PROJECTED YOUR NUMBER UNIT SIZE 5 / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E TOTAL LIVESTOCK INVESTMENT $ U. 4 _. 5 " TOTAL UNITS UNIT 6.0 CWT.
|
|
|
- Ruth Clarke
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 24 3 PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/27/82. STOCKER CALF BUDGET TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS I REGION 1982 S AND S PER HEAD PURCHASE NOV 1, SELL MARCH 10 B-1241 (L 5) INVESTMENT REQUIREMENTS YOUR NUMBER UNIT SIZE 5 / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E H C R S E HEAD INVESTMENT $ U. 4 _. 5 " PRODUCTION WGT. NUMBER EACH F E E D E E S T E E R S S UNITS UNIT 6.0 CWT. OPERATING INPUTS INPUT USE UNIT S T O C K E R S T E E R S C W T D E A T H L O S S 0. 3 D O L. W H E A T P A S T U R E D A Y S HAY 4.0C BALE V E T M E D I C I N E D O L. SALT 5 MIN LB. M I S C E X P E N S E 2. 0 D O L H A U L I N G & M K T G C W T. F E N C E R E P A I R H E A D WATER FACIL REPR HEAD FUEL AND LUBE REPAIR OPERATING I/UNIT fc-ktuhn Z.29.UU 5/UNIT 7OT RESIDUAL S TO LAND, LABOR, CAPITAL, OWNERSHIP, MANAGEMENT, AND PROFIT $ CAPITAL INVESTMENT ANNUAL OPERATING CAPITAL INVESTMENT INVESTMENT CAPITAL QUANTITY UNIT RATE OF INVESTED ,42 74 RESIDUAL S TO LAND, LABOR, OWNERSHIP, MANAGEMENT, AND PROFIT $ OWNERSHIP S (DEPRECIATION, TAXES, AND INSURANCE) OWNERSHIP RESIDUAL S TO LAND, LABOR, MANAGEMENT, AND PROFIT OPERATOR LABOR S LABOR USE UNIT.RATE OF 0.26 HOUR HOUR 5.00 LABOR RESIDUAL S TO LAND, MANAGEMENT, AND PROFIT RESIDUAL S TO MANAGEMENT AND PROFIT $ 7 T 7 H T $ $ T 7 5 o ' IH OF PRODUCTION $ PRIMARILY GRAZING OF WHEAT PASTURE, STOCKING RATE OF 2 ACRE/HEAD, 130 DAYS GRAZING, 3% DEATH LOSS, HIGH GOOD GRADE. C INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE S AND S FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED AND DEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION.
2 243 PROJECTIONS?OH PLANNING PORPOSES ONLX... MOT TO BE OSED -ITHOOT OPDATIHG ATEB 01/27/82. STOCKEH CAL? 30DGET TEXAS BOLLIHG PLAINS I REGIOH 1982 S AHD BETOHHS PEB BEAD POBCHASE HOT 1, SELL HAHCH J A M P E B fl A B 4 APR 5 3AT 6 JON JOL AOG SEP 10 OCT 11 NOV 12 DEC AVER. ANNOAL CAPITAL , LABCR.REQUIREMENTS aachi_sri LABOR LABOB LABOB O S , (DOLLARS) (HOOHS) LABOR ' Q O I P H E N T C O D E D E P R HAT RACX-.ESDER STOCK TRAILER STOCK SPRAKEB TACK PICKOP T30CK HORSE EQOIPHENT?I2ED INT INS AHD 7ABIABLE S PEB TEAR TQT1L T A X R E P A I R F O E L L O B. O H H SELECTED EQOIPHEHT C0HPLEH2HT INFORMATION OPEB. 900BS LABOB o.o o.o aa.03 o.o o.o ALLOC SQOIPMSNT CODE HO. 2 3 SIZE UNIT T T P E L I S T P O R C H L I 7 E S A LV. R E PA I R F O E L A H H O A L A H H O A L P H I C E P H I C E ( _ R S ) ( S L P ) ( % L P ) O S E L A B O B O S E 13 XXXXXX 14 XXXXXX 15 E. HA.HACK-FEEDER 1. S T O C K T H A I L S R 2. S T O C K S P B A. E H 4. T A C K 5. PICKOP T30CJC 13. H O B S E ' PEET 24. PEET 150. GAI TON 1. HEAD
