COW-CALF PROOUCTION TEXAS GRAND PRAIRIF REGION FROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER COW NATIVE RANGE UNIT CWT. CWT. CWT.
|
|
- Della Shepherd
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 * G R O S S R E C E I P T S COW-CALF PROOUCTION TEAS GRAND PRAIRIF REGION FROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER COW NATIVE RANGE WEIGHT EACH UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST STEER CALVES HEIFER CALVES CULL COWS TOTAL * VA R I A B L E C O S T S ±3* PASTURE, NATIVE HAY S A LT & M I N RANGE CUBES VET MEDICINF MARKETING MISC EPENSE MACHINERY(FUEL,LUBE,REP) EQUIPMENT(FUEL,LUEF,REP) LABOR, TPACTCR & MACHINERY LABOR, EQUIPMENT LABOR, LIVESTOCK INTEREST ON OPERCAP, TOTAL VARIABLE CCSTS INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS FIED COSTS LAND CHARGE I N T O N L I V E S TO C K C A P I TA L INT qn OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR ON BEEF BULL DEPR ON HORSE DEPR ON OTHER ECUIP OTHER FC, MACH & ECUIP TOTAL FIED CCSTS TOTAL COSTS ACRE ^6 BALE CWT, HRS HRS HRS R RA ±* ACRF OOL * NET RETUPNS COW HERD 4 BULLS, 80 PERCENT CALF CROP, 1-1/ PERCENT REPLACEMENT _,_JJJ_-AT_f_? F0P e>- TEAS AGRICULTURAL ETENSION SFRVICF?n_fndd t tl0n-pesent6d is Peped slely ^ genetg^deune nd is nt S^^^J^ " PedlCt ^ C StS ^ S «?-* P^ite
2 i h- C 4 VI c " - c> U' C 4 _ c s O 1 U h- ) C ( n Ui R I p Q IT' _J 0 s if!l» 4 h / ft- D _ 1 _ h- CJ tfl T s V) c _M D - c i - 1 V li \ ft i? pm V- y- n 4 h 0 I > / N _> II tn! h li h l/ 0 c CD b 4 _J i c - ^ i T - J N U ) «0 > O O 0 _> in _ t CIH NO Of» IT If h «J (v > lp _ cm j n vj - iff impi ^» it i» _ i i n _ - ~ «- V m if) -> n - I s h- m t t _3 h- J * x ( 3 Ui _ O I _l 10 c _> _> i _ I _ > i n /) j Ui * > : Cl U' CD _j _) U: -J D IL O 7 in v - 4 D I t t > in I - y - > _> U > -J J - 4 OJ Wl > pi _ 1- - s t/i _> M Q tn -i tf) IT - O c c _> Q in _j 4 _> Ui M Ul M»- m»_i O - O O in cv ( M fi n t O O O O O O O C O O i O OOlf OOlTilTOOIT'O ««m m i i i i _ N - - t O O U I i fl i A l i n - v i i f ) t f v j l S I l l ; - -, j, ) - O O O e c c O O O O i C m m i n t T i t_ in ^nwifjccc 4 m - 1 ' O i i n i n i " c _ e -hoqmiigio* n n i _ -J J_j_j»j hddoo_b_ i c i i x pzzzz ZZZZZ h- Z O c t h- Ul > CD _i D 1 «3 D c c m c v _ «\ i «_ «x 03 U J y - i n i m m M t n i t i fi i ^ i i M i c c ^ i l i ' " ' i i f - t-ni t 4 U i/iinifl(m«i 7 t - _ j x _wfif)icn«ec»in xiincc'cj'incinh tn 11 l n ( - c - ^ t» U O K:_**"***""'*w,ttv' Q - O» x v i n U l l t O O O O O O O O O O O m j > ~» - i _ j * - ««, «*--J_j-j_jj_jj_i _ h l i i n m D I O O O O O O O I OOOOOOOOOOO U1 OOOOOOOOOOO Nl W O m ^ i _ t _> y bi - O -1 y- Ul _ > t in til J > y-» m Ul IE 0 * y Ifl t n D i tt V 7 h- (> HI i h- h- tn tn m U y- V c I - - M n 4 ip N n in in m Oi y- i x t t i -J >- D h- - tn _j j > * _ j in 10 tf) n _ c B t _: v_ j t n j _ H m y - j i i t t h- h- i *_itf)tf>h-»x - n i i * i n i _ h _ ) - * i n «O _1 ~ >
3 GROSS RECEIPTS STCCKER PRODUCTION TFAS GRAND PRAIRIE REGION PRCJECTEC COSTS AND RFTURNS PER STOCKER NATIVE PASTURE WEIGHT UNIT EACH PRICE OR COST/UNI QUANTITY VALUE CR COST FEEDER STEERS TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS 650 CWT, * STOCKER STEERS PASTURE, NATIVE HAY VET MEDICINE SALT & MIN MARKETING DEATH LOSS STOC MISC EPENSE MACHINERY!FUEL,LUBE,REP ) EQUIPMENT!FUEL,LUBE,REP ) LABOR, TRACTOR & MACHINFRY LABOR, EQUIPMENT LA80P, LIVESTCCK INTEREST ON OPERCAP,, TOTAL VARIAELE CCSTS INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS FIED COSTS LAND CHARGE INT ON LIVESTCCK CAPITAL INT ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR ON HORSE DEPR ON OTHER ECUIP OTHER FC, MACH & FCUI TOTAL FIED COSTS 5 TOTAL COSTS ACRE BALE HRS HRS HRS ,94 * ACRE C US! NET RETURNS S T E E R U N I T, A A C R E S P P R S T O C K E R, I D E A T H L O S S E S T I M A T E D F O R f C, T E A S A G R I C U L T U R A L E T E N S I O N S E R V I C E Bdget infmtin pesented is peped slely s genel gideline nd is nt intended t ecgnie t pedict the csts nd etns fm ny ne pticl fm nch petin
4 in h- 4 1 IT _> K c: O I 4 tt V O C h- D O ( 1 U Ul 0 O _J _ V c 4 * h 7 _ D O * _: O h- Ul I O 4 U C f-> _) f - I > s O h - 0 «y- 1 > "v» c I t h- O ti h- tn c tt D 4 C J O O N c O O I IT «M C >mv)(\t_>4* if mm i n c j h N i d * -viv-h ic«_ci in cm n c c c m»-«-c - - s m W D O M Ul ffi _l _> t _i D O O O O O O O O O V h tfi Ul j - O I "* in \j _ Ul O I tf) CC 3 U l 0 tf) 1 3 tf) i * > U' Ul > _) If) _J -J tf) t x in - _ t 3 m i N O - in tf I Ul D tf) I Ul c h 0 4 ti, _- Ul _> I - «- _- _i O O O O h C O «_ (MnintiOHC C C t_> m c ^ - in in c > > pi cm n m iini in h- s N 1/1 I1 ' - m t m 4 > c c _*/ in cm O O O O O O O O O» i n m h - n - - i i K i 4 I " ( \ > OOOCCOOOO OOOOO «O CJ c t i, c»-c«o; -J_d=-J->-'_-l'«s c c c x c c OOOOOOOOO C D O tf) 3 f C C M O ~ C I U J O O O O O O O O O h- Oi tfl c c U' >? I _* _J j h I T C ' «C 0 # - V) U 0 -» t j t f > C " ^ «C v J C M _> - h : y- I l i _ } N 1 [ \ j O - _> U J O O O O O O O O O h- Ul Ul I - t f ) 0 > O C t \ J N - «C O (M-_>_l(-_ i tn t_ Q c f ' - ' O _> (0 * V) O I O « * _ «_ c h- C U J O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I! c Ui tt tfl Ul OOOOOOOOO ttl OOOOOOOOO» h - _-,»_, f - U l i-_j-j_j_j_j J_l «_ j 3 5 C O O O O O O I OOOOOOOOO U' OOOOOOOOO ' - J e M h ^ - Q 3 Ul Ul Ui _J > D h - tf) in > (^ tf) (_ U -> Ul - - 0* O O l U U 4 «- t - U l * 0) tf) tf) U h- - O - _ t 111 MI) in -1 h 7 _ : hi -1 l >- ) 1- tf) n Ul > n i- tf) i- tn 10 M fi (i ll I Ul _ tf) 7 y- n til 4 i- y- Ul n * CO m t/> Ill - p t in n N it> in _ J * _
