHTO Article (kip) P = force in slab at point of maximum positive live load moment given by Equation (7-2) (kip) P = P p F p Eq. (7-2)
56 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 7 where: P p F p = longitudinal force in the slab at point of maximum positive live load moment computed as the smaller of P 1p or P 2p from Equations (7-3) and (7-4) (kip) = radial force in the slab at point of maximum positive live load moment computed from Equation (7-5) (kip) P = 1 p where: A s = area of steel girder (in 2 ) A s F y Eq. (7-3) P 2 p = f c b d t d Eq. (7-4) where: f c = specified 28-day compressive stress of concrete (ksi) b d = effective concrete with as specified in Article (in) t d = average concrete thickness (in)
57 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 7 where: L p = arc length between an end of the girder and an adjacent point of maximum positive live load moment (ft) R = minimum girder radius over the length, L p (ft) " Between M LL+ and M LL- - where: P T F T F p = P P L R P = + Eq. (7-5) Eq. (7-6) = longitudinal force in the concrete slab at point of greatest negative live load moment computed from Equation (7-7) (kip) = radial force in the concrete slab at point of greatest negative live load moment computed from Equation (7-10) (kip) p 2 2 P T F T
58 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 7 where: P n P = P + = the smaller of P 1n or P 2n (kip) P 2n T P = 1n p A = s f F c P y b d n t d Eq. (7-7) Eq. (7-8) Eq. (7-9) L F = n Eq. (7-10) T PT R where: L n = arc length between a point of maximum positive live load moment and an adjacent point of greatest negative live load moment (ft) R = minimum girder radius over the length, L n (ft)
59 ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 7 - Fatigue 2 ( V ) ( ) 2 fat F V sr = + where: V fat = longitudinal fatigue shear range/unit length (k/in) F fat = radial fatigue shear range/unit length (k/in) F fat = wr where: A bot = area of bottom flange (in 2 ) σ flg = range of fatigue stress in the bottom flange (ksi) l = distance between brace points (ft) R = minimum girder radius within the panel (ft) w = effective length of deck (in) A bot σ flgl fat Eq. (7-11) Eq. (7-12)
60 where: ** 2003 New Guide Specifications Section 7 Eq. (7-13) F CR = net range of cross frame force at the top flange (kip) where: F Eq. (7-14) n = number of shear connectors in a cross section fat Z r = shear fatigue strength of an individual shear connector determined as specified in AASHTO LRFD Article (kip) V sr = range of horizontal shear for fatigue from Equation (7-11) (kip) = F CR w nz p = V sr r
61 CURVED HYBRID GIRDERS 2.18 GENERAL 2.19 ALLOWABLE STRESSES 2.20 PLATE THICKNESS REQUIREMENTS ** not covered in 2003 new Guide Specifications
62 2.18 GENERAL! Pertains to hybrid I-girders having a vertical axis of symmetry through the middle-plane of the web plate
63 2.19 ALLOWABLE STRESSES (A) Bending-Noncomposite Girders! Allowable flange stress Equal to allowable stress from Article 2.12 multiplied by reduction factor R = 1 2 ( 1 α ) ( 3 + α ) 6+ BΨ( 3 Ψ) BΨ Ψ Ψ where F y = yield strength of compression flange B = Ψ= web area tension flange area C of tension flange depth of section
64 2.19 ALLOWABLE STRESSES (Cont.) ( / ) w α = α 1 + f f b t α = web yield strength tension flange yield strength f w / f b t = absolute value of (lateral flange bending stress / bending stress) for tension flange If f / f 1 α, then R = 1 w b t α
65 2.19 ALLOWABLE STRESSES (Cont.) (B) Bending Composite Girders! Allowable flange stress positive moment region Same as for noncomposite girder! Allowable flange stress negative moment region Same as for noncomposite girder, except α is defined as follows: T when f f w b c 2Ψ 1 = 1 Ψ, α α T when 2 Ψ 1 f w Ψ < < 1 Ψ f 1 b c α ( Ψ) 1
66 2.19 ALLOWABLE STRESSES (Cont.) = + α α 1 1 f f w b c Ψ Ψ where is the same as f f f f w b c w b t except that it is for the compression flange ( ) if, then R = 1 f f w b Ψ Ψ α 1 1
67 2.19 ALLOWABLE STRESSES (Cont.)! Shear (same as homogeneous section in Art. 2.12(C)! Fatigue V u = C V p Same as current AASHTO for straight hybrid girders
68 2.20 PLATE THICKNESS REQUIREMENTS! Web plate thickness requirements Same as for non-hybrid curved girders, except that f b in the formulas is replaced by f b / R! Flange plate thickness requirements Same as for non-hybrid curved girders