3 244 PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/27/82. B-1241 (L 5) FARROW TO FINISH HOG PRODUCTION ROLLING PLAINS I REGION 1982 S AND S PER SOW I N V E S T M E N T R E Q U I R E M E N T S P R O J E C T E D Y O U R N U M B E R U N I T S I Z E 5 / U N T T VA L U E E S T I M AT E SOW PURCHASED HEAD BOAR PURCHASED 7 HEAD T O T A L L I V E S T O C K I N V E S T M E N T $ T T PRODUCTION WGT. NUMBER EACH UNITS UNIT 27TJTTTT M A R K E T H O G S C W T T O T A L P R O J E C T E D R E T U H N S $ /. 6 T J T ERATING INPUTS INPUT USE UNIT 3/UNIT SOW FEED GEST. 16 CWT SOW FEED LACT CWT BOAR FEED 0.73 CWT PIG STARTER 8.00 CWT FINISHING RATION CWT VET 5 MEDICINE SALES COMM HEAD MISC EXPENSE FUEL AND LUBE REPAIR 4.71 OPERATING $ 93/.31 RESIDUAL S TO LAND, LABOR, CAPITAL, OWNERSHIP, MANAGEMENT, AND PROFIT $ $ C A P I TA L I N V E S T M E N T Q U A N T I T Y U N I T R AT E O E P R O J E C T E D INVESTED ANNUAL OPERATING CAPITAL INVESTMENT L I V E S T O C K I N V E S T M E N T D O L CAPITAL $ 8J.04 RESIDUAL S TO LAND, LABOR, OWNERSHIP, MANAGEMENT, AND PROFIT $ $ OWNERSHIP S (DEPRECIATION, TAXES, AND INSURANCE) " OWNERSHIP $ 26b.U8 5 RESIDUAL S TO LAND, LABOR, MANAGEMENT, AND PROFIT $ $ OPERATOR LABOR S LABCR USE UNIT " RATE OF PR OJECTED ' 5.46 HOUR L I V E S T O C K H O U R LABOR $ ' _ RESIDUAL S TO LAND, MANAGEMENT, AND PROFIT $ $ RESIDUAL S TO MANAGEMENT AND PROFIT $ $ OF PRODUCTION $ $ 300 SOW UNIT, 16 PIGS WEANED/SOW/YEAR, 16 SOWS/BOAR, C INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE S AND S FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED AND DEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION.
4 244 PROJECTIONS POR PLAHHIHG POHPOSES ONLT... NOT TO BE 0S2D WITHOOT OPDATIHG ATBB 01/27/82. PAH HOW TO FIHISH HOG PRODOCTION ROLLIKG PLAINS I REGIOH 1982 S AHD BETOBHS PEB SOH 1 JAN 2 FEB 3 BAR 4 APR 5 MAX 6 JON 7 8 JOL AOG 9 SEP 10 OCT 11 NOV 12 DSC AVER. ANNOAL CAPITAL (DOLLARS) LABCB 92QOIREMENTS :.ACHINERT LABOR SQOIPMENT LABOR LABOR 1-87 (HOOBS) LABOR EQOIPHENT CODE DEPB EQOIPHEHT FIXED AHD VABIABLE S PEB T2AB I H T. I H S. T A X R E P A I R F O E L L O B * T0T1L OBI. TOT1L OPEB. HOOBS LABOB STOCK TRAILER FARROWING HOOSE NORSERT a FINISHING FLOOR GESTATION aarn HILL 5 STORAGE a.oo 10 WATER STSTEM a.oo 10 PICKUP TROCK OQ SOW POBCHASED BOAR PORCHASED S2L2CT2D EQOIPHEHT C0MPL2H2HT IHOBHATIOH CODE SIZE ONIT TTPE LIST POHCH LIFE SALV. lepaib F02L AHHOAL AHHOAL XXXXXX XXXXXX BTT. NO. PBICB PRICE (TRS) (XLP) (%LP) 0S2 L A B O B O S E STOCK TRAILER FEET FARROWING HOOSE 7.»91. SQFT o.o NORSEHT a SQFT B FINISHING FLOOR SQPT GESTATION BARH 907. SQFT SILL. STORAGE a.o o. 0 WATER STSTEM' a.o o. 0 PICKOP TROCK TOH SOW PORCHASED HEAD BOAR PORCHASED HEAD SOO ALLOC
5 245 PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/27/82. FEEDER PIG PRODUCTION, ROLLING PLAINS I REGION 1982 S AND S PER SOW B-1241 (L 5) INVESTMENT REQUIREMENTS NUMBER UNIT SIZE SOW PURCHASED HEAD BOAR PURCHASED 7 HEAD INVESTMENT PRODUCTION WGT. NUMBER EACH F E E D E R P I G S S OPERATING INPUTS INPUT USE SCW FEED GEST. 16 SOW FEED LACT BOAR FEED 0.73 PIG STARTER 8.50 V E T - & M E D I C I N E. 2 S A L E S C O M M M I S C E X P E N S E FUEL AND LUBE REPAIR OPERATING UNITS UNIT S/UNIT 85 LB UNIT CWT. CWT. CWT. CWT. HEAD RESIDUAL S TO LAND, LABOR, CAPITAL, OWNERSHIP, MANAGEMENT, AND PROFIT CAPITAL INVESTMENT QUANTITY