***All blue fields with double frames are used for input.*** by DesignSpreadsheets.com

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "***All blue fields with double frames are used for input.*** by DesignSpreadsheets.com"

Transcription

1 Spreadsheet Title: Last Revision 8/27/2005 ***All blue fields with double frames are used for input.*** by DesignSpreadsheets.com Project I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo for DesignSpreadsheets.com Website Job No. Subject Spreadsheet Demo Sheet No. Made By Date Made Checked By Date Checked Comments Spreadsheet Instructions [ah..hey ca..][r..p c.i..t][.es.ct.ca..yo.as..s] Checks for marking relevant/nonrelevant calculations in the left column: 1. Positive / Negative Moment Region 2. Composite / Noncomposite Section 3. Compact / Noncompact Section (Local) Note: Factor 1.5 used for construction loads (Strength IV load combination - high dead load to live load ratio). Color Coding: [LIGHT BROWN shading] headings [CYAN shading] user's input [STRIPED CYAN shading] user's input that typically depends on other input (typically, these cells do not need to be changed) [YELLOW shading] important conclusions, values, etc. '' with green shading in very left column - relevant calculations for current input red '' in very left column - nonrelevant calculations for current input. '.' in very left column - calculations not considered in the current version of the spreadsheet but referenced for completeness Tab: ReadMe 1/2 printed 5/13/2008, 10:29 PM

2 [RED bold font] failed code check Disclaimer This spreadsheet was tested for reliability and accuracy by DesignSpreadsheets.com. However, it is entirely responsibility of the spreadsheet user to verify the applicability and accuracy of any results obtained from this spreadsheet. DesignSpreadsheets.com is not liable for any damages, direct or indirect, resulting from using this spreadsheet. Spreadsheet Revision History 4/11/2006 [ver ] First BridgeArt.net version. 4/14/2006 [ver ] Minor cosmetic revisions. Registration Unregistered Demo Version Registration Key??? Tab: ReadMe 2/2 printed 5/13/2008, 10:29 PM

3 Active Record Name Database of All Records 1 Girder 1 2 Girder 2 - Neg. Moment Region 3 Girder 3 - Pos. Moment Region 4 5 Girder 5 6 Girder 6 7 Girder 7 8 Girder 8 9 Girder Save To Database Upload From Database Hide NonRelevant Rows Show All Rows Select database record you want to upload and hit "Upload From Database" button. Save current input data to the database. The input data will be associated with active record name. Upload input data for active (selected) record. Upload input data for the previous or net record in the database. Add new names for records into the blue shaded fields. Hide non-relevant rows for current input (use e.g prior to printing). Show all rows Tab: Control Panel 1/1 printed 5/13/2008, 10:38 PM

4 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: INPUT OUTPUT - Sectional Properties (section transformed into steel) Girder Girder Only Composite (3n) Composite (n) Composite (rebar) b bf 18 in Girder A [in 2 ] b tf 18 in Girder y cg [in] t bf in Girder I z [in 4 ] t tf 1.75 in Haunch A [in 2 ] h w 51 in Haunch y cg [in] t w in Haunch I z [in 4 ] Deck A [in 2 ] Deck Deck y cg [in] b d in Deck I z [in 4 ] t d 8 in Rebar A A s in 2 Rebar y cg A s in 2 Rebar I z d 1 2 in Total A d 2 2 in Total y cg Total Iz Hauch y_topdeck(d) [in] b h 0 in y_topbar(c) [in] Section Properties about Weak Ais t h 0 in y_topgrd(b) [in] I y = in 4 y_botgrd(a) [in] S y[top FLANGE] = in 3 Modular ratio S_topdeck(d) [in 3 ] S y[bot FLANGE] = in 3 n 7.9 [-] S_topbar(c) [in 3 ] S_topgrd(b) [in 3 ] S_botgrd(a) [in 3 ] Comment Neutral Ais Check OK - neutral ais is within girder Tab: SectProps 1/1 printed 5/13/2008, 10:36 PM

5 Project: Subject: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Note: Stress sign convention for this sheet - compressive stresses are reported as negative, tensile stresses as positive (sign convention for moments - see sketch below). INPUT - Moments DC1 DC2 DW LL+I LL+I fat range LL+I permit SE kip-ft -230 kip-ft -308 kip-ft kip-ft -370 kip-ft kip-ft 0 kip-ft OUTPUT - Stresses Positive Moment Region (stress at the top of deck is reported as stress in concrete: f c =f s /n or f c =f s /(3n)) Load Acting on Grd Only Composite (3n) Composite (n) Load Type DC1 DC2 DW SE LL+I LL+I fat LL+I p Service II Strength I Strength II Fatigue topdeck(d) topbar(c) STRESS topgrd(b) botgrd(a) Negative Moment Region (stress at the top of deck is reported as stress in concrete using short-term composite section: f c =f s /n) Load Acting on Grd Only Composite (rebar) Load Type DC1 DC2 DW SE LL+I LL+I fat LL+I p Service II Strength I Strength II Fatigue topdeck(d) topbar(c) STRESS topgrd(b) botgrd(a) Moment [kip-ft] Tab: Stresses 1/1 printed 5/13/2008, 10:36 PM

6 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Variable/Formula Value Units Comment AASHTO Page indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) BASIC INPUTS general NEG positive moment region (POS), negative moment region (NEG) COMPOSITE composite section (COMPOSITE), noncomposite section (NONCOMPOSITE) geometry t w = in web thickness b fc = in full width of compression flange t fc = in thickness of compression flange D = in web depth material properties E = 29,000 ksi steel Young's modulus F yf = 50.0 ksi specified minimum yield strenth of flange F yw = 50.0 ksi specified mininum yield stress of web F y,reinf = 60.0 ksi specified minimum yield strength of reinforcement F yc = 50.0 ksi specified minimum yield strength of compression flange F yt = 50.0 ksi specified minimum yield strength of tension flange F yr = 35.0 ksi compression flange stress at the onset of nominal yielding note: F yr = min (0.7F yc, F yw ), Fyr 0.5F yc effect of applied loads load factors [AASHTO ] 6-27 Ф f = 1.00 [-] resistance factor for fleure Ф v = 1.00 [-] resistance factor for shear slenderness ratios for local buckling resistance [AASHTO ] λ f = b fc / (2t fc ) = [-] slenderness ratio for compression flange λ pf = 0.38 sqrt (E/F yc ) = [-] limiting slenderness ratio for a compact flange λ rf = 0.56 sqrt (E/F yc ) = [-] limiting slenderness ratio for a noncompact flange reduction factors R h = [-] hybrid factor to account for reduced contribution of web to nominal fleural resistance at first yield in flange element; use 1.0 for girders with same steel strength for flange and web. NOT CONSIDERED:. R h = [12+β(3ρ-ρ 3 )] / [12+2β] =. β = 2D n t w / A fn =. ρ = min (F yw /f n, 1.0) = R b = [-] web load-shedding factor; accounts for increase in compression flange stress due to web local buckling R b = 1 - [a wc /( a wc )] [2D c /t w -λ rw ] = [-] λ rw = 5.7 sqrt(e/f yc ) = [-] limiting slenderness ratio for noncompact web a wc = 2D c t w /b fc t fc = [-] Tab: Detailed 1/8 printed 5/13/2008, 10:37 PM