69 THE END Questions??
APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS
APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS D-1 An extensive literature search revealed many methods for the calculation of live load distribution factors. This appendix will discuss, in detail,
More informationAPPENDIX D COMPARISON OF CURVED STEEL I-GIRDER BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS
APPENIX COMPARISON O CURVE STEEL I-GIRER BRIGE ESIGN SPECIICATIONS (This page is intentionally left blank.) TABLE O CONTENTS LIST O IGURES... -iv LIST O TABLES... -vi 1 OBJECTIVE... -1 METHOOLOGY... -1
More informationKarbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi
Chapter 05 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Beams By Dr. Jawad Talib Al-Nasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering 71 Introduction
More informationGeneral Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD
General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 1 General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 2 AISC ASD and LRFD AISC ASD = American Institute of Steel Construction = Allowable Stress Design AISC Ninth
More information***All blue fields with double frames are used for input.*** by DesignSpreadsheets.com
Spreadsheet Title: Last Revision 8/27/2005 ***All blue fields with double frames are used for input.*** by DesignSpreadsheets.com www.designspreadsheets.com email: info@designspreadsheets.com Project I-Girder
More informationAASHTO-LRFD LIVE LOAD DISTRIBUTION SPECIFICATIONS
AASHTO-LRFD LIVE LOAD DISTRIBUTION SPECIFICATIONS By Toorak Zokaie, 1 Member, ASCE ABSTRACT: The live load distribution factors contained in the AASHTO-LRFD Bridge Design Specification present a major
More informationAccordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.
C3 Flexural Members C3.1 Bending The nominal flexural strength [moment resistance], Mn, shall be the smallest of the values calculated for the limit states of yielding, lateral-torsional buckling and distortional
More informationAppendix J. Example of Proposed Changes
Appendix J Example of Proposed Changes J.1 Introduction The proposed changes are illustrated with reference to a 200-ft, single span, Washington DOT WF bridge girder with debonded strands and no skew.
More informationPLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder
16 PLATE GIRDERS II 1.0 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the current practice for the design of plate girders adopting meaningful simplifications of the equations derived in the chapter on Plate Girders
More informationRoadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.
Example on Design of Slab Bridge Design Data and Specifications Chapter 5 SUPERSTRUCTURES Superstructure consists of 10m slab, 36m box girder and 10m T-girder all simply supported. Only the design of Slab
More informationAppendix K Design Examples
Appendix K Design Examples Example 1 * Two-Span I-Girder Bridge Continuous for Live Loads AASHTO Type IV I girder Zero Skew (a) Bridge Deck The bridge deck reinforcement using A615 rebars is shown below.
More informationKarbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi
Chapter 04 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Compression Members By Dr. Jawad Talib Al-Nasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering
More informationA.2 AASHTO Type IV, LRFD Specifications
A.2 AASHTO Type IV, LRFD Specifications A.2.1 INTRODUCTION A.2.2 DESIGN PARAMETERS 1'-5.0" Detailed example showing sample calculations for design of typical Interior AASHTO Type IV prestressed concrete
More informationENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members
ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures III. Compression Members C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department University of Maryland Compression Members Following subjects are covered:
More informationMODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS
MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS This module of CIE 428 covers the following subjects Column theory Column design per AISC Effective length Torsional and flexural-torsional buckling Built-up members READING:
More informationServiceability Deflection calculation
Chp-6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation Deflection example Structural Design Profession is concerned with: Limit States Philosophy: Strength Limit State (safety-fracture, fatigue, overturning
More informationMechanics of Materials Primer
Mechanics of Materials rimer Notation: A = area (net = with holes, bearing = in contact, etc...) b = total width of material at a horizontal section d = diameter of a hole D = symbol for diameter E = modulus
More informationCompression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)
ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures III. Compression Members C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department University of Maryland Compression Members Following subjects are covered:
More informationTORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES)
Page1 TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES) Restrained warping for the torsion of thin-wall open sections is not included in most commonly used frame analysis programs. Almost
More informationRESEARCH ON HORIZONTALLY CURVED STEEL BOX GIRDERS
RESEARCH ON HORIZONTALLY CURVED STEEL BOX GIRDERS Chai H. Yoo Kyungsik Kim Byung H. Choi Highway Research Center Auburn University Auburn University, Alabama December 2005 Acknowledgements The investigation
More informationDesign of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge
Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge CL (Bridge is symmetric about CL) 0.8 L 0.2 L 0.6 L 0.2 L 0.8 L L = 80 ft Bridge Span = 2.6 L = 2.6 80 = 208 Bridge Width = 30 No. of girders = 6, Width of each girder
More informationSeismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design
Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Elmer E. Marx, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Michael Keever, California Department
More informationFailure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas
Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING LECTURE VIII Dr. Jason E. Charalambides Failure in Flexure!
More informationDesign of Steel Structures Prof. Damodar Maity Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati
Design of Steel Structures Prof. Damodar Maity Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati Module 7 Gantry Girders and Plate Girders Lecture - 3 Introduction to Plate girders
More informationDEFLECTION CALCULATIONS (from Nilson and Nawy)
DEFLECTION CALCULATIONS (from Nilson and Nawy) The deflection of a uniformly loaded flat plate, flat slab, or two-way slab supported by beams on column lines can be calculated by an equivalent method that
More informationBEHAVIOR AND ANALYSIS OF A HORIZONTALLY CURVED AND SKEWED I-GIRDER BRIDGE. A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty. Cagri Ozgur
BEHAVIOR AND ANALYSIS OF A HORIZONTALLY CURVED AND SKEWED I-GIRDER BRIDGE A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty by Cagri Ozgur In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science
More informationFHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges
FHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, 2008 Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges By Firas I. Sheikh Ibrahim, PhD, PE Part B Gusset Plate Resistance in Accordance
More informationresearch report Design Example for Analytical Modeling of a Curtainwall and Considering the Effects of Bridging (All-Steel Design Approach)
research report Design Example for Analytical Modeling of a Curtainwall and Considering the Effects of Bridging (All-Steel Design Approach) RESEARCH REPORT RP18- August 018 Committee on Specifications
More informationSingly Symmetric Combination Section Crane Girder Design Aids. Patrick C. Johnson
Singly Symmetric Combination Section Crane Girder Design Aids by Patrick C. Johnson PCJohnson@psu.edu The Pennsylvania State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University Park,
More informationDesigner Supplement GSD-1-19 Intermediate Crossframes and Intermediate Diaphragms January 18, 2019
Designer Supplement GSD-1-19 Intermediate Crossframes and Intermediate Diaphragms January 18, 2019 1 Overview The purpose of Standard Bridge Drawing, GSD-1-19, is to address updated design requirements
More informationLongitudinal strength standard
(1989) (Rev. 1 199) (Rev. Nov. 001) Longitudinal strength standard.1 Application This requirement applies only to steel ships of length 90 m and greater in unrestricted service. For ships having one or
More informationAPPENDIX A Thickness of Base Metal
APPENDIX A Thickness of Base Metal For uncoated steel sheets, the thickness of the base metal is listed in Table A.1. For galvanized steel sheets, the thickness of the base metal can be obtained by subtracting
More informationThis procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis.
