ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE HEADWALLS AASHTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE HEADWALLS AASHTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN"

Marianna Alexander
6 years ago
Views:

1 ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE EADWALLS AASTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN LANE ENTERPRISES, INC.

2 Required Backfill and Load Cases: ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE EADWALLS BASIS OF DESIGN Backfill in the strucutral zone shall be AASTO No. 57 stone ( = 40º). 3' #57 Sone 1 3' Case A 10' Case B Cases used to calculate deadmen locations Native soil at its own angle of repose The above cases as directed by SCDOT for the development of the tables. owever, these cases could easily develop into a constant slope from the top of the wall over time. Therefore the following case will be used to calculate the loads on the wall, and the above cases will be used to calculate the depth of bury and rod lenghts for the deadmen anchors. #57 Sone 1 º = 6.6 = 90º Case used to calculate loads on the wall Native soil at its own angle of repose AASTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications Active Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficient, k a k a = sin (+ ' f ) [sin sin(-)] = 0.8 = 1 + sin(' f + ) sin(' f - ) sin( - ) sin( + ) ½ =.4 Where, ' f, effective angle of internal friciton, angle of fill to the horizontal, angle of back face to horizontal, friction angle between fill and wall deg rad (Table ) Compare 1 Coulomb Theory results for k a and k p : k a = cos 1 + cos sin(+)sin(-) coscos ½ = 0.8 taken as positive for the active case k p = cos 1 - cos sin(+)sin(+) coscos ½ = 3.67 taken as negative for the passive case 1 Trigonometric expressions of Coulomb's theory taken from Page 7 of USS Steel Sheet Piling Design Manual (dated July 1984). Page 1

AASTO LRFD PASSIVE LATERAL EART PRESSURE COEFFICIENT ANALYSIS AASTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 3.11.5.

3 AASTO LRFD PASSIVE LATERAL EART PRESSURE COEFFICIENT ANALYSIS AASTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications Passive Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficient, k p For non-cohesive soils, values of the coefficient of passive earth pressure may be taken from Figure for the case of a vertical wall and sloping backfill. Where, f, effective angle of internal friciton, angle of fill to the horizontal deg rad / f = -/ f = R = 0.68, friction angle between fill and wall k p = R[k p (/ f = -1)] = (0.68)(58) = 39.6 A value of 36.9 is too large a k p for deadmen application (note that the above chart is for vertical walls) in that it will not produce a conservative pullout resistance of the anchors (i.e. the lower the value the more conservative the result). Therefore, use the more traditional result from Coulomb's theory calculated on the previous page (k p = 3.67). Page

4 ROD LENGTS AND DMA BURIAL DEPTS Rod lengths are determined by measuring from the wall to the effective zone (along the top row), adding an additional three feet, and then rounding up to the nearest whole foot. All rods will be the same length as the top row rods. 3' effective zone h 1 h a Case A Two levels of wale beams = 40º b = 45 - / c Rod Length, L 6 8 Dimensions in feet a b c L h 1 h ' a effective zone h 1 h h 3 b c Case A Three levels of wale beams = 40º = 45 - / d Rod Length, L Dimensions in feet 10 a 1.5 b 4.0 c 3.0 d 1.5 L 14.0 h h h ' 1 effective zone h 1 h a Case B Two levels of wale beams = 40º b = 45 - / Dimensions in feet c a b c L h 1 h Rod Length, L ' 1 a effective zone h 1 h h 3 b c Case B Three levels of wale beams = 40º = 45 - / d Rod Length, L Dimensions in feet a b c d L h 1 h h Page 3

