P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0."

Transcription

1 3. P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0. C O W - C A L F B U O G E T T E X A S R O L L I N G P L A I N S I R E G I O N P R OJECTEO C OSTS A N O R E TURNS P E R H E A D 300 COW HERO, OCT-NOV-DEC CALVING B-12 _(L 5) ITE. WEIGHT EACH UN IT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST G R O S S R E C E I P T S STEER CALVES HEIFER CALVES CULL COWS 5.00 CWT CWT CWT j VARIABLE COSTS r C O T T O N S E E D C A K E L B. HAY BALE V E T M E D I C I N E D O L. S A L T & M I N. L B. R A N G E I M P R O V E M E N A C R E M I S C E X P E N S E D O L. MARKETING DOL. F E N C E R E P A I R H E A D WATER FACIL REPR HEAD BARN REPAIR HEAD M A C H I N E R Y C F U E L. L U B E - R E P ) D O L. E Q U I P M E N T ( F U E L. L U B E. R E P ) D O L. L A B O R. T R A C T O R & M A C H I N E R Y H R S. LABOR. EQUIPMENT HRS. L A B O R. L I V E S T O C K H R S. INTEREST ON OPER.CAP.. DOL. T O TA L VA R I A B L E C O S T S... I N C O M E A B O V E V A R I A B L E C O S T S lfi.oo t ? x2 90. _ FIXED COSTS LAND RENT ACRE I N T. O N L I V E S T O C K C A P I T A L D O L. INT. ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DOL. OEPR. ON BEEF BULL PURCH. DOL. D E P R. O N H O R S E D O L. DEPR. ON OTHER EQUIP. DOL. O T H E R F C. M A C H & E Q U I P. D O L. FIXED COSTS 5. COSTS x NET RETURNS N AT I V E R A N G E C O N TA I N S T E X A S W I N T E R G R A S S. N O C R E E P F E E D. 8 6 % C A L F C R O P. 1 2 % R E P L A C E M E N T R AT E. 1 % D E AT H L O S S O N C O W S. 7 S E C T I O N R A N C H. ^ F O R M AT I O N P R E S E N T E D I S P R E PA R E D S O L E LY A S A G E N E R A L G U I D E A N D I S J T I N T E N D E D T O R E C O G N I Z E O R P R E D I C T T H E C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S F R O M A N Y O N E PA R T I C U L A R FA R M O R R A N C H O P E R AT I O N. T H E S E P R O J E C T I O N S W E R E C O L L E C T E D A N D D E V E L O P E D B Y S TA F F M E M B E R S O F T H E T E X A S A G R I C U LT U R A L E X T E N S I O N S E R V I C E A N D A P P R O V E O F O R P U B L I C AT I O N. ;

2 1 M,.CHINERY FIXEO ANO VARI.-BLE COST PER HOUR ' * M A C H I N E C O D E OEPR INSUR. TAX FIXEO REPAIR FUEL LUB. VARIABLE INT. Ha/TIME PICKUP 1/2 TON ANNUAL COST SUMMARY FOR EQUIPMENT ANOi L I V E S T O C K LINE LIST DEPREC INSUR FUEL T O T O W N - T 3 T NO. ITEM SIZE UNIT IATION INTEREST ANCE T A X E S R E P A I R S AND Luee LABOR ERSHO/YR.TING/. 9 1 H AY R A C K - F E E D E R FEET t.oo S T O C K T R A I L E R FEET _ G R A I N T R A I L E R FEET STOCK SPRAYER 150 GAL P E N S _ E Q U I P M E N T 7500 FEET S ? TACK 1.00 DOL SO « BEEF COW RAISED 1.00 HEAD BEEF HEIFER RAI HEAD BEEF BULL PURCH HEAD 1200 ISO HORSE 1.00 HEAO 600 SO.25 SS ft ANNUAL C H A R G E S M A D E I N T H I S B U O G E T FOR EQUIPMENT AND _. IVESTOC< LINE NUM 8ER PROPOR. OWNERSHP OPERATING INTERST LABOR NO. ITEM SIZE UNIT ITEMS CHARGED CHARGES C H A R G E S C H A R G E S Z HARGED 1 H AY R A C K - F E E D E R FEET S T O C K T R A I L E R FEET G R A I N T R A I L E R FEET S TO C K S P R AY E R 150 GAL P E N S & E Q U I P M E N T 7500 FEET S 3 5 TA C C 1.00 OOL BEEF COW RAISEO 1.00 HEAO BEEF HEIFER 7AI HEAO BEEF BULL PURCH HEAO HORSE 1.00 HEAD I I* N A M E O F M A C H I N E C O D E WIDTH INITIAL SPEED FIELD RC1 RC2 RC3 YEARS RFVl R F V.? P U R C H A S E F U E L H O J O S H P (FEET11 L I S T C M P H ) EFFIC- USED OWNED RIC_ TY3. 3 = ENCY ANNUALLY LI _ PICKUP 1/2 TON * ITEM NAME CODE S I Z E U N I T T Y P E HAYRACK-FEEOER S T O C K T R A I L E R GRAIN TRAILER S T O C K S P R A Y E R T A C K S P E N S C E Q U I P M E N T BEEF COW RAISED BEEF BULL PURCH BEEF HEIFER RAI H O R S E LIST PURCHASE S S A LVA G E R E PA I R F U E L & YEAR S " R O P O F P R O P L U B A S LIFE L I S T O F L I S T P R O P ANNUAL LABOR 3.00 N AT I V E R A N G E C O N TA I N S T E X A S W I N T E R G R A S S. N O C R E E P F E E D. 8 6 t C A L F C R O P. 1 2 Z R E P L A C E M E N T R AT E. I X O E AT H L O S S O N C O W S. 7 S E C T I O N R A N C H. MACHINERY COMPLEMENT 5 EQUIPMENT COM^LEMSNT 5 P R I C E V E C TO R 5 _ / J