7 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Variable/Formula Value Units Comment AASHTO Page indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) Nominal Shear Resistance of Unstiffened Webs [AASHTO ] V n = V cr = CV p = 632 kip V n = nominal shear resistance, V cr = shear-buckling resistance V p = 0.58F yw Dt w = 924 kip plastic shear force C = [-] ratio of the shear buckling resistance to the shear yield strength if D/t w 1.12 sqrt (Ek/F yw ) then C = [-] if 1.12 sqrt (Ek/F yw ) < D/t w 1.40 sqrt (Ek/F yw ) then C = = 1.12 / (D/t w ) sqrt (Ek/F yw ) = [-] if D/t w > 1.40 sqrt (Ek/F yw ) then C = = 1.57 / (D/t w ) 2 (Ek/F yw ) = [-] note: D/t w = 81.6 [-] note: 1.12 sqrt (Ek/F yw ) = 60.3 [-] note: 1.40 sqrt (Ek/F yw ) = 75.4 [-] k = 5.0 [-] shear buckling coefficient (k=5 for unstiffened webs) Nominal Resistance of Stiffened Webs - Interior Panels [AASHTO ]. NOT CONSIDERED not considered, because current version of the spreadsheet handles only unstiffened webs.. Nominal Resistance of Stiffened Webs - End Panels [AASHTO ]. NOT CONSIDERED not considered, because current version of the spreadsheet handles only unstiffened webs CONSTRUCTIBILITY 6-86 Basic Inputs f bu[c] = 21.9 ksi stress in compression flange due to DC1 (no lateral bending), factored by 1.5 (Strength IV load combination) f bu[t] = 22.9 ksi stress in tension flange due to DC2 (no lateral bending), factored by 1.5 (Strength IV load combination) f l[c] = 10.0 ksi stress in compression flange due to lateral bending (wind, from eterior girder bracket during construction, etc.) f l[t] = 10.0 ksi stress in tension flange due to lateral bending V u = 96 kips factored shear in web, factored by 1.5 (Strength IV load combination) D c = in depth of web in compression in the elastic range 6-69 r t = b fc / sqrt{ 12 [1+(D c t w )/(3b fc t fc )] } = in effective radius of gyration for lateral torsional buckling C b = [-] moment gradient modifier (conservatively, use C b = ) unbraced lengths for lateral torsional buckling resistance [AASHTO ] L b = in unbraced length L p = 1.0 r t sqrt(e/f yc ) = in limiting unbraced length 1 (for compact) L r = π r t sqrt (E/F yr ) = in limiting unbraced length 2 (for noncompact) Compression Flange Fleural Resistance [AASHTO ] Tab: Detailed 2/8 printed 5/13/2008, 10:37 PM

8 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Variable/Formula Value Units Comment AASHTO Page indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) F nc = min (F nc[1], F nc[2] ) = 43.1 ksi nominal fleural resistance of flange taken as smaller local buckling resistance and lateral torsional buckling resistance [AASHTO ] F nc[1] = 50.0 ksi local buckling resistance of the compression flange [AASHTO ] if λ f λ pf then F nc[1] = R b R h F yc = 50.0 ksi if λ f > λ pf then F nc[1] = = {1-[1-F yr /(R h F yc )][(λ f -λ pf )/(λ rf -λ pf )] } R b R h F yc = 63.6 ksi F nc[2] = 43.1 ksi lateral torsional buckling resistance of compression flange [AASHTO ] if L b L p then F nc[2] = R b R h F yc = 50.0 ksi if L p < L b L r then F nc[2] = = C b {1-[1-F yr /(R h F yc )][(L b -L p )/(L r -L p )]} R b R h F yc = 43.1 ksi note: F nc[2] R b R h F yc if L b > L r then F nc[2] = F cr = 96.1 ksi note: F nc[2] R b R h F yc F cr = C b R b π 2 E / (L b /r t ) 2 = 96.1 ksi F crw = min (F crw[1], F crw[2], F crw[3] ) = 50.0 ksi nominal bend buckling resistance for webs without longitudinal stiffeners [AASHTO ] F crw[1] = 0.9Ek / (D/t w ) 2 = ksi k = 9 / (D c /D) 2 = 37.9 [-] bend buckling coefficient F crw[2] = R h F yc = 50.0 ksi F crw[3] = F yw /0.7 = 71.4 ksi Fleure - Discretely Braced Flanges in Compression [AASHTO ] f bu + f l Ф f R h F yc OK f bu + f l = 31.9 ksi Ф f R h F yc = 50.0 ksi f bu + (1/3)f l Ф f F nc OK f bu + (1/3)f l = 25.3 ksi Ф f F nc = 43.1 ksi f bu Ф f F crw OK f bu = 21.9 ksi Ф f F crw = 50.0 ksi Fleure - Discretely Braced Flanges in Tension [AASHTO ] f bu + f l Ф f R h F yt OK f bu + f l = 32.9 ksi Ф f R h F yt = 50.0 ksi Fleure - Continously Braced Flanges in C or T; assumption that continously braced flange is not subject to local or lateral torsional buckling. f bu Ф f R h F yf. NOT CONSIDERED not considered, because no flanges are continously braced during constructruction Shear 6-90 V u Ф v V cr OK V u = 96 kips factored shear in the web V cr = 632 kips shear buckling resistance Stress in Concrete Deck [AASHTO ] 6-89 Tab: Detailed 3/8 printed 5/13/2008, 10:37 PM