5 1 GROSS RECEIPTS STCCKER PRODUCTION TEAS GRAND PRAIRIE REGION PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS PER STOCKER SMALL GRAIN PASTURE WEIGHT UNIT EACH PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST FEEDER STEERS TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS * STOCKER STEERS SM GR PASTURE PASTURE, NATIVE HAY SUPPLEMENT SALT & MIN MARKETING DEATH LOSS STOC MISC EPENSE VET MEDICINE MACHINERY(FUEL, LUBE, REP» EQUIPMENT(FUEL,LUBE REP) LABOR, TRACTCR & MACHINERY LABOR, EQUIPMENT LABOR, LIVESTCCK INTEREST ON OPERCAP, TOTAL VARIAELE CCS^S INCOME ABOVE VARIAELE COSTS FIED COSTS LAND CHARGE PASTURE CHG INT ON LIVESTOCK CAPITAL INT ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR ON HORSE DEPR ON OTHER EQUIP OTHER FC, MACH & EQUIP TOTAL FIEC COSTS 5 TOTAL COSTS 6 NET RETURNS ACRE ACRE BALE AUM HRS HRS HRS Q46 ±1* ACRE ACRE OIO * ,55 l/,si^ 1/4 ACRE n T> OF NATIVE HE4D PASTURE P- *COE 1 F PERCENT SM4LL 0 GR*'* TM LOSS PASTURE AND lfjlatfp F0R-,973-8 ' TF=AS AGRICULTURAL ETENSION SERVICE nte_ldntzlzilt??* is^t" S lely " ^TgWellne nd is nt f Rtin! t0 PTedlCt the C Sts nd et *» - - pticl
6 t m O 4 * T \ U J h- D C Ul - IT n 4 K 7 _* _) O * _- y- () tf) T e : * _> c h- 4 m c in _) O - I V h- cm V) c Ul Ul _> y- I M \ m w t i -I tf) 3 3 U J t f ) I D tfi Uj «i 4 > > t > 3 in _i _j ~ 4 C J tf) > Ui (A I U l fl - O c tn n m - N O > tf) O _' 4 _ ^ > c O Ul \ «c h- h P h O - _ CM > _* CM (M _- c tn \ S in ev _ C h CJ en h O Ui h c c c i tf) _ CM * - _ t CO ^* 3 c c c O J c * «U' CO c «t _ l 3 * Ul J e c 3 c I t 3 tf) Z I Ul >H h n Ul i- tf> «J h«3 h - «- «)h in i t j if 4 «J O O O O _ i O O O O O O O O C M W I - N O N N N n n w i M m * OOOOOOOO O If i h m in if it J 4 «M O O O O O CM h-j inin- t in in ^ c t M i i t- m in U J J J Ul _J 0 -J U' U O I (9 O U - c tf) ^ m If) C _: 3 O c CM 4 CM (VI CVJ _* I Ui O 19 tf! 0 O > D I -4 J _J O H tn in!" c Ifl CO - t_ Z 10 e CM c U> Ll 0 O h- Z H J s _ I O in CM m _ M - _4 _> Z Ul O O h- c CC C 1- tfi s CM _ CM - C N Ui h- 4 CM _ ^ V) e : O O O O O 3 CD I If) O I, CO CD CO CD CD CO t n h- CO CO c -j CD c t Z c CtflOOOOOOOOO U1 iooooooooo m i c -,_*_,_ h - K h»-i_j_jj_j_!_i _JOOO_JOOU1 3 U O O O U O O O O O O O O O O O O U J O O O O O O O O O N 0 h O h h h O - * * m - i n - Ul _> h- Ul x l l! 3 l - tt t J Q t > t n s j > in y- in 10 h- b_ i w U J Q _ V U tf) 'U / Z Z h - i 1 Ul 4 1- y~ 4 C t * n tf) 10 - M -* J Ul «n _J h Ul x t d y- m t > tf) _ Ul tt tn j - Ul in * i i J > «- y- m m _ O U O i»- i en in tn i _: tn _ n y- i Mjn^iO-STiifi > ^
7 GROSS RECEIPTS DAIRY PRODUCTION TEAS GRAND PRAIRIE REGION PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS PER COW WITH SILAGE WEIGHT EACH UNI PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST MILK 100 BULL CALVES 1 00 BREEDING HEIFERS 100 CULL COWS 1300 REPLACEMENT COWS 100 BULL 100 TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS I ft * GRAIN MI HAY SORGHUM SILAGE PASTURE VET MEDICINE BREEDING SUPPLIES MGMT RECORDS UTILITIES HAULING SALT SOW FEED LACT MISC EPENSE MACHINERY(FUELLUBE,REP) EQUIPMENT(FUELLUBE,REP) LABOR, TRACTOR S MACHINERY LABOR, LIVESTCCK INTEREST ON OPERCAP, TOTAL VARIABLE CCSTS TON AUM LB LB HRS HRS C T e * INCOME ABOVE VAPIABLE COSTS FIED COSTS LAND CHARGE I N T O N L I V F S TO C K C A P I TA L TNT ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR ON DAIRY COW PURCH DEPR ON OTHER EQUIP OTHER FC, MACH & ECUIP TOTAL FIEO CCSTS ACRE * TOTAL COSTS NET RETURNS COW DAIRY, LBS PRODUCTION PER COW, BARN IS DOUBLE 6 HERRINGBONE ;EDING OUTSIDE MILKING PARLOR, 5% REPLACEMENT, 3% DEATH LOSS ON COWS ESTIMATED FOR TEAS AGRICULTURAL ETENSION SERVICE! _!!? ^f^^ is pte**ted slely s genel gideline nd is nt intended t ecgnie t pedict the csts nd etns fm ny ne pticl fm nch petin
8 H O U R L Y C O S T S U M M A R Y _ " I V P L E M F N T S A N D P O W E R U N I T S B U D G E T I D E N T I F I C A T I O N N U M B E R I PICKUP MACHINE P U R C H A S E S A L V A G E S I Z E P R I C E V A L U E 0, , 315 ANNUAL YEARS HOURS DEPR*/ I N T F S INS/ TAES/ OWNED USED HOUR HOUR HOUR HOUR * , 116 TOTAL P E R F O R M O P «O W N E R R A T E C O S T SHIP/ HOUP/ PER H O U R A C R E H O U R ,000 4T45 ANNUAL COST SUMMARY FOR EQUIPMENT AND Ll VESTOCK eudgft NUMBER LINE NO* LIST DEPREC INSUR FUEL SIZE UNIT PRICE IATION INTEREST ANCE TAES REPAIRS AND LUBE H ' U R S T O T O W N - T O T O P E R - LABOR ERSHP/YR ATING/YR 1 MILKING PARLOR MILK ROOM 3 MILKING STALLS 4 MILKERS 5 B U L K M I L K C O O L E R 6 HORIZONTAL SILO 7 MECHANICAL FEEDR d S I L A G E D I G / W A G O N HOLDING AREA 30 ROOF FNDG AREA 31 CALF tjarn 3 HAY RACKS 33 HAY barn 34 FEED MILL 3 5 M A N U R E S Y S T E M 36 WATER SYSTEM 61 DAIRY COW RAISED 6 DAISY COW PURCH 65 DAIRY HEIFER RAI 96ft" SOFT 1800* *50 91*«0-45*50 0*0 440*00 SQFT 8800*00 440*00 440*00 *00 44*00 * *0 9*06 18* 1 15* 10 0*» 1* *50 39,00 3*50 O* GAL 9570OC et T 55* *0 1600*00 TON 8500* *00 1*5 4* *0 1* * 00 13* *0 1* * * *50 55*00 55* SQFT * *00 6* 00 0*0 1600*00 SQFT 6400*00 30*00 30*00 16* * SQFT * *00 FEET *50 5* *0 600 SOFT * DOL* *00 70" 3500 " _ * 0*0 1*00 OOL* iOO * 0 1*00 DOL* 300^ 00 15* T * *00 0*0 80* *0 1* * * * 0*0 1* *0 80*00 4* *0 0*0 1046*50 45*50 0* *0 68*"_ *0 5^350 3SO 0* *35 0*0 488*75 4*5 559*00 6* * *0 45*00 6n 0*0 36 _ 00 6*40 0*0?30* *0 10*94 *5 0* *0 1505*00 70*00 0* *0 3* * * *0 0*0 100 J LINE NO* 1 MILKING PARLOR MILK ROOM 3 MILKING STALLS 4 MILKERS 5 BULK MILK COOLER 6 HORIZONTAL SILO 7 MECHANICAL FEEDR 8 SILAGE DIG/WAGON 9 HOLDING AREA 30 ROOF FNDG AREA 31 CALF BARN 3 HAY RACKS 33 HAY BARN 34 PEED MILL 35 MANURE SYSTEM 36 WATER SYSTEM 61 DAIRY COW RAISED 6 DAIRY COW POdCH 5 041HY Ht! " M A N N U A L C H A R G E S M A D E I N T H I S B U D G E ^ F O R E Q U I P M E N T A N D - L I V E S T O C K NUMBER PROPOR OWNFRSHP OPERATNG INTEREST LABOR HOURS SIZE UNIT S CHARGED CHARGES CHARGES CHAOG CHARGED 960*00 SQFT 1* *45 9* *00 SQFT 0* * 4* *00 DOL* 0* * DOL* 0* *90 0*0 1500*00 GAL* *010 8* *53 0* TON 1*000 0*010 4* *0 1*00 DOL* 1 * *010 5* *0 1*00 OOL* 1* * * 00 SQFT 1*000 0*010 3*45 0*06 3, *00 SQFT 0*010 3* *0 0*0 500*00 SOFT 1*000 0*010 * *0 T5*00 FEET 1,000 0*010 1*1 0*0 0*56 0, 0 600*00 SOFT 1*000 0,010 5* ,00 0* DOL* 0*010 15* *0 1*00 DOL* 0*010 0*96 0*39 9T5 0, DOL* 0*010 3* 0* *0 1*00 0* , 4 0 0*0 76*00 0,0 1*00 HEAO 0* * *0 1*00 HEAO _/ i ) )
