***All blue fields with double frames are used for input.*** by DesignSpreadsheets.com
|
|
- Ginger Mills
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Spreadsheet Title: Last Revision 8/27/2005 ***All blue fields with double frames are used for input.*** by DesignSpreadsheets.com Project I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo for DesignSpreadsheets.com Website Job No. Subject Spreadsheet Demo Sheet No. Made By Date Made Checked By Date Checked Comments Spreadsheet Instructions [ah..hey ca..][r..p c.i..t][.es.ct.ca..yo.as..s] Checks for marking relevant/nonrelevant calculations in the left column: 1. Positive / Negative Moment Region 2. Composite / Noncomposite Section 3. Compact / Noncompact Section (Local) Note: Factor 1.5 used for construction loads (Strength IV load combination - high dead load to live load ratio). Color Coding: [LIGHT BROWN shading] headings [CYAN shading] user's input [STRIPED CYAN shading] user's input that typically depends on other input (typically, these cells do not need to be changed) [YELLOW shading] important conclusions, values, etc. '' with green shading in very left column - relevant calculations for current input red '' in very left column - nonrelevant calculations for current input. '.' in very left column - calculations not considered in the current version of the spreadsheet but referenced for completeness Tab: ReadMe 1/2 printed 5/13/2008, 10:29 PM
2 [RED bold font] failed code check Disclaimer This spreadsheet was tested for reliability and accuracy by DesignSpreadsheets.com. However, it is entirely responsibility of the spreadsheet user to verify the applicability and accuracy of any results obtained from this spreadsheet. DesignSpreadsheets.com is not liable for any damages, direct or indirect, resulting from using this spreadsheet. Spreadsheet Revision History 4/11/2006 [ver ] First BridgeArt.net version. 4/14/2006 [ver ] Minor cosmetic revisions. Registration Unregistered Demo Version Registration Key??? Tab: ReadMe 2/2 printed 5/13/2008, 10:29 PM
3 Active Record Name Database of All Records 1 Girder 1 2 Girder 2 - Neg. Moment Region 3 Girder 3 - Pos. Moment Region 4 5 Girder 5 6 Girder 6 7 Girder 7 8 Girder 8 9 Girder Save To Database Upload From Database Hide NonRelevant Rows Show All Rows Select database record you want to upload and hit "Upload From Database" button. Save current input data to the database. The input data will be associated with active record name. Upload input data for active (selected) record. Upload input data for the previous or net record in the database. Add new names for records into the blue shaded fields. Hide non-relevant rows for current input (use e.g prior to printing). Show all rows Tab: Control Panel 1/1 printed 5/13/2008, 10:38 PM
4 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: INPUT OUTPUT - Sectional Properties (section transformed into steel) Girder Girder Only Composite (3n) Composite (n) Composite (rebar) b bf 18 in Girder A [in 2 ] b tf 18 in Girder y cg [in] t bf in Girder I z [in 4 ] t tf 1.75 in Haunch A [in 2 ] h w 51 in Haunch y cg [in] t w in Haunch I z [in 4 ] Deck A [in 2 ] Deck Deck y cg [in] b d in Deck I z [in 4 ] t d 8 in Rebar A A s in 2 Rebar y cg A s in 2 Rebar I z d 1 2 in Total A d 2 2 in Total y cg Total Iz Hauch y_topdeck(d) [in] b h 0 in y_topbar(c) [in] Section Properties about Weak Ais t h 0 in y_topgrd(b) [in] I y = in 4 y_botgrd(a) [in] S y[top FLANGE] = in 3 Modular ratio S_topdeck(d) [in 3 ] S y[bot FLANGE] = in 3 n 7.9 [-] S_topbar(c) [in 3 ] S_topgrd(b) [in 3 ] S_botgrd(a) [in 3 ] Comment Neutral Ais Check OK - neutral ais is within girder Tab: SectProps 1/1 printed 5/13/2008, 10:36 PM
5 Project: Subject: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Note: Stress sign convention for this sheet - compressive stresses are reported as negative, tensile stresses as positive (sign convention for moments - see sketch below). INPUT - Moments DC1 DC2 DW LL+I LL+I fat range LL+I permit SE kip-ft -230 kip-ft -308 kip-ft kip-ft -370 kip-ft kip-ft 0 kip-ft OUTPUT - Stresses Positive Moment Region (stress at the top of deck is reported as stress in concrete: f c =f s /n or f c =f s /(3n)) Load Acting on Grd Only Composite (3n) Composite (n) Load Type DC1 DC2 DW SE LL+I LL+I fat LL+I p Service II Strength I Strength II Fatigue topdeck(d) topbar(c) STRESS topgrd(b) botgrd(a) Negative Moment Region (stress at the top of deck is reported as stress in concrete using short-term composite section: f c =f s /n) Load Acting on Grd Only Composite (rebar) Load Type DC1 DC2 DW SE LL+I LL+I fat LL+I p Service II Strength I Strength II Fatigue topdeck(d) topbar(c) STRESS topgrd(b) botgrd(a) Moment [kip-ft] Tab: Stresses 1/1 printed 5/13/2008, 10:36 PM
6 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Variable/Formula Value Units Comment AASHTO Page indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) BASIC INPUTS general NEG positive moment region (POS), negative moment region (NEG) COMPOSITE composite section (COMPOSITE), noncomposite section (NONCOMPOSITE) geometry t w = in web thickness b fc = in full width of compression flange t fc = in thickness of compression flange D = in web depth material properties E = 29,000 ksi steel Young's modulus F yf = 50.0 ksi specified minimum yield strenth of flange F yw = 50.0 ksi specified mininum yield stress of web F y,reinf = 60.0 ksi specified minimum yield strength of reinforcement F yc = 50.0 ksi specified minimum yield strength of compression flange F yt = 50.0 ksi specified minimum yield strength of tension flange F yr = 35.0 ksi compression flange stress at the onset of nominal yielding note: F yr = min (0.7F yc, F yw ), Fyr 0.5F yc effect of applied loads load factors [AASHTO ] 6-27 Ф f = 1.00 [-] resistance factor for fleure Ф v = 1.00 [-] resistance factor for shear slenderness ratios for local buckling resistance [AASHTO ] λ f = b fc / (2t fc ) = [-] slenderness ratio for compression flange λ pf = 0.38 sqrt (E/F yc ) = [-] limiting slenderness ratio for a compact flange λ rf = 0.56 sqrt (E/F yc ) = [-] limiting slenderness ratio for a noncompact flange reduction factors R h = [-] hybrid factor to account for reduced contribution of web to nominal fleural resistance at first yield in flange element; use 1.0 for girders with same steel strength for flange and web. NOT CONSIDERED:. R h = [12+β(3ρ-ρ 3 )] / [12+2β] =. β = 2D n t w / A fn =. ρ = min (F yw /f n, 1.0) = R b = [-] web load-shedding factor; accounts for increase in compression flange stress due to web local buckling R b = 1 - [a wc /( a wc )] [2D c /t w -λ rw ] = [-] λ rw = 5.7 sqrt(e/f yc ) = [-] limiting slenderness ratio for noncompact web a wc = 2D c t w /b fc t fc = [-] Tab: Detailed 1/8 printed 5/13/2008, 10:37 PM