9 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Variable/Formula Value Units Comment AASHTO Page indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) Shall 1% longitudinal reinforcement be provided? YES If the actual tensile stress in concrete deck eceeds Φf r, to control cracking, the area of longitudinal reinforcement shall be at least 1% of the concrete deck area. [AASHTO ] σ c = (1/n) (M/S) = 1.2 ksi actual tensile stress in concrete deck M = 42,984 kip-in moment due to construction loads, DC1, factored by 1.5 (Strength IV load combination - high DL to LL ratio) [imported from Stresses tab] [AASHTO ] note: M = 3,582 kip-ft S = in 3 section modulus for top of deck using n = 1 (section transformed in steel) [imported from Stresses tab] Фf r = 0.0 ksi factored concrete tensile resistance Ф = [-] resistance factor for concrete in tension 5-53 f r = 0.24 sqrt (f c ') = 0.00 ksi modulus of rupture for concrete deck 5-16 [AASHTO ] f c ' = ksi specified compressive strength of concrete SERVICE LIMIT STATE [AASHTO ] 6-93 Basic Inputs f f[top] = 30.0 ksi stress in top flange for Service II load combination f f[bot] = 29.9 ksi stress in bottom flange for Service II load combination f l = 10.0 ksi Fleural Checks 6-93 f f 0.95R h F yf OK top steel flange of composite sections f f = 30.0 ksi 0.95R h F yf = 47.5 ksi f f + f l /2 0.95R h F yf OK bottom steel flange of composite sections f f + f l /2 = 34.9 ksi 0.95R h F yf = 47.5 ksi. f f + f l /2 0.80R h F yf both steel flanges of noncomposite sections. NOT CONSIDERED noncomposite sections are not considered in this version of the spreadsheet. f c F crw OK this check applies to all sections ecept for composite sections in positive fleure with web proportions such that D/t w 150 [AASHTO Eq ] f c = f l[top] = 30.0 ksi compression flange stress due to Service II loads F crw = 50.0 ksi nominal bend buckling resistance for webs [see "Strength Limit State" section below for the calculation of F crw ] [AASHTO ] Stress in Concrete Deck [AASHTO ] 6-89 Shall 1% longitudinal reinforcement be provided? YES If the actual tensile stress in concrete deck eceeds 6-75 Φf r, to control cracking, the area of longitudinal reinforcement shall be at least 1% of the concrete deck area. [AASHTO ] σ c = (1/n) (M/S) = 1.70 ksi actual tensile stress in concrete deck M = 59,323 kip-in moment due to Service II load combination [imported from Stresses tab] [AASHTO ] 6-75 Tab: Detailed 4/8 printed 5/13/2008, 10:37 PM

10 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Variable/Formula Value Units Comment AASHTO Page indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) S = in 3 section modulus for top of deck using n = 1; section transformed in steel (same as for constructibility check above) Фf r = 0.0 ksi factored concrete tensile resistance (same as for constructibility check above) FATIGUE AND FRACTURE LIMIT STATES [AASHTO ] 6-95 fatigue detail description = tension flange fatigue detail category = C γ(δf) (ΔF) n OK 6-29 γ(δf) = 1.6 ksi live load stress range due to passage of fatigue load multiplied by load factor γ = 0.75 (ΔF) n = (A/N)^(1/3) = 5.0 ksi nominal fatigue resistance [AASHTO ] 6-40 A = ksi 3 constant from [AASHTO Tab ] 6-42 N = (365)(75)n(ADTT) SL = 232,687,500 n = 1 number of stress range cycles per truck passage taken from [AASHTO Tab ] (ADTT) SL = (p)(adtt) = 8,500 single lane ADTT (number of trucks per day in one 3-24 direction averaged over the design life) [AASHTO ] p = 0.85 reduction factor for number of trucks for multiple lanes taken from [AASHTO Tab ] ADTT = (ftt) (ADT) = 10,000 number of trucks per day in one direction averaged over the design life ftt = 0.25 fraction of trucks in traffic ADT = (nl) (ADT) SL = 40,000 average daily traffic per whole bridge (ADT) SL = 20,000 average daily traffic per single lane (20,000 is considered maimum) nl = 2 number of lanes note: (ΔF)n (1/2)(ΔF) TH = 5.0 ksi (ΔF) TH = ksi 3 constant amplitude fatigue threshold taken from [AASHTO Tab ]. special requirements for webs [AASHTO ] V u V cr. NOT CONDERED not considered, because this requirement does not need to be checked for unstiffened webs STRENGTH LIMIT STATE 6-96 Basic Inputs f bu[c] = 39.0 ksi stress in compression flange (no lateral bending) f bu[t] = 39.1 ksi stress in tension flange (no lateral bending) f l[c] = 10.0 ksi stress in compression flange due to lateral bending f l[t] = 10.0 ksi stress in tension flange due to lateral bending M u = 6,451 kip-ft bending moment about major ais note: M u = 77,406 kip-in V u = 389 kips factored shear in web D c = in depth of web in compression in the elastic range 6-69 D cp = in depth of web in compression at the plastic moment 6-68 Tab: Detailed 5/8 printed 5/13/2008, 10:37 PM

11 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Variable/Formula Value Units Comment AASHTO Page indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) r t = b fc / sqrt{ 12 [1+(D c t w )/(3b fc t fc )] } = in effective radius of gyration for lateral torsional buckling C b = [-] moment gradient modifier (conservatively, use C b = 1.0) unbraced lengths for lateral torsional buckling resistance [AASHTO ] L b = in unbraced length L p = 1.0 r t sqrt (E/F yc ) = in limiting unbraced length 1 (for compact) L r = π r t sqrt (E/F yr ) = in limiting unbraced length 2 (for noncompact) Compression Flange Fleural Resistance [AASHTO ] F nc = min (F nc[1], F nc[2] ) = 43.1 ksi nominal fleural resistance of flange taken as smaller local buckling resistance and lateral torsional buckling resistance [AASHTO ] F nc[1] = 50.0 ksi local buckling resistance of the compression flange [AASHTO ], same as for constructibility - see calculations above F nc[2] = 43.1 ksi lateral torsional buckling resistance of compression flange [AASHTO ] if L b L p then F nc[2] = R b R h F yc = 50.0 ksi if L p < L b L r then F nc[2] = = C b {1-[1-F yr /(R h F yc )] [(L b -L p )/(L r -L p )]} R b R h F yc = 43.1 ksi if L b > L r then F nc[2] = F cr = C b R b π 2 E / (L b /r t ) 2 = 95.8 ksi note: F nc[2] R b R h F yc F crw = min (F crw[1], F crw[2], F crw[3] ) = 50.0 ksi nominal bend buckling resistance for webs without longitudinal stiffeners [AASHTO ] 6-67 F crw[1] = 0.9Ek / (D/t w ) 2 = ksi k = 9 / (D c /D) 2 = 36.2 [-] bend buckling coefficient F crw[2] = R h F yc = 50.0 ksi F crw[3] = F yw /0.7 = 71.4 ksi Composite Section in Positive Fleure Compact Section Criteria 6-98 COMPACT Compact/Noncompact (To qualify as compact, section must meet all the criteria listed below). Is F yf 70ksi satisfied? YES Is D/t w 150 satisfied? YES D/t w = 81.6 [-] Is 2D cp /t w 3.76 sqrt(e/f yc ) satisfied? YES 2D cp /t w = 0.0 [-] 3.76 sqrt(e/f yc ) = 90.6 [-] Fleural Resistance for Compact Section [AASHTO ] M u + 1/3f l S t Ф f M n OK M u + 1/3f l S t = 84,738 kip-in Ф f M n = 136,224 kip-in note: M n = 11,352 kip-ft S t = M yt /F yt = in 3 elastic section modulus about the major ais of the section to the tension flange M yt = 109,985 kip-in yield moment with respect to tension flange M n = 136,224 kip-in nominal fleural resistance of the section Tab: Detailed 6/8 printed 5/13/2008, 10:37 PM