327 Sample Problems Problem 16.1 The moment of inertia about the neutral axis for the T-beam shown is most nearly (A) 36 in 4 (C) 236 in 4 (B) 136 in 4 (D) 736 in 4 This procedure covers the determination
More informationAISC LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System
Model: Verification11_3 Typical Floor Beam #10 W21x44 (10,3,10) AISC 360-05 LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System Floor Loads: Slab Self-weight: Concrete above flute + concrete in flute + metal
More informationSubmitted to the Highway Research Board for. Publication in, the lfhighway Research Record!! CONTRIBUTION OF LONGITUDINAL STIFFENERS OF PLATE GIRDERS
Submitted to the Highway Research Board for Publication in, the lfhighway Research Record!! THE CONTRIBUTION OF LONGITUDINAL STIFFENERS TO THE STATIC STRENGTH OF PLATE GIRDERS by Peter B. Cooper Lehigh
More informationCONNECTION DESIGN. Connections must be designed at the strength limit state
CONNECTION DESIGN Connections must be designed at the strength limit state Average of the factored force effect at the connection and the force effect in the member at the same point At least 75% of the
More informationStructural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 0 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic Loads
More informationLoad Capacity Evaluation of Pennsylvania s Single Span T-Beam Bridges
Presentation at 2003 TRB Meeting, Washington, D.C. UNIVERSITY Load Capacity Evaluation of Pennsylvania s Single Span T-Beam Bridges F. N. Catbas, A. E. Aktan, K. Ciloglu, O. Hasancebi, J. S. Popovics Drexel
More informationBridge deck modelling and design process for bridges
EU-Russia Regulatory Dialogue Construction Sector Subgroup 1 Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges Application to a composite twin-girder bridge according to Eurocode 4 Laurence Davaine
More informationSERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN
CHAPTER 11 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN Article 49. Cracking Limit State 49.1 General considerations In the case of verifications relating to Cracking Limit State, the effects of actions comprise
More informationStructural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode 3 Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 20 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic
More informationof I Section Members
IMPROVED DESIGN ASSESSMENT OF LTB OF I-SECTION MEMBERS VIA MODERN COMPUTATIONAL METHODS Improved Design Assessment of LTB of I Section Members Donald W. White (with credits to Dr. Woo Yong Jeong & Mr.
More informationDesign of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602
Design of wall panel according to EN 160 Example 3: Wall panel with wind load 1.1 Issue Design of a wall panel at an industrial building Materials with a compressive strength 3,5, density class 500, welded
More informationFLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES
UNIT - I FLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES 1. What is meant by indeterminate structures? Structures that do not satisfy the conditions of equilibrium are called indeterminate structure. These
More informationChapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams
Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams Introduction One of the earliest studies concerned with the strength and deflection of beams was conducted by Galileo Galilei. Galileo was the first to discuss
More information4.3 Moment Magnification
CHAPTER 4: Reinforced Concrete Columns 4.3 Moment Magnification Description An ordinary or first order frame analysis does not include either the effects of the lateral sidesway deflections of the column
More informationDirect Strength Method for Steel Deck
issouri University of Science and Technology Scholars ine AISI-Specifications for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural embers Wei-Wen Yu Center for Cold-Formed Steel Structures 1-1-2015 Direct Strength
More informationPIER MOMENT-ROTATION OF COMPACT AND NONCOMPACT HPS70W I-GIRDERS
PIER MOMENT-ROTATION OF COMPACT AND NONCOMPACT HPS70W I-GIRDERS Bryan A. Hartnagel, Ph.D., P.E. An Vinh Tran, Ph.D. June 2003 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors gratefully acknowle dge the sponsors of the project
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)
Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of one-way ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are
More informationPreferred practice on semi-integral abutment layout falls in the following order:
GENERAL INFORMATION: This section of the chapter establishes the practices and requirements necessary for the design and detailing of semi-integral abutments. For general requirements and guidelines on
More informationDesign of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar
6. BEAMS 6.1 Introduction One of the frequently used structural members is a beam whose main function is to transfer load principally by means of flexural or bending action. In a structural framework,
More informationSUMMARY FOR COMPRESSION MEMBERS. Determine the factored design loads (AISC/LRFD Specification A4).