9 11 DAIRY PRODUCTION TEAS GRAND PRAIRIE REGION PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS PER COW WITHOUT SILAGE WEIGHT EACH UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST GROSS RECEIPTS MILK BULL CALVES BREEDING HEIFERS CULL COWS REPLACEMENT CCtS BULL ,! _ TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS GRAIN MI HAY PASTURE VET MEDICINE BREEDING SUPPLIES MGMT RECORDS UTILITIES HAULING SALT SOW FEED LACT MISC EPENSE MACHINERY(FUELLUBE,REP) EQUIPMENT(FUELLUBE REP) LABOR, TRACTOR & MACHINERY LABOR, LIVESTCCK INTEREST ON OPERCAP, TOTAL VARIAELE CCSTS AUM LB LB HRS HRS * INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS 4 FIED COSTS LAND CHARGE INT ON LIVESTCCK CAPITAL INT ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR ON DAIRY COW PURCH DEPR ON OTHER EQUIP OTHER FC, MACH & EQUIP TOTAL FIED COSTS 5 TOTAL COSTS ACRE ^ NET RETURNS 9443 )0 COW DAIRY, 135C0 LBS PRODUCTION PER COW, BARN IS DOUBLE 6 HERPINGBONE, FEEDING OUTSIDE MILKING PARLOR 5 REPLACEMENT, 3% DEATH LOSS ON COWS ESTIMATED FOR , TEAS AGRICULTURAL ETENSION SERVICE Bdget infmtin pesented,is peped slely s genel gideline nd is nt intended t ecgnie t pedict the csts nd etns fm ny ne pticl fm nch petin
10 H O U R LY C O S T S U M M A R Y F C P I M P L E M E N T S A N " p 0 w t R U N I T S B U D G E T I O T, I C AT I O N N U M B E R , 4 MACHINE PICKUP ANNUAL -RCKASE SALVAGE YEARS HOURS SIZE PR ICE VALUE OWNED USED 0* , 500 DEPR*/ INTERFST/ HOUR HOUR 1*95 0*90 INS/ T A / HOUP HOUR S " TOTAL PERFORM OP O W N E R 9 A T E C O S T SHIP/ HOUR/ PER H O U R A C R E H O U R 1*465 4^45 ANNUAL COST SUMMARY _P EQUIPMENT AND L IVE STOCK BUDGET NUMBFP, U400014OQ14 LINE NO LIST 0E REC- S I Z E U N I T P R I C E I A T I O N I N T E R E S T INSUR ANCE FUEL T A E S R E P A I R S A N O L U B * H O U _ t t O W N - T O T O P E R - LABOR _ SHP/YR ATING/YP 1 MILKING PARLOR 960 SQFT M I L K R O O M S O F T 3 M I L K I N G S T A L L S D O L 4 M I L K E R S D O L 5 B U L K M I L K C O O L E R G A L 7 MECHANICAL FEEDR HOLDING AREA 1500 SQFT 30 ROOF FNDG AREA 1600 SQFT 31 CALF BARN 500 SQFT 3 H A Y R A C K S 7 S 0 0 F E E T 33 HAY BARN 600 SQFT 3* FEED MILL M A N U R E S Y S T E M D O L 3 6 W A T E R S Y S T E M D O L 61 DAIRY COW RAISED DAIRY COW PURCH OAIRY HEIFER RAI secc 300 6SC0 957C CO e _ *13 0* * * * * * ^ TO00 9TS0 15OO , T T0 39 CO 1SOO OO 0*0 OO OO OO OO T * * *0 57S« * S 0 0 TO * *53 0* LINE NO 1 MILKING PARLOR MILK ROOM 3 MILKING STALLS 4 MILKERS 5 BULK MILK COOLER 7 MECHANICAL FEEDR 9 HOLDING AREA 30 ROOF FNDG AREA 31 CALF BARN 3 HAY RACKS 33 HAY BARN 34 FEED MILL 35 MANURE SYSTEM A N N U A L C H A R G E S M «D E I N T H I S B D G E y F 0 R e q I P M F N T A N D L I V F S T O C K NUMBER PROPOR OWNERSHp OPERATNG INTEREST LABOR HO SIZE UNIT S CHARGED CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGED SQFT * *00 SQFT * * * GAL * * SQFT locg * SQFT 0* * SQFT 0* FEET 0* * SQFT 0*010 5, *00 0* O0 0* 0 1*00 0* WATER SYSTEM 61 DAIRY COW RAISED 6 DAIRY COW PURCH 65 DAIRY HEIFER RAI 1*00 OOL 1*000 0* * * 0 1*00 1*000 0* * 0 1*00 1*000 0* , * *000 0* * '
11 13 GROSS RECEIPTS GOAT BUDGET TEAS GRANDE PRAIRIE REGION PRCJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ANIMAL UNIT (6 DOES) WEIGHT CACH UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST ADULT MOHAIR 100 LB KID MOHAIR 100 LB KID GOATS DOES TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS « *1-351 RANGE SUPPLEMENT SALT & MIN VET MED & IMP SHEARING SALES COMM MISC EPENSE MACHINERY(FUEL,LUEF,REP) EQUIPMENT(FUELLUBEREP) LABOR, TRACTOR MACHINERY LABOR, EQUIPMENT LABOR, LIVESTCCK INTEREST ON OPFRCAP, TOTAL VARIABLE CCSTS 3 INCOME ABOVE VARIABLF COSTS 4 FIED COSTS LAND RENT INT ON LIVESTCCK CAPITAL INT, ON OTHER EGUIPMENT DEPR ON BILLIES PURCH DEPR ON HORSE DEPR ON OTHER EQUIP OTHER FC, MACH & EQUIP TOTAL FIED COSTS 5 TOTAL COSTS OOL 044 HRS HRS T HRS * ACRE *3* NET RETURNS 36 40% KID CROP, 1 B U C K P E R 5 0 D O E S 7 % D E A ^ H L O S S, 0 R E P L A C E M E N T ESTIMATED FOR , T E A S A G R I C U L T U R A L E T E N S I O N S F R V I C E Bdget infmtin pesented is peped slely s genel gideline nd is nt intended t ecgnie t pedict the csts nd etns fm ny ne pticl fm nch petin