3 5. NOT PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY TO BE USEO WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 12/19/80. B-124KL 5) STUCKER CALF BUDGET TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS I REGION PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS ER HEAD PURCHASE NOV 1. SELL MARCH 10 ITEM WEIGHT EACH UNIT OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST 1. GROSS RECEIPTS FEEDER STEERS 6.00 CWT ±22x VAPIABLE COSTS STOCKER STEERS DEATH LOSS WHEAT PASTURE HAY VET MEDICINE SALT & MIN. MISC EXPENSE HAULING & MKTG. FENCE REPAIR WATER FACIL REPR MACHINERY(FUEL.LUBE.REP) EQUIPMENT(FUEL.LUBE.REP) LABOR. TRACTOR & MACHINERY LABOR. EQUIPMENT LABOR. LIVESTOCK INTEREST ON OPER.CAP.. VARIABLE COSTS 3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS 4. FIXED COSTS INT. ON LIVESTOCK CAPITAL INT. ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR. ON HORSE DEPR. ON OTHER EQUIP. OTHER FC. MACH & EQUIP. FIXED COSTS 5. COSTS CWT DOL. J DAYS BALE DOL L DOL CWT HEAD HEAD OOL DOL. 4 HRS HRS ? HRS DOL ? llxz± DOL DOL / 0.54 OOL. 5 DOL DOL. 2x NET RETURNS PRIMARILY GRAZING OF WHEAT PASTURE. STOCKING RATE OF 2 ACRE/HEAD. 130 DAYS GRAZING. 3% DEATH LOSS. HIGH GOOD GRADE. INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED AND DEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL.TENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION.

4 M A C H I N E C 001 PICKUP 1/2 TON 10 MACHINERY FIXED ANO VARIABLE COST PER HOUR O E P R I N S U R. T A X T O T A L F I X E O R E P A I R F U E L LUB VARIABLE 3.97 INT HR/TIME 1.00 LINE NO. ITEM 95 HORSE 2 S T O C K T R A I L E R 4 STOCK SPRAYER 1 HAYRACK-FEEDER 5 TACK LINE NO. ITEM 95 HORSE 2 STOCK TRAILER 4 STOCK SPRAYER 1 H AYRACK-FEEDER 5 TA C K ANNUAL COST SUMMARY FOR EQUIPMENT AND LIVESTOCK LIST OEPREC- I N S U R - S I Z E U N I T P R I C E I A T I O N I N T E R E S T 1.00 HEAO FEET ISO.00 GAL FEET 1.03 DOL OO OO F U E L A N C E T A X E S _» A I B S A N O L U B E SO A N N U A L C H A R G E S M A D E I N T H I S B U D G E T F O R E Q U I P M E N T A N D L I V E S T O C K NUMBER PROPOR. OWNERSHP OPERATING INTERST LABOR S I Z E U N I T I T E M S C H A R G E D C H A R G E S C H A R G E S C H A R G E S C H A R G E D 1.00 HEAO 24.OO FEET 150 GAL FEET 1.00 OOL TOT OWN- TOT OPER- LABOR ERSHP/YR -TING/YR O.O _0.68.7? NAME OF MACHINE PICKUP 1/2 TON 1 COOE 2 WIDTH (FEET) INITIAL LIST SPEED (MPH) 3 5 FIELD EFFIC- ENCY RC1 7 RC RC3 9 USED ANNUALLY YEARS OWNED 3.0 I 1 RFV1 12 RFV PURCHASE FUEL TY=»E 15 OF LIFE HP I T E M N A M E C O D E HAYRACK-FEEDER I. S T O C K T R A I L E R 2. S T O C K S P R A Y E R 4. T A C K 5. H O R S E LIST S A LVA G E R E PA I R F U E L G P U R C H A S E Y E A R S P R O P O F P R O P L U B A S ANNUAL S I Z E U N I T T Y P E P R I C E P R I C E L I F E LIST OF LIST PROP LABOR OO l.oo IS OO P R I M A R I LY G R A Z I N G O F W H E AT PA S T U R E. S T O C K I N G R AT E O F 2 A C R E / H E A D D AY S G R A Z I N G. 3 X D E AT H L O S S. H I G H G O O D G R A D E. MACHINERY COMPLEMENT 5 EQUIPMENT COMPLEMENT 5 P R I C E V E C T O R 5

5 7. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE JJSED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 12/19/80. FARROW TO FINISH HOG PRODUCTION ROLLING PLAINS PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER SOW I REGION B-124KL 5) ITEM WEIGHT EACH UNIT OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST 1. GROSS RECEIPTS MARKET HOGS 2.40 CWT x VA R I A B L E C O S T S r SOW FEED GEST. SOW FEED LACT. BOAR FEED PIG STARTER FINISHING RATION VET 6- MEDICINE SALES COMM MISC EXPENSE MACHINERY(FUEL.LUBE.REP) EQUIPMENT(FUEL.LUBE.REP) LABOR. TRACTOR & MACHINERY LABOR. EQUIPMENT LABOR. LIVESTOCK INTEREST ON OPER.CAP.. VARIABLE COSTS INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS FIXED COSTS INT. ON LIVESTOCK CAPITAL INT. ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR. ON SOW PURCHASED DEPR. ON BOAR PURCHASED DEPR. ON OTHER EQUIP. OTHER FC. MACH & EQUIP. FIXED COSTS CWT CWT ? CWT CWT CWT DOL HEAD DOL DOL DOL. 2.0? HRS HRS HRS DOL x DOL DOL OOL DOL DOL ? DOL. 21x2± COSTS NET RETURNS SOW UNIT. 16 PIGS WEANED/SOW/YEAR. 16 SOWS/BOAR. INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED AND DEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL /^-(TENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION.