12 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Variable/Formula Value Units Comment AASHTO Page indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) note: M n = 11,352 kip-ft if D p 0.1 D t then M n = M p = 141,433 kip-in if D p > 0.1 D t then M n = M p ( D p /D t ) = 136,224 kip-in D t = in total depth of composite section [imported from Mp tab] D p = in distance from top of concrete deck to the neutral ais of composite section at plastic moment [imported from Mp tab] M p = 141,433 kip-in plastic moment of composite section [imported from Mp tab] note: M p = 11,786 kip-ft note: M n 1.3R h M y = 142,981 kip-in M y = 109,985 kip-in yield moment [import from My tab] note: M y = 9,165 kip-ft Fleural Resistance for Noncompact Section [AASHTO ] - Compression Flange Check f bu Ф f F nc OK f bu = 39.0 ksi Ф f F nc = 50.0 ksi F nc = R b R h F yc = 50.0 ksi nominal fleural resistance of compression flange - Tension Flange Check f bu + 1/3f l Ф f F nt OK f bu + 1/3f l = 42.4 ksi Ф f F nt = 50.0 ksi F nt = R h F yt = 50.0 ksi nominal fleural resistance of tension flange D p 0.42 D t OK D p = in 0.42 D t = in Ductility Requirement (For Both Compact and Noncompact Sections) Composite Sections in Negative Fleure and Noncomposite Sections Compact Section Criteria COMPACT Compact/Noncompact (To qualify as compact, section must meet all the criteria listed below). Is F yf 70ksi satisfied? YES Is 2D c /t w 5.7 sqrt(e/f yc ) satisfied? YES 2D c /t w = 81.4 [-] 5.7 sqrt(e/f yc ) = [-] Fleural Resistance - Discretely Braced Flanges in Compression [AASHTO ] f bu + (1/3)f l Ф f F nc OK f bu + (1/3)f l = 42.4 ksi Ф f F nc = 43.1 ksi. Fleural Resistance - Discretely Braced Flanges in Tension. f bu + (1/3)f l Ф f F nt. NOT CONSIDERED not considered, because the flanges in tension are continously braced by deck in the negative moment region for strength check Tab: Detailed 7/8 printed 5/13/2008, 10:37 PM

13 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Variable/Formula Value Units Comment AASHTO Page indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) Fleural Resistance - Continously Braced Flanges in T or C f bu Ф f R h F yf OK f bu = 39.0 ksi Ф f R h F yf = 50.0 ksi Shear Resistance [AASHTO ] V u Ф v V n OK V u = 389 kip Ф v V n = 632 kip Tab: Detailed 8/8 printed 5/13/2008, 10:37 PM

14 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Note: sign convention for this sheet - all moments are reported as absolute values; negative "P" forces are compressive, positive "P" forces are tensile. Checked By: indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) DETERMINATION OF PLASTIC MOMENT Mp [AASHTO D6.1, p ] Input Taken from Other Tabs b bf = 18 in girder dimensions b tf = 18 in t bf = in t tf = 1.75 in h w = 51 in t w = in b d = in deck dimensions t d = 8 in t h = 0 in haunch dimensions Additional Input F yf = 50.0 ksi specified minimum yield stress of flange F yw = 50.0 ksi specified minimum yield stress of web F y,reinf = 60.0 ksi specified minimum yield stress of reinforcement f c ' = 4.0 ksi minimum specified 28-day compressive strength of concrete β 1 = [-] use β 1 = 1 to consider whole concrete block in compression Outputs - Positive Moment Region top coord bot coord Height Force Arm Moment to PNA [in] [in] [in] [kips] [in] [kip-in] Ps compression concrete Pc compression top flange Pc tension Pw compression web Pw tension Pt tension bottom flange Total y = D p = in distance of PNA from the top of section M p = 141,433 kip-in plastic moment note: M p = 11,786 kip-ft plastic moment D cp = in depth of web in compression at plastic moment D t = in total depth of composite section Outputs - Negative Moment Region bot coord top coord Height Force Arm Moment to PNA [in] [in] [in] [kips] [in] [kip-in] Pr reinforcement Pt tension top flange Pt compression Pw tension web Pw compression Pc compression bottom flange Tab: Mp 1/2 printed 5/13/2008, 10:39 PM

15 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: Note: sign convention for this sheet - all moments are reported as absolute values; negative "P" forces are compressive, positive "P" forces are tensile. indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) Total y = D p = in distance of PNA from the bottom of section M p = 112,274 kip-in plastic moment note: M p = 9,356 kip-ft plastic moment D cp = in depth of web in compression at plastic moment D t = in total depth of composite section Tab: Mp 2/2 printed 5/13/2008, 10:39 PM

16 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) DETERMINATION OF YIELD MOMENT My (for strength check) [AASHTO D6.2, p ] Input general M D1 = 35,820 kip-in factored moment applied to noncomposite section (1.25 DC1) M D2 = 8,994 kip-in factored moment applied to longterm composite section (1.25 DC DW) note: M D1 = kip-ft note: M D2 = kip-ft f c = 39.0 ksi sum of compression flange stresses [import from Stresses tab, for Service II load group] f t = 39.1 ksi sum of tension flange stresses [import from Stresses tab, for Service I load group] F yf = 50.0 ksi specified minimum yield strength of flange F y,reinf = 60.0 ksi specified minimum yield strength of reinforcement Composite Section in Positive Fleure M Y = min (M Y[T], M Y[C] ) = 109,985 kip-in note: M Y = 9,165 kip-ft determine moment to cause yielding in tension (bottom) flange M Y[T] = M D1 + M D2 + M AD[T] = 109,985 kip-in M AD[T] = (F yf - M D1 /S NC[T] - M D2 /S LT[T] ) S ST[T] = 65,171 kip-in additional moment applied to short term composite section to cause nominal yielding in tension flange S NC[T] = 1,959.1 in 3 noncomposite section modulus S LT[T] = 2,189.0 in 3 short-term composite section modulus S ST[T] = 2,360.7 in 3 long-term composite section modulus determine moment to cause yielding in compression (top) flange M Y[C] = M D1 + M D2 + M AD[C] = 241,760 kip-in M AD[C] = (F yf - M D1 /S NC[C] - M D2 /S LT[C] ) S ST[C] = 196,946 kip-in S NC[C] = 1,878.9 in 3 S LT[C] = 3,435.9 in 3 S ST[C] = 6,954.7 in 3 D c = f c / ( f c +f t ) d - t fc = in depth of web in compression in the elastic range d = in depth of steel section t fc = in thickness of top flange Composite Section in Negative Fleure M Y = min (M Y[T1], M Y[T2], M Y[C] ) = 75,145 kip-in note: M Y = 6,262 kip-ft determine moment to cause yielding in tension (top) flange M Y[T1] = M D1 + M D2 + M AD[T1] = 100,163 kip-in Tab: My 1/3 printed 5/13/2008, 10:39 PM