12 H O U R L Y C O S T S U M M A R Y F C R I W F L E M E N T S A N D P O W E R U N I T S B U D G E T I D E N T I F I C A T I O N N U M B E R S MACHINE PICKUP P U R C H A S E S A L V A G E S I Z E P R T C E V A L U E ANNUAL YEARS HOURS DEPR/ INTEREST/ INS/ TAES/ OWNED USED HOUR HOUR HOUR HOUR Q TOTAL P E R F O R M O P, O W N E R R A T E C O S T SHIP/ HOUR/ PER H O U R A C R E H O U R * ANNUAL COST SUMW-PY FOR EQUIPMENT AND LIVESTOCK--BUDGET NUMBER 5? LINp LIST DEPREC INSUR NO SIZE UNIT PRICE IATION INTEREST ANCE TAES REPAIRS FUEL H O U R S t t O W N - T O T O P E R - LABOP FPSHP/YO ATING/YR 90 YEARLING DOE FENCE 300 MILE 96C P E N S & E O U I P M E N T 100 DOL* WATER SYSTEM 100 7C BARN S T O C K T R A I L E R 100 OOL ec c O 16 S T O C K S P R A Y E R 100 GAL* 7CC , FEEDERS 100 5C0 50* TACK 100 DOL* * N A N N I E S R A I S E D OC 0* B I L L I E S P U R C H 1* *5 5T HORSE 1* O ? ** * t 0 0*0 0*0 hi I _ 90 YEARLING DOE 11 FENCE 1 PENS 6 EQUIPMENT 13 WATER SYSTEM 14 BARN 1 5 S T O C K T R A I L E R 1 6 S T O C K S P R A Y E R 17 FEEDERS 19 TACK 8 6 N A N N I E S R A I S E D 8 9 B I L L I E S P U R C H 95 HORSE A N N U A L C H A R G E S M A D E I N T H I S B U D G E T F O R E Q U I P M E N T A N D L I V E S T O C K NUMBER ITE»S PROPQR OWNEf >HP CHARGED CHAf,ES smm INTEREST CHARGES L -gg _?URS * * C C , _ 75 0* S I Z E U N I T 1*00 9*00 MILE 100 1*00 DOL* 100 DOL* 1*00 DOL* 100*00 GAL* 1*00 DOL* 1*00 OOL* 100 1* HEAO 1
13 15 SHEEP BUDGET TEAS GRANDE PRAIRIE REGION PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ANIMAL UNIT (5 EWES) WEIGHT EACH UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST GROSS RECEIPTS WOOL LAMBS CULL EWES TOTAL CO00 LB, LB LB, * VARIABLE COSTS RANGE CUBES SALT & MIN VET MEDICINE SHEARING SALES COMM MISC EPENSE MACHINERYFUEL,LUBF,RE ) EQUIPMENT (FUEL LUB«,REP) LABOR, TRACTOR & MACHINERY LABOR, EQUIPMENT LABOR, LIVESTCCK INTEREST ON OPERCAP, TOTAL VARIABLE CCSTS HRS HRS HRS ^ * 44 1A *> * INCOME ABOVE V«CI _LE COSTS 1^6 FIED COSTS LAND RENT I N T O N L I V E S T C C K C A P I TA L INT ON OTHER ECUIPMPNT DEPR ON RAMS PURCHASED DEPR ON HORSE DEPR ON OTHER EQUIP OTHER FC, MACH F EQUIP TOTAL FIED CCSTS ACRE _1_U6 187 TOTAL COSTS NET RETURNS % LAMB CROP 1 RAM PER 33 EWES 3 DFATH LOSS, FINEWOOL EW^S & CROSSBRED LAMBS,?0 REPLACEMENT ESTIMATED FOR , TEAS AGRICULTURAL ETENSION SERVICE Bdget infmtin pesented is peped slely s genel gideline nd is nt intended t ecgnie t pedict the csts nd etns fm ny ne pticl fm nch petin
14 IP 4 i/> _> CJ s _ t O t y t D J S U 0 0! 4»* - 7 ft-l * 3 * I O i- O tf) 1 Q 0 > N 3 1- c «> K I > Z V * D I m Q C U; c h - _ 0 «0 0 ( e * * CO 1)1111)40 N O O - O O I T l T O O N > i f i -» t f ' n " N N O I fl f M c IT fti O 4 O (? IT I fi P I M ( - ti e _ > D y- J If f Q CD * _> m O J C C _ O O O O C C c c c c i m i V) 3 *"* \ y- -J VI c> ti) i t 3 I ) * * S tfl» (I IT OJ 3 li C) t 3 ~) t _> in 10 Q j t OD 4 _l 3 _J O 3 U O Z, 4 t fl t CD 3 Z V- in 3 1»- 1 _ U h 1 tf) c LU - ) Z > tf f >- Z _l _ H Q Z H tf) H U! Z tt l_ t y- _ 3 O I _- k Q «U - c t «O P) III N O c - ( m t - c i tf i n i " * n - -«m tf f OJ O - c v f - i n i n m c v in*~\jin'cm, N N - «0 - c c c - c c i c c c i t,,,,, * * h - O O J ) O O U i i f, c (C-jnflcvifi t\i - n ininm c > h - n e i m i i * " m t _ vi tf) V 3 i» - j > 0 ~ C V _ * > y- V) OOOOOOOOOOOO Ui c > m x _ 4 U _l _l 1- tf) tfimih n - V)»)i_ini-inn«Uj i l f - 4 f " K ti) 4 _ y - i Ul _ ) t f ) m i n c M i n c v j Z U J O O O O O O O O O O t- _ Q tf) (VI (i-o-n, «i Ui 3 HI _ ii(ctc?_)ni_ih i - m n j p j - - f l _ in O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O m «H H H «w - «i ( O O O J O O O O O O O O O O O Q - c C c - C ' 0 I I _ i 4 t i l U I f ) U - O > 3 i n M 3 in _> in -J _- Ui t> n > - j 01 I PI ^i OJ C _ * *, * * * * Q ( J-J-J_J-J_J_J_J* -' CU;U' Z Q Q O O O O O I I OOOOOOOOOOOO -, U t f ) l_ ID Ul x y ~ * ~_ _ i--» OC _-*_J-»-J-J_l_J_J_J ZI_MOODO_OlLI_l _ 3 I Z O O O O O O O I I I U J C O O O O O O O O O O O N,,,,, W O t f ) - _> _ : t n l i Ul II i in - > 3 O - n O I >- tf) I/) t- w tf> >~i M -> M : hi 7 _ y- t n n III HI Ul _t _) en tf) U 1- Ul c i in m t m >0 N m ^, m t ) c _l 7 IIJ _ i it t 1 _ hi in V) _ >- Ul i >- 3 ~ c K 1 C3 tf) III 13 Ul > y- f tf) i - iq -I 3 _l III i * V 111 i in in J! n V ) tn 4 s i- -J t _l ::l t- ^- j _ O > * in w v> 1- IU ' * f i 4 id «0) _»-l n 0-1 ' Q ^
15 17 GROSS RECEIPTS FEEDER PIG PRODUCTION TEAS GRANDE PPAIRIE REGION PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS PEP SOW WEIGHT UNIT EACH PRICE OR COST/UNI' QUANTIty VALUE OR COST FEEDER PIGS TOTAL LB, ±*- 450 VARIABLE COSTS SOW FEED GEST SOW FEED LACT PIG STARTER BOAR FEED VET MEDICINE MARKETING MISC EPENSE MACHINERY(FUEL,LUEE,RED) EQUIPMENT(FUEL,LUBE,REP) LABOR, TRACTCR & MACHINERY LABOR, EQUIPMENT LABOR, LIVESTCCK INTEREST ON OPERCAP, TOTAL VARIABLE CCS^S HRS HRS HRS OO * INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS FIED COSTS LAND RENT INT n LIVESTOCK CAPITAL INT ON OTHER EQUIPMENT DEPR ON SOW PURCHASED DEPR ON BOAR PURCHASED DEPR ON OTHER EQUIP OTHER FC, MACH 6 ECUIP TOTAL FIED COSTS ACRE x TOTAL COSTS NET RETURNS 15 SOW UNIT, FALL-SFRING FARROWING, 56 DAY WEANING, 1 6 P I G S W E A N E D P E P S C W P E R Y E A R E S T I M A T E D F O R T E A S A G R I C U L T U R A L E T E N S I O N S E R V I C E Bdget infmtin pesented is peped slely s genel gideline nd is nt intended t ecgnie t pedict the csts nd etns fm ny ne pticl m nch petin
16 HOURLY COST SUMMARY FOR IMPLEMENTS AND POWER UNITS BUDGET IDFNT IF ICATI ON NUMBER A3 01 A 01 A! -_ 1A MACHINE PICKUP ANNUAL PURCHASE SALVAGE YEARS HOURS SIZE PRICE VALUE OWNED USED DFPP/ INTEREST/ HOUR HOUR INS/ txfs/ HOUR HOUR 0 05A 011" TOTAL OERFORM OP OWNER RATE COST SHIP/ HOUR/ PER HOUR ACRF HOUR 1 A65 1 OOO ATd5 ANNUAL COS-*- SUMMARY FOR EQUIPMENT AND LIVF STOC K BUDGET NUMBER _ *1C1& L INE NO S I Z E U N I T L I S T D E R E C - I N S U R - P R I C E I A T I O N I N T E R E S T A N C E FUEL TAFS REPAIRS AND LUBF HOURS TOT OWN- TQT OPER- LABOR ERSHP/YP TING/VC AJ HOG FENCF FARROWING HOUSE 4 PASTURE SHEDS *3 FEED STORAGt 4 FEEDERS-HOGS A5 BOAR PEN 4 waterers-hog 43 MINERAL FEEDER 7 SOW PURCHASED 7A BOAR PURCHASED C50C * n 100 A0 A00 * ,33 * A0 1* e 1*60 0*40 00 PEET _ ? * ^ 0*40 O 0 O* IT 0 3& 1* C P ' * / C"_ On LINE NO* 40 HOG FENCE 41 FARROWING HOUSE, 4 PA S T U R E S H E D S 43 FEED STORAGE 4A FEEDERS-HOGS 45 BOAR PEN 46 WATERERS-HOG 48 MINERAL FEEDER 7 SO- PURCHASED 74 BOAR PURCHASED ANNUAL CHARGES MADE IN THIS BUDGET FOR EQUIPMENT AND LIVESTOCK S I Z E U N I T 100 DOL* FEET NUMBER S looc FROPOR CHARGED _050 OWNERSHP OPERATNG CHARGES CHARGES 1 1Q INTFRPST LABO R HOURS CHARGES CHA RGED 55 «tn 57 = « AO * > f I _ I