UNIT ANNUAL OPERATING CAPITAL INVESTMENT INVESTMENT CAPITAL INVESTED S/UNIT VALUE b/.63 VUN1T RATE OF " _>U $ ^2 RESIDUAL RETUHNS TO LAND, LABOR, OWNERSHIP. MANAGEMENT, AND PROFIT $ OWNERSHIP S (DEPRECIATION, TAXES, AND INSURANCE) OWNERSHIP RESIDUAL S TO LAND, LABOR, MANAGEMENT, AND PROFIT OPERATOR LABOR S LABOR LABOR USE UNIT HOUR HOUR RESIDUAL RETUHNS TO LAND, MANAGEMENT, AND PROFIT RESIDUAL S TO MANAGEMENT AND PROFIT OF PRODUCTION RATE OF SOW UNIT, 17 PIGS WEANED/SOW/YEAR, 16 SOWS/BOAR. FEED CONVERSION 3.5 TO 1 ON FINISHING FLOOR $ I/U.U $ I U I INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PHEDICT THE S AND S FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED AND DEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION. YOUR ESTIMATE
6 245 PR0J2CTI0HS FOR PLANNING PORPOSES ONLI... NOT TO BE OSED WITHOOT UPDATIHG AFTEB 01/27/82- FEEDER PIG PRODOCTIOH, ROLLING PLAINS I R2GI0H 1982 S AND R2T0RHS PER SOW 1 JAN 2 FEB 3 MAB 4 APR 5 HAT 6 JON 7 JOL 8 AOG 9 SEP 10 OCT 11 sov 12 D2C AVER. ANNUAL CAPITAL LABCR REQ0IHEM2NTS 3ACHINERT LABOR SQOIPMENT LABOR LABOR ' (DOLLARS) S (HOOHS) 1.04 LABOR EQOIPHENT FIXED AHD VABIABLE S PER TEAR SQOIPMENT CODE DEPR I N T. I N S. T A X R E P A I R F O E L L O B FARROWING HOOSE HORSERT GESTATION 3ARN SILL. STORAGE WATER STSTEM 1? PICKOP TROCK SOW PORCHASED AR PORCHASED SELECTED EQ0IPH2MT COMPLEMENT INFORMATION 1.01 OWN OPER HOOBS LABOB ALLOC (-X) " ZQOIPMENT CODE SIZE ONIT TTPE LIST PORCH LIFE SALV. JBPAII FOEL AHHOAL AHHOAL XXXXXX XXXXXX E. HO. PHICE PRIC2 (TRS) (XL?) (XLP) OSE L A B O B 0 S 2 STCCK TRAILER FEET FARROWING HOOSE SQFT JIOHSERT SQFT GESTATION BABN 907. SQFT SILL 5 STOBAGE WATER STSTEM TON SOW PURCHASED HEAD BOAR POBCHASED HEAD o.o V
7 246 PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/27/82 FINISHING HOGS ROLLING PLAINS I REGION 1982 S AND S PER HOG PRODUCTION WGT. NUMBER EACH M A R K E T H O G S S UNITS UNIT 2.4 CWT. OPERATING INPUTS INPUT USE UNIT FINISHING RATION 6.65 CWT. F E D E R P I G S L B. V E T 5 M E D I C I N E D O L. S A L E S C O M M H E A D M I S C E X P E N S E D O L. D E A T H L O S S H E A D FUEL AND LUBE REPAIR OPERATING 3/UNIT ~T23Tb7J T70TTTT (L 5) ' 0.75 ~" "" "" 0.21 "" 10b.54 t RESIDUAL S TO LAND, LABOR, CAPITAL. OWNERSHIP, MANAGEMENT, AND PROFIT $ $ CAPITAL INVESTMENT ANNUAL OPERATING CAPITAL INVESTMENT CAPITAL UANTITY UNIT RATE OF NVESTED RESIDUAL RETUHNS TO LAND, LABOR, OWNERSHIP, MANAGEMENT, AND PROFIT OWNERSHIP S (DEPRECIATION, TAXES, AND INSURANCE) OWNERSHIP RESIDUAL RETUHNS TO LAND, LABOR, MANAGEMENT, AND PROFIT $ OPERATOR LABOR S LABOR LABOR USE UNIT RATE OF 0.28 HOUR HOUR 5.00 RESIDUAL S TO LAND, MANAGEMENT, AND PROFIT RESIDUAL S TO MANAGEMENT AND PROFIT OF PRODUCTION "2771 T $ 6.42 $ 5TIT2 T 8.91 $ S 3 T T. T 4.99 $_ 4.99 $ $ 540 FED PER YEAR, 140 FED PER BUNCH, 3.50 POUNDS FEED PEH POUND GAIN, 2% DEATH LOSS. YOUR ESTIMATE INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE S AND S FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERE COLLECTED AND DEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGHICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION.