SUMMARY FOR COMPRESSION MEMBERS Columns with Pinned Supports Step 1: Step : Determine the factored design loads (AISC/LRFD Specification A4). From the column tables, determine the effective length KL using
More informationDesign of Beams (Unit - 8)
Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Contents Introduction Beam types Lateral stability of beams Factors affecting lateral stability Behaviour of simple and built - up beams in bending (Without vertical stiffeners)
More informationERRATA for PE Civil Structural Practice Exam ISBN Copyright 2014 (July 2016 Second Printing) Errata posted
Errata posted 8-16-2017 Revisions are shown in red. Question 521, p. 47: Question 521 should read as follows: 521. The W10 22 steel eam (Fy = 50 ksi) shown in the figure is only raced at the center of
More information2/23/ WIND PRESSURE FORMULA 2. PERCENT OF ALLOWABLE STRESS 3. FATIGUE DESIGN
Original Title Presented by Northwest Signal copyright 2010 Designing & Building Structural Steel Products since 1976 Primary Users Traffic Signal Strain & Mast Arm Poles Cantilever & Bridge Sign Structures
More informationε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram
CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case
More informationBPSC Main Exam 2019 ASSISTANT ENGINEER. Test 11. CIVIL ENGINEERING Subjective Paper-I. Detailed Solutions. Detailed Solutions
etailed Solutions SC Main Exam 19 SSISTNT ENGINEER CIVI ENGINEERING Subjective aper-i Test 11 Q.1 (a) Solution: (i) Calculation of maximum moment at 8 m. For maximum moment Case 1: Case : Case : Case 4:
More informationDesign of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar
5.4 Beams As stated previousl, the effect of local buckling should invariabl be taken into account in thin walled members, using methods described alread. Laterall stable beams are beams, which do not
More informationBeam Design and Deflections
Beam Design and Deflections tation: a = name for width dimension A = name for area Areq d-adj = area required at allowable stress when shear is adjusted to include self weight Aweb = area of the web of
More informationSteel Box Girder Bridges Design Guides & Methods
Steel Box Girder Bridges Design Guides & Methods CONRAD P. HEINS IN MEMORIAM CONRAD P. HEINS September, 97 December 4, 98 During the past decade, there has been extensive use of steel box girders for straight
More informationWhere and are the factored end moments of the column and >.
11 LIMITATION OF THE SLENDERNESS RATIO----( ) 1-Nonsway (braced) frames: The ACI Code, Section 6.2.5 recommends the following limitations between short and long columns in braced (nonsway) frames: 1. The
More informationFor sunshades using the Zee blades wind loads are reduced by 10 psf.
C.R. Laurence Co., Inc. 2503 East Vernon Los Angeles, CA 90058 24 July 2009 SUBJ: CR LAURENCE UNIVERSAL SUN SHADES The CRL Universal Aluminum Sun Shades were evaluated in accordance with the 2006 International
More information3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties
CHAPER 3: Reinforced Concrete Slabs and Beams 3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties Description his application calculates gross section moment of inertia neglecting reinforcement, moment of inertia
More informationMAXIMUM SUPERIMPOSED UNIFORM ASD LOADS, psf SINGLE SPAN DOUBLE SPAN TRIPLE SPAN GAGE
F-DEK ROOF (ASD) 1-1/2" high x 6" pitch x 36" wide SECTION PROPERTIES GAGE Wd 22 1.63 20 1.98 18 2.62 16 3.30 I D (DEFLECTION) 0.142 0.173 0.228 fy = 40 ksi Sp Sn 0.122 0.135 708 815 905 1211 1329 2365
More informationPurpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will be on Exam 3.