17 19 FARROW TC FINISH HOG PRODUCTION TEAS GRAND PRAIPIE REGION PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS PEP SOW WEIGHT EACH UNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST G R O S S R E C E I P T S MARKET HOGS TOTAL 0 CWT, ^ VA R I A B L E C O S T S SOW FEED GEST SOW FEED LACT PIG STARTER BOAR FEED FINISHING RATICN VET MEDICINE MARKETING MISC EPENSE MACHINERY(FUEL,LU8F,RFP> EQUIPMENT(FUELLUEF,REP) L A B O R, T R A C T C R & M A C H I N E R Y LABOR, EQUIPMENT LABOR, LIVESTCCK INTEREST ON OPERCAP, T O TA L VA R I A E L E C C S T S I N C O M E A B O V E VA P I A E L E C O S T S FIED COSTS LAND RENT I N T O N L I V E S T O C K C A I T A L INT ON OTHER EQUIPMENT OEPR ON SOW PLRCHASEC DEPR ON BOAR PURCHASED DEPR ON OTHER EQUIP OTHER PC, MACH G ECUIP, TOTAL FIED COSTS TOTAL COSTS 6 NET RETURNS HRS HRS HRS * ACRF * S '988 C ttg^f?n_c_?_t_ " _6P_ S lely " gene "gse^d is nt f nchrtin """^ ^ C StS 3nd "tuns f0m «* ne Pticl
18 ' 1 ""» 4 in i - t 4 m t f 0 t i 4 N O U' Q Uj C t 1 - D f f O tt 4 O U Ui tt Q V" C If _J \ c 4 ;«h 7 - _ 3 OJ P * I O - - O U l I c 4 i c 4 U' - i - C O H I 0 c-» \ i n 7 t f ) D Z y- - I s * - ( V J V ) O I i_ M tt h U D O y- Z I M y- V _ ~ t t t tt j «3 m m D _ f- _J > tt - 3 _ -C Z O ( / ) i m tf) Q j in U J * 4 y- > U' -J Ui 13 4 t _> Ul _ J - Ui tf) «_(_ I U IT O «O t t * 3 Q I D I > t \ p y- y- 4* -J 3 J _> OJ 4 4 Q t tt 1 > Z V tf) tt _> I i l c D I Uj»- tfi Q - 0 ^ m j i c ^ n -tm^^- c OJOOOOO t i c >ci t n _ _ vl j y P _, _i f > eg t w i- O U : Q tf) C m p j c ) it i i - in O O C 0 1 O c - c OOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOO O*COI0N4l ^ v ^ t - f ^ ; _ j c O j - O 0 > - _ 0 f _ O i ij c O O O O O O O O O 0 O O - - N Ii S ( O j j c m ** i n i f > c c i n O j f - O O f _ ( V J 4 _ i U ( M O tn in j i j c _ m in O f f I f «f n «n * * i j n n n m j e i i 4 4 j n «- n n m I OOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOO 3 Z - tt - 3 D O i n i n m m i n n L - O v i h tt LU c > OD I - J _i»- in m in tf Uj j j j t c m j j t t c c i i n j j j t 4 _ I - i j 3- «V) n «D ii; tt m _ s _- n - U -VJ 1 h tf) c- U ) cc- n, Ol 4 n m ii: >) tt i n «- N _ Ui _«_H m tf) I-* * * CJ "* *" - " * - - T n Ul U i n j j j _> _,^^_-^,_ Z y - \ - M_J-I-J-JJ_I_IUI_J ZOOOOOOOOUi 3 O 0 C 0 O 0 0 U O I _; tf) ^ ^ i - J l tf) _ tf) 0 O U' 1 I 13 If tt V Z Ul I- t * i U O ff I- O ff L j x il tt O tt O t U) O Q O 0 15 P O tf) O I U l J I 1 7 Ul III j - _> ff Q U J 7 3 t t - P! t j in t (J 4 j IL T_ * x t tn " - ' " J I S W * * f «4 «4 > tf) n Q 3 tfl O O 0 U) n tf) Ul l 13 in CJ tf) f - l > in tf) i i U x Ill j ^ O i tfi 1- Ul i- i t J ff 3»H Ul «tf) n _ 3 U J in i i -«t- ' n i in n 13 I tf) in in 4 - y i * O LU (1»-* i Tl ' tf) _3 1 _ m 4 in >0 0 N OJ * 4 * f t 4 t K N -1 "I
19 1 GROSS RECEIPTS FINISHING HOGS TEAS GRAND PRAIRIE REGION PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS PER HOG WEIGHT EACH UNIT PRICE OR QUANTITY VALUE OR CGST/UNIT COST MARKET HOGS TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS 40 CWT * 8880 FINISHING RATION FEEDER PIGS VET MEDICINE MARKETING MISC EPENSE OEATH LOSS % MACHINERYFUFL,LU8E,RE ) EQUIPMENT(FUEL,LUEE,RE > LABOR, TRACTOR & MACHINERY LABOR, EQUIPMENT LABOR, LIVESTCCK INTEREST ON OPERCAP, TOTAL VARIAELE CCSTS INCOME ABOVE VARIAELE COSTS FIED COSTS LAND RENT INT ON OTHER EGUIPM^NT DEPR ON OTHER EQUIP OTHER FC, MACH & ECUIP TOTAL FIFC CCSTS TOTAL COSTS cw- LB HRS HRS HRS ACRF e7 0, Ots ! ±_i4_ , Q 6 -*ZL NET RETURNS 40 FED PER YEAR, DEATH LOSS 10 FED PER BUNCH, 350 POUNDS FEED PER POUND GAIN, -990 lsj«"/ w F0R, ' TE& S AGRICULTURAL ETENSION SEQVIC- Ke"t^ZPeSenJed 1S PepMed slely s genel gideline'nd is nt
20 HOURLY COST SUMMARY FOR IMPLEMENTS AND POWER UNITS BUDGET IDENTIFICATION NUMBER AA 01A01A101A ANNUAL PURCHASE SALVAGE YEARS HOURS MACHINE SIZE PRICE VALUE OWNED USED PICKUP DEPR/ INTEREST/ HOUR HOUR INS/ TAFS/ HOUR HOUR TOTAL PERFORM OP OWNER RATE cst SHIP/ HOUR/ PER HOUR ACRE HOUP 1*465 1* ANNUAL COST SUMMARY ^OP EOUIPMFNT AND LIVFSTOCK--eUDGET NUMBFP 4A A 1C14 LINE NO S I Z E U N I T L I S T D E P R E C - I N S U R - PPICF IATION INTEREST ANCE FUEL REPAIRS AND LUBE HOU _ T0T OWN TOT OPCQ LABOP FRSHP/YP ATING/YR 43 FEED STORAGE 44 FEEDERS-HOGS A6 WATERERS-HOG 47 FEEDING FLOOR 48 MINERAL FEEDER 100 AC nn *»> *00 DOL* 430 T '? * * 0 16 " *00 30* Oni 00 FEET ANNUAL CHARGES M»DE IN THIS BUDGET FOR EOlpMENT AnD LIVESTOCK LINE NUMBER PROPOR* OWNEPSHP OPERATNG INTEREST LABOR HO NO* SIZE UNIT S CHARGED CHARGES CHARGES CHARGES CHARGED 43 FEEO STORAGE 1*00 1*000 0* AA FEEDERS-HOGS 1*00 DOL* 1* WATERERS-HOG 1*00 DOL* 1* A7 FEEDING FLOOR 1*00 DOL* 1* MINERAL FEEDER *00 FEET 1* Edctinl pgms cndcted by the Texs Agicltl Extensin Sevice seve peple f ll ges egdless f sci-ecnmic level, ce, cl, sex eligin ntinl igin Cpetive Extensin Wk in Agiclte nd Hme Ecnmics The Texs A&M Univesity System nd the United Sttes Deptment f Agiclte cpeting Distibted i n f t h e n c e f t h e A c t s f C n g e s s f M y 8, s m e n d e d, n d J n e " i n n t e , Revised AEC0 6 _ 1 1
30 COH. 1 BULL UNIT. FALL CALVING. NO CREEP FEED. GRAOE GOOD CALVES* PURCHASEO REPLACEMENT EVERV 8 VR.. 86% CALF CROP. 2X COH DEATH LOSS.