5 DMA PULLOUT CAPACITY - BACKFILL/EMBEDMENT RESISTANCE Anchor capacities will be based on the difference in passive and active soil pressures at the anchor elevation, and based solely on the area of the anchors (methods that account for the shear capacity of the soil above the anchor are more appropriate for a single anchor near the surface). h 1, h or h 3 T = Rod Pull (lbs) P p D M A P a Dead Man Anchor (DMA) Pullout Force P p - P a = (k p -k a )h = 3.39h = 15 pcf k p = 3.67 k a = 0.8 T u = Factored Pullout Resistance = (P p - P a ) = (3.39h) T u =.h l =.h =.(h+l) D M A = resistance factor for anchor pullout = 0.65 for anchors in granular soils, Table l = 1'-8" (top row), '-4" (intermediate and bottom rows) w = width of DMA (into the page) = '-4" A = Area of DMA = l x w (planar area) T u (lbs) = + A See "Rod Lengths and DMA Burial Depths" sheet for dimensions, h 1, h and h 3. (ft) Case 6 A 6 B 8 A 8 B 10 A 10 B 1 A 1 B h 1 (ft) T u (lbs) , , , , , , , ,101 h (ft) T u (lbs) h 3 (ft) T u (lbs) , , , , , , , ,55 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a , , , ,97 Page 4

6 DESIGN LOADS Live Load Surcharge, LS The increase in horizontal pressure ( p ) due to live load surcharge may be estimated as k a s h eq ( ). p = constant horizontal earth pressure due to live load surcharge, LS Table Equivalent eight of Soil for Vehicular Loading on Retaining Walls Parallel to Traffic Retaining Wall eight (ft) h eq (ft) Distance from wall backface to edge of traffic 0.0 ft 1.0 ft or Further k a = 0.8 h eq = s = 15 pcf equivalent height of soil for vehicular load per Table The load factor for both vertical and horizontal components of live load surcharge (LS) shall be 1.75 (Table ). orizontal componenet of LS = p Use h eq values for LS located 1.0 ft or further from the backface of the wall p = (1.75)(0.8)(15 lbs/ft 3 )( ft) = 1.5 lbs/ft orizontal Earth Pressure, E The load factor for the active horizontal earth pressure shall be taken as 1.50 (Table ). p = k a s z k a = 0.8 s = 15 pcf p = (1.50)(0.8)(15)z = 5.5z LS 1' = 1.5 z p = 5.5z = Factored Wall Loads (ft) Page 5

7 LOAD CASES Four load cases shall demonstrate the various loadings that can occur during construction and over the service life of the completed structure: Case 1 Case Case 3 Case 4 Backfill only between top and bottom anchors. This case produces the maximum moment in a two anchor wall and sometimes the maximum tension on the middle anchor on a three anchor wall Completley backfilled with no passive pressure at the toe. This case shall ensure stabiltiy in the event of total scour at the base of the wall. Backfill to the centerline of the top anchor with no passive pressure at the toe. This case shall represent the worst case construction loads. Completely backfilled with the toe secured with passive pressure. This case shall model the actual installation of the structure as designed. Cases for Two Levels of Wale Beams (see "Rod Lengths and DMA Burial Depths" sheet for dimensions, a, b, and c) T 1 T 1 T 1 T 1 T T T T Case 1 Case Case 3 Case 4 Cases for Three Levels of Wale Beams (see "Rod Lengths and DMA Burial Depths" sheet for dimensions, a, b, c and d) T 1 T 1 T 1 T 1 T T T T T 3 T 3 T 3 T 3 Case 1 Case Case 3 Case 4 = 6ft = 10ft Case = 8ft T 1 (lb/ft) T (lb/ft) M max (lb-ft/ft) Case = 1ft T 1 T (lb/ft) (lb/ft) T 3 (lb/ft) M max (lb-ft/ft) Case T 1 T (lb/ft) (lb/ft) M max (lb-ft/ft) Case T 1 T (lb/ft) (lb/ft) T 3 M max (lb/ft) (lb-ft/ft) Page 6