6 J. MJ -CHINt.RY FIXED _.NO VARI4I B L E C O S T PER HOUR M A C H I N E C O O E DEPR INSUR. TAX FIXED REPAIR FUEL LUB. VARIABLE INT. KR/TIME PICKUP 1/2 TON 10 I.AT 0* ? 0., ANNUAL COST SUMMARY FOR EQUIPMENT AND LIVESTOCK LINE LIST DEPREC INSUR FUEL T O T O W N - T O T O P E R - NO. ITEM SIZE UNIT IATION INTEREST ANCE T A X E S. E P A I R S AND LUBE LABOR ERSHP/YR ATING/Y3 7 FARROWING HOUSE SOFT ? B NURSERY t71.00 SOFT GESTATION BARN SOFT MILL C STORAGE l.oo DOL MATER SYSTEM 1.00 OOL S T O C K T R A I L E R FEET OO F I N I S H I N G F L O O R 1280.OO SQFT IO SOW PURCHASED 1.00 HEAD S BOAR PURCHASEO HEAD ANNUAL C H A R G E S M A O E I N T H I S B U D G E T FOR EQUIPMENT ANO LIVESTOCK LINE NUMBER PROPOR. OWNERSHP OPERATING INTERST LABOP NO. ITEM SIZE UNIT ITEMS CHARGED CHARGES CHARGES C H A R G E S C H A R G E O 7 FARROWING HOUSE SOFT B NURSERY SOFT IO GESTATION BARN SOFT MILL 6 STORAGE t.oo OOL WATER SYSTEM 1.00 DOL S T O C K T R A I L E R FEET F I N I S H I N G F L O O R 1280.OO SQFT SOW PURCHASED 1.00 HEAD BOAR PURCHASED HEAD S N A M E O F M A C H I N E C O D E W IOTH INITIAL SPEEDi F I E L D RC1 RC2 *_3 YEARS RFV1 R F V 2 P J R C H A S E F J E L H O J R S H P (FEET]1 L I S T ( M P H ) EFFIC- USED OWNED P R I C E T Y _ 3r ENCY ANNUALLY LI=E PICKUP 1/2 TON l I T E M N A M E C O O E S T O C K T R A I L E R 2. F A R R O W I N G H O U S E 7. NURSERY S A LVA G E R E PA I R F U E L. A N N U A L L I S T P U R C H A S E Y E A R S P R O P O F P R O P L U B A S H O U R S S I Z E U N I T T Y P E = > R I C E P R I C E L I F E L I S T O F L I S T P R O P L A B O R FINISHING FLOOR GESTATION BARN M I L L & S T O R A G E WATER SYSTEM SOW PURCHASEO BOAR PURCHASEO O S S S O W U N I T. 1 6 P I G S W E A N E D / S O W / Y E A R. 1 6 S O W S / B O A R, MACHINERY COMPLEMENT 5 EQUIPMENT COMPLEMENT 5 P R I C E V E C T O F 5 J J

7 PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY 9. NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 12/19/80. R-124KL 5) FEEDER PIG PRODUCTION. ROLLING PLAINS PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS PER SOW I REGION ITEM WEIGHT UNIT EACH OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST 1. GROSS RECEIPTS FEEDER PIGS 50 LB x VARIABLE COSTS SOW FEED GEST. SOW FEED LACT. BOAR FEEO PIG STARTER VET t. MEDICINE SALES COMM MISC EXPENSE MACHINERY(FUEL.LUBE.REP) EQUIPMENT(FUEL.LUBE,REP) LABOR. TRACTOR & MACHINERY LABOR, EQUIPMENT LABOR. LIVESTOCK INTEREST ON OPER.CAP.. VARIABLE COSTS INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS FIXED COSTS INT. ON LIVESTOCK CAPITAL INT. ON OTHEP EQUIPMENT DEPR. ON SOW PURCHASED DEPR. ON BOAR PURCHASED DEPR. ON OTHER EQUIP* OTHER FC. MACH & EQUIP. FIXED COSTS COSTS CWT CWT ? CWT CWT DOL* HEAD ?5 DOL* DOL DOL. l.?l HRS* HRS* HRS DOL* x DOL * DOL DOL DOL DOL OOL. 2 L NET RETURNS SOW UNIT, 17 PIGS WEANED/SOW/YEAR, 16 SOWS/BOAR, FEED CONVERSION 3.5 TO 1 ON FINISHING FLOOR. INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENOED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICJLAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERF COLLECTED AND DEVELOPED BY STAFF MEM8ERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION.

8 J 10. MACHINE PtCKUP 1/2 TON CODE 10 M A C H I N E RY F I X E O A N O VA R I A B L E C O S T P E R H O U R O E P R I N S U R. T A X T O T A L F I X E O R E P A I R FUEL 2.62 LUB. VARIABLE INT. H=*/TINE LINE NO. ITEM 7 FARROWING HOUSE S NURSERY IO GESTATION BARN 11 M I L L & S T O R A G E 12 WATER SYSTEM 2 S T O C K T R A I L E R 72 SOW PURCHASED 74 BOAR PURCHASED ANNUAL COST SUMMARY _R EQUIPMENT ANO LIVESTOCK LIST DEPREC INSUR S I Z E U N I T IATION INTEREST ANCE TAXES _»AIRS SOFT SS SQFT SO SQFT S OOL DOL FEET l.oo HEAO HEAO FUEL ) L U 9. TOT OWN- TOT OPEP- LABOR ERSHP/YR ATING/YS l._ LINE NO. ITEM 7 FARROWING KOJSE 8 NURSERY 10 GESTATION BARN 11 M I L L & S T O R A G E 12 WATER SYSTEM 2 S T O C K T R A I L E R 72 SOW PURCHASED 74 BOAR PURCHASEO A N N U A L C H A R G E S M A D E I N T H I S B U O G E T F O R E Q U I P M E N T A N O L I V E S TO C K NUMBER PROPOR. OWNERSHP OPERATING INTERST LABOR S I Z E U N I T I T E M S C H A R G E O C H A R G E S C H A R G E S C H A R G E S C H A R G E D SOFT SOFT OO SQFT DOL DOL FEET HEAD 1.00 t.oo HEAO N A M E O F M A C H I N E PICKUP 1/2 TON 1 CODE 2 WIDTH (FEET) INITIAL LIST FIELD RC1 RC2 PC3 EFFIC- ENCY SPEED (MPH) 9 USED ANNUALLY YEARS OWNED RFV1 12 RFV f-rchase 3RICF FUEL HOJRS TY _ 3C LIFE HP I T E M N A M E C O D E S T O C K T R A I L E R 2. F A R R O W I N G H O U S E 7. NURSERY B. GESTATION BARN 10. M I L L t r S T O R A G E 1 1. W A T E R S Y S T E M 1 2. SOW PURCHASEO 72. BOAR PURCHASEO 74. LIST PURCHASE S I Z E U N I T T Y P E P R I C E P R I C E S IS S A LVA G E P E PA I R F U E L t, Y E A R S P R O P O F P R O P L U B A S LIFE LIST OF LIST PROP ANNUAL LABOR S O W U N I T. 1 7 P I G S W E A N E D / S O U / Y E A R, 1 6 S O W S / B O A R. FEEO CONVERSION 3.5 TO 1 ON FINISHING FLOOR. MACHINERY COMPLEMENT 5 EQUIPMENT COMPLEMENT 5 P R I C E V E C T O R 5