MACHINERY F I X E O A N O VA R I A B L E C U 5 I PER HOUR 2. M A C H I N E C O O E O E P R INSUR. T A X T O T A L F I X E O R E P A I R F U E L LUB. VARIABLE INT. HR/TIME PICKUP IO 0.71 6 4 0.81 1.91 6
More informationF E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e
F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e ITEM PRICE OR CUANTITY CCST G R O S S R E C E I P T S
More informationP R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0.
3. P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0. C O W - C A L F B U O G E T T E X A S R O L L I N G
More informationC O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W
r r TEXAS I5LACKLAND FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Blackland Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationENCY 0.8S SALVAGE REPAIR YEARS PROP OF PROP
M A C H I N E R Y F I X E O A N D VA R I A B L E C O S T PER HOUR TOTAL 4. M A C H I N E C O D E DEPR INSUR. TAX TOTAL FIXEO REPAIR FUEt LUB. V A R I A B L E I N T. K R / T I M E PICKUP 10 0.90 8 6 1.03
More informationHARVEST COSTS COLOR ING LABUR COLORING ADVERTISING NET ring EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL. HARVEST OT AL VARIABLE CUST. 3. INCUME AbOVE VAR1AbLfc COSTS
54 C H R I S T M A S T f L ' i P R O D U C T I O N, F O U R T H Y E A R, N O R T H E A S T T E X A S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N O R E T U R N S P b P A C R E UNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT
More informationP R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST UNIT 1* GROSS RECEIPTS FRCM PRODUCTION TOTAL 0*0
42 ^ \ O AT S F O R G R A Z E, I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D A Q U I F E R R E G I C N E S T I M AT E O C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E TYPICAL MANAGEMENT P R I C E O R V A L U E
More informationSPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT
40 SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1 GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION WHEAT
More informationSelf-Propelled Machines FUEL RECORD PERF FUEL CONS LABOR LABOR PURCHASE SV R&M USEFUL ANNUAL
Table 1. Parameters Diesel Fuel (DI) Price......($/gal): 1.28 Electricity (EL) Price......($/kWh): 0.09 Gasoline (GA) Price........($/gal): 1.30 LP Gas (LP) Price.........($/gal): 0.70 Natural Gas (NG)
More informationBARN BOAR PEN BROILER HOUSE SQ CORRALS DAIRY BARN FARROHING HOUSE FEED STORAGE FEED STORAGE 2 BINS HAY BARN 1200 SQ HAY BARN 2600 SQ
BUILDINGS OR IMPROVEMENTS RESOURCES APRIL 23, 1987 DESCRIPTION BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAHE FUEL - UTILITY COST ($/YR)
More informationLIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK BOAR BULL COH
LIVESTOCK RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTION FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAME REHAINING LIFE CURRENT MARKET VALUE SALVAGE VALUE INSURANCE RATE ANNUAL LEASE CALC OPTIONS (YR) ($) (X) (X) ($) (R,L,P) X LIVESTOCK
More informationPICKING BOXES PEACHES COOLER STORAGE 7500 EL
CROP PRODUCTS REPORT October 24, 1992 Crop Product Name Price Weight Cash p e r o f p e r F l o w Mes. Row P E A C H E S W H O L S A L E 1 2. 5 0 0 0 b u 6 0. 0 0 0 0 2 0 P E C A N S I M P R O V E D. 8
More informationC3.44 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR
LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR F I R S T N A H E L I V E S T O C K L A B O R O P E R A T O R L A B O R QUALIFYING NAHE C O S T O R V A L U E ( $ / H R ) 5 5 TOTAL HAGE
More informationT I M E S L A B O R OVER HOURS
OPERATION S PA N I S H P E A N U T S. I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D S P L AT E A U E A S T. R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E SOLID PLANT ITEM NO. DATE
More informationBudgets: 2007 planning budgets
R5 Ranch Budgets: 2007 planning budgets Anywhere UR, Eastern Oregon File: Ray & Reba Barlow User: Bart Eleveld FINPACK Printed 10/30/2008 3:33:50 PM Crop Budget No. 1 2 3 Crop Wheat, Cash Winter Barley,
More informationEconomic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Alberta Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations Comparing: Southern Alberta Total, Southern Alberta Low Cost, and
More informationEconomic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Cow/Calf Operations Moist Mixed land Production Year - 1999 Nov-03 Foreword This AgriProfit$ & Returns
More informationJOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY
62 JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY P R I C E O R V A L U E O R UNIT COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. G R O S S R E
More informationU.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model
U.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model LMIC WORKING GROUP: Coordinator: Bridger Feuz, University of Wyoming Member Cooperators: Tim Petry, North Dakota State University; David Anderson, Texas A&M
More informationTotal llo7. '1'1 999 'IOo'l. J 2113 '155 72o o61 'I
Ohio State Data- Census of Agriculture Table. Summary of Selected Economic Class Groups: [Classes - provide data comparable to the grouping identified as "commercial farms" in earlier census publications.
More informationCrop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Jay Jenkins, Extension Educator Paul A. Burgener, Former Graduate Assistant Jim J. Jacobs, Professor,
More informationPROJECTED YOUR NUMBER UNIT SIZE 5 / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E TOTAL LIVESTOCK INVESTMENT $ U. 4 _. 5 " TOTAL UNITS UNIT 6.0 CWT.
24 3 PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/27/82. STOCKER CALF BUDGET TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS I REGION 1982 S AND S PER HEAD PURCHASE NOV 1, SELL MARCH 10 B-1241
More informationlb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb.
r r TEXAS NORTHEAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Northeast Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationTEXAS UPPER GULF COAST
r r TEXAS UPPER GULF COAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Upper Gulf Coast Region are based on estimates of yields, pro duction input quantities, and production practices which represent the
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Establishment with Oats Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationPROJECTED S/UNIT VALUE GROSS RECEIPTS COTTON LINT LB COTTONSEED 0.28 TON TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS $ 308.
INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION THESE PROJECTIONS WERE EXTENSION
More information176 5 t h Fl oo r. 337 P o ly me r Ma te ri al s
A g la di ou s F. L. 462 E l ec tr on ic D ev el op me nt A i ng er A.W.S. 371 C. A. M. A l ex an de r 236 A d mi ni st ra ti on R. H. (M rs ) A n dr ew s P. V. 326 O p ti ca l Tr an sm is si on A p ps
More informationCrop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Chris Bastian, Research Associate MP-72.3 University of Wyoming - August, 1994
More informationCOTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT
12 COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationP R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0.
^ P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0. B-124KC17) K L E I N G R A S S PA S T U R E. O R Y L A
More informationD A I R Y P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D P R A I R I E R E G I C N E S T I M AT E D C C S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C O W WITH SILAGE
D A I R Y P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D P R A I R I E R E G I C N E S T I M AT E D C C S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C O W WITH SILAGE ITEM WEIGHT JNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT 3UANTITY VALUE
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Corn Silage: Grown Using Genetically Modified Seed Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs
More information-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. (10 ACRE INCHES APPLIED)
-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. ( ACRE INCHES APPLIED) FUEL,OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE
More informationCOTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE,
COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER, FUEL.OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO, DATE OVER HOUPS HOURS PER PER SHREDDER 2R TM 4,56 DEC
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure valley Commercial Dry Beans Kathleen Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
EBB4-SU-17 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Bingham and Power Counties Sugarbeets Ben Eborn Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are based
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Soft White Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationBackground & Assumptions
EBB2 SWWW 15 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate.. Southwestern Idaho: Treasure Valley Soft White Winter Wheat Ben Eborn Southwestern Idaho Background & Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More informationP a g e 5 1 of R e p o r t P B 4 / 0 9
P a g e 5 1 of R e p o r t P B 4 / 0 9 J A R T a l s o c o n c l u d e d t h a t a l t h o u g h t h e i n t e n t o f N e l s o n s r e h a b i l i t a t i o n p l a n i s t o e n h a n c e c o n n e
More informationEastern Idaho. Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Soft White Spring Wheat Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Lower Rainfall Dryland Feed Barley Ben Eborn and Terrell Sorensen Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho Spring Malting Barley Ben Eborn, Terrell Sorensen and Jon Hogge Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationPaul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Commercial Dry Beans Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More information~,. :'lr. H ~ j. l' ", ...,~l. 0 '" ~ bl '!; 1'1. :<! f'~.., I,," r: t,... r':l G. t r,. 1'1 [<, ."" f'" 1n. t.1 ~- n I'>' 1:1 , I. <1 ~'..