ES230 STRENGTH OF MTERILS Exam 3 Study Guide Exam 3: Wednesday, March 8 th in-class Updated 3/3/17 Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will be on
More informationLecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures
Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Contents Analysis Approaches Point of Inflection Method Equivalent
More information2010 NASCC / Structures Congress Orlando, Florida May 13, 2010
2010 NASCC / Structures Congress Orlando, Florida May 13, 2010 Load Transfer in Composite Construction (Chapter I of the 2010 AISC Specification) William P. Jacobs, V Stanley D. Lindsey & Associates Atlanta,
More informationComposite bridge design (EN1994-2) Bridge modelling and structural analysis
EUROCODES Bridges: Background and applications Dissemination of information for training Vienna, 4-6 October 2010 1 Composite bridge design (EN1994-2) Bridge modelling and structural analysis Laurence
More informationLecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion
Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Design of
More information3. Stability of built-up members in compression
3. Stability of built-up members in compression 3.1 Definitions Build-up members, made out by coupling two or more simple profiles for obtaining stronger and stiffer section are very common in steel structures,
More informationBeam Bending Stresses and Shear Stress
Beam Bending Stresses and Shear Stress Notation: A = name or area Aweb = area o the web o a wide lange section b = width o a rectangle = total width o material at a horizontal section c = largest distance
More informationTension Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. II. Tension Members. Introduction. Introduction (cont.)
ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures II. Tension Members C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department University of Maryland Tension Members Following subjects are covered: Introduction
More informationDES140: Designing for Lateral-Torsional Stability in Wood Members
DES140: Designing for Lateral-Torsional Stability in Wood embers Welcome to the Lateral Torsional Stability ecourse. 1 Outline Lateral-Torsional Buckling Basic Concept Design ethod Examples In this ecourse,
More informationPresented by: Civil Engineering Academy
Presented by: Civil Engineering Academy Structural Design and Material Properties of Steel Presented by: Civil Engineering Academy Advantages 1. High strength per unit length resulting in smaller dead
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite
More informationMoment redistribution of continuous composite I-girders with high strength steel
Moment redistribution of continuous composite I-girders with high strength steel * Hyun Sung Joo, 1) Jiho Moon, 2) Ik-Hyun sung, 3) Hak-Eun Lee 4) 1), 2), 4) School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural
More informationTuesday, February 11, Chapter 3. Load and Stress Analysis. Dr. Mohammad Suliman Abuhaiba, PE
1 Chapter 3 Load and Stress Analysis 2 Chapter Outline Equilibrium & Free-Body Diagrams Shear Force and Bending Moments in Beams Singularity Functions Stress Cartesian Stress Components Mohr s Circle for
More informationALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE HEADWALLS AASHTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN
ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE EADWALLS AASTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN LANE ENTERPRISES, INC. www.lane-enterprises.com Required Backfill and Load Cases: ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE EADWALLS BASIS OF DESIGN Backfill
More informationNAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: Law of Sines:
NME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: EXM 3 PST PROBLEMS (LESSONS 21 TO 28) 100 points Thursday, November 16, 2017, 7pm to 9:30, Room 200 You are allowed to use a calculator and drawing equipment, only.
More informationFundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures
Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures Civil Engineering for Bachelors 133FSTD Teacher: Zdeněk Sokol Office number: B619 1 Syllabus of lectures 1. Introduction, history of steel structures,
More information6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of
6593 Riverdale St. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-91 (80-266-18**) Unit: YORK ZJ,ZR 180-300 / ZF 210-300 / XP 180-240 Curb Information Hcurb = 18 in (Height of curb) Lcurb = 126.25 in (Length
More information6593 Riverdale St. San Diego, CA (619) Page of. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-92 ( **) Unit: ZF180
6593 Riverdale St. Client: ProVent PV1807 Description: CBKD-92 (80-266-19**) Unit: ZF180 Curb Information Hcurb = 18 in (Height of curb) Lcurb = 115.25 in (Length of curb) wcurb = 84 in (Width of curb)
More informationA Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages
A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages P L/2 L PL/4 MOMNT F b < 1 lastic F b = 2 lastic F b = 3 lastoplastic 4 F b = Plastic hinge Plastic Dr. M.. Haque, P.. (LRFD:
More informationStructural Calculations For:
Structural Calculations For: Project: Address: Job No. Revision: Date: 1400 N. Vasco Rd. Livermore, CA 94551 D031014 Delta 1 - Plan Check May 8, 2015 Client: Ferreri & Blau MEMBER REPORT Roof, Typical
More information5. What is the moment of inertia about the x - x axis of the rectangular beam shown?