17 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) M AD[T1] = (F yf - M D1 /S NC[T1] - M D2 / COMP[T1] ) S COMP[T1] = 55,349 kip-in additional moment applied to short term composite section to cause nominal yielding in tension flange S NC[T1] = 1,878.9 in 3 noncomposite section modulus S COMP[T1] = S LT[T1] = S ST[T1] = 2,079.9 in 3 composite section modulus (concrete deck not effective) determine moment to cause yielding in reinforcement M Y[T2] = M D2 + M AD[T2] = 75,145 kip-in M AD[T2] = (F y,reinf - M D1 /S NC[T2] ) S COMP[T2] = 66,151 kip-in S COMP[T2] = S LT[T2] = S ST[T2] = 1,699.5 in 3 determine moment to cause yielding in compression (bottom) flange M Y[C] = M D1 + M D2 + M AD[C] = 99,403 kip-in M AD[C] = (F yf - M D1 /S NC[C] - M D2 /S COMP[C] ) S COM[C] = 54,589 kip-in S NC[C] = 1,959.1 in 3 S COMP[C] = S LT[C] = S ST[C] = 2,004.8 in 3 D c = f c / ( f c +f t ) d - t fc = in depth of web in compression in the elastic range d = in depth of steel section t bc = in thickness of bottom flange DETERMINATION OF YIELD MOMENT My (for constructibility check) [AASHTO D6.2, p ] Input f c = 14.6 ksi sum of compression flange stresses [import from Stresses tab, for DC1] f t = 15.3 ksi sum of tension flange stresses [import from Stresses tab, for DC1] F yf = 50.0 ksi specified minimum yield strength of flange Noncomposite Section in Positive Fleure M Y = min( S NC[T] F yf, S NC[C] F yf ) = 93,947 kip-in note: M Y = 7,829 kip-ft S NC[T] = 1,959.1 in 3 section modulus for tension flange S NC[C] = 1,878.9 in 3 section modulus for compression flange D c = f c / ( f c +f t ) d - t fc = in depth of web in compression in the elastic range d = in depth of steel section t fc = in thickness of top flange Noncomposite Section in Negative Fleure M Y = min( S NC[T] F yf, S NC[C] F yf ) = 93,947 kip-in note: M Y = 7,829 kip-ft S NC[T] = 1,878.9 in 3 section modulus for tension flange S NC[C] = 1,959.1 in 3 section modulus for compression flange D c = f c / ( f c +f t ) d - t fc = in depth of web in compression in the elastic range Tab: My 2/3 printed 5/13/2008, 10:39 PM

18 Project: I-Girder Section Analysis and Design Spreadsheet Demo Checked By: indicates that corresponding checks are applicable for section under consideration (based on user's input) d = in depth of steel section t bc = in thickness of bottom flange Tab: My 3/3 printed 5/13/2008, 10:39 PM

Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003

Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003 Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003 Guide Specifications (1993-2002) 2.3 LOADS 2.4 LOAD COMBINATIONS

More information

APPENDIX D COMPARISON OF CURVED STEEL I-GIRDER BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

APPENDIX D COMPARISON OF CURVED STEEL I-GIRDER BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS APPENIX COMPARISON O CURVE STEEL I-GIRER BRIGE ESIGN SPECIICATIONS (This page is intentionally left blank.) TABLE O CONTENTS LIST O IGURES... -iv LIST O TABLES... -vi 1 OBJECTIVE... -1 METHOOLOGY... -1

More information

Appendix J. Example of Proposed Changes

Appendix J. Example of Proposed Changes Appendix J Example of Proposed Changes J.1 Introduction The proposed changes are illustrated with reference to a 200-ft, single span, Washington DOT WF bridge girder with debonded strands and no skew.

More information

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi Chapter 05 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Beams By Dr. Jawad Talib Al-Nasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering 71 Introduction

More information

Appendix K Design Examples

Appendix K Design Examples Appendix K Design Examples Example 1 * Two-Span I-Girder Bridge Continuous for Live Loads AASHTO Type IV I girder Zero Skew (a) Bridge Deck The bridge deck reinforcement using A615 rebars is shown below.

More information

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder 16 PLATE GIRDERS II 1.0 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the current practice for the design of plate girders adopting meaningful simplifications of the equations derived in the chapter on Plate Girders

More information

3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties

3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties CHAPER 3: Reinforced Concrete Slabs and Beams 3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties Description his application calculates gross section moment of inertia neglecting reinforcement, moment of inertia

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite

More information

This procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis.

This procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis. 327 Sample Problems Problem 16.1 The moment of inertia about the neutral axis for the T-beam shown is most nearly (A) 36 in 4 (C) 236 in 4 (B) 136 in 4 (D) 736 in 4 This procedure covers the determination

More information

APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES

APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES 163 APPENDIX 1 MODEL CALCULATION OF VARIOUS CODES A1.1 DESIGN AS PER NORTH AMERICAN SPECIFICATION OF COLD FORMED STEEL (AISI S100: 2007) 1. Based on Initiation of Yielding: Effective yield moment, M n

More information

CE 562 Structural Design I Midterm No. 2 Closed Book Portion (25 / 100 pts)

CE 562 Structural Design I Midterm No. 2 Closed Book Portion (25 / 100 pts) CE 56 Structural Design I Name: Midterm No. Closed Book Portion (5 / 100 pts) 1. ( pts) List all of the failure modes that should be checked for the followg bearg-tpe connection: P u ½ 7/8" dia bolts,

More information

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar 5.4 Beams As stated previousl, the effect of local buckling should invariabl be taken into account in thin walled members, using methods described alread. Laterall stable beams are beams, which do not

More information

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 1 General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 2 AISC ASD and LRFD AISC ASD = American Institute of Steel Construction = Allowable Stress Design AISC Ninth

More information

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS This module of CIE 428 covers the following subjects Column theory Column design per AISC Effective length Torsional and flexural-torsional buckling Built-up members READING:

More information

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement. Example on Design of Slab Bridge Design Data and Specifications Chapter 5 SUPERSTRUCTURES Superstructure consists of 10m slab, 36m box girder and 10m T-girder all simply supported. Only the design of Slab

More information

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1. C3 Flexural Members C3.1 Bending The nominal flexural strength [moment resistance], Mn, shall be the smallest of the values calculated for the limit states of yielding, lateral-torsional buckling and distortional

More information

Serviceability Deflection calculation

Serviceability Deflection calculation Chp-6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation Deflection example Structural Design Profession is concerned with: Limit States Philosophy: Strength Limit State (safety-fracture, fatigue, overturning

More information

Lecture Example. Steel Deck (info from Vulcraft Steel Roof and Floor Deck Manual)

Lecture Example. Steel Deck (info from Vulcraft Steel Roof and Floor Deck Manual) 1 / 8 Geometry beam span L 40 ft Steel Wide Flange Beam: beam spacing s beam 10 ft F y 50 ksi construction live load LL construc 20 psf row 148 live load LL 150 psf unit weight of concrete UW conc 145

More information

A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages

A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages P L/2 L PL/4 MOMNT F b < 1 lastic F b = 2 lastic F b = 3 lastoplastic 4 F b = Plastic hinge Plastic Dr. M.. Haque, P.. (LRFD:

More information

A.2 AASHTO Type IV, LRFD Specifications

A.2 AASHTO Type IV, LRFD Specifications A.2 AASHTO Type IV, LRFD Specifications A.2.1 INTRODUCTION A.2.2 DESIGN PARAMETERS 1'-5.0" Detailed example showing sample calculations for design of typical Interior AASHTO Type IV prestressed concrete

More information

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING LECTURE VIII Dr. Jason E. Charalambides Failure in Flexure!