7 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Variable/Formula Value Units Comment AASHTO Page indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) Nominal Shear Resistance of Unstiffened Webs [AASHTO ] V n = V cr = CV p = 632 kip V n = nominal shear resistance, V cr = shear-buckling resistance V p = 0.58F yw Dt w = 924 kip plastic shear force C = [-] ratio of the shear buckling resistance to the shear yield strength if D/t w 1.12 sqrt (Ek/F yw ) then C = [-] if 1.12 sqrt (Ek/F yw ) < D/t w 1.40 sqrt (Ek/F yw ) then C = = 1.12 / (D/t w ) sqrt (Ek/F yw ) = [-] if D/t w > 1.40 sqrt (Ek/F yw ) then C = = 1.57 / (D/t w ) 2 (Ek/F yw ) = [-] note: D/t w = 81.6 [-] note: 1.12 sqrt (Ek/F yw ) = 60.3 [-] note: 1.40 sqrt (Ek/F yw ) = 75.4 [-] k = 5.0 [-] shear buckling coefficient (k=5 for unstiffened webs) Nominal Resistance of Stiffened Webs - Interior Panels [AASHTO ]. NOT CONSIDERED not considered, because current version of the spreadsheet handles only unstiffened webs.. Nominal Resistance of Stiffened Webs - End Panels [AASHTO ]. NOT CONSIDERED not considered, because current version of the spreadsheet handles only unstiffened webs CONSTRUCTIBILITY 6-86 Basic Inputs f bu[c] = 21.9 ksi stress in compression flange due to DC1 (no lateral bending), factored by 1.5 (Strength IV load combination) f bu[t] = 22.9 ksi stress in tension flange due to DC2 (no lateral bending), factored by 1.5 (Strength IV load combination) f l[c] = 10.0 ksi stress in compression flange due to lateral bending (wind, from eterior girder bracket during construction, etc.) f l[t] = 10.0 ksi stress in tension flange due to lateral bending V u = 96 kips factored shear in web, factored by 1.5 (Strength IV load combination) D c = in depth of web in compression in the elastic range 6-69 r t = b fc / sqrt{ 12 [1+(D c t w )/(3b fc t fc )] } = in effective radius of gyration for lateral torsional buckling C b = [-] moment gradient modifier (conservatively, use C b = ) unbraced lengths for lateral torsional buckling resistance [AASHTO ] L b = in unbraced length L p = 1.0 r t sqrt(e/f yc ) = in limiting unbraced length 1 (for compact) L r = π r t sqrt (E/F yr ) = in limiting unbraced length 2 (for noncompact) Compression Flange Fleural Resistance [AASHTO ] Tab: Detailed 2/8 printed 5/13/2008, 10:37 PM
8 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Variable/Formula Value Units Comment AASHTO Page indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) F nc = min (F nc[1], F nc[2] ) = 43.1 ksi nominal fleural resistance of flange taken as smaller local buckling resistance and lateral torsional buckling resistance [AASHTO ] F nc[1] = 50.0 ksi local buckling resistance of the compression flange [AASHTO ] if λ f λ pf then F nc[1] = R b R h F yc = 50.0 ksi if λ f > λ pf then F nc[1] = = {1-[1-F yr /(R h F yc )][(λ f -λ pf )/(λ rf -λ pf )] } R b R h F yc = 63.6 ksi F nc[2] = 43.1 ksi lateral torsional buckling resistance of compression flange [AASHTO ] if L b L p then F nc[2] = R b R h F yc = 50.0 ksi if L p < L b L r then F nc[2] = = C b {1-[1-F yr /(R h F yc )][(L b -L p )/(L r -L p )]} R b R h F yc = 43.1 ksi note: F nc[2] R b R h F yc if L b > L r then F nc[2] = F cr = 96.1 ksi note: F nc[2] R b R h F yc F cr = C b R b π 2 E / (L b /r t ) 2 = 96.1 ksi F crw = min (F crw[1], F crw[2], F crw[3] ) = 50.0 ksi nominal bend buckling resistance for webs without longitudinal stiffeners [AASHTO ] F crw[1] = 0.9Ek / (D/t w ) 2 = ksi k = 9 / (D c /D) 2 = 37.9 [-] bend buckling coefficient F crw[2] = R h F yc = 50.0 ksi F crw[3] = F yw /0.7 = 71.4 ksi Fleure - Discretely Braced Flanges in Compression [AASHTO ] f bu + f l Ф f R h F yc OK f bu + f l = 31.9 ksi Ф f R h F yc = 50.0 ksi f bu + (1/3)f l Ф f F nc OK f bu + (1/3)f l = 25.3 ksi Ф f F nc = 43.1 ksi f bu Ф f F crw OK f bu = 21.9 ksi Ф f F crw = 50.0 ksi Fleure - Discretely Braced Flanges in Tension [AASHTO ] f bu + f l Ф f R h F yt OK f bu + f l = 32.9 ksi Ф f R h F yt = 50.0 ksi Fleure - Continously Braced Flanges in C or T; assumption that continously braced flange is not subject to local or lateral torsional buckling. f bu Ф f R h F yf. NOT CONSIDERED not considered, because no flanges are continously braced during constructruction Shear 6-90 V u Ф v V cr OK V u = 96 kips factored shear in the web V cr = 632 kips shear buckling resistance Stress in Concrete Deck [AASHTO ] 6-89 Tab: Detailed 3/8 printed 5/13/2008, 10:37 PM
9 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Variable/Formula Value Units Comment AASHTO Page indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) Shall 1% longitudinal reinforcement be provided? YES If the actual tensile stress in concrete deck eceeds Φf r, to control cracking, the area of longitudinal reinforcement shall be at least 1% of the concrete deck area. [AASHTO ] σ c = (1/n) (M/S) = 1.2 ksi actual tensile stress in concrete deck M = 42,984 kip-in moment due to construction loads, DC1, factored by 1.5 (Strength IV load combination - high DL to LL ratio) [imported from Stresses tab] [AASHTO ] note: M = 3,582 kip-ft S = in 3 section modulus for top of deck using n = 1 (section transformed in steel) [imported from Stresses tab] Фf r = 0.0 ksi factored concrete tensile resistance Ф = [-] resistance factor for concrete in tension 5-53 f r = 0.24 sqrt (f c ') = 0.00 ksi modulus of rupture for concrete deck 5-16 [AASHTO ] f c ' = ksi specified compressive strength of concrete SERVICE LIMIT STATE [AASHTO ] 6-93 Basic Inputs f f[top] = 30.0 ksi stress