1 of 5 Continuing Education Course #274 What Every Engineer Should Know About Structures Part D - Bending Strength Of Materials NOTE: The following question was revised on 15 August 2018 1. The moment
More informationTorsional Analysis of
Steel Design Guide Series Torsional Analysis of Structured Steel Members Steel Design Guide Series Torsional Analysis of Structural Steel Members Paul A. Seaburg, PhD, PE Head, Department of Architectural
More informationSway Column Example. PCA Notes on ACI 318
Sway Column Example PCA Notes on ACI 318 ASDIP Concrete is available for purchase online at www.asdipsoft.com Example 11.2 Slenderness Effects for Columns in a Sway Frame Design columns C1 and C2 in the
More informationSOLUTION (17.3) Known: A simply supported steel shaft is connected to an electric motor with a flexible coupling.
SOLUTION (17.3) Known: A simply supported steel shaft is connected to an electric motor with a flexible coupling. Find: Determine the value of the critical speed of rotation for the shaft. Schematic and
More informationFlexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections
4 5000 4000 (increased d ) (increased f (increased A s or f y ) c or b) Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections Moment (kip-in.) 3000 2000 1000 0 0 (basic) (A s 0.5A s ) 0.0005 0.001 0.0015
More informationChapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations
Chapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations Introduction As we stated in Chapter 3, foundations are considered to be shallow if if [D (3 4)B]. Shallow foundations have several advantages: minimum
More informationDEVELOPMENT AND EXPERIMENTAL TESTING OF PRESS-BRAKE- BRAKE-FORMED STEEL TUB GIRDERS FOR SHORT SPAN BRIDGE APPLICATIONS
DEVELOPMENT AND EXPERIMENTAL TESTING OF PRESS-BRAKE- FORMED STEEL TUB GIRDERS FOR SHORT SPAN BRIDGE APPLICATIONS Karl E. Barth, Ph.D. Gregory K. Michaelson, Ph.D. VOLUME I: DEVELOPMENT AND FEASIBILITY
More informationEquivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams
University of Alberta Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Master of Engineering Report in Structural Engineering Equivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams
More informationSTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction
CHAPTER 2 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Introduction The primary purpose of structural analysis is to establish the distribution of internal forces and moments over the whole part of a structure and to identify
More informationLecture Example. Steel Deck (info from Vulcraft Steel Roof and Floor Deck Manual)
1 / 8 Geometry beam span L 40 ft Steel Wide Flange Beam: beam spacing s beam 10 ft F y 50 ksi construction live load LL construc 20 psf row 148 live load LL 150 psf unit weight of concrete UW conc 145
More informationCSiBridge. Bridge Rating
Bridge Rating CSiBridge Bridge Rating ISO BRG102816M15 Rev. 0 Proudly developed in the United States of America October 2016 Copyright Copyright Computers & Structures, Inc., 1978-2016 All rights reserved.
More informationCE 562 Structural Design I Midterm No. 2 Closed Book Portion (25 / 100 pts)
CE 56 Structural Design I Name: Midterm No. Closed Book Portion (5 / 100 pts) 1. ( pts) List all of the failure modes that should be checked for the followg bearg-tpe connection: P u ½ 7/8" dia bolts,
More informationThe Contribution of Longitudinal Stiffeners To the Static Strength of Plate Girders
The Contribution of Longitudinal Stiffeners To the Static Strength of Plate Girders PETER B. COOPER, Research Assistant, Lehigh University This paper summarizes the results of a research project on the
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Structural Description The two pinned (at the bases) portal frame is stable in its plane due to the moment connection
More informationThe Lateral Torsional Buckling Strength of Steel I- Girders with Corrugated Webs
Lehigh University Lehigh Preserve ATLSS Reports Civil and Environmental Engineering 5-1-6 The Lateral Torsional Buckling Strength of Steel I- Girders with Corrugated Webs Daming Yu Richard Sause Follow
More informationUNIT- I Thin plate theory, Structural Instability:
UNIT- I Thin plate theory, Structural Instability: Analysis of thin rectangular plates subject to bending, twisting, distributed transverse load, combined bending and in-plane loading Thin plates having
More information