More information

ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members

ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures III. Compression Members C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department University of Maryland Compression Members Following subjects are covered:

More information

Part 1 is to be completed without notes, beam tables or a calculator. DO NOT turn Part 2 over until you have completed and turned in Part 1.

Part 1 is to be completed without notes, beam tables or a calculator. DO NOT turn Part 2 over until you have completed and turned in Part 1. NAME CM 3505 Fall 06 Test 2 Part 1 is to be completed without notes, beam tables or a calculator. Part 2 is to be completed after turning in Part 1. DO NOT turn Part 2 over until you have completed and

More information

SUMMARY FOR COMPRESSION MEMBERS. Determine the factored design loads (AISC/LRFD Specification A4).

SUMMARY FOR COMPRESSION MEMBERS. Determine the factored design loads (AISC/LRFD Specification A4). SUMMARY FOR COMPRESSION MEMBERS Columns with Pinned Supports Step 1: Step : Determine the factored design loads (AISC/LRFD Specification A4). From the column tables, determine the effective length KL using

More information

Singly Symmetric Combination Section Crane Girder Design Aids. Patrick C. Johnson

Singly Symmetric Combination Section Crane Girder Design Aids. Patrick C. Johnson Singly Symmetric Combination Section Crane Girder Design Aids by Patrick C. Johnson PCJohnson@psu.edu The Pennsylvania State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University Park,

More information

CIVL473 Fundamentals of Steel Design

CIVL473 Fundamentals of Steel Design CIVL473 Fundamentals of Steel Design CHAPTER 4 Design of Columns- embers with Aial Loads and oments Prepared B Asst.Prof.Dr. urude Celikag 4.1 Braced ultistore Buildings - Combined tension and oments Interaction

More information

CivilBay Crane Load and Crane Runway Beam Design v1.0.0 User Manual

CivilBay Crane Load and Crane Runway Beam Design v1.0.0 User Manual CivilBay Crane Load and Crane Runway Beam Design v1.0.0 User Manual (Alberta, Canada) Web: Tel: 1-403-510568 01-01-01 Rev 1.0.0 Page 1 of 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT... 3.0 QUICK

More information

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Contents Introduction Beam types Lateral stability of beams Factors affecting lateral stability Behaviour of simple and built - up beams in bending (Without vertical stiffeners)

More information

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case

More information

The plastic moment capacity of a composite cross-section is calculated in the program on the following basis (BS 4.4.2):

The plastic moment capacity of a composite cross-section is calculated in the program on the following basis (BS 4.4.2): COMPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 2002 COMPOSITE BEAM DESIGN BS 5950-90 Technical Note Composite Plastic Moment Capacity for Positive Bending This Technical Note describes

More information

CSiBridge. Bridge Rating

CSiBridge. Bridge Rating Bridge Rating CSiBridge Bridge Rating ISO BRG102816M15 Rev. 0 Proudly developed in the United States of America October 2016 Copyright Copyright Computers & Structures, Inc., 1978-2016 All rights reserved.

More information

Compression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)

Compression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.) ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures III. Compression Members C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department University of Maryland Compression Members Following subjects are covered:

More information

BEHAVIOR AND ANALYSIS OF A HORIZONTALLY CURVED AND SKEWED I-GIRDER BRIDGE. A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty. Cagri Ozgur

BEHAVIOR AND ANALYSIS OF A HORIZONTALLY CURVED AND SKEWED I-GIRDER BRIDGE. A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty. Cagri Ozgur BEHAVIOR AND ANALYSIS OF A HORIZONTALLY CURVED AND SKEWED I-GIRDER BRIDGE A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty by Cagri Ozgur In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science

More information

SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS

SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS CHAPTER REINFORCED CONCRETE Reinforced Concrete Design A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition Fifth Edition SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil

More information

PIER MOMENT-ROTATION OF COMPACT AND NONCOMPACT HPS70W I-GIRDERS

PIER MOMENT-ROTATION OF COMPACT AND NONCOMPACT HPS70W I-GIRDERS PIER MOMENT-ROTATION OF COMPACT AND NONCOMPACT HPS70W I-GIRDERS Bryan A. Hartnagel, Ph.D., P.E. An Vinh Tran, Ph.D. June 2003 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors gratefully acknowle dge the sponsors of the project

More information

AISC LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System

AISC LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System Model: Verification11_3 Typical Floor Beam #10 W21x44 (10,3,10) AISC 360-05 LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System Floor Loads: Slab Self-weight: Concrete above flute + concrete in flute + metal

More information

Mechanics of Materials Primer

Mechanics of Materials Primer Mechanics of Materials rimer Notation: A = area (net = with holes, bearing = in contact, etc...) b = total width of material at a horizontal section d = diameter of a hole D = symbol for diameter E = modulus

More information

4.3 Moment Magnification

4.3 Moment Magnification CHAPTER 4: Reinforced Concrete Columns 4.3 Moment Magnification Description An ordinary or first order frame analysis does not include either the effects of the lateral sidesway deflections of the column

More information

Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads

Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com Prof.

More information

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Elmer E. Marx, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Michael Keever, California Department

More information

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk 1 Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular

More information

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular Beams Diagonal Tension

More information

of I Section Members

of I Section Members IMPROVED DESIGN ASSESSMENT OF LTB OF I-SECTION MEMBERS VIA MODERN COMPUTATIONAL METHODS Improved Design Assessment of LTB of I Section Members Donald W. White (with credits to Dr. Woo Yong Jeong & Mr.

More information

Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement

Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Section 1: Deflections

More information

Improved Flexural Design Provisions for I-Shaped Members and Channels

Improved Flexural Design Provisions for I-Shaped Members and Channels Improved Flexural Design Provisions for I-Shaped Members and Channels DONALD W. WHITE Donald W. White is Associate Professor, Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Materials, Georgia Institute of Technology,

More information

Moment redistribution of continuous composite I-girders with high strength steel

Moment redistribution of continuous composite I-girders with high strength steel Moment redistribution of continuous composite I-girders with high strength steel * Hyun Sung Joo, 1) Jiho Moon, 2) Ik-Hyun sung, 3) Hak-Eun Lee 4) 1), 2), 4) School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural

More information

CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE

CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE 6.1 GENERAL It shall be in accordance with JSCE Standard Specification (Design), 6.1. The collapse mechanism in statically indeterminate structures shall not be considered.

More information

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Design of

More information

APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS

APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS D-1 An extensive literature search revealed many methods for the calculation of live load distribution factors. This appendix will discuss, in detail,

More information

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Sample Problem 4.2

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Sample Problem 4.2 Sample Problem 4. SOLUTON: Based on the cross section geometry, calculate the location of the section centroid and moment of inertia. ya ( + Y Ad ) A A cast-iron machine part is acted upon by a kn-m couple.