in top flange for Service II load combination f f[bot] = 29.9 ksi stress in bottom flange for Service II load combination f l = 10.0 ksi Fleural Checks 6-93 f f 0.95R h F yf OK top steel flange of composite sections f f = 30.0 ksi 0.95R h F yf = 47.5 ksi f f + f l /2 0.95R h F yf OK bottom steel flange of composite sections f f + f l /2 = 34.9 ksi 0.95R h F yf = 47.5 ksi. f f + f l /2 0.80R h F yf both steel flanges of noncomposite sections. NOT CONSIDERED noncomposite sections are not considered in this version of the spreadsheet. f c F crw OK this check applies to all sections ecept for composite sections in positive fleure with web proportions such that D/t w 150 [AASHTO Eq ] f c = f l[top] = 30.0 ksi compression flange stress due to Service II loads F crw = 50.0 ksi nominal bend buckling resistance for webs [see "Strength Limit State" section below for the calculation of F crw ] [AASHTO ] Stress in Concrete Deck [AASHTO ] 6-89 Shall 1% longitudinal reinforcement be provided? YES If the actual tensile stress in concrete deck eceeds 6-75 Φf r, to control cracking, the area of longitudinal reinforcement shall be at least 1% of the concrete deck area. [AASHTO ] σ c = (1/n) (M/S) = 1.70 ksi actual tensile stress in concrete deck M = 59,323 kip-in moment due to Service II load combination [imported from Stresses tab] [AASHTO ] 6-75 Tab: Detailed 4/8 printed 5/13/2008, 10:37 PM
10 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Variable/Formula Value Units Comment AASHTO Page indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) S = in 3 section modulus for top of deck using n = 1; section transformed in steel (same as for constructibility check above) Фf r = 0.0 ksi factored concrete tensile resistance (same as for constructibility check above) FATIGUE AND FRACTURE LIMIT STATES [AASHTO ] 6-95 fatigue detail description = tension flange fatigue detail category = C γ(δf) (ΔF) n OK 6-29 γ(δf) = 1.6 ksi live load stress range due to passage of fatigue load multiplied by load factor γ = 0.75 (ΔF) n = (A/N)^(1/3) = 5.0 ksi nominal fatigue resistance [AASHTO ] 6-40 A = ksi 3 constant from [AASHTO Tab ] 6-42 N = (365)(75)n(ADTT) SL = 232,687,500 n = 1 number of stress range cycles per truck passage taken from [AASHTO Tab ] (ADTT) SL = (p)(adtt) = 8,500 single lane ADTT (number of trucks per day in one 3-24 direction averaged over the design life) [AASHTO ] p = 0.85 reduction factor for number of trucks for multiple lanes taken from [AASHTO Tab ] ADTT = (ftt) (ADT) = 10,000 number of trucks per day in one direction averaged over the design life ftt = 0.25 fraction of trucks in traffic ADT = (nl) (ADT) SL = 40,000 average daily traffic per whole bridge (ADT) SL = 20,000 average daily traffic per single lane (20,000 is considered maimum) nl = 2 number of lanes note: (ΔF)n (1/2)(ΔF) TH = 5.0 ksi (ΔF) TH = ksi 3 constant amplitude fatigue threshold taken from [AASHTO Tab ]. special requirements for webs [AASHTO ] V u V cr. NOT CONDERED not considered, because this requirement does not need to be checked for unstiffened webs STRENGTH LIMIT STATE 6-96 Basic Inputs f bu[c] = 39.0 ksi stress in compression flange (no lateral bending) f bu[t] = 39.1 ksi stress in tension flange (no lateral bending) f l[c] = 10.0 ksi stress in compression flange due to lateral bending f l[t] = 10.0 ksi stress in tension flange due to lateral bending M u = 6,451 kip-ft bending moment about major ais note: M u = 77,406 kip-in V u = 389 kips factored shear in web D c = in depth of web in compression in the elastic range 6-69 D cp = in depth of web in compression at the plastic moment 6-68 Tab: Detailed 5/8 printed 5/13/2008, 10:37 PM
11 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Variable/Formula Value Units Comment AASHTO Page indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) r t = b fc / sqrt{ 12 [1+(D c t w )/(3b fc t fc )] } = in effective radius of gyration for lateral torsional buckling C b = [-] moment gradient modifier (conservatively, use C b = 1.0) unbraced lengths for lateral torsional buckling resistance [AASHTO ] L b = in unbraced length L p = 1.0 r t sqrt (E/F yc ) = in limiting unbraced length 1 (for compact) L r = π r t sqrt (E/F yr ) = in limiting unbraced length 2 (for noncompact) Compression Flange Fleural Resistance [AASHTO ] F nc = min (F nc[1], F nc[2] ) = 43.1 ksi nominal fleural resistance of flange taken as smaller local buckling resistance and lateral torsional buckling resistance [AASHTO ] F nc[1] = 50.0 ksi local buckling resistance of the compression flange [AASHTO ], same as for constructibility - see calculations above F nc[2] = 43.1 ksi lateral torsional buckling resistance of compression flange [AASHTO ] if L b L p then F nc[2] = R b R h F yc = 50.0 ksi if L p < L b L r then F nc[2] = = C b {1-[1-F yr /(R h F yc )] [(L b -L p )/(L r -L p )]} R b R h F yc = 43.1 ksi if L b > L r then F nc[2] = F cr = C b R b π 2 E / (L b /r t ) 2 = 95.8 ksi note: F nc[2] R b R h F yc F crw = min (F crw[1], F crw[2], F crw[3] ) = 50.0 ksi nominal bend buckling resistance for webs without longitudinal stiffeners [AASHTO ] 6-67 F crw[1] = 0.9Ek / (D/t w ) 2 = ksi k = 9 / (D c /D) 2 = 36.2 [-] bend buckling coefficient F crw[2] = R h F yc = 50.0 ksi F crw[3] = F yw /0.7 = 71.4 ksi Composite Section in Positive Fleure Compact Section Criteria 6-98 COMPACT Compact/Noncompact (To qualify as compact, section must meet all the criteria listed below). Is F yf 70ksi satisfied? YES Is D/t w 150 satisfied? YES D/t w = 81.6 [-] Is 2D cp /t w 3.76 sqrt(e/f yc ) satisfied? YES 2D cp /t w = 0.0 [-] 3.76 sqrt(e/f yc ) = 90.6 [-] Fleural Resistance for Compact Section [AASHTO ] M u + 1/3f l S t Ф f M n OK M u + 1/3f l S t = 84,738 kip-in Ф f M n = 136,224 kip-in note: M n = 11,352 kip-ft S t = M yt /F yt = in 3 elastic section modulus about the major ais of the section to the tension flange M yt = 109,985 kip-in yield moment with respect to tension flange M n = 136,224 kip-in nominal fleural resistance of the section Tab: Detailed 6/8 printed 5/13/2008, 10:37 PM