8 DMA PULLOUT CAPACITY - ANCOR SYSTEM RESISTANCE Corrugated Aluminum Structural Plate (9" x ½") Corrugated Aluminum Structural Plate (9" x ½") '-4" 0.150" ASP (Top Row DMA's) 0.50" ASP (Intermediate and Bottom Row DMA's) I = in 4 /in (8 in) = in 4 I = in 4 /in (8 in) = in 4 c = ( )/ = 1.35 in c = ( )/ = in S = I/c =.639 in 3 S = I/c = 4.64 in 3 M y = F y S = 4,000(.639)(1/1) = 5,78 lb-ft M y = F y S = 4,000(4.64)(1/1) = 8,58 lb-ft M p = 3.18 k-ft/ft (published) M p = 5.30 k-ft/ft (published) M p = 3180 ft-lbs/ft (.33 ft) = 7,409 lb-ft M p = 5300 ft-lbs/ft (.33 ft) = 1,349 lb-ft '-4" DMA (top row) DMA (intermediate and bottom rows) All DMA's T 1'-8" T '-4" T '-4" side view DMA PLATE CAPACITIES q (lb/ft) M max = q T side view l q (lb/ft) = T (lbs) = q x l T u = T (l/) M max (l/) ( = 0.65) see above side view top view DMA Plate Capacities (M max = M p ) Top row Intermed/bottom rows q = 1,509 lbs/ft q = 18,145 lbs/ft T = 35,90 lbs T = 4,338 lbs T u = 3,348 lbs T u = 7,519 lbs DMA RIB CAPACITIES w/o composite action (distributed load) T q (lb/ft) top view w M max = q q (lb/ft) = T (lbs) = q x w T u = T (w/) M max (w/) ( = 0.65) see above CAPACITY OF ¾ TREADED TIE RODS (use ASTM A36 Threaded Rods, F y = 36 ksi) Type VI Rib F y = 35 ksi M p = k-ft DMA Rib Capacities (M max = M p ) q = 3,774 lbs/ft T allow = 55,393 lbs T u = 36,005 lbs CAPACITY OF 1 TREADED TIE RODS (use ASTM A36 Threaded Rods, F y = 36 ksi) Area based on nominal diameter = in Area based on nominal diameter = in u F y A = (0.90)F y A = 14.3 kips u F y A = (0.90)F y A = 5.4 kips T u = factored tensile resistance of the anchor tendon. For mild steel the resistance factor (0.90) shall be applied to F y (Table ) Page 7

9 ANCOR SPACING There will be an increase in one or more of the end reactions due to the overhang of the wale beam at the end of the wall. The increase is minimal but a factor will be used to increase reactions accordingly. The increased reaction will be used to determine the anchor spacing across the entire level. The diagrams below model an infinitely long wale beam with deadmen anchors spaced a distance l apart with a maximum overhangs of l/4 and l/. w (lb/ft) l/4 l l l l l l l/ Reaction coefficients for span l and span overhang l/4 Reaction = (Reaction coefficient) x wl w (lb/ft) l/ l l l l l l l/ Reaction coefficients for span l and span overhang l/ Reaction = (Reaction coefficient) x wl The beam analysis for an overhang of l/4 shows a maximum reaction coefficient of 1.08 (second reaction from the end). The analysis for the l/ overhang shows a maximum reaction coefficient of Based on the beam analysis an end factor of 1.08 will be used as a multiplier to accommodate the worst case scenario, while the maximum overhang will be established as l/. Maximum Reactions T 1 (lb/ft) T (lb/ft) T 3 (lb/ft) = 6 ft = 8 ft = 10 ft = 1 ft n/a n/a Increased Reactions 1.08T 1 (lb/ft) = 6 ft = 8 ft = 10 ft T (lb/ft) T 3 (lb/ft) n/a n/a = 1 ft = 6 ft = 8 ft = 10 ft = 1 ft Anchor Tendon Resistance (lbs) DMA Structural Resistance (lbs) 1 Minimum DMA Pullout Resistance (lbs) ¾ Tie-Rods 1 Tie-Rods Top Row Intrmd/Bottom Top Intrmd Bottom 14,300 5,400 3,348 7,519 4,86 n/a 7,13 14,300 5,400 3,348 7,519 4,86 n/a 9,7 14,300 5,400 3,348 7,519 4,81 8,737 11,947 14,300 5,400 3,348 7,519 5,356 9,807 13,55 1 Pullout resistance of the anchors provides the least resistance and will therefore be used to determine anchor spacing. = 6 ft = 8 ft = 10 ft = 1 ft 1 DMA Spacings, (ft) Top Intrmd Bottom n/a n/a Minimum anchor resistance at each level, R A (lbs) Increased maximum reaction at each level, T max (lb/ft) DMA Spacing, S (ft) = R A /T max [S 4'-6"] 1 Maximum DMA spacings of 4'-6" are established to enhance constructability, improve safety, and minimize deflection. Page 8