More information

Unbraced Column Verification Example. AISC Design Examples AISC 13 th Edition. ASDIP Steel is available for purchase online at

Unbraced Column Verification Example. AISC Design Examples AISC 13 th Edition. ASDIP Steel is available for purchase online at Unbraced Column Verification Example AISC Design Examples AISC 3 th Edition IP Steel is available for purchase onle at www.asdipsoft.com H-9 Example H.4 W-Shape Subject to Combed Axial Compression and

More information

It s a bird it s a plane it s Super Table! F y = 50 ksi F u = 65 ksi ASD LRFD ASD LRFD

It s a bird it s a plane it s Super Table! F y = 50 ksi F u = 65 ksi ASD LRFD ASD LRFD It s a bird it s a plane it s Super Table! steelwise ONE-STOP SHOP BY ABBAS AMINMANSOUR, PhD WHAT IF THERE WAS a table that could be directly used for designing tension members, compression members, flexural

More information

999 TOWN & COUNTRY ROAD ORANGE, CALIFORNIA TITLE PUSHOVER ANALYSIS EXAMPLE BY R. MATTHEWS DATE 5/21/01

999 TOWN & COUNTRY ROAD ORANGE, CALIFORNIA TITLE PUSHOVER ANALYSIS EXAMPLE BY R. MATTHEWS DATE 5/21/01 DESCRIPTION Nonlinear static (pushover) analysis will be performed on a railroad bridge bent using several methods to determine its ultimate lateral deflection capability. 1. SAP2000 Nonlinear with axial-moment

More information

Steel connections. Connection name : MEP_BCF_W=14.29[mm]_W=6.35[mm]_tp=63.5[mm]_N=0_N=2_N=0_N=1_W=14.29[mm]_W=14.29[mm]_W=14.29[ mm] Connection ID : 1

Steel connections. Connection name : MEP_BCF_W=14.29[mm]_W=6.35[mm]_tp=63.5[mm]_N=0_N=2_N=0_N=1_W=14.29[mm]_W=14.29[mm]_W=14.29[ mm] Connection ID : 1 Current Date: 08-Dec-13 7:05 PM Units system: SI File name: E:\ram\1\1.cnx\ Microsoft Steel connections Detailed report Connection name : MEP_BCF_W=14.29[mm]_W=6.35[mm]_tp=63.5[mm]_N=0_N=2_N=0_N=1_W=14.29[mm]_W=14.29[mm]_W=14.29[

More information

CONNECTION DESIGN. Connections must be designed at the strength limit state

CONNECTION DESIGN. Connections must be designed at the strength limit state CONNECTION DESIGN Connections must be designed at the strength limit state Average of the factored force effect at the connection and the force effect in the member at the same point At least 75% of the

More information

Example Bridge Deck Design for Assign. 3 Summary

Example Bridge Deck Design for Assign. 3 Summary Bridge Design Spring 2012 Example Bridge Deck Design for Assign. 3 Summary 1 / 2 Geometry Material Properties N gird 6 f' c 4 ksi S 8.00 ft 1 0.85 b f 0 in f r 0.740 ksi = 0.37 * SQRT( f' c ) L over 3.25

More information

2/23/ WIND PRESSURE FORMULA 2. PERCENT OF ALLOWABLE STRESS 3. FATIGUE DESIGN

2/23/ WIND PRESSURE FORMULA 2. PERCENT OF ALLOWABLE STRESS 3. FATIGUE DESIGN Original Title Presented by Northwest Signal copyright 2010 Designing & Building Structural Steel Products since 1976 Primary Users Traffic Signal Strain & Mast Arm Poles Cantilever & Bridge Sign Structures

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Structural Description The two pinned (at the bases) portal frame is stable in its plane due to the moment connection

More information

APRIL Conquering the FE & PE exams Formulas, Examples & Applications. Topics covered in this month s column:

APRIL Conquering the FE & PE exams Formulas, Examples & Applications. Topics covered in this month s column: APRIL 2015 DR. Z s CORNER Conquering the FE & PE exams Formulas, Examples & Applications Topics covered in this month s column: PE Exam Specifications (Geotechnical) Transportation (Horizontal Curves)

More information

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections 4 5000 4000 (increased d ) (increased f (increased A s or f y ) c or b) Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections Moment (kip-in.) 3000 2000 1000 0 0 (basic) (A s 0.5A s ) 0.0005 0.001 0.0015

More information

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi Chapter 04 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Compression Members By Dr. Jawad Talib Al-Nasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering

More information

RESEARCH REPORT RP02-2 MARCH 2002 REVISION Committee on Specifications for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members

RESEARCH REPORT RP02-2 MARCH 2002 REVISION Committee on Specifications for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members research report Web Crippling and Bending Interaction of Cold-Formed Steel Members RESEARCH REPORT RP02-2 MARCH 2002 REVISION 2006 Committee on Specifications for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural

More information

DEVELOPMENT AND EXPERIMENTAL TESTING OF PRESS-BRAKE- BRAKE-FORMED STEEL TUB GIRDERS FOR SHORT SPAN BRIDGE APPLICATIONS

DEVELOPMENT AND EXPERIMENTAL TESTING OF PRESS-BRAKE- BRAKE-FORMED STEEL TUB GIRDERS FOR SHORT SPAN BRIDGE APPLICATIONS DEVELOPMENT AND EXPERIMENTAL TESTING OF PRESS-BRAKE- FORMED STEEL TUB GIRDERS FOR SHORT SPAN BRIDGE APPLICATIONS Karl E. Barth, Ph.D. Gregory K. Michaelson, Ph.D. VOLUME I: DEVELOPMENT AND FEASIBILITY

More information

Direct Design and Indirect Design of Concrete Pipe Part 2 Josh Beakley March 2011

Direct Design and Indirect Design of Concrete Pipe Part 2 Josh Beakley March 2011 Direct Design and Indirect Design of Concrete Pipe Part 2 Josh Beakley March 2011 Latest in Design Methods? AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2010 Direct Design Method for Concrete Pipe 1993? LRFD5732FlexuralResistance

More information

Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams

Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams Introduction One of the earliest studies concerned with the strength and deflection of beams was conducted by Galileo Galilei. Galileo was the first to discuss

More information

Chapter 8. Shear and Diagonal Tension

Chapter 8. Shear and Diagonal Tension Chapter 8. and Diagonal Tension 8.1. READING ASSIGNMENT Text Chapter 4; Sections 4.1-4.5 Code Chapter 11; Sections 11.1.1, 11.3, 11.5.1, 11.5.3, 11.5.4, 11.5.5.1, and 11.5.6 8.2. INTRODUCTION OF SHEAR

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 0 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic Loads

More information

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN CHAPTER 11 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN Article 49. Cracking Limit State 49.1 General considerations In the case of verifications relating to Cracking Limit State, the effects of actions comprise

More information

Fire resistance assessment of composite steel-concrete structures

Fire resistance assessment of composite steel-concrete structures Workshop Structural Fire Design of Buildings according to the Eurocodes Brussels, 78 November 0 Fire resistance assessment of composite steelconcrete structures Basic design methods Worked examples CAJOT

More information

Local Buckling. Local Buckling in Columns. Buckling is not to be viewed only as failure of the entire member

Local Buckling. Local Buckling in Columns. Buckling is not to be viewed only as failure of the entire member Local Buckling MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING LECTURE V Dr. Jason E. Charalamides Local Buckling in Columns Buckling is not to e viewed only as failure of the entire memer

More information

FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS

FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS Write Known Data Estimate self-weight of the member. a. The self-weight may be taken as 10 percent of the applied dead UDL or dead point load distributed over all the length.