9 11. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO 8E USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 12/19/80. B-124KL 5) FINISHING HOGS ROLLING PLAINS I REGION PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS PER HOG ITEM WEIGHT EACH UNIT OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST GROSS RECEIPTS MARKET HOGS 2.40 CWT x VARIABLE COSTS FINISHING RATION CWT. F E E D E R ^ > I G S L B * V E T & M E D I C I N E D O L * S A L E S C O M M H E A D M I S C E X P E N S E D O L * D E A T H L O S S 2 X H E A D MACHINERY(FUEL,LUBE,REP) DOL* EQUIPMENT(FUEL,LUBE.REP) DOL. LABOR. TRACTOR & MACHINERY HRS. LABOR. EQUIPMENT HRS. L A B O R. L I V E S T O C K H R S. INTEREST ON OPER.CAP*. DOL. VARIABLF COSTS INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS * FIXED COSTS INT. ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DOL. DEPR. ON OTHER EQUIP* DOL. O T H E R F C. M A C H & E Q U I P. O O L. FIXED COSTS 0* lxl± COSTS * NET RETURNS 25* FED PER YEAR. 140 FED PER BUNCH. 3*50 POUNDS FEED PER POUND GAIN. 2% DEATH LOSS* INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTEO AND DEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION. y *^nv

10 J 1 2. M A C H I N E C O D E PICKUP 1/2 TON 10 MACHINERY FIXEO AND VARIABLE COST PER HOUR O E P R I N S U R. T A X T O T A L F I X E O R E P A I R F U E L LUB TDTAL VARIABLE 3.97 INT HR/TIM Lite NO. ITEM 9 FINISHING FLOOR It MILL t STORAGE 12 WATER SYSTEM 2 STOCK TRAILER LINE NO. ITEM 9 FINISHING FL30R 11 MILL 6 STORAGE 12 WATER SYSTEM 2 STOCK TRAILER ANNUAL COST SUMMARY FOR EQUIPMENT AND LIVESTOCK LIST OEPREC- I N S U R - F U E L S I Z E U N I T P R I C E I A T I O N I N T E R E S T A N C E T A X E S R E P A I R S A N D L U B E 1280 SOFT OOL S SO 1.00 DOL FEET A N N U A L C H A R G E S M A D E I N T H I S B U O G E T F O R E Q U I P M E N T A N D L I V E S TO C K NUMBER PROPOR. OWNERSHP OPERATING INTERST LABOR S I Z E U N I T I T E M S C H A R G E D C H A R G E S C H A R G E S C H A R G E S C H A R G E D 1280 SQFT t.oo OOL DOL FEET TOT OWN- TOT OP_R- LABOR ERSHP/YR ATING/Y S NAME OF MACHINE PICKUP 1/2 TON 1 CODE 2 4 IDTH ( FEET ) INITIAL LIST SPEED (MPH) 3 5 FIELD EFFIC- ENCY RC1 7 RC RC3 USED ANNUALLY YEARS OWNED 3.0 t I RFV1 12 RFV PJRCHASE ORICE FUEL TY=_ 15 ft- LIFE HP I T E M N A M E C O O E S T O C K T R A I L E R 2. FINISHING FLOOR 9. M I L L 6 S T O R A G E 1 1. W A T E R S Y S T E M SALVAGE REPAIR FUEL & LIST PURCHASE YEARS PROP OF PROP LUB AS S I Z E U N I T T Y P E P R I C E P R I C E L I F E LIST OF LIST PROP * ANNUAL LABOR FE0 PER YEAR. 2X DEATH LOSS. 140 FED PER BUNCH POUNDS FEEO PER POUND GAIN* MACHINERY COMPLEMENT 5 EQUIPMENT COMPLEMENT 5 P R I C E V E C TO R 5

30 COH. 1 BULL UNIT. FALL CALVING. NO CREEP FEED. GRAOE GOOD CALVES* PURCHASEO REPLACEMENT EVERV 8 VR.. 86% CALF CROP. 2X COH DEATH LOSS.