12 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Variable/Formula Value Units Comment AASHTO Page indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) note: M n = 11,352 kip-ft if D p 0.1 D t then M n = M p = 141,433 kip-in if D p > 0.1 D t then M n = M p ( D p /D t ) = 136,224 kip-in D t = in total depth of composite section [imported from Mp tab] D p = in distance from top of concrete deck to the neutral ais of composite section at plastic moment [imported from Mp tab] M p = 141,433 kip-in plastic moment of composite section [imported from Mp tab] note: M p = 11,786 kip-ft note: M n 1.3R h M y = 142,981 kip-in M y = 109,985 kip-in yield moment [import from My tab] note: M y = 9,165 kip-ft Fleural Resistance for Noncompact Section [AASHTO ] - Compression Flange Check f bu Ф f F nc OK f bu = 39.0 ksi Ф f F nc = 50.0 ksi F nc = R b R h F yc = 50.0 ksi nominal fleural resistance of compression flange - Tension Flange Check f bu + 1/3f l Ф f F nt OK f bu + 1/3f l = 42.4 ksi Ф f F nt = 50.0 ksi F nt = R h F yt = 50.0 ksi nominal fleural resistance of tension flange D p 0.42 D t OK D p = in 0.42 D t = in Ductility Requirement (For Both Compact and Noncompact Sections) Composite Sections in Negative Fleure and Noncomposite Sections Compact Section Criteria COMPACT Compact/Noncompact (To qualify as compact, section must meet all the criteria listed below). Is F yf 70ksi satisfied? YES Is 2D c /t w 5.7 sqrt(e/f yc ) satisfied? YES 2D c /t w = 81.4 [-] 5.7 sqrt(e/f yc ) = [-] Fleural Resistance - Discretely Braced Flanges in Compression [AASHTO ] f bu + (1/3)f l Ф f F nc OK f bu + (1/3)f l = 42.4 ksi Ф f F nc = 43.1 ksi. Fleural Resistance - Discretely Braced Flanges in Tension. f bu + (1/3)f l Ф f F nt. NOT CONSIDERED not considered, because the flanges in tension are continously braced by deck in the negative moment region for strength check Tab: Detailed 7/8 printed 5/13/2008, 10:37 PM
13 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Variable/Formula Value Units Comment AASHTO Page indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) Fleural Resistance - Continously Braced Flanges in T or C f bu Ф f R h F yf OK f bu = 39.0 ksi Ф f R h F yf = 50.0 ksi Shear Resistance [AASHTO ] V u Ф v V n OK V u = 389 kip Ф v V n = 632 kip Tab: Detailed 8/8 printed 5/13/2008, 10:37 PM
14 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Note: sign convention for this sheet - all moments are reported as absolute values; negative "P" forces are compressive, positive "P" forces are tensile. Checked By: indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) DETERMINATION OF PLASTIC MOMENT Mp [AASHTO D6.1, p ] Input Taken from Other Tabs b bf = 18 in girder dimensions b tf = 18 in t bf = in t tf = 1.75 in h w = 51 in t w = in b d = in deck dimensions t d = 8 in t h = 0 in haunch dimensions Additional Input F yf = 50.0 ksi specified minimum yield stress of flange F yw = 50.0 ksi specified minimum yield stress of web F y,reinf = 60.0 ksi specified minimum yield stress of reinforcement f c ' = 4.0 ksi minimum specified 28-day compressive strength of concrete β 1 = [-] use β 1 = 1 to consider whole concrete block in compression Outputs - Positive Moment Region top coord bot coord Height Force Arm Moment to PNA [in] [in] [in] [kips] [in] [kip-in] Ps compression concrete Pc compression top flange Pc tension Pw compression web Pw tension Pt tension bottom flange Total y = D p = in distance of PNA from the top of section M p = 141,433 kip-in plastic moment note: M p = 11,786 kip-ft plastic moment D cp = in depth of web in compression at plastic moment D t = in total depth of composite section Outputs - Negative Moment Region bot coord top coord Height Force Arm Moment to PNA [in] [in] [in] [kips] [in] [kip-in] Pr reinforcement Pt tension top flange Pt compression Pw tension web Pw compression Pc compression bottom flange Tab: Mp 1/2 printed 5/13/2008, 10:39 PM
15 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Note: sign convention for this sheet - all moments are reported as absolute values; negative "P" forces are compressive, positive "P" forces are tensile. indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) Total y = D p = in distance of PNA from the bottom of section M p = 112,274 kip-in plastic moment note: M p = 9,356 kip-ft plastic moment D cp = in depth of web in compression at plastic moment D t = in total depth of composite section Tab: Mp 2/2 printed 5/13/2008, 10:39 PM
16 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) DETERMINATION OF YIELD MOMENT My (for strength check) [AASHTO D6.2, p ] Input general M D1 = 35,820 kip-in factored moment applied to noncomposite section (1.25 DC1) M D2 = 8,994 kip-in factored moment applied to longterm composite section (1.25 DC DW) note: M D1 = kip-ft note: M D2 = kip-ft f c = 39.0 ksi sum of compression flange stresses [import from Stresses tab, for Service II load group] f t = 39.1 ksi sum of tension flange stresses [import from Stresses tab, for Service I load group] F yf = 50.0 ksi specified minimum yield strength of flange F y,reinf = 60.0 ksi specified minimum yield strength of reinforcement Composite Section in Positive Fleure M Y = min (M Y[T], M Y[C] ) = 109,985 kip-in note: M Y = 9,165 kip-ft determine moment to cause yielding in tension (bottom) flange M Y[T] = M D1 + M D2 + M AD[T] = 109,985 kip-in M AD[T] = (F yf - M D1 /S NC[T] - M D2 /S LT[T] ) S ST[T] = 65,171 kip-in additional moment applied to short term composite section to cause nominal yielding in tension flange S NC[T] = 1,959.1 in 3 noncomposite section modulus S LT[T] = 2,189.0 in 3 short-term composite section modulus S ST[T] = 2,360.7 in 3 long-term composite section modulus determine moment to cause yielding in compression (top) flange M Y[C] = M D1 + M D2 + M AD[C] = 241,760 kip-in M AD[C] = (F yf - M D1 /S NC[C] - M D2 /S LT[C] ) S ST[C] = 196,946 kip-in S NC[C] = 1,878.9 in 3 S LT[C] = 3,435.9 in 3 S ST[C] = 6,954.7 in 3 D c = f c / ( f c +f t ) d - t fc = in depth of web in compression in the elastic range d = in depth of steel section t fc = in thickness of top flange Composite Section in Negative Fleure M Y = min (M Y[T1], M Y[T2], M Y[C] ) = 75,145 kip-in note: M Y = 6,262 kip-ft determine moment to cause yielding in tension (top) flange M Y[T1] = M D1 + M D2 + M AD[T1] = 100,163 kip-in Tab: My 1/3 printed 5/13/2008, 10:39 PM