,, 'l t (.) :;,/.I I n ri' ' r l ' rt ( n :' (I : d! n t, :?rj I),.. fl.),. f!..,,., til, ID f-i... j I. 't' r' t II!:t () (l r El,, (fl lj J4 ([) f., () :. -,,.,.I :i l:'!, :I J.A.. t,.. p, - ' I I I
More informationPaul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Spring Malting Barley Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More informationOF UNITS UNITS CASH VARI.
P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 2 4, 1 9 9 2, B-124KC02) DATE STAGE OF PRODUCTION TYPE OF
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Hard Red Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationTEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER
C TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER FOREWORD The entepise budgets fo Texas Edwads Aquife Region ae based on estimates of yields, poduction input quantities, and poduction pac tices which epesent the best judgment
More informationGuidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs
Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Based on marketing 11,527 pigs sold from 18 shelters Date: March, 2007 This publication is intended to provide a format and a set of guidelines
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure Valley Field Corn: Roundup Ready Kathleen Painter, Jerry Neufeld, Neil Rimbey and Paul Patterson Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs
More informationTEXAS HIGH PLAINS I. gets custom rates, primarily harvesting, were used in lieu of the assumption that harvesting equip ment was owned.
r TEXAS HIGH PLAINS I FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas High Plains I Region arc based on estimates of yields, produc tion input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
More informationGuidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs
Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Based on marketing 11,353 pigs sold from 19 shelters Date: Oct, 2009 This publication is intended to provide a format and a set of guidelines
More informationPROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/20/81.
INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION^ THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED
More informationA L A BA M A L A W R E V IE W
A L A BA M A L A W R E V IE W Volume 52 Fall 2000 Number 1 B E F O R E D I S A B I L I T Y C I V I L R I G HT S : C I V I L W A R P E N S I O N S A N D TH E P O L I T I C S O F D I S A B I L I T Y I N
More informationMICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR
MICROCOMPUTER CROP AND RETURN GENERATOR BUDGET AREA... VALENCIA AND SOUTHERN BERNALILLO COUNT FARM SIZE.... 30.00 ACRES IRRIGATION TYPE FLOOD NUMBER OF CROPS 5 VERSION 1.0 COPYRIGHT (C) 1984 by NEW MEXICO
More informationrw^vr! h1 t\v?vc - hlrr TEXAS EL PASO ! L ' _ \.V
r - hlrr M H ^ _ ^ t t _ ^ ^ 1 _ V H T. h1 t\v?vc rw^vr! i ^ _.! L ' _ \.V L... r TEXAS EL PASO FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas El Paso Re gion are based on estimates of yields, production input
More informationT h e C S E T I P r o j e c t
T h e P r o j e c t T H E P R O J E C T T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S A r t i c l e P a g e C o m p r e h e n s i v e A s s es s m e n t o f t h e U F O / E T I P h e n o m e n o n M a y 1 9 9 1 1 E T
More informationFUEL,OIL, FIXED TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUE.,REP. COSTS OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE
22 F O R A G E S O R G H U M F O R G R A Z E, I P R I G AT E D, T E X A S W I N T E R G A R D E N R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E OPERATION ITEM NO DATE FUEL,OIL,
More information. BALE 3S.OO CtlT BU BU ACRE 8.00 CUT CHTo 0.25 ACRE 10.OO
_- LISTING OF THE NAME SET AMI PRICE VECTOR REGION NUMBERS DATES 101480 151 PASTURE 152 SM. gr. PASTURE 133 PAST E«TAME 154 PASTURE. NATIVE 155 SORGHUM PASTURE 156 COASTAL-RG-CL 157 COASTAL RYEGRASS 158
More informationI22. EARLE W. KLOSTERMAN Ohio A g r i c u l t u r a l Research and Development Center Wooster, Ohio
I22 BODY SIZE AND PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY* EARLE W. KLOSTERMAN Ohio A g r i c u l t u r a l Research and Development Center Wooster, Ohio Beef c a t t l e s e l e c t i o n and performance t e s t i n g
More informationSoftware Process Models there are many process model s in th e li t e ra t u re, s om e a r e prescriptions and some are descriptions you need to mode
Unit 2 : Software Process O b j ec t i ve This unit introduces software systems engineering through a discussion of software processes and their principal characteristics. In order to achieve the desireable
More informationN o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, NUHBER OF UNITS
Projections for Planning Purposes Only N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, B-141(03) DATE STAGE OF PRODUTION TYPE OF PROD. PRODUT NAHE NUHBER OF UNITS
More informationAPPH 4200 Physics of Fluids
APPH 42 Physics of Fluids Problem Solving and Vorticity (Ch. 5) 1.!! Quick Review 2.! Vorticity 3.! Kelvin s Theorem 4.! Examples 1 How to solve fluid problems? (Like those in textbook) Ç"Tt=l I $T1P#(
More informationSouthwestern Idaho. The Model Farm. Production Practices
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwestern Idaho and Eastern Oregon: Treasure Valley Onions Mike Thornton, Neil R. Rimbey, and Kate Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University
More informationAgenda Rationale for ETG S eek ing I d eas ETG fram ew ork and res u lts 2
Internal Innovation @ C is c o 2 0 0 6 C i s c o S y s t e m s, I n c. A l l r i g h t s r e s e r v e d. C i s c o C o n f i d e n t i a l 1 Agenda Rationale for ETG S eek ing I d eas ETG fram ew ork
More informationSOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY SCHEDULE H-6.1b NUCLEAR UNIT OUTAGE DATA. For the Test Year Ended March 31, 2009
Schedule H-6.lb SOUTHWSTRN LCTRIC POWR COMPANY SCHDUL H-6.1b NUCLAR UNIT OUTAG DATA For the Test Year nded March 31, 29 This schedule is not applicable to SVvPCO. 5 Schedule H-6.1 c SOUTHWSTRN LCTRIC POWR
More informationEnterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region AEB 0031, May 2012 Capital Typical Farm Machinery and Equipment
Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region Tyler West¹, Rebecca Sullivan¹, Clark Seavert¹ and Lynn Long, 2 ¹Student, Instructor & Agricultural Economist, Department
More informationOH BOY! Story. N a r r a t iv e a n d o bj e c t s th ea t e r Fo r a l l a g e s, fr o m th e a ge of 9
OH BOY! O h Boy!, was or igin a lly cr eat ed in F r en ch an d was a m a jor s u cc ess on t h e Fr en ch st a ge f or young au di enc es. It h a s b een s een by ap pr ox i ma t ely 175,000 sp ect at
More informationExecutive Committee and Officers ( )
Gifted and Talented International V o l u m e 2 4, N u m b e r 2, D e c e m b e r, 2 0 0 9. G i f t e d a n d T a l e n t e d I n t e r n a t i o n a2 l 4 ( 2), D e c e m b e r, 2 0 0 9. 1 T h e W o r
More informationfur \ \,,^N/ D7,,)d.s) 7. The champion and Runner up of the previous year shall be allowed to play directly in final Zone.