30 COH. 1 BULL UNIT. FALL CALVING. NO CREEP FEED. GRAOE GOOD CALVES* PURCHASEO REPLACEMENT EVERV 8 VR.. 86% CALF CROP. 2X COH DEATH LOSS. MACHINERY F I X E O A N O VA R I A B L E C U 5 I PER HOUR 2. M A C H I N E C O O E O E P R INSUR. T A X T O T A L F I X E O R E P A I R F U E L LUB. VARIABLE INT. HR/TIME PICKUP IO 0.71 6 4 0.81 1.91 6

More information

ENCY 0.8S SALVAGE REPAIR YEARS PROP OF PROP

ENCY 0.8S SALVAGE REPAIR YEARS PROP OF PROP M A C H I N E R Y F I X E O A N D VA R I A B L E C O S T PER HOUR TOTAL 4. M A C H I N E C O D E DEPR INSUR. TAX TOTAL FIXEO REPAIR FUEt LUB. V A R I A B L E I N T. K R / T I M E PICKUP 10 0.90 8 6 1.03

More information

C O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W

C O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W r r TEXAS I5LACKLAND FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Blackland Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment

More information

P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST UNIT 1* GROSS RECEIPTS FRCM PRODUCTION TOTAL 0*0

P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST UNIT 1* GROSS RECEIPTS FRCM PRODUCTION TOTAL 0*0 42 ^ \ O AT S F O R G R A Z E, I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D A Q U I F E R R E G I C N E S T I M AT E O C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E TYPICAL MANAGEMENT P R I C E O R V A L U E

More information

SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT

SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT 40 SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1 GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION WHEAT

More information

F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e

F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e ITEM PRICE OR CUANTITY CCST G R O S S R E C E I P T S

More information

LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK BOAR BULL COH

LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK BOAR BULL COH LIVESTOCK RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTION FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAME REHAINING LIFE CURRENT MARKET VALUE SALVAGE VALUE INSURANCE RATE ANNUAL LEASE CALC OPTIONS (YR) ($) (X) (X) ($) (R,L,P) X LIVESTOCK

More information

HARVEST COSTS COLOR ING LABUR COLORING ADVERTISING NET ring EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL. HARVEST OT AL VARIABLE CUST. 3. INCUME AbOVE VAR1AbLfc COSTS

HARVEST COSTS COLOR ING LABUR COLORING ADVERTISING NET ring EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL. HARVEST OT AL VARIABLE CUST. 3. INCUME AbOVE VAR1AbLfc COSTS 54 C H R I S T M A S T f L ' i P R O D U C T I O N, F O U R T H Y E A R, N O R T H E A S T T E X A S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N O R E T U R N S P b P A C R E UNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT

More information

C3.44 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR

C3.44 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR F I R S T N A H E L I V E S T O C K L A B O R O P E R A T O R L A B O R QUALIFYING NAHE C O S T O R V A L U E ( $ / H R ) 5 5 TOTAL HAGE

More information

PROJECTED YOUR NUMBER UNIT SIZE 5 / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E TOTAL LIVESTOCK INVESTMENT $ U. 4 _. 5 " TOTAL UNITS UNIT 6.0 CWT.

PROJECTED YOUR NUMBER UNIT SIZE 5 / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E TOTAL LIVESTOCK INVESTMENT $ U. 4 _. 5  TOTAL UNITS UNIT 6.0 CWT. 24 3 PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/27/82. STOCKER CALF BUDGET TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS I REGION 1982 S AND S PER HEAD PURCHASE NOV 1, SELL MARCH 10 B-1241

More information

BARN BOAR PEN BROILER HOUSE SQ CORRALS DAIRY BARN FARROHING HOUSE FEED STORAGE FEED STORAGE 2 BINS HAY BARN 1200 SQ HAY BARN 2600 SQ

BARN BOAR PEN BROILER HOUSE SQ CORRALS DAIRY BARN FARROHING HOUSE FEED STORAGE FEED STORAGE 2 BINS HAY BARN 1200 SQ HAY BARN 2600 SQ BUILDINGS OR IMPROVEMENTS RESOURCES APRIL 23, 1987 DESCRIPTION BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAHE FUEL - UTILITY COST ($/YR)

More information

T I M E S L A B O R OVER HOURS

T I M E S L A B O R OVER HOURS OPERATION S PA N I S H P E A N U T S. I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D S P L AT E A U E A S T. R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E SOLID PLANT ITEM NO. DATE

More information

P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0.

P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0. ^ P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0. B-124KC17) K L E I N G R A S S PA S T U R E. O R Y L A

More information

PROJECTED S/UNIT VALUE GROSS RECEIPTS COTTON LINT LB COTTONSEED 0.28 TON TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS $ 308.

PROJECTED S/UNIT VALUE GROSS RECEIPTS COTTON LINT LB COTTONSEED 0.28 TON TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS $ 308. INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION THESE PROJECTIONS WERE EXTENSION

More information

. BALE 3S.OO CtlT BU BU ACRE 8.00 CUT CHTo 0.25 ACRE 10.OO

. BALE 3S.OO CtlT BU BU ACRE 8.00 CUT CHTo 0.25 ACRE 10.OO _- LISTING OF THE NAME SET AMI PRICE VECTOR REGION NUMBERS DATES 101480 151 PASTURE 152 SM. gr. PASTURE 133 PAST E«TAME 154 PASTURE. NATIVE 155 SORGHUM PASTURE 156 COASTAL-RG-CL 157 COASTAL RYEGRASS 158

More information

Self-Propelled Machines FUEL RECORD PERF FUEL CONS LABOR LABOR PURCHASE SV R&M USEFUL ANNUAL

Self-Propelled Machines FUEL RECORD PERF FUEL CONS LABOR LABOR PURCHASE SV R&M USEFUL ANNUAL Table 1. Parameters Diesel Fuel (DI) Price......($/gal): 1.28 Electricity (EL) Price......($/kWh): 0.09 Gasoline (GA) Price........($/gal): 1.30 LP Gas (LP) Price.........($/gal): 0.70 Natural Gas (NG)

More information

COW-CALF PROOUCTION TEXAS GRAND PRAIRIF REGION FROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER COW NATIVE RANGE UNIT CWT. CWT. CWT.