8 246 PROJECTIONS FOR PLAHNING POHPOSES ONLT... NOT TO BE OSED 9ITHOOT OPDATIHG AFTEB 01/27/82- FIHISBING HOGS BOILING PLAINS I REGION 1982 S AHD BETOBNS PEB HOG J A N P E B R A H A P R 5 MAT 6 JON 7 JOL 8 AOG 9 SEP 10 OCT 11 HOT 12 DEC AVER. AHUOAL CAPITAL LABOB 3EQ0IREHENTS MACHXM2BT LABOR -QUIPMENT LABOR LIVESTCCK LABOR (DOLLARS) (HOOBS) O.SO LABOR EQOIPHENT STOCK TRAILER FINISHING FLOOR MILL 6 STORAGE WATER STSTEM PICKUP TROCK SQOIPMENT FIXED CO D E D E P H I H T. I N S AMD VARIABLE S PEB TEAR T A X B E P A I B F O E L L O B. O W N SELECTED EQOIPHEHT COMPLEMENT INFORMATION 0P2B. HOOBS LABOB S ALLOC (-X) STOCK TRAILER PINISHING FLOOR MILL 5 STORAGE WATER STSTEM PICKOP TROCK 1 CODE NO S I Z E O N I T T T P 2 L I S T P O R C H L I F E S A LT. H E PA I H F O E L P B I C E P B I C E ( T H S ) ( X L P ) ( X L P ) O S E 24. FEBT SQFT OOL T O M o.o ANNOAL AHNOAI L A B O B 0 S XXXXXX 14 XXXXXX 15 E.
9 " > LISTING OP ECONOMIC AND ENGINEERING DATA FOR EQUIPHENT IN REGION L I S T P U R C H. L I F E S A L V. NAME CODE SIZE UNIT TYPE PRICE PRICE ( YRS) ( XLP) REPAIR FUEL ( X L P ) O S E DATE iq ANNUAL ANNOAL LABOR USE XXXXXX XXXXXX 15 EFF. LUT4 HAYRACK-FEEDER STOCK TRAILER GRAIN TRAILER STOCK SPRAYER TACK PENS 6 EQUIPHENT FARROWING HOUSE O.O NURSERY FINISHING FLOOR GESTATION BARN HILL C STORAGE 11. o.o WATER SYSTEM PICKUP TRUCK o.o i COTTON TRAILER WELL 250L 100SAT B PUMP 70PSI BHP ENG RA-DR AC HI-P C-SPK BEEF COW RAISED o.o BEEP DULL PURCH. 5* BEEF HEIFER RAI. o.o COTTON TB 3BL SOW PURCHASED BOAR PURCHASED HORSE
P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0.
3. P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E D W I T H O U T J P O A T I N G A F T E R 1 2 / 1 9 / 8 0. C O W - C A L F B U O G E T T E X A S R O L L I N G
30 COH. 1 BULL UNIT. FALL CALVING. NO CREEP FEED. GRAOE GOOD CALVES* PURCHASEO REPLACEMENT EVERV 8 VR.. 86% CALF CROP. 2X COH DEATH LOSS.
MACHINERY F I X E O A N O VA R I A B L E C U 5 I PER HOUR 2. M A C H I N E C O O E O E P R INSUR. T A X T O T A L F I X E O R E P A I R F U E L LUB. VARIABLE INT. HR/TIME PICKUP IO 0.71 6 4 0.81 1.91 6
LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK LIVESTOCK BOAR BULL COH
LIVESTOCK RESOURCES OCTOBER 24, 1992 DESCRIPTION FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAME REHAINING LIFE CURRENT MARKET VALUE SALVAGE VALUE INSURANCE RATE ANNUAL LEASE CALC OPTIONS (YR) ($) (X) (X) ($) (R,L,P) X LIVESTOCK
C O W - C A L F P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S B L A C K L A N D S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R C C W
r r TEXAS I5LACKLAND FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Blackland Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
C3.44 LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR
LABOR RESOURCES APRIL 8, 1989 DESCRIPTION OTHER LABOR OTHER LABOR F I R S T N A H E L I V E S T O C K L A B O R O P E R A T O R L A B O R QUALIFYING NAHE C O S T O R V A L U E ( $ / H R ) 5 5 TOTAL HAGE
P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST UNIT 1* GROSS RECEIPTS FRCM PRODUCTION TOTAL 0*0
42 ^ \ O AT S F O R G R A Z E, I R R I G AT E D, T E X A S E D W A R D A Q U I F E R R E G I C N E S T I M AT E O C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E TYPICAL MANAGEMENT P R I C E O R V A L U E
BARN BOAR PEN BROILER HOUSE SQ CORRALS DAIRY BARN FARROHING HOUSE FEED STORAGE FEED STORAGE 2 BINS HAY BARN 1200 SQ HAY BARN 2600 SQ
BUILDINGS OR IMPROVEMENTS RESOURCES APRIL 23, 1987 DESCRIPTION BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. BUILD. OR IHP. FIRST NAHE QUALIFYING NAHE FUEL - UTILITY COST ($/YR)
SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT
40 SPRING WHEAT, DRYLAND, TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER TYPICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1 GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION WHEAT
F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e
F E E D E R P I G P R O D U C T I O N T E X A S G R A N D E P R A I R I E R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R S C t e ITEM PRICE OR CUANTITY CCST G R O S S R E C E I P T S
Self-Propelled Machines FUEL RECORD PERF FUEL CONS LABOR LABOR PURCHASE SV R&M USEFUL ANNUAL
Table 1. Parameters Diesel Fuel (DI) Price......($/gal): 1.28 Electricity (EL) Price......($/kWh): 0.09 Gasoline (GA) Price........($/gal): 1.30 LP Gas (LP) Price.........($/gal): 0.70 Natural Gas (NG)
PROJECTED S/UNIT VALUE GROSS RECEIPTS COTTON LINT LB COTTONSEED 0.28 TON TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS $ 308.
INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANY ONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION THESE PROJECTIONS WERE EXTENSION
HARVEST COSTS COLOR ING LABUR COLORING ADVERTISING NET ring EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL. HARVEST OT AL VARIABLE CUST. 3. INCUME AbOVE VAR1AbLfc COSTS
54 C H R I S T M A S T f L ' i P R O D U C T I O N, F O U R T H Y E A R, N O R T H E A S T T E X A S R E G I O N E S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N O R E T U R N S P b P A C R E UNIT P R I C E O R COST/UNIT
PICKING BOXES PEACHES COOLER STORAGE 7500 EL
CROP PRODUCTS REPORT October 24, 1992 Crop Product Name Price Weight Cash p e r o f p e r F l o w Mes. Row P E A C H E S W H O L S A L E 1 2. 5 0 0 0 b u 6 0. 0 0 0 0 2 0 P E C A N S I M P R O V E D. 8
P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0.
^ P R O J E C T I O N S F O R P L A N N I N G P U R P O S E S O N LY N O T T O B E U S E O W I T H O U T U P O AT 1 N G A F T E R 11 / 0 5 / 8 0. B-124KC17) K L E I N G R A S S PA S T U R E. O R Y L A
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, NUHBER OF UNITS
Projections for Planning Purposes Only N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 1 3, 1993, B-141(03) DATE STAGE OF PRODUTION TYPE OF PROD. PRODUT NAHE NUHBER OF UNITS
Background and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Lower Rainfall Dryland Feed Barley Ben Eborn and Terrell Sorensen Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
Background and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Establishment with Oats Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are
Background and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are based
Background and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho Spring Malting Barley Ben Eborn, Terrell Sorensen and Jon Hogge Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
Eastern Idaho. Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Soft White Spring Wheat Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
ENCY 0.8S SALVAGE REPAIR YEARS PROP OF PROP
M A C H I N E R Y F I X E O A N D VA R I A B L E C O S T PER HOUR TOTAL 4. M A C H I N E C O D E DEPR INSUR. TAX TOTAL FIXEO REPAIR FUEt LUB. V A R I A B L E I N T. K R / T I M E PICKUP 10 0.90 8 6 1.03
Background and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure valley Commercial Dry Beans Kathleen Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
Background and Assumptions
EBB4-SU-17 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Bingham and Power Counties Sugarbeets Ben Eborn Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Cow/Calf Operations Moist Mixed land Production Year - 1999 Nov-03 Foreword This AgriProfit$ & Returns
Background and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Soft White Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Spring Malting Barley Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Commercial Dry Beans Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns
Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs
Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Based on marketing 11,353 pigs sold from 19 shelters Date: Oct, 2009 This publication is intended to provide a format and a set of guidelines
Background and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Hard Red Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
Background & Assumptions
EBB2 SWWW 15 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate.. Southwestern Idaho: Treasure Valley Soft White Winter Wheat Ben Eborn Southwestern Idaho Background & Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns
Budgets: 2007 planning budgets
R5 Ranch Budgets: 2007 planning budgets Anywhere UR, Eastern Oregon File: Ray & Reba Barlow User: Bart Eleveld FINPACK Printed 10/30/2008 3:33:50 PM Crop Budget No. 1 2 3 Crop Wheat, Cash Winter Barley,
Total llo7. '1'1 999 'IOo'l. J 2113 '155 72o o61 'I
Ohio State Data- Census of Agriculture Table. Summary of Selected Economic Class Groups: [Classes - provide data comparable to the grouping identified as "commercial farms" in earlier census publications.
Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Corn Silage: Grown Using Genetically Modified Seed Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs
MICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR
MICROCOMPUTER CROP AND RETURN GENERATOR BUDGET AREA... VALENCIA AND SOUTHERN BERNALILLO COUNT FARM SIZE.... 30.00 ACRES IRRIGATION TYPE FLOOD NUMBER OF CROPS 5 VERSION 1.0 COPYRIGHT (C) 1984 by NEW MEXICO
Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs
Guidelines For Estimating Swine Hoop Shelter Finishing Costs Based on marketing 11,527 pigs sold from 18 shelters Date: March, 2007 This publication is intended to provide a format and a set of guidelines
U.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model
U.S. Baseline Lamb Cost of Production Model LMIC WORKING GROUP: Coordinator: Bridger Feuz, University of Wyoming Member Cooperators: Tim Petry, North Dakota State University; David Anderson, Texas A&M
Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Chris Bastian, Research Associate MP-72.3 University of Wyoming - August, 1994
Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations
Benchmarks for Alberta Cattlemen Economics & Competitiveness Economic, Productive & Financial Performance Of Alberta Cow/Calf Operations Comparing: Southern Alberta Total, Southern Alberta Low Cost, and
Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Dry Beans, Powell Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Jay Jenkins, Extension Educator Paul A. Burgener, Former Graduate Assistant Jim J. Jacobs, Professor,
Background and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure Valley Field Corn: Roundup Ready Kathleen Painter, Jerry Neufeld, Neil Rimbey and Paul Patterson Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs
COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT
12 COTTON. IRRIGATED. TEXAS HIGH PLAINS III REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SPRINKLERSl PREPLANT PLUS ONE POSTPLANT UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS
lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb. lb.
r r TEXAS NORTHEAST FOREWORD The enterprise budgets for Texas Northeast Region are based on estimates of yields, production input quantities, and production practices which represent the best judgment
OF UNITS UNITS CASH VARI.