17 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) M AD[T1] = (F yf - M D1 /S NC[T1] - M D2 / COMP[T1] ) S COMP[T1] = 55,349 kip-in additional moment applied to short term composite section to cause nominal yielding in tension flange S NC[T1] = 1,878.9 in 3 noncomposite section modulus S COMP[T1] = S LT[T1] = S ST[T1] = 2,079.9 in 3 composite section modulus (concrete deck not effective) determine moment to cause yielding in reinforcement M Y[T2] = M D2 + M AD[T2] = 75,145 kip-in M AD[T2] = (F y,reinf - M D1 /S NC[T2] ) S COMP[T2] = 66,151 kip-in S COMP[T2] = S LT[T2] = S ST[T2] = 1,699.5 in 3 determine moment to cause yielding in compression (bottom) flange M Y[C] = M D1 + M D2 + M AD[C] = 99,403 kip-in M AD[C] = (F yf - M D1 /S NC[C] - M D2 /S COMP[C] ) S COM[C] = 54,589 kip-in S NC[C] = 1,959.1 in 3 S COMP[C] = S LT[C] = S ST[C] = 2,004.8 in 3 D c = f c / ( f c +f t ) d - t fc = in depth of web in compression in the elastic range d = in depth of steel section t bc = in thickness of bottom flange DETERMINATION OF YIELD MOMENT My (for constructibility check) [AASHTO D6.2, p ] Input f c = 14.6 ksi sum of compression flange stresses [import from Stresses tab, for DC1] f t = 15.3 ksi sum of tension flange stresses [import from Stresses tab, for DC1] F yf = 50.0 ksi specified minimum yield strength of flange Noncomposite Section in Positive Fleure M Y = min( S NC[T] F yf, S NC[C] F yf ) = 93,947 kip-in note: M Y = 7,829 kip-ft S NC[T] = 1,959.1 in 3 section modulus for tension flange S NC[C] = 1,878.9 in 3 section modulus for compression flange D c = f c / ( f c +f t ) d - t fc = in depth of web in compression in the elastic range d = in depth of steel section t fc = in thickness of top flange Noncomposite Section in Negative Fleure M Y = min( S NC[T] F yf, S NC[C] F yf ) = 93,947 kip-in note: M Y = 7,829 kip-ft S NC[T] = 1,878.9 in 3 section modulus for tension flange S NC[C] = 1,959.1 in 3 section modulus for compression flange D c = f c / ( f c +f t ) d - t fc = in depth of web in compression in the elastic range Tab: My 2/3 printed 5/13/2008, 10:39 PM
18 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) d = in depth of steel section t bc = in thickness of bottom flange Tab: My 3/3 printed 5/13/2008, 10:39 PM
Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003
Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003 Guide Specifications (1993-2002) 2.3 LOADS 2.4 LOAD COMBINATIONS
More informationAPPENDIX D COMPARISON OF CURVED STEEL I-GIRDER BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS
APPENIX COMPARISON O CURVE STEEL I-GIRER BRIGE ESIGN SPECIICATIONS (This page is intentionally left blank.) TABLE O CONTENTS LIST O IGURES... -iv LIST O TABLES... -vi 1 OBJECTIVE... -1 METHOOLOGY... -1
More informationAppendix J. Example of Proposed Changes
Appendix J Example of Proposed Changes J.1 Introduction The proposed changes are illustrated with reference to a 200-ft, single span, Washington DOT WF bridge girder with debonded strands and no skew.
More informationKarbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi
Chapter 05 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Beams By Dr. Jawad Talib Al-Nasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering 71 Introduction
More informationAppendix K Design Examples
Appendix K Design Examples Example 1 * Two-Span I-Girder Bridge Continuous for Live Loads AASHTO Type IV I girder Zero Skew (a) Bridge Deck The bridge deck reinforcement using A615 rebars is shown below.
More informationPLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder
16 PLATE GIRDERS II 1.0 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the current practice for the design of plate girders adopting meaningful simplifications of the equations derived in the chapter on Plate Girders
More information3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties
CHAPER 3: Reinforced Concrete Slabs and Beams 3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties Description his application calculates gross section moment of inertia neglecting reinforcement, moment of inertia
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite
More informationThis procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis.
327 Sample Problems Problem 16.1 The moment of inertia about the neutral axis for the T-beam shown is most nearly (A) 36 in 4 (C) 236 in 4 (B) 136 in 4 (D) 736 in 4 This procedure covers the determination
More informationAPPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES
163 APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES A1.1 DESIGN AS PER NORTH AMERICAN SPECIFICATION OF COLD FORMED STEEL (AISI S100: 2007) 1. Based on Initiation of Yielding: Effective yield moment, M n
More informationCE 562 Structural Design I Midterm No. 2 Closed Book Portion (25 / 100 pts)
CE 56 Structural Design I Name: Midterm No. Closed Book Portion (5 / 100 pts) 1. ( pts) List all of the failure modes that should be checked for the followg bearg-tpe connection: P u ½ 7/8" dia bolts,
More informationDesign of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar
5.4 Beams As stated previousl, the effect of local buckling should invariabl be taken into account in thin walled members, using methods described alread. Laterall stable beams are beams, which do not
More informationGeneral Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD
General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 1 General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 2 AISC ASD and LRFD AISC ASD = American Institute of Steel Construction = Allowable Stress Design AISC Ninth
More informationMODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS
MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS This module of CIE 428 covers the following subjects Column theory Column design per AISC Effective length Torsional and flexural-torsional buckling Built-up members READING:
More informationRoadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.