COW-CALF PROOUCTION TEXAS GRAND PRAIRIF REGION FROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER COW NATIVE RANGE UNIT CWT. CWT. CWT. 1 * G R O S S R E C E I P T S COW-CALF PROOUCTION TEAS GRAND PRAIRIF REGION FROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER COW NATIVE RANGE WEIGHT EACH UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST STEER CALVES HEIFER

More information

PICKING BOXES PEACHES COOLER STORAGE 7500 EL

PICKING BOXES PEACHES COOLER STORAGE 7500 EL CROP PRODUCTS REPORT October 24, 1992 Crop Product Name Price Weight Cash p e r o f p e r F l o w Mes. Row P E A C H E S W H O L S A L E 1 2. 5 0 0 0 b u 6 0. 0 0 0 0 2 0 P E C A N S I M P R O V E D. 8

More information

PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/20/81.

PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/20/81. INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION^ THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED

More information

J J ) " '- ACRE L SO DAYS

J J )  '- ACRE L SO DAYS L I S T I N G O F. - \ A M E S E T A N D P R I C - V E C T O R REGION number: DATE: 131480 151 PASTURE MAINT. 152 SM. GR. PASTURE 153 PASTURE. TAME 154 PASTURE. NATIVE 155 SORGHUM PASTURE 156 COASTAL-RG-CL

More information

Budgets: 2007 planning budgets

Budgets: 2007 planning budgets R5 Ranch Budgets: 2007 planning budgets Anywhere UR, Eastern Oregon File: Ray & Reba Barlow User: Bart Eleveld FINPACK Printed 10/30/2008 3:33:50 PM Crop Budget No. 1 2 3 Crop Wheat, Cash Winter Barley,

More information

N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, NUHBER OF UNITS

N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, NUHBER OF UNITS Projections for Planning Purposes Only N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, B-141(03) DATE STAGE OF PRODUTION TYPE OF PROD. PRODUT NAHE NUHBER OF UNITS

More information

Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area

Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Jay Jenkins, Extension Educator Paul A. Burgener, Former Graduate Assistant Jim J. Jacobs, Professor,

More information

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations Benchmarks for Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Cow/Calf Operations Moist Mixed land Production Year - 1999 Nov-03 Foreword This AgriProfit$ & Returns

More information

JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY

JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY 62 JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY P R I C E O R V A L U E O R UNIT COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. G R O S S R E

More information

lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb.

lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. r r TEXAS NORTHEAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Northeast Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment

More information

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Establishment with Oats Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Lower Rainfall Dryland Feed Barley Ben Eborn and Terrell Sorensen Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

Background & Assumptions

Background & Assumptions EBB2 SWWW 15 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate.. Southwestern Idaho: Treasure Valley Soft White Winter Wheat Ben Eborn Southwestern Idaho Background & Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns

More information

rw^vr! h1 t\v?vc - hlrr TEXAS EL PASO ! L ' _ \.V

rw^vr! h1 t\v?vc - hlrr TEXAS EL PASO ! L ' _ \.V r - hlrr M H ^ _ ^ t t _ ^ ^ 1 _ V H T. h1 t\v?vc rw^vr! i ^ _.! L ' _ \.V L... r TEXAS EL PASO FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas El Paso Re gion are based on estimates of yields, production input

More information

COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT

COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT 12 COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS

More information

U.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model

U.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model U.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model LMIC WORKING GROUP: Coordinator: Bridger Feuz, University of Wyoming Member Cooperators: Tim Petry, North Dakota State University; David Anderson, Texas A&M

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Soft White Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs

More information

OF UNITS UNITS CASH VARI.

OF UNITS UNITS CASH VARI. P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 2 4, 1 9 9 2, B-124KC02) DATE STAGE OF PRODUCTION TYPE OF

More information

Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area

Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Chris Bastian, Research Associate MP-72.3 University of Wyoming - August, 1994

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure valley Commercial Dry Beans Kathleen Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

Eastern Idaho. Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions

Eastern Idaho. Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Soft White Spring Wheat Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5. Coleman. McCulloch

TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5. Coleman. McCulloch r TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5 r Coleman McCulloch 1. f~^ PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 0i/09/8lo E. 2 4 K C 5 ) COTTON* DRYLAND, (SOLIO 40"

More information

Total llo7. '1'1 999 'IOo'l. J 2113 '155 72o o61 'I

Total llo7. '1'1 999 'IOo'l. J 2113 '155 72o o61 'I Ohio State Data- Census of Agriculture Table. Summary of Selected Economic Class Groups: [Classes - provide data comparable to the grouping identified as "commercial farms" in earlier census publications.

More information

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations

Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations Benchmarks for Alberta Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations Comparing: Southern Alberta Total, Southern Alberta Low Cost, and

More information

Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions

Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Commercial Dry Beans Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are based

More information

COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE,

COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE, COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER, FUEL.OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO, DATE OVER HOUPS HOURS PER PER SHREDDER 2R TM 4,56 DEC

More information

Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions

Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Spring Malting Barley Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Hard Red Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs

More information

Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions

Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho Spring Malting Barley Ben Eborn, Terrell Sorensen and Jon Hogge Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions EBB4-SU-17 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Bingham and Power Counties Sugarbeets Ben Eborn Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates

More information

MICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR

MICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR MICROCOMPUTER CROP AND RETURN GENERATOR BUDGET AREA... VALENCIA AND SOUTHERN BERNALILLO COUNT FARM SIZE.... 30.00 ACRES IRRIGATION TYPE FLOOD NUMBER OF CROPS 5 VERSION 1.0 COPYRIGHT (C) 1984 by NEW MEXICO

More information

TEXAS UPPER GULF COAST

TEXAS UPPER GULF COAST r r TEXAS UPPER GULF COAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Upper Gulf Coast Region are based on estimates of yields, pro duction input quantities, and production practices which represent the

More information

Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions

Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Corn Silage: Grown Using Genetically Modified Seed Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs

More information

Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs

Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Based on marketing 11,527 pigs sold from 18 shelters Date: March, 2007 This publication is intended to provide a format and a set of guidelines

More information

Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs

Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Based on marketing 11,353 pigs sold from 19 shelters Date: Oct, 2009 This publication is intended to provide a format and a set of guidelines

More information

TEXAS MIDDLE GULF COAST

TEXAS MIDDLE GULF COAST M i l TEXA MIDDLE GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Middle Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, poduction input quantitie, and poduction pac tice which epeent the bet judgment of local

More information

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions 2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure Valley Field Corn: Roundup Ready Kathleen Painter, Jerry Neufeld, Neil Rimbey and Paul Patterson Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs

More information

TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned.

TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned. r TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas High Plains I Region arc based on estimates of yields, produc tion input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment

More information

-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. (10 ACRE INCHES APPLIED)

-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. (10 ACRE INCHES APPLIED) -33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. ( ACRE INCHES APPLIED) FUEL,OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE

More information

Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region AEB 0031, May 2012 Capital Typical Farm Machinery and Equipment

Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region AEB 0031, May 2012 Capital Typical Farm Machinery and Equipment Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region Tyler West¹, Rebecca Sullivan¹, Clark Seavert¹ and Lynn Long, 2 ¹Student, Instructor & Agricultural Economist, Department

More information

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON Farm Business Management Reports EB1862 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON Gayle S. Willett Walter J. Gary PREFACE Enterprise costs and returns

More information

Southwestern Idaho. The Model Farm. Production Practices

Southwestern Idaho. The Model Farm. Production Practices 2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwestern Idaho and Eastern Oregon: Treasure Valley Onions Mike Thornton, Neil R. Rimbey, and Kate Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University

More information

TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER

TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER C TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER FOREWORD The entepise budgets fo Texas Edwads Aquife Region ae based on estimates of yields, poduction input quantities, and poduction pac tices which epesent the best judgment

More information

PROJECTICNS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO mlthout UPDATING AFTER 11/05/80.

PROJECTICNS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO mlthout UPDATING AFTER 11/05/80. c TEXA UPPER GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Uppe Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, po duction input quantitie, and poduction pactice which epeent the bet judgment of local poduc

More information

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho

More information

1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington

1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington Farm Business Management Reports EB1375 1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington Walter J. Gary Gayle S. Willett COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Washington State ~University - 1996 ALFALFA

More information

FUEL,OIL, FIXED TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUE.,REP. COSTS OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE

FUEL,OIL, FIXED TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUE.,REP. COSTS OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE 22 F O R A G E S O R G H U M F O R G R A Z E, I P R I G AT E D, T E X A S W I N T E R G A R D E N R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E OPERATION ITEM NO DATE FUEL,OIL,

More information

2013 INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES

2013 INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES Don Shurley and Amanda Smith Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia March 2013 Annual

More information

Unit Measure Row : = = = = = = ======= ==== 3 acre bale ton acre ton 42

Unit Measure Row : = = = = = = ======= ==== 3 acre bale ton acre ton 42 Auto or Truck Resources D e s c r i p t i o n A u t o o r o r TTr r u c k Pirst ame H o r s e p o w e r R a t i n g ( H p ) U s e f u l L i f e ( H r o r M i ) Fuel Type R e m a i n i n g L i f e ( H r

More information

EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County

EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Orchard Economics: Establishing and

More information

ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY

ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY AEB 0056 July 2016 ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY David Halliday, Clark Seavert and Steve Castagnoli Photo: A pear orchard at the base

More information

EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley

EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley James W. Julian, Clark F. Seavert, Bernadine C. Strik, and Diane Kaufman Berry Economics:

More information

EM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County

EM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County EM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing

More information

D A I R Y P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D P R A I R I E R E G I C N E S T I M AT E D C C S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C O W WITH SILAGE

D A I R Y P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D P R A I R I E R E G I C N E S T I M AT E D C C S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C O W WITH SILAGE D A I R Y P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D P R A I R I E R E G I C N E S T I M AT E D C C S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C O W WITH SILAGE ITEM WEIGHT JNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT 3UANTITY VALUE

More information

Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009

Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009 Farm Business Management Report Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009 J. Shannon Neibergs and Tim Waters Washington State University Extension Estimated

More information

BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS

BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS Cost of Producing Fresh and Processing Blueberries in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia Spring 2016 The BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS enterprise budget series were developed to

More information

The Talking Farm Treasurer's Report and Financial Statements (for internal use only) June 30, 2016

The Talking Farm Treasurer's Report and Financial Statements (for internal use only) June 30, 2016 Treasurer's Report and Financial Statements (for internal use only) June 30, 2016 Table of Contents: Treasurer's Report 1 Page: Financial Statements: Statements of Financial Position 2 Statements of Activities

More information

Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms

Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms Agricultural & Food Policy Center at Texas A&M University Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms AFPC Briefing Paper 04-5 December 2004 This work was

More information

BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS SECTORAL GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT MARKET PRICES (current prices) (US$M)

BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS SECTORAL GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT MARKET PRICES (current prices) (US$M) SECTORAL GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT MARKET PRICES (current prices) Sector 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000r 2001r 2002r 2003r 2004r 2005e Agriculture, Hunting & Forestry 1.36 1.50 1.63 1.77

More information

UNIT CWT, LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR OOL. TON TON ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE CWT

UNIT CWT, LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE LBS. ACRE ACRE ACRE HOUR OOL. TON TON ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE CWT 42 PEANUTS. ORYLANO. OEEP EAST TEXAS REGION ESTIMATEO COSTS ANO RETURNS PER UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION PEANUTS TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS PREHARVEST PEANUT

More information

72. <~*x TOTALS lm^smammtm ««- *. ««.. m m m t M r n m r n. m m «. ««_...wi.«mi.*.i

72. <~*x TOTALS lm^smammtm ««- *. ««.. m m m t M r n m r n. m m «. ««_...wi.«mi.*.i lm^smammtm ««- *. ««.. m m m t M r n m r n. m m «. ««_...wi.«mi.*.i 72. C U C U M B E R S ( P I C K L E S ) I R R I G A T E D T E X A S W I N T E R G A R D E N R E G I G N E S T I M AT E D C C S T S A

More information

UNIT LBS* ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE ACRE HOUR DOL* ACRE BALE ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE

UNIT LBS* ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE ACRE HOUR DOL* ACRE BALE ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE 48 COTTON, DRYLAND, DEEP EAST TEXAS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACPE UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION COTTONSEED TON 0*00 0*20 20*00 COTTON

More information

2010 Budgets for Horticultural Crops Grown on a Half Acre. by Roger Wilson Farm Management / Enterprise Budget Analyst

2010 Budgets for Horticultural Crops Grown on a Half Acre. by Roger Wilson Farm Management / Enterprise Budget Analyst 2010 Budgets for Horticultural Crops Grown on a Half Acre by Roger Wilson Farm Management / Enterprise Budget Analyst Budgeting Assumptions Everyone's situation is different so no budget is accurate for

More information

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2011-03 December 2011 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary

More information

Projections for Planning Purposes Only. Not to be Used without Updating after March 17, 1986.