10 MOMENT CAPACITY CECKS Wale Beam (6061-T6 Alloy, F y = 35,000 psi) Plastic Analysis.76 in c 4.7 in c 1.96 in y y 1 3 in 1.1 in c 1 PNA A = in I = in 4 S = I/c = /.76 = 4.0 in 3 M y (ft-lbs) = F y S/1 = 11,75 lb-ft M p = F y A(y 1 + y ) = 197,794 in-lbs (16,483 lb-ft) The design flexural strength for plastic analysis = b M p M p = 0.8(16,483) = 13,186 lb-ft AASTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications Table Resistance Factors (Aluminum Structures) Tension in Extreme Fibers of Beams, u = 0.8 Compression in Extreme Fibers of Beams, b = 0.8 Compression in Components of Beams, c = F y = 0.8(35,000 psi) = 8,000 psi Check the wale beam moment capacity assuming the maximum moment on the wale beam occurrs at the overhang reaction: M max (lb-ft/ft) = M max = max = w(l/) w max = 918. lb/ft l max = 4.5 ft 7,386.7 lb-ft (88,640.4 lb-in) Mc/I = ( )(.76)/ =,03.4 psi less than 8,000 psi therefore okay Increased Max Reactions 1.08T 1 (lb/ft) 1.08T (lb/ft) 1.08T 3 (lb/ft) w (lb/ft) l/ l l l/ = 6 ft = 8 ft = 10 ft n/a n/a = 1 ft Corrugated (9" x ½") Aluminum Structural Plate, ASP 0.150" ASP I (in 4 /ft) = (0.149 in 4 /in)(1 in/ft) = in 4 /ft c = ( )/ = 1.35 in S (in 3 /ft) = I/c = in 3 /ft M y (lb-ft/ft) = F y S = 4,000(1.131)(1/1) =,6 lb-ft/ft M p = 3.18 k-ft/ft (published) (M p = 3,180 lb-ft/ft) Flexural capacity of vertical elements M p = 0.9M p (Table ) M p = 0.90(3,180) =,86 lb-ft/ft M max (lb-ft/ft) from sheet entitled "Load Cases" = 6 ft = 8 ft = 10 ft = 1 ft The factored moment resistance of the 0.150" aluminum structural plate exceeds the maximum moment in each case above. Page 9

11 Aluminum Structural Plate eadwall - General Notes: 1. Aluminum structural plate headwalls shall conform to the latest requirements of AASTO M19 or ASTM B746 with a minimum thickness of eadwalls may incorporate the full variety of shapes and sizes available in corrugated metal pipe and structural plate culverts (arch pipe, arch, box culvert, et al). Additionally, headwalls may be equipped with wingwalls of the same design and material. owever, it shall be incumbent upon the project engineer to ensure constructability and structural adequacy through the implementation of submittal requirements (shop drawings, calculations, etc). 3. It shall be the responsibility of the installation crew to implement sound installation practices consistent with AASTO LRFD Bridge Construction Practices. As necessary and at the discretion of the project engineer, the headwall manufacturer or other expertise may be enacted to supervise construction when a bid item for such activity has been included in the contract documents or project specifications. 4. A culvert stub shall be integral with the headwall by means of a full periphery weld on both the interior and exterior of their junction. The headwall is properly placed at the design elevation by ensuring the stub is placed at grade for the culvert crossing. 5. Backfill placement and compaction shall be consistent with Section 6 of the AASTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications. All backfill in the structural zone shall be #57 washed stone or other as approved by the engineer of record. 6. The headwall shall be properly shored through the backfilling process. In general, the wall should be braced at the wale line located above the fill line until the corresponding anchor is completely embedded. The wall shall also be braced at the top anchor location until completely backfilled. 7. All steel components (nuts, bolts, tie back rods) shall have a hot-dipped galvanized coating. 8. As a matter of expedience and to the extent practical, the headwall-culvert system may be completely or partially assembled and lifted as a unit to facilitate placement of the unit in a prepared excavation complete with bedding to grade.

Preferred practice on semi-integral abutment layout falls in the following order:

Preferred practice on semi-integral abutment layout falls in the following order: GENERAL INFORMATION: This section of the chapter establishes the practices and requirements necessary for the design and detailing of semi-integral abutments. For general requirements and guidelines on