More information

Steel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes

Steel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes Steel Structures Design and Drawing Lecture Notes INTRODUCTION When the need for a new structure arises, an individual or agency has to arrange the funds required for its construction. The individual or

More information

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges EU-Russia Regulatory Dialogue Construction Sector Subgroup 1 Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges Application to a composite twin-girder bridge according to Eurocode 4 Laurence Davaine

More information

host structure (S.F.D.)

host structure (S.F.D.) TABLE 00.4 FBC Typical Mansard Beam [AAF] Allowable Span of Mansard Screen Enclosure Self-Mating Beams in accordance with requirements of Table 00.4 (and the 005 Aluminum Design Manual) using 6005T5 alloy:

More information

Edward C. Robison, PE, SE. 02 January Architectural Metal Works ATTN: Sean Wentworth th ST Emeryville, CA 94608

Edward C. Robison, PE, SE. 02 January Architectural Metal Works ATTN: Sean Wentworth th ST Emeryville, CA 94608 Edward C. Robison, PE, SE ks ATTN: Sean Wentworth 1483 67 th ST Emeryville, CA 94608 02 January 2013 SUBJ: 501 CORTE MADERA AVE, CORTE MADERA, CA 94925 BALCONY GUARD BASE PLATE MOUNTS The guards for the

More information

Interaction Diagram Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements

Interaction Diagram Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements Interaction Diagram Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements Interaction Diagram - Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements Investigate the capacity for the irregular

More information

Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps

Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps a brief guide on element design to EC3 Tim McCarthy Email tim.mccarthy@umist.ac.uk Slides available on the web http://www2.umist.ac.uk/construction/staff/

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 22 : Design of an unbraced sway frame with rigid joints Summary: NOTE This example

More information

Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures

Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Contents Analysis Approaches Point of Inflection Method Equivalent

More information

Preferred practice on semi-integral abutment layout falls in the following order:

Preferred practice on semi-integral abutment layout falls in the following order: GENERAL INFORMATION: This section of the chapter establishes the practices and requirements necessary for the design and detailing of semi-integral abutments. For general requirements and guidelines on

More information

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode 3 Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 20 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic

More information

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)

Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of one-way ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are

More information

MODIFIED MONTE CARLO WITH LATIN HYPERCUBE METHOD

MODIFIED MONTE CARLO WITH LATIN HYPERCUBE METHOD MODIFIED MONTE CARLO WITH LATIN HYPERCUBE METHOD Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) was introduced by McKay, Conover and Beckman as a solution to increase the efficiency of computer simulations. This technique

More information

TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES)

TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES) Page1 TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES) Restrained warping for the torsion of thin-wall open sections is not included in most commonly used frame analysis programs. Almost

More information

Supplement: Statically Indeterminate Trusses and Frames

Supplement: Statically Indeterminate Trusses and Frames : Statically Indeterminate Trusses and Frames Approximate Analysis - In this supplement, we consider an approximate method of solving statically indeterminate trusses and frames subjected to lateral loads

More information

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite

More information

Design Beam Flexural Reinforcement

Design Beam Flexural Reinforcement COPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA DECEBER 2001 CONCRETE FRAE DESIGN ACI-318-99 Technical Note This Technical Note describes how this program completes beam design when the ACI 318-99

More information

PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT

PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT Structural Concrete Software System TN191_PT7_punching_shear_aci_4 011505 PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT 1. OVERVIEW Punching shear calculation applies to column-supported slabs, classified

More information

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110

CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110 E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column Effects From Structural Analysis Axial force, N (tension-ve and comp +ve) (ensure >= 0) 8000kN OK Major

More information

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich

UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ME 313.3 MECHANICS OF MATERIALS I FINAL EXAM DECEMBER 13, 2008 Professor A. Dolovich A CLOSED BOOK EXAMINATION TIME: 3 HOURS For Marker s Use Only LAST NAME (printed): FIRST

More information

Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A )

Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A ) Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A23.3-94) Slender Concrete Column Design in Sway Frame Buildings Evaluate slenderness effect for columns in a

More information

Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures

Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures Civil Engineering for Bachelors 133FSTD Teacher: Zdeněk Sokol Office number: B619 1 Syllabus of lectures 1. Introduction, history of steel structures,

More information

FHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges

FHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges FHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, 2008 Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges By Firas I. Sheikh Ibrahim, PhD, PE Part B Gusset Plate Resistance in Accordance

More information

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar 5.10 Examples 5.10.1 Analysis of effective section under compression To illustrate the evaluation of reduced section properties of a section under axial compression. Section: 00 x 80 x 5 x 4.0 mm Using

More information

BUCKLING STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF BARS AND FRAMES, AND SPHERICAL SHELLS

BUCKLING STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF BARS AND FRAMES, AND SPHERICAL SHELLS CLASSIFICATION NOTES No. 30.1 BUCKLING STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF BARS AND FRAMES, AND SPHERICAL SHELLS APRIL 004 Veritasveien 1, NO-13 Høvik, Norway Tel.: +47 67 57 99 00 Fax: +47 67 57 99 11 FOREWORD is an

More information

1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6

1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6 Page 3 Page 4 Substructure Design. ARRANGEMENT a. Frame A-P3 L = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m b. Frame P3-P6 L = 25 m H 3 = 8.39 m L 2 = 3 m H 4 = 8.5 m L

More information

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in

Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are

More information

Conceptual question Conceptual question 12.2

Conceptual question Conceptual question 12.2 Conceptual question 12.1 rigid cap of weight W t g r A thin-walled tank (having an inner radius of r and wall thickness t) constructed of a ductile material contains a gas with a pressure of p. A rigid

More information

BEAMS. By.Ir.Sugeng P Budio,MSc 1

BEAMS. By.Ir.Sugeng P Budio,MSc 1 BEAMS B.Ir.Sugeng P Budio,MSc 1 INTRODUCTION Beams are structural members that support transverse loads and are therefore subjected primaril to flexure, or bending. If a substantial amount of axial load

More information

1C8 Advanced design of steel structures. prepared by Josef Machacek

1C8 Advanced design of steel structures. prepared by Josef Machacek 1C8 Advanced design of steel structures prepared b Josef achacek List of lessons 1) Lateral-torsional instabilit of beams. ) Buckling of plates. 3) Thin-walled steel members. 4) Torsion of members. 5)

More information