Projections for Planning Purposes Only. Not to be Used without Updating after March 17, 1986. Projections for Planning Purposes Only Not to be Used without Updating after arch 7, 986. B-4K04) DATE STAGE TYPE PRODUT NAE NUBER HEIGHT ASH LANDLORD BREAK PER NON SHARE EVEN PRODUTION PROD. UNITS HEAD

More information

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2012-05 December 2012 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary

More information

Texas Panhandle & South Plains Districts

Texas Panhandle & South Plains Districts k Texas Agricultural Extension Service W The Texas A&M University System B-141(01) Texas rop Enterprise Budgets Texas Panhandle & South Plains Districts Projected for 199 Shermanl Ef I ^ iupecom Mitchell

More information

AgriProfit$ Economics of Beekeeping in Alberta 2016

AgriProfit$ Economics of Beekeeping in Alberta 2016 AgriProfit$ Economics of Beekeeping in Alberta 2016 AGDEX 821-62 December, 2017 ECONOMICS OF BEEKEEPING IN ALBERTA 2016 Emmanuel Anum Laate Economics Section Economics and Competitiveness Branch Alberta

More information

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS

CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-03 October 2017 2 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary

More information

Economics and Competitiveness. Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages. Brown Soil Zone

Economics and Competitiveness. Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages. Brown Soil Zone Economics and Competitiveness 2015 Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages Brown Soil Zone TABLE OF CONTENTS 2015 Brown Soil Zone OVERVIEW...1 CROPS Spring Wheat...2 FORAGES Roundup Ready Canola...5

More information

I22. EARLE W. KLOSTERMAN Ohio A g r i c u l t u r a l Research and Development Center Wooster, Ohio

I22. EARLE W. KLOSTERMAN Ohio A g r i c u l t u r a l Research and Development Center Wooster, Ohio I22 BODY SIZE AND PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY* EARLE W. KLOSTERMAN Ohio A g r i c u l t u r a l Research and Development Center Wooster, Ohio Beef c a t t l e s e l e c t i o n and performance t e s t i n g

More information

A DISCOUNT MINI STORAGE

A DISCOUNT MINI STORAGE A DISCOUNT MINI STORAGE 3735 Mangum Rd, Houston, TX 77092 High Density Mini Storage in Near NW Houston and close to newly proposed renovated US290 Highway Renovated Living Quarters, Gated Customer Access,

More information

I-94 COMMERCIAL LAND ±30.44 ACRES TH ST Eau Galle, WI 54747

I-94 COMMERCIAL LAND ±30.44 ACRES TH ST Eau Galle, WI 54747 PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS + + Located off I-94 and Hwy 63 Interchange 2,900 VPD + + Baldwin-Woodville Area School District + + Zoning: Commercial, Rural Residential + + 40 miles to St. Paul + + 25 miles to Menomonie,

More information

RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS

RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS 1 RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2014-04 October 2014 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data

More information

The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State

The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State Farm Business Management Reports EB1922E The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State Herbert R. Hinman Alan Schreiber Online

More information

Weekly Management Report Week 44

Weekly Management Report Week 44 Section 1: Summary Services Reproduction Stock Count 1st 2nd > 2nd Total Boar Fertility 92.3 % Gilts / Sows Gilt 7 1 8 Conception Rate (%) 8. % Maiden Gilts Sow 13 1 1 15 Farrowing Rate 78. % Dry Sows

More information

2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide

2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide 2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide The Organic Crop Planning Guide is produced to help producers estimate their costs of producing various crops. Please remember that the Guide is an estimate and does not

More information

EMVEST ASSET MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED. Investment Proposal. Matuba Estate Chokwe District Mozambique

EMVEST ASSET MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED. Investment Proposal. Matuba Estate Chokwe District Mozambique EMVEST ASSET MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED Investment Proposal Matuba Estate Chokwe District Mozambique 20 July 2009 PROJECT SUMMARY Project Name: EMVEST LIMOPO Lda (MATUBA), District Chokwe, Province of Gaza.

More information

Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291

Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291 Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 AG -1291 Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 October 2013 AG-1291 Archie Flanders Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness

More information

Swine: Selection and Mating of Breeding Stock 1

Swine: Selection and Mating of Breeding Stock 1 RFAA083 Swine: Selection and Mating of Breeding Stock 1 Walker, Randy 2 SELECTION OF GILTS Select gilts to be retained for the breeding herd at five to six months of age or when they weigh 200 lb or more.

More information

Effective Gross Revenue 3,335,005 3,130,591 3,320,552 3,338,276 3,467,475 3,606,962 3,509,653 3,981,103 3,984,065 4,147,197 4,300,790

Effective Gross Revenue 3,335,005 3,130,591 3,320,552 3,338,276 3,467,475 3,606,962 3,509,653 3,981,103 3,984,065 4,147,197 4,300,790 Schedule Of Prospective Cash Flow In Inflated Dollars for the Fiscal Year Beginning 1/1/2011 Potential Gross Revenue Base Rental Revenue $3,331,625 $3,318,220 $3,275,648 $3,270,394 $3,368,740 $3,482,312

More information