OUL O GR SODRY DUTO, ODS,RT,SMTUR,USWR.l ntuctin f cnuct f Kbi ( y/gil)tunent f 2L-Lg t. 2.. 4.. 6. Mtche hll be lye e K ule f ene f tie t tie Dutin f ech tch hll be - +0 (Rece)+ = M The ticint f ech Te
More informationCATAVASII LA NAȘTEREA DOMNULUI DUMNEZEU ȘI MÂNTUITORULUI NOSTRU, IISUS HRISTOS. CÂNTAREA I-A. Ήχος Πα. to os se e e na aș te e e slă ă ă vi i i i i
CATAVASII LA NAȘTEREA DOMNULUI DUMNEZEU ȘI MÂNTUITORULUI NOSTRU, IISUS HRISTOS. CÂNTAREA I-A Ήχος α H ris to os s n ș t slă ă ă vi i i i i ți'l Hris to o os di in c ru u uri, în tâm pi i n ți i'l Hris
More informationI M P O R T A N T S A F E T Y I N S T R U C T I O N S W h e n u s i n g t h i s e l e c t r o n i c d e v i c e, b a s i c p r e c a u t i o n s s h o
I M P O R T A N T S A F E T Y I N S T R U C T I O N S W h e n u s i n g t h i s e l e c t r o n i c d e v i c e, b a s i c p r e c a u t i o n s s h o u l d a l w a y s b e t a k e n, i n c l u d f o l
More informationFuture Self-Guides. E,.?, :0-..-.,0 Q., 5...q ',D5', 4,] 1-}., d-'.4.., _. ZoltAn Dbrnyei Introduction. u u rt 5,4) ,-,4, a. a aci,, u 4.
te SelfGi ZltAn Dbnyei Intdtin ; ) Q) 4 t? ) t _ 4 73 y S _ E _ p p 4 t t 4) 1_ ::_ J 1 `i () L VI O I4 " " 1 D 4 L e Q) 1 k) QJ 7 j ZS _Le t 1 ej!2 i1 L 77 7 G (4) 4 6 t (1 ;7 bb F) t f; n (i M Q) 7S
More informationDelaware County Census Data
Number of s Owners Percent of s Operated by Owner Percent of Tenancy Number of Renters Number of Managers No Return 94 90 96 4 4 0 0 42 35 83 17 6 1 1 62 56 90 10 6 0 4 19 11 58 42 4 4 0 137 114 83 17
More informationUsing the Rational Root Theorem to Find Real and Imaginary Roots Real roots can be one of two types: ra...-\; 0 or - l (- - ONLl --
Using the Rational Root Theorem to Find Real and Imaginary Roots Real roots can be one of two types: ra...-\; 0 or - l (- - ONLl -- Consider the function h(x) =IJ\ 4-8x 3-12x 2 + 24x {?\whose graph is
More informationo C *$ go ! b», S AT? g (i * ^ fc fa fa U - S 8 += C fl o.2h 2 fl 'fl O ' 0> fl l-h cvo *, &! 5 a o3 a; O g 02 QJ 01 fls g! r«'-fl O fl s- ccco
> p >>>> ft^. 2 Tble f Generl rdnes. t^-t - +«0 -P k*ph? -- i t t i S i-h l -H i-h -d. *- e Stf H2 t s - ^ d - 'Ct? "fi p= + V t r & ^ C d Si d n. M. s - W ^ m» H ft ^.2. S'Sll-pl e Cl h /~v S s, -P s'l
More information. ~ ~~::::~m Review Sheet #1
. ~ ~~::::~m Review Sheet #1 Math lla 1. 2. Which ofthe following represents a function(s)? (1) Y... v \ J 1\ -.. - -\ V i e5 3. The solution set for 2-7 + 12 = 0 is :---:---:- --:...:-._",,, :- --;- --:---;-..!,..;-,...
More informationINSTRUCTIONS: CHEM Exam I. September 13, 1994 Lab Section
CHEM 1314.05 Exam I John I. Gelder September 13, 1994 Name TA's Name Lab Section Please sign your name below to give permission to post, by the last 4 digits of your student I.D. number, your course scores
More informationAPPH 4200 Physics of Fluids
APPH 4200 Physcs of Fluds A Few More Flud Insables (Ch. 12) Turbulence (Ch. 13) December 1, 2011 1.!! Vscous boundary layer and waves 2.! Sably of Parallel Flows 3.! Inroducon o Turbulence: Lorenz Model
More information8. Relax and do well.
CHEM 1314.03 Exam I John I. Gelder September 25, 1997 Name TA's Name Lab Section Please sign your name below to give permission to post, by the last 4 digits of your student I.D. number, your course scores
More informationRanking accounting, banking and finance journals: A note
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Ranking accounting, banking and finance ournals: A note George Halkos and Nickolaos Tzeremes University of Thessaly, Department of Economics January 2012 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/36166/
More informationEM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley
EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley James W. Julian, Clark F. Seavert, Bernadine C. Strik, and Diane Kaufman Berry Economics:
More informationSOLUTION SET. Chapter 9 REQUIREMENTS FOR OBTAINING POPULATION INVERSIONS "LASER FUNDAMENTALS" Second Edition. By William T.
SOLUTION SET Chapter 9 REQUIREMENTS FOR OBTAINING POPULATION INVERSIONS "LASER FUNDAMENTALS" Second Edition By William T. Silfvast C.11 q 1. Using the equations (9.8), (9.9), and (9.10) that were developed
More informationSwine: Selection and Mating of Breeding Stock 1
RFAA083 Swine: Selection and Mating of Breeding Stock 1 Walker, Randy 2 SELECTION OF GILTS Select gilts to be retained for the breeding herd at five to six months of age or when they weigh 200 lb or more.
More informationFOR TESTING THill POWER PLANT STANLEY STEAM AUTOMOBILE SOME TESTS MADE WITH IT. A Thesis surmitted to the
..' -...,-.....,.; \'
More informationOi ir\ o CM CM ! * - CM T. c *" H - VO - a CM - t - T - j. Vv VO r t- CO on *- t- «- - ** <* - CM CM CM b- f - on on. on CM CVJ t - o.
292 b» CJ «n :T * v j U n n C l * n t l f VL. n n W n V ' n Ln fv C ), C n e. t f *" T V n! * t t T j t Vv V t l / n * t «** n Pk Q * Ph t * b T~! ^ v n f n n N n T n l f P n t. n pn «n =f LPv j t t n
More informationAgriProfit$ Economics of Beekeeping in Alberta 2016
AgriProfit$ Economics of Beekeeping in Alberta 2016 AGDEX 821-62 December, 2017 ECONOMICS OF BEEKEEPING IN ALBERTA 2016 Emmanuel Anum Laate Economics Section Economics and Competitiveness Branch Alberta
More informationECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Farm Business Management Reports EB1862 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON Gayle S. Willett Walter J. Gary PREFACE Enterprise costs and returns
More informationLab Day and Time: Instructions. 1. Do not open the exam until you are told to start.
Name: Lab Day and Time: Instructions 1. Do not open the exam until you are told to start. 2. This exam is closed note and closed book. You are not allowed to use any outside material while taking this
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More informationEstimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009
Farm Business Management Report Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009 J. Shannon Neibergs and Tim Waters Washington State University Extension Estimated
More information2013 INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES
INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES Don Shurley and Amanda Smith Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia March 2013 Annual
More informationWe enclose herewith a copy of your notice of October 20, 1990 for your reference purposes.
W-E AND ISuC ATTORNEYS AT lhw 10 QUEEN STIlEET P. 0. BOX NO. 201 NEWTOWN. CONNEWICUT 06470 OEOROE N. WNCELEE HENRY J. ISAAC BUWrpOff 203 9992218 FAX NO. 903-4P6-3011 October 30, 1990.. The Master Collectors
More information6 'J~' ~~,~, [u.a~, ~').J\$.'..
6 'J',, [u.a, ').J\$.'...;iJ A.a...40 - II L:lI'J - fo.4 i I.J.,l I J.jla.I (JIJ.,.,JI A.a...40 -.Jjll I...IJ J.l - c.sjl.s.4 jj..jaj.lj.... -"4...J.A.4 " o u.lj; 3. \J)3 0 )I.bJil j (" 0L...i'i w-? I
More information(tnaiaun uaejna) o il?smitfl?^ni7wwuiinuvitgviisyiititvi2a-a a imaviitjivi5a^ qw^ww^i fiaa!i-j?s'u'uil?g'ijimqwuwiijami.wti. a nmj 1,965,333.
0 fltu77jjiimviu«7mi^ gi^"ijhm?'ijjw?flfi^ V m 1 /14 il?mitfl?^i7wwuiinuvitgviiyiititvi2- imviitvi^ qw^ww^i fi!i-j?'u'uil?g'iqwuwiijmi.wti twwrlf^ imii2^
More informationDangote Flour Mills Plc
SUMMARY OF OFFER Opening Date 6 th September 27 Closing Date 27 th September 27 Shares on Offer 1.25bn Ord. Shares of 5k each Offer Price Offer Size Market Cap (Post Offer) Minimum Offer N15. per share
More informationI N A C O M P L E X W O R L D
IS L A M I C E C O N O M I C S I N A C O M P L E X W O R L D E x p l o r a t i o n s i n A g-b eanste d S i m u l a t i o n S a m i A l-s u w a i l e m 1 4 2 9 H 2 0 0 8 I s l a m i c D e v e l o p m e
More information