P r o j e c t i o n s f o r P l a n n i n g P u r p o s e s O n l y N o t t o b e U s e d w i t h o u t U p d a t i n g a f t e r O c t o b e r 2 4, 1 9 9 2, B-124KC02) DATE STAGE OF PRODUCTION TYPE OF
TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5. Coleman. McCulloch
r TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS SOIL RESOURCE AREA 5 r Coleman McCulloch 1. f~^ PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY NOT TO BE USEO WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 0i/09/8lo E. 2 4 K C 5 ) COTTON* DRYLAND, (SOLIO 40"
Math 0301 Course Review. 1) 8 less the quotient of 52 and 4. 2) The product of 7 and 25. 9) 5x 3.2y + 6.8z 1.1x + 0.2y 10) (11x 9) (43x 2)
Simplify: Math Course Review ) 8 less the quotient of and. ) The product of 7 and. (7)( )() ) 9 less than the product of and 8. ) ( 8) ( ) ) 7(8) ( [ 9]) ) 9 { 8[ ()] + } 7) 7 ( ) ( ) 8) 9 ( ) + 7 9) x.y
Swine: Selection and Mating of Breeding Stock 1
RFAA083 Swine: Selection and Mating of Breeding Stock 1 Walker, Randy 2 SELECTION OF GILTS Select gilts to be retained for the breeding herd at five to six months of age or when they weigh 200 lb or more.
The Talking Farm Treasurer's Report and Financial Statements (for internal use only) June 30, 2016
Treasurer's Report and Financial Statements (for internal use only) June 30, 2016 Table of Contents: Treasurer's Report 1 Page: Financial Statements: Statements of Financial Position 2 Statements of Activities
Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region AEB 0031, May 2012 Capital Typical Farm Machinery and Equipment
Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region Tyler West¹, Rebecca Sullivan¹, Clark Seavert¹ and Lynn Long, 2 ¹Student, Instructor & Agricultural Economist, Department
COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE,
COTTON, DRYLAND, EDWARDS PLATEAU II REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER, FUEL.OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO, DATE OVER HOUPS HOURS PER PER SHREDDER 2R TM 4,56 DEC
Southwestern Idaho. The Model Farm. Production Practices
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwestern Idaho and Eastern Oregon: Treasure Valley Onions Mike Thornton, Neil R. Rimbey, and Kate Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University
-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. (10 ACRE INCHES APPLIED)
-33- ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE (SIDE ROLL SYSTEM) HIGH LEVEL MGMT. ( ACRE INCHES APPLIED) FUEL,OIL, FIXED ITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE LUB.,REP. COSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE
Weekly Management Report Week 44
Section 1: Summary Services Reproduction Stock Count 1st 2nd > 2nd Total Boar Fertility 92.3 % Gilts / Sows Gilt 7 1 8 Conception Rate (%) 8. % Maiden Gilts Sow 13 1 1 15 Farrowing Rate 78. % Dry Sows
A DISCOUNT MINI STORAGE
A DISCOUNT MINI STORAGE 3735 Mangum Rd, Houston, TX 77092 High Density Mini Storage in Near NW Houston and close to newly proposed renovated US290 Highway Renovated Living Quarters, Gated Customer Access,
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Farm Business Management Reports EB1862 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE IRRIGATED WHEAT ENTERPRISES, WALLA WALLA COUNTY, WASHINGTON Gayle S. Willett Walter J. Gary PREFACE Enterprise costs and returns
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
EMVEST ASSET MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED. Investment Proposal. Matuba Estate Chokwe District Mozambique
EMVEST ASSET MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED Investment Proposal Matuba Estate Chokwe District Mozambique 20 July 2009 PROJECT SUMMARY Project Name: EMVEST LIMOPO Lda (MATUBA), District Chokwe, Province of Gaza.