Example on Design of Slab Bridge Design Data and Specifications Chapter 5 SUPERSTRUCTURES Superstructure consists of 10m slab, 36m box girder and 10m T-girder all simply supported. Only the design of Slab
More informationAccordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.
C3 Flexural Members C3.1 Bending The nominal flexural strength [moment resistance], Mn, shall be the smallest of the values calculated for the limit states of yielding, lateral-torsional buckling and distortional
More informationServiceability Deflection calculation
Chp-6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation Deflection example Structural Design Profession is concerned with: Limit States Philosophy: Strength Limit State (safety-fracture, fatigue, overturning
More informationLecture Example. Steel Deck (info from Vulcraft Steel Roof and Floor Deck Manual)
1 / 8 Geometry beam span L 40 ft Steel Wide Flange Beam: beam spacing s beam 10 ft F y 50 ksi construction live load LL construc 20 psf row 148 live load LL 150 psf unit weight of concrete UW conc 145
More informationA Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages
A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages P L/2 L PL/4 MOMNT F b < 1 lastic F b = 2 lastic F b = 3 lastoplastic 4 F b = Plastic hinge Plastic Dr. M.. Haque, P.. (LRFD:
More informationA.2 AASHTO Type IV, LRFD Specifications
A.2 AASHTO Type IV, LRFD Specifications A.2.1 INTRODUCTION A.2.2 DESIGN PARAMETERS 1'-5.0" Detailed example showing sample calculations for design of typical Interior AASHTO Type IV prestressed concrete
More informationFailure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas
Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING LECTURE VIII Dr. Jason E. Charalambides Failure in Flexure!
More informationENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members
ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures III. Compression Members C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department University of Maryland Compression Members Following subjects are covered:
More informationPart 1 is to be completed without notes, beam tables or a calculator. DO NOT turn Part 2 over until you have completed and turned in Part 1.
NAME CM 3505 Fall 06 Test 2 Part 1 is to be completed without notes, beam tables or a calculator. Part 2 is to be completed after turning in Part 1. DO NOT turn Part 2 over until you have completed and
More informationSUMMARY FOR COMPRESSION MEMBERS. Determine the factored design loads (AISC/LRFD Specification A4).
SUMMARY FOR COMPRESSION MEMBERS Columns with Pinned Supports Step 1: Step : Determine the factored design loads (AISC/LRFD Specification A4). From the column tables, determine the effective length KL using
More informationSingly Symmetric Combination Section Crane Girder Design Aids. Patrick C. Johnson
Singly Symmetric Combination Section Crane Girder Design Aids by Patrick C. Johnson PCJohnson@psu.edu The Pennsylvania State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University Park,
More informationCIVL473 Fundamentals of Steel Design
CIVL473 Fundamentals of Steel Design CHAPTER 4 Design of Columns- embers with Aial Loads and oments Prepared B Asst.Prof.Dr. urude Celikag 4.1 Braced ultistore Buildings - Combined tension and oments Interaction
More informationCivilBay Crane Load and Crane Runway Beam Design v1.0.0 User Manual
CivilBay Crane Load and Crane Runway Beam Design v1.0.0 User Manual (Alberta, Canada) Web: Tel: 1-403-510568 01-01-01 Rev 1.0.0 Page 1 of 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT... 3.0 QUICK
More informationDesign of Beams (Unit - 8)
Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Contents Introduction Beam types Lateral stability of beams Factors affecting lateral stability Behaviour of simple and built - up beams in bending (Without vertical stiffeners)
More informationε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram
CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case
More informationThe plastic moment capacity of a composite cross-section is calculated in the program on the following basis (BS 4.4.2):
COMPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 2002 COMPOSITE BEAM DESIGN BS 5950-90 Technical Note Composite Plastic Moment Capacity for Positive Bending This Technical Note describes
More informationCSiBridge. Bridge Rating
Bridge Rating CSiBridge Bridge Rating ISO BRG102816M15 Rev. 0 Proudly developed in the United States of America October 2016 Copyright Copyright Computers & Structures, Inc., 1978-2016 All rights reserved.
More informationCompression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)
ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures III. Compression Members C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department University of Maryland Compression Members Following subjects are covered:
More informationBEHAVIOR AND ANALYSIS OF A HORIZONTALLY CURVED AND SKEWED I-GIRDER BRIDGE. A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty. Cagri Ozgur
BEHAVIOR AND ANALYSIS OF A HORIZONTALLY CURVED AND SKEWED I-GIRDER BRIDGE A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty by Cagri Ozgur In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science
More informationSERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS
CHAPTER REINFORCED CONCRETE Reinforced Concrete Design A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition Fifth Edition SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil
More informationPIER MOMENT-ROTATION OF COMPACT AND NONCOMPACT HPS70W I-GIRDERS
PIER MOMENT-ROTATION OF COMPACT AND NONCOMPACT HPS70W I-GIRDERS Bryan A. Hartnagel, Ph.D., P.E. An Vinh Tran, Ph.D. June 2003 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors gratefully acknowle dge the sponsors of the project
More informationAISC LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System
Model: Verification11_3 Typical Floor Beam #10 W21x44 (10,3,10) AISC 360-05 LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System Floor Loads: Slab Self-weight: Concrete above flute + concrete in flute + metal
More informationMechanics of Materials Primer
Mechanics of Materials rimer Notation: A = area (net = with holes, bearing = in contact, etc...) b = total width of material at a horizontal section d = diameter of a hole D = symbol for diameter E = modulus
More information4.3 Moment Magnification
CHAPTER 4: Reinforced Concrete Columns 4.3 Moment Magnification Description An ordinary or first order frame analysis does not include either the effects of the lateral sidesway deflections of the column
More informationLecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads
Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com Prof.
More informationSeismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design
Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Elmer E. Marx, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Michael Keever, California Department
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear
Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk 1 Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear
Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular Beams Diagonal Tension
More informationof I Section Members
IMPROVED DESIGN ASSESSMENT OF LTB OF I-SECTION MEMBERS VIA MODERN COMPUTATIONAL METHODS Improved Design Assessment of LTB of I Section Members Donald W. White (with credits to Dr. Woo Yong Jeong & Mr.
More informationLecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement
Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Section 1: Deflections
More informationImproved Flexural Design Provisions for I-Shaped Members and Channels
Improved Flexural Design Provisions for I-Shaped Members and Channels DONALD W. WHITE Donald W. White is Associate Professor, Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Materials, Georgia Institute of Technology,
More informationMoment redistribution of continuous composite I-girders with high strength steel
Moment redistribution of continuous composite I-girders with high strength steel * Hyun Sung Joo, 1) Jiho Moon, 2) Ik-Hyun sung, 3) Hak-Eun Lee 4) 1), 2), 4) School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural
More informationCHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE
CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE 6.1 GENERAL It shall be in accordance with JSCE Standard Specification (Design), 6.1. The collapse mechanism in statically indeterminate structures shall not be considered.
More informationLecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion
Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Design of
More informationAPPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS
APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS D-1 An extensive literature search revealed many methods for the calculation of live load distribution factors. This appendix will discuss, in detail,
More informationMECHANICS OF MATERIALS Sample Problem 4.2
Sample Problem 4. SOLUTON: Based on the cross section geometry, calculate the location of the section centroid and moment of inertia. ya ( + Y Ad ) A A cast-iron machine part is acted upon by a kn-m couple.
More informationUnbraced Column Verification Example. AISC Design Examples AISC 13 th Edition. ASDIP Steel is available for purchase online at
Unbraced Column Verification Example AISC Design Examples AISC 3 th Edition IP Steel is available for purchase onle at www.asdipsoft.com H-9 Example H.4 W-Shape Subject to Combed Axial Compression and
More informationIt s a bird it s a plane it s Super Table! F y = 50 ksi F u = 65 ksi ASD LRFD ASD LRFD
It s a bird it s a plane it s Super Table! steelwise ONE-STOP SHOP BY ABBAS AMINMANSOUR, PhD WHAT IF THERE WAS a table that could be directly used for designing tension members, compression members, flexural
More information999 TOWN & COUNTRY ROAD ORANGE, CALIFORNIA TITLE PUSHOVER ANALYSIS EXAMPLE BY R. MATTHEWS DATE 5/21/01
DESCRIPTION Nonlinear static (pushover) analysis will be performed on a railroad bridge bent using several methods to determine its ultimate lateral deflection capability. 1. SAP2000 Nonlinear with axial-moment
More informationSteel connections. Connection name : MEP_BCF_W=14.29[mm]_W=6.35[mm]_tp=63.5[mm]_N=0_N=2_N=0_N=1_W=14.29[mm]_W=14.29[mm]_W=14.29[ mm] Connection ID : 1
Current Date: 08-Dec-13 7:05 PM Units system: SI File name: E:\ram\1\1.cnx\ Microsoft Steel connections Detailed report Connection name : MEP_BCF_W=14.29[mm]_W=6.35[mm]_tp=63.5[mm]_N=0_N=2_N=0_N=1_W=14.29[mm]_W=14.29[mm]_W=14.29[
More informationCONNECTION DESIGN. Connections must be designed at the strength limit state
CONNECTION DESIGN Connections must be designed at the strength limit state Average of the factored force effect at the connection and the force effect in the member at the same point At least 75% of the
More informationExample Bridge Deck Design for Assign. 3 Summary
Bridge Design Spring 2012 Example Bridge Deck Design for Assign. 3 Summary 1 / 2 Geometry Material Properties N gird 6 f' c 4 ksi S 8.00 ft 1 0.85 b f 0 in f r 0.740 ksi = 0.37 * SQRT( f' c ) L over 3.25
More information2/23/ WIND PRESSURE FORMULA 2. PERCENT OF ALLOWABLE STRESS 3. FATIGUE DESIGN
Original Title Presented by Northwest Signal copyright 2010 Designing & Building Structural Steel Products since 1976 Primary Users Traffic Signal Strain & Mast Arm Poles Cantilever & Bridge Sign Structures
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Structural Description The two pinned (at the bases) portal frame is stable in its plane due to the moment connection
More informationAPRIL Conquering the FE & PE exams Formulas, Examples & Applications. Topics covered in this month s column:
APRIL 2015 DR. Z s CORNER Conquering the FE & PE exams Formulas, Examples & Applications Topics covered in this month s column: PE Exam Specifications (Geotechnical) Transportation (Horizontal Curves)
More informationFlexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections
4 5000 4000 (increased d ) (increased f (increased A s or f y ) c or b) Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections Moment (kip-in.) 3000 2000 1000 0 0 (basic) (A s 0.5A s ) 0.0005 0.001 0.0015
More informationKarbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi
Chapter 04 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Compression Members By Dr. Jawad Talib Al-Nasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering
More informationRESEARCH REPORT RP02-2 MARCH 2002 REVISION Committee on Specifications for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members
research report Web Crippling and Bending Interaction of Cold-Formed Steel Members RESEARCH REPORT RP02-2 MARCH 2002 REVISION 2006 Committee on Specifications for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural
More informationDEVELOPMENT AND EXPERIMENTAL TESTING OF PRESS-BRAKE- BRAKE-FORMED STEEL TUB GIRDERS FOR SHORT SPAN BRIDGE APPLICATIONS
DEVELOPMENT AND EXPERIMENTAL TESTING OF PRESS-BRAKE- FORMED STEEL TUB GIRDERS FOR SHORT SPAN BRIDGE APPLICATIONS Karl E. Barth, Ph.D. Gregory K. Michaelson, Ph.D. VOLUME I: DEVELOPMENT AND FEASIBILITY
More informationDirect Design and Indirect Design of Concrete Pipe Part 2 Josh Beakley March 2011
Direct Design and Indirect Design of Concrete Pipe Part 2 Josh Beakley March 2011 Latest in Design Methods? AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2010 Direct Design Method for Concrete Pipe 1993? LRFD5732FlexuralResistance
More informationChapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams
Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams Introduction One of the earliest studies concerned with the strength and deflection of beams was conducted by Galileo Galilei. Galileo was the first to discuss
More informationChapter 8. Shear and Diagonal Tension
Chapter 8. and Diagonal Tension 8.1. READING ASSIGNMENT Text Chapter 4; Sections 4.1-4.5 Code Chapter 11; Sections 11.1.1, 11.3, 11.5.1, 11.5.3, 11.5.4, 11.5.5.1, and 11.5.6 8.2. INTRODUCTION OF SHEAR
More informationStructural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 0 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic Loads
More informationSERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN
CHAPTER 11 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN Article 49. Cracking Limit State 49.1 General considerations In the case of verifications relating to Cracking Limit State, the effects of actions comprise
More informationFire resistance assessment of composite steel-concrete structures
Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 78 November 0 Fire resistance assessment of composite steelconcrete structures Basic design methods Worked examples CAJOT
More informationLocal Buckling. Local Buckling in Columns. Buckling is not to be viewed only as failure of the entire member
Local Buckling MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING LECTURE V Dr. Jason E. Charalamides Local Buckling in Columns Buckling is not to e viewed only as failure of the entire memer
More informationFLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS
FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS Write Known Data Estimate self-weight of the member. a. The self-weight may be taken as 10 percent of the applied dead UDL or dead point load distributed over all the length.