Economics and Competitiveness. Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages. Brown Soil Zone
Economics and Competitiveness 2015 Cost and Return Benchmarks for Crops and Forages Brown Soil Zone TABLE OF CONTENTS 2015 Brown Soil Zone OVERVIEW...1 CROPS Spring Wheat...2 FORAGES Roundup Ready Canola...5
TEXAS MIDDLE GULF COAST
M i l TEXA MIDDLE GULF COAT FOREWORD The entepie budget fo Texa Middle Gulf Coat Region ae baed on etimate of yield, poduction input quantitie, and poduction pac tice which epeent the bet judgment of local
EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County
EM 8822-E October 2007 Orchard Economics: Establishing and Producing Medium-Density Pears in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Orchard Economics: Establishing and
EM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County
EM 8878-E October 2007 Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing Wine Grapes in Hood River County Clark F. Seavert, Jenny Freeborn, and Steve Castagnoli Vineyard Economics: Establishing and Producing
The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State
Farm Business Management Reports EB1922E The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State Herbert R. Hinman Alan Schreiber Online
Evaluating Feeding Financials. Marty Faldet, PhD Nutrition & Management Consulting Calmar, IA
Evaluating Feeding Financials Marty Faldet, PhD Nutrition & Management Consulting Calmar, IA martyfaldet@gpsdairy.com Evaluating Feeding Financials Feed costs are the highest expense on a P&L. Which measurements
Colorado PUC E-Filings System
Attachment A.1 RES Summary Colorado PUC E-Filings System Total RECs Acquired Non-Distributed Generation Distributed Generation Retail Distributed Generation Carry Forward Previous Carry Forward Total Carry
COW-CALF PROOUCTION TEXAS GRAND PRAIRIF REGION FROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER COW NATIVE RANGE UNIT CWT. CWT. CWT.
1 * G R O S S R E C E I P T S COW-CALF PROOUCTION TEAS GRAND PRAIRIF REGION FROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER COW NATIVE RANGE WEIGHT EACH UNIT PRICE OR COST/UNIT QUANTITY VALUE OR COST STEER CALVES HEIFER
Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291
Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 AG -1291 Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 October 2013 AG-1291 Archie Flanders Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness
Manatee School of Arts and Sciences, Inc. Budget vs. Actuals: Budget FY - FY16 P&L July June 2017
Budget vs. Actuals: Budget 16-17 FY - FY16 P&L July 2016 - June 2017 Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Total 16-17 Actual Budget Actual Budget Actual Budget
2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide
2014 Organic Crop Planning Guide The Organic Crop Planning Guide is produced to help producers estimate their costs of producing various crops. Please remember that the Guide is an estimate and does not
Using the Budget Features in Quicken 2008
Using the Budget Features in Quicken 2008 Quicken budgets can be used to summarize expected income and expenses for planning purposes. The budget can later be used in comparisons to actual income and expenses
JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY
62 JOSE TALL WHEAT GRASS ESTABLISHMENT. SPRINKLER IRRIGATED. TRANS-PECOS REG1 PROJECTEO COSTS AND RETURNS PEK ACRE PECOS VALLEY P R I C E O R V A L U E O R UNIT COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST 1. G R O S S R E
Swine Enteric Coronavirus Disease (SECD) Situation Report June 30, 2016
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Veterinary Services Swine Enteric Coronavirus Disease (SECD) Situation Report June 30, 2016 Information current as of 12:00 pm MDT, 06/29/2016 This report provides
1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington
Farm Business Management Reports EB1375 1996 Alfalfa Seed Enterprise Budget, Walla Walla County, Washington Walter J. Gary Gayle S. Willett COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Washington State ~University - 1996 ALFALFA
EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley
EM 8773-REVISED July 2009 Berry Economics: Establishing and Producing Marion Blackberries in the Willamette Valley James W. Julian, Clark F. Seavert, Bernadine C. Strik, and Diane Kaufman Berry Economics:
BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS
BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS Cost of Producing Fresh and Processing Blueberries in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia Spring 2016 The BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS enterprise budget series were developed to
Distributed Generation. Retail Distributed Generation
Attachment A.1 RES Summary Total RECs Acquired NonDistributed Generation Distributed Generation Retail Distributed Generation Carry Forward to 2017 Previous Carry Forward to 2017 Total Carry Forward to
ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY
AEB 0056 July 2016 ORCHARD ECONOMICS: ESTABLISHING AND PRODUCING D ANJOU AND FRESH BARTLETT PEARS IN HOOD RIVER COUNTY David Halliday, Clark Seavert and Steve Castagnoli Photo: A pear orchard at the base
Unit Measure Row : = = = = = = ======= ==== 3 acre bale ton acre ton 42
Auto or Truck Resources D e s c r i p t i o n A u t o o r o r TTr r u c k Pirst ame H o r s e p o w e r R a t i n g ( H p ) U s e f u l L i f e ( H r o r M i ) Fuel Type R e m a i n i n g L i f e ( H r
Effective Gross Revenue 3,335,005 3,130,591 3,320,552 3,338,276 3,467,475 3,606,962 3,509,653 3,981,103 3,984,065 4,147,197 4,300,790
Schedule Of Prospective Cash Flow In Inflated Dollars for the Fiscal Year Beginning 1/1/2011 Potential Gross Revenue Base Rental Revenue $3,331,625 $3,318,220 $3,275,648 $3,270,394 $3,368,740 $3,482,312
Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms
Agricultural & Food Policy Center at Texas A&M University Impact of Alternative Property and Sales Tax Policies on Texas Representative Cotton Farms AFPC Briefing Paper 04-5 December 2004 This work was
UNIT LBS* ACRE ACRE APPL ACRE ACRE HOUR DOL* ACRE BALE ACRE ACRE HOUR ACRE ACRE ACRE
48 COTTON, DRYLAND, DEEP EAST TEXAS REGION ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACPE UNIT P R I C E O R V A L U E O R COST/UNIT QUANTITY COST GROSS RECEIPTS FROM PRODUCTION COTTONSEED TON 0*00 0*20 20*00 COTTON
2013 INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES
INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES Don Shurley and Amanda Smith Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia March 2013 Annual
Swine Enteric Coronavirus Disease (SECD) Situation Report Sept 17, 2015
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Veterinary Services Swine Enteric Coronavirus Disease (SECD) Situation Report Sept 17, 2015 Information current as of 12:00 pm MDT, 09/16/2015 This report provides
GAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7
FYE 09/30/92 JULY 92 0.00 254,550.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 254,550.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 254,550.00 AUG 10,616,710.31 5,299.95 845,656.83 84,565.68 61,084.86 23,480.82 339,734.73 135,893.89 67,946.95
CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2012 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2011-03 December 2011 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2013 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2012-05 December 2012 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
The point is located eight units to the right of the y-axis and two units above the x-axis. A) ( 8, 2) B) (8, 2) C) ( 2, 8) D) (2, 8) E) ( 2, 8)
Name: Date: 1. Find the coordinates of the point. The point is located eight units to the right of the y-axis and two units above the x-axis. A) ( 8, ) B) (8, ) C) (, 8) D) (, 8) E) (, 8). Find the coordinates
Practice Questions for Math 131 Exam # 1
Practice Questions for Math 131 Exam # 1 1) A company produces a product for which the variable cost per unit is $3.50 and fixed cost 1) is $20,000 per year. Next year, the company wants the total cost
c. Solve the system of two equations to find the speed of the boat in the water (x) and the speed of the current (y). (0.45, 0.05)
Math Applications The applications that follow are like the ones you will encounter in many workplaces. Use the mathematics you have learned in this chapter to solve the problems. Wherever possible, use
World Agricultural Outlook Board Interagency Commodity Estimates Committee Forecasts. Lockup Briefing April 10, 2013
World Agricultural Outlook Board Interagency Commodity Estimates Committee Forecasts Lockup Briefing World Wheat Production Country or Region estimate 2012/13 previous month Million Tons Percent Percent
Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009
Farm Business Management Report Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009 J. Shannon Neibergs and Tim Waters Washington State University Extension Estimated
Colorado PUC E-Filings System
Colorado PUC E-Filings System Attachment A.1 RES Summary Total Acquired Non-Distributed Generation Distributed Generation Retail Distributed Generation Carry Forward Previous Carry Forward Total Carry
CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 CORN, GRAIN SORGHUM &WHEAT 2018 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2017-03 October 2017 2 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary
Weaning Age ReVisited
Weaning Age ReVisited Dr Mike Varley BSc PhD FIBiol CBiol R.Nutr. mikeavarley@tiscali.co.uk mike.varley@bpex.org.uk Menu Menu Weaning age The last 30 years Weaning age The biology Weaning age The economics
CITY OF MESQUITE Quarterly Investment Report Overview Quarter Ending September 30, 2018
CITY OF MESQUITE Quarterly Investment Report Overview Quarter Ending September 30, 2018 Investment objectives are safety, liquidity, yield and public trust. Portfolio objective is to meet or exceed the
CITY OF MESQUITE Quarterly Investment Report Overview Quarter Ending June 30, 2018
CITY OF MESQUITE Quarterly Investment Report Overview Quarter Ending June 30, 2018 Investment objectives are safety, liquidity, yield and public trust. Portfolio objective is to meet or exceed the average
INCOME BEFORE CONTRIBUTIONS 32,373 Net Operating Gain/(Loss) (97,940) 70, ,619 32,373 Net Total Gain/(Loss) (97,940) 71, ,306
Goodwill Industries, Inc. Comparative Income Statement Feb16 Year to Date Variance/ Variance Variance Variance/ Last Year from Budget Actual INCOME Actual from Budget Last Year (5,847) (6,678) 1,471,935
CONTENT. I. Project at a Glance. A Small write up about the Project & Promoters Back Ground. Project Implementation Schedule. Financial Statements
CONTENT I. Project at a Glance II. III. IV. A Small write up about the Project & Promoters Back Ground Project Implementation Schedule Financial Statements FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 1 Details of Project 2 Projected
RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS
1 RICE 2015 PLANNING BUDGETS Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Budget Report 2014-04 October 2014 i Foreword This report is designed to provide necessary planning data
G200 & CL605 Analysis
G200 & CL605 Analysis Annual & Hourly Cost Detail Gulfstream G200 GENERAL PARAMETERS Min Crew / Max Passengers 2 / 8 Seats Full Range (NM / SM) 3051.75 / 3511.89 Normal Cruise Speed (KTS / MPH) 447.53