More informationSteel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes
Steel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes INTRODUCTION When the need for a new structure arises, an individual or agency has to arrange the funds required for its construction. The individual or
More informationBridge deck modelling and design process for bridges
EU-Russia Regulatory Dialogue Construction Sector Subgroup 1 Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges Application to a composite twin-girder bridge according to Eurocode 4 Laurence Davaine
More informationhost structure (S.F.D.)
TABLE 00.4 FBC Typical Mansard Beam [AAF] Allowable Span of Mansard Screen Enclosure Self-Mating Beams in accordance with requirements of Table 00.4 (and the 005 Aluminum Design Manual) using 6005T5 alloy:
More informationEdward C. Robison, PE, SE. 02 January Architectural Metal Works ATTN: Sean Wentworth th ST Emeryville, CA 94608
Edward C. Robison, PE, SE ks ATTN: Sean Wentworth 1483 67 th ST Emeryville, CA 94608 02 January 2013 SUBJ: 501 CORTE MADERA AVE, CORTE MADERA, CA 94925 BALCONY GUARD BASE PLATE MOUNTS The guards for the
More informationInteraction Diagram Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements
Interaction Diagram Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements Interaction Diagram - Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements Investigate the capacity for the irregular
More informationEurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps
Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps a brief guide on element design to EC3 Tim McCarthy Email tim.mccarthy@umist.ac.uk Slides available on the web http://www2.umist.ac.uk/construction/staff/
More informationStructural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 22 : Design of an unbraced sway frame with rigid joints Summary: NOTE This example
More informationLecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures
Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Contents Analysis Approaches Point of Inflection Method Equivalent
More informationPreferred practice on semi-integral abutment layout falls in the following order:
GENERAL INFORMATION: This section of the chapter establishes the practices and requirements necessary for the design and detailing of semi-integral abutments. For general requirements and guidelines on
More informationStructural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode 3 Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 20 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)
Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of one-way ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are
More informationMODIFIED MONTE CARLO WITH LATIN HYPERCUBE METHOD
MODIFIED MONTE CARLO WITH LATIN HYPERCUBE METHOD Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) was introduced by McKay, Conover and Beckman as a solution to increase the efficiency of computer simulations. This technique
More informationTORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES)
Page1 TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES) Restrained warping for the torsion of thin-wall open sections is not included in most commonly used frame analysis programs. Almost
More informationSupplement: Statically Indeterminate Trusses and Frames
: Statically Indeterminate Trusses and Frames Approximate Analysis - In this supplement, we consider an approximate method of solving statically indeterminate trusses and frames subjected to lateral loads
More informationSTEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams
STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite
More informationDesign Beam Flexural Reinforcement
COPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA DECEBER 2001 CONCRETE FRAE DESIGN ACI-318-99 Technical Note This Technical Note describes how this program completes beam design when the ACI 318-99
More informationPUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT
Structural Concrete Software System TN191_PT7_punching_shear_aci_4 011505 PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT 1. OVERVIEW Punching shear calculation applies to column-supported slabs, classified
More informationCONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110
E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column Effects From Structural Analysis Axial force, N (tension-ve and comp +ve) (ensure >= 0) 8000kN OK Major
More informationUNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich
UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME 313.3 MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich A CLOSED BOOK EXAMINATION TIME: 3 HOURS For Marker s Use Only LAST NAME (printed): FIRST
More informationSlenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A )
Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A23.3-94) Slender Concrete Column Design in Sway Frame Buildings Evaluate slenderness effect for columns in a
More informationFundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures
Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures Civil Engineering for Bachelors 133FSTD Teacher: Zdeněk Sokol Office number: B619 1 Syllabus of lectures 1. Introduction, history of steel structures,
More informationFHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges
FHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, 2008 Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges By Firas I. Sheikh Ibrahim, PhD, PE Part B Gusset Plate Resistance in Accordance
More informationDesign of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar
5.10 Examples 5.10.1 Analysis of effective section under compression To illustrate the evaluation of reduced section properties of a section under axial compression. Section: 00 x 80 x 5 x 4.0 mm Using
More informationBUCKLING STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF BARS AND FRAMES, AND SPHERICAL SHELLS
CLASSIFICATION NOTES No. 30.1 BUCKLING STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF BARS AND FRAMES, AND SPHERICAL SHELLS APRIL 004 Veritasveien 1, NO-13 Høvik, Norway Tel.: +47 67 57 99 00 Fax: +47 67 57 99 11 FOREWORD is an
More information1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6
Page 3 Page 4 Substructure Design. ARRANGEMENT a. Frame A-P3 L = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m b. Frame P3-P6 L = 25 m H 3 = 8.39 m L 2 = 3 m H 4 = 8.5 m L
More informationSabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are
More informationConceptual question Conceptual question 12.2
Conceptual question 12.1 rigid cap of weight W t g r A thin-walled tank (having an inner radius of r and wall thickness t) constructed of a ductile material contains a gas with a pressure of p. A rigid
More informationBEAMS. By.Ir.Sugeng P Budio,MSc 1
BEAMS B.Ir.Sugeng P Budio,MSc 1 INTRODUCTION Beams are structural members that support transverse loads and are therefore subjected primaril to flexure, or bending. If a substantial amount of axial load
More information1C8 Advanced design of steel structures. prepared by Josef Machacek
1C8 Advanced design of steel structures prepared b Josef achacek List of lessons 1) Lateral-torsional instabilit of beams. ) Buckling of plates. 3) Thin-walled steel members. 4) Torsion of members